Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Principles of Consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries as follows: Subsidiary Apartment Complex Number Property Location RRE Opportunity Holdings II, LLC N/A N/A N/A RRE Opportunity OP II, LP N/A N/A N/A RRE Bear Creek Holdings, LLC, or Bear Creek Adair off Addison 152 Dallas, TX RRE Oak Hill Holdings, LLC, or Oak Hill Overton Trails Apartment Homes 360 Fort Worth, TX RRE Buckhead Holdings, LLC, or Buckhead Uptown Buckhead 216 Atlanta, GA RRE Farrington Holdings, LLC, or Farrington Crosstown at Chapel Hill 411 Chapel Hill, NC RRE Mayfair Chateau Holdings, LLC, or Mayfair Chateau The Brookwood 274 Homewood, AL RRE Fairways of Bent Tree Holdings, LLC, or Fairways of Bent Tree Adair off Addison Apartment Homes 200 Dallas, TX RRE Montclair Terrace Holdings, LLC, or Montclair Holdings Montclair Terrace 188 Portland, OR RRE Grand Reserve Holdings, LLC, or Grand Reserve Grand Reserve 319 Naperville, IL RRE Canterwood Holdings, LLC, or Canterwood Verdant Apartment Homes 216 Boulder, CO RRE Spalding Crossing Holdings, LLC, or Spalding Crossing 1000 Spalding Apartment Homes 252 Atlanta, GA RRE Fox Ridge Holdings, LLC, or Fox Ridge Arcadia Apartment Homes 300 Centennial, CO RRE Riverlodge Holdings, LLC, or Riverlodge Riverlodge 498 Austin, TX RRE Breckenridge Holdings, LLC, or Breckenridge Breckenridge 357 Portland, OR RRE Santa Rosa Holdings, LLC, or Santa Rosa Santa Rosa 476 Irving, TX RRE Windbrooke Holdings, LLC, or Windbrooke Crossing Windbrooke Crossing 236 Buffalo Grove, IL RRE Woods Holdings, LLC, or The Woods of Burnsville The Woods of Burnsville 400 Burnsville, MN RRE Indigo Creek Holdings, LLC N/A N/A N/A N/A - Not Applicable All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Segment Reporting The Company does not evaluate performance on a relationship-specific or transactional basis and does not distinguish its principal business or group its operations on a geographical basis for purposes of measuring performance. Accordingly, the Company believes it has a single operating segment for reporting purposes in accordance with GAAP. Use of Estimates The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Real Estate Investments The Company records acquired real estate at fair value on its acquisition date. The Company considers the period of future benefit of an asset to determine its appropriate useful life. The Company's estimated useful lives of its assets by class are as follows: Buildings 27.5 years Building improvements 3.0 to 27.5 years Tenant improvements Shorter of lease term or expected useful life Lease intangibles Remaining term of related lease As four of the Company's multifamily properties are located in the Dallas-Fort Worth area, two properties are located in Portland, Oregon, two properties are located in the Atlanta area and two properties are located in the Denver area, our portfolio is currently particularly susceptible to adverse economic developments in these real estate markets. Any adverse economic or real estate developments in these markets, such as business layoffs or downsizing, industry slowdowns, relocations of businesses, changing demographics and other factors, or any decrease in demand for multifamily rentals resulting from the local business climate, could negatively affect our liquidity and adversely affect our ability to fund our ongoing operations. Impairment of Long Lived Assets When circumstances indicate the carrying value of a property may not be recoverable, the Company reviews the asset for impairment. This review is based on an estimate of the future undiscounted cash flows, excluding interest charges, expected to result from the property’s use and eventual disposition. These estimates consider factors such as expected future operating income, market and other applicable trends and residual value, as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. If impairment exists, due to the inability to recover the carrying value of a property, an impairment loss will be recorded to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the property for properties to be held and used. For properties held for sale, the impairment loss is the adjustment to fair value less estimated cost to dispose of the asset. These assessments have a direct impact on net income because recording an impairment loss results in an immediate negative adjustment to net income. The Company did not recognize any impairment charges as of March 31, 2017 . Allocation of Purchase Price of Acquired Assets Upon the acquisition of real properties, the Company allocates the purchase price of properties to acquired tangible assets, consisting of land, buildings, fixtures and improvements, identified intangible lease assets, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, as applicable, the value of in-place leases, the value of tenant relationships, and liabilities, based in each case on their fair values. Fair value estimates are based on information obtained from a number of sources, including information obtained about each property as a result of pre-acquisition due diligence, marketing and leasing activities. In addition, the Company may obtain independent appraisal reports. The information in the appraisal reports, along with the aforementioned information available to the Company's management, is used in allocating the purchase price. The independent appraisers have no involvement in management's allocation decisions other than providing market information. The Company records above-market and below-market in-place lease values for acquired properties based on the present value (using an interest rate that reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (ii) management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease. The Company amortizes any capitalized above-market or below-market lease values as an increase or reduction to rental income over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. The Company measures the aggregate value of other intangible assets acquired based on the difference between (i) the property valued with existing in-place leases adjusted to market rental rates and (ii) the property valued as if vacant. Management’s estimates of value are expected to be made using methods similar to those used by independent appraisers (e.g., discounted cash flow analysis). Factors to be considered by management in its analysis include an estimate of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, management includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the expected lease-up periods. Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions and legal and other related expenses to the extent that such costs have not already been incurred in connection with a new lease origination as part of the transaction. The total amount of other intangible assets acquired is further allocated to customer relationship intangible values based on management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and the Company’s overall relationship with that respective tenant. Characteristics considered by management in allocating these values include the nature and extent of the Company’s existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and expectations of lease renewals (including those existing under the terms of the lease agreement), among other factors. The Company amortizes the value of in-place leases to expense over the remaining term of the underlying leases. The value of customer relationship intangibles is amortized to expense over the initial term and any renewal periods in the respective leases, but in no event does amortization periods for the intangible assets exceed the remaining depreciable life of the building. Should a tenant terminate its lease, the unamortized portion of the in-place lease value and relationship intangibles related to that customer would be charged to expense in that period. The determination of the fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired requires the use of significant assumptions with regard to current market rental rates, discount rates and other variables. These estimates are subject to change until all information is finalized, which is generally within one year of the acquisition date. Revenue Recognition The Company recognizes minimum rent, including rental abatements and contractual fixed increases attributable to operating leases, on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease and includes amounts expected to be received in later years in deferred rents. The Company records property operating expense reimbursements due from tenants for common area maintenance, real estate taxes and other recoverable costs in the period the related expenses are incurred. The specific timing of a sale is measured against various criteria related to the terms of the transaction and any continuing involvement associated with the property. If the criteria for profit recognition under the full-accrual method are not met, the Company defers the gain recognition and accounts for the continued operations of the property by applying the percentage-of-completion, reduced profit, deposit, installment or cost recovery methods, as appropriate, until the appropriate criteria are met. The future minimum rental payments to be received from noncancelable operating leases are $28.9 million and $268,697 for the 12-month periods ending March 31 , 2018 and 2019 , respectively, and none thereafter. Tenant Receivables The Company makes estimates of the collectability of its tenant receivables related to base rents, including straight-line rentals, expense reimbursements and other revenue or income. The Company specifically analyzes accounts receivable and historic bad debts, tenant creditworthiness, current economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. In addition, with respect to tenants in bankruptcy, the Company makes estimates of the expected recovery of pre-petition and post-petition claims in assessing the estimated collectability of the related receivable. In some cases, the ultimate resolution of these claims can exceed one year . At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , there were allowances for uncollectible accounts of $1,400 and $5,009 , respectively. Income Taxes The Company elected to be taxed as a REIT, commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 2014. Accordingly, the Company will generally not be subject to corporate U.S. federal or state income tax to the extent that it makes qualifying distributions to its stockholders, and provided it satisfies on a continuing basis, through actual investment and operating results, the REIT requirements including certain asset, income, distribution and stock ownership tests. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT, and does not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, it will be subject to U.S. federal, state and local income taxes and may be precluded from qualifying as a REIT for the subsequent four taxable years following the year in which it lost its REIT qualification. Accordingly, the Company’s failure to qualify as a REIT could have a material adverse impact on its results of operations and amounts available for distribution to its stockholders. The dividends paid deduction of a REIT for qualifying dividends to its stockholders is computed using the Company’s taxable income as opposed to net income reported on the financial statements. Taxable income, generally, will differ from net income reported on the financial statements because the determination of taxable income is based on tax provisions and not financial accounting principles. The Company may elect to treat certain of its subsidiaries as taxable REIT subsidiaries (“TRSs”). In general, the Company’s TRSs may hold assets and engage in activities that the Company cannot hold or engage in directly and generally may engage in any real estate or non-real estate-related business. A TRS is subject to U.S. federal, state and local corporate income taxes. While a TRS may generate net income, a TRS can declare dividends to the Company which will be included in the Company’s taxable income and necessitate a distribution to its stockholders. Conversely, if the Company retains earnings at a TRS level, no distribution is required and the Company can increase book equity of the consolidated entity. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , the Company had no TRSs. Earnings Per Share Basic earnings (loss) per share is calculated on the basis of the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share takes into account the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised and converted to common stock. None of the convertible shares (discussed in Note 11) are included in the diluted earnings per share calculations because the necessary conditions for conversion have not been satisfied as of March 31, 2017 (were such date to represent the end of the contingency period). Due to reported losses for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, common shares potentially issuable to settle accrued distributions are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share calculations, as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. Organization and Offering Costs The Company incurred organizational, accounting, and offering costs in pursuit of its financing. Organization and offering costs (other than selling commissions and dealer-manager fees) of the Company were initially paid by the Advisor on behalf of the Company. Organization costs were expensed as incurred and included all expenses incurred by the Company in connection with the formation of the Company, including, but not limited to, legal fees and other costs to incorporate the Company. Pursuant to the Amended and Restated Advisory Agreement between the Company and the Advisor dated January 9, 2014, as amended (the “Advisory Agreement”), the Company is obligated to reimburse the Advisor for organizational and offering costs it incurred on the Company's behalf, but only to the extent that such reimbursements did not cause organizational and offering expenses (other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fees) to exceed 2.5% of the gross offering proceeds raised in the offering, when recorded by the Company. The primary portion of the offering closed on February 6, 2016 , at which point total organizational and offering costs incurred did not exceed 2.5% of the gross offering proceeds raised in the offering. During the offering period which closed in 2016, the Company incurred $11.2 million for the payment of offering costs consisting of accounting, advertising, allocated payroll, due diligence, marketing, legal and similar costs. During the offering period, the Advisor had incurred $7.2 million of these costs on behalf of the Company, all of which had been reimbursed. A portion of these costs was charged to equity upon the sale of each share of common stock sold under the public offering. Similarly, a portion of the proceeds received from the sales of shares in the Company's public offering was paid to the Advisor to reimburse it for the amount incurred on behalf of the Company. Adoption of New Accounting Standards Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Effective In May 2014, FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”, which will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP. The core principle of ASU No. 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue for the transfer of goods or services equal to the amount that it expects to be entitled to receive for those goods or services. ASU No. 2014-09 requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments. ASU No. 2014-09 will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2018, including interim periods in 2018, and allows for both retrospective and prospective methods of adoption. The Company is in the process of determining the method of adoption and assessing the impact of this guidance on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. In February 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842)", which is intended to improve financial reporting about leasing transactions and requires organizations that lease assets to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases. ASU No. 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is continuing to evaluate this guidance; however, it does not expect the adoption of ASU No. 2016-02 to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements. In June 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses”, which requires measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for financial assets held. ASU No. 2016-13 will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2019. The Company is evaluating this guidance; however, it does not expect the adoption of ASU No. 2016-13 to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements. In August 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15 "Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments", which addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing existing diversity in practice. The guidance is effective for the Company as of January 1, 2018. Early application is permitted. The adoption of the new requirements is not expected to have a material impact on the reporting of the Company's consolidated cash flows. In January 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, "Business Combinations (Topic 850): Clarifying the Definition of Business", which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of businesses. ASU No. 2017-01 will be effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2018. Early application is permitted. The Company is evaluating this guidance and assessing the impact of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements. In January 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, "Intangibles- Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Accounting for Goodwill Impairment", which alters the current goodwill impairment testing procedures to eliminate Step 2. ASU No. 2017-04 will be effective for the Company beginning December 15, 2019. Early application is permitted. The Company is evaluating this guidance and assessing the impact of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements. |