Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies) | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Use of Estimates | Use of Estimates |
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Although actual results could differ from those estimates, management does not believe that such differences would be material. |
Cash and Cash Equivalents | Cash and Cash Equivalents |
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less from the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents consist of checking accounts, money market accounts, money market funds, and certificates of deposit with a maturity date of three months or less. Certificates of deposit, commercial paper, corporate notes and corporate bonds with a maturity date of more than three months are classified separately on the balance sheet. Their carrying values approximate the fair market value. |
Marketable Securities | Marketable Securities |
Marketable securities may consist of investments in U.S. Treasuries, various U.S. governmental agency debt securities, corporate bonds, certificates of deposit, and other fixed income securities with an average maturity of twelve months or less. Management classifies the Company’s investments as available-for-sale. Such securities are carried at estimated fair value, with any unrealized holding gains or losses reported, net of any tax effects reported, as accumulated other comprehensive income, which is a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses, and declines in value judged to be other-than-temporary, if any, are included in consolidated results of operations. A decline in the market value of any available-for-sale security below cost that is deemed to be other-than-temporary results in a reduction in fair value, which is charged to earnings in that period, and a new cost basis for the security is established. Dividend and interest income is recognized as interest income when earned. The cost of securities sold is calculated using the specific identification method. |
Investment Securities | Investment Securities |
Investment securities consisted of the following (in thousands): |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2014 | |
| | Amortized | | | Unrealized | | | Unrealized | | | Estimated | |
Cost | Gains | (Losses) | Fair |
| | | Value |
| | (unaudited) | |
U.S. Government Agency Securities | | $ | 4,316 | | | $ | — | | | $ | (3 | ) | | $ | 4,313 | |
FDIC Certificates of Deposit | | | 16,374 | | | | — | | | | (14 | ) | | | 16,360 | |
Certificates of Deposit | | | 2,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | | 2,000 | |
Commercial Paper | | | 9,743 | | | | 1 | | | | — | | | | 9,744 | |
Corporate Notes/Bonds | | | 35,992 | | | | — | | | | (89 | ) | | | 35,903 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 68,425 | | | $ | 1 | | | $ | (106 | ) | | $ | 68,320 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | December 31, 2013 | |
| | Amortized | | | Unrealized | | | Unrealized | | | Estimated | |
Cost | Gains | (Losses) | Fair |
| | | Value |
Certificates of Deposit | | $ | 2,000 | | | | — | | | | — | | | $ | 2,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 2,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 2,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Company has classified all of its investment securities available-for-sale, including those with maturities beyond one year, as current assets on the consolidated balance sheets based on the highly liquid nature of the investment securities and because these investment securities are considered available for use in current operations. As of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company held $31.8 million and $0, respectively, of available-for-sale investment securities with contractual maturity dates more than one year and less than two years. |
Fair Value Measurements | Fair Value Measurements |
The Company applies the fair value method under ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. ASC Topic 820 defines fair value, establishes a fair value hierarchy for assets and liabilities measured at fair value and requires expanded disclosures about fair value measurements. The ASC Topic 820 hierarchy ranks the quality and reliability of inputs, or assumptions, used in the determination of fair value and requires assets and liabilities carried at fair value to be classified and disclosed in one of the following categories based on the lowest level input used that is significant to a particular fair value measurement: |
|
| • | | Level 1—Fair value is determined by using unadjusted quoted prices that are available in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| • | | Level 2—Fair value is determined by using inputs other than Level 1 quoted prices that are directly or indirectly observable. Inputs can include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets and liabilities in inactive markets. Related inputs can also include those used in valuation or other pricing models, such as interest rates and yield curves that can be corroborated by observable market data. | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| • | | Level 3—Fair value is determined by inputs that are unobservable and not corroborated by market data. Use of these inputs involves significant and subjective judgments to be made by a reporting entity—e.g., determining an appropriate adjustment to a discount factor for illiquidity associated with a given security. | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The Company evaluates financial assets and liabilities subject to fair value measurements on a recurring basis to determine the appropriate level at which to classify them each reporting period. This determination requires the Company to make subjective judgments as to the significance of inputs used in determining fair value and where such inputs lie within the ASC Topic 820 hierarchy. |
|
