Diego Pellicer Worldwide (DPWW) POS AM21 Jan 152014 Q3 Prospectus update (post-effective amendment)Financial data

Company Profile

Document_and_Entity_Informatio

Document and Entity Information	9 Months Ended
Document and Entity Information	Sep. 30, 2014
Document And Entity Information
Entity Registrant Name	Type 1 Media Inc.
Entity Central Index Key	1559172
Document Type	POS AM
Document Period End Date	30-Sep-14
Amendment Flag	FALSE
Current Fiscal Year End Date	-19
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2014
Entity a Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Entity a Voluntary Filer	No
Entity's Reporting Status Current	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company

Consolidated_Balance_Sheets

Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash	$29,335	$114,429	$10,302
Accounts receivable			37,000
Total current assets	29,335	114,429	47,302
COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
Computer equipment	2,717	2,833	558
Accumulated depreciation	-969	-538	-93
Computer equipment, net	1,748	2,295	465
TOTAL ASSETS	31,083	116,724	47,767
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accrued expenses	54,098	89,753	73,736
Advances from stockholder	17,158	20,088	37,660
Deferred revenue	4,894	45,402	21,816
Total current liabilities	76,150	155,243	133,212
LONG TERM LIABLITIES
Deferred revenue, net of current portion			21,822
Total Long-Term Liabilities			21,822
TOTAL LIABILITIES	76,150	155,243	155,034
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Preferred stock par value $0.000001: 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding
Common stock par value $0.000001: 95,000,000 shares authorized; 5,700,000 shares issued and outstanding	6	6	5
Additional paid in capital	-1,778	-1,778	-36,777
Accumulated deficit	-50,758	-43,645	-68,860
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)	7,463	6,898	-1,635
Total Stockholders' Deficit	-45,067	-38,519	-107,267
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT	$31,083	$116,724	$47,767

Consolidated_Balance_Sheets_Pa

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Preferred stock, Par value	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
Preferred stock, Authorized	5,000,000	5,000,000	5,000,000
Preferred stock, Issued	0	0	0
Preferred stock, Outstanding	0	0	0
Common stock, Par value	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
Common stock, Authorized	95,000,000	95,000,000	95,000,000
Common stock, Issued	5,700,000	5,700,000	5,700,000
Common stock, Outstanding	5,700,000	5,700,000	5,700,000

Consolidated_Statements_of_Ope

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
Consolidated Statements Of Operations And Comprehensive Income Loss
Revenue	$12,014	$16,054	$46,962	$25,144	$98,093	$30,368
Cost of Revenue	4,137	14,137	12,345	14,137	18,424	26,495
Gross Margin	7,877	1,917	34,617	11,007	79,669	3,873
Operating Expenses:
Professional fees	2,580	2,269	21,677	5,183	9,278	10,000
Salary and compensation - officer	4,137	4,327	12,345	13,189	17,476	35,171
Travel expenses					21,019	19,075
General and administrative expenses	224	5,792	7,708	25,347	7,056	8,487
Total Operating Expenses	6,941	12,388	41,730	43,719	54,829	72,733
Income (Loss) from Operations					24,840	-68,860
Other (income) expense
Foreign currency transaction (gain) loss					-375
Other (income) expense, net					-375
Income (loss) before income tax provision	936	-10,471	-7,113	-32,712	25,215	-68,860
Income tax provision
Net Income (Loss)	936	-10,471	-7,113	-32,712	25,215	-68,860
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):
Foreign currency translation gain (loss)	3,918	-392	565	3,642	8,533	-494
Comprehensive Income (Loss)	$4,854	($10,863)	($6,548)	($29,070)	$33,748	($69,354)
Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share - basic and diluted	$0	$0	$0	($0.01)	$0	($0.01)
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding: - basic and diluted	5,700,000	5,700,000	5,700,000	5,282,380	5,387,642	5,000,000

