useful life of the property, the recipient shares the risk that the property will decline in value, the recipient shares in any appreciation in the value of the property, the recipient shares in savings in the property’s operating costs, or the recipient bears the risk of damage to or loss of the property;
•
the service provider bears the risk of substantially diminished receipts or substantially increased expenditures if there is nonperformance under the contract;
•
the service provider uses the property concurrently to provide significant services to entities unrelated to the service recipient; and
•
the total contract price substantially exceeds the rental value of the property for the contract period.
Since the determination of whether a service contract should be treated as a lease is inherently factual, the presence or absence of any single factor will not be dispositive in every case.
We believe that our percentage leases will be treated as true leases for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Such belief is based, in part, on the following facts:
•
the Partnerships, on the one hand, and our TRSs, on the other hand, intend for their relationship to be that of a lessor and lessee, and such relationship is documented by lease agreements;
•
our TRSs have the right to the exclusive possession, use, and quiet enjoyment of the hotels during the term of the percentage leases;
•
our TRSs bear the cost of, and are responsible for, day-to-day maintenance and repair of the hotels and generally dictate how the hotels are operated, maintained, and improved;
•
our TRSs bear all of the costs and expenses of operating the hotels, including the cost of any inventory used in their operation, during the term of the percentage leases, other than, in certain cases, real estate taxes;
•
our TRSs benefit from any savings in the costs of operating the hotels during the term of the percentage leases;
•
our TRSs generally indemnify the Partnerships against all liabilities imposed on the Partnerships during the term of the percentage leases by reason of (1) injury to persons or damage to property occurring at the hotels, (2) our TRSs’ use, management, maintenance, or repair of the hotels, (3) any environmental liability caused by acts or grossly negligent failures to act of our TRSs, (4) taxes and assessments in respect of the hotels that are the obligations of our TRSs, or (5) any breach of the percentage leases or of any sublease of a hotel by our TRSs;
•
our TRSs are obligated to pay, at a minimum, substantial base rent for the period of use of the hotels;
•
our TRSs stand to incur substantial losses or reap substantial gains depending on how successfully they operate the hotels;
•
the Partnerships cannot use the hotels concurrently to provide significant services to entities unrelated to our TRSs;
•
the total contract price under the percentage leases does not substantially exceed the rental value of the hotels for the term of the percentage leases;
•
each lease, at the time we entered into it enabled the tenant to derive a meaningful profit, after expenses and taking into account the risks associated with the lease, from the operation of the hotels during the term of its leases (and we expect that each lease, at any time it is subsequently renewed or extended, will do the same); and
•
upon termination of each lease, the applicable hotel is expected to have a substantial remaining useful life and substantial remaining fair market value.
Investors should be aware that there are no controlling Treasury regulations, published rulings, or judicial decisions involving leases with terms substantially the same as the percentage leases that discuss whether such leases constitute true leases for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If the percentage leases are