The Company has no assets or liabilities that were measured using quoted prices for significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 assets and liabilities) as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The carrying value of cash held in money market funds of approximately $8.5 million as of December 31, 2014 and $0.0 million as of December 31, 2013, is included in cash and cash equivalents and approximates market value based on quoted market price or Level 1 inputs. |
The fair value measurements of the Company’s cash equivalents and available-for-sale investment securities are identified in the following tables (in thousands): |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Fair Value Measurements at | |
Reporting Date Using |
| | December 31, | | | Quoted Prices | | | Significant | | | Significant | |
2014 | in Active | Other | Unobservable |
| Markets for | Observable | Inputs |
| Identical | Inputs | (Level 3) |
| Assets | (Level 2) | |
| (Level 1) | | |
Money market funds | | $ | 8,495 | | | $ | 8,495 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
U.S. Government Agency Securities | | | 4,313 | | | | — | | | | 4,313 | | | | — | |
FDIC certificates of deposit | | | 16,360 | | | | — | | | | 16,360 | | | | — | |
Certificates of deposit | | | 41,000 | | | | — | | | | 41,000 | | | | — | |
Commercial paper | | | 9,744 | | | | — | | | | 9,744 | | | | — | |
Corporate Bonds/Notes | | | 35,903 | | | | — | | | | 35,903 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 115,815 | | | $ | 8,495 | | | $ | 107,320 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | Fair Value Measurements at | |
Reporting Date Using |
| | December 31, | | | Quoted Prices | | | Significant | | | Significant | |
2013 | in Active | Other | Unobservable |
| Markets for | Observable | Inputs |
| Identical | Inputs | (Level 3) |
| Assets | (Level 2) | |
| (Level 1) | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Certificates of deposit | | | 6,000 | | | | — | | | | 6,000 | | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | $ | 6,000 | | | $ | — | | | $ | 6,000 | | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Financial Instruments | Financial Instruments |
The Company considers the recorded costs of its financial assets and liabilities, which consist of cash equivalents, investment securities available-for-sale, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, to approximate their fair value because of their relatively short maturities at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. Management believes that the risks associated with its financial instruments are minimal as the counterparties are various corporations, financial institutions and government agencies of high credit standing. |
Concentration of Credit Risk | Concentration of Credit Risk |
Cash equivalents are held with major financial institutions in the United States. Certificates of deposit held with banks may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits. Generally, these deposits may be redeemed upon demand and, therefore, bear minimal risk. |
Accounts Receivable | Accounts Receivable |
Accounts receivable that management has the intent and ability to collect are reported in the balance sheets at outstanding amounts, less an allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company writes off uncollectible receivables when the likelihood of collection is remote. |
The Company evaluates the collectability of accounts receivable on a regular basis. The allowance, if any, is based upon various factors including the financial condition and payment history of customers, an overall review of collections experience on other accounts and economic factors or events expected to affect future collections experience. No allowance was recorded as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, as the Company has a history of collecting on all its accounts including government agencies and collaborations funding its research. |
Property and Equipment | Property and Equipment |
Property and equipment is stated at cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis over estimated useful lives ranging from three to five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated useful life of the assets or the term of the related lease. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. |
When indicators of possible impairment are identified, the Company evaluates the recoverability of the carrying value of its long-lived assets based on the criteria established in ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment. The Company considers historical performance and anticipated future results in its evaluation of potential impairment. The Company evaluates the carrying value of those assets in relation to the operating performance of the business and undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of those assets. Impairment losses are recognized when carrying value exceeds the undiscounted cash flows, in which case management must determine the fair value of the underlying asset. No such impairment losses have been recognized to date. |
Revenue Recognition | Revenue Recognition |
Revenue is recognized when all terms and conditions of the agreements have been met, including persuasive evidence of an arrangement, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. The Company is reimbursed for certain costs incurred on specified research projects under the terms and conditions of grants, collaboration agreements, and awards. The Company records the amount of reimbursement as revenues on a gross basis in accordance with ASC Topic 605-45, Revenue Recognition/Principal Agent Considerations. The Company is the primary obligor with respect to purchasing goods and services from third-party suppliers, is obligated to compensate the service provider for the work performed, and has discretion in selecting the supplier. Provisions for estimated losses on research grant projects and any other contracts are made in the period such losses are determined. |
The Company has entered into arrangements involving the delivery of more than one element. Each required deliverable is evaluated to determine whether it qualifies as a separate unit of accounting. For the Company, this determination is generally based on whether the deliverable has “stand-alone value” to the customer. The Company adopted this accounting standard on a prospective basis for all Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements (“MDRAs”) entered into on or after January 1, 2011, and for any MDRAs that were entered into prior to January 1, 2011, but materially modified on or after that date. |
The Company adopted ASC Topic 605-28, Milestone Method. Under this guidance, the Company recognizes revenue contingent upon the achievement of a substantive milestone in its entirety in the period the milestone is achieved. Substantive milestone payments are recognized upon achievement of the milestone only if all of the following conditions are met: |
|
| • | | The milestone payments are non-refundable; | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| • | | Achievement of the milestone involves a degree of risk and was not reasonably assured at the inception of the arrangement; | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| • | | Substantive effort on the Company’s part is involved in achieving the milestone; | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| • | | The amount of the milestone payment is reasonable in relation to the effort expended or the risk associated with achievement of the milestone; and | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| • | | A reasonable amount of time passes between the up-front license payment and the first milestone payment, as well as between each subsequent milestone payment. | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Determination as to whether a payment meets the aforementioned conditions involves management’s judgment. If any of these conditions are not met, the resulting payment would not be considered a substantive milestone, and therefore, the resulting payment would be considered part of the consideration for the single unit of accounting and be recognized as revenue in accordance with the revenue models described above. In addition, the determination that one such payment was not a substantive milestone could prevent the Company from concluding that subsequent milestone payments were substantive milestones and, as a result, any additional milestone payments could also be considered part of the consideration for the single unit of accounting and would be recognized as revenue as such performance obligations are performed under either the proportional performance or straight-line methods, as applicable. |
Deferred Revenue | Deferred Revenue |
Cash received as prepayment on future services is deferred and recognized as revenue as the services are performed. The Company must remit interest on any deferred revenue related to a governmental agency. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, no interest was due as the Company did not have any deferred revenue from a government agency. |
Research and Development | Research and Development |
Except for payments made in advance of services, the Company expenses its research and development costs as incurred. For payments made in advance, the Company recognizes research and development expense as the services are rendered. Research and development costs primarily consist of salaries and related expenses for personnel and resources and the costs of clinical trials. Other research and development expenses include preclinical analytical testing, outside services, providers, materials and consulting fees. |
Income Taxes | Income Taxes |
Income taxes are accounted for using the liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and its respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the year in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. |
The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce net deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Income tax expense is the tax payable for the period and the change during the period in deferred tax assets and liabilities. |
The Company accounts for uncertain tax positions pursuant to ASC Topic 740 (previously included in FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109). Financial statement recognition of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return is determined based on a more-likely-than-not threshold of that position being sustained. If the tax position meets this threshold, the benefit to be recognized is measured as the tax benefit having the highest likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the taxing authority. The Company recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits and penalties in the provision for income taxes. |
Comprehensive Income (Loss) | Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
All components of comprehensive income (loss), including net income (loss), are reported in the financial statements in the period in which they are incurred. Comprehensive income (loss) is defined as the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources. In accordance with accounting guidance, the Company presents the impact of any unrealized gains or (losses) on its investment securities in a separate statement of comprehensive income (loss) for each period. |
Share-Based Compensation | Share-Based Compensation |
|
Share-based payments are accounted for in accordance with the provisions of ASC Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation. The fair value of share-based payments is estimated, on the date of grant, using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model (the “Black-Scholes model”). The resulting fair value is recognized ratably over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period of the option. |
|
