Yinghong Guangda Technology (UBLI) 10-Q 14 Aug 14 2014 Q3 Quarterly report Financial data

Document_and_Entity_Informatio

Document and Entity Information	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014	Aug. 13, 2014
Document And Entity Information [Abstract]	'	'
Entity Registrant Name	'UBL Interactive,Inc.	'
Entity Central Index Key	'0001576778	'
Amendment Flag	'false	'
Current Fiscal Year End Date	'--09-30	'
Document Type	'10-Q	'
Document Period End Date	30-Jun-14	'
Document Fiscal Year Focus	'2014	'
Document Fiscal Period Focus	'Q3	'
Entity Filer Category	'Smaller Reporting Company	'
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	'	34,612,673

Consolidated_Balance_Sheets

Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Current Assets	'	'
Cash	$421,276	$125,517
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $141,497 and $27,000, respectively	404,306	314,999
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	23,342	19,336
Deferred costs	1,598,581	299,685
Total Current Assets	2,447,505	759,537
Property and Equipment, net	43,464	29,659
Other Assets	'	'
Intangible assets, net	105,594	143,890
Security deposits	16,968	12,468
Debt issue costs, net	5,038	6,383
Total Other Assets	127,600	162,741
Total Assets	2,618,569	951,937
Current Liabilities:	'	'
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	2,338,207	1,545,409
Accounts payable - related party	16,525	11,574
Deferred revenue	2,916,728	1,249,224
Current maturities of convertible notes payable, net of discount	797,148	25,000
Derivative liabilities	564,033	'
Current maturities of capital lease liability	'	2,535
Current maturities of notes payable	10,284	9,981
Total Current Liabilities	6,642,925	2,843,723
Long-Term Liabilities:	'	'
Notes payable, net of current maturities	320,459	328,242
Convertible notes payable, net of current maturities and discount	'	497,980
Derivative liabilities	260,655	1,385,973
Other liabilities	44,304	50,013
Total Long-Term Liabilities	625,418	2,262,208
Total Liabilities	7,268,343	5,105,931
Commitments and Contingencies	'	'
Stockholders' Deficit	'	'
Preferred stock par value $0.01: 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding	'	'
Common stock par value $0.01: 50,000,000 shares authorized; 34,607,465 and 33,900,385 shares issued and outstanding, respectively	346,075	339,004
Additional paid in capital	2,190,863	1,520,375
Accumulated deficit	-7,186,712	-6,013,373
Total Stockholders' Deficit	-4,649,774	-4,153,994
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit	$2,618,569	$951,937

Consolidated_Balance_Sheets_Pa

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parentheticals) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Statement of Financial Position [Abstract]	'	'
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$141,497	$27,000
Preferred stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$0.01	$0.01
Preferred stock, shares authorized	10,000,000	10,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued	'	'
Preferred stock, shares outstanding	'	'
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$0.01	$0.01
Common stock, shares authorized	50,000,000	50,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	34,607,465	33,900,385
Common stock, shares outstanding	34,607,465	33,900,385

Consolidated_Statements_of_Ope

Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) (USD $)	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
Income Statement [Abstract]	'	'	'	'
Revenues	$1,359,675	$923,415	$3,201,331	$2,666,578
Cost of revenues	584,470	404,427	1,179,522	1,161,045
Gross margin	775,205	518,988	2,021,809	1,505,533
Operating expenses	'	'	'	'
Compensation	659,429	490,333	2,243,424	1,337,821
Consulting fees	52,742	22,000	154,224	54,240
Professional fees	60,735	78,800	180,821	186,456
Research and development	229,551	26,324	389,084	85,061
Selling, general and administrative	341,715	174,884	738,772	491,795
Total operating expenses	1,344,172	792,341	3,706,325	2,155,373
Loss from operations	-568,967	-273,353	-1,684,516	-649,840
Other income (expense)	'	'	'	'
Interest income	'	17	'	313
Interest expense	-111,408	-53,012	-323,350	-165,446
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities	1,051,455	-701	1,242,651	-222,114
Derivative expense	'	'	-389,200	-181,426
Loss on extinguishment of debt	'	'	-12,166	-177,277
Gain on settlement of liabilities	3,833	'	3,425	'
Other income (expense)	2,508	-59	-10,183	-214
Other income (expense), net	946,388	-53,755	511,177	-746,164
Income (Loss) before income tax provision	377,421	-327,108	-1,173,339	-1,396,004
Income tax provision	'	'	'	'
Net income (Loss)	$377,421	($327,108)	($1,173,339)	($1,396,004)
Net income (loss) per common share - basic and diluted	$0.01	($0.01)	($0.03)	($0.04)
Weighted average common shares outstanding	'	'	'	'
- Basic and diluted	34,600,941	33,624,310	34,190,859	33,584,749

Consolidated_Statements_of_Cas

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:	'	'
Net loss	($1,173,339)	($1,396,004)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	'	'
Depreciation and amortization	50,327	41,649
Bad debt expense (recovery)	-16,000	36,918
Stock based compensation	650,626	10,164
Amortization of debt discount	274,168	136,099
Amortization of debt issuance costs	6,345	2,557
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities	-1,242,651	222,114
Derivative expense	389,200	181,426
Loss on extinguishment of debt	12,166	177,277
Loss on settlement of liabilities	-3,425	'
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:	'	'
Accounts receivable	-73,307	179,814
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	-4,006	-18,576
Deferred costs	-1,298,896	92,104
Security deposits	-4,500	-12,468
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	817,188	236,472
Accounts payable - related party	4,951	3,351
Deferred revenue	1,667,504	-124,079
Other liabilities	-5,709	51,372
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities	56,610	-179,810
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:	'	'
Purchase of property and equipment	-25,836	-13,775
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities	-25,836	-13,775
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:	'	'
Proceeds from note	50,000	'
Repayment of capital lease	-2,535	-2,505
Repayment of notes	-57,480	-9,886
Debt issuance costs	-5,000	-5,000
Proceeds from convertible notes	280,000	205,000
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities	264,985	187,609
Net change in cash	295,759	-5,976
Cash at beginning of reporting period	125,517	126,765
Cash at end of reporting period	421,276	120,789
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:	'	'
Interest paid	10,754	11,463
Income tax paid	'	'
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:	'	'
Debt discount recorded on convertible debt and warrants accounted for as derivative liabilities	280,000	205,000
Furniture and fixtures	'	5,288
Stock options exercised through settlement of liability	15,000	'
Fully depreciated equipment disposed	'	2,810
Customer list [Member]	'	'
Assets acquired through asset acquisition as follows:	'	'
Intangible Assets Acquired	'	80,000
Non-compete agreement [Member]	'	'
Assets acquired through asset acquisition as follows:	'	'
Intangible Assets Acquired	'	65,000
Domain name [Member]	'	'
Assets acquired through asset acquisition as follows:	'	'
Intangible Assets Acquired	'	$7,500

Organization_and_Operations

Organization and Operations	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Organization And Operations [Abstract]	'
Organization and Operations	'
	Note 1 – Organization and Operations
	UBL Interactive, Inc.
	UBL Interactive, Inc. (“UBL” or the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on September 30, 2009. The Company provides public identity services to businesses by managing their online profile information and distributing this information uniformly to search engines, directory publishers, social networks and mobile services.

