Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(3)
Registration No. 333-184677
AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
SUPPLEMENT NO. 7, DATED DECEMBER 2, 2013,
TO THE PROSPECTUS, DATED FEBRUARY 14, 2013
This prospectus supplement, or this Supplement No. 7, is part of the prospectus of American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc., or the Company, dated February 14, 2013, or the Prospectus, as supplemented by Supplement No. 5, dated August 22, 2013, or Supplement No. 5, and Supplement No. 6, dated October 21, 2013, or Supplement No. 6. This Supplement No. 7 supplements, modifies, supersedes and replaces certain information contained in the Prospectus, Supplement No. 5 and Supplement No. 6 and should be read in conjunction with the Prospectus. This Supplement No. 7 will be delivered with the Prospectus. Unless the context suggests otherwise, the terms “we,” “us” and “our” used herein refer to the Company, together with its consolidated subsidiaries.
The purpose of this Supplement No. 7 is to, among other things:
• | update the status of our offering, shares currently available for sale, our declaration of distributions, our real estate investment summary and selected financial data; |
• | disclose changes to investor suitability standards for Alabama, Massachusetts, Pennsylvania, Tennessee and Texas investors; |
• | update disclosure relating to our minimum offering amount; |
• | update disclosure relating to our organization and offering expenses; |
• | update disclosure relating to our transfer agent; |
• | update our risk factors; |
• | update disclosure relating to our estimated use of proceeds; |
• | update disclosure relating to management compensation; |
• | update disclosure relating to our directors; |
• | update disclosure relating to our advisor; |
• | update disclosure relating to the reorganization of the parent of our sponsor; |
• | update disclosure relating to our affiliates; |
• | update disclosure relating to our targeted investments; |
• | update disclosure related to our allocation policy; |
• | update disclosure related to our exit strategy; |
• | update disclosure relating to our real estate investments; |
• | update disclosure relating to our prior performance; |
• | update disclosure relating to access to our records; |
• | update disclosure on how to subscribe; |
• | update Appendix A — Prior Performance Tables; |
• | update Appendix B — Distribution Reinvestment Plan; |
• | replace Appendix C — American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc. Subscription Agreement with Appendix C-1 — Subscription Agreement; |
• | add Appendix C-2 — Multi-Offering Subscription Agreement; |
• | update Appendix D — Transfer on Death Designation; and |
• | attach our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2013 as Annex A. |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
S-i
OPERATING INFORMATION
Status of the Offering
We commenced our reasonable best efforts initial public offering of up to 68.0 million shares of common stock on February 14, 2013 (excluding shares to be issued under our distribution reinvestment plan, or DRIP). On April 12, 2013, we satisfied the general escrow conditions of our public offering of common stock. On such date, we received and accepted aggregate subscriptions equal to the minimum of $2.0 million in shares of common stock, broke general escrow and issued shares to our initial investors. Additionally, on May 30, 2013, we received and accepted aggregate subscriptions in excess of $10.0 million in shares of common stock and broke escrow in Washington. Additionally, on September 18, 2013 we received and accepted aggregate subscriptions in excess of $85.0 million in shares of common stock and broke escrow in Pennsylvania. Accordingly, we began accepting subscriptions from all states, including Washington and Pennsylvania.
We will offer shares of our common stock until February 14, 2015, unless the offering is extended in accordance with the Prospectus, as supplemented from time to time, provided that the offering will be terminated if all 68.0 million shares of our common stock are sold before such date (subject to our right to reallocate shares offered pursuant to the DRIP for sale in our primary offering).
As of October 15, 2013, we had acquired seven healthcare-related properties which were 100% leased as of such date. As of October 15, 2013, we had total real estate investments, at cost, of $46.2 million. As of June 30, 2013, we had incurred cumulatively to that date, $5.0 million in selling commissions, dealer manager fees and offering costs in connection with the issuance and distribution of our registered securities.
Shares Currently Available for Sale
As of October 15, 2013, we had received aggregate gross proceeds of $104.7 million, consisting of the sale of 4.2 million shares of common stock in our public offering and the receipt of $0.6 million from the DRIP. As of October 15, 2013, there were 4.2 million share of our common stock outstanding, including shares issued under the DRIP and unvested restricted stock. As of October 15, 2013, there were 63.8 million shares of our common stock available for sale, excluding shares issued under the DRIP.
Declaration of Distributions
On April 9, 2013, our board of directors authorized, and we declared, a distribution rate which will be calculated based on stockholders of record each day during the applicable period at a rate of $0.0046575343 per day, based on a per share price of $25.00. The distributions began accruing on May 24, 2013, 15 days following our initial property acquisition. The distributions are payable by the 5th day following each month’s end to investors that were stockholders of record at the close of business each day during the prior month.
There can be no assurance that any such distribution will continue to be paid to stockholders. The amount of distributions payable to our stockholders is determined by our board of directors and is dependent on a number of factors, including funds available for distribution, financial condition, capital expenditure requirements, as applicable, requirements of Maryland law and annual distribution requirements needed to qualify and maintain our status as a real estate investment trust under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Our board of directors may reduce the amount of distributions paid or suspend distribution payments at any time.
During the three months ended June 30, 2013, distributions paid to common stockholders totaled approximately $16,000, inclusive of approximately $9,000 of distributions issued under the DRIP. During the three months ended June 30, 2013, cash used to pay distributions was generated from proceeds from the issuance of common stock and common stock issued under the DRIP.
S-1
The following table shows the sources for the payment of distributions to common stockholders for the period indicated:
Three Months Ended June 30, 2013 | ||||||||
(In thousands) | Percentage of Distributions | |||||||
Distributions: | ||||||||
Distributions paid in cash | $ | 7 | ||||||
Distributions reinvested | 9 | |||||||
Total distributions | $ | 16 | ||||||
Source of distribution coverage: | ||||||||
Cash flows provided by operations(1) | $ | — | — % | |||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | 7 | 43.7 % | ||||||
Common stock issued under the DRIP/offering proceeds | 9 | 56.3 % | ||||||
Proceeds from financings | — | — % | ||||||
Total source of distribution coverage | $ | 16 | 100.0 % | |||||
Cash flows used in operations (GAAP(2) basis)(1) | $ | (32 ) | ||||||
Net loss (in accordance with GAAP) | $ | (116 ) |
(1) | Cash flows used in operations for the three months ended June 30, 2013 reflect acquisition and transaction related expenses of $0.1 million. |
(2) | Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP. |
The following table compares cumulative distributions paid to cumulative net loss (in accordance with GAAP) for the period from October 15, 2012 (date of inception) through June 30, 2013:
(In thousands) | For the Period from October 15, 2012 (date of inception) to June 30, 2013 | |||
Distributions paid: | ||||
Common stockholders in cash | $ | 7 | ||
Common stockholders pursuant to DRIP/offering proceeds | 9 | |||
Total distributions paid | $ | 16 | ||
Reconciliation of net loss: | ||||
Revenues | $ | 27 | ||
Acquisition and transaction related | (118 | ) | ||
Depreciation and amortization | (16 | ) | ||
Other operating expenses | (71 | ) | ||
Net loss (in accordance with GAAP)(1) | $ | (178 | ) |
(1) | Net loss as defined by GAAP includes the non-cash impact of depreciation and amortization expense as well as costs incurred relating to acquisitions and related transactions. |
Status of Our Share Repurchase Program
Our share repurchase program generally requires you to hold your shares for at least one year prior to submitting them for repurchase by us. Our share repurchase program also contains numerous restrictions on your ability to sell your shares to us. During any calendar year, we may repurchase no more than 5.0% of the weighted-average number of shares outstanding during the prior calendar year. Further, the cash available for redemption on any particular date will generally be limited to the proceeds from the DRIP and we generally will limit the amount we spend to repurchase shares in a given quarter to the amount of proceeds we received
S-2
from the DRIP in that same quarter; however, subject to the limitations described above, we may use other sources of cash at the discretion of our board of directors. We may amend, suspend or terminate the program at any time upon 30 days’ notice.
As of June 30, 2013, no shares of common stock have been repurchased or requested to be repurchased.
Status of Fees Paid and Deferred
The following table reflects the fees and expense reimbursements incurred and unpaid to our dealer manager, advisor and property manager as of and for the periods presented (in thousands):
Incurred Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 | Forgiven Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 | Unpaid As of June 30, 2013 | ||||||||||
Selling commissions and dealer manager fees | $ | 2,745 | $ | — | $ | 138 | ||||||
Offering costs | 715 | — | 444 | |||||||||
Acquisition fees | 84 | — | — | |||||||||
Financing coordination fees | — | — | — | |||||||||
Other expense reimbursements | — | — | — | |||||||||
Property management and leasing fees | — | — | — | |||||||||
Strategic advisory fees | 28 | — | 28 |
Real Estate Investment Summary
Real Estate Portfolio
We acquire and operate healthcare-related properties. As of October 15, 2013, the properties we owned were 100.0% leased. Our portfolio of real estate properties was comprised of the following properties as of October 15, 2013:
Portfolio | Acquisition Date | Number of Properties | Square Feet | Occupancy | Remaining Lease Term(1) | Base Purchase Price(2) | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fresenius Dialysis Center | May 2013 | 1 | 5,564 | 100.0 | % | 9.4 | $ | 1,920 | ||||||||||||||||
Adena Health Center | Jun. 2013 | 1 | 24,924 | 100.0 | % | 10.4 | 5,446 | |||||||||||||||||
Ouachita Community Hospital | Jul. 2013 | 1 | 17,830 | 100.0 | % | 10.3 | 6,834 | |||||||||||||||||
CareMeridian | Aug. 2013 | 1 | 27,630 | 100.0 | % | 13.8 | 11,275 | |||||||||||||||||
Oak Lawn Medical Center | Aug. 2013 | 1 | 26,324 | 100.0 | % | 4.4 | 10,300 | |||||||||||||||||
Surgery Center of Temple | Aug. 2013 | 1 | 10,400 | 100.0 | % | 13.4 | 6,150 | |||||||||||||||||
Greenville Health Medical Office Building | Oct. 2013 | 1 | 21,603 | 100.0 | % | 6.5 | 4,300 | |||||||||||||||||
7 | 134,275 | 100.0 | % | 9.8 | $ | 46,225 |
(1) | Remaining lease term in years as of October 15, 2013, calculated on a weighted-average basis. |
(2) | Contract purchase price, excluding acquisition related costs. |
S-3
Future Lease Expirations
The following is a summary of lease expirations for the next ten years at the properties we own as of October 15, 2013:
Year of Expiration | Number of Leases Expiring | Annualized Rental Income(1) (in thousands) | Annualized Rental Income as a Percentage of the Total Portfolio | Leased Rentable Sq. Ft. | Percent of Portfolio Rentable Sq. Ft. Expiring | |||||||||||||||
October 16, 2013 – December 31, 2013 | — | $ | — | — | % | — | — | % | ||||||||||||
2014 | — | — | — | % | — | — | % | |||||||||||||
2015 | — | — | — | % | — | — | % | |||||||||||||
2016 | — | — | — | % | — | — | % | |||||||||||||
2017 | 2 | 201 | 5.1 | % | 5,713 | 4.3 | % | |||||||||||||
2018 | 3 | 702 | 17.9 | % | 20,611 | 15.3 | % | |||||||||||||
2019 | — | — | — | % | — | — | % | |||||||||||||
2020 | 1 | 364 | 9.3 | % | 21,603 | 16.1 | % | |||||||||||||
2021 | — | — | — | % | — | — | % | |||||||||||||
2022 | — | — | — | % | — | — | % | |||||||||||||
Total | 6 | $ | 1,267 | 32.3 | % | 47,927 | 35.7 | % |
(1) | Annualized rental income as of October 15, 2013 on a straight-line basis, which includes tenant concessions such as free rent, as applicable. |
Tenant Concentration
The following table lists tenants (including for this purpose, all affiliates of such tenants) whose square footage is greater than 10% of the total portfolio square footage as of October 15, 2013:
Tenant | Number of Units Occupied by Tenant | Square Feet | Square Feet as a % of Total Portfolio | Lease Expiration | Remaining Lease Term(1) | Annualized Rental Income(2) | Renewal Options | |||||||||||||||||||||
Greenville Health System | 1 | 21,603 | 16.1 | % | Mar. 2020 | 6.5 | $ | 0.4 million | Two, three-year options | |||||||||||||||||||
IASIS Healthcare, LLC | 1 | 17,830 | 13.3 | % | Feb. 2024 | 10.3 | $ | 0.6 million | Two, ten-year options | |||||||||||||||||||
Adena Health System | 1 | 24,924 | 18.6 | % | Feb. 2024 | 10.4 | $ | 0.4 million | None | |||||||||||||||||||
National Mentor Holdings, Inc. | 1 | 27,630 | 20.6 | % | Jul. 2027 | 13.8 | $ | 1.0 million | Two, ten-year options |
(1) | Remaining lease term in years as of October 15, 2013. |
(2) | Annualized rental income as of October 15, 2013 on a straight-line basis, which includes tenant concessions such as free rent, as applicable. |
S-4
Selected Financial Data
The following is selected financial data as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and for the six months ended June 30, 2013:
(in thousands) | June 30, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | ||||||
Total real estate investments, at cost | $ | 7,366 | $ | — | ||||
Total assets | 25,998 | 810 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 1,374 | 625 | ||||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 24,624 | 185 |
Operating data (in thousands, except for share and per share data) | Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 | |||
Total revenues | $ | 27 | ||
Property operating | 1 | |||
Acquisition and transaction related | 118 | |||
General and administrative | 55 | |||
Depreciation and amortization | 16 | |||
Total expenses | 190 | |||
Net loss | $ | (163 | ) | |
Other data: | ||||
Cash flows used in operations | $ | (32 | ) | |
Cash flows used in investing activities | $ | (7,366 | ) | |
Cash flows provided by financing activities | $ | 24,445 | ||
Per share data: | ||||
Basic and diluted net loss per share | $ | (0.83 | ) | |
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding | 195,425 |
S-5
PROSPECTUS UPDATES
Cover Page
The paragraph “Pennsylvania Investors” is hereby deleted from the cover page of the Prospectus.
Investor Suitability Standards
The fourth paragraph on page i of the Prospectus is hereby replaced with the following disclosure.
“Several states have established suitability requirements that are more stringent than the standards that we have established and described above. Shares in this offering will be sold to investors in these states only if they meet the special suitability standards set forth below. In each case, these special suitability standards exclude from the calculation of net worth or liquid net worth the value of the investor’s home, home furnishings and automobiles.”
The paragraph “Massachusetts, Ohio, Oregon, Pennsylvania and New Mexico” on pages i – ii of the Prospectus is hereby replaced with the following disclosure.
“Massachusetts, Ohio, Oregon and New Mexico
• | Investors must have either (a) a minimum net worth of at least $250,000 or (b) an annual gross income of at least $70,000 and a net worth of at least $70,000. The investor’s maximum investment in us and our affiliates cannot exceed 10% of the Oregon or New Mexico resident’s net worth. A Massachusetts or Ohio investor’s aggregate investment in our shares, shares of our affiliates, and in other non-traded real estate investment programs may not exceed ten percent (10%) of his or her liquid net worth. “Liquid net worth” is defined as that portion of net worth (total assets exclusive of home, home furnishings, and automobiles minus total liabilities) that is comprised of cash, cash equivalents, and readily marketable securities. Note that Ohio investors cannot participate in the DRIP feature that reinvests distributions into subsequent affiliated programs. |
Pennsylvania
• | A Pennsylvania investor’s investment in us cannot exceed 10% of his or her net worth.” |
The last sentence of the paragraph “Alabama” on page iii of the Prospectus is hereby replaced with the following disclosure.
“Note that Alabama investors cannot participate in the distribution reinvestment plan feature that reinvests distributions into subsequent affiliated programs or our Automatic Purchase Plan.”
The following disclosure is added immediately following the paragraph “Alabama” on page iii of the Prospectus.
“Tennessee
• | A Tennessee resident’s investment must not exceed ten percent (10%) of his or her liquid net worth (exclusive of home, home furnishings and automobiles). |
Texas
• | An investor must have had, during the last tax year, or estimate that the investor will have during the current tax year, (a) a minimum net worth of $100,000 and a minimum annual gross income of $100,000, or (b) a minimum net worth of $500,000. The investor’s maximum investment in this offering shall not exceed 10% of the investor’s liquid net worth.” |
The paragraph following the paragraph “Alabama” on page iii of the Prospectus is hereby deleted in its entirety.
S-6
Prospectus Summary
The second paragraph on page 4 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced with the following disclosure.
“On April 9, 2013, we raised total gross proceeds in the amount of approximately $2.0 million, sufficient to break general escrow, broke general escrow and issued approximately 88,888 shares of common stock to our initial investors who were admitted as stockholders. Additionally, on May 30, 2013, we received and accepted aggregate subscriptions in excess of $10.0 million in shares of common stock and broke escrow in Washington. Additionally, on September 18, 2013 we received and accepted aggregate subscriptions in excess of $85.0 million in shares of common stock and broke escrow in Pennsylvania. Accordingly, we began accepting subscriptions from all states, including Washington and Pennsylvania.”
The table and its footnotes on page 8 of the Prospectus regarding the use of proceeds are replaced in their entirety by the following disclosure.
“The table does not give effect to special sales or volume discounts which could reduce selling commissions and many of the figures represent management’s best estimate because they cannot be precisely calculated at this time.
Minimum Offering (Not Including Distribution Reinvestment Plan) | Maximum Offering (Not Including Distribution Reinvestment Plan) | |||||||||||||||
Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | |||||||||||||
“Gross offering proceeds | $ | 2,000,000 | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,700,000,000 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Less offering expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
Selling commissions and dealer manager fee | $ | 200,000 | 10.0 | $ | 170,000,000 | 10.0 | (1) | |||||||||
Organization and offering expenses(2) | $ | 30,000 | 1.5 | $ | 25,500,000 | 1.5 | ||||||||||
Amount available for investment | $ | 1,770,000 | 88.5 | % | $ | 1,504,500,000 | 88.5 | % | ||||||||
Acquisition: | ||||||||||||||||
Acquisition fees | $ | 18,000 | 0.9 | $ | 15,300,000 | 0.9 | ||||||||||
Acquisition expenses | $ | 18,000 | 0.9 | $ | 15,300,000 | 0.9 | ||||||||||
Amount invested in properties(3) | $ | 1,734,000 | 86.7 | % | $ | 1,473,900,000 | 86.7 | % |
(1) | Until such time as we calculate NAV, the per share purchase price for our shares in our primary offering will be up to $25.00 (including the maximum allowed to be charged for commissions and fees, subject to certain discounts as described in the prospectus). In determining the amount of selling commissions and dealer manager fees, we have assumed the sale of 36,000,000 shares at a purchase price of $25.00 per share, and 32,000,000 shares at a NAV price per share of $22.73 (plus applicable commissions and fees). |
(2) | Based on the experience of our sponsor and its affiliates, we anticipate that organization and offering expenses, excluding selling commissions and the dealer manager fee, will not exceed 1.5% of the gross proceeds from our primary offering. Pursuant to the terms of our advisory agreement, we have agreed to reimburse our advisor and its affiliates for organization and offering expenses up to 2.0% of the gross proceeds from our primary offering. |
(3) | This table does not give effect to any leverage, the use of which would entitle our advisor or its assignees to a financing coordination fee and, as a result, would decrease the percentage of offering proceeds that would be invested in properties.” |
S-7
The section “Organization and Offering Expenses” on page 13 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced with the following disclosure.
“Type of Compensation | Determination of Amount | Recipient(s) | Estimated Amount for Minimum Offering (80,000 shares)/ Maximum Offering (68,000,000 shares) | |||
Organization and Offering Expenses | We will reimburse our advisor for organization and offering expenses, which may include reimbursements to our advisor for other organization and offering expenses that it incurs for due diligence fees included in detailed and itemized invoices. Based on the experience of our sponsor and its affiliates, we anticipate that organization and offering expenses, excluding selling commissions and the dealer manager fee, will not exceed 1.5% of the gross proceeds from our primary offering. Pursuant to the terms of our advisory agreement, we have agreed to reimburse our advisor up to 2.0% of the gross proceeds from our primary offering. | Our advisor. | $30,000/$25,500,000.” |
S-8
The disclosure under the section “Acquisition Fees” on page 14 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following disclosure.
“Type of Compensation | Determination of Amount | Recipient(s) | Estimated Amount for Minimum Offering (80,000 shares)/ Maximum Offering (68,000,000 shares) | |||
Acquisition Fees | We will pay to our advisor or its assignees 1.0% of the contract purchase price of each property acquired (including our pro rata share of any indebtedness assumed or incurred in respect of that investment and exclusive of acquisition fees and financing coordination fees) and 1.0% of the amount advanced for a loan or other investment (including our pro rata share of any indebtedness assumed or incurred in respect of that investment and exclusive of acquisition fees and financing coordination fees). This acquisition fee is reflective of services performed by our advisor in connection with selecting assets for acquisition and shall cover such services until such time as our advisor has submitted a letter of intent to the seller to purchase such asset and presented a detailed investment memorandum to our board of directors for approval. For purposes of this prospectus, “contract purchase price” or the “amount advanced for a loan or other investment” means the amount actually paid or allocated in respect of the purchase, development, construction or improvement of a property or the amount actually paid or allocated in respect of the purchase of loans or other real-estate related assets, in each case inclusive of any indebtedness assumed or incurred in respect of such investment, but exclusive of acquisition fees and financing coordination fees. This acquisition fee does not include any acquisition expenses payable to our advisor, as described in “Acquisition Expenses” below. | Our advisor or its assignees. | $18,000/$15,300,000 (or $32,727/ $27,818,182 assuming we incur our expected leverage of 45% set forth in our investment guidelines or $72,000/$61,200,000 assuming the maximum leverage of approximately 75% permitted by our charter).” | |||
Once the proceeds from the primary offering have been fully invested, the aggregate amount of acquisition fees and financing coordination fees (as described below) shall not exceed 1.5% of the contract purchase price and the amount advanced for a loan or other investment, as applicable, for all the assets acquired. |
S-9
The disclosure under the section “Acquisition Expenses” on page 15 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following disclosure.
“Type of Compensation | Determination of Amount | Recipient(s) | Estimated Amount for Minimum Offering (80,000 shares)/ Maximum Offering (68,000,000 shares) | |||
Acquisition Expenses | We will pay our advisor for expenses actually incurred (including personnel costs) related to selecting, evaluating and acquiring assets on our behalf, regardless of whether we actually acquire the related assets. Specifically, we will pay our advisor or its affiliates for any services provided by such entities for which they incur investment-related expenses, or insourced expenses. Such insourced expenses will be fixed initially at, and may not exceed, 0.50% of the purchase price of each property (including our pro rata share of debt attributable to the property) and 0.50% of the amount advanced for each loan or other investment (including our pro rata share of debt attributable to such investment), which will be paid at the closing of each such investment. Examples of insourced expenses include legal advisory expenses, due diligence expenses, acquisition-related administrative and advisory expenses, survey, property, lease and contract review expenses, travel and communications expenses and other closing costs, regardless of whether we acquire the investment. Aggregate insourced expenses in any year shall be fixed initially, and may not exceed, at 0.50% of the purchase price of our acquisitions (including our pro rata share of debt attributable to such investments) and 0.50% of the amounts advanced for all loans or other investments (including our pro rata share of debt attributable to such investments). By fixing insourced expenses for each acquisition and for any calendar year to 0.50% of the purchase price of our acquisitions for such year, we intend for these expenses to remain at or below the amount of expenses that we would incur if we outsourced the services performed by our advisor and its affiliates described above. In order to ensure that such insourced expenses remain at or below market rates, we will perform annually a comparative analysis of the insourced expenses paid to the advisor or its affiliates for the preceding year, and assuming we outsource the services provided by the advisor or its affiliates | Our advisor, its affiliates or third parties. | $9,000/$7,650,000 (or $16,364/ $13,909,091 assuming we incur our expected leverage of 45% set forth in our investment guidelines or $36,000/$30,600,000 assuming the maximum leverage of 75% permitted by our charter). Such estimates reflect only the compensation payable to our advisor and its affiliates for insourced acquisition expenses.” |
S-10
Type of Compensation | Determination of Amount | Recipient(s) | Estimated Amount for Minimum Offering (80,000 shares)/ Maximum Offering (68,000,000 shares) | |||
during such year for a substantially similar amount of acquisitions in the subsequent year, or a market check. In light of this market check, we will adjust our future insourced expenses annually, or we may determine to outsource certain services provided by the advisor or its affiliates for any subsequent year in order to remain at or below market, if needed. Additionally, we will pay third party acquisition expenses and other acquisition expenses that we incur, including, but not limited to, nonrefundable option payments on property not acquired, accounting fees and expenses, third party brokerage or finders fees, title insurance premiums and transfer taxes, appraisals, incorporation costs, surveying, zoning and environmental reports, insurance review and third party legal expenses. | ||||||
In no event will the total of all acquisition fees and acquisition expenses (including any financing coordination fee) payable with respect to our portfolio of investments or reinvestments exceed 4.5% of the contract purchase price of our portfolio to be measured at the close of the acquisition phase (including our pro rata share of debt attributable to the portfolio) or 4.5% of the amount advanced for all loans or other investments (including our pro rata share of debt attributable to such investments). Additionally, in no event will the total of all acquisition fees and acquisition expenses (including any financing coordination fee) payable with respect to each investment or reinvestment be unreasonable or exceed 4.5% of the contract purchase price of such investment (including our pro rata share of debt attributable to such investment) or 4.5% of the amount advanced for a loan or other investment (including our pro rata share of debt attributable to such investment); provided, however, that a majority of our directors (including a majority of our independent directors) not otherwise interested in a transaction may approve fees and expenses in excess of this limit if they determine the transaction to be commercially competitive, fair and reasonable to us. We may, from time to time, pay our advisor for third party acquisition expenses that it incurs, if any. |
S-11
The disclosure under the section “Operating Expenses” on page 19 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following disclosure.
“Type of Compensation | Determination of Amount | Recipient(s) | Estimated Amount for Minimum Offering (80,000 shares)/ Maximum Offering (68,000,000 shares) | |||
Operating Expenses | We will pay our advisor’s costs of providing administrative services, subject to the limitation that we will not pay our advisor for any amount by which our operating expenses at the end of the four preceding fiscal quarters exceeds the greater of (a) 2.0% of average invested assets and (b) 25.0% of net income other than any additions to reserves for depreciation, bad debt or other similar non-cash reserves and excluding any gain from the sale of assets for that period. For these purposes, “average invested assets” means, for any period, the average of the aggregate book value of our assets (including lease intangibles, invested, directly or indirectly, in financial instruments, debt and equity securities and equity interests in and loans secured by real estate assets (including amounts invested in REITs and other real estate operating companies)) before deducting reserves for depreciation, or bad debts or other similar non-cash reserves, computed by taking the average of these values at the end of each month during the period. Additionally, we will not make operating expense payments for personnel costs to our advisor in connection with services for which the advisor already receives acquisition fees, acquisition expenses or real estate commissions. We will not pay the advisor for salaries and benefits paid to our executive officers. | Our advisor. | Not determinable at this time.” |
S-12
The section “Compensation and Restricted Stock Awards to Independent Directors” on pages 21 – 22 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following disclosure.
“Type of Compensation | Determination of Amount | Recipient(s) | Estimated Amount for Minimum Offering (80,000 shares)/ Maximum Offering (68,000,000 shares) | |||
Compensation and Restricted Stock Awards to Independent Directors | We pay to our lead independent director a retainer of $55,000 per year in addition to the retainer of $30,000 per year that we pay to all of our independent directors, plus $2,000 for each board or board committee meeting the director attends in person ($2,500 for attendance by the chairperson of the audit committee at each meeting of the audit committee), $1,500 for each meeting attended via telephone, and $750 per transaction reviewed and voted upon via electronic board meeting up to a maximum of $2,250 for three or more transactions reviewed and voted upon per meeting. If there is a meeting of the board of directors and one or more committees in a single day, the fees will be limited to $2,500 per day ($3,000 for the chairperson of the audit committee if there is a meeting of such committee). We also will pay each independent director for each external seminar, conference, panel, forum or other industry-related event attended in person and in which the independent director actively participates, solely in his or her capacity as an independent director of the company, in the following amounts: | Our independent directors. | The independent directors, as a group, will receive for a full fiscal year: (i) estimated aggregate compensation of approximately $175,000; and (ii) 3,999 restricted shares of common stock (excluding shares issued upon joining the board of directors).” | |||
$5,000 for each day of an external seminar, conference, panel, forum or other industry-related event that exceeds four hours. | ||||||
In either of the above cases, the company will reimburse, to the extent not otherwise reimbursed, an independent director’s reasonable expenses associated with attendance at such external seminar, conference, panel, forum or other industry-related event. An independent director cannot be paid or reimbursed for attendance at a single external seminar, conference, panel, forum or other industry-related event by us and another company for which he or she is a director. | ||||||
Each independent director also is entitled to receive an award of 1,333 restricted shares of common stock under our employee and director incentive restricted share plan when he or she joins the board of directors and on the date of each annual stockholder’s meeting thereafter. Restricted stock issued to independent directors will vest over a five-year period following the first anniversary of the date of grant in increments of 20% per annum. |
S-13
The section “Who is the transfer agent?” on page 30 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced with the following disclosure.
“Who is the transfer agent?
The name and address of our affiliated transfer agent is as follows:
American National Stock Transfer, LLC
405 Park Avenue, 12th Floor
New York, NY 10022
Phone: (877) 373-2522
Facsimile: (646) 861-7793
American National Stock Transfer, LLC, or our transfer agent, will provide customer service to subscribers and will supervise third party vendors, including DST Systems, Inc., in its execution of your subscription agreement and other administrative forms. Our transfer agent is owned by an entity which is under common control with our sponsor. For more detail about our transfer agent, see “Management — Affiliated Companies — Transfer Agent.””
Risk Factors
The following risk factor is hereby inserted immediately following the risk factor “We will compete for investors with other programs of our sponsor, which could adversely affect the amount of capital we have to invest” on page 39 of the Prospectus.
“American National Stock Transfer, LLC, our affiliated transfer agent, has a limited operating history and a failure by our transfer agent to perform its functions for us effectively may adversely affect our operations.
Our transfer agent is a related party which was recently launched as a new business. The business was formed on November 2, 2012 and has not had a significant operating history to date. As of March 1, 2013, our transfer agent began providing certain transfer agency services for programs sponsored directly or indirectly by AR Capital, LLC. Because of its limited experience, there is no assurance that our transfer agent will be able to effectively provide transfer agency and registrar services to us. Furthermore, our transfer agent will be responsible for supervising third party service providers who may, at times, be responsible for executing certain transfer agency and registrar services. If our transfer agent fails to perform its functions for us effectively, our operations may be adversely affected.”
The following risk factor is hereby inserted as the last risk factor under the heading “Risks Related to Conflicts of Interest” on page 40 of the Prospectus.
“Our dealer manager signed a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent with FINRA; any further action, proceeding or litigation with respect to the substance of the Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent could adversely affect this offering or the pace at which we raise proceeds.
In April 2013, our dealer manager received notice and a proposed Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent, or AWC, from FINRA, the self-regulatory organization that oversees broker dealers, that certain violations of SEC and FINRA rules, including Rule 10b-9 under the Exchange Act and FINRA Rule 2010, occurred in connection with its activities as a co-dealer manager for a public offering. Without admitting or denying the findings, our dealer manager submitted an AWC, which FINRA accepted on June 4, 2013. In connection with the AWC, our dealer manager consented to the imposition of a censure and a fine of $60,000.
To the extent any action would be taken against our dealer manager in connection with the above AWC, our dealer manager could be adversely affected.”
S-14
Estimated Use of Proceeds
The table under the section “Estimated Use of Proceeds” on page 75 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following disclosure.
Minimum Offering (Not Including Distribution Reinvestment Plan) | Maximum Offering (Not Including Distribution Reinvestment Plan) | |||||||||||||||
Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | |||||||||||||
“Gross offering proceeds | $ | 2,000,000 | 100.0 | % | $ | 1,700,000,000 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Less offering expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
Selling commissions and dealer manager fee(1) | $ | 200,000 | 10.0 | $ | 170,000,000 | 10.0 | (9) | |||||||||
Organization and offering expenses(2) | $ | 30,000 | 1.5 | $ | 25,500,000 | 1.5 | ||||||||||
Amount available for investment(3) | $ | 1,770,000 | 88.5 | % | $ | 1,504,500,000 | 88.5 | % | ||||||||
Acquisition:(4) | ||||||||||||||||
Acquisition fees(5) | $ | 18,000 | 0.9 | $ | 15,300,000 | 0.9 | ||||||||||
Acquisition expenses(6) | $ | 18,000 | 0.9 | $ | 15,300,000 | 0.9 | ||||||||||
Amount invested in properties(7)(8)* | $ | 1,734,000 | 86.7 | % | $ | 1,473,900,000 | 86.7%” |
The last sentence of footnote (2) to the “Estimated Use of Proceeds” table on page 76 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced with the following disclosure.
“Based on the experience of our sponsor and its affiliates, we anticipate that organization and offering expenses, excluding selling commissions and the dealer manager fee, will not exceed 1.5% of the gross proceeds from our primary offering. Our advisor will not be reimbursed for the direct payment of such organization and offering expenses that exceed 2.0% of the aggregate gross proceeds of this offering over the life of the offering, which may include reimbursements to be paid to the dealer manager and soliciting dealers for due diligence fees included in a detailed and itemized invoice.”
Footnotes 5 and 6 to the table in the section “Estimated Use of Proceeds” on page 76 of the Prospectus are hereby replaced in their entirety with the following disclosure.
“(5) | Acquisition fees are defined generally as fees and commissions paid by any party to any person in connection with identifying, reviewing, evaluating, investing in and the purchase of properties. We will pay to our advisor or its assignees acquisition fees up to a maximum amount of 1.0% of the contract purchase price of each property acquired (including our pro rata share of debt attributable to such property) and up to 1.0% of the amount advanced for a loan or other investment (including our pro rata share of debt attributable to such investment). These acquisition fees are reflective of services performed by our advisor in connection with selecting assets for acquisition and shall cover such services until such time as our advisor has submitted a letter of intent to the seller to purchase such asset and presented a detailed investment memorandum to our board of directors for approval. This acquisition fee does not include any acquisition expenses payable to our advisor. Once the proceeds from this offering have been fully invested, the aggregate amount of acquisition fees and financing coordination fees shall not exceed 1.5% of the contract purchase price and the amount advanced for a loan or other investment, as applicable, for all of the assets acquired. Assuming that we incur leverage up to 45% of the aggregate fair market value of our assets, as set forth in our investment guidelines, the minimum and maximum acquisition fees would be $32,182 and $27,354,545, respectively. Assuming we incur leverage up to 300% of our total “net assets” (as defined in our charter and in accordance with the NASAA REIT Guidelines) as of the date of any borrowing, which is generally expected to be approximately 75% of the cost of our investments, the minimum and maximum acquisition fees would be $70,800 and $60,180,000, respectively. |
(6) | Acquisition expenses include both third party acquisition expenses and insourced acquisition expenses. Aggregate acquisition expenses include legal fees and expenses, travel and communications expenses, costs of appraisals, accounting fees and expenses, title insurance premiums and other closing costs and miscellaneous expenses relating to the selection, evaluation and acquisition of real estate properties, whether or not acquired. We may directly pay third parties for third party acquisition expenses, and our advisor or its affiliates may incur expenses for third party services, in each case from time to time. We |
S-15
will reimburse our advisor for any such third party acquisition expenses that it incurs. Additionally, for certain services provided directly by our advisor or its affiliates, we will pay insourced acquisition expenses incurred related to selecting, evaluating and acquiring assets on our behalf, including legal advisory expenses, due diligence expenses, personnel expenses, acquisition-related administrative and advisory expenses, survey, property, contract review expenses, travel and communications expenses and other closing costs, as applicable, regardless of whether we acquire the investment. We will fix our insourced acquisition expenses on an annual basis to 0.5% of the purchase price of our acquisitions (including our pro rata share of debt attributable to such acquisitions) and 0.5% of the amount advanced for loans or other investments (including our pro rata share of debt attributable to such investments), subject to a reduction in such expenses for the following year in light of our annual market check. Furthermore, we will limit our third party acquisition expenses (including both those third party acquisition expenses that we pay directly and those third party acquisition expenses for which we reimburse our advisor) on an annual basis to 0.5% of the purchase price of our acquisitions (including our pro rata share of debt attributable to such acquisitions) and 0.5% of the amount advanced for loans or other investments (including our pro rata share of debt attributable to such investments). Total acquisition fees and expenses (including any financing coordination fee) for our portfolio will not exceed 4.5% of the contract purchase price of our portfolio (including our pro rata share of debt attributable to our portfolio) or 4.5% of the amount advanced for all loans or other investments (including our pro rata share of debt attributable to such investments). Assuming that we incur leverage up to 45% of the aggregate fair market value of our assets, as set forth in our investment guidelines, the minimum and maximum aggregate acquisition expenses would be $32,727 and $27,818,182, respectively. Assuming we incur leverage up to 300% of our total “net assets” (as defined in our charter and in accordance with the NASAA REIT Guidelines) as of the date of any borrowing, which is generally expected to be approximately 75% of the cost of our investments, the minimum and maximum aggregate acquisition expenses would be $72,000 and $61,200,000, respectively.” |
Management
The sections “Committees of the Board of Directors” and “Audit Committee” on pages 82 – 83 of the Prospectus are hereby replaced with the following disclosure.
