PBF Holding 10-Q 2013 Q3 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: September 30, 2013

Or

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from             to             

Commission File Number: 001-35764

Commission File Number: 333-186007

Commission File Number: 333-186007-07

PBF ENERGY INC.

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

PBF FINANCE CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE DELAWARE DELAWARE	45-3763855 27-2198168 45-2685067
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
One Sylvan Way, Second Floor Parsippany, New Jersey	07054
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(973) 455-7500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

PBF Energy Inc.	x  Yes    ¨  No
PBF Holding Company LLC	x  Yes    ¨  No
PBF Finance Corporation	x  Yes    o  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

PBF Energy Inc.	x  Yes    o  No
PBF Holding Company LLC	x  Yes    o  No
PBF Finance Corporation	x  Yes    o  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

	Large accelerated filer	Accelerated filer	Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company
PBF Energy Inc.	¨	¨	x	¨
PBF Holding Company LLC	¨	¨	x	¨
PBF Finance Corporation	o	o	x	o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

PBF Energy Inc.	¨  Yes    x  No
PBF Holding Company LLC	¨  Yes    x  No
PBF Finance Corporation	o  Yes    x  No

As of November 4, 2013, PBF Energy Inc. had outstanding 39,582,312 shares of Class A common stock and 41 shares of Class B common stock. PBF Energy Inc. is the sole managing member of, and owner of an equity interest of approximately 40.9% of the outstanding economic interest in, PBF Energy Company LLC. PBF Energy Company LLC held 100% of the membership interests in PBF Holding Company LLC as of November 4, 2013. PBF Holding Company LLC has no common stock outstanding. As of November 4, 2013, PBF Finance Corporation had 100 shares of common stock outstanding, all of which were held by PBF Holding Company LLC.

PBF Finance Corporation meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction (H)(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this form with the reduced disclosure format.

PBF ENERGY INC. AND

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

FORM 10-Q FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS			3
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	ITEM 1.	Financial Statements(Unaudited)
		PBF Energy Inc.
		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012	5
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012	6
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012	7
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012	8
		PBF Holding Company LLC
		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012	9
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012	10
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012	11
		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012	12
		Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	13
	ITEM 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	37
	ITEM 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	53
	ITEM 4.	Controls and Procedures	55
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
	ITEM 1.	Legal Proceedings	56
	ITEM 1A.	Risk Factors	56
	ITEM 6.	Exhibits	58
SIGNATURES			59

Explanatory Note

This combined Form 10-Q is filed by PBF Energy Inc. (“PBF Energy”), PBF Holding Company LLC (“PBF Holding”) and PBF Finance Corporation ("PBF Finance"). Each Registrant hereto is filing on its own behalf all of the information contained in this report that relates to such Registrant. Each Registrant hereto is not filing any information that does not relate to such Registrant, and therefore makes no representation as to any such information. PBF Energy is the sole managing member of, and owner of an equity interest representing approximately 40.9% of the outstanding economic interests in, PBF Energy Company LLC ("PBF LLC"). PBF Holding is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PBF LLC and PBF Finance is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PBF Holding. PBF Holding is the parent company for PBF LLC's operating subsidiaries.

PBF Holding is an indirect subsidiary of PBF Energy, representing 100% of PBF Energy’s consolidated revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and constituting 100% of PBF Energy’s revenue generating assets as of September 30, 2013.

Unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to both PBF Energy and PBF Holding and subsidiaries. Discussions or areas of this report that either apply only to PBF Energy or PBF Holding are clearly noted in such sections.

2

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain “forward-looking statements”, as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, of expected future developments that involve risks and uncertainties. You can identify forward-looking statements because they contain words such as “believes,” “expects,” “may,” “should,” “seeks,” “approximately,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates,” or “anticipates” or similar expressions that relate to our strategy, plans or intentions. All statements we make relating to our estimated and projected earnings, margins, costs, expenditures, cash flows, growth rates and financial results or to our expectations regarding future industry trends are forward-looking statements. In addition, we, through our senior management, from time to time make forward-looking public statements concerning our expected future operations and performance and other developments. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may change at any time, and, therefore, our actual results may differ materially from those that we expected. We derive many of our forward-looking statements from our operating budgets and forecasts, which are based upon many detailed assumptions. While we believe that our assumptions are reasonable, we caution that it is very difficult to predict the impact of known factors, and, of course, it is impossible for us to anticipate all factors that could affect our actual results.

Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations, which we refer to as “cautionary statements,” are disclosed under “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and elsewhere in the Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 of PBF Energy Inc., PBF Holding Company LLC and PBF Finance Corporation, which we refer to as our 2012 Annual Reports on Form 10-K, and in our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All forward-looking information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us, or persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements. Some of the factors that we believe could affect our results include:

• supply, demand, prices and other market conditions for our products;

• the effects of competition in our markets;

• changes in currency exchange rates, interest rates and capital costs;

• adverse developments in our relationship with both our key employees and unionized employees;

• our ability to operate our businesses efficiently, manage capital expenditures and costs (including general and administrative expenses) and generate earnings and cash flow;

• our substantial indebtedness described in our 2012 Annual Reports on Form 10-K and this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q;

• our arrangements with J. Aron expose us to J. Aron-related credit and performance risk;

• termination of our Inventory Intermediation Agreements with J. Aron could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, as we would be required to finance our refined products inventory covered by the agreements. Additionally, we are obligated to repurchase from J. Aron all volumes of products located at the Paulsboro and Delaware City refineries’ storage tanks upon termination of these agreements;

• restrictive covenants in our indebtedness that may adversely affect our operational flexibility;

• payments to the holders of PBF LLC Series A Units and PBF LLC Series B Units under our tax receivable agreement for certain tax benefits we may claim, and our assumptions regarding payments arising under the tax receivable agreement and other arrangements relating to our organizational structure;

• our expectations with respect to our acquisition activity;

• our expectations with respect to our capital improvement projects including the development and expansion of our Delaware City crude unloading facilities and status of an air permit to transfer crude to Paulsboro;

• the possibility that we might reduce or not make further dividend payments;

• adverse impacts from changes in our regulatory environment or actions taken by environmental interest groups;

• the costs of being a public company, including Sarbanes-Oxley Act compliance;

3

• any decisions we make with respect to our energy-related logistical assets that could qualify for an MLP structure, including future opportunities that we may determine present greater potential value to stockholders than the planned MLP initial public offering;

• the timing and structure of the planned MLP may change;

• unanticipated developments may delay or negatively impact the planned MLP;

• receipt of regulatory approvals and compliance with contractual obligations required in connection with the planned MLP;

• the impact of the planned MLP on our relationships with our employees, customers and vendors and our credit rating and cost of funds; and

• the possibility that the interests of our financial sponsors (funds affiliated with The Blackstone Group L.P. and First Reserve Management, L.P.) will conflict with ours.

We caution you that the foregoing list of important factors may not contain all of the material factors that are important to you. In addition, in light of these risks and uncertainties, the matters referred to in the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may not in fact occur. Accordingly, investors should not place undue reliance on those statements.

Our forward-looking statements also include estimates of the total amount of payments, including annual payments, under our tax receivable agreement. These estimates are based on assumptions that are subject to change due to various factors, including, among other factors, the timing of exchanges of PBF LLC Series A Units for shares of our Class A common stock as contemplated by the tax receivable agreement, the price of our Class A common stock at the time of such exchanges, the extent to which such exchanges are taxable, and the amount and timing of our income. See the following risks set forth in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012: “We will be required to pay the holders of PBF LLC Series A Units for certain tax benefits we may claim arising in connection with our initial public offering and future exchanges of PBF LLC Series A Units for shares of our Class A Common Stock and related transactions, and the amounts we may pay could be significant.” and “In certain cases, payments by us under the tax receivable agreement may be accelerated and/or significantly exceed the actual benefits we realize in respect of the tax attributes subject to the tax receivable agreement. These provisions may deter a change in control of our Company.”

Our forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not intend to update or revise any forward-looking statements. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing.

4

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

PBF ENERGY INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(COMBINED AND CONSOLIDATED WITH PBF ENERGY COMPANY LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES)

(unaudited, in thousands, except share and per share data)

	September 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	57,417		$	285,884
Accounts receivable	577,879			503,796
Inventories	1,472,637			1,497,119
Deferred tax asset	27,279			7,717
Prepaid expense and other current assets	56,133			13,388
Total current assets	2,191,345			2,307,904
Property, plant, and equipment, net	1,735,760			1,635,587
Deferred tax assets	200,282			112,862
Deferred charges and other assets, net	201,954			197,349
Total assets	$	4,329,341		$	4,253,702
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	563,922		$	360,057
Accrued expenses	1,042,539			1,031,467
Payable to related parties pursuant to tax receivable agreement	1,007			1,007
Deferred revenue	1,882			210,543
Total current liabilities	1,609,350			1,603,074
Delaware Economic Development Authority loan	16,000			20,000
Long-term debt	722,565			709,980
Payable to related parties pursuant to tax receivable agreement	298,112			159,004
Other long-term liabilities	34,478			38,099
Total liabilities	2,680,505			2,530,157
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
Equity:
Class A common stock, $0.001 par value, 1,000,000,000 shares authorized, 39,581,613 shares outstanding at September 30, 2013, 23,571,221 shares outstanding, at December 31, 2012	40			24
Class B common stock, $0.001 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, 41 shares outstanding, at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012	—			—
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, no shares outstanding, at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012	—			—
Additional paid in capital	659,661			417,835
(Accumulated deficit) / Retained earnings	(15,702		)	1,956
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(3,495		)	(61		)
Total PBF Energy Inc. equity	640,504			419,754
Noncontrolling interest	1,008,332			1,303,791
Total equity	1,648,836			1,723,545
Total liabilities and equity	$	4,329,341		$	4,253,702

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

PBF ENERGY INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(COMBINED AND CONSOLIDATED WITH PBF ENERGY COMPANY LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES)

(unaudited, in thousands, except share and per share data)

	Three Months Ended   September 30,						Nine Months Ended   September 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Revenues	$	4,858,880		$	5,395,206		$	14,335,020		$	15,188,327
Cost and expenses:
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation	4,663,697			4,932,645			13,394,777			13,871,884
Operating expenses, excluding depreciation	192,647			179,035			601,245			537,880
General and administrative expenses	30,748			38,942			79,983			78,042
(Gain) loss on sale of assets	(48		)	20			(48		)	(2,430		)
Depreciation and amortization expense	27,435			24,455			81,530			67,419
	4,914,479			5,175,097			14,157,487			14,552,795
(Loss) income from operations	(55,599		)	220,109			177,533			635,532
Other income (expense)
Change in fair value of contingent consideration	—			(692		)	—			(2,076		)
Change in fair value of catalyst lease	(2,363		)	(5,952		)	3,118			(6,929		)
Interest expense, net	(26,242		)	(26,901		)	(69,561		)	(86,753		)
(Loss) income before income taxes	(84,204		)	186,564			111,090			539,774
Income tax benefit	(19,311		)	—			(898		)	—
Net (loss) income	(64,893		)	$	186,564		111,988			$	539,774
Less: net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest	(45,045		)				103,604
Net (loss) income attributable to PBF Energy Inc.	$	(19,848	)				$	8,384
Weighted-average shares of Class A common stock outstanding
Basic	39,575,429						30,094,946
Diluted	39,575,429						30,748,901
Net (loss) income available to Class A common stock per share:
Basic	$	(0.50	)				$	0.28
Diluted	$	(0.50	)				$	0.27
Dividends per common share	$	0.30					$	0.90

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

PBF ENERGY INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

(COMBINED AND CONSOLIDATED WITH PBF ENERGY COMPANY LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES)

(unaudited, in thousands)

	Three Months Ended   September 30,					Nine Months Ended   September 30,
	2013			2012		2013		2012
Net (loss) income	$	(64,893	)	$	186,564	$	111,988	$	539,774
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized gain on available for sale securities	13			2		7		2
Amortization of defined benefit plans unrecognized net loss	108			—		324		17
Total other comprehensive income	121			2		331		19
Comprehensive (loss) income	(64,772		)	$	186,566	112,319		$	539,793
Less: Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest	(45,004		)			103,800
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to PBF Energy Inc.	$	(19,768	)			$	8,519

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

7

PBF ENERGY INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(COMBINED AND CONSOLIDATED WITH PBF ENERGY COMPANY LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES)

(unaudited, in thousands)

	Nine months ended September 30,
	2013			2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	111,988		$	539,774
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations:
Depreciation and amortization	86,417			71,144
Stock-based compensation	2,750			1,707
Change in fair value of catalyst lease obligation	(3,118		)	6,929
Change in fair value of contingent consideration	—			2,076
Deferred income taxes	(898		)	—
Change in tax receivable agreement liability	8,095			—
Non-cash change in inventory repurchase obligations	(13,362		)	5,126
Write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees	—			4,391
Pension and other post retirement benefits costs	12,654			9,513
Gain on disposition of property, plant and equipment	(48		)	(2,430		)
Changes in current assets and current liabilities:
Accounts receivable	(74,083		)	(179,989		)
Inventories	31,165			85,179
Other current assets	(42,745		)	36,971
Accounts payable	203,865			(39,153		)
Accrued expenses	48,811			(56,404		)
Deferred revenue	(208,661		)	13,719
Other assets and liabilities	(20,249		)	(29,731		)
Net cash provided by operations	142,581			468,822
Cash flow from investing activities:
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment	(201,906		)	(102,004		)
Expenditures for deferred turnarounds cost	(15,859		)	(27,501		)
Expenditures for other assets	(10,584		)	(7,731		)
Proceeds from sale of assets	30,826			3,381
Net cash used in investing activities	(197,523		)	(133,855		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from members' capital contributions to PBF Energy Company LLC (former controlling interest)	—			250
Distribution to PBF Energy Company LLC members	(140,457		)	(15,081		)
Dividend payments	(26,042		)	—
Proceeds from 8.25% senior secured notes	—			665,806
Proceeds from long-term debt	—			430,000
Proceeds from catalyst lease	—			9,452
Proceeds from revolver borrowings	745,000			—
Repayments of revolver borrowings	(730,000		)	—
Repayments of long-term debt	—			(1,184,597		)
Payment of contingent consideration related to acquisition of Toledo refinery	(21,357		)	(103,642		)
Deferred financing costs and other	(669		)	(17,273		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(173,525		)	(215,085		)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	(228,467		)	119,882
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period	285,884			50,166
Cash and equivalents, end of period	$	57,417		$	170,048
Supplemental cash flow disclosures
Non-cash activities:
Conversion of Delaware Economic Development Authority loan to grant	$	4,000		$	—
Accrued construction in progress	7,649			11,710
Non-cash impact of inventory supply and offtake agreements on inventory and accrued expenses	6,683			48,180

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

8

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(unaudited, in thousands)

	September 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	57,417		$	254,291
Accounts receivable	577,879			503,796
Due from related party	—			14,721
Inventories	1,472,637			1,497,119
Prepaid expense and other current assets	56,133			13,388
Total current assets	2,164,066			2,283,315
Property, plant and equipment, net	1,735,760			1,635,587
Deferred charges and other assets, net	201,954			197,349
Total assets	$	4,101,780		$	4,116,251
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	563,922		$	360,057
Accrued expenses	1,043,603			1,025,918
Deferred revenue	1,882			210,543
Total current liabilities	1,609,407			1,596,518
Delaware Economic Development Authority loan	16,000			20,000
Long-term debt	722,565			709,980
Intercompany notes payable	31,632			—
Other long-term liabilities	36,351			38,099
Total liabilities	2,415,955			2,364,597
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
Equity:
Member's equity	931,587			930,098
Retained earnings	762,848			830,497
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(8,610		)	(8,941		)
Total equity	1,685,825			1,751,654
Total liabilities and equity	$	4,101,780		$	4,116,251

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

9

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited, in thousands)

	Three Months Ended   September 30,						Nine Months Ended   September 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Revenues	$	4,858,880		$	5,395,206		$	14,335,020		$	15,188,327
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation	4,663,697			4,932,645			13,394,777			13,871,884
Operating expenses, excluding depreciation	192,647			179,035			601,245			537,880
General and administrative expenses	22,653			38,942			71,888			78,042
(Gain) loss on sale of assets	(48		)	20			(48		)	(2,430		)
Depreciation and amortization expense	27,435			24,455			81,530			67,419
	4,906,384			5,175,097			14,149,392			14,552,795
(Loss) income from operations	(47,504		)	220,109			185,628			635,532
Other income (expense)
Change in fair value of contingent consideration	—			(692		)	—			(2,076		)
Change in fair value of catalyst lease	(2,363		)	(5,952		)	3,118			(6,929		)
Interest expense, net	(26,363		)	(26,901		)	(69,712		)	(86,753		)
Net (loss) income	$	(76,230	)	$	186,564		$	119,034		$	539,774

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

10

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

(unaudited, in thousands)

	Three Months Ended   September 30,					Nine Months Ended   September 30,
	2013			2012		2013		2012
Net (loss) income	$	(76,230	)	$	186,564	$	119,034	$	539,774
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized gain on available for sale      securities	13			2		7		2
Amortization of defined benefit plans       unrecognized net loss	108			—		324		17
Total other comprehensive income	121			2		331		19
Comprehensive (loss) income	$	(76,109	)	$	186,566	$	119,365	$	539,793

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

11

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited, in thousands)