Consolidated_Statement_of_Stoc

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Deficit (USD $)	Common Stock	Additional Paid-In Capital	Accumulated Deficit	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Foreign Currency Translation gain (loss)	Total
Beginning Balance, Amount at Dec. 31, 2012	$5	($36,777)	($68,860)	($1,635)	($107,267)
Beginning Balance, Shares at Dec. 31, 2012	5,000,000
Common stock issued for cash at $0.05 per share on June 30, 2013, Shares	700,000
Common stock issued for cash at $0.05 per share on June 30, 2013, Amount	1	34,999			35,000
Net loss			25,215		25,215
Foreign currency translational gain (loss)				8,533	8,533
Total comprehensive income (loss)					33,748
Ending Balance, Amount at Dec. 31, 2013	6	-1,778	-43,645	6,898	-38,519
Ending Balance, Shares at Dec. 31, 2013	5,700,000
Net loss			-7,113		-7,113
Foreign currency translational gain (loss)				565	565
Total comprehensive income (loss)					-6,548
Ending Balance, Amount at Sep. 30, 2014	$6	($1,778)	($50,758)	$7,463	($45,067)
Ending Balance, Shares at Sep. 30, 2014	5,700,000

Consolidated_Statements_of_Cas

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (USD $)	9 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013	Dec. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	($7,113)	($32,712)	$25,215	($68,860)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities
Depreciation expense	457	321	451	93
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		16,704	28,048	-37,000
Accrued expenses	-32,560	13,100	21,036	36,964
Deferred revenue	-39,665	-10,419	4,604	43,638
Net cash used in operating activities	-78,881	-13,006	79,354	-25,165
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of computer equipment		-2,399	-2,311	-558
Net cash used in investing activities		-2,399	-2,311	-558
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Advances from (repayments to) stockholder	-1,672	5,427	-15,919	37,660
Proceeds from sale of common stock		35,000	35,000
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	-1,672	40,427	19,081	37,660
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH	-4,541	60	8,003	-1,635
NET CHANGE IN CASH	-85,094	25,082	104,127	10,302
CASH BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF REPORTING PERIOD	114,429	10,302	10,302
CASH BALANCE AT END OF REPORTING PERIOD	29,335	35,384	114,429	10,302
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOWS INFORMATION:
Interest paid
Income tax paid

Organization_and_Operations

Organization and Operations	9 Months Ended			12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014			Dec. 31, 2013
Notes to Financial Statements
1. Organization and Operations	Make Good Media			Make Good Media

	Make Good Media, a development stage company, (“Predecessor”), was organized as a Sole-Proprietorship on October 28, 2009 under the laws of Canada. The Company plans to make people, newly diagnosed with Type 1 Diabetes, aware of the information in self-management with the disease.			Make Good Media, a development stage company, (“Predecessor”), was organized as a Sole-Proprietorship on October 28, 2009 under the laws of Canada. The Company plans to make people, newly diagnosed with Type 1 Diabetes, aware of the information in self-management with the disease.

	The Company exists to increase the number of people living healthy, happy lives with Type 1 Diabetes by:			The Company exists to increase the number of people living healthy, happy lives with Type 1 Diabetes by:

		·	Providing people with type 1 diabetes with a proactive perspective about self-care that will lead them to seek to understand and manage their condition		·	Providing people with type 1 diabetes with a proactive perspective about self-care that will lead them to seek to understand and manage their condition
		·	Providing people with type 1 diabetes with the information they need to self-manage and thrive with the condition.
		·	Increasing the number of people who use existing informational, support, and research organizations concerned with improving the lives of people with type 1 diabetes.		·	Providing people with type 1 diabetes with the information they need to self-manage and thrive with the condition.

	Type 1 Media, Inc.				·	Increasing the number of people who use existing informational, support, and research organizations concerned with improving the lives of people with type 1 diabetes.

	Type 1 Media, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated on January 12, 2012 under the laws of the State of Delaware for the sole purpose of acquiring all of the outstanding rights of Make Good Media. Upon formation, the Company issued an aggregate of 5,000,000 shares of the newly formed corporation’s common stock to the President of the Predecessor for all of the outstanding rights. No value was given to the stock issued by the newly formed corporation. Therefore, the shares were recorded to reflect the $0.000001 par value and paid in capital was recorded as a negative amount ($5). The acquisition process utilizes the capital structure of the Company and the assets and liabilities of Make Good Media, which are recorded at historical cost.			Type 1 Media, Inc.