Significant_and_Critical_Accou

Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices [Abstract]	'
Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices	'
	Note 2 – Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices
	The Management of the Company is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies and the appropriateness of accounting policies and their application. Critical accounting policies and practices are those that are both most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results and require management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company’s significant and critical accounting policies and practices are disclosed below as required by generally accepted accounting principles.
	Basis of Presentation- Unaudited Interim Financial Information
	The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and in accordance with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) with respect to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013 and notes thereto contained in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013, as filed with the SEC on December 30, 2013.
	Fiscal Year-End
	The Company elected September 30 as its fiscal year-end date.
	Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions
	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).
	Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:
		(i)	Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.
		(ii)	Allowance for doubtful accounts: Management’s estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts is based on historical sales, historical loss levels, and an analysis of the collectability of individual accounts; and general economic conditions that may affect a client’s ability to pay. The Company evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop the allowance in determining that it is reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.
		(iii)	Sales returns and allowances: Management’s estimate of sales returns and allowances is based on an analysis of historical returns and allowance activity to establish a baseline reserve level. The Company then evaluates whether there are any underlying product quality or other customer specific issues that require additional specific reserves above the baseline level.
		(iv)	Fair value of long-lived assets: Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.
		(v)	Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors.
		(vi)	Estimates and assumptions used in valuation of convertible debt and equity instruments: Management estimates the fair value of the derivative warrant issued in connection with the Company’s convertible promissory notes, using a lattice model, with the assistance of an independent valuation expert.
	These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.
	Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
	Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.
	Actual results could differ from those estimates.
	Principles of Consolidation
	The Company applies the guidance of Topic 810 “Consolidation” of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to determine whether and how to consolidate another entity. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-10 all majority-owned subsidiaries—all entities in which a parent has a controlling financial interest—shall be consolidated except (1) when control does not rest with the parent, the majority owner; (2) if the parent is a broker-dealer within the scope of Topic 940 and control is likely to be temporary; (3) consolidation by an investment company within the scope of Topic 946 of a non-investment-company investee. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-8 the usual condition for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a majority voting interest, and, therefore, as a general rule ownership by one reporting entity, directly or indirectly, of more than 50 percent of the outstanding voting shares of another entity is a condition pointing toward consolidation. The power to control may also exist with a lesser percentage of ownership, for example, by contract, lease, agreement with other stockholders, or by court decree. The Company consolidatesall less-than-majority-owned subsidiaries, if any, in which the parent’s power to control exists.
	The Company's consolidated subsidiaries and/or entities are as follows:
	Name of consolidated		State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization		Date of incorporation or formation	Attributable interest
	subsidiary or entity				(date of acquisition, if applicable)
	UBL Europe, LLC (1)		Delaware		7-Sep-10		100	%
	Mongoose Technologies, Inc. (2)		Delaware		September 9, 2009		100	%
					(January 18, 2010)
		-1	UBL Europe, LLC filed a Certificate of Cancellation on February 13, 2013.
		-2	Currently inactive.
	The consolidated financial statements include all accounts of the Company and consolidated subsidiaries and/or entities as of June 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013 and for the interim period ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.
	All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.
	Fair Value of Financial Instruments
	The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and has adopted paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:
	Level 1		Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
	Level 2		Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
	Level 3		Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.
	Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.
	The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.
	The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, deferred costs, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and deferred revenues, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.
	The Company’s capital lease liability, notes payable and convertible notes payable approximate the fair value of such instruments based upon management’s best estimate of interest rates that would be available to the Company for similar financial arrangements at June 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013.
	The Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities consist of the derivative convertible notes and derivative warrants issued in connection with the Company’s convertible promissory notes (the "Notes"), for which there is no current market for these securities, such that the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. The Company valued the automatic conditional conversion, re-pricing/down-round, change of control; default and follow-on offering provisions using a lattice model, with the assistance of an independent valuation expert, for which management understands the methodologies. These models incorporate transaction details such as Company stock price, contractual terms, maturity, risk free rates, as well as assumptions about future financings, volatility, and holder behavior as of the date of issuance and each balance sheet date.
	Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.
	Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis
	Level 3 Financial Liabilities – Derivative Financial Instruments
	The Company uses Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy to measure the fair value of the derivative liabilities and revalues its derivative convertible notes and warrant liabilities at every reporting period and recognizes gains or losses in the statements of operations that are attributable to the change in the fair value of the derivative convertible notes and warrant liabilities.
	Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
	The Company has adopted Section 360-10-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-17 an impairment loss shall be recognized only if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset (asset group). That assessment shall be based on the carrying amount of the asset (asset group) at the date it is tested for recoverability. An impairment loss shall be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) exceeds its fair value. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-20 if an impairment loss is recognized, the adjusted carrying amount of a long-lived asset shall be its new cost basis. For a depreciable long-lived asset, the new cost basis shall be depreciated (amortized) over the remaining useful life of that asset. Restoration of a previously recognized impairment loss is prohibited.
	Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-21 the Company’s long-lived asset (asset group) is tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company considers the following to be some examples of such events or changes in circumstances that may trigger an impairment review: (a) significant decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset (asset group); (b) A significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which a long-lived asset (asset group) is being used or in its physical condition; (c) A significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of a long-lived asset (asset group), including an adverse action or assessment by a regulator; (d) An accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of a long-lived asset (asset group); (e) A current-period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of a long-lived asset (asset group); and (f) A current expectation that, more likely than not, a long-lived asset (asset group) will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life. The Company tests its long-lived assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.
	Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 360-10-45-4 and 360-10-45-5 an impairment loss recognized for a long-lived asset (asset group) to be held and used shall be included in income from continuing operations before income taxes in the income statement of a business entity. If a subtotal such as income from operations is presented, it shall include the amount of that loss. A gain or loss recognized on the sale of a long-lived asset (disposal group) that is not a component of an entity shall be included in income from continuing operations before income taxes in the income statement of a business entity. If a subtotal such as income from operations is presented, it shall include the amounts of those gains or losses.
	Cash Equivalents
	The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.
	The Company minimizes its credit risk associated with cash by periodically evaluating the credit quality of its primary financial institution. The balance at times may exceed federally insured limits.
	Accounts Receivable and Allowances
	The Company maintains an allowance for losses it may incur as a result of its customers’ inability to make required payments. The Company follows paragraph 310-10-50-9 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to estimate the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company performs on-going credit evaluations of its customers and adjusts credit limits based upon payment history and the customer’s current credit worthiness, as determined by the review of their current credit information; and determines the allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical write-off experience, customer specific facts and general economic conditions that may affect a client’s ability to pay.
	Pursuant to paragraph 310-10-50-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. The Company has adopted paragraph 310-10-50-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and determine when receivables are past due or delinquent based on how recently payments have been received.
	Outstanding account balances are reviewed individually for collectability. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s existing accounts receivable. Bad debt expense is included in general and administrative expenses, if any.
	If the financial condition of one or more of its customers unexpectedly deteriorates, resulting in their inability to make payments, or if the Company otherwise underestimates the losses it incurs as a result of its customers’ inability to pay, the Company could be required to increase its allowance for doubtful accounts which could materially adversely affect its operating results.
	The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure to its customers at June 30, 2014 or September 30, 2013.
	The Company’s sales to certain customers consist of gross product sales reduced by expected future sales returns and allowances. To estimate sales returns and allowances, the Company analyzes historical returns and allowance activity to establish a baseline reserve level. The Company then evaluates whether there are any underlying product quality or other customer specific issues that require additional specific reserves above the baseline level. Because the reserve for sales returns and allowances is based on judgments and estimates of the management of the Company, its reserves may not be adequate to cover actual sales returns and other allowances. If the Company’s reserves are not adequate, its net sales and accounts receivable could be materially adversely affected.
	Property and Equipment
	Property and equipment is recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation of property and equipment is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets as follows:
			Estimated
			Useful Life
(Years)
Computer and software		5
Equipment under capital lease		5
Furniture and fixture		7
Leasehold improvement		*
(*) Amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease or the estimated useful lives, whichever is shorter.
Upon sale or retirement of property and equipment, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in statements of operations.
Leases
Lease agreements are evaluated to determine whether they are capital leases or operating leases in accordance with paragraph 840-10-25-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 840-10-25-1”). Pursuant to Paragraph 840-10-25-1 A lessee and a lessor shall consider whether a lease meets any of the following four criteria as part of classifying the lease at its inception under the guidance in the Lessees Subsection of this Section (for the lessee) and the Lessors Subsection of this Section (for the lessor): a. Transfer of ownership. The lease transfers ownership of the property to the lessee by the end of the lease term. This criterion is met in situations in which the lease agreement provides for the transfer of title at or shortly after the end of the lease term in exchange for the payment of a nominal fee, for example, the minimum required by statutory regulation to transfer title. b. Bargain purchase option. The lease contains a bargain purchase option. c. Lease term. The lease term is equal to 75 percent or more of the estimated economic life of the leased property. d. Minimum lease payments. The present value at the beginning of the lease term of the minimum lease payments, excluding that portion of the payments representing executory costs such as insurance, maintenance, and taxes to be paid by the lessor, including any profit thereon, equals or exceeds 90 percent of the excess of the fair value of the leased property to the lessor at lease inception over any related investment tax credit retained by the lessor and expected to be realized by the lessor. In accordance with paragraphs 840-10-25-29 and 840-10-25-30, if at its inception a lease meets any of the four lease classification criteria in Paragraph 840-10-25-1, the lease shall be classified by the lessee as a capital lease; and if none of the four criteria in Paragraph 840-10-25-1 are met, the lease shall be classified by the lessee as an operating lease. Pursuant to Paragraph 840-10-25-31 a lessee shall compute the present value of the minimum lease payments using the lessee's incremental borrowing rate unless both of the following conditions are met, in which circumstance the lessee shall use the implicit rate: a. It is practicable for the lessee to learn the implicit rate computed by the lessor. b. The implicit rate computed by the lessor is less than the lessee's incremental borrowing rate. Capital lease assets are depreciated on a straight line method, over the capital lease assets estimated useful lives consistent with the Company’s normal depreciation policy for tangible fixed assets. Interest charges are expensed over the period of the lease in relation to the carrying value of the capital lease obligation.
Operating leases primarily relate to the Company’s leases of office spaces. When the terms of an operating lease include tenant improvement allowances, periods of free rent, rent concessions, and/or rent escalation amounts, the Company establishes a deferred rent liability for the difference between the scheduled rent payment and the straight-line rent expense recognized, which is amortized over the underlying lease term on a straight-line basis as a reduction of rent expense.
Intangible Assets Other Than Goodwill
The Company has adopted Subtopic 350-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for intangible assets other than goodwill. Under the requirements, the Company amortizes the acquisition costs of intangible assets other than goodwill on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, the terms of the exclusive licenses and/or agreements, or the terms of legal lives of the intangible assets, whichever is shorter. Upon becoming fully amortized, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.
Research and Development and Capitalized Internal Use Software Development Costs
The Company has adopted paragraph 350-40-15-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 350-40-15-2”) for software developed for internal use. Paragraph 350-40-15-2 requires the capitalization of certain external and internal computer software costs incurred during the application development stage. The application development stage is characterized by software design and configuration activities, coding, testing and installation. Training costs and maintenance are expensed as incurred, while upgrades and enhancements are capitalized if it is probable that such expenditures will result in additional functionality. Capitalized software development costs for internal use begins when the software is available for internal use and is amortized on a straight-line basis over software’s estimated useful life ranging from one to three years. Upon becoming fully amortized or being charged off as impaired, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.
Research and development costs incurred in the process of software development before establishment of technological feasibility is expensed as incurred.
Customer Deposits
Customer deposits primarily represent amounts received from customers for future delivery of products, which are fully or partially refundable depending upon the terms and conditions of the sales agreements.
Derivative Instruments
The Company evaluates its convertible debt, warrants or other contracts to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with Paragraph 815-10-05-4 of the Codification and Paragraph 815-40-25 of the Codification. The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the embedded derivative is marked-to-market each balance sheet date and recorded as a liability. In the event that the fair value is recorded as a liability, the change in fair value is recorded in the consolidated statements of operations as other income or expense. Upon conversion or exercise of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the conversion date and then that fair value is reclassified to equity.
In circumstances where the embedded conversion option in a convertible instrument is required to be bifurcated and there are also other embedded derivative instruments in the convertible instrument that are required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compound derivative instrument.
The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Equity instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to reclassification are reclassified to liability at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. Derivative instrument liabilities will be classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument is expected within 12 months of the balance sheet date.
The Company marks to market the fair value of the remaining embedded derivative warrants at each balance sheet date and records the change in the fair value of the remaining embedded derivative warrants as other income or expense in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
The Company utilizes the Lattice model that values the liability of the derivative warrants based on a probability weighted discounted cash flow model with the assistance of the third party valuation firm. The reason the Company picks the Lattice model is that in many cases there may be multiple embedded features or the features of the bifurcated derivatives may be so complex that a Black-Scholes valuation does not consider all of the terms of the instrument. Therefore, the fair value may not be appropriately captured by simple models. In other words, simple models such as Black-Scholes may not be appropriate in many situations given complex features and terms of conversion option (e.g., combined embedded derivatives). The Lattice model is based on future projections of the various potential outcomes. The features that were analyzed and incorporated into the model included the exercise and full reset features. Based on these features, there are two primary events that can occur; the Holder exercises the Warrants or the Warrants are held to expiration. The Lattice model analyzed the underlying economic factors that influenced which of these events would occur, when they were likely to occur, and the specific terms that would be in effect at the time (i.e. stock price, exercise price, volatility, etc.). Projections were then made on the underlying factors which led to potential scenarios. Probabilities were assigned to each scenario based on management projections. This led to a cash flow projection and a probability associated with that cash flow. A discounted weighted average cash flow over the various scenarios was completed to determine the value of the derivative warrants.
Related Parties
The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.
Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the related parties include a. affiliates of the Company; b. entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d. principal owners of the Company; e. management of the Company; f. other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.
The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a. the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b. a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.
Commitment and Contingencies
The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.
If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.
Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.
Revenue Recognition
The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue is recognized from the point at which service is first provided over the life of the subscription period, typically one year. Appropriate allowances for returns and discounts are recorded concurrent with revenue recognition.
Deferred Costs (Asset)
Service arrangements with customers require certain significant up-front costs.
The Company capitalizes the up-front costs associated with providing the services and amortizes those costs ratably over the same period that the revenue is recognized for the related up-front payment.
Deferred Revenue (Liability)
The Company receives non-refundable up-front payments for services. These payments are initially deferred and subsequently recognized over the subscription period, typically one year.
Advertising
The Company expenses advertising when incurred. Advertising expense for the reporting period ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was $19,687 and $28,420, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation for Obtaining Employee Services
The Company accounts for share-based payment transactions issued to employees under the guidance of the Topic 718 Compensation—Stock Compensation of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC Topic 718”).
Pursuant to ASC Section 718-10-20 an employee is an individual over whom the grantor of a share-based compensation award exercises or has the right to exercise sufficient control to establish an employer-employee relationship based on common law as illustrated in case law and currently under U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) Revenue Ruling 87-41. A nonemployee director does not satisfy this definition of employee. Nevertheless, nonemployee directors acting in their role as members of a board of directors are treated as employees if those directors were elected by the employer’s shareholders or appointed to a board position that will be filled by shareholder election when the existing term expires. However, that requirement applies only to awards granted to nonemployee directors for their services as directors. Awards granted to nonemployee directors for other services shall be accounted for as awards to non-employees.
Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 718-10-30-2 and 718-10-30-3 a share-based payment transaction with employees shall be measured based on the fair value of the equity instruments issued and an entity shall account for the compensation cost from share-based payment transactions with employees in accordance with the fair value-based method, i.e., the cost of services received from employees in exchange for awards of share-based compensation generally shall be measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity instruments issued or the fair value of the liabilities incurred/settled.
Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 718-10-30-6 and 718-10-30-9 the measurement objective for equity instruments awarded to employees is to estimate the fair value at the grant date of the equity instruments that the entity is obligated to issue when employees have rendered the requisite service and satisfied any other conditions necessary to earn the right to benefit from the instruments (for example, to exercise share options). That estimate is based on the share price and other pertinent factors, such as expected volatility, at the grant date. As such, the fair value of an equity share option or similar instrument shall be estimated using a valuation technique such as an option pricing model. For this purpose, a similar instrument is one whose fair value differs from its intrinsic value, that is, an instrument that has time value.
If the Company’s common shares are traded in one of the national exchanges the grant-date share price of the Company’s common stock will be used to measure the fair value of the common shares issued, however, if the Company’s common shares are thinly traded the use of share prices established in its most recent private placement memorandum (“PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
The Company estimates the fair value of share options and similar instruments on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model. The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:
●	Expected term of share options and similar instruments: The expected life of options and similar instruments represents the period of time the option and/or warrant are expected to be outstanding.  Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments.  Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-S99-1, it may be appropriate to use the simplified method, i.e., expected term =(vesting term + original contractual term) / 2), if (i) A company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term due to the limited period of time its equity shares have been publicly traded; (ii) A company significantly changes the terms of its share option grants or the types of employees that receive share option grants such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term; or (iii) A company has or expects to have significant structural changes in its business such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term. The Company uses the simplified method to calculate expected term of share options and similar instruments as the company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.
●Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it.  Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall disclose the reasons why it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price, the appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index.  The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility.  If shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
●	Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends.  An entity that uses a method that employs different dividend rates during the contractual term shall disclose the range of expected dividends used and the weighted-average expected dividends.  The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.
●	Risk-free rate(s). An entity that uses a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.
Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 718-10-30-11 and 718-10-30-17 a restriction that stems from the forfeitability of instruments to which employees have not yet earned the right, such as the inability either to exercise a non-vested equity share option or to sell non-vested shares, is not reflected in estimating the fair value of the related instruments at the grant date. Instead, those restrictions are taken into account by recognizing compensation cost only for awards for which employees render the requisite service and a non-vested equity share or non-vested equity share unit awarded to an employee shall be measured at its fair value as if it were vested and issued on the grant date.
Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 718-10-35-2 and 718-10-35-3 the compensation cost for an award of share-based employee compensation classified as equity shall be recognized over the requisite service period, with a corresponding credit to equity (generally, paid-in capital). The requisite service period is the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for an award, which often is the vesting period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized at the end of the requisite service period for an award of share-based compensation shall be based on the number of instruments for which the requisite service has been rendered (that is, for which the requisite service period has been completed). An entity shall base initial accruals of compensation cost on the estimated number of instruments for which the requisite service is expected to be rendered. That estimate shall be revised if subsequent information indicates that the actual number of instruments is likely to differ from previous estimates. The cumulative effect on current and prior periods of a change in the estimated number of instruments for which the requisite service is expected to be or has been rendered shall be recognized in compensation cost in the period of the change. Previously recognized compensation cost shall not be reversed if an employee share option (or share unit) for which the requisite service has been rendered expires unexercised (or unconverted).
Under the requirement of ASC Paragraph 718-10-35-8 the Company made a policy decision to recognize compensation cost for an award with only service conditions that has a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.
Equity Instruments Issued to Parties Other Than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services
The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under guidance of Sub-topic 505-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Sub-topic 505-50”).
Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-25-7, if fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (no specific performance is required by the grantee to retain those equity instruments), then, because of the elimination of any obligation on the part of the counterparty to earn the equity instruments, a measurement date has been reached. A grantor shall recognize the equity instruments when they are issued (in most cases, when the agreement is entered into). Whether the corresponding cost is an immediate expense or a prepaid asset (or whether the debit should be characterized as contra-equity under the requirements of paragraph 505-50-45-1) depends on the specific facts and circumstances. Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-45-1, a grantor may conclude that an asset (other than a note or a receivable) has been received in return for fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (and no specific performance is required by the grantee in order to retain those equity instruments). Such an asset shall not be displayed as contra-equity by the grantor of the equity instruments. The transferability (or lack thereof) of the equity instruments shall not affect the balance sheet display of the asset. This guidance is limited to transactions in which equity instruments are transferred to other than employees in exchange for goods or services.
Pursuant to Paragraphs 505-50-25-8 and 505-50-25-9, an entity may grant fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are exercisable by the grantee only after a specified period of time if the terms of the agreement provide for earlier exercisability if the grantee achieves specified performance conditions. Any measured cost of the transaction shall be recognized in the same period(s) and in the same manner as if the entity had paid cash for the goods or services or used cash rebates as a sales discount instead of paying with, or using, the equity instruments. A recognized asset, expense, or sales discount shall not be reversed if a stock option that the counterparty has the right to exercise expires unexercised.
Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 505-50-30-2 and 505-50-30-11 share-based payment transactions with nonemployees shall be measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The issuer shall measure the fair value of the equity instruments in these transactions using the stock price and other measurement assumptions as of the earlier of the following dates, referred to as the measurement date: (a) The date at which a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached (a performance commitment); or (b) The date at which the counterparty's performance is complete. If the Company’s common shares are traded in one of the national exchanges the grant-date share price of the Company’s common stock will be used to measure the fair value of the common shares issued, however, if the Company’s common shares are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum (“PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
The Company estimates the fair value of share options and similar instruments on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model. The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:
●	Expected term of share options and similar instruments: Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and holder’s expected exercise behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments.  The Company uses historical data to estimate holder’s expected exercise behavior.  If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the contractual term of the share options and similar instruments is used as the expected term of share options and similar instruments as the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.
●	Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it.  Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall disclose the reasons why it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price, the appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index.  The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility.  If shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
●	Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends.  An entity that uses a method that employs different dividend rates during the contractual term shall disclose the range of expected dividends used and the weighted-average expected dividends.  The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.
●	Risk-free rate(s). An entity that uses a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used.  The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.
Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-S99-1, if the Company receives a right to receive future services in exchange for unvested, forfeitable equity instruments, those equity instruments are treated as unissued for accounting purposes until the future services are received (that is, the instruments are not considered issued until they vest). Consequently, there would be no recognition at the measurement date and no entry should be recorded.
Income Tax Provision
The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income in the period that includes the enactment date.
The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”). Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty (50) percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.
The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.
Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.
Uncertain Tax Positions
The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no adjustments to its income tax liabilities or benefits pursuant to the provisions of Section 740-10-25 for the reporting period ended June 30, 2014 or 2013.
Net Income (Loss) per Common Share
Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through contingent share arrangements, stock options and warrants.
The following table shows the potentially outstanding dilutive common shares excluded from the diluted net income (loss) per common share calculation as they were anti-dilutive:
		Potentially Outstanding Dilutive Common Shares
		For the reporting period ended			For the reporting period ended
		June 30,			June 30,
		2014			2013
Convertible Note Shares
On May 3, 2011, June 13, 2011 and August 1, 2011, the Company issued three (3) convertible notes payable in the face amount of $25,0000 each, or $75,000 in aggregate, with interest at 10% per annum due October 1, 2011, June 1, 2012 and June 1, 2012, respectively, convertible at the lesser of (i) an amount equal to ninety percent (90%) of the then offering price of subsequent financings, or (ii) $0.15 per share. The due date of the remaining note was subsequently extended three times to December 31, 2014.			166,667			166,667
On January 31, 2012, the Company issued two (2) convertible notes in the face amount of $130,000 each, or $260,000 in aggregate with interest at 5% per annum originally due one (1) year from the date of issuance, convertible at $0.10 per share. The due date of the notes was subsequently extended twice to January 31, 2015.			2,600,000			2,600,000
On November 19, 2012, the Company issued two (2) convertible notes in the face amount of $102,500 each, or $205,000 in aggregate, with interest at 5% per annum, convertible at $0.10 per share. The due date of the notes was subsequently extended to January 31, 2015.			2,050,000			2,050,000
On July 19, 2013, the Company issued three (3) convertible notes in the aggregate amount of $250,000, with interest at 5% per annum, due January 31, 2015, convertible at $0.10 per share.			2,500,000			-
On October 18, 2013, the Company issued three (3) convertible notes in the aggregate amount of $280,000, with interest at 5% per annum, due January 31, 2015, convertible at $0.10 per share.			2,800,000			-
Warrant Shares
Common stock warrants, with exercise prices ranging from $0.15 to $0.75 per share.			3,560,000			1,417,500
Option Shares
Stock options, with exercise prices ranging from $0.06 to $0.30 per share.			8,194,167			5,083,500
Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares			21,870,834			11,317,667
Cash Flows Reporting
The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.
Subsequent Events
The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements are issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. The amendments in this Update change the requirements for reporting discontinued operations in Subtopic 205-20.
Under the new guidance, a discontinued operation is defined as a disposal of a component or group of components that is disposed of or is classified as held for sale and “represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results.” The ASU states that a strategic shift could include a disposal of (i) a major geographical area of operations, (ii) a major line of business, (iii) a major equity method investment, or (iv) other major parts of an entity. Although “major” is not defined, the standard provides examples of when a disposal qualifies as a discontinued operation.
The ASU also requires additional disclosures about discontinued operations that will provide more information about the assets, liabilities, income and expenses of discontinued operations. In addition, the ASU requires disclosure of the pre-tax profit or loss attributable to a disposal of an individually significant component of an entity that does not qualify for discontinued operations presentation in the financial statements.
The ASU is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those years.
In May 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”)
This guidance amends the existing FASB Accounting Standards Codification, creating a new Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customer. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.
To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps:
	1	Identify the contract(s) with the customer
	2	Identify the performance obligations in the contract
	3	Determine the transaction price
	4	Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract
	5	Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligations
The ASU also provides guidance on disclosures that should be provided to enable financial statement users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue recognition and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. Qualitative and quantitative information is required about the following:
	1	Contracts with customers – including revenue and impairments recognized, disaggregation of revenue, and information about contract balances and performance obligations (including the transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations)
	2	Significant judgments and changes in judgments – determining the timing of satisfaction of performance obligations (over time or at a point in time), and determining the transaction price and amounts allocated to performance obligations
	3	Assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract.
ASU 2014-09 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period for all public entities. Early application is not permitted.
In June 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-12 “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718) : Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period” (“ASU 2014-12”).
The amendments clarify the proper method of accounting for share-based payments when the terms of an award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. The Update requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. The performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered.
The amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted.
Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

Going_Concern

Going Concern	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Going Concern [Abstract]	'
Going Concern	'
	Note 3 – Going Concern
	The consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.
	As reflected in the consolidated financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit at June 30, 2014 and a net loss for the nine months then ended. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
	The Company is attempting to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue; however, the Company’s cash position may not be sufficient to support the Company’s daily operations. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and in its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering.
	The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Property_and_Equipment

Property and Equipment	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Property and Equipment [Abstract]	'
Property and Equipment	'
	Note 4 – Property and Equipment
	Property and equipment, stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation consisted of the following:
		Estimated	June 30,			September 30,
		Useful Life	2014			2013
		(Years)
	Computers and software	5	$	69,175		$	46,853
	Equipment under capital lease	5		6,962			6,962
	Furniture and equipment	7		20,928			17,414
	Leasehold improvements	*		7,425			7,425
				104,490			78,654
	Less accumulated depreciation and amortization			(61,026	)		(48,995	)
			$	43,464		$	29,659
	* To be amortized over the term of the lease or its estimated useful life, whichever is shorter.
	(i) Impairment
	Management regularly reviews property and equipment for possible impairment. This review occurs annually (September 1 for us), or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.
	(ii) Depreciation and Amortization Expense
	Depreciation and amortization expense was $12,031 and $14,725 for the nine months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Capitalized_Software_Developme

Capitalized Software Development Costs	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Capitalized Software Development Costs [Abstract]	'
Capitalized Software Development Costs	'
	Note 5 – Capitalized Software Development Costs
	Capitalized software development costs, stated at cost, less accumulated amortization consisted of the following:
		Estimated Useful Life	June 30,			September 30,
		(Years)	2014			2013
	Capitalized software development costs	3	$	109,983		$	109,983
	Less accumulated amortization			(109,983	)		(109,983	)
			$	-		$	-
	(i) Amortization Expense
	Amortization expense amounted to $0 and $22,896 for the nine months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Intangible_Assets

Intangible Assets	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Intangible Assets [Abstract]	'
Intangible Assets	'
	Note 6 – Intangible Assets
	The following table summarizes changes in intangible assets as of June 30, 2014:
		Estimated		Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Impairment		Net
		Life							Charges
	Customer list	3 years		$	84,000	$	(30,222	)	$	-	$	53,778
	Non-compete	3 years			69,183		(24,867	)		-		44,316
	Domain name	Indefinite			7,500		-			-		7,500
				$	160,683	$	(55,089	)	$	-	$	105,594
	The following table summarizes changes in intangible assets as of September 30, 2013:
		Estimated		Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Impairment		Net
		Life							Charges
	Customer list	3 years		$	84,000	$	(9,222	)	$	-	$	74,778
	Non-compete	3 years			69,183		(7,571	)		-		61,612
	Domain name	Indefinite			7,500		-			-		7,500
				$	160,683	$	(16,793	)	$	-	$	143,890
	(i) Impairment
	Intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized but instead are measured for impairment at least annually (September 1 for us), or when events indicate that an impairment exists. Management regularly reviews definite-lived intangible assets, for possible impairment. This review occurs annually (September 1 for us), or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.
	(ii) Amortization Expense
	Amortization expense amounted to $38,296 and $4,028 for the nine months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
	Amortization expense for the next five years is as follows:
	Fiscal Year ending September 30:
	2014 (remainder of year)	$	12,766
	2015		51,061
	2016		41,767
		$	105,594

