SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
Basis of Presentation |
These consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("GAAP"). These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, MethylGene and MethylGene US Inc. All significant inter-company transactions, balances and expenses have been eliminated upon consolidation. |
Mirati was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on April 29, 2013. The Company was created to enter into an arrangement agreement described below. |
|
On May 8, 2013, the Company's Board of Directors approved and the Company entered into an arrangement agreement with MethylGene. Subject to the terms and conditions of the arrangement agreement, which was consummated on June 28, 2013, the shareholders of MethylGene received one share of the Company's common stock in exchange for every 50 common shares of MethylGene, which had the effect of a 50 for 1 reverse split of the common shares pursuant to a court-approved plan of arrangement under Section 192 of the Canada Business Corporations Act. Such transaction is referred to herein as the Arrangement. In addition, all outstanding options and warrants to purchase common shares of MethylGene became exercisable on a 50-for-1 basis for shares of our common stock, and a proportionate adjustment was made to the exercise price or conversion price, as applicable. The accompanying financial statements and notes to the financial statements give retroactive effect to the reverse split of our common stock for all periods presented. Upon completion of the Arrangement, MethylGene became the Company's wholly-owned subsidiary. The shares of the Company's common stock issued at the closing of the Arrangement were issued in reliance upon the exemption from registration under Section 3(A)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. |
These consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars, which effective January 1, 2013, is also the functional currency of the Company. |
Use of Estimates |
The preparation of the Company's audited consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. |
Reported amounts and note disclosures reflect the overall economic conditions that are most likely to occur and anticipated measures management intends to take. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed quarterly. Any revisions to accounting estimates are recognized in the period in which the estimates are revised and in any future periods affected. |
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short-term Investments |
Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and highly liquid securities with original maturities of ninety days or less. Investments with an original maturity of more than ninety days are considered short-term investments and have been classified by management as available-for-sale. These investments are classified as current assets, even though the stated maturity date may be one year or more beyond the current balance sheet date, which reflects management’s intention to use the proceeds from sales of these securities to fund its operations, as necessary. Such investments are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. Realized gains and losses from the sale of available-for-sale securities or the amounts, net of tax, reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income, if any, are determined on a specific identification basis. |
Concentration of Credit Risk |
The Company invests its excess cash in accordance with its investment policy. The Company's investments are comprised primarily of commercial paper and debt instruments of financial institutions, corporations, U.S. government-sponsored agencies and the U.S. Treasury. The Company mitigates credit risk by maintaining a diversified portfolio and limiting the amount of investment exposure as to institution, maturity and investment type. Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to significant credit risk consist principally of cash equivalents and short-term investments. |
Foreign Currency Transactions |
Foreign currency transactions are initially recorded by the Company using the exchange rates prevailing at the date of the transaction. At the balance sheet date, monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated at the period-end rates of exchange. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated at the historical exchange rates. Exchange gains and losses arising from the translation of foreign currency items are included in other income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The Company recognized net foreign exchange losses of $0.2 million, $1.3 million and an immaterial amount in other income (expense) in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. |
Property and Equipment |
Property and equipment is stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation. Historical cost includes expenditures that are directly attributable to the acquisition of the items. All repairs and maintenance are charged to net loss during the financial period in which they are incurred. |
Depreciation of property and equipment is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, as follows: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Computer equipment | | 3 years | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Office and other equipment | | 6 years | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Laboratory equipment | | 6 years | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Leasehold improvements | | The lesser of the lease term or the life of the asset | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
On disposal or impairment of property and equipment, the cost and related accumulated depreciation is removed from the consolidated financial statements and the net amount, less any proceeds, is included in net loss. |
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets |
The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. If such circumstances are determined to exist, an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows produced by the long-lived asset, including its eventual residual value, is compared to the carrying value to determine whether impairment exists. In the event that such cash flows are not expected to be sufficient to recover the carrying amount of the assets, the assets are written-down to their estimated fair values. Fair value is estimated through discounted cash flow models to project cash flows from the asset. The Company recognized immaterial impairment charges related to property and equipment for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, and no impairment charges in 2012. |
|
Reclassification of Warrants |
|
In 2011 and 2012, MethylGene issued common stock warrants in connection with the issuance of common stock through private placements (referred to as the 2011 Warrants and the 2012 Warrants). The exercise prices of the 2011 and 2012 Warrants were denominated in Canadian dollars. Upon the issuance of the 2011 and 2012 Warrants, the net proceeds were allocated to common stock and warrants based on their relative fair values, and the fair value of the issued common stock warrants was calculated utilizing the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The allocated fair value was then recorded as warrants within stockholders’ equity on the consolidated balance sheet. |
|
