Yinghong Guangda Technology (UBLI) Inactive 10-K29 Dec 142014 FY Annual reportFinancial data

Company Profile

Document_and_Entity_Informatio

Document and Entity Information (USD $)	12 Months Ended
Document and Entity Information (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Dec. 24, 2014	Mar. 31, 2014
Document and Entity Information [Abstract]
Entity Registrant Name	UBL Interactive,Inc.
Entity Central Index Key	1576778
Amendment Flag	FALSE
Current Fiscal Year End Date	-21
Document Type	10-K
Document Period End Date	30-Sep-14
Document Fiscal Period Focus	FY
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2014
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Smaller Reporting Company
Entity Public Float			$4,234,880
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		35,263,713

Consolidated_Balance_Sheets

Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Current Assets
Cash	$735,562	$125,517
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $222,256 and $27,000, respectively	1,090,266	314,999
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	35,979	19,336
Deferred costs	2,537,321	299,685
Total Current Assets	4,399,128	759,537
Property and Equipment, net	43,032	29,659
Other Assets
Intangible assets, net		143,890
Security deposits	16,968	12,468
Debt issue costs, net	2,839	6,383
Total Other Assets	19,807	162,741
Total Assets	4,461,967	951,937
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	3,628,234	1,545,409
Accounts payable - related party		11,574
Deferred revenue	3,764,299	1,249,224
Current maturities of convertible notes payable, net of discount	892,952	25,000
Current portion of derivative liabilities	149,750
Current maturities of capital lease obligation		2,535
Notes payable - related party (including accrued interest of $1,825 and net of debt discount of $45,521)	256,304
Current maturities of notes payable	10,387	9,981
Total Current Liabilities	8,701,926	2,843,723
Long-Term Liabilities:
Notes payable, net of current maturities	317,993	328,242
Convertible notes payable, net of current maturities and discount		497,980
Derivative liabilities, net of current portion	67,220	1,385,973
Other liabilities	42,129	50,013
Total Long-Term Liabilities	427,342	2,262,208
Total Liabilities	9,129,268	5,105,931
Commitments and Contingencies
Stockholders' Deficit
Preferred stock par value $0.01: 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding
Common stock par value $0.01: 50,000,000 shares authorized; 34,623,089 and 33,900,385 shares issued and outstanding, respectively	346,231	339,004
Additional paid in capital	2,331,568	1,520,375
Accumulated deficit	-7,345,100	-6,013,373
Total Stockholders' Deficit	-4,667,301	-4,153,994
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit	$4,461,967	$951,937

Consolidated_Balance_Sheets_Pa

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parentheticals) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Statement of Financial Position [Abstract]
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$222,256	$27,000
Accrued interest	1,825
Net of debt discount	$45,521
Preferred stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$0.01	$0.01
Preferred stock, shares authorized	10,000,000	10,000,000
Preferred stock, shares issued
Preferred stock, shares outstanding
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$0.01	$0.01
Common stock, shares authorized	50,000,000	50,000,000
Common stock, shares issued	34,623,089	33,900,385
Common stock, shares outstanding	34,623,089	33,900,385

Consolidated_Statements_of_Ope

Consolidated Statements of Operations (USD $)	12 Months Ended
Consolidated Statements of Operations (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Income Statement [Abstract]
Revenues	$4,927,374	$3,430,177
Cost of revenues	2,181,569	1,398,516
Gross margin	2,745,805	2,031,661
Operating expenses
Compensation	2,920,206	1,865,095
Consulting fees	249,346	74,840
Professional fees	230,022	253,709
Research and development	493,399	110,679
Selling, general and administrative	1,043,499	684,887
Impairment of intangible assets	92,829
Total operating expenses	5,029,301	2,989,210
Loss from operations	-2,283,496	-957,549
Other income (expense)
Interest income		341
Interest expense	-480,967	-219,761
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities	1,850,369	199,654
Derivative expense	-389,200	-491,676
Loss on extinguishment of debt	-12,166	-491,745
Gain on settlement of liabilities	5,040
Other income (expense)	-21,307	-103
Other income (expense), net	951,769	-1,003,290
Loss before income tax provision	-1,331,727	-1,960,839
Income tax provision
Net loss	($1,331,727)	($1,960,839)
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted	($0.04)	($0.06)
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Basic and diluted	34,297,836	33,652,806

Consolidated_Statement_of_Stoc

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Deficit (USD $)	Total	Common stock, par value $0.01 [Member]	Additional Paid-in Capital [Member]	Accumulated Deficit [Member]
Beginning Balance at Sep. 30, 2012	($2,273,136)	$335,650	$1,443,748	($4,052,534)
Beginning Balance (Shares) at Sep. 30, 2012		33,564,969
Common stock issued for settlement of liabilities	38,000	2,000	36,000
Common stock issued for settlement of liabilities (in shares)		200,000
Common stock issued to purchase intangible assets	25,729	1,354	24,375
Common stock issued to purchase intangible assets, (in shares)		135,416
Stock options issued for services	16,252		16,252
Net loss	-1,960,839			-1,960,839
Ending Balance at Sep. 30, 2013	-4,153,994	339,004	1,520,375	-6,013,373
Ending Balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 2013		33,900,385
Common stock issued for services	50,000	5,000	45,000
Common stock issued for services (in shares)		500,000
Common stock issued for settlement of liabilities	13,286	727	12,559
Common stock issued for settlement of liabilities (in shares)		72,704
Stock options exercised	15,000	1,500	13,500
Stock options exercised, (in shares)		150,000
Stock options issued for services	617,280		617,280
Warrants issued for services	33,984		33,984
Warrants issued with promissory notes	88,870		88,870
Net loss	-1,331,727			-1,331,727
Ending Balance at Sep. 30, 2014	($4,667,301)	$346,231	$2,331,568	($7,345,100)
Ending Balance (in shares) at Sep. 30, 2014		34,623,089

Consolidated_Statements_of_Cas

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (USD $)	12 Months Ended
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
Net loss	($1,331,727)	($1,960,839)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
Depreciation and amortization	68,123	58,888
Bad debt expense (recovery)	-21,000	53,453
Impairment of intangible assets	92,829
Stock based compensation	701,264	16,252
Amortization of debt discount	413,321	177,969
Amortization of debt issuance costs	8,544	3,617
Change in fair value of derivative liabilities	-1,850,369	-199,654
Derivative expense	389,200	491,676
Loss on extinguishment of debt	12,166	491,745
Gain on settlement of liabilities	-5,040
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	-754,267	54,056
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	-16,643	-12,045
Deferred costs	-2,237,636	73,022
Security deposits	-4,500	-12,468
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	2,116,151	311,653
Accounts payable - related party	-11,574	1,508
Accrued interest - related party notes	1,825
Deferred revenue	2,515,075	-12,101
Other liabilities	-7,884	50,013
Net Cash Provided by (Used in) Operating Activities	77,858	-413,255
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
Purchase of property and equipment	-30,435	-17,193
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities	-30,435	-17,193
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
Proceeds from notes payable	50,000
Proceeds from notes payable - related party	300,000
Repayment of capital lease obligation	-2,535	-3,396
Repayment of notes payable	-59,843	-12,404
Debt issuance costs	-5,000	-10,000
Proceeds from convertible notes	280,000	455,000
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities	562,622	429,200
Net change in cash	610,045	-1,248
Cash at beginning of reporting period	125,517	126,765
Cash at end of reporting period	735,562	125,517
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Interest paid	14,224	14,884
Income tax paid
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Debt discount recorded on convertible debt and warrants accounted for as derivative liabilities	280,000	455,000
Debt discount recorded on related party notes	88,870
Furniture and fixtures		5,288
Stock options exercised through settlement of liability	15,000
Fully depreciated equipment disposed		2,810
Customer list [Member]
Assets acquired through asset acquisition as follows:
Intangible Assets Acquired		84,000
Non-compete agreement [Member]
Assets acquired through asset acquisition as follows:
Intangible Assets Acquired		69,183
Domain name [Member]
Assets acquired through asset acquisition as follows:
Intangible Assets Acquired		$7,500

Organization_and_Operations

Organization and Operations	12 Months Ended
Organization and Operations	Sep. 30, 2014
Organization and Operations [Abstract]
Organization and Operations	Note 1 – Organization and Operations



	UBL Interactive, Inc.



	UBL Interactive, Inc. (“UBL” or the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on September 30, 2009. The Company provides public identity services to businesses by managing their online profile information and distributing this information uniformly to search engines, directory publishers, social networks and mobile services.

Significant_and_Critical_Accou

Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices [Abstract]
Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices	Note 2 – Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices



	The Management of the Company is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies and the appropriateness of accounting policies and their application. Critical accounting policies and practices are those that are both most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results and require management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company’s significant and critical accounting policies and practices are disclosed below as required by generally accepted accounting principles.



	Basis of Presentation



	The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).



	Fiscal Year-End



	The Company elected September 30 as its fiscal year-end date.



	Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions



	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.



	Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:



		(i)	Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business;

		(ii)	Allowance for doubtful accounts: Management’s estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts is based on historical sales, historical loss levels, and an analysis of the collectability of individual accounts; and general economic conditions that may affect a client’s ability to pay. The Company evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop the allowance in determining that it is reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole;

		(iii)	Sales returns and allowances: Management’s estimate of sales returns and allowances is based on an analysis of historical returns and allowance activity to establish a baseline reserve level. The Company then evaluates whether there are any underlying product quality or other customer specific issues that require additional specific reserves above the baseline level.

		(iv)	Fair value of long-lived assets: Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events;



		(v)	Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors;

		(vi)	Estimates and assumptions used in valuation of convertible debt and equity instruments: Management estimates the fair value of the derivative warrant issued in connection with the Company’s convertible promissory notes, using a lattice model, with the assistance of an independent valuation expert.



	These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.



	Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.



	Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.



Actual results could differ from those estimates.



Principles of Consolidation



The Company applies the guidance of Topic 810 “Consolidation” of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to determine whether and how to consolidate another entity. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-10 all majority-owned subsidiaries—all entities in which a parent has a controlling financial interest—shall be consolidated except (1) when control does not rest with the parent, the majority owner; (2) if the parent is a broker-dealer within the scope of Topic 940 and control is likely to be temporary; (3) consolidation by an investment company within the scope of Topic 946 of a non-investment-company investee. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-8 the usual condition for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a majority voting interest, and, therefore, as a general rule ownership by one reporting entity, directly or indirectly, of more than 50 percent of the outstanding voting shares of another entity is a condition pointing toward consolidation. The power to control may also exist with a lesser percentage of ownership, for example, by contract, lease, agreement with other stockholders, or by court decree. The Company consolidates all less-than-majority-owned subsidiaries, if any, in which the parent’s power to control exists.



The Company's consolidated subsidiaries and/or entities are as follows:



Name of consolidated subsidiary or entity		State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization		Date of incorporation or formation	Attributable interest
				(date of acquisition, if applicable)

UBL Europe, LLC (1)		Delaware		7-Sep-10	100%

Mongoose Technologies, Inc. (2)		Delaware		September 9, 2009	100%
				(January 18, 2010)



	-1	UBL Europe, LLC filed a Certificate of Cancellation on February 13, 2013.



	-2	Currently inactive.



The consolidated financial statements include all accounts of the Company and consolidated subsidiaries and/or entities as of September 30, 2014 and 2013 and for the fiscal year then ended.



All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.



Fair Value of Financial Instruments



The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and has adopted paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:



Level 1		Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 2		Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

Level 3		Pricing inputs that are generally unobservable inputs and not corroborated by market data.



Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.



The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.



The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, deferred costs, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and deferred revenue, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.



The Company’s capital lease obligation, notes payable and convertible notes payable approximate the fair value of such instruments based upon management’s best estimate of interest rates that would be available to the Company for similar financial arrangements at September 30, 2014 and 2013.



The Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities consist of derivative convertible notes and derivative warrants issued in connection with the Company’s convertible promissory notes (the "Notes"), for which there is no current market for these securities, such that the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. The Company valued the automatic conditional conversion, re-pricing/down-round, change of control; default and follow-on offering provisions using a lattice model, with the assistance of an independent valuation expert, for which management understands the methodologies. These models incorporate transaction details such as Company stock price, contractual terms, maturity, risk free rates, as well as assumptions about future financings, volatility, and holder behavior as of the date of issuance and each balance sheet date.



Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.



Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis



Level 3 Financial Liabilities – Derivative Financial Instruments



The Company uses Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy to measure the fair value of the derivative liabilities and revalues its derivative convertible notes and derivative warrant liabilities at every reporting period and recognizes gains or losses in the consolidated statements of operations that are attributable to the change in the fair value of the derivative convertible notes and derivative warrant liabilities.



Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets



The Company has adopted Section 360-10-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-17 an impairment loss shall be recognized only if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset (asset group). That assessment shall be based on the carrying amount of the asset (asset group) at the date it is tested for recoverability. An impairment loss shall be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) exceeds its fair value. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-20 if an impairment loss is recognized, the adjusted carrying amount of a long-lived asset shall be its new cost basis. For a depreciable long-lived asset, the new cost basis shall be depreciated (amortized) over the remaining useful life of that asset. Restoration of a previously recognized impairment loss is prohibited.



Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-21 the Company’s long-lived asset (asset group) is tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company considers the following to be some examples of such events or changes in circumstances that may trigger an impairment review: (a) significant decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset (asset group); (b) A significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which a long-lived asset (asset group) is being used or in its physical condition; (c) A significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of a long-lived asset (asset group), including an adverse action or assessment by a regulator; (d) An accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of a long-lived asset (asset group); (e) A current-period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of a long-lived asset (asset group); and (f) A current expectation that, more likely than not, a long-lived asset (asset group) will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life. The Company tests its long-lived assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.



Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 360-10-45-4 and 360-10-45-5 an impairment loss recognized for a long-lived asset (asset group) to be held and used shall be included in income from continuing operations before income taxes in the income statement of a business entity. If a subtotal such as income from operations is presented, it shall include the amount of that loss. A gain or loss recognized on the sale of a long-lived asset (disposal group) that is not a component of an entity shall be included in income from continuing operations before income taxes in the income statement of a business entity. If a subtotal such as income from operations is presented, it shall include the amounts of those gains or losses.



Cash Equivalents



The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.



The Company minimizes its credit risk associated with cash by periodically evaluating the credit quality of its primary financial institution. The balance at times may exceed federally insured limits.



Accounts Receivable and Allowances



Pursuant to FASB ASC paragraph 310-10-35-47 trade receivables that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future shall be reported in the balance sheet at outstanding principal adjusted for any charge-offs and the allowance for doubtful accounts.. The Company follows FASB ASC paragraphs 310-10-35-7 through 310-10-35-10 to estimate the allowance for doubtful accounts. Pursuant to FASB ASC paragraph 310-10-35-9 Losses from uncollectible receivables shall be accrued when both of the following conditions are met: (a) Information available before the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued (as discussed in Section 855-10-25) indicates that it is probable that an asset has been impaired at the date of the financial statements, and (b) The amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Those conditions may be considered in relation to individual receivables or in relation to groups of similar types of receivables. If the conditions are met, accrual shall be made even though the particular receivables that are uncollectible may not be identifiable. The Company reviews individually each trade receivable for collectability and performs on-going credit evaluations of its customers and adjusts credit limits based upon payment history and the customer’s current credit worthiness, as determined by the review of their current credit information; and determines the allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical write-off experience, customer specific facts and general economic conditions that may affect a client’s ability to pay. Bad debt expense is included in general and administrative expenses, if any.



Pursuant to FASB ASC paragraph 310-10-35-41 Credit losses for trade receivables (uncollectible trade receivables), which may be for all or part of a particular trade receivable, shall be deducted from the allowance. The related trade receivable balance shall be charged off in the period in which the trade receivables are deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of trade receivables previously charged off shall be recorded when received. The Company charges off its trade account receivables against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote.

If the financial condition of one or more of its customers unexpectedly deteriorates, resulting in their inability to make payments, or if the Company otherwise underestimates the losses it incurs as a result of its customers’ inability to pay, the Company could be required to increase its allowance for doubtful accounts which could materially adversely affect its operating results.



The Company’s sales to certain customers consist of gross product sales reduced by expected future sales returns and allowances. To estimate sales returns and allowances, the Company analyzes historical returns and allowance activity to establish a baseline reserve level. The Company then evaluates whether there are any underlying product quality or other customer specific issues that require additional specific reserves above the baseline level. Because the reserve for sales returns and allowances is based on judgments and estimates of the management of the Company, its reserves may not be adequate to cover actual sales returns and other allowances. If the Company’s reserves are not adequate, its net sales and accounts receivable could be materially adversely affected.



Off-Balance-Sheet Credit Exposures



Pursuant to FASB ASC paragraph 310-10-50-9 an entity shall disclose a description of the accounting policies and methodology the entity used to estimate its liability for off-balance-sheet credit exposures and related charges for those credit exposures. Such a description shall identify the factors that influenced management's judgment (for example, historical losses and existing economic conditions) and a discussion of risk elements relevant to particular categories of financial instruments.

The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure to its customers at September 30, 2014 or 2013.

