UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10
GENERAL FORM FOR REGISTRATION OF SECURITIES
Pursuant to Section 12(b) or (g) of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934
ALLIED ENERGY CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
NEVADA | | 46-1855856 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
| | |
3800 Howard Hughes Parkway Suite 500 Las Vegas, NV | | 89169 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(310) 291-5687 |
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) |
Securities registered to be registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: none
Securities to be registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act.
Common Stock, par value $0.001 |
(Title of class) |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | ¨ | | Accelerated filer | ¨ |
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ | | Smaller reporting company | x |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART 1 | | | |
ITEM 1. | BUSINESS | 3 | |
ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS | 11 | |
ITEM 2. | FINANCIAL INFORMATION | 20 | |
ITEM 3. | PROPERTIES | 23 | |
ITEM 4. | SECURITIES OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT | 23 | |
ITEM 5 | DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS | 24 | |
ITEM 6 | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION | 26 | |
ITEM 7 | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE | 26 | |
ITEM 8. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS | 27 | |
ITEM 9 | MARKET PRICE OF AND DIVIDENDS ON THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS. | 27 | |
ITEM 10 | RECENT SALES OF SECURITIES | 27 | |
ITEM 11. | DESCRIPTION OF REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES | 28 | |
ITEM 12 | INDEMNIFICATION OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS | 30 | |
ITEM 13 | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA | 31 | |
ITEM 14. | CHANGES IN AN DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE | 31 | |
ITEM 15 | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS | 31 | |
| | | |
SIGNATURES | | 32 | |
| | | |
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
PLAN OF OPERATION
The Company will attempt to locate and negotiate with a business entity for the combination of that target company with the Company. The combination will normally take the form of a merger, stock-for-stock exchange or stock-for-assets exchange (the “business combination”). The Company anticipates structuring a business combination to acquire 100% of the equity interest or assets of the target business or businesses. The Company may, however, structure a business combination to acquire less than 100% of such interests or assets of the target business, but we will only consummate such business combination if we (or any entity that is a successor to us in a business combination) acquire a majority of the outstanding voting securities or assets of the target with the objective of making sure that we are not required to register as an investment company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, or the Investment Company Act, based on the fact that less than 40% of our assets will be defined as investment securities under the provisions of that statute, If a US corporation becomes the target company, then the target company will likely wish to structure the business combination to be within the definition of a tax-free reorganization under Section 351 or Section 368 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. We have not identified any acquisition target and we have not, nor has anyone on our behalf, initiated any discussions, directly or indirectly, with respect to identifying any acquisition target. We have conducted no operations and have generated no revenues to date and we will not generate operating revenues at the earliest until we consummate a business combination. No assurances can be given that the Company will be successful in locating or negotiating with any target business.
WE ARE A BLANK CHECK SHELL COMPANY
We are now considered a blank check company. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) defines those companies as “any development stage company that is issuing a penny stock, within the meaning of Section 3 (a)(51) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and that has no specific business plan or purpose, or has indicated that its business plan is to merge with an unidentified company or companies.”
Under SEC Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), we also qualify as a “shell company,” because we have no or nominal assets (other than cash) and no or nominal operations. Many states have enacted statutes, rules and regulations limiting the sale of securities of “blank check” companies in their respective jurisdictions. Management does not intend to undertake any efforts to cause a market to develop in our securities, either debt or equity, until we have successfully concluded a business combination. We intend to comply with the periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act for so long as we are subject to those requirements.
WE ARE AN EMERGING GROWTH COMPANY
We are an emerging growth company as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 (which we refer to herein as the JOBS Act) and will remain such for up to five years. If our non-convertible debt issued within a three year period or revenues exceeds $1 billion, or the market value of our ordinary shares that are held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million on the last day of the second fiscal quarter of any given fiscal year, we would cease to be an emerging growth company as of the following fiscal year. As an emerging growth company, we will elect, under Section 107(b) of the JOBS Act, to take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Securities Act Section 7(a)(2)(B) for complying with new or revised accounting standards.
BUSINESS PLAN
Our current business plan is to attempt to identify and negotiate with a business target for the merger of that entity with and into the Company. In certain instances, a target company may wish to become a subsidiary of the Company or may wish to contribute or sell assets to the Company, or may wish to joint venture with the Company or license the Company, rather than to merge. No assurances can be given that we will be successful in identifying or negotiating with any target company. We seek to provide a method for a foreign or domestic private company to become a reporting or public company whose securities may ultimately be qualified for trading in the United States secondary markets. However, our securities do not currently trade in any public market, and there is no assurance that our securities will ever be qualified for trading in such markets.
The Company has not restricted its search for any specific kind of businesses, and it may acquire a business which is in its preliminary or development stage, which is already in operation, or in essentially any stage of its business life. It is impossible to predict the status of any business in which the Company may become engaged, in that such business may need to seek additional capital, may desire to have its shares publicly traded, or may seek other perceived advantages which the Company may offer.
It is anticipated that any securities issued in any such business combination would be issued in reliance upon exemption from registration under applicable federal and state securities laws. In some circumstances, however, as a negotiated element of its transaction, the Company may agree to register all or a part of such securities immediately after the transaction is consummated or at specified times hereafter. If such registration occurs, it will be undertaken by the surviving entity after the Company has entered into an agreement for a business combination or has consummated a business combination. The issuance of additional securities and their potential sale into any trading market which may develop in the Company’s securities may depress the market value of the Company’s securities in the future if such a market develops, of which there is no assurance.
The Company will participate in a business combination only after the negotiation and execution of appropriate agreements. Negotiations with a target company will likely focus on the percentage of the Company, which the target company shareholders would acquire in exchange for their shareholdings. Although the terms of such agreements cannot be predicted, generally
such agreements will require certain representations and warranties of the parties thereto, will specify certain events of default, will detail the terms of closing and the conditions which must be satisfied by the parties prior to and after such closing and will include miscellaneous other terms. Any merger or acquisition effected by the Company can be expected to have a significant dilutive effect on the percentage of shares held by the Company’s shareholders at such time.
A business combination with a target company may result in the substitution by the target company of its own management and board of directors. No assurances can be given that we will be able to enter into a business combination or transaction, or, if we do enter into such a business combination or transaction, no assurances can be given as to the terms of a business combination or transaction, or as to the nature of the target company.
Criteria
Our management team intends to focus on increasing stockholder value by growing revenue and improving the efficiency of business operations of the acquired company. Consistent with this strategy, we believe the following general criteria and guidelines are important in evaluating prospective target businesses. We will use these criteria and guidelines in evaluating acquisition opportunities, but we may decide to enter into a business combination with a target business that does not meet these criteria and guidelines.
• | | Opportunities for Platform Growth: We will seek to acquire one or more businesses or assets that we can grow. We may initially consider those sectors that complement our management team’s background, including the semi-precious mineral industry. |
• | | History of and Potential for Strong Free Cash Flow Generation: We will seek to acquire one or more businesses that have the potential to generate strong cash flow based upon the asset base of its mineral properties. We will focus on one or more businesses that have potential revenue streams from its mineral properties and low working capital and capital expenditure requirements. |
• | | Established Companies with Proven Track Records: We will seek to acquire established companies with sound historical financial performance. We will typically focus on companies with a history of strong exploratory and operating results. Although we are not restricted from doing so, we do not intend to acquire start-up companies. |
• | | Experienced and Motivated Management Teams: We will seek to acquire businesses that have strong, experienced management teams with a substantial personal economic stake in the performance of the acquired business. We will focus on management teams with a proven track record involving the semi-precious mineral industry, enhancing potential profitability and generating cash flow. We expect that the operating expertise of our officer and director will complement and not replace the target’s management team. |
• | | Strong Competitive Industry Position: We will seek to acquire businesses that have strong fundamentals. The factors we will consider include growth prospects, competitive dynamics, level of consolidation, need for capital investment and barriers to entry. We will analyze the strengths and weaknesses of target businesses relative to their competitors, focusing on mineral properties. |
These criteria are not intended to be exhaustive. Any evaluation relating to the merits of a particular initial business combination may be based, to the extent relevant, on these general guidelines as well as other considerations, factors and criteria that our management may deem relevant. In the event that we decide to enter into a business combination with a target business that does not meet the above criteria and guidelines, we will disclose that the target business does not meet the above criteria in our stockholder communications related to our initial business combination, which, as discussed in this prospectus, would be in the form of tender offer documents or proxy solicitation materials that we would file with the SEC.
Regulation and Taxation
The Investment Company Act of 1940 defines an "investment company" as an issuer which is or holds itself out as being engaged primarily in the business of investing, reinvesting or trading of securities. While the Company does not intend to engage in such activities, the Company could become subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act of 1940 in the event the Company obtains or continues to hold a minority interest in a number of development stage enterprises. The Company could be expected to incur significant registration and compliance costs if required to register under the Investment Company Act of 1940. Accordingly, management will continue to review the Company's activities from time to time with a view toward reducing the likelihood the Company could be classified as an "investment company."
The Company intends to structure a merger or acquisition in such manner as to minimize Federal and state tax consequences to the Company and to any target company.
Plan of Operations
Certain statements contained in this prospectus, including statements regarding the anticipated development and expansion of our business, our intent, belief or current expectations, primarily with respect to the future operating performance of Allied Energy Corp. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made. We undertake no obligation to update such statements to reflect events that occur or circumstances that exist after the date on which they are made.
Plan of Operation - General
During the next 12 months, the Company intends to seek, investigate and, if such investigation warrants, acquire an interest in one or more business opportunities presented to it by persons or firms who or which desire to seek the perceived advantages of a publicly held corporation. At this time, the Company has no plan, proposal, agreement, understanding or arrangement to acquire or merge with any specific business or company, and the Company has not identified any
specific business or company for investigation and evaluation. No member of Management or promoter of the Company has had any material discussions with any other company with respect to any acquisition of that company.