Effective January 1, 2013, the Company changed its functional currency which changed how the 2011 and 2012 warrants are accounted for as they continued to have exercise prices denominated in Canadian dollars. Upon the change in functional currency, the warrants were classified as a current liability and a warrant liability of $16.2 million which represented the fair market value of the warrants at that date in accordance with accounting standards. The initial fair value recorded as warrants within stockholders’ equity of $11.2 million was reversed. The change in fair value related to periods prior to January 1, 2013 of $5.0 million was recorded as an adjustment to accumulated deficit. At each reporting period subsequent to January 1, 2013, the fair value of the warrant liability was recalculated and any corresponding increase or decrease to the warrant liability was recorded as change in fair value of warrant liability on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. The estimated fair value was determined using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the estimated value of the underlying common stock at the valuation measurement date, the remaining contractual term of the warrants, risk-free interest rates, expected dividends and expected volatility of the price of the underlying common stock. |
|
During the second half of 2014, the Company amended all of its outstanding warrant agreements to allow for the warrants to be denominated in U.S. Dollars. As a result of this amendment, the amended warrants qualified for equity classification and were reclassified into stockholders’ equity at their fair value as of the amendment date and revaluations of fair value are no longer required. |
|
Prior to the amendments, for all of the warrants classified as liabilities during the relevant periods, the Company recorded warrant valuation expense of $4.5 million and $19.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. No such expense was recorded for the year ended December 31, 2012 as the functional currency was the Canadian dollar. |
|
Reclassification of Share-Based Compensation Liability |
|
The Company granted stock options denominated in Canadian dollars under its 1997 Equity Plan to Canadian and United States, or US, based employees and directors until July 26, 2013. Following the delisting of the Company’s shares from the Toronto Stock Exchange, the options denominated in Canadian dollars that were granted to US-based employees and US-based directors were subject to liability accounting ("liability options") with fair value calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The Company revalued the liability options as of July 26, 2013 and recorded a share-based compensation liability of $1.1 million with a corresponding reduction of additional paid-in capital. |
|
At each reporting period subsequent to July 26, 2013, the Company adjusted the fair value of the liability options and any corresponding increase or decrease to the liability was recorded as either a reduction of additional paid in capital or as stock compensation expense on the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss, as appropriate. During the year ended December 31, 2013 these fair value adjustments resulted in an increase to additional paid in capital of $0.3 million and total stock compensation expense of $1.4 million. Effective November 30, 2013 the Company amended the agreements underlying the liability options such that the exercise price was converted from Canadian dollars to the equivalent US dollar exercise price by applying the exchange rate for the conversion of Canadian dollars into U.S. dollars based on the Bank of Canada’s noon buying rate for one U.S. dollar on the date the option was granted. The fair value of the liability options as of November 30, 2013 was $2.2 million and was reclassified from share-based compensation liability to additional paid-in capital. |
|
Share-Based Compensation |
The Company has a stock option compensation plan in which the fair value of stock options granted is determined at the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model and is expensed over the vesting period of the options. Share-based compensation is recognized using the graded accelerated vesting method. In determining the expense, the Company deducts the number of options that are expected to be forfeited at the time of a grant and revises this estimate, if necessary, in subsequent years if actual forfeitures differ from those estimated. The stock-based compensation expense attributable to awards under the Company's 2013 Employee Stock Purchase Plan ("ESPP") was also determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. |
The determination of the fair value of share-based compensation awards utilizing the Black-Scholes model is affected by the Company's stock price and a number of assumptions, including but not limited to expected stock price volatility over the term of the awards and the expected term of stock options. Changes in the assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimates. |
Investment Tax Credits |
The Company's accounts include claims for investment tax credits ("ITCs") relating to scientific research and experimental development activities of the Company. The qualification and recording of these activities for investment tax credit purposes are established by the Canadian federal and Provincial Tax Acts and are subject to audit by the taxation authorities. Refundable ITCs are reflected as reductions of expenses or reductions of the cost of the assets to which they relate when there is reasonable assurance that the assistance will be received and all conditions have been complied with. The non-refundable ITCs are carried forward for a time and will be recognized when it is more likely than not that the Company will become subject to Canadian federal taxes, at which time, said ITCs are applied as a reduction of tax expense. As operations in Canada ceased in early 2014, there were no new investment tax credits earned for the year ended December 31, 2014. |
Research and Development Expenses |
Research and development expenditures are charged to net loss in the period in which they are incurred and are comprised of the following types of costs incurred in performing research and development activities: salaries and benefits, share-based compensation expense, allocated overhead and occupancy costs, clinical trial and related clinical manufacturing costs, contract services, and other outside costs. |
Income Taxes |
Income taxes have been accounted for using the asset and liability method. Under the asset and liability method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates applicable to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance against deferred tax assets is recorded if, based upon the weight of all available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. For uncertain tax positions that meet "a more likely than not" threshold, the Company recognizes the benefit of uncertain tax positions in the consolidated financial statements. |
Segment Reporting |
Operating segments are components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision-maker for purposes of making decisions regarding resource allocation and assessing performance. To date, the Company has viewed its operations and managed its business as one segment operating primarily in the United States. |