Property and Equipment



Property and equipment is recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation of property and equipment is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets as follows:




		Estimated Useful Life (Years)

Computer and software			5
Equipment under capital lease			5

Furniture and fixture			7

Leasehold improvement			*



(*) Amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease or the estimated useful lives, whichever is shorter.



Upon sale or retirement of property and equipment, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in statements of operations.



Leases



Lease agreements are evaluated to determine whether they are capital leases or operating leases in accordance with paragraph 840-10-25-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 840-10-25-1”). Pursuant to Paragraph 840-10-25-1 a lessee and a lessor shall consider whether a lease meets any of the following four criteria as part of classifying the lease at its inception under the guidance in the Lessees Subsection of this Section (for the lessee) and the Lessors Subsection of this Section (for the lessor): a. Transfer of ownership. The lease transfers ownership of the property to the lessee by the end of the lease term. This criterion is met in situations in which the lease agreement provides for the transfer of title at or shortly after the end of the lease term in exchange for the payment of a nominal fee, for example, the minimum required by statutory regulation to transfer title. b. Bargain purchase option. The lease contains a bargain purchase option. c. Lease term. The lease term is equal to 75 percent or more of the estimated economic life of the leased property. d. Minimum lease payments. The present value at the beginning of the lease term of the minimum lease payments, excluding that portion of the payments representing executory costs such as insurance, maintenance, and taxes to be paid by the lessor, including any profit thereon, equals or exceeds 90 percent of the excess of the fair value of the leased property to the lessor at lease inception over any related investment tax credit retained by the lessor and expected to be realized by the lessor. In accordance with paragraphs 840-10-25-29 and 840-10-25-30, if at its inception a lease meets any of the four lease classification criteria in Paragraph 840-10-25-1, the lease shall be classified by the lessee as a capital lease; and if none of the four criteria in Paragraph 840-10-25-1 are met, the lease shall be classified by the lessee as an operating lease. Pursuant to Paragraph 840-10-25-31 a lessee shall compute the present value of the minimum lease payments using the lessee's incremental borrowing rate unless both of the following conditions are met, in which circumstance the lessee shall use the implicit rate: a. It is practicable for the lessee to learn the implicit rate computed by the lessor. b. The implicit rate computed by the lessor is less than the lessee's incremental borrowing rate. Capital lease assets are depreciated on a straight line method, over the capital lease assets estimated useful lives consistent with the Company’s normal depreciation policy for tangible fixed assets. Interest charges are expensed over the period of the lease in relation to the carrying value of the capital lease obligation.



Operating leases primarily relate to the Company’s leases of office spaces. When the terms of an operating lease include tenant improvement allowances, periods of free rent, rent concessions, and/or rent escalation amounts, the Company establishes a deferred rent liability for the difference between the scheduled rent payment and the straight-line rent expense recognized, which is amortized over the underlying lease term on a straight-line basis as a reduction of rent expense.



Intangible Assets Other Than Goodwill



The Company has adopted Subtopic 350-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for intangible assets other than goodwill. Under the requirements, the Company amortizes the acquisition costs of intangible assets other than goodwill on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, the terms of the exclusive licenses and/or agreements, or the terms of legal lives of the intangible assets, whichever is shorter. Upon becoming fully amortized, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.



Research and Development and Capitalized Internal Use Software Development Costs



The Company has adopted paragraph 350-40-15-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 350-40-15-2”) for software developed for internal use. Paragraph 350-40-15-2 requires the capitalization of certain external and internal computer software costs incurred during the application development stage. The application development stage is characterized by software design and configuration activities, coding, testing and installation. Training costs and maintenance are expensed as incurred, while upgrades and enhancements are capitalized if it is probable that such expenditures will result in additional functionality. Capitalized software development costs for internal use begins when the software is available for internal use and is amortized on a straight-line basis over software’s estimated useful life ranging from one to three years. Upon becoming fully amortized or being charged off as impaired, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.



Research and development costs incurred in the process of software development before establishment of technological feasibility is expensed as incurred.



Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities



The Company accounts for derivative instruments and hedging activities in accordance with paragraph 815-10-05-4 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 815-10-05-4”). Paragraph 815-10-05-4 requires companies to recognize all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends upon: (i) whether the derivative has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship, and (ii) the type of hedging relationship. For those derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, a company must designate the hedging instrument based upon the exposure being hedged as either a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation.



Derivative Liability



The Company evaluates its convertible debt, warrants or other contracts to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with Paragraph 815-10-05-4 of the Codification and Paragraph 815-40-25 of the Codification. The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the embedded derivative is marked-to-market each balance sheet date and recorded as a liability. In the event that the fair value is recorded as a liability, the change in fair value is recorded in the consolidated statements of operations as other income or expense. Upon conversion or exercise of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the conversion date and then that fair value is reclassified to equity.



In circumstances where the embedded conversion option in a convertible instrument is required to be bifurcated and there are also other embedded derivative instruments in the convertible instrument that are required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compound derivative instrument.



The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Equity instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to reclassification are reclassified to liability at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. Derivative instrument liabilities will be classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument is expected within 12 months of the balance sheet date.



The Company marks to market the fair value of the remaining derivative convertible notes and derivative warrants at each balance sheet date and records the change in the fair value of the remaining derivatives as other income or expense in the consolidated statements of operations.



The Company utilizes the Lattice model that values the liability of the derivatives based on a probability weighted discounted cash flow model with the assistance of the third party valuation firm. The reason the Company picks the Lattice model is that in many cases there may be multiple embedded features or the features of the bifurcated derivatives may be so complex that a Black-Scholes valuation does not consider all of the terms of the instrument. Therefore, the fair value may not be appropriately captured by simple models. In other words, simple models such as Black-Scholes may not be appropriate in many situations given complex features and terms of conversion option (e.g., combined embedded derivatives). The Lattice model is based on future projections of the various potential outcomes. The features that were analyzed and incorporated into the model included the exercise and full reset features. Based on these features, there are two primary events that can occur; the Holder converts/exercises the Notes/Warrants or the Notes/Warrants are held to expiration. The Lattice model analyzed the underlying economic factors that influenced which of these events would occur, when they were likely to occur, and the specific terms that would be in effect at the time (i.e. stock price, exercise price, volatility, etc.). Projections were then made on the underlying factors which led to potential scenarios. Probabilities were assigned to each scenario based on management projections. This led to a cash flow projection and a probability associated with that cash flow. A discounted weighted average cash flow over the various scenarios was completed to determine the value of the derivative warrants.



Related Parties



The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.



Pursuant to section 850-10-20 the related parties include a) affiliates (“Affiliate” means, with respect to any specified Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with such Person, as such terms are used in and construed under Rule 405 under the Securities Act) of the Company; b) entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c) trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d) principal owners of the Company; e) management of the Company; f) other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.



The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a) the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b) a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c) the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d) amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.



Commitments and Contingencies



The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or un-asserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or un-asserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.



If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.



Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed.



Revenue Recognition



The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue is recognized from the point at which service is first provided over the life of the subscription period, typically one year. Appropriate allowances for returns and discounts are recorded concurrent with revenue recognition.



Deferred Costs (Asset)



Service arrangements with customers require certain significant up-front costs.



The Company capitalizes the up-front costs associated with providing the services and amortizes those costs ratably over the same period that the revenue is recognized for the related up-front payment.



Deferred Revenue (Liability)



The Company receives non-refundable up-front payments for services. These payments are initially deferred and subsequently recognized over the subscription period, typically one year.



Advertising



The Company expenses advertising when incurred. Advertising expense for the reporting period ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was $83,145 and $83,764, respectively.



Stock-Based Compensation for Obtaining Employee Services



The Company accounts for share-based payment transactions issued to employees under the guidance of the Topic 718 Compensation—Stock Compensation of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC Topic 718”).



Pursuant to ASC Section 718-10-20 an employee is an individual over whom the grantor of a share-based compensation award exercises or has the right to exercise sufficient control to establish an employer-employee relationship based on common law as illustrated in case law and currently under U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) Revenue Ruling 87-41. A non-employee director does not satisfy this definition of employee. Nevertheless, non-employee directors acting in their role as members of a board of directors are treated as employees if those directors were elected by the employer’s shareholders or appointed to a board position that will be filled by shareholder election when the existing term expires. However, that requirement applies only to awards granted to non-employee directors for their services as directors. Awards granted to non-employee directors for other services shall be accounted for as awards to non-employees.



Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 718-10-30-2 and 718-10-30-3 a share-based payment transaction with employees shall be measured based on the fair value of the equity instruments issued and an entity shall account for the compensation cost from share-based payment transactions with employees in accordance with the fair value-based method, i.e., the cost of services received from employees in exchange for awards of share-based compensation generally shall be measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity instruments issued or the fair value of the liabilities incurred/settled.



Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 718-10-30-6 and 718-10-30-9 the measurement objective for equity instruments awarded to employees is to estimate the fair value at the grant date of the equity instruments that the entity is obligated to issue when employees have rendered the requisite service and satisfied any other conditions necessary to earn the right to benefit from the instruments (for example, to exercise share options). That estimate is based on the share price and other pertinent factors, such as expected volatility, at the grant date. As such, the fair value of an equity share option or similar instrument shall be estimated using a valuation technique such as an option pricing model. For this purpose, a similar instrument is one whose fair value differs from its intrinsic value, that is, an instrument that has time value.



If the Company’s common shares are traded in one of the national exchanges the grant-date share price of the Company’s common stock will be used to measure the fair value of the common shares issued, however, if the Company’s common shares are thinly traded the use of share prices established in its most recent private placement memorandum (“PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.



Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-55-21 if an observable market price is not available for a share option or similar instrument with the same or similar terms and conditions, an entity shall estimate the fair value of that instrument using a valuation technique or model that meets the requirements in paragraph 718-10-55-11 and takes into account, at a minimum, all of the following factors:



a.	The exercise price of the option.



b.	The expected term of the option, taking into account both the contractual term of the option and the effects of employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior: The expected life of options and similar instruments represents the period of time the option and/or warrant are expected to be outstanding. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-S99-1, it may be appropriate to use the simplified method, i.e., expected term =(vesting term + original contractual term) / 2), if (i) A company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term due to the limited period of time its equity shares have been publicly traded; (ii) A company significantly changes the terms of its share option grants or the types of employees that receive share option grants such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term; or (iii) A company has or expects to have significant structural changes in its business such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term. The Company uses the simplified method to calculate expected term of share options and similar instruments as the company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.



c.	The current price of the underlying share.



d.	The expected volatility of the price of the underlying share for the expected term of the option. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-55-25 a newly publicly traded entity might base expectations about future volatility on the average volatilities of similar entities for an appropriate period following their going public. A nonpublic entity might base its expected volatility on the average volatilities of otherwise similar public entities. For purposes of identifying otherwise similar entities, an entity would likely consider characteristics such as industry, stage of life cycle, size, and financial leverage. Because of the effects of diversification that are present in an industry sector index, the volatility of an index should not be substituted for the average of volatilities of otherwise similar entities in a fair value measurement. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-S99-1 if shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market. The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected term of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility.



e.	The expected dividends on the underlying share for the expected term of the option. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.



f.	The risk-free interest rate(s) for the expected term of the option. Pursuant to ASC 718-10-55-28 a U.S. entity issuing an option on its own shares must use as the risk-free interest rates the implied yields currently available from the U.S. Treasury zero-coupon yield curve over the contractual term of the option if the entity is using a lattice model incorporating the option’s contractual term. If the entity is using a closed-form model, the risk-free interest rate is the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected term used as the assumption in the model.



Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 718-10-30-11 and 718-10-30-17 a restriction that stems from the forfeitability of instruments to which employees have not yet earned the right, such as the inability either to exercise a non-vested equity share option or to sell non-vested shares, is not reflected in estimating the fair value of the related instruments at the grant date. Instead, those restrictions are taken into account by recognizing compensation cost only for awards for which employees render the requisite service and a non-vested equity share or non-vested equity share unit awarded to an employee shall be measured at its fair value as if it were vested and issued on the grant date.



Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 718-10-35-2 and 718-10-35-3 the compensation cost for an award of share-based employee compensation classified as equity shall be recognized over the requisite service period, with a corresponding credit to equity (generally, paid-in capital). The requisite service period is the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for an award, which often is the vesting period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized at the end of the requisite service period for an award of share-based compensation shall be based on the number of instruments for which the requisite service has been rendered (that is, for which the requisite service period has been completed). An entity shall base initial accruals of compensation cost on the estimated number of instruments for which the requisite service is expected to be rendered. That estimate shall be revised if subsequent information indicates that the actual number of instruments is likely to differ from previous estimates. The cumulative effect on current and prior periods of a change in the estimated number of instruments for which the requisite service is expected to be or has been rendered shall be recognized in compensation cost in the period of the change. Previously recognized compensation cost shall not be reversed if an employee share option (or share unit) for which the requisite service has been rendered expires unexercised (or unconverted).



Under the requirement of ASC Paragraph 718-10-35-8 the Company made a policy decision to recognize compensation cost for an award with only service conditions that has a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.

Equity Instruments Issued to Parties Other Than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services



The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under guidance of Sub-topic 505-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Sub-topic 505-50”).



Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-25-7, if fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (no specific performance is required by the grantee to retain those equity instruments), then, because of the elimination of any obligation on the part of the counterparty to earn the equity instruments, a measurement date has been reached. A grantor shall recognize the equity instruments when they are issued (in most cases, when the agreement is entered into). Whether the corresponding cost is an immediate expense or a prepaid asset (or whether the debit should be characterized as contra-equity under the requirements of paragraph 505-50-45-1) depends on the specific facts and circumstances. Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-45-1, a grantor may conclude that an asset (other than a note or a receivable) has been received in return for fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (and no specific performance is required by the grantee in order to retain those equity instruments). Such an asset shall not be displayed as contra-equity by the grantor of the equity instruments. The transferability (or lack thereof) of the equity instruments shall not affect the balance sheet display of the asset. This guidance is limited to transactions in which equity instruments are transferred to other than employees in exchange for goods or services.



Pursuant to Paragraphs 505-50-25-8 and 505-50-25-9, an entity may grant fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are exercisable by the grantee only after a specified period of time if the terms of the agreement provide for earlier exercisability if the grantee achieves specified performance conditions. Any measured cost of the transaction shall be recognized in the same period(s) and in the same manner as if the entity had paid cash for the goods or services or used cash rebates as a sales discount instead of paying with, or using, the equity instruments. A recognized asset, expense, or sales discount shall not be reversed if a stock option that the counterparty has the right to exercise expires unexercised.



Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 505-50-30-2 and 505-50-30-11 share-based payment transactions with nonemployees shall be measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The issuer shall measure the fair value of the equity instruments in these transactions using the stock price and other measurement assumptions as of the earlier of the following dates, referred to as the measurement date: (a) The date at which a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached (a performance commitment); or (b) The date at which the counterparty's performance is complete. If the Company’s common shares are traded in one of the national exchanges the grant-date share price of the Company’s common stock will be used to measure the fair value of the common shares issued, however, if the Company’s common shares are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum (“PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.



Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-55-21 if an observable market price is not available for a share option or similar instrument with the same or similar terms and conditions, an entity shall estimate the fair value of that instrument using a valuation technique or model that meets the requirements in paragraph 718-10-55-11 and takes into account, at a minimum, all of the following factors:



	a.	The exercise price of the option.



	b.	The expected term of the option, taking into account both the contractual term of the option and the effects of employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior: Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and holder’s expected exercise behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments. The Company uses historical data to estimate holder’s expected exercise behavior. If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the contractual term of the share options and similar instruments is used as the expected term of share options and similar instruments as the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.



c.The current price of the underlying share.



	d.	The expected volatility of the price of the underlying share for the expected term of the option. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-55-25 a newly publicly traded entity might base expectations about future volatility on the average volatilities of similar entities for an appropriate period following their going public. A nonpublic entity might base its expected volatility on the average volatilities of otherwise similar public entities. For purposes of identifying otherwise similar entities, an entity would likely consider characteristics such as industry, stage of life cycle, size, and financial leverage. Because of the effects of diversification that are present in an industry sector index, the volatility of an index should not be substituted for the average of volatilities of otherwise similar entities in a fair value measurement. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-S99-1 if shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market. The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected term of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility.



	e.	The expected dividends on the underlying share for the expected term of the option. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.



	f.	The risk-free interest rate(s) for the expected term of the option. Pursuant to ASC 718-10-55-28 a U.S. entity issuing an option on its own shares must use as the risk-free interest rates the implied yields currently available from the U.S. Treasury zero-coupon yield curve over the contractual term of the option if the entity is using a lattice model incorporating the option’s contractual term. If the entity is using a closed-form model, the risk-free interest rate is the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected term used as the assumption in the model.



Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-S99-1, if the Company receives a right to receive future services in exchange for unvested, forfeitable equity instruments, those equity instruments are treated as unissued for accounting purposes until the future services are received (that is, the instruments are not considered issued until they vest). Consequently, there would be no recognition at the measurement date and no entry should be recorded.



Deferred Tax Assets and Income Taxes Provision



The Company adopted the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Paragraph 740-10-25-13.addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under paragraph 740-10-25-13, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Paragraph 740-10-25-13 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13.



The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.



Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.



Tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions



The Company discloses tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions pursuant to the ASC Paragraph 740-10-50-15.