	The Company applied paragraph 505-10-S99-3 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (formerly Topic 4B of the Staff Accounting Bulletins (“SAB”) (“SAB Topic 4B”) issued by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), by reclassifying the Sole-Proprietorship’s deficit accumulated during the development stage of ($37,913) and other comprehensive income of $1,141 at January 12, 2012 to additional paid-in capital.			Type 1 Media, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated on January 12, 2012 under the laws of the State of Delaware for the sole purpose of acquiring all of the outstanding rights of Make Good Media. Upon formation, the Company issued an aggregate of 5,000,000 shares of the newly formed corporation’s common stock to the President of the Predecessor for all of the outstanding rights. No value was given to the stock issued by the newly formed corporation. Therefore, the shares were recorded to reflect the $0.000001 par value and paid in capital was recorded as a negative amount ($5). The acquisition process utilizes the capital structure of the Company and the assets and liabilities of Make Good Media, which are recorded at historical cost.

	The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared as if the Company had its corporate capital structure as of the first date of the first period presented.			The Company applied paragraph 505-10-S99-3 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (formerly Topic 4B of the Staff Accounting Bulletins (“SAB”) (“SAB Topic 4B”) issued by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), by reclassifying the Sole-Proprietorship’s deficit accumulated during the development stage of ($37,913) and other comprehensive income of $1,141 at January 12, 2012 to additional paid-in capital.

				The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared as if the Company had its corporate capital structure as of the first date of the first period presented.

Significant_and_Critical_Accou

Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices

9 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2014

Dec. 31, 2013

Notes to Financial Statements

2. Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices

The Management of the Company is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies and the appropriateness of accounting policies and their application. Critical accounting policies and practices are those that are both most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results and require management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company’s significant and critical accounting policies and practices are disclosed below as required by generally accepted accounting principles.

Basis of Presentation - Unaudited Interim Financial Information

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2013 and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on May 15, 2014.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).

Reclassification

Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on reported losses.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).

Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:

(i)

Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

(i)

(ii)

Fair value of long-lived assets: Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.

(iii)

Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors.

(ii)

Allowance for doubtful accounts: Management’s estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts is based on historical sales, historical loss levels, and an analysis of the collectability of individual accounts and general economic conditions that may affect a client’s ability to pay. The Company evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop the allowance in determining that it is reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole;

These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.

(iii)

Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.

(iv)

Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.

Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Principles of Consolidation

The Company applies the guidance of Topic 810 “Consolidation” of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") to determine whether and how to consolidate another entity. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-10 all majority-owned subsidiaries—all entities in which a parent has a controlling financial interest—shall be consolidated except (1) when control does not rest with the parent, the majority owner; (2) if the parent is a broker-dealer within the scope of Topic 940 and control is likely to be temporary; (3) consolidation by an investment company within the scope of Topic 946 of a non-investment-company investee. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-8 the usual condition for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a majority voting interest, and, therefore, as a general rule ownership by one reporting entity, directly or indirectly, of more than 50 percent of the outstanding voting shares of another entity is a condition pointing toward consolidation. The power to control may also exist with a lesser percentage of ownership, for example, by contract, lease, agreement with other stockholders, or by court decree. The Company consolidates all less-than-majority-owned subsidiaries, if any, in which the parent’s power to control exists.

Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The Company's consolidated subsidiaries and/or entities are as follows:

Principles of Consolidation

Name of consolidated subsidiary

State or other jurisdiction of

Date of incorporation or formation

Attributable interest

or entity

incorporation or organization

(date of acquisition, if applicable)

The Company's consolidated subsidiaries and/or entities are as follows:

Make Good Media

Canada

28-Oct-09

100%

Name of consolidated subsidiary or entity

State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization

Date of incorporation or formation (date of acquisition, if applicable)

Attributable interest

The consolidated financial statements include all accounts of the Company and Make Good Media as of reporting period dates and for the reporting periods then ended.

Make Good Media

Canada

28-Oct-09

100

All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The consolidated financial statements include all accounts of the Company and Make Good Media as of reporting period dates and for the reporting periods then ended.

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:

All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Level 1

Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Level 2

Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

Level 3

Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

Level 1

Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

Level 2

Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

Level 3

Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.

Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.

Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts receivable, and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.

The Company has adopted Section 360-10-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-17 an impairment loss shall be recognized only if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset (asset group). That assessment shall be based on the carrying amount of the asset (asset group) at the date it is tested for recoverability. An impairment loss shall be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) exceeds its fair value. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-20 if an impairment loss is recognized, the adjusted carrying amount of a long-lived asset shall be its new cost basis. For a depreciable long-lived asset, the new cost basis shall be depreciated (amortized) over the remaining useful life of that asset. Restoration of a previously recognized impairment loss is prohibited.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-21 the Company’s long-lived asset (asset group) is tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company considers the following to be some examples of such events or changes in circumstances that may trigger an impairment review: (a) significant decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset (asset group); (b) A significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which a long-lived asset (asset group) is being used or in its physical condition; (c) A significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of a long-lived asset (asset group), including an adverse action or assessment by a regulator; (d) An accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of a long-lived asset (asset group); (e) A current-period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of a long-lived asset (asset group); and (f) A current expectation that, more likely than not, a long-lived asset (asset group) will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life. The Company tests its long-lived assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.

Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 360-10-45-4 and 360-10-45-5 an impairment loss recognized for a long-lived asset (asset group) to be held and used shall be included in income from continuing operations before income taxes in the income statement of a business entity. If a subtotal such as income from operations is presented, it shall include the amount of that loss. A gain or loss recognized on the sale of a long-lived asset (disposal group) that is not a component of an entity shall be included in income from continuing operations before income taxes in the income statement of a business entity. If a subtotal such as income from operations is presented, it shall include the amounts of those gains or losses.

The Company has adopted paragraph 360-10-35-17 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. The Company’s long-lived assets, which include computer equipment, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.

Cash Equivalents

The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives.

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.

The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.

Computer Equipment

The impairment charges, if any, is included in operating expenses in the accompanying statements of operations.

Computer equipment is recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the asset’s estimated useful lives of five (5) years. Upon sale or retirement, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in the statements of operations.

Cash Equivalents

Related Parties

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.

The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the related parties include a. affiliates (“Affiliate” means, with respect to any specified Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with such Person, as such terms are used in and construed under Rule 405 under the Securities Act) of the Company; b. entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d. principal owners of the Company; e. management of the Company; f. other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount, net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company follows paragraph 310-10-50-9 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to estimate the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company performs on-going credit evaluations of its customers and adjusts credit limits based upon payment history and the customer’s current credit worthiness, as determined by the review of their current credit information; and determines the allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical write-off experience, customer specific facts and economic conditions.

The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a. the nature of the relationship(s) involved ; b. a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.

Pursuant to paragraph 310-10-50-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. The Company has adopted paragraph 310-10-50-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and determine when receivables are past due or delinquent based on how recently payments have been received.

Commitment and Contingencies

Outstanding account balances are reviewed individually for collectability. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s existing accounts receivable.

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or un-asserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or un-asserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

There was no allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31, 2013 or December 31, 2012, or bad debt expense for the reporting period ended December 31, 2013 or 2012.

If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure to its customers at December 31, 2013 or December 31, 2012.

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed.

Computer Equipment

Foreign Currency Transactions

The Company applies the guidelines as set out in Section 830-20-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 830-20-35”) for foreign currency transactions. Pursuant to Section 830-20-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, foreign currency transactions are transactions denominated in currencies other than U.S. Dollar, the Company’s reporting currency or Canadian Dollar, the Company’s operating functional currency. Foreign currency transactions may produce receivables or payables that are fixed in terms of the amount of foreign currency that will be received or paid. A change in exchange rates between the functional currency and the currency in which a transaction is denominated increases or decreases the expected amount of functional currency cash flows upon settlement of the transaction. That increase or decrease in expected functional currency cash flows is a foreign currency transaction gain or loss that generally shall be included in determining net income for the period in which the exchange rate changes. Likewise, a transaction gain or loss (measured from the transaction date or the most recent intervening balance sheet date, whichever is later) realized upon settlement of a foreign currency transaction generally shall be included in determining net income for the period in which the transaction is settled. The exceptions to this requirement for inclusion in net income of transaction gains and losses pertain to certain intercompany transactions and to transactions that are designated as, and effective as, economic hedges of net investments and foreign currency commitments. Pursuant to Section 830-20-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the following shall apply to all foreign currency transactions of an enterprise and its investees: (a) at the date the transaction is recognized, each asset, liability, revenue, expense, gain, or loss arising from the transaction shall be measured and recorded in the functional currency of the recording entity by use of the exchange rate in effect at that date as defined in section 830-10-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification; and (b) at each balance sheet date, recorded balances that are denominated in currencies other than the functional currency or reporting currency of the recording entity shall be adjusted to reflect the current exchange rate.

Related Parties

Revenue Recognition

The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.

The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.

Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the related parties include a. affiliates of the Company; b. entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d. principal owners of the Company; e. management of the Company; f. other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

The Company applies the aforementioned criteria of the revenue recognition policy in the accounting standards to the transactions that generated revenue in the Company’s financial statements as follows:

The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a. the nature of the relationship(s) involved ; b. adescription of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.

Whiteboard Video Creation

Commitment and Contingencies

The Company creates whiteboard video for its customers. The Company bills 50% of the total estimated fees of the project as a retainer receivable before commencing the job. The Company recognizes whiteboard video creation revenue when the creation is completed and delivered to the customer.

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

Content Sponsorships

The Company sells sponsorship blocks in its website to pharmaceutical companies and medical device manufacturers. The Company recognizes content sponsorship revenue ratably over the period in which the related sponsorship content is available on the Company’s website.

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.

The Company assesses collection based on a number of factors, including past transaction history with the customer and the creditworthiness of the customer. The Company does not request collateral from customers. If the Company determines that collection of a fee is not reasonably assured, the Company defers the fee and recognizes revenue at the time collection becomes reasonably assured, which is generally upon receipt of cash.

Foreign Currency Transactions

Income Tax Provision

The Company was treated as a disregarded entity for income tax purposes until January 12, 2012. The operating results prior to January 12, 2012 were included in the income tax return of the Company’s founder.

Revenue Recognition

Effective January 12, 2012, the Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based upon differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the statements of operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”). Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.

The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.

Whiteboard Video Creation

Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.

The Company discloses tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions pursuant to the ASC Paragraph 740-10-50-15.

Content Sponsorships

Foreign Currency Translation

The Company follows Section 830-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 830-10-45”) for foreign currency translation to translate the financial statements from the functional currency, generally the local currency, into U.S. Dollars. Section 830-10-45 sets out the guidance relating to how a reporting entity determines the functional currency, re-measures the books of record (if necessary), and characterizes transaction gains and losses. Pursuant to Section 830-10-45, the assets, liabilities, and operations of a foreign entity shall be measured using the functional currency of that entity. An entity’s functional currency is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates; normally, that is the currency of the environment, or local currency, in which an entity primarily generates and expends cash.

The functional currency is determined based on management’s judgment and involves consideration of all relevant economic facts and circumstances affecting the subsidiary. Generally, the currency in which it transacts a majority of its transactions, including billings, financing, payroll and other expenditures, would be considered the functional currency. If a functional currency is deemed to be the local currency, then any gain or loss associated with the translation of the financial statements is included in accumulated other comprehensive income. However, if the functional currency is deemed to be the U.S. Dollar, then any gain or loss associated with the re-measurement of these financial statements from the local currency to the functional currency would be included in the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income (loss).

Income Tax Provision

Based on an assessment of the factors discussed above, the management of the Company determined the relevant local currency to be the functional currency.

The financial records of the Company are maintained in its local currency, the Canadian Dollar (“CAD”), which is the functional currency. Assets and liabilities are translated from the local currencies into the reporting currency, U.S. dollars, at the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated at weighted average exchange rates for the period to approximate translation at the exchange rates prevailing at the dates those elements are recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Foreign currency translation gain (loss) resulting from the process of translating the local currency financial statements into U.S. dollars are included in determining accumulated other comprehensive income in the consolidated statement of stockholders’ deficit.

Unless otherwise noted, the rate presented below per U.S. $1.00 was the midpoint of the interbank rate as quoted by OANDA Corporation (www.oanda.com) contained in its consolidated financial statements. Translation of amounts from CAD into U.S. dollars has been made at the following exchange rates for the respective periods:

30-Sep-14

31-Dec-13

30-Sep-13

31-Dec-12

Balance sheets

0.8963

0.935

0.9704

0.9968

Statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss)

0.9145

0.9712

0.9773

Uncertain Tax Positions

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no adjustments to its income tax liabilities or benefits pursuant to the provisions of Section 740-10-25 for the reporting period ended December 31, 2013 or 2012.

The Company has applied section 220-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. This statement establishes rules for the reporting of comprehensive income and its components. Comprehensive income (loss), for the Company, consists of net loss and foreign currency translation adjustments and is presented in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) and stockholders’ equity.

