for the District of New Jersey against Tyme and the members of its board. The complaint generally alleges violations of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act in connection with the registration statement on Form S-4 of which this joint proxy statement/prospectus is a part. In particular, the complaint generally alleges that the registration statement contains materially misleading and incomplete information concerning: (i) certain conflicts of interest involving Tyme management and its board; (ii) the background and process leading up to the merger; (iii) Syros’ and Tyme’s financial projections; (iv) the description of the fairness opinion and financial analyses performed by Piper Sandler, which acted as Syros’ financial advisor for the merger; and (v) financial analyses performed by Moelis, which acted as Tyme’s financial advisor for the merger.
On August 30, 2022, a complaint captioned Lawrence v. Tyme Technologies, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-01133 was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware against Tyme and the members of its board. The complaint generally alleges violations of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act similar to those in the Irwin complaint relating to (i) Syros’ and Tyme’s financial projections, (ii) financial analyses performed by Moelis, (iii) potential conflicts of interest involving Moelis and (iv) the background leading up to the merger.
On August 31, 2022, a complaint captioned Finger v. Tyme Technologies, Inc., et al., Case No. 1:22-cv-07454 was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Tyme and the members of its board. The complaint generally alleges violations of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act similar to those in the Irwin and Lawrence complaints relating to (i) the background leading up to the merger, (ii) potential conflicts of interest involving Moelis, (iii) Syros’ and Tyme’s financial projections, and (iv) financial analyses performed by Moelis.
Syros and Tyme believe that the complaints is are wholly without merit.
Each of Syros and Tyme has also received correspondence from law firms claiming to represent purported stockholders, either threatening litigation, requesting books and records concerning the Merger pursuant to Section 220 of the DGCL, or making other demands relating to the Merger including that additional disclosures be provided. Neither Syros nor Tyme can predict whether any of such demands or threats will result in litigation, whether additional demands or litigation may materialize, or the outcome of litigation relating to the merger. If additional similar complaints are filed or additional demands are received, absent new or materially different allegations, Syros and Tyme will not necessarily disclose them.
* * *
Forward-Looking Statements
This Current Report on Form 8-K contains forward-looking statements (including within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) concerning Syros, Tyme, the proposed transactions and other matters. These statements may discuss goals, intentions and expectations as to future plans, trends, events, results of operations or financial condition, or otherwise, based on current beliefs of the management of Syros and Tyme, as well as assumptions made by, and information currently available to, management of Syros and Tyme. Forward-looking statements generally include statements that are predictive in nature and depend upon or refer to future events or conditions, and include words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “would,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “likely,” “believe,” “estimate,” “project,” “intend,” and other similar expressions. Statements that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements.