SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Management acknowledges its responsibility for the preparation of the accompanying interim financial statements which reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary in its opinion for a fair statement of its financial position and the results of its operations for the interim period presented. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the summary of significant accounting policies and notes to financial statements included in the Company’s filing of Form 10-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for BPFI have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 8-03 of Regulation S-X. Operating results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the fiscal year as a whole. The Company uses the accrual basis of accounting and GAAP. The Company has adopted an October 31 fiscal year end. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Mercury Tours, Inc. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation for all periods presented. Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2014 financial statement amounts and disclosures to conform to the 2015 presentation. In previous periods certain expenses were not being netted against revenues. Amounts in previous periods have been reclassified to present costs directly associated with revenues as a net revenue number. For the three and nine months ended July 31, 2014, $ 54,154 54,154 The accompanying financial statements have been prepared contemplating a continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has reported a net income of $ 845,457 25,722 602,870 599,842 The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The Company adopted the guidance of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 820 for fair value measurements which clarifies the definition of fair value, prescribes methods for measuring fair value, and establishes a fair value hierarchy to classify the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: ⋅ Level 1-Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities available at the measurement date. ⋅ Level 2-Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable, and inputs derived from or corroborated by observable market data. ⋅ Level 3-Inputs are unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions on what assumptions the market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on the best available information. The carrying amounts reported in the consolidated balance sheets for cash, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued expenses, advances payable and deferred revenue approximate their fair market value based on the short-term maturity of these financial instruments. The Company has liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of July 31, 2015 and 2014. ASC 825-10 “Financial Instruments”, allows entities to voluntarily choose to measure certain financial assets and liabilities at fair value (fair value option). The fair value option may be elected on an instrument-by-instrument basis and is irrevocable, unless a new election date occurs. If the fair value option is elected for an instrument, unrealized gains and losses for that instrument should be reported in earnings at each subsequent reporting date. The Company did not elect to apply the fair value option to any outstanding instruments. Fair Value Measurements Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Assets Total $ - $ - $ - $ - Liabilities Derivative Liability $ - $ - $ 62,582 $ 62,582 Total - $ - $ 62,582 $ 62,582 If the conversion features of conventional convertible debt provides for a rate of conversion that is below market value, this feature is characterized as a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”). A BCF is recorded by the Company as a debt discount pursuant to ASC Topic 470-20 “Debt with Conversion and Other Options.” In those circumstances, the convertible debt is recorded net of the discount related to the BCF and the Company amortizes the discount to interest expense over the life of the debt using the effective interest method. The Company determines if the convertible debenture should be accounted for as liability or equity under ASC 480, Liabilities Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity. ASC 480, applies to certain contracts involving a company’s own equity, and requires that issuers classify the following freestanding financial instruments as liabilities: mandatorily redeemable financial instruments, obligations that require or may require repurchase of the issuer’s equity shares by transferring assets (e.g., written put options and forward purchase contracts) and certain obligations where at inception the monetary value of the obligation is based solely or predominantly on: A fixed monetary amount known at inception, for example, a payable settled with a variable number of the issuer’s equity shares with an issuance date fair value equal to a fixed dollar amount, Variations in something other than the fair value of the issuer’s equity shares, for example, a financial instrument indexed to the S&P 500 and settled with a variable number of the issuer’s equity shares, or Variations inversely related to changes in the fair value of the issuer’s equity shares, for example, a written put that could be net share settled. If the Company determined the instrument meets the guidance under ASC 480 the instrument is accounted for as a liability with a respective debt discount. The Company records debt discounts in connection with raising funds through the issuance of promissory notes (see Note 5). These costs are amortized to non-cash interest expense over the life of the debt. If a conversion of the underlying debt occurs, a proportionate share of the unamortized amounts is immediately expensed. Derivative financial instruments, as defined in ASC 815, “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging Activities”, consist of financial instruments or other contracts that contain a notional amount and one or more underlying (e.g. interest rate, security price or other variable), require no initial net investment and permit net settlement. Derivative financial instruments may be free-standing or embedded in other financial instruments. Further, derivative financial instruments are initially, and subsequently, measured at fair value and recorded as liabilities or, in rare instances, assets. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to cash-flow, market or foreign-currency risks. However, the Company has issued financial instruments including senior convertible promissory notes payable and freestanding stock purchase warrants with features that are either (i) not afforded equity classification, (ii) embody risks not clearly and closely related to host contracts, or (iii) may be net-cash settled by the counterparty. As required by ASC 815, in certain instances, these instruments are required to be carried as derivative liabilities, at fair value, in our consolidated financial statements. Cash and cash equivalents For purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less and money market accounts to be cash equivalents The Company recognizes an allowance for losses on accounts receivable in an amount equal to the estimated probable losses net of recoveries. The allowance is based on an analysis of historical bad debt experience, current receivables aging, and expected future write-offs, as well as an assessment of specific identifiable customer accounts considered at risk or uncollectible. Management determined that an allowance was not required as of the balance sheet dates. Property and equipment are carried at cost and are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The cost of repairs and maintenance is expensed as incurred; major replacements and improvements are