Earnings per Share



Earnings per share ("EPS") is the amount of earnings attributable to each share of common stock. For convenience, the term is used to refer to either earnings or loss per share. EPS is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-10 through 260-10-45-16 Basic EPS shall be computed by dividing income available to common stockholders (the numerator) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding (the denominator) during the period. Income available to common stockholders shall be computed by deducting both the dividends declared in the period on preferred stock (whether or not paid) and the dividends accumulated for the period on cumulative preferred stock (whether or not earned) from income from continuing operations (if that amount appears in the income statement) and also from net income. The computation of diluted EPS is similar to the computation of basic EPS except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through contingent shares issuance arrangement, stock options or warrants.



Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-45-21 through 260-10-45-45-23 Diluted EPS shall be based on the most advantageous conversion rate or exercise price from the standpoint of the security holder. The dilutive effect of outstanding call options and warrants (and their equivalents) issued by the reporting entity shall be reflected in diluted EPS by application of the treasury stock method unless the provisions of paragraphs 260-10-45-35 through 45-36 and 260-10-55-8 through 55-11 require that another method be applied. Equivalents of options and warrants include non-vested stock granted to employees, stock purchase contracts, and partially paid stock subscriptions (see paragraph 260–10–55–23). Anti-dilutive contracts, such as purchased put options and purchased call options, shall be excluded from diluted EPS. Under the treasury stock method: a. Exercise of options and warrants shall be assumed at the beginning of the period (or at time of issuance, if later) and common shares shall be assumed to be issued. b. The proceeds from exercise shall be assumed to be used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. (See paragraphs 260-10-45-29 and 260-10-55-4 through 55-5.) c. The incremental shares (the difference between the number of shares assumed issued and the number of shares assumed purchased) shall be included in the denominator of the diluted EPS computation.



The Company’s contingent shares issuance arrangement, stock options or warrants are as follows:




		Potentially Outstanding Dilutive Common Shares
		For the fiscal year ended			For the fiscal year ended
		30-Sep-14			30-Sep-13
Convertible Note Shares

On May 3, 2011, June 13, 2011 and August 1, 2011, the Company issued three (3) convertible notes payable in the face amount of $25,0000 each, or $75,000 in aggregate, with interest at 10% per annum due October 1, 2011, June 1, 2012 and June 1, 2012, respectively, convertible at the lesser of (i) an amount equal to ninety percent (90%) of the then offering price of subsequent financings, or (ii) $0.15 per share. The due date of the remaining note was subsequently extended three times to December 31, 2014.			166,667			166,667

On January 31, 2012, the Company issued two (2) convertible notes in the face amount of $130,000 each, or $260,000 in aggregate with interest at 5% per annum originally due one (1) year from the date of issuance, convertible at $0.10 per share. The due date of the notes was subsequently extended twice to January 31, 2015.			2,600,000			2,600,000

On November 19, 2012, the Company issued two (2) convertible notes in the face amount of $102,500 each, or $205,000 in aggregate, with interest at 5% per annum, convertible at $0.10 per share. The due date of the notes was subsequently extended to January 31, 2015.			2,050,000			2,050,000

On July 19, 2013, the Company issued three (3) convertible notes in the aggregate amount of $250,000, with interest at 5% per annum, due January 31, 2015, convertible at $0.10 per share.			2,500,000			2,500,000

On October 18, 2013, the Company issued three (3) convertible notes in the aggregate amount of $280,000, with interest at 5% per annum, due January 31, 2015, convertible at $0.10 per share.			2,800,000			-

Warrant Shares

Common stock warrants, with an exercise price of $0.15 per share.			5,045,000			2,167,500

Option Shares

Stock options, with exercise prices ranging from $0.06 to $0.30 per share.			8,228,542			4,878,708

Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares			23,390,209			14,362,875



These were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation as they were anti-dilutive.

Cash Flows Reporting



The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.



Subsequent Events



The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements are issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.



Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements



In May 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”).



This guidance amends the existing FASB Accounting Standards Codification, creating a new Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customer. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.



To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps:



	1	Identify the contract(s) with the customer
	2	Identify the performance obligations in the contract
	3	Determine the transaction price
	4	Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract
	5	Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligations



The ASU also provides guidance on disclosures that should be provided to enable financial statement users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue recognition and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. Qualitative and quantitative information is required about the following:



	1	Contracts with customers – including revenue and impairments recognized, disaggregation of revenue, and information about contract balances and performance obligations (including the transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations)
	2	Significant judgments and changes in judgments – determining the timing of satisfaction of performance obligations (over time or at a point in time), and determining the transaction price and amounts allocated to performance obligations
	3	Assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract.



ASU 2014-09 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period for all public entities. Early application is not permitted.



In June 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-12 “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period” (“ASU 2014-12”).



The amendments clarify the proper method of accounting for share-based payments when the terms of an award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. The Update requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. The performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered.



The amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted.



In August 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”).

In connection with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period, an entity’s management should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Management’s evaluation should be based on relevant conditions and events that are known and reasonably knowable at the date that the financial statements are issued (or at the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern exists when relevant conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate that it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The term probable is used consistently with its use in Topic 450, Contingencies.



When management identifies conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, management should consider whether its plans that are intended to mitigate those relevant conditions or events will alleviate the substantial doubt. The mitigating effect of management’s plans should be considered only to the extent that (1) it is probable that the plans will be effectively implemented and, if so, (2) it is probable that the plans will mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.



If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, but the substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following (or refer to similar information disclosed elsewhere in the footnotes):



	a.	Principal conditions or events that raised substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern (before consideration of management’s plans)
	b.	Management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations
	c.	Management’s plans that alleviated substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.



If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and substantial doubt is not alleviated after consideration of management’s plans, an entity should include a statement in the footnotes indicating that there is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). Additionally, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following:



	a.	Principal conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern
	b.	Management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations
	c.	Management’s plans that are intended to mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.



The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted.



Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, when adopted, will have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Going_Concern

Going Concern	12 Months Ended
Going Concern	Sep. 30, 2014
Going Concern [Abstract]
Going Concern	Note 3 – Going Concern

	The Company has elected to adopt early application of Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”).

	The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

	The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that it will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

	As reflected in the consolidated financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit at September 30, 2014 and a net loss for the reporting period then ended. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

	The Company is attempting to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue; however, the Company’s cash position may not be sufficient to support the Company’s daily operations. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and in its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to further implement its business plan and generate sufficient revenue and its ability to raise additional funds by way of a public or private offering.

	The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Property_and_Equipment

Property and Equipment	12 Months Ended
Property and Equipment	Sep. 30, 2014
Property and Equipment [Abstract]
Property and Equipment	Note 4 – Property and Equipment



	Property and equipment, stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation consisted of the following:



		Estimated Useful Life (Years)		September 30, 2014			September 30, 2013

	Computers and software		5	$	72,474		$	46,853

	Equipment under capital lease		5		6,962			6,962

	Furniture and equipment		7		22,228			17,414

	Leasehold improvements		*		7,425			7,425

					109,089			78,654

	Less accumulated depreciation and amortization				(66,057	)		(48,995	)

				$	43,032		$	29,659



	* To be amortized over the term of the lease or its estimated useful life, whichever is shorter.



	(i) Impairment



	Property and equipment to be held and used are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of the assets may not be recoverable. Determination of recoverability is based on the lowest level of identifiable estimated undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. Measurement of any impairment loss for long-lived assets that management expects to hold and use is based on the excess of the carrying value of the asset over its fair value. No impairments of such assets were identified during any of the periods presented.



	(ii) Depreciation and Amortization Expense



	Depreciation and amortization expense was $17,062 and $19,199 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Capitalized_Software_Developme

Capitalized Software Development Costs	12 Months Ended
Capitalized Software Development Costs	Sep. 30, 2014
Capitalized Software Development Costs [Abstract]
Capitalized Software Development Costs	Note 5 – Capitalized Software Development Costs



	Capitalized software development costs, stated at cost, less accumulated amortization consisted of the following:



		Estimated Useful Life (Years)		30-Sep-14			30-Sep-13

	Capitalized software development costs		3	$	109,983		$	109,983

	Less accumulated amortization				(109,983	)		(109,983	)

				$	-		$	-



	(i) Amortization Expense



	Amortization expense amounted to $0 and $22,896 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Intangible_Assets

Intangible Assets	12 Months Ended
Intangible Assets	Sep. 30, 2014
Intangible Assets [Abstract]
Intangible Assets	Note 6 – Intangible Assets



	The following table summarizes changes in intangible assets as of September 30, 2014:



		Estimated Life		Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Impairment Charges			Net
	Customer list		3 years	$	84,000	$	(37,222	)	$	(46,778	)	$	-
	Non-compete		3 years		69,183		(30,632	)		(38,551	)		-
	Domain name		Indefinite		7,500		-			(7,500	)		-
				$	160,683	$	(67,854	)	$	(92,829	)	$	-



	The following table summarizes changes in intangible assets as of September 30, 2013:



		Estimated Life		Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Impairment Charges			Net
	Customer list		3 years	$	84,000	$	(9,222	)	$	-		$	74,778
	Non-compete		3 years		69,183		(7,571	)		-			61,612
	Domain name		Indefinite		7,500		-			-			7,500
				$	160,683	$	(16,793	)	$	-		$	143,890

	(i) Impairment



	Intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized but instead are measured for impairment at least annually or when events indicate that an impairment exists. Management regularly reviews definite-lived intangible assets, for possible impairment. This review occurs annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable.



	As a result of unexpected poor results of operations, the fair values of the Company’s intangible assets were negatively impacted. Based on our annual impairment test performed the estimated fair values of our Assets were determined to be significantly less than their respective carrying amounts, so the management of the Company determined that its intangible assets were impaired. An impairment charge totaling $92,829 was recorded on September 30, 2014, reducing the carrying amount of its intangible assets to $0.



	(ii) Amortization Expense



	Amortization expense amounted to $51,061 and $16,793 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Notes_Payable

Notes Payable	12 Months Ended
Notes Payable	Sep. 30, 2014
Notes Payable [Abstract]
Notes Payable	Note 7 – Notes Payable



	Short Term Note



	On January 23, 2014, the Company issued a note with the principal in the amount of $50,000 to one note holder with the following terms and conditions:



		·	Maturing on February 28, 2014,
		·	Interest rate at 12% per annum, with interest payable at maturity,
		·	Penalty - upon default the Company shall issue the holder 200,000 shares of common stock of the Company.



	The Company repaid the total outstanding principal along with accrued interest in the amount of $50,608 on February 27, 2014.



	SBA Loan - Default and Contingent Liability



	Prior to September 2010, the Company issued a note with the principal in the amount of $386,300 to the United States Small Business Administration ("SBA") with the following terms and conditions:



		·	Maturing in January 2036;
		·	Interest at 4% per annum;
		·	Monthly principal and interest payment of $1,944



	Default and Potential Violation



	The Company has been in violation of certain covenants contained in this note since 2011. The circumstances that potentially led to these violations have not been cured. The Company does not believe it is probable that the loan will be called by the SBA due to the fact that the Company is current with its monthly installment payment obligation.



	Debt under these obligations is as follows:



			30-Sep-14			30-Sep-13

	Notes payable		$	328,380		$	338,223

	Less: Current maturities			(10,387	)		(9,981	)

	Notes payable, net of Current maturities		$	317,993		$	328,242



	Future minimum principal and interest payment under SBA loan are as follows:



	Fiscal Year ending September 30:

2015		$	23,328

2016			23,328

2017			23,328

2018			23,328

2019			23,328

2020 and thereafter			373,248

			489,888

Less interest portion			(161,508	)

			328,380

Less current maturities			(10,387	)

		$	317,993

Notes_Payable_Related_Party

Notes Payable - Related Party	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Notes Payable - Related Party [Abstract]
Notes Payable - Related Party	Note 8 – Notes Payable – Related Party



	Related Parties		Relationship
	The Edmonds-Jaques Family Trust dated 06/13/2003		An entity of which the Chief Financial Officer and member of the board of directors of the Company is a trustee.

	Radeon, LLC		An entity owned and controlled by a significant stockholder and the President and the Chief Revenue Officer of the Company.



	Debt Offering (A)



	In August 2014, the Company issued an unsecured promissory note with the principal in the amount of $100,000 to Radeon, LLC with the following terms and conditions:



		·	Maturing October 30, 2014,
		·	Interest rate at 6% per annum, with interest payable on maturity,
		·	Default interest rate is 18% per annum,
		·	Three (3) year warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of common stock, with an exercise price of $0.15 per share.



	The fair value of the warrants issued with the note was recorded as a debt discount of $30,400 and shall be amortized over the life of the debt to interest expense.



	The Company recorded $21,607 interest expense on the note during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014.



	As of September 30, 2014, the Company is reflecting a liability of $101,003 which includes $1,003 accrued interest.



	On December 24, 2014 the maturity date of the note was extended from October 30, 2014 to February 28, 2015. As consideration for the extension, the Company agreed to pay the note holder $1,000, to be paid at the extended maturity date of the note.



	Debt Offering (B)



	In August 2014, the Company issued an unsecured promissory note with the principal in the amount of $100,000 to the Edmonds-Jaques Family Trust dated 06/13/03 with the following terms and conditions:



		·	Maturing October 14, 2014,
		·	Interest rate at 6% per annum, with interest payable on maturity,
		·	Default interest rate is 18% per annum,
		·	Three (3) year warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of common stock, with an exercise price of $0.15 per share.



	The fair value of the warrants issued with the note was recorded as a debt discount of $28,065 and shall be amortized over the life of the debt to interest expense.



	The Company recorded $22,873 interest expense on the note during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014.



As of September 30, 2014, the Company is reflecting a liability of $100,789 which includes $789 accrued interest.



On December 22, 2014 the maturity date of the note was extended from October 14, 2014 to February 28, 2015. As consideration for the extension, the Company agreed to pay the note holder $1,000, to be paid at the extended maturity date of the note.



Debt Offering (C)



In August 2014, the Company issued an unsecured promissory note with the principal in the amount of $100,000 to Radeon, LLC with the following terms and conditions:



	·	Maturing December 30, 2014,
	·	Interest rate at 6% per annum, with interest payable on maturity,
	·	Default interest rate is 18% per annum,
	·	Three (3) year warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of common stock, with an exercise price of $0.15 per share.



The fair value of the warrants issued with the note was recorded as a debt discount of $30,405 and shall be amortized over the life of the debt to interest expense.



The Company recorded $694 interest expense on the note during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014.



As of September 30, 2014 and 2012, the Company is reflecting a liability of $100,033 which includes $33 accrued interest.



On December 22, 2014 the maturity date of the note was extended from December 30, 2014 to February 28, 2015. As consideration for the extension, the Company agreed to pay the note holder $1,000, to be paid at the extended maturity date of the note.



Notes payable – related party and accrued interest consisted of the following:



		30-Sep-14			30-Sep-13

Notes payable – related party including accrued interest		$	301,825		$	-
Discount on convertible notes			(45,521	)		-
Notes payable – related party, net			256,304			-

Less current maturities			(256,304	)		-

Notes payable – related party, net of current maturities		$	-		$	-



Debt Discount – Related party notes



The debt discounts recorded in 2014 pertain to the warrants issued with the related party notes.



The following is a summary of the Company’s debt discount – related party notes:



		30-Sep-14			30-Sep-13

Debt discount		$	88,870		$	-
Amortization of debt discount			(43,349	)		-
Debt discount - net		$	45,521		$	-

Convertible_Notes_Payable

Convertible Notes Payable	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Convertible Notes Payable [Abstract]
Convertible Notes Payable	Note 9 – Convertible Notes Payable



	Debt Offering (A)



	On May 3, 2011, June 13, 2011 and August 1, 2011, the Company sold three (3) $25,000 notes or $75,000 in aggregate of unsecured, subordinated convertible notes (the "Notes") with the following terms and conditions:



		·	Maturity dates ranging from October 1, 2011 to December 31, 2014 as amended;

		·	Interest rate at 10% per annum, with interest payable at maturity;
		·	Convertible (see further description below); and
		·	Subordinate to any senior debt, mezzanine debt, secured debt, or other creditors having priority by law or agreement of the Company as may be incurred by the Company prior to maturity.



	Conversion Feature – Convertible Notes



	In the event the Company consummates, prior to the maturity date of the Notes, an equity financing pursuant to which it sells shares of its common stock with the aggregate gross proceeds of not less than $5 million (a “Qualified Financing”), then the note holder has the right to either (i) exercise the option to call the notes due, whereby the Company shall repay the balance of the notes, including the unpaid principal and all accrued interest; or (ii) exercise the conversion option of converting all of the amounts due from the Company for additional shares. The conversion price shall be the lesser of (i) an amount equal to ninety percent (90%) of the then offering price of such additional shares, or (ii) $0.15 per share.



	If the Company does not engage in a Qualified Financing on or prior to the maturity date of the Notes, the holder of the note may exercise the option of converting the Notes, including all principal and accrued interest, into shares of the Company's common stock at a conversion price of $0.15 per share. If the option is not exercised on the maturity date the conversion option will cease to exist.



	Because these conversion features are variable, management has concluded that the features cannot be indexed solely to the Company’s own stock and therefore are precluded from equity classification. As a result, the features must be accounted for as derivative liabilities.



