SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on a regular basis. We base our estimates on historical experience and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and such differences could be material. Restricted Cash and Equivalents We were required under agreements with our chief executive officer (“CEO”) and an officer in our Sand segment (the “Sand Officer”) to establish and maintain Rabbi Trusts used to fund deferred compensation as described in the agreements. Restricted cash and equivalents were invested in short-term instruments at market rates; therefore the carrying values approximated fair value. In May 2014, all funds in the Rabbi Trusts were distributed to our CEO and Sand Officer and the Rabbi Trusts were terminated. Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Trade accounts receivable are recognized at their invoiced amounts and do not bear interest. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. We estimate our allowances for doubtful accounts based on specifically identified amounts that are believed to be uncollectible. If the financial condition of our customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances for doubtful accounts might be required. After all attempts to collect a receivable have failed, the receivable is written off against the allowance for doubtful accounts. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $1.9 million at December 31, 2015 , and $0.4 million at December 31, 2014 . Inventories Finished goods inventories consist of dried sand and refined motor fuel products. Finished sand costs include all transportation costs necessary to transport the finished sand to the point of sale. All inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market using the average cost method. Raw materials inventories consist of unprocessed sand, transmix feedstock, and supplies. Raw materials inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market using the average cost method. Wet sand is included in work in process. Overhead in our Sand segment is capitalized at an average rate per unit based on actual costs incurred. Our Fuel segment does not capitalize overhead to its refined transmix inventory because turnover is high and the quantities are generally modest in comparison to our finished fuel inventories we purchase from third party refiners. Accounting for Renewable Identification Numbers The Fuel segment is required to comply with federal laws that regulate biofuels and renewable identification numbers (“RINs”). RINs are serial numbers assigned to biofuels for the purpose of tracking its production, use, and trading as required by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “EPA”) under its Renewable Fuel Standard implemented according to the Energy Policy Act of 2005. Generally, companies that refine petroleum-based fuels are obligated to meet certain quotas based on the volume of fuel they introduce into the marketplace. We are required to satisfy these obligations to the extent previously non-certified fuels are included or introduced into transmix feedstock. We account for these direct obligations as a liability until satisfied. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014 , accrued liabilities include $0.5 million and $0.6 million , respectively, for obligations under the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The Fuel segment routinely purchases ethanol for blending with gasoline. To a lesser extent, the Fuel segment purchases biodiesel for blending with diesel. We have the option to purchase these biofuels with or without RINs, but most biofuels are only available for purchase with RINs. The price suppliers charge to us for biofuels with RINs is somewhat higher than a price that would be charged for product without RINs. We generally purchase the biofuels with RINs. We account for RINs in a manner similar to the purchase of conventional fuels. On a monthly basis, we sell most of our RINs under a contractual arrangement with a major refiner. For RINs that remain unsold at the end of an accounting period, we value this asset at an amount that approximates net realizable value, recording the offset as a reduction in cost of goods sold. When these RINs are sold, we record the sale as a reduction of costs of goods sold instead of additional revenue, effectively offsetting the charge to cost of goods sold when the RINs asset is relieved. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014 , prepaid expenses and other current assets include RINs valued at $1.4 million and $1.0 million , respectively. Property, Plant and Equipment, net We recognize purchases of property, plant and equipment at cost, including any capitalized interest. Maintenance, repairs and renewals are expensed when incurred. Additions and significant improvements are capitalized. Disposals are removed at cost less accumulated depreciation and any gain or loss from dispositions is recognized in income. We capitalized $0 million , $0.6 million and $0 million of interest on construction of assets for the years ended December 31, 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively. Depreciation of property, plant and equipment other than mineral reserves is provided for on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. We recognized $19.2 million , $15.2 million and $13.7 million of depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively. Mineral reserves are initially recognized at cost, which approximates the estimated fair value as of the date of acquisition. The provision for depletion of the cost of mineral reserves is computed on the units-of-production method. Under this method, we compute the provision by multiplying the total cost of the mineral reserves by a rate arrived at dividing the physical units of sand produced during the period by the total estimated mineral resources at the beginning of the period. Depletion expense for the years ended December 31, 2015 , 2014 and 2013 totaled $2.0 million , $1.2 million and $29 thousand , respectively. Following are the estimated useful lives of our property, plant and equipment: Useful Lives (in Years) Building and land improvements including assets under capital lease 10 – 39 Mineral reserves N/A* Tanks and equipment 7 – 40 Railroad and related improvements 20 – 40 Machinery and equipment 5 – 10 Plant equipment including assets under capital lease 5 – 7 Industrial vehicles 3 – 7 Furniture, office equipment and software 3 – 7 Leasehold improvements 3 – 5 or lease term, whichever is less * Depletion calculated using units-of-production method Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets In accordance with FASB ASC 360-10-05, Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets , long-lived assets such as property, plant and equipment, and intangible assets subject to amortization are reviewed for impairments whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the related carrying amount may not be recoverable. If circumstances require a long-lived asset be tested for possible impairment, we first compare undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by an asset to the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value of the long-lived asset is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, impairment is recognized to the extent that the carrying value exceeds its fair value. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less selling costs. The recoverability of intangible assets subject to amortization is also evaluated whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. In management's opinion, no impairment of long-lived assets exists at December 31, 2015 and 2014 . Intangible Assets Other Than Goodwill Intangible assets consist of trade names, patents, customer relationships, supply and transportation arrangements, and non-compete agreements. Trade names are amortized on a straight-line basis over 15 years ; patents are amortized on a straight line basis over 30 months , customer relationships are amortized using an accelerated amortization method over 15 years ; supply and transportation arrangements are amortized using the straight-line method over varying periods up to 54 months , depending on the contract terms; and the non-compete agreements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the agreements. We recognized $7.2 million , $8.4 million and $7.1 million of amortization expense for 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , respectively. Goodwill Goodwill is not amortized and represents the excess purchase price of the Direct Fuels acquisition over the estimated fair value of the net identifiable assets acquired. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014 , goodwill is associated with our Fuel segment. In accordance with GAAP, we perform impairment testing of goodwill assets annually, or more frequently if indicators of impairment exist in interim periods. The impairment test for goodwill uses a two-step process, which is performed at the entity level (the reporting unit). Step one compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value, there is a potential impairment and step two must be performed. Step two compares the carrying value of the reporting unit's goodwill to the implied fair value (i.e., the fair value of the reporting unit less the fair value of the unit's assets and liabilities, including identifiable intangible assets). If the carrying value of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, we record the excess as an impairment charge to earnings. We performed our annual assessment of goodwill in the fourth quarter of 2015 , and determined during Step one that the fair value of the reporting unit (our Fuel segment) exceeds its carrying value. Therefore, it was not necessary to perform Step two of the analysis. Railcar Freight Costs The cost to transport leased railcars from the manufacturer to our site for initial placement in service is capitalized and amortized over the term of the lease (typically five to seven years). The non-current portion of these capitalized costs totaled $11.8 million and $8.3 million as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 , respectively, and is included in “Other assets, net” on our Consolidated Balance Sheets Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities We account for derivatives and hedging activities in accordance with FASB ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging , which requires entities to recognize all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet at their respective fair values. For derivative instruments that do not qualify as an accounting hedge, changes in fair value of the assets and liabilities are recognized in earnings. Our policy is to not hold or issue derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes. Mining and Wet Sand Processing Agreement In April 2014, a five-year contract with a sand processor (“Processor”) became effective to support our sand business in Wisconsin. Under this contract, the Processor financed and built a wet wash processing plant near our Wisconsin operations. As part of the agreement, the Processor wet washes our sand, creates stockpiles of washed sand and maintains the plant and equipment. During the term of the agreement the Processor will own the wet plant along with the equipment and other temporary structures used to support this activity. At the end of the five -year term of the agreement or following a default under the contract by the Processor, we have the right to take ownership of the wet plant and other equipment without charge. Subject to certain conditions, ownership of the plant and equipment will transfer to us at the expiration of the term. We accounted for the wet plant as a capital lease obligation. The original capitalized lease asset and corresponding capital lease obligation totaled $ 3.3 million . Asset Retirement Obligations We follow the provisions of FASB ASC 410-20, Asset Retirement Obligations, which generally applies to legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the acquisition, construction, development and/or the normal operation of a long-lived asset. The standard requires us to recognize an estimated liability for costs associated with the future reclamation of sand mining properties, whether leased or owned, whenever we have a legal obligation to restore the site in the future. A liability for the fair value of an asset retirement obligation with a corresponding increase to the carrying value of the related long-lived asset is recognized at the time the land is mined. The asset is depleted using the straight-line method, and the discounted liability is increased through accretion over the remaining life of the mine site. The estimated liability is based on historical industry experience in abandoning mine sites, including estimated economic lives, external estimates as to the cost to bringing back the land to federal and state regulatory requirements. We have utilized a discounted rate reflecting management's best estimate of our credit-adjusted risk-free rate. Revisions to the liability could occur due to changes in the estimated costs, changes in the mine's economic life or if federal or state regulators enact new requirements regarding the abandonment of mine sites. Changes in the asset retirement obligations are as follows: Year Ended December 31, 2015 2014 ($ in thousands) Beginning balance $ 2,386 $ 1,414 Additions 113 934 Accretion 80 38 Reclamation costs (9 ) — Ending balance $ 2,570 $ 2,386 Revenue Recognition Our revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery of products has occurred, the sales price charged is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. This