Notes_Payable

Notes Payable	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Notes Payable [Abstract]	'
Notes Payable	'
	Note 7 – Notes Payable
	Short Term Note
	On January 23, 2014, the Company sold a note in the amount of $50,000 to one (1) note holder with the following terms and conditions:
		●	Maturing on February 28, 2014,
		●	Interest rate at 12% per annum, with interest payable at maturity,
		●	Penalty - upon default the Company shall issue the holder 200,000 shares of common stock of the Company.
	The Company repaid the total outstanding principal along with accrued interest in the amount of $50,608 on February 27, 2014.
	SBA Loan - Default and Contingent Liability
	Prior to September 2010, the Company executed a note for $386,300 with the United States Small Business Administration ("SBA") with the following terms and conditions:
		●	Maturing in January 2036;
		●	Interest at 4% per annum;
		●	Monthly principal and interest payment of $1,944
	Default and Potential Violation
	The Company has been in violation of certain covenants contained in this note since 2011. The circumstances that potentially led to these violations have not been cured. The Company does not believe it is probable that the loan will be called by the SBA due to the fact that the Company is current with its obligation.
	Debt under these obligations is as follows:
			June 30,			September 30,
			2014			2013
	Notes payable		$	330,743		$	338,223
	Less: Current maturities			(10,284	)		(9,981	)
	Notes payable, net of Current maturities		$	320,459		$	328,242
	Future minimum principal and interest payment under SBA loan at June 30, 2014 are as follows:
	Fiscal Year ending September 30:
	2014 (remainder of year)		$	5,832
	2015			23,328
	2016			23,328
	2017			23,328
	2018			23,328
	2019 and thereafter			390,744
				489,888
	Less interest portion			(159,145	)
				330,743
	Less current maturities			(10,284	)
			$	320,459

Convertible_Notes_Payable

Convertible Notes Payable	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Convertible Notes Payable [Abstract]	'
Convertible Notes Payable	'
	Note 8 – Convertible Notes Payable
	Debt Offering (A)
	On May 3, 2011, June 13, 2011 and August 1, 2011, the Company sold three (3) $25,000 notes or $75,000 in aggregate of unsecured, subordinated convertible notes (the "Notes") with the following terms and conditions:
		●	Maturity dates ranging from October 1, 2011 to December 31, 2014 as amended;
		●	Interest rate at 10% per annum, with interest payable at maturity;
		●	Convertible (see further description below); and
		●	Subordinate to any senior debt, mezzanine debt, secured debt, or other creditors having priority by law or agreement of the Company as may be incurred by the Company prior to maturity.
	Conversion Feature – Convertible Notes
	In the event the Company consummates, prior to the maturity date of the Notes, an equity financing pursuant to which it sells shares of its common stock with the aggregate gross proceeds of not less than $5 million (a “Qualified Financing”), then the note holder has the right to either (i) exercise the option to call the notes due, whereby the Company shall repay the balance of the notes, including the unpaid principal and all accrued interest; or (ii) exercise the conversion option of converting all of the amounts due from the Company for additional shares. The conversion price shall be the lesser of (i) an amount equal to ninety percent (90%) of the then offering price of such additional shares, or (ii) $0.15 per share.
	If the Company does not engage in a Qualified Financing on or prior to the maturity date of the Notes, the holder of the note may exercise the option of converting the Notes, including all principal and accrued interest, into shares of the Company's common stock at a conversion price of $0.15 per share. If the option is not exercised on the maturity date the conversion option will cease to exist.
	Because these conversion features are variable, management has concluded that the features cannot be indexed solely to the Company’s own stock and therefore are precluded from equity classification. As a result, the features must be accounted for as derivative liabilities.
	During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, two (2) note holders converted notes and related accrued interest of $52,774 at $0.15 per share into 351,827 shares of common stock.
	On February 10, 2014, the remaining note holder, having a note in the principal amount of $25,000, signed a note amendment extending the maturity date of the note. The maturity of the note was extended to December 31, 2014 or the closing of an equity investment where the Company receives net proceeds of more than $500,000, whichever is earlier.
	Derivative Warrants
	Each of the three (3) note holders received a warrant to purchase shares of the Company's common stock equal to 30% of the principal amount of their note (e.g., a warrant to purchase 7,500 shares for each $25,000 invested). These warrants are exercisable at $0.75 per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance, i.e. May 3, 2014, June 13, 2014 and August 1, 2014, respectively.
	Management has concluded that the above conversion features cannot be indexed solely to the Company’s own stock and therefore are precluded from equity classification. The warrants have a maturity date subsequent to the maturity date of the Notes and the warrants are not otherwise excluded from liability treatment. As a result, the warrants must be accounted for as derivative liabilities.
	Extinguishment Accounting
	In order for the conversion feature to be consistent for all note holders, on August 3, 2011, in accordance with a note Modification and Amendment Agreement, one note holder’s conversion price relating to the initial issuance was modified from an amount equal to ninety percent (90%) of the then offering price of such additional shares (future issuances) to the lesser of (i) an amount equal to ninety percent (90%) of the then offering price of such additional shares, or (ii) $0.15 per share.
	The Company compared the fair value of the note on the date of modification to the as-modified note. Because the fair value of the as-modified note was 10% greater than the fair value of the existing note, the Company applied extinguishment accounting, resulting in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $34,390, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011.
	On June 1, 2012, one note holder signed a note amendment extending the maturity date of the note to March 1, 2013, this was considered a substantial modification of terms and the Company applied extinguishment accounting. The Company compared the fair value of the note on the date of modification to the as-modified note. Because the fair value of the as-modified note was 10% greater than the fair value of the existing note, the Company applied extinguishment accounting, resulting in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $8,667, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012.
	On March 1, 2013, one (1) note holder signed a note amendment further extending the maturity date of the note to December 31, 2013, or the closing of an equity investment where the Company receives net proceeds of more than $500,000, whichever is earlier. This was considered a substantial modification of terms and the Company applied extinguishment accounting. The Company compared the fair value of the note on the date of modification to the as-modified note. Because the fair value of the as-modified note was 10% greater than the fair value of the existing note, the Company applied extinguishment accounting, resulting in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $25,667, for the year ended September 30, 2013.
	On February 10, 2014, one (1) note holder signed a note amendment further extending the maturity date of the note to December 31, 2014, or the closing of an equity investment where the Company receives net proceeds of more than $500,000, whichever is earlier. This was considered a substantial modification of terms and the Company applied extinguishment accounting. The Company compared the fair value of the note on the date of modification to the as-modified note. Because the fair value of the as-modified note was 10% greater than the fair value of the existing note, the Company applied extinguishment accounting, resulting in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $12,166, for the reporting period ended June 30, 2014.
	Debt Offering (B)
	On January 31, 2012, the Company sold two (2) $130,000 notes or $260,000 in aggregate of secured, subordinated convertible notes (the "Notes") with the following terms and conditions:
		●	Maturing on January 31, 2015 as amended (see below),
		●	Interest rate at 5% per annum, with interest payable semi-annually,
		●	Default interest rate is 10% per annum,
		●	Convertible to common shares at $0.10 per share (see discussion of ratchet feature below),
		●	Three (3) year warrants to purchase 780,000 shares of common stock, with an exercise price of $0.15 per share; and
		●	Secured by all assets of the Company.
	On November 13, 2012 the maturity date of these notes was extended from January 31, 2013 to January 31, 2014. As consideration for the extension, the Company issued the Note holders 307,500 warrants, with an exercise price of $0.15 per share.
	On July 19, 2013 the maturity date of these notes was further extended from January 31, 2014 to January 31, 2015. As consideration for the extension, the Company issued the Note holders 300,000 warrants, with an exercise price of $0.15 per share.
	Because these warrants contain price protection features (ratchet provision), management has concluded that the features cannot be indexed solely to the company’s own stock and therefore are precluded from equity classification. As a result, the features must be accounted for as derivative liabilities.
	Conversion Feature – Convertible Notes
	The holder has the right from and after the date of the issuance of the Notes and then at any time until the Notes are fully paid, to convert any outstanding and unpaid principal and accrued unpaid interest at a conversion price of $0.10 per share. In the event the Company issues any common stock prior to the complete conversion or payment of the Notes, for a per share price that is less than the conversion price, the conversion price of the Notes shall be reduced to the lower per share price.
	Because these notes contain price protection features (ratchet provision), management has concluded that the features cannot be indexed solely to the company’s own stock and therefore are precluded from equity classification. As a result, the features must be accounted for as derivative liabilities.
	Derivative Warrants
	Each of the two (2) note holders received warrants to purchase 390,000 shares of the Company's common stock. These warrants are exercisable at $0.15 per share. The warrants expire three (3) years from the date of issuance.
	In the event the Company issues any common stock prior to expiration date of the warrants, for a per share price that is less than the purchase price of the warrants, the warrant price shall be reduced to the lower per share price.
	Because these warrants contain price protection features (ratchet provision), management has concluded that the features cannot be indexed solely to the company’s own stock and therefore are precluded from equity classification. As a result, the features must be accounted for as derivative liabilities.
	Extinguishment Accounting
	On November 13, 2012, the note holders signed a note amendment extending the maturity date of the note to January 31, 2014, this was considered a substantial modification of terms and the Company applied extinguishment accounting. The Company compared the fair value of the note on the date of modification to the as-modified note. Because the fair value of the as-modified note was 10% greater than the fair value of the existing note, the Company applied extinguishment accounting, resulting in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $151,610, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013.
	On July 19, 2013, the note holders signed a second note amendment extending the maturity date of the note to January 31, 2015, this was considered a substantial modification of terms and the Company applied extinguishment accounting. The Company compared the fair value of the note on the date of modification to the as-modified note. Because the fair value of the as-modified note was 10% greater than the fair value of the existing note, the Company applied extinguishment accounting, resulting in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $124,800, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013.
	Debt Offering (C)
	On November 19, 2012, the Company sold two (2) $102,500 notes or $205,000 in aggregate of secured, subordinated convertible notes (the "Notes") with the following terms and conditions:
		●	Maturing on January 31, 2015 as amended (see below),
		●	Interest rate at 5% per annum, with interest payable semi-annually,
		●	Default interest rate is 10% per annum,
		●	Convertible to common shares at $0.10 per share (see discussion of ratchet feature below),
		●	Three (3) year warrants to purchase 615,000 shares of common stock, with an exercise price of $0.15 per share; and
		●	Secured by all assets of the Company.
	On July 19, 2013 the maturity date of these notes was extended from January 31, 2014 to January 31, 2015. As consideration for the extension, the Company issued the Note holders 300,000 warrants, with an exercise price of $0.15 per share.
	Because these warrants contain price protection features (ratchet provision), management has concluded that the features cannot be indexed solely to the company’s own stock and therefore are precluded from equity classification. As a result, the features must be accounted for as derivative liabilities.
	Conversion Feature – Convertible Notes
	The holder has the right from and after the date of the issuance of the Notes and then at any time until the Notes are fully paid, to convert any outstanding and unpaid principal and accrued unpaid interest at a conversion price of $0.10 per share. In the event the Company issues any common stock prior to the complete conversion or payment of the Notes, for a per share price that is less than the conversion price, the conversion price of the Notes shall be reduced to the lower per share price.
	Because these notes contain price protection features (ratchet provision), management has concluded that the features cannot be indexed solely to the company’s own stock and therefore are precluded from equity classification. As a result, the features must be accounted for as derivative liabilities.
	Derivative Warrants
	Each of the two (2) note holders received warrants to purchase 307,500 shares of the Company's common stock. These warrants are exercisable at $0.15 per share. The warrants expire three years from the date of issuance.
	In the event the Company issues any common stock prior to expiration date of the warrants, for a per share price that is less than the purchase price of the warrants, the warrant price shall be reduced to the lower per share price.
	Because these warrants contain price protection features (ratchet provision), management has concluded that the features cannot be indexed solely to the company’s own stock and therefore are precluded from equity classification. As a result, the features must be accounted for as derivative liabilities.
	Extinguishment Accounting
	On July 19, 2013, the note holders signed a note amendment extending the maturity date of the note to January 31, 2015, this was considered a substantial modification of terms and the Company applied extinguishment accounting. The Company compared the fair value of the note on the date of modification to the as-modified note. Because the fair value of the as-modified note was 10% greater than the fair value of the existing note, the Company applied extinguishment accounting, resulting in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $189,668, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013.
	Debt Offering (D)
On July 19, 2013, the Company sold $250,000 in aggregate of secured, subordinated convertible notes (the "Notes") to three (3) note holders with the following terms and conditions:
	●	Maturing on January 31, 2015,
	●	Interest rate at 5% per annum, with interest payable semi-annually,
	●	Default interest rate is 10% per annum,
	●	Convertible to common shares at $0.10 per share (see discussion of ratchet feature below),
	●	Three (3) year warrants to purchase 750,000 shares of common stock, with an exercise price of $0.15 per share; and
	●	Secured by all assets of the Company.
Conversion Feature – Convertible Notes
The holder has the right from and after the date of the issuance of the Notes and then at any time until the Notes are fully paid, to convert any outstanding and unpaid principal and accrued unpaid interest at a conversion price of $0.10 per share. In the event the Company issues any common stock prior to the complete conversion or payment of the Notes, for a per share price that is less than the conversion price, the conversion price of the Notes shall be reduced to the lower per share price.
Because these notes contain price protection features (ratchet provision), management has concluded that the features cannot be indexed solely to the company’s own stock and therefore are precluded from equity classification. As a result, the features must be accounted for as derivative liabilities.
Derivative Warrants
Two (2) note holders received warrants to purchase 300,000 shares of the Company's common stock and one (1) note holder received warrants to purchase 150,000 shares of the Company's common stock. These warrants are exercisable at $0.15 per share. The warrants expire three years from the date of issuance.
In the event the Company issues any common stock prior to expiration date of the warrants, for a per share price that is less than the purchase price of the warrants, the warrant price shall be reduced to the lower per share price.
Because these warrants contain price protection features (ratchet provision), management has concluded that the features cannot be indexed solely to the company’s own stock and therefore are precluded from equity classification. As a result, the features must be accounted for as derivative liabilities.
Debt Offering (E)
On October 18, 2013, the Company sold $280,000 in aggregate of secured, subordinated convertible notes (the "Notes") to three (3) note holders with the following terms and conditions:
	●	Maturing on January 31, 2015,
	●	Interest rate at 5% per annum, with interest payable semi-annually,
	●	Default interest rate is 10% per annum,
	●	Convertible to common shares at $0.10 per share (see discussion of ratchet feature below),
	●	Three (3) year warrants to purchase 1,400,000 shares of common stock, with an exercise price of $0.15 per share; and
	●	Secured by all assets of the Company.
Conversion Feature – Convertible Notes
The holder has the right from and after the date of the issuance of the Notes and then at any time until the Notes are fully paid, to convert any outstanding and unpaid principal and accrued unpaid interest at a conversion price of $0.10 per share. In the event the Company issues any common stock prior to the complete conversion or payment of the Notes, for a per share price that is less than the conversion price, the conversion price of the Notes shall be reduced to the lower per share price.
Because these notes contain price protection features (ratchet provision), management has concluded that the features cannot be indexed solely to the company’s own stock and therefore are precluded from equity classification. As a result, the features must be accounted for as derivative liabilities.
Derivative Warrants
One (1) note holder received warrants to purchase 650,000 shares of the Company's common stock, one (1) note holder received warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of the Company's common stock, ,and one (1) note holder received warrants to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company's common stock. These warrants are exercisable at $0.15 per share. The warrants expire three years from the date of issuance.
In the event the Company issues any common stock prior to expiration date of the warrants, for a per share price that is less than the purchase price of the warrants, the warrant price shall be reduced to the lower per share price.
Because these warrants contain price protection features (ratchet provision), management has concluded that the features cannot be indexed solely to the company’s own stock and therefore are precluded from equity classification. As a result, the features must be accounted for as derivative liabilities.
Convertible notes payable consisted of the following:
		June 30,			September 30,
		2014			2013
Convertible notes payable		$	1,020,000		$	740,000
Discount on convertible notes			(222,852	)		(217,020	)
Convertible notes payable, net			797,148			522,980
Less current maturities			(797,148	)		(25,000	)
Convertible notes payable, net of current maturities		$	-		$	497,980
Debt Discount
The debt discounts recorded in 2013 pertain to the derivative liability classification of the embedded conversion option and warrants.
The following is a summary of the Company’s debt discount:
		June 30,			September 30,
		2014			2013
Debt discount		$	898,322		$	765,000
Amortization of debt discount			(675,470	)		(401,302	)
Unamortized debt discount removed due to loss on debt extinguishment			-			(146,678	)
Debt discount - net		$	222,852		$	217,020

Derivative_Liabilities

Derivative Liabilities	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Derivative Liabilities [Abstract]	'
Derivative Liabilities	'
	Note 9 – Derivative Liabilities
	The Company identified derivative liabilities associated with the convertible debt and warrants issued in 2013 and 2012.
	As a result of the application of ASC No. 815, the fair values of the Company’s derivative liabilities are summarized as follows:
	Derivative liability – September 30, 2012		$	293,884
	Fair value at the commitment date			946,676
	Fair value of derivative liability associated with the extinguishment of the current note			(837,150	)
	Fair value of derivative liability under terms of newly issued modified note			1,182,217
	Fair value mark to market adjustment			(199,654	)
	Derivative liability – September 30, 2013			1,385,973
	Fair value at the commitment date			669,200
	Fair value of derivative liability associated with the extinguishment of the current note			(11,667	)
	Fair value of derivative liability under terms of newly issued modified note			23,833
	Fair value mark to market adjustment			(1,242,651	)
	Derivative liability – June 30, 2014		$	824,688
	Current portion		$	564,033
				260,655
			$	824,688
	The Company recorded debt discount to the extent of the gross proceeds of each note, and immediately expensed the remaining derivative value if it exceeded the gross proceeds. The Company recorded a derivative expense of $389,200 and $181,426 for the nine months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. No additional debt discount was recognized in connection with the extinguishments.
	The fair value of the Company’s derivative liabilities at the commitment and re-measurement dates were based upon the following management assumptions as of the commitment date and June 30, 2014:
			Commitment Date		Re-measurement Date
	Expected dividends		0	%		0	%
	Expected volatility		162%-171	%		170%-197	%
	Expected term:		1.09 years – 3.00 years			1 month – 2.30 years
	Risk free interest rate		0.12% - 0.62	%		0.02% - 0.47	%
	The fair value of the Company’s derivative liabilities at the commitment and re-measurement dates were based upon the following management assumptions as of the commitment date and September 30, 2013:
			Commitment Date				Re-measurement Date
	Expected dividends			0	%			0	%
	Expected volatility			174%-243	%			150%-233	%
	Expected term:			10 months – 3.00 years				3 months – 2.80 years
	Risk free interest rate			0.11% - 0.59	%			0.02% - 0.63	%
	Warrant Activities
	The following is a summary of the Company’s warrant activity:
			Warrants				Weighted Average Exercise Price
	Balance – September 30, 2012			802,500			$	0.17
	Granted			1,365,000			$	0.15
	Exercised			-			$	-
	Forfeited/Cancelled			-			$	-
	Outstanding – September 30, 2013			2,167,500			$	0.16
	Granted			1,400,000			$	0.15
	Exercised			-		$	-
	Forfeited/Cancelled			(7,500	)		$	0.75
	Outstanding – June 30, 2014			3,560,000			$	0.15
	Exercisable – June 30, 2014			3,560,000			$	0.15
		Warrants Outstanding										Warrants Exercisable
	Exercise price			Number Outstanding				Weighted		Weighted		Number Exercisable	Weighted Average
								Average Remaining		Average			Exercise Price
								Contractual		Exercise Price
								Life
								(in years)
	$	0.15-0.75			3,560,000			1.71 years		$	0.15	3,560,000	$	0.15
	At June 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013 the total intrinsic value of warrants outstanding and exercisable was $0 and $107,250, respectively.