	During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012, two (2) note holders converted notes and related accrued interest of $52,774 at $0.15 per share into 351,827 shares of common stock.



	On February 10, 2014, the remaining note holder, having a note in the principal amount of $25,000, signed a note amendment extending the maturity date of the note. The maturity of the note was extended to December 31, 2014 or the closing of an equity investment where the Company receives net proceeds of more than $500,000, whichever is earlier.



	Derivative Warrants



	Each of the three (3) note holders received a warrant to purchase shares of the Company's common stock equal to 30% of the principal amount of their note (e.g., a warrant to purchase 7,500 shares for each $25,000 invested). These warrants are exercisable at $0.75 per share expiring three (3) years from the date of issuance, i.e. May 3, 2014, June 13, 2014 and August 1, 2014, respectively.



	Management has concluded that the above conversion features cannot be indexed solely to the Company’s own stock and therefore are precluded from equity classification. The warrants have a maturity date subsequent to the maturity date of the Notes and the warrants are not otherwise excluded from liability treatment. As a result, the warrants must be accounted for as derivative liabilities.



	Extinguishment Accounting



	In order for the conversion feature to be consistent for all note holders, on August 3, 2011, in accordance with a note Modification and Amendment Agreement, one note holder’s conversion price relating to the initial issuance was modified from an amount equal to ninety percent (90%) of the then offering price of such additional shares (future issuances) to the lesser of (i) an amount equal to ninety percent (90%) of the then offering price of such additional shares, or (ii) $0.15 per share.



The Company compared the fair value of the note on the date of modification to the as-modified note. Because the fair value of the as-modified note was 10% greater than the fair value of the existing note, the Company applied extinguishment accounting, resulting in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $34,390, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011.



On June 1, 2012, one note holder signed a note amendment extending the maturity date of the note to March 1, 2013, this was considered a substantial modification of terms and the Company applied extinguishment accounting. The Company compared the fair value of the note on the date of modification to the as-modified note. Because the fair value of the as-modified note was 10% greater than the fair value of the existing note, the Company applied extinguishment accounting, resulting in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $8,667, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2012.



On March 1, 2013, one (1) note holder signed a note amendment further extending the maturity date of the note to December 31, 2013, or the closing of an equity investment where the Company receives net proceeds of more than $500,000, whichever is earlier. This was considered a substantial modification of terms and the Company applied extinguishment accounting. The Company compared the fair value of the note on the date of modification to the as-modified note. Because the fair value of the as-modified note was 10% greater than the fair value of the existing note, the Company applied extinguishment accounting, resulting in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $25,667, for the year ended September 30, 2013.



On February 10, 2014, one (1) note holder signed a note amendment further extending the maturity date of the note to December 31, 2014, or the closing of an equity investment where the Company receives net proceeds of more than $500,000, whichever is earlier. This was considered a substantial modification of terms and the Company applied extinguishment accounting. The Company compared the fair value of the note on the date of modification to the as-modified note. Because the fair value of the as-modified note was 10% greater than the fair value of the existing note, the Company applied extinguishment accounting, resulting in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $12,166, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014.



On December 22, 2014, one (1) note holder signed a note amendment further extending the maturity date of the note to December 31, 2015, or the closing of an equity investment where the Company receives net proceeds of more than $500,000, whichever is earlier.



Debt Offering (B)



On January 31, 2012, the Company sold two (2) $130,000 notes or $260,000 in aggregate of secured, subordinated convertible notes (the "Notes") with the following terms and conditions:



	·	Maturing on January 31, 2015 as amended (see below),
	·	Interest rate at 5% per annum, with interest payable semi-annually,
	·	Default interest rate is 10% per annum,
	·	Convertible to common shares at $0.10 per share (see discussion of ratchet feature below),
	·	Three (3) year warrants to purchase 780,000 shares of common stock, with an exercise price of $0.15 per share; and
	·	Secured by all assets of the Company.



On November 13, 2012 the maturity date of these notes was extended from January 31, 2013 to January 31, 2014. As consideration for the extension, the Company issued the Note holders 307,500 warrants, with an exercise price of $0.15 per share.



On July 19, 2013 the maturity date of these notes was further extended from January 31, 2014 to January 31, 2015. As consideration for the extension, the Company issued the Note holders 300,000 warrants, with an exercise price of $0.15 per share.



Because these warrants contain price protection features (ratchet provision), management has concluded that the features cannot be indexed solely to the company’s own stock and therefore are precluded from equity classification. As a result, the features must be accounted for as derivative liabilities.



Conversion Feature – Convertible Notes



The holder has the right from and after the date of the issuance of the Notes and then at any time until the Notes are fully paid, to convert any outstanding and unpaid principal and accrued unpaid interest at a conversion price of $0.10 per share. In the event the Company issues any common stock prior to the complete conversion or payment of the Notes, for a per share price that is less than the conversion price, the conversion price of the Notes shall be reduced to the lower per share price.



Because these notes contain price protection features (ratchet provision), management has concluded that the features cannot be indexed solely to the company’s own stock and therefore are precluded from equity classification. As a result, the features must be accounted for as derivative liabilities.



Derivative Warrants



Each of the two (2) note holders received warrants to purchase 390,000 shares of the Company's common stock. These warrants are exercisable at $0.15 per share. The warrants expire three (3) years from the date of issuance.



In the event the Company issues any common stock prior to expiration date of the warrants, for a per share price that is less than the purchase price of the warrants, the warrant price shall be reduced to the lower per share price.



Because these warrants contain price protection features (ratchet provision), management has concluded that the features cannot be indexed solely to the company’s own stock and therefore are precluded from equity classification. As a result, the features must be accounted for as derivative liabilities.



Extinguishment Accounting



On November 13, 2012, the note holders signed a note amendment extending the maturity date of the note to January 31, 2014, this was considered a substantial modification of terms and the Company applied extinguishment accounting. The Company compared the fair value of the note on the date of modification to the as-modified note. Because the fair value of the as-modified note was 10% greater than the fair value of the existing note, the Company applied extinguishment accounting, resulting in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $151,610, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013.



On July 19, 2013, the note holders signed a second note amendment extending the maturity date of the note to January 31, 2015, this was considered a substantial modification of terms and the Company applied extinguishment accounting. The Company compared the fair value of the note on the date of modification to the as-modified note. Because the fair value of the as-modified note was 10% greater than the fair value of the existing note, the Company applied extinguishment accounting, resulting in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $124,800, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013.



Debt Offering (C)



On November 19, 2012, the Company sold two (2) $102,500 notes or $205,000 in aggregate of secured, subordinated convertible notes (the "Notes") with the following terms and conditions:



	·	Maturing on January 31, 2015 as amended (see below),
	·	Interest rate at 5% per annum, with interest payable semi-annually,
	·	Default interest rate is 10% per annum,
	·	Convertible to common shares at $0.10 per share (see discussion of ratchet feature below),
·	Three (3) year warrants to purchase 615,000 shares of common stock, with an exercise price of $0.15 per share; and
	·	Secured by all assets of the Company.



On July 19, 2013 the maturity date of these notes was extended from January 31, 2014 to January 31, 2015. As consideration for the extension, the Company issued the Note holders 300,000 warrants, with an exercise price of $0.15 per share.



Because these warrants contain price protection features (ratchet provision), management has concluded that the features cannot be indexed solely to the company’s own stock and therefore are precluded from equity classification. As a result, the features must be accounted for as derivative liabilities.



Conversion Feature – Convertible Notes



The holder has the right from and after the date of the issuance of the Notes and then at any time until the Notes are fully paid, to convert any outstanding and unpaid principal and accrued unpaid interest at a conversion price of $0.10 per share. In the event the Company issues any common stock prior to the complete conversion or payment of the Notes, for a per share price that is less than the conversion price, the conversion price of the Notes shall be reduced to the lower per share price.



Because these notes contain price protection features (ratchet provision), management has concluded that the features cannot be indexed solely to the company’s own stock and therefore are precluded from equity classification. As a result, the features must be accounted for as derivative liabilities.



Derivative Warrants



Each of the two (2) note holders received warrants to purchase 307,500 shares of the Company's common stock. These warrants are exercisable at $0.15 per share. The warrants expire three years from the date of issuance.



In the event the Company issues any common stock prior to expiration date of the warrants, for a per share price that is less than the purchase price of the warrants, the warrant price shall be reduced to the lower per share price.



Because these warrants contain price protection features (ratchet provision), management has concluded that the features cannot be indexed solely to the company’s own stock and therefore are precluded from equity classification. As a result, the features must be accounted for as derivative liabilities.



Extinguishment Accounting



On July 19, 2013, the note holders signed a note amendment extending the maturity date of the note to January 31, 2015, this was considered a substantial modification of terms and the Company applied extinguishment accounting. The Company compared the fair value of the note on the date of modification to the as-modified note. Because the fair value of the as-modified note was 10% greater than the fair value of the existing note, the Company applied extinguishment accounting, resulting in a loss on extinguishment of debt of $189,668, for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013.



Debt Offering (D)



On July 19, 2013, the Company sold $250,000 in aggregate of secured, subordinated convertible notes (the "Notes") to three (3) note holders with the following terms and conditions:



	·	Maturing on January 31, 2015,
	·	Interest rate at 5% per annum, with interest payable semi-annually,
	·	Default interest rate is 10% per annum,
	·	Convertible to common shares at $0.10 per share (see discussion of ratchet feature below),
	·	Three (3) year warrants to purchase 750,000 shares of common stock, with an exercise price of $0.15 per share; and
	·	Secured by all assets of the Company.



Conversion Feature – Convertible Notes



The holder has the right from and after the date of the issuance of the Notes and then at any time until the Notes are fully paid, to convert any outstanding and unpaid principal and accrued unpaid interest at a conversion price of $0.10 per share. In the event the Company issues any common stock prior to the complete conversion or payment of the Notes, for a per share price that is less than the conversion price, the conversion price of the Notes shall be reduced to the lower per share price.



Because these notes contain price protection features (ratchet provision), management has concluded that the features cannot be indexed solely to the company’s own stock and therefore are precluded from equity classification. As a result, the features must be accounted for as derivative liabilities.



Derivative Warrants



Two (2) note holders received warrants to purchase 300,000 shares of the Company's common stock and one (1) note holder received warrants to purchase 150,000 shares of the Company's common stock. These warrants are exercisable at $0.15 per share. The warrants expire three years from the date of issuance.



In the event the Company issues any common stock prior to expiration date of the warrants, for a per share price that is less than the purchase price of the warrants, the warrant price shall be reduced to the lower per share price.



Because these warrants contain price protection features (ratchet provision), management has concluded that the features cannot be indexed solely to the company’s own stock and therefore are precluded from equity classification. As a result, the features must be accounted for as derivative liabilities.



Debt Offering (E)



On October 18, 2013, the Company sold $280,000 in aggregate of secured, subordinated convertible notes (the "Notes") to three (3) note holders with the following terms and conditions:



	·	Maturing on January 31, 2015,
	·	Interest rate at 5% per annum, with interest payable semi-annually,
	·	Default interest rate is 10% per annum,
	·	Convertible to common shares at $0.10 per share (see discussion of ratchet feature below),
	·	Three (3) year warrants to purchase 1,400,000 shares of common stock, with an exercise price of $0.15 per share; and
	·	Secured by all assets of the Company.



Conversion Feature – Convertible Notes



The holder has the right from and after the date of the issuance of the Notes and then at any time until the Notes are fully paid, to convert any outstanding and unpaid principal and accrued unpaid interest at a conversion price of $0.10 per share. In the event the Company issues any common stock prior to the complete conversion or payment of the Notes, for a per share price that is less than the conversion price, the conversion price of the Notes shall be reduced to the lower per share price.



Because these notes contain price protection features (ratchet provision), management has concluded that the features cannot be indexed solely to the company’s own stock and therefore are precluded from equity classification. As a result, the features must be accounted for as derivative liabilities.



Derivative Warrants



One (1) note holder received warrants to purchase 650,000 shares of the Company's common stock, one (1) note holder received warrants to purchase 500,000 shares of the Company's common stock, ,and one (1) note holder received warrants to purchase 250,000 shares of the Company's common stock. These warrants are exercisable at $0.15 per share. The warrants expire three years from the date of issuance.



In the event the Company issues any common stock prior to expiration date of the warrants, for a per share price that is less than the purchase price of the warrants, the warrant price shall be reduced to the lower per share price.



Because these warrants contain price protection features (ratchet provision), management has concluded that the features cannot be indexed solely to the company’s own stock and therefore are precluded from equity classification. As a result, the features must be accounted for as derivative liabilities.



Convertible notes payable consisted of the following:



		30-Sep-14			30-Sep-13

Convertible notes payable		$	1,020,000		$	740,000
Discount on convertible notes			(127,048	)		(217,020	)
Convertible notes payable, net			892,952			522,980

Less current maturities			(892,952	)		(25,000	)

Convertible notes payable, net of current maturities		$	-		$	497,980



Debt Discount



The debt discounts recorded in 2013 pertain to the derivative liability classification of the embedded conversion option and warrants.



The following is a summary of the Company’s debt discount:



		30-Sep-14			30-Sep-13

Debt discount		$	898,322		$	765,000
Amortization of debt discount			(771,274	)		(401,302	)
Unamortized debt discount removed due to loss on debt extinguishment			-			(146,678	)
Debt discount - net		$	127,048		$	217,020

Derivative_Liabilities

Derivative Liabilities	12 Months Ended
Derivative Liabilities	Sep. 30, 2014
Derivative Liabilities [Abstract]
Derivative Liabilities	Note 10 – Derivative Liabilities



	The Company identified derivative liabilities associated with the convertible debt and warrants issued in 2013 and 2012.



	As a result of the application of ASC No. 815, the fair values of the Company’s derivative liabilities are summarized as follows:



	Derivative liability – September 30, 2012		$	293,884
	Fair value at the commitment date			946,676
	Fair value of derivative liability associated with the extinguishment of the current note			(837,150	)
	Fair value of derivative liability under terms of newly issued modified note			1,182,217
	Fair value mark to market adjustment			(199,654	)
	Derivative liability – September 30, 2013			1,385,973
	Fair value at the commitment date			669,200
	Fair value of derivative liability associated with the extinguishment of the current note			(11,667	)
	Fair value of derivative liability under terms of newly issued modified note			23,833
	Fair value mark to market adjustment			(1,850,369	)
	Derivative liability – September 30, 2014		$	216,970
	Current portion		$	149,750
	Non-current portion		$	67,220



	The Company recorded debt discount to the extent of the net proceeds of each note, and immediately expensed the remaining derivative value if it exceeded the net proceeds. The Company recorded a derivative expense of $389,200 and $491,676 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. No additional debt discount was recognized in connection with the extinguishments.



	The fair value of the Company’s derivative liabilities at the commitment and re-measurement dates were based upon the following management assumptions as of the commitment date and September 30, 2014:



			Commitment Date			Re-measurement Date

	Expected dividends			0	%		0	%
	Expected volatility			162%-171	%		77%-89%
	Expected term:			1.09 years – 3.00 years			1 month – 2.05 years
	Risk free interest rate			0.12% - 0.62	%		0.02% - 0.58	%



	The fair value of the Company’s derivative liabilities at the commitment and re-measurement dates were based upon the following management assumptions as of the commitment date and September 30, 2013:



			Commitment Date				Re-measurement Date

	Expected dividends			0	%			0	%
	Expected volatility			174%-243%				150%-233%
	Expected term:			10 months – 3.00 years				3 months – 2.80 years
	Risk free interest rate			0.11% - 0.59	%			0.02% - 0.63	%



	Warrant Activities



	The following is a summary of the Company’s warrant activity:



		Warrants				Weighted
						Average
						Exercise Price

Balance – September 30, 2012			802,500			$	0.17
Granted			1,365,000			$	0.15
Exercised			-			$	-
Forfeited/Cancelled			-			$	-
Outstanding – September 30, 2013			2,167,500			$	0.16
Granted			2,900,000			$	0.15
Exercised			-			$	-
Forfeited/Cancelled			(22,500	)		$	0.75
Outstanding – September 30, 2014			5,045,000			$	0.15
Exercisable – September 30, 2014			5,045,000			$	0.15





Warrants Outstanding												Warrants Exercisable
Exercise price				Number				Weighted Average		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number	Weighted Average Exercise Price
				Outstanding				Remaining				Exercisable
								Contractual Life
								(in years)

$	0.15				5,045,000			1.89 years		$	0.15	5,045,000	$	0.15



At September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013 the total intrinsic value of warrants outstanding and exercisable was $0 and $0, respectively.

Stockholders_Deficit

Stockholders' Deficit	12 Months Ended
Stockholders' Deficit	Sep. 30, 2014
Stockholders' Deficit [Abstract]
Stockholders' Deficit	Note 11 – Stockholders’ Deficit



	Common Stock



	The issuance of common stock during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 is summarized in the table below:



	Transaction Type								Range of Value per Share

			Quantity of Shares			Valuation

	Stock issued for settlement of liabilities			72,704		$	11,933		$	0.06 – 0.22
	Stock options exercised			150,000			15,000			0.1
	Stock issued for services			500,000			50,000			0.1

	Total			722,704		$	76,933		$	0.06 - 0.22



	The fair value of all stock issuances above is based upon the quoted closing trading price on the date of issuance.



