ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Jul. 31, 2013 |
ACCOUNTING POLICIES | |
Organization | Organization |
Miami Days Corp. is a development stage company based in Serbia and registered in the State of Nevada on July 5, 2012. On September 17, 2013, the Company changed its name to Life Stem Genetics, Inc. |
|
The Company has not commenced significant operations and, in accordance with ASC Topic 915, the Company is considered a development stage company. |
Nature of operations Policy | Nature of operations |
Miami Days Corp. was a fast food business. The Company planned to sell Serbian fast food cuisine from a chain of fast food outlets and will be competing in the wider fast food market. During August 30, 2013, there was a change of control and change in business direction. The Company is establishing a series of Stem Cell therapy based clinics around the world. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy | Cash and cash equivalents |
For the purpose of the statements of cash flows, all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. The carrying value of these investments approximate fair value. |
Revenue recognition | Revenue recognition |
The Company recognizes revenue when consulting and placement services are rendered on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in ASC 605. The Company does not recognize revenue until all four of the following criteria are met: (1) Persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (2) Services have been rendered, (3) The seller’s price to the buyer is fixed and (4) Collectability is reasonably assured. |
Advertising costs | Advertising costs |
Advertising costs are anticipated to be expensed as incurred; however there were no advertising costs included in general and administrative expenses for the year ended July 31, 2013 and for the period from July 5, 2012 (Inception) to July 31, 2012. |
Fair value of financial instruments | Fair value of financial instruments |
Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of July 31, 2013 and 2012. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values. These financial instruments include cash, prepaid expenses and accounts payable. Fair values were assumed to approximate carrying values for cash and payables because they are short term in nature and their carrying amounts approximate fair values or they are payable on demand. |
|
Level 1: The preferred inputs to valuation efforts are “quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities,” with the caveat that the reporting entity must have access to that market. Information at this level is based on direct observations of transactions involving the same assets and liabilities, not assumptions, and thus offers superior reliability. However, relatively few items, especially physical assets, actually trade in active markets. |
|
Level 2: FASB acknowledged that active markets for identical assets and liabilities are relatively uncommon and, even when they do exist, they may be too thin to provide reliable information. To deal with this shortage of direct data, the board provided a second level of inputs that can be applied in three situations. |
|
Level 3: If inputs from levels 1 and 2 are not available, FASB acknowledges that fair value measures of many assets and liabilities are less precise. The board describes Level 3 inputs as “unobservable,” and limits their use by saying they “shall be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available.” This category allows “for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date”. Earlier in the standard, FASB explains that “observable inputs” are gathered from sources other than the reporting company and that they are expected to reflect assumptions made by market participants. |
Stock-based compensation Policy | Stock-based compensation |
The Company records stock based compensation in accordance with the guidance in ASC Topic 505 and 718 which requires the Company to recognize expense related to the fair value of its employee stock option awards. This eliminates accounting for share-based compensation transactions using the intrinsic value and requires instead that such transactions be accounted for using a fair-value-based method. The Company recognizes the cost of all share-based awards on a graded vesting basis over the vesting period of the award. |
Earnings per share Policy | Earnings per share |
The Company follows ASC Topic 260 to account for the earnings per share. Basic earning per common share (“EPS”) calculations are determined by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the year. Diluted earning per common share calculations are determined by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common share equivalents outstanding. During periods when common stock equivalents, if any, are anti-dilutive they are not considered in the computation. |
Income taxes Policy | Income taxes |
The Company follows ASC Topic 740 for recording the provision for income taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed based upon the difference between the financial statement and income tax basis of assets and liabilities using the enacted marginal tax rate applicable when the related asset or liability is expected to be realized or settled. Deferred income tax expenses or benefits are based on the changes in the asset or liability each period. If available evidence suggests that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized, a valuation allowance is required to reduce the deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. Future changes in such valuation allowance are included in the provision for deferred income taxes in the period of change. |
|
Deferred income taxes may arise from temporary differences resulting from income and expense items reported for financial accounting and tax purposes in different periods. Deferred taxes are classified as current or non-current, depending on the classification of assets and liabilities to which they relate. Deferred taxes arising from temporary differences that are not related to an asset or liability are classified as current or non-current depending on the periods in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. |
|
The Company applies a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold for all tax uncertainties. ASC Topic 740 only allows the recognition of those tax benefits that have a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities. As of July 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company reviewed its tax positions and determined there were no outstanding, or retroactive tax positions with less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, therefore this standard has not had a material effect on the Company. |
|
The Company does not anticipate any significant changes to its total unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months. |
|
The Company classifies tax-related penalties and net interest as income tax expense. As of July 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company has income tax payable totaling $0 and $0, respectively. |
Use of Estimates | Use of estimates |
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ significantly from those estimates. |
Recent pronouncements | Recent pronouncements |
The Company has evaluated all the recent accounting pronouncements issued through October 2013 and believes that none of them will have a material effect on the company’s financial statement. |