“Lead Independent Director
Our board of directors has appointed a lead independent director to provide an additional measure of balance, ensure the board’s independence, and enhance the board’s ability to fulfill its management oversight responsibilities. David Gong, the chairman of the audit committee, currently serves as our lead independent director. Our lead independent director chairs meetings or executive sessions of the independent directors, reviews and comments on board of directors’ meeting agendas, represents the views of the independent directors to management, facilitates communication among the independent directors and between management and the independent directors, acts as a liaison with service providers, officers, attorneys, and other directors generally between meetings, serves as a representative and speaks on behalf of the company at external seminars, conferences, in the media and otherwise and otherwise assumes such responsibilities as may be assigned to him by the board.
Our management believes that having a combined chairman and chief executive officer, coupled with a majority of independent, experienced directors, including a lead independent director with specified responsibilities on behalf of the board, provides the right leadership structure for the company and is best for the company and its stockholders at this time.
Committees of the Board of Directors
Our entire board of directors considers all major decisions concerning our business, including property acquisitions. However, our charter and bylaws provide that our board may establish such committees as the board of directors believes appropriate. The board of directors will appoint the members of the committee in the board’s discretion. Our charter and bylaws require that a majority of the members of each committee of our board be independent directors.
Audit Committee
Our board of directors has established an audit committee, which consists of our three independent directors. The audit committee, by approval of at least a majority of the members, selects the independent
S-16
registered public accounting firm to audit our annual financial statements, reviews with the independent registered public accounting firm the plans and results of the audit engagement, approves the audit and non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, reviews the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm, considers the range of audit and non-audit fees and reviews the adequacy of our internal accounting controls. Our lead independent director, David Gong, is our audit committee financial expert. Our board of directors has adopted a charter for the audit committee that sets forth its specific functions and responsibilities.”
The table under the section “Executive Officers and Directors” on page 83 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced with the following disclosure.
“We have provided below certain information about our executive officers and directors. The primary function of our executive officers is to oversee the advisor, who will provide the day-to-day services for, and operations of, the company.
Name | Age | Position(s) | ||
Thomas P. D’Arcy | 53 | Chief Executive Officer | ||
Edward M. Weil, Jr. | 46 | President, Chief Operating Officer, Treasurer and Secretary | ||
W. Todd Jensen | 48 | Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer | ||
Peter M. Budko | 53 | Executive Vice President | ||
Brian S. Block | 41 | Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer | ||
Nicholas S. Schorsch | 52 | Chairman of the Board of Directors | ||
William M. Kahane | 65 | Director | ||
David Gong | 64 | Lead Independent Director | ||
Elizabeth K. Tuppeny | 53 | Independent Director | ||
Dr. Robert J. Froehlich | 60 | Independent Director” |
The following disclosure is added immediately before Elizabeth K. Tuppeny’s biography on page 86 of the Prospectus.
“William M. Kahane was appointed as a director in March 2013. Mr. Kahane has been active in the structuring and financial management of commercial real estate investments for over 35 years. Mr. Kahane served as an executive officer of ARCT, the ARCT advisor and the ARCT property manager from their formation in August 2007 until the close of ARCT’s merger with Realty Income Corporation in January 2013. He also served as a director of ARCT from August 2007 until January 2013. Mr. Kahane has served as a director of ARC RCA since its formation in July 2010. He also had served as an executive officer of ARC RCA and the ARC RCA advisor from their formation in July 2010 and May 2010, respectively, until March 2012. Mr. Kahane also has been a director of PE-ARC and the president, chief operating officer and treasurer of the PE-ARC advisor since their formation in December 2009. Mr. Kahane has served as a director of NYRR since its formation in October 2009 and had served as an executive officer of NYRR from October 2009 until March 2012 and as an executive officer of the NYRR advisor and property manager from their formation in November 2009 until March 2012. Mr. Kahane served as a director of ARC DNAV and an executive officer of ARC DNAV, the ARC DNAV advisor and the ARC DNAV property manager from their formation in September 2010 until March 2012. Mr. Kahane served as an executive officer of ARCT III from October 2010 until April 2012 and as an executive officer of the ARCT III advisor and the ARCT III property manager from their formation in October 2010 until April 2012. Mr. Kahane has served as a director of ARC HT since its formation in August 2010 and as president and chief operating officer of ARC HT, the ARC HT advisor and the ARC HT property manager from August 2010 until March 2012. Mr. Kahane served as a director and executive officer of ARCP and as an executive officer of the ARCP advisor from their formation in December 2010 and November 2010, respectively, until March 2012. Mr. Kahane was reappointed as a director of ARCP in February 2013. Mr. Kahane also has been an interested director of BDCA since its formation in May 2010 and, until March 2012, was the president of BDCA. Mr. Kahane also served as president and chief operating officer of the BDCA advisor from its formation in June 2010 until March 2012. Mr. Kahane has served as a director of PE-ARC II since August 2013. Mr. Kahane has also served as ARC HOST’s chief executive officer and president since August 2013. Mr. Kahane has served as co-chief executive officer of the ARC HOST advisor and chief executive officer of the ARC HOST property manager since
S-17
August 2013. Mr. Kahane has served as chief executive officer and a director of RCS Capital Corporation since February 2013. Mr. Kahane has served as a member of the investment committee of Aetos Capital Asia Advisors, a $3 billion series of opportunistic funds focusing on assets primarily in Japan and China, since 2008.
Mr. Kahane began his career as a real estate lawyer practicing in the public and private sectors from 1974 – 1979. From 1981 – 1992, Mr. Kahane worked at Morgan Stanley & Co., specializing in real estate, becoming a managing director in 1989. In 1992, Mr. Kahane left Morgan Stanley to establish a real estate advisory and asset sales business known as Milestone Partners which continues to operate and of which Mr. Kahane is currently the chairman. Mr. Kahane served as a trustee at AFRT (April 2003 to August 2006), during which time Mr. Kahane served as chairman of the finance committee of AFRT’s board of trustees. Mr. Kahane has been a managing director of GF Capital Management & Advisors LLC, or GF Capital, a New York-based merchant banking firm, where he has directed the firm’s real estate investments since 2001. GF Capital offers comprehensive wealth management services through its subsidiary TAG Associates LLC, a leading multi-client family office and portfolio management services company with approximately $5 billion of assets under management. Mr. Kahane also was on the board of directors of Catellus Development Corp., a NYSE growth-oriented real estate development company, where he served as chairman. Mr. Kahane received a B.A. from Occidental College, a J.D. from the University of California, Los Angeles Law School and an MBA from Stanford University’s Graduate School of Business. We believe that Mr. Kahane’s current experience as a director of RCS Capital, ARCP, ARC RCA, BDCA, NYRR, ARC HT, PE-ARC and PE-ARC II, his prior experience as an executive officer and director of ARC DNAV, ARCT III, and ARCT, his prior experience as chairman of the board of Catellus Development Corp. and his significant investment banking experience in real estate, make him well qualified to serve as a member of our board of directors.
David Gong was appointed as lead independent director of our company in March 2013. He also has served as an independent director of ARCT III from January 2011 until the close of its merger with ARCP in February 2013 and as an independent director of ARCP from July 2011 until October 2012. Mr. Gong has also served as an independent director of ARC RCA since July 2011 and as an independent director of ARCT V since January 2013. Mr. Gong has over 25 years of experience in global asset management. From August 2004 to February 2005, Mr. Gong served as a consultant to AFRT. During such time, he sourced and structured, from a tax and legal perspective, potential bank branch acquisitions in Asia. From August 2002 to July 2004, Mr. Gong served as the managing director of Ankar Capital Management, a New York based investment advisory firm. While at Ankar, Mr. Gong managed the firm’s private equity group in the Singapore office. From February 1990 to January 2001, Mr. Gong served as a senior partner and international portfolio manager at Ardsley Partners, also New York based investment advisory firm, where he managed several emerging market hedge funds, including the Ardsley Pacific Fund. From September 1981 to January 1990, Mr. Gong served as an equity portfolio manager at T. Rowe Price where he also assisted in the establishment of the firm’s Hong Kong office. Mr. Gong has served as a director of Helios Capital LLC’s Helios Strategic Fund since its inception in January 2005. He previously served as a director of Alliance Capital Management, LLC’s Turkish Growth Fund from October 1993 to December 2000 and India Liberalization Fund from December 1993 to December 2003. Mr. Gong received a B.A. from the University of California, Berkeley, a J.D. from the University of California, Davis where he earned Order of the Coif honors and an M.B.A. from Stanford University’s Graduate School of Business. We believe that Mr. Gong’s current experience as a director of ARC RCA and ARCT V, his prior experience as a director of ARCP and ARCT III, his extensive experience in global asset management, his experience in sourcing and structuring potential bank branch acquisitions in Asia for AFRT, and his educational background, make him well qualified to serve as a member of our Board of Directors.”
Elizabeth K. Tuppeny’s biography on pages 86 – 87 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced with the following disclosure.
“Elizabeth K. Tuppenywas appointed as an independent director of our company in January 2013. Ms. Tuppeny has also served as an independent director of ARCT IV since May 2012 and as an independent director of ARC RFT since January 2013. Ms. Tuppeny has been the chief executive officer and founder of Domus, Inc., a full-service marketing communications agency since 1993. Domus, Inc.’s largest client is Merck & Co. and Ms. Tuppeny advises Merck & Co. with respect to communications related to their
S-18
healthcare-related real estate acquisitions. Ms. Tuppeny has 30 years of experience in the branding and advertising industries, with a focus on Fortune 50 companies. Ms. Tuppeny also founded EKT Development, LLC to pursue entertainment projects in publishing, feature film and education video games. Prior to founding Domus, Ms. Tuppeny was executive vice president, business development at Earle Palmer Brown from 1992 – 1993. From 1984 – 1993, Ms. Tuppeny worked at Weightman Advertising, where she became senior vice president. From 1982 – 1984, Ms. Tuppeny was an account executive at The Marketing Group. Ms. Tuppeny served on the board of directors and executive committee of the Philadelphia Industrial Development Council, or PIDC, for three-plus years where she helped to plan and implement real estate transactions that helped to attract jobs to Philadelphia. As a board member of the PIDC, Ms. Tuppeny was responsible for evaluating and approving commercial and residential real estate business development applications for financing and tax abatement for for-profit and non-profit companies. During her tenure on the PIDC, Ms. Tuppeny approved over 500 real estate development applications including the funding for the Wistar Institute’s biotech and cancer research facility, the Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, a 1.2 million square foot distribution center for Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd., the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania/Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia expansion and the Philadelphia State Hospital at Byberry. Ms. Tuppeny has served on the boards of directors and advisory committees for the Arthur Ashe Foundation, Avenue of the Arts, Drexel Medical School, Philadelphia Hospitality Cabinet, Pennsylvania Commission for Women, Penn Relays and the Police Athletic League. Ms. Tuppeny was the recipient of the national Stevie Award as the nation’s top woman entrepreneur in 2004 and was named as a “Top Woman in Philadelphia Business” in 1996, one of the “Top 50 Women in Pennsylvania” in 2004 and as the “Businessperson of the Year” in 2003 by the Greater Philadelphia Chamber of Commerce. Ms. Tuppeny has taught at New York University, University of Pennsylvania and Temple University, and received her undergraduate degree from the University of Pennsylvania, Annenberg School of Communications. We believe that Ms. Tuppeny’s current experience as an independent director of ARCT IV and ARC RFT, as chief executive officer and founder of Domus, Inc. and in evaluating healthcare-related real estate business development applications, makes her well qualified to serve on our board of directors.”
The first paragraph under the column “Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)” on page 89 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced with the following disclosure.
“Additional yearly retainer of $55,000 for the lead independent director and $30,000 for each independent director annually; $2,000 for all meetings personally attended by the directors and $1,500 for each meeting attended via telephone; an additional $500 for the audit committee chairperson for personal attendance at all audit committee meetings; $750 per transaction reviewed and voted upon via electronic board meeting up to a maximum of $2,250 for three or more transactions reviewed and voted upon per meeting.(1)”
Management
The following disclosure is hereby added as the second sentence of the fourth paragraph on page 94 of the Prospectus.
“Because our advisor owes a fiduciary duty to us and our stockholders, it reasonably believes it can adequately meet its responsibilities to us in accordance with the advisory agreement.”
The fifth full paragraph on page 95 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced with the following disclosure.
“Our advisor and its officers, employees and affiliates engage in other business ventures and, as a result, their resources are not dedicated exclusively to our business. However, pursuant to the advisory agreement, our advisor is required to devote sufficient resources to our administration to discharge its obligations. Our advisor currently has no paid employees; however, as of January 31, 2013, its affiliates had approximately 108 full-time employees, each of whom may dedicate a portion of his or her time providing services to our advisor. See “Conflicts of Interest” for a description of the entities organized directly under our sponsor and those entities organized directly under RCAP Holdings, LLC. Our advisor is responsible for a pro rata portion of each employee’s compensation based upon the approximate percentage of time the employee dedicates to our advisor. Our advisor may assign the advisory agreement to an affiliate upon approval of a majority of our independent directors. We may assign or transfer the advisory agreement to a successor entity with the approval of a majority of our directors (including a majority of our independent directors).”
S-19
The following disclosure is added immediately prior to the section “Investment Decisions” on page 97 of the Prospectus.
“Transfer Agent
Our transfer agent is owned by an entity which is under common control with the parent of our sponsor. While our transfer agent will not process your subscription agreement or certain forms directly, our transfer agent will provide customer service to you. Additionally, our transfer agent will supervise third party vendors, including DST Systems, Inc., in its efforts to administer certain services. Our transfer agent, through its knowledge and understanding of the direct participation program industry which includes non-traded REITs, is particularly suited to provide us with transfer agency and registrar services. Our transfer agent will conduct transfer agency, registrar and supervisory services for us and other non-traded REITs and direct investment programs, including those directly and indirectly sponsored by the parent of by our sponsor.”
Management Compensation
The section “Organization and Offering Expenses” on page 100 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced with the following disclosure.
“Type of Compensation | Determination of Amount | Recipient(s) | Estimated Amount for Minimum Offering (80,000 shares)/ Maximum Offering (68,000,000 shares) | |||
Organization and Offering Expenses(2) | We will reimburse our advisor for organization and offering expenses, which may include reimbursements to our advisor for other organization and offering expenses that it incurs for due diligence fees included in detailed and itemized invoices. Based on the experience of our sponsor and its affiliates, we anticipate that organization and offering expenses, excluding selling commissions and the dealer manager fee, will not exceed 1.5% of the gross proceeds from our primary offering. Pursuant to the terms of our advisory agreement, we have agreed to reimburse our advisor up to 2.0% of the gross proceeds from our primary offering. | Our advisor. | $30,000/$25,500,000.” |
S-20
The disclosure under the section “Acquisition Fees” on page 101 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following disclosure.
“Type of Compensation | Determination of Amount | Recipient(s) | Estimated Amount for Minimum Offering (80,000 shares)/ Maximum Offering (68,000,000 shares) | |||
Acquisition Fees | We will pay to our advisor or its assignees 1.0% of the contract purchase price of each property acquired (including our pro rata share of any indebtedness assumed or incurred in respect of that investment and exclusive of acquisition fees and financing coordination fees) and 1.0% of the amount advanced for a loan or other investment (including our pro rata share of any indebtedness assumed or incurred in respect of that investment and exclusive of acquisition fees and financing coordination fees). This acquisition fee is reflective of services performed by our advisor in connection with selecting assets for acquisition and shall cover such services until such time as our advisor has submitted a letter of intent to the seller to purchase such asset and presented a detailed investment memorandum to our board of directors for approval. For purposes of this prospectus, “contract purchase price” or the “amount advanced for a loan or other investment” means the amount actually paid or allocated in respect of the purchase, development, construction or improvement of a property or the amount actually paid or allocated in respect of the purchase of loans or other real-estate related assets, in each case inclusive of any indebtedness assumed or incurred in respect of such investment, but exclusive of acquisition fees and financing coordination fees. This acquisition fee does not include any acquisition expenses payable to our advisor, as described in “Acquisition Expenses” below. Once the proceeds from the primary offering have been fully invested, the aggregate amount of acquisition fees and financing coordination fees (as described below) shall not exceed 1.5% of the contract purchase price and the amount advanced for a loan or other investment, as applicable, for all the assets acquired.(3)(4)(13) | Our advisor or its assignees. | $18,000/$15,300,000 (or $32,727/$27,818,182 assuming we incur our expected leverage of 45% set forth in our investment guidelines or $72,000/$61,200,000 assuming the maximum leverage of approximately 75% permitted by our charter).” |
S-21
The disclosure under the section “Acquisition Expenses” on page 102 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following disclosure.
“Type of Compensation | Determination of Amount | Recipient(s) | Estimated Amount for Minimum Offering (80,000 shares)/ Maximum Offering (68,000,000 shares) | |||
Acquisition Expenses | We will pay our advisor for expenses actually incurred (including personnel costs) related to selecting, evaluating and acquiring assets on our behalf, regardless of whether we actually acquire the related assets. Specifically, we will pay our advisor or its affiliates for any services provided by such entities for which they incur investment-related expenses, or insourced expenses. Such insourced expenses will be fixed initially at, and may not exceed, 0.50% of the purchase price of each property (including our pro rata share of debt attributable to the property) and 0.50% of the amount advanced for each loan or other investment (including our pro rata share of debt attributable to such investment), which will be paid at the closing of each such investment. Examples of insourced expenses include legal advisory expenses, due diligence expenses, acquisition-related administrative and advisory expenses, survey, property, lease and contract review expenses, travel and communications expenses and other closing costs, regardless of whether we acquire the investment. Aggregate insourced expenses in any year shall be fixed initially at, and may not exceed, 0.50% of the purchase price of our acquisitions (including our pro rata share of debt attributable to such investments) and 0.50% of the amounts advanced for all loans or other investments (including our pro rata share of debt attributable to such investments). By fixing insourced expenses for each acquisition and for any calendar year to 0.50% of the purchase price of our acquisitions for such year, we intend for these expenses to remain at or below the amount of expenses that we would incur if we outsourced the services performed by our advisor and its affiliates described above. In order to ensure that such insourced expenses remain at or below market rates, we will perform annually a comparative analysis of the insourced expenses paid to the advisor or its affiliates for the preceding year, and assuming we outsource the services provided by the advisor or its affiliates | Our advisor, its affiliates or third parties. | $9,000/$7,650,000 (or $16,364/ $13,909,091 assuming we incur our expected leverage of 45% set forth in our investment guidelines or $36,000/$30,600,000 assuming the maximum leverage of 75% permitted by our charter). Such estimates reflect only the compensation payable to our advisor and its affiliates for insourced acquisition expenses.” |
S-22
Type of Compensation | Determination of Amount | Recipient(s) | Estimated Amount for Minimum Offering (80,000 shares)/ Maximum Offering (68,000,000 shares) | |||
during such year for a substantially similar amount of acquisitions in the subsequent year, or a market check. In light of this market check, we will adjust our future insourced expenses annually, or we may determine to outsource certain services provided by the advisor or its affiliates for any subsequent year in order to remain at or below market, if needed. | ||||||
Additionally, we will pay third party acquisition expenses and other acquisition expenses that we incur, including, but not limited to, nonrefundable option payments on property not acquired, accounting fees and expenses, third party brokerage or finders fees, title insurance premiums and transfer taxes, appraisals, incorporation costs, surveying, zoning and environmental reports, insurance review and third party legal expenses. | ||||||
In no event will the total of all acquisition fees and acquisition expenses (including any financing coordination fee) payable with respect to our portfolio of investments or reinvestments exceed 4.5% of the contract purchase price of our portfolio to be measured at the close of the acquisition phase (including our pro rata share of debt attributable to the portfolio) or 4.5% of the amount advanced for all loans or other investments (including our pro rata share of debt attributable to such investments). Additionally, in no event will the total of all acquisition fees and acquisition expenses (including any financing coordination fee) payable with respect to each investment or reinvestment be unreasonable or exceed 4.5% of the contract purchase price of such investment (including our pro rata share of debt attributable to such investment) or 4.5% of the amount advanced for a loan or other investment (including our pro rata share of debt attributable to such investment); provided, however, that a majority of our directors (including a majority of our independent directors) not otherwise interested in a transaction may approve fees and expenses in excess of this limit if they determine the transaction to be commercially competitive, fair and reasonable to us. We may, from time to time, pay our advisor for third party acquisition expenses that it incurs, if any.(13) |
S-23
The disclosure under the section “Operating Expenses” on page 107 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following disclosure.
“Type of Compensation | Determination of Amount | Recipient(s) | Estimated Amount for Minimum Offering (80,000 shares)/ Maximum Offering (68,000,000 shares) | |||
Operating Expenses(6) | We will pay our advisor’s costs of providing administrative services, subject to the limitation that we will not pay our advisor for any amount by which our operating expenses at the end of the four preceding fiscal quarters exceeds the greater of (a) 2.0% of average invested assets and (b) 25.0% of net income other than any additions to reserves for depreciation, bad debt or other similar non-cash reserves and excluding any gain from the sale of assets for that period. For these purposes, “average invested assets” means, for any period, the average of the aggregate book value of our assets (including lease intangibles, invested, directly or indirectly, in financial instruments, debt and equity securities and equity interests in and loans secured by real estate assets (including amounts invested in REITs and other real estate operating companies)) before deducting reserves for depreciation, or bad debts or other similar non-cash reserves, computed by taking the average of these values at the end of each month during the period. Additionally, we will not make operating expense payments for personnel costs to our advisor in connection with services for which the advisor already receives acquisition fees, acquisition expenses or real estate commissions. We will not pay the advisor for salaries and benefits paid to our executive officers. | Our advisor. | Not determinable at this time.” |
S-24
The section “Compensation and Restricted Stock Awards to Independent Directors” on pages 109 – 110 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following disclosure.
“Type of Compensation | Determination of Amount | Recipient(s) | Estimated Amount for Minimum Offering (80,000 shares)/ Maximum Offering (68,000,000 shares) | |||
Compensation and Restricted Stock Awards to Independent Directors | We pay to our lead independent director a retainer of $55,000 per year in addition to the retainer of $30,000 per year that we pay to all of our independent directors, plus $2,000 for each board or board committee meeting the director attends in person ($2,500 for attendance by the chairperson of the audit committee at each meeting of the audit committee), $1,500 for each meeting attended via telephone, and $750 per transaction reviewed and voted upon via electronic board meeting up to a maximum of $2,250 for three or more transactions reviewed and voted upon per meeting. If there is a meeting of the board of directors and one or more committees in a single day, the fees will be limited to $2,500 per day ($3,000 for the chairperson of the audit committee if there is a meeting of such committee). We also will pay each independent director for each external seminar, conference, panel, forum or other industry-related event attended in person and in which the independent director actively participates, solely in his or her capacity as an independent director of the company, in the following amounts: | Our independent directors. | The independent directors, as a group, will receive for a full fiscal year: (i) estimated aggregate compensation of approximately $175,000; and (ii) 3,999 restricted shares of common stock (excluding shares issued upon joining the board of directors).” | |||
$5,000 for each day of an external seminar, conference, panel, forum or other industry-related event that exceeds four hours. | ||||||
In either of the above cases, the company will reimburse, to the extent not otherwise reimbursed, an independent director’s reasonable expenses associated with attendance at such external seminar, conference, panel, forum or other industry-related event. An independent director cannot be paid or reimbursed for attendance at a single external seminar, conference, panel, forum or other industry-related event by us and another company for which he or she is a director. | ||||||
Each independent director also is entitled to receive an award of 1,333 restricted shares of common stock under our employee and director incentive restricted share plan when he or she joins the board of directors and on the date of each annual stockholder’s meeting thereafter. Restricted stock issued to independent directors will vest over a five-year period following the first anniversary of the date of grant in increments of 20% per annum. |
S-25
The last sentence of footnote (2) to the “Management Compensation” table on page 113 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced with the following disclosure.
“Based on the experience of our sponsor and its affiliates, we anticipate that organization and offering expenses, excluding selling commissions and the dealer manager fee, will not exceed 1.5% of the gross proceeds from our primary offering. Our advisor will not be reimbursed for the direct payment of such organization and offering expenses that exceed 2.0% of the aggregate gross proceeds of this offering, which may include reimbursements to our advisor for due diligence fees included in a detailed and itemized invoice.”
Footnote 4 to the table in the section “Management Compensation” on page 113 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following disclosure.
“(4) | These acquisition fees will be payable with respect to reinvestment only, if during the period ending two years after this close of the primary offering, we sell an asset and then reinvest in assets; in this event, we will pay our advisor 1.0% of the contract purchase price of each property acquired and 1.0% of the amount advanced for a loan or other investment;provided, however, that in no event shall the aggregate acquisition fees and expenses (including any financing coordination fee) paid in respect of our total reinvestments exceed 4.5% of the contract purchase price of our portfolio (including our pro rata share of debt attributable to our portfolio) or 4.5% of the amount advanced for all loans or other investments (including our pro rata share of debt attributable to such investments).” |
Footnote 10 to the table in the section “Management Compensation” on page 114 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following disclosure.
“(10) | Upon an investment liquidity event, which means a liquidation or the sale of all or substantially all our investments (regardless of the form in which such sale shall occur, including through a merger or sale of stock or other interests in an entity), the special limited partner will be entitled to receive, payable in one or more payments solely out of net sales proceeds, an amount equal to (A) 15.0% of the amount, if any, by which (1) the sum of (w) the fair market value of the included assets (as defined below), or all issued and outstanding shares of our common stock, in each case as determined in good faith by us, as the general partner of the operating partnership, as of the date the investment liquidity event is consummated, plus (y) total distributions paid through the date the investment liquidity event is consummated on shares issued in all offerings through such date, exceeds (2) the sum of the gross proceeds raised in all offerings through the date the investment liquidity event is consummated (less amounts paid on or prior to such date to purchase or redeem any shares of our common stock purchased in an offering pursuant to our share repurchase program) and the total amount of cash that, if distributed to those stockholders who purchased shares of our common stock in an offering on or prior to the date the investment liquidity event is consummated, would have provided such stockholders an annual 6.0% cumulative, non-compounded, pre-tax return on the gross proceeds raised in all offerings through the date the investment liquidity event is consummated, measured for the period from inception through the date the investment liquidity event is consummated, less (B) any prior payments to the special limited partner or advisor of the subordinated participation in net sales proceeds, the subordinated incentive listing distribution or the annual subordinated performance fee, as applicable. “Included assets” means the fair market value of the investments owned as of the date of the investment liquidity event or the termination date of the advisory agreement, as applicable, and the investments acquired after such date for which a contract to acquire such investment had been entered into as of such date.” |
Footnote 12 to the table in the section “Management Compensation” on pages 114 – 116 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following disclosure.
“(12) | The subordinated distribution upon termination, if any, will be payable in the form of a non-interest bearing promissory note equal to (A) 15.0% of the amount, if any, by which (1) the sum of (w) the fair market value (determined by appraisal as of the termination date) of our investments on the termination date, less (x) any loans secured by such investments, plus (y) total distributions paid through the termination date on shares issued in all offerings through the termination date, less (z) any amounts distributable as of the termination date to limited partners who received OP Units in connection with the acquisition of any investments (including cash used to acquire investments) upon the liquidation or sale of such investments (assuming the liquidation or sale of such investments on the termination date), exceeds (2) the sum of the gross proceeds raised in all offerings through the termination date (less amounts paid on or prior to the termination date to purchase or redeem any |
S-26
shares of our common stock purchased in an offering pursuant to our share repurchase program) and the total amount of cash that, if distributed to those stockholders who purchased shares of our common stock in an offering on or prior to the termination date, would have provided such stockholders an annual 6.0% cumulative, non-compounded, pre-tax return on the gross proceeds raised in all offerings through the termination date, measured for the period from inception through the termination date, less (B) any prior payments to the special limited partner or our advisor of the subordinated participation in net sales proceeds, the subordinated incentive listing distribution or the annual subordinated performance fee, as applicable. In addition, at the time of termination, the special limited partner may elect to defer its right to receive a subordinated distribution upon termination until either a listing or another liquidity event occurs, including a liquidation or the sale of all or substantially all our investments (regardless of the form in which such sale shall occur, including through a merger or sale of stock or other interests in an entity). If the special limited partner elects to defer its right to receive a subordinated distribution upon termination and there is a subsequent listing of the shares of our common stock on a national securities exchange, then the special limited partner will be entitled to receive a subordinated distribution upon termination, payable in one or more payments solely out of net sales proceeds, in an amount equal to (A) 15.0% of the amount, if any, by which (1) the sum of (w) the fair market value (determined by appraisal as of the date of listing) of the included assets, less (x) any loans secured by the included assets, plus (y) total distributions paid through the date of listing on shares of our common stock issued in offerings through the termination date, less (z) any amounts distributable as of the date of listing to limited partners who received OP Units in connection with the acquisition of any included assets (including cash used to acquire the included assets) upon the liquidation or sale of such included assets (assuming the liquidation or sale of such included assets on the date of listing), exceeds (2) the sum of (y) the gross proceeds raised in all offerings through the termination date (less amounts paid on or prior to the date of listing to purchase or redeem any shares of our common stock purchased in an offering on or prior to the termination date pursuant to our share repurchase program), plus (z) the total amount of cash that, if distributed to those stockholders who purchased shares of our common stock in an offering on or prior to the termination date, would have provided such stockholders an annual 6.0% cumulative, non-compounded, pre-tax return on the gross proceeds raised in all offerings through the termination date, measured for the period from inception through the date of listing, less (B) any prior payments to the special limited partner or our advisor of the subordinated participation in net sales proceeds, the subordinated incentive listing distribution or the annual subordinated performance fee, as applicable. If the special limited partner elects to defer its right to receive a subordinated distribution upon termination and there is a subsequent investment liquidity event, then the special limited partner will be entitled to receive a subordinated distribution upon termination, payable in one or more payments solely out of net sales proceeds, in an amount equal to (A) 15.0% of the amount, if any, by which (1) the sum of (w) the fair market value (determined by appraisal as of the date of such other liquidity event) of the included assets, less (x) any loans secured by the included assets, plus (y) total distributions paid through the date of the other liquidity event on shares of our common stock issued in offerings through the termination date, less (z) any amounts distributable as of the date of the other liquidity event to limited partners who received OP Units in connection with the acquisition of any included assets (including cash used to acquire included assets) upon the liquidation or sale of such included assets (assuming the liquidation or sale of such included assets on the date of the other liquidity event), exceeds (2) the sum of (y) the gross proceeds raised in all offerings through the termination date (less amounts paid on or prior to the date of the other liquidity event to purchase or redeem any shares of our common stock purchased in an offering on or prior to the termination date pursuant to our share repurchase program), plus (z) the total amount of cash that, if distributed to those stockholders who purchased shares of our common stock in an offering on or prior to the termination date, would have provided such stockholders an annual 6.0% cumulative, non-compounded, pre-tax return on the gross proceeds raised in all offerings through the termination date, measured for the period from inception through the date of the other liquidity event, less (B) any prior payments to the special limited partner or our advisor of the subordinated participation in net sales proceeds, the subordinated incentive listing distribution or the annual subordinated performance fee, as applicable. If the special limited partner receives the subordinated distribution upon termination, neither it nor any of its affiliates would be entitled to receive any more of the subordinated participation in net sales proceeds or the subordinated incentive listing distribution. There are many additional conditions and restrictions on the amount of compensation our advisor and its affiliates may receive.” |
S-27
Conflicts of Interest
The following disclosure is hereby added as the first, second, third and fourth full paragraphs on page 120 of the Prospectus.
“AR Capital, LLC, the parent of our sponsor, recently entered into a series of reorganization transactions, or the reorganization, in which certain lines of business were reorganized under two parent companies, RCAP Holdings, LLC, which was formerly AR Capital, LLC, and a new AR Capital, LLC. Following the reorganization, RCAP Holdings, LLC became the parent of our dealer manager, our transfer agent and RCS Advisory Services, LLC. The new AR Capital, LLC was formed to continue to sponsor the remaining programs previously sponsored by RCAP Holdings, LLC (formerly, AR Capital, LLC), including us. The new AR Capital, LLC has assumed the role of RCAP Holdings, LLC as the parent of our sponsor and the direct or indirect sponsor of the remaining investment programs previously sponsored by RCAP Holdings, LLC. Our dealer manager and transfer agent are subsidiaries of RCAP Holdings, LLC, which is under common ownership with the new AR Capital, LLC. Each of the new AR Capital, LLC and RCAP Holdings, LLC is controlled directly or indirectly by Nicholas S. Schorsch and William M. Kahane.
Concurrently with the reorganization, each of our dealer manager, our transfer agent and RCS Advisory Services, LLC became a subsidiary of RCS Capital Corporation, a publicly traded holding company listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “RCAP.” RCAP Holdings, LLC maintains a majority economic interest in each of our dealer manager, our transfer agent and RCS Advisory Services, LLC. RCS Capital Corporation maintains voting control of each of these three entities. RCS Capital Corporation is a controlled company because the substantial majority of the voting power is held by RCAP Holdings, LLC. Because it is a controlled company, RCS Capital Corporation is not required to maintain a board with a majority of its board of directors being independent. Thus, the members of RCAP Holdings, LLC maintain control over the management of each of our dealer manager, our transfer agent and RCS Advisory Services, LLC.
Additionally, in connection with the reorganization, the new AR Capital, LLC entered into a services agreement with RCS Advisory Services, LLC on June 10, 2013. Pursuant to the services agreement, RCS Advisory Services, LLC will provide us and other programs sponsored directly or indirectly by the new AR Capital, LLC with transaction management (including, without limitation, transaction management, due diligence, event coordination and marketing services) and other services. The services agreement is a related party transaction which was not negotiated at arms-length. The agreement provides for an initial ten year term, with automatic renewals for successive five-year periods, in of each case, unless either party provides written notice of non-renewal to the other party at least 90 days prior the expiration of the term. In addition, the agreement will terminate upon the earlier to occur of: (i) AR Capital, LLC’s delivery to RCS Advisory Services, LLC of a notice of non-compliance with its obligations under the agreement and the failure of the parties to resolve the matters referred to in the non-compliance notice; and (ii) the impact of a force majeure-related delay upon either party, if the force majeure results in performance being delayed by greater than 60 days.
RCAP Holdings, LLC recently acquired First Allied Holdings Inc., or First Allied, and its retail broker dealer business. First Allied’s broker dealer is a soliciting dealer for this offering and acts as a soliciting dealer for other offerings sponsored directly or indirectly by AR Capital, LLC. First Allied will maintain the management of all of its business and strategic decisions and RCAP Holdings, LLC will not require First Allied to sell the securities of any offering sponsored by AR Capital, LLC, including this offering. The individual broker dealers and financial advisors employed by First Allied will, consistent with their obligations under FINRA rules and the policies and procedures of First Allied, determine the suitability of each investment for each client independently based upon the facts and circumstances of each proposed sale.”
The last paragraph on page 120 of the Prospectus which continues onto page 121 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following disclosure.
“Although certain of our executive officers face conflicts of interest as a result of the foregoing, the following factors tend to ameliorate the effect of the resulting potential conflicts of interest. Our fundraising, including finding investors, will be handled principally by our dealer manager, with our executive officers’ participation limited to participation in sales seminars. As described below, our dealer manager and the other
S-28
subsidiaries of RCAP Holdings, LLC, which is under common ownership with our sponsor, have a team of 198 professionals, including a wholesaling team for each offering dedicated to that offering, which it believes is adequate and structured in a manner to handle sales for all of the offerings for which it is the dealer manager. Some of the American Realty Capital-sponsored REITs have sub-advisors or dedicated management teams who have primary responsibility for investment activities of the REIT, which may mitigate some of these conflicts of interest. Five senior members, all of which are our executive officers or directors, collectively indirectly own interests in the dealer manager and the sponsors or co-sponsors of the American Realty Capital-sponsored investment programs. Controlling interests in the dealer manager and the sponsors or co-sponsors of the American Realty Capital-sponsored investment programs are owned by Nicholas S. Schorsch and William M. Kahane. See the organizational chart in this section below. These members share responsibility for overseeing key management functions, including general management, investing, asset management, financial reporting, legal and accounting activities, marketing strategy and investor relations. This “bench” of senior members provides depth of management and is designed with succession planning in mind. Nonetheless, the competing time commitments resulting from managing multiple development stage REITs may impact our investment activities and our executive officers’ ability to oversee these activities. We will compete for investors with other American Realty Capital-sponsored programs, which offerings will be ongoing during a significant portion of our offering period. The overlap of these offerings with our offering could adversely affect our ability to raise all the capital we seek in this offering, the timing of sales of our shares and the amount of proceeds we have to spend on real estate investments.”
The second paragraph under the section “Affiliated Dealer Manager” on page 123 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced in its entirety with the following disclosure.
“Our dealer manager also is the dealer manager in other offerings, including unaffiliated offerings and offerings sponsored by the American Realty Capital group of companies, that are either effective or in registration. In addition, our dealer manager may in the future be retained to raise capital through public offerings sponsored by our sponsor and other third-party sponsors that will be conducted concurrently with our offering. As a result, our dealer manager will have competing demands on its time and resources. Our dealer manager may face conflicts of interest arising from potential competition with these other programs for investors and investment capital. We will compete for investors with these other programs, and the overlap of these offerings with our offering could adversely affect our ability to raise all the capital we seek in this offering, the timing of sales of our shares and the amount of proceeds we have to spend on real estate investments. Our dealer manager was designed as a wholesale broker dealer capable of simultaneously distributing multiple direct investment programs. Our dealer manager and the other subsidiaries of RCAP Holdings, LLC, which is under common ownership with our sponsor, have a team of 198 professionals, including a wholesaling team for each offering dedicated to that offering. Our dealer manager believes its sales team is adequate and structured in a manner to handle sales for all of the offerings for which it is the dealer manager, including those offerings that are currently in registration or that were recently declared effective, without adversely affecting its ability to act as dealer manager in this offering.”
The following disclosure is hereby inserted as the third paragraph under the section “Affiliated Dealer Manager” on page 123 of the Prospectus.
“In April 2013, our dealer manager received notice and a proposed Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent, or AWC, from FINRA, the self-regulatory organization that oversees broker dealers, that certain violations of SEC and FINRA rules, including Rule 10b-9 under the Exchange Act and FINRA Rule 2010, occurred in connection with its activities as a co-dealer manager for a public offering. Without admitting or denying the findings, Realty Capital Securities submitted an AWC, which FINRA accepted on June 4, 2013. In connection with the AWC, our dealer manager consented to the imposition of a censure and a fine of $60,000. Our dealer manager believes that the matter will not have a material adverse effect on it or its business.”
The following disclosure is hereby inserted before the paragraph “Certain Conflict Resolution Procedures” on page 125 of the Prospectus.
“Investment Rights and Obligations
On April 9, 2013, we entered into an investment opportunity allocation agreement, or the healthcare allocation agreement, with ARC HT and us, or the ARC Funds, which governs our ability to make
S-29
investments in our target assets. Pursuant to the healthcare allocation agreement, until such time as ARC HT has substantially completed its property acquisitions, ARC HT will have priority over us as to any potential healthcare related real estate acquisition, or a proposed healthcare property acquisition, except as may otherwise be agreed upon between the board of directors of both ARC Funds. After such time as ARC HT has substantially completed its property acquisitions, if any ARC Fund advisor determines that one or more proposed healthcare property acquisitions is appropriate for its ARC Fund, and assuming each ARC Fund has sufficient capital to support such proposed healthcare property acquisition, such proposed healthcare property acquisition will be presented to our board of directors and the board of directors of ARC HT for a vote on whether to pursue such proposed healthcare property acquisition. If the board of directors of more than one ARC Fund approves to pursue such proposed healthcare property acquisition, then the acquisitions of such properties will be subject to rotation among the ARC Funds, depending on whether the ARC Funds have sufficient capital to acquire all or some of the proposed healthcare property acquisitions and which ARC Fund most recently made a property acquisition.
The investment objectives of both ARC Funds is to acquire a diversified portfolio of healthcare-related assets including medical office buildings, seniors housing and other healthcare-related facilities that generate sustainable growth in cash flow from operations to pay monthly cash distributions. For this reason, we are a party to the healthcare allocation agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, any priority to proposed healthcare property acquisitions will be lifted in cases in which a proposed healthcare property acquisition would overly concentrate us or ARC HT in a particular industry, geographical region or tenant.”
S-30
Investment Strategy, Objectives and Policies
The following disclosure is hereby added as the second sentence in the paragraph “Primary Investment Focus” on page 129 of the Prospectus.
“We expect to invest at least 85% of available offering proceeds into a diversified portfolio of healthcare-related assets. To the extent our investment strategy/focus changes in terms of the type of real estate we expect to purchase, we expect that at least 85% of our offering proceeds will be invested in such real estate.”
The following disclosure is hereby added immediately prior to the paragraph “Evaluating Investments” on page 129 of the Prospectus.
“Pursuant to the healthcare allocation agreement we have entered into with ARC HT, until such time as ARC HT has substantially completed its property acquisitions, ARC HT has priority over any proposed healthcare property acquisitions. See the section entitled “Conflicts of Interests – Investment Rights and Obligations” in this Prospectus for additional disclosure regarding the healthcare allocation agreement and how our advisor and its affiliates allocates proposed healthcare property acquisitions amongst us and ARC HT.”
The second sentence in the first paragraph under the section “Exit Strategy — Liquidity Event” on page 134 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced with the following disclosure.
“Our board of directors, in consultation with management, may determine that it is in our best interests to begin the process of engaging advisors (which may include the investment banking and capital markets division of our dealer manager) to consider alternatives with respect to a liquidity event at such time during our offering stage that it can reasonably determine that all of the securities being offered in our initial public offering will be sold within a reasonable period, which has occurred to date, allowing us to commence engaging such advisors at this time.”
Description of Real Estate Investments
The following disclosure is hereby added as a new section immediately prior to “Selected Financial Data” on page 147 of the Prospectus.
“DESCRIPTION OF REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS
Fresenius Dialysis Center
On May 10, 2013, we closed on the acquisition of a fee simple interest in a dialysis center, or the Fresenius Dialysis Center, located in Winfield, Alabama. We acquired the property through a wholly owned subsidiary of our operating partnership. The seller of the property was TST Appleton South, LLC, an entity which has no material relationship with us, and the acquisition was not an affiliated transaction.
The property contains 5,564 rentable square feet and provides kidney dialysis services and renal care products for its patients. The property was constructed in 2008.
Capitalization
The contract purchase price of the Fresenius Dialysis Center was $1.9 million, exclusive of closing costs. At closing, we funded the acquisition, exclusive of closing costs, of the Fresenius Dialysis Center with net proceeds from this offering.
Major Tenant/Lease Expiration
The property is 100% leased to Fresenius Medical Care of Northwest Alabama, a subsidiary of Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co., or Fresenius. The lease is fully guaranteed by the parent of the lessee, Fresenius Medical Care Holdings, Inc, or Fresenius Holdings. The lease is net whereby the tenant is required to pay substantially all operating expenses, excluding all costs to maintain and repair the roof and structure of the building, in addition to base rent. The lease has an original 15-year term which commenced in March 2008 and expires in February 2023. The annualized straight-line rental income for the initial term is $0.2 million. The lease contains rental escalations of 10% every 5 years and has three renewal options of five years each.
The table below sets forth the occupancy rate and average effective annual rent per rentable square foot as of December 31 for each of the last five years.
S-31
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Occupancy | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
Average effective annual rent per rentable square foot | $ | 24.50 | $ | 24.50 | $ | 24.50 | $ | 24.50 | $ | 24.50 |
Other
We believe the property is suitable and adequate for its uses.
We do not have any scheduled capital improvements for the property.
We believe that the property is adequately insured.
The Federal tax basis and the rate of depreciation will be determined based upon the completion of cost allocation studies in connection with finalizing our 2013 Federal tax return.
The annual real estate taxes on the building for the calendar year 2013 are expected to be approximately $4,000. Such real estate taxes are to be paid directly by the tenant under the terms of the lease.
The tenant is a German-based holding and kidney dialysis company, operating in the fields of dialysis products and dialysis services. Its dialysis business is vertically integrated, providing dialysis treatment at its own dialysis clinics and supplying these clinics with a range of products. In addition, the tenant sells dialysis products to other dialysis service providers. The tenant operates in two business segments: North America and International.
We believe that the Fresenius Dialysis Center is well-located with acceptable roadway access and is well maintained. The Fresenius Dialysis Center will be subject to competition from similar properties within its market area, and the economic performance of the center could be affected by changes in local economic conditions or losses of contracts to major insurance companies reducing the in-network patient base. We did not consider any other factors material or relevant to the decision to acquire Fresenius Dialysis Center, nor, after reasonable inquiry, are we aware of any material factors other than those discussed above that would cause the reported financial information not to be necessarily indicative of future operating results.
Set forth below are summary financial statements of Fresenius, the parent of the guarantor to the lease on the property described above. Fresenius currently files its financial statements in reports filed with the SEC, which may be obtained from the website maintained by the SEC athttp://www.sec.gov and the following summary financial data regarding Fresenius are taken from such filings:
Six Months Ended June 30, 2013 | Year Ended | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | December 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenue | $ | 7,076,436 | $ | 13,800,282 | $ | 12,570,515 | $ | 11,844,194 | ||||||||
Operating income | 1,037,552 | 2,218,573 | 2,074,892 | 1,923,805 | ||||||||||||
Net income | 488,023 | 1,186,809 | 1,071,154 | 987,517 |
(In thousands) | June 30, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | ||||||||||||
Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets | ||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 22,328,347 | $ | 22,325,998 | $ | 19,532,850 | $ | 17,094,661 | ||||||||
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations | 7,657,012 | 7,841,914 | 5,494,810 | 4,309,676 | ||||||||||||
Total liabilities | 13,218,354 | 13,118,738 | 11,471,833 | 9,570,750 | ||||||||||||
Total shareholders | 9,109,993 | 9,207,260 | 8,061,017 | 7,523,911 |
Adena Health Center
On June 28, 2013, we closed on the acquisition of a fee simple interest in a medical office building, or the Adena Health Center, located in Jackson, Ohio. We acquired the property through a wholly owned subsidiary of our operating partnership. The seller of the property was Vets Development LLC, an entity which has no material relationship with us, and the acquisition was not an affiliated transaction.
S-32
The property contains 24,924 rentable square feet and offers a wide range of services. The property was constructed in 2003.
Capitalization
The contract purchase price of the Adena Health Center was $5.4 million, exclusive of closing costs. At closing, we funded the acquisition, exclusive of closing costs, of the Adena Health Center with net proceeds from this offering.
Major Tenant/Lease Expiration
The property is 100% leased to Adena Health System. The lease is net whereby the tenant is required to pay substantially all operating expenses, including all costs to maintain and repair the roof and structure of the building, in addition to base rent. The lease has an original 11-year term which commenced in March 2013 and expires in February 2024. The annualized straight-line rental income for the initial term is $0.4 million.
The table below sets forth the occupancy rate and average effective annual rent per rentable square foot as of December 31 for each of the last five years.
2012(1) | 2011(1) | 2010(1) | 2009(1) | 2008(1) | ||||||||||||||||
Occupancy | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
Average effective annual rent per rentable square foot | $ | 15.38 | $ | 15.38 | $ | 15.38 | $ | 15.38 | $ | 15.38 |
(1) | Adena Health Systems original leases commenced on August 1, 2003, the occupancy and average effective annual rent per rentable square foot above reflect that original lease. On March 1, 2013, Adena Health System entered into a new lease for the Adena Health Center which expires in February 2024. |
Other
We believe the property is suitable and adequate for its uses.
We do not have any scheduled capital improvements for the property.
We believe that the property is adequately insured.
The Federal tax basis and the rate of depreciation will be determined based upon the completion of cost allocation studies in connection with finalizing our 2013 Federal tax return.
The annual real estate taxes on the building for the calendar year 2013 are expected to be approximately $26,000. Such real estate taxes are to be paid directly by the tenant under the terms of the lease.
Adena Health System includes three hospitals and five regional clinics. Adena Health System offers its patients services in the areas of heart, cancer, women’s health, children’s health and orthopedics. As a health care provider with certain advanced capabilities in the south central and southern Ohio region, Adena Health System is well-positioned to provide patients with advanced care, close to home.
We believe that the Adena Health Center is well-located with acceptable roadway access and is well maintained. The Adena Health Center will be subject to competition from similar properties within its market area, and the economic performance of the center could be affected by changes in local economic conditions or losses of contracts to major insurance companies reducing the in-network patient base. We did not consider any other factors material or relevant to the decision to acquire the Adena Health Center, nor, after reasonable inquiry, are we aware of any material factors other than those discussed above that would cause the reported financial information not to be necessarily indicative of future operating results.
Ouachita Community Hospital
On July 12, 2013, we closed on the acquisition of a fee simple interest in a multi-specialty surgical hospital, or the Ouachita Community Hospital, located in West Monroe, Louisiana. We acquired the property through a wholly owned subsidiary of our operating partnership. The seller of the property was Ouachita Medical Properties, L.C., an entity which has no material relationship with us, and the acquisition was not an affiliated transaction.
S-33
The property contains 17,830 rentable square feet and is a specialized surgery center for a multitude of different procedures. The property was constructed in 2004.
Capitalization
The contract purchase price of the Ouachita Community Hospital was $6.8 million, exclusive of closing costs. At closing, we funded the acquisition, exclusive of closing costs, of the Ouachita Community Hospital with net proceeds from this offering.
Major Tenant/Lease Expiration
The property is 100% leased to IASIS Ouachita Community Hospital, L.P. The lease is fully guaranteed by IASIS Glenwood Regional Medical Center, LP. The lease is net whereby the tenant is required to pay substantially all operating expenses, excluding all costs to maintain and repair the roof and structure of the building, in addition to base rent. The lease has an original 20-year term which commenced in February 2004 and expires in February 2024. The annualized straight-line rental income for the initial term is $0.6 million. The lease contains rental escalations equal to one-half the Consumer Price Index every five years and has two renewal options of ten years each.
The table below sets forth the occupancy rate and average effective annual rent per rentable square foot as of December 31 for each of the last five years.
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Occupancy | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Average effective annual rent per rentable square foot | $ | 33.69 | $ | 33.69 | $ | 33.69 | $ | 33.69 | $ | 32.39 |
Other
We believe the property is suitable and adequate for its uses.
We do not have any scheduled capital improvements for the property.
We believe that the property is adequately insured.
The Federal tax basis and the rate of depreciation will be determined based upon the completion of cost allocation studies in connection with finalizing our 2013 Federal tax return.
The annual real estate taxes on the building for the calendar year 2013 are expected to be approximately $45,000. Such real estate taxes are to be paid directly by the tenant under the terms of the lease.
The tenant is a subsidiary of IASIS Healthcare LLC. IASIS Healthcare is a privately owned operator of acute care hospitals and behavior health hospital across the United States.
We believe that the Ouachita Community Hospital is well-located with acceptable roadway access and is well maintained. The Ouachita Community Hospital will be subject to competition from similar properties within its market area, and the economic performance of the center could be affected by changes in local economic conditions or losses of contracts to major insurance companies reducing the in-network patient base. We did not consider any other factors material or relevant to the decision to acquire the Ouachita Community Hospital, nor, after reasonable inquiry, are we aware of any material factors other than those discussed above that would cause the reported financial information not to be necessarily indicative of future operating results.
S-34
Set forth below are summary financial statements of IASIS Healthcare LLC, the owner of the guarantor to the lease on the property described above. IASIS Healthcare LLC currently files its financial statements in reports filed with the SEC, which may be obtained from the website maintained by the SEC athttp://www.sec.gov, and the following summary financial data regarding IASIS Healthcare LLC are taken from such filings:
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2013 | Year Ended | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | September 30, 2012 (Audited) | September 30, 2011 (Audited) | September 30, 2010 (Audited) | |||||||||||||
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenue | $ | 1,791,881 | $ | 2,535,615 | $ | 2,536,433 | $ | 2,325,372 | ||||||||
Earnings from continuing operations before gain on disposal of assets and income taxes | 16,559 | 34,678 | 74,572 | 122,086 | ||||||||||||
Net earnings attributable to IASIS Healthcare LLC | 6,852 | 22,876 | 31,361 | 66,467 |
(In thousands) | June 30, 2013 | September 30, 2012 (Audited) | September 30, 2011 (Audited) | September 30, 2010 (Audited) | ||||||||||||
Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets | ||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 2,707,106 | $ | 2,681,616 | $ | 2,679,777 | $ | 2,353,194 | ||||||||
Long-term debt and capital lease obligations | 1,900,144 | 1,853,107 | 1,864,749 | 1,044,887 | ||||||||||||
Total equity | 151,539 | 151,372 | 127,790 | 712,506 |
CareMeridian Rehabilitation Facility
Littleton, Colorado
On August 8, 2013, we closed on the acquisition of a fee simple interest in an inpatient rehabilitation facility, or the CareMeridian Rehabilitation Facility located in Littleton, Colorado. We acquired the property through a wholly owned subsidiary of our operating partnership. The seller of the property was Littleton Med Partners, LP, an entity which has no material relationship with us, and the acquisition was not an affiliated transaction.
The property contains 27,630 rentable square feet and is an inpatient rehabilitation facility specializing in caring for patients suffering from catastrophic brain and spine injuries, medically complex illnesses and other life-altering injuries. The property was constructed in 2011.
Capitalization
The contract purchase price of the CareMeridian Rehabilitation Facility was $11.3 million, exclusive of closing costs. At closing, we funded the acquisition, exclusive of closing costs, of the CareMeridian Rehabilitation Facility with net proceeds from this offering.
Major Tenant/Lease Expiration
The property is 100% leased to CareMeridian, LLC. The lease is fully guaranteed by the parent of the lessee, National Mentor Holdings, Inc. The lease is net whereby the tenant is required to pay substantially all operating expenses, including all costs to maintain and repair the roof and structure of the building, in addition to base rent. The lease has an original 15-year term which commenced in July 2012 and expires in July 2027. The annualized straight-line rental income for the initial term is $1.0 million. The lease contains rental escalations of 2.5% annually and has two renewal options of ten years each.
The table below sets forth the occupancy rate and average effective annual rent per rentable square foot as of December 31 for each of the last five years.
2012 | 2011(1) | 2010(1) | 2009(1) | 2008(1) | ||||||||||||||||
Occupancy | 100.0 | % | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | ||||||||||||||
Average effective annual rent per rentable square foot | $ | 29.16 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
(1) | CareMeridian LLC’s lease began on July 9, 2012. Accordingly no occupancy rate or average effective annual rent information is available for prior periods. |
S-35
Other
We believe the property is suitable and adequate for its uses.
We do not have any scheduled capital improvements for the property.
We believe that the property is adequately insured.
The Federal tax basis and the rate of depreciation will be determined based upon the completion of cost allocation studies in connection with finalizing our 2013 Federal tax return.
The annual real estate taxes on the building for the calendar year 2013 are expected to be approximately $37,000. Such real estate taxes are to be paid directly by the tenant under the terms of the lease.
National Mentor Holdings, Inc. is a leading provider of home and community-based health and human services to adults and children with intellectual and/or developmental disabilities, acquired brain injury and other catastrophic injuries and illnesses, and to youth with emotional, behavioral and/or medically complex challenges, or at-risk youth.
We believe that the CareMeridian Rehabilitation Facility is well-located with acceptable roadway access and is well maintained. The CareMeridian Rehabilitation Facility will be subject to competition from similar properties within its market area, and the economic performance of the center could be affected by changes in local economic conditions or losses of contracts to major insurance companies reducing the in-network patient base. We did not consider any other factors material or relevant to the decision to acquire CareMeridian Rehabilitation Facility, nor, after reasonable inquiry, are we aware of any material factors other than those discussed above that would cause the reported financial information not to be necessarily indicative of future operating results.
Set forth below are summary financial statements of National Mentor Holdings, Inc., the parent of the guarantor to the lease on the property described above. National Mentor Holdings, Inc. currently files its financial statements in reports filed with the SEC, which may be obtained from the website maintained by the SEC athttp://www.sec.gov and the following summary financial data regarding National Mentor Holdings, Inc. are taken from such filings:
Nine Months Ended June 30, 2013 | Year Ended | |||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | September 30, 2012 | September 30, 2011 | September 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income | ||||||||||||||||
Net revenue | $ | 893,541 | $ | 1,129,611 | $ | 1,070,610 | $ | 1,011,469 | ||||||||
Income from operations | 34,291 | 46,740 | 35,161 | 44,669 | ||||||||||||
Net loss | (18,680 | ) | (14,380 | ) | (34,142 | ) | (6,867 | ) |
(In thousands) | June 30, 2013 | September 30, 2012 | September 30, 2011 | September 30, 2010 | ||||||||||||
Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets | ||||||||||||||||
Total assets | $ | 1,033,921 | $ | 1,044,983 | $ | 1,010,850 | $ | 1,015,885 | ||||||||
Long-term debt, less current portion | 780,183 | 752,398 | 754,742 | 500,799 | ||||||||||||
Total liabilities | 1,095,598 | 1,089,230 | 1,041,973 | 790,752 | ||||||||||||
Total shareholders’ equity (deficit) | (61,677 | ) | (44,247 | ) | (31,123 | ) | 225,133 |
Oak Lawn Medical Center
On August 21, 2013, we closed the acquisition of the fee simple interest in a three story medical office building, or the Oak Lawn Medical Center. We acquired the property through a wholly owned subsidiary of our operating partnership. The seller of the property was OLMC Partners, LLC, an entity which has no material relationship with us, and the acquisition was not an affiliated transaction.
The Oak Lawn Medical Center contains 26,324 rentable square feet. The property was constructed in 2008.
S-36
Capitalization
The contract purchase price of the Oak Lawn Medical Center was $10.3 million, exclusive of closing costs. At closing, we funded the acquisition, exclusive of closing costs, of the Oak Lawn Medical Center with net proceeds from this offering.
Major Tenant/Lease Expiration
The Oak Lawn Medical Center is 100% leased to five tenants: Advocate Health and Hospitals Corporation d/b/a Advocate Medical Group; Pulmonary Consultants, S.C.; Hanger Prosthetics & Orthotics, Inc.; Quest Diagnostics, LLC; and Adult Primary Care Center, Ltd.
The following table provides information relating to lease commencement and termination dates, rentable square feet, rental escalations, renewal options and annualized straight line rental income for the five tenants:
Tenant | Lease Commencement Date | Lease Termination Date | Rentable Square Feet | Annualized Straight Line Rental Income (in thousands) | Rental Escalations | Renewal Options | ||||||||||||||||||
Advocate Health and Hospitals Corporation d/b/a Advocate Medical Group | Feb. 2008 | Feb. 2018 | 13,069 | $ | 0.4 million | 3.0% annually | Four – five year options | |||||||||||||||||
Pulmonary Consultants, S.C. | Jun. 2008 | Jun. 2018 | 4,128 | $ | 0.2 million | 3.5% annually | One – five year option | |||||||||||||||||
Hanger Prosthetics & Orthotics, Inc. | Jun. 2007 | Oct. 2017 | 3,272 | $ | 0.1 million | 3.5% annually | Two – five year options | |||||||||||||||||
Quest Diagnostics, LLC | Jan. 2009 | Jan. 2017 | 2,441 | $ | 0.1 million | 3.5% annually | One – three year option | |||||||||||||||||
Adult Primary Care Center, Ltd. | Dec. 2008 | Dec. 2018 | 3,414 | $ | 0.1 million | 3.5% annually | Two – five year options |
The table below sets forth the occupancy rate and average effective annual rent per rentable square foot as of December 31 for each of the last five years.
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Occupancy | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 90.7 | % | ||||||||||
Average effective annual rent per rentable square foot | $ | 31.04 | $ | 29.97 | $ | 29.02 | $ | 28.10 | $ | 27.53 |
Other
We believe the property is suitable and adequate for its uses.
We do not have any scheduled capital improvements for the property.
We believe that the property is adequately insured.
The Federal tax basis and the rate of depreciation will be determined based upon the completion of cost allocation studies in connection with finalizing our 2013 Federal tax return.
The annual real estate taxes on the building for the calendar year 2013 are expected to be $0.4 million. Such real estate taxes are to be paid directly by the tenant under the terms of the lease.
Advocate Health and Hospitals Corporation is part of the Advocate Health Care Network, which includes 10 hospitals, 2 integrated children’s hospitals and nearly 3,000 beds.
Pulmonary Consultants provides pulmonary, critical care and sleep medicine to patients in Oak Lawn.
Hanger Prosthetics & Orthotics, Inc. is a premier provider of orthotic and prosthetic (O&P) services and products, offering clinically differentiated programs.
Quest Diagnostics is a provider of diagnostic testing, information and services through its network of laboratories and patient service centers, and provides interpretive consultation.
Adult Primary Care Center provides internal medicine with four accredited physicians.
S-37
We believe that the Oak Lawn Medical Center is well-located with acceptable roadway access and is well maintained. The Oak Lawn Medical Center will be subject to competition from similar properties within its market area, and the economic performance of the center could be affected by changes in local economic conditions or losses of contracts to major insurance companies reducing the in-network patient base. We did not consider any other factors material or relevant to the decision to acquire the Oak Lawn Medical Center, nor, after reasonable inquiry, are we aware of any material factors other than those discussed above that would cause the reported financial information not to be necessarily indicative of future operating results.
Surgery Center of Temple
On August 30, 2013, we closed on the acquisition of a fee simple interest in an ambulatory surgery center, or the Surgery Center of Temple located in Temple, Texas. We acquired the property through a wholly owned subsidiary of our operating partnership. The seller of the property was KDC ASC Partners, L.P., an entity which has no material relationship with us, and the acquisition was not an affiliated transaction.
The property contains 10,400 rentable square feet and is a surgery center that specializes in a multitude of different procedures. The property was constructed in 2008.
Capitalization
The contract purchase price of the Surgery Center of Temple was $6.2 million, exclusive of closing costs. At closing, we funded the acquisition, exclusive of closing costs, of the Surgery Center of Temple with net proceeds from this offering.
Major Tenant/Lease Expiration
The property is 100% leased to HH/Killeen Health System, LLC, which is 80% owned by Legacy Health Partners and 20% owned by Seton Health System, a subsidiary of Ascension Health. The lease is net whereby the tenant is required to pay substantially all operating expenses, excluding all costs to maintain and repair the roof and structure of the building, in addition to base rent. The lease has an original 18-year term which commenced in December 2008 and expires in February 2027. The annualized straight-line rental income for the initial term is $0.5 million. The lease contains rental escalations of 2.5% annually and has four renewal options of five years each.
The table below sets forth the occupancy rate and average effective annual rent per rentable square foot as of December 31 for each of the last five years.
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Occupancy | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Average effective annual rent per rentable square foot | $ | 40.38 | $ | 39.40 | $ | 38.44 | $ | 37.48 | $ | 36.54 |
Other
We believe the property is suitable and adequate for its uses.
We do not have any scheduled capital improvements for the property.
We believe that the property is adequately insured.
The Federal tax basis and the rate of depreciation will be determined based upon the completion of cost allocation studies in connection with finalizing our 2013 Federal tax return.
The annual real estate taxes on the building for the calendar year 2013 are expected to be $0.1 million. Such real estate taxes are to be paid directly by the tenant under the terms of the lease.
Legacy Health Partners is a privately held company established to provide hospital capital and expertise to not-for-profit hospitals and hospital systems, with which it forms joint ventures to own, operate and manage acute care hospitals.
Ascension Health is a large Catholic healthcare system nationally, and services the national community through hospitals and a vast network of affiliated physicians.
S-38
We believe that the Surgery Center of Temple is well-located with acceptable roadway access and is well maintained. The Surgery Center of Temple will be subject to competition from similar properties within its market area, and the economic performance of the center could be affected by changes in local economic conditions or losses of contracts to major insurance companies reducing the in-network patient base. We did not consider any other factors material or relevant to the decision to acquire Surgery Center of Temple, nor, after reasonable inquiry, are we aware of any material factors other than those discussed above that would cause the reported financial information not to be necessarily indicative of future operating results.
Greenville Health Medical Office Building
On October 10, 2013, we closed on the acquisition of a leasehold interest in medical office building, or the Greenville Health Medical Office Building located in Greenville, South Carolina. We acquired the property through a wholly owned subsidiary of our operating partnership. The seller of the property was Greenville Med, LLC, an entity which has no material relationship with us, and the acquisition was not an affiliated transaction.
The property contains 21,603 rentable square feet and operates as a OB/GYN center. The property was constructed in 1997.
Capitalization
The contract purchase price of the Greenville Health Medical Office Building was $4.3 million, exclusive of closing costs. At closing, we funded the acquisition, exclusive of closing costs, of the Greenville Health Medical Office Building with net proceeds from this offering.
Major Tenant/Lease Expiration
The property is 100% leased to Greenville Hospital System, a subsidiary of Greenville Health System. The lease is net whereby the tenant is required to pay substantially all operating expenses, excluding all costs to maintain and repair the roof and structure of the building, in addition to base rent. The lease has an original 13-year term which commenced in June 2007 and expires in March 2020. The annualized straight-line rental income for the initial term is $0.4 million. The lease contains rental escalations of 2.0% annually and has two renewal options of three years each.
The table below sets forth the occupancy rate and average effective annual rent per rentable square foot as of December 31 for each of the last five years.
2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||||||||
Occupancy | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||
Average effective annual rent per rentable square foot | $ | 15.48 | $ | 15.18 | $ | 14.88 | $ | 11.50 | $ | 11.50 |
Other
We believe the property is suitable and adequate for its uses.
We do not have any scheduled capital improvements for the property.
We believe that the property is adequately insured.
The Federal tax basis and the rate of depreciation will be determined based upon the completion of cost allocation studies in connection with finalizing our 2013 Federal tax return.
The annual real estate taxes on the building for the calendar year 2013 are expected to be approximately $46,000. Such real estate taxes are to be paid directly by the tenant under the terms of the lease.
Greenville Health System is a public non-profit academic healthcare delivery system of medical services through clinical care, education and research. It is headquartered in Greenville, South Carolina, were it has six healthcare related campus locations throughout the community.
We believe that the Greenville Health Medical Office Building is well-located with acceptable roadway access and is well maintained. The Greenville Health Medical Office Building will be subject to competition from similar properties within its market area, and the economic performance of the center could be affected
S-39
by changes in local economic conditions or losses of contracts to major insurance companies reducing the in-network patient base. We did not consider any other factors material or relevant to the decision to acquire Greenville Health Medical Office Building, nor, after reasonable inquiry, are we aware of any material factors other than those discussed above that would cause the reported financial information not to be necessarily indicative of future operating results.”
S-40
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following disclosure is hereby added immediately following the third sentence under the section “Distributions” on page 149 of the Prospectus.
“While we do not intend to pay distributions from sources other than cash flows from operations, we intend to pay distributions consistently once we declare a distribution. Should we be unable to fund our distributions from cash flows or earnings fully, we may pay distributions in excess of earnings and from financings or offering proceeds, if necessary. We do not expect to use such a substantial portion of our offering proceeds or financings to fund distributions which would substantially affect our ability to achieve our investment objectives.”
Prior Performance Summary
The section “Prior Performance Summary” on pages 155 – 165 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced with the following disclosure.
“PRIOR PERFORMANCE SUMMARY
Prior Investment Programs
The information presented in this section represents the historical experience of the real estate programs managed or sponsored over the last ten years by Messrs. Schorsch and Kahane. In connection with ARCT’s internalization and listing on The NASDAQ Global Select Market in March 2012, Mr. Kahane had resigned from the various officer positions he held with the sponsor and its affiliates. Investors should not assume that they will experience returns, if any, comparable to those experienced by investors in such prior real estate programs. The prior performance of real estate investment programs sponsored by affiliates of Messrs. Schorsch and Kahane and our advisor may not be indicative of our future results. For an additional description of this risk, see “Risk Factors — Risks Related to an Investment in American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc. — We are a company with a limited operating history, which makes our future performance difficult to predict.” The information summarized below is current as of December 31, 2012 (unless specifically stated otherwise) and is set forth in greater detail in the Prior Performance Tables included in this prospectus. In addition, we will provide upon request to us and without charge, a copy of the most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC by any public program within the last 24 months, and for a reasonable fee, a copy of the exhibits filed with such report.
We intend to conduct this offering in conjunction with future offerings by one or more public and private real estate entities sponsored by American Realty Capital and its affiliates. To the extent that such entities have the same or similar investment strategies or objectives as ours, such entities may be in competition with us for the investments we make. See the section entitled “Conflicts of Interest” in this prospectus for additional information.
Summary Information
During the period from August 2007 (inception of the first program) to December 31, 2012, affiliates of our advisor have sponsored ten public programs, all of which had raised funds as of December 31, 2012 and five non-public programs. From August 2007 (inception of the first public program) to December 31, 2012, our public programs, which include ARCT, NYRR, PE-ARC, ARC HT, ARC RCA, ARC DNAV, ARCT III, ARCP, ARC Global and ARCT IV and the programs consolidated into ARCT, which were ARC Income Properties II and all of the Section 1031 Exchange Programs described below, had raised $4.7 billion from 70,663 investors in public offerings and an additional $37.5 million from 205 investors in a private offering by ARC Income Properties II and 45 investors in private offerings by the Section 1031 Exchange Programs. The public programs purchased 1,321 properties with an aggregate purchase price of $5.5 billion, including acquisition fees, in 49 states and U.S. territories and one property in the United Kingdom. The investment objectives of each of these public programs are substantially identical to our investment objectives of (1) paying attractive and stable cash distributions, (2) preserving and returning stockholders’ capital contributions and (3) realizing appreciation in the value of our investments.
The following table details the percentage of properties located in the following U.S. states as well as the United Kingdom. The investment objectives of each of these public programs are substantially identical to our
S-41
investment objectives of (1) paying attractive and stable cash distributions, (2) preserving and returning stockholders’ capital contributions and (3) realizing appreciation in the value of our investments. Based on purchase price:
State/Possession | Purchase Price | |||
Alabama | 1.7 | % | ||
Arizona | 2.0 | % | ||
Arkansas | 1.2 | % | ||
California | 4.2 | % | ||
Colorado | 1.2 | % | ||
Connecticut | 0.4 | % | ||
Delaware | 0.1 | % | ||
Florida | 2.9 | % | ||
Georgia | 4.5 | % | ||
Idaho | 0.2 | % | ||
Illinois | 9.2 | % | ||
Indiana | 2.8 | % | ||
Iowa | 1.4 | % | ||
Kansas | 1.9 | % | ||
Kentucky | 2.1 | % | ||
Louisiana | 1.2 | % | ||
Maine | 0.2 | % | ||
Maryland | 1.2 | % | ||
Massachusetts | 1.2 | % | ||
Michigan | 3.7 | % | ||
Minnesota | 1.0 | % | ||
Mississippi | 1.9 | % | ||
Missouri | 4.2 | % | ||
Montana | 0.2 | % | ||
Nebraska | 0.6 | % | ||
Nevada | 1.6 | % | ||
New Hampshire | 0.5 | % | ||
New Jersey | 1.4 | % | ||
New Mexico | 0.1 | % | ||
New York | 13.7 | % | ||
North Carolina | 2.9 | % | ||
North Dakota | 0.2 | % | ||
Ohio | 5.1 | % | ||
Oklahoma | 0.7 | % | ||
Oregon | 0.2 | % | ||
Pennsylvania | 4.6 | % | ||
Puerto Rico | 0.2 | % | ||
Rhode Island | 0.3 | % | ||
South Carolina | 2.3 | % | ||
South Dakota | 0.1 | % | ||
Tennessee | 1.1 | % | ||
Texas | 8.8 | % | ||
United Kingdom | 0.0 | % | ||
Utah | 0.6% |
S-42
State/Possession | Purchase Price | |||
Vermont | 0.3 | % | ||
Virginia | 1.0 | % | ||
Washington | 0.8 | % | ||
West Virginia | 0.6 | % | ||
Wisconsin | 1.9 | % | ||
Wyoming | 0.1 | % | ||
100.0 | % |
The properties are used by our tenants in the following industries based on purchase price:
Industry | Purchase Price | |||
Aerospace | 0.9 | % | ||
Auto Retail | 1.5 | % | ||
Auto Services | 1.6 | % | ||
Consumer Goods | 0.7 | % | ||
Consumer Products | 6.7 | % | ||
Discount Retail | 7.4 | % | ||
Financial Services | 0.5 | % | ||
Freight | 10.6 | % | ||
Gas/Convenience | 2.4 | % | ||
Government Services | 2.7 | % | ||
Healthcare | 16.7 | % | ||
Home Maintenance | 1.5 | % | ||
Insurance | 2.7 | % | ||
Manufacturing | 2.2 | % | ||
Office | 2.1 | % | ||
Parking | 0.1 | % | ||
Pharmacy | 10.9 | % | ||
Residential | 0.6 | % | ||
Restaurant | 2.8 | % | ||
Retail | 11.2 | % | ||
Retail Banking | 7.7 | % | ||
Specialty Retail | 4.5 | % | ||
Storage Facility | 0.1 | % | ||
Supermarket | 1.1 | % | ||
Technology | 0.6 | % | ||
Telecommunications | 0.2 | % | ||
100.0 | % |
The purchased properties were 26.7% new and 73.3% used, based on purchase price. None of the purchased properties were construction properties. As of December 31, 2012, two properties had been sold. The acquired properties were purchased with a combination of proceeds from the issuance of common stock, the issuance of convertible preferred stock, mortgage notes payable, short-term notes payable, revolving lines of credit, long-term notes payable issued in private placements and joint venture arrangements.
During the period from June 2008 (inception of the first non-public program) to December 31, 2012, our non-public programs, which were ARC Income Properties, ARC Income Properties II, ARC Income Properties III, ARC Income Properties IV and ARC Growth Fund, LLC, had raised $54.4 million from 694 investors. The non-public programs purchased 171 properties with an aggregate purchase price of $247.9 million including acquisition fees, in 18 states.
S-43
The following table details the percentage of properties by state based on purchase price:
State location | Purchase Price % | |||
Alabama | 0.1 | % | ||
Connecticut | 0.6 | % | ||
Delaware | 4.8 | % | ||
Florida | 11.0 | % | ||
Georgia | 3.5 | % | ||
Illinois | 6.6 | % | ||
Louisiana | 2.3 | % | ||
Michigan | 11.5 | % | ||
North Carolina | 0.1 | % | ||
New Hampshire | 0.5 | % | ||
New Jersey | 13.0 | % | ||
New York | 9.7 | % | ||
Ohio | 10.3 | % | ||
Pennsylvania | 9.5 | % | ||
South Carolina | 8.4 | % | ||
Texas | 5.0 | % | ||
Virginia | 1.2 | % | ||
Vermont | 2.2 | % | ||
100.0 | % |
The properties are all commercial single tenant facilities with 81.0% retail banking and 10.5% retail distribution facilities and 8.6% specialty retail. The purchased properties were 11.0% new and 89.0% used, based on purchase price. None of the purchased properties were construction properties. As of December 31, 2012, 53 properties had been sold. The acquired properties were purchased with a combination of equity investments, mortgage notes payable and long-term notes payable issued in private placements.
The investment objectives of these programs are different from our investment objectives, which aim to acquire medical office buildings, senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities.
For a more detailed description, please see Table VI in Part II of the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part. In addition, we will provide upon request to us and without charge, the more detailed information in Part II.
Programs of Our Sponsor
American Realty Capital Trust, Inc.
American Realty Capital Trust, Inc., or ARCT, incorporated on August 17, 2007, was a Maryland corporation that qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes. ARCT was formed to acquire a diversified portfolio of commercial real estate, primarily freestanding single-tenant properties net leased to credit worthy tenants on a long-term basis. In January 2008, ARCT commenced an initial public offering on a “best efforts” basis to sell up to 150.0 million shares of common stock, excluding 25.0 million shares issuable pursuant to a distribution reinvestment plan, offered at a price of $10.00 per share, subject to certain volume and other discounts. In March 2008, ARCT commenced real estate operations. ARCT’s initial public offering closed in July 2011 having raised $1.7 billion in gross proceeds from the sale of 179.4 million shares of common stock and having incurred, cumulatively to that date, $198.0 million in offering costs, commissions and dealer manager fees for the sale of its common stock. ARCT operated as a non-traded REIT through February 29, 2012. Effective as of March 1, 2012, ARCT internalized the management services previously provided by American Realty Capital Advisors, LLC and its affiliates, as a result of which the Company became a self-administered REIT managed full-time by its own management team, or the Internalization. Concurrent with the Internalization, ARCT listed its common stock on The NASDAQ Global Select Market
S-44
under the symbol “ARCT”, or the Listing. In connection with the Listing, ARCT offered to purchase up to $220.0 million in shares of common stock from its stockholders, pursuant to a modified “Dutch Auction” cash tender offer, or the Tender Offer. As a result of the Tender Offer, in April 2012, ARCT had purchased 21.0 million shares of its common stock at a purchase price of $10.50 per share, for an aggregate cost of $220.0 million, excluding fees and expenses relating to the Tender Offer. On September 6, 2012, ARCT entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Realty Income Corporation, a Maryland corporation and its subsidiary, which was subsequently amended on January 6, 2013. The merger was approved by both companies’ boards of directors and was subsequently approved by both companies’ stockholders on January 16, 2013. The merger closed on January 22, 2013, pursuant to which ARCT merged with and into a subsidiary of Realty Income Corporation and trading of ARCT’s shares was suspended at market close on that date. As of December 31, 2012, ARCT had total real estate investments, at cost, of $2.2 billion, comprised of 515 properties.
American Realty Capital New York Recovery REIT, Inc.
American Realty Capital New York Recovery REIT, Inc., or NYRR, a Maryland corporation, is the second publicly offered REIT sponsored by American Realty Capital. NYRR was incorporated on October 6, 2009 and qualified as a REIT beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2010. NYRR filed its initial registration statement with the SEC on November 12, 2009 and became effective on September 2, 2010. NYRR had received aggregate gross offering proceeds of $17.0 million from the sale of 2.0 million shares from a private offering to “accredited investors” (as defined in Regulation D as promulgated under the Securities Act). On December 15, 2011, NYRR exercised its option to convert all its outstanding preferred shares into 2.0 million shares of common stock on a one-to-one basis. As of October 15, 2013, NYRR had received aggregate gross proceeds of $1.1 billion which includes the sale of 112.6 million shares in its public offering, $17.0 million from its private offering and $15.6 million from its distribution reinvestment plan. As of October 15, 2013, there were 116.2 million shares of NYRR common stock outstanding, including restricted stock, converted preferred shares, and shares issued under its distribution reinvestment plan. As of October 15, 2013, NYRR had total real estate investments, at cost, of $773.8 million, comprised of 19 properties. As of June 30, 2013, NYRR had incurred, cumulatively to that date, $65.7 million in selling commissions, dealer manager fees and offering costs for the sale of its common stock and $9.4 million for acquisition costs related to its portfolio of properties.
Phillips Edison — ARC Shopping Center REIT Inc.
Phillips Edison — ARC Shopping Center REIT Inc., or PE-ARC, a Maryland corporation, is the third publicly offered REIT sponsored by American Realty Capital. PE-ARC was incorporated on October 13, 2009 and qualified as a REIT beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2010. PE-ARC filed its registration statement with the SEC on January 13, 2010 and became effective on August 12, 2010. PE-ARC invests primarily in necessity-based neighborhood and community shopping centers throughout the United States with a focus on well-located grocery-anchored shopping centers that are well occupied at the time of purchase and typically cost less than $20.0 million per property. As of October 15, 2013, PE-ARC had received aggregate gross offering proceeds of $1.2 billion which includes the sale of 117.3 million shares of common stock in its public offering and $12.7 million from its distribution reinvestment program. As of October 15, 2013 PE-ARC had acquired 61 properties, 20 of which are held through a 54% owned joint venture, and had total real estate investments at cost of $902.2 million. As of June 30, 2013, PE-ARC had incurred, cumulatively to that date, $69.7 million in offering costs for the sale of its common stock and $11.9 million for acquisition costs related to its portfolio of properties.
American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust, Inc.
American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust, Inc., or ARC HT, a Maryland corporation, is the fourth publicly offered REIT sponsored by American Realty Capital. ARC HT was organized on August 23, 2010 and qualified as a REIT beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2011. ARC HT filed its registration statement with the SEC on August 27, 2010 and became effective on February 18, 2011. As of October 15, 2013, ARC HT had received aggregate gross offering proceeds of $1.8 billion which includes the sale of 174.7 million shares in its public offering and $46.6 million from its distribution reinvestment plan. As of October 15, 2013, ARC HT had acquired 105 healthcare-related
S-45
properties, for a purchase price of $1.5 billion. As of June 30, 2013, ARC HT had incurred, cumulatively to that date, $197.6 million in offering costs for the sale of its common stock and $17.6 million for acquisition costs related to its portfolio of properties.
American Realty Capital — Retail Centers of America, Inc.
American Realty Capital — Retail Centers of America, Inc., or ARC RCA, a Maryland corporation, is the fifth publicly offered REIT sponsored by American Realty Capital. ARC RCA was organized on July 29, 2010 and intends to qualify as a REIT beginning with the taxable year ending December 31, 2012. ARC RCA filed its registration statement with the SEC on September 14, 2010 and became effective on March 17, 2011. As of October 15, 2013, ARC RCA had received aggregate gross proceeds of $51.4 million which includes the sale of 5.2 million shares in its public offering and $0.4 million from its distribution reinvestment plan. As of October 15, 2013, ARC RCA had acquired three properties for a purchase price of $107.6 million. As of June 30, 2013, ARC RCA has incurred, cumulatively to that date, $10.2 million in offering costs for the sale of its common stock and $1.0 million for acquisition costs related to its portfolio of properties.
American Realty Capital Daily Net Asset Value Trust, Inc.
American Realty Capital Daily Net Asset Value Trust, Inc. (formerly known as American Realty Capital Trust II, Inc.), or ARC DNAV, a Maryland corporation, is the sixth publicly offered REIT sponsored by American Realty Capital. ARC DNAV was incorporated on September 10, 2010 and intends to qualify as a REIT beginning with the taxable year ending December 31, 2013, ARC DNAV filed its registration statement with the SEC on October 8, 2010 and became effective on August 15, 2011. As of October 15, 2013, ARC DNAV had received aggregate gross proceeds of $18.5 million which includes the sale of 1.8 million shares in its public offering and $0.3 million from its distribution reinvestment plan. As of October 15, 2013, ARC DNAV had acquired 11 properties with total real estate investments, at cost, of $30.2 million. As of June 30, 2013, ARC DNAV had incurred, cumulatively to that date, $5.2 million in offering costs from the sale of its common stock and $0.7 million for acquisition costs related to its portfolio of properties.
American Realty Capital Trust III, Inc.
American Realty Capital Trust III, Inc., or ARCT III, a Maryland corporation, was the seventh publicly offered REIT sponsored by American Realty Capital. ARCT III was incorporated on October 15, 2010 and qualified as a REIT beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2011. ARCT III filed its registration statement with the SEC on November 2, 2010 and became effective on March 31, 2011. As of February 28, 2013, ARCT III had received aggregate gross proceeds of $1.8 billion which includes the sale of 174.0 million shares in its public offering and $31.9 million from its distribution reinvestment plan. As of February 28, 2013, ARCT III owned 533 single-tenant, freestanding properties and had total real estate investments, at cost, of $1.7 billion. As of December 31, 2012, ARCT III had incurred, cumulatively to that date, $196.5 million in offering costs for the sale of its common stock and $40.8 million for acquisition costs related to its portfolio of properties. On December 17, 2012, ARCT III and ARCP entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger under which ARCP acquired all of the outstanding shares of ARCT III. The merger was approved by the independent members of both companies’ boards of directors and was subsequently approved by both companies’ stockholders on February 26, 2013. On February 26, 2013, ARCP stockholders approved the issuance of common stock in connection with the merger and ARCT III stockholders approved the merger. The merger closed on February 28, 2013, pursuant to which ARCT III merged with and into a subsidiary of ARCP. On March 1, 2013, in connection with the merger, ARCT III stockholders received their respective cash or stock consideration from ARCP, as elected, pursuant to terms of the Agreement and Plans of Merger on March 1, 2013.
American Realty Capital Properties, Inc.
American Realty Capital Properties, Inc., or ARCP, a Maryland corporation, is the eighth publicly offered REIT sponsored by American Realty Capital. ARCP was incorporated on December 2, 2010 and qualified as a REIT beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2011. On September 6, 2011, ARCP completed its initial public offering of 5.6 million shares of common stock. ARCP’s common stock is traded on The NASDAQ Capital Market under the symbol “ARCP.” On November 2, 2011, ARCP completed an underwritten follow-on offering of 1.5 million shares of common stock. In addition, on November 7, 2011,
S-46
ARCP closed on the underwriters’ overallotment option of an additional 0.1 million shares of common stock. On June 18, 2012, ARCP closed its secondary offering of 3.3 million shares of common stock. In addition, on July 9, 2012, ARCP closed on the underwriters’ overallotment option of an additional 0.5 million shares of common stock. On January 29, 2013, ARCP completed an underwritten public follow-on offering of 1.8 million shares of common stock and an additional 270,000 shares of common stock for the overallotment option of the underwriters. In January 2013, ARCP commenced its “at the market” equity offering under which ARCP has issued 553,300 shares of common stock. On February 28, 2013, ARCT III merged with and into a subsidiary of ARCP, pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger entered into on December 17, 2012, under which ARCP acquired all of the outstanding shares of ARCT III. On March 1, 2013, in connection with the merger, ARCT III stockholders received, pursuant to terms of the Agreement and Plan of Merger, their respective cash or stock consideration from ARCP, as elected. On June 7, 2013, ARCP completed two private placement transactions through which it issued approximately 29.4 million shares of common stock and approximately 8.4 million shares of Series C convertible preferred stock. In aggregate, through October 15, 2013, ARCP has received $1.1 billion of proceeds from the sale of common and convertible preferred stock. As of October 15, 2013, ARCP owned 1,260 single-tenant, including the properties purchased by ARCT III, freestanding properties and real estate investments, at a purchase price of $3.2 billion. On May 28, 2013, ARCP and CapLease, Inc., or CapLease, entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger under which ARCP will acquire all of the outstanding shares of CapLease. The merger has been approved by both companies’ boards of directors and CapLease’s stockholders and is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2013. On July 1, 2013, ARCT IV and ARCP entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger under which ARCP will acquire all of the outstanding shares of ARCT IV. The merger has been approved by both companies’ boards of directors but is subject to ARCT IV stockholder approval and is expected to close in the fourth quarter of 2013. On October 22, 2013, ARCP entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Cole Real Estate Investments, Inc., or Cole, under which ARCP will acquire all of the outstanding shares of Cole. The merger has been approved by both companies’ boards of directors but is subject to stockholder approval of both companies and is expected to close in the first half of 2014. On November 29, 2013, the closing price per share of common stock of ARCP was $13.11.
American Realty Capital Global Trust, Inc.
American Realty Capital Global Trust, Inc., or ARC Global, a Maryland corporation, is the ninth publicly offered REIT sponsored by American Realty Capital. ARC Global was incorporated on July 13, 2011 and intends to qualify as a REIT beginning with the taxable year ending December 31, 2013. ARC Global filed its registration statement with the SEC on October 27, 2011, which was declared effective by the SEC on April 20, 2012. As of October 15, 2013, ARC Global received aggregate gross proceeds of $91.4 million which includes the sale of 9.2 million shares in its public offering and $0.8 million from its distribution reinvestment plan. As of October 15, 2013, ARC Global had acquired nine properties with an aggregate base purchase price of $83.3 million. As of June 30, 2013, ARC Global had incurred, cumulatively to that date, $8.2 million in offering costs for the sale of its common stock and $1.5 million for acquisition costs related to its property acquisitions.
American Realty Capital Trust IV, Inc.
American Realty Capital Trust IV, Inc., or ARCT IV, a Maryland corporation, is the tenth publicly offered REIT sponsored by American Realty Capital. ARCT IV was incorporated on February 14, 2012 and intends to qualify as a REIT beginning with the taxable year ending December 31, 2012. ARCT IV filed its registration statement with the SEC on March 22, 2012, which was declared effective by the SEC on June 8, 2012. On July 1, 2013, ARCT IV and ARCP entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger under which ARCP will acquire all of the outstanding shares of ARCT IV. The merger has been approved by both companies’ boards of directors but is subject to stockholder approval. As of October 15, 2013, ARCT IV received aggregate gross proceeds of $1.8 billion which includes the sale of 70.2 million shares in its public offering and $21.0 million under its distribution reinvestment plan. As of October 15, 2013, ARCT IV owned 1,212 freestanding properties at an aggregate purchase price of $2.2 billion. As of June 30, 2013, ARCT IV had incurred, cumulatively to that date, $197.3 million in offering costs for the sale of its common stock and $29.2 million for acquisition costs related to its portfolio of properties.
S-47
ARC Realty Finance Trust, Inc.
ARC Realty Finance Trust, Inc., or ARC RFT, a Maryland corporation, is the twelfth publicly offered REIT sponsored by American Realty Capital. ARC RFT was incorporated on November 15, 2012 and intends to qualify as a REIT beginning with the taxable year ending December 31, 2013. ARC RFT filed its registration statement publicly with the SEC on January 22, 2013, which was declared effective by the SEC on February 12, 2013. As of October 15, 2013, ARC RFT received aggregate gross proceeds of $17.1 million from the sale of 0.7 million shares in its public offering and $0.1 milllion from its distribution reinvestment plan. As of October 15, 2013, ARC RFT’s investments, at original cost, were $18.1 million. As of June 30, 2013, ARC RFT had incurred, cumulatively to that date, $2.3 million in offering costs for the sale of its common stock.
American Realty Capital Trust V, Inc.
American Realty Capital Trust V, Inc., or ARCT V, a Maryland corporation, is the thirteenth publicly offered REIT sponsored by American Realty Capital. ARCT V was incorporated on January 22, 2013 and intends to qualify as a REIT beginning with the taxable year ending December 31, 2013. ARCT V filed its registration statement publicly with the SEC on March 6, 2013, which was declared effective by the SEC on April 4, 2013. As of October 15, 2013, ARCT V received aggregate gross proceeds of $1.5 billion from the sale of 60.9 million shares in its public offering and $10.6 million from its distribution reinvestment plan. As of October 15, 2013, ARCT V owned 161 freestanding properties at an aggregate purchase price of $967.1 million. As of June 30, 2013, ARCT V had incurred, cumulatively to that date, $46.9 million in offering costs for the sale of its common stock and $0.1 million for acquisition costs related to its portfolio of properties.
Phillips Edison — ARC Grocery Center REIT II, Inc.
Phillips Edison — ARC Grocery Center REIT II, Inc., or PE-ARC II, a Maryland corporation, is the fourteenth publicly offered REIT sponsored by American Realty Capital. PE-ARC II was incorporated on June 5, 2013 and intends to qualify as a REIT beginning with the taxable year ending December 31, 2013. PE-ARC II filed its registration statement with the SEC on August 13, 2013, which was declared effective by the SEC on November 25, 2013. As of October 15, 2013, PE-ARC II received aggregate gross proceeds of $0.2 million from the sale of 8,888 shares in a private placement. As of October 15, 2013, PE-ARC II had not acquired any properties. As of July 1, 2013, PE-ARC II had incurred, cumulatively to that date, approximately $11,000 in offering costs for the sale of its common stock.
American Realty Capital Hospitality Trust, Inc.
American Realty Capital Hospitality Trust, Inc., or ARC HOST, a Maryland corporation, is the fifteenth publicly offered REIT sponsored by American Realty Capital. ARC HOST was incorporated on July 25, 2013 and intends to qualify as a REIT beginning with the taxable year ending December 31, 2013. ARC HOST filed its registration statement with the SEC on August 16, 2013, which has not yet been declared effective by the SEC. As of October 15, 2013, ARC HOST received aggregate gross proceeds of $0.2 million from the sale of 8,888 shares in a private placement. As of October 15, 2013, ARC HOST had not acquired any properties. As of August 7, 2013, ARC HOST had incurred, cumulatively to that date, $0.6 million in offering costs for the sale of its common stock.
Business Development Corporation of America
The American Realty Capital group of companies also has sponsored Business Development Corporation of America, or BDCA, a Maryland corporation. BDCA was organized on May 5, 2010 and is a publicly offered specialty finance company which has elected to be treated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act. As of October 15, 2013, BDCA had raised gross proceeds of $535.2 million which includes the sale of 49.3 million shares in its public offering and $9.6 million from its distribution reinvestment plan. As of October 15, 2013, BDCA’s investments, at original cost, were $713.6 million. As of June 30, 2013, BDCA had incurred, cumulatively to that date, $6.9 million in offering costs for the sale of its common stock.
S-48
Liquidity of Public Programs
FINRA Rule 2310(b)(3)(D) requires that we disclose the liquidity of prior public programs sponsored by American Realty Capital, our sponsor, which for this purpose excludes ARCP, a REIT that is and always has been listed on a national securities exchange, commencing with the NASDAQ Capital Market and, subsequently, the NASDAQ Global Select Market. American Realty Capital has sponsored the following other public programs (excluding ARCP): ARCT, NYRR, PE-ARC, ARC HT, ARC DNAV, ARCT III, ARC Global, ARCT IV, ARCT IV, ARCT V, ARC RFT and BDCA. ARCT was a non-traded REIT until March 1, 2012, when it listed its shares of common stock on The NASDAQ Global Select Market. ARCT’s prospectus for its initial public offering provided that it would seek to consummate a listing of shares of its common stock on a national securities exchange by the tenth anniversary of the commencement of its initial public offering. By listing its common stock on The NASDAQ Global Select Market, ARCT achieved a listing on a national securities exchange within the time it contemplated to do so. Additionally, ARCT III was a non-traded REIT until February 28, 2013, when it merged with and into ARCP. ARCT III’s prospectus for its initial public offering provided that ARCT III would seek to consummate a sale or merger by the fifth anniversary of the termination of its initial public offering. By merging with and into ARCP, ARCT III achieved a sale or merger within the time it contemplated to do so.
The prospectus for each of these other public programs states a date or time period by which it may be liquidated or engage in another liquidity event. Further, NYRR, PE-ARC, ARC HT, ARC DNAV, ARC Global, ARCT IV, ARC RFT, ARC HT II, ARCT V and BDCA are in their offering and acquisition stages. Other than ARCT and ARCT III, none of these public programs have reached the stated date or time period by which they may be liquidated or engage in another liquidity event.
Private Note Programs
ARC Income Properties, LLC implemented a note program that raised aggregate gross proceeds of $19.5 million. The net proceeds were used to acquire, and pay related expenses in connection with, a portfolio of 65 bank branch properties triple-net leased to RBS Citizens, N.A. and Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania. The purchase price for those bank branch properties also was funded with proceeds received from mortgage loans, as well as equity capital invested by AR Capital, LLC. Such properties contain approximately 323,000 square feet with a purchase price of approximately $98.8 million. The properties are triple-net leased for a primary term of five years and include extension provisions. The notes issued under this note program by ARC Income Properties, LLC were sold by our dealer manager through participating broker-dealers. On September 7, 2011, the note holders were repaid, the properties were contributed to ARCP as part of its formation transaction, and the mortgage loans were repaid.
ARC Income Properties II, LLC implemented a note program that raised aggregate gross proceeds of $13.0 million. The net proceeds were used to acquire, and pay related expenses in connection with, a portfolio of 50 bank branch properties triple-net leased to PNC Bank. The purchase price for those bank branch properties also was funded with proceeds received from a mortgage loan, as well as equity capital raised by ARCT in connection with its public offering of equity securities. The properties are triple-net leased with a primary term of ten years with a 10% rent increase after five years. The notes issued under this note program by ARC Income Properties II, LLC were sold by our dealer manager through participating broker-dealers. In May 2011, the notes were repaid in full including accrued interest and the program was closed.
ARC Income Properties III, LLC implemented a note program that raised aggregate gross proceeds of $11.2 million. The net proceeds were used to acquire, and pay related expenses in connection with the acquisition of a distribution facility triple-net leased to Home Depot. The purchase price for the property was also funded with proceeds received from a mortgage loan. The property has a primary lease term of twenty years which commenced on January 30, 2010 with a 2% escalation each year. The notes issued under this note program by ARC Income Properties III, LLC were sold by our dealer manager through participating broker-dealers. On September 7, 2011, the note holders were repaid and the property was contributed to ARCP as part of its formation transaction.
ARC Income Properties IV, LLC implemented a note program that raised gross proceeds of $5.4 million. The proceeds were used to acquire and pay related expenses in connection with the acquisition of six retail stores triple net leased to Tractor Supply stores for $21.2 million. An existing mortgage loan of $16.5 million
S-49
was assumed in connection with the acquisition. The properties had a remaining average lease term of 11.8 years with a 6.25% rental escalation every 5 years. The notes issued under this program by ARC Income Properties IV, LLC were sold by our dealer manager through participating broker-dealers.
ARC Growth Fund, LLC
ARC Growth Fund, LLC is a non-public real estate program formed to acquire vacant bank branch properties and opportunistically sell such properties, either vacant or subsequent to leasing the bank branch to a financial institution or other third-party tenant. Total gross proceeds of approximately $7.9 million were used to acquire, and pay related expenses in connection with, a portfolio of vacant bank branches. The purchase price of the properties also was funded with proceeds received from a one-year revolving warehouse facility. The purchase price for each bank branch is derived from a formulated price contract entered into with a financial institution. During the period from July 2008 to January 2009, ARC Growth Fund, LLC acquired 54 vacant bank branches from Wachovia Bank, N.A., under nine separate transactions. Such properties contain approximately 230,000 square feet with a gross purchase price of approximately $63.6 million. As of December 31, 2010, all properties were sold, 28 of which were acquired and simultaneously sold, resulting in an aggregate gain of approximately $4.8 million.
Section 1031 Exchange Programs
American Realty Capital Exchange, LLC, or ARCX, an affiliate of American Realty Capital, developed a program pursuant to which persons selling real estate held for investment can reinvest the proceeds of that sale in another real estate investment in an effort to obtain favorable tax treatment under Section 1031 of the Code, or a Section 1031 Exchange Program. ARCX acquires real estate to be owned in co-tenancy arrangements with persons desiring to engage in such like-kind exchanges. ARCX acquires the subject property or portfolio of properties and, either concurrently with or following such acquisition, prepares and markets a private placement memorandum for the sale of co-tenancy interests in that property. ARCX has engaged in four Section 1031 Exchange Programs raising aggregate gross proceeds of $10.1 million.
American Realty Capital Operating Partnership, L.P. purchased a Walgreens property in Sealy, TX under a tenant in common structure with an unaffiliated third party, a Section 1031 Exchange Program. The third party’s investment of $1.1 million represented a 44.0% ownership interest in the property. The remaining interest of 56% will be retained by American Realty Capital Operating Partnership, L.P. To date, $1.1 million has been accepted by American Realty Capital Operating Partnership, L.P. pursuant to this program. In November 2012, the third party’s interest was purchased by American Realty Capital Operating Partnership, L.P.
American Realty Capital Operating Partnership, L.P., an affiliate of American Realty Capital, previously had transferred 49% of its ownership interest in a Federal Express distribution facility, located in Snowshoe, Pennsylvania, and a PNC Bank branch, located in Palm Coast, Florida, to American Realty Capital DST I, or ARC DST I, a Section 1031 Exchange Program. Realty Capital Securities, LLC, our dealer manager, has offered membership interests of up to 49%, or $2.6 million, in ARC DST I to investors in a private offering. The remaining interests of no less than 51% will be retained by American Realty Capital Operating Partnership, L.P. To date, cash payments of $2.6 million have been accepted by American Realty Capital Operating Partnership, L.P. pursuant to this program. In October through November 2012, the third party’s interests in the properties were purchased by American Realty Capital Operating Partnership, L.P.
American Realty Capital Operating Partnership, L.P. also has transferred 35.2% of its ownership interest in a PNC Bank branch location, located in Pompano Beach, Florida, to American Realty Capital DST II, or ARC DST II, a Section 1031 Exchange Program. Realty Capital Securities, LLC, our dealer manager, has offered membership interests of 35.2%, or $0.5 million, in ARC DST II to investors in a private offering. The remaining interests of no less than 64.8% will be retained by American Realty Capital Operating Partnership, L.P. To date, cash payments of $0.5 million have been accepted by American Realty Capital Operating Partnership, L.P pursuant to this program. In October 2012, the third party’s interest in the properties was purchase by American Realty Capital Operating Partnership, L.P.
American Realty Capital Operating Partnership, L.P. also has transferred 49% of its ownership interest in three CVS properties, located in Smyrna, Georgia, Chicago, Illinois and Visalia, California, to American
S-50
Realty Capital DST III, or ARC DST III, a Section 1031 Exchange Program. Realty Capital Securities, LLC, our dealer manager, has offered membership interests of up to 49%, or $3.1 million, in ARC DST III to investors in a private offering. The remaining interests of no less than 51% will be retained by American Realty Capital Operating Partnership, L.P. To date, cash payments of $3.1 million have been accepted by American Realty Capital Operating Partnership, L.P. pursuant to this program. In October 2012, the third party’s interests in the properties were purchase by American Realty Capital Operating Partnership, L.P.
American Realty Capital Operating Partnership, L.P. has transferred 49% of its ownership interest in six Bridgestone Firestone properties, located in Texas and New Mexico, to American Realty Capital DST IV, or ARC DST IV, a Section 1031 Exchange Program. Realty Capital Securities, LLC, our dealer manager, has offered membership interests of up to 49%, or $7.3 million, in ARC DST IV to investors in a private offering. The remaining interests of no less than 51% will be retained by American Realty Capital Operating Partnership, L.P. To date, cash payments of $7.3 million had been accepted by American Realty Capital Operating Partnership, L.P. pursuant to this program. American Realty Capital Operating Partnership, L.P. also has sold 24.9% of its ownership interest in a Jared Jewelry property located in Lake Grove, NY, under a tenant-in-common structure with an affiliated third party. The remaining interest of 75.1% will be retained by American Realty Capital Operating Partnership, L.P. To date cash payments of $0.6 million has been accepted by American Realty Capital Operating Partnership, L.P. pursuant to this program. In October 2012, the third party’s interests in the properties were purchase by American Realty Capital Operating Partnership, L.P.
Adverse Business Developments and Conditions
The net losses incurred by public and non-public programs are primarily attributable to non-cash items and acquisition expenses incurred for the purchases of properties which are not ongoing expenses for the operation of the properties and not the impairment of the programs’ real estate assets. With respect to ARCT, for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the entire net loss was attributable to depreciation and amortization expenses incurred on the properties during the ownership period; and for the year ended December 31, 2008, 71% of the net losses were attributable to depreciation and amortization, and the remaining 29% of the net losses was attributable to the fair market valuation of certain derivative investments held.
Additionally, each of ARC Income Properties, LLC, ARC Income Properties II, LLC, ARC Income Properties III, LLC and ARC Income Properties IV, LLC was an offering of debt securities. Despite incurring net losses during certain periods, all anticipated distributions to investors have been paid on these programs through interest payments on the debt securities. The equity interests in each of these entities were owned by Nicholas Schorsch and William Kahane and their respective families. Any losses pursuant to a reduction in value of the equity in any of these entities (which did not occur), were to be borne by Messrs. Schorsch and Kahane and their respective families. On September 7, 2011, the note-holders in ARC Income Properties, LLC and ARC Income Properties III, LLC were repaid and the properties were contributed to ARCP as part of its formation transaction. Additionally, the mortgage loans in ARC Income Properties, LLC were repaid.
ARC Growth Fund, LLC was different from our other programs in that all of the properties were vacant when the portfolio was purchased and the properties were purchased with the intention of reselling them. Losses from operations represent carrying costs on the properties as well as acquisition and disposition costs in addition to non-cash depreciation and amortization costs. Upon final distribution in 2010, all investors received their entire investment plus an incremental return based on a percentage of their initial investment and the sponsor retained the remaining available funds and four properties which were unsold at the end of the program.
From 2008 to 2012, our sponsor’s programs referenced above have experienced a non-renewal of eight leases, five units of which have been leased to new tenants. Further, none of these programs have been subject to mortgage foreclosure or significant losses on the sales of properties during the same period of time.
Other than as disclosed above, there have been no major adverse business developments or conditions experienced by any program or non-program property that would be material to investors, including as a result of recent general economic conditions.”
S-51
Summary of our Organizational Documents
The following disclosure is added after the first sentence of the first paragraph on page 208 of the Prospectus under the section “Inspection of Books and Records; Stockholder Lists.”
“Under Maryland law, these records include: our bylaws; minutes of the proceedings of our stockholders; an annual statement of affairs; and voting trust agreements deposited with us at our principal office. To the extent that one of our current stockholders makes a request for a record that does not fit within the items listed here, we will consult with our board of directors to determine whether the stockholder shall receive the requested record. After such consultation, we will notify the stockholder of the acceptance or rejection of their request for the record within a reasonable time of their request.”
Plan of Distribution
The section “Minimum Offering” on page 230 of the Prospectus is deleted in its entirety.
How to Subscribe
The fourth sentence of the fourth paragraph on page 231 of the Prospectus is hereby replaced with the following disclosure.
“This option, however, is not available to residents of Louisiana.”
Prior Performance Tables
The prior performance tables contained in Appendix A of the Prospectus are hereby replaced with the prior performance tables attached to this Supplement No. 7 as Appendix A. The revised prior performance tables supersede and replace the prior performance tables contained in the Prospectus.
Distribution Reinvestment Plan
The distribution reinvestment plan contained in Appendix B of the Prospectus is hereby replaced with the distribution reinvestment plan attached to this Supplement No. 7 as Appendix B. The revised distribution reinvestment plan supersedes and replaces the distribution reinvestment plan contained in the Prospectus.
Subscription Agreements
The form of subscription agreement included in this Supplement No. 7 is hereby added as Appendix C-1 to the Prospectus. Appendix C-1 will hereby replace Appendix C — American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc. Subscription Agreement of the Prospectus.
The form of multi-offering subscription agreement included in this Supplement No. 7 is hereby added as Appendix C-2 to the Prospectus.
Transfer on Death Designation
The Transfer on Death Designation contained in Appendix D of the Prospectus is hereby replaced with the revised Transfer on Death Designation attached to this Supplement No. 7 as Appendix D. The revised Transfer on Death Designation supersedes and replaces the Transfer on Death Designation contained in the Prospectus.
Annex A
On November 13, 2013, we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013, which is attached as Annex C to this Supplement No. 7.
S-52
APPENDIX A
PRIOR PERFORMANCE TABLES
The tables below provide summarized information concerning programs sponsored directly or indirectly by the parent of our sponsor. The information contained herein is included solely to provide prospective investors with background to be used to evaluate the real estate experience of the parent of our sponsor and its affiliates. We do not believe that our affiliated programs currently in existence are in direct competition with our investment objectives, except for ARC HT. For additional information see the section entitled “Prior Performance Summary.”
THE INFORMATION IN THIS SECTION AND THE TABLES REFERENCED HEREIN SHOULD NOT BE CONSIDERED AS INDICATIVE OF HOW WE WILL PERFORM. THIS DISCUSSION REFERS TO THE PERFORMANCE OF PRIOR PROGRAMS AND PROPERTIES SPONSORED BY THE PARENT OF OUR SPONSOR OR ITS AFFILIATES OVER THE PERIODS LISTED THEREIN. IN ADDITION, THE TABLES INCLUDED WITH THIS PROSPECTUS (WHICH REFLECT RESULTS OVER THE PERIODS SPECIFIED IN EACH TABLE) DO NOT MEAN THAT WE WILL MAKE INVESTMENTS COMPARABLE TO THOSE REFLECTED IN SUCH TABLES. IF YOU PURCHASE SHARES IN AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC., YOU WILL NOT HAVE ANY OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN ANY OF THE REAL ESTATE PROGRAMS DESCRIBED IN THE TABLES (UNLESS YOU ARE ALSO AN INVESTOR IN THOSE REAL ESTATE PROGRAMS).
YOU SHOULD NOT CONSTRUE INCLUSION OF THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION AS IMPLYING IN ANY MANNER THAT WE WILL HAVE RESULTS COMPARABLE TO THOSE REFLECTED IN THE INFORMATION BELOW BECAUSE THE YIELD AND CASH AVAILABLE AND OTHER FACTORS COULD BE SUBSTANTIALLY DIFFERENT IN OUR PROPERTIES.
The following tables are included herein:
A-1
TABLE I
EXPERIENCE IN RAISING AND INVESTING FUNDS FOR PUBLIC PROGRAM PROPERTIES
Table I provides a summary of the experience of our sponsor and its affiliates in raising and investing funds for American Realty Capital Trust, Inc. from its inception on August 17, 2007 to December 31, 2011, its last year before termination, and American Realty Capital Trust III, Inc. from its inception on October 15, 2010 to December 31, 2012, its last year before termination. Information is provided as to the manner in which the proceeds of the offering have been applied, the timing and length of this offering and the time period over which the proceeds have been reinvested.