	The issuance of common stock during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013 is summarized in the table below:



	Transaction Type								Range of Value per Share

			Quantity of Shares			Valuation

	Stock issued for settlement of liabilities			200,000		$	38,000		$	0.19
	Stock issued for acquisition of intangible assets			135,416			25,729			0.2
	Total			335,416		$	63,729		$	0.19 - 0.20



	The fair value of all stock issuances above is based upon the quoted closing trading price on the date of issuance.



	Stock Options



	The Company maintains a stock option plan that provides for the issuance of incentive stock options at purchase prices equal to the fair market value of the Company's common stock at the date of grant (or 110% of such fair market value in the case of substantial stockholders). The plans also authorize the Company to grant nonqualified options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and deferred stock awards.



	On December 23, 2010, the Board approved the 2010 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the "2010 Plan"), under which 6 million shares of the Company's common stock were reserved for issuance pursuant to the grant of stock awards to employees, non-employee directors or consultants of the Company. Options are granted at an exercise price determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, which, unless a substitute award, may not be less than the fair market value of the stock on the date of grant. Vesting terms and expiration are also approved by the Compensation Committee.



	On October 22, 2013 the Board approved and made the following amendments to the 2010 Plan:



		(i)	add 4,750,000 shares of stock to the amount of stock eligible for grant pursuant to the Plan, and
		(ii)	insert an evergreen provision whereby every October 1, the amount of shares available pursuant to the Plan would reset to a number equal to the greater of (A) 20% of the then issued and outstanding shares of the Company, and (B) the number of shares available for grant pursuant to the Plan on the immediately preceding September 30.



Under the 2010 Plan, as amended on October 22, 2013, approximately 1.98 million shares were available for future option grants at September 30, 2014.



The 2010 Plan stipulates prior to the time that shares of Common Stock are publicly traded on a national securities exchange registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under 6(a) of the Exchange Act, after a termination of the Grantee’s employment with the Company or any Subsidiary for any reason, the Company has the right (but not the obligation) to repurchase the Grantee’s shares of Common Stock acquired by the Grantee pursuant to exercise of the Stock Option granted under the 2010 Plan at a purchase price equal to the Fair Market Value of the shares of Common Stock as of the date of repurchase. Such right of repurchase shall be exercisable at any time and from time to time at the discretion of the Company. The Company has evaluated these options for liability treatment but has concluded that it’s not applicable.



At September 30, 2010, the Company had 1,155,000 stock options issued and outstanding. On December 17, 2010, all 1,155,000 options issued and outstanding were cancelled and reissued with changes in expiration terms. The cancelled options were to expire between October 1, 2012 and October 1, 2014, and the re-issued options expire on December 16, 2015. This resulted in a modification of an equity award under ASC No. 718-20-35, which in substance, the Company repurchases the original instrument by issuing a new instrument of equal or greater value, incurring additional compensation cost for any incremental value.



Incremental compensation cost was measured as the excess, of the fair value of the modified award determined in accordance with the provisions of ASC No. 718-20-35 over the fair value of the original award immediately before its terms are modified, measured based on the share price and other pertinent factors at that date. The Company applied the Black-Scholes option valuation model and determined additional compensation cost of approximately $43,000 during 2011.



During the year ended September 30, 2011, the Company's board of directors authorized the grant of 3,235,000 stock options, having a total fair value of approximately $515,000, with vesting periods ranging from immediate vesting to four (4) years. These options expire between September 30, 2012 and September 1, 2017.



The 1,155,000 stock options discussed above are included as components of both options granted and cancelled/modified during 2011.



During the year ended September 30, 2012, the Company's board of directors authorized the grant of 3,279,000 stock options, having a total fair value of approximately $446,000, with vesting periods ranging from immediate vesting to four (4) years. These options expire between December 2012 and September 1, 2017.



During the year ended September 30, 2013, the Company's board of directors authorized the grant of 275,000 stock options, having a total fair value of approximately $40,767, with a vesting period ranging from immediate to 2 years. These options expire between October 16, 2014 and June 1, 2016.



During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014, the Company's board of directors authorized the grant of 3,967,000 stock options, having a total fair value of approximately $635,391, with a vesting period ranging from immediate to 2.55 years. These options expire between November 14, 2016 and January 16, 2017.



The following is a summary of the Company’s stock option activity:



		Options			Weighted			Weighted			Aggregate
					Average			Average			Intrinsic
					Exercise			Remaining Contractual Life (in years)			Value
					Price

Balance – September 30, 2012			5,202,000		$	0.11			3.73		$	336,200
Granted			275,000			0.1			2.52		$	27,500
Exercised			-			-
Cancelled/Modified			(366,000	)		0.1
Balance – September 30, 2013 – outstanding			5,111,000			0.11			2.9		$	478,160
Balance – September 30, 2013 – exercisable			4,878,708		$	0.11			2.91		$	454,931

Outstanding options held by related parties – September 30, 2013			1,994,000
Exercisable options held by related parties – September 30, 2013			1,994,000
Balance – September 30, 2013			5,111,000		$	0.11			2.9		$	478,160
Granted			3,967,000			0.11			2.13		$	-
Exercised			(150,000	)		0.1
Cancelled/Modified			(157,000	)		0.1
Balance – September 30, 2014 – outstanding			8,771,000			0.11			2.04		$	29,060
Balance – September 30, 2014 – exercisable			8,228,542		$	0.11			2.04		$	29,060

Outstanding options held by related parties – September 30, 2014			1,974,000
Exercisable options held by related parties – September 30, 2014			1,974,000

On the dates of grant during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014, the Company valued stock option issuances at fair value, utilizing a Black-Scholes option valuation model. The Company utilized the following management assumptions:



Exercise price			$0.10-$0.30
Expected dividends			0%
Expected volatility			171% – 181%
Risk fee interest rate			0.56% – 0.80%
Expected life of stock options			1.5 years – 2.8 years
Expected forfeitures			0%



On the dates of grant during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013, the Company valued stock option issuances at fair value, utilizing a Black-Scholes option valuation model. The Company utilized the following management assumptions:



Exercise price			$0.10
Expected dividends			0%
Expected volatility			132%-174%
Risk fee interest rate			0.27% -0.52%
Expected life of stock options			1.0 years – 1.5 years
Expected forfeitures			0%



The following is a summary of the Company’s stock options issued to related parties for services during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014:



		Options			Value

Issued to board members			40,000		$	6,388
Total			40,000		$	6,388



On the dates of grant during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014, the Company valued these issuances at fair value, utilizing a Black-Scholes option valuation model. The Company utilized the following management assumptions:



Exercise price			$0.10
Expected dividends			0%
Expected volatility			171%
Risk fee interest rate			0.56%
Expected life of stock options			1.5 years
Expected forfeitures			0%



The Company did not issue stock options to any related parties during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2013.



The following is a summary of the Company’s non-vested stock options at September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013:



					Weighted Average
		Unvested			Grant
		Stock Options			Date Fair Value

Non-vested – September 30, 2012			182,644		$	0.1
Granted			275,000		$	0.1
Vested/Exercised			(184,000	)	$	0.1
Forfeited/Cancelled			(41,352	)	$	0.09
Non-vested – September 30, 2013			232,292		$	0.1
Granted			3,967,000		$	0.11
Vested/Exercised			(3,656,833	)	$	0.11
Forfeited/Cancelled			-		$	-
Non-vested – September 30, 2014			542,458		$	0.12

Weighted average remaining period for vesting			2.06 years

Commitments_and_Contingencies

Commitments and Contingencies	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	Note 12 – Commitments and Contingencies



	Consulting Agreements



	On March 4, 2014, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with an Investor Relations firm with the following terms and conditions:



		·	Term – 1 year, the agreement can be cancelled by either party with 30 days written notice after the first 90 days
		·	Compensation – months 1-6 - $6,000 per month
		·	Compensation – months 7-12 - $10,000 per month
		·	Restricted stock – 75,000 shares of restricted common stock, the shares are valued at their respective grant dates
		n	18,750 shares to be issued at the end of each 90 day period over the term



	On August 7, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement with a law firm with the following terms and conditions:



		·	Term – monthly
		·	Compensation – $5,000 per month
		·	Stock purchase warrants – 576,746 stock purchase warrants to be issued immediately with a maturity of 5 years and an exercise price of $0.06 per share. The warrants are fully vested at issuance and contain a cashless exercise provision.
		n	An additional 100,000 stock purchase warrants to be issued at each 12 month anniversary. The warrants shall have a maturity of 5 years and an exercise price at the current closing price of our common stock as of the date of the subsequent grant. The warrants shall be fully vested at each issuance.



	The Company valued the issuance of the 576,746 stock purchase warrants using a Black-Scholes option pricing model, and recorded an expense of $33,984 during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 as a result of the fully vested issuance.



	Services Agreement



	The Company’s, Data Contribution and Service Agreement with InfoUSA, Inc., as amended, effective November 12, 2012, requires an annual minimum fee of $300,000. Any shortfall in the annual minimum fee is required to be paid in a lump sum within 30 days of the end of the contract period. InfoUSA provides data distribution services to the Company. For the contract period from August 21, 2013 through August 20, 2014, UBL met the annual minimum fee based upon the purchases made through normal operations and anticipates that based on current operations to date, will meet the annual minimum fee for the contract period from August 21, 2014 through August 20, 2015. If operations were to decrease below current levels, UBL may not meet the annual minimum fee and may be forced to use cash on hand or seek to raise funds through the sale of its securities to meet the required payment. There can be no assurance such funding will be available on terms acceptable to us, or at all.



	Agreements with Placement Agents and Finders



	(A)



	The Company entered into a one year Financial Advisory Agreement with Dragonfly Capital Partners, LLC (“Dragonfly”) effective October 15, 2013 (the “Dragonfly Advisory Agreement”). Pursuant to the Dragonfly Advisory Agreement, Dragonfly will act as the Company’s financial advisor to assist the Company in connection with a best efforts basis in identifying potential sources of capital.



	Dragonfly shall be compensated as follows:



		·	5% of the total credit facility(s) received by the Company from a completed financing with a Dragonfly identified party. The total fee due at each closing will be reduced by any retainer fees already paid to Dragonfly as detailed below.



	Non-refundable retainer fees



	·	$5,000 for each proposal received from a Dragonfly-identified party for a minimum credit facility of $1,000,000.
	·	$10,000 upon execution of a proposal of a debt financing from a Dragonfly identified party; this amount shall be reduced by any amount payable to a lender upon signing of a proposal.



Subsequent financings within 12 months from the date of termination of the Dragonfly Advisory Agreement whereby a subsequent loan is executed or an existing loan is increased shall result in a cash fee on the new or increased capital/facility provided.



During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 the Company paid to Dragonfly non-refundable retainer fees of $5,000.



Operating Leases



Charlotte, North Carolina



The Company was obligated under an operating lease agreement for office facilities. The lease expired in December 2012.



The Company signed a new forty-three (43) month lease agreement for its office facilities expiring in July 2016. The lease requires base annual rent of approximately $130,000 for the first year, with 2.5% increments each year thereafter. The lease contains a five (5) month rent abatement period starting on January 1, 2013. Rent expense will be recognized on a straight line basis over the term of the lease. The lease contains one option to renew for a term of thirty-six (36) months.



On April 10, 2013, the lease was amended to extend the term for an additional 12 months. Accordingly the lease will expire on July 31, 2017.



In May 2014 the Company signed a lease for additional office space for a five month period. The Company will pay monthly rental payments of $1,500.



Rent expense totaled $128,945 and $110,306 for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.



Charlotte, North Carolina



In October 2013 the Company entered into a six (6) month lease agreement for a second corporate apartment starting in October 2013. The Company will pay monthly rental payments of $1,100. Rent expense totaled $13,111 and $0 for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. In May 2014 the lease was extended to October 31, 2014 and monthly rental payments increased to $1,200.



Irvine, California



In October 2014, the Company signed a three (3) year lease agreement, commencing November 1, 2014, for office facilities in Irvine, California. The lease requires base annual rent of approximately $47,000 for the first year, with approximately 2.6% increments each year thereafter.



Future minimum lease payments under these non-cancelable operating leases are approximately as follows:



Fiscal Year Ending September 30
	2015			$	180,000
	2016				187,000
	2017				168,000
	2018				4,000
	Total			$	539,000



Charlotte, North Carolina



In December 2012 the Company entered into an operating lease for its corporate apartment under a month-to-month agreement starting in January 2013. The Company will pay monthly rental payments of $1,200. Rent expense totaled $11,250 and $10,800 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. In June of 2013 the Company cancelled the lease.



Charleston, South Carolina



In February 2014 the Company entered into an operating lease for its Charleston, South Carolina office facility under a month-to-month agreement starting in February 2014. The Company will pay monthly rental payments of $1,300. Rent expense totaled $13,425 and $0 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.



Newport Beach, California



In February 2014 the Company entered into an operating lease for its Newport Beach, California office facility under a month-to-month agreement starting in February 2014. Currently, the Company pays monthly rental payments of $3,750. Rent expense totaled $30,840 and $0 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.



Capital Lease



In April 2012, the Company entered into a capital lease agreement for computer equipment. The lease expired in May 2014. The assets and liabilities under capital leases are recorded at the lower of the present value of the minimum lease payments or the fair value of the assets. The assets are depreciated over the lower of their related lease terms or their estimated useful lives.



The interest rate on the capital lease is 13.50% and was imputed based on the lower of Company’s incremental borrowing rate at the inception of the lease or the lessor’s implicit rate of return.



Interest paid during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was $130 and $595, respectively.

Concentrations

Concentrations	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Concentrations [Abstract]
Concentrations	Note 13 – Concentrations



	The Company has the following concentrations:



	(A)	Accounts Receivable



	Customer				September 30,				September 30,
					2014				2013
	A		***			94	%			45	%



	(B)	Sales



	Customer				September 30,				September 30,
					2014				2013
	A		***			80	%			7	%
	B					0	%			15	%



	(C)	Accounts Payable



	Vendor		September 30,				September 30,
			2014				2013
	A			9	%			29	%
	B			3	%			14	%



	(D)	Purchases



			September 30,				September 30,
			2014				2013
	Vendor
	A			14	%			30	%
	B			0	%			41	%
	C			18	%			1	%
	D			12	%			1	%
	E			14	%			1	%
	F			12	%			0	%



	*** The loss of this customer and/or if the financial condition of this customer unexpectedly deteriorates, resulting in their inability to make payments would materially adversely affect our financial position, operating results and cash flows.

Deferred_Tax_Assets_and_Income

Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision	12 Months Ended
Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision	Sep. 30, 2014
Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision [Abstract]
Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision	Note 14 – Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision



	The income tax provision (benefit) consists of the following:



		September 30,
		2014			2013
	Federal
	Current	-			-
	Deferred		1,606,785			(328,941	)
	State and local
	Current		-			-
	Deferred		215,215			(44,059	)
	Change in valuation allowance		(1,822,000	)		373,000
	Income tax provision (benefit)		-			-



	The reconciliation between the statutory federal income tax rate (34%) and the Company’s effective rate for the year ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 is as follows:



		2014			2013
	U.S. Federal statutory rate		(34.0	)%		(34.0	)%
	State tax benefit, net of federal tax		(4.55	)		(4.55	)
	Change in valuation allowance		38.55			38.55
	Income tax provision (Benefit)		0	%		0	%



	The deferred tax asset consisted of the following:



		September 30, 2014			September 30, 2013
	Deferred Tax Asset
	Net operating loss carryovers	$	1,995,000		$	3,956,000
	Intangible asset amortization		91,000			100,000
	Accounts receivable allowances		40,000			10,000
	Accrued compensation		410,000			292,000
	Total deferred tax asset		2,536,000			4,358,000
	Valuation allowance		(2,536,000	)		(4,358,000	)
	Net Deferred Tax Asset, net of valuation allowance	$	--		$	--



	As of September 30, 2014 the Company had approximately $5.2 million of U.S. federal and state net operating loss carryovers available to offset future taxable income. These net operating losses which, if not utilized, begin expiring between the years 2023 through 2034. In accordance with Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code, deductibility of the Company’s net operating loss carry over may be subject to an annual limitation in the event of a change of control. The Company has performed a preliminary evaluation as to whether a change of control, as defined under the regulations has taken place, and concluded that a change of control had occurred during the period ended September 30, 2010. Due to the section 382 ownership change the Company’s NOL carryovers accumulated through the date of the change of control are subject to an annual limitation of approximately $29,000. The Company’s deferred tax asset related to its net operating loss carryovers had been impaired by $2,578,000 since this represents the tax effect of the Company’s net operating loss carryovers that will expire unused due to the annual limitation as calculated under section 382.



	Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. In assessing the realization of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which temporary differences representing net future deductible amounts become deductible. ASC 740 - “Income Taxes” requires that a valuation allowance be established when it is “more likely than not” that all, or a portion of, deferred tax assets will not be realized. A review of all available positive and negative evidence needs to be considered, including the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies. Management believes that significant uncertainty exists with respect to future realization of the deferred tax assets and has therefore established a full valuation allowance as of September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013. For the year ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 the change in deferred tax asset valuation allowance was $(1,822,000) and $373,000 respectively.



