Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2013 |
Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies | ' |
Principles of Consolidation | ' |
Principles of Consolidation |
|
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and the Operating Partnership. The Company consolidates real estate partnerships and other entities that are not variable interest entities when it owns, directly or indirectly, a majority voting interest in the entity or is otherwise able to control the entity. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP. |
Use of Estimates | ' |
Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions regarding future events that may affect the reported amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The Company’s estimates are inherently subjective in nature and actual results could differ from these estimates. |
Reclassifications | ' |
Reclassifications |
|
Certain reclassifications have been made to amounts in prior period financial statements to conform to current period presentation. These reclassifications have not changed the results of operations or stockholders’ equity. |
Investments in Real Estate | ' |
Investments in Real Estate |
|
Operating real estate assets are stated at cost and consist of land, buildings and improvements, including other costs incurred during their possession, renovation and acquisition. A property acquired not subject to an existing lease is treated as an asset acquisition and recorded at its purchase price, inclusive of acquisition costs, allocated between land and building based upon their fair values at the date of acquisition. A property acquired with an existing lease is treated as a business combination under the guidance of Codification Topic, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”) and recorded at fair value (approximated by the purchase price), allocated to land, building and the existing lease based upon their fair values at the date of acquisition, with acquisition costs expensed as incurred. Fair value is determined under the guidance of Codification Topic, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”), primarily based on unobservable market data inputs, which are categorized as Level 3 valuations. In making estimates of fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price, the Company utilizes its own market knowledge and published market data. The Company utilizes information obtained from county tax assessment records to develop regional averages to allocate the fair value to land and building. The estimated fair value of acquired in-place leases represents the costs the Company would have incurred to lease the property at the date of acquisition, based upon the Company’s current leasing activity. |
|
Building depreciation is computed on the straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The Company generally uses a 27.5-year estimated life with no salvage value. The Company considers the value of acquired in-place leases in the allocation of purchase price and the amortization period reflects the average remaining term of each respective in-place acquired lease. The lease periods are generally short-term in nature (one or two years) and reflect market rental rates. |
|
The Company incurs costs to prepare certain of its acquired properties to be placed in service. These costs are capitalized and allocated to building costs as part of such properties’ initial renovation. Expenditures for ordinary maintenance and repairs are expensed to operations as incurred and expenditures for significant capital expenditures that improve the asset and extend the useful life of the asset are capitalized and depreciated over their remaining useful life. |
|
The Company evaluates its long-lived assets for indicators of impairment periodically or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that an asset’s carrying amount may not be recoverable. The judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators are based on factors such as operational performance, market conditions and the Company’s ability to hold, and its intent with regard to, each asset. If an impairment indicator exists, the Company compares the expected future undiscounted cash flows against the carrying amount of the asset. If the sum of the estimated undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset, the Company records an impairment loss for the difference between the estimated fair value and the carrying amount of the asset. |
Assets Held for Sale | ' |
Assets Held for Sale |
|
The Company evaluates its long-lived assets on a periodic basis to ensure the individual properties still meet its investment criteria. If the Company has determined that an individual property no longer meets its investment criteria, a decision is made to dispose of the property. The property is subject to the Company’s impairment test and an impairment loss is immediately recognized when the estimated fair value, less costs to sell, is less than the carrying amount of the asset. The property is then marketed for sale and classified as held for sale in the consolidated financial statements, with any material operations reported as discontinued operations. Depreciation ceases to be recorded upon designation of an asset as held for sale. |
|
The properties included in held for sale at December 31, 2013 did not have material leasing operations under the Company’s ownership. |
|
For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recognized $792 in impairment charges and $114 in net gain on sale of assets, along with certain operating costs on properties held for sale. These costs are classified as other in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The Company did not record impairment or dispose of assets during the year ended December 31, 2012. |
Cash | ' |
Cash |
|
The Company maintains its cash and escrow deposits at financial institutions. The combined account balances at one or more institutions typically exceed the Federal Depository Insurance Corporation, or FDIC, insurance coverage, and, as a result, there is a concentration of credit risk related to amounts on deposit in excess of FDIC insurance coverage. The Company believes that the risk is not significant, as the Company does not anticipate the financial institutions’ non-performance. |
Escrow Deposits | ' |
Escrow Deposits |
|
Escrow deposits include refundable and non-refundable cash and earnest money on deposit with the Manager’s operating subsidiary and certain third party property managers for property purchases and renovation costs, earnest money deposits, and, at times, monies held at certain municipalities for property purchases. Escrow deposits also include cash held in reserve at financial institutions, as required by the revolving credit facility described in Note 5. |
Rent and Other Receivables, Net | ' |
Rent and Other Receivables, Net |
|