The Company will not restrict its search to any specific business, industry or geographical location, and the Company may participate in a business venture of virtually any kind or nature. The discussion of the proposed plan of operation under this caption and throughout this Annual Report is purposefully general and is not meant to be restrictive of the Company's virtually unlimited discretion to search for and enter into potential business opportunities.
Management anticipates that it will only participate in one potential business venture. This lack of diversification should be considered a substantial risk in investing in the Company because it will not permit the Company to offset potential losses from one venture against gains from another. The Company may seek a business opportunity with a firm which only recently commenced operations, or a developing company in need of additional funds for expansion into new products or markets, or seeking to develop a new product or service, or an established business which may be experiencing financial or operating difficulties and is in the need for additional capital which is perceived to be easier to raise by a public company. In some instances, a business opportunity may involve the acquisition or merger with a corporation which does not need substantial additional cash but which desires to establish a public trading market for its common stock. The Company may purchase assets and establish wholly owned subsidiaries in various business or purchase existing businesses as subsidiaries.
The Company anticipates that the selection of a business opportunity in which to participate will be complex and extremely risky. Because of general economic conditions, rapid technological advances being made in some industries, and shortages of available capital, management believes that there are numerous firms seeking the benefits of a publicly traded corporation. Such perceived benefits of a publicly traded corporation may include facilitating or improving the terms on which additional equity financing may be sought, providing liquidity for the principals of a business, creating a means for providing incentive stock options or similar benefits to key employees, providing liquidity (subject to restrictions of applicable statutes) for all shareholders, and other factors. Potentially available business opportunities may occur in many different industries and at various stages of development, all of which will make the task of comparative investigation and analysis of such business opportunities extremely difficult and complex.
The Company shareholders will not be provided the opportunity to approve or consent to such sale. The opportunity to sell all or a portion of their shares in connection with an acquisition may influence management's decision to enter into a specific transaction. However, management believes that since the anticipated sales price will be less than market value, that the potential of a stock sale by management will be a material factor on their decision to enter a specific transaction.
The above description of potential sales of management stock is not based upon any corporate bylaw, shareholder or board resolution, or contract or agreement. No other payments of cash or property are expected to be received by Management in connection with any acquisition.
The Company has not formulated any policy regarding the use of consultants or outside advisors, but does not anticipate that it will use the services of such persons.
The Company has, and will continue to have, insufficient capital with which to provide the owners of business opportunities with any significant cash or other assets. However, management believes the Company will offer owners of business opportunities the opportunity to acquire a controlling ownership interest in a public company at substantially less cost than is required to conduct an initial public offering. The owners of the business opportunities will, however, incur significant post-merger or acquisition registration costs in the event they wish to register a portion of their shares for subsequent sale. The Company will also incur significant legal and accounting costs in connection with the acquisition of a business opportunity including the costs of preparing post-effective amendments, Forms 8-K, agreements and related reports and documents nevertheless, the officers and directors of the Company have not conducted market research and are not aware of statistical data which would support the perceived benefits of a merger or acquisition transaction for the owners of a business opportunity.
The Company does not intend to make any loans to any prospective merger or acquisition candidates or to unaffiliated third parties.
Sources of Opportunities
The Company anticipates that business opportunities for possible acquisition will be referred by various sources, including its officers and directors, professional advisers, securities broker-dealers, venture capitalists, members of the financial community, and others who may present unsolicited proposals.
The Company will seek a potential business opportunity from all known sources, but will rely principally on personal contacts of its officers and directors as well as indirect associations between them and other business and professional people. It is not presently anticipated that the Company will engage professional firms specializing in business acquisitions or reorganizations.
The officers and directors of the Company are currently employed in other positions and will devote only a portion of their time (not more than three hour per week) to the business affairs of the Company, until such time as an acquisition has been determined to be highly favorable, at which time they expect to spend full time in investigating and closing any acquisition for a period of two weeks. In addition, in the face of competing demands for their time, the officers and directors may grant priority to their full-time positions rather than to the Company.
Evaluation of Opportunities
The analysis of new business opportunities will be undertaken by or under the supervision of the officers and directors of the Company. Management intends to concentrate on identifying prospective business opportunities which may be brought to its attention through present associations with management. In analyzing prospective business opportunities, management will consider such matters as the available technical, financial and managerial resources; working capital and other financial requirements; history of operation, if any; prospects for the
future; present and expected competition; the quality and experience of management services which may be available and the depth of that management; the potential for further research, development or exploration; specific risk factors not now foreseeable but which then may be anticipated to impact the proposed activities of the Company; the potential for growth or expansion; the potential for profit; the perceived public recognition or acceptance of products, services or trades; name identification; and other relevant factors. Officers and directors of the Company will meet personally with management and key personnel of the firm sponsoring the business opportunity as part of their investigation. To the extent possible, the Company intends to utilize written reports and personal investigation to evaluate the above factors. The Company will not acquire or merge with any company for which audited financial statements cannot be obtained.
It may be anticipated that any opportunity in which the Company participates will present certain risks. Many of these risks cannot be adequately identified prior to selection of the specific opportunity, and the Company's shareholders must, therefore, depend on the ability of management to identify and evaluate such risk. In the case of some of the opportunities available to the Company, it may be anticipated that the promoters thereof have been unable to develop a going concern or that such business is in its development stage in that it has not generated significant revenues from its principal business activities prior to the Company's anticipation. There is a risk, even after the Company's participation in the activity and the related expenditure of the Company's funds, that the combined enterprises will still be unable to become a going concern or advance beyond the development stage. Many of the opportunities may involve new and untested products, processes, or market strategies which may not succeed. Such risks will be assumed by the Company and, therefore, its shareholders.
The Company will not restrict its search for any specific kind of business, but may acquire a venture which is in its preliminary or development stage, which is already in operation, or in essentially any stage of its corporate life. It is currently impossible to predict the status of any business in which the Company may become engaged, in that such business may need additional capital, may merely desire to have its shares publicly traded, or may seek other perceived advantages which the Company may offer.
Acquisition of Opportunities
In implementing a structure for a particular business acquisition, the Company may become a party to a merger, consolidation, reorganization, joint venture, franchise or licensing agreement with another corporation or entity. It may also purchase stock or assets of an existing business. On the consummation of a transaction, it is possible that the present management and shareholders of the Company will not be in control of the Company. In addition, a majority or all of the Company's officers and directors may, as part of the terms of the acquisition transaction, resign and be replaced by new officers and directors without a vote of the Company's shareholders.
It is anticipated that any securities issued in any such reorganization would be issued in reliance on exemptions from registration under applicable Federal and state securities laws. In some circumstances, however, as a negotiated element of this transaction, the Company may agree to
register such securities either at the time the transaction is consummated, under certain conditions, or at specified time thereafter. The issuance of substantial additional securities and their potential sale into any trading market which may develop in the Company's Common Stock may have a depressive effect on such market. While the actual terms of a transaction to which the Company may be a party cannot be predicted, it may be expected that the parties to the business transaction will find it desirable to avoid the creation of a taxable event and thereby structure the acquisition in a so called "tax free" reorganization under Sections 368(a)(1) or 351 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). In order to obtain tax free treatment under the Code, it may be necessary for the owners of the acquired business to own 80% or more of the voting stock of the surviving entity. In such event, the shareholders of the Company, including investors in this offering, would retain less than 20% of the issued and outstanding shares of the surviving entity, which could result in significant dilution in the equity of such shareholders.
As part of the Company's investigation, officers and directors of the Company will meet personally with management and key personnel, may visit and inspect material facilities, obtain independent analysis or verification of certain information provided, check references of management and key personnel, and take other reasonable investigative measures, to the extent of the Company's limited financial resources and management expertise.
The manner in which each Company participates in an opportunity will depend on the nature of the opportunity, the respective needs and desires of the Company and other parties, the management of the opportunity, and the relative negotiating strength of the Company and such other management.
With respect to any mergers or acquisitions, negotiations with target company management will be expected to focus on the percentage of the Company which target company shareholders would acquire in exchange for their shareholdings in the target company. Depending upon, among other things, the target company's assets and liabilities, the Company's shareholders will in all likelihood hold a lesser percentage ownership interest in the Company following any merger or acquisition. The percentage ownership may be subject to significant reduction in the event the Company acquires a target company with substantial assets. Any merger or acquisition effected by the Company can be expected to have a significant dilutive effect on the percentage of shares held by the Company's then shareholders, including purchasers in this offering.
The Company will not have sufficient funds (unless it is able to raise funds in a private placement) to undertake any significant development, marketing and manufacturing of any products which may be acquired.
Accordingly, following the acquisition of any such product, the Company will, in all likelihood, be required to either seek debt or equity financing or obtain funding from third parties, in exchange for which the Company would probably be required to give up a substantial portion of its interest in any acquired product. There is no assurance that the Company will be able either to obtain additional financing or interest third parties in providing funding for the further development, marketing and manufacturing of any products acquired.
It is anticipated that the investigation of specific business opportunities and the negotiation, drafting and execution of relevant agreements, disclosure documents and other instruments will require substantial management time and attention and substantial costs for accountants, attorneys and others. If a decision is made not to participate in a specific business opportunity the costs therefore incurred in the related investigation would not be recoverable.
Furthermore, even if an agreement is reached for the participation in a specific business opportunity, the failure to consummate that transaction may result in a loss to the Company of the related costs incurred.
The focus of the Company’s efforts is to acquire an operating business. Despite no active operations at this time, management intends to continue in business and has no intention to liquidate the Company. Allied Energy Corp. does not contemplate limiting the scope of its search to any particular industry. Management has considered the risk of possible opportunities as well as their potential rewards. Management has invested time evaluating several proposals for possible acquisition or combination; however, none of these opportunities were pursued. Allied Energy Corp. presently owns no real property and at this time has no intention of acquiring any such property. Allied Energy Corp.’s significant expected expenses are comprised primarily of professional fees incident to its reporting requirements.
Employees
As of January 24, 2013, we had no full-time employees
Consultants
The Company currently has no agreements with management consultants.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
An investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully all of the risks described below and all of the other information set forth in this registration statement before deciding to invest in our securities. If any of the events or developments described below occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be negatively affected.
We are a development stage company, which recently filed Chapter 7 voluntary liquidation and thus have little operating history and no revenues, and you have no basis on which to evaluate our ability to achieve our business objective.
We are a development stage company with no operating results. Because we lack an operating history, you have no basis upon which to evaluate our ability to achieve our business objective, which is to acquire one or more operating businesses focused on exploration and development of semi-precious mineral properties. We have no plans, arrangements or understandings with any prospective target business concerning a business combination and may be unable to complete a
business combination. If we fail to complete a business combination, we will never generate any operating revenues.
Our stockholders may not be afforded an opportunity to vote on our proposed business combination, unless such vote is required by law, which means we may consummate a business combination even though a majority of our public stockholders do not support such a combination.
We may not hold a stockholder vote to approve our initial business combination unless the business combination would require stockholder approval under applicable state law or if we decide to hold a stockholder vote for business or other reasons. If we were structuring a business combination that required us to issue more than 20% of our outstanding shares, we may seek stockholder approval of such business combination. However, except for as required by law, the decision as to whether we will seek stockholder approval of a proposed business combination shall be made by us, solely in our discretion, and will be based on a variety of factors, such as the timing of the transaction and whether the terms of the transaction would otherwise require us to seek stockholder approval. Accordingly, we may consummate a business combination even if holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock do not approve of the business combination we consummate.
Because of our limited resources and the significant competition for business combination opportunities, it may be more difficult for us to complete a business combination.
We expect to encounter intense competition from other entities having a business objective similar to ours, including private investors (which may be individuals or investment partnerships), other blank check companies and other entities, domestic and international, competing for the types of businesses we intend to acquire, i.e. companies with an asset base consisting of semi-precious mineral properties. Many of these individuals and entities are well-established and have extensive experience in identifying and effecting, directly or indirectly, acquisitions of companies operating in the same industry. Many of these competitors possess greater technical, human and other resources, or more local industry knowledge than we do and our financial resources will be relatively limited when contrasted with those of many of these competitors. While we believe there are numerous target businesses we could potentially acquire, our ability to compete with respect to the acquisition of certain target businesses that are sizable will be limited by our available financial resources. This inherent competitive limitation gives others an advantage in pursuing the acquisition of certain target businesses. Any of these obligations may place us at a competitive disadvantage in successfully negotiating a business combination.
Subsequent to our consummation of a business combination, we may be required to subsequently take write-downs or write-offs, restructuring and impairment or other charges that could have a significant negative effect on our financial condition, results of operations and our stock price, which could cause you to lose some or all of your investment
Even if we conduct extensive due diligence on a target business with which we combine, we cannot assure you that this diligence will surface all material issues that may be present inside a particular target business and/or its mineral properties, that it would be possible to uncover all
material issues through a customary amount of due diligence, or that factors outside of the target business and outside of our control will not later arise. As a result of these factors, we may be forced to later write-down or write-off assets, restructure our operations, or incur impairment or other charges that could result in our reporting losses. Even if our due diligence successfully identifies certain risks, unexpected risks may arise and previously known risks may materialize in a manner not consistent with our preliminary risk analysis. Even though these charges may be non-cash items and not have an immediate impact on our liquidity, the fact that we report charges of this nature could contribute to negative market perceptions about us or our securities.
If we are deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, we may be required to institute burdensome compliance requirements and our activities may be restricted, which may make it difficult for us to complete a business combination.
If we are deemed to be an investment company under the Investment Company Act, our activities may be restricted, including:
• | | restrictions on the nature of our investments; and |
• | | restrictions on the issuance of securities, |
each of which may make it difficult for us to complete a business combination.
In addition, we may have imposed upon us burdensome requirements, including:
• | | registration as an investment company; |
• | | adoption of a specific form of corporate structure; and |
• | | reporting, record keeping, voting, proxy and disclosure requirements and other rules and regulations. |
We do not believe that our anticipated principal activities will subject us to the Investment Company Act. If we were deemed to be subject to the Investment Company Act, compliance with these additional regulatory burdens would require additional expenses for which we have not allotted funds and may hinder our ability to consummate a business combination.
Changes in laws or regulations, or a failure to comply with any laws and regulations, may adversely affect our business, investments and results of operations.
We are subject to laws and regulations enacted by national, regional and local governments. In particular, we will be required to comply with certain SEC and other legal requirements. Compliance with, and monitoring of, applicable laws and regulations may be difficult, time consuming and costly. Those laws and regulations and their interpretation and application may also change from time to time and those changes could have a material adverse effect on our business, investments and results of operations. In addition, a failure to comply with applicable laws or regulations, as interpreted and applied, could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Although we identified general criteria and guidelines that we believe are important in evaluating prospective target businesses, we may enter into a business combination with a target does not meet such criteria and guidelines, and as a result, the target business with which we enter into a business combination may not have attributes entirely consistent with our general criteria and guidelines.
Although we have identified specific criteria and guidelines for evaluating prospective target businesses, it is possible that a target business with which we enter into a business combination will not have all of these positive attributes. If we consummate a business combination with a target that does not meet some or all of these guidelines, such combination may not be as successful as a combination with a business that does meet all of our general criteria and guidelines.
We may issue additional common shares to complete a business combination, which would dilute the interest of our stockholders and likely present other risks.
Our articles of incorporation authorizes the issuance of up to 300,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share. As of the date of this Registration Statement, there are 2,715,458 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. We may issue a substantial number of additional shares of common stock to complete a business combination. The issuance of additional shares of common:
• | | may significantly dilute the equity interest of current shareholders; |
• | | could cause a change in control if a substantial number of shares of common stock is issued, which may affect, among other things, our ability to use our net operating loss carry forwards, if any, and could result in the resignation or removal of our present officers and directors; and |
• | | may adversely affect prevailing market prices for common stock. |
We are dependent upon our officer and director and his loss could adversely affect our ability to operate.
Our operations are dependent upon a single individual, our officer/director. We believe that our success depends on the continued service of our officer and director, at least until we have consummated a business combination. In addition, our officer and director is not required to commit any specified amount of time to our affairs and, accordingly, will have conflicts of interest in allocating management time among various business activities, including identifying potential business combinations and monitoring the related due diligence, and these conflicts of interest that may not be resolved in our favor. We do not have an employment agreement with, or key-man insurance on the life of our director/officer. The unexpected loss of the services of our director or officer could have a detrimental effect on us.
We may have a limited ability to assess the management of a prospective target business and, as a result, may effect our business combination with a target business whose management may not have the skills, qualifications or abilities to manage a public company.
When evaluating the desirability of effecting a business combination with a prospective target business, our ability to assess the target business’ management may be limited due to a lack of time, resources or information. Our assessment of the capabilities of the target’s management, therefore, may prove to be incorrect and such management may lack the skills, qualifications or abilities we expected. Should the target’s management not possess the skills, qualifications or abilities necessary to manage a public company, the operations and profitability of the post-combination business may be negatively impacted.
The officers and directors of an acquisition candidate may resign upon consummation of a business combination. The loss of an acquisition target’s key personnel could negatively impact the operations and profitability of our post-combination business.
The role of an acquisition candidate’s key personnel upon the consummation of our initial business combination cannot be ascertained at this time. Although we contemplate that certain members of an acquisition candidate’s management team will remain associated with us following our initial business combination, it is possible that members of the management of an acquisition candidate will not wish to remain in place. The loss of an acquisition target’s key personnel could negatively impact the operations and profitability of our post-combination business.
Our officer and director will allocatehis time to other businesses thereby causing conflicts of interest in his determination as to how much time to devote to our affairs. This conflict of interest could have a negative impact on our ability to consummate a business combination.
Our executive officer and director is not required to commit his full time to our affairs, which may result in a conflict of interest in allocating his time between our operations and the search for a business combination on the one hand and their other businesses on the other hand. We do not intend to have any full-time employees prior to the consummation of our business combination. Our executive officer is engaged in several other business endeavors for which he is entitled to substantial compensation and is not obligated to contribute any specific number of hours per week to our affairs.
We may issue notes or other debt securities, or otherwise incur substantial debt, to complete a business combination, which may adversely affect our leverage and financial condition and thus negatively impact the value of our stockholders’ investment in us.
Although we have no commitments as of the date of this Registration Statement to issue any notes or other debt securities, or to otherwise incur outstanding debt, we may choose to incur substantial debt, contemporaneous with, in connection with and in order to complete, our initial business combination. The incurrence of debt could have a variety of negative effects, including:
• | | default and foreclosure on our assets if our operating revenues after a business combination are insufficient to repay our debt obligations; |
• | | acceleration of our obligations to repay the indebtedness even if we make all principal and interest payments when due if we breach certain covenants that require the maintenance of certain financial ratios or reserves without a waiver or renegotiation of that covenant; |
• | | our immediate payment of all principal and accrued interest, if any, if the debt security is payable on demand; |
• | | our inability to obtain necessary additional financing if the debt security contains covenants restricting our ability to obtain such financing while the debt security is outstanding; |
• | | our inability to pay dividends on our common stock; |
• | | using a substantial portion of our cash flow to pay principal and interest on our debt, which will reduce the funds available for dividends on our common stock if declared, expenses, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes; |
• | | limitations on our flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes in our business and in the industry in which we operate; |
• | | increased vulnerability to adverse changes in general economic, industry and competitive conditions and adverse changes in government regulation; and |
• | | limitations on our ability to borrow additional amounts for expenses, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service requirements, execution of our strategy and other purposes and other disadvantages compared to our competitors who have less debt. |
We do not have a maximum debt leverage ratio or a policy with respect to how much debt we may incur. To the extent that the amount of our debt increases, the impact of the negative effects listed above may also increase.
We may only be able to complete one business combination, which will cause us to be solely dependent on a single business which may have a limited number of mineral properties. This lack of diversification may negatively impact our operations and profitability.