capitalized. When assets are retired or disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gains or losses are included in income in the year of disposition. The Company examines the possibility of decreases in the value of fixed assets when events or changes in circumstances reflect the fact that their recorded value may not be recoverable. The cost of scheduled inspections and repairs and routine maintenance costs for all aircraft and engines are charged to maintenance materials and repairs expense as incurred. The Company also has “power-by-the-hour” agreements related to certain of its aircraft engines with external service providers. Under these agreements, which the Company has determined effectively transfers the risk and creates an obligation associated with the maintenance on such engines to the counterparty, expense is recorded commensurate with each hour flown on an engine. In situations where the payments to the counterparty do not sufficiently match the level of services received during the period, expense is recorded on a straight-line basis over the term of the agreement based on our best estimate of expected future aircraft utilization. For our engine maintenance contracts that do not transfer risk to the service provider, the Company records expense on a time and materials basis when an engine repair event takes place. Modifications that significantly enhance the operating performance or extend the useful lives of aircraft or engines are capitalized and amortized over the remaining life of the asset. Spare parts, especially major replacement items such as motors, are capitalized and included in property. However, if their aggregate cost is not significant, they may, less desirably, be classified as prepaid expenses or with maintenance supply inventories. Spare parts not put in use should be depreciated over the remaining life of the related equipment when the parts are held primarily for standby use or when obsolescence risks are significant. In accordance with ASC Topic 360, the Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable, or at least annually. The Company recognizes an impairment loss when the sum of expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset. The amount of impairment is measured as the difference between the asset’s estimated fair value and its book value. The Company did not record any impairment charges as of July 31, 2015 and October 31, 2014. The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, products are fully delivered or services have been provided, the purchase price is fixed or determinable and collection is reasonably assured. Revenue from helicopter services on an “ad hoc” basis, which usually entails a short contract notice period and duration, is recognized as the related services are performed and is based on a monthly fixed fee plus additional fees for each hour flown. The Company works as an agent between its customers and the service providers under these “ad hoc” service arrangements. Therefore, the Company recognizes revenue under these arrangements on the net amount retained; which is the amount billed to the customer less the amount paid to the service providers. The Company is governed by the income tax laws of the United States of America. The Company accounts for income tax using the liability method prescribed by ASC 740, “ Income Taxes The Company applies the provisions of ASC 740-10-50, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”, which provides clarification related to the process associated with accounting for uncertain tax positions recognized in our consolidated financial statements. Audit periods remain open for review until the statute of limitations has passed. The completion of review or the expiration of the statute of limitations for a given audit period could result in an adjustment to the Company’s liability for income taxes. Any such adjustment could be material to the Company’s results of operations for any given quarterly or annual period based, in part, upon the results of operations for the given period. As of July 31, 2015 and October 31, 2014, the Company had no uncertain tax positions, and will continue to evaluate for uncertain positions in the future. The Company is subject to U.S. Federal income tax examinations for the tax years ended October 31, 2012 through October 31, 2014. Advertising is expensed as incurred and is included in general and administrative expenses on the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. Advertising expense for the three months ended July 31, 2015 and 2014 amounted to $ 0 6,337 790 18,994 Stock-based compensation is accounted for based on the requirements of the Share-Based Payment Topic of ASC 718 which requires recognition in the consolidated financial statements of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments over the period the employee or director is required to perform the services in exchange for the award (presumptively, the vesting period). The ASC also requires measurement of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award based on the grant-date fair value of the award. Pursuant to ASC Topic 505-50, for share-based payments to consultants and other third-parties, compensation expense is determined at the “measurement date.” The expense is recognized over the service period of the award. Until the measurement date is reached, the total amount of compensation expense remains uncertain. The Company initially records compensation expense based on the fair value of the award at the reporting date. The Company issued no stock based compensation during the period ending July 31, 2015. The Company computes earnings per share in accordance with “ASC-260”, “ Earnings per Share 37,500 0.001 10,000 0.001 A related party is generally defined as (i) any person that holds 10 The Company’s President, Treasurer, Chief Executive Office, and director, Jacob Gitman, owns 90 Effective January 31, 2014, the Company entered into an Exclusive Agreement for the Promotion and Marketing of Services of Monarch. Upon execution of this agreement, the Company received a one-time fee of $ 5,000 10 On May 30, 2014, the Company entered into an Aircraft Management Agreement with Monarch. Pursuant to that Agreement, Monarch agreed to use, maintain and operate a Beechcraft 400 that the Company leases. Monarch agreed to maintain the aircraft and manage it at the Company’s expense and cost and the Company agreed to pay Monarch 10% of all funds received for Charters in any given month. Additionally, pilot salaries and benefits and other expenses, as defined, will be paid by the Company. BPFI received no payments from Monarch pursuant to the agreement, and no revenue was generated from this contract as of July 31, 2015. In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Updates (“ASU”) 2014-15 requiring an entity’s management to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 which outlines a single comprehensive model for companies to use when accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. The core principle of the revenue recognition model is that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of goods and services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In order to achieve this core principle a company must apply the following steps in determining revenue recognition: · Identify the contract(s) with a customer. · Identify the performance obligations in the contract. · Determine the transaction price. · Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract. · Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 including interim periods within that reporting period with early application not allowed. Management is currently assessing whether the implementation of ASU 2014-09 will have any material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. |