DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS, BASIS OF PRESENTATION, ACCOUNTING POLICIES, AND RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS | DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS, BASIS OF PRESENTATION, ACCOUNTING POLICIES, AND RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS Description of Business FTD Companies, Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “FTD” or the “Company”), is a premier floral and gifting company with a vision to be the world’s floral innovator and leader, creating products, brands, and technology-driven services its customers love. The Company provides floral, specialty foods, gift and related products and services to consumers, retail florists, and other retail locations and companies in need of floral and gifting solutions. The business uses the highly recognized FTD ® and Interflora ® brands, both supported by the iconic Mercury Man ® logo. While the Company operates primarily in the United States (“U.S.”) and the United Kingdom (“U.K.”), it has worldwide presence as its Mercury Man logo is displayed in approximately 35,000 floral shops in over 125 countries. The Company’s diversified portfolio of brands also includes ProFlowers ® , ProPlants ® , Shari’s Berries ® , Personal Creations ® , RedEnvelope ® , Flying Flowers ® , and Gifts.com ™ . While floral arrangements and plants are its primary offerings, the Company also markets and sells gift items, including gourmet-dipped berries and other sweets, personalized gifts, gift baskets, wine and champagne, and jewelry. The principal operating subsidiaries of FTD Companies, Inc. are Florists’ Transworld Delivery, Inc., FTD.COM Inc. (“FTD.com”), Interflora British Unit (“Interflora”), and Provide Commerce, Inc. (“Provide Commerce”). The operations of the Company include those of its subsidiary, Interflora, Inc., of which one-third is owned by a third party. The Company’s corporate headquarters is located in Downers Grove, Illinois. The Company also maintains offices in San Diego, California; Woodridge, Illinois; Centerbrook, Connecticut; Sleaford, England; and Hyderabad, India; and distribution centers in various locations throughout the U.S. Basis of Presentation The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. (“GAAP”). All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make accounting policy elections, estimates and assumptions that affect a number of reported amounts and related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and assumptions that it believes are reasonable. Actual results could differ from those estimates and assumptions. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 . Going Concern The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. The ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on the Company generating profitable operating results, having sufficient liquidity, maintaining compliance with the revised financial covenants and other requirements under the Amended Credit Agreement (as defined below), and refinancing or repaying the indebtedness outstanding under the Amended Credit Agreement, including in connection with a sale or merger of the Company or other strategic transaction. As described in more detail in Note 6—“Financing Arrangements,” on May 31, 2018, the Company entered into the Third Amendment to Credit Agreement (the Credit Agreement, as defined in Note 6—“Financing Arrangements,” as previously amended and as further amended by the Third Amendment, is referred to in this Form 10-Q as the “Third Amendment”) with its lenders, which included an agreement by the lenders to waive existing defaults caused by (1) the inclusion of a going concern uncertainty explanatory paragraph in the audit opinion on the Company’s financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 and (2) the breach of the consolidated net leverage ratio covenant for the three months ended March 31, 2018. Among other modifications to the Credit Agreement, the Third Amendment revised the consolidated net leverage ratio and fixed charge coverage ratio covenants for each quarterly period through the September 19, 2019 maturity date, as well as the interest rates applicable to the borrowings. Also as described in more detail in Note 6—“Financing Arrangements,” on September 28, 2018, the Company entered into the Fourth Amendment to Credit Agreement (the Third Amendment, as further amended by the Fourth Amendment, is referred to in this Form 10-Q as the “Fourth Amendment”) with its lenders. Among other modifications to the Credit Agreement, the Fourth Amendment modified the measurement dates for the consolidated net leverage ratio and fixed charge coverage ratio covenant tests such that the next measurement date was revised to the twelve month period ended October 31, 2018, from the four fiscal quarter period ended September 30, 2018, with the specific required ratio levels otherwise unchanged from the Third Amendment. As discussed in Note 6—“Financing Arrangements” and disclosed in Note 16—“Subsequent Events,” the Company entered into the Fifth Amendment to Credit Agreement (the Fourth Amendment, as further amended by the Fifth Amendment, is referred to in this Form 10-Q as the “Fifth Amendment”) and the Sixth Amendment to Credit Agreement (the Fifth Amendment, as further amended by the Sixth Amendment, is referred to in this Form 10-Q as the “Sixth Amendment” or the “Amended Credit Agreement”) with its lenders on October 31, 2018 and November 5, 2018, respectively. Among other modifications to the Fourth Amendment, the Fifth Amendment further restricted the Company’s combined usage of the revolving credit facility portion of the Credit Agreement. The Fifth Amendment also modified the measurement dates for the consolidated net leverage ratio and fixed charge coverage ratio covenant tests from the dates set forth in the Fourth Amendment such that the next measurement date was revised to the twelve month period ending November 30, 2018 from the twelve month period ended October 31, 2018. The Fifth Amendment also established the consolidated net leverage and fixed charge coverage ratios for the twelve month period ending November 30, 2018 with the required ratio levels for the remaining periods otherwise unchanged