Foreign Currency Translation

Earnings per Share

Earnings per share ("EPS") is the amount of earnings attributable to each share of common stock. For convenience, the term is used to refer to either earnings or loss per share. EPS is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-10 through 260-10-45-16 Basic EPS shall be computed by dividing income available to common stockholders (the numerator) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding (the denominator) during the period. Income available to common stockholders shall be computed by deducting both the dividends declared in the period on preferred stock (whether or not paid) and the dividends accumulated for the period on cumulative preferred stock (whether or not earned) from income from continuing operations (if that amount appears in the income statement) and also from net income. The computation of diluted EPS is similar to the computation of basic EPS except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through contingent shares issuance arrangement, stock options or warrants.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-45-21 through 260-10-45-45-23 Diluted EPS shall be based on the most advantageous conversion rate or exercise price from the standpoint of the security holder. The dilutive effect of outstanding call options and warrants (and their equivalents) issued by the reporting entity shall be reflected in diluted EPS by application of the treasury stock method unless the provisions of paragraphs 260-10-45-35 through 45-36 and 260-10-55-8 through 55-11 require that another method be applied. Equivalents of options and warrants include non-vested stock granted to employees, stock purchase contracts, and partially paid stock subscriptions (see paragraph 260–10–55–23). Anti-dilutive contracts, such as purchased put options and purchased call options, shall be excluded from diluted EPS. Under the treasury stock method: a. Exercise of options and warrants shall be assumed at the beginning of the period (or at time of issuance, if later) and common shares shall be assumed to be issued. b. The proceeds from exercise shall be assumed to be used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. (See paragraphs 260-10-45-29 and 260-10-55-4 through 55-5.) c. The incremental shares (the difference between the number of shares assumed issued and the number of shares assumed purchased) shall be included in the denominator of the diluted EPS computation.

Based on an assessment of the factors discussed above, the management of the Company determined the relevant local currency to be the functional currency.

There were no potentially dilutive common shares outstanding for the reporting period ended September 30, 2014 or 2013.

Cash Flows Reporting

The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.

31-Dec-13

31-Dec-12

Subsequent Events

Balance sheets

1.0696

0.9968

The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.

Statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss)

1.03

0.9998

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. The amendments in this Update change the requirements for reporting discontinued operations in Subtopic 205-20.

Under the new guidance, a discontinued operation is defined as a disposal of a component or group of components that is disposed of or is classified as held for sale and “represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results.” The ASU states that a strategic shift could include a disposal of (i) a major geographical area of operations, (ii) a major line of business, (iii) a major equity method investment, or (iv) other major parts of an entity. Although “major” is not defined, the standard provides examples of when a disposal qualifies as a discontinued operation.

Net Income (Loss) per Common Share

The ASU also requires additional disclosures about discontinued operations that will provide more information about the assets, liabilities, income and expenses of discontinued operations. In addition, the ASU requires disclosure of the pre-tax profit or loss attributable to a disposal of an individually significant component of an entity that does not qualify for discontinued operations presentation in the financial statements.

Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially dilutive outstanding shares of common stock during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through contingent share arrangements, stock options and warrants.

The ASU is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those years.

There were no potentially dilutive common shares outstanding for the reporting period ended December 31, 2013 or 2012.

In May 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”).

Cash Flows Reporting

This guidance amends the existing FASB Accounting Standards Codification, creating a new Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customer. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.

To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps:

Subsequent Events

Identify the contract(s) with the customer

Identify the performance obligations in the contract

Determine the transaction price

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract

Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligations

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, Income Tax (Topic 740): Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carry-forward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carry-forward Exists. This ASU provides guidance on the financial statement presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carry-forward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carry-forward exists. An unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion of an unrecognized tax benefit, should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carry-forward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carry-forward, except as follows. To the extent a net operating loss carry-forward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carry-forward is not available at the reporting date under the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction to settle any additional income taxes that would result from the disallowance of a tax position or the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a liability and should not be combined with deferred tax assets. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2013.

The ASU also provides guidance on disclosures that should be provided to enable financial statement users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue recognition and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. Qualitative and quantitative information is required about the following:

Contracts with customers – including revenue and impairments recognized, disaggregation of revenue, and information about contract balances and performance obligations (including the transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations)

Significant judgments and changes in judgments – determining the timing of satisfaction of performance obligations (over time or at a point in time), and determining the transaction price and amounts allocated to performance obligations

Assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract.

ASU 2014-09 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period for all public entities. Early application is not permitted.

The ASU is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those years.

In August 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”).

Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

In connection with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period, an entity’s management should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Management’s evaluation should be based on relevant conditions and events that are known and reasonably knowable at the date that the financial statements are issued (or at the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern exists when relevant conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate that it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The term probable is used consistently with its use in Topic 450, Contingencies.