	Management evaluated the provisions of ASC 740 related to the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements. ASC 740 prescribes a recognition threshold and a measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For those benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities. Differences between tax positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return and the benefit recognized and measured pursuant to the interpretation are referred to as "unrecognized benefits." A liability is recognized (or amount of net operating loss carry forward or amount of tax refundable is reduced) for an unrecognized tax benefit because it represents an enterprise's potential future obligation to the taxing authority for a tax position that was not recognized as a result of applying the provisions of ASC 740.



	Interest costs related to unrecognized tax benefits are required to be calculated (if applicable) and would be classified as "Interest expense, net" in the statements of operation. Penalties would be recognized as a component of "General and administrative expenses."



No interest or penalties were recorded during the years ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013. As of September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013 no liability for unrecognized tax benefits was required to be reported. The Company does not expect any significant changes in its unrecognized tax benefits in the next year.



The Company files tax returns in U.S. federal and various state jurisdictions and is subject to audit by tax authorities beginning with the year ended September 30, 2010.

Subsequent_Events

Subsequent Events	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Subsequent Events [Abstract]
Subsequent Events	Note 15 – Subsequent Events



	The Company has evaluated all events that occurred after the balance sheet date through the date when the consolidated financial statements were issued to determine if they must be reported. The Management of the Company determined that there were certain reportable subsequent events to be disclosed as follows:



	Stock Issuances



	During October, November and December 2014 the Company issued 15,624 shares of its common stock for the settlement of accounts payable.



	On December 16, 2014, the Company issued an investment banking firm an aggregate of 625,000 shares of common stock for services at a fair value of $56,250 ($0.09 per share).



	Debt Offerings



	On December 5, 2014, the Company entered into a term loan agreement (the “Term Loan Agreement”) with Grace McLain Capital Advisors, LLC (the “Lender”) pursuant to which the Lender will lend the Company up to $600,000 in unsecured term loans in three tranches of $200,000 each (the “Loans”). Also on December 5, 2014, the Company received the first $200,000 tranche from the Lender under the Term Loan Agreement (the “Tranche A Term Loan”). At the Company’s option, under the Term Loan Agreement, the Lender will lend us a second $200,000 (the “Tranche B Term Loan”) and a third $200,000 (the “Tranche C Term Loan”).



	The Tranche A Term Loan will be repaid in six consecutive monthly installments of principal and interest on the 15th day of each month commencing the month following execution of this Agreement and continuing until June 15, 2015 with the balance then owing under this Agreement being paid at that time.



	The Tranche B Term Loan would be repaid in consecutive monthly installments of interest only ($2,000 per month) beginning on the 30th day following the closing of that tranche and continuing until the sixth month following the closing of the tranche, with the entire principal amount and the balance of interest then owing under this tranche being paid at that time.



	The Tranche C Term Loan would be repaid in full, including principal and interest, on or before the 180th day following the closing of that tranche.



	The Tranche A Term Loan and Tranche B Term Loan will carry interest at 12% per annum while the Tranche C Term Loan will carry interest at 14% per annum, with all interest amounts compounded annually.



	The Company may prepay any of the Loans in minimum increments of $100,000 and any such prepayments will include an additional premium of 3% of the prepayment amount, subject to certain exclusions.



	On the closing of the Tranche A Term Loan, the Company paid the Lender a 2% ($4,000) structuring fee and a 1% ($2,000) closing fee on the principal amount of the Tranche A Term Loan. The Lender will receive the same fees in the same amounts on the Tranche B Term Loan and the Tranche C Term Loan if we exercise our option to close one or both of those additional loans. The Company has also agreed to reimburse the Lender for its out of pocket costs related to the Loans (including reasonable legal fees, due diligence and other costs) up to a maximum of $7,500 and the Company has given the Lender a deposit of $6,500 against these reimbursable expenses.



	In connection with the Tranche A Term Loan, the Company will issue to the Lender a detachable and transferable warrant (the “Term Loan A Warrant”) to purchase that number of shares of its common stock equal to 1.5% of the Company’s total issued and outstanding shares of common stock on a non-fully diluted basis (but including the issuance of the equity underlying the Term Loan A Warrant) calculated as of the date of closing of the Tranche A Term Loan. Similarly, with respect to the Tranche B Term Loan the Company would be required to issue to the Lender a warrant to purchase an additional 1.5% of the Company’s common stock issued and outstanding as of the closing of that tranche and, with respect to the Tranche C Term Loan, a warrant for an additional 1% of the Company’s issued and outstanding stock. Each of these warrants will have an exercise price of $0.15 per share and will expire two years following the date of issuance.



	In connection with the Tranche A Term Loan made to the Company by the Lender, the Company issued to the Lender a Tranche A Warrant exercisable for 527,493 shares of the Company’s common stock.



	Amendments to the Convertible Notes Payable



During November 2014 the Company entered into loan modification agreements with certain convertible note holders (the “Lenders”) (See Note 9 above – Debt offerings “B through E”). Each of the Lenders agreed to certain modifications to the terms of the notes as outlined below:



	●	The Company may prepay the notes at any time, provided that the notes are paid off at one time, in full, on or before December 31, 2014, at 105% of the amount owed on the notes.
	●	Conversion rights of the notes are suspended through and including December 31, 2014.
	●	In consideration of the Lenders’ entry into the loan modifications, the Company agreed to issue to each of the Lenders warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock in cash. The number of warrant shares which may be issued to the Lenders and the exercise price thereof shall be determined by reference to one or more public or private offerings of the Company’s securities expected to be completed in 2015.

Significant_and_Critical_Accou1

Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices (Policies)	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices [Abstract]
Basis of Presentation	Basis of Presentation



	The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).
Fiscal Year-End	Fiscal Year-End



	The Company elected September 30 as its fiscal year-end date.
Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions	Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions



	The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.



	Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:



		(i)	Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business;

		(ii)	Allowance for doubtful accounts: Management’s estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts is based on historical sales, historical loss levels, and an analysis of the collectability of individual accounts; and general economic conditions that may affect a client’s ability to pay. The Company evaluated the key factors and assumptions used to develop the allowance in determining that it is reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole;

		(iii)	Sales returns and allowances: Management’s estimate of sales returns and allowances is based on an analysis of historical returns and allowance activity to establish a baseline reserve level. The Company then evaluates whether there are any underlying product quality or other customer specific issues that require additional specific reserves above the baseline level.

		(iv)	Fair value of long-lived assets: Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events;



		(v)	Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors;

		(vi)	Estimates and assumptions used in valuation of convertible debt and equity instruments: Management estimates the fair value of the derivative warrant issued in connection with the Company’s convertible promissory notes, using a lattice model, with the assistance of an independent valuation expert.



	These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.



	Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.



	Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.



	Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Principles of Consolidation	Principles of Consolidation



	The Company applies the guidance of Topic 810 “Consolidation” of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to determine whether and how to consolidate another entity. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-10 all majority-owned subsidiaries—all entities in which a parent has a controlling financial interest—shall be consolidated except (1) when control does not rest with the parent, the majority owner; (2) if the parent is a broker-dealer within the scope of Topic 940 and control is likely to be temporary; (3) consolidation by an investment company within the scope of Topic 946 of a non-investment-company investee. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-8 the usual condition for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a majority voting interest, and, therefore, as a general rule ownership by one reporting entity, directly or indirectly, of more than 50 percent of the outstanding voting shares of another entity is a condition pointing toward consolidation. The power to control may also exist with a lesser percentage of ownership, for example, by contract, lease, agreement with other stockholders, or by court decree. The Company consolidates all less-than-majority-owned subsidiaries, if any, in which the parent’s power to control exists.



	The Company's consolidated subsidiaries and/or entities are as follows:



	Name of consolidated subsidiary or entity		State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization		Date of incorporation or formation	Attributable interest
					(date of acquisition, if applicable)

	UBL Europe, LLC (1)		Delaware		7-Sep-10	100%

	Mongoose Technologies, Inc. (2)		Delaware		September 9, 2009	100%
					(January 18, 2010)



		-1	UBL Europe, LLC filed a Certificate of Cancellation on February 13, 2013.



		-2	Currently inactive.



	The consolidated financial statements include all accounts of the Company and consolidated subsidiaries and/or entities as of September 30, 2014 and 2013 and for the fiscal year then ended.



	All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments	Fair Value of Financial Instruments



	The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and has adopted paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:



	Level 1		Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

	Level 2		Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

	Level 3		Pricing inputs that are generally unobservable inputs and not corroborated by market data.



	Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.



	The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.



	The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, deferred costs, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and deferred revenue, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.



	The Company’s capital lease obligation, notes payable and convertible notes payable approximate the fair value of such instruments based upon management’s best estimate of interest rates that would be available to the Company for similar financial arrangements at September 30, 2014 and 2013.



	The Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities consist of derivative convertible notes and derivative warrants issued in connection with the Company’s convertible promissory notes (the "Notes"), for which there is no current market for these securities, such that the determination of fair value requires significant judgment or estimation. The Company valued the automatic conditional conversion, re-pricing/down-round, change of control; default and follow-on offering provisions using a lattice model, with the assistance of an independent valuation expert, for which management understands the methodologies. These models incorporate transaction details such as Company stock price, contractual terms, maturity, risk free rates, as well as assumptions about future financings, volatility, and holder behavior as of the date of issuance and each balance sheet date.



	Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.
Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis	Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis



	Level 3 Financial Liabilities – Derivative Financial Instruments



	The Company uses Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy to measure the fair value of the derivative liabilities and revalues its derivative convertible notes and derivative warrant liabilities at every reporting period and recognizes gains or losses in the consolidated statements of operations that are attributable to the change in the fair value of the derivative convertible notes and derivative warrant liabilities.
Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets	Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets



	The Company has adopted Section 360-10-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-17 an impairment loss shall be recognized only if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset (asset group). That assessment shall be based on the carrying amount of the asset (asset group) at the date it is tested for recoverability. An impairment loss shall be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) exceeds its fair value. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-20 if an impairment loss is recognized, the adjusted carrying amount of a long-lived asset shall be its new cost basis. For a depreciable long-lived asset, the new cost basis shall be depreciated (amortized) over the remaining useful life of that asset. Restoration of a previously recognized impairment loss is prohibited.



	Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-21 the Company’s long-lived asset (asset group) is tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company considers the following to be some examples of such events or changes in circumstances that may trigger an impairment review: (a) significant decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset (asset group); (b) A significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which a long-lived asset (asset group) is being used or in its physical condition; (c) A significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of a long-lived asset (asset group), including an adverse action or assessment by a regulator; (d) An accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of a long-lived asset (asset group); (e) A current-period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of a long-lived asset (asset group); and (f) A current expectation that, more likely than not, a long-lived asset (asset group) will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life. The Company tests its long-lived assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.



	Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 360-10-45-4 and 360-10-45-5 an impairment loss recognized for a long-lived asset (asset group) to be held and used shall be included in income from continuing operations before income taxes in the income statement of a business entity. If a subtotal such as income from operations is presented, it shall include the amount of that loss. A gain or loss recognized on the sale of a long-lived asset (disposal group) that is not a component of an entity shall be included in income from continuing operations before income taxes in the income statement of a business entity. If a subtotal such as income from operations is presented, it shall include the amounts of those gains or losses.
Cash Equivalents	Cash Equivalents



	The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents.



	The Company minimizes its credit risk associated with cash by periodically evaluating the credit quality of its primary financial institution. The balance at times may exceed federally insured limits.
Accounts Receivable and Allowances	Accounts Receivable and Allowances



	Pursuant to FASB ASC paragraph 310-10-35-47 trade receivables that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future shall be reported in the balance sheet at outstanding principal adjusted for any charge-offs and the allowance for doubtful accounts.. The Company follows FASB ASC paragraphs 310-10-35-7 through 310-10-35-10 to estimate the allowance for doubtful accounts. Pursuant to FASB ASC paragraph 310-10-35-9 Losses from uncollectible receivables shall be accrued when both of the following conditions are met: (a) Information available before the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued (as discussed in Section 855-10-25) indicates that it is probable that an asset has been impaired at the date of the financial statements, and (b) The amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Those conditions may be considered in relation to individual receivables or in relation to groups of similar types of receivables. If the conditions are met, accrual shall be made even though the particular receivables that are uncollectible may not be identifiable. The Company reviews individually each trade receivable for collectability and performs on-going credit evaluations of its customers and adjusts credit limits based upon payment history and the customer’s current credit worthiness, as determined by the review of their current credit information; and determines the allowance for doubtful accounts based on historical write-off experience, customer specific facts and general economic conditions that may affect a client’s ability to pay. Bad debt expense is included in general and administrative expenses, if any.



	Pursuant to FASB ASC paragraph 310-10-35-41 Credit losses for trade receivables (uncollectible trade receivables), which may be for all or part of a particular trade receivable, shall be deducted from the allowance. The related trade receivable balance shall be charged off in the period in which the trade receivables are deemed uncollectible. Recoveries of trade receivables previously charged off shall be recorded when received. The Company charges off its trade account receivables against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote.

	If the financial condition of one or more of its customers unexpectedly deteriorates, resulting in their inability to make payments, or if the Company otherwise underestimates the losses it incurs as a result of its customers’ inability to pay, the Company could be required to increase its allowance for doubtful accounts which could materially adversely affect its operating results.



	The Company’s sales to certain customers consist of gross product sales reduced by expected future sales returns and allowances. To estimate sales returns and allowances, the Company analyzes historical returns and allowance activity to establish a baseline reserve level. The Company then evaluates whether there are any underlying product quality or other customer specific issues that require additional specific reserves above the baseline level. Because the reserve for sales returns and allowances is based on judgments and estimates of the management of the Company, its reserves may not be adequate to cover actual sales returns and other allowances. If the Company’s reserves are not adequate, its net sales and accounts receivable could be materially adversely affected.
Off-Balance-Sheet Credit Exposures	Off-Balance-Sheet Credit Exposures



	Pursuant to FASB ASC paragraph 310-10-50-9 an entity shall disclose a description of the accounting policies and methodology the entity used to estimate its liability for off-balance-sheet credit exposures and related charges for those credit exposures. Such a description shall identify the factors that influenced management's judgment (for example, historical losses and existing economic conditions) and a discussion of risk elements relevant to particular categories of financial instruments.



	The Company does not have any off-balance-sheet credit exposure to its customers at September 30, 2014 or 2013.
Property and Equipment	Property and Equipment



	Property and equipment is recorded at cost. Expenditures for major additions and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation of property and equipment is computed by the straight-line method (after taking into account their respective estimated residual values) over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets as follows:



			Estimated Useful Life (Years)

	Computer and software			5

	Equipment under capital lease			5

	Furniture and fixture			7

	Leasehold improvement			*



	(*) Amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease or the estimated useful lives, whichever is shorter.



	Upon sale or retirement of property and equipment, the related cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in statements of operations.
Leases	Leases



	Lease agreements are evaluated to determine whether they are capital leases or operating leases in accordance with paragraph 840-10-25-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 840-10-25-1”). Pursuant to Paragraph 840-10-25-1 a lessee and a lessor shall consider whether a lease meets any of the following four criteria as part of classifying the lease at its inception under the guidance in the Lessees Subsection of this Section (for the lessee) and the Lessors Subsection of this Section (for the lessor): a. Transfer of ownership. The lease transfers ownership of the property to the lessee by the end of the lease term. This criterion is met in situations in which the lease agreement provides for the transfer of title at or shortly after the end of the lease term in exchange for the payment of a nominal fee, for example, the minimum required by statutory regulation to transfer title. b. Bargain purchase option. The lease contains a bargain purchase option. c. Lease term. The lease term is equal to 75 percent or more of the estimated economic life of the leased property. d. Minimum lease payments. The present value at the beginning of the lease term of the minimum lease payments, excluding that portion of the payments representing executory costs such as insurance, maintenance, and taxes to be paid by the lessor, including any profit thereon, equals or exceeds 90 percent of the excess of the fair value of the leased property to the lessor at lease inception over any related investment tax credit retained by the lessor and expected to be realized by the lessor. In accordance with paragraphs 840-10-25-29 and 840-10-25-30, if at its inception a lease meets any of the four lease classification criteria in Paragraph 840-10-25-1, the lease shall be classified by the lessee as a capital lease; and if none of the four criteria in Paragraph 840-10-25-1 are met, the lease shall be classified by the lessee as an operating lease. Pursuant to Paragraph 840-10-25-31 a lessee shall compute the present value of the minimum lease payments using the lessee's incremental borrowing rate unless both of the following conditions are met, in which circumstance the lessee shall use the implicit rate: a. It is practicable for the lessee to learn the implicit rate computed by the lessor. b. The implicit rate computed by the lessor is less than the lessee's incremental borrowing rate. Capital lease assets are depreciated on a straight line method, over the capital lease assets estimated useful lives consistent with the Company’s normal depreciation policy for tangible fixed assets. Interest charges are expensed over the period of the lease in relation to the carrying value of the capital lease obligation.