American Realty Capital Trust, Inc. | American Realty Capital Trust III, Inc. | |||||||||||||||
Percentage of total Dollar Amount Raised | Percentage of total Dollar Amount Raised | |||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | (dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Dollar amount offered | $ | 1,500,000 | $ | 1,500,000 | ||||||||||||
Dollar amount raised | 1,695,813 | 1,750,291 | ||||||||||||||
Dollar amount raised from non-public program and private investments | 37,460 | (1) | — | |||||||||||||
Total dollar amount raised | $ | 1,733,273 | 100.00 | % | $ | 1,750,291 | (5) | 100.00 | % | |||||||
Less offering expenses: | ||||||||||||||||
Selling commissions and discounts retained by affiliates | $ | 168,269 | 9.71 | % | 170,433 | 9.74 | % | |||||||||
Organizational expenses | 29,692 | (2) | 1.71 | % | 26,052 | 1.49 | % | |||||||||
Other | — | 0.00 | % | — | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||
Reserves | — | 0.00 | % | — | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||
Available for investment | $ | 1,535,512 | 88.58 | % | $ | 1,553,806 | 88.77 | % | ||||||||
Acquisition costs: | ||||||||||||||||
Prepaid items related to purchase of property | $ | — | 0.00 | % | — | 0.00 | % | |||||||||
Cash down payment | 2,157,713 | (3) | 124.49 | % | 1,529,812 | 87.40 | % | |||||||||
Acquisition fees | 41,320 | 2.38 | % | 38,646 | 2.21 | % | ||||||||||
Other | — | 0.00 | % | — | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||
Total acquisition costs | $ | 2,199,033 | 126.87 | % | $ | 1,568,458 | 89.61 | % | ||||||||
Percentage leverage (mortgage financing divided by total acquisition costs) | 32.8 | 14.6 | %(11) | |||||||||||||
Date offering began | 3/18/2008 | 3/31/2011 | ||||||||||||||
Number of offerings in the year | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||||
Length of offerings (in months) | 39 | (4) | 18 | (5) | ||||||||||||
Months to invest 90% of amount available for investment (from beginning of the offering) | 39 | 18 |
(1) | American Realty Capital Trust, Inc. sold non-controlling interests in certain properties in nine separate arrangements. The total amount contributed in these arrangements was $24.5 million. In addition, $13.0 million was raised in a private offering of debt securities through ARC Income Properties II, Inc. The structure of these arrangements and program is such that they are required to be consolidated with the results of American Realty Capital Trust, Inc. and therefore are included with this program. ARC Income Properties II, Inc is also included as a stand-alone program and is included separately in information about private programs. |
(2) | Excludes offering costs from proceeds assumed from the distribution reinvestment plan. |
A-2
(3) | Includes $12.0 million investment made in joint venture with American Realty Capital New York Recovery REIT, Inc. for the purchase of real estate and $17.3 million of other investments in common stock. |
(4) | American Realty Capital Trust, Inc. completed its offering in July 2011. The data above includes uses of offering proceeds through December 31, 2011. |
(5) | American Realty Capital Trust III, Inc. completed its offering in September 2012. The data above includes uses of offering proceeds through December 31, 2012. |
A-3
TABLE I
EXPERIENCE IN RAISING AND INVESTING FUNDS FOR NON-PUBLIC PROGRAM PROPERTIES
Table I provides a summary of the experience of our sponsor and its affiliates as a sponsor in raising and investing funds in ARC Income Properties, LLC from its inception on June 5, 2008 to its termination on September 6, 2011, ARC Income Properties II, LLC from its inception on August 12, 2008 to its termination on May 16, 2011, ARC Income Properties III, LLC from its inception on September 29, 2009 to its termination on September 6, 2011, ARC Income Properties IV, LLC from its inception on June 23, 2010 to December 31, 2011 and ARC Growth Fund, LLC from its inception on July 24, 2008 to its termination on December 31, 2010. Information is provided as to the manner in which the proceeds of the offerings have been applied, the timing and length of this offering and the time period over which the proceeds have been invested.
ARC Income Properties, LLC | ARC Income Properties II, LLC | ARC Income Properties, III, LLC | ARC Income Properties, IV, LLC | ARC Growth Fund, LLC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Percentage of Total Dollar Amount Raised | Percentage of Total Dollar Amount Raised | Percentage of Total Dollar Amount Raised | Percentage of Total Dollar Amount Raised | Percentage of Total Dollar Amount Raised | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dollar amount offered | $ | 19,537 | $ | 13,000 | $ | 11,243 | $ | 5,350 | $ | 7,850 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dollar amount raised | 19,537 | 13,000 | 11,243 | 5,215 | 5,275 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dollar amount contributed from sponsor and affiliates(1) | 1,975 | — | — | — | 2,575 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total dollar amount raised | $ | 21,512 | 100.00 | % | $ | 13,000 | 100.00 | % | $ | 11,243 | 100.00 | % | $ | 5,215 | 100.00 | % | $ | 7,850 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less offering expenses: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Selling commissions and discounts retained by affiliates | $ | 1,196 | 5.56 | % | $ | 323 | 2.48 | % | $ | 666 | 5.92 | % | $ | 397 | 7.61 | % | $ | — | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Organizational expenses | — | 0.00 | % | — | 0.00 | % | — | 0.00 | % | — | 0.00 | % | — | 0.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | — | 0.00 | % | — | 0.00 | % | — | 0.00 | % | — | 0.00 | % | — | 0.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reserves | — | 0.00 | % | — | 0.00 | % | — | 0.00 | % | — | 0.00 | % | — | 0.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available for investment | $ | 20,316 | 94.44 | % | $ | 12,677 | 97.52 | % | $ | 10,577 | 94.08 | % | $ | 4,818 | 92.39 | % | $ | 7,850 | 100.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition costs: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Prepaid items and fees related to purchased property | $ | — | 0.00 | % | $ | — | 0.00 | % | $ | — | 0.00 | % | $ | — | 0.00 | % | $ | — | 0.00 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash down payment | 11,302 | 52.54 | % | 9,086 | 69.89 | % | 9,895 | 88.01 | % | 4,780 | 91.66 | % | 5,440 | 69.30 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition fees | 7,693 | 35.76 | % | 2,328 | 17.91 | % | 682 | 6.07 | % | — | 0.00 | % | 2,410 | 30.70 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other | — | 0.00 | % | — | 0.00 | % | — | 0.00 | % | — | 0.00 | % | — | 0.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total acquisition costs | $ | 18,995 (2) | 88.30 | % | $ | 11,414 (3) | 87.80 | % | $ | 10,577 | (4) | 94.08 | % | $ | 4,780 (5) | 91.66 | % | $ | 7,850 (6) | 100.00 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
Percentage leverage (mortgage financing divided by total acquisition costs) | 434.97 | % | 292.61 | % | 141.19 | % | 344.35 | % | 253.20 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Date offering began | 6/09/2008 | 9/17/2008 | 9/29/2009 | 6/23/2011 | 7/24/2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of offerings in the year | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Length of offerings (in months) | 7 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Months to invest 90% of amount available for investment (from the beginning of the offering) | 7 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 1 |
(1) | Includes separate investment contributed by sponsor and affiliates for purchase of portfolio properties and related expenses. |
(2) | Total acquisition costs of properties exclude $82.6 million purchased with mortgage financing. Including borrowings, the total acquisition purchase price was $101.6 million. The leverage ratio was 83.6% at December 31, 2010. This program ended when it contributed its real estate assets and certain liabilities to American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. on September 6, 2011. |
A-4
(3) | Total acquisition costs of properties exclude $33.4 million purchased with mortgage financing. Including borrowings, the total acquisition purchase price was $101.6 million. The leverage ratio was 60.1% at December 31, 2010. This program ended when the notes were repaid on May 16, 2011. The related properties were owned by American Realty Capital Trust, Inc. on December 31, 2012. |
(4) | Total acquisition costs of properties exclude $14.9 million purchased with mortgage financing and $3.5 million related to a final purchase price adjustment which was initially held in escrow until conditions for its release were satisfied in 2010. Including borrowings, the total acquisition purchase price was $25.9 million. The leverage ratio was 59.2% at December 31, 2010. This program ended when it contributed its real estate assets and certain liabilities to American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. on September 6, 2011. |
(5) | Total acquisition costs of properties exclude a $16.5 million purchased with assumed mortgage financing. Including borrowings, the total acquisition purchase price was $21.2 million. The leverage ratio was 77.5% at December 31, 2011. |
(6) | Total acquisition costs of properties exclude a $20.0 million purchased with assumed mortgage financing. Including borrowings and $36.3 million purchased with proceeds from the sale of properties, the total acquisition purchase price was $63.6 million. The program was concluded at December 31, 2010. |
A-5
TABLE II
COMPENSATION TO SPONSOR FROM PUBLIC PROGRAM PROPERTIES
Table II summarizes the amount and type of compensation paid to our sponsor and its affiliates for American Realty Capital Trust, Inc. from its inception on August 17, 2007 to December 31, 2011, its last year before termination, and American Realty Capital Trust III, Inc. from its inception on October 15, 2010 to December 31, 2012, its last year before termination.
(dollars in thousands) | American Realty Capital Trust, Inc. | American Realty Capital Trust III, Inc. | ||||||
Date offering commenced | 3/18/2008 | 3/31/2011 | ||||||
Dollar amount raised | $ | 1,733,273 | $ | 1,750,291 | ||||
Amount paid to sponsor from proceeds of offering | ||||||||
Underwriting fees | $ | 168,269 | $ | 170,433 | ||||
Acquisition fees: | ||||||||
Real estate commissions | $ | — | $ | — | ||||
Advisory fees – acquisition fees | $ | 21,281 | $ | 15,298 | ||||
Other – organizational and offering costs | $ | 15,944 | $ | 20,464 | ||||
Other – financing coordination fees | $ | 9,257 | $ | 3,029 | ||||
Other – acquisition expense reimbursements | $ | 11,921 | $ | 10,779 | ||||
Dollar amount of cash generated from operations before deducting payments to sponsor | $ | 60,876 | $ | 4,365 | ||||
Actual amount paid to sponsor from operations: | ||||||||
Property management fees | $ | — | $ | — | ||||
Partnership management fees | — | — | ||||||
Reimbursements | — | — | ||||||
Leasing commissions | — | — | ||||||
Other (asset management fees) | $ | 7,071 | 212 | |||||
Total amount paid to sponser from operations | $ | 7,071 | $ | 212 | ||||
Dollar amount of property sales and refinancing before deducting payment to sponsor | ||||||||
Cash | $ | 1,485 | $ | — | ||||
Notes | $ | — | ||||||
Amount paid to sponsor from property sale and refinancing: | ||||||||
Real estate commissions | $ | 45 | $ | — | ||||
Incentive fees | $ | — | $ | — | ||||
Other – Financing coordination fees | $ | — | $ | — |
A-6
TABLE II
COMPENSATION TO SPONSOR FROM NON-PUBLIC PROGRAM PROPERTIES
Table II summarizes the amount and type of compensation paid to our sponsor and its affiliates for ARC Income Properties, LLC from its inception on June 5, 2008 to its termination on September 6, 2011, ARC Income Properties II, LLC from its inception on August 12, 2008 to its termination on May 16, 2011, ARC Income Properties III, LLC from its inception on September 29, 2009 to its termination on September 6, 2011. ARC Income Properties IV, LLC from its inception on June 23, 2010 to December 31, 2010 and ARC Growth Fund, LLC. from its inception on July 24, 2008 to its termination on December 31, 2010.
(dollars in thousands) | ARC Income Properties, LLC | ARC Income Properties II, LLC | ARC Income Properties III, LLC | ARC Income Properties IV, LLC | ARC Growth Fund, LLC | |||||||||||||||
Date offering commenced | 6/05/2008 | 8/12/2008 | 9/29/2009 | 6/23/2011 | 7/24/2008 | |||||||||||||||
Dollar amount raised | $ | 21,512 | (1) | $ | 13,000 | (2) | $ | 11,243 | (2) | $ | 5,215 | (2) | $ | 7,850 | (3) | |||||
Amount paid to sponsor from proceeds of offering | ||||||||||||||||||||
Underwriting fees | $ | 785 | $ | 323 | $ | 666 | $ | 397 | $ | — | ||||||||||
Acquisition fees | ||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate commissions | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Advisory fees – acquisition fees | $ | 2,959 | $ | 423 | $ | 662 | $ | — | $ | 1,316 | ||||||||||
Other – organizational and offering costs | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Other – financing coordination fees | $ | 939 | $ | 333 | $ | 149 | $ | — | $ | 45 | ||||||||||
Dollar amount of cash generated from operations before deducting payments to sponsor | $ | (3,091 | ) | $ | 2,291 | $ | (724 | ) | $ | (691 | ) | $ | (5,325 | ) | ||||||
Actual amount paid to sponsor from operations: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Property management fees | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Partnership management fees | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Reimbursements | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Leasing commissions | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Other (explain) | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Total amount paid to sponsor from operations | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||
Dollar amount of property sales and refinancing before deducting payment to sponsor | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 13,560 | ||||||||||
Notes | — | — | — | — | $ | 18,281 | ||||||||||||||
Amount paid to sponsor from property sale and refinancing: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate commissions | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Incentive fees | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Other (disposition fees) | — | — | — | — | $ | 1,169 | ||||||||||||||
Other (refinancing fees) | — | — | — | — | $ | 39 |
(1) | Includes $19.5 million raised from investors and $2.0 million raised from sponsor and affiliates. |
(2) | Amounts raised from investors. |
(3) | Includes $5.2 million raised from investors and $2.6 million raised from the sponsor and affiliates. |
A-7
TABLE III
OPERATING RESULTS OF PUBLIC PROGRAM PROPERTIES
Table III summarizes the operating results of American Realty Capital Trust, Inc. from its inception on August 17, 2007 to December 31, 2011, its last year before termination, and American Realty Capital Trust III, Inc. from its inception on October 15, 2010 to December 31, 2012, its last year before termination. Information is provided as to the manner in which the proceeds of the offering have been applied, the timing and length of this offering and the time period over which the proceeds have been reinvested.
American Realty Capital Trust, Inc. | American Realty Capital Trust III, Inc. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Year Ended December 31, 2011 | Year Ended December 31, 2010 | Year Ended December 31, 2009 | Year Ended December 31, 2008 | Year Ended December 31, 2012 | Year Ended December 31, 2011 | Period From October 15, 2010 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Gross revenues | $ | 129,982 | $ | 45,233 | $ | 15,511 | $ | 5,549 | $ | 49,971 | $ | 795 | $ | — | ||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) on sales of properties | (44 | ) | 143 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Less: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses | 45,041 | 15,265 | 1,158 | 2,002 | 44,202 | 2,385 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | 39,912 | 18,109 | 10,352 | 4,774 | 6,542 | 35 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation | 54,764 | 17,280 | 6,581 | 2,534 | 25,524 | 414 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization | 14,176 | 4,374 | 1,735 | 522 | 5,854 | 85 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) before noncontrolling interests – GAAP Basis | (23,955 | ) | (9,652 | ) | (4,315 | ) | (4,283 | ) | (32,151 | ) | (2,124 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations | — | — | — | �� | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests – GAAP Basis | (1,121 | ) | (181 | ) | 49 | — | 30 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) GAAP basis | $ | (25,076 | ) | $ | (9,833 | ) | $ | (4,266 | ) | $ | (4,283 | ) | $ | (32,121 | ) | $ | (2,124 | ) | $ | — | ||||||||
Taxable income (loss) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From operations | $ | (25,032 | ) | $ | (9,976 | ) | $ | (4,266 | ) | $ | (4,283 | ) | $ | (32,121 | ) | $ | (2,124 | ) | $ | — | ||||||||
From gain (loss) on sale | (44 | ) | 143 | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Cash generated from (used by) operations(1) | 49,525 | 9,864 | $ | (2,526 | ) | $ | 4,013 | 5,542 | (1,177 | ) | — | |||||||||||||||||
Cash generated from sales | 581 | 900 | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash generated from refinancing | — | — | — | — | 224,300 | 5,060 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash generated from operations, sales and refinancing | $ | 50,106 | $ | 10,764 | $ | (2,526 | ) | $ | 4,013 | $ | 229,842 | $ | 3,883 | $ | — | |||||||||||||
Less: Cash distribution to investors | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From operating cash flow | $ | 47,524 | $ | 9,864 | $ | 1,818 | $ | 296 | $ | 5,542 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||
From sales and refinancing | — | 900 | — | — | 23,285 | 294 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
From other(2) | — | 647 | 70 | — | 26,784 | 271 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash generated after cash distributions | $ | 2,582 | $ | (647 | ) | $ | (4,414 | ) | $ | 3,717 | $ | 174,231 | $ | 3,318 | $ | — | ||||||||||||
Less: Special items | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash generated after cash distributions and special items | $ | 2,582 | $ | (647 | ) | $ | (4,414 | ) | $ | 3,717 | $ | 174,231 | $ | 3,318 | $ | — | ||||||||||||
Tax and distribution data per $1,000 invested | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal income tax results:(3)(4) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ordinary income (loss) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
from operations | $ | (19.00 | ) | $ | (23.55 | ) | $ | (22.75 | ) | $ | (0.33 | ) | $ | (13.96 | ) | $ | (4.04 | ) | $ | — | ||||||||
from recapture | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Capital gain (loss) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash distributions to investors | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Source (on GAAP Basis) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment income | $ | — | $ | 1.44 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||
Return of capital | 43.51 | 16.78 | (13.06 | ) | 1.22 | 31.77 | 5.52 | — | ||||||||||||||||||||
Source (on GAAP basis) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sales | $ | — | 1.44 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||||||||
Refinancing | — | — | — | — | 13.30 | 2.87 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Operations | 43.51 | 15.75 | 12.57 | 1.22 | 3.17 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other | — | — | — | — | 15.30 | 2.65 | — |
A-8
(1) | Includes cash paid for interest and acquisition costs |
(2) | Distributions paid from proceeds from the sale of common stock and through distribution reinvestment plans |
(3) | Based on amounts raised as of the end of each period. |
(4) | Federal tax results for the year ended December 31, 2012 are not available as of the date of this filing. Extensions of time to file tax returns for the year ended December 31, 2012 have been filed for each program, and estimated information is provided for all programs based on preliminary tax returns by outside accountants. |
A-9
TABLE III
OPERATING RESULTS OF NON-PUBLIC PROGRAM PROPERTIES
Table III summarizes the consolidated operating results of ARC Income Properties, LLC, ARC Income Properties II, LLC, ARC Income Properties III, LLC, ARC Income Properties IV, LLC, and ARC Growth Fund, LLC as of the dates indicated.
(table begins on following page)
A-10
ARC Income Properties, LLC | ARC Income Properties II, LLC | ARC Income Properties III, LLC | ARC Income Properties IV, LLC | ARC Growth Fund, LLC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Period from January 1, 2011 to September 6, 2011(1) | Year Ended December 31, 2010 | Year Ended December 31, 2009 | Period from June 5, 2008 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2008 | Period from January 1, 2011 to May 16, 2011(2) | Year Ended December 31, 2010 | Year Ended December 31, 2009 | Period from August 12, 2008 to December 31, 2008 | Period from January 1, 2011 to September 6, 2011(1) | Year Ended December 31, 2010 | Period from September 29, 2009 to December 31, 2009 | Year Ended December 31, 2011 | Period from June 24, 2010 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2010 | Year Ended December 31, 2011 | Year Ended December 31, 2010 | Year Ended December 31, 2009 | Period from July 25, 2008 to December 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross revenues | $ | 4,652 | $ | 7,008 | $ | 5,347 | $ | 1,341 | $ | 1,383 | $ | 3,507 | $ | 3,423 | $ | 337 | $ | 1,548 | $ | 2,237 | $ | 341 | $ | 1,549 | $ | 94 | $ | — | $ | 95 | $ | 185 | $ | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Profit (loss) on sales of properties | — | (44 | ) | 143 | — | — | — | (251 | ) | (4,682 | ) | 9,746 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses | 122 | 320 | 2,847 | 5 | 45 | 113 | 7 | — | 51 | 36 | 918 | 86 | 489 | — | 234 | 528 | 2,004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense | 4,504 | 6,525 | 4,993 | 688 | 1,690 | 2,151 | 2,161 | 162 | 1,434 | 1,359 | 186 | 1,134 | 100 | — | — | 1,494 | 597 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense – investors notes | 1,323 | 1,935 | 1,583 | 381 | 430 | 1,167 | 1,024 | 11 | 671 | 986 | 201 | 446 | 90 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation | 2,346 | 3,519 | 2,676 | 909 | 710 | 1,748 | 1,758 | 200 | 495 | 642 | 127 | 642 | 54 | — | 195 | 592 | 344 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization | 527 | 976 | 886 | — | 268 | 663 | 670 | — | 187 | 249 | 42 | 218 | 18 | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income – GAAP Basis | $ | (4,170 | ) | $ | (6,267 | ) | $ | (7,638 | ) | $ | (642 | ) | $ | (1,804 | ) | $ | (2,192 | ) | $ | (2,197 | ) | $ | (36 | ) | $ | (1,290 | ) | $ | (1,035 | ) | $ | (1,133 | ) | $ | (977 | ) | $ | (657 | ) | $ | — | $ | (585 | ) | $ | (7,111 | ) | $ | 6,809 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable income (loss) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From operations | $ | (4,170 | ) | $ | (6,267 | ) | $ | (7,638 | ) | $ | (642 | ) | $ | (1,760 | ) | $ | (2,335 | ) | $ | (2,197 | ) | $ | (36 | ) | $ | (1,290 | ) | $ | (1,035 | ) | $ | (1,133 | ) | $ | (977 | ) | $ | (443 | ) | $ | — | $ | (334 | ) | $ | (2,429 | ) | $ | (2,937 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From gain (loss) on sale | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (44 | ) | $ | 143 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | (251 | ) | $ | (4,682 | ) | $ | 9,746 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash generated from (used by) operations(3) | $ | (1,297 | ) | $ | (1,896 | ) | $ | (2,349 | ) | $ | 1,154 | $ | (782 | ) | $ | 560 | $ | (2,282 | ) | $ | 4,013 | $ | (608 | ) | $ | (33 | ) | $ | (691 | ) | $ | (117 | ) | $ | (691 | ) | $ | — | $ | (330 | ) | $ | (1,769 | ) | $ | (3,226 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash generated from sales | — | — | — | — | — | 246 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | (447 | ) | 11,158 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash generated from refinancing | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash generated from operations, sales and refinancing | $ | (1,297 | ) | $ | (1,896 | ) | $ | (2,349 | ) | $ | 1,154 | $ | (782 | ) | $ | 806 | $ | (2,282 | ) | $ | 4,013 | $ | (608 | ) | $ | (33 | ) | $ | (691 | ) | $ | (117 | ) | $ | (691 | ) | $ | — | $ | (330 | ) | $ | (2,216 | ) | $ | 7,932 |
A-11
ARC Income Properties, LLC | ARC Income Properties II, LLC | ARC Income Properties III, LLC | ARC Income Properties IV, LLC | ARC Growth Fund, LLC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Period from January 1, 2011 to September 6, 2011(1) | Year Ended December 31, 2010 | Year Ended December 31, 2009 | Period from June 5, 2008 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2008 | Period from January 1, 2011 to May 16, 2011(2) | Year Ended December 31, 2010 | Year Ended December 31, 2009 | Period from August 12, 2008 to December 31, 2008 | Period from January 1, 2011 to September 6, 2011(1) | Year Ended December 31, 2010 | Period from September 29, 2009 to December 31, 2009 | Year Ended December 31, 2011 | Period from June 24, 2010 (Date of Inception) to December 31, 2010 | Year Ended December 31, 2011 | Year Ended December 31, 2010 | Year Ended December 31, 2009 | Period from July 25, 2008 to December 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: Cash interest payments made to investors | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From operating cash flow | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From sales and refinancing | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
From other | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash generated after cash distributions | $ | (1,297 | ) | $ | (1,896 | ) | $ | (2,349 | ) | $ | 1,154 | $ | (782 | ) | $ | 806 | $ | (2,282 | ) | $ | 4,013 | $ | (608 | ) | $ | (33 | ) | $ | (691 | ) | $ | (117 | ) | $ | — | $ | (691 | ) | $ | (330 | ) | $ | (2,216 | ) | $ | 7,932 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: Special items | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash generated after cash distributions and special items | $ | (1,297 | ) | $ | (1,896 | ) | $ | (2,349 | ) | $ | 1,154 | $ | (782 | ) | $ | 806 | $ | (2,282 | ) | $ | 4,013 | $ | (608 | ) | $ | (33 | ) | $ | (691 | ) | $ | (117 | ) | $ | — | $ | (691 | ) | $ | (330 | ) | $ | (2,216 | ) | $ | 7,932 |
(1) | On September 6, 2011, the real estate assets and certain liabilities of ARC Income Properties, LLC and ARC Income Properties III, LLC were contributed in the formation transaction of American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. |
(2) | The program ended on May 16, 2011, when the notes were repaid. These properties were owned by American Realty Capital Trust, Inc. |
(3) | Includes cash paid for interest including interest payments to investors. |
Non-public programs are combined with other entities for U.S. federal income tax reporting purposes, therefore, U.S. Federal income tax results for these programs are not presented.
A-12
TABLE IV
RESULTS OF COMPLETED PUBLIC PROGRAMS OF THE SPONSOR AND ITS AFFILIATES
Table IV includes the operations of American Realty Capital Trust, Inc., which completed its operations On March 1, 2012 when it listed its common stock on The NASDAQ Global Select Market.
Program name | American Realty Capital Trust, Inc. | |||
Dollar amount raised | $ | 1,733,273 | ||
Number of properties purchased | 487 | |||
Date of closing of offering | 7/18/2011 | |||
Date of first sale of property | 3/1/2012 | |||
Date of final sale of property | 3/1/2012 | |||
Tax and distribution data per $1,000 invested through | ||||
Federal income tax results: | ||||
Ordinary income (loss) | ||||
– from operations | $ | (46.96 | ) | |
– from recapture | — | |||
Capital gain (loss) | 0.02 | |||
Deferred gain | — | |||
Capital | — | |||
Ordinary | — | |||
Cash distributions to investors | ||||
Source (on GAAP Basis) | ||||
– Investment income | $ | 1.44 | ||
– Return of capital | 47.74 | |||
Source (on cash basis) | ||||
– Sales | $ | 1.44 | ||
– Refinancing | — | |||
– Operations | 47.74 | |||
– Other(1) | 10.49 | |||
Receivable on net purchase money financing | — |
(1) | American Realty Capital Trust, Inc.'s price per share was $10.49 on March 1, 2012, at the end of its first day of trading on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. |
A-13
TABLE IV
RESULTS OF COMPLETED NON-PUBLIC PROGRAMS OF THE SPONSOR AND ITS AFFILIATES
Table IV summarizes the results of ARC Income Properties, LLC, ARC Income Properties II, LLC, ARC Income Properties III, LLC and ARC Growth Fund, LLC, each a completed program of affiliates of our sponsor as of December 31, 2011.
(dollars in thousands) Program name | ARC Income Properties, LLC | ARC Income Properties II, LLC | ARC Income Properties III, LLC | ARC Growth Fund, LLC | ||||||||||||
Dollar amount raised | $ | 21,512 | $ | 13,000 | $ | 11,243 | $ | 7,850 | ||||||||
Number of properties purchased | 62 | 50 | 1 | 52 | ||||||||||||
Date of closing of offering | June 2008 | September 2008 | September 2009 | July 2008 | ||||||||||||
Date of first sale of property | September 2011(2) | May 2011(3) | September 2011(2) | July 2008 | ||||||||||||
Date of final sale of property | September 2011(2) | May 2011(3) | September 2011(2) | December 2010 | ||||||||||||
Tax and distribution data per $1,000 investment through 12/31/2010(1) | ||||||||||||||||
Federal income tax results: | ||||||||||||||||
Ordinary income (loss) | ||||||||||||||||
- From operations | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
- From recapture | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Capital gain (loss) | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Deferred gain | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Capital | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Ordinary | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
Cash distributions to investors | ||||||||||||||||
Source (on GAAP basis) | ||||||||||||||||
- Investment income | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||
- Return of capital | $ | 19,537 | $ | 13,000 | $ | 11,243 | $ | 7,226 | ||||||||
Source (on cash basis) | ||||||||||||||||
- Sales | $ | 19,537 | $ | 13,000 | $ | 11,243 | $ | 7,226 | ||||||||
- Refinancing | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
- Operations | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||
- Other | ||||||||||||||||
Receivable on net purchase money financing | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — |
(1) | Programs are combined with other entities for U.S. federal income tax reporting purposes, therefore, U.S. Federal income tax results for this program is not presented. |
(2) | The real estate assets and certain liabilities of these programs were contributed to American Realty Capital Properties, Inc. as part of its formation transaction. |
(3) | The notes used to purchase these properties were paid off in May 2011, these properties are still owned by American Realty Capital Trust, Inc. on December 31, 2012. |
A-14
TABLE V
SALES OR DISPOSALS OF PUBLIC PROGRAM PROPERTIES
The following table summarizes the sales or disposals of properties by American Realty Capital Trust, Inc., from its inception on August 17, 2007 to December 31, 2011, its last year before termination, and American Realty Capital Trust III, Inc. from its inception on October 15, 2010 to December 31, 2012, its last year before termination. Information is provided as to the manner in which the proceeds of the offering have been applied, the timing and length of this offering and the time period over which the proceeds have been reinvested.
Selling Price, Net of Closing costs and GAAP Adjustments(dollars in thousands) | Cost of Properties Including Closing and Soft Costs(dollars in thousands) | Excess (deficiency) of Property Operating Cash Receipts Over Cash Expenditures(5) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property | Date Acquired | Date of Sale | Cash received net of closing costs | Mortgage balance at time of sale | Purchase money mortgage taken back by program(1) | Adjustments resulting from application of GAAP(2) | Total(3) | Original Mortgage Financing | Total acquisition cost, capital improvement, closing and soft costs(4) | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
American Realty Capital Trust, Inc.: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PNC Bank Branch – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Jersey | November – 08 | September 2010 | $ | 388 | $ | 512 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 900 | $ | 512 | $ | 187 | $ | 699 | $ | 1,035 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
PNC Bank Branch – | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
New Jersey | November – 08 | January 2011 | $ | 79 | $ | 502 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 581 | $ | 502 | $ | 178 | $ | 680 | $ | 1,305 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
American Realty Capital Trust III, Inc.: Not applicable |
1) | No purchase money mortgages were taken back by program. |
2) | Financial information for programs was prepared in accordance with GAAP, therefore GAAP adjustments are not applicable. |
3) | All taxable gains were categorized as capital gains. None of these sales were reported on the installment basis. |
4) | Amounts shown do not include a prorata share of the offering costs. There were no carried interests received in lieu of commissions in connection with the acquisition of property. |
5) | Amounts exclude the amounts included under “Selling Price Net of Closing Costs and GAAP Adjustments” or “Costs of Properties Including Closing Costs and Soft Costs” and exclude costs incurred in administration of the program not related to the operations of the property. |
A-15
TABLE V
SALES OR DISPOSALS OF NON-PUBLIC PROGRAM PROPERTIES
Table V provides summary information on the results of sales or disposals of properties by non-public prior programs. All figures below are through December 31, 2012.
(dollars in thousands) | Selling Price Net of Closing Costs and GAAP Adjustments | Costs of properties Including Closing Costs and Soft Costs | Excess (Deficit) of Property Operating Cash Receipts Over Cash Expenditures(6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property | Date Acquired | Date of Sale | Cash Received (cash deficit) Net of Closing Costs | Mortgage Balance at Time of Sale | Purchase Money Mortgage Taken Back by Program(2) | Adjustments Resulting From Application of GAAP(3) | Total(4) | Original Mortgage Financing | Total Acquisition Costs, Capital Improvement Costs, Closing and Soft Costs(5) | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ARC Income Properties, LLC: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Citizens Bank branches(1) | July to August-09 | September-11 | $ | 23,300 | $ | 82,622 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 105,922 | $ | 96,883 | $ | 4,734 | $ | 101,617 | $ | 6,815 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ARC Income Properties II, LLC: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PNC Bank Branch – New Jersey | November-08 | September-10 | $ | 388 | $ | 512 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 900 | $ | 512 | $ | 187 | $ | 699 | $ | 1,035 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
PNC Bank Branch – New Jersey | November-08 | January 2011 | 79 | 502 | — | — | 581 | 502 | 178 | 680 | 1,305 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 467 | $ | 1,014 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 1,481 | $ | 1,014 | $ | 365 | $ | 1,379 | $ | 2,340 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ARC Income Properties III, LLC: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Home Depot(1) | November-09 | September-11 | $ | 11,325 | $ | 13,850 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 25,175 | $ | 25,925 | $ | 20 | $ | 25,945 | $ | 2,288 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ARC Growth Fund, LLC: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bayonet Point, FL | July-08 | July-08 | $ | 628 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 628 | $ | — | $ | 642 | $ | 642 | $ | — | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Boca Raton, FL | July-08 | July-08 | 2,434 | — | — | — | 2,434 | — | 2,000 | 2,000 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bonita Springs, FL | July-08 | May-09 | (459 | ) | 1,207 | — | — | 748 | 1,207 | 543 | 1,750 | (29 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clearwater, FL | July-08 | September-08 | 253 | 539 | — | — | 792 | 539 | 371 | 910 | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Clearwater, FL | July-08 | October-08 | (223 | ) | 582 | — | — | 359 | 582 | 400 | 982 | (3 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Destin, FL | July-08 | July-08 | 1,358 | — | — | — | 1,358 | — | 1,183 | 1,183 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Englewood, FL | July-08 | November-08 | 138 | 929 | — | — | 1,067 | 929 | 632 | 1,561 | (13 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fort Myers, FL | July-08 | July-08 | 2,434 | — | — | — | 2,434 | — | 1,566 | 1,566 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Naples, FL | July-08 | July-08 | 2,727 | — | — | — | 2,727 | — | 1,566 | 1,566 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Palm Coast, FL | July-08 | September-08 | 891 | 1,770 | — | — | 2,661 | 1,770 | -530 | 1,240 | (8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Pompano Beach, FL | July-08 | October-08 | 1,206 | 2,162 | — | — | 3,368 | 2,162 | -411 | 1,751 | (8 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Port St. Lucie, FL | July-08 | August-09 | (60 | ) | 654 | — | — | 594 | 654 | 648 | 1,302 | (40 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Punta Gorda, FL | July-08 | July-08 | 2,337 | — | — | — | 2,337 | — | 2,143 | 2,143 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Vero Beach, FL | July-08 | February-09 | 87 | 830 | — | — | 917 | 830 | 565 | 1,395 | (13 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cherry Hill, NJ | July-08 | July-08 | 1,946 | — | — | — | 1,946 | — | 2,225 | 2,225 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cranford, NJ | July-08 | July-08 | 1,453 | — | — | — | 1,453 | — | 725 | 725 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warren, NJ | July-08 | July-08 | 1,375 | — | — | — | 1,375 | — | 1,556 | 1,556 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Westfield, NJ | July-08 | July-08 | 2,539 | — | — | — | 2,539 | — | 2,230 | 2,230 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lehigh Acres, FL | July-08 | August-09 | (207 | ) | 758 | — | — | 551 | 758 | 752 | 1,510 | (28 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Alpharetta, GA | July-08 | December-08 | 98 | 914 | — | — | 1,012 | 914 | 617 | 1,531 | (9 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Atlanta, GA | July-08 | September-08 | 825 | 1,282 | — | — | 2,107 | 1,282 | 862 | 2,144 | (27 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Columbus, GA | July-08 | December-08 | (43 | ) | 111 | — | — | 68 | 111 | 85 | 196 | (3 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Duluth, GA | July-08 | July-08 | 1,851 | — | — | — | 1,851 | — | 1,457 | 1,457 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oakwood, GA | July-08 | September-08 | 49 | 898 | — | — | 947 | 898 | 607 | 1,505 | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Riverdale, GA | July-08 | August-09 | (104 | ) | 471 | — | — | 367 | 471 | 286 | 757 | (12 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Laurinburg, NC | July-08 | July-08 | 188 | — | — | — | 188 | — | 197 | 197 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Haworth, NJ | July-08 | July-08 | 1,781 | — | — | — | 1,781 | — | 1,834 | 1,834 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fredericksburg, VA | August-08 | August-08 | 2,432 | — | — | — | 2,432 | — | 2,568 | 2,568 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dallas, PA | August-08 | August-08 | 1,539 | — | — | — | 1,539 | — | 366 | 366 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Virginia Beach, VA | August-08 | August-08 | 1,210 | — | — | — | 1,210 | — | 930 | 930 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Baytown, TX | August-08 | August-08 | 3,205 | — | — | — | 3,205 | — | 1,355 | 1,355 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bradenton, FL | November-08 | November-08 | 778 | — | — | — | 778 | — | 748 | 748 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sarasota, FL | November-08 | November-08 | 1,688 | — | — | — | 1,688 | — | 867 | 867 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tuscaloosa, AL | November-08 | November-08 | 580 | — | — | — | 580 | — | 242 | 242 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Palm Harbor, FL | November-08 | November-08 | 1,064 | — | — | — | 1,064 | — | 790 | 790 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reading, PA | November-08 | November-08 | 137 | — | — | — | 137 | — | 248 | 248 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
St. Augustine, FL | November-08 | November-08 | 1,936 | — | — | — | 1,936 | — | 1,428 | 1,428 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cumming, GA | December-08 | December-08 | 1,227 | — | — | — | 1,227 | — | 810 | 810 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Suffolk, VA | December-08 | February-09 | 115 | 172 | — | — | 287 | 172 | 129 | 301 | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Titusville, FL | December-08 | December-08 | 321 | — | — | — | 321 | — | 260 | 260 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
West Caldwell, NJ(1) | December-08 | September-09 | 333 | 898 | — | — | 1,231 | 357 | 358 | 715 | 15 |
A-16
(dollars in thousands) | Selling Price Net of Closing Costs and GAAP Adjustments | Costs of properties Including Closing Costs and Soft Costs | Excess (Deficit) of Property Operating Cash Receipts Over Cash Expenditures(6) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property | Date Acquired | Date of Sale | Cash Received (cash deficit) Net of Closing Costs | Mortgage Balance at Time of Sale | Purchase Money Mortgage Taken Back by Program(2) | Adjustments Resulting From Application of GAAP(3) | Total(4) | Original Mortgage Financing | Total Acquisition Costs, Capital Improvement Costs, Closing and Soft Costs(5) | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Palm Coast, FL | December-08 | December-08 | 507 | — | — | — | 507 | — | 599 | 599 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mableton, GA | December-08 | December-08 | 676 | — | — | — | 676 | — | 696 | 696 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Warner Robins, GA | January-09 | January-09 | 149 | — | — | — | 149 | — | 257 | 257 | — | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Philadelphia(1) | January-09 | October-09 | 291 | 1,474 | — | — | 1,765 | 552 | 1,105 | 1,657 | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stockholm, NJ | December-08 | November-09 | (29 | ) | 240 | — | — | 211 | 240 | 438 | 678 | (46 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Sebastian, FL | July-08 | December-09 | (104 | ) | 654 | — | — | 550 | 654 | 1,302 | 1,956 | (102 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fort Myers, FL | July-08 | December-09 | (314 | ) | 795 | — | — | 481 | 795 | 1,582 | 2,377 | (113 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Seminole, FL | July-08 | March-10 | — | 1,098 | 1,098 | 1,098 | 1,061 | 2,159 | (48 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Port Richey, FL(1) | July-08 | December-10 | — | 544 | — | — | 544 | 544 | 1,086 | 1,630 | (71 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Punta Gorda, FL(1) | July-08 | December-10 | — | 690 | — | — | 690 | 690 | 1,550 | 2,240 | (72 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Lawrenceville, GA(1) | July-08 | December-10 | — | 695 | — | — | 695 | 695 | 1,381 | 2,076 | (73 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Norristown, PA(1) | July-08 | December-10 | — | 471 | — | — | 471 | 471 | 943 | 1,414 | (83 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 43,243 | $ | 20,838 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 64,081 | $ | 19,375 | $ | 47,850 | $ | 67,225 | $ | (788 | ) |
(1) | Sale of property was to related party. |
(2) | No purchase money mortgages were taken back by program. |
(3) | Financial information for programs was prepared in accordance with GAAP, therefore GAAP adjustments are not applicable. |
(4) | All taxable gains were categorized as capital gains. None of these sales were reported on the installment basis. |
(5) | Amounts shown do not include a pro rata share of the offering costs. There were no carried interests received in lieu of commissions in connection with the acquisition of property. |
(6) | Amounts exclude the amounts included under “Selling Price Net of Closing Costs and GAAP Adjustments” or “Costs of Properties Including Closing Costs and Soft Costs” and exclude costs incurred in administration of the program not related to the operations of the property. |
A-17
APPENDIX B
DISTRIBUTION REINVESTMENT PLAN
AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
EFFECTIVE AS OF FEBRUARY 14, 2013
American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the “Company”), has adopted this Distribution Reinvestment Plan (the “Plan”), to be administered by the Company, Realty Capital Securities, LLC (the “Dealer Manager”) or an unaffiliated third party (the “Administrator”), in each case as agent for participants in the Plan (“Participants”), on the terms and conditions set forth below.