We may effectuate an initial business combination with a single target business or multiple target businesses simultaneously. However, we may not be able to effectuate a business combination with more than one target business because of various factors, including the existence of complex accounting issues and the requirement that we prepare and file pro forma financial statements with the SEC that present operating results and the financial condition of several target businesses as if they had been operated on a combined basis. By consummating an initial business combination with only a single entity, our lack of diversification may subject us to numerous economic, competitive and regulatory developments. Further, we would not be able to diversify our operations or benefit from the possible spreading of risks or offsetting of losses, unlike other entities which may have the resources to complete several business combinations in
different industries or different areas of a single industry. Accordingly, the prospects for our success may be:
• | | solely dependent upon the performance of a single business, property or asset, or |
• | | dependent upon the development or market acceptance of a single or limited number of properties. |
This lack of diversification may subject us to numerous economic, competitive and regulatory developments, any or all of which may have a substantial adverse impact upon the particular industry in which we may operate subsequent to an initial business combination.
We may attempt to consummate a business combination with a private company about which little information is available, which may result in a business combination with a company that is not as profitable as we expected, if at all.
In pursuing our acquisition strategy, we may seek to effectuate a business combination with a privately held company. By definition, very little public information exists about private companies, and we could be required to make our decision on whether to pursue a potential initial business combination on the basis of limited information, which may result in a business combination with a company that is not as profitable as we expected, if at all. Furthermore, the relative lack of information about a private company may hinder our ability to properly assess the value of such a company in relation to public company comparables, in which case we may pay too much to acquire a private company in our initial business combination.
A market for our securities may not develop, which would adversely affect the liquidity and price of our securities.
Although we will apply to have our securities listed on OTC Market QB, as of the date of this Registration Statement, there is no market for our securities. Prospective stockholders therefore have no access to information about prior trading history on which to base their investment decision. The price of our securities may vary significantly due to one or more potential business combinations and general market and economic conditions. Once listed on OTC Markets QB, an active trading market for our securities may never develop or, if developed, it may not be sustained. In addition, the price of our securities after the offering can vary due to general economic conditions and forecasts, our general business condition and the release of our financial reports. You may be unable to sell your securities unless a market for such securities can be established or sustained.
The requirements of being a public company may strain our resources and divert management’s attention
As a public company, we will be subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (which we refer to herein as the Exchange Act), the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, the listing requirements of Nasdaq and other
applicable securities rules and regulations. Compliance with these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs, make some activities more difficult, time-consuming or costly and increase demand on our systems and resources, particularly after we are no longer an “emerging growth company.” The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. In order to maintain and, if required, improve our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting to meet this standard, significant resources and management oversight may be required. As a result, management’s attention may be diverted from other business concerns, which could adversely affect our business and operating results. We may need to hire more employees in the future or engage outside consultants to comply with these requirements, which will increase our costs and expenses.
In addition, changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure are creating uncertainty for public companies, increasing legal and financial compliance costs and making some activities more time consuming. These laws, regulations and standards are subject to varying interpretations, in many cases due to their lack of specificity, and, as a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies. This could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. We intend to invest resources to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards, and this investment may result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management’s time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. If our efforts to comply with new laws, regulations and standards differ from the activities intended by regulatory or governing bodies due to ambiguities related to their application and practice, regulatory authorities may initiate legal proceedings against us and our business may be adversely affected.
However, for as long as we remain an “emerging growth company” as defined in the JOBS Act, we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We may take advantage of these reporting exemptions until we are no longer an “emerging growth company.”
We may remain an “emerging growth company” for up to five years. If our non-convertible debt issued within a three year period or revenues exceeds $1 billion, or the market value of our ordinary shares that are held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million on the last day of the second fiscal quarter of any given fiscal year, we would cease to be an emerging growth company as of the following fiscal year.
We are an “emerging growth company” and we cannot be certain if the reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our ordinary shares less attractive to investors.
We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the JOBS Act, and we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not “emerging growth companies” including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and shareholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. Additionally, as an emerging growth company, we have elected to delay the adoption of new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until those standards apply to private companies. As such, our financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company effective dates. We cannot predict if investors will find our ordinary shares less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our ordinary shares less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our ordinary shares and our share price may be more volatile.
Compliance obligations under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 may make it more difficult for us to effectuate a business combination, require substantial financial and management resources, and increase the time and costs of completing an acquisition.
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, requires that we evaluate and report on our system of internal controls and requires that we have such system of internal controls audited beginning with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2013. The fact that we are a blank check company makes compliance with the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act particularly burdensome on us as compared to all public companies because a target company with which we seek to complete a business combination may not be in compliance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding adequacy of its internal controls. The development of the internal controls of any such entity to achieve compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act may increase the time and costs necessary to complete any such acquisition. Which the markets for our products or services develop. If the market for our products or services decreases, remains constant or grows more slowly than we anticipate, there could be a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming Allied Energy Corp. will continue as a going concern. Allied Energy Corp.’s recurring losses from operations, stockholders' deficiency and working capital deficiency, and lack of revenue generating operations, raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Management believes Allied Energy Corp. will continue to incur losses and negative cash flows from operating activities for the foreseeable future and will need additional equity or debt financing to sustain its operations until it can achieve profitability and positive cash flows, if ever. Management plans to seek additional debt and/or equity financing for Allied Energy Corp., but cannot assure that such financing will be available on acceptable terms.
The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. There can be no assurance that management will be successful in implementing its business plan or that the successful implementation of such business plan will actually improve the Company’s operating results.
Going Concern Consideration
The Company’s financial statements have been prepared on a “going concern” basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. From inception to September 30, 2012, the Company incurred losses of $22,429,483. These factors create substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company plans to improve its financial condition by reorganizing and acquiring a new business. However, there is no assurance that the Company will be successful in accomplishing this objective. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
Certain statements contained in this prospectus, including statements regarding the anticipated development and expansion of our business, our intent, belief or current expectations, primarily with respect to the future operating performance of Allied Energy Corp. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made. We undertake no obligation to update such statements to reflect events that occur or circumstances that exist after the date on which they are made.
ITEM 2. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following information should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in our financial statements and notes thereto and the related "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations". We also urge you to review and consider our disclosures describing various risks that may affect our business, which are set forth under the heading "Risk Factors".
The Company intends to serve as a vehicle to effect an asset acquisition, merger, or exchange of capital stock or other business combination with a domestic or foreign business. The Company is still devoting substantially all of its efforts on locating a business and it has not initiated principal operations.
Revenues
The Company reported revenues for the year ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 of $1,175,000 and $650,000.
Operating Expenses
Total operating expenses for the year ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 were $1,175,000 and $650,000. A majority of our operating expenses in the year ended September 30, 2011 have been for consulting services. Such consulting services totaled $750,000 for the year ended September 30, 2011.
Going Concern
As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $22,429,483 at September 30, 2012. While the Company is attempting to commence operations and generate revenues, the Company’s cash position may not be significant enough to support the Company’s daily operations. Management intends to raise additional funds by way of public or private offering. Management believes that the actions presently being taken to further implement its business plan and generate revenues provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to generate revenues and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate revenues.
The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company is currently illiquid. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company’s ability to raise additional capital, as well as successful implementation of its business plan. In the last fiscal year, the Company has been funded by its board members. Whether we will be successful in obtaining additional capital, or obtaining such capital on commercially reasonable terms, and whether we can begin to generate and then significantly increase revenues, is uncertain.
As of September 30, 2012, total current assets were $0.
As of September 30, 2011, total current liabilities were $2,895.
Critical Accounting Policies
Revenue Recognition
In general, the Company records revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been rendered or product delivery has occurred, the sales price to the customer is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. The following policies reflect specific criteria for the various revenues streams of the Company:
Revenue will be recognized at the time a product is shipped. Provision for sales returns will be estimated based on the Company's historical return experience. Revenue is presented net of returns.
Financial Instruments
Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of September 30, 2012. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values. These financial instruments include cash and accounts payable and accrued expenses. Fair values were assumed to approximate carrying values for these financial instruments because they are short term in nature and their carrying amounts approximate fair values.
Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share
Basic net (loss) income per common share is calculated using the weighted average common shares outstanding during each reporting period. Diluted net (loss) income per common share adjusts the weighted average common shares for the potential dilution that could occur if common stock equivalents (convertible debt and preferred stock, warrants, stock options and restricted stock shares and units) were exercised or converted into common stock. There were no common stock equivalents at September 30, 2012.
Income Taxes
Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences related to temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for tax purposes at each year end, based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. A valuation allowance is recognized when, based on the weight of all available evidence, it is considered more likely than not that all, or some portion, of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Income tax expense is the sum of current income tax plus the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities.
ASC 740, Income Taxes, requires a company to first determine whether it is more likely than not (which is defined as a likelihood of more than fifty percent) that a tax position will be sustained based on its technical merits as of the reporting date, assuming that taxing authorities will examine the position and have full knowledge of all relevant information. A tax position that meets this more likely than not threshold is then measured and recognized at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely to be realized upon effective settlement with a taxing authority.
Stock-Based Compensation
The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to employees in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation. ASC 718 requires all share-based compensation payments to be recognized in the financial statements based on the fair value using an option pricing
model. ASC 718 requires forfeitures to be estimated at the time of grant and revised in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from initial estimates.
Equity instruments granted to non-employees are accounted for in accordance with ASC 505, Equity. The final measurement date for the fair value of equity instruments with performance criteria is the date that each performance commitment for such equity instrument is satisfied or there is a significant disincentive for non-performance.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
There were no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2009, Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") became the source of authoritative GAAP recognized by the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") for nongovernmental entities, except for certain FASB Statements not yet incorporated into ASC. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for registrants.
Emerging Growth Company
We are an emerging growth company as defined in the JOBS Act. As an emerging growth company, we have elected, pursuant to Section 107(b) of the JOBS Act, to take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Securities Act Section 7(a)(2)(B) for complying with new or revised accounting standards. We will therefore delay the adoption of new or revised accounting standards that have different effective dates for public and private companies until those standards apply to private companies. We may take advantage of this extended transition period provided in Securities Act Section 7(a)(2)(B) until the first to occur of the date we (i) are no longer an “emerging growth company” or (ii) affirmatively and irrevocably opt out of the extended transition period provided in Securities Act Section 7(a)(2)(B). As such, our financial statements may not be comparable to companies that comply with public company effective dates.