	Operating leases primarily relate to the Company’s leases of office spaces. When the terms of an operating lease include tenant improvement allowances, periods of free rent, rent concessions, and/or rent escalation amounts, the Company establishes a deferred rent liability for the difference between the scheduled rent payment and the straight-line rent expense recognized, which is amortized over the underlying lease term on a straight-line basis as a reduction of rent expense.
Intangible Assets Other Than Goodwill	Intangible Assets Other Than Goodwill



	The Company has adopted Subtopic 350-30 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for intangible assets other than goodwill. Under the requirements, the Company amortizes the acquisition costs of intangible assets other than goodwill on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, the terms of the exclusive licenses and/or agreements, or the terms of legal lives of the intangible assets, whichever is shorter. Upon becoming fully amortized, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.
Research and Development and Capitalized Internal Use Software Development Costs	Research and Development and Capitalized Internal Use Software Development Costs



	The Company has adopted paragraph 350-40-15-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 350-40-15-2”) for software developed for internal use. Paragraph 350-40-15-2 requires the capitalization of certain external and internal computer software costs incurred during the application development stage. The application development stage is characterized by software design and configuration activities, coding, testing and installation. Training costs and maintenance are expensed as incurred, while upgrades and enhancements are capitalized if it is probable that such expenditures will result in additional functionality. Capitalized software development costs for internal use begins when the software is available for internal use and is amortized on a straight-line basis over software’s estimated useful life ranging from one to three years. Upon becoming fully amortized or being charged off as impaired, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.



	Research and development costs incurred in the process of software development before establishment of technological feasibility is expensed as incurred.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities	Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities



	The Company accounts for derivative instruments and hedging activities in accordance with paragraph 815-10-05-4 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 815-10-05-4”). Paragraph 815-10-05-4 requires companies to recognize all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet at fair value. The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends upon: (i) whether the derivative has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship, and (ii) the type of hedging relationship. For those derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments, a company must designate the hedging instrument based upon the exposure being hedged as either a fair value hedge, cash flow hedge or hedge of a net investment in a foreign operation.
Derivative Liability	Derivative Liability



	The Company evaluates its convertible debt, warrants or other contracts to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for in accordance with Paragraph 815-10-05-4 of the Codification and Paragraph 815-40-25 of the Codification. The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the embedded derivative is marked-to-market each balance sheet date and recorded as a liability. In the event that the fair value is recorded as a liability, the change in fair value is recorded in the consolidated statements of operations as other income or expense. Upon conversion or exercise of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the conversion date and then that fair value is reclassified to equity.



	In circumstances where the embedded conversion option in a convertible instrument is required to be bifurcated and there are also other embedded derivative instruments in the convertible instrument that are required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compound derivative instrument.



	The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Equity instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to reclassification are reclassified to liability at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. Derivative instrument liabilities will be classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument is expected within 12 months of the balance sheet date.



	The Company marks to market the fair value of the remaining derivative convertible notes and derivative warrants at each balance sheet date and records the change in the fair value of the remaining derivatives as other income or expense in the consolidated statements of operations.



	The Company utilizes the Lattice model that values the liability of the derivatives based on a probability weighted discounted cash flow model with the assistance of the third party valuation firm. The reason the Company picks the Lattice model is that in many cases there may be multiple embedded features or the features of the bifurcated derivatives may be so complex that a Black-Scholes valuation does not consider all of the terms of the instrument. Therefore, the fair value may not be appropriately captured by simple models. In other words, simple models such as Black-Scholes may not be appropriate in many situations given complex features and terms of conversion option (e.g., combined embedded derivatives). The Lattice model is based on future projections of the various potential outcomes. The features that were analyzed and incorporated into the model included the exercise and full reset features. Based on these features, there are two primary events that can occur; the Holder converts/exercises the Notes/Warrants or the Notes/Warrants are held to expiration. The Lattice model analyzed the underlying economic factors that influenced which of these events would occur, when they were likely to occur, and the specific terms that would be in effect at the time (i.e. stock price, exercise price, volatility, etc.). Projections were then made on the underlying factors which led to potential scenarios. Probabilities were assigned to each scenario based on management projections. This led to a cash flow projection and a probability associated with that cash flow. A discounted weighted average cash flow over the various scenarios was completed to determine the value of the derivative warrants.
Related Parties	Related Parties



	The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.



	Pursuant to section 850-10-20 the related parties include a) affiliates (“Affiliate” means, with respect to any specified Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with such Person, as such terms are used in and construed under Rule 405 under the Securities Act) of the Company; b) entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c) trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d) principal owners of the Company; e) management of the Company; f) other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.



	The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a) the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b) a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c) the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d) amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.
Commitment and Contingencies	Commitments and Contingencies



	The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the consolidated financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or un-asserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or un-asserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.



	If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potentially material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.



	Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed.
Revenue Recognition	Revenue Recognition



	The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company recognizes revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. Revenue is recognized from the point at which service is first provided over the life of the subscription period, typically one year. Appropriate allowances for returns and discounts are recorded concurrent with revenue recognition.
Deferred Costs (Asset)	Deferred Costs (Asset)



	Service arrangements with customers require certain significant up-front costs.



	The Company capitalizes the up-front costs associated with providing the services and amortizes those costs ratably over the same period that the revenue is recognized for the related up-front payment.
Deferred Revenue (Liability)	Deferred Revenue (Liability)



	The Company receives non-refundable up-front payments for services. These payments are initially deferred and subsequently recognized over the subscription period, typically one year.
Advertising	Advertising



	The Company expenses advertising when incurred. Advertising expense for the reporting period ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was $83,145 and $83,764, respectively.
Stock-Based Compensation for Obtaining Employee Services	Stock-Based Compensation for Obtaining Employee Services



	The Company accounts for share-based payment transactions issued to employees under the guidance of the Topic 718 Compensation—Stock Compensation of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC Topic 718”).



	Pursuant to ASC Section 718-10-20 an employee is an individual over whom the grantor of a share-based compensation award exercises or has the right to exercise sufficient control to establish an employer-employee relationship based on common law as illustrated in case law and currently under U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) Revenue Ruling 87-41. A non-employee director does not satisfy this definition of employee. Nevertheless, non-employee directors acting in their role as members of a board of directors are treated as employees if those directors were elected by the employer’s shareholders or appointed to a board position that will be filled by shareholder election when the existing term expires. However, that requirement applies only to awards granted to non-employee directors for their services as directors. Awards granted to non-employee directors for other services shall be accounted for as awards to non-employees.



	Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 718-10-30-2 and 718-10-30-3 a share-based payment transaction with employees shall be measured based on the fair value of the equity instruments issued and an entity shall account for the compensation cost from share-based payment transactions with employees in accordance with the fair value-based method, i.e., the cost of services received from employees in exchange for awards of share-based compensation generally shall be measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity instruments issued or the fair value of the liabilities incurred/settled.



	Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 718-10-30-6 and 718-10-30-9 the measurement objective for equity instruments awarded to employees is to estimate the fair value at the grant date of the equity instruments that the entity is obligated to issue when employees have rendered the requisite service and satisfied any other conditions necessary to earn the right to benefit from the instruments (for example, to exercise share options). That estimate is based on the share price and other pertinent factors, such as expected volatility, at the grant date. As such, the fair value of an equity share option or similar instrument shall be estimated using a valuation technique such as an option pricing model. For this purpose, a similar instrument is one whose fair value differs from its intrinsic value, that is, an instrument that has time value.



	If the Company’s common shares are traded in one of the national exchanges the grant-date share price of the Company’s common stock will be used to measure the fair value of the common shares issued, however, if the Company’s common shares are thinly traded the use of share prices established in its most recent private placement memorandum (“PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.



	Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-55-21 if an observable market price is not available for a share option or similar instrument with the same or similar terms and conditions, an entity shall estimate the fair value of that instrument using a valuation technique or model that meets the requirements in paragraph 718-10-55-11 and takes into account, at a minimum, all of the following factors:



	a.	The exercise price of the option.



	b.	The expected term of the option, taking into account both the contractual term of the option and the effects of employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior: The expected life of options and similar instruments represents the period of time the option and/or warrant are expected to be outstanding. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-S99-1, it may be appropriate to use the simplified method, i.e., expected term =(vesting term + original contractual term) / 2), if (i) A company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term due to the limited period of time its equity shares have been publicly traded; (ii) A company significantly changes the terms of its share option grants or the types of employees that receive share option grants such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term; or (iii) A company has or expects to have significant structural changes in its business such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term. The Company uses the simplified method to calculate expected term of share options and similar instruments as the company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.

	c.	The current price of the underlying share.



	d.	The expected volatility of the price of the underlying share for the expected term of the option. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-55-25 a newly publicly traded entity might base expectations about future volatility on the average volatilities of similar entities for an appropriate period following their going public. A nonpublic entity might base its expected volatility on the average volatilities of otherwise similar public entities. For purposes of identifying otherwise similar entities, an entity would likely consider characteristics such as industry, stage of life cycle, size, and financial leverage. Because of the effects of diversification that are present in an industry sector index, the volatility of an index should not be substituted for the average of volatilities of otherwise similar entities in a fair value measurement. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-S99-1 if shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market. The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected term of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility.



	e.	The expected dividends on the underlying share for the expected term of the option. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.



	f.	The risk-free interest rate(s) for the expected term of the option. Pursuant to ASC 718-10-55-28 a U.S. entity issuing an option on its own shares must use as the risk-free interest rates the implied yields currently available from the U.S. Treasury zero-coupon yield curve over the contractual term of the option if the entity is using a lattice model incorporating the option’s contractual term. If the entity is using a closed-form model, the risk-free interest rate is the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected term used as the assumption in the model.



	Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 718-10-30-11 and 718-10-30-17 a restriction that stems from the forfeitability of instruments to which employees have not yet earned the right, such as the inability either to exercise a non-vested equity share option or to sell non-vested shares, is not reflected in estimating the fair value of the related instruments at the grant date. Instead, those restrictions are taken into account by recognizing compensation cost only for awards for which employees render the requisite service and a non-vested equity share or non-vested equity share unit awarded to an employee shall be measured at its fair value as if it were vested and issued on the grant date.



	Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 718-10-35-2 and 718-10-35-3 the compensation cost for an award of share-based employee compensation classified as equity shall be recognized over the requisite service period, with a corresponding credit to equity (generally, paid-in capital). The requisite service period is the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for an award, which often is the vesting period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized at the end of the requisite service period for an award of share-based compensation shall be based on the number of instruments for which the requisite service has been rendered (that is, for which the requisite service period has been completed). An entity shall base initial accruals of compensation cost on the estimated number of instruments for which the requisite service is expected to be rendered. That estimate shall be revised if subsequent information indicates that the actual number of instruments is likely to differ from previous estimates. The cumulative effect on current and prior periods of a change in the estimated number of instruments for which the requisite service is expected to be or has been rendered shall be recognized in compensation cost in the period of the change. Previously recognized compensation cost shall not be reversed if an employee share option (or share unit) for which the requisite service has been rendered expires unexercised (or unconverted).



	Under the requirement of ASC Paragraph 718-10-35-8 the Company made a policy decision to recognize compensation cost for an award with only service conditions that has a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.
Equity Instruments Issued to Parties Other Than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services	Equity Instruments Issued to Parties Other Than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services



	The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under guidance of Sub-topic 505-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Sub-topic 505-50”).



	Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-25-7, if fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (no specific performance is required by the grantee to retain those equity instruments), then, because of the elimination of any obligation on the part of the counterparty to earn the equity instruments, a measurement date has been reached. A grantor shall recognize the equity instruments when they are issued (in most cases, when the agreement is entered into). Whether the corresponding cost is an immediate expense or a prepaid asset (or whether the debit should be characterized as contra-equity under the requirements of paragraph 505-50-45-1) depends on the specific facts and circumstances. Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-45-1, a grantor may conclude that an asset (other than a note or a receivable) has been received in return for fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (and no specific performance is required by the grantee in order to retain those equity instruments). Such an asset shall not be displayed as contra-equity by the grantor of the equity instruments. The transferability (or lack thereof) of the equity instruments shall not affect the balance sheet display of the asset. This guidance is limited to transactions in which equity instruments are transferred to other than employees in exchange for goods or services.



	Pursuant to Paragraphs 505-50-25-8 and 505-50-25-9, an entity may grant fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are exercisable by the grantee only after a specified period of time if the terms of the agreement provide for earlier exercisability if the grantee achieves specified performance conditions. Any measured cost of the transaction shall be recognized in the same period(s) and in the same manner as if the entity had paid cash for the goods or services or used cash rebates as a sales discount instead of paying with, or using, the equity instruments. A recognized asset, expense, or sales discount shall not be reversed if a stock option that the counterparty has the right to exercise expires unexercised.



	Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 505-50-30-2 and 505-50-30-11 share-based payment transactions with nonemployees shall be measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The issuer shall measure the fair value of the equity instruments in these transactions using the stock price and other measurement assumptions as of the earlier of the following dates, referred to as the measurement date: (a) The date at which a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached (a performance commitment); or (b) The date at which the counterparty's performance is complete. If the Company’s common shares are traded in one of the national exchanges the grant-date share price of the Company’s common stock will be used to measure the fair value of the common shares issued, however, if the Company’s common shares are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum (“PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.



	Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-55-21 if an observable market price is not available for a share option or similar instrument with the same or similar terms and conditions, an entity shall estimate the fair value of that instrument using a valuation technique or model that meets the requirements in paragraph 718-10-55-11 and takes into account, at a minimum, all of the following factors:



		a.	The exercise price of the option.



		b.	The expected term of the option, taking into account both the contractual term of the option and the effects of employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior: Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and holder’s expected exercise behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments. The Company uses historical data to estimate holder’s expected exercise behavior. If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the contractual term of the share options and similar instruments is used as the expected term of share options and similar instruments as the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term.



		c.	The current price of the underlying share.



		d.	The expected volatility of the price of the underlying share for the expected term of the option. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-55-25 a newly publicly traded entity might base expectations about future volatility on the average volatilities of similar entities for an appropriate period following their going public. A nonpublic entity might base its expected volatility on the average volatilities of otherwise similar public entities. For purposes of identifying otherwise similar entities, an entity would likely consider characteristics such as industry, stage of life cycle, size, and financial leverage. Because of the effects of diversification that are present in an industry sector index, the volatility of an index should not be substituted for the average of volatilities of otherwise similar entities in a fair value measurement. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-S99-1 if shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market. The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected term of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility.



		e.	The expected dividends on the underlying share for the expected term of the option. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.



		f.	The risk-free interest rate(s) for the expected term of the option. Pursuant to ASC 718-10-55-28 a U.S. entity issuing an option on its own shares must use as the risk-free interest rates the implied yields currently available from the U.S. Treasury zero-coupon yield curve over the contractual term of the option if the entity is using a lattice model incorporating the option’s contractual term. If the entity is using a closed-form model, the risk-free interest rate is the implied yield currently available on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with a remaining term equal to the expected term used as the assumption in the model.



	Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-S99-1, if the Company receives a right to receive future services in exchange for unvested, forfeitable equity instruments, those equity instruments are treated as unissued for accounting purposes until the future services are received (that is, the instruments are not considered issued until they vest). Consequently, there would be no recognition at the measurement date and no entry should be recorded.
Deferred Tax Assets and Income Taxes Provision	Deferred Tax Assets and Income Taxes Provision



	The Company adopted the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Paragraph 740-10-25-13.addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under paragraph 740-10-25-13, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Paragraph 740-10-25-13 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13.



	The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.



	Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.
Tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions	Tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions



	The Company discloses tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions pursuant to the ASC Paragraph 740-10-50-15.
Earnings per Share	Earnings per Share



	Earnings per share ("EPS") is the amount of earnings attributable to each share of common stock. For convenience, the term is used to refer to either earnings or loss per share. EPS is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-10 through 260-10-45-16 Basic EPS shall be computed by dividing income available to common stockholders (the numerator) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding (the denominator) during the period. Income available to common stockholders shall be computed by deducting both the dividends declared in the period on preferred stock (whether or not paid) and the dividends accumulated for the period on cumulative preferred stock (whether or not earned) from income from continuing operations (if that amount appears in the income statement) and also from net income. The computation of diluted EPS is similar to the computation of basic EPS except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through contingent shares issuance arrangement, stock options or warrants.



	Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-45-21 through 260-10-45-45-23 Diluted EPS shall be based on the most advantageous conversion rate or exercise price from the standpoint of the security holder. The dilutive effect of outstanding call options and warrants (and their equivalents) issued by the reporting entity shall be reflected in diluted EPS by application of the treasury stock method unless the provisions of paragraphs 260-10-45-35 through 45-36 and 260-10-55-8 through 55-11 require that another method be applied. Equivalents of options and warrants include non-vested stock granted to employees, stock purchase contracts, and partially paid stock subscriptions (see paragraph 260–10–55–23). Anti-dilutive contracts, such as purchased put options and purchased call options, shall be excluded from diluted EPS. Under the treasury stock method: a. Exercise of options and warrants shall be assumed at the beginning of the period (or at time of issuance, if later) and common shares shall be assumed to be issued. b. The proceeds from exercise shall be assumed to be used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. (See paragraphs 260-10-45-29 and 260-10-55-4 through 55-5.) c. The incremental shares (the difference between the number of shares assumed issued and the number of shares assumed purchased) shall be included in the denominator of the diluted EPS computation.