|
Fair Value Measurements |
The Company has certain financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value which have been classified as Level 1, 2 or 3 within the fair value hierarchy as described in the accounting standards for fair value measurements. |
The authoritative guidance for fair value measurements defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or the most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Market participants are buyers and sellers in the principal market that are (i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able to transact, and (iv) willing to transact. The guidance prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value into the following hierarchy: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
• | Level 1- Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
• | Level 2- Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are either directly or indirectly observable; and | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
• | Level 3- Unobservable inputs in which little or no market activity exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
The following table summarizes the assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands): |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
2014 |
Assets | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 6,593 | | | $ | 4,590 | | | $ | 2,003 | | | $ | — | |
|
Short-term investments | 22,710 | | | — | | | 22,710 | | | — | |
|
| $ | 29,303 | | | $ | 4,590 | | | $ | 24,713 | | | $ | — | |
|
| | | | | | | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| December 31, | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 |
2013 |
Assets | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 14,235 | | | $ | 12,431 | | | $ | 1,804 | | | $ | — | |
|
Short-term investments | 47,835 | | | — | | | 47,835 | | | — | |
|
| $ | 62,070 | | | $ | 12,431 | | | $ | 49,639 | | | $ | — | |
|
| | | | | | | |
Liabilities | | | | | | | |
Warrant liability | $ | 33,407 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 33,407 | |
|
| $ | 33,407 | | | $ | — | | | $ | — | | | $ | 33,407 | |
|
| | | | | | | |
The Company’s investments in Level 1 assets are valued based on publicly available quoted market prices for identical securities as of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013. The Company determines the fair value of Level 2 related securities with the aid of valuations provided by third parties using proprietary valuation models and analytical tools. These valuation models and analytical tools use market pricing or prices for similar instruments that are both objective and publicly available, including matrix pricing or reported trades, benchmark yields, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids and/or offers. There were no transfers between fair value measurement levels for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. |
The following table presents a rollforward of the fair value of the warrant liability, which included Level 3 measurements (in thousands): |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Warrant liability: | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at January 1, 2013 | | $ | — | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Fair value upon reclassification of balance as of January 1, 2013 | | 16,194 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Change in fair value of warrant liability | | 19,799 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
included in net loss | | | | | | | | | | | |
Fair value of warrants exercised | | (2,586 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2013 | | 33,407 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Change in fair value of warrant liability included in net loss | | 4,517 | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Fair value of warrants exercised | | (993 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Reclassification of warrants to stockholders' equity | | (36,931 | ) | | | | | | | | | | | |
Balance at December 31, 2014 | | $ | — | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
|
The Company estimated the fair value of warrants at the time of issuance and subsequent remeasurement through the date of reclassification into equity using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model at each reporting date, using the following inputs: the risk-free interest rates; the expected dividend rates; the remaining expected life of the warrants; and the expected volatility of the price of the underlying common stock. The estimates are based, in part, on subjective assumptions and changes to these assumptions could have a significant impact on the fair value of the warrants. |
|
The following assumptions were used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model as of the warrant amendments dates to determine the fair value of the warrants to reclassify into equity: |
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Sep-14 | | Dec-14 | | | | | | |
| | 2011 Warrants | | 2012 Warrants | | 2011 Warrants | | | | | | |
Risk-free interest rate | | 1.2 | % | | 1.2 | % | | 1 | % | | | | | | |
Volatility | | 108.6 | % | | 100.8 | % | | 62.8% - 63.9% | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Dividend yield | | — | | | — | | | — | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
Expected life in years | | 1.6 | | | 3.2 | | | 1.3 | | | | | | | |
| | | | | |
The following assumptions were used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of the warrant liability as of December 31, 2013. All 2011 and 2012 warrants were amended and did not require a valuation as of December 31, 2014. |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | 31-Dec-13 | | | | | | | | | |
| | 2011 Warrants | | 2012 Warrants | | | | | | | | | |
Risk-free interest rate | | 1.2 | % | | 1.6 | % | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Volatility | | 112 | % | | 115.9 | % | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Dividend yield | | — | | | — | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
Expected life in years | | 2.3 | | | 3.9 | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
|
Net Loss Per Share |
Basic net loss per common share is calculated by dividing the net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, without consideration for potentially dilutive securities. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares and potentially dilutive securities outstanding for the period. Common share equivalents outstanding, determined using the treasury stock method, are comprised of shares that may be issued under the Company’s stock option and warrant agreements. |
|
The following table presents the weighted average number of potentially dilutive securities not included in the calculation of diluted net loss per share due to the anti-dilutive effect of the securities: |
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year ended | | | | | | |
| | December 31, | | | | | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 | | | | | | |
Common stock options | | 253,595 | | | 495 | | | 15,663 | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Common stock warrants | | 1,515,445 | | | 644,426 | | | 690,046 | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
Total | | 1,769,040 | | | 644,921 | | | 705,709 | | | | | | | |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |