Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | Note 2 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Basis of Presentation The accompanying consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). The Company’s functional currency is the United States Dollars (“$” or “United States dollar”) and the functional currency of the Company’s operating subsidiary is the New Taiwanese Dollar (“NTD”). The accompanying consolidated financial statements are presented in United States dollars. Principles of Consolidation The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Jishanye and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Jishanye Taiwan. All significant intercompany transactions and balances were eliminated in consolidation. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Specific estimates include the collectability of accounts receivable and the valuation of inventory and deferred income tax. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Foreign Currency Translation The Company’s reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. Its functional currency is the U.S. dollar, and the functional currency of its operating subsidiary is the NTD. For its subsidiary, results of operations and cash flows are translated at average exchange rates during the period, assets and liabilities are translated at the unified exchange rate at the end of the period, and equity is translated at historical exchange rates. As a result, amounts relating to assets and liabilities reported on the statements of cash flows may not necessarily agree with the changes in the corresponding balances on the balance sheets. Translation adjustments resulting from the process of translating the local currency financial statements into U.S. dollars are included in determining comprehensive income. The cumulative translation adjustment and effect of exchange rate changes on cash for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $6,416 and $(109), respectively. Transactions denominated in foreign currencies are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rates prevailing on the transaction dates. Assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into the functional currency at the exchange rates prevailing at the balance sheet date with any transaction gains and losses that arise from exchange rate fluctuations on transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency are included in the results of operations as incurred. All of our revenue transactions are transacted in the functional currency of the operating subsidiary. We do not enter into any material transaction in foreign currencies. Transaction gains or losses have not had, and are not expected to have, a material effect on the results of our operations. Asset and liability accounts at December 31, 2015 and 2014 were translated at NTD30.03 to $1.00 and at NTD31.46 to $1.00, respectively, which were the exchange rates on the balance sheet dates. Equity accounts were stated at their historical rate. The average translation rates applied to the statements of income for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 were NTD31.50 to $1.00 and NTD33.00 to $1.00, respectively. Cash flows from our operations are calculated based upon the local currencies using the average translation rate. Translation adjustments resulting from this process are charged or credited to Other Comprehensive Income (Loss). Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents include cash in hand and on deposit with banks. Accounts and Notes Receivable Accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount, net of allowances for doubtful accounts and sales returns. Management reviews the composition of accounts receivable and analyzes historical bad debts, customer concentration, customer credit worthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment patterns to determine if the allowance for doubtful accounts is adequate. An estimate for doubtful accounts is made when collection of the full amount is no longer probable. Delinquent account balances are written-off after management has determined that the likelihood of collection is not probable and known bad debts are written off against the allowance for doubtful accounts when identified. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, there was no allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable. Notes receivable are promissory notes issued by the banks to make payment on behalf of trade debtors. The Company does not provide allowance for notes receivable in the absence of bad debt experience and the high credit quality of the banks. Concentration of Credit Risk Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit risk consist principally of accounts receivable. Credit risk concentration with respect to accounts receivables is reduced because a diverse number of customers make up the Company’s customer base. Inventories Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market, with cost determined by using the average cost method. Management compares the cost of inventory with its market value and an allowance is made to write down inventory to market value, if lower. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company had finished goods for the continuing operation of $4,985 and nil, respectively. Fair Value of Financial Instruments The Company’s financial instruments primarily consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, accounts payable, other payables, and short-term debt from related parties. As of the balance sheet dates, the estimated fair value of these financial instruments were not materially different from their carrying values as presented due to the short maturities of these instruments. The fair value measurement accounting standard defines fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures. The three levels are defined as follows: • Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. • Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the assets or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instruments. • Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value. Comprehensive Income (Loss) U.S. GAAP generally requires that recognized revenue, expenses, gains and losses be included in net income or loss. Although certain changes in assets and liabilities are reported as separate components of the equity section of the consolidated balance sheet, such items, along with net income or loss, are components of comprehensive income or loss. The components of other comprehensive income or loss consist of foreign currency translation adjustments. Revenue Recognition Service revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, service has been provided, the fee is fixed or determinable, and collectability is probable. Payments received before all of the relevant criteria for revenue recognition are satisfied are recorded as advances from customers. Rental income relates to the rental of mounting halls and memorial tablets at the Company’s funeral parlors which is recognized on a straight-line basis over the terms of the respective leases. In accordance with the Company’s standard lease terms, rental payments of memorial tablets are generally payable yearly. Deferred income represents the cumulative difference between rental revenue as recorded on a straight line basis and rents received