Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | NOTE 1 –SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Organization, Nature of Business and Trade Name A summary of significant accounting policies of Bigfoot Project Investments, Inc. (the “Company”), a company organized in the state of Nevada, is presented to assist in understanding the Company’s financial statements. The accounting policies presented in these footnotes conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the companying financial statements. These financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management who are responsible for their integrity and objectivity. The Company was incorporated in the State of Nevada on November 30, 2011. The Company’s administrative office is located at 570 El Camino Real NR-150, Redwood City, CA and its fiscal year ends July 31. Since inception, the Company has been engaged in organizational efforts and obtaining initial financing. The Company was established as an entertainment investment company. The Company’s mission is to create exciting and interesting proprietary investment projects, entertainment properties surrounding the mythology, research, and potential capture of the creature known as Bigfoot. The Company will perform research in determining the existences of an elusive creature commonly known as Bigfoot. For the past six years the research team, that has joined the company, has performed research on expeditions throughout the United States and Canada. The Company’s competitive advantage is the in-house developed knowledge base and the advanced level of maturity of their projects developed and currently owned by our current officers and shareholders. The Company will capitalize on the current stock pile of these projects through contract agreements which will allow the Company to continue creation of media properties and the establishment of physical locations, partnerships, and strategic alliances with organizations to augment investment markets to create revenue as a stand-alone enterprise. Basis of Presentation The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements have been prepared on the same basis as the annual audited financial statements and in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim financial statements. In the opinion of management such unaudited information includes all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of this interim information. Operating results and cash flows for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that can be expected for the entire year. The information included in this report should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and notes thereto included in our 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2017 filed with the SEC on November 15, 2017. Accounts receivable The Company routinely assesses the recoverability of receivables to determine their collectability by considering factors such as historical experience, credit quality, the age of the accounts receivable balances, and current economic conditions that may affect a customer’s ability to pay. The Company determines its allowance for doubtful accounts by considering such factors as the length of time balances are past due, the Company’s previous loss history, the customer’s current ability to pay its obligations to the Company and the condition of the general economy and the industry as a whole. The Company has evaluated its accounts receivable history and determined that an allowance for doubtful accounts of $75,500 is required for the nine months ended April 30, 2018. Fair value of financial instruments The carrying value of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, and debt approximate their fair values because of the short-term nature of these instruments. Management believes the Company is not exposed to significant interest or credit risks arising from these financial instruments. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The Company utilizes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable. ● Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. These are typically obtained from real-time quotes for transactions in active exchange markets involving identical assets. ● Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices included for identical or similar assets and liabilities that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets. These are typically obtained from readily-available pricing sources for comparable instruments. ● Level 3 - Unobservable inputs, where there is little or no market activity for the asset or liability. These inputs reflect the reporting entity’s own beliefs about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, based on the best information available in the circumstances. The following table presents the derivative financial instruments, the Company’s only financial liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on the Company’s balance sheets on a recurring basis, and their level within the fair value hierarchy as of July 31, 2017: Amount Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Embedded conversion derivative liability $ 262,722 $ - $ - $ 262,722 Total $ 262,722 $ - $ - $ 262,722 The following table presents the derivative financial instruments, the Company’s only financial liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on the Company’s balance sheets on a recurring basis, and their level within the fair value hierarchy as of April 30, 2018: Amount Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Embedded conversion derivative liability $ 156,246 $ - $ - $ 156,246 Total $ 156,246 $ - $ - $ 156,246 The following table provides a summary of the changes in fair value, including net transfers in and/or out, of the derivative financial instruments, measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs: Balance at July 31, 2017 $ 262,722 Fair value of derivative liability at issuance charged to debt discount 55,614 Reclass to equity due to conversion (202,901 ) Unrealized derivative loss included in other expense 40,811 Balance at April 30, 2018 $ 156,246 The Company evaluated its convertible notes to determine if the embedded component of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for under ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” The Company determined that due to the variable number of common stock that the notes convert to, the embedded conversion option were required to be bifurcated and accounted for as a derivative liability. The fair value of the derivative liability is calculated at the time of issuance and the Company records a derivative liability for the calculated value. Changes in the fair value of the derivative liability are recorded in other income (expense) in the statements of operations. Upon conversion of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the conversion date and then that fair value is reclassified to equity. The Company’s derivative instruments were valued using the Lattice model which was based on a probability weighted discounted cash flow model. Assumptions used in the valuation include the following: a) underlying stock price ranging from $0.0026 to $0.0002; b) projected discount on the conversion price ranging from 35% to 62% with the notes effectively converting at discounts in the range of 49.5% to 72.45%; c) projected volatility of 293% to 663%; d) probabilities related to default and redemption of the notes during the term of the notes. The Company has considered the provisions of ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity Both notes are currently in default and the Company is researching options to satisfy the notes. Basic and Diluted Earnings per Share Basic earnings per share are based on the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding. The FASB ASC Topic 260, “Earnings per Share”, requires the Company to include additional shares in the computation of earnings per share, assuming dilution. Diluted earnings per share are based on the assumption that all dilutive options were converted or exercised. Dilution is computed by applying the treasury stock method. Under this method, options are assumed to be exercised at the time of issuance, and as if funds obtained thereby were used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. The Company does not have diluted effects on common stock as there was no warrant or option issued. Basic and diluted earnings per share are the same as there was no dilutive effect of outstanding stock options for the three and nine months ended April 30, 2018 and April 30, 2017. The following is a reconciliation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended April 30, 2018 and 2017: Three Months Ended Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended Nine Months Ended April 30, 2018 April 30, 2017 April 30, 2018 April 30, 2017 Numerator: Net (loss) available to common shareholders $ (124,108 ) $ (98,131 ) $ (5,673,592 ) $ (1,141,930 ) Denominator: Weighted average shares – basic and diluted 612,063,461 217,317,000 397,384,200 213,940,000 Net (loss) per share – basic and diluted $ (0.00 ) $ (0.00 ) (0.01 ) (0.00 ) |