The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses that may result from the inability of residents to make required rent or other payments. This allowance is estimated based on payment history and current occupancy status. The Company generally does not require collateral or other security from its residents, other than security deposits. If estimates of collectability differ from the cash received, the timing and amount of the Company’s reported revenue could be impacted. |
|
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had $665 and $142 in gross rent receivables, respectively, and $228 and $27 in allowances for doubtful accounts, respectively, classified as other assets on the consolidated balance sheets. |
|
For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized $771 and $27 in bad debt expense, respectively, classified as property operating and maintenance in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Including Derivative Instruments | ' |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Including Derivative Instruments |
|
The valuation of financial instruments requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the fair value of the instruments. The Company, where possible, bases the fair values of its financial instruments, including its derivative instruments, on listed market prices and third party quotes. Where these are not available, the Company bases its estimates on current instruments with similar terms and maturities or on other factors relevant to the financial instruments. |
|
In the normal course of business, the Company is exposed to the effect of interest rate changes. The Company seeks to manage these risks through the use of derivatives to hedge interest rate risk on debt instruments. |
|
The Company recognizes derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets and measures those instruments at fair value. In addition, fair value adjustments will affect either stockholders’ equity or net income (loss) depending on whether the derivative instruments qualify as a hedge for accounting purposes and, if so, the nature of the hedging activity. The Company does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. |
Deferred Financing Costs, Net | ' |
|
Deferred Lease Costs, Net |
|
Direct and incremental costs incurred by the Company to lease properties are capitalized and amortized over the life of the lease and reflected as deferred lease costs on the consolidated balance sheets. Amortization of leasing costs is included in depreciation and amortization in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. |
|
Deferred Financing Costs, Net |
|
Costs incurred in the placement of the Company’s debt are deferred and amortized, as a component of interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss, using the effective interest method, or alternative methods that approximate the effective interest method, over the terms of the related debt. |
|
Revenue Recognition | ' |
Revenue Recognition |
|
Rental income attributable to resident leases is recorded on a straight-line basis, which is not materially different than if it were recorded when due from residents and recognized monthly as earned. Rental income is presented net of sales tax on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. Leases entered into between residents and the Company for the rental of property units are generally year-to-year, renewable upon consent of both parties on an annual or monthly basis. |
Noncontrolling Interests | ' |
Noncontrolling Interests |
|
The ownership interests in a consolidated subsidiary that are not held by the Company are noncontrolling interests and are reported on the consolidated balance sheets within equity, separately from the Company’s equity. However, securities that are redeemable for cash or other assets at the option of the holder, not solely within the control of the issuer, must be classified outside of permanent equity. This would result in certain outside ownership interests being included as redeemable noncontrolling interests outside of permanent equity in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company makes this determination based on terms in applicable agreements, specifically in relation to redemption provisions. Additionally, with respect to noncontrolling interests for which the Company has a choice to settle the contract by delivery of its own shares, the Company considered the guidance in the Codification Topic Derivatives and Hedging —Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (“ASC 815-40”) to evaluate whether it controls the actions or events necessary to issue the maximum number of shares that could be required to be delivered under share settlement of the contract. The Company presents the noncontrolling interest for common Operating Partnership units in the equity section of its consolidated balance sheets. |
|
Net income (loss) is allocated to common Operating Partnership unit holders based on their respective ownership percentage of the Operating Partnership. Such ownership percentage is calculated by dividing the number of common Operating Partnership units held by the common Operating Partnership unit holders by the total Operating Partnership units held by the common Operating Partnership unit holders and the Company. Issuance of additional shares of common stock or common Operating Partnership units changes the percentage ownership of both the noncontrolling interests — common Operating Partnership unit holders and the Company. Due in part to the exchange rights (which provide for the redemption of common Operating Partnership units into shares for common stock on a one-for-one basis), such transactions and the proceeds therefrom are treated as capital transactions and result in an allocation between stockholders’ equity and noncontrolling interests to account for the change in the respective percentage ownership of the underlying equity of the Operating Partnership. |
|
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had zero and 27,459 common Operating Partnership units classified as noncontrolling interests, respectively. As described in Note 8, the 27,459 common Operating Partnership units were redeemed in exchange for Company common stock on December 31, 2013. As the transaction occurred at the end of the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company allocated net loss to noncontrolling interests for the full year ended December 31, 2013. |
Preferred Stock | ' |
Preferred Stock |
|
The Company accounts for its 10% cumulative redeemable preferred stock in accordance with the Codification Topic Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity—SEC Materials (“ASC 480-10-S99”). Holders of the Company’s 10% cumulative redeemable preferred stock have certain preference rights with respect to the common stock. Based on the Company’s analysis, the preferred stock has been classified as redeemable interests outside of permanent equity in the mezzanine section of the Company’s consolidated balance sheets as a result of certain redemption requirements or other terms. |
Earnings (Loss) Per Share | ' |
Earnings (Loss) Per Share |
|