When management identifies conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, management should consider whether its plans that are intended to mitigate those relevant conditions or events will alleviate the substantial doubt. The mitigating effect of management’s plans should be considered only to the extent that (1) it is probable that the plans will be effectively implemented and, if so, (2) it is probable that the plans will mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, but the substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following (or refer to similar information disclosed elsewhere in the footnotes):

Principal conditions or events that raised substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern (before consideration of management’s plans)

Management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations

Management’s plans that alleviated substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and substantial doubt is not alleviated after consideration of management’s plans, an entity should include a statement in the footnotes indicating that there is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). Additionally, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following:

Principal conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern

Management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations

Management’s plans that are intended to mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted.

Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, when adopted, will have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Going_Concern

Going Concern	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
Going Concern	Sep. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Notes to Financial Statements
3. Going Concern	The Company has elected to adopt early application of Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”).	The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

	The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that it will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.	As reflected in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit and working capital deficiency at December 31, 2013. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

	As reflected in the consolidated financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit at September 30, 2014, a net loss and net cash used in operating activities for the reporting period then ended. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.	While the Company is attempting to commence operations and generate sufficient revenues, the Company’s cash position may not be sufficient enough to support the Company’s daily operations. Management intends to raise additional funds by way of a private or public offering. Management believes that the actions presently being taken to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenues provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to generate sufficient revenues and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenues.

	The Company is attempting to generate sufficient revenue; however, the Company’s cash position may not be sufficient to support its daily operations. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to generate sufficient revenues and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and in its ability to raise additional funds.	The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

	The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Computer_Equipment

Computer Equipment	9 Months Ended			12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014			Dec. 31, 2013
Notes to Financial Statements
4. Computer Equipment		(i)	Impairment Testing		(i)	Impairment Test

	The Company completed the annual impairment testing of computer equipment and determined that there was no impairment as the fair value of property and equipment, exceeded their carrying values at December 31, 2013.			The Company completed the annual impairment test of computer equipment and determined that there was no impairment as the fair value of property and equipment, substantially exceeded their carrying values at December 31, 2013.

		(ii)	Depreciation Expense		(ii)	Depreciation Expense

	Depreciation expense was $457 and $321 for the reporting period ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.			Depreciation expense was $451 and $93 for the reporting period ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Stockholders_Deficit

Stockholder's Deficit	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
Stockholder's Deficit	Sep. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Notes to Financial Statements
5. Stockholder's Deficit	Shares Authorized	Shares Authorized

	Upon formation the total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Company is authorized to issue is One Hundred Million (100,000,000) shares of which Five Million (5,000,000) shares shall be Preferred Stock, par value $0.000001 per share, and Ninety Five Million (95,000,000) shares shall be Common Stock, par value $0.000001 per share.	Upon formation the total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Company is authorized to issue is One Hundred Million (100,000,000) shares of which Five Million (5,000,000) shares shall be Preferred Stock, par value $0.000001 per share, and Ninety Five Million (95,000,000) shares shall be Common Stock, par value $0.000001 per share.

	Common Stock	Common Stock

	Upon formation, the Company issued an aggregate of 5,000,000 shares of the newly formed corporation’s common stock to the President of the Predecessor for all of the outstanding shares. No value was given to the stock issued by the newly formed corporation. Therefore, the shares were recorded to reflect the $0.000001 par value and paid in capital was recorded as a negative amount ($5). In other words, no net value was assigned to these shares.	Upon formation, the Company issued an aggregate of 5,000,000 shares of the newly formed corporation’s common stock to the President of the Predecessor for all of the outstanding shares. No value was given to the stock issued by the newly formed corporation. Therefore, the shares were recorded to reflect the $0.000001 par value and paid in capital was recorded as a negative amount ($5). In other words, no net value was assigned to these shares.

	For the period from May 21, 2013 through June 30, 2013, the Company sold 700,000 shares of its common stock at $0.05 per share to thirty two (32) individuals for a total consideration of $35,000.	For the period from May 21, 2013 through June 30, 2013, the Company sold 700,000 shares of its common stock at $0.05 per share to thirty two (32) individuals for a total consideration of $35,000.

