Background
As previously disclosed, on August 11, 2021, The ExOne Company (“ExOne” or the “Company”) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among Desktop Metal, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Desktop Metal”), Texas Merger Sub I, Inc., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Desktop Metal (“Merger Sub I”), Texas Merger Sub II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a wholly owned subsidiary of Desktop Metal (“Merger Sub II”), and ExOne. The Merger Agreement provides, among other things, that upon the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub I will merge with and into ExOne, with ExOne surviving the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of Desktop Metal (the “First Merger”). The Merger Agreement also provides that, immediately following the effective time of the First Merger, ExOne, as the surviving corporation of the First Merger, will merge with and into Merger Sub II (the “Second Merger,” and together with the First Merger, the “Mergers”), with Merger Sub II surviving the Second Merger and continuing as a wholly owned subsidiary of Desktop Metal. The proposed Mergers are described in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, dated October 8, 2021, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and mailed to all stockholders of record of ExOne in connection with the Mergers (the “Proxy Statement/Prospectus”).
Regulatory Matters
On October 20, 2021, ExOne and Desktop Metal received clearance from the German Federal Ministry for Economic Affairs and Energy, a foreign investment regulatory authority, that the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement have been cleared pursuant to section 58a paragraph 1 of the German Foreign Trade and Payments Ordinance. Additionally, and as previously reported, the waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, expired on October 28, 2021 at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time. Accordingly, ExOne and Desktop Metal have now received all regulatory approvals required as a condition to consummate the Mergers.
Subject to obtaining ExOne stockholder approval and the satisfaction of other customary closing conditions to the Mergers, ExOne and Desktop Metal expect to complete the Mergers during the fourth quarter of 2021, and, subject to the terms of the Merger Agreement, such closing may occur as soon as three days following the date of the special meeting of ExOne stockholders.
Litigation Update
As previously disclosed in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, seven purported ExOne stockholders filed lawsuits against ExOne, its board of directors, and Desktop Metal related to the Mergers, one of which was subsequently withdrawn: Stein v. The ExOne Company, et. al, Case No. 1:21-cv-07756, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on September 16, 2021 (the “Stein Complaint”); Kong v. The ExOne Company, et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-04165, filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on September 21, 2021 (the “Kong Complaint”); Vasedevan v. The ExOne Company, et. al, Case No. 1:21-cv-07984, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on September 24, 2021 (the “Vasedevan Complaint”); Goldstein v. The ExOne Company, et al., Case No. 21-cv-05358, filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York on September 27, 2021 and subsequently voluntarily dismissed on October 14, 2021 (the “Goldstein Complaint”); Abramova v. The ExOne Company, et. al, Case No. 1:21-cv-08091, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on September 29, 2021 (the “Abramova Complaint”); Campanella v. The ExOne Company, et. al, Case No. 2:21-cv-01302, filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania on September 29, 2021 (the “Campanella Complaint”); McDevitt v. The ExOne Company, et. al, Case No. 1:21-cv-08249, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on October 6, 2021 (the “McDevitt Complaint”). Following the filing of the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, five additional purported ExOne stockholders filed lawsuits against the various parties: Fruster v. The ExOne Company, et. al, Case No. 1:21-cv-05753, filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York on October 14, 2021 (the “Fruster Complaint”); Jones v. The ExOne Company, et. al., Case No. 1:21-cv-01474, filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware on October 20, 2021 (the “Jones Complaint”); Justice v. The ExOne Company, et. al. Case No. 2:21-cv-04607, filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on October 20, 2021 (the “Justice Complaint”); Coffman v. The ExOne Company, et. al., Case No. 1:21-CV-08648, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on October 21, 2021 (the “Coffman Complaint”); Vasudevan v. The ExOne Company, et. al., Case No. 1:21-cv-08679, filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York on October 22, 2021 (the “Vasudevan Complaint”).