from the Third Amendment. In addition, the Fifth Amendment subjects the Company to certain additional restrictions on capital expenditures and certain additional events of default. The Sixth Amendment, or Amended Credit Agreement, further restricts the Company’s combined usage of the revolving credit facility portion of the Credit Agreement to amounts ranging from $90 million to $170 million based on the Company’s expected borrowing needs at various points in its business cycle. The Sixth Amendment, or Amended Credit Agreement, also revises the consolidated net leverage ratio and fixed charge coverage ratio covenants set forth in the Fifth Amendment for each period through the September 19, 2019 maturity date of the Amended Credit Agreement. Based on the Company’s 2018 year-to-date results of operations and outlook for the remainder of the term of the Amended Credit Agreement, the Company currently anticipates that it will be in compliance with the revised financial covenants under the Amended Credit Agreement. However, the Company also will need to make sufficient progress in addressing the need to refinance or repay the indebtedness outstanding under the Amended Credit Agreement such that the Company is able to obtain an audit opinion with no modifications on the Company’s financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2018. If the Company is unable to meet the revised financial covenants or other requirements of the Amended Credit Agreement and is unable to obtain waivers or amendments from its lenders, the lenders could exercise remedies under the Amended Credit Agreement and repayment of the debt owed under the Amended Credit Agreement could be accelerated. The Company does not expect that it could repay all of its outstanding indebtedness if the repayment of such indebtedness was accelerated. As part of the Company’s efforts to address these issues, as previously announced, the Company’s board of directors has initiated a review of strategic alternatives. The strategic alternatives under consideration include, but are not limited to, a sale or merger of the Company, the Company continuing to pursue value-enhancing initiatives as a standalone company, and potential financings or other equity transactions. The Company also announced a corporate restructuring and cost savings plan, under which opportunities to optimize operations, drive efficiency, and reduce costs have been identified. As noted above, the Company will need to refinance or repay the indebtedness outstanding under the Amended Credit Agreement no later than the September 2019 maturity date of the Amended Credit Agreement. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to effect a refinancing on acceptable terms or repay the indebtedness outstanding, when required or if at all, including as a result of the strategic alternatives review noted above. In this regard, there can be no assurance that the strategic alternatives review will result in any particular strategic alternative or strategic transaction. If the Company is not successful in its initiatives or does not have sufficient liquidity to fund its business activities, the Company may be forced to limit its business activities or be unable to continue as a going concern, which would have a material adverse effect on its results of operations and financial condition. The uncertainties identified above raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements included in this Form 10-Q do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of the Company’s efforts to address these uncertainties. Accounting Policies With the exception of the Company’s revenue recognition and income tax policies as noted below, refer to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017 for a discussion of the Company’s accounting policies, as updated below for recently adopted accounting standards. Revenue Recognition The Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606 (“ASC 606”), Revenue from Contracts with Customers effective January 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective method. This method requires that the cumulative effect of the initial application is recognized as an adjustment to the opening balance of the Company’s retained earnings at January 1, 2018. However, the adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s revenue recognition. As such, the Company did not record an adjustment to its beginning balance of retained earnings as of January 1, 2018. The Company recognizes revenue from short-term contracts for the sale of various products and services to its customers, which include consumers, floral network members, and wholesale customers. Sales to consumers are generated via the Company’s websites, mobile sites, or over the telephone with payment made either at the time the order is placed or upon shipment. Product revenues from these short-term contracts are single performance obligations and are considered complete upon delivery to the recipient. Amounts collected from customers upon placement of an order are recorded as deferred revenue and recognized upon delivery of the product. Products revenues, less discounts and refunds, and the related cost of revenues are recognized when control of the goods is transferred to the recipient, which is generally upon delivery. Product sales are not refundable other than as related to customer service issues. Shipping and service fees charged to customers are recognized at the time the related products revenues are recognized and are included in products revenues. Shipping and delivery costs are included in cost of revenues. Sales taxes are collected from customers and remitted to the appropriate taxing authorities and are not reflected in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations as revenues. The Company generally recognizes revenues for sales to consumers on a gross basis because the Company controls the goods before they are transferred to the recipient as the Company (i) bears primary responsibility for fulfilling the promise to the customer; (ii) bears inventory risk before and/or after the good or service is transferred to the customer; and (iii) has discretion in establishing the price for the sale of the good or service to the