		Capital Contribution

		The Company applied paragraph 505-10-S99-3 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (formerly Topic 4B of the Staff Accounting Bulletins (“SAB”) (“SAB Topic 4B”) issued by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), by reclassifying the Sole-Proprietorship’s deficit accumulated during the development stage of ($37,913) and other comprehensive income of $1,141 at January 12, 2012 to additional paid-in capital.

Related_Party_Transactions

Related Party Transactions	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
Related Party Transactions	Sep. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Notes to Financial Statements
6. Related Party Transactions	Advances from Stockholder	Advances from Stockholder

	From time to time, the stockholder of the Company advances funds to the Company for working capital purpose. Those advances are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.	From time to time, the stockholder of the Company advances funds to the Company for working capital purpose. Those advances are unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand.

	Free Office Space	Free Office Space

	The Company has been provided office space by its Chief Executive Officer at no cost. The management determined that such cost is nominal and did not recognize the rent expense in its financial statement.	The Company has been provided office space by its Chief Executive Officer at no cost. The management determined that such cost is nominal and did not recognize the rent expense in its financial statement.

Concentrations_and_Credit_Risk

Concentrations and Credit Risk	9 Months Ended									12 Months Ended
Concentrations and Credit Risk	Sep. 30, 2014									Dec. 31, 2013
Notes to Financial Statements
7. Concentrations and Credit Risk	Customers and Credit Concentrations									Customers and Credit Concentrations

	Customer concentrations and credit concentrations are as follows:									Customer concentrations and credit concentrations are as follows:

		Net Revenue				Accounts Receivable					Net Revenue for the reporting period ended						Accounts Receivable at
		for the reporting period ended				at					31-Dec-13			31-Dec-12			31-Dec-13			December 31, 2012
		30-Sep-14		30-Sep-13		30-Sep-14		31-Dec-13
										Customer A		22.8	%		76.8	%		-	%		81.1	%
	Customer A	32	%	63.6	%	-	%	-	%
										Customer B		53.9	%		-	%		-	%		-	%
	Customer B	15	%	36.4	%	-	%	-	%
										Customer C		16.2	%		-	%		-	%		18.9	%
	Customer C	53	%	-	%	-	%	-	%			92.9	%		76.8	%		-	%		100	%

		100	%	100	%	-	%	-	%	A reduction in sales from or loss of such customers would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

	A reduction in sales from or loss of such customers would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

Income_Tax_Provision

Income Tax Provision	12 Months Ended
Income Tax Provision	Dec. 31, 2013
Income Tax Provision
8. Income Tax Provision	Deferred Tax Assets

	At December 31, 2013, the Company had net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes of $43,645 that may be offset against future taxable income through 2033. No tax benefit has been reported with respect to these net operating loss carry-forwards in the accompanying financial statements because the Company believes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets of approximately $14,839 was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance.

	Deferred tax assets consist primarily of the tax effect of NOL carry-forwards. The Company has provided a full valuation allowance on the deferred tax assets because of the uncertainty regarding its realization. The valuation allowance decreased by approximately $8,573 and increased $23,412 for the year ended December 31, 2013 and for the period from January 12, 2012 (inception) through December 31, 2012, respectively.

	Components of deferred tax assets are as follows:

		31-Dec-13			31-Dec-12
	Net deferred tax assets – Non-current:

	Expected income tax benefit from NOL carry-forwards		14,839			23,412

	Less: Valuation allowance		(14,839	)		(23,412	)

	Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance	$	-		$	-

	Income Tax Provision in the Consolidated Statements of Operations

	A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate and the effective income tax rate as a percentage of income before income taxes is as follows:

		For the Year Ended			For the Period from January 12, 2012 (inception) through
		31-Dec-13			31-Dec-12

	Federal statutory income tax rate		34	%		34	%

	Change in valuation allowance on net operating loss carry-forwards		(34.0	)		(34.0	)

	Effective income tax rate		0	%		0	%

Subsequent_Events

Subsequent Events	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
Subsequent Events	Sep. 30, 2014	Dec. 31, 2013
Notes to Financial Statements
9. Subsequent Events	The Company has evaluated all events that occur after the balance sheet date through the date when the financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported. The Management of the Company determined that there were no reportable subsequent event(s) to be disclosed.	The Company has evaluated all events that occur after the balance sheet date through the date when the financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported. The Management of the Company determined that there were no reportable subsequent event(s) to be disclosed.

Significant_and_Critical_Accou1

Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices (Policies)

9 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2014

Dec. 31, 2013

Significant And Critical Accounting Policies And Practices Policies