generally means that we recognize revenue when our products leave our facilities. Sand and fuel are generally transported via railcar or trucking companies hired by the customer. We sell some of our Sand segment products under short-term price agreements or at prevailing market rates. A significant portion of our Sand segment revenues are realized through take-or-pay supply agreements with large oilfield services companies. The initial terms of these contracts expire between 2016 and 2021. These agreements define, among other commitments, the volume of product that our customers must purchase, the volume we must provide and the price that we will charge, as well as the rate that our customers will pay. Prices under these agreements are generally fixed and subject to adjustment, upward or downward, only for certain changes in published producer cost indices or market factors. With respect to the take-or-pay arrangements, if the customer is unable to carry forward minimum quantity deficiencies, we recognize Sand segment revenues to the extent of the minimum contracted quantity, assuming payment has been received or is reasonably assured. If deficiencies can be carried forward, receipts in excess of actual sales are recognized as deferred revenues until product is actually delivered or the right to carry forward minimum quantities expires. We recognize Fuel segment revenue related to our terminals, reclamation, transportation services, and sales of motor fuels, net of trade discounts and allowances, in the reporting period in which the services are performed and motor fuel products are transferred from our terminals, title and risk of ownership pass to the customer, collection of the relevant receivable is probable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists and the sales price is fixed or determinable. Purchases and sales of fuel with the same counterparty that are entered into in contemplation of one another are considered to be a single nonmonetary transaction. Therefore, we record the net effect of such transactions as revenues. Motor Fuel Taxes We report excise taxes on motor fuels on a gross basis. For the years ended December 31, 2015 , 2014 and 2013 , excise taxes included in fuel revenues and cost of fuel totaled $50.9 million , $50.1 million and $47.0 million , respectively. Equity-Based Compensation and Equity Incentive Plan We recognize expenses for equity-based compensation based on the fair value method, which requires that a fair value be assigned to a unit grant on its grant date and that this value be amortized over the grantees' required service period. Restricted and phantom units have a fair value equal to the closing market price of the common units on the date of the grant. We amortize the fair value of the restricted and phantom units over the vesting period using the straight-line method. The fair value of a certain equity award to a key employee was determined using a Monte Carlo simulation. We calculate a forfeiture rate to estimate the equity-based awards that will ultimately vest based on types of awards and historical experience. For market-based awards, we make estimates as to the probability of the underlying market conditions being achieved and record expense if the conditions will probably be achieved. Environmental Costs Environmental costs are expensed or capitalized depending on their future economic benefit. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations and that have no future economic benefits are expensed. We capitalize expenditures that extend the life of the related property or mitigate or prevent future environmental risk. We record liabilities when site restoration and environmental remediation, cleanup and other obligations are either known or considered probable and can be reasonably estimated. Such estimates require judgment with respect to costs, time frame and extent of required remedial and clean-up activities and are subject to periodic adjustments based on currently available information. At December 31, 2015 and 2014 , we had no accrued expenses related to environmental costs. Provision for Income Taxes For federal income tax purposes, we report our income, expenses, gains, and losses as a partnership not subject to income taxes. As such, each partner is responsible for his or her share of federal and state income tax. Net earnings for financial statement purposes may differ significantly from taxable income reportable to each partner as a result of differences between the tax basis and financial reporting basis of assets and liabilities. We are responsible for our portion of the Texas margin tax that is included in our subsidiaries' consolidated Texas franchise tax returns. The margin tax qualifies as an income tax under GAAP, which requires us to recognize the impact of this tax on the temporary differences between the financial statement assets and liabilities and their tax basis attributable to such tax. Emerge Energy Distributors Inc. (“Distributor”), our subsidiary that supports the Fuel segment, reports its income, expenses, gains, and losses as a corporation and is subject to both federal and state income taxes. Our provision for income taxes relates to: (i) Texas margin taxes for the Partnership and for Distributor, as well as (ii) federal and state income taxes for Distributor. Fair Value of Financial Instruments Fair value is an exit price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. Hierarchy Levels 1, 2, or 3 are terms for the priority of inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. Hierarchy Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Hierarchy Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included with Level 1 that are directly or indirectly observable for the asset or liability. Hierarchy Level 3 inputs are inputs that are not observable in the market. Our financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and debt instruments. The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable are representative of their fair values due to their short maturities. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014 , the carrying amount for our $350 million senior secured revolving credit facility approximates fair value because the underlying instrument includes provisions that adjust our interest rates based on current market rates. Concentration of Credit Risk Financial instruments that potentially subject us to concentration of credit risk are cash and cash equivalents and trade accounts receivable. Cash deposits with banks are federally insured up to $250,000 per depositor at each financial institution; and certain of our cash balances did exceed federally insured limits as of December 31, 2015 . We maintain our cash and cash equivalents in financial institutions we consider to be of high credit quality. We provide credit, in the normal course of business, to customers located throughout the United States and Canada. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and generally do not require collateral. In addition, we regularly evaluate our credit accounts for loss potential. Our two largest customer balances each represented 12% of our net accounts receivable balance as of December 31, 2015 , and our third largest customer represented 11% of our net accounts receivable balance as of December 31, 2015 , while our two largest customer balances represented 24% and 15% of our net accounts receivable balance as of December 31, 2014 . No other customer balances exceeded 10% of the total net accounts receivable balance as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 . No individual customer represented more than 10% of revenues for the years ended December 31, 2015 , 2014 and 2013 . Segments We operate our business in two reportable segments. • The Sand segment consists of the production and sale of various grades of industrial sand primarily used in the extraction of oil and natural gas, as well as the production of building products and foundry materials. • The Fuel segment operates two terminals and two transmix processing facilities that are located in the Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas area and Birmingham, Alabama. In addition to refining transmix, the Fuel segment sells a suite of complementary fuel products and services, including third-party terminaling services, the sale of wholesale petroleum products, certain reclamation services (which consist primarily of tank cleaning services) and blending of renewable fuels. For operations and other Partnership activities not managed through our two operating segments, these items of income, if any, and costs are presented herein as “corporate.” Our chief operating decision maker (“CODM”) is our chief executive officer. The CODM allocates resources and assesses performance of the business based on segment income or loss as presented in Note 16. Seasonality For our Sand segment, winter weather affects the months during which we can wash and wet-process sand in Wisconsin. Seasonality is not a significant factor in determining our ability to supply sand to our customers because we accumulate a stockpile of wet sand feedstock during non-winter months. During the winter, we process the stockpiled sand to meet customer requirements. However, we sell sand for use in oil and natural gas production basins where severe weather conditions may curtail drilling activities. This is particularly true in drilling areas located in the northern U.S. and western Canada. If severe winter weather precludes drilling activities, our frac sand sales volume may be adversely affected. Generally, severe weather episodes affect production in the first quarter with possible effect continuing into the second quarter. Generally, our Fuel segment does not experience dramatic seasonal shifts in quantities delivered to its customers. Other Reclassifications Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications do not impact net income and do not reflect a material change in the information previously presented in our consolidated financial statements. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers , as a new Topic, Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606. The new revenue recognition standard provides a five-step analysis of transactions to determine when and how revenue is recognized. The core principle is that a company should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 with early adoption permitted on January 1, 2017 and shall be applied retrospectively to each period presented or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. We are evaluating the effect of adopting this new accounting guidance but do not expect adoption will have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern. This ASU requires an entity to evaluate whether conditions or events, in the aggregate, raise substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern for one year from the date the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The new guidance is effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We are evaluating the effect of adopting this new accounting guidance but do not expect adoption will have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Interest—Imputation of Interest , to modify the presentation of debt issuance costs. Under ASU 2015-03 debt issuance costs are required to be presented as a direct deduction of debt balances on the statement of financial position, similar to the presentation of debt discounts. ASU 2015-03 is effective for public companies for years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal periods. For all other entities, ASU 2015-03 is effective for years beginning after December 15, 2015 and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted for financial statements that have not already been issued. Additionally, the provisions should be applied on a retrospective basis as a change in accounting principle. We adopted ASU 2015-03 as of March 31, 2015. The adoption of this new accounting guidance resulted in a reclassification of deferred financing costs from “Other assets, net” to “Long-term debt, net of current portion” on our condensed consolidated balance sheets for the current and all prior periods. There was no impact on our results of operations or cash flows. In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory . Under this ASU, inventory will be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value and options that currently exist for market value will be eliminated. The ASU defines net realizable value as the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. No other changes were made to the current guidance on inventory measurement. ASU 2015-11 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early application is permitted and should be applied prospectively. We are evaluating the effect of adopting this new accounting guidance but do not expect adoption will have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases. This ASU requires lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities generated by contracts longer than a year on their balance sheet. The ASU also requires companies to disclose in the footnotes to their financial statements information about the amount, timing, and uncertainty for the payments they make for the lease agreements. ASU 2016-02 is effective for public companies for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 31, 2018. For all other entities, ASU 2016-02 is effective for years beginning after December 15, 2019 and interim periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted for all entities. We are evaluating the effect of adopting this new accounting guidance. |