Stockholders_Deficit

Stockholders' Deficit	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Stockholders' Deficit [Abstract]	'
Stockholders' Deficit	'
	Note 10 – Stockholders’ Deficit
	Common Stock
	The issuance of common stock during the nine months ended June 30, 2014 is summarized in the table below:
	Transaction Type		Quantity of Shares			Valuation		Range of Value per Share
	Stock issued to settle liabilities			57,080		$	11,933	$	0.06 – 0.22
	Stock options exercised			150,000			15,000		0.1
	Stock issued for services			500,000			50,000		0.1
	Total			707,080		$	76,933	$	0.06 - 0.22
	The fair value of all stock issuances above is based upon the quoted closing trading price on the date of issuance.
	The issuance of common stock during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013 is summarized in the table below:
	Transaction Type		Quantity of Shares			Valuation		Range of Value per Share
	Stock issued to settle liabilities			200,000		$	38,000	$	0.19
	Stock issued in purchase of intangible assets			135,416			25,729		0.2
	Total			200,000		$	63,729	$	0.19 - 0.20
	The fair value of all stock issuances above is based upon the quoted closing trading price on the date of issuance.
	Stock Options
	The Company maintains a stock option plan that provides for the issuance of incentive stock options at purchase prices equal to the fair market value of the Company's common stock at the date of grant (or 110% of such fair market value in the case of substantial stockholders). The plans also authorize the Company to grant nonqualified options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and deferred stock awards.
	On December 23, 2010, the Board approved the 2010 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the "2010 Plan"), under which 6 million shares of the Company's common stock were reserved for issuance pursuant to the grant of stock awards to employees, non-employee directors or consultants of the Company. Options are granted at an exercise price determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, which, unless a substitute award, may not be less than the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant. Vesting terms and expiration are also approved by the Compensation Committee.
	On October 22, 2013 the Board approved and made the following amendments to the 2010 Plan:
		(i)	add 4,750,000 shares of stock to the amount of stock eligible for grant pursuant to the Plan, and
		(ii)	insert an evergreen provision whereby every October 1, the amount of shares available pursuant to the Plan would reset to a number equal to the greater of (A) 20% of the then issued and outstanding shares of the Company, and (B) the number of shares available for grant pursuant to the Plan on the immediately preceding September 30.
	Under the 2010 Plan, as amended on October 22, 2013, approximately 1.98 million shares were available for future option grants at June 30, 2014.
	The 2010 Plan stipulates prior to the time that shares of Common Stock are publicly traded on a national securities exchange registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under 6(a) of the Exchange Act, after a termination of the Grantee’s employment with the Company or any Subsidiary for any reason, the Company has the right (but not the obligation) to repurchase the Grantee’s shares of Common Stock acquired by the Grantee pursuant to exercise of the Stock Option granted under the 2010 Plan at a purchase price equal to the Fair Market Value of the shares of Common Stock as of the date of repurchase. Such right of repurchase shall be exercisable at any time and from time to time at the discretion of the Company. The Company has evaluated these options for liability treatment but has concluded that it’s not applicable.
	At September 30, 2010, the Company had 1,155,000 stock options issued and outstanding. On December 17, 2010, all 1,155,000 options issued and outstanding were cancelled and reissued with changes in expiration terms. The cancelled options were to expire between October 1, 2012 and October 1, 2014, and the re-issued options expire on December 16, 2015. This resulted in a modification of an equity award under ASC No. 718-20-35, which in substance, the Company repurchases the original instrument by issuing a new instrument of equal or greater value, incurring additional compensation cost for any incremental value.
	Incremental compensation cost was measured as the excess, of the fair value of the modified award determined in accordance with the provisions of ASC No. 718-20-35 over the fair value of the original award immediately before its terms are modified, measured based on the share price and other pertinent factors at that date. The Company applied the Black-Scholes option valuation model and determined additional compensation cost of approximately $43,000 during 2011.
	During the year ended September 30, 2011, the Company's board of directors authorized the grant of 3,235,000 stock options, having a total fair value of approximately $515,000, with vesting periods ranging from immediate vesting to four (4) years. These options expire between September 30, 2012 and September 1, 2017.
	The 1,155,000 stock options discussed above are included as components of both options granted and cancelled/modified during 2011.
	During the year ended September 30, 2012, the Company's board of directors authorized the grant of 3,279,000 stock options, having a total fair value of approximately $446,000, with vesting periods ranging from immediate vesting to four (4) years. These options expire between December 2012 and September 1, 2017.
	During the year ended September 30, 2013, the Company's board of directors authorized the grant of 275,000 stock options, having a total fair value of approximately $40,767, with a vesting period ranging from immediate to 2 years. These options expire between October 16, 2014 and June 1, 2016.
	During the nine months ended June 30, 2014, the Company's board of directors authorized the grant of 3,967,000 stock options, having a total fair value of approximately $635,391, with a vesting period ranging from immediate to 2.55 years. These options expire between November 14, 2016 and January 16, 2017.
	The following is a summary of the Company’s stock option activity:
			Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
	Balance – September 30, 2012			5,202,000		$	0.11		3.73	$	336,200
	Granted			275,000			0.1		2.52	$	27,500
	Exercised			-			-
	Cancelled/Modified			(366,000	)		0.1
	Balance – September 30, 2013 – outstanding			5,111,000			0.11		2.9	$	478,160
	Balance –  September 30, 2013 – exercisable			4,878,708		$	0.11		2.91	$	454,931
	Outstanding options held by related parties – September 30, 2013			1,994,000
	Exercisable options held by related parties – September 30, 2013			1,994,000
	Balance – September 30, 2013			5,111,000		$	0.11		2.9	$	336,200
	Granted			3,967,000			0.11		2.63	$	310,910
	Exercised			(150,000	)		0.1
	Cancelled/Modified			(157,000	)		0.1
	Balance – June 30, 2014 – outstanding			8,771,000			0.11		2.29	$	48,272
	Balance –  June 30, 2014 – exercisable			8,194,167		$	0.11		2.3	$	46,189
	Outstanding options held by related parties – June 30, 2014			1,974,000
	Exercisable options held by related parties – June 30, 2014			1,974,000
	On the dates of grant during the nine months ended June 30, 2014, the Company valued stock option issuances at fair value, utilizing a Black-Scholes option valuation model. The Company utilized the following management assumptions:
	Exercise price		$	0.10-$0.30
	Expected dividends			0	%
	Expected volatility			171% – 181%
	Risk fee interest rate			0.56% – 0.80%
	Expected life of stock options			1.5 years – 2.8 years
	Expected forfeitures			0	%
	On the dates of grant during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013, the Company valued stock option issuances at fair value, utilizing a Black-Scholes option valuation model. The Company utilized the following management assumptions:
	Exercise price		$	0.1
	Expected dividends			0	%
	Expected volatility			132%-174%
	Risk fee interest rate			0.27% -0.52%
	Expected life of stock options			1.0 years – 1.5 years
	Expected forfeitures			0	%
	The following is a summary of the Company’s stock options issued to related parties for services during the nine months ended June 30, 2014:
		Options			Value
Issued to board members			40,000		$	6,388
Total			40,000		$	6,388
On the dates of grant during the nine months ended June 30, 2014, the Company valued these issuances at fair value, utilizing a Black-Scholes option valuation model. The Company utilized the following management assumptions:
Exercise price		$	0.1
Expected dividends			0	%
Expected volatility			171	%
Risk fee interest rate			0.56	%
Expected life of stock options			1.5 years
Expected forfeitures			0	%
The Company did not issue stock options to any related parties during the year ended September 30, 2013.
The following is a summary of the Company’s non-vested stock options at June 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013:
					Weighted Average
		Unvested			Grant
		Stock			Date Fair Value
		Options
Non-vested – September 30, 2012			182,644			0.1
Granted			275,000			0.1
Vested/Exercised			(184,000	)		0.1
Forfeited/Cancelled			(41,352	)		0.09
Non-vested – September 30, 2013			232,292			0.1
Granted			3,967,000			0.11
Vested/Exercised			(3,622,459	)		0.11
Forfeited/Cancelled			-			-
Non-vested – June 30, 2014			576,833		$	0.12
Weighted average remaining period for vesting			2.29 years

Commitments_and_Contingencies

Commitments and Contingencies	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]	'
Commitments and Contingencies	'
	Note 11 – Commitments and Contingencies
	Consulting Agreements
	On March 4, 2014, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with an Investor Relations firm with the following terms and conditions:
		●	Term – 1 year, the agreement can be cancelled by either party with 30 days written notice after the first 90 days
		●	Compensation – months 1-6 - $6,000 per month
		●	Compensation – months 7-12 - $10,000 per month
		●	Restricted stock – 75,000 shares of restricted common stock, the shares are valued at their respective grant dates 18,750 shares to be issued at the end of each 90 day period over the term
	Services Agreement
	The Company’s, Data Contribution and Service Agreement with InfoUSA, Inc., as amended, effective November 12, 2012, requires an annual minimum fee of $300,000. Any shortfall in the annual minimum fee is required to be paid in a lump sum within 30 days of the end of the contract period. InfoUSA provides data distribution services to the Company, For the contract period from August 21, 2012 through August 20, 2013, UBL met the annual minimum fee based upon the purchases made through normal operations and anticipates that based on current operations to date, will meet the annual minimum fee for the contract period from August 21, 2013 through August 20, 2014. If operations were to decrease below current levels, UBL may not meet the annual minimum fee and may be forced to use cash on hand or seek to raise funds through the sale of its securities to meet the required payment. There can be no assurance such funding will be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all.
	Agreements with Placement Agents and Finders
	(A)
	The Company entered into a one year Financial Advisory Agreement with Dragonfly Capital Partners, LLC (“Dragonfly”) effective October 15, 2013 (the “Dragonfly Advisory Agreement”). Pursuant to the Dragonfly Advisory Agreement, Dragonfly will act as the Company’s financial advisor to assist the Company in connection with a best efforts basis in identifying potential sources of capital.
	Dragonfly shall be compensated as follows:
		●	5% of the total credit facility(s) received by the Company from a completed financing with a Dragonfly identified party. The total fee due at each closing will be reduced by any retainer fees already paid to Dragonfly as detailed below.
	Non-refundable retainer fees
		●	$5,000 for each proposal received from a Dragonfly-identified party for a minimum credit facility of $1,000,000.
		●	$10,000 upon execution of a proposal of a debt financing from a Dragonfly identified party; this amount shall be reduced by any amount payable to a lender upon signing of a proposal.
	Subsequent financings within 12 months from the date of termination of the Dragonfly Advisory Agreement whereby a subsequent loan is executed or an existing loan is increased shall result in a cash fee on the new or increased capital/facility provided.
	During the nine months ended June 30, 2014 the Company paid to Dragonfly non-refundable retainer fees of $5,000.
	Operating Leases
	The Company was obligated under an operating lease agreement for office facilities. The lease expired in December 2012.
	The Company signed a new forty-three (43) month lease agreement for its office facilities expiring in July 2016. The lease requires base annual rent of approximately $130,000 for the first year, with 2.5% increments each year thereafter. The lease contains a five (5) month rent abatement period starting on January 1, 2013. Rent expense will be recognized on a straight line basis over the term of the lease. The lease contains one option to renew for a term of thirty-six (36) months.
	On April 10, 2013, the lease was amended to extend the term for an additional 12 months. Accordingly the lease will expire on July 31, 2017.
	In May 2014 the Company signed a lease for additional office space for a five month period. The Company will pay monthly rental payments of $1,500.
	Rent expense totaled $96,328 and $79,211 for the nine months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
	In October 2013 the Company entered into a six (6) month lease agreement for a second corporate apartment starting in October 2013. The Company will pay monthly rental payments of $1,100. Rent expense totaled $9,461 and $0 for the nine months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. In May 2014 monthly rental payments increased to $1,200.
	Future minimum lease payments under this non-cancelable operating are approximately as follows:
	Fiscal Year Ending September 30
	2014 (remainder of year)		$	36,000
	2015			135,000
	2016			139,000
	2017			119,000
	Total		$	429,000
	In December 2012 the Company entered into an operating lease for its corporate apartment under a month-to-month agreement starting in January 2013. The Company will pay monthly rental payments of $1,200. Rent expense totaled $11,250 and $7,200 for the nine months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. In June of 2013 the Company cancelled the lease.
	In February 2014 the Company entered into an operating lease for its Charleston, South Carolina office facility under a month-to-month agreement starting in February 2014. The Company will pay monthly rental payments of $1,300. Rent expense totaled $8,055 and $0 for the nine months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
	In February 2014 the Company entered into an operating lease for its Newport Beach, California office facility under a month-to-month agreement starting in February 2014. Currently, the Company pays monthly rental payments of $3,750. Rent expense totaled $16,323 and $0 for the nine months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
	Capital Lease
	In April 2012, the Company entered into a capital lease agreement for computer equipment. The lease expired in May 2014. The assets and liabilities under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the assets. The assets are depreciated over the lower of their related lease terms or their estimated useful lives.
	The interest rate on the capital lease is 13.50% and was imputed based on the lower of Company’s incremental borrowing rate at the inception of the lease or the lessor’s implicit rate of return.
	Interest paid during the nine months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was $130 and $489, respectively.

Concentrations

Concentrations	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Concentrations [Abstract]	'
Concentrations	'
	Note 12 – Concentrations
	The Company has the following concentrations:
	(A)  Accounts Receivable
	Customer		30-Jun-14	30-Sep-13
	A	***	75%	45%
	(B)  Sales
	Customer		30-Jun-14	30-Jun-13
	A	***	74%	3%
	B		0%	19%
	(C)  Accounts Payable
	Vendor	30-Jun-14	30-Sep-13
	A		21%	29%
	B		3%	14%
	(D)  Purchases
	Vendor		30-Jun-14	30-Jun-13
	A		16%	29%
	B		0%	46%
	C		20%	0%
	D		14%	0%
	E		15%	0%
	F		11%	0%
	*** The loss of this customer and/or if the financial condition of this customer unexpectedly deteriorates, resulting in their inability to make payments could materially adversely affect our financial position, operating results and cash flows.

Subsequent_Events

Subsequent Events	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Subsequent Events [Abstract]	'
Subsequent Events	'
	Note 13 – Subsequent Events
	The Company has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date through the date when the consolidated financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported. The Management of the Company determined that there were certain reportable subsequent events to be disclosed as follows:
	Stock Issuances
	During July and August 2014 the Company issued 5,208 shares of its common stock for the settlement of accounts payable.
	Debt Offerings
	In August 2014, the Company issued an unsecured promissory note in the amount of $100,000 to a related party with the following terms and conditions:
		●	Maturing in October 2014,
		●	Interest rate at 6% per annum, with interest payable on maturity,
		●	Default interest rate is 18% per annum,
		●	Three (3) year warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of common stock, with an exercise price of $0.15 per share.

