Significant Accounting Policies | 2. Significant Accounting Policies Basis of Presentation The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. The financial statements reported for September 30, 2015, and the three and nine month periods then ended include the Company and all of its subsidiaries. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. These reclassifications include the reclassification of ad valorem taxes of $0.1 million and $3.3 million from Lease Operating Expense to Production and Ad Valorem Taxes in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. These interim financial statements have not been audited. However, in the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the financial statements have been included. As these are interim financial statements, they do not include all disclosures required for financial statements prepared in conformity with GAAP. Interim period results are not necessarily indicative of results of operations or cash flows for a full year. These consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) regarding interim financial reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all disclosures required by GAAP and should be read in conjunction with our most recent audited consolidated financial statements included in Jones Energy, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. Use of Estimates In preparing the accompanying financial statements, management has made certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent liabilities, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Changes in estimates are recorded prospectively. Significant assumptions are required in the valuation of proved and unproved oil and natural gas reserves, which affect the Company’s estimates of depletion expense, impairment, and the allocation of value in our business combinations. Significant assumptions are also required in the Company’s estimates of the net gain or loss on commodity derivative assets and liabilities, fair value associated with business combinations, and asset retirement obligations (“ARO”). Oil and Gas Properties The Company accounts for its oil and natural gas exploration and production activities under the successful efforts method of accounting. Oil and gas properties consisted of the following at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014: September 30, December 31, (in thousands of dollars) 2015 2014 Mineral interests in properties Unproved $ $ Proved Wells and equipment and related facilities Less: Accumulated depletion and impairment ) ) Net oil and gas properties $ $ Costs to acquire mineral interests in oil and natural gas properties are capitalized. Costs to drill and equip development wells and the related asset retirement costs are capitalized. The costs to drill and equip exploratory wells are capitalized pending determination of whether the Company has discovered proved commercial reserves. If proved commercial reserves are not discovered, such drilling costs are charged to expense. In some circumstances, it may be uncertain whether proved commercial reserves have been found when drilling has been completed. Such exploratory well drilling costs may continue to be capitalized if the anticipated reserve quantity is sufficient to justify its completion as a producing well and sufficient progress in assessing the reserves and the economic and operating viability of the project is being made. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 we had no material capitalized costs associated with exploratory wells. The Company capitalizes interest on expenditures for significant exploration and development projects that last more than six months while activities are in progress to bring the assets to their intended use. The Company did not capitalize any interest during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as no projects lasted more than six months. Depletion of oil and gas properties amounted to $52.5 million and $155.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, and $50.3 million and $136.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. Other Property, Plant and Equipment Other property, plant and equipment consisted of the following at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014: September 30, December 31, (in thousands of dollars) 2015 2014 Leasehold improvements $ $ Furniture, fixtures, computers and software Vehicles Aircraft Other Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization ) ) Net other property, plant and equipment $ $ Other property, plant and equipment is depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the property, plant and equipment, which range from three years to ten years. Depreciation and amortization of other property, plant and equipment amounted to $0.3 million and $0.9 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, and $0.2 million and $0.8 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. Commodity Derivatives The Company records its commodity derivative instruments on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value. Changes in the derivative’s fair value are recognized currently in earnings, unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. During the nine month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company elected not to designate any of its commodity price risk management activities as cash-flow or fair value hedges. The changes in the fair values of outstanding financial instruments are recognized as gains or losses in the period of change. Although the Company does not designate its commodity derivative instruments as cash-flow hedges, management uses those instruments to reduce the Company’s exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices related to its natural gas and oil production. Net gains and losses, at fair value, are included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as current or noncurrent assets or liabilities based on the anticipated timing of cash settlements under the related contracts. Changes in the fair value of commodity derivative contracts are recorded in earnings as they occur and are included in the Other Income (Expense) caption on the Consolidated Statement of Operations. See Note 3, “Fair Value Measurement,” for disclosure about the fair values of commodity derivative instruments. Asset Retirement Obligations The Company’s asset retirement obligations consist of future plugging and abandonment expenses on oil and natural gas properties. A summary of the Company’s ARO for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 is as follows: (in thousands of dollars) Balance at December 31, 2014 $ Liabilities incurred Accretion of ARO liability Liabilities settled ) Change in estimate Balance at September 30, 2015 Less: Current portion of ARO ) Total long-term ARO at September 30, 2015 $ Tax Receivable Agreement In connection with the IPO, the Company entered into a Tax Receivable Agreement (the “TRA”) which obligates the Company to make payments to certain current and former owners equal to 85% of the applicable cash savings that the Company realizes as a result of tax attributes arising from exchanges of JEH Units and shares of the Company’s Class B common stock held by those owners for shares of the Company’s Class A common stock. The Company will retain the benefit of the remaining 15% of these tax savings. As a result of exchanges made through September 30, 2015, the Company has accrued future tax benefits of $47.1 million and has accounted for this amount as a reduction of deferred tax liabilities on its consolidated balance sheet. As of September 30, 2015, the Company has recorded a liability of $40.0 million associated with its future obligations under the TRA. The actual amount and timing of payments to be made under the TRA will depend upon a number of factors, including the amount and timing of taxable income generated in the future, changes in future tax rates, the use of loss carryovers, and the portion of the Company’s payments under the TRA constituting imputed interest. To the extent the Company does not realize all of the tax benefits in future years or in the event of a change in future tax rates, this liability may change. As of September 30, 2015, the Company has made no payments under the TRA and does not anticipate making a payment under the TRA in 2015. Stock Compensation Effective January 1, 2010, JEH implemented a management incentive plan that provided indirect awards of membership interests in JEH to members of senior management (“management units”). The management unit grants awarded prior to the initial filing of the IPO registration statement in March 2013 had a dual vesting schedule. Grants awarded after the filing of the initial IPO registration statement have a single vesting structure with equal annual installments and were valued at the IPO price, adjusted for equivalent shares. In connection with the IPO, both the vested and unvested management units were converted into the right to receive an indirect interest in JEH Units and shares of Class B common stock. Under the Jones Energy, Inc. 2013 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”), established in conjunction with the Company’s IPO, the Company reserved 3,850,000 shares of Class A common stock for director and employee stock-based compensation awards. The Company granted performance unit and restricted stock unit awards to certain officers and employees under the LTIP during 2014 and 2015. The fair value of the performance units was based on the grant date fair value (using a Monte Carlo simulation model) and is expensed on a straight-line basis over the applicable three-year performance period. The number of shares of Class A common stock issuable upon vesting of the performance unit awards ranges from zero to 200% based on the Company’s total shareholder return relative to an industry peer group over the applicable three-year performance period. The fair value of the restricted stock unit awards was based on the value of the Company’s Class A common stock on the date of grant and is expensed on a straight-line basis over the applicable vesting period. The Company granted each of the outside members of the Board of Directors shares of restricted Class A common stock under the LTIP in 2014 and 2015. The fair value of the restricted stock grants was based on the value of the Company’s Class A common stock on the date of grant and is expensed on a straight-line basis over the applicable vesting period. Refer to Note 6, “Stock-based Compensation,” for additional information regarding director and employee stock-based compensation awards. Recent Accounting Pronouncements In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” which creates a new topic in the ASC, topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” This ASU sets forth a five-step model for determining when and how revenue is recognized. Under the model, an entity will be required to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to a customer at an amount reflecting the consideration it expects to receive in exchange for those goods or services. Additional disclosures will be required to describe the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14 which deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year. The amendments are now effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and may be applied on either a full or modified retrospective basis. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of Update 2014-09 and Update 2015-14 will have on our financial statements. In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.” This ASU requires management to evaluate whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a “going concern” and to provide disclosures when certain criteria are met. Substantial doubt exists when relevant conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate that it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The amendments are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. We do not expect the adoption of these disclosures to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015- 01, Income Statement—Extraordinary and Unusual Items. This ASU removes the concept of extraordinary items from GAAP. Under existing guidance, an entity is required to separately disclose extraordinary items, net of tax, in the income statement after income from continuing operations if an event or transaction is of an unusual nature and occurs infrequently. This separate, net-of-tax presentation will no longer be allowed. The amendments are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on its financial position, cash flows or results of operations. In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. Entities that have historically presented debt issuance costs as an asset, related to a recognized debt liability, will be required to present those costs as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability. The ASU does not change the recognition, measurement, or subsequent measurement guidance for debt issuance costs. Adoption of this ASU will be applied retrospectively. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15, Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) (“Update 2015-15”), which addresses the presentation or subsequent measurement of debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements, given the absence of authoritative guidance within Update 2015-03 for debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements. The amendments are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. We are currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of Update 2015-03 and Update 2015-15 will have on our financial statements. |