For all awards granted with time-based vesting conditions, expense is amortized using the straight-line attribution method. For awards that contain a performance-based vesting condition, expense is amortized using the accelerated attribution method. As share-based compensation expense recognized in the statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 is based on share-based awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. ASC Topic 718 requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. Pre-vesting forfeitures are based on the Company’s historical experience for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, and have not been material. |
|
The Company utilizes the Black-Scholes model for estimating fair value of its stock options granted. Option valuation models, including the Black-Scholes model, require the input of subjective assumptions, and changes in the assumptions used can materially affect the grant date fair value of an award. These assumptions include the risk-free rate of interest, expected dividend yield, expected volatility and the expected life of the award. |
|
Expected volatility rates are based on historical volatility of the common stock of comparable publicly traded entities and other factors due to the lack of historic information of the Company’s common stock. The expected life of stock options is the period of time for which the stock options are expected to be outstanding. Given the lack of historic exercise data, the expected life is determined using the “simplified method,” which is defined as the midpoint between the vesting date and the end of the contractual term. |
|
The risk-free interest rates are based on the U.S. Treasury yield for a period consistent with the expected term of the option in effect at the time of the grant. The Company has not paid dividends to its stockholders since its inception and does not plan to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Therefore, the Company has assumed an expected dividend rate of zero. |
|
For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, given that there was no active market for the Company’s common stock, the exercise prices of the stock options on the dates of grant were determined and approved by the board of directors using several factors, including progress and milestones achieved in the Company’s business development and performance, the price per share of its convertible preferred stock offerings and general industry and economic trends. In establishing the estimated fair value of the common stock, the Company considered the guidance set forth in American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Practice Guide, Valuation of Privately-Held-Company Equity Securities Issued as Compensation. For the year ended December 31, 2014, the exercise price was determined by using the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. |
|
Under ASC Topic 718, the cumulative amount of compensation cost recognized for instruments classified as equity that ordinarily would result in a future tax deduction under existing tax law shall be considered to be a deductible temporary difference in applying ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes. The deductible temporary difference is based on the compensation cost recognized for financial reporting purposes; however, these provisions currently do not impact the Company, as all the deferred tax assets have a full valuation allowance. |
|
Since the Company had net operating loss carryforwards as of December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, no excess tax benefits for the tax deductions related to share-based awards were recognized in the statements of operations. |
|
Equity instruments issued to consultants are accounted for under the provisions of ASC Topic 718 and ASC Topic 505-50, Equity/Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees. Accordingly, the estimated fair value of the equity instrument is recorded on the earlier of the performance commitment date or the date the services required are completed and are marked to market during the service period. |
Loss Per Share | Loss Per Share |
Basic net loss per common share is determined by dividing the net loss allocable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, without consideration of common stock equivalents. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss allocable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common stock equivalents outstanding for the period. The treasury stock method is used to determine the dilutive effect of the Company’s stock option grants. |
The following common stock equivalents were excluded in the calculation of diluted loss per share because their effect would be anti-dilutive as applied to the loss from operations as of December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Years Ended December 31, | | | | | |
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | | | 2012 | | | | | |
Stock Equivalents | | | 958,712 | | | | 898,982 | | | | 905,284 | | | | | |
Recently Issued Accounting Standards | Recently Issued Accounting Standards |
|
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (ASU 2014-09), Revenue from Contracts with Customers. ASU 2014-09 will eliminate transaction-specific and industry-specific revenue recognition guidance under current GAAP and replace it with a principle-based approach for determining revenue recognition. ASU 2014-09 will require that companies recognize revenue based on the value of transferred goods or services as they occur in the contract. ASU 2014-09 also will require additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early application is not permitted. Entities can transition to the standard either retrospectively or as a cumulative-effect adjustment as of the date of adoption. Presently, the Company is assessing what effect the adoption of ASU 2014-09 will have on our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. |