Exhibit 1.1
Lima, July 12, 2021
PERUVIAN SECURITIES COMMISSION (SUPERINTENDENCIA DEL MERCADO DE VALORES)
| | | | |
Atention | | : | | Mr. Alix Godos |
| | | | General Commission of Conduct Supervision (Intendencia General de Supervisión de Conductas) |
| | |
Reference | | : | | Communication No. 2715-2021-SMV/11.1 dated as of July 8, |
| | | | 2021. File No. 2021025815 |
Dear Sirs,
We address this letter to you in connection with the communication referenced above (the “Communication”), by means of which the Peruvian Securities Commission (Superintendencia del Mercado de Valores) required us to clarify certain aspects related to the valuation analysis which is referred to in the report of the board of directors of Aenza S.A.A. dated as of June 24, 2021 (the “Report”).
The following are our responses to the Communication:
1. | According to the Communication, the Peruvian Securities Commission interprets that Aenza S.A.A. (“Aenza”) has not disclosed the information referred to in numeral 24 of Annex 1 of the Relevant Information Communication (hechos de importancia) and Reserved Information Rules, approved by the Peruvian Securities Commission Resolution No. 005-2014-SMV/01 (the “Rules”), which sets forth that: |
“24. Valuation reports made by specialized companies, audit companies, banks, investment banks, or persons in connection with or in the context of public offerings of securities or due diligence.”
2. | Aenza did not engage Ernst & Young Asesores Empresariales S. Civil de R.L. (“EY”) to issue a valuation report in connection with the requirements of numeral 24 of Annex 1 of the Rules. |
Rather, once the board of directors of Aenza was informed in November 2019 of the intention of IG4 Capital (“IG4”) to undertake a tender offer (the “Tender Offer”), the board of directors of Aenza, in exercising its due care, requested EY to perform a valuation analysis of Aenza for use as an internal working document and as the basis for a potential valuation of Aenza by the board of directors in the event that IG4 launched the Tender Offer. The board of directors of Aenza considered that having a reference valuation of Aenza could assist the board in issuing an opinion with respect to the Tender Offer.
Since the engagement of EY involved performing a valuation analysis and did not involve preparing any valuation report subject to disclosure obligations under the Rules, Aenza and EY entered into a confidentiality agreement in connection with such engagement.