	Nine months ended September 30,
	2013			2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	119,034		$	539,774
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations:
Depreciation and amortization	86,417			71,144
Stock-based compensation	2,750			1,707
Change in fair value of catalyst lease obligation	(3,118		)	6,929
Change in fair value of contingent consideration	—			2,076
Non-cash change in inventory repurchase obligations	(13,362		)	5,126
Write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees	—			4,391
Pension and other post retirement benefit costs	12,654			9,513
Gain on disposition of property, plant and equipment	(48		)	(2,430		)
Changes in current assets and current liabilities:
Accounts receivable	(74,083		)	(179,989		)
Due to/from related party	14,721			—
Inventories	31,165			85,179
Other current assets	(42,745		)	36,971
Accounts payable	203,865			(39,153		)
Accrued expenses	52,513			(56,404		)
Deferred revenue	(208,661		)	13,719
Other assets and liabilities	(18,375		)	(29,731		)
Net cash provided by operations	162,727			468,822
Cash flows from investing activities:
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment	(201,906		)	(102,004		)
Expenditures for deferred turnarounds costs	(15,859		)	(27,501		)
Expenditures for other assets	(10,584		)	(7,731		)
Proceeds from sale of assets	30,826			3,381
Net cash used in investing activities	(197,523		)	(133,855		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from revolver borrowings	745,000			—
Proceeds from intercompany notes payable	31,632			—
Proceeds from member's capital contributions	—			250
Proceeds from 8.25% senior secured notes	—			665,806
Proceeds from long-term debt	—			430,000
Proceeds from catalyst lease	—			9,452
Distributions to members	(186,684		)	(15,081		)
Repayments of revolver borrowings	(730,000		)	—
Repayments of long-term debt	—			(1,184,597		)
Payment of contingent consideration related to acquisition of Toledo refinery	(21,357		)	(103,642		)
Deferred financing costs and other	(669		)	(17,273		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(162,078		)	(215,085		)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	(196,874		)	119,882
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period	254,291			50,166
Cash and equivalents, end of period	$	57,417		$	170,048
Supplemental cash flow disclosures
Non-cash activities:
Conversion of Delaware Economic Development Authority loan to grant	$	4,000		$	—
Accrued construction in progress	7,649			11,710
Non-cash impact of inventory supply and offtake agreements on inventory and accrued expenses	6,683			48,180

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

12

PBF ENERGY INC. AND

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE, UNIT, PER SHARE, PER UNIT AND BARREL DATA)

1. DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Description of the Business

PBF Energy Inc. ("PBF Energy") was formed as a Delaware corporation on November 7, 2011 for the purpose of facilitating an initial public offering ("IPO") of its common equity and to become the sole managing member of PBF Energy Company LLC ("PBF LLC"), a Delaware limited liability company. Prior to completion of its IPO, PBF Energy had not engaged in any business or other activities except in connection with its formation and the IPO. On December 12, 2012, PBF Energy completed an IPO of 23,567,686 shares of its Class A common stock at a public offering price of $26.00 per share. The IPO subsequently closed on December 18, 2012. PBF Energy used the net proceeds of the offering to acquire approximately 24.4% of the membership interests in PBF LLC and to cover offering expenses. As a result of the IPO and related reorganization transactions, PBF Energy became the sole managing member of PBF LLC with a controlling interest in PBF LLC and its subsidiaries. PBF Energy consolidates the financial results of PBF LLC and its subsidiaries and records a noncontrolling interest in its consolidated financial statements representing the economic interests of PBF LLC's members other than PBF Energy. The financial statements and results of operations for periods prior to the completion of PBF Energy’s IPO and the related reorganization transactions are those of PBF LLC. Effective with the completion of the PBF Energy IPO and related reorganization transactions, PBF LLC became a minority-owned, controlled and consolidated subsidiary of PBF Energy.

On June 12, 2013, PBF Energy completed a public offering of 15,950,000 shares of Class A common stock at a price of $27.00 per share, less underwriting discounts and commissions, in a secondary public offering (the "Secondary Offering"). All of the shares were sold by funds affiliated with The Blackstone Group L.P., or Blackstone, and First Reserve Management, L.P., or First Reserve. In connection with the Secondary Offering, Blackstone and First Reserve exchanged 15,950,000 Series A Units of PBF LLC for an equivalent number of shares of Class A common stock of PBF Energy, resulting in a divestiture of approximately 16.6% of Blackstone and First Reserve's holdings in PBF LLC. PBF Energy did not receive any proceeds from the Secondary Offering. PBF Energy incurred approximately $1,388 of expenses, included in general and administrative expenses, in connection with, the Secondary Offering during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 for which it was reimbursed by PBF LLC in accordance with the PBF LLC amended and restated limited liability company agreement.

PBF LLC, together with its consolidated subsidiaries, owns and operates oil refineries and related facilities in North America. PBF Holding Company LLC ("PBF Holding") is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PBF LLC. PBF Finance Corporation ("PBF Finance") is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PBF Holding. PBF Holding and PBF Finance issued 8.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2020 ("senior secured notes") in 2012, which were subsequently registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Delaware City Refining Company LLC, Delaware Pipeline Company LLC, PBF Power Marketing LLC, Paulsboro Refining Company LLC, Paulsboro Natural Gas Pipeline Company LLC and Toledo Refining Company LLC are PBF LLC’s principal operating subsidiaries and are all wholly-owned subsidiaries of PBF Holding. Collectively, PBF Energy and subsidiaries, including PBF Holding, are referred to hereinafter as the "Company".

Substantially all of the Company’s operations are in the United States. The Company’s three oil refineries are all engaged in the refining of crude oil and other feedstocks into petroleum products, and have been aggregated to form one reportable segment. To generate earnings and cash flows from operations, the Company is primarily dependent upon processing crude oil and selling refined petroleum products at margins sufficient to cover fixed and variable costs and other expenses. Crude oil and refined petroleum products are commodities and factors largely out of the Company’s control can cause prices to vary over time. The potential margin volatility can have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, earnings and cash flow.    

Basis of Presentation

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial information furnished herein reflects all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, considered necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and the results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the periods presented. Certain amounts reported in prior years have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required

13

PBF ENERGY INC. AND

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE, UNIT, PER SHARE, PER UNIT AND BARREL DATA)

by GAAP for complete financial statements. These interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in the Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 of PBF Energy Inc., PBF Holding Company LLC and PBF Finance Corporation. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 are not indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

NOTE 2. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

On January 1, 2013, the Company adopted changes issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") to the disclosure of offsetting assets and liabilities. These changes require an entity to disclose gross and net information about instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. The enhanced disclosures will enable users of an entity's financial statements to understand and evaluate the effect or potential effect of master netting arrangements on an entity's financial position, including the effect or potential effect of rights of setoff associated with certain financial instruments and derivative instruments. As of September 30, 2013, the impact of offsetting assets and liabilities was not material to the Company and additional disclosure is not included in this Form 10-Q.

On January 1, 2013, the Company adopted changes issued by the FASB to the reporting of amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income. These changes require an entity to report the effect of significant reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income on the respective line items in net income if the amount being reclassified is required to be reclassified in its entirety to net income. For other amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income in the same reporting period, an entity is required to cross-reference other disclosures that provide additional detail about those amounts. These requirements are to be applied to each component of accumulated other comprehensive income. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, the impact of reclassification out of accumulated other comprehensive income was not material to the Company and additional disclosure is not included in this Form 10-Q.

3. NONCONTROLLING INTEREST OF PBF ENERGY

As a result of the PBF Energy IPO and the related reorganization transactions on December 18, 2012, PBF Energy became the sole managing member of, and had a controlling interest in, PBF LLC which represented 24.4% of the outstanding units. As the sole managing member of PBF LLC, PBF Energy operates and controls all of the business and affairs of PBF LLC and its subsidiaries. In connection with the Secondary Offering, Blackstone and First Reserve exchanged 15,950,000 Series A Units of PBF LLC for an equivalent number of shares of Class A common stock of PBF Energy, which increased PBF Energy's interest in PBF LLC to approximately 40.9%.

PBF Energy consolidates the financial results of PBF LLC and its subsidiaries, and records a noncontrolling interest for the economic interest in PBF Energy held by the members of PBF LLC other than PBF Energy. Noncontrolling interest on the consolidated statements of operations represents the portion of net income or loss attributable to the economic interest in PBF Energy held by the members of PBF LLC other than PBF Energy. Noncontrolling interest on the consolidated balance sheets represents the portion of net assets of PBF Energy attributable to the members of PBF LLC other than PBF Energy. The noncontrolling interest ownership percentage as of September 30, 2013, June 12, 2013 (the completion date of the Secondary Offering) and December 31, 2012 is calculated as follows:

	Holders of PBF LLC Series A Units		Outstanding Shares of PBF Energy Class A Common Stock		Total *
December 31, 2012	72,972,131		23,571,221		96,543,352
	75.6	%	24.4	%	100	%
June 12, 2013	57,027,225		39,563,835		96,591,060
	59.0	%	41.0	%	100	%
September 30, 2013	57,237,488		39,581,613		96,819,101
	59.1	%	40.9	%	100	%

14

PBF ENERGY INC. AND

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE, UNIT, PER SHARE, PER UNIT AND BARREL DATA)

——————————

* Assumes all of the holders of PBF LLC Series A Units exchange their PBF LLC Series A Units for shares of PBF Energy’s Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis.

The following table summarizes the changes in equity for the controlling and noncontrolling interests of PBF Energy for the nine months ended September 30, 2013:

	PBF Energy Inc. Equity			Noncontrolling Interest			Total Equity
Balance at January 1, 2013	$	419,754		$	1,303,791		$	1,723,545
Net income	8,384			103,604			111,988
Dividend and distributions	(26,042		)	(140,457		)	(166,499		)
Record deferred tax asset and liabilities and tax receivable agreement associated with Secondary Offering	(23,654		)	—			(23,654		)
Record allocation of non controlling interest upon completion of Secondary Offering	260,243			(260,243		)	—
Stock-based compensation	1,636			1,114			2,750
Exercise of PBF LLC options and warrants, net	—			375			375
Other comprehensive income	167			164			331
Exchange of PBF LLC Series A Units for Class A common stock	16			(16		)	—
Balance at September 30, 2013	$	640,504		$	1,008,332		$	1,648,836

4. INVENTORIES

Inventories consisted of the following:

September 30, 2013
	Titled Inventory		Inventory Supply and Offtake Arrangements		Total
Crude oil and feedstocks	$	541,097	$	95,371	$	636,468
Refined products and blendstocks	471,289		331,626		802,915
Warehouse stock and other	33,254		—		33,254
	$	1,045,640	$	426,997	$	1,472,637

December 31, 2012
	Titled Inventory		Inventory Supply and Offtake Arrangements		Total
Crude oil and feedstocks	$	384,441	$	257,947	$	642,388
Refined products and blendstocks	405,545		417,865		823,410
Warehouse stock and other	31,321		—		31,321
	$	821,307	$	675,812	$	1,497,119

The inventory offtake agreements at the Paulsboro and Delaware City refineries were terminated on July 1, 2013 and separate inventory intermediation agreements for these refineries became effective upon the termination (see Note 5 Inventory Intermediation Agreements).

15

PBF ENERGY INC. AND

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE, UNIT, PER SHARE, PER UNIT AND BARREL DATA)

Inventory under inventory supply and offtake arrangements includes crude oil stored at the Company’s Paulsboro and Delaware City refineries' storage facilities that the Company will purchase as it is consumed in connection with the crude supply agreements; feedstocks and blendstocks sold to counterparties that the Company will repurchase for further blending into finished products; lube products sold to a counterparty that the Company will repurchase; and light finished products sold to counterparties in connection with the offtake and intermediation agreements and stored in the Paulsboro and Delaware City refineries' storage facilities.

At September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the replacement value of inventories exceeded the LIFO carrying value by approximately $72,689 and $79,859, respectively.

5. INVENTORY INTERMEDIATION AGREEMENTS

On June 26, 2013, the Company entered into Inventory Intermediation Agreements (the “Intermediation Agreements”) with J. Aron & Company (“J. Aron”), a subsidiary of The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., to support the operations of the Paulsboro and Delaware City refineries (the "Refineries"). Pursuant to the Intermediation Agreements, J. Aron purchased all of the finished and intermediate products (collectively the “Products”) located at the Refineries immediately subsequent to the termination of the product offtake agreements. Pursuant to the terms of the Intermediation Agreements which expire on July 1, 2015, J. Aron has agreed to purchase the Products produced and delivered into the Refineries’ storage tanks on a daily basis. J. Aron further agreed to sell to us on a daily basis the Products delivered out of the Refineries’ storage tanks. The net amount of all J. Aron daily purchases and sales with PBF will be provisionally invoiced weekly with a monthly true-up invoice issued for any price, volume, or fee adjustments ten business days after the calendar month end. We entered into the Intermediation Agreements for the purpose of managing the Products inventory at the Refineries, which provides us with financial flexibility and improves our liquidity by allowing us to monetize Products inventory in our tanks as they are produced prior to being sold to third parties.

Title to Products purchased by J.Aron passes upon delivery into the Refineries’ storage tanks and title to Products purchased by us passes upon discharge out of the Refineries’ storage tanks. J. Aron owns and has title to all of the Products stored in the tanks (or in other locations outside the refineries as agreed upon by both parties) while custody remains with us. The Company incurred fees of $3.1 million in connection with the Intermediation Agreements during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2013, which are included as a component of interest expense in the condensed consolidated statement of income.

Upon the expiration or termination of the Intermediation Agreements, we are obligated to purchase from J. Aron all volumes of Products located in the Refineries’ storage tanks. All purchase and sale transactions under the Intermediation Agreements are consummated at a benchmark market price adjusted for a specified product type differential. The sale and purchase transactions under the Intermediation Agreements are considered to be made in contemplation of each other and, accordingly, do not result in the recognition of a sale when title passes to J. Aron. The Products inventory remains on our balance sheet at cost and the net cash receipts result in a liability that is recorded at market price for the volume of Products inventory held in our Refineries’ storage tanks with any change in the market price recorded in costs of sales. At September 30, 2013, there were 3.2 million barrels of inventory stored in the Company's tanks at the Refineries that were owned by J. Aron. The Company recorded liabilities associated with purchase of this inventory of $366.7 million in accrued expenses as of September 30, 2013.

16

PBF ENERGY INC. AND

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE, UNIT, PER SHARE, PER UNIT AND BARREL DATA)

6. DEFERRED CHARGES AND OTHER ASSETS, NET

Deferred charges and other assets, net consisted of the following:

	September 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Deferred turnaround costs, net	$	77,656	$	78,128
Catalyst	68,374		66,377
Deferred financing costs, net	27,929		30,987
Restricted cash	12,116		12,114
Linefill	9,636		8,042
Intangible assets, net	761		1,085
Other	5,482		616
	$	201,954	$	197,349

7. ACCRUED EXPENSES

PBF Energy

Accrued expenses consisted of the following:

	September 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Inventory-related accruals	$	445,753	$	287,929
Inventory supply and offtake arrangements	439,264		536,594
Excise and sales tax payable	27,651		40,776
Accrued transportation costs	23,979		20,338
Accrued interest	9,041		22,764
Accrued utilities	16,622		19,060
Customer deposits	28,104		26,541
Accrued salaries and benefits	5,995		15,212
Accrued construction in progress	7,649		16,481
Income taxes payable	—		1,275
Fair value of contingent consideration for refinery acquisition	—		21,358
Other	38,481		23,139
	$	1,042,539	$	1,031,467

17

PBF ENERGY INC. AND

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE, UNIT, PER SHARE, PER UNIT AND BARREL DATA)

PBF Holding

Accrued expenses consisted of the following:

	September 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Inventory-related accruals	$	445,753	$	287,929
Inventory supply and offtake arrangements	439,264		536,594
Excise and sales tax payable	27,651		36,414
Accrued transportation costs	23,979		20,338
Accrued interest	9,041		22,764
Accrued utilities	16,622		19,060
Customer deposits	28,104		26,541
Accrued salaries and benefits	5,995		15,212
Accrued construction in progress	7,649		16,481
Fair value of contingent consideration for refinery acquisition	—		21,358
Other	39,545		23,227
	$	1,043,603	$	1,025,918

The Company has the obligation to repurchase certain intermediates and finished products that are held in the Company’s refinery storage tanks in accordance with the Intermediation Agreements with J. Aron commencing in July 2013 (see Note 5 Inventory Intermediation Agreements). As of September 30, 2013, a liability included in Inventory supply and offtake arrangements is recorded at market price for the J. Aron owned inventory held in the Company's storage tanks under the Intermediation Agreements, with any change in the market price being recorded in costs of sales. 

Prior to July 1, 2013, the Company had the obligation to repurchase certain intermediates and lube products under its products offtake agreements with Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. (“MSCG”) that were held in the Company’s refinery storage tanks. A liability included in Inventory supply and offtake arrangements was recorded at market price for the volumes held in storage consistent with the terms of the offtake agreements with any change in the market price recorded in costs of sales.  The liability represented the amount the Company expected to pay to repurchase the volumes held in storage. The Company recorded a non-cash benefit of $0 and $20,248 related to this liability in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively. The Company recorded a non-cash charge of $30,249 and $17,309 related to this liability in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively.

8. DELAWARE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY LOAN

In June 2010, in connection with the Delaware City acquisition, the Delaware Economic Development Authority (the “Authority”) granted the Company a $20,000 loan to assist with operating costs and the cost of restarting the refinery. The loan is represented by a zero interest rate note and the entire unpaid principal amount is payable in full on March 1, 2017, unless the loan is converted to a grant. The Company recorded the loan as a long-term liability pending approval from the Authority that it has met the requirements to convert the remaining loan balance to a grant.

The loan converts to a grant in tranches of up to $4,000 annually over a five-year period, starting at the one-year anniversary of the “certified restart date” as defined in the agreement and certified by the Authority. In order for the loan to be converted to a grant, the Company is required to utilize at least 600 man hours of labor in connection with the reconstruction and restarting of the Delaware City refinery, expend at least $125,000 in qualified capital expenditures, commence refinery operations, and maintain certain employment levels, all as defined in the agreement. In February 2013, the Company received confirmation from the Authority that the Company had satisfied the conditions necessary for the first $4,000 tranche of the loan to be converted to a grant. As a result of the grant conversion, property, plant and equipment, net was reduced by $4,000 as of September 30, 2013, as the proceeds from the loan were used for capital projects.

18

PBF ENERGY INC. AND

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE, UNIT, PER SHARE, PER UNIT AND BARREL DATA)

In October 2013, the Company received confirmation from the Delaware Economic Development Authority that the Company had satisfied the conditions necessary for the second $4,000 tranche of the loan to be converted to a grant.

9. INCOME TAXES

PBF Energy

For periods following PBF Energy’s IPO, PBF Energy is required to file federal and applicable state corporate income tax returns and recognizes income taxes on its pre-tax income, which to-date has consisted solely of its share (approximately 24.4% prior to the Secondary Offering and approximately 40.9% subsequent to the Secondary Offering) of PBF LLC’s pre-tax income. PBF LLC is organized as a limited liability company which is treated as a "flow-through" entity for income tax purposes and therefore is not subject to income taxes. As a result, the PBF Energy condensed consolidated financial statements do not reflect a benefit or provision for income taxes for PBF LLC for periods prior to the IPO or any benefit or provision for income taxes on the pre-tax income or loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest in PBF LLC.

The income tax provision in the PBF Energy condensed consolidated financial statements of operations consists of the following:

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2013			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
Current tax benefit	$	(1,744	)	$	—
Deferred tax benefit	(17,567		)	(898		)
Total tax benefit	$	(19,311	)	$	(898	)

The difference between the Company’s income tax benefit and the income tax provision computed by applying the United States statutory rate and the difference between the Company’s effective income tax rate and the United States statutory rate are reconciled below:

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2013					Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
Provision at Federal statutory rate	$	(13,693	)	35.0	%	$	2,620		35.0	%
Increase (decrease) attributable to flow-through of certain tax adjustments:
State income taxes (net federal income tax)	(1,917		)	4.9	%	367			4.9	%
Non deductible/nontaxable items	2,377			(6.1	)%	2,438			32.6	%
Adjustment to deferred tax assets and liabilities for change in tax rates due to business mix	(4,983		)	12.7	%	(4,983		)	(66.6	)%
Other	(1,095		)	2.8	%	(1,340		)	(17.9	)%
Total	$	(19,311	)	49.3	%	$	(898	)	(12.0	)%

PBF Energy has determined there are no material uncertain tax positions as of September 30, 2013.

PBF Holding

PBF Holding is a limited liability company treated as a "flow-through" entity for income tax purposes. Accordingly there is no benefit or provision for federal or state income tax in the accompanying PBF Holding financial statements.

19

PBF ENERGY INC. AND

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE, UNIT, PER SHARE, PER UNIT AND BARREL DATA)

10. INTERCOMPANY NOTES PAYABLE

As of September 30, 2013, PBF Holding entered into notes payable with PBF Energy and PBF LLC for an aggregate principal amount of $31,632. The notes have an interest rate of 2.5% and a five year term but may be prepaid in whole or in part at any time, at the option of the PBF Holding, without penalty or premium.

11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Environmental Matters

The Company’s refineries are subject to extensive and frequently changing federal, state and local laws and regulations, including, but not limited to, those relating to the discharge of materials into the environment or that otherwise relate to the protection of the environment, waste management and the characteristics and the compositions of fuels. Compliance with existing and anticipated laws and regulations can increase the overall cost of operating the refineries, including remediation, operating costs and capital costs to construct, maintain and upgrade equipment and facilities.

In connection with the Paulsboro refinery acquisition, the Company assumed certain environmental remediation obligations. The environmental liability of $10,426 recorded as of September 30, 2013 ($9,669 as of December 31, 2012) represents the present value of expected future costs discounted at a rate of 8%. The current portion of the environmental liability is recorded in accrued expenses and the non-current portion is recorded in other long-term liabilities. A trust fund related to this liability in the amount of $12,116 and $12,114, acquired in the Paulsboro acquisition, is recorded as restricted cash in deferred charges and other assets, net as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

In connection with the acquisition of the Delaware City assets, Valero Energy Corporation ("Valero") remains responsible for certain pre-acquisition environmental obligations up to $20,000 and the predecessor to Valero in ownership of the refinery retains other historical obligations.

In connection with the acquisition of the Delaware City assets and the Paulsboro refinery, the Company and Valero purchased ten year, $75,000 environmental insurance policies to insure against unknown environmental liabilities at each site. In connection with the Toledo refinery acquisition, Sunoco, Inc. (R&M) ("Sunoco") remains responsible for environmental remediation for conditions that existed on the closing date for twenty years from March 1, 2011.

In 2010, New York State adopted a Low-Sulfur Heating Oil mandate that, beginning July 1, 2012, requires all heating oil sold in New York State to contain no more than 15 PPM sulfur. Other states have laws with various implementation dates that also require lower levels of sulfur in heating oils. Not all of the heating oil we currently produce meets these specifications. The Company has made and is continuing to make certain processing improvements to shift conventional heating oil production to ultra-low sulfur heating oil and ultra-low sulfur diesel in order to comply with these new mandates. The Company plans to continue increasing ultra-low sulfur distillate production over the next several years while marketing conventional heating oil in states where regulations have not changed. The mandate and other requirements do not currently have a material impact on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In addition, on June 1, 2012, the Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") issued final amendments to the New Source Performance Standards (“NSPS”) for petroleum refineries, including standards for emissions of nitrogen oxides from process heaters and work practice standards and monitoring requirements for flares. The Company has evaluated the impact of the regulation and amended standards on its refinery operations and currently does not expect the cost to comply by July 1, 2015 with the amended NSPS to be material.

The Company is aware that the EPA has drafted the proposed Tier 3 Motor Vehicle Emission and Fuel Standards. The draft Standards are in the formal public comment period at this time. The gasoline currently manufactured by the Company's refineries does not meet a portion of the proposed requirements, specifically as related to meeting the proposed 10  ppm annual average gasoline sulfur requirement. The EPA has included potential options in other portions of the proposed Standards that the Company's gasoline products may meet if adopted in the final rulemaking. The Company is continuing to evaluate the potential impact of these proposed Standards.

On June 14, 2013, two administrative appeals were filed by the Sierra Club and Delaware Audubon regarding an air permit Delaware City Refining Company LLC (“Delaware City Refining”) obtained to allow loading of crude oil onto barges.  The appeals allege that both the loading of crude oil onto barges and the operation of the Delaware City Refining

20

PBF ENERGY INC. AND

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE, UNIT, PER SHARE, PER UNIT AND BARREL DATA)

double-loop rail terminal violate Delaware’s Coastal Zone Act.  A hearing on the first appeal before the State Coastal Zone Industrial Control Board occurred on July 16, 2013, and the board ruled in favor of Delaware City Refining dismissing the appeal for lack of standing.  Sierra Club and Delaware Audubon have appealed that decision to the Delaware Superior Court, New Castle County, Case No. N13A-09-001 ALR, and Delaware City Refining and the state filed cross-appeals.  No schedule has yet been set for the appeal in Superior Court.  A hearing on the second appeals before the Environmental Appeals Board, case no. 2013-06, has been scheduled for January 21, 2014 with motions to dismiss scheduled to be heard on December 10, 2013.

The Company is also currently subject to certain other existing environmental claims and proceedings. The Company believes that there is only a remote possibility that future costs related to any of these other known contingent liability exposures would have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

PBF LLC Limited Liability Company Agreement

The holders of limited liability company interests in PBF LLC, including PBF Energy, generally have to include for purposes of calculating their U.S. federal, state and local income taxes their share of any taxable income of PBF LLC. Taxable income of PBF LLC generally is allocated to the holders of PBF LLC units (including PBF Energy) pro rata in accordance with their respective share of the net profits and net losses of PBF LLC. In general, PBF LLC is required to make periodic tax distributions to the members of PBF LLC, including PBF Energy, pro rata in accordance with their respective percentage interests for such period (as determined under the amended and restated limited liability company agreement of PBF LLC), subject to available cash and applicable law and contractual restrictions (including pursuant to our debt instruments) and based on certain assumptions. Generally, these tax distributions will be an amount equal to our estimate of the taxable income of PBF LLC for the year multiplied by an assumed tax rate equal to the highest effective marginal combined U.S. federal, state and local income tax rate prescribed for an individual or corporate resident in New York, New York (taking into account the nondeductibility of certain expenses). If, with respect to any given calendar year, the aggregate periodic tax distributions were less than the actual taxable income of PBF LLC multiplied by the assumed tax rate, PBF LLC will make a “true up” tax distribution, no later than March 15 of the following year, equal to such difference, subject to the available cash and borrowings of PBF LLC.

Tax Receivable Agreement

PBF Energy entered into a tax receivable agreement with the PBF LLC Series A and PBF LLC Series B Unit holders (the “Tax Receivable Agreement”) that provides for the payment by PBF Energy to such persons of an amount equal to 85% of the amount of the benefits, if any, that PBF Energy is deemed to realize as a result of (i) increases in tax basis, as described below, and (ii) certain other tax benefits related to entering into the Tax Receivable Agreement, including tax benefits attributable to payments under the Tax Receivable Agreement. For purposes of the Tax Receivable Agreement, the benefit deemed realized by PBF Energy will be computed by comparing the actual income tax liability of PBF Energy (calculated with certain assumptions) to the amount of such taxes that PBF Energy would have been required to pay had there been no increase to the tax basis of the assets of PBF LLC as a result of purchases or exchanges of PBF LLC Series A Units for shares of PBF Energy's Class A common stock and had PBF Energy not entered into the Tax Receivable Agreement. The term of the Tax Receivable Agreement will continue until all such tax benefits have been utilized or expired unless: (i) PBF Energy exercises its right to terminate the Tax Receivable Agreement, (ii) PBF Energy breaches any of its material obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement or (iii) certain changes of control occur, in which case all obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement will generally be accelerated and due as calculated under certain assumptions.

The payment obligations under the Tax Receivable Agreement are obligations of PBF Energy and not of PBF LLC or PBF Holding. In general, PBF Energy expects to obtain funding for these payments by causing PBF Holding to distribute cash to PBF LLC, which will then distribute this cash, generally as tax distributions, on a pro-rata basis to its owners. Such owners include PBF Energy, which holds a 40.9% interest as of September 30, 2013.

21

PBF ENERGY INC. AND

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE, UNIT, PER SHARE, PER UNIT AND BARREL DATA)

12. DIVIDENDS AND DISTRIBUTIONS

With respect to dividends and distributions paid during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, PBF Holding paid $186,684 in distributions to PBF LLC. PBF LLC used $86,936 of this amount in total to make three separate non-tax distributions of $0.30 per unit ($0.90 per unit in total) to its members, of which $26,042 was distributed to PBF Energy and the balance was distributed to its other members on March 15, 2013, June 7, 2013 and August 21, 2013. PBF Energy used this $26,042 to pay three separate cash dividends of $0.30 per share of Class A common stock on March 15, 2013, June 7, 2013 and August 21, 2013. PBF LLC used the remaining $99,748 from PBF Holding's distribution to make tax distributions to its members during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, with $20,185 distributed to PBF Energy, of which $1,065 was paid by PBF LLC directly to the applicable taxing authorities on behalf of PBF Energy.

13. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

The components of net periodic benefit cost related to the Company’s defined benefit plans consisted of the following:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
Pension Benefits	2013			2012			2013			2012
Components of net period benefit cost:
Service cost	$	3,699		$	2,860		$	11,096		$	8,578
Interest cost	248			125			744			376
Expected return on plan assets	(138		)	(81		)	(414		)	(243		)
Amortization of prior service costs	3			3			9			8
Amortization of loss	105			8			315			23
Net periodic benefit cost	$	3,917		$	2,915		$	11,750		$	8,742

	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
Post Retirement Medical Plan	2013		2012		2013		2012
Components of net period benefit cost:
Service cost	$	181	$	205	$	544	$	475
Interest cost	84		106		251		296
Net periodic benefit cost	$	265	$	311	$	795	$	771

22

PBF ENERGY INC. AND

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE, UNIT, PER SHARE, PER UNIT AND BARREL DATA)

14. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The tables below present information about the Company's financial assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis and indicate the fair value hierarchy of the inputs utilized to determine the fair values as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

	As of September 30, 2013
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Money market funds	$	5,856	$	—	$	—	$	5,856
Commodity contracts	8,319		—		—		8,319
Derivatives included with intermediation agreement obligations	—		29,563		—		29,563
Liabilities:
Commodity contracts	—		14,587		—		14,587
Derivatives included with inventory supply arrangement obligations	—		1,291		—		1,291
Catalyst lease obligations	—		40,323		—		40,323

	As of December 31, 2012
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Money market funds	$	175,786	$	—	$	—	$	175,786
Commodity contracts	3,303		—		—		3,303
Derivatives included with inventory supply arrangement obligations	—		5,595		—		5,595
Liabilities:
Catalyst lease obligations	—		43,442		—		43,442
Commodity contracts	—		1,872		—		1,872
Contingent consideration for refinery acquisition	—		—		21,358		21,358

The valuation methods used to measure financial instruments at fair value are as follows:

• Money market funds categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy are measured at fair value based on quoted market prices and included within cash and cash equivalents.

• The commodity contracts categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy are measured at fair value based on quoted prices in an active market. The commodity contracts categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy are measured at fair value using a market approach based upon future commodity prices for similar instruments quoted in active markets.

• The derivatives included with inventory supply arrangement obligations, derivatives included with intermediation agreement obligations and the catalyst lease obligations are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and are measured at fair value using a market approach based upon commodity prices for similar instruments quoted in active markets.

• The contingent consideration for refinery acquisition obligation at December 31, 2012 is categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and is estimated using a discounted cash flow model based on management's estimate of the future cash flows of the Toledo refinery; a risk free rate of return of 0.16%; credit rate spread of 4.38%; and a discount rate of 4.54%. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, there was no change in fair value, as the obligation was known and was paid in full on April 30, 2013.

23

PBF ENERGY INC. AND

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE, UNIT, PER SHARE, PER UNIT AND BARREL DATA)

The table below summarizes the changes in fair value measurements categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy:

	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013		2012			2013			2012
Balance at beginning of period	$	—	$	122,924		$	21,358		$	122,232
Purchases	—		—			—			—
Settlements	—		(103,643		)	(21,358		)	(103,643		)
Unrealized loss included in earnings	—		692			—			1,384
Transfers into Level 3	—		—			—			—
Transfers out of Level 3	—		—			—			—
Balance at end of period	$	—	$	19,973		$	—		$	19,973

There were no transfers between levels during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Fair value of debt

The table below summarizes the fair value and carrying value as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

	September 30, 2013				December 31, 2012
	Carrying value		Fair  value		Carrying  value		Fair value
Senior secured notes (a)	$	667,242	$	684,918	$	666,538	$	700,963
Revolver (b)	15,000		15,000		—		—
Catalyst leases (c)	40,323		40,323		43,442		43,442
Long-term debt	$	722,565	$	740,241	$	709,980	$	744,405

(a) The estimated fair value, categorized as a Level 2 measurement, was calculated based on the present value of future expected payments utilizing implied current market interest rates based on quoted prices of the senior secured notes.

(b) The estimated fair value approximates carrying value, categorized as a Level 2 measurement, as these borrowings bear interest based upon short-term floating market interest rates.

(c) Catalyst leases are valued using a market approach based upon commodity prices for similar instruments quoted in active markets and are categorized as a Level 2 measurement. The Company has elected the fair value option for accounting for its catalyst lease repurchase obligations as the Company's liability is directly impacted by the change in fair value of the underlying catalyst.

24

PBF ENERGY INC. AND

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE, UNIT, PER SHARE, PER UNIT AND BARREL DATA)

15. DERIVATIVES

The Company uses derivative instruments to mitigate certain exposures to commodity price risk. The Company’s crude supply agreements contain purchase obligations for certain volumes of crude oil and other feedstocks. In addition, the Company entered into Intermediation Agreements commencing in July 2013 that contain purchase obligations for certain volumes of intermediates and refined products. The Company was also party to an agreement that contained purchase obligations for certain volumes of stored intermediates inventory during the nine months ended September 30, 2012, which was terminated during the first quarter of 2012. The purchase obligations related to crude oil, feedstocks, intermediates and refined products under these agreements are derivative instruments that have been designated as fair value hedges in order to hedge the commodity price volatility of certain refinery inventory. The fair value of these purchase obligation derivatives is based on market prices of crude oil and refined products in the future. The level of activity for these derivatives is based on the level of operating inventories.

As of September 30, 2013, there were 928,846 barrels of crude oil and feedstocks (2,529,447 barrels at December 31, 2012) outstanding under these derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges and no barrels (no barrels at December 31, 2012) outstanding under these derivative instruments not designated as hedges. As of September 30, 2013, there were 3,240,579 barrels of intermediates and refined products (no barrels at December 31, 2012) outstanding under these derivative instruments designated as fair value hedges and no barrels (no barrels at December 31, 2012) outstanding under these derivative instruments not designated as hedges. These volumes represent the notional value of the contract.

The Company also enters into economic hedges primarily consisting of commodity derivative contracts that are not designated as hedges and are used to manage price volatility in certain crude oil and feedstock inventories as well as crude oil, feedstock, and refined product sales or purchases. The objective in entering into economic hedges is consistent with the objectives discussed above for fair value hedges. As of September 30, 2013, there were 38,156,010 barrels of crude oil and no barrels of refined products (9,234,000 and 1,310,000, respectively, as of December 31, 2012), outstanding under short and long term commodity derivative contracts not designated as hedges representing the notional value of the contracts.

The following tables provide information about the fair values of these derivative instruments as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 and the line items in the consolidated balance sheet in which the fair values are reflected.

Description	Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value Asset/(Liability)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
September 30, 2013:
Derivatives included with inventory supply arrangement obligations	Accrued expenses	$	(1,291	)
Derivatives included with the intermediation agreement obligations	Accrued expenses	$	29,563
December 31, 2012:
Derivatives included with inventory supply arrangement obligations	Accrued expenses	$	5,595
Derivatives included with the intermediation agreement obligations	Accrued expenses	$	—
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
September 30, 2013:
Commodity contracts	Accrued expenses	$	(6,269	)
December 31, 2012:
Commodity contracts	Accounts receivable	$	1,431

The Company’s policy is to net the fair value of the derivatives included with inventory supply arrangement obligations and inventory intermediation agreement obligations against the liabilities related to inventory supply arrangements and intermediation agreements with the same counterparty as the legal right of offset exists.

The following tables provide information about the gain or loss recognized in income on these derivative instruments and the line items in the consolidated financial statements in which such gains and losses are reflected.

25

PBF ENERGY INC. AND

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE, UNIT, PER SHARE, PER UNIT AND BARREL DATA)

Description	Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in  Income on Derivatives	Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivatives
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
For the three months ended September 30, 2013:
Derivatives included with inventory supply arrangement obligations	Cost of sales	$	(4,015	)
Derivatives included with the intermediation agreement obligations	Cost of sales	$	29,563
For the three months ended September 30, 2012:
Derivatives included with inventory supply arrangement obligations	Cost of sales	$	12,519
Derivatives included with the intermediation agreement obligations	Cost of sales	$	—
For the nine months ended September 30, 2013:
Derivatives included with inventory supply arrangement obligations	Cost of sales	$	(6,886	)
Derivatives included with the intermediation agreement obligations	Cost of sales	$	29,563
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012:
Derivatives included with inventory supply arrangement obligations	Cost of sales	$	12,192
Derivatives included with the intermediation agreement obligations	Cost of sales	$	—
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
For the three months ended September 30, 2013:
Derivatives included with inventory supply arrangement obligations	Cost of sales	$	—
Commodity contracts	Cost of sales	$	(23,843	)
For the three months ended September 30, 2012:
Derivatives included with inventory supply arrangement obligations	Cost of sales	$	—
Commodity contracts	Cost of sales	$	3,029
For the nine months ended September 30, 2013:
Derivatives included with inventory supply arrangement obligations	Cost of sales	$	—
Commodity contracts	Cost of sales	$	(9,894	)
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012:
Derivatives included with inventory supply arrangement obligations	Cost of sales	$	(8	)
Commodity contracts	Cost of sales	$	30,636
Hedged items designated in fair value hedges:
For the three months ended September 30, 2013:
Crude oil and feedstock inventory	Cost of sales	$	3,127
Intermediate and refined product inventory	Cost of sales	$	(29,563	)
For the three months ended September 30, 2012:
Crude oil and feedstock inventory	Cost of sales	$	(4,196	)
Intermediate and refined product inventory	Cost of sales	$	—
For the nine months ended September 30, 2013:
Crude oil and feedstock inventory	Cost of sales	$	(378	)
Intermediate and refined product inventory	Cost of sales	$	(29,563	)
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012:
Crude oil and feedstock inventory	Cost of sales	$	(4,590	)
Intermediate and refined product inventory	Cost of sales	$	—

26

PBF ENERGY INC. AND

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE, UNIT, PER SHARE, PER UNIT AND BARREL DATA)

Ineffectiveness related to the Company's fair value hedges resulted in a loss of $888 and $7,264 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and loss of $8,127 and $7,602 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, recorded in cost of sales. Gains and losses due to ineffectiveness were excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.

16. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE OF PBF ENERGY

For the period subsequent to the IPO, the following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per Class A common share attributable to PBF Energy:

Basic Earnings Per Share:	Three Months Ended September 30, 2013			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
Numerator for basic net income per Class A common share net income (loss) attributable to PBF Energy	$	(19,848	)	$	8,384
Denominator for basic net income (loss) per Class A common share-weighted average shares	39,575,429			30,094,946
Basic net income (loss) attributable to PBF Energy per Class A common share	$	(0.50	)	$	0.28
Diluted Earnings Per Share:
Numerator for diluted net income per Class A common share net income (loss) attributable to PBF Energy (1)	$	(19,848	)	$	8,384
Denominator (1):
Denominator for basic net income (loss) per Class A common share-weighted average shares	39,575,429			30,094,946
Effect of dilutive securities:
Common stock equivalents (2)	—			653,955
Denominator for diluted net income (loss) per common share-adjusted weighted average shares	39,575,429			30,748,901
Diluted net income (loss) attributable to PBF Energy per Class A common share	$	(0.50	)	$	0.27

——————————

(1) During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, the potential conversion of 57,243,672 and 66,724,155 PBF LLC Series A Units, respectively, were excluded from the denominator in computing diluted net income per share because including them would have had an antidilutive effect. As the PBF LLC Series A Units were not included, the numerator used in the calculation of diluted net income per share was equal to the numerator used in the calculation of basic net income per share and does not include the net income and income tax attributable to the net income associated with the potential conversion of the PBF LLC Series A Units.

(2) Represents an adjustment to weighted-average diluted shares outstanding to assume the full exchange of common stock equivalents, including options and warrants for PBF LLC Series A Units and options for shares of PBF Energy Class A common stock. Common stock equivalents excludes the effects of options to purchase 753,750 shares of PBF Energy Class A common stock because they are anti-dilutive for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

27

PBF ENERGY INC. AND

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE, UNIT, PER SHARE, PER UNIT AND BARREL DATA)

17. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Dividend Declared

On October 29, 2013, the Company's Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.30 per share on outstanding Class A common stock. The dividend is payable on November 21, 2013 to Class A common stockholders of record at the close of business on November 15, 2013.

Delaware City Catalyst Lease

In October 2013, the Delaware City catalyst lease expired and the Company entered into a new catalyst lease agreement with a three year term ending October 21, 2016 and an annual fixed interest rate of 1.96%. The annual lease expense is $322.

Sale-leaseback

On November 5, 2013, the Company sold 250 of its owned railcars and concurrently entered into a lease agreement for the same railcars. The lease agreement has terms for the railcars of four and six years. The Company received cash proceeds for the railcars of approximately $35.7 million.

18. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PBF HOLDING

PBF Services Company, Delaware City Refining Company LLC, Delaware Pipeline Company LLC, PBF Power Marketing LLC, Paulsboro Refining Company LLC, Paulsboro Natural Gas Pipeline Company LLC, Toledo Refining Company LLC and PBF Investments LLC are 100% owned subsidiaries of PBF Holding and serve as guarantors of the obligations under the senior secured notes. These guarantees are full and unconditional and joint and several. For purposes of the following footnote, PBF Holding is referred to as “Issuer.” The indenture dated February 9, 2012, among PBF Holding, PBF Finance, the guarantors party thereto and Wilmington Trust, National Association, governs subsidiaries designated as “Guarantor Subsidiaries.” PBF Logistics LP, PBF Rail Logistics Company LLC and Delaware City Terminaling Company LLC are consolidated subsidiaries of the Company that are not guarantors of the senior secured notes.

The senior secured notes were co-issued by PBF Finance. For purposes of the following footnote, PBF Finance is referred to as “Co-Issuer.” The Co-Issuer has no independent assets or operations.

The following supplemental combining and consolidating financial information reflects the Issuer’s separate accounts, the combined accounts of the Guarantor Subsidiaries, the combining and consolidating adjustments and eliminations and the Issuer’s consolidated accounts for the dates and periods indicated. For purposes of the following combining and consolidating information, the Issuer’s Investments in its subsidiaries and the Guarantor Subsidiaries’ investments in its subsidiaries are accounted for under the equity method of accounting.

PBF Holding has determined that a correction to the previously presented 2012 condensed consolidating financial information presented in the following statements was necessary to reflect intercompany transactions between the Issuer and the Guarantor Subsidiaries. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, sales to third parties were made and recorded by the Issuer, but the product sold was owned and delivered by the Guarantor Subsidiaries which recorded the related cost of sales. For that nine month period, correcting entries totaling approximately $1,752.5 million have been reflected in the consolidating schedules to record the intercompany sale of product on the Guarantor Subsidiaries and to record an equal amount of cost of sales on the Issuer. All such intercompany activity was then eliminated in consolidation and, therefore, had no effect on the PBF Holding’s reported condensed consolidated financial statements. The effect of these adjustments increased net income of the Guarantor Subsidiaries by $1,752.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. On the Issuer, the increase in cost of sales was completely offset by the increase in the Issuer’s equity in the earnings of the Guarantor Subsidiaries. These adjustments also affected the respective entities’ intercompany receivable/payable accounts and the Issuer’s investment in subsidiaries account by $1,910.0 million at December 31, 2012.

28

PBF ENERGY INC. AND

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE, UNIT, PER SHARE, PER UNIT AND BARREL DATA)

18. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PBF HOLDING

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED)

	September 30, 2013
	Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries		Combining and Consolidating Adjustments			Total
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	56,808		$	609		$	—	$	—		$	57,417
Accounts receivable	531,004			46,875			—		—			577,879
Inventories	851,985			620,652			—		—			1,472,637
Prepaid expense and other current assets	43,721			12,412			—		—			56,133
Due from related parties	10,852,441			15,714,459			—		(26,566,900		)	—
Total current assets	12,335,959			16,395,007			—		(26,566,900		)	2,164,066
Property, plant and equipment, net	63,428			1,672,332			—		—			1,735,760
Investment in subsidiaries	3,814,871			—			—		(3,814,871		)	—
Deferred charges and other assets, net	29,511			172,443			—		—			201,954
Total assets	$	16,243,769		$	18,239,782		$	—	$	(30,381,771	)	$	4,101,780
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	476,299		$	87,623		$	—	$	—		$	563,922
Accrued expenses	482,446			561,157			—		—			1,043,603
Deferred revenue	1,882			—			—		—			1,882
Due to related parties	12,878,170			13,688,730			—		(26,566,900		)	—
Total current liabilities	13,838,797			14,337,510			—		(26,566,900		)	1,609,407
Delaware Economic Development Authority loan	—			16,000			—		—			16,000
Long-term debt	682,242			40,323			—		—			722,565
Intercompany notes payable	31,632			—			—		—			31,632
Other long-term liabilities	5,273			31,078			—		—			36,351
Total liabilities	14,557,944			14,424,911			—		(26,566,900		)	2,415,955
Commitments and contingencies
Equity:
Member's equity	931,587			664,978			—		(664,978		)	931,587
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)	762,848			3,151,447			—		(3,151,447		)	762,848
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(8,610		)	(1,554		)	—		1,554			(8,610		)
Total equity	1,685,825			3,814,871			—		(3,814,871		)	1,685,825
Total liabilities and equity	$	16,243,769		$	18,239,782		$	—	$	(30,381,771	)	$	4,101,780

29

PBF ENERGY INC. AND

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE, UNIT, PER SHARE, PER UNIT AND BARREL DATA)

18. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PBF HOLDING

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED)

	December 31, 2012
	Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries		Combining and Consolidating Adjustments			Total
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	241,926		$	12,365		$	—	$	—		$	254,291
Accounts receivable	306,999			196,797			—		—			503,796
Inventories	664,225			832,894			—		—			1,497,119
Prepaid expense and other current assets	8,835			4,553			—		—			13,388
Due from related parties	6,770,893			10,015,340			—		(16,771,512		)	14,721
Total current assets	7,992,878			11,061,949			—		(16,771,512		)	2,283,315
Property, plant and equipment, net	28,200			1,607,387			—		—			1,635,587
Investment in subsidiaries	2,855,598			—			—		(2,855,598		)	—
Deferred charges and other assets, net	31,081			166,268			—		—			197,349
Total assets	$	10,907,757		$	12,835,604		$	—	$	(19,627,110	)	$	4,116,251
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	197,624		$	162,433		$	—	$	—		$	360,057
Accrued expenses	363,536			662,382			—		—			1,025,918
Deferred revenue	—			210,543			—		—			210,543
Due to related parties	7,926,481			8,845,031			—		(16,771,512		)	—
Total current liabilities	8,487,641			9,880,389			—		(16,771,512		)	1,596,518
Delaware Economic Development Authority loan	—			20,000			—		—			20,000
Long-term debt	666,538			43,442			—		—			709,980
Other long-term liabilities	1,924			36,175			—		—			38,099
Total liabilities	9,156,103			9,980,006			—		(16,771,512		)	2,364,597
Commitments and contingencies
Equity:
Member's equity	930,098			664,108			—		(664,108		)	930,098
Retained earnings	830,497			2,193,052			—		(2,193,052		)	830,497
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(8,941		)	(1,562		)	—		1,562			(8,941		)
Total equity	1,751,654			2,855,598			—		(2,855,598		)	1,751,654
Total liabilities and equity	$	10,907,757		$	12,835,604		$	—	$	(19,627,110	)	$	4,116,251

30

PBF ENERGY INC. AND

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE, UNIT, PER SHARE, PER UNIT AND BARREL DATA)

18. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PBF HOLDING

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

(UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2013
	Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries		Combining and Consolidating Adjustments			Total
Revenues	$	4,813,737		$	745,102		$	—	$	(699,959	)	$	4,858,880
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation	4,624,531			739,125			—		(699,959		)	4,663,697
Operating expenses, excluding depreciation	(168		)	192,815			—		—			192,647
General and administrative expenses	19,567			3,086			—		—			22,653
(Gain) loss on sale of asset	(254		)	206			—		—			(48		)
Depreciation and amortization expense	3,317			24,118			—		—			27,435
	4,646,993			959,350			—		(699,959		)	4,906,384
Income (loss) from operations	166,744			(214,248		)	—		—			(47,504		)
Other income (expense):
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries	(218,232		)	—			—		218,232			—
Change in fair value of catalyst lease	—			(2,363		)	—		—			(2,363		)
Interest expense, net	(24,742		)	(1,621		)	—		—			(26,363		)
Net (loss) income	$	(76,230	)	$	(218,232	)	$	—	$	218,232		$	(76,230	)
Comprehensive (Loss) Income	$	(76,109	)	$	(218,232	)	$	—	$	218,232		$	(76,109	)

31

PBF ENERGY INC. AND

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE, UNIT, PER SHARE, PER UNIT AND BARREL DATA)

18. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PBF HOLDING

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(UNAUDITED)

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2012
	Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries		Combining and Consolidating Adjustments			Total
Revenues	$	2,191,427		$	4,133,729		$	—	$	(929,950	)	$	5,395,206
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation	2,428,649			3,433,946			—		(929,950		)	4,932,645
Operating expenses, excluding depreciation	—			179,035			—		—			179,035
General and administrative expenses	38,150			792			—		—			38,942
Loss on sale of asset	—			20			—		—			20
Depreciation and amortization expense	2,183			22,272			—		—			24,455
	2,468,982			3,636,065			—		(929,950		)	5,175,097
(Loss) income from operations	(277,555		)	497,664			—		—			220,109
Other income (expense):
Equity in earnings (loss) of subsidiaries	483,690			—			—		(483,690		)	—
Change in fair value of contingent consideration	—			(692		)	—		—			(692		)
Change in fair value of catalyst lease	—			(5,952		)	—		—			(5,952		)
Interest expense, net	(19,552		)	(7,349		)	—		—			(26,901		)
Net income	$	186,583		$	483,671		$	—	$	(483,690	)	$	186,564
Comprehensive Income	$	186,566		$	483,690		$	—	$	(483,690	)	$	186,566

32

PBF ENERGY INC. AND

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE, UNIT, PER SHARE, PER UNIT AND BARREL DATA)

18. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PBF HOLDING

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(UNAUDITED)

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
	Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries		Combining and Consolidating Adjustments			Total
Revenues	$	11,375,513		$	7,060,883		$	—	$	(4,101,376	)	$	14,335,020
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation	12,078,314			5,417,839			—		(4,101,376		)	13,394,777
Operating expenses, excluding depreciation	(310		)	601,555			—		—			601,245
General and administrative expenses	61,607			10,281			—		—			71,888
(Gain) loss on sale of asset	(254		)	206			—		—			(48		)
Depreciation and amortization expense	9,457			72,073			—		—			81,530
	12,148,814			6,101,954			—		(4,101,376		)	14,149,392
(Loss) income from operations	(773,301		)	958,929			—		—			185,628
Other income (expense):
Equity in earnings (loss) of subsidiaries	958,402			—			—		(958,402		)	—
Change in fair value of catalyst lease	—			3,118			—		—			3,118
Interest expense, net	(66,067		)	(3,645		)	—		—			(69,712		)
Net income	$	119,034		$	958,402		$	—	$	(958,402	)	$	119,034
Comprehensive Income	$	119,365		$	958,402		$	—	$	(958,402	)	$	119,365

33

PBF ENERGY INC. AND

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE, UNIT, PER SHARE, PER UNIT AND BARREL DATA)

18. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PBF HOLDING

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(UNAUDITED)

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
	Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries		Combining and Consolidating Adjustments			Total
Revenues	$	5,036,947		$	12,767,276		$	—	$	(2,615,896	)	$	15,188,327
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation	6,010,490			10,477,290			—		(2,615,896		)	13,871,884
Operating expenses, excluding depreciation	—			537,880			—		—			537,880
General and administrative expenses	72,706			5,336			—		—			78,042
Gain on sale of asset	—			(2,430		)	—		—			(2,430		)
Depreciation and amortization expense	5,123			62,296			—		—			67,419
	6,088,319			11,080,372			—		(2,615,896		)	14,552,795
(Loss) income from operations	(1,051,372		)	1,686,904			—		—			635,532
Other income (expense):
Equity in earnings (loss) of subsidiaries	1,654,329			—			—		(1,654,329		)	—
Change in fair value of contingent consideration	—			(2,076		)	—		—			(2,076		)
Change in fair value of catalyst lease	—			(6,929		)	—		—			(6,929		)
Interest expense, net	(63,164		)	(23,589		)	—		—			(86,753		)
Net income	$	539,793		$	1,654,310		$	—	$	(1,654,329	)	$	539,774
Comprehensive Income	$	539,793		$	1,654,329		$	—	$	(1,654,329	)	$	539,793

34

PBF ENERGY INC. AND

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE, UNIT, PER SHARE, PER UNIT AND BARREL DATA)

18. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PBF HOLDING

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW (UNAUDITED)