Significant_and_Critical_Accou1

Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices (Policies)	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices [Abstract]	'
Basis of Presentation- Unaudited Interim Financial Information	'
	Basis of Presentation- Unaudited Interim Financial Information
	The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and in accordance with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) with respect to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013 and notes thereto contained in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013, as filed with the SEC on December 30, 2013.
Fiscal Year-End	'
	Fiscal Year-End
	The Company elected September 30 as its fiscal year-end date.
Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions	'
	Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions
	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).
	Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:
		(i)	Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.
		(ii)	Allowance for doubtful accounts: Management’s estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts is based on historical sales, historical loss levels, and an analysis of the collectability of individual accounts; and general economic conditions that may affect a client’s ability to pay. The Company evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop the allowance in determining that it is reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.
		(iii)	Sales returns and allowances: Management’s estimate of sales returns and allowances is based on an analysis of historical returns and allowance activity to establish a baseline reserve level. The Company then evaluates whether there are any underlying product quality or other customer specific issues that require additional specific reserves above the baseline level.
		(iv)	Fair value of long-lived assets: Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.
		(v)	Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors.
		(vi)	Estimates and assumptions used in valuation of convertible debt and equity instruments: Management estimates the fair value of the derivative warrant issued in connection with the Company’s convertible promissory notes, using a lattice model, with the assistance of an independent valuation expert.
	These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.
	Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.
	Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.
	Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Principles of Consolidation	'
	Principles of Consolidation
	The Company applies the guidance of Topic 810 “Consolidation” of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to determine whether and how to consolidate another entity. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-10 all majority-owned subsidiaries—all entities in which a parent has a controlling financial interest—shall be consolidated except (1) when control does not rest with the parent, the majority owner; (2) if the parent is a broker-dealer within the scope of Topic 940 and control is likely to be temporary; (3) consolidation by an investment company within the scope of Topic 946 of a non-investment-company investee. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-8 the usual condition for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a majority voting interest, and, therefore, as a general rule ownership by one reporting entity, directly or indirectly, of more than 50 percent of the outstanding voting shares of another entity is a condition pointing toward consolidation. The power to control may also exist with a lesser percentage of ownership, for example, by contract, lease, agreement with other stockholders, or by court decree. The Company consolidatesall less-than-majority-owned subsidiaries, if any, in which the parent’s power to control exists.
	The Company's consolidated subsidiaries and/or entities are as follows:
	Name of consolidated		State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization		Date of incorporation or formation	Attributable interest
	subsidiary or entity				(date of acquisition, if applicable)
	UBL Europe, LLC (1)		Delaware		7-Sep-10		100	%
	Mongoose Technologies, Inc. (2)		Delaware		September 9, 2009		100	%
					(January 18, 2010)
		-1	UBL Europe, LLC filed a Certificate of Cancellation on February 13, 2013.
		-2	Currently inactive.
	The consolidated financial statements include all accounts of the Company and consolidated subsidiaries and/or entities as of June 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013 and for the interim period ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.
	All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments	'
	Fair Value of Financial Instruments
	The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and has adopted paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:
	Level 1		Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.
	Level 2		Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
	Level 3		Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.
	Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.
	The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.
	The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, deferred costs, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and deferred revenues, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.
	The Company’s capital lease liability, notes payable and convertible notes payable approximate the fair value of such instruments based upon management’s best estimate of interest rates that would be available to the Company for similar financial arrangements at June 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013.
	The Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities consist of the derivative convertible notes and derivative warrants issued in connection with the Company’s convertible promissory notes (the "Notes"), for which there is no current market for these securities, such that the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. The Company valued the automatic conditional conversion, re-pricing/down-round, change of control; default and follow-on offering provisions using a lattice model, with the assistance of an independent valuation expert, for which management understands the methodologies. These models incorporate transaction details such as Company stock price, contractual terms, maturity, risk free rates, as well as assumptions about future financings, volatility, and holder behavior as of the date of issuance and each balance sheet date.
	Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.
Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis	'
	Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis
	Level 3 Financial Liabilities – Derivative Financial Instruments
	The Company uses Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy to measure the fair value of the derivative liabilities and revalues its derivative convertible notes and warrant liabilities at every reporting period and recognizes gains or losses in the statements of operations that are attributable to the change in the fair value of the derivative convertible notes and warrant liabilities.
Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets	'
	Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
	The Company has adopted Section 360-10-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-17 an impairment loss shall be recognized only if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset (asset group). That assessment shall be based on the carrying amount of the asset (asset group) at the date it is tested for recoverability. An impairment loss shall be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) exceeds its fair value. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-20 if an impairment loss is recognized, the adjusted carrying amount of a long-lived asset shall be its new cost basis. For a depreciable long-lived asset, the new cost basis shall be depreciated (amortized) over the remaining useful life of that asset. Restoration of a previously recognized impairment loss is prohibited.
	Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-21 the Company’s long-lived asset (asset group) is tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company considers the following to be some examples of such events or changes in circumstances that may trigger an impairment review: (a) significant decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset (asset group); (b) A significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which a long-lived asset (asset group) is being used or in its physical condition; (c) A significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of a long-lived asset (asset group), including an adverse action or assessment by a regulator; (d) An accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of a long-lived asset (asset group); (e) A current-period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of a long-lived asset (asset group); and (f) A current expectation that, more likely than not, a long-lived asset (asset group) will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life. The Company tests its long-lived assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.
	Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 360-10-45-4 and 360-10-45-5 an impairment loss recognized for a long-lived asset (asset group) to be held and used shall be included in income from continuing operations before income taxes in the income statement of a business entity. If a subtotal such as income from operations is presented, it shall include the amount of that loss. A gain or loss recognized on the sale of a long-lived asset (disposal group) that is not a component of an entity shall be included in income from continuing operations before income taxes in the income statement of a business entity. If a subtotal such as income from operations is presented, it shall include the amounts of those gains or losses.
Cash Equivalents	'
	Cash Equivalents
	The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.
	The Company minimizes its credit risk associated with cash by periodically evaluating the credit quality of its primary financial institution. The balance at times may exceed federally insured limits.
Accounts Receivable and Allowances	'
	Accounts Receivable and Allowances
	The Company maintains an allowance for losses it may incur as a result of its customers’ inability to make required payments. The Company follows paragraph 310-10-50-9 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to estimate the allowance for doubtful accounts. The Company performs on-going credit evaluations of its customers and adjusts credit limits based upon payment history and the customer’s current credit worthiness, as determined by the review of their current credit information; and determines the allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical write-off experience, customer specific facts and general economic conditions that may affect a client’s ability to pay.
	Pursuant to paragraph 310-10-50-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. The Company has adopted paragraph 310-10-50-6 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and determine when receivables are past due or delinquent based on how recently payments have been received.
	Outstanding account balances are reviewed individually for collectability. The allowance for doubtful accounts is the Company’s best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in the Company’s existing accounts receivable. Bad debt expense is included in general and administrative expenses, if any.
	If the financial condition of one or more of its customers unexpectedly deteriorates, resulting in their inability to make payments, or if the Company otherwise underestimates the losses it incurs as a result of its customers’ inability to pay, the Company could be required to increase its allowance for doubtful accounts which could materially adversely affect its operating results.
	The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure to its customers at June 30, 2014 or September 30, 2013.
	The Company’s sales to certain customers consist of gross product sales reduced by expected future sales returns and allowances. To estimate sales returns and allowances, the Company analyzes historical returns and allowance activity to establish a baseline reserve level. The Company then evaluates whether there are any underlying product quality or other customer specific issues that require additional specific reserves above the baseline level. Because the reserve for sales returns and allowances is based on judgments and estimates of the management of the Company, its reserves may not be adequate to cover actual sales returns and other allowances. If the Company’s reserves are not adequate, its net sales and accounts receivable could be materially adversely affected.
Property and Equipment	'
	Property and Equipment
	Property and equipment is recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation of property and equipment is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets as follows:
			Estimated
			Useful Life
			(Years)
	Computer and software		5
	Equipment under capital lease		5
	Furniture and fixture		7
	Leasehold improvement		*
	(*) Amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease or the estimated useful lives, whichever is shorter.
	Upon sale or retirement of property and equipment, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in statements of operations.
Leases	'
	Leases
	Lease agreements are evaluated to determine whether they are capital leases or operating leases in accordance with paragraph 840-10-25-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 840-10-25-1”). Pursuant to Paragraph 840-10-25-1 A lessee and a lessor shall consider whether a lease meets any of the following four criteria as part of classifying the lease at its inception under the guidance in the Lessees Subsection of this Section (for the lessee) and the Lessors Subsection of this Section (for the lessor): a. Transfer of ownership. The lease transfers ownership of the property to the lessee by the end of the lease term. This criterion is met in situations in which the lease agreement provides for the transfer of title at or shortly after the end of the lease term in exchange for the payment of a nominal fee, for example, the minimum required by statutory regulation to transfer title. b. Bargain purchase option. The lease contains a bargain purchase option. c. Lease term. The lease term is equal to 75 percent or more of the estimated economic life of the leased property. d. Minimum lease payments. The present value at the beginning of the lease term of the minimum lease payments, excluding that portion of the payments representing executory costs such as insurance, maintenance, and taxes to be paid by the lessor, including any profit thereon, equals or exceeds 90 percent of the excess of the fair value of the leased property to the lessor at lease inception over any related investment tax credit retained by the lessor and expected to be realized by the lessor. In accordance with paragraphs 840-10-25-29 and 840-10-25-30, if at its inception a lease meets any of the four lease classification criteria in Paragraph 840-10-25-1, the lease shall be classified by the lessee as a capital lease; and if none of the four criteria in Paragraph 840-10-25-1 are met, the lease shall be classified by the lessee as an operating lease. Pursuant to Paragraph 840-10-25-31 a lessee shall compute the present value of the minimum lease payments using the lessee's incremental borrowing rate unless both of the following conditions are met, in which circumstance the lessee shall use the implicit rate: a. It is practicable for the lessee to learn the implicit rate computed by the lessor. b. The implicit rate computed by the lessor is less than the lessee's incremental borrowing rate. Capital lease assets are depreciated on a straight line method, over the capital lease assets estimated useful lives consistent with the Company’s normal depreciation policy for tangible fixed assets. Interest charges are expensed over the period of the lease in relation to the carrying value of the capital lease obligation.
	Operating leases primarily relate to the Company’s leases of office spaces. When the terms of an operating lease include tenant improvement allowances, periods of free rent, rent concessions, and/or rent escalation amounts, the Company establishes a deferred rent liability for the difference between the scheduled rent payment and the straight-line rent expense recognized, which is amortized over the underlying lease term on a straight-line basis as a reduction of rent expense.
Intangible Assets Other Than Goodwill	'
	Intangible Assets Other Than Goodwill
	The Company has adopted Subtopic 350-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for intangible assets other than goodwill. Under the requirements, the Company amortizes the acquisition costs of intangible assets other than goodwill on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, the terms of the exclusive licenses and/or agreements, or the terms of legal lives of the intangible assets, whichever is shorter. Upon becoming fully amortized, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.
Research and Development and Capitalized Internal Use Software Development Costs	'
	Research and Development and Capitalized Internal Use Software Development Costs
	The Company has adopted paragraph 350-40-15-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 350-40-15-2”) for software developed for internal use. Paragraph 350-40-15-2 requires the capitalization of certain external and internal computer software costs incurred during the application development stage. The application development stage is characterized by software design and configuration activities, coding, testing and installation. Training costs and maintenance are expensed as incurred, while upgrades and enhancements are capitalized if it is probable that such expenditures will result in additional functionality. Capitalized software development costs for internal use begins when the software is available for internal use and is amortized on a straight-line basis over software’s estimated useful life ranging from one to three years. Upon becoming fully amortized or being charged off as impaired, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.
	Research and development costs incurred in the process of software development before establishment of technological feasibility is expensed as incurred.
Customer Deposits	'
	Customer Deposits
	Customer deposits primarily represent amounts received from customers for future delivery of products, which are fully or partially refundable depending upon the terms and conditions of the sales agreements.
Derivative Instruments	'
	Derivative Instruments
	The Company evaluates its convertible debt, warrants or other contracts to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with Paragraph 815-10-05-4 of the Codification and Paragraph 815-40-25 of the Codification. The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the embedded derivative is marked-to-market each balance sheet date and recorded as a liability. In the event that the fair value is recorded as a liability, the change in fair value is recorded in the consolidated statements of operations as other income or expense. Upon conversion or exercise of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the conversion date and then that fair value is reclassified to equity.
	In circumstances where the embedded conversion option in a convertible instrument is required to be bifurcated and there are also other embedded derivative instruments in the convertible instrument that are required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compound derivative instrument.
	The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Equity instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to reclassification are reclassified to liability at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. Derivative instrument liabilities will be classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument is expected within 12 months of the balance sheet date.
	The Company marks to market the fair value of the remaining embedded derivative warrants at each balance sheet date and records the change in the fair value of the remaining embedded derivative warrants as other income or expense in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).
	The Company utilizes the Lattice model that values the liability of the derivative warrants based on a probability weighted discounted cash flow model with the assistance of the third party valuation firm. The reason the Company picks the Lattice model is that in many cases there may be multiple embedded features or the features of the bifurcated derivatives may be so complex that a Black-Scholes valuation does not consider all of the terms of the instrument. Therefore, the fair value may not be appropriately captured by simple models. In other words, simple models such as Black-Scholes may not be appropriate in many situations given complex features and terms of conversion option (e.g., combined embedded derivatives). The Lattice model is based on future projections of the various potential outcomes. The features that were analyzed and incorporated into the model included the exercise and full reset features. Based on these features, there are two primary events that can occur; the Holder exercises the Warrants or the Warrants are held to expiration. The Lattice model analyzed the underlying economic factors that influenced which of these events would occur, when they were likely to occur, and the specific terms that would be in effect at the time (i.e. stock price, exercise price, volatility, etc.). Projections were then made on the underlying factors which led to potential scenarios. Probabilities were assigned to each scenario based on management projections. This led to a cash flow projection and a probability associated with that cash flow. A discounted weighted average cash flow over the various scenarios was completed to determine the value of the derivative warrants.
Related Parties	'
	Related Parties
	The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.
	Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the related parties include a. affiliates of the Company; b. entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d. principal owners of the Company; e. management of the Company; f. other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.
	The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a. the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b. a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.
Commitment and Contingencies	'
	Commitment and Contingencies
	The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or unasserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or unasserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.
	If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.
	Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed. Management does not believe, based upon information available at this time, that these matters will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no assurance that such matters will not materially and adversely affect the Company’s business, financial position, and results of operations or cash flows.
Revenue Recognition	'
	Revenue Recognition
	The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue is recognized from the point at which service is first provided over the life of the subscription period, typically one year. Appropriate allowances for returns and discounts are recorded concurrent with revenue recognition.
Deferred Costs (Asset)	'
	Deferred Costs (Asset)
	Service arrangements with customers require certain significant up-front costs.
	The Company capitalizes the up-front costs associated with providing the services and amortizes those costs ratably over the same period that the revenue is recognized for the related up-front payment.
Deferred Revenue (Liability)	'
	Deferred Revenue (Liability)
	The Company receives non-refundable up-front payments for services. These payments are initially deferred and subsequently recognized over the subscription period, typically one year.
Advertising	'
	Advertising
	The Company expenses advertising when incurred. Advertising expense for the reporting period ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 was $19,687 and $28,420, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation for Obtaining Employee Services	'
	Stock-Based Compensation for Obtaining Employee Services
	The Company accounts for share-based payment transactions issued to employees under the guidance of the Topic 718 Compensation—Stock Compensation of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC Topic 718”).
	Pursuant to ASC Section 718-10-20 an employee is an individual over whom the grantor of a share-based compensation award exercises or has the right to exercise sufficient control to establish an employer-employee relationship based on common law as illustrated in case law and currently under U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) Revenue Ruling 87-41. A nonemployee director does not satisfy this definition of employee. Nevertheless, nonemployee directors acting in their role as members of a board of directors are treated as employees if those directors were elected by the employer’s shareholders or appointed to a board position that will be filled by shareholder election when the existing term expires. However, that requirement applies only to awards granted to nonemployee directors for their services as directors. Awards granted to nonemployee directors for other services shall be accounted for as awards to non-employees.
	Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 718-10-30-2 and 718-10-30-3 a share-based payment transaction with employees shall be measured based on the fair value of the equity instruments issued and an entity shall account for the compensation cost from share-based payment transactions with employees in accordance with the fair value-based method, i.e., the cost of services received from employees in exchange for awards of share-based compensation generally shall be measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity instruments issued or the fair value of the liabilities incurred/settled.
	Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 718-10-30-6 and 718-10-30-9 the measurement objective for equity instruments awarded to employees is to estimate the fair value at the grant date of the equity instruments that the entity is obligated to issue when employees have rendered the requisite service and satisfied any other conditions necessary to earn the right to benefit from the instruments (for example, to exercise share options). That estimate is based on the share price and other pertinent factors, such as expected volatility, at the grant date. As such, the fair value of an equity share option or similar instrument shall be estimated using a valuation technique such as an option pricing model. For this purpose, a similar instrument is one whose fair value differs from its intrinsic value, that is, an instrument that has time value.
	If the Company’s common shares are traded in one of the national exchanges the grant-date share price of the Company’s common stock will be used to measure the fair value of the common shares issued, however, if the Company’s common shares are thinly traded the use of share prices established in its most recent private placement memorandum (“PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
	The Company estimates the fair value of share options and similar instruments on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model. The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:
	●	Expected term of share options and similar instruments: The expected life of options and similar instruments represents the period of time the option and/or warrant are expected to be outstanding.  Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments.  Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-S99-1, it may be appropriate to use the simplified method, i.e., expected term =(vesting term + original contractual term) / 2), if (i) A company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term due to the limited period of time its equity shares have been publicly traded; (ii) A company significantly changes the terms of its share option grants or the types of employees that receive share option grants such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term; or (iii) A company has or expects to have significant structural changes in its business such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term. The Company uses the simplified method to calculate expected term of share options and similar instruments as the company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.
	●	Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it.  Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall disclose the reasons why it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price, the appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index.  The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility.  If shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
	●	Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends.  An entity that uses a method that employs different dividend rates during the contractual term shall disclose the range of expected dividends used and the weighted-average expected dividends.  The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.
	●	Risk-free rate(s). An entity that uses a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.
	Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 718-10-30-11 and 718-10-30-17 a restriction that stems from the forfeitability of instruments to which employees have not yet earned the right, such as the inability either to exercise a non-vested equity share option or to sell non-vested shares, is not reflected in estimating the fair value of the related instruments at the grant date. Instead, those restrictions are taken into account by recognizing compensation cost only for awards for which employees render the requisite service and a non-vested equity share or non-vested equity share unit awarded to an employee shall be measured at its fair value as if it were vested and issued on the grant date.
	Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 718-10-35-2 and 718-10-35-3 the compensation cost for an award of share-based employee compensation classified as equity shall be recognized over the requisite service period, with a corresponding credit to equity (generally, paid-in capital). The requisite service period is the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for an award, which often is the vesting period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized at the end of the requisite service period for an award of share-based compensation shall be based on the number of instruments for which the requisite service has been rendered (that is, for which the requisite service period has been completed). An entity shall base initial accruals of compensation cost on the estimated number of instruments for which the requisite service is expected to be rendered. That estimate shall be revised if subsequent information indicates that the actual number of instruments is likely to differ from previous estimates. The cumulative effect on current and prior periods of a change in the estimated number of instruments for which the requisite service is expected to be or has been rendered shall be recognized in compensation cost in the period of the change. Previously recognized compensation cost shall not be reversed if an employee share option (or share unit) for which the requisite service has been rendered expires unexercised (or unconverted).
	Under the requirement of ASC Paragraph 718-10-35-8 the Company made a policy decision to recognize compensation cost for an award with only service conditions that has a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.
Equity Instruments Issued to Parties Other Than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services	'
	Equity Instruments Issued to Parties Other Than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services
	The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under guidance of Sub-topic 505-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Sub-topic 505-50”).
	Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-25-7, if fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (no specific performance is required by the grantee to retain those equity instruments), then, because of the elimination of any obligation on the part of the counterparty to earn the equity instruments, a measurement date has been reached. A grantor shall recognize the equity instruments when they are issued (in most cases, when the agreement is entered into). Whether the corresponding cost is an immediate expense or a prepaid asset (or whether the debit should be characterized as contra-equity under the requirements of paragraph 505-50-45-1) depends on the specific facts and circumstances. Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-45-1, a grantor may conclude that an asset (other than a note or a receivable) has been received in return for fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (and no specific performance is required by the grantee in order to retain those equity instruments). Such an asset shall not be displayed as contra-equity by the grantor of the equity instruments. The transferability (or lack thereof) of the equity instruments shall not affect the balance sheet display of the asset. This guidance is limited to transactions in which equity instruments are transferred to other than employees in exchange for goods or services.
	Pursuant to Paragraphs 505-50-25-8 and 505-50-25-9, an entity may grant fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are exercisable by the grantee only after a specified period of time if the terms of the agreement provide for earlier exercisability if the grantee achieves specified performance conditions. Any measured cost of the transaction shall be recognized in the same period(s) and in the same manner as if the entity had paid cash for the goods or services or used cash rebates as a sales discount instead of paying with, or using, the equity instruments. A recognized asset, expense, or sales discount shall not be reversed if a stock option that the counterparty has the right to exercise expires unexercised.
	Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 505-50-30-2 and 505-50-30-11 share-based payment transactions with nonemployees shall be measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The issuer shall measure the fair value of the equity instruments in these transactions using the stock price and other measurement assumptions as of the earlier of the following dates, referred to as the measurement date: (a) The date at which a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached (a performance commitment); or (b) The date at which the counterparty's performance is complete. If the Company’s common shares are traded in one of the national exchanges the grant-date share price of the Company’s common stock will be used to measure the fair value of the common shares issued, however, if the Company’s common shares are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum (“PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
	The Company estimates the fair value of share options and similar instruments on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model. The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:
	●	Expected term of share options and similar instruments: Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and holder’s expected exercise behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments.  The Company uses historical data to estimate holder’s expected exercise behavior.  If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the contractual term of the share options and similar instruments is used as the expected term of share options and similar instruments as the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.
	●	Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it.  Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall disclose the reasons why it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price, the appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index.  The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility.  If shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.
	●	Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends.  An entity that uses a method that employs different dividend rates during the contractual term shall disclose the range of expected dividends used and the weighted-average expected dividends.  The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.
	●	Risk-free rate(s). An entity that uses a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used.  The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.
	Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-S99-1, if the Company receives a right to receive future services in exchange for unvested, forfeitable equity instruments, those equity instruments are treated as unissued for accounting purposes until the future services are received (that is, the instruments are not considered issued until they vest). Consequently, there would be no recognition at the measurement date and no entry should be recorded.
Income Tax Provision	'
	Income Tax Provision
	The Company accounts for income taxes under Section 740-10-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income in the period that includes the enactment date.
	The Company adopted section 740-10-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 740-10-25”). Section 740-10-25 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under Section 740-10-25, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty (50) percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Section 740-10-25 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures.
	The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.
	Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.
Uncertain Tax Positions	'
	Uncertain Tax Positions
	The Company did not take any uncertain tax positions and had no adjustments to its income tax liabilities or benefits pursuant to the provisions of Section 740-10-25 for the reporting period ended June 30, 2014 or 2013.
Net Income (Loss) per Common Share	'
	Net Income (Loss) per Common Share
	Net income (loss) per common share is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock and potentially outstanding shares of common stock during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through contingent share arrangements, stock options and warrants.
	The following table shows the potentially outstanding dilutive common shares excluded from the diluted net income (loss) per common share calculation as they were anti-dilutive:
			Potentially Outstanding Dilutive Common Shares
			For the reporting period ended			For the reporting period ended
			June 30,			June 30,
			2014			2013
	Convertible Note Shares
	On May 3, 2011, June 13, 2011 and August 1, 2011, the Company issued three (3) convertible notes payable in the face amount of $25,0000 each, or $75,000 in aggregate, with interest at 10% per annum due October 1, 2011, June 1, 2012 and June 1, 2012, respectively, convertible at the lesser of (i) an amount equal to ninety percent (90%) of the then offering price of subsequent financings, or (ii) $0.15 per share. The due date of the remaining note was subsequently extended three times to December 31, 2014.			166,667			166,667
	On January 31, 2012, the Company issued two (2) convertible notes in the face amount of $130,000 each, or $260,000 in aggregate with interest at 5% per annum originally due one (1) year from the date of issuance, convertible at $0.10 per share. The due date of the notes was subsequently extended twice to January 31, 2015.			2,600,000			2,600,000
	On November 19, 2012, the Company issued two (2) convertible notes in the face amount of $102,500 each, or $205,000 in aggregate, with interest at 5% per annum, convertible at $0.10 per share. The due date of the notes was subsequently extended to January 31, 2015.			2,050,000			2,050,000
	On July 19, 2013, the Company issued three (3) convertible notes in the aggregate amount of $250,000, with interest at 5% per annum, due January 31, 2015, convertible at $0.10 per share.			2,500,000			-
	On October 18, 2013, the Company issued three (3) convertible notes in the aggregate amount of $280,000, with interest at 5% per annum, due January 31, 2015, convertible at $0.10 per share.			2,800,000			-
	Warrant Shares
	Common stock warrants, with exercise prices ranging from $0.15 to $0.75 per share.			3,560,000			1,417,500
	Option Shares
	Stock options, with exercise prices ranging from $0.06 to $0.30 per share.			8,194,167			5,083,500
	Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares			21,870,834			11,317,667
Cash Flows Reporting	'
	Cash Flows Reporting
	The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.
Subsequent Events	'
	Subsequent Events
	The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements are issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements	'
	Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
	In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. The amendments in this Update change the requirements for reporting discontinued operations in Subtopic 205-20.
	Under the new guidance, a discontinued operation is defined as a disposal of a component or group of components that is disposed of or is classified as held for sale and “represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results.” The ASU states that a strategic shift could include a disposal of (i) a major geographical area of operations, (ii) a major line of business, (iii) a major equity method investment, or (iv) other major parts of an entity. Although “major” is not defined, the standard provides examples of when a disposal qualifies as a discontinued operation.
	The ASU also requires additional disclosures about discontinued operations that will provide more information about the assets, liabilities, income and expenses of discontinued operations. In addition, the ASU requires disclosure of the pre-tax profit or loss attributable to a disposal of an individually significant component of an entity that does not qualify for discontinued operations presentation in the financial statements.
	The ASU is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within those years.
	In May 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”)
	This guidance amends the existing FASB Accounting Standards Codification, creating a new Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customer. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.
	To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps:
		1	Identify the contract(s) with the customer
		2	Identify the performance obligations in the contract
		3	Determine the transaction price
		4	Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract
		5	Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligations
	The ASU also provides guidance on disclosures that should be provided to enable financial statement users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue recognition and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. Qualitative and quantitative information is required about the following:
		1	Contracts with customers – including revenue and impairments recognized, disaggregation of revenue, and information about contract balances and performance obligations (including the transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations)
		2	Significant judgments and changes in judgments – determining the timing of satisfaction of performance obligations (over time or at a point in time), and determining the transaction price and amounts allocated to performance obligations
		3	Assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract.
	ASU 2014-09 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period for all public entities. Early application is not permitted.
	In June 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-12 “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718) : Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period” (“ASU 2014-12”).
	The amendments clarify the proper method of accounting for share-based payments when the terms of an award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. The Update requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. The performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered.
	The amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted.
	Management does not believe that any other recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, if adopted, would have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

Significant_and_Critical_Accou2

Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices (Tables)	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices [Abstract]	'
Schedule of consolidated subsidiaries	'
	Name of consolidated		State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization		Date of incorporation or formation	Attributable interest
	subsidiary or entity				(date of acquisition, if applicable)
	UBL Europe, LLC (1)		Delaware		7-Sep-10		100	%
	Mongoose Technologies, Inc. (2)		Delaware		September 9, 2009		100	%
					(January 18, 2010)
		-1	UBL Europe, LLC filed a Certificate of Cancellation on February 13, 2013.
		-2	Currently inactive.
Schedule of estimated useful lives of assets	'
			Estimated
			Useful Life
			(Years)
	Computer and software		5
	Equipment under capital lease		5
	Furniture and fixture		7
	Leasehold improvement		*
	(*) Amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease or the estimated useful lives, whichever is shorter.
Schedule of outstanding dilutive common shares excluded from the diluted net income (loss)	'
			Potentially Outstanding Dilutive Common Shares
			For the reporting period ended			For the reporting period ended
			June 30,			June 30,
			2014			2013
	Convertible Note Shares
	On May 3, 2011, June 13, 2011 and August 1, 2011, the Company issued three (3) convertible notes payable in the face amount of $25,0000 each, or $75,000 in aggregate, with interest at 10% per annum due October 1, 2011, June 1, 2012 and June 1, 2012, respectively, convertible at the lesser of (i) an amount equal to ninety percent (90%) of the then offering price of subsequent financings, or (ii) $0.15 per share. The due date of the remaining note was subsequently extended three times to December 31, 2014.			166,667			166,667
	On January 31, 2012, the Company issued two (2) convertible notes in the face amount of $130,000 each, or $260,000 in aggregate with interest at 5% per annum originally due one (1) year from the date of issuance, convertible at $0.10 per share. The due date of the notes was subsequently extended twice to January 31, 2015.			2,600,000			2,600,000
	On November 19, 2012, the Company issued two (2) convertible notes in the face amount of $102,500 each, or $205,000 in aggregate, with interest at 5% per annum, convertible at $0.10 per share. The due date of the notes was subsequently extended to January 31, 2015.			2,050,000			2,050,000
	On July 19, 2013, the Company issued three (3) convertible notes in the aggregate amount of $250,000, with interest at 5% per annum, due January 31, 2015, convertible at $0.10 per share.			2,500,000			-
	On October 18, 2013, the Company issued three (3) convertible notes in the aggregate amount of $280,000, with interest at 5% per annum, due January 31, 2015, convertible at $0.10 per share.			2,800,000			-
	Warrant Shares
	Common stock warrants, with exercise prices ranging from $0.15 to $0.75 per share.			3,560,000			1,417,500
	Option Shares
	Stock options, with exercise prices ranging from $0.06 to $0.30 per share.			8,194,167			5,083,500
	Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares			21,870,834			11,317,667

Property_and_Equipment_Tables

Property and Equipment (Tables)	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Property and Equipment [Abstract]	'
Summary of Property and Equipment, Net	'
		Estimated	June 30,			September 30,
		Useful Life	2014			2013
		(Years)
	Computers and software	5	$	69,175		$	46,853
	Equipment under capital lease	5		6,962			6,962
	Furniture and equipment	7		20,928			17,414
	Leasehold improvements	*		7,425			7,425
				104,490			78,654
	Less accumulated depreciation and amortization			(61,026	)		(48,995	)
			$	43,464		$	29,659
	* To be amortized over the term of the lease or its estimated useful life, whichever is shorter.

Capitalized_Software_Developme1

Capitalized Software Development Costs (Tables)	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Capitalized Software Development Costs [Abstract]	'
Summary of Capitalized Software Development Costs	'
		Estimated Useful Life	June 30,			September 30,
		(Years)	2014			2013
	Capitalized software development costs	3	$	109,983		$	109,983
	Less accumulated amortization			(109,983	)		(109,983	)
			$	-		$	-

Intangible_Assets_Tables

Intangible Assets (Tables)	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Intangible Assets [Abstract]	'
Summary of Changes in Intangible Assets	'
		Estimated		Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Impairment		Net
		Life							Charges
	Customer list	3 years		$	84,000	$	(30,222	)	$	-	$	53,778
	Non-compete	3 years			69,183		(24,867	)		-		44,316
	Domain name	Indefinite			7,500		-			-		7,500
				$	160,683	$	(55,089	)	$	-	$	105,594
		Estimated		Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Impairment		Net
		Life							Charges
	Customer list	3 years		$	84,000	$	(9,222	)	$	-	$	74,778
	Non-compete	3 years			69,183		(7,571	)		-		61,612
	Domain name	Indefinite			7,500		-			-		7,500
				$	160,683	$	(16,793	)	$	-	$	143,890
Schedule of Amortization Expense for the Next five Years	'
	Fiscal Year ending September 30:
	2014 (remainder of year)	$	12,766
	2015		51,061
	2016		41,767
		$	105,594

Notes_Payable_Tables

Notes Payable (Tables)	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Notes Payable [Abstract]	'
Schedule of Debt	'
		June 30,			September 30,
		2014			2013
	Notes payable	$	330,743		$	338,223
	Less: Current maturities		(10,284	)		(9,981	)
	Notes payable, net of Current maturities	$	320,459		$	328,242
Schedule Of Minimum Debt Repayments	'
	Fiscal Year ending September 30:
	2014 (remainder of year)	$	5,832
	2015		23,328
	2016		23,328
	2017		23,328
	2018		23,328
	2019 and thereafter		390,744
			489,888
	Less interest portion		(159,145	)
			330,743
	Less current maturities		(10,284	)
		$	320,459

Convertible_Notes_Payable_Tabl

Convertible Notes Payable (Tables)	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Convertible Notes Payable [Abstract]	'
Schedule of Convertible notes payable	'
		June 30,			September 30,
		2014			2013
	Convertible notes payable	$	1,020,000		$	740,000
	Discount on convertible notes		(222,852	)		(217,020	)
	Convertible notes payable, net		797,148			522,980
	Less current maturities		(797,148	)		(25,000	)
	Convertible notes payable, net of current maturities	$	-		$	497,980
Schedule of Debt discount	'
		June 30,			September 30,
		2014			2013
	Debt discount	$	898,322		$	765,000
	Amortization of debt discount		(675,470	)		(401,302	)
	Unamortized debt discount removed due to loss on debt extinguishment		-			(146,678	)
	Debt discount - net	$	222,852		$	217,020

Derivative_Liabilities_Tables

Derivative Liabilities (Tables)	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Derivative Liabilities [Abstract]	'
Summary of Fair Value of Derivative Liabilities	'
	Derivative liability – September 30, 2012		$	293,884
	Fair value at the commitment date			946,676
	Fair value of derivative liability associated with the extinguishment of the current note			(837,150	)
	Fair value of derivative liability under terms of newly issued modified note			1,182,217
	Fair value mark to market adjustment			(199,654	)
	Derivative liability – September 30, 2013			1,385,973
	Fair value at the commitment date			669,200
	Fair value of derivative liability associated with the extinguishment of the current note			(11,667	)
	Fair value of derivative liability under terms of newly issued modified note			23,833
	Fair value mark to market adjustment			(1,242,651	)
	Derivative liability – June 30, 2014		$	824,688
	Current portion		$	564,033
				260,655
			$	824,688
Summary of Fair Value Assumptions of Derivative Liabilities at Commitment and Re-measurement Dates	'
			Commitment Date		Re-measurement Date
	Expected dividends		0	%		0	%
	Expected volatility		162%-171	%		170%-197	%
	Expected term:		1.09 years – 3.00 years			1 month – 2.30 years
	Risk free interest rate		0.12% - 0.62	%		0.02% - 0.47	%
			Commitment Date				Re-measurement Date
	Expected dividends			0	%			0	%
	Expected volatility			174%-243	%			150%-233	%
	Expected term:			10 months – 3.00 years				3 months – 2.80 years
	Risk free interest rate			0.11% - 0.59	%			0.02% - 0.63	%
Summary of Warrant Activity	'
			Warrants				Weighted Average Exercise Price
	Balance – September 30, 2012			802,500			$	0.17
	Granted			1,365,000			$	0.15
	Exercised			-			$	-
	Forfeited/Cancelled			-			$	-
	Outstanding – September 30, 2013			2,167,500			$	0.16
	Granted			1,400,000			$	0.15
	Exercised			-			$	-
	Forfeited/Cancelled			(7,500	)		$	0.75
	Outstanding – June 30, 2014			3,560,000			$	0.15
	Exercisable – June 30, 2014			3,560,000			$	0.15
Summary of Outstanding and Exercisable Warrants	'
	Warrants Outstanding											Warrants Exercisable
	Exercise price			Number Outstanding				Weighted		Weighted			Number Exercisable	Weighted Average
								Average Remaining		Average				Exercise Price
								Contractual		Exercise Price
								Life
								(in years)
	$	0.15-0.75			3,560,000			1.71 years		$	0.15		3,560,000	$	0.15

Stockholders_Deficit_Tables

Stockholders' Deficit (Tables)	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Stockholders' Deficit [Abstract]	'
Schedule of issuance of common stock	'
	Transaction Type	Quantity of Shares			Valuation		Range of Value per Share
	Stock issued to settle liabilities		57,080		$	11,933	$	0.06 – 0.22
	Stock options exercised		150,000			15,000		0.1
	Stock issued for services		500,000			50,000		0.1
	Total		707,080		$	76,933	$	0.06 - 0.22
	Transaction Type	Quantity of Shares			Valuation		Range of Value per Share
	Stock issued to settle liabilities		200,000		$	38,000	$	0.19
	Stock issued in purchase of intangible assets		135,416			25,729		0.2
	Total		200,000		$	63,729	$	0.19 - 0.20
Schedule of share-based compensation, stock options activity	'
		Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
	Balance – September 30, 2012		5,202,000		$	0.11		3.73	$	336,200
	Granted		275,000			0.1		2.52	$	27,500
	Exercised		-			-
	Cancelled/Modified		(366,000	)		0.1
	Balance – September 30, 2013 – outstanding		5,111,000			0.11		2.9	$	478,160
	Balance –  September 30, 2013 – exercisable		4,878,708		$	0.11		2.91	$	454,931
	Outstanding options held by related parties – September 30, 2013		1,994,000
	Exercisable options held by related parties – September 30, 2013		1,994,000
	Balance – September 30, 2013		5,111,000		$	0.11		2.9	$	336,200
	Granted		3,967,000			0.11		2.63	$	310,910
	Exercised		(150,000	)		0.1
	Cancelled/Modified		(157,000	)		0.1
	Balance – June 30, 2014 – outstanding		8,771,000			0.11		2.29	$	48,272
	Balance –  June 30, 2014 – exercisable		8,194,167		$	0.11		2.3	$	46,189
	Outstanding options held by related parties – June 30, 2014		1,974,000
	Exercisable options held by related parties – June 30, 2014		1,974,000
Fair value of option by using Black-Scholes option valuation model	'
	Exercise price	$	0.10-$0.30
	Expected dividends		0	%
	Expected volatility		171% – 181%
	Risk fee interest rate		0.56% – 0.80%
	Expected life of stock options		1.5 years – 2.8 years
	Expected forfeitures		0	%
	Exercise price	$	0.1
	Expected dividends		0	%
	Expected volatility		132%-174%
	Risk fee interest rate		0.27% -0.52%
	Expected life of stock options		1.0 years – 1.5 years
	Expected forfeitures		0	%
	Exercise price	$	0.1
	Expected dividends		0	%
	Expected volatility		171	%
	Risk fee interest rate		0.56	%
	Expected life of stock options		1.5 years
	Expected forfeitures		0	%
Schedule of stock options to related party transactions	'
		Options			Value
	Issued to board members		40,000		$	6,388
	Total		40,000		$	6,388
Shedule of non-vested stock options activity	'
					Weighted Average
		Unvested			Grant
		Stock			Date Fair Value
		Options
	Non-vested – September 30, 2012		182,644			0.1
	Granted		275,000			0.1
	Vested/Exercised		(184,000	)		0.1
	Forfeited/Cancelled		(41,352	)		0.09
	Non-vested – September 30, 2013		232,292			0.1
	Granted		3,967,000			0.11
	Vested/Exercised		(3,622,459	)		0.11
	Forfeited/Cancelled		-			-
	Non-vested – June 30, 2014		576,833		$	0.12
	Weighted average remaining period for vesting		2.29 years