Upon the issuance of a new or revised accounting standard that applies to our financial statements and has a different effective date for public and private companies, we will disclose the date on which adoption is required for non-emerging growth companies and the date on which we will adopt the recently-issued accounting standard.
ITEM 3. PROPERTIES
The Company owns no real property.
ITEM 4. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our common stock beneficially owned on January 24, 2013, for (i) each stockholder known to be the beneficial owner of 5% or more of our outstanding common stock, (ii) each executive officer and director, and (iii) all executive officers and directors as a group.
| Number of Shares Beneficially Owned | | Percentage of Class(2) |
Name and Address(1) | Class |
Joseph Arcaro | 2,000,000 | Common | 74% |
President, Chief Financial Officer and Director | | | |
| | | |
All directors and executives officers (1 person) | 2,000,000 | Common | 74% |
1) Unless noted otherwise, the address for all persons listed is c/o the Company at 3800 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 500, Las Vegas, NV 89169.
2) The above percentages are based on 2,715,458 shares of common stock outstanding as January 24, 2013.
ITEM 5. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
The following table sets forth the names, ages, and positions of our executive officers and directors. Executive officers are elected annually by our Board of Directors. Each executive officer holds his office until he resigns, is removed by the Board, or his successor is elected and qualified. Directors are elected annually by our stockholders at the annual meeting. Each director holds his office until his successor is elected and qualified or his earlier resignation or removal.
Name | Age | Position |
Joseph Arcaro | 48 | President, Chief Financial Officer and Director |
Biography
Mr. Arcaro attended Ohio State University to 2003 and was a stock broker with a series 7, 63 and 65 licenses-From 2004 to present Mr. Arcaro has been self employed as a business and investment consulting to multiple publicly held companies.
Stock Option Plan
We do not maintain any equity incentive or stock option plan. Accordingly, we did not grant options to purchase any equity interests to any employees or officers, and no stock options are issued or outstanding to any officers. We do, however, anticipate adopting a non-qualified stock option plan where we will be granting our officers options to purchase shares of common stock at some point in the future.
Internal Controls and Procedures
We are not currently required to maintain an effective system of internal controls as defined by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We will be required to comply with the internal control requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2013. As of the date of this Registration Statement, we have not completed an assessment, nor have our auditors tested our systems, of internal controls. We expect to assess the internal controls of our target business or businesses prior to the consummation of a business combination and, if necessary, to implement and test additional controls as we may determine are necessary in order to state that we maintain an effective system of internal controls. A target business may not be in compliance with the provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act regarding the adequacy of internal controls. Many small and mid-sized target businesses we may consider for a business combination may have internal controls that need improvement in areas such as:
• | | staffing for financial, accounting and external reporting areas, including segregation of duties; |
• | | reconciliation of accounts; |
• | | proper recording of expenses and liabilities in the period to which they relate; |
• | | evidence of internal review and approval of accounting transactions; |
• | | documentation of processes, assumptions and conclusions underlying significant estimates; and |
• | | documentation of accounting policies and procedures. |
Because it will take time, management involvement and perhaps outside resources to determine what internal control improvements are necessary for us to meet regulatory requirements and market expectations for our operation of a target business, we may incur significant expense in meeting our public reporting responsibilities, particularly in the areas of designing, enhancing, or remediating internal and disclosure controls. Doing so effectively may also take longer than we expect, thus increasing our exposure to financial fraud or erroneous financing reporting.
Once our management’s report on internal controls is complete, we will retain our independent auditors to audit and render an opinion on such report when required by Section 404. The
independent auditors may identify additional issues concerning a target business’s internal controls while performing their audit of internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 6. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
We have not paid any compensation to our officers or directors during th most recent fiscal years, and currently have no plans to do so until after we combine with an operating business.
ITEM 7. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships between any of our directors or executive officers and any other directors or executive officers.
Code of Ethics
We currently do not have a code of ethics that applies to our officers, employees and directors, including our Chief Executive Officer and senior executives, however, we intend to adopt one in the near future.
Conflicts of Interest
Certain potential conflicts of interest are inherent in the relationships between our officers and directors, and us.
From time to time, one or more of our affiliates may form or hold an ownership interest in and/or manage other businesses both related and unrelated to the type of business that we own and operate. These persons expect to continue to form, hold an ownership interest in and/or manage additional other businesses which may compete with ours with respect to operations, including financing and marketing, management time and services and potential customers. These activities may give rise to conflicts between or among the interests of us and other businesses with which our affiliates are associated. Our affiliates are in no way prohibited from undertaking such activities, and neither we nor our shareholders will have any right to require participation in such other activities.
Further, because we intend to transact business with some of our officers, directors and affiliates, as well as with firms in which some of our officers, directors or affiliates have a material interest, potential conflicts may arise between the respective interests of us and these related persons or entities. We believe that such transactions will be effected on terms at least as favorable to us as those available from unrelated third parties.
With respect to transactions involving real or apparent conflicts of interest, we have adopted policies and procedures which require that: (i) the fact of the relationship or interest giving rise to the potential conflict be disclosed or known to the directors who authorize or approve the
transaction prior to such authorization or approval, (ii) the transaction be approved by a majority of our disinterested outside directors, and (iii) the transaction be fair and reasonable to us at the time it is authorized or approved by our directors.
ITEM 8. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
None.
ITEM 9. MARKET PRICE AND DIVIDENDS ON THE REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Market Information
We have the following class of equity securities outstanding: (i) common stock, par value $.001 per share, 2,715,458 shares of which were outstanding as of January 24, 2013 and (ii) preferred stock, par value $.001 per share, 5,000,000 shares of which none were outstanding as of January 24, 2013.
Our common stock is not currently quoted on any public market.
As of January 24, 2013, there were approximately 1,066 shareholders of record of our common stock. This does not reflect the number of persons or entities who held stock in nominee or "street" name through various brokerage firms.
Holders of common stock are entitled to share in all dividends that the board of directors, in its discretion, declares from legally available funds. In the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up, each outstanding share entitles its holder to participate pro rata in all assets that remain after payment of liabilities and after providing for each class of stock, if any, having preference over the common stock. Holders of our common stock have no pre-emptive rights, no conversion rights and there are no redemption provisions applicable to our common stock.
Dividends
Our board of directors has not declared a dividend on our common stock during the last two fiscal years nor do we anticipate paying any in the foreseeable future. Furthermore, we expect to retain future earnings, if any, to finance our operations and expansion. The payment of cash dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon our earnings levels, capital requirements, any restrictive loan covenants and other factors the Board considers relevant.
Equity Compensation Plans
We do not have any equity compensation plans.
ITEM 10. RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 11. DESCRIPTION OF REGISTRANT’S SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED
Authorized Capital Stock
The authorized capital stock of the Company consists of 300,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $.001 per share, (the "Common Stock"),of which there are 2,715,458 issued and outstanding, and 5,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, (the “Preferred Stock”) par value $.001 per share, of which none have been designated or issued. The following summarized the important provisions of the Company’s capital stock.
Common Stock
Holders of shares of common stock are entitled to one vote for each share on all matters to be voted on by the stockholders. Holders of common stock do not have cumulative voting rights. Holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in dividends, if any, as may be declared from time to time by the Board of Directors in its discretion from funds legally available. In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the company, the holders of common stock are entitled to share pro rata all assets remaining after payment in full of all liabilities. All of the outstanding shares of common stock are fully paid and non-assessable.
Holders of common stock have no preemptive rights to purchase the Company’s common stock. There are no conversion or redemption rights or sinking fund provisions with respect to the common stock.
Preferred Stock
The Board of Directors is authorized to provide for the issuance of shares of preferred stock in series and, by filing a certificate pursuant to the applicable law of Nevada, to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in each such series, and to fix the designation, powers, preferences and rights of the shares of each such series and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof without any further vote or action by the shareholders. Any shares of preferred stock so issued would have priority over the common stock with respect to dividend or liquidation rights. Any future issuance of preferred stock may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of our Company without further action by the shareholders and may adversely affect the voting and other rights of the holders of common stock. At present, we have no plans to neither issue any preferred stock nor adopt any series, preferences or other classification of preferred stock.
The issuance of shares of preferred stock, or the issuance of rights to purchase such shares, could be used to discourage an unsolicited acquisition proposal. For instance, the issuance of a series of preferred stock might impede a business combination by including class voting rights that would enable the holder to block such a transaction, or facilitate a business combination by including
voting rights that would provide a required percentage vote of the stockholders. In addition, under certain circumstances, the issuance of preferred stock could adversely affect the voting power of the holders of the common stock. Although the Board of Directors is required to make any determination to issue such stock based on its judgment as to the best interests of our stockholders, the Board of Directors could act in a manner that would discourage an acquisition attempt or other transaction that some, or a majority, of the stockholders might believe to be in their best interests or in which stockholders might receive a premium for their stock over the then market price of such stock. The Board of Directors does not at present intend to seek stockholder approval prior to any issuance of currently authorized stock, unless otherwise required by law or stock exchange rules. We have no present plans to issue any preferred stock.
Dividends
We have not paid any dividends on our common stock and do not presently intend to pay cash dividends prior to the consummation of a business combination. The payment of cash dividends in the future, if any, will be contingent upon our revenues and earnings, if any, capital requirements and general financial condition subsequent to consummation of a business combination, if any. The payment of any dividends subsequent to a business combination, if any, will be within the discretion of our then existing board of directors. It is the present intention of our board of directors to retain all earnings, if any, for use in our business operations and, accordingly, the board of directors does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Trading of Securities in Secondary Market
The Company presently has 2,715,458 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, all of which are “restricted securities,” as that term is defined under Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act, in that such shares were issued in private transactions not involving a public offering.
Following a business combination, a target company will normally wish to list its common stock for trading in one or more United States markets. The target company may elect to apply for such listing immediately following the business combination or at some later time.
In order to qualify for listing on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, a company must have at least (i) net tangible assets of $4,000,000 or market capitalization of $50,000,000 or net income for two of the last three years of $750,000; (ii) public float of 1,000,000 shares with a market value of $5,000,000; (iii) a bid price of $4.00; (iv) three market makers; (v) 300 shareholders and (vi) an operating history of one year or, if less than one year, $50,000,000 in market capitalization. For continued listing on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, a company must have at least (i) net tangible assets of $2,000,000 or market capitalization of $35,000,000 or net income for two of the last three years of $500,000; (ii) a public float of 500,000 shares with a market value of $1,000,000; (iii) a bid price of $1.00; (iv) two market makers; and (v) 300 shareholders.
If, after a business combination, we do not meet the qualifications for listing on the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, we may apply for quotation of our securities on OTC Bulletin Board. In
certain cases we may elect to have our securities initially quoted in the “pink sheets” published by the Pink Sheets, LLC. On April 7, 2000, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued a clarification with regard to the reporting status under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 of a non-reporting company after it acquired a reporting “blank check” company. This letter clarified the Commission’s position that such Company would not be a successor issuer to the reporting obligation of the “blank check” company by virtue of Exchange Act Rule 12g-3(a), because the definition of "succession," according to the SEC, requires "the direct acquisition of the assets comprising a going business," and that a ""blank check" company did not seem to satisfy these criteria."
Therefore, as a result of the letter, the Company intends that any merger it undertakes would not be deemed a "back door" registration since it would remain the reporting company and the Company that it merges with would not become a successor issuer to its reporting obligations by virtue of Commission Rule 12g-3(a). A "back door" registration is used to describe the way a formerly non-reporting company first presents disclosure in a Commission filing about itself after completion of a Rule 12g-3(a) transaction, or after it acquired a reporting “blank check" company, such as the Company. Because the information is filed under cover of Form 8-K rather than Form 10, it has been referred to in this way.
Rules 504, 505 and 506 of Regulation D
The Commission is of the opinion that Rule 504 of Regulation D regarding exemption for limited offerings and sales of securities not exceeding $1,000,000 is not available to blank check companies. However, Rules 505 and 506 of Regulation D are available.
We have considered the possible need and intend to issue shares prior to any business combination relying on the exemption provided under Regulation D of The Securities Act of 1933 as the need arises to complete a business combination, to retain a consultant, finder or other professional to locate and investigate a potential target company or for any other requirement we deem necessary and in the interest of our shareholders. We do not intend to conduct a registered offering of our securities at this time. We have taken no action in furtherance of any offering of any securities at this time as our only activities since inception have been limited to organizational efforts, obtaining initial financing, and preparing a registration statement on Form 10 to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
ITEM 12. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS
Under our Bylaws, we may indemnify an officer or director who is made a party to any proceeding, including a lawsuit, because of his position, if he acted in good faith and in a manner he reasonably believed to be in our best interest. We may advance expenses incurred in defending a proceeding. To the extent that the officer or director is successful on the merits in a proceeding as to which he is to be indemnified, we must indemnify him against all expenses incurred, including attorney's fees. With respect to a derivative action, indemnity may be made only for expenses actually and reasonably incurred in defending the proceeding, and if the officer or director is judged liable, only by a court order. The indemnification is intended to be to the fullest extent permitted by the laws of the State of Nevada. Regarding indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, which may be permitted to directors or officers under Nevada law, we are informed that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, indemnification is against public policy, as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.
ITEM 13. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF INACTIVE REGISTRANT
The company meets the exception of the requirement to provide audited financial statements under Rule 210.3-11. Accordingly, the accompanying 2012 and 2011 financial statements have not been audited by an independent registered public accounting firm. A summary of the Rule is as follows:
| § | Gross Receipts from all sources for the fiscal year were not in excess of $100,000; |
| § | Allied Energy Corp. has not purchased or sold any of its own stock, granted options therefore, or levied assessments upon outstanding stock; |
| § | Expenditures for all purposes for the fiscal year were not in excess of $100,000; |
| § | No material change in the business has occurred during the fiscal year, including any bankruptcy, reorganization, readjustment or succession or any material acquisition or disposition of plants, mines, mining equipment, mine rights or leases; and |
| § | No exchange upon which the shares are listed, or governmental authority having jurisdiction, requires the furnishing to it or the publication of audited financial statements. |
ITEM 14. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 15. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND EXHIBITS
a) Documents filed as part of this Report
1. Financial Statements
2. Financial Statement Schedules
3. Exhibits
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
| Allied Energy Corp. | |
| | | |
Date: January 28, 2013 | By: | /s/ Joseph Arcaro | |
| | Joseph Arcaro | |
| | President, Principal Executive Officer | |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
| Allied Energy Corp. | |
| | | |
Date: January 28, 2013 | By: | /s/ Joseph Arcaro | |
| | Joseph Arcaro | |
| | Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer | |
ALLIED ENERGY CORP.
Financial Statements
September 30, 2012
ALLIED ENERGY CORP. |
BALANCE SHEETS |
(Unaudited) |
| | | |
| | | |
Assets: | September 30, | | December 31, |
Current Assets | 2012 | | 2011 |
Cash | $- | | $- |
Total Current Assets | - | | - |
| | | |
Total Assets | $- | | $- |
Liabilities: | | | |
Current Liabilities: | | | |
Note Payable-Convertible | 2,895 | | 2,895 |
Accounts Payable & Accrued Expenses | - | | - |
Accrued Officer Compensation | - | | - |
Total Current Liabilities | 2,895 | | 2,895 |
| | | |
Total Liabilities | 2,895 | | 2,895 |
| | | |
| | | |
Common Stock par value $0.001 authorized 300,000,000 | | | |
shares, Issued 2,715,458 and 1,715,428 shares | 2,715 | | 1,715 |
Preferred Stock par value $0.001 authorized 5,000,000 | | | |
shares, Issued and outstanding shares, 0, respectively | - | | - |
Additional Paid in Capital | 800,768 | | 799,768 |
Accumulated Deficit | (806,378) | | (804,378) |
Total Stockholders' Deficit | (2,895) | | (2,895) |
| | | |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit | $- | | $- |
| | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | | |
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS |
(Unaudited) |
| | | | |
| | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| | 2012 | | 2011 |
Revenues | | $ - | | $ - |
Costs of Services | | - | | - |
| | | | |
Gross Margin | | - | | - |
| | | | |
Operating Expenses: | | | | |
Stock for Services | | 2,000 | | - |
Officer Compensation | | - | | - |
General and Administrative | | - | | - |
Operating Expenses | | 2,000 | | - |
| | | | |
Operating (Loss) | | (2,000) | | - |
| | | | |
Other Income (Expense): | | | | |
Sale of Licenses | | - | | - |
Sale of Patent | | - | | - |
Impairment | | - | | - |
Loss on Disposal of Assets | | - | | - |
Loss on Discontinued Operations | | - | | - |
Other Income | | - | | - |
Interest Expense | | - | | - |
| | - | | - |
| | | | |
Net Income (Loss) Before Taxes | | (2,000) | | - |
| | | | |
Income Tax | | - | | - |
| | | | |
Net Income (Loss) | | $(2,000) | | - |
| | | | |
Gain (Loss) per Share, Basic & Diluted | | $(0.00) | | - |
| | | | |
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding | | 2,215,443 | | 1,599,034 |
| | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
|
|
ALLIED ENERGY CORP. STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDER EQUITY (Unaudited) |
| | | Preferred | Preferred | Additional | | |
| Common | Common | Shares | Stock | Paid in | Accumulated | |
| Shares | Stock | Series A | Series A | Capital | Deficit | Total |
Balance January 1, 2011 | 1,482,640 | 1,483 | - | - | $529 | (4,907) | $(2,895) |
Common shares for services | 1,000,000 | 1,000 | - | - | 799,000 | - | 800,000 |
Shares cancelled | (767,212) | (768) | - | - | 768 | - | - |
Net income for the year | - | - | - | - | | (800,000) | (800,000) |
Balance December 31, 2011 | 1,715,428 | $1,715 | - | - | $800,297 | $(804,907) | $(2,895) |
Common Shares for services | 1,000,030 | 1,000 | - | - | 1,000 | - | 2,000 |
Net loss for the period | - | - | - | - | - | (2,000) | (2,000) |
Balance September 30, 2012 | 2,715,458 | $2,715 | - | - | $801,297 | $(806,907) | (2,895) |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
ALLIED ENERGY CORP. |
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
(Unaudited) |
| | | |
| For the Year Nine Months Ended September 30, |
| 2012 | | 2011 |
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | | |
Net Income (Loss) for the Period | $ (2,000) | | $ - |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash | | | |
used by operating activities: | | | |
Shares Issued for Services | 2,000 | | - |
| - | | - |
Finance Charge | - | | - |
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities: | | | |
Decrease in Accounts Receivable | - | | - |
Increase(Decrease) in Accounts Payable & Accrued Expenses | - | | - |
Increase (Decrease) in Accrued Officer Compensation | - | | - |
Increase in Interest Payable | - | | - |
Net Cash (Used) in Operating Activities | - | | - |
| | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | |
Proceeds from Issuance of Stock | - | | - |
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities | - | | - |
| | | |
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash | - | | - |
Cash at Beginning of Period | - | | - |
Cash at End of Period | $- | | $- |
| | | |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | | |
Cash paid during the year for: | | | |
Interest | - | | - |
Franchise and Income Taxes | - | | - |
| | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
ALLIED ENERGY CORP.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2012
NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS
ALLIED ENERGY CORP was incorporated in the State of Nevada on May 5, 1994 as Sterling Harvest, Ltd. On January 11, 2006 the Company changed its name to its current name. In July 2011 the District Court in the State of Nevada appointed the controlling shareholder to serve as the custodian of the Corporation pursuant to NRS 78.347. The Company is presently seeking a merger candidate.
NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of presentation
The Company’s financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The preparationoffinancial statementsinconformitywithaccounting principlesgenerallyacceptedintheUnited StatesofAmericarequiresmanagementtomakeestimatesandassumptionsthataffectthereportedamountsof assetsandliabilitiesanddisclosureofcontingentassetsandliabilitiesatthe date ofthefinancialstatementsandthe reportedamountsofrevenuesandexpensesduringthereportingperiod.Actualresultscoulddifferfrom those estimates.
Managementfurtheracknowledgesthatitissolely responsibleforadoptingsoundaccounting practices,establishing andmaintainingasystem ofinternal accountingcontrolandpreventingand detectingfraud.TheCompany'ssystem ofinternalaccountingcontrolisdesignedtoassure,among otheritems,that1) recordedtransactionsare valid;2) validtransactionsarerecorded;and3)transactionsarerecordedintheproperperiodinatimelymannertoproduce financialstatementswhichpresentfairlythefinancial condition,resultsofoperationsandcashflows ofthe Company fortherespectiveperiodsbeingpresented
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period.
The Company’s significant estimates includeincome taxes provision and valuation allowance of deferred tax assets;the fair value of financial instruments; the carrying valueand recoverability of long-lived assets, including the values assigned to and estimated useful lives of computer equipment;and the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern.Those significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to those estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.
Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Management regularly reviews its estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such reviews, and if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Fair value of financial instruments measured on a recurring basis
The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:
| | |
Level 1 | | Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. | |
| | | |
Level 2 | | Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. | |
| | | |
Level 3 | | Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data. | |
Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.
The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.
The carrying amount of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, prepaid expenses and accrued expenses approximate their fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments.The Company’s line of credit andnotes payableapproximate the fair value of such instruments based upon management’s best estimate of interest rates that would be available to the Company for similar financial arrangements at December 31, 2011 and 2010.
Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.
It is not however, practical to determine the fair value of advances from stockholders due to their related party nature.
Carrying value, recoverability and impairment of long-lived assets
The Company has adopted paragraph 360-10-35-17 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. The Company’s long-lived assets, which include computer equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives.
The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.
The impairment charges, if any, is included in operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Cash equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
Related parties
The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.
Pursuant to Section 850-10-20the Related parties include a. affiliates of the Company; b. Entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d .principal owners of the Company; e. management of the Company; f. other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. Other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.
The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of
business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a. the nature of the relationship(s) involved description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and mounts due from or torelated partiesas of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.
Commitments and contingencies
The Company follows subtopic 450-20 ofthe FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.
If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.
Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.
Revenue recognition
The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company will recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.
Income Tax Provisions
The Company follows Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the fiscal year in which the differences are expected to
reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the fiscal years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income in the period that includes the enactment date.
The Company adoptedsection 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”) with regards to uncertainty income taxes.Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. UnderSection 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.
Net income (loss) per common share
Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during the period. Theweighted average number of common shares outstandingand potentially outstanding common sharesassumes that the Company incorporated as of the beginning of the first period presented.
There were no potentially dilutive shares outstanding for the period ended September 30, 2012 or December 31, 2011.
Cash flows reporting
The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.
Subsequent events
The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.
Recently issued accounting pronouncements
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05
In June 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05 “Comprehensive Income” (“ASU 2011-05”), whichwas the result of a joint project with the IASB and amends the guidance in ASC 220,Comprehensive Income,by eliminating the option to present components of other comprehensive income (OCI) in the statement of stockholders’ equity. Instead, the new guidance now gives entities the option to present all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity either as a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or as two separate but consecutive statements. Regardless of whether an entity chooses to present comprehensive income in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements, the amendments require entities to present all reclassification adjustments from OCI to net income on the face of the statement of comprehensive income.
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-08
In September 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-08 “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other:Testing Goodwill for Impairment” (“ASU 2011-08”).This Update is to simplify how public and nonpublic entities test goodwill for impairment. The amendments permit an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in Topic 350. Under the amendments in this Update, an entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount.
The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011.Early adoption is permitted.
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-10
In December 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-10“Property, Plant and Equipment: Derecognition of in Substance Real Estate-a Scope Clarification” (“ASU 2011-09”).This Update is to resolve the diversity in practice as to how financial statements have been reflecting circumstances when parent company reporting entities cease to have controlling financial interests in subsidiaries that are in substance real estate, where the situation arises as a result of default on nonrecourse debt of the subsidiaries.
The amended guidance is effective for annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2012for public entities. Early adoption is permitted.
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-11
In December 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-11“Balance Sheet: Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” (“ASU 2011-11”). This Update requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial
statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position. The objective of this disclosure is to facilitate comparison between those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of U.S. GAAP and those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of IFRS.
The amended guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods.
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-12
In December 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-12 “Comprehensive Income: Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05” (“ASU 2011-12”).This Update is a deferral of the effective date pertaining to reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income in ASU 2011-05. FASB is to going to reassess the costs and benefits of those provisions in ASU 2011-05 related to reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. Due to the time required to properly make such a reassessment and to evaluate alternative presentation formats, the FASB decided that it is necessary to reinstate the requirements for the presentation of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income that were in place before the issuance of Update 2011-05.
All other requirements in Update 2011-05 are not affected by this Update, including the requirement to report comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. Public entities should apply these requirements for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011.
Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 3 – GOING CONCERN
The accompanying financial statements have been preparedassuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.
As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit at September 30, 2012 of $806,378 and its liabilities exceeded its assets. These factors among others raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
While the Company is attempting to commence operations and generate revenues, the Company’s cash position may not be significant enough to support the Company’s daily operations. Management intends to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering. Management believes that the actions presently being taken to further implement its business plan and generate revenues provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to generate revenues and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate revenues.
The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
NOTE 4-NOTE PAYABLE-CONVERTIBLE
The Company entered into a convertible note agreement on February 1, 2010 for $2,895 anytime after December 31, 2011. The amount is convertible into common shares at the market rate. As the note due date expired the financials do not include any derivative liability.
NOTE 5 – REVERSE STOCK SPLIT
The Company effected a 100 to 1 reverse stock split on December 26, 2011. The financials have been presented to reflect this reverse split for all periods presented.
NOTE 6 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Share Issuances to Officers and Directors
On December 15, 2011 the Company issued 1,000,000 shares to its new officer and director and in March 2012 the Company issued another 1,000,000 shares.
Free office space from its majority stockholder and Chief Executive Officer
The Company has been provided office space by one of its officer at no cost. The management determined that such cost is nominal and did not recognize the rent expense in its financial statement.
NOTE 7 – STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Shares authorized
The Company is authorized to issue 300,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001 per share, and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock with the same par value.
Common Stock Issued
In the twelve months ended December 31, 2011 the Company issued 1,000,000 common shares to its new officer and director valued at market which resulted in a stock for services expense of $800,000 and shown on the statement of operations. The Company also cancelled 767,212 shares.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 the Company issued 1,000,030 shares for services 1,000,000 of which was to its sole officer and director.
NOTE 8 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date through the date when the financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported. The Management of the Company determined that there were no reportable subsequent events to be disclosed.
ALLIED ENERGY CORP.
Financial Statements
December 31, 2011
ALLIED ENERGY CORP. |
BALANCE SHEETS |
(Unaudited) |
| | | |
| | | |
Assets: | December 31, | | December 31, |
Current Assets | 2011 | | 2010 |
Cash | $- | | $- |
Total Current Assets | - | | - |
| | | |
Total Assets | $- | | $- |
Liabilities: | | | |
Current Liabilities: | | | |
Note Payable-Convertible | 2,895 | | 2,895 |
Accounts Payable & Accrued Expenses | - | | - |
Accrued Officer Compensation | - | | - |
Total Current Liabilities | 2,895 | | 2,895 |
| | | |
Total Liabilities | 2,895 | | 2,895 |
| | | |
| | | |
Common Stock par value $0.001 authorized 300,000,000 | | | |
shares, Issued 1,715,428 and 1,482,640 shares | 1,715 | | 1,483 |
Preferred Stock par value $0.001 authorized 5,000,000 | | | |
shares, Issued and outstanding shares, 0, respectively | - | | - |
Additional Paid in Capital | 799,768 | | 529 |
Accumulated Deficit | (804,378) | | (4,907) |
Total Stockholders' Deficit | (2,895) | | (2,895) |
| | | |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit | $- | | $- |
| | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. | | |
ALLIED ENERGY CORP. |
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS |
(Unaudited) |
| | | | |
| | For the Year Ended December 31, |
| | 2011 | | 2010 |
Revenues | | $ - | | $ - |
Costs of Services | | - | | - |
| | | | |
Gross Margin | | - | | - |
| | | | |
Operating Expenses: | | | | |
Stock for Services | | 800,000 | | - |
Officer Compensation | | - | | - |
General and Administrative | | - | | - |
Operating Expenses | | 800,000 | | - |
| | | | |
Operating (Loss) | | (800,000) | | - |
| | | | |
Other Income (Expense): | | | | |
Sale of Licenses | | - | | - |
Sale of Patent | | - | | - |
Impairment | | - | | - |
Loss on Disposal of Assets | | - | | - |
Loss on Discontinued Operations | | - | | - |
Other Income | | - | | - |
Interest Expense | | - | | - |
| | - | | - |
| | | | |
Net Income (Loss) Before Taxes | | (800,000) | | - |
| | | | |
Income Tax | | - | | - |
| | | | |
Net Income (Loss) | | $(800,000) | | - |
| | | | |
Gain (Loss) per Share, Basic & Diluted | | $(0.50) | | - |
| | | | |
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding | | 1,599,034 | | 1,747,331 |
| | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
ALLIED ENERGY CORP. |
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDER EQUITY |
(Unaudited) |
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
| | | Preferred | Preferred | Additional | | |
| Common | Common | Shares | Stock | Paid in | Accumulated | |
| Shares | Stock | Series A | Series A | Capital | Deficit | Total |
Balance January 1, 2010 | 2,012,022 | $2,012 | - | - | - | (4,907) | $(2,895) |
Common shares cancelled | (529,382) | (529) | - | - | 529 | - | - |
Net income for the period | | | | | | - | - |
Balance December 31, 2010 | 1,482,640 | 1,483 | - | - | 529 | (4,907) | $(2,895) |
| | | | | | | |
Common Shares for services | 1,000,000 | 1,000 | - | - | 799,000 | - | 800,000 |
Shares cancelled | (767,212) | (768) | - | - | 768 | - | - |
Net loss for the year | - | - | - | - | - | (800,000) | (800,000) |
Balance December 31, 2011 | 1,715,428 | $1,715 | - | - | $800,297 | $(804,907) | (2,895) |
| | | | | | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
ALLIED ENERGY CORP. |
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS |
(Unaudited) |
| | | |
| For the Year Ended December 31, |
| 2011 | | 2010 |
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | | |
Net Income (Loss) for the Period | $(800,000) | | - |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash | | | |
used by operating activities: | | | |
Shares Issued for Services | 800,000 | | - |
| - | | - |
Finance Charge | - | | - |
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities: | | | |
Decrease in Accounts Receivable | - | | - |
Increase(Decrease) in Accounts Payable & Accrued Expenses | - | | - |
Increase (Decrease) in Accrued Officer Compensation | - | | - |
Increase in Interest Payable | - | | - |
Net Cash (Used) in Operating Activities | - | | - |
| | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | |
Proceeds from Issuance of Stock | - | | - |
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities | - | | - |
| | | |
Net (Decrease) Increase in Cash | - | | - |
Cash at Beginning of Period | - | | - |
Cash at End of Period | $- | | $- |
| | | |
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: | | |
Cash paid during the year for: | | | |
Interest | - | | - |
Franchise and Income Taxes | - | | - |
| | | |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. |
ALLIED ENERGY CORP.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2011
NOTE 1 - ORGANIZATION AND OPERATIONS
ALLIED ENERGY CORP. was incorporated in the State of Nevada on May 5, 1994 as Sterling Harvest, Ltd. On January 11, 2006 the Company changed its name to its current name. In July 2011 the District Court in the State of Nevada appointed the controlling shareholder to serve as the custodian of the Corporation pursuant to NRS 78.347. The Company is presently seeking a merger candidate.
NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of presentation
The Company’s financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The preparationoffinancial statementsinconformitywithaccounting principlesgenerallyacceptedintheUnited StatesofAmericarequiresmanagementtomakeestimatesandassumptionsthataffectthereportedamountsof assetsandliabilitiesanddisclosureofcontingentassetsandliabilitiesatthe date ofthefinancialstatementsandthe reportedamountsofrevenuesandexpensesduringthereportingperiod.Actualresultscoulddifferfrom those estimates.
Managementfurtheracknowledgesthatitissolely responsibleforadoptingsoundaccounting practices,establishing andmaintainingasystem ofinternal accountingcontrolandpreventingand detectingfraud.TheCompany'ssystem ofinternalaccountingcontrolisdesignedtoassure,among otheritems,that1) recordedtransactionsare valid;2) validtransactionsarerecorded;and3)transactionsarerecordedintheproperperiodinatimelymannertoproduce financialstatementswhichpresentfairlythefinancial condition,resultsofoperationsandcashflows ofthe Company fortherespectiveperiodsbeingpresented
Use of estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period.
The Company’s significant estimates includeincome taxes provision and valuation allowance of deferred tax assets;the fair value of financial instruments; the carrying valueand recoverability of long-lived assets, including the values assigned to and estimated useful lives of computer equipment;and the assumption that the Company will continue as a going concern.Those significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there
are uncertainties attached to those estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.
Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
Management regularly reviews its estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such reviews, and if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Fair value of financial instruments measured on a recurring basis
The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:
| | |
Level 1 | | Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. |
| | |
Level 2 | | Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date. |
| | |
Level 3 | | Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data. |
Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.
The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.
The carrying amount of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, prepaid expenses and accrued expenses approximate their fair value because of the short maturity of those instruments.The Company’s line of credit andnotes payableapproximate the fair value of such instruments based upon management’s best estimate of interest rates that would be available to the Company for similar financial arrangements at December 31, 2011 and 2010.
Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.
It is not however, practical to determine the fair value of advances from stockholders due to their related party nature.
Carrying value, recoverability and impairment of long-lived assets
The Company has adopted paragraph 360-10-35-17 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. The Company’s long-lived assets, which include computer equipment are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable.
The Company assesses the recoverability of its long-lived assets by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related long-lived asset or group of long-lived assets over their remaining estimated useful lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairment, if any, is based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives.
The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.
The impairment charges, if any, is included in operating expenses in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.
Cash equivalents
The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
Related parties
The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.
Pursuant to Section 850-10-20the Related parties include a. affiliates of the Company; b. Entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d.principal owners of the Company; e. management of the Company; f. other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. Other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.
The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a. the nature of the relationship(s) involved. description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and mounts due from or torelated partiesas of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.
Commitments and contingencies
The Company follows subtopic 450-20 ofthe FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.
If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but
cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.
Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.
Revenue recognition
The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company will recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured.
Income Tax Provisions
The Company follows Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the fiscal year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the fiscal years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income in the period that includes the enactment date.
The Company adoptedsection 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”) with regards to uncertainty income taxes.Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. UnderSection 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement.Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.
Net income (loss) per common share
Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock
outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during the period. Theweighted average number of common shares outstandingand potentially outstanding common sharesassumes that the Company incorporated as of the beginning of the first period presented.
There were no potentially dilutive shares outstanding for the period ended December 31, 2011 and 2010.
Cash flows reporting
The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.
Subsequent events
The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.
Recently issued accounting pronouncements
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05
In June 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05 “Comprehensive Income” (“ASU 2011-05”), whichwas the result of a joint project with the IASB and amends the guidance in ASC 220,Comprehensive Income,by eliminating the option to present components of other comprehensive income (OCI) in the statement of stockholders’ equity. Instead, the new guidance now gives entities the option to present all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity either as a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or as
two separate but consecutive statements. Regardless of whether an entity chooses to present comprehensive income in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements, the amendments require entities to present all reclassification adjustments from OCI to net income on the face of the statement of comprehensive income.
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-08
In September 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-08 “Intangibles—Goodwill and Other:Testing Goodwill for Impairment” (“ASU 2011-08”).This Update is to simplify how public and nonpublic entities test goodwill for impairment. The amendments permit an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test described in Topic 350. Under the amendments in this Update, an entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount.
The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2011.Early adoption is permitted.
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-10
In December 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-10“Property, Plant and Equipment: Derecognition of in Substance Real Estate-a Scope Clarification” (“ASU 2011-09”).This Update is to resolve the diversity in practice as to how financial statements have been reflecting circumstances when parent company reporting entities cease to have controlling financial interests in subsidiaries that are in substance real estate, where the situation arises as a result of default on nonrecourse debt of the subsidiaries.
The amended guidance is effective for annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2012for public entities. Early adoption is permitted.
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-11
In December 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-11“Balance Sheet: Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities” (“ASU 2011-11”).This Update requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effect of those arrangements on its financial position.The objective of this disclosure is to facilitate comparison between those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of U.S. GAAP and those entities that prepare their financial statements on the basis of IFRS.
The amended guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013, and interim periods within those annual periods.
FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-12
In December 2011, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-12 “Comprehensive Income: Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05” (“ASU 2011-12”).This Update is a deferral of the effective date pertaining to reclassification adjustments out of accumulated other comprehensive income in ASU 2011-05. FASB is to going to reassess the costs and benefits of those provisions in ASU 2011-05 related to reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income. Due to the time required to properly make such a reassessment and to evaluate alternative presentation formats, the FASB decided that it is necessary to reinstate the requirements for the presentation of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income that were in place before the issuance of Update 2011-05.
All other requirements in Update 2011-05 are not affected by this Update, including the requirement to report comprehensive income either in a single continuous financial statement or in two separate but consecutive financial statements. Public entities should apply these requirements for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011.
Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
NOTE 3 – GOING CONCERN
The accompanying financial statements have been preparedassuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.
As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit at December 31, 2011 of $804,378 and its liabilities exceeded its assets. These factors among others raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
While the Company is attempting to commence operations and generate revenues, the Company’s cash position may not be significant enough to support the Company’s daily operations. Management intends to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering. Management believes that the actions presently being taken to further implement its business plan and generate revenues provide the opportunity for the Company to continue as a going concern. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to generate revenues and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company’s ability to further implement its business plan and generate revenues.
The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.
NOTE 4-NOTE PAYABLE-CONVERTIBLE
The Company entered into a convertible note agreement on February 1, 2010 for $2,895 anytime after December 31, 2011. The amount is convertible into common shares at the market rate. As the note due date expired the financials do not include any derivative liability.
NOTE 5 – REVERSE STOCK SPLIT
The Company effected a 100 to 1 reverse stock split on December 26, 2011. The financials have been presented to reflect this reverse split for all periods presented.
NOTE 6 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Share Issuances to Officers and Directors
On December 15, 2011 the Company issued 1,000,000 shares to its new officer and director.
Free office space from its majority stockholder and Chief Executive Officer
The Company has been provided office space by one of its officer at no cost. The management determined that such cost is nominal and did not recognize the rent expense in its financial statement.
NOTE 7 – STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Shares authorized
The Company is authorized to issue 300,000,000 shares of common stock with a par value of $0.001 per share, and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock with the same par value.
Common Stock Issued
In the twelve months ended December 31, 2011 the Company issued 1,000,000 common shares to its new officer and director valued at market which resulted in a stock for services expense of $800,000 and shown on the statement of operations. The Company also cancelled 767,212 shares..
For the year ended December 31, 2010 the Company cancelled 529,382 shares of common shares.
NOTE 8 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
The Company has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date through the date when the financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported. The Management of the Company determined that there was one reportable subsequent event to be disclosed as follows:
| 1. | The Company in March 2012 issued 1,000,000 additional shares to its sole officer and director. |