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
	Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries		Combining and Consolidating Adjustments			Total
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	119,034		$	958,402		$	—	$	(958,402	)	$	119,034
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	14,273			72,144			—		—			86,417
Stock-based compensation	—			2,750			—		—			2,750
Change in fair value of catalyst lease obligation	—			(3,118		)	—		—			(3,118		)
Change in fair value of contingent consideration	—			—			—		—			—
Non-cash change in inventory repurchase obligations	—			(13,362		)	—		—			(13,362		)
Write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees	—			—			—		—			—
Pension and other post retirement benefit costs	3,541			9,113			—		—			12,654
Gain on disposition of property, plant and equipment	(254		)	206			—		—			(48		)
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries	(958,402		)	—			—		958,402			—
Changes in current assets and current liabilities:
Accounts receivable	(224,005		)	149,922			—		—			(74,083		)
Amounts due to/from related parties	870,141			(855,420		)	—		—			14,721
Inventories	(187,760		)	218,925			—		—			31,165
Other current assets	(34,886		)	(7,859		)	—		—			(42,745		)
Accounts payable	278,675			(74,810		)	—		—			203,865
Accrued expenses	118,507			(65,994		)	—		—			52,513
Deferred revenue	1,882			(210,543		)	—		—			(208,661		)
Other assets and liabilities	122			(18,497		)	—		—			(18,375		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	868			161,859			—		—			162,727
Cash flows from investing activities:
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment	(75,099		)	(126,807		)	—		—			(201,906		)
Expenditures for refinery turnarounds costs	—			(15,859		)	—		—			(15,859		)
Expenditures for other assets	—			(10,584		)	—		—			(10,584		)
Proceeds from sale of assets	30,826			—			—		—			30,826
Net cash used in investing activities	(44,273		)	(153,250		)	—		—			(197,523		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from revolver borrowings	745,000			—			—		—			745,000
Proceeds from intercompany notes payable	31,632			—			—		—			31,632
Distribution to members	(186,684		)	—			—		—			(186,684		)
Repayments of revolver borrowings	(730,000		)	—			—		—			(730,000		)
Payment of contingent consideration related to acquisition of Toledo refinery	—			(21,357		)	—		—			(21,357		)
Deferred financing costs and other	(1,661		)	992			—		—			(669		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(141,713		)	(20,365		)	—		—			(162,078		)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(185,118		)	(11,756		)	—		—			(196,874		)
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period	241,926			12,365			—		—			254,291
Cash and equivalents, end of period	$	56,808		$	609		$	—	$	—		$	57,417

35

PBF ENERGY INC. AND

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE, UNIT, PER SHARE, PER UNIT AND BARREL DATA)

18. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PBF HOLDING

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOW (UNAUDITED)

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012
	Issuer			Guarantor Subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries		Combining and Consolidating Adjustments			Total
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	539,793		$	1,654,310		$	—	$	(1,654,329	)	$	539,774
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	8,847			62,297			—		—			71,144
Stock-based compensation	—			1,707			—		—			1,707
Change in fair value of catalyst lease obligation	—			6,929			—		—			6,929
Change in fair value of contingent consideration	—			2,076			—		—			2,076
Non-cash change in inventory repurchase obligations	—			5,126			—		—			5,126
Write-off of unamortized deferred financing fees	4,391			—			—		—			4,391
Pension and other post retirement benefit costs	1,594			7,919			—		—			9,513
Gain on disposition of property, plant and equipment	—			(2,430		)	—		—			(2,430		)
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries	(1,654,329		)	—			—		1,654,329			—
Changes in current assets and current liabilities:
Accounts receivable	(410,412		)	230,423			—		—			(179,989		)
Amounts due to/from related parties	1,710,567			(1,710,567		)	—		—			—
Inventories	(540,547		)	625,726			—		—			85,179
Other current assets	(8,501		)	45,472			—		—			36,971
Accounts payable	63,779			(77,121		)	—		(25,811		)	(39,153		)
Accrued expenses	347,790			(404,194		)	—		—			(56,404		)
Deferred revenue	3,912			9,807			—		—			13,719
Other assets and liabilities	(2,723		)	(27,008		)	—		—			(29,731		)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	64,161			430,472			—		(25,811		)	468,822
Cash flows from investing activities:
Expenditures for property, plant and equipment	(13,859		)	(88,145		)	—		—			(102,004		)
Expenditures for refinery turnarounds costs	—			(27,501		)	—		—			(27,501		)
Expenditures for other assets	—			(7,731		)	—		—			(7,731		)
Proceeds from sale of assets	—			3,381			—		—			3,381
Net cash used in investing activities	(13,859		)	(119,996		)	—		—			(133,855		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from member's capital contributions	250			—			—		—			250
Proceeds from 8.25% senior secured notes	665,806			—			—		—			665,806
Proceeds from long-term debt	430,000			—			—		—			430,000
Proceeds from catalyst lease	—			9,452			—		—			9,452
Distributions to members	(15,081		)	—			—		—			(15,081		)
Repayments of long-term debt	(823,749		)	(360,848		)	—		—			(1,184,597		)
Payment of contingent consideration related to acquisition of Toledo refinery	(103,642		)	—			—		—			(103,642		)
Deferred financing costs and other	(17,273		)	—			—		—			(17,273		)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	136,311			(351,396		)	—		—			(215,085		)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	186,613			(40,920		)	—		(25,811		)	119,882
Cash and equivalents, beginning of period	3,124			47,042			—		—			50,166
Cash and equivalents, end of period	$	189,737		$	6,122		$	—	$	(25,811	)	$	170,048

36

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements of PBF Energy Inc. and PBF Holding Company LLC included in the Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 and the unaudited financial statements and related notes included in this report. The following discussion contains “forward-looking statements” that reflect our future plans, estimates, beliefs and expected performance. Our actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated and expressed in such forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors. We caution that assumptions, expectations, projections, intentions or beliefs about future events may, and often do, vary from actual results and the differences can be material. Please see “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

Explanatory Note

PBF Energy is the sole managing member of PBF LLC. PBF Energy owned an equity interest representing approximately 24.4% of the outstanding economic interests in PBF LLC prior to the Secondary Offering completed on June 12, 2013, and its economic interests increased to approximately 40.9% as of September 30, 2013. PBF Holding is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PBF LLC and PBF Finance is a wholly-owned subsidiary of PBF Holding. PBF Holding is the parent company for PBF LLC's operating subsidiaries.

PBF Holding is an indirect subsidiary of PBF Energy, representing 100% of PBF Energy’s consolidated revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively. PBF Holding also constitutes 100% of PBF Energy’s revenue generating assets as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Unless the context indicates otherwise, the terms “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to both PBF Energy and PBF Holding and subsidiaries, as the financial information is materially consistent. Discussions or areas of this report that either apply only to PBF Energy or PBF Holding are clearly noted in such sections.

Overview

We are one of the largest independent petroleum refiners and suppliers of unbranded transportation fuels, heating oil, petrochemical feedstocks, lubricants and other petroleum products in the United States. We sell our products throughout the Northeast and Midwest of the United States, as well as in other regions of the United States and Canada, and are able to ship products to other international destinations. We were formed in 2008 to pursue acquisitions of crude oil refineries and downstream assets in North America. We currently own and operate three domestic oil refineries and related assets, which we acquired in 2010 and 2011. Our refineries have a combined processing capacity, known as throughput, of approximately 540,000 bpd, and a weighted-average Nelson Complexity Index of 11.3.

Our three refineries are located in Toledo, Ohio, Delaware City, Delaware and Paulsboro, New Jersey. Our Mid-Continent refinery at Toledo processes light, sweet crude, has a throughput capacity of 170,000 bpd and a Nelson Complexity Index of 9.2. The majority of Toledo’s WTI-based crude is delivered via pipelines that originate in both Canada and the United States. Since our acquisition of Toledo in 2011, we have added additional truck and rail crude unloading capabilities that provide feedstock sourcing flexibility for the refinery and enables Toledo to run a more cost-advantaged crude slate. Our East Coast refineries at Delaware City and Paulsboro have a combined refining capacity of 370,000 bpd and Nelson Complexity Indices of 11.3 and 13.2, respectively. These high-conversion refineries process primarily medium and heavy, sour crudes and have historically received the bulk of their feedstock via ships and barges on the Delaware River. In May 2012, we commenced crude shipments via rail into a newly developed crude rail unloading facility at our Delaware City refinery. During 2012, we expanded and upgraded the existing on-site railroad infrastructure, including the expansion of the crude rail unloading facilities that was completed in February 2013 and is capable of discharging approximately 110,000 bpd, consisting of 40,000 bpd of heavy crude oil and 70,000 bpd of light crude oil. However, due to greater operating efficiency, discharge capacity for light crude oil at our dual-loop track has increased from 70,000 bpd to approximately 100,000 bpd. In conjunction with the development of our rail crude unloading facilities at Delaware City, we constructed a railcar storage yard with capacity for 330 railcars that is integral to railcar staging and storage and helps facilitate daily rail traffic at the refinery. Also in February 2013, our board of directors approved a third rail crude offloading project to add an additional 40,000 bpd of heavy crude rail unloading capability at the refinery, which is expected to cost approximately $62 million and to be completed in 2014. Completion of this third rail project will increase our discharge capacity of heavy crude oil from 40,000 bpd to 80,000 bpd and bring the total rail crude unloading capability up to 180,000 bpd. As a result of our crude rail unloading facility

37

expansion, the delivery of coiled and insulated railcars, the development of crude rail loading infrastructure in Canada and the use of unit trains, we expect to be capable of taking delivery of approximately 80,000 bpd of Canadian heavy crude oil at the Delaware City refinery by the end of 2014.

We entered into agreements to lease or purchase a total of 5,900 railcars, including 4,600 coiled and insulated rails cars, which are capable of transporting Canadian heavy crude oils, and 1,300 general purpose cars, which we intend to use to transport lighter crude oils. In addition to the construction of our rail unloading facilities at Delaware City and the execution of our railcar procurement strategy, we also created dedicated crude-by-rail acquisition and rail logistics teams. These teams, staffed by PBF employees in our corporate headquarters, at the Delaware City refinery and in our field office in Calgary, Alberta, are responsible for crude procurement, logistics via rail and monitoring crude-by-rail offloading. In April 2013, we opened a field office in Oklahoma City to augment these activities.

Crude delivered to our Delaware City refinery is processed at Delaware City or we can load up to 45,000 bpd to be transferred to our Paulsboro refinery. The Delaware City rail unloading facility allows our East Coast refineries to source West Texas Intermediate ("WTI") based crudes from Western Canada and the Mid-Continent, which we believe may provide significant cost advantages versus traditional Brent-based international crudes trading on the Brent-WTI differential.

Factors Affecting the Comparability Between Periods

Throughout 2013 we have seen an escalation in the cost of renewable fuel credits, known as RINs, required for compliance with the Renewable Fuels Standard. We incurred approximately $112.9 million in RINs costs during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to $33.2 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2012, an increase of $79.7 million due primarily to the price increase for ethanol-linked RINs during 2013. Our RINs purchase obligation is dependent on our actual shipment of on-road transportation fuels domestically and the amount of blending achieved.

38

Results of Operations

The following tables reflect our financial and operating highlights for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (amounts in thousands, except per share data) except for income tax benefit, interest expenses, net income attributable to noncontrolling interest and earnings per share, each of which apply only to the financial results of PBF Energy. In addition, general and administrative expenses for PBF Energy for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 include a charge of $8.1 million associated with a change in the tax receivable agreement liability.

	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Revenue	$	4,858,880		$	5,395,206		$	14,335,020		$	15,188,327
Cost of sales, excluding depreciation	4,663,697			4,932,645			13,394,777			13,871,884
Gross refining margin (1)	195,183			462,561			940,243			1,316,443
Operating expenses, excluding depreciation	192,647			179,035			601,245			537,880
General and administrative expenses	30,748			38,942			79,983			78,042
Loss (gain) on sale of assets	(48		)	20			(48		)	(2,430		)
Depreciation and amortization expense	27,435			24,455			81,530			67,419
(Loss) income from operations	(55,599		)	220,109			177,533			635,532
Change in fair value of catalyst leases	(2,363		)	(5,952		)	3,118			(6,929		)
Change in fair value of contingent consideration	—			(692		)	—			(2,076		)
Interest expense, net	(26,242		)	(26,901		)	(69,561		)	(86,753		)
(Loss) income before income taxes	(84,204		)	186,564			111,090			539,774
Income tax benefit	(19,311		)	—			(898		)	—
Net (loss) income	(64,893		)	$	186,564		111,988			$	539,774
Less: net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest	(45,045		)				103,604
Net (loss) income attributable to PBF Energy Inc.	$	(19,848	)				$	8,384
Gross margin	$	(21,580	)	$	261,254		$	266,927		$	716,267
Net (loss) income available to Class A common stock per share:
Basic	$	(0.50	)				$	0.28
Diluted	$	(0.50	)				$	0.27

(1) See Non-GAAP Financial Measures below.

39

Operating Highlight

	Three Months Ended   September 30,						Nine Months Ended   September 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Key Operating Information
Production (barrels per day ("bpd") in thousands)	446.1			488.3			449.3			463.3
Crude oil and feedstocks throughput (bpd in thousands)	446.0			488.9			450.7			464.0
Total crude oil and feedstocks throughput (millions of barrels)	41.0			45.0			123.1			127.1
Gross refining margin per barrel of throughput (1)	$	4.75		$	10.29		$	7.65		$	10.35
Operating expense, excluding depreciation, per barrel of throughput	$	4.69		$	3.98		$	4.89		$	4.23
Crude and feedstocks (% of total throughput) (2):
Heavy crude	17		%	11		%	16		%	16		%
Medium crude	43		%	51		%	44		%	48		%
Light crude	30		%	30		%	32		%	28		%
Other feedstocks and blends	10		%	8		%	8		%	8		%
Yield (% of total throughput):
Gasoline and gasoline blendstocks	45		%	45		%	45		%	47		%
Distillates and distillate blendstocks	37		%	38		%	37		%	36		%
Lubes	2		%	2		%	2		%	2		%
Chemicals	3		%	3		%	3		%	3		%
Other	13		%	12		%	13		%	12		%

(1) See Non-GAAP Financial Measures below.

(2) We define heavy crude oil as crude oil with an American Petroleum Institute (API) gravity less than 24 degrees.    We define medium crude oil as crude oil with an API gravity between 24 and 35 degrees. We define light crude oil as crude oil with an API gravity higher than 35 degrees.

40

The table below summarizes certain market indicators relating to our operating results as reported by Platts.

	Three Months Ended   September 30,					Nine Months Ended   September 30,
	2013		2012			2013			2012
(dollars per barrel, except as noted)
Dated Brent Crude	$	110.29	$	109.50		$	108.46		$	112.21
West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil	$	105.79	$	92.10		$	98.13		$	96.13
Crack Spreads
Dated Brent (NYH) 2-1-1	$	13.15	$	17.87		$	13.43		$	14.55
WTI (Chicago) 4-3-1	$	14.97	$	35.00		$	23.38		$	28.05
Crude Oil Differentials
Dated Brent (foreign) less WTI	$	4.50	$	17.40		$	10.33		$	16.08
Dated Brent less Maya (heavy, sour)	$	10.95	$	12.06		$	8.56		$	10.51
Dated Brent less WTS (sour)	$	4.81	$	20.74		$	12.48		$	20.18
Dated Brent less ASCI (sour)	$	5.92	$	5.30		$	4.37		$	4.46
WTI less WCS (heavy, sour)	$	23.89	$	14.89		$	22.37		$	20.40
WTI less Bakken (light, sweet)	$	4.75	$	1.06		$	2.92		$	6.36
WTI less Syncrude (light, sweet)	$	0.81	$	(4.89	)	$	(2.23	)	$	1.37
Natural gas (dollars per MMBTU)	$	3.56	$	2.89		$	3.69		$	2.58

Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 Compared to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012

Overview— Net loss for PBF Energy was $64.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to net income of $186.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012. Net loss attributable to PBF Energy was $19.8 million, or $(0.50) per diluted share, for the three months ended September 30, 2013 ($(0.48) per share on a fully exchanged, fully diluted basis based on adjusted pro forma net (loss) income as described below in Non-GAAP Financial Measures). The net loss attributable to PBF Energy represents PBF Energy’s equity interest in PBF LLC’s pre-tax loss, less applicable income tax benefit of approximately 40.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2013. Net loss for PBF Holding, which does not include income tax benefits or the expense associated with the change in our tax receivable agreement liability, was $76.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to net income of $186.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012.

Our results for the three months ended September 30, 2013 were unfavorably impacted by lower crack spreads, the tightening of crude differentials, higher operating expenses due to increased energy costs, the continued higher costs of compliance with the Renewable Fuels Standard and lower throughput primarily due to reduced run rates.

Revenues— Revenues totaled $4.9 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $5.4 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2012, a decrease of $0.5 billion, or 9.9%. For the three months ended September 30, 2013, the total throughput rates in the East Coast and Mid-Continent refineries averaged approximately 298,100 bpd and 147,900 bpd, respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2012, the total throughput rates at our East Coast and Mid-Continent refineries averaged approximately 335,900 bpd, and 153,000 bpd, respectively. The decrease in throughput rates at our East Coast refineries in 2013 compared to 2012 was primarily driven by market factors including narrower crude differentials for rail-delivered crude which reduced crude run rates during the period. The decrease in throughput rates at our Mid-Continent refinery in 2013 compared to 2012 was primarily driven by refinery maintenance which occurred during the period. For the three months ended September 30, 2013, the total barrels sold at our East Coast and Mid-Continent refineries averaged approximately 301,200 bpd and 150,700 bpd, respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2012, the total barrels sold at our East Coast and Mid-Continent refineries averaged approximately 332,400 bpd and 161,900 bpd, respectively. Total barrels sold at our Mid-Continent refinery are typically higher than throughput rates, reflecting sales and purchases of refined products outside the refinery. Total barrels sold from our East Coast refineries were higher than throughput rates, reflecting sales from inventory as well as sales and purchases of refined products outside the refinery.

Gross Margin— Gross refining margin (as described below in Non-GAAP Financial Measures) totaled $195.2 million, or $4.75 per barrel of throughput, for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $462.6 million, or $10.29 per barrel of throughput during the three months ended September 30, 2012, a decrease of $267.4 million. Gross margin,

41

including refinery operating expenses and depreciation was a loss of $21.6 million, or $(0.53) per barrel of throughput, for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to a gain of $261.3 million, or $5.81 per barrel of throughput, for the three months ended September 30, 2012, a decrease of $282.9 million. The decrease in gross refining margin was primarily due to lower crack spreads and the result of unfavorable crude differentials, the continued higher costs of compliance with the Renewable Fuels Standard and the production of low-value products such as sulfur, petroleum coke and fuel oils at our East Coast refineries that price at a substantial discount to light products. The decrease in gross margin was also attributable to an increase in operating expenses due to increased energy costs.

Average industry refining margins in the U.S. Mid-Continent were significantly weaker during the three months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012. The WTI (Chicago) 4-3-1 industry crack spread was approximately $14.97 per barrel or 57.2% lower in the three months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012. Moreover, the price of WTI versus Dated Brent and other crudes narrowed during the quarter negatively impacting our results.

The Dated Brent (NYH) 2-1-1 industry crack spread was approximately $13.15 per barrel, or 26.4%, lower in the three months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012. Moreover, the WTI/Dated Brent differential was $12.90 lower in the three months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 and the Dated Brent/Maya differential was approximately $1.11 per barrel lower in the three months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012. A decrease in the WTI/Dated Brent crude differential unfavorably impacts our East Coast refineries which have increased shipments of WTI based crudes from the Bakken and Western Canada. A reduction in the Dated Brent/Maya crude differential, our proxy for the light/heavy crude differential, has a negative impact on our East Coast refineries, which can process a large slate of medium and heavy, sour crude oil that is priced at a discount to light, sweet crude oil.

Operating Expenses— Operating expenses totaled $192.6 million, or $4.69 per barrel of throughput, for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $179.0 million, or $3.98 per barrel of throughput, for the three months ended September 30, 2012, an increase of $13.6 million, or 7.6%. The increase in operating expenses is mainly attributable to an increase of approximately $6.3 million in outside engineering and consulting fees related to refinery capital and maintenance projects, as well as an increase of approximately $3.1 million in energy and utilities costs primarily driven by higher natural gas prices. Our operating expenses principally consist of salaries and employee benefits, maintenance, energy and catalyst and chemicals costs at our refineries.

General and Administrative Expenses— General and administrative expenses totaled $30.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $38.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012, a decrease of $8.2 million or 21.1%. The decrease in general and administrative expenses primarily relates to lower employee compensation expense, partially offset by $8.1 million of expense associated with the change in our tax receivable agreement liability during the period. Our general and administrative expenses are comprised of the personnel, facilities and other infrastructure costs necessary to support our refineries.

General and administrative expenses for PBF Holding, which do not include the $8.1 million expense associated with PBF Energy's tax receivable agreement liability, totaled $22.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $38.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012.

Gain / loss on Sale of Assets— Gain on sale of assets for the three months ended September 30, 2013 was $48.0 thousand related to the sale of railcars which were subsequently leased back, compared to a loss which was recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2012 of $20.0 thousand related to sales of certain equipment at Paulsboro and Delaware City.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense— Depreciation and amortization expense totaled $27.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $24.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012, an increase of $2.9 million. The increase was principally due to capital projects that were completed at our Paulsboro and Toldeo refineries.

Change in Fair Value of Catalyst Leases— Change in the fair value of catalyst leases represented a loss of $2.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to a loss of $6.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012. This loss relates to the change in value of the precious metals underlying the sale and leaseback of our refineries’ precious metals catalyst, which we are obligated to repurchase at fair market value on the lease termination dates.

Change in Fair Value of Contingent Consideration— In 2013, there was no change in the fair value of contingent consideration related to the Toledo refinery acquisition and the liability was paid in full in April 2013.

42

Interest Expense, net— Interest expense totaled $26.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $26.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012, a decrease of $0.7 million. Interest expense includes interest on long-term debt, costs related to the sale and leaseback of our precious metals catalyst, interest expense incurred in connection with our crude and feedstock supply agreements with Statoil and MSCG, financing cost associated with the Inventory Intermediation Agreements ("Intermediation Agreements") with J. Aron, letter of credit fees associated with the purchase of certain crude oils, and the amortization of deferred financing fees. The decrease in interest expense primarily relates to lower interest costs associated with our ABL Revolving Credit Facility ("credit facilities") due to lower outstanding borrowings and reduced financing costs related to the termination of our Paulsboro Statoil supply agreement partially offset by higher letter of credit fees and costs pertaining to the Intermediation Agreements.

Income Tax Benefit— As PBF LLC is a limited liability company treated as a "flow-through" entity for income tax purposes, the members of PBF LLC are required to include their proportionate share of PBF LLC’s taxable income or loss on their respective tax returns. Accordingly, PBF Energy’s consolidated financial statements do not include a benefit or provision for income taxes for periods prior to the closing of our initial public offering on December 18, 2012. However, we generally made distributions to our members, per the terms of the PBF LLC limited liability agreement, related to such taxes. Effective with the completion of the initial public offering of PBF Energy, we recognize an income tax expense or benefit in our consolidated financial statements based on PBF Energy's allocable share of PBF LLC’s pre-tax income (loss), which was approximately 40.9% for the three months ended September 30, 2013. We do not recognize any income tax expense or benefit related to the noncontrolling interest of the other members in PBF LLC (although, as described elsewhere, we must make tax distributions to all members of PBF LLC under the terms of its amended and restated limited liability company agreement). PBF Energy's effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2013 was 49.3% reflecting tax benefit adjustments for discrete items related to changes in income tax provision estimates based on our income tax returns and changes in our effective state tax rates.

PBF Holding, as a limited liability company treated as a "flow-through" entity for income tax purposes, did not recognize a benefit or provision for income tax expense for the three months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

Noncontrolling Interest— As a result of our initial public offering and the related reorganization transactions, PBF Energy became the sole managing member of, and has a controlling interest in, PBF LLC. As the sole managing member of PBF LLC, PBF Energy operates and controls all of the business and affairs of PBF LLC and its subsidiaries. PBF Energy consolidates the financial results of PBF LLC and its subsidiaries, and records a noncontrolling interest for the economic interest in PBF LLC held by members other than PBF Energy. Noncontrolling interest on the consolidated statement of operations represents the portion of earnings or loss attributable to the economic interest in PBF LLC held by members other than PBF Energy. Noncontrolling interest on the balance sheet represents the portion of net assets of PBF Energy attributable to the members of PBF LLC other than PBF Energy, based on the relative equity interest held by such members. The noncontrolling interest ownership percentage as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was approximately 59.1% and 75.6%, respectively. The carrying amount of the noncontrolling interest on our consolidated balance sheet attributable to the noncontrolling interest is not equal to the noncontrolling interest ownership percentage due to the effect of income taxes and related agreements that pertain solely to PBF Energy.

Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, 2013 Compared to the Nine Months EndedSeptember 30, 2012

Overview— Net income for PBF Energy was $112.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $539.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Net income attributable to PBF Energy was $8.4 million, or $0.27 per diluted share ($0.72 per share on a fully exchanged, fully diluted basis based on adjusted pro forma net income as described below in Non-GAAP Financial Measures), for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The net income attributable to PBF Energy represents PBF Energy’s equity interest in PBF LLC’s pre-tax income, less applicable income taxes, of approximately 24.4% prior to the Secondary Offering and approximately 40.9% subsequent to the Secondary Offering. Net income for PBF Holding, which does not include income tax benefits or the expense associated with the change in our tax receivable agreement liability, was $119.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $539.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Our throughput rates during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, were impacted by unplanned and planned downtime at our Toledo refinery. On January 31, 2013 there was a brief fire within the fluid catalytic cracking complex at the Toledo refinery that resulted in that unit being temporarily shutdown. The refinery resumed running at planned rates on February 18, 2013. In the first quarter of 2012, the Toledo refinery was impacted by a thirty day turnaround of its hydrocracker, reformer and UDEX units which commenced on March 9, 2012. Our results for the nine months ended

43

September 30, 2013 were unfavorably impacted by lower crack spreads and the result of unfavorable crude differentials, higher operating expenses due to increased energy costs, repair and restart costs related to the Toledo fire, as well as higher costs of compliance with the Renewable Fuels Standard.

Revenues— Revenues totaled $14.3 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $15.2 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, a decrease of $0.9 billion, or 5.6%. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the total throughput rates in the East Coast and Mid-Continent refineries averaged approximately 311,300 bpd and 139,400 bpd, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the total throughput rates at our East Coast and Mid-Continent refineries averaged approximately 316,600 bpd, and 147,400 bpd, respectively. The decrease in throughput rates at our East Coast refineries in 2013 compared to 2012 was primarily driven by market factors including narrower crude differentials for rail-delivered crude which reduced crude run rates during the period. The decrease in throughput rates at our Mid-Continent refinery in 2013 compared to 2012 was primarily due to the refinery's 18 day unplanned down time in the first quarter of 2013, attributable to the fire at the Toledo refinery as described above, as well as refinery maintenance. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the total barrels sold at our East Coast and Mid-Continent refineries averaged approximately 307,000 bpd and 149,100 bpd, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the total barrels sold at our East Coast and Mid-Continent refineries averaged approximately 312,300 bpd and 156,700 bpd, respectively. Total barrels sold at our Mid-Continent refinery are typically higher than throughput rates, reflecting sales and purchases of refined products outside the refinery. Total barrels sold at our East Coast refineries typically reflect inventory movements in addition to throughput rates.

Gross Margin— Gross refining margin (as defined below in Non-GAAP Financial Measures) totaled $940.2 million, or $7.65 per barrel of throughput, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $1,316.4 million, or $10.35 per barrel of throughput during the nine months ended September 30, 2012, a decrease of $376.2 million. Gross margin, including refinery operating expenses and depreciation, totaled $266.9 million, or $2.17 per barrel of throughput, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $716.3 million, or $5.63 per barrel of throughput, for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, a decrease of $449.3 million. The decrease in gross refining margin was primarily due to reduced throughput rates, unfavorable movement in crude differentials, and higher costs of compliance with the Renewable Fuels Standard. The decrease in gross margin was also attributable to an increase in operating expenses due to increased energy costs and repair and restart costs related to the fire at Toledo.

Average industry refining margins in the U.S. Mid-Continent were generally weaker during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012. The WTI (Chicago) 4-3-1 industry crack spread was approximately $23.38 per barrel or 16.6% lower in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012. Additionally, the price of WTI versus Syncrude and Bakken increased in 2013, which negatively impacted our overall cost of crude.

The Dated Brent (NYH) 2-1-1 industry crack spread was approximately $13.43 per barrel, or 7.7%, lower in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012. Furthermore, the WTI/Dated Brent differential was $5.75 lower in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012 and the Dated Brent/Maya differential was approximately $1.95 per barrel lower in the nine months ended September 30, 2013 as compared to the same period in 2012. A decrease in the WTI/Dated Brent crude differential unfavorably impacts our East Coast refineries which have increased shipments of WTI based crudes from the Bakken and Western Canada. A reduction in the Dated Brent/Maya crude differential, our proxy for the light/heavy crude differential, has a negative impact on our East Coast refineries, which can process a large slate of medium and heavy, sour crude oil that is priced at a discount to light, sweet crude oil.

Operating Expenses— Operating expenses totaled $601.2 million, or $4.89 per barrel of throughput, for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $537.9 million, or $4.23 per barrel of throughput, for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, an increase of $63.3 million, or 11.8%. The increase in operating expenses is mainly attributable to an increase of approximately $36.3 million in energy and utilities costs, primarily driven by higher natural gas prices, $8.3 million in increased personnel cost associated with higher headcount, $7.5 million in repair and restart costs related to the Toledo fire described above, and $7.2 million in increased outside engineering and consulting fees related to refinery capital and maintenance projects. Our operating expenses principally consist of salaries and employee benefits, maintenance, energy and catalyst and chemicals costs at our refineries.

General and Administrative Expenses— General and administrative expenses totaled $80.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $78.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, an increase of $2.0 million or 2.6%. The increase in general and administrative expenses primarily relates to the $8.1 million of expense associated with the change in our tax receivable agreement liability and $7.0 million in costs associated with being a public company,

44

which are offset by lower employee compensation expense. Our general and administrative expenses are comprised of the personnel, facilities and other infrastructure costs necessary to support our refineries.

General and administrative expenses for PBF Holding, which do not include the $8.1 million expense associated with PBF Energy's tax receivable agreement liability, totaled $71.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $78.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Gain on Sale of Assets— Gain on sale of assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $48.0 thousand which related to the sale of railcars which were subsequently leased back, compared to a gain of $2.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, for the sale of certain equipment at Paulsboro and Delaware City.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense— Depreciation and amortization expense totaled $81.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $67.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, an increase of $14.1 million. The increase was principally due to capital projects including the expansion of the crude rail unloading facility completed in the first quarter of 2013 as well as new system implementations at the corporate level during 2012.

Change in Fair Value of Catalyst Leases— Change in the fair value of catalyst leases represented a gain of $3.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to a loss of $6.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. This gain relates to the change in value of the precious metals underlying the sale and leaseback of our refineries’ precious metals catalyst, which we are obligated to return or repurchase at fair market value on the lease termination dates.

Change in Fair Value of Contingent Consideration— In 2013, there was no change in the fair value of contingent consideration related to the Toledo refinery acquisition and the liability was paid in full in April 2013.

Interest Expense, net— Interest expense totaled $69.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $86.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, a decrease of $17.2 million. Interest expense includes interest on long-term debt, costs related to the sale and leaseback of our precious metals catalyst, interest expense incurred in connection our crude and feedstock supply agreements with Statoil and MSCG, financing cost associated with the Intermediation Agreements, letter of credit fees associated with the purchase of certain crude oils, and the amortization of deferred financing fees. The decrease in interest expense primarily relates to lower interest costs associated with our credit facilities reflecting lower outstanding borrowings, reduced financing costs related to the termination of the Paulsboro Statoil supply agreement, and the $4.4 million write-off of deferred financing costs in the first quarter of 2012 on debt that was repaid from the proceeds of our 2012 senior secured notes offering.

Income Tax Benefit— As PBF LLC is a limited liability company treated as a "flow-through" entity for income tax purposes, the members of PBF LLC are required to include their proportionate share of PBF LLC’s taxable income or loss on their respective tax returns. Accordingly, PBF Energy’s consolidated financial statements do not include a benefit or provision for income taxes for periods prior to the closing of our initial public offering on December 18, 2012. However, we generally made distributions to our members, per the terms of the PBF LLC limited liability agreement, related to such taxes. Effective with the completion of the initial public offering of PBF Energy, we recognize an income tax expense or benefit in our consolidated financial statements based on PBF Energy's allocable share of PBF LLC’s pre-tax income (loss), which was approximately 24.4% prior to the Secondary Offering and 40.9% subsequent to the Secondary Offering. We do not recognize any income tax expense or benefit related to the noncontrolling interest of the other members in PBF LLC (although, as described elsewhere, we must make tax distributions to all members of PBF LLC under the terms of its amended and restated limited liability company agreement). PBF Energy's effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was (12.0)% reflecting tax benefit adjustments for discrete items related to changes in income tax provision estimates based on our income tax returns and changes in our effective state tax rates.

PBF Holding, as a limited liability company treated as a "flow-through" entity for income tax purposes, did not recognize a benefit or provision for income tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012.

Noncontrolling Interest— As a result of our initial public offering and the related reorganization transactions, PBF Energy became the sole managing member of, and has a controlling interest in, PBF LLC. As the sole managing member of PBF LLC, PBF Energy operates and controls all of the business and affairs of PBF LLC and its subsidiaries. PBF Energy consolidates the financial results of PBF LLC and its subsidiaries, and records a noncontrolling interest for the economic interest in PBF LLC held by members other than PBF Energy. Noncontrolling interest on the consolidated statement of operations represents the portion of earnings or loss attributable to the economic interest in PBF LLC held by members other than PBF Energy. Noncontrolling interest on the balance sheet represents the portion of net assets of PBF Energy attributable to the members of PBF LLC other than PBF Energy, based on the relative equity interest held by such members. The

45

noncontrolling interest ownership percentage as of September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was approximately 59.1% and 75.6%, respectively. The carrying amount of the noncontrolling interest on our consolidated balance sheet attributable to the noncontrolling interest is not equal to the noncontrolling interest ownership percentage due to the effect of income taxes and related agreements that pertain solely to PBF Energy.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

Management uses certain financial measures to evaluate our operating performance that are calculated and presented on the basis of methodologies other than in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These measures should not be considered a substitute for, or superior to, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and our calculations thereof may not be comparable to similarly entitled measures reported by other companies.

Adjusted Pro Forma Net (Loss) Income

PBF Energy utilizes results presented on an Adjusted Pro Forma basis that reflects an assumed exchange of all PBF LLC Series A Units for shares of Class A common stock of PBF Energy. We believe that these Adjusted Pro Forma measures, when presented in conjunction with comparable U.S. GAAP measures, are useful to investors to compare PBF Energy results across different periods and to facilitate an understanding of our operating results. The differences between Adjusted Pro Forma and U.S. GAAP results are as follows:

1. Assumed Exchange of all PBF LLC Series A Units for shares of PBF Energy Class A common stock. As a result of the assumed exchange of all PBF LLC Series A Units, the noncontrolling interest related to these units is converted to controlling interest. Management believes that it is useful to provide the per-share effect associated with the assumed exchange of all PBF LLC Series A Units.

2. Income Taxes. Prior to the IPO we were organized as a limited liability company treated as a “flow-through” entity for income tax purposes, and even after our IPO, not all of our earnings are subject to corporate-level income taxes. Adjustments have been made to the Adjusted Pro Forma tax provisions and earnings to assume that we had adopted our post-IPO corporate tax structure for all periods presented and are taxed as a C corporation in the U.S. at the prevailing corporate rates. These assumptions are consistent with the assumption in clause 1 above that all PBF LLC Series A Units are exchanged for shares of PBF Energy Class A common stock, as the assumed exchange would change the amount of our earnings that is subject to corporate income tax.