Commitments_and_Contingencies_

Commitments and Contingencies (Tables)	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]	'
Schedule of annual minimum payments under operating lease arrangements	'
	Fiscal Year Ending September 30
	2014 (remainder of year)	$	36,000
	2015		135,000
	2016		139,000
	2017		119,000
	Total	$	429,000

Concentrations_Tables

Concentrations (Tables)	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Concentrations [Abstract]	'
Shedule of concentrations	'
	(A)  Accounts Receivable
	Customer		30-Jun-14	30-Sep-13
	A	***	75%	45%
	(B)  Sales
	Customer		30-Jun-14	30-Jun-13
	A	***	74%	3%
	B		0%	19%
	(C)  Accounts Payable
	Vendor	30-Jun-14	30-Sep-13
	A		21%	29%
	B		3%	14%
	(D)  Purchases
	Vendor		30-Jun-14	30-Jun-13
	A		16%	29%
	B		0%	46%
	C		20%	0%
	D		14%	0%
	E		15%	0%
	F		11%	0%
	*** The loss of this customer and/or if the financial condition of this customer unexpectedly deteriorates, resulting in their inability to make payments could materially adversely affect our financial position, operating results and cash flows.

Significant_and_Critical_Accou3

Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices (Details)	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
UBL Europe, LLC Member	'
Entity Incorporation, State Country Name	'Delaware	[1]
Entity Incorporation, Date of Incorporation	7-Sep-10	[1]
Noncontrolling Interest, Ownership Percentage by Parent	100.00%	[1]
Mongoose Technologies, Inc Member	'
Entity Incorporation, State Country Name	'Delaware	[2]
Entity Incorporation, Date of Incorporation	9-Sep-09	[2]
Business Acquisition, Effective Date of Acquisition	18-Jan-10	[2]
Noncontrolling Interest, Ownership Percentage by Parent	100.00%	[2]
[1]	UBL Europe, LLC filed a Certificate of Cancellation on February 13, 2013.
[2]	Currently inactive.

Significant_and_Critical_Accou4

Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices (Details 1)	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Computer and software Member	'
Estimated Useful Life (Years)	'5 years
Equipment under capital lease Member	'
Estimated Useful Life (Years)	'5 years
Furniture and fixtures Member	'
Estimated Useful Life (Years)	'7 years
Leasehold improvement Member	'
Estimated Useful Life (Years)	'0 years	[1]
[1]	Amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease or the estimated useful lives, whichever is shorter.

Significant_and_Critical_Accou5

Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices (Details 2)	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares	21,870,834	11,317,667
Equity Option Member	'	'
Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares	8,194,167	5,083,500
Warrant Member	'	'
Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares	3,560,000	1,417,500
Convertible Note Shares Member | May 3, 2011, June 13, 2011 and August 1, 2011	'	'
Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares	166,667	166,667
Convertible Note Shares Member | January 31, 2012 Member	'	'
Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares	2,600,000	2,600,000
Convertible Note Shares Member | November 19, 2012 Member	'	'
Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares	2,050,000	2,050,000
Convertible Note Shares Member | July 19, 2013 Member	'	'
Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares	2,500,000	'
Convertible Note Shares Member | October 18, 2013 Member	'	'
Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares	2,800,000	'

Significant_and_Critical_Accou6

Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices (Details Textual)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2013
Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices [Abstract]	'
Percentage of direct or indirect voting interest owned	'More than 50 percent

Significant_and_Critical_Accou7

Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices (Details Textual 1) (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
Percentage of fair value equal	75.00%	'
Percentage of fair value excess	90.00%	'
Advertising expense	$19,687	$28,420
Minimum [Member]	'	'
Common stock warrant, exercise price	$0.15	'
Stock options, exercise price	$0.06	'
Maximum [Member]	'	'
Common stock warrant, exercise price	$0.75	'
Stock options, exercise price	$0.30	'
Convertible Notes Payable [Member] | May 3, 2011 Member	'	'
Principal amount of debt instrument	250,000	'
Convertible Notes, Due date	1-Oct-11	'
Convertible Notes Payable [Member] | June 13, 2011 Member	'	'
Principal amount of debt instrument	250,000	'
Convertible Notes, Due date	1-Jun-12	'
Convertible Notes Payable [Member] | August 1, 2011 Member	'	'
Principal amount of debt instrument	250,000	'
Convertible Notes, Due date	1-Jun-12	'
Convertible Notes Payable [Member] | January 31, 2012 Member	'	'
Principal amount of debt instrument	260,000	'
Convertible Notes, Interest rate	5.00%	'
Convertible Notes, Due date	31-Jan-15	'
Convertible per share	0.1	'
Convertible Notes Payable [Member] | November 19, 2012 Member	'	'
Principal amount of debt instrument	205,000	'
Convertible Notes, Interest rate	5.00%	'
Convertible Notes, Due date	31-Jan-15	'
Convertible per share	0.1	'
Convertible Notes Payable [Member] | July 19, 2013 Member	'	'
Principal amount of debt instrument	250,000	'
Convertible Notes, Interest rate	5.00%	'
Convertible Notes, Due date	31-Jan-15	'
Convertible per share	0.1	'
Convertible Notes Payable [Member] | May 3, 2011, June 13, 2011 and August 1, 2011	'	'
Principal amount of debt instrument	75,000	'
Convertible Notes, Interest rate	10.00%	'
Convertible per share	0.15	'
Offering price percentage	90.00%	'
Convertible Notes Payable [Member] | October 18, 2013 Member	'	'
Principal amount of debt instrument	280,000	'
Convertible Notes, Interest rate	5.00%	'
Convertible Notes, Due date	31-Jan-15	'
Convertible per share	0.1	'
Convertible Notes Payable One [Member] | January 31, 2012 Member	'	'
Principal amount of debt instrument	130,000	'
Convertible Notes Payable One [Member] | November 19, 2012 Member	'	'
Principal amount of debt instrument	102,500	'
Convertible Notes Payable Two [Member] | January 31, 2012 Member	'	'
Principal amount of debt instrument	130,000	'
Convertible Notes Payable Two [Member] | November 19, 2012 Member	'	'
Principal amount of debt instrument	$102,500	'

Property_and_Equipment_Details

Property and Equipment (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2014
			Computers and software [Member]	Equipment under capital lease [Member]	Furniture and equipment [Member]	Leasehold improvement [Member]
Computers and software	$69,175	$46,853	'	'	'	'
Equipment under capital lease	6,962	6,962	'	'	'	'
Furniture and equipment	20,928	17,414	'	'	'	'
Leasehold improvements	7,425	7,425	'	'	'	'
Property and equipment - Gross	104,490	78,654	'	'	'	'
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization	-61,026	-48,995	'	'	'	'
Property and equipment - net	$43,464	$29,659	'	'	'	'
Estimated Useful Life (Years)	'	'	'5 years	'5 years	'7 years	'0 years	[1]
[1]	Amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease or the estimated useful lives, whichever is shorter.

Property_and_Equipment_Details1

Property and Equipment (Details Textual) (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
Property and Equipment (Textual)	'	'
Depreciation and amortization expense	$12,031	$14,725

Capitalized_Software_Developme2

Capitalized Software Development Costs (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013	Jun. 30, 2014
			Capitalized software development costs [Member]
Capitalized software development costs	$109,983	$109,983	'
Less accumulated amortization	-109,983	-109,983	'
Capitalized software development costs, net	'	'	'
Estimated Useful Life (Years)	'	'	'3 years

Capitalized_Software_Developme3

Capitalized Software Development Costs (Details Textual) (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
Capitalized Software Development Costs (Textual)	'	'
Capitalized Computer Software, Amortization	$0	$22,896

Intangible_Assets_Details

Intangible Assets (Details) (USD $)	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'
Gross Amount	$160,683	$160,683
Accumulated Amortization	-55,089	-16,793
Impairment Charges	'	'
Net	105,594	143,890
Customer list [Member]	'	'
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'
Estimated Life	'3 years	'3 years
Gross Amount	84,000	84,000
Accumulated Amortization	-30,222	-9,222
Impairment Charges	'	'
Net	53,778	74,778
Non-compete [Member]	'	'
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'
Estimated Life	'3 years	'3 years
Gross Amount	69,183	69,183
Accumulated Amortization	-24,867	-7,571
Impairment Charges	'	'
Net	44,316	61,612
Domain name [Member]	'	'
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]	'	'
Estimated Life	'Indefinite	'Indefinite
Gross Amount	7,500	7,500
Accumulated Amortization	'	'
Impairment Charges	'	'
Net	$7,500	$7,500

Intangible_Assets_Details_1

Intangible Assets (Details 1) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2014
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets, Net, Amortization Expense, Fiscal Year Maturity [Abstract]	'
2014 (remainder of year)	$12,766
2015	51,061
2016	41,767
Amortization expense	$105,594

Intangible_Assets_Details_Text

Intangible Assets (Details Textual) (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013
Intangible Assets (Textual)	'	'
Amortization of intangible assets	$38,296	$4,028

Notes_Payable_Details

Notes Payable (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Notes Payable [Abstract]	'	'
Notes payable	$330,743	$338,223
Less: Current maturities	-10,284	-9,981
Notes payable, net of current maturities	$320,459	$328,242

Notes_Payable_Details_1

Notes Payable (Details 1) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Notes Payable [Abstract]	'	'
2014 (remainder of year)	$5,832	'
2015	23,328	'
2016	23,328	'
2017	23,328	'
2018	23,328	'
2019 and thereafter	390,744	'
Long-term Debt	489,888	'
Less interest portion	-159,145	'
Notes payable	330,743	338,223
Less current maturities	10,284	9,981
Notes payable, net of current maturities	$320,459	$328,242

Notes_Payable_Details_Textual

Notes Payable (Details Textual) (USD $)	0 Months Ended		8 Months Ended
	Feb. 27, 2014	Jan. 23, 2014	Aug. 31, 2010
	Short Term Note	Short Term Note	SBA Loan - Default and Contingent Liability Member
Debt Instrument [Line Items]	'	'	'
Capital loan, periodic payment	'	'	$1,944
Note executed	'	50,000	386,300
Maturing date	'	28-Feb-14	31-Jan-36
Note interest rate	'	12.00%	4.00%
Repayments of short-term debt	$50,608	'	'
Shares issuable upon default	'	200,000	'

Convertible_Notes_Payable_Deta

Convertible Notes Payable (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Convertible Notes Payable [Abstract]	'	'
Convertible notes payable	$1,020,000	$740,000
Discount on convertible notes	-222,852	-217,020
Convertible notes payable, net	797,148	522,980
Less current maturities	-797,148	-25,000
Convertible notes payable, net of current maturities	'	$497,980

Convertible_Notes_Payable_Deta1

Convertible Notes Payable (Details 1) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Convertible Notes Payable [Abstract]	'	'
Debt discount	$898,322	$765,000
Amortization of debt discount	-675,470	-401,302
Unamortized debt discount removed due to loss on debt extinguishment	'	-146,678
Debt discount - net	$222,852	$217,020

Convertible_Notes_Payable_Deta2

Convertible Notes Payable (Details Textual) (USD $)

0 Months Ended

9 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

9 Months Ended

0 Months Ended

9 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

9 Months Ended

0 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

9 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

9 Months Ended

9 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

0 Months Ended

Oct. 18, 2013

Jun. 30, 2014

Sep. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Aug. 01, 2011

Jun. 13, 2011

3-May-11

Feb. 10, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Sep. 30, 2012

Aug. 03, 2011

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Nov. 30, 2012

Jan. 31, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

Jul. 19, 2013

Jun. 30, 2014

Jul. 19, 2013

Nov. 19, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jul. 19, 2013

Jun. 30, 2014

Jul. 19, 2013

Jul. 19, 2013

Oct. 18, 2013

Oct. 18, 2013

Oct. 18, 2013

Oct. 18, 2013

Minimum [Member]

Maximum [Member]

Warrant Member

Warrant Member

Debt Offering (A) Member

Debt Offering (A) Member

Debt Offering (A) Member

Debt Offering (A) Member

Debt Offering (A) Member

Debt Offering (A) Member

Debt Offering (A) Member

Debt Offering (A) Member

Debt Offering (A) Member

Debt Offering (A) Member

Debt Offering (A) Member

Debt Offering (A) Member

Debt Offering (A) Member

Debt Offering (A) Member

Debt Offering (B) Member

Debt Offering (B) Member

Debt Offering (B) Member

Debt Offering (B) Member

Debt Offering (B) Member

Debt Offering (C) Member

Debt Offering (C) Member

Debt Offering (C) Member

Debt Offering (C) Member

Debt Offering (C) Member

Debt Offering (D) Member

Debt Offering (D) Member

Debt Offering (D) Member

Debt Offering (D) Member

Debt Offering (E) Member

Debt Offering (E) Member

Debt Offering (E) Member

Debt Offering (E) Member

Note Holder One Member

Note Holder Two Member

Convertible Note Shares Member

Convertible Note Shares Member

Convertible Note Shares Member

Convertible Note Shares Member

Minimum [Member]

Maximum [Member]

Warrant Member

Warrant Member

Warrant Member

Warrant Member

Warrant Member

Warrant Member

Convertible Note Shares Member

Warrant Member

Warrant Member

Warrant Member

Warrant Member

Warrant Member

Warrant Member

Note Holder One Member

Note Holder Two Member

Note Holder Three Member

Note Holder One Member

Note Holder Two Member

Note Holder One Member

Note Holder Two Member

Note Holder Three Member

Debt Instrument [Line Items]

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Subordinated convertible notes

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$25,000

$25,000

$25,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$130,000

'

'

'

'

$102,500

'

'

'

$250,000

'

'

'

$280,000

'

'

'

Debt Instrument, Maturity Date

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

1-Oct-11

31-Dec-14

'

'

'

'

'

31-Jan-15

'

'

'

'

31-Jan-15

'

'

'

31-Jan-15

'

'

'

31-Jan-15

'

'

'

Convertible subordinated notes, Interest rate

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

10.00%

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

5.00%

'

'

'

'

5.00%

'

'

'

5.00%

'

'

5.00%

'

'

'

Gross proceeds from sale of common stock

'

76,933

63,729

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

5,000,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Percentage of conversion equal to offering price

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

90.00%

'

90.00%

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Conversion price per share

$0.10

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$0.15

$0.15

$0.15

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$0.10

'

'

'

$0.10

'

$0.10

'

'

'

$0.10

'

'

'

Conversion of notes and accrued interest,Shares

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

351,827

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

0.1

'

'

'

Conversion of notes and accrued interest, Value

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$52,774

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Percentage of warrant to purchase against principal amount of note

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

30.00%

'

'

'

'

30.00%

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Number of warrants against note amount

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

7,500

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Excersise price of the warrant

'

'

'

$0.15

$0.75

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$0.75

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$0.15

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Warrants, Expiration date

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

3-May-14

13-Jun-14

1-Aug-14

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Default Interest Rate on convertable notes

10.00%

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

10.00%

'

'

'

'

'

10.00%

'

'

10.00%

'

'

'

10.00%

'

'

'

Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)

'

$0.01

$0.01

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$0.10

'

'

'

'

'

$0.10

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Warrants expiration term

'3 years

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'3 years

'

'

'3 years

'

'

'3 years

'

'3 years

'3 years

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Purchase of common stock, Shares

1,400,000

'

'

'

'

150,000

300,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

780,000

'

'

390,000

'

'

615,000

'

307,500

750,000

'

300,000

150,000

1,400,000

650,000

500,000

250,000

Warrants issued

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

300,000

'

300,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Stock option issued per share value

'

'

'

'

'

$0.15

$0.15

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$0.15

'

$0.15

'

$0.15

'

$0.15

'

$0.15

$0.15

'

'

'

$0.15

'

'

'

Description from extending the maturity date of $25,000 note

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'The closing of an equity investment where the Company receives net proceeds of more than $500,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Description of extended maturity date

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'The maturity date of these notes was extended from January 31, 2013 to January 31, 2014

'

'

'The maturity date of these notes was further extended from January 31, 2014 to January 31, 2015.

'

'The maturity date of these notes was extended from January 31, 2014 to January 31, 2015.