customer. Services revenues related to orders sent through the floral network are variable based on either the number of orders or the value of orders and are recognized in the period in which the orders are delivered. Membership and other subscription-based fees are recognized monthly as earned, on a month-to-month basis. Each service offered by the Company is separate and distinct from other services and represents an individual performance obligation. The Company also sells point-of-sale systems and related technology services to its floral network members and recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC 606. For hardware sales that include software, revenues are recognized when delivery, installation and customer acceptance have all occurred. The transaction price for point-of-sale systems is based on the equipment and the software modules ordered by the customer and include installation and training for the system. The sale of the system is considered a single performance obligation since the installation and training are a significant part of the sale in order for the floral network member to send and receive floral orders through the point-of-sale systems. The Company recognizes revenues on hardware which is sold without software at the time of delivery. Probability of collection for both products and services revenue is assessed based on a number of factors, including past transaction history with the customer and the creditworthiness of the customer. If it is determined that collectability is not reasonably assured, revenues are not recognized until collectability becomes reasonably assured. The Company incurs contract costs that are incremental costs incurred for obtaining a contract. These contract costs are short-term (less than a year) and are expensed as incurred based on the practical expedient provided in ASC 606. As such, the Company does not capitalize costs incurred for obtaining a contract. Income Taxes We apply the provisions of ASC 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”). Under ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more-likely-than-not to be realized. In evaluating our ability to recover our deferred tax assets, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including our operating results, ongoing tax planning, and forecasts of future taxable income on a jurisdiction-by-jurisdiction basis. In accordance with ASC 740, we recognize, in our consolidated financial statements, the impact of our tax positions that are more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination based on the technical merits of the positions. We recognize interest and penalties for uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. Our U.S. businesses were in a cumulative three year net loss position, adjusted for permanent items, at the end of the three months ended September 30, 2018. Given the cumulative losses, which are negative evidence that was considered in assessing the realizability of the U.S. deferred tax assets, we did not consider future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards nor did we consider tax planning strategies related to those businesses. We did consider the future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences as positive evidence that was considered in assessing the need for a valuation allowance. At September 30, 2018, the U.S. businesses were in a net deferred tax liability position. Based on a scheduling analysis, the deferred tax liabilities will be reversed over future periods and create taxable income that will exceed the deductions created by the reversal of the deferred tax assets. We believe that this presents sufficient positive evidence to overcome the negative evidence presented by the cumulative net losses. Recent Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted Accounting Standards In March 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2018-05, Income Taxes (Topic 740)—Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 , which provides guidance from the SEC allowing for the recognition of provisional amounts in the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2017 as a result of the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”) that was signed into law in December 2017. The guidance allows for a measurement period of up to one year from the enactment date to finalize the accounting related to the TCJA. The Company has applied the guidance in this update in its financial statements for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and will finalize and record any adjustments related to the TCJA within the one year measurement period. The Company does not currently anticipate any material adjustments related to the TCJA. In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) and issued subsequent amendments to the initial guidance in August 2015, March 2016, April 2016, May 2016, and December 2016 within ASU 2015-14, ASU 2016-08, ASU 2016-10, ASU 2016-12, and ASU 2016-20, respectively (collectively, “Topic 606”). Topic 606 supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP. The core principle of Topic 606 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received for those goods or services. The Company adopted the guidance under this topic as of January 1, 2018 with no material impact to its consolidated financial statements. See Accounting Policies— Revenue Recognition above. The disclosures required by ASC 606 have been included in Note 2—Segment Information. In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments—Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (Subtopic 825-10). The updated guidance enhances the reporting model for financial instruments, and includes amendments to address aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure. The Company adopted the guidance under this topic as of January 1, 2018 with no impact to its consolidated financial statements. In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. This update was issued to address the diversity in practice related to the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows by adding or clarifying guidance on eight specific cash flow issues. The Company adopted the guidance under this topic as of January 1, 2018 with no impact to its consolidated financial statements. In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting . This update was issued to provide clarity and reduce diversity in practice as well as cost and complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718 to the modification of terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. The amendments provide guidance on determining which changes to the terms and conditions of share-based payment awards would require an entity to apply modification accounting under Topic 718. The Company adopted the guidance under this topic as of January 1, 2018 with no impact to its consolidated financial statements. Recently Issued Accounting Standards In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842) . This update requires the recognition of certain lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet as well as the disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements. ASU 2016-02 includes a number of optional practical expedients which may be elected by the Company. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-10, Codification Improvements to Topic 842 (Leases) , which provides narrow amendments to clarify how to apply certain aspects of the new lease standard, and ASU 2018-11, Targeted Improvements to Topic 842 (Leases) , which provides an additional, optional transition method that allows entities to initially apply the requirements by recognizing a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. An entity that adopts this method must report comparative periods in accordance with current guidance ( Topic 840 ). The amendments will be effective for the Company for fiscal years, and the interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company anticipates adopting this ASU effective January 1, 2019 using the new transition method. The Company expects to recognize a liability and corresponding asset associated with in-scope operating leases but is still in the process of determining those amounts and the processes required to account for leasing activity on an ongoing basis. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this update on its consolidated statements of income. The impact of this topic is non-cash in nature and, as such, it will not affect the Company’s cash flows. In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326) . This update seeks to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments, including trade receivables, and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date. The amendments require an entity to replace the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects current expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. The amendments are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The amendments will be applied through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which guidance is effective, which is a modified-retrospective approach. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements. In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities . This update seeks to improve the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements and make certain targeted improvements to simplify the application of the hedge accounting guidance in current GAAP. The amendments in this update better align an entity’s risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships through changes to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and presentation of hedge results. For cash flow and net investment hedges as of the adoption date, this ASU requires a modified retrospective approach. The amended presentation and disclosure guidance is required only prospectively. The amendments in this ASU are effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning after December 31, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements. In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income . This update allows for a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the TCJA. This update also requires certain disclosures about stranded tax effects. The amendments in this ASU will be effective for the Company for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements. In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting . This update allows existing employee guidance to apply to non-employee share-based transactions (as long as the transaction is not effectively a form of financing), with the exception of specific guidance related to the attribution of compensation cost. The cost of nonemployee awards will continue to be recorded as if the grantor had paid cash for the goods or services. The amendments in this ASU will be effective for the Company for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements. I n July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-09, Codification Improvements. This update facilitates technical corrections, clarifications and other minor improvements and should eliminate the need for periodic agenda requests for narrow and incremental items. The FASB does not expect these changes to have a significant administrative cost to most entities. Some of the amendments in this ASU do not require transition guidance and were effective upon issuance. However, many of the amendments do have transition guidance effective for the Company for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements. In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement . This update eliminates, amends and adds disclosure requirements for fair value measurement. Entities will no longer be required to disclose the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, but public companies will be required to disclose the range and the weighted average used to develop significant unobservable inputs for Level 3 fair value measurements. The amendments in this ASU are effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements. In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That is a Service Contract. This update aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a cloud computing arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. The amendments in this ASU are effective for all entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements. |