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share are computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares and potential common shares outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2013 and the period from December 19, 2012, the date of the Offering and Formation Transactions, through December 31, 2012. For both basic and diluted per share calculations, potential common shares represents issued and unvested shares of restricted stock, which have full rights to the common stock dividend declarations of the Company. The common Operating Partnership units are excluded from the calculation of earnings (loss) per share as their inclusion would not be dilutive. |
Equity Incentive Plan | ' |
Equity Incentive Plan |
|
The Company adopted an equity incentive plan which provides incentive compensation to attract and retain qualified directors, officers, advisors, consultants and other personnel, including certain personnel of Pine River, the Company’s Manager or the Manager’s operating subsidiary. Partners of Pine River and any personnel of the Company’s Manager whose compensation is not reimbursable by the Company are ineligible to receive grants under the plan. The plan permits the granting of stock options, restricted shares of common stock, restricted stock units, phantom shares, dividend equivalent rights, or other equity-based awards. The equity incentive plan is administered by the compensation committee of the Company’s board of directors. The cost of equity awards to independent directors is based on the price of the Company’s stock as of the date of grant, in accordance with Codification Topic Compensation - Stock Compensation (“ASC 718”). The cost of equity awards to employees of the Company’s Manager and the Manager’s operating subsidiary is measured at each reporting date based on the price of the Company’s stock as of period end, in accordance with Codification Topic Equity (“ASC 505”). All equity awards are amortized ratably over the applicable service period. |
Income Taxes | ' |
Income Taxes |
|
The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code, or the Code, and the corresponding provisions of state law. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must distribute at least 90% of its annual REIT taxable income to stockholders (not including taxable income retained in its taxable subsidiaries) within the time frame set forth in the Code and the Company must also meet certain other requirements. In addition, because certain activities, if performed by the Company, may cause the Company to earn income which is not qualifying for the REIT gross income tests, the Company formed a TRS, as defined in the Code, to engage in such activities. These TRS activities are subject to both federal and state income taxes on any taxable income of such entities after consideration of any net operating losses, as well as any REIT taxable income not distributed to stockholders. |
|
The Company assesses its tax positions for all open tax years and determines whether the Company has any material unrecognized liabilities in accordance with Codification Topic Income Taxes (“ASC 740”). The Company records these liabilities to the extent the Company deems them more likely than not to be incurred. The Company classifies interest and penalties on material uncertain tax positions as interest expense and operating expense, respectively, in its consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. |
|
Deferred Tax Assets and Liabilities |
|
Income recognition for GAAP and tax differ in certain respects. These differences often reflect differing accounting treatments for tax and GAAP, such as differing GAAP and tax basis on capitalized assets, real estate asset impairments and the timing of expense recognition for certain accrued liabilities. Some of these differences are temporary in nature and create timing mismatches between when taxable income is earned and the tax is paid versus when the GAAP income is recognized and the tax provision is recorded. Some of these differences are permanent since certain income (or expense) may be recorded for tax but not for GAAP (or vice-versa). One such significant permanent difference is the Company’s ability as a REIT to deduct dividends paid to stockholders as an expense for tax, but not for GAAP. |
|
As a result of these temporary differences, the Company’s TRS, may recognize taxable income in periods prior or subsequent to when it recognizes income for GAAP. When this occurs, the TRS will pay or defer the tax liability and establish deferred tax assets or deferred tax liabilities, respectively, for GAAP. |
|
As income previously taxed is subsequently realized in future periods under GAAP, the deferred tax asset is reversed and a tax expense is recognized. Alternatively, as income previously recognized for GAAP is subsequently realized in future periods for tax, the deferred tax liability is reversed and a tax benefit is recognized. To date, the Company’s deferred tax assets and/or liabilities are generated solely by differences in GAAP and taxable income at our TRS. GAAP and tax differences in the REIT may create additional deferred tax assets to the extent the Company does not distribute all of its taxable income. |
|
A valuation allowance is provided if the Company believes it is more likely than not that all or some portion of deferred tax assets will not be realized. Any increase or decrease in the valuation allowance that results from a change in circumstances and that causes the Company to change judgment about the realizability of the related deferred tax asset is included in the provision when such changes occur. |
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements | ' |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements |
|
Under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act, or the JOBS Act, we meet the definition of an “emerging growth company.” We have irrevocably elected to opt out of the extended transition period for complying with new or revised U.S. accounting standards pursuant to Section 107(b) of the JOBS Act. As a result, we will comply with new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for non-emerging growth companies. |
|
In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-11, which amends Codification Topic Balance Sheet (“ASC 210”). This amendment enhances disclosures required by U.S. GAAP by requiring information about financial instruments and derivative instruments that are either (1) offset in accordance with ASC 210, Balance Sheet or ASC 815, Other Presentation Matters or (2) subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement. ASU No. 2011-11 is effective for first interim or annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. |
|
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, which amends Codification Topic Comprehensive Income (“ASC 220”). The objective of this amendment is to improve the reporting of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income and their corresponding effect on net income. ASU No. 2013-02 is effective for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of this ASU did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. |