The following table reconciles our Adjusted Pro Forma results with our results presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012:

	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2013			2012			2013			2012
Net (loss) income attributable to PBF Energy Inc.	$	(19,848	)	$	—		$	8,384		$	—
Add: Net (loss) income attributable to the noncontrolling interest(1)	(45,045		)	186,564			103,604			539,774
Less: Income tax benefit (expense) (2)	17,973			(73,693		)	(41,338		)	(213,211		)
Adjusted pro forma net (loss) income	$	(46,920	)	$	112,871		$	70,650		$	326,563
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding of PBF Energy Inc. (3)	39,575,429			—			30,748,901			—
Conversion of PBF LLC Series A Units (4)	57,243,672			96,819,101			66,724,155			97,473,056
Pro forma shares outstanding—diluted (5)	96,819,101			96,819,101			97,473,056			97,473,056
Adjusted pro forma net (loss) income per fully exchanged, fully diluted shares outstanding	$	(0.48	)	$	1.17		$	0.72		$	3.35

——————————

46

(1)	Represents the elimination of the noncontrolling interest associated with the ownership by the members of PBF LLC other than PBF Energy as if such members had fully exchanged their PBF LLC Series A Units for shares of PBF Energy's Class A common stock.
(2)	Represents an adjustment to apply PBF Energy's statutory tax rate of approximately 39.9% for the 2013 periods and 39.5% for the 2012 periods to the noncontrolling interest. The adjustment assumes the full exchange of existing PBF LLC Series A Units as described in (1) above.
(3)	Represents weighted-average diluted shares outstanding assuming the conversion of all common stock equivalents, including options and warrants for units of PBF LLC Series A Units and options for shares of PBF Energy Class A common stock as calculated under the treasury stock method for the three and nine month period ended September 30, 2013. Common stock equivalents exclude the effects of options to purchase 753,750 shares of PBF Energy's Class A common stock because they are anti-dilutive.
(4)	Represents an adjustment to weighted-average diluted shares to assume the full exchange of existing PBF LLC Series A Units as described in (1) above.
(5)	Diluted pro forma shares outstanding for historical periods prior to our IPO reflect the same number of diluted shares outstanding as the applicable current periods in order to present such pre-IPO periods on a comparable basis.

Gross Refining Margin

Gross refining margin is defined as gross margin excluding depreciation and operating expense related to the refineries. We believe gross refining margin is an important measure of operating performance and provides useful information to investors because it is a better metric comparison for the industry refining margin benchmarks, as the refining margin benchmarks do not include a charge for depreciation expense. In order to assess our operating performance, we compare our gross refining margin (revenue less cost of sales) to industry refining margin benchmarks and crude oil prices as defined in the table below.

Gross refining margin should not be considered an alternative to gross margin, operating income, net cash flows from operating activities or any other measure of financial performance or liquidity presented in accordance with GAAP. Gross refining margin presented by other companies may not be comparable to our presentation, since each company may define this term differently. The following table presents a reconciliation of gross refining margin to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, gross margin, on a historical basis, as applicable, for each of the periods indicated:

47

	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2013				2012
	$			per barrel of throughput	$		per barrel of throughput
Reconciliation of gross margin to gross refining margin:
Gross margin	$	(21,580	)	$(0.53)	$	261,254	$5.81
Add:
Refinery operating expense	192,647			$4.69	179,035		$3.98
Refinery depreciation expense	24,116			$0.59	22,272		$0.50
Gross refining margin	$	195,183		$4.75	$	462,561	$10.29
	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013				2012
	$			per barrel of throughput	$		per barrel of throughput
Reconciliation of gross margin to gross refining margin:
Gross margin	$	266,927		$2.17	$	716,267	$5.63
Add:
Refinery operating expense	601,245			$4.89	537,880		$4.23
Refinery depreciation expense	72,071			$0.59	62,296		$0.49
Gross refining margin	$	940,243		$7.65	$	1,316,443	$10.35

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

Our management uses EBITDA (earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization) and Adjusted EBITDA as measures of operating performance to assist in comparing performance from period to period on a consistent basis and to readily view operating trends, as a measure for planning and forecasting overall expectations and for evaluating actual results against such expectations, and in communications with our board of directors, creditors, analysts and investors concerning our financial performance. Our senior secured notes, revolving credit facility and other contractual obligations also include similar measures as a basis for certain covenants under those agreements which may differ from the Adjusted EBITDA definition described below.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not presentations made in accordance with GAAP and our computation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA may vary from others in our industry. In addition, Adjusted EBITDA contains some, but not all, adjustments that are taken into account in the calculation of the components of various covenants in the agreements governing the senior secured notes and the ABL Revolving Credit Facility. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as alternatives to operating income or net income (loss) as measures of operating performance. In addition, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not presented as, and should not be considered, an alternative to cash flows from operations as a measure of liquidity. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA before equity-based compensation expense, gains (losses) from certain derivative activities and contingent consideration and the non-cash change in the deferral of gross profit related to the sale of certain finished products. Other companies, including other companies in our industry, may calculate Adjusted EBITDA differently than we do, limiting its usefulness as a comparative measure. Adjusted EBITDA also has limitations as an analytical tool and should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations include that Adjusted EBITDA:

• does not reflect depreciation expense or our cash expenditures, or future requirements, for capital expenditures or contractual commitments;

• does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs;

48

• does not reflect our interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on our debt;

• does not reflect realized and unrealized gains and losses from hedging activities, which may have a substantial impact on our cash flow;

• does not reflect certain other non-cash income and expenses; and

• excludes income taxes that may represent a reduction in available cash.

The following tables reconcile net (loss) income as reflected in our results of operations to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA for the periods presented:

	Three Months Ended   September 30,					Nine Months Ended   September 30,
	2013			2012		2013			2012
Reconciliation of net (loss) income to EBITDA:
Net (loss) income (1)	$	(64,893	)	$	186,564	$	111,988		$	539,774
Add:Depreciation and amortization expense	27,435			24,455		81,530			67,419
Add: Interest expense, net	26,242			26,901		69,561			86,753
Add: Income tax benefit (1)	(19,311		)	—		(898		)	—
EBITDA	$	(30,527	)	$	237,920	$	262,181		$	693,946
Reconciliation of EBITDA to Adjusted EBITDA:
EBITDA	$	(30,527	)	$	237,920	$	262,181		$	693,946
Stock based compensation	773			660		2,750			1,707
Change in tax receivable agreement liability	8,095			—		8,095			—
Non-cash change in fair value of catalyst lease obligations	2,363			5,952		(3,118		)	6,929
Non-cash change in fair value of contingent consideration	—			692		—			2,076
Non-cash change in fair value of inventory repurchase obligations	888			21,925		(12,985		)	9,716
Non-cash deferral of gross profit on finished product sales	(3,299		)	21,668		(31,329		)	18,229
Adjusted EBITDA	$	(21,707	)	$	288,817	$	225,594		$	732,603

——————————

(1) Net (loss) income for PBF Holding for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $(76,230) and $119,034 respectively, which excludes $19,311 and $898, respectively, of income tax benefit of PBF Energy, $8,095 of expense associated with the change in the tax receivable agreement liability and includes $120 and $150, respectively, of interest expense related to the intercompany notes payable between PBF Holding and PBF Energy.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Overview

Our primary sources of liquidity are our cash flows from operations and borrowing availability under our credit facilities, as more fully described below. We believe that our cash flows from operations and available capital resources will be sufficient to meet our capital expenditure, working capital, dividend payments and debt service requirements, as well as PBF Energy's obligations under the tax receivable agreement, for the next twelve months. However, our ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations depends, in part, on oil market pricing and general economic, political and other factors beyond our control. We are in compliance with all of the covenants, including financial covenants, for all of our debt agreements.

49

Cash Flow Analysis

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities was $142.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to net cash provided by operating activities of $468.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. Our operating cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 included our net income of $112.0 million, plus net non-cash charges relating to depreciation and amortization of $86.4 million, change in the tax receivable agreement liability of $8.1 million, pension and other post retirement benefits costs of $12.7 million and stock-based compensation of $2.8 million, partially offset by the change in the fair value of our inventory repurchase obligations of $13.4 million, changes in the fair value of our catalyst lease of $3.1 million, change in deferred income taxes of $0.9 million, and gain on sale of assets of $48 thousand. In addition, net changes in working capital reflected uses of cash of $61.9 million driven by the timing of inventory purchases and collections of accounts receivables as well as payments associated with the terminations of the MSCG offtake and Statoil supply agreements. Our operating cash flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 included our net income of $539.8 million, plus net non-cash charges relating to depreciation and amortization of $71.1 million, pension and other post retirement benefits costs of $9.5 million, write off of unamortized deferred financing fees of $4.4 million, change in the fair value of our inventory repurchase obligations of $5.1 million, change in the fair value of the Toledo contingent consideration of $2.1 million, changes in the fair value of our catalyst lease obligations of $6.9 million and stock-based compensation of $1.7 million, partially offset by gain on sale of assets of $2.4 million and net cash used in working capital of $169.4 million.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $197.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to net cash used in investing activities of $133.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The net cash flows used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was comprised of capital expenditures totaling $201.9 million, expenditures for turnarounds of $15.9 million and expenditures for other assets of $10.6 million, slightly offset by $30.8 million in proceeds from the sale of railcars. Net cash used in investing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 consisted primarily of the capital expenditures totaling $102.0 million, expenditures for turnarounds of $27.5 million and expenditures for other assets of $7.7 million, slightly offset by $3.4 million in proceeds from the sale of assets.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities was $173.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to $215.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, net cash used in financing activities consisted primarily of distributions and dividends of $166.5 million, payments of contingent consideration related to the Toledo acquisition of $21.4 million and $0.7 million for deferred financing costs offset by $15.0 million of net proceeds from revolver borrowings. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, net cash from financing activities consisted primarily of repayments of long term debt of $1,184.6 million, payments of contingent consideration related to the Toledo acquisition of $103.6 million, deferred financing costs of $17.3 million and distributions to members of $15.1 million, offset by net proceeds from the senior secured notes offering of $665.8 million, proceeds from long-term debt of $430.0 million and proceeds of $9.7 million from the Paulsboro catalyst lease and member capital contributions.

The cash flow activity of PBF Holding is materially consistent with that discussed above , other than the PBF Holding change in due to/due from related party of $14.7 million included in cash flows from operating activities, as well as proceeds from intercompany notes payable of $31.6 million and distributions of $20.2 million related to tax distributions paid to, or on behalf of, PBF Energy included in cash flows from financing activities.

Working Capital

Working capital for PBF Energy at September 30, 2013 was $582.0 million, consisting of $2,191.3 million in total current assets and $1,609.4 million in total current liabilities. Working capital at December 31, 2012 was $704.8 million, consisting of $2,307.9 million in total current assets and $1,603.1 million in total current liabilities.

Working capital for PBF Holding at September 30, 2013 was $554.7 million, consisting of $2,164.1 million in total current assets and $1,609.4 million in total current liabilities. Working capital at December 31, 2012 was $686.8 million, consisting of $2,283.3 million in total current assets and $1,596.5 million in total current liabilities.

50

We entered into two separate Intermediation Agreements with J. Aron on June 26, 2013 which commenced upon the termination of the product offtake agreements with MSCG. We entered into the Intermediation Agreements for the purpose of managing the Products inventory at the Refineries, which provides us with financial flexibility and improves our liquidity by allowing us to monetize Products inventory in our tanks as they are produced prior to being sold to third parties. Pursuant to the Intermediation Agreements, J. Aron purchases and holds title to all of the intermediate and finished products produced by the Delaware City and Paulsboro refineries and delivered into our tanks at the refineries. Inventory held outside the refineries may be purchased and owned by J. Aron under the Intermediation Agreements upon the agreement of both parties. Furthermore, J. Aron agrees to sell the intermediate and finished products back to us as they are discharged out of the refineries' tanks (or other locations outside the refinery as agreed upon by both parties). We currently market and sell the finished products independently to third parties.

Our accounts receivable increased from $503.8 million at December 31, 2012 to $577.9 million at September 30, 2013 and our deferred revenue decreased from $210.5 million at December 31, 2012 to $1.9 million at September 30, 2013 as a result of the termination of the MSCG offtake agreements and commencement of the J. Aron Intermediation Agreements. Previously, under the MSCG offtake agreements we sold substantially all of our East Coast finished products to MSCG and received payment on the day of sale. We deferred the revenue on these finished product sales until MSCG shipped the products out of our refinery storage facilities. Under the J. Aron agreements no revenue is deferred as we sell finished products directly to third parties with varying payment terms and recognize revenue as the products are shipped and title transfers to the customer. Similarly, accounts payable increased from $360.1 million at December 31, 2012 to $563.9 million at September 30, 2013, primarily as a result of the termination of the Statoil supply agreement at Paulsboro and our increased purchases of crude by rail delivered to the East Coast.

Liquidity

As of September 30, 2013, our total liquidity was approximately $587.7 million, compared to total liquidity of approximately $599.2 million as of December 31, 2012. Total liquidity is the sum of our cash and cash equivalents plus the amount of availability under the ABL Revolving Credit Facility.

Capital Spending

Capital spending was $228.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, which primarily included safety related enhancements and facility improvements at the refinery and the continued expansion of the rail unloading facility at our Delaware City refinery. We currently expect to spend an aggregate of approximately $250 to $275 million in capital expenditures during 2013 for facility improvements, refinery maintenance and turnaround and further expansion of the rail unloading facility at our Delaware City refinery.

We are pursuing capital project opportunities designed to increase the profitability of our Toledo refinery. These projects are expected to improve crude sourcing and flexibility, further diversify our product sales into higher margin chemicals and improve the ULSD and total liquid yield from the Toledo refinery. We spent approximately $16.2 million through September 30, 2013 related to these capital projects and estimate aggregate total capital expenditures of approximately $85 million through the end of 2015.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations and Commitments

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements as of September 30, 2013, other than outstanding letters of credit in the amount of approximately $460.6 million.

On September 30, 2013, we sold 216 of our owned crude railcars and concurrently entered into a lease agreement for the same railcars.  The lease agreement has terms for railcars ranging from four to six years. We received a cash payment for the railcars of approximately $30.6 million and expect to make payments totaling $11.9 million over the term of the lease for these railcars. In addition, on November 5, 2013, we sold 250 of our owned railcars and concurrently entered into a lease agreement for the same railcars. The lease agreement has terms for railcars of four and six years. We received a cash payment for the railcars of approximately $35.7 million and expects to make payments totaling $13.8 million over the term of the lease for these railcars.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, we entered into additional railcar leases with terms of up to 12 years. We expect to make lease payments of $148.9 million over the term of these additional agreements.

51

Tax Receivable Agreement Obligations

We expect that the payments that we may make under the tax receivable agreement will be substantial. As of September 30, 2013, we have recognized a liability for the tax receivable agreement of $299.1 million reflecting our estimate of the undiscounted amounts that we expect to pay under the agreement due to exchanges of PBF LLC Series A Units for shares of PBF Energy's Class A common stock that occurred prior to that date, and to range over the next five years from approximately $1.0 million to $31.7 million per year and decline thereafter. In addition, under certain circumstances, our obligations under the tax receivable agreement may be accelerated and determined based on certain assumptions set forth therein. Assuming that the market value of a share of our Class A common stock equals $22.45 per share of Class A common stock (the closing price on September 30, 2013) and that LIBOR were to be 1.85%, we estimate as of September 30, 2013 that the aggregate amount of these accelerated payments would have been approximately $568.2 million if triggered immediately on such date. These payment obligations are obligations of PBF Energy and not of PBF LLC or any of its subsidiaries, although because PBF Energy is a holding company with no operations of its own, its ability to make payments under the tax receivable agreement is dependent on our subsidiaries' ability to make distributions for the benefit of PBF LLC's members, including PBF Energy.

Future payments under the tax receivable agreement by us in respect of subsequent exchanges would be in addition to these amounts and are expected to be substantial. The foregoing numbers are merely estimates-the actual payments could differ materially-and assume no material changes in the relevant tax law, and that we earn sufficient taxable income to realize all tax benefits that are subject to the tax receivable agreement. It is possible that future transactions or events could increase or decrease the actual tax benefits realized and the corresponding tax receivable agreement payments.

Dividend and Distribution Policy

With respect to dividends and distributions paid during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, PBF Holding paid $186.7 million in distributions to PBF LLC. BF LLC used $86.9 million of this amount in total to make three separate non-tax distributions of $0.30 per unit ($0.90 per unit in total) to its members,, of which $26.0 million was distributed to PBF Energy and the balance was distributed to PBF LLC's other members. PBF Energy used this $26.0 million to pay three separate cash dividends of $0.30 per share of Class A common stock on August 21, 2013, June 7, 2013 and March 15, 2013. PBF LLC used the remaining $99.7 million from PBF Holding's distribution to make tax distributions to its members, with $20.2 million distributed to PBF Energy, of which $1.1 million was paid by PBF LLC directly to the applicable taxing authorities on behalf of PBF Energy.

On October 29, 2013, our Board of Directors declared a dividend of $0.30 per share on outstanding Class A common stock. The dividend is payable on November 21, 2013 to Class A common stockholders of record at the close of business on November 15, 2013.

PBF Energy currently intends to pay a quarterly cash dividend of $0.30 per share of Class A common stock. The declaration, amount and payment of this and any other future dividends on shares of Class A common stock will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors, and we are not obligated under any applicable laws, our governing documents or any contractual agreements with our existing owners or otherwise to declare or pay any dividends or other distributions (other than the obligations of PBF LLC to make tax distributions to its members).

As of September 30, 2013, PBF Holding had $587.7 million of unused borrowing availability, which includes our cash and cash equivalents of $57.4 million, under our ABL Revolving Credit Facility to fund its operations, if necessary. Accordingly, as of September 30, 2013, there was sufficient cash and cash equivalents and borrowing capacity under our credit facilities available to PBF Holding to make distributions to PBF LLC, in order for PBF LLC to make pro rata distributions to its members, including PBF Energy, necessary to fund in excess of one year’s cash dividend payments by PBF Energy. PBF Holding would have been permitted under its debt agreements to make these distributions; however, its ability to continue to comply with its debt covenants is, to a significant degree, subject to its operating results, which are dependent on a number of factors outside of our control. We believe our and our subsidiaries' available cash and cash equivalents, other sources of liquidity to operate our business and operating performance provides us with a reasonable basis for our assessment that we can support our intended dividend and distribution policy.

52

Iran Sanctions Compliance Disclosure

Under the Iran Threat Reduction and Syrian Human Rights Act of 2012 ("ITRA"), which added Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act, we are required to include certain disclosures in our periodic reports if we or any of our “affiliates” knowingly engaged in certain specified activities during the period covered by the report. Because the SEC defines the term “affiliate” broadly, it may include any entity controlled by us as well as any person or entity that controls us or is under common control with us (“control” is also construed broadly by the SEC). Neither we nor any of our controlled affiliates or subsidiaries have knowingly engaged in any transaction or dealing reportable under Section 13(r) of the Exchange Act during the reporting period.

Funds affiliated with The Blackstone Group L.P. (“Blackstone”) are holders of approximately 26.8% of the outstanding voting interests of PBF Energy and have nominated three of the current directors on PBF Energy's Board of Directors. Accordingly, Blackstone may be deemed an “affiliate” of PBF Energy, as that term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2.  We received notice from Blackstone that it has included the disclosures described below in its SEC filings pursuant to ITRA regarding one of its portfolio companies that may be deemed to be affiliates of Blackstone. Because of the broad definition of “affiliate” in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2, these portfolio companies of Blackstone, through Blackstone's ownership of PBF Energy, may also be deemed to be affiliates of ours.  We have not independently verified the disclosures described in the following paragraphs.

We have received notice from Blackstone that Travelport Limited ("Travelport"), as part of their global business in the travel industry, provides certain passenger travel related GDS and airline IT services to Iran Air and certain airline IT services to Iran Air Tours. All of these services are either exempt from applicable sanctions prohibitions pursuant to a statutory exemption in the International Emergency Economic Powers Act permitting transactions ordinarily incident to travel or, to the extent not otherwise exempt, specifically licensed by the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control (“OFAC”). Subject to any changes in the exempt/licensed status of such activities, Travelport intends to continue these business activities, which are directly related to and promote the arrangement of travel for individuals. Prior to and during the reporting period, Travelport also provided airline IT services to Syrian Arab Airlines. These services were generally understood to be permissible under the same statutory travel exemption. The services were terminated following the May 2013 action by OFAC to designate this airline as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist pursuant to the Global Terrorism Sanctions Regulations.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We are exposed to market risks, including changes in commodity prices and interest rates. Our primary commodity price risk is associated with the difference between the prices we sell our refined products and the prices we pay for crude oil and other feedstocks. We may use derivative instruments to manage the risks from changes in the prices of crude oil and refined products, interest rates, or to capture market opportunities.

Commodity Price Risk

In order to realize value from our processing capacity, we must achieve a positive spread between the cost of raw materials and the value of finished products (i.e., refinery gross product margin or crack spread). The physical commodities that comprise our raw materials and finished goods are typically bought and sold at a spot or index price that can be highly variable.

The prices of crude oil, refined products and other commodities are subject to fluctuations in response to changes in supply, demand, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors that are beyond our control. The crude and feedstock supply agreements for our Paulsboro and Delaware City refineries allow us to take title to and price our crude oil at locations in close proximity to our refineries, as opposed to the crude oil origination point, reducing the time we are exposed to market fluctuations before the finished refined products are sold. The crude and feedstock supply agreement for our Paulsboro refinery terminated on March 31, 2013, which increases our exposure to market fluctuations between the time we purchase crude oil and sell finished products in the future. Our offtake agreements with MSCG for our Paulsboro and Delaware City refineries allowed us to sell our light finished products and certain intermediates and lube base oils as they were produced. As of July 1, 2013, we terminated the product offtake agreements with MSCG for the Paulsboro and Delaware City refineries and entered into two separate inventory Intermediation Agreements with J. Aron. Pursuant to the Intermediation Agreements, J. Aron purchases and holds title to all of the intermediate and finished products produced by the Delaware City and Paulsboro refineries and delivered into our tanks and agrees to sell such products back to us as they are discharged out of the refineries' tanks. Inventory held outside the refineries may be purchased and owned by J. Aron under the Intermediation Agreements upon the agreement of

53

both parties. We market and sell the finished products independently to third parties. We do not believe the termination of the MSCG product offtake agreements and commencement of the Intermediation Agreements will significantly impact our exposure to commodity price risk.

We carry inventories of crude oil, intermediates and refined products (“hydrocarbon inventories”) on our balance sheet, the values of which are subject to fluctuations in market prices. Our hydrocarbon inventories totaled approximately 14.5 million barrels and 14.4 million barrels at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The average cost of our hydrocarbon inventories was approximately $99.16 and $101.89 per barrel on a LIFO basis at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. If market prices decline to a level below the average cost, we may be required to write down the carrying value of our hydrocarbon inventories to market.

Our predominant variable operating cost is energy, which is comprised primarily of natural gas and electricity. We are therefore sensitive to movements in natural gas prices. Assuming normal operating conditions, we annually consume a total of approximately 37 million MMBTUs of natural gas amongst our three refineries. Accordingly, a $1.00 per MMBTU change in natural gas prices would increase or decrease our natural gas costs by approximately $37 million.

We periodically use non-trading derivative instruments to manage exposure to commodity price risks associated with the purchase or sale of crude oil, finished products and natural gas to fuel our refinery operations. We may also use non-trading derivative instruments to manage price risks associated with inventories above or below a baseline we set for our target levels of hydrocarbon inventories. We may engage in the purchase and sale of physical commodities, derivatives, options, over-the-counter products and various exchange-traded instruments. We mark-to-market our derivative instruments and recognize the changes in their fair value in our statements of operations.

Compliance Program Price Risk

We are exposed to market risks related to the volatility in the price of Renewable Identification Numbers ("RINs") required to comply with the Renewable Fuel Standard. Our overall RINs obligation is based on a percentage of our domestic shipments of on-road fuels as established by the EPA. To the degree we are unable to blend the required amount of biofuels to satisfy our RINs obligation, we must purchase RINs on the open market. To mitigate the impact of this risk on our results of operations and cash flows we may purchase RINs when the price of these instruments is deemed favorable.

Interest Rate Risk

During 2012, we amended the terms of our ABL Revolving Credit Facility to increase the size of our asset-based revolving credit facility from $500.0 million to $1.575 billion. Borrowings under our ABL Revolving Credit Facility bear interest at the Adjusted LIBOR Rate plus 1.75% to 2.50%, depending on our debt rating. If this facility were fully drawn, a one percent change in the interest rate would increase or decrease our interest expense by $15.8 million annually.

We also have interest rate exposure in connection with our Statoil and MSCG crude oil agreement and J. Aron Intermediation Agreements under which we pay a time value of money charge based on LIBOR.

Credit Risk

We are subject to risk of losses resulting from nonpayment or nonperformance by our counterparties. We will continue to closely monitor the creditworthiness of customers to whom we grant credit and establish credit limits in accordance with our credit policy.

54

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

PBF Energy and PBF Holding maintain a system of disclosure controls and procedures that is designed to provide reasonable assurance that information which is required to be disclosed is accumulated and communicated to management in a timely manner. Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including PBF Energy's and PBF Holding's principal executive officer and the principal financial officer, we have evaluated the effectiveness of our system of disclosure controls and procedures as required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(b) as of September 30, 2013. Based on that evaluation, PBF Energy's and PBF Holding's principal executive officer and the principal financial officer have concluded that PBF Energy's and PBF Holding's disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management has not identified any changes in PBF Energy's or PBF Holding's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended September 30, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, either entity's internal control over financial reporting.

55

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

On June 14, 2013, two administrative appeals were filed by the Sierra Club and Delaware Audubon regarding an air permit Delaware City Refining Company LLC (“Delaware City Refining”) obtained to allow loading of crude oil onto barges.  The appeals allege that both the loading of crude oil onto barges and the operation of the Delaware City Refining double-loop rail terminal violate Delaware’s Coastal Zone Act.  A hearing on the first appeal before the State Coastal Zone Industrial Control Board occurred on July 16, 2013, and the board ruled in favor of Delaware City Refining dismissing the appeal for lack of standing.  Sierra Club and Delaware Audubon have appealed that decision to the Delaware Superior Court, New Castle County, Case No. N13A-09-001 ALR, and Delaware City Refining and the state filed cross-appeals.  No schedule has yet been set for the appeals in Superior Court.  A hearing on the second appeals before the Environmental Appeals Board, case no. 2013-06, has been scheduled for January 21, 2014, with a motions to dismiss scheduled to be heard on December 10, 2013.

On July 24, 2013, the Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control ("DNREC") issued a Notice of Administrative Penalty Assessment and Secretary’s Order to Delaware City Refining Company LLC for alleged air emission violations that occurred during the re-start of the refinery in 2011 and subsequent to the re-start.  The penalty assessment seeks $460,200 in penalties and $69,030 in cost recovery for DNREC’s expenses associated with investigation of the incidents.  We dispute the amount of the penalty assessment and allegations made in the order, and are in discussions with DNREC to resolve the assessment.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The following Risk Factor disclosure updates the risk factors as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 previously filed with the SEC.

We could incur substantial costs or disruptions in our business if we cannot obtain or maintain necessary permits and authorizations or otherwise comply with health, safety, environmental and other laws and regulations.

Our operations require numerous permits and authorizations under various laws and regulations. These authorizations and permits are subject to revocation, renewal or modification and can require operational changes to limit impacts or potential impacts on the environment and/or health and safety. A violation of authorization or permit conditions or other legal or regulatory requirements could result in substantial fines, criminal sanctions, permit revocations, injunctions, and/or facility shutdowns. In addition, major modifications of our operations could require modifications to our existing permits or upgrades to our existing pollution control equipment. Any or all of these matters could have a negative effect on our business, results of operations and cash flows.

We may incur significant liability under, or costs and capital expenditures to comply with, environmental and health and safety regulations, which are complex and change frequently.

Our operations are subject to federal, state and local laws regulating, among other things, the handling of petroleum and other regulated materials, the emission and discharge of materials into the environment, waste management, and remediation of discharges of petroleum and petroleum products, characteristics and composition of gasoline and distillates and other matters otherwise relating to the protection of the environment. Our operations are also subject to extensive laws and regulations relating to occupational health and safety.

We cannot predict what additional environmental, health and safety legislation or regulations may be adopted in the future, or how existing or future laws or regulations may be administered or interpreted with respect to our operations. Many of these laws and regulations are becoming increasingly stringent, and the cost of compliance with these requirements can be expected to increase over time.

Certain environmental laws impose strict, and in certain circumstances, joint and several, liability for costs of investigation and cleanup of such spills, discharges or releases on owners and operators of, as well as persons who arrange for treatment or disposal of regulated materials at, contaminated sites. Under these laws, we may incur liability or be required to pay penalties for past contamination, and third parties may assert claims against us for damages allegedly arising out of any past or future contamination. The potential penalties and clean-up costs for past or future releases or spills, the failure of prior owners of our facilities to complete their clean-up obligations, the liability to third parties for

56

damage to their property, or the need to address newly-discovered information or conditions that may require a response could be significant, and the payment of these amounts could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Furthermore, our Delaware City refinery and our Delaware City Rail Terminal are located in Delaware's coastal zone where certain activities are regulated under the Delaware Coastal Zone Act and closely monitored by environmental interest groups. On June 14, 2013, two administrative appeals were filed by the Sierra Club and Delaware Audubon regarding an air permit Delaware City Refining obtained to allow loading of crude oil onto barges.  The appeals allege that both the loading of crude oil onto barges and the operation of the Delaware City Refining double-loop rail terminal violate Delaware’s Coastal Zone Act.  A hearing on the first appeal before the State Coastal Zone Industrial Control Board occurred on July 16, 2013, and the board ruled in favor of Delaware City Refining dismissing the appeal for lack of standing.  Sierra Club and Delaware Audubon have appealed that decision to the Delaware Superior Court, New Castle County, Case No. N13A-09-001 ALR, and Delaware City Refining and the state filed cross-appeals.  No schedule has yet been set for the appeals in Superior Court.  A hearing on the second appeal before the Environmental Appeals Board, case no. 2013-06, has been scheduled for January 21, 2014, with a motions to dismiss scheduled to be heard on December 10, 2013. If the Appellants in one or both of these matters prevail, our volumes may decline, which would have an adverse material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

We may have capital needs for which our internally generated cash flows and other sources of liquidity may not be adequate.

If we cannot generate sufficient cash flows or otherwise secure sufficient liquidity to support our short-term and long-term capital requirements, we may not be able to meet our payment obligations or our future debt obligations, comply with certain deadlines related to environmental regulations and standards, or pursue our business strategies, including acquisitions, in which case our operations may not perform as we currently expect. We have substantial short-term capital needs and may have substantial long term capital needs. Our short-term working capital needs are primarily related to financing certain of our refined products inventory not covered by our various supply and Intermediation Agreements. We terminated our supply agreement with Statoil for our Paulsboro refinery effective March 31, 2013 and our MSCG Offtake Agreements for our Paulsboro and Delaware City refineries effective July 1, 2013. Concurrent with the termination of our MSCG Offtake Agreements, we entered into Intermediation Agreements with J. Aron at our Paulsboro and Delaware City refineries. Pursuant to the Intermediation Agreements, J. Aron purchases and holds title to all of the intermediate and finished products produced by the Delaware City and Paulsboro refineries and delivered into the tanks at the refineries (or at other locations outside of the refineries as agreed upon by both parties). Furthermore, J. Aron agrees to sell the intermediate and finished products back to us as they are discharged out of the refineries' tanks (or other locations outside of the refineries as agreed upon by both parties). We market and sell the finished products independently to third parties.

If we cannot adequately handle our crude oil and feedstock requirements without the benefit of the Statoil arrangement at Paulsboro, or if we are required to obtain our crude oil supply at our other refineries without the benefit of the existing supply arrangements or the applicable counterparty defaults in its obligations, our crude oil pricing costs may increase as the number of days between when we pay for the crude oil and when the crude oil is delivered to us increases. Termination of our inventory Intermediation Agreements with J. Aron would require us to finance our refined products inventory covered by the agreements at terms that may not be as favorable. Additionally, we are obligated to repurchase from J. Aron all volumes of products located at the refineries’ storage tanks (or at other locations outside of the refineries as agreed upon by both parties) upon termination of these agreements, which may have a material adverse impact on our working capital and financial condition. Further, if we are not able to market and sell our finished products to credit worthy customers, we may be subject to delays in the collection of our accounts receivable and exposure to additional credit risk. Such increased exposure could negatively impact our liquidity due to our increased working capital needs as a result of the increase in the amount of crude oil inventory and accounts receivable we would have to carry on our balance sheet. Our long-term needs for cash include those to support ongoing capital expenditures for equipment maintenance and upgrades during turnarounds at our refineries and to complete our routine and normally scheduled maintenance, regulatory and security expenditures.

In addition, from time to time, we are required to spend significant amounts for repairs when one or more processing units experiences temporary shutdowns. We continue to utilize significant capital to upgrade equipment, improve facilities, and reduce operational, safety and environmental risks. In connection with the Paulsboro acquisition, we assumed certain significant environmental obligations, and may similarly do so in future acquisitions. We will likely incur substantial compliance costs in connection with new or changing environmental, health and safety regulations. See “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition.” Our liquidity will affect our ability to satisfy any of these needs or obligations.

57

PBF ENERGY INC. AND

PBF HOLDING COMPANY LLC

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE, UNIT, PER SHARE, PER UNIT AND BARREL DATA)

Item 6. Exhibits

The exhibits listed in the accompanying Exhibit Index are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this report and such Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number	Description
31.1	Certification of Thomas J. Nimbley, Chief Executive Officer of PBF Energy Inc. pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of Matthew C. Lucey, Chief Financial Officer of PBF Energy Inc. pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.3	Certification of Thomas J. Nimbley, Chief Executive Officer of PBF Holding Company LLC pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.4	Certification of Matthew C. Lucey, Chief Financial Officer of PBF Holding Company LLC pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1*	Certification of Thomas J. Nimbley, Chief Executive Officer of PBF Energy Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2*	Certification of Matthew C. Lucey, Chief Financial Officer of PBF Energy Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.3*	Certification of Thomas J. Nimbley, Chief Executive Officer of PBF Holding Company LLC pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.4*	Certification of Matthew C. Lucey, Chief Financial Officer of PBF Holding Company LLC pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

* Furnished, not filed.

In accordance with Rule 402 of Regulation S-T, the XBRL information in Exhibit 101 to this Form 10-Q shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

58

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrants have duly caused this report to be signed on their behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

		PBF Energy Inc.
Date	November 7, 2013		By:	/s/ Matthew C. Lucey
				Matthew C. Lucey Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
		PBF Holding Company LLC
Date	November 7, 2013		By:	/s/ Matthew C. Lucey
				Matthew C. Lucey Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
		PBF Finance Corporation
Date	November 7, 2013		By:	/s/ Matthew C. Lucey
				Matthew C. Lucey Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

59

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number	Description
31.1	Certification of Thomas J. Nimbley, Chief Executive Officer of PBF Energy Inc. pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of Matthew C. Lucey, Chief Financial Officer of PBF Energy Inc. pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.3	Certification of Thomas J. Nimbley, Chief Executive Officer of PBF Holding Company LLC pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.4	Certification of Matthew C. Lucey, Chief Financial Officer of PBF Holding Company LLC pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1*	Certification of Thomas J. Nimbley, Chief Executive Officer of PBF Energy Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2*	Certification of Matthew C. Lucey, Chief Financial Officer of PBF Energy Inc. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.3*	Certification of Thomas J. Nimbley, Chief Executive Officer of PBF Holding Company LLC pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.4*	Certification of Matthew C. Lucey, Chief Financial Officer of PBF Holding Company LLC pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

* Furnished, not filed.

In accordance with Rule 402 of Regulation S-T, the XBRL information in Exhibit 101 to this Form 10-Q shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

60