from the tenants. As of December 31, 2015, the deferred income is $4,247. There was no deferred income at December 31, 2014. Income Taxes The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the accounting standard issued by the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) for income taxes. Under the asset and liability method as required by this accounting standard, deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences of temporary differences by applying enacted statutory tax rates applicable to future years to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. The charge for taxation is based on the results for the reporting period as adjusted for items which are non-assessable or disallowed. It is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the balance sheet date. The effect on deferred income taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recognized if it is more likely than not that some portion, or all of, a deferred tax asset will not be realized. Under the accounting standard regarding accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, a tax position is recognized as a benefit only if it is “more likely than not” that the tax position would be sustained in a tax examination, with a tax examination being presumed to occur. The amount recognized is the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized on examination. For tax positions not meeting the “more likely than not” test, no tax benefit is recorded. U.S. GAAP also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosures and transition. Operating Leases Leases where substantially all the rewards and risks of ownership of assets remain with the leasing company are accounted for as operating leases. Payments made under operating leases are charged to the statements of income on a straight-line basis over the lease periods. Basic and Diluted (Loss) Per Share Basic (loss) per share of common stock is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common stockholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding (denominator) during the year. Diluted earnings per share gives effect to all dilutive potential shares of common stock outstanding during the year using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing diluted earnings per share, the average stock price for the year is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Dilutive potential shares are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share if their effect is anti-dilutive. There were no options, warrants or other instruments convertible into common stock outstanding for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 and 2014; therefore, basic and diluted earnings or loss per share of common stock are the same. The following is a reconciliation of the basic and diluted earnings per share computation: Year ended December 31, 2015 2014 Loss from continuing operations, net of taxes $ (248,671 ) $ (122,112 ) Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes - (23,724 ) Net loss $ (248,671 ) $ (145,836 ) Weighted average number of shares outstanding: Basic and diluted 39,346,576 12,500,001 Loss per share: Basic and diluted From continuing operations $ (0.01 ) $ (0.01 ) From discontinued operations (0.00 ) (0.00 ) Basic and diluted $ (0.01 ) $ (0.01 ) Recent Accounting Pronouncements In August 2014, the FASB issued Presentation of Financial Statements — Going Concern. This standard requires management to evaluate for each annual and interim reporting period whether it is probable that the reporting entity will not be able to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. If the entity is in such a position, the standard provides for certain disclosures depending on whether or not the entity will be able to successfully mitigate its going concern status. This guidance is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early application is permitted. The Company does not anticipate that this adoption will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. The FASB has issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This ASU supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification 605 - Revenue Recognition and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Codification. The standard requires that an entity recognizes revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This ASU is effective on January 1, 2017 and should be applied retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the ASU recognized at the date of initial application. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date. The amendment in this ASU defers the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 for all entities for one year. Public business entities, certain not-for-profit entities, and certain employee benefit plans should apply the guidance in ASU 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption of this guidance on the consolidated financial statements. The FASB has issued ASU No. 2014-12, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. This ASU requires that a performance target that affects vesting, and that could be achieved after the requisite service period, be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant date fair value of the award. This update further clarifies that compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. In February 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, “Consolidation (Topic 810) - Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis”, which provides guidance for reporting entities that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. In accordance with ASU 2015-02, all legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation model. ASU 2015-02 is effective for public business entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not anticipate that this adoption will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Inventory, which requires an entity to measure inventory within the scope at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the ordinary course of business, less reasonably predictable costs of completion, disposal, and transportation. The effective date for the standard is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not anticipate that this adoption will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments. To simplify the accounting for adjustments made to provisional amounts recognized in a business combination, the amendments eliminate the requirement to retrospectively account for those adjustments. For public business entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The amendments should be applied prospectively to adjustments to provisional amounts that occur after the effective date with earlier application permitted for financial statements that have not been issued. The Company does not anticipate that this adoption will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, : In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The new standard establishes a right-of-use (“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement. The new standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. A modified retrospective transition approach is required for lessees for capital and operating leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact of adoption of this ASU on the consolidated financial statements. |