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Convertible_Notes_Payable_Deta3

Convertible Notes Payable (Details Textual 1) (USD $)

3 Months Ended

9 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

0 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Sep. 30, 2013

Oct. 18, 2013

Sep. 30, 2013

Sep. 30, 2012

Sep. 30, 2011

Aug. 03, 2011

Jan. 31, 2012

Nov. 19, 2012

Sep. 30, 2013

Jul. 19, 2013

Feb. 10, 2014

Sep. 30, 2013

Sep. 30, 2013

Debt Offering (A) Member

Debt Offering (A) Member

Debt Offering (A) Member

Debt Offering (A) Member

Debt Offering (B) Member

Debt Offering (C) Member

Debt Offering (C) Member

Debt Offering (D) Member

Debt Offering (D) Member

November 13, 2012 [Member]

July 19, 2013 [Member]

Extinguishment Accounting Member

Extinguishment Accounting Member

Extinguishment Accounting Member

Extinguishment Accounting Member

Extinguishment Accounting Member

Extinguishment Accounting Member

Debt Offering (B) Member

Debt Offering (B) Member

Extinguishment Accounting Member

Extinguishment Accounting Member

Extinguishment of Debt [Line Items]

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Percentage of conversion equal to offering price

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

90.00%

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Conversion price per share

'

'

'

'

'

$0.10

'

'

'

$0.15

'

'

'

$0.10

'

'

'

Percentage of increase in fair value

'

'

'

'

'

'

10.00%

10.00%

10.00%

'

'

'

10.00%

'

10.00%

10.00%

10.00%

Loss on extinguishment of debt

'

'

($12,166)

($177,277)

'

'

$25,667

$8,667

$34,390

'

'

'

$189,668

'

$12,166

$151,610

$124,800

Maturing date

'

'

'

'

'

'

31-Dec-13

1-Mar-13

'

'

31-Jan-15

31-Jan-15

31-Jan-15

31-Jan-15

31-Dec-14

31-Jan-14

31-Jan-15

Proceeds from stock applied extinguishment accounting

'

'

$76,933

'

$63,729

'

$500,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$500,000

'

'

Derivative_Liabilities_Details

Derivative Liabilities (Details) (USD $)	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Derivative Liabilities (Textual)	'	'
Derivative liability	$1,385,973	$293,884
Fair value at the commitment date	669,200	946,676
Fair value of derivative liability associated with the extinguishment of the current note	-11,667	-837,150
Fair value of derivative liability under terms of newly issued modified note	23,833	1,182,217
Fair value mark to market adjustment	-1,242,651	-199,654
Derivative liability	824,688	1,385,973
Current portion	564,033	'
Noncurrent portion	260,655	1,385,973
Derivative Liability	$824,688	$1,385,973

Derivative_Liabilities_Details1

Derivative Liabilities (Details 1)	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Commitment Date Member	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'
Expected dividends	0.00%	0.00%
Commitment Date Member | Minimum [Member]	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'
Expected volatility	162.00%	174.00%
Expected term:	'1 year 1 month 2 days	'10 months
Risk free interest rate	0.12%	0.11%
Commitment Date Member | Maximum [Member]	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'
Expected volatility	171.00%	243.00%
Expected term:	'3 years	'3 years
Risk free interest rate	0.62%	0.59%
Remeasurement Date Member	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'
Expected dividends	0.00%	0.00%
Remeasurement Date Member | Minimum [Member]	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'
Expected volatility	170.00%	150.00%
Expected term:	'1 month	'3 months
Risk free interest rate	0.02%	0.02%
Remeasurement Date Member | Maximum [Member]	'	'
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]	'	'
Expected volatility	197.00%	233.00%
Expected term:	'2 years 3 months 18 days	'2 years 9 months 18 days
Risk free interest rate	0.47%	0.63%

Derivative_Liabilities_Details2

Derivative Liabilities (Details 2) (USD $)	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Derivative [Line Items]	'	'
Warrants, Forfeited/Cancelled	0	0
Warrant Member	'	'
Derivative [Line Items]	'	'
Begining Balance	2,167,500	802,500
Warrants, Granted	1,400,000	1,365,000
Warrants, Exercised	'	'
Warrants, Forfeited/Cancelled	-7,500	'
Ending Balance - Outstanding	3,560,000	2,167,500
Exercisable, Warrants	3,560,000	1,400,000
Begining Balance, Weighted Average Exercise Price	0.16	0.17
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Granted	0.15	0.15
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Exercised	'	'
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Forfeited/Cancelled	0.75	'
Ending Balance, WeightedAverage Exercise Price, Outstanding	0.15	0.16
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Exercisable	0.16	0.15

Derivative_Liabilities_Details3

Derivative Liabilities (Details 3) (Warrant Member, USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Warrant Member	'	'	'
Derivative [Line Items]	'	'	'
Warrants Outstanding, Lower range of exercise price	$0.15	'	'
Warrants Outstanding, Upper range of exercise price	$0.75	'	'
Warrants Outstanding, Number Outstanding	3,560,000	2,167,500	802,500
Warrants Outstanding, Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)	'1 year 8 months 16 days	'	'
Warrants Outstanding, Weighted Average Exercise Price	$0.15	$0.16	$0.17
Warrants Exercisable, Number Exercisable	3,560,000	1,400,000	'
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Exercisable	$0.16	$0.15	'

Derivative_Liabilities_Details4

Derivative Liabilities (Details Textual) (USD $)	9 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014	Jun. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2013
Derivative Liabilities (Textual)	'	'	'
Derivative expense	$389,200	$181,426	$181,426
Warrants outstanding and exercisable	$0	'	$107,250

Stockholders_Deficit_Details

Stockholders' Deficit (Details) (USD $)	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Issuance of common stock, Quantity of Shares	707,080	200,000
Issuance of common stock, Valuation	$76,933	$63,729
Minimum [Member]	'	'
Issuance of common stock, Range of Value per Share	$0.06	$0.19
Maximum [Member]	'	'
Issuance of common stock, Range of Value per Share	$0.22	$0.20
Stock issued to settle liabilities [Member]	'	'
Issuance of common stock, Quantity of Shares	57,080	200,000
Issuance of common stock, Valuation	11,933	38,000
Issuance of common stock, Range of Value per Share	'	$0.19
Stock issued to settle liabilities [Member] | Minimum [Member]	'	'
Issuance of common stock, Range of Value per Share	$0.06	'
Stock issued to settle liabilities [Member] | Maximum [Member]	'	'
Issuance of common stock, Range of Value per Share	$0.22	'
Stock issued in purchase of intangible assets [Member]	'	'
Issuance of common stock, Quantity of Shares	'	135,416
Issuance of common stock, Valuation	'	25,729
Issuance of common stock, Range of Value per Share	'	$0.20
Stock options exercised [Member]	'	'
Issuance of common stock, Quantity of Shares	150,000	'
Issuance of common stock, Valuation	15,000	'
Issuance of common stock, Range of Value per Share	$0.10	'
Stock issued for services [Member]	'	'
Issuance of common stock, Quantity of Shares	500,000	'
Issuance of common stock, Valuation	$50,000	'
Issuance of common stock, Range of Value per Share	$0.10	'

Stockholders_Deficit_Details_1

Stockholders' Deficit (Details 1) (Employee Stock Option [Member], USD $)	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Employee Stock Option [Member]	'	'
Options	'	'
Begining Balance	5,111,000	5,202,000
Options, Granted	3,967,000	275,000
Options, Exercised	-150,000	'
Options, Cancelled/Modified	-157,000	-366,000
Ending Balance - Outstanding	8,771,000	5,111,000
Ending Balance - Exercisable	8,194,167	4,878,708
Options, Outstanding options held by related parties	1,974,000	1,994,000
Options, Exercisable options held by related parties	1,974,000	1,994,000
Weighted Average Exercise Price	'	'
Begining Balance, Weighted Average Exercise Price	$0.11	$0.11
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Granted	$0.11	$0.10
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Exercised	$0.10	'
WeightedAverage Exercise Price, Cancelled/Modified	$0.10	$0.10
Ending Balance, WeightedAverage Exercise Price, Outstanding	$0.11	$0.11
Ending Balance, WeightedAverage Exercise Price, Exercisable	$0.11	$0.11
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)	'	'
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years), Outstanding	'2 years 10 months 24 days	'3 years 8 months 23 days
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years), Granted	'2 years 7 months 17 days	'2 years 6 months 7 days
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years), Outstanding	'2 years 3 months 15 days	'2 years 10 months 24 days
Ending Balance, Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years), Exercisable	'2 years 3 months 18 days	'2 years 10 months 28 days
Aggregate Intrinsic Value	'	'
Begining Balance, Aggregate Intrinsic Value	$336,200	$336,200
Aggregate Intrinsic Value, Granted	310,910	27,500
Ending Balance, Aggregate Intrinsic Value, Outstanding	48,272	336,200
Ending Balance, Aggregate Intrinsic Value, Exercisable	$46,189	$454,931

Stockholders_Deficit_Details_2

Stockholders' Deficit (Details 2) (USD $)	9 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014
Stock options issued to related parties for services, Shares	40,000
Stock options issued to related parties for services, Values	$6,388
Issued to board members	'
Stock options issued to related parties for services, Shares	40,000
Stock options issued to related parties for services, Values	$6,388

Stockholders_Deficit_Details_3

Stockholders' Deficit (Details 3) (USD $)	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Exercise price	$0.10	$0.10
Expected dividends	0.00%	0.00%
Expected forfeitures	0	0
Maximum [Member]	'	'
Exercise price	$0.30	'
Expected volatility	181.00%	174.00%
Risk fee interest rate	0.80%	0.52%
Expected life of stock options	'2 years 9 months 18 days	'1 year 6 months
Minimum [Member]	'	'
Exercise price	$0.10	'
Expected volatility	171.00%	132.00%
Risk fee interest rate	0.56%	0.27%
Expected life of stock options	'1 year 6 months	'1 year

Stockholders_Deficit_Details_4

Stockholders' Deficit (Details 4) (USD $)	9 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Shedule of non-vested stock options activity	'	'
Unvested Stock Options Begining Balance, Non-vested	232,292	182,644
Unvested Stock Options, Granted	3,967,000	275,000
Unvested Stock Options, Vested/Exercised	-3,622,459	-184,000
Unvested Stock Options, Forfeited/Cancelled	'	-41,352
Unvested Stock Options Ending Balance, Non-vested	576,833	232,292
Begining Balance, Weighted AverageGrant DateFairValue, Non-vested	$0.10	$0.10
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value, Granted	$0.11	$0.10
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value, Vested/Exercised	$0.11	$0.10
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value, Forfeited/Cancelled	'	$0.09
Ending Balance, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value, Non-vested	$0.12	$0.10
Weighted average remaining period for vesting	'2 years 3 months 15 days	'

Stockholders_Deficit_Details_T

Stockholders' Deficit (Details Textual) (USD $)

9 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

9 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

9 Months Ended

3 Months Ended

9 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Sep. 30, 2011

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Sep. 30, 2011

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Dec. 31, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Oct. 22, 2013

Dec. 23, 2010

September Thirty Two Thousand And Ten Member

September Thirty Two Thousand And Ten Member

September Thirty Two Thousand And Ten Member

September Thirty Two Thousand And Ten Member

September Thirty Two Thousand And Ten Member

September Thirty Two Thousand And Eleven Member

September Thirty Two Thousand And Eleven Member

September Thirty Two Thousand And Eleven Member

September Thirty Two Thousand And Twelve Member

September Thirty Two Thousand And Twelve Member

September Thirty Two Thousand And Twelve Member

September Thirty Two Thousand And Thirteen Member

September Thirty Two Thousand And Thirteen Member

September Thirty Two Thousand And Thirteen Member

December Thirty First Two Thousand And Thirteen [Member]

Two Thousand Ten Plan Member

Two Thousand Ten Plan Member

Two Thousand Ten Plan Member

Black-Scholes model Member

Reissued Option Member

Minimum [Member]

Maximum [Member]

Minimum [Member]

Maximum [Member]

Minimum [Member]

Maximum [Member]

Minimum [Member]

Maximum [Member]

Cancelled Option Member

Cancelled Option Member

Fair market value perecentage

110.00%

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Issued and outstanding perentage of shares

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

20.00%

'

'

Common stock reserved for issuance

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

1,980,000

4,750,000

6,000,000

Stock options issued

'

1,155,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Stock options outstanding

'

1,155,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Stock options cancelled

'

1,155,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Stock options reissued

'

1,155,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Stock option expired date

'

'

'

16-Dec-15

1-Oct-12

1-Oct-14

'

30-Sep-12

1-Sep-17

'

31-Dec-12

1-Sep-17

'

16-Oct-14

1-Jun-16

14-Nov-16

'

'

'

Additional Compensation Cost

'

'

$43,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Stock option granted

'

'

'

'

'

'

3,235,000

'

'

3,279,000

'

'

275,000

'

'

3,967,000

'

'

'

Total fair value

'

'

'

'

'

'

$515,000

'

'

$446,000

'

'

$40,767

'

'

$635,391

'

'

'

Vesting period

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'4 years

'

'

'4 years

'

'

'2 years

'2 years 6 months 18 days

'

'

'

Commitments_and_Contingencies_1

Commitments and Contingencies (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2014
Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]	'
2014 (remainder of year)	$36,000
2015	135,000
2016	139,000
2017	119,000
Total	$429,000

Commitments_and_Contingencies_2

Commitments and Contingencies (Details Textual) (USD $)

9 Months Ended

6 Months Ended

9 Months Ended

0 Months Ended

9 Months Ended

0 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

3 Months Ended

9 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

9 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2014

Mar. 04, 2014

Jun. 30, 2014

Dec. 31, 2011

Mar. 04, 2014

Mar. 04, 2014

31-May-14

Oct. 31, 2013

Dec. 31, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2014

Nov. 30, 2012

Nov. 12, 2012

Jun. 30, 2014

Capital Lease Member

Capital Lease Member

Consulting Agreements Member

Consulting Agreements Member

Consulting Agreements Member

Consulting Agreements Member

Consulting Agreements Member

Operating Lease Member

Operating Lease Member

Operating Lease Member

Operating Lease Member

Operating Lease Member

Operating Lease Member

Operating Lease Member

Operating Lease Member

Operating Lease Member

Deferred Rent Member

Services Agreement Member

Services Agreement Member

Agreements With Placement Agents And Finders Member

Months 1-6 [Member]

Months 7-12 [Member]

Charleston, South Carolina [Member]

Charleston, South Carolina [Member]

Newport Beach, California [Member]

Newport Beach, California [Member]

Consulting agreement, Term

'

'

'

'

'90 days

'1 year

'

'

'

'

'6 months

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Common Stock Shares Outstanding (Percentage)

'

'

'

'

'

'

12.00%

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Annual minimum fee

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$300,000

'

Contract period for annual minimum fee

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'30 days

'

'

New Operting lease agreement

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'The Company signed a new forty-three (43) month lease agreement for its office facilities expiring in July 2016

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Accrued Rent

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

130,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Lease annual rent to increments each year thereafter

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

2.50%

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Rent abatemnet period

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'The lease contains a five (5) month rent abatement period starting on January 1, 2013. Rent expense will be recognized on a straight line basis over the term of the lease.

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Renewal term

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'36 months

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Lease expiration date

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

31-Jul-17

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Rent expense, total

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

96,328

79,211

8,055

0

16,323

0

'

'

'

'

Monthly rental payments

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

1,500

1,100

'

1,200

'

'

1,300

'

3,750

'

'

'

'

Total operating lease rent expense

9,461

0

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

0

11,250

7,200

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Cumulative Rent Expense Recognize

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'5 months

'

'

'

Rent Recognised Method

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'straight-line basis

'

'

'

Initial Lease Term

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'36 months

'

'

'

Capital lease agreement for computer equipment

'

'

'

'The Company entered into a capital lease agreement for computer equipment. The lease expires in May 2014.

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Interest rate on the capital lease

'

'

'

13.50%

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Interest Paid

10,754

11,463

489

130

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Consulting agreement cancellation description

'

'

'

'

'Term 1 year, the agreement can be cancelled by either party with 30 days written notice after the first 90 days

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Compensation expenses

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

6,000

10,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Restricted stock award gross

'

'

'

'

75,000

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Share to be issued

'

'

'

'

18,750

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Credit facility percentage

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

5.00%

Non refundable retainer fees

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

5,000

Debt financing

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

10,000

Credit Facility Fee Amount

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

1,000,000

Increase value of monthly rental

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

$1,200

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Concentrations_Details

Concentrations (Details)

9 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

9 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

9 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

9 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2014

Sep. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2014

Sep. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2014

Sep. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Jun. 30, 2014

Jun. 30, 2013

Accounts Payable Member

Accounts Payable Member

Accounts Payable Member

Accounts Payable Member

Accounts Receivable Member

Accounts Receivable Member

Sales Member

Sales Member

Sales Member

Sales Member

Purchases Member

Purchases Member

Purchases Member

Purchases Member

Purchases Member

Purchases Member

Purchases Member

Purchases Member

Purchases Member

Purchases Member

Purchases Member

Purchases Member

Vendor A Member

Vendor A Member

Vendor B Member

Vendor B Member

Customer A Member

Customer A Member

Customer A Member

Customer A Member

Customer B Member

Customer B Member

Vendor A Member

Vendor A Member

Vendor B Member

Vendor B Member

Vendor C Member

Vendor C Member

Vendor D Member

Vendor D Member

Vendor E Member

Vendor E Member

Vendor F [Member]

Vendor F [Member]

Concentration Risk [Line Items]

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

'

Concentration Risk, Percentage

21.00%

29.00%

3.00%

14.00%

75.00%

[1]

45.00%

[1]

74.00%

[1]

3.00%

[1]

0.00%

19.00%

16.00%

29.00%

0.00%

46.00%

20.00%

0.00%

14.00%

0.00%

15.00%

0.00%

11.00%

0.00%

[1]

The loss of this customer and/or if the financial condition of this customer unexpectedly deteriorates, resulting in their inability to make payments could materially adversely affect our financial position, operating results and cash flows.

Subsequent_Events_Details_Text

Subsequent Events (Details Textual) (USD $)	Oct. 18, 2013	Aug. 31, 2014	Jul. 31, 2014	Aug. 31, 2014
		Subsequent Event [Member]	Subsequent Event [Member]	Subsequent Event [Member]
				Related Party [Member]
Subsequent Event [Line Items]	'	'	'	'
Common stock issued for settlement accounts of payable	'	5,208	5,208	'
Proceeds from issuance of unsecured promissory note	'	'	'	$100,000
Notes maturity date, discription	'	'	'	'Maturing in October 2014
Rate of Interest payable on maturity	'	'	'	6.00%
Default interest rate	'	'	'	18.00%
Warrant Term	'	'	'	'3 years
Warrant exercise price	'	'	'	$0.15
Purchase of common stock, Shares	1,400,000	'	'	500,000