1.Election to Participate. Any purchaser of shares of common stock of the Company, par value $0.01 per share (the “Shares”), may become a Participant by making a written election to participate on such purchaser’s subscription agreement at the time of subscription for Shares or by delivering a completed and executed authorized form to the Administrator, which can be obtained from the Administrator. Any stockholder who has not previously elected to participate in the Plan, and subject to Section 8(b) herein, any participant in any previous or subsequent publicly offered limited partnership, real estate investment trust or other real estate program sponsored by the Company or its affiliates (an “Affiliated Program”), may so elect at any time by completing and executing an authorization form obtained from the Administrator or any other appropriate documentation as may be acceptable to the Administrator.
2.Distribution Reinvestment. The Administrator will receive all cash distributions (other than Excluded Distributions (as defined below)) paid by the Company or an Affiliated Program with respect to Securities of Participants (collectively, the “Distributions”). Participation will commence with the next Distribution payable after receipt of the Participant’s election pursuant to Paragraph 1 hereof, provided it is received at least ten (10) days prior to the last day of the period to which such Distribution relates. Subject to the preceding sentence, regardless of the date of such election, a holder of Securities will become a Participant in the Plan effective on the first day of the period following such election, and the election will apply to all Distributions attributable to such period and to all periods thereafter. Participants in the Plan generally are required to have the full amount of their cash distributions (other than Excluded Distributions) with respect to all Shares or shares of stock or units of limited partnership interest of an Affiliated Program (collectively “Securities”) owned by them reinvested pursuant to the Plan. However, the Administrator shall have the sole discretion, upon the request of a Participant, to accommodate a Participant’s request for less than all of the Participant’s Securities to be subject to participation in the Plan. As used in this Plan, the term (“Excluded Distributions”) shall mean those cash or other distributions designated as “Excluded Distributions” by the board of directors of the Company or the board of directors or general partner of an Affiliated Program, as applicable.
3.General Terms of Plan Investments.
(a) The Company intends to offer Shares pursuant to the Plan initially at $23.75 per share, regardless of the price per Security paid by the Participant for the Securities in respect of which the Distributions are paid. Within six months following the Company’s acquisition of at least $2.0 billion in total portfolio assets, the Company intends to offer Shares pursuant to the Plan at the net asset value of the Company as determined by American Realty Capital Healthcare II Advisors, LLC, divided by the number of shares of common stock outstanding as of the end of business on the first day of each fiscal quarter after giving effect to any share purchases or repurchases effected by the Company in the immediately preceding quarter. A stockholder may not participate in the Plan through distribution channels that would be eligible to purchase Shares in a public offering of Shares by the Company pursuant to a prospectus outside of the Plan at prices below $23.75 per share.
(b) Selling commissions will not be paid for the Shares purchased pursuant to the Plan.
(c) Dealer Manager fees will not be paid for the Shares purchased pursuant to the Plan.
(d) For each Participant, the Administrator will maintain an account which shall reflect for each period in which Distributions are paid (a “Distribution Period”) the Distributions received by the Administrator on behalf of such Participant. A Participant’s account shall be reduced as purchases of Shares are made on behalf of such Participant.
B-1
(e) Distributions shall be invested in Shares by the Administrator promptly following the payment date with respect to such Distributions to the extent Shares are available for purchase under the Plan. If sufficient Shares are not available, any such funds that have not been invested in Shares within 30 days after receipt by the Administrator and, in any event, by the end of the fiscal quarter in which they are received, will be distributed to Participants. Any interest earned on such accounts will be paid to the Company and will become property of the Company.
(f) Participants may acquire fractional Shares, computed to four decimal places, so that 100% of the Distributions will be used to acquire Shares. The ownership of the Shares shall be reflected on the books of Company or its transfer agent.
(g) A Participant will not be able to acquire Shares under the Plan to the extent such purchase would cause it to exceed the Ownership Limit or other Share ownership restrictions imposed by the Company’s Charter. For purposes of this Plan, “Ownership Limit” shall mean the prohibition on beneficial ownership of not more than 9.8% in value of the aggregate outstanding shares of stock of the Company and not more than 9.8% (in value or in number of shares, whichever is more restrictive) of any class or series of the shares of stock of the Company.
4.Absence of Liability. The Company, the Dealer Manager and the Administrator shall not have any responsibility or liability as to the value of the Shares or any change in the value of the Shares acquired for the Participant’s account. The Company, the Dealer Manager and the Administrator shall not be liable for any act done in good faith, or for any good faith omission to act hereunder.
5.Suitability. Each Participant shall notify the Administrator if, at any time during his participation in the Plan, there is any material change in the Participant’s financial condition or inaccuracy of any representation under the subscription agreement for the Participant’s initial purchase of Shares. A material change shall include any anticipated or actual decrease in net worth or annual gross income or any other change in circumstances that would cause the Participant to fail to meet the suitability standards set forth in the Company’s prospectus for the Participant’s initial purchase of Shares.
6.Reports to Participants. Within ninety (90) days after the end of each calendar year, the Administrator will mail to each Participant a statement of account describing, as to such Participant, the Distributions received, the number of Shares purchased and the per Share purchase price for such Shares pursuant to the Plan during the prior year. Each statement also shall advise the Participant that, in accordance with Paragraph 5 hereof, the Participant is required to notify the Administrator if there is any material change in the Participant’s financial condition or if any representation made by the Participant under the subscription agreement for the Participant’s initial purchase of Shares becomes inaccurate. Tax information regarding a Participant’s participation in the Plan will be sent to each Participant by the Company or the Administrator at least annually.
7.Taxes. Taxable Participants may incur a tax liability for Distributions even though they have elected not to receive their Distributions in cash but rather to have their Distributions reinvested in Shares under the Plan.
8.Reinvestment in Subsequent Programs.
(a) After the termination of the Company’s initial public offering of Shares pursuant to the Company’s prospectus dated February 14, 2013, (the “Initial Offering”), the Company may determine, in its sole discretion, to cause the Administrator to provide to each Participant notice of the opportunity to have some or all of such Participant’s Distributions (at the discretion of the Administrator) invested through the Plan in any publicly offered limited partnership, real estate investment trust or other real estate program sponsored by the Company or an Affiliated Program (a “ Subsequent Program”). If the Company makes such an election, Participants may invest Distributions in equity securities issued by such Subsequent Program through the Plan only if the following conditions are satisfied:
(i) prior to the time of such reinvestment, the Participant has received the final prospectus and any supplements thereto offering interests in the Subsequent Program and such prospectus allows investment pursuant to a distribution reinvestment plan;
B-2
(ii) a registration statement covering the interests in the Subsequent Program has been declared effective under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”);
(iii) the offering and sale of such interests are qualified for sale under the applicable state securities laws;
(iv) the Participant executes the subscription agreement included with the prospectus for the Subsequent Program;
(v) the Participant qualifies under applicable investor suitability standards as contained in the prospectus for the Subsequent Program; and
(vi) the Subsequent Program has accepted an aggregate amount of subscriptions in excess of its minimum offering amount.
(b) The Company may determine, in its sole discretion, to cause the Administrator to allow one or more participants of an Affiliated Program to become a “Participant.” If the Company makes such an election, such Participants may invest distributions received from the Affiliated Program in Shares through the Plan, if the following conditions are satisfied:
(i) prior to the time of such reinvestment, the Participant has received the final prospectus and any supplements thereto offering interests in the Subsequent Program and such prospectus allows investment pursuant to a distribution reinvestment plan;
(ii) a registration statement covering the interests in the Subsequent Program has been declared effective under the Securities Act;
(iii) the offering and sale of such interests are qualified for sale under the applicable state securities laws;
(iv) the Participant executes the subscription agreement included with the prospectus for the Subsequent Program; and
(v) the Participant qualifies under applicable investor suitability standards as contained in the prospectus for the Subsequent Program.
9.Termination.
(a) A Participant may terminate or modify his participation in the Plan at any time by written notice to the Administrator. To be effective for any Distribution, such notice must be received by the Administrator at least ten (10) days prior to the last day of the Distribution Period to which it relates.
(b) Prior to the listing of the Shares on a national securities exchange, a Participant’s transfer of Shares will terminate participation in the Plan with respect to such transferred Shares as of the first day of the Distribution Period in which such transfer is effective, unless the transferee of such Shares in connection with such transfer demonstrates to the Administrator that such transferee meets the requirements for participation hereunder and affirmatively elects participation by delivering an executed authorization form or other instrument required by the Administrator.
10.State Regulatory Restrictions. The Administrator is authorized to deny participation in the Plan to residents of any state or foreign jurisdiction that imposes restrictions on participation in the Plan that conflict with the general terms and provisions of this Plan, including, without limitation, any general prohibition on the payment of broker-dealer commissions for purchases under the Plan.
B-3
11.Amendment to; Suspension or Termination of the Plan.
(a) Except for Section 9(a) of the Plan which shall not be amended prior to a listing of the Shares on a national securities exchange, the terms and conditions of the Plan may be amended by the Company at any time, including, but not limited to, an amendment to the Plan to substitute a new Administrator to act as agent for the Participants, by mailing an appropriate pending notice at least ten (10) days prior to the effective date thereof to the Participants.
(b) The Administrator may terminate a Participant’s individual participation in the Plan and the Company may terminate or suspend the Plan itself, at any time by providing ten (10) days’ prior written notice to a Participant, or to all Participants, as the case may be.
(c) After termination of the Plan or termination of a Participant’s participation in the Plan, the Administrator will send to each Participant a check for the amount of any Distributions in the Participant’s account that have not been invested in Shares. Any future Distributions with respect to such former Participant’s Shares made after the effective date of the termination of the Participant’s participation will be sent directly to the former Participant.
12.Participation by Limited Partners of American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II Operating Partnership, L.P. For purposes of the Plan, “stockholders” shall be deemed to include limited partners of American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II Operating Partnership, L.P. (the “Partnership”), “Participants” shall be deemed to include limited partners of thePartnership that elect to participate in the Plan, and “Distribution,” when used with respect to a limited partner of the Partnership, shall mean cash distributions on limited partnership interests held by such limited partner.
13.Governing Law. This Plan and the Participants’ election to participate in the Plan shall be governed by the laws of the State of Maryland.
14.Notice. Any notice or other communication required or permitted to be given by any provision of this Plan shall be in writing and, if to the DRIP Administrator, addressed to: DRIP Administrator, c/o DST Systems, Inc., 430 W 7th St., Kansas City, MO 64105-1407, or such other address as may be specified by the Administrator by written notice to all Participants. Notices to a Participant may be given by letter addressed to the Participant at the Participant’s last address of record with the Administrator or by providing the relevant information in a press release or a report filed by the Company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each Participant shall notify the Administrator promptly in writing of any changes of address.
15.Certificates. The ownership of the Shares will be in book-entry form prior to the issuance of certificates. The Company will not issue share certificates except to stockholders who make a written request to the Administrator.
B-4
C-1-1
C-1-2
C-1-3
C-1-4
C-1-5
C-1-6
C-1-7
C-1-8
C-2-1
C-2-2
C-2-3
C-2-4
C-2-5
C-2-6
C-2-7
C-2-8
C-2-9
C-2-10
C-2-11
C-2-12
C-2-13
C-2-14
C-2-15
C-2-16
APPENDIX D
TRANSFER ON DEATH DESIGNATION
American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc.
TRANSFER ON DEATH FORM (TOD)
This form is NOT VALID for Trust or IRA accounts.
Both pages of this form must accompany the subscription agreement.
As our transfer agent, American National Stock Transfer, LLC, is located in New York and thus a Transfer on Death (“TOD”) designation pursuant to this form and all rights related thereto shall be governed by the laws of the State of New York. Any beneficiary wanting to purchase additional shares of common stock of American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc. must meet applicable suitability standards.
PLEASE REVIEW THE FOLLOWING IN ITS ENTIRETY BEFORE COMPLETING THE TRANSFER ON DEATH FORM:
1. | Eligible accounts: Individual accounts and joint accounts with rights of survivorship are eligible. A TOD designation will not be accepted from residents of Louisiana. |
2. | Designation of beneficiaries: The account owner may designate one or more beneficiaries of the TOD account. Beneficiaries are not “account owners” as the term is used herein. |
3. | Primary and contingent beneficiaries: The account owner may designate primary and contingent beneficiaries of the TOD account. Primary beneficiaries are the first in line to receive the account upon the death of the account owner. Contingent beneficiaries,if any are designated, receive the account upon the death of the account owner if, and only if, there are no surviving primary beneficiaries. |
4. | Minors as beneficiaries: Minors may be beneficiaries of a TOD account only if a custodian, trustee, or guardian is set forth for the minor on the transfer on death form. By not providing a custodian, trustee, or guardian, the account owner is representing that all of the named beneficiaries are not minors. |
5. | Status of beneficiaries: Beneficiaries have no rights to the account until the death of the account owner or last surviving joint owner. |
6. | Joint owners: If more than one person is the owner of an account registered or to be registered TOD, the joint owners of the account must own the account as joint tenants with rights of survivorship. |
7. | Transfer to designated beneficiaries upon the owner’s death: |
a. | Percentage designation: Unless the account owner designates otherwise by providing a percentage for each beneficiary on the Transfer on Death Form, all surviving beneficiaries will receive equal portions of the account upon the death of the account owner. |
b. | Form of ownership: Multiple beneficiaries will be treated as tenants in common unless the account owner expressly indicates otherwise. |
c. | Predeceasing beneficiaries: If the account owner wishes to have the account pass to the children of the designated beneficiaries if the designated beneficiaries predecease the account owner, the account owner must check the box labeled Lineal Descendants per Stirpes, or LDPS, in Section B of this form. If the box is not checked, the children of beneficiaries who die before you will not receive a portion of your account. If the account is registered LDPS and has contingent beneficiaries, LDPS takes precedence. If a TOD account with multiple beneficiaries is registered LDPS, the LDPS registration must apply to all beneficiaries. If the account is not registered LDPS, a beneficiary must survive the account owner to take the account or his or her part of the account. In the case of multiple beneficiaries, if one of the beneficiaries does not survive the account owner, the deceased beneficiary’s share of the account will be divided equally among the remaining beneficiaries upon the death of the account owner. If no beneficiary survives the account owner, the account will be treated as part of the estate of the account owner. |
d. | Notice of dispute: Should the transfer agent receive written notice of a dispute over the disposition of a TOD account, re-registration of the account to the beneficiaries may be delayed. |
D-1
8. | Revocation or changes: An account owner or all joint owners may revoke or change a beneficiary designation. The Change of Transfer on Death (TOD) Form is available for this purpose on our websitewww.americanrealtycap.com/materials/ or from your registered representative. |
9. | Controlling terms: The language as set forth in the TOD account registration shall control at all times. Unless the transfer agent is expressly instructed by the account owner to change the status of the account or the beneficiary designation prior to the account owner’s death, the person or persons set forth as the beneficiaries of the account shall remain the beneficiaries of the account, and events subsequent to the registration of the account as a TOD account shall not change either the rights of the persons designated as beneficiaries or the status of the account as a TOD account. |
a. | Divorce: If the account owner designated his or her spouse as a TOD beneficiary of the account, and subsequently the account owner and the beneficiary are divorced, the fact of the divorce will not automatically revoke the beneficiary designation. If the account owner wishes to revoke the beneficiary designation, the account owner must notify American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc. of the desired change in writing as specified in paragraph 8 above. |
b. | Will or other testamentary document: The beneficiary designation may not be revoked by the account owner by the provisions of a will or a codicil to a will. |
c. | Dividends, interest, capital gains, and other distributions after the account owner’s death: |
i. | Accruals to the account which occur after the death of the account owner or last surviving joint owner, and are still in the account when it is re-registered to the beneficiaries, stay with the account and pass to the beneficiaries. |
ii. | Where the account has been coded for cash distributions, and such distributions have actually been paid out prior to notice to the transfer agent of the death of the account owner, such distributions are deemed to be the property of the estate of the original account owner and do not pass with the account to the designated beneficiaries. |
10. | TOD registrations may not be made irrevocable. |
A — STOCKHOLDER INFORMATION
Name of stockholder(s) exactly as indicated on subscription agreement:
Stockholder Name | Mr. o | Mrs. o | Ms. o | |||||||||
First | Middle | Last | ||||||||||
Co-Stockholder Name (if applicable) | Mr. o | Mrs. o | Ms. o | |||||||||
First | Middle | Last | ||||||||||
Social Security Number(s) of Stockholder(s) | — | |||||||||||
Stockholder | Co-Stockholder | |||||||||||
Daytime Telephone | State of Residence (Not accepted from residents of Louisiana) |
D-2
B — TRANSFER ON DEATH (Not permitted in Louisiana)
I (we) authorize American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc. to register the percentage of shares of common stock set forth below in beneficiary form, assigning investorship on my (our) death to the TOD beneficiary(ies) named below. Use an additional sheet of paper if space is needed to designate more TOD beneficiaries. Complete information must be provided for all TOD beneficiaries.
PRIMARY Beneficiary Name | ||||||
TOD Share Percentage % | ||||||
Social Security or Tax ID # | Birth Date / / | Relationship | ||||
PRIMARY Beneficiary Name | ||||||
TOD Share Percentage % | ||||||
Social Security or Tax ID # | Birth Date / / | Relationship | ||||
PRIMARY Beneficiary Name | ||||||
TOD Share Percentage % | ||||||
Social Security or Tax ID # | Birth Date / / | Relationship | ||||
Contingent Beneficiary Name (Optional) | ||||||
TOD Share Percentage % | ||||||
Social Security or Tax ID # | Birth Date / / | Relationship | ||||
Contingent Beneficiary Name (Optional) | ||||||
TOD Share Percentage % | ||||||
Social Security or Tax ID # | Birth Date / / | Relationship |
o | LDPS: Check if you wish to have the account pass to children of the above-designated beneficiary(ies) if the designated beneficiary(ies) predeceases the stockholder. The LDPS designation will apply to all designated beneficiaries. |
C — SIGNATURE
By signing below, I (we) authorize American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc. to register the shares in beneficiary form as designated above. I (we) agree on behalf of myself (ourselves) and my (our) heirs, assigns, executors, administrators and beneficiaries to indemnify and hold harmless American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc. and any and all of its affiliates, agents, successors and assigns, and their respective directors, officers and employees, from and against any and all claims, liabilities, damages, actions and expenses arising directly or indirectly relating to this TOD designation or the transfer of my (our) shares in accordance with this TOD designation. If any claims are made or disputes are raised in connection with this TOD designation or account, American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc. reserves the right to require the claimants or parties in interest to arrive at a final resolution by adjudication, arbitration, or other acceptable method, prior to transferring any TOD account assets. I (we) have reviewed all the information set forth on pages1 and2 of this form.
I (we) further understand that American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc. cannot provide any legal advice and I (we) agree to consult with my (our) attorney, if necessary, to make certain that any TOD designation is consistent with my (our) estate and tax planning and is valid. Sign exactly as the name(s) appear(s) on the statement of account. All investors must sign.This TOD is effective subject to the acceptance of American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc.
Signature — Investor (Required) Date | Signature — Co-Investor (If Applicable) Date |
D-3
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) | ||
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 333-184677
American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland | 38-3888962 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
405 Park Ave., 15th Floor, New York, NY | 10022 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(212) 415-6500
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yesx Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web Site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).Yesx Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filero | Accelerated filero | |
Non-accelerated filerx (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting companyo |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso Nox
As of October 31, 2013, the registrant had 4,952,489 shares of common stock outstanding.
AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
i
Part I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except for share and per share data)
September 30, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Real estate investments, at cost: | ||||||||
Land | $ | 2,279 | $ | — | ||||
Buildings, fixtures and improvements | 34,291 | — | ||||||
Acquired intangible lease assets | 5,416 | — | ||||||
Total real estate investments, at cost | 41,986 | — | ||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization | (401 | ) | — | |||||
Total real estate investments, net | 41,585 | — | ||||||
Cash | 37,925 | 3 | ||||||
Receivable for sale of common stock | 734 | — | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | 612 | — | ||||||
Deferred costs | — | 807 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 80,856 | $ | 810 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY | ||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | $ | 611 | $ | 625 | ||||
Below-market lease liability, net | 60 | — | ||||||
Deferred rent and other liabilities | 50 | — | ||||||
Distributions payable | 472 | — | ||||||
Total liabilities | 1,193 | 625 | ||||||
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 50,000,000 authorized, none issued and outstanding at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 | — | — | ||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 300,000,000 shares authorized, 3,764,547 and 8,888 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively | 38 | — | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital | 81,439 | 200 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit | (1,814 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders' equity | 79,663 | 185 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity | $ | 80,856 | $ | 810 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
1
AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
(In thousands, except for share and per share data)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 | |||||||
Revenues: | ||||||||
Rental income | $ | 564 | $ | 590 | ||||
Operating expense reimbursements | 88 | 89 | ||||||
Total revenues | 652 | 679 | ||||||
Expenses: | ||||||||
Property operating | 88 | 89 | ||||||
Acquisition and transaction related | 533 | 651 | ||||||
General and administrative | 49 | 104 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization | 381 | 397 | ||||||
Total expenses | 1,051 | 1,241 | ||||||
Net loss | $ | (399 | ) | $ | (562 | ) | ||
Comprehensive loss | $ | (399 | ) | $ | (562 | ) | ||
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding | 2,559,022 | 991,948 | ||||||
Basic and diluted net loss per share | $ | (0.16 | ) | $ | (0.57 | ) |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
2
AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
(In thousands, except for share data)
(Unaudited)
Common Stock | Additional Paid-in Capital | Accumulated Deficit | Total Stockholders' Equity | |||||||||||||||||
Number of Shares | Par Value | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2012 | 8,888 | $ | — | $ | 200 | $ | (15 | ) | $ | 185 | ||||||||||
Issuance of common stock | 3,735,445 | 38 | 92,619 | — | 92,657 | |||||||||||||||
Common stock offering costs, commissions and dealer manager fees | — | — | (11,776 | ) | — | (11,776 | ) | |||||||||||||
Common stock issued through distribution reinvestment plan | 16,215 | — | 385 | — | 385 | |||||||||||||||
Share-based compensation | 3,999 | — | 11 | — | 11 | |||||||||||||||
Distributions declared | — | — | — | (1,237 | ) | (1,237 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net loss | — | — | — | (562 | ) | (562 | ) | |||||||||||||
Balance, September 30, 2013 | 3,764,547 | $ | 38 | $ | 81,439 | $ | (1,814 | ) | $ | 79,663 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statements.
3
AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 | ||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | ||||
Net loss | $ | (562 | ) | |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | ||||
Depreciation | 306 | |||
Amortization of intangibles | 91 | |||
Accretion of below-market lease liability and amortization of above-market lease assets, net | 3 | |||
Share-based compensation | 11 | |||
Changes in assets and liabilities: | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets | (402 | ) | ||
Accounts payable and accrued expenses | 327 | |||
Deferred rent and other liabilities | 50 | |||
Net cash used in operating activities | (176 | ) | ||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||
Investment in real estate and other assets | (41,834 | ) | ||
Deposits for real estate acquisitions | (210 | ) | ||
Net cash used in investing activities | (42,044 | ) | ||
Cash flows from financing activities: | ||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | 91,923 | |||
Payments of offering costs and fees related to common stock issuances | (11,002 | ) | ||
Distributions paid | (380 | ) | ||
Advances from affiliate, net | (399 | ) | ||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 80,142 | |||
Net change in cash | 37,922 | |||
Cash, beginning of period | 3 | |||
Cash, end of period | $ | 37,925 | ||
Non-Cash Financing Activities: | ||||
Common stock issued through distribution reinvestment plan | $ | 385 | ||
Reclassification of deferred offering costs to equity | 807 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of this statements.
4
AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)
Note 1 — Organization
American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated on October 15, 2012 as a Maryland corporation that intends to qualify as a real estate investment trust for U.S. federal income tax purposes beginning with the taxable year ending December 31, 2013. On February 14, 2013, the Company commenced its ongoing initial public offering (the “IPO”) on a “reasonable best efforts” basis of up to $1.7 billion of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, at a price of $25.00 per share, subject to certain volume and other discounts, pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-11, as amended (File No. 333-184677) (the “Registration Statement”), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Registration Statement also covers up to 14.7 million shares of common stock available pursuant to a distribution reinvestment plan (the “DRIP”) under which common stockholders may elect to have their distributions reinvested in additional shares of common stock.
On April 12, 2013, the Company received and accepted subscriptions in excess of the minimum offering amount for the IPO of $2.0 million in shares, broke general escrow and issued shares of common stock to initial investors who were admitted as stockholders of the Company. As of September 30, 2013, the Company had 3.8 million shares of common stock outstanding, including unvested restricted shares and shares issued pursuant to the DRIP, and had received total gross proceeds from the IPO and the DRIP of $93.2 million. As of September 30, 2013, the aggregate value of all share issuances and subscriptions of common stock outstanding was $94.0 million based on a per share value of $25.00 (or $23.75 for shares issued under the DRIP). Until a date within six months following the Company's acquisition of at least $2.0 billion in total portfolio assets, the per share purchase price in the IPO will be up to $25.00 per share (including the maximum allowed to be charged for commissions and fees) and shares issued under the DRIP will be based on the greater of $23.75 per share or 95% of the estimated value of a share of common stock. Within six months following the Company's acquisition of at least $2.0 billion in total portfolio assets, the per share purchase price will vary quarterly and will be equal to the net asset value (“NAV”) per share, as determined by American Realty Capital Healthcare II Advisors, LLC (the “Advisor”), plus applicable commissions and fees and the per share purchase price in the DRIP will be equal to the NAV per share. The Company reserves the right to reallocate shares covered in the Registration Statement between the IPO and the DRIP.
The Company was formed to primarily acquire a diversified portfolio of real estate properties, focusing primarily on building a portfolio of healthcare-related assets, including medical office buildings, senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities. All such properties may be acquired and operated by the Company alone or jointly with another party. The Company may also originate or acquire first mortgage loans secured by real estate. The Company purchased its first property and commenced real estate operations in May 2013. As of September 30, 2013, the Company owned six properties consisting of 112,672 rentable square feet, which were 100.0% leased, with a weighted average remaining lease term of 10.2 years.
Substantially all of the Company's business is conducted through American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II Operating Partnership, L.P. (the “OP”), a Delaware limited partnership. The Company is the sole general partner and holds substantially all of the units of limited partner interests in the OP (“OP units”). American Realty Capital Healthcare II Special Limited Partnership, LLC (the “Special Limited Partner”), an entity wholly owned by the Company's sponsor, American Realty Capital VII, LLC (the “Sponsor”), expects to contribute $2,020 to the OP in exchange for 90 OP units, which will represent a nominal percentage of the aggregate OP ownership. A holder of OP units has the right to convert OP units for the cash value of a corresponding number of shares of the Company's common stock or, at the option of the OP, a corresponding number of shares of the Company's common stock, in accordance with the limited partnership agreement of the OP, provided, however, that such OP units must have been outstanding for at least one year. The remaining rights of the limited partners in the OP are limited, however, and do not include the ability to replace the general partner or to approve the sale, purchase or refinancing of the OP's assets.
5
AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)
Note 1 — Organization – (continued)
The Company has no employees. The Advisor has been retained by the Company to manage the Company's affairs on a day-to-day basis. The Company has retained American Realty Capital Healthcare II Properties, LLC (the “Property Manager”) to serve as the Company's property manager. Realty Capital Securities, LLC (the “Dealer Manager”) serves as the dealer manager of the IPO. The Advisor and the Property Manager are wholly owned entities of, and the Dealer Manager is under common ownership with, the Sponsor, as a result of which, they are related parties, and each of which will receive compensation, fees and expense reimbursements for services related to the IPO and the investment and management of the Company's assets. The Advisor, Property Manager and Dealer Manager will receive compensation, fees and expense reimbursements during the Company's offering, acquisition, operational and liquidation stages.
Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company included herein were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. The information furnished includes all adjustments and accruals of a normal recurring nature, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of results for the interim periods. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results for the entire year or any subsequent interim period.
These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto as of December 31, 2012, and for the period from October 15, 2012 (date of inception) to December 31, 2012, which are included in the Registration Statement. There have been no significant changes to Company's significant accounting policies during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 other than the updates described below.
Development Stage Company
On April 12, 2013, the Company raised proceeds sufficient to break general escrow in connection with its IPO. The Company received and accepted aggregate subscriptions in excess of the minimum offering amount in the IPO of $2.0 million, broke general escrow and issued shares of common stock to the Company's initial investors who were admitted as stockholders of the Company. The Company acquired its first property and commenced real estate operations on May 10, 2013, and, as of such date, is no longer considered to be a development stage company.
Deferred Costs
Deferred costs consists of deferred offering costs. Deferred offering costs represent professional fees, fees paid to various regulatory agencies, and other costs incurred in connection with registering to sell shares of the Company's common stock. On February 14, 2013, the day the Company commenced the IPO, deferred offering costs were reclassified to stockholders' equity.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance regarding disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities, which requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. The guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 with retrospective application for all comparative periods presented. The adoption of this guidance, which is related to disclosure only, did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
6
AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)
Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies – (continued)
In July 2012, the FASB issued revised guidance intended to simplify how an entity tests indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment. The amendments will allow an entity first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative impairment test. An entity will no longer be required to calculate the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative test unless the entity determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The amendments are effective for annual and interim indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In February 2013, the FASB issued guidance which requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. The guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2012 with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this guidance, which is related to disclosure only, did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In February 2013, the FASB issued new accounting guidance clarifying the accounting and disclosure requirements for obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount under the arrangement is fixed at the reporting date. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2013. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Note 3 — Real Estate Investments
The following table presents the allocation of the assets acquired during the nine months ended September 30, 2013:
(Dollar amounts in thousands) | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 | |||
Real estate investments, at cost: | ||||
Land | $ | 2,279 | ||
Buildings, fixtures and improvements | 34,291 | |||
Total tangible assets | 36,570 | |||
Acquired intangibles: | ||||
In-place leases | 5,180 | |||
Above-market lease assets | 236 | |||
Below-market lease liability | (61 | ) | ||
Total assets acquired, net | 41,925 | |||
Other liabilities assumed | (91 | ) | ||
Cash paid for acquired real estate investments | $ | 41,834 | ||
Number of properties purchased | 6 |
7
AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)
Note 3 — Real Estate Investments – (continued)
The following table presents unaudited pro forma information as if the acquisitions during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, had been consummated on October 15, 2012 (date of inception). Additionally, the unaudited pro forma net loss attributable to stockholders was adjusted to reclass acquisition and transaction related expense of $0.7 million from the nine months ended September 30, 2013 to October 15, 2012.
(In thousands) | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 | |||
Pro forma revenues | $ | 3,178 | ||
Pro forma net income | $ | 736 |
The following table presents future minimum base rental cash payments due to the Company over the next five years and thereafter. These amounts exclude contingent rent payments, as applicable, that may be collected from certain tenants based on provisions related to sales thresholds and increases in annual rent based on exceeding certain economic indexes among other items.
(In thousands) | Future Minimum Base Rent Payments | |||
October 1, 2013 – December 31, 2013 | $ | 816 | ||
2014 | 3,301 | |||
2015 | 3,361 | |||
2016 | 3,423 | |||
2017 | 3,399 | |||
Thereafter | 22,057 | |||
$ | 36,357 |
The following table lists the tenants (including for this purpose, all affiliates of such tenants) whose annualized rental income on a straight-line basis represented greater than 10% of total annualized rental income for all properties on a straight-line basis as of September 30, 2013:
Tenant | September 30, 2013 | |||
Adena Health System | 11.9 | % | ||
Advocate Health and Hospitals Corporation | 12.0 | % | ||
HH/Killeen Health System, LLC | 14.1 | % | ||
IASIS Healthcare, LLC | 16.9 | % | ||
National Mentor Holdings, Inc. | 27.4 | % |
The termination, delinquency or non-renewal of leases by one or more of the above tenants may have a material adverse effect on revenues.
8
AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)
Note 3 — Real Estate Investments – (continued)
The following table lists the states where the Company has concentrations of properties where annualized rental income on a straight-line basis represented greater than 10% of consolidated annualized rental income for all properties on a straight-line basis as of September 30, 2013:
State | September 30, 2013 | |||
Colorado | 27.4 | % | ||
Illinois | 25.3 | % | ||
Louisiana | 16.9 | % | ||
Ohio | 11.9 | % | ||
Texas | 14.1 | % |
Note 4 — Common Stock
The Company had 3.8 million and 8,888 shares of common stock outstanding, including unvested restricted shares and shares issued pursuant to the DRIP, and had received total proceeds of $93.2 million and $0.2 million, including proceeds from shares issued pursuant to the DRIP, as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.
On April 9, 2013, the Company's board of directors authorized, and the Company declared, a distribution rate, which is calculated based on stockholders of record each day during the applicable period at a rate of $0.0046575343 per day based on a price of $25.00 per share of common stock. Distributions began to accrue on May 24, 2013, 15 days following the Company's initial property acquisition. Distributions are payable by the 5th day following each month end to stockholders of record at the close of business each day during the prior month. Distribution payments are dependent on the availability of funds. The board of directors may reduce the amount of distributions paid or suspend distribution payments at any time and therefore distributions payments are not assured.
The Company has a Share Repurchase Program (“SRP”) that enables stockholders, subject to certain conditions and limitations, to sell their shares to the Company. Under the SRP, stockholders may request that the Company repurchase all or any portion of their shares of common stock, if such repurchase does not impair the Company's capital or operations. As of September 30, 2013, no shares of common stock have been repurchased or requested to be repurchased. The Company will fund repurchases from proceeds from the sale of common stock pursuant to the DRIP.
Note 5 — Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
In the ordinary course of business, the Company may become subject to litigation or claims. There are no material legal proceedings pending or known to be contemplated against the Company.
Environmental Matters
In connection with the ownership and operation of real estate, the Company may potentially be liable for costs and damages related to environmental matters. As of September 30, 2013, the Company has not been notified by any governmental authority of any non-compliance, liability or other claim, and is not aware of any other environmental condition that it believes will have a material adverse effect on the results of operations.
9
AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)
Note 6 — Related Party Transactions and Arrangements
As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Special Limited Partner owned 8,888 shares of the Company's outstanding common stock. The Advisor and its affiliates may incur and pay costs and fees on behalf of the Company. As of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company had approximately $5,000 and $0.4 million payable to affiliated entities, primarily related to funding the payment of third party professional fees and offering costs, net of expenses absorbed by the Advisor.
Fees Paid in Connection with the IPO
The Dealer Manager receives fees and compensation in connection with the sale of the Company's common stock in the IPO. The Dealer Manager receives a selling commission of up to 7.0% of the per share purchase price of offering proceeds before reallowance of commissions earned by participating broker-dealers. In addition, the Dealer Manager receives up to 3.0% of the gross proceeds from the sale of shares, before reallowance to participating broker-dealers, as a dealer-manager fee. The Dealer Manager may reallow its dealer-manager fee to such participating broker-dealers. A participating broker dealer may elect to receive a fee equal to 7.5% of the gross proceeds from the sale of shares (not including selling commissions and dealer manager fees) by such participating broker dealer, with 2.5% thereof paid at the time of such sale and 1.0% thereof paid on each anniversary of the closing of such sale up to and including the fifth anniversary of the closing of such sale. If this option is elected, the dealer manager fee will be reduced to 2.5% of gross proceeds (not including selling commissions and dealer manager fees). The following table details total selling commissions and dealer manager fees incurred from and due to the Dealer Manager as of and for the periods presented:
Payable as of | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 | September 30, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||
Total commissions and fees incurred from the Dealer Manager | $ | 5,947 | $ | 8,692 | $ | 71 | $ | — |
The Advisor and its affiliates receive compensation and reimbursement for services relating to the IPO, including transfer agent services provided by an affiliate of the Dealer Manager. All offering costs incurred by the Company or its affiliated entities on behalf of the Company are charged to additional paid-in capital on the accompanying balance sheet as of September 30, 2013 and were included in deferred offering costs as of December 31, 2012. The following table details offering costs and reimbursements incurred from and due to the Advisor and Dealer Manager as of and for the periods presented:
Payable as of | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 | September 30, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | ||||||||||||
Fees and expense reimbursements from the Advisor and Dealer Manager | $ | 538 | $ | 1,253 | $ | 74 | $ | — |
The Company is responsible for offering and related costs from the IPO, excluding commissions and dealer manager fees, up to a maximum of 2.0% of gross proceeds received from the IPO, measured at the end of the IPO. Offering costs in excess of the 2.0% cap as of the end of the IPO are the Advisor's responsibility. As of September 30, 2013, offering and related costs, excluding commissions and dealer manager fees, exceeded 2.0% of gross proceeds received from the IPO by $1.2 million.
10
AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)
Note 6 — Related Party Transactions and Arrangements – (continued)
After the general escrow break, the Advisor and the Dealer Manager elected to cap cumulative offering costs for the IPO, including selling commissions and dealer manager fees, incurred by the Company, net of unpaid amounts, to 15% of gross common stock proceeds during the offering period of the IPO. As of September 30, 2013, cumulative offering costs were $11.8 million. Cumulative offering costs net of unpaid amounts, were less than the 15% threshold as of September 30, 2013.
Fees Paid in Connection With the Operations of the Company
The Advisor receives an acquisition fee of 1.0% of the contract purchase price of each acquired property and 1.0% of the amount advanced for a loan or other investment. The Advisor is also paid for services provided for which they incur investment-related expenses, or insourced expenses. Such insourced expenses will be fixed initially at, and may not exceed, 0.5% of the contract purchase price of each acquired property and 0.5% of the amount advanced for a loan or other investment. Additionally, the Company pays third party acquisition expenses. Once the proceeds from the IPO have been fully invested, the aggregate amount of acquisition fees and financing coordination fees (as described below) shall not exceed 1.5% of the contract purchase price and the amount advanced for a loan or other investment for all the assets acquired. In no event will the total of all acquisition fees, acquisition expenses and any financing coordination fees payable with respect to the Company's portfolio of investments or reinvestments exceed 4.5% of the contract purchase price of the Company's portfolio to be measured at the close of the acquisition phase or 4.5% of the amount advanced for all loans or other investments.
If the Advisor provides services in connection with the origination or refinancing of any debt that the Company obtains and uses to acquire properties or to make other permitted investments, or that is assumed, directly or indirectly, in connection with the acquisition of properties, the Company will pay the Advisor a financing coordination fee equal to 0.75% of the amount available and/or outstanding under such financing, subject to certain limitations.
For its asset management services, the Company expects to issue (subject to periodic approval by the board of directors) to the Advisor performance-based restricted partnership units of the OP (“Class B Units”) in an amount equal to the excess of the cost of the Company's assets multiplied by 0.1875% less any amounts payable as an oversight fee (as described below) divided by the value of one share of common stock as of the last day of such calendar quarter, which is equal initially to $22.50 (the IPO price minus selling commissions and dealer manager fees) and, at such time as the Company calculates NAV, to per share NAV. However, if the amounts payable as an oversight fee for such quarter exceed the amount of the cost of the Company's assets multiplied by 0.1875% for such quarter (an excess oversight fee), no Class B Units shall be issued for such quarter and the excess oversight fee shall be carried forward to the next succeeding calendar quarter and included with and treated as amounts payable as an oversight fee for such quarter for purposes of determining the amount of restricted Class B Units issuable for that quarter. In addition, the sum of the cost of the Company's assets multiplied by 0.1875% for a calendar year plus the amounts payable as an oversight fee for such calendar year, shall not be less than 0.75% of the cost of assets for such calendar year. The Advisor will be entitled to receive distributions on the vested and unvested Class B units it receives in connection with its asset management subordinated participation at the same rate as distributions received on the Company's common stock; such distributions will be in addition to the incentive fees the Advisor and its affiliates may receive from the Company, including, without limitation, the annual subordinated performance fee and the subordinated participation in net sales proceeds, the subordinated incentive listing distribution or the subordinated distribution upon termination of the advisory agreement, as applicable. The restricted Class B Units shall not be convertible into unrestricted Class B Units until such time as the adjusted market value of the OP's assets plus applicable distributions equals the sum of the aggregate capital contributed by investors plus an amount equal to an annual 6.0% cumulative, pre-tax, non-compounded return to investors and only at such time as the capital account associated with a restricted Class B Unit equals the capital account of an
11
AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)
Note 6 — Related Party Transactions and Arrangements – (continued)
unrestricted Class B Unit. As of September 30, 2013, the Company's board of directors approved the issuance of 618 Class B Units to the Advisor in connection with this arrangement.
Unless the Company contracts with a third party, the Company will pay the Property Manager a property management fee of 1.5% of gross revenues from the Company's stand-alone single-tenant net leased properties and 2.5% of gross revenues from all other types of properties, respectively. The Company will also reimburse the affiliate for property level expenses. If the Company contracts directly with third parties for such services, the Company will pay them customary market fees and will pay the Property Manager an oversight fee of up to 1.0% of the gross revenues of the property managed. In no event will the Company pay the Property Manager or any affiliate both a property management fee and an oversight fee with respect to any particular property.
Effective June 1, 2013, the Company entered into an agreement with the Dealer Manager to provide strategic advisory services and investment banking services required in the ordinary course of the Company's business, such as performing financial analysis, evaluating publicly traded comparable companies and assisting in developing a portfolio composition strategy, a capitalization structure to optimize future liquidity options and structuring operations. Strategic advisory fees are amortized over approximately 32 months, the estimated remaining term of the IPO and are included in general and administrative expenses in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss.
The following table details amounts incurred, forgiven and payable in connection with the Company's operations-related services described above as of and for the periods presented:
(In thousands) | Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 | Payable as of | |||||||||||||||||||||
Incurred | Forgiven | Incurred | Forgiven | September 30, 2013 | December 31, 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||
One-time fees and reimbursements: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisition fees and related cost reimbursements | $ | 457 | $ | — | $ | 541 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||
Financing coordination fees | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Other expense reimbursements | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Ongoing fees: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Property management and leasing fees | — | 9 | — | 9 | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Strategic advisory fees | 152 | — | 180 | — | 180 | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Distributions on Class B Units | — | — | — | — | — | — | ||||||||||||||||||
Total related party operation fees and reimbursements | $ | 609 | $ | 9 | $ | 721 | $ | 9 | $ | 180 | $ | — |
The Company reimburses the Advisor's costs of providing administrative services, subject to the limitation that the Company will not reimburse the Advisor for any amount by which the Company's operating expenses at the end of the four preceding fiscal quarters exceeds the greater of (a) 2.0% of average invested assets and (b) 25.0% of net income other than any additions to reserves for depreciation, bad debt or other similar non-cash reserves and excluding any gain from the sale of assets for that period. Additionally, the Company reimburses the Advisor for personnel costs in connection with other services during the operational stage; however, the Company may not reimburse the Advisor for personnel costs in connection with services for which the Advisor receives acquisition fees, acquisition expenses or real estate commissions. No reimbursement was incurred from the Advisor for providing services during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013.
12
AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)
Note 6 — Related Party Transactions and Arrangements – (continued)
In order to improve operating cash flows and the ability to pay distributions from operating cash flows, the Advisor may elect to waive certain fees. Because the Advisor may waive certain fees, cash flow from operations that would have been paid to the Advisor may be available to pay distributions to stockholders. The fees that are forgiven are not deferrals and accordingly, will not be paid to the Advisor. In certain instances, to improve the Company's working capital, the Advisor may elect to absorb a portion of the Company's property operating and general and administrative costs, which the Company will not repay. The following table details property operating and general and administrative expenses absorbed by the Advisor during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013. These costs are presented net in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.
(In thousands) | Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 | ||||||
Property operating expenses absorbed | $ | — | $ | — | ||||
General and administrative expenses absorbed | 302 | 479 | ||||||
Total expenses absorbed(1) | $ | 302 | $ | 479 |
(1) | The Company had a receivable from affiliates of $0.5 million as of September 30, 2013 related to absorbed general and administrative expenses. As of December 31, 2012, there was no such receivable. |
Fees Paid in Connection with the Liquidation or Listing of the Company's Real Estate Assets
The Company will pay the Advisor an annual subordinated performance fee calculated on the basis of the Company's total return to stockholders, payable annually in arrears, such that for any year in which the Company's total return on stockholders' capital exceeds 6.0% per annum, the Advisor will be entitled to 15.0% of the excess total return but not to exceed 10.0% of the aggregate total return for such year. This fee will be payable only upon the sale of assets, distributions or other event which results in the return on stockholders' capital exceeding 6.0% per annum. No subordinated performance fees were incurred during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013.
The Company will pay a brokerage commission on the sale of property, not to exceed the lesser of 2.0% of the contract sale price of the property and 50.0% of the total brokerage commission paid if a third party broker is also involved; provided, however, that in no event may the real estate commissions paid to the Advisor, its affiliates and unaffiliated third parties exceed the lesser of 4.5% of the contract sales price and a reasonable, customary and competitive real estate commission, in each case, payable to the Advisor if the Advisor or its affiliates, as determined by a majority of the independent directors, provided a substantial amount of services are provided in connection with the sale. No such fees were incurred during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013.
If the Company is not simultaneously listed on an exchange, the Company intends to pay the Special Limited Partner a subordinated participation in the net sales proceeds of the sale of real estate assets of 15.0% of remaining net sale proceeds after return of capital contributions to investors plus payment to investors of a 6.0% cumulative, pre-tax non-compounded return on the capital contributed by investors. The Company cannot assure that it will provide this 6.0% return but the Special Limited Partner will not be entitled to the subordinated participation in net sale proceeds unless the Company's investors have received a 6.0% cumulative non-compounded return on their capital contributions. No such fees were incurred during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013.
If the common stock of the Company is listed on a national exchange, the Company expects to pay the Special Limited Partner a subordinated incentive listing distribution of 15.0% of the amount by which the adjusted market value of real estate assets plus distributions exceeds the aggregate capital contributed by investors plus an amount equal to a 6.0% cumulative, pre-tax non-compounded annual return to investors. The
13
AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)
Note 6 — Related Party Transactions and Arrangements – (continued)
Company cannot assure that it will provide this 6.0% return but the Special Limited Partner will not be entitled to the subordinated incentive listing fee unless investors have received a 6.0% cumulative, pre-tax non-compounded return on their capital contributions. No such fees were incurred during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013. Neither the Special Limited Partner nor any of its affiliates can earn both the subordinated participation in the net proceeds and the subordinated listing distribution.
Upon termination or non-renewal of the advisory agreement with the Advisor, with or without cause, the Special Limited Partner, through its controlling interest in the Advisor, will be entitled to receive distributions from the OP equal to 15% of the amount by which the sum of the Company's market value plus distributions exceeds the sum of the aggregate capital contributed by investors plus an amount equal to an annual 6% cumulative, pre-tax, non-compounded return to investors. The Special Limited Partner may elect to defer its right to receive a subordinated distribution upon termination until either a listing on a national securities exchange or other liquidity event occurs.
Note 7 — Economic Dependency
Under various agreements, the Company has engaged or will engage the Advisor, its affiliates and entities under common ownership with the Advisor to provide certain services that are essential to the Company, including asset management services, supervision of the management and leasing of properties owned by the Company, asset acquisition and disposition decisions, the sale of shares of the Company's common stock available for issue, transfer agency services, as well as other administrative responsibilities for the Company including accounting services, transaction management services and investor relations.
As a result of these relationships, the Company is dependent upon the Advisor and its affiliates. In the event that the Advisor and its affiliates are unable to provide the Company with the respective services, the Company will be required to find alternative providers of these services.
Note 8 — Share-Based Compensation
Restricted Share Plan
The Company has an employee and director incentive restricted share plan (the “RSP”), which provides for the automatic grant of 1,333 restricted shares of common stock to each of the independent directors, without any further action by the Company's board of directors or the stockholders, on the date of initial election to the board of directors and on the date of each annual stockholder's meeting. Restricted stock issued to independent directors will vest over a five-year period following the first anniversary of the date of grant in increments of 20.0% per annum. The RSP provides the Company with the ability to grant awards of restricted shares to the Company's directors, officers and employees (if the Company ever has employees), employees of the Advisor and its affiliates, employees of entities that provide services to the Company, directors of the Advisor or of entities that provide services to the Company, certain consultants to the Company and the Advisor and its affiliates or to entities that provide services to the Company. The total number of common shares granted under the RSP shall not exceed 5.0% of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock on a fully diluted basis at any time and in any event will not exceed 3.4 million shares (as such number may be adjusted for stock splits, stock dividends, combinations and similar events).
Restricted share awards entitle the recipient to receive shares of common stock from the Company under terms that provide for vesting over a specified period of time or upon attainment of pre-established performance objectives. Such awards would typically be forfeited with respect to the unvested shares upon the termination of the recipient's employment or other relationship with the Company. Restricted shares may not, in general, be sold or otherwise transferred until restrictions are removed and the shares have vested. Holders of restricted shares may receive cash distributions prior to the time that the restrictions on the restricted shares have lapsed. Any distributions payable in shares of common stock shall be subject to the same restrictions as
14
AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)
Note 8 — Share-Based Compensation – (continued)
the underlying restricted shares. As of September 30, 2013, there were 3,999 unvested restricted shares issued to independent directors under the RSP at $22.50 per share. There were no such restricted shares outstanding as of December 31, 2012. The fair value of the restricted shares is being expensed over the vesting period of five years. Compensation expense related to restricted stock was approximately $4,000 and $11,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, and is recorded as general and administrative expense in the accompanying statements of operations.
Other Share-Based Compensation
The Company may issue common stock in lieu of cash to pay fees earned by the Company's directors at the respective director's election. There are no restrictions on the shares issued since these payments in lieu of cash relate to fees earned for services performed. There were no such shares of common stock issued in lieu of cash during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013.
Note 9 — Net Loss Per Share
The following is a summary of the basic and diluted net loss per share computation for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 | |||||||
Net loss(in thousands) | $ | (399 | ) | $ | (562 | ) | ||
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding | 2,559,022 | 991,948 | ||||||
Basic and diluted net loss per share | $ | (0.16 | ) | $ | (0.57 | ) |
The Company had the following common share equivalents as of September 30, 2013, which were excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per share attributable to stockholders as the effect would have been antidilutive:
September 30, 2013 | ||||
Unvested restricted stock | 3,999 | |||
Class B units | 618 | |||
Total common share equivalents | 4,617 |
Note 10 — Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and determined that there have not been any events that have occurred that would require adjustments to disclosures in the consolidated financial statements except for the following transactions:
Sales of Common Stock
As of October 31, 2013, the Company had 5.0 million shares of common stock outstanding, including unvested restricted shares and shares issued pursuant to the DRIP from total gross proceeds from the IPO and the DRIP of $122.7 million. As of October 31, 2013, the aggregate value of all share issuances was $123.7 million based on a per share value of $25.00 (or $23.75 per share for shares issued under the DRIP).
15
AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30, 2013
(Unaudited)
Note 10 — Subsequent Events – (continued)
Total capital raised to date, including shares issued under the DRIP, is as follows:
Source of Capital(in thousands) | Inception to September 30, 2013 | October 1, 2013 to October 31, 2013 | Total | |||||||||
Common stock | $ | 93,242 | $ | 29,478 | $ | 122,720 |
Acquisitions
The following table presents certain information about the properties that the Company acquired from October 1, 2013 to October 31, 2013:
Number of Properties | Rentable Square Feet | Base Purchase Price(1) | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
Portfolio, September 30, 2013 | 6 | 112,672 | $ | 41,925 | ||||||||
Acquisitions | 1 | 21,603 | 4,300 | |||||||||
Portfolio, October 31, 2013 | 7 | 134,275 | $ | 46,225 |
(1) | Contract purchase price, excluding acquisition related costs. |
16
Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements of American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc. and the notes thereto. As used herein, the terms the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc., a Maryland corporation, including, as required by context, American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II Operating Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, which we refer to as the “OP,” and its subsidiaries. The Company is externally managed by American Realty Capital Healthcare II Advisors, LLC (our “Advisor”), a Delaware limited liability company.
Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are forward-looking statements. Those statements include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of the Company and members of our management team, as well as the assumptions on which such statements are based, and generally are identified by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “seeks,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “should” or similar expressions. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements. Further, forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results over time, unless required by law.
The following are some of the risks and uncertainties, although not all risks and uncertainties, that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those presented in our forward-looking statements:
• | We have a limited operating history and the Advisor has limited experience operating a public company. This inexperience makes our future performance difficult to predict. |
• | All of our executive officers are also officers, managers and/or holders of a direct or indirect controlling interest in our Advisor, our dealer manager, Realty Capital Securities, LLC (the “Dealer Manager”) and other American Realty Capital affiliated entities. As a result, our executive officers, our Advisor and its affiliates face conflicts of interest, including significant conflicts created by our Advisor's compensation arrangements with us and other investment programs advised by American Realty Capital affiliates and conflicts in allocating time among these investment programs and us. These conflicts could result in unanticipated actions. |
• | Because investment opportunities that are suitable for us may also be suitable for other American Realty Capital advised investment programs, our Advisor and its affiliates face conflicts of interest relating to the purchase of properties and other investments and such conflicts may not be resolved in our favor, meaning that we could invest in less attractive assets, which could reduce the investment return to our stockholders. |
• | Within six months following our acquisition of $2.0 billion in total portfolio assets, the purchase price and repurchase price for our shares will be based on our net asset value (“NAV”) rather than a public trading market. Our published NAV may not accurately reflect the value of our assets. No public market currently exists, or may ever exist, for shares of our common stock which are, and may continue to be, illiquid. |
• | We focus on acquiring a diversified portfolio of healthcare-related assets located in the United States and are subject to risks inherent in concentrating investments in the healthcare industry. |
• | The healthcare industry is heavily regulated, and new laws or regulations, changes to existing laws or regulations, loss of licensure or failure to obtain licensure could result in the inability of tenants to make lease payments to us. |
• | If we and our Advisor are unable to find suitable investments, then we may not be able to achieve our investment objectives or pay distributions. |
17
• | Our initial public offering of common stock (the “IPO”), which commenced on February 14, 2013, is a blind pool offering and you may not have the opportunity to evaluate our investments before you make your purchase of our common stock, thus making your investment more speculative. |
• | If we raise substantially less than the maximum offering in our IPO, we may not be able to invest in a diversified portfolio of real estate assets, which may cause the value of an investment in us to vary more widely with the performance of specific assets. |
• | We may be unable to pay or maintain cash distributions or increase distributions over time. |
• | We are obligated to pay substantial fees to our Advisor and its affiliates. |
• | We will depend on tenants for our revenue and, accordingly, our revenue is dependent upon the success and economic viability of our tenants. |
• | Increases in interest rates could increase the amount of our debt payments and limit our ability to pay distributions. |
• | Organizational documents permit us to pay distributions from unlimited amounts of any source. Until substantially all of the proceeds from our IPO are invested, we may use proceeds from our IPO and financings to fund distributions until we have sufficient cash flow. There are not established limits on the amount of net proceeds and borrowings that we may use to fund distribution payments. |
• | Any distributions may reduce the amount of capital we ultimately invest in properties and other permitted investments and negatively impact the value of your investment. |
• | We may not generate cash flows sufficient to pay our distributions to stockholders, as such, we may be forced to borrow at higher rates or depend on our Advisor to waive reimbursement of certain expenses and fees to fund our operations. |
• | We are subject to risks associated with any dislocations or liquidity disruptions that may exist or occur in the credit markets of the United States from time to time. |
• | We may fail to qualify, or continue to qualify, to be treated as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for United States federal income tax purposes, which would result in higher taxes, may adversely affect our operations and would reduce our NAV and cash available for distributions. |
• | We may be deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”), and thus subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. |
• | As of September 30, 2013, we only own six properties and therefore, have limited diversification. |
Overview
We were incorporated on October 15, 2012 as a Maryland corporation that intends to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes beginning with the taxable year ending December 31, 2013. On February 14, 2013, we commenced our IPO on a “reasonable best efforts” basis of up to $1.7 billion of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, at a price of $25.00 per share, subject to certain volume and other discounts, pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-11, as amended (File No. 333-184677) (the “Registration Statement”), filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Registration Statement also covers up to 14.7 million shares of common stock available pursuant to a distribution reinvestment plan (the “DRIP”) under which common stockholders may elect to have their distributions reinvested in additional shares of common stock.
On April 12, 2013, we received and accepted subscriptions in excess of the minimum offering amount of $2.0 million in shares, broke general escrow and issued shares of common stock to initial investors who were admitted as stockholders. As of September 30, 2013, we had 3.8 million shares of common stock outstanding, including unvested restricted shares and shares issued pursuant to the DRIP, and had received total gross proceeds from the IPO and the DRIP of $93.2 million. As of September 30, 2013, the aggregate value of all share issuances and subscriptions of common stock outstanding was $94.0 million based on a per share value of $25.00 (or $23.75 for shares issued under the DRIP). Until a date within six months following our
18
acquisition of at least $2.0 billion in total portfolio assets, the per share purchase price in the IPO will be up to $25.00 per share (including the maximum allowed to be charged for commissions and fees) and shares issued under the DRIP will be based on the greater of $23.75 per share or 95% of the estimated value of a share of common stock. Within six months following our acquisition of at least $2.0 billion in total portfolio assets, the per share purchase price will vary quarterly and will be equal to the NAV per share, as determined by the Advisor, plus applicable commissions and fees and the per share purchase price in the DRIP will be equal to the NAV per share. We reserve the right to reallocate shares we are offering between the IPO and the DRIP.
We were formed to acquire a diversified portfolio of real estate properties, focusing primarily on building a portfolio of healthcare-related assets, including medical office buildings, senior housing and other healthcare-related facilities. All such properties may be acquired and operated by us alone or jointly with another party. We may also originate or acquire first mortgage loans secured by real estate. We purchased our first property and commenced real estate operations in May 2013. As of September 30, 2013, the Company owned six properties consisting of 112,672 rentable square feet, which were 100.0% leased, with a remaining lease term of 10.2 years.
Substantially all of our business is conducted through the OP. We are the sole general partner and hold substantially all of the units of limited partner interests in the OP (“OP units”). American Realty Capital Healthcare II Special Limited Partnership, LLC (the “Special Limited Partner”), a wholly owned entity of American Realty Capital VII, LLC (the “Sponsor”), expects to contribute $2,020 to the OP in exchange for 90 OP units, which will represent a nominal percentage of the aggregate OP ownership. A holder of OP units has the right to convert OP units for the cash value of a corresponding number of shares of the Company's common stock or, at the option of the OP, a corresponding number of shares of the Company's common stock, in accordance with the limited partnership agreement of the OP. The remaining rights of the limited partner interests are limited, however, and do not include the ability to replace the general partner or to approve the sale, purchase or refinancing of the OP's assets.
We have no employees. The Advisor is our affiliated external advisor, which we have retained to manage our affairs on a day-to-day basis. We have retained American Realty Capital Healthcare II Properties, LLC (the “Property Manager”) to serve as our property manager. The Dealer Manager serves as the dealer manager of the IPO. The Advisor and the Property Manager are wholly owned entities of, and the Dealer Manager is under common ownership with, the Sponsor, as a result of which, they are related parties, and each of which will receive compensation, fees and expense reimbursements for services related to the IPO and the investment and management of our assets. The Advisor, Property Manager and Dealer Manager will receive fees during our offering, acquisition, operational and liquidation stages.
Significant Accounting Estimates and Critical Accounting Policies
Set forth below is a summary of the significant accounting estimates and critical accounting policies that management believes are important to the preparation of our financial statements. Certain of our accounting estimates are particularly important for an understanding of our financial position and results of operations and require the application of significant judgment by our management. As a result, these estimates are subject to a degree of uncertainty. These significant accounting estimates and critical accounting policies include:
Offering and Related Costs
Offering and related costs include all expenses incurred in connection with our IPO. Offering costs (other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fees) include costs that may be paid by the Advisor, the Dealer Manager or their affiliates on our behalf. These costs include but are not limited to (i) legal, accounting, printing, mailing, and filing fees; (ii) escrow service related fees; (iii) reimbursement of the Dealer Manager for amounts it may pay to reimburse the bona fide diligence expenses of broker-dealers; and (iv) reimbursement to the Advisor for a portion of the costs of its employees and other costs in connection with preparing supplemental sales materials and related offering activities. We are obligated to reimburse the Advisor or its affiliates, as applicable, for organization and offering costs paid by them on our behalf, provided that the Advisor is obligated to reimburse us to the extent organization and offering costs (excluding selling commissions and the dealer manager fee) incurred by us in our IPO exceed 2.0% of gross offering proceeds in
19
the IPO. As a result, these costs are only our liability to the extent aggregate selling commissions, the dealer manager fee and other organization and offering costs do not exceed 12.0% of the gross proceeds determined at the end of our IPO.
Revenue Recognition
Our rental income is primarily related to rent received from tenants, which are recorded in accordance with the terms of each lease on a straight-line basis over the initial term of the lease. Since many of the leases provide for rental increases at specified intervals, straight-line basis accounting requires us to record a receivable, and include in revenues, unbilled rent receivables that we will only receive if the tenant makes all rent payments required through the expiration of the initial term of the lease. When we acquire a property, the terms of existing leases are considered to commence as of the acquisition date for the purposes of this calculation. We defer the revenue related to lease payments received from tenants in advance of their due dates. Cost recoveries from tenants are included in operating expense reimbursement in the period the related costs are incurred, as applicable.
We continually review receivables related to rent and unbilled rent receivables and determine collectability by taking into consideration the tenant's payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area in which the property is located. In the event that the collectability of a receivable is in doubt, we will record an increase in the allowance for uncollectible accounts or record a direct write-off of the receivable in the consolidated statements of operations.
Investments in Real Estate
Investments in real estate are recorded at cost. Improvements and replacements are capitalized when they extend the useful life of the asset. Costs of repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of up to 40 years for buildings, 15 years for land improvements, five years for fixtures and improvements and the shorter of the useful life or the remaining lease term for tenant improvements and leasehold interests.
We are required to make subjective assessments as to the useful lives of our properties for purposes of determining the amount of depreciation to record on an annual basis with respect to our investments in real estate. These assessments have a direct impact on our net income because if we were to shorten the expected useful lives of our investments in real estate, we would depreciate these investments over fewer years, resulting in more depreciation expense and lower net income on an annual basis. We are required to present the operations related to properties that have been sold or properties that are intended to be sold as discontinued operations in the statement of operations at fair value for all periods presented. Properties that are intended to be sold are to be designated as “held for sale” on the balance sheet.
Long-lived assets are carried at cost and evaluated for impairment when events or changes in circumstances indicate such an evaluation is warranted or when they are designated as held for sale. Valuation of real estate is considered a “critical accounting estimate” because the evaluation of impairment and the determination of fair values involve a number of management assumptions relating to future economic events that could materially affect the determination of the ultimate value, and therefore, the carrying amounts of our real estate. Additionally, decisions regarding when a property should be classified as held for sale are also highly subjective and require significant management judgment.
Events or changes in circumstances that could cause an evaluation for impairment include the following:
• | a significant decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset; |
• | a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which a long-lived asset is being used or in its physical condition; |
• | a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of a long-lived asset, including an adverse action or assessment by a regulator; |
• | an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of a long-lived asset; and |
20
• | a current-period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of a long-lived asset. |
We review our portfolio on an ongoing basis to evaluate the existence of any of the aforementioned events or changes in circumstances that would require us to test for recoverability. In general, our review of recoverability is based on an estimate of the future undiscounted cash flows, excluding interest charges, expected to result from the property's use and eventual disposition. These estimates consider factors such as expected future operating income, market and other applicable trends and residual value expected, as well as the effects of leasing demand, competition and other factors. If impairment exists due to the inability to recover the carrying value of a property, an impairment loss is recorded to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the property. We are required to make subjective assessments as to whether there are impairments in the values of our investments in real estate. These assessments have a direct impact on our net income because recording an impairment loss results in an immediate negative adjustment to net income.
Purchase Price Allocation
We allocate the purchase price of acquired properties to tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired based on their respective fair values. Tangible assets include land, land improvements, buildings, fixtures and tenant improvements on an as-if vacant basis. We utilize various estimates, processes and information to determine the as-if vacant property value. Estimates of value are made using customary methods, including data from appraisals, comparable sales, discounted cash flow analysis and other methods. Amounts allocated to land, land improvements, buildings and fixtures are based on cost segregation studies performed by independent third-parties or on our analysis of comparable properties in our portfolio. Identifiable intangible assets include amounts allocated to acquire leases for above-and below-market lease rates, the value of in-place leases, and the value of customer relationships, as applicable.
The aggregate value of intangible assets related to in-place leases is primarily the difference between the property valued with existing in-place leases adjusted to market rental rates and the property valued as if vacant. Factors considered by us in our analysis of the in-place lease intangibles include an estimate of carrying costs during the expected lease-up period for each property, taking into account current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. In estimating carrying costs, we include real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at contract rates during the expected lease-up period, which typically ranges from six to 12 months. We also estimate costs to execute similar leases including leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses.
Above-market and below-market in-place lease values for owned properties are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and management's estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease. The capitalized above-market lease intangibles are amortized as a decrease to rental income over the remaining term of the lease. The capitalized below-market lease values are amortized as an increase to rental income over the remaining term and any fixed rate renewal periods provided within the respective leases. In determining the amortization period for below-market lease intangibles, we initially will consider, and periodically evaluate on a quarterly basis, the likelihood that a lessee will execute the renewal option. The likelihood that a lessee will execute the renewal option is determined by taking into consideration the tenant's payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the area in which the property is located.
The aggregate value of intangible assets related to customer relationship is measured based on our evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant's lease and our overall relationship with the tenant. Characteristics considered by us in determining these values include the nature and extent of our existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant's credit quality and expectations of lease renewals, among other factors.
21
The value of in-place leases is amortized to expense over the initial term of the respective leases, which range primarily from 3 to 13 years. The value of customer relationship intangibles is amortized to expense over the initial term and any renewal periods in the respective leases, but in no event does the amortization period for intangible assets exceed the remaining depreciable life of the building. If a tenant terminates its lease, the unamortized portion of the in-place lease value and customer relationship intangibles is charged to expense.
In making estimates of fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price, we utilize a number of sources, including independent appraisals that may be obtained in connection with the acquisition or financing of the respective property and other market data. We also consider information obtained about each property as a result of our pre-acquisition due diligence, as well as subsequent marketing and leasing activities, in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and intangible liabilities assumed.
Derivative Instruments
We may use derivative financial instruments to hedge all or a portion of the interest rate risk associated with our borrowings. The principal objective of such agreements is to minimize the risks and/or costs associated with our operating and financial structure as well as to hedge specific anticipated transactions.
We record all derivatives on the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative, whether we have elected to designate a derivative in a hedging relationship and apply hedge accounting and whether the hedging relationship has satisfied the criteria necessary to apply hedge accounting. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives designated and qualifying as a hedge of the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges. Derivatives may also be designated as hedges of the foreign currency exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation. Hedge accounting generally provides for the matching of the timing of gain or loss recognition on the hedging instrument with the recognition of the changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that is attributable to the hedged risk in a fair value hedge or the earnings effect of the hedged forecasted transactions in a cash flow hedge. We may enter into derivative contracts that are intended to economically hedge certain risks, even though hedge accounting does not apply or we elect not to apply hedge accounting.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued guidance regarding disclosures about offsetting assets and liabilities, which requires entities to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. The guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 with retrospective application for all comparative periods presented. The adoption of this guidance, which is related to disclosure only, did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In July 2012, the FASB issued revised guidance intended to simplify how an entity tests indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment. The amendments will allow an entity first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform a quantitative impairment test. An entity will no longer be required to calculate the fair value of an indefinite-lived intangible asset and perform the quantitative test unless the entity determines, based on a qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The amendments are effective for annual and interim indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
In February 2013, the FASB issued guidance which requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income by component. The guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2012 with early adoption permitted. The adoption of this guidance, which is related to disclosure only, did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
22
In February 2013, the FASB issued new accounting guidance clarifying the accounting and disclosure requirements for obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount under the arrangement is fixed at the reporting date. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2013. We do not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Properties
The Company acquires and operates healthcare-related properties. All such properties may be acquired and operated by the Company alone or jointly with another party. The Company's portfolio of real estate properties is comprised of the following properties as of September 30, 2013:
Portfolio | Acquisition Date | Number of Properties | Rentable Square Feet | Occupancy | Remaining Lease Term(1) | Base Purchase Price(2) | ||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fresenius Dialysis Center | May 2013 | 1 | 5,564 | 100.0 | % | 9.4 | $ | 1,920 | ||||||||||||||||
Adena Health Center | Jun. 2013 | 1 | 24,924 | 100.0 | % | 10.4 | 5,446 | |||||||||||||||||
Ouachita Community Hospital | Jul. 2013 | 1 | 17,830 | 100.0 | % | 10.4 | 6,834 | |||||||||||||||||
CareMeridian | Aug. 2013 | 1 | 27,630 | 100.0 | % | 13.8 | 11,275 | |||||||||||||||||
Oak Lawn Medical Center | Aug. 2013 | 1 | 26,324 | 100.0 | % | 4.4 | 10,300 | |||||||||||||||||
Surgery Center of Temple | Aug. 2013 | 1 | 10,400 | 100.0 | % | 13.4 | 6,150 | |||||||||||||||||
6 | 112,672 | 100.0 | % | 10.2 | $ | 41,925 |
(1) | Remaining lease term in years as of September 30, 2013, calculated on a weighted-average basis, as applicable. |
(2) | Contract purchase price, excluding acquisition related costs. |
Results of Operations
We were incorporated on October 15, 2012. We purchased our first property and commenced our real estate operations in May 2013.
Rental Income
Rental income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $0.6 million. As of September 30, 2013, we owned six properties, which were 100.0% leased with annualized rental income on a straight line basis of $3.6 million and a weighted average remaining lease term of 10.2 years.
Operating Expense Reimbursements and Property Operating Expense
Operating expense reimbursements and property operating expense were $0.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013. Pursuant to many of our lease agreements, tenants are required to pay their pro rata share of property operating expenses, in addition to base rent, whereas under certain other lease agreements, the tenants are directly responsible for all operating costs of the respective properties.
Acquisition and Transaction Related Expenses
Acquisition and transaction related expenses of $0.5 million and $0.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, related to our acquisition of four and six properties with an aggregate purchase price of $34.6 million and $41.9 million, respectively.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 of $49,000 and $0.1 million, respectively, primarily included board member compensation, insurance expense, professional fees and state income tax expense. General and administrative expense also reflects absorbed costs of $0.3 million and $0.5 million by our Advisor during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively.
23
Depreciation and Amortization Expenses
Depreciation and amortization expenses of $0.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, related to our acquisition of four and six properties with an aggregate purchase price of $34.6 million and $41.9 million, respectively. The purchase price of acquired properties is allocated to tangible and identifiable intangible assets and depreciated or amortized over the estimated useful lives.
Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, net cash used in operating activities was $0.2 million. The level of cash flows used in or provided by operating activities is affected by the volume of acquisition activity and the receipt of scheduled rent payments. Cash flows used in operating activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 includes $0.7 million of acquisition and transaction costs. Cash outflows included a net loss adjusted for non-cash items of $0.2 million (net loss of $0.6 million adjusted for non-cash items including depreciation and amortization of tangible and intangible real estate assets and share based compensation of $0.4 million) and an increase in prepaid expenses of $0.4 million primarily related to real estate taxes, insurance, rent receivable and unbilled rent receivables recorded in accordance with accounting for rental income on a straight-line basis. These cash outflows were partially offset by cash inflows that consisted of an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $0.3 million related to accrued real estate taxes and accrued professional fees, and deferred rent of $0.1 million.
The net cash used in investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 of $42.0 million related to the acquisition of six properties with an aggregate purchase price of $41.9 million. Net cash used in investing activities also includes a deposit on an acquisition of $0.2 million, which closed in October 2013.
Net cash provided by financing activities of $80.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 related to proceeds, net of receivables, from the issuance of common stock of $91.9 million, partially offset by and net advances from affiliates of $0.4 million, payments related to offering costs of $11.0 million and $0.4 million in distributions paid to stockholders.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We are offering and selling to the public in our primary offering up to $1.7 billion in shares of our common stock, $0.01 par value per share, until the first quarter following our acquisition of at least $2.0 billion in total portfolio assets, at $25.00 per share (including the maximum allowed to be charged for commissions and fees). We are also offering up to 14.7 million shares of our common stock to be issued pursuant to our DRIP under which our stockholders may elect to have distributions reinvested in additional shares. Following the quarter after the quarter in which we have acquired at least $2.0 billion in total portfolio assets, the per share purchase price in the IPO will vary quarterly and will be equal to the NAV per share, as determined by the Advisor, plus applicable commissions and fees and the per share purchase price in the DRIP will be equal to the NAV per share.
On April 12, 2013, we received and accepted aggregate subscriptions in excess of the minimum offering amount of $2.0 million, broke general escrow and issued shares of common stock to our initial investors who were admitted as stockholders. We expect to continue to raise capital through the sale of our common stock and to utilize the net proceeds from the sale of our common stock and proceeds from secured financings to complete future property acquisitions. We acquired our first property and commenced real estate operations in May 2013. As of September 30, 2013, we owned six properties with an aggregate purchase price of $41.9 million. As of September 30, 2013, we had 3.8 million shares of common stock outstanding, including unvested restricted shares and shares issued pursuant to the DRIP, and had received total gross proceeds from the IPO and the DRIP of $93.2 million.
Our principal demands for cash will be for acquisition costs, including the purchase price of any properties, loans and securities we acquire, improvement costs, the payment of our operating and administrative expenses, debt service obligations and distributions to our stockholders. Generally, we will fund our acquisitions from the net proceeds of our IPO. We intend to acquire our assets with cash and mortgage or other debt proceeds, but we also may acquire assets free and clear of permanent mortgage or other indebtedness by paying the entire purchase price for the asset in cash or in OP Units.
24
We expect to meet our future short-term operating liquidity requirements through a combination of net cash provided by our current property operations and the operations of properties to be acquired in the future, proceeds from the sale of common stock and proceeds from secured mortgage financings. Management expects that in the future, as our portfolio matures, our properties will cover operating expenses and the payment of our monthly distributions. Other potential future sources of capital include proceeds from secured and unsecured financings from banks or other lenders, proceeds from public and private offerings, proceeds from the sale of properties and undistributed funds from operations.
We expect to use debt financing as a source of capital. Under our charter, the maximum amount of our total indebtedness shall not exceed 300% of our total “net assets” (as defined by the North American Securities Administrators Association Statement of Policy Regarding Real Estate Investment Trusts, (the “NASAA REIT Guidelines”)) as of the date of any borrowing, which is generally expected to be approximately 75% of the cost of our investments; however, we may exceed that limit if approved by a majority of our independent directors and disclosed to stockholders in our next quarterly report following such borrowing along with justification for exceeding such limit. This charter limitation, however, does not apply to individual real estate assets or investments. In addition, it is currently our intention to limit our aggregate borrowings to 45% of the aggregate fair market value of our assets (calculated after the close of our IPO and once we have invested substantially all the proceeds of our IPO), unless borrowing a greater amount is approved by a majority of our independent directors and disclosed to stockholders in our next quarterly report following such borrowing along with justification for borrowing such a greater amount. This limitation, however, will not apply to individual real estate assets or investments. At the date of acquisition of each asset, we anticipate that the cost of investment for such asset will be substantially similar to its fair market value, which will enable us to satisfy our requirements under the NASAA REIT Guidelines. However, subsequent events, including changes in the fair market value of our assets, could result in our exceeding these limits. As of September 30, 2013, we had not obtained any debt financing.
We intend to maintain the following percentage of the overall value of our portfolio in liquid assets that can be liquidated more readily than properties: 5% of our NAV in excess of $1 billion. However, our stockholders should not expect that we will maintain liquid assets at or above this level. To the extent that we maintain borrowing capacity under a line of credit, such available amount will be included in calculating our liquid assets. Our Advisor will consider various factors in determining the amount of liquid assets we should maintain, including, but not limited to, our receipt of proceeds from sales of additional shares, our cash flow from operations, available borrowing capacity under a line of credit, if any, our receipt of proceeds from any asset sale, and the use of cash to fund repurchases. The board of directors will review the amount and sources of liquid assets on a quarterly basis.
Our board of directors has adopted a share repurchase plan that enables our stockholders to sell their shares to us under limited circumstances. At the time a stockholder requests a repurchase, we may, subject to certain conditions, repurchase the shares presented for repurchase for cash to the extent we have sufficient funds available to fund such purchase. As of September 30, 2013, no shares of common stock have been repurchased or requested to be repurchased.
As of September 30, 2013, we had cash of $37.9 million. We expect cash flows from operations and the sale of common stock to be used primarily to invest in additional real estate, pay debt service, pay operating expenses and pay stockholder distributions.
Acquisitions
Our Advisor evaluates potential acquisitions of real estate and real estate related assets and engages in negotiations with sellers and borrowers on our behalf. Investors should be aware that after a purchase contract is executed that contains specific terms the property will not be purchased until the successful completion of due diligence and negotiation of final binding agreements. During this period, we may decide to temporarily invest any unused proceeds from common stock offerings in certain investments that could yield lower returns than the properties. These lower returns may affect our ability to make distributions.
Funds from Operations and Modified Funds from Operations
Due to certain unique operating characteristics of real estate companies, as discussed below, the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts (“NAREIT”), an industry trade group, has promulgated a
25
measure known as funds from operations (“FFO”), which we believe to be an appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a REIT. The use of FFO is recommended by the REIT industry as a supplemental performance measure. FFO is not equivalent to net income or loss as determined under accounting principals generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”).
We define FFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the standards established by the White Paper on FFO approved by the Board of Governors of NAREIT, as revised in February 2004 (the “White Paper”). The White Paper defines FFO as net income or loss computed in accordance with GAAP, excluding gains or losses from sales of property and asset impairment writedowns, plus depreciation and amortization, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures. Adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated to reflect FFO. Our FFO calculation complies with NAREIT's policy described above.
The historical accounting convention used for real estate assets requires straight-line depreciation of buildings and improvements, which implies that the value of real estate assets diminishes predictably over time, especially if such assets are not adequately maintained or repaired and renovated as required by relevant circumstances and/or is requested or required by lessees for operational purposes in order to maintain the value disclosed. We believe that, since real estate values historically rise and fall with market conditions, including inflation, interest rates, the business cycle, unemployment and consumer spending, presentations of operating results for a REIT using historical accounting for depreciation may be less informative. Additionally, we believe it is appropriate to disregard impairment charges, as this is a fair value adjustment that is largely based on market fluctuations and assessments regarding general market conditions which can change over time. An asset will only be evaluated for impairment if certain impairment indicators exist and if the carrying, or book value, exceeds the total estimated undiscounted future cash flows (including net rental and lease revenues, net proceeds on the sale of the property, and any other ancillary cash flows at a property or group level under GAAP) from such asset. Investors should note, however, that determinations of whether impairment charges have been incurred are based partly on anticipated operating performance, because estimated undiscounted future cash flows from a property, including estimated future net rental and lease revenues, net proceeds on the sale of the property, and certain other ancillary cash flows, are taken into account in determining whether an impairment charge has been incurred. While impairment charges are excluded from the calculation of FFO as described above, investors are cautioned that due to the fact that impairments are based on estimated undiscounted future cash flows and the relatively limited term of our operations, it could be difficult to recover any impairment charges.
Historical accounting for real estate involves the use of GAAP. Any other method of accounting for real estate such as the fair value method cannot be construed to be any more accurate or relevant than the comparable methodologies of real estate valuation found in GAAP. Nevertheless, we believe that the use of FFO, which excludes the impact of real estate related depreciation and amortization and impairments, provides a more complete understanding of our performance to investors and to management, and when compared year over year, reflects the impact on our operations from trends in occupancy rates, rental rates, operating costs, general and administrative expenses, and interest costs, which may not be immediately apparent from net income. However, FFO and modified funds from operations (“MFFO”), as described below, should not be construed to be more relevant or accurate than the current GAAP methodology in calculating net income or in its applicability in evaluating our operating performance. The method utilized to evaluate the value and performance of real estate under GAAP should be construed as a more relevant measure of operational performance and considered more prominently than the non-GAAP FFO and MFFO measures and the adjustments to GAAP in calculating FFO and MFFO.
Changes in the accounting and reporting promulgations under GAAP (for acquisition fees and expenses from a capitalization/depreciation model to an expensed-as-incurred model) that were put into effect in 2009 and other changes to GAAP accounting for real estate subsequent to the establishment of NAREIT's definition of FFO have prompted an increase in cash-settled expenses, specifically acquisition fees and expenses for all industries as items that are expensed under GAAP, that are typically accounted for as operating expenses. Management believes these fees and expenses do not affect our overall long-term operating performance. Publicly registered, non-listed REITs typically have a significant amount of acquisition activity and are substantially more dynamic during their initial years of investment and operation. While other start up entities
26
also may experience significant acquisition activity during their initial years, we believe that non-listed REITs are unique in that they have a limited life with targeted exit strategies within a relatively limited time frame after the acquisition activity ceases. As disclosed in the prospectus for our IPO (the “Prospectus”), our board of directors, in consultation with our management, may determine that it is in our best interest to begin the process of engaging advisors to consider alternatives with respect to a liquidity event (i.e., listing of our common stock on a national stock exchange, a merger or sale or another similar transaction) at such time during its offering stage that it can reasonably determine that all of the securities being offered in our IPO will be sold within a reasonable period (i.e. three to six months). Thus, we will not continuously purchase assets and will have a limited life. Due to the above factors and other unique features of publicly registered, non-listed REITs, the Investment Program Association (“IPA”), an industry trade group, has standardized a measure known as MFFO, which the IPA has recommended as a supplemental measure for publicly registered non-listed REITs and which we believe to be another appropriate supplemental measure to reflect the operating performance of a non-listed REIT having the characteristics described above. MFFO is not equivalent to our net income or loss as determined under GAAP, and MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance on value if we do not continue to operate with a limited life and targeted exit strategy, as currently intended. We believe that, because MFFO excludes costs that we consider more reflective of investing activities and other non-operating items included in FFO and also excludes acquisition fees and expenses that affect our operations only in periods in which properties are acquired, MFFO can provide, on a going forward basis, an indication of the sustainability (that is, the capacity to continue to be maintained) of our operating performance after the period in which we are acquiring our properties and once our portfolio is in place. By providing MFFO, we believe it is presenting useful information that assists investors and analysts to better assess the sustainability of our operating performance after our IPO has been completed and our properties have been acquired. We also believe that MFFO is a recognized measure of sustainable operating performance by the non-listed REIT industry. Further, we believe MFFO is useful in comparing the sustainability of our operating performance after our IPO and acquisitions are completed with the sustainability of the operating performance of other real estate companies that are not as involved in acquisition activities. Investors are cautioned that MFFO should only be used to assess the sustainability of our operating performance after our offering has been completed and properties have been acquired, as it excludes acquisition costs that have a negative effect on our operating performance during the periods in which properties are acquired.
We define MFFO, a non-GAAP measure, consistent with the IPA's Guideline 2010-01, Supplemental Performance Measure for Publicly Registered, Non-Listed REITs: Modified Funds from Operations (“Practice Guideline”) issued by the IPA in November 2010. The Practice Guideline defines MFFO as FFO further adjusted for the following items, as applicable, included in the determination of GAAP net income: acquisition fees and expenses; amounts relating to deferred rent receivables and amortization of above and below market leases and liabilities (which are adjusted in order to reflect such payments from a GAAP accrual basis to a cash basis of disclosing the rent and lease payments); accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments; mark-to-market adjustments included in net income; gains or losses included in net income from the extinguishment or sale of debt, hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings where trading of such holdings is not a fundamental attribute of the business plan, unrealized gains or losses resulting from consolidation from, or deconsolidation to, equity accounting, and after adjustments for consolidated and unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures, with such adjustments calculated to reflect MFFO on the same basis. The accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums on debt investments, gains and losses on hedges, foreign exchange, derivatives or securities holdings, unrealized gains and losses resulting from consolidations, as well as other listed cash flow adjustments are adjustments made to net income in calculating the cash flows provided by operating activities and, in some cases, reflect gains or losses which are unrealized and may not ultimately be realized.
Our MFFO calculation complies with the IPA's Practice Guideline described above. In calculating MFFO, we exclude acquisition related expenses, amortization of above and below market leases, fair value adjustments of derivative financial instruments, deferred rent receivables and the adjustments of such items related to non-controlling interests. Under GAAP, acquisition fees and expenses are characterized as operating expenses in determining operating net income. These expenses are paid in cash by us, and therefore such funds will not be available to distribute to investors. All paid and accrued acquisition fees and expenses
27
negatively impact our operating performance during the period in which properties are acquired and will have negative effects on returns to investors, the potential for future distributions, and cash flows generated by us, unless earnings from operations or net sales proceeds from the disposition of other properties are generated to cover the purchase price of the property, these fees and expenses and other costs related to such property. Therefore, MFFO may not be an accurate indicator of our operating performance, especially during periods in which properties are being acquired. MFFO that excludes such costs and expenses would only be comparable to that of non-listed REITs that have completed their acquisition activities and have similar operating characteristics as us. Further, under GAAP, certain contemplated non-cash fair value and other non-cash adjustments are considered operating non-cash adjustments to net income in determining cash flow from operating activities. In addition, we view fair value adjustments of derivatives and gains and losses from the disposition of assets as items which are unrealized and may not ultimately be realized, or which are otherwise not reflective of ongoing operations and are therefore typically adjusted for when assessing operating performance and calculating MFFO. While we are responsible for managing interest rate, hedge and foreign exchange risk, we do retain an outside consultant to review all our hedging agreements. Inasmuch as interest rate hedges are not a fundamental part of our operations, we believe it is appropriate to exclude such gains and losses in calculating MFFO, as such gains and losses are not reflective of ongoing operations. As disclosed elsewhere in the Prospectus, the purchase of properties, and the corresponding expenses associated with that process, is a key operational feature of our business plan to generate operational income and cash flows in order to make distributions to investors. There may be inadequate proceeds from the sale of shares in our IPO to pay and reimburse, as applicable, the Advisor for acquisition fees and expenses, and therefore such fees and expenses may need to be paid from either additional debt, operational earnings or cash flows, net proceeds from the sale of properties or from ancillary cash flows.
Our management uses MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate it in order to evaluate our performance against other non-listed REITs which have limited lives with short and defined acquisition periods and targeted exit strategies shortly thereafter. As noted above, MFFO may not be a useful measure of the impact of long-term operating performance on value if we do not continue to operate in this manner. We believe that our use of MFFO and the adjustments used to calculate it allow us to present our performance in a manner that reflects certain characteristics that are unique to non-listed REITs, such as their limited life, limited and defined acquisition period and targeted exit strategy, and hence that the use of such measures is useful to investors. For example, acquisitions costs are funded from the proceeds of our IPO and other financing sources and not from operations. By excluding expensed acquisition costs, the use of MFFO provides information consistent with management's analysis of the operating performance of the properties. Additionally, fair value adjustments, which are based on the impact of current market fluctuations and underlying assessments of general market conditions, but can also result from operational factors such as rental and occupancy rates, may not be directly related or attributable to our current operating performance. By excluding such changes that may reflect anticipated and unrealized gains or losses, we believe MFFO provides useful supplemental information.
Presentation of this information is intended to provide useful information to investors as they compare the operating performance of different REITs, although it should be noted that not all REITs calculate FFO and MFFO the same way. Accordingly, comparisons with other REITs may not be meaningful. Furthermore, FFO and MFFO are not necessarily indicative of cash flow available to fund cash needs and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) or income (loss) from continuing operations as an indication of our performance, as an alternative to cash flows from operations as an indication of our liquidity, or indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs including our ability to make distributions to our stockholders. FFO and MFFO should be reviewed in conjunction with GAAP measurements as an indication of our performance. MFFO has limitations as a performance measure in an offering such as our IPO (unless and until we calculate NAV prior to the close of our IPO) where the price of a share of common stock is a stated value and there is no net asset value determination during the offering stage and for a period thereafter. MFFO is useful in assisting management and investors in assessing the sustainability of operating performance in future operating periods, and in particular, after the offering and acquisition stages are complete and net asset value is disclosed. FFO and MFFO are not useful measures in evaluating net asset value because impairments are taken into account in determining net asset value but not in determining FFO or MFFO.
28
Neither the SEC, NAREIT nor any other regulatory body has passed judgment on the acceptability of the adjustments that we use to calculate FFO or MFFO. In the future, the SEC, NAREIT or another regulatory body may decide to standardize the allowable adjustments across the non-listed REIT industry and we would have to adjust our calculation and characterization of FFO or MFFO.
The table below reflects the items deducted or added to net loss in our calculation of FFO and MFFO for the periods indicated. We did not have FFO or MFFO prior to the quarter ended June 30, 2013, because we did not purchase our first property and commence real estate operations until May 2013.
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended September 30, 2013 | |||||||||||
(In thousands) | June 30, 2013 | September 30, 2013 | ||||||||||
Net loss (in accordance with GAAP) | $ | (116 | ) | $ | (399 | ) | $ | (515 | ) | |||
Depreciation and amortization | 16 | 381 | 397 | |||||||||
FFO | (100 | ) | (18 | ) | (118 | ) | ||||||
Acquisition fees and expenses(1) | 118 | 533 | 651 | |||||||||
Amortization of above or accretion of below market leases and liabilities, net(2) | — | 3 | 3 | |||||||||
Straight-line rent(3) | (1 | ) | (38 | ) | (39 | ) | ||||||
MFFO | $ | 17 | $ | 480 | $ | 497 |
(1) | In evaluating investments in real estate, management differentiates the costs to acquire the investment from the operations derived from the investment. Such information would be comparable only for non-listed REITs that have completed their acquisition activity and have other similar operating characteristics. By excluding expensed acquisition costs, management believes MFFO provides useful supplemental information that is comparable for each type of real estate investment and is consistent with management's analysis of the investing and operating performance of our properties. Acquisition fees and expenses include payments to our Advisor or third parties. Acquisition fees and expenses under GAAP are considered operating expenses and as expenses included in the determination of net income and income from continuing operations, both of which are performance measures under GAAP. All paid and accrued acquisition fees and expenses will have negative effects on returns to investors, the potential for future distributions, and cash flows generated by us, unless earnings from operations or net sales proceeds from the disposition of properties are generated to cover the purchase price of the property, these fees and expenses and other costs related to the property. |
(2) | Under GAAP, certain intangibles are accounted for at cost and reviewed at least annually for impairment, and certain intangibles are assumed to diminish predictably in value over time and amortized, similar to depreciation and amortization of other real estate related assets that are excluded from FFO. However, because real estate values and market lease rates historically rise or fall with market conditions, management believes that by excluding charges relating to amortization of these intangibles, MFFO provides useful supplemental information on the performance of the real estate. |
(3) | Under GAAP, rental receipts are allocated to periods using various methodologies. This may result in income recognition that is significantly different than underlying contract terms. By adjusting for these items (to reflect such payments from a GAAP accrual basis to a cash basis of disclosing the rent and lease payments), MFFO provides useful supplemental information on the realized economic impact of lease terms and debt investments, providing insight on the contractual cash flows of such lease terms and debt investments, and aligns results with management's analysis of operating performance. |
Distributions
On April 9, 2013, our board of directors authorized, and we declared, a distribution rate, which is calculated based on stockholders of record each day during the applicable period at a rate of $0.0046575343 per day based on a price of $25.00 per share of common stock. Distributions began to accrue on May 24, 2013, 15 days following our initial property acquisition. Distributions are payable by the 5th day following each month end to stockholders of record at the close of business each day during the prior month.
The amount of distributions payable to our stockholders is determined by our board of directors and is dependent on a number of factors, including funds available for distribution, our financial condition, capital
29
expenditure requirements, as applicable, requirements of Maryland law and annual distribution requirements needed to qualify and maintain our status as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). Distribution payments are dependent on the availability of funds. Our board of directors may reduce the amount of distributions paid or suspend distribution payments at any time and therefore distribution payments are not assured.
During the six months ended September 30, 2013, distributions paid to common stockholders totaled $0.8 million, inclusive of $0.4 million of distributions issued under the DRIP. Distributions began to accrue on May 24, 2013, 15 days following our initial property acquisition. During the six months ended September 30, 2013, cash used to pay distributions was generated from proceeds from the issuance of common stock and common stock issued under the DRIP.
The following table shows the sources for the payment of distributions to common stockholders for the period indicated:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended September 30, 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2013 | September 30, 2013 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | Percentage of Distributions | Percentage of Distributions | Percentage of Distributions | |||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Distributions paid in cash | $ | 7 | $ | 370 | $ | 377 | ||||||||||||||||||
Distributions reinvested | 9 | 376 | 385 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total distributions | $ | 16 | $ | 746 | $ | 762 | ||||||||||||||||||
Source of distribution coverage: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash flows provided by operations(1) | $ | — | — | % | $ | — | — | % | $ | — | — | % | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | 7 | 43.7 | % | 370 | 49.6 | % | 377 | 49.5 | % | |||||||||||||||
Common stock issued under the DRIP/offering proceeds | 9 | 56.3 | % | 376 | 50.4 | % | 385 | 50.5 | % | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from financings | — | — | % | — | — | % | — | — | % | |||||||||||||||
Total source of distribution coverage | $ | 16 | 100.0 | % | $ | 746 | 100.0 | % | $ | 762 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||
Cash flows used in operations (GAAP basis)(1) | $ | (32 | ) | $ | (144 | ) | $ | (176 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Net loss (in accordance with GAAP) | $ | (116 | ) | $ | (399 | ) | $ | (515 | ) |
(1) | Cash flows used in operations for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 reflect acquisition and transaction related expenses of $0.1 million, $0.5 million and $0.7 million, respectively. |
30
The following table compares cumulative distributions paid to cumulative net loss (in accordance with GAAP) for the period from October 15, 2012 (date of inception) through September 30, 2013:
(In thousands) | For the Period from October 15, 2012 (date of inception) to September 30, 2013 | |||
Distributions paid: | ||||
Common stockholders in cash | $ | 377 | ||
Common stockholders pursuant to DRIP/offering proceeds | 385 | |||
Total distributions paid | $ | 762 | ||
Reconciliation of net loss: | ||||
Revenues | $ | 679 | ||
Acquisition and transaction related | (651 | ) | ||
Depreciation and amortization | (397 | ) | ||
Other operating expenses | (208 | ) | ||
Net loss (in accordance with GAAP)(1) | $ | (577 | ) |
(1) | Net loss as defined by GAAP includes the non-cash impact of depreciation and amortization expense as well as costs incurred relating to acquisitions and related transactions. |
Election as a REIT
We intend to elect to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Code, effective for our taxable year ending December 31, 2013. We believe that, commencing with such taxable year, we are organized and operate in such a manner as to qualify for taxation as a REIT under the Code. We intend to continue to operate in such a manner to qualify for taxation as a REIT, but no assurance can be given that we will operate in a manner so as to qualify or remain qualified as a REIT. If we qualify, and continue to qualify, for taxation as a REIT, we generally will not be subject to federal corporate income tax so long as we distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income. REITs are subject to a number of other organizational and operational requirements. Even if we qualify for taxation as a REIT, we may be subject to certain state and local taxes on our income and properties as well as federal income and excise taxes on our undistributed income.
Inflation
We may be adversely impacted by inflation on any leases that do not contain indexed escalation provisions. In addition, we may be required to pay costs for maintenance and operation of properties which may adversely impact our results of operations due to potential increases in costs and operating expenses resulting from inflation.
Related-Party Transactions and Agreements
We have entered into agreements with affiliates of our Sponsor, whereby we have paid or may in the future pay certain fees or reimbursements to our Advisor, its affiliates and entities under common ownership with our Advisor in connection with acquisition and financing activities, sales and maintenance of common stock under our offering, transfer agency services, asset and property management services and reimbursement of operating and offering related costs. See Note 6 — Related Party Transactions and Arrangements to our financial statements included in this report for a discussion of the various related party transactions, agreements and fees.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.
31
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
The market risk associated with financial instruments and derivative financial instruments is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices or rates. As of September 30, 2013, we do not have any long-term debt, but anticipate incurring long-term debt in the future. Our interest rate risk management objectives with respect to our long-term debt will be to limit the impact of interest rate changes in earnings and cash flows and to lower our overall borrowing costs. To achieve these objectives, from time to time, we may enter into interest rate hedge contracts such as swaps and collars in order to mitigate our interest rate risk with respect to various debt instruments. We would not hold or issue these derivative contracts for trading or speculative purposes. We do not anticipate having any foreign operations and we do not expect to be exposed to foreign currency fluctuations.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
In accordance with Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), we, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and determined that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective.
No change occurred in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the three months ended September 30, 2013 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.
32
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we are not a party to any material pending legal proceedings.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Our potential risks and uncertainties are presented in the section entitled “Risk Factors,” contained in the prospectus as supplemented and included in our Registration Statement (File No. 333-184677), as amended from time to time. The following additional risk factors should be considered regarding our potential risks and uncertainties:
Distributions paid from sources other than our cash flows from operations, particularly from proceeds of our IPO, will result in us having fewer funds available for the acquisition of properties and other real estate-related investments and may dilute your interests in us, which may adversely affect our ability to fund future distributions with cash flows from operations and may adversely affect your overall return.
Our cash flows used in operations were $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we paid distributions of $0.8 million, of which $0.4 million, or 49.5%, was funded from proceeds from the issuance of common stock and $0.4 million, or 50.5%, was funded from proceeds from common stock issued under the DRIP. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013 cash flow from operations included an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $0.3 million, as reflected on the statement of cash flows. Accordingly, if these accounts payable and accrued expenses had been paid during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, there would have been $0.3 million less in cash flow from operations available to pay distributions. Additionally, we may in the future pay distributions from sources other than from our cash flows from operations.
Until we acquire additional properties or other real estate-related investments, we may not generate sufficient cash flows from operations to pay distributions. If we are unable to acquire additional properties or other real estate-related investments, it may result in a lower return on your investment than you expect. If we have not generated sufficient cash flows from our operations and other sources, such as from borrowings, the sale of additional securities, advances from our Advisor, and our Advisor’s deferral, suspension or waiver of its fees and expense reimbursements, to fund distributions, we may use the proceeds from our IPO. Moreover, our board of directors may change our distribution policy, in its sole discretion, at any time. Distributions made from offering proceeds are a return of capital to stockholders, from which we will have already paid offering expenses in connection with our IPO. We have not established any limit on the amount of proceeds from our IPO that may be used to fund distributions, except that, in accordance with our organizational documents and Maryland law, we may not make distributions that would: (1) cause us to be unable to pay our debts as they become due in the usual course of business; (2) cause our total assets to be less than the sum of our total liabilities plus senior liquidation preferences, if any; or (3) jeopardize our ability to qualify as a REIT.
If we fund distributions from the proceeds of our IPO, we will have less funds available for acquiring properties or other real estate-related investments. As a result, the return you realize on your investment may be reduced. Funding distributions from borrowings could restrict the amount we can borrow for investments, which may affect our profitability. Funding distributions with the sale of assets or the proceeds of our IPO may affect our ability to generate cash flows. Funding distributions from the sale of additional securities could dilute your interest in us if we sell shares of our common stock or securities that are convertible or exercisable into shares of our common stock to third-party investors. Payment of distributions from the mentioned sources could restrict our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations, affect our profitability or affect the distributions payable to you upon a liquidity event, any or all of which may have an adverse effect on your investment.
33
We rely significantly on five major tenants (including, for this purpose, all affiliates of such tenants) and therefore, are subject to tenant credit concentrations that make us more susceptible to adverse events with respect to those tenants.
As of September 30, 2013, the following five major tenants had annualized rental income on a straight-line basis, which represented 5% or more of our total annualized rental income on a straight-line basis including for this purpose, all affiliates of such tenants):
Tenant | Percentage of Straight-Line Rental Income | |||
Adena Health System | 11.9 | % | ||
Advocate Health and Hospitals Corporation | 12.0 | % | ||
HH/Killeen Health System, LLC | 14.1 | % | ||
IASIS Healthcare, LLC | 16.9 | % | ||
National Mentor Holdings, Inc. | 27.4 | % |
Therefore, the financial failure of either tenant is likely to have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and our financial condition. In addition, the value of our investment is driven by the credit quality of the underlying tenant, and an adverse change in either tenant's financial condition or a decline in the credit rating of such tenant may result in a decline in the value of our investments and have a material adverse effect on our results from operations.
Our property portfolio has a high concentration of properties in five states. Our properties may be adversely affected by economic cycles and risks inherent to those states.
As of September 30, 2013, the following states had concentrations of annualized rental income on a straight-line basis in excess of 5% from our property portfolio:
State | September 30, 2013 | |||
Colorado | 27.4 | % | ||
Illinois | 25.3 | % | ||
Louisiana | 16.9 | % | ||
Ohio | 11.9 | % | ||
Texas | 14.1 | % |
Any adverse situation that disproportionately affects the states listed above may have a magnified adverse effect on our portfolio. Real estate markets are subject to economic downturns, as they have been in the past, and we cannot predict how economic conditions will impact this market in both the short and long term. Declines in the economy or a decline in the real estate market in these states could hurt our financial performance and the value of our properties. Factors that may negatively affect economic conditions in these states include:
• | business layoffs or downsizing; |
• | industry slowdowns; |
• | relocations of businesses; |
• | changing demographics; |
• | increased telecommuting and use of alternative work places; |
• | infrastructure quality; |
• | any oversupply of, or reduced demand for, real estate; |
• | concessions or reduced rental rates under new leases for properties where tenants defaulted; and |
• | increased insurance premiums. |
34
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds of Registered Securities.
We did not sell any equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.
On February 14, 2013 we commenced our IPO on a “reasonable best efforts” basis of up to a maximum of $1.7 billion of common stock, consisting of up to 68.0 million shares, pursuant to the Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-184677) (the “Registration Statement”) initially filed on October 31, 2012 with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The Registration Statement, which was declared effective by the SEC on February 14, 2013, also covers 14.7 million shares of common stock pursuant the DRIP under which common stockholders may elect to have their distributions reinvested in additional shares of common stock. As of September 30, 2013, we have issued 3.8 million shares of our common stock, including unvested restricted shares and shares issued pursuant to the DRIP, and received $93.2 million of offering proceeds, including proceeds from shares issued pursuant to the DRIP. On April 12, 2013, we received and accepted aggregate subscriptions in excess of the minimum of $2.0 million, broke general escrow and issued shares of common stock to our initial investors who were admitted as stockholders.
The following table reflects the offering costs associated with the issuance of common stock:
(In thousands) | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 | |||
Selling commissions and dealer manager fees | $ | 8,692 | ||
Other offering costs | 3,084 | |||
Total offering costs | $ | 11,776 |
The Dealer Manager may reallow the selling commissions and a portion of the dealer manager fees to participating broker-dealers. The following table details the selling commissions incurred and reallowed related to the sale of shares of common stock:
(In thousands) | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 | |||
Total commissions paid to the Dealer Manager | $ | 8,692 | ||
Less: | ||||
Commissions to participating brokers | (5,918 | ) | ||
Reallowance to participating broker dealers | (683 | ) | ||
Net to the Dealer Manager | $ | 2,091 |
As of September 30, 2013, we have incurred $11.8 million of cumulative offering costs in connection with the issuance and distribution of our registered securities. As of September 30, 2013, cumulative offering costs included $1.3 million of offering costs reimbursements incurred from the Advisor and Dealer Manager. The Advisor elected to cap cumulative offering costs incurred by us, net of unpaid amounts, to 15% of gross common stock proceeds during the offering period. Cumulative offering costs, net of unpaid amounts, were less than the 15% threshold as of September 30, 2013. Cumulative offering proceeds from the sale of common stock exceeded cumulative offering costs by $81.4 million at September 30, 2013.
We expect to use substantially all of the net proceeds from our IPO to primarily acquire a diversified portfolio of income producing real estate properties, focusing predominantly on medical office buildings and healthcare-related facilities. We may also originate or acquire first mortgage loans secured by real estate. As of September 30, 2013, we have used the net proceeds from our IPO to purchase six properties with an aggregate purchase price of $41.9 million.
We did not repurchase any of our securities during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.
35
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.
Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits.
The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index (following the signatures section of this report) are included, or incorporated by reference, in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
36
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
AMERICAN REALTY CAPITAL HEALTHCARE TRUST II, INC.
By: | /s/ Thomas P. D'Arcy Thomas P. D'Arcy Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
By: | /s/ Brian S. Block Brian S. Block Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer) |
Dated: November 12, 2013
37
EXHIBITS INDEX
The following exhibits are included, or incorporated by reference, in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2013 (and are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K).
Exhibit No. | Description | |
10.15* | Agreement for Purchase and Sale of Real Property, dated as of July 15, 2013, between American Realty Capital V, LLC and OLMC Partners, LLC | |
10.16* | Letter Agreement No. 1, dated as of July 18, 2013, between American Realty Capital V, LLC and OLMC Partners, LLC | |
10.17* | Letter Agreement No. 2, dated as of August 14, 2013, between American Realty Capital V, LLC and OLMC Partners, LLC | |
10.18* | Letter Agreement No. 3, dated as of August 16, 2013, between American Realty Capital V, LLC and OLMC Partners, LLC | |
31.1* | Certification of the Principal Executive Officer of the Company pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
31.2* | Certification of the Principal Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32* | Written statements of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer of the Company pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
101* | XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language). The following materials from American Realty Capital Healthcare Trust II, Inc.'s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2013, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss, (iii) the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (v) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information in furnished and not filed for purpose of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
* | Filed herewith |
38