	The Company’s contingent shares issuance arrangement, stock options or warrants are as follows:



			Potentially Outstanding Dilutive Common Shares
			For the fiscal year ended			For the fiscal year ended
			30-Sep-14			30-Sep-13
	Convertible Note Shares

	On May 3, 2011, June 13, 2011 and August 1, 2011, the Company issued three (3) convertible notes payable in the face amount of $25,0000 each, or $75,000 in aggregate, with interest at 10% per annum due October 1, 2011, June 1, 2012 and June 1, 2012, respectively, convertible at the lesser of (i) an amount equal to ninety percent (90%) of the then offering price of subsequent financings, or (ii) $0.15 per share. The due date of the remaining note was subsequently extended three times to December 31, 2014.			166,667			166,667

	On January 31, 2012, the Company issued two (2) convertible notes in the face amount of $130,000 each, or $260,000 in aggregate with interest at 5% per annum originally due one (1) year from the date of issuance, convertible at $0.10 per share. The due date of the notes was subsequently extended twice to January 31, 2015.			2,600,000			2,600,000

	On November 19, 2012, the Company issued two (2) convertible notes in the face amount of $102,500 each, or $205,000 in aggregate, with interest at 5% per annum, convertible at $0.10 per share. The due date of the notes was subsequently extended to January 31, 2015.			2,050,000			2,050,000

	On July 19, 2013, the Company issued three (3) convertible notes in the aggregate amount of $250,000, with interest at 5% per annum, due January 31, 2015, convertible at $0.10 per share.			2,500,000			2,500,000

	On October 18, 2013, the Company issued three (3) convertible notes in the aggregate amount of $280,000, with interest at 5% per annum, due January 31, 2015, convertible at $0.10 per share.			2,800,000			-

	Warrant Shares

	Common stock warrants, with an exercise price of $0.15 per share.			5,045,000			2,167,500

	Option Shares

	Stock options, with exercise prices ranging from $0.06 to $0.30 per share.			8,228,542			4,878,708

	Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares			23,390,209			14,362,875



	These were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation as they were anti-dilutive.
Cash Flows Reporting	Cash Flows Reporting



	The Company adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period pursuant to paragraph 830-230-45-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.
Subsequent Events	Subsequent Events



	The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements are issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements	Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements



	In May 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (“ASU 2014-09”).



	This guidance amends the existing FASB Accounting Standards Codification, creating a new Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customer. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.



	To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps:



		1	Identify the contract(s) with the customer
		2	Identify the performance obligations in the contract
		3	Determine the transaction price
		4	Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract
		5	Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligations



	The ASU also provides guidance on disclosures that should be provided to enable financial statement users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue recognition and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. Qualitative and quantitative information is required about the following:



		1	Contracts with customers – including revenue and impairments recognized, disaggregation of revenue, and information about contract balances and performance obligations (including the transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations)
		2	Significant judgments and changes in judgments – determining the timing of satisfaction of performance obligations (over time or at a point in time), and determining the transaction price and amounts allocated to performance obligations
		3	Assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract.



	ASU 2014-09 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period for all public entities. Early application is not permitted.



	In June 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-12 “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period” (“ASU 2014-12”).



	The amendments clarify the proper method of accounting for share-based payments when the terms of an award provide that a performance target could be achieved after the requisite service period. The Update requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. The performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered.



	The amendments in this Update are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted.



	In August 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”).



	In connection with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period, an entity’s management should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Management’s evaluation should be based on relevant conditions and events that are known and reasonably knowable at the date that the financial statements are issued (or at the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern exists when relevant conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate that it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The term probable is used consistently with its use in Topic 450, Contingencies.



	When management identifies conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, management should consider whether its plans that are intended to mitigate those relevant conditions or events will alleviate the substantial doubt. The mitigating effect of management’s plans should be considered only to the extent that (1) it is probable that the plans will be effectively implemented and, if so, (2) it is probable that the plans will mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.



	If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, but the substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following (or refer to similar information disclosed elsewhere in the footnotes):



	a.	Principal conditions or events that raised substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern (before consideration of management’s plans)
	b.	Management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations
	c.	Management’s plans that alleviated substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.



If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and substantial doubt is not alleviated after consideration of management’s plans, an entity should include a statement in the footnotes indicating that there is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). Additionally, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following:



	a.	Principal conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern
	b.	Management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations
	c.	Management’s plans that are intended to mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.



The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted.



Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, when adopted, will have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Significant_and_Critical_Accou2

Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices (Tables)	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices [Abstract]
Schedule of consolidated subsidiaries	Name of consolidated subsidiary or entity		State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization		Date of incorporation or formation	Attributable interest
	Name of consolidated subsidiary or entity				(date of acquisition, if applicable)	Attributable interest

	UBL Europe, LLC (1)		Delaware		7-Sep-10	100%

	Mongoose Technologies, Inc. (2)		Delaware		September 9, 2009	100%
	Mongoose Technologies, Inc. (2)		Delaware		(January 18, 2010)	100%



		-1	UBL Europe, LLC filed a Certificate of Cancellation on February 13, 2013.



		-2	Currently inactive.
Schedule of estimated useful lives of assets			Estimated Useful Life (Years)

	Computer and software			5

	Equipment under capital lease			5

	Furniture and fixture			7

	Leasehold improvement			*



	(*) Amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease or the estimated useful lives, whichever is shorter.
Schedule of outstanding dilutive common shares excluded from the diluted net income (loss)			Potentially Outstanding Dilutive Common Shares
			For the fiscal year ended			For the fiscal year ended
			30-Sep-14			30-Sep-13

	Convertible Note Shares

	On May 3, 2011, June 13, 2011 and August 1, 2011, the Company issued three (3) convertible notes payable in the face amount of $25,0000 each, or $75,000 in aggregate, with interest at 10% per annum due October 1, 2011, June 1, 2012 and June 1, 2012, respectively, convertible at the lesser of (i) an amount equal to ninety percent (90%) of the then offering price of subsequent financings, or (ii) $0.15 per share. The due date of the remaining note was subsequently extended three times to December 31, 2014.			166,667			166,667

	On January 31, 2012, the Company issued two (2) convertible notes in the face amount of $130,000 each, or $260,000 in aggregate with interest at 5% per annum originally due one (1) year from the date of issuance, convertible at $0.10 per share. The due date of the notes was subsequently extended twice to January 31, 2015.			2,600,000			2,600,000

	On November 19, 2012, the Company issued two (2) convertible notes in the face amount of $102,500 each, or $205,000 in aggregate, with interest at 5% per annum, convertible at $0.10 per share. The due date of the notes was subsequently extended to January 31, 2015.			2,050,000			2,050,000

	On July 19, 2013, the Company issued three (3) convertible notes in the aggregate amount of $250,000, with interest at 5% per annum, due January 31, 2015, convertible at $0.10 per share.			2,500,000			2,500,000

	On October 18, 2013, the Company issued three (3) convertible notes in the aggregate amount of $280,000, with interest at 5% per annum, due January 31, 2015, convertible at $0.10 per share.			2,800,000			-

	Warrant Shares

	Common stock warrants, with an exercise price of $0.15 per share.			5,045,000			2,167,500

	Option Shares

	Stock options, with exercise prices ranging from $0.06 to $0.30 per share.			8,228,542			4,878,708

	Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares			23,390,209			14,362,875

Property_and_Equipment_Tables

Property and Equipment (Tables)	12 Months Ended
Property and Equipment (Tables)	Sep. 30, 2014
Property and Equipment [Abstract]
Summary of property and equipment, net		Estimated Useful Life (Years)		September 30, 2014			September 30, 2013

	Computers and software		5	$	72,474		$	46,853

	Equipment under capital lease		5		6,962			6,962

	Furniture and equipment		7		22,228			17,414

	Leasehold improvements		*		7,425			7,425

					109,089			78,654

	Less accumulated depreciation and amortization				(66,057	)		(48,995	)

				$	43,032		$	29,659



	* To be amortized over the term of the lease or its estimated useful life, whichever is shorter.

Capitalized_Software_Developme1

Capitalized Software Development Costs (Tables)	12 Months Ended
Capitalized Software Development Costs (Tables)	Sep. 30, 2014
Capitalized Software Development Costs [Abstract]
Summary of capitalized software development costs		Estimated Useful Life (Years)		30-Sep-14			30-Sep-13

	Capitalized software development costs		3	$	109,983		$	109,983

	Less accumulated amortization				(109,983	)		(109,983	)

				$	-		$	-

Intangible_Assets_Tables

Intangible Assets (Tables)	12 Months Ended
Intangible Assets (Tables)	Sep. 30, 2014
Intangible Assets [Abstract]
Summary of changes in intangible assets

		Estimated Life		Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Impairment Charges			Net
	Customer list		3 years	$	84,000	$	(37,222	)	$	(46,778	)	$	-
	Non-compete		3 years		69,183		(30,632	)		(38,551	)		-
	Domain name		Indefinite		7,500		-			(7,500	)		-
				$	160,683	$	(67,854	)	$	(92,829	)	$	-



		Estimated Life		Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization			Impairment Charges			Net
	Customer list		3 years	$	84,000	$	(9,222	)	$	-		$	74,778
	Non-compete		3 years		69,183		(7,571	)		-			61,612
	Domain name		Indefinite		7,500		-			-			7,500
				$	160,683	$	(16,793	)	$	-		$	143,890

Notes_Payable_Tables

Notes Payable (Tables)	12 Months Ended
Notes Payable (Tables)	Sep. 30, 2014
Notes Payable [Abstract]
Schedule of debt
		30-Sep-14			30-Sep-13

	Notes payable	$	328,380		$	338,223

	Less: Current maturities		(10,387	)		(9,981	)

	Notes payable, net of Current maturities	$	317,993		$	328,242
Schedule of minimum debt repayments

	Fiscal Year ending September 30:

	2015	$	23,328

	2016		23,328

	2017		23,328

	2018		23,328

	2019		23,328

	2020 and thereafter		373,248

			489,888

	Less interest portion		(161,508	)

			328,380

	Less current maturities		(10,387	)

		$	317,993

Notes_Payable_Related_Party_Ta

Notes Payable - Related Party (Tables)	12 Months Ended
Notes Payable - Related Party (Tables)	Sep. 30, 2014
Notes Payable - Related Party [Abstract]
Schedule of related partiese relationship	Related Parties	Relationship
	The Edmonds-Jaques Family Trust dated 06/13/2003	An entity of which the Chief Financial Officer and member of the board of directors of the Company is a trustee.

	Radeon, LLC	An entity owned and controlled by a significant stockholder and the President and the Chief Revenue Officer of the Company.


Summary of notes payable related party and accrued interest		30-Sep-14			30-Sep-13

	Notes payable – related party including accrued interest	$	301,825		$	-
	Discount on convertible notes		(45,521	)		-
	Notes payable – related party, net		256,304			-

	Less current maturities		(256,304	)		-

	Notes payable – related party, net of current maturities	$	-		$	-
Summary of debt discount related party		30-Sep-14			30-Sep-13

	Debt discount	$	88,870		$	-
	Amortization of debt discount		(43,349	)		-
	Debt discount - net	$	45,521		$	-

Convertible_Notes_Payable_Tabl

Convertible Notes Payable (Tables)	12 Months Ended
Convertible Notes Payable (Tables)	Sep. 30, 2014
Convertible Notes Payable [Abstract]
Schedule of convertible notes payable		30-Sep-14			30-Sep-13

	Convertible notes payable	$	1,020,000		$	740,000
	Discount on convertible notes		(127,048	)		(217,020	)
	Convertible notes payable, net		892,952			522,980

	Less current maturities		(892,952	)		(25,000	)

	Convertible notes payable, net of current maturities	$	-		$	497,980
Schedule of debt discount		30-Sep-14			30-Sep-13

	Debt discount	$	898,322		$	765,000
	Amortization of debt discount		(771,274	)		(401,302	)
	Unamortized debt discount removed due to loss on debt extinguishment		-			(146,678	)
	Debt discount - net	$	127,048		$	217,020

Derivative_Liabilities_Tables

Derivative Liabilities (Tables)	12 Months Ended
Derivative Liabilities (Tables)	Sep. 30, 2014
Derivative Liabilities [Abstract]
Summary of fair value of derivative liabilities	Derivative liability – September 30, 2012		$	293,884
	Fair value at the commitment date			946,676
	Fair value of derivative liability associated with the extinguishment of the current note			(837,150	)
	Fair value of derivative liability under terms of newly issued modified note			1,182,217
	Fair value mark to market adjustment			(199,654	)
	Derivative liability – September 30, 2013			1,385,973
	Fair value at the commitment date			669,200
	Fair value of derivative liability associated with the extinguishment of the current note			(11,667	)
	Fair value of derivative liability under terms of newly issued modified note			23,833
	Fair value mark to market adjustment			(1,850,369	)
	Derivative liability – September 30, 2014		$	216,970
	Current portion		$	149,750
	Non-current portion		$	67,220


Summary of fair value assumptions of derivative liabilities at commitment and re-measurement dates

			Commitment Date			Re-measurement Date

	Expected dividends			0	%		0	%
	Expected volatility			162%-171	%		77%-89%
	Expected term:			1.09 years – 3.00 years			1 month – 2.05 years
	Risk free interest rate			0.12% - 0.62	%		0.02% - 0.58	%





			Commitment Date				Re-measurement Date

	Expected dividends			0	%			0	%
	Expected volatility			174%-243%				150%-233%
	Expected term:			10 months – 3.00 years				3 months – 2.80 years
	Risk free interest rate			0.11% - 0.59	%			0.02% - 0.63	%
Summary of warrant activity			Warrants				Weighted
							Average
							Exercise Price

	Balance – September 30, 2012			802,500			$	0.17
	Granted			1,365,000			$	0.15
	Exercised			-			$	-
	Forfeited/Cancelled			-			$	-
	Outstanding – September 30, 2013			2,167,500			$	0.16
	Granted			2,900,000			$	0.15
	Exercised			-			$	-
	Forfeited/Cancelled			(22,500	)		$	0.75
	Outstanding – September 30, 2014			5,045,000			$	0.15
	Exercisable – September 30, 2014			5,045,000			$	0.15
Summary of outstanding and exercisable warrants	Warrants Outstanding											Warrants Exercisable
	Exercise price				Number				Weighted Average	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number	Weighted Average Exercise Price
					Outstanding				Remaining			Exercisable
									Contractual Life
									(in years)

	$	0.15				5,045,000			1.89 years	$	0.15	5,045,000	$	0.15

Stockholders_Deficit_Tables

Stockholders' Deficit (Tables)	12 Months Ended
Stockholders' Deficit (Tables)	Sep. 30, 2014
Stockholders' Deficit [Abstract]
Schedule of issuance of common stock	Transaction Type						Range of Value per Share

		Quantity of Shares			Valuation

	Stock issued for settlement of liabilities		72,704		$	11,933	$	0.06 – 0.22
	Stock options exercised		150,000			15,000		0.1
	Stock issued for services		500,000			50,000		0.1

	Total		722,704		$	76,933	$	0.06 - 0.22

	Transaction Type						Range of Value per Share

		Quantity of Shares			Valuation

	Stock issued for settlement of liabilities		200,000		$	38,000	$	0.19
	Stock issued for acquisition of intangible assets		135,416			25,729		0.2
	Total		335,416		$	63,729	$	0.19 - 0.20


Schedule of share-based compensation, stock options activity		Options			Weighted		Weighted		Aggregate
					Average		Average		Intrinsic
					Exercise		Remaining Contractual Life (in years)		Value
					Price

	Balance – September 30, 2012		5,202,000		$	0.11		3.73	$	336,200
	Granted		275,000			0.1		2.52	$	27,500
	Exercised		-			-
	Cancelled/Modified		(366,000	)		0.1
	Balance – September 30, 2013 – outstanding		5,111,000			0.11		2.9	$	478,160
	Balance – September 30, 2013 – exercisable		4,878,708		$	0.11		2.91	$	454,931

	Outstanding options held by related parties – September 30, 2013		1,994,000
	Exercisable options held by related parties – September 30, 2013		1,994,000
	Balance – September 30, 2013		5,111,000		$	0.11		2.9	$	478,160
	Granted		3,967,000			0.11		2.13	$	-
	Exercised		(150,000	)		0.1
	Cancelled/Modified		(157,000	)		0.1
	Balance – September 30, 2014 – outstanding		8,771,000			0.11		2.04	$	29,060
	Balance – September 30, 2014 – exercisable		8,228,542		$	0.11		2.04	$	29,060

	Outstanding options held by related parties – September 30, 2014		1,974,000
	Exercisable options held by related parties – September 30, 2014		1,974,000

Fair value of option by using Black-Scholes option valuation model	Exercise price		$0.10-$0.30
	Expected dividends		0%
	Expected volatility		171% – 181%
	Risk fee interest rate		0.56% – 0.80%
	Expected life of stock options		1.5 years – 2.8 years
	Expected forfeitures		0%





	Exercise price		$0.10
	Expected dividends		0%
	Expected volatility		132%-174%
	Risk fee interest rate		0.27% -0.52%
	Expected life of stock options		1.0 years – 1.5 years
	Expected forfeitures		0%




	Exercise price		$0.10
	Expected dividends		0%
	Expected volatility		171%
	Risk fee interest rate		0.56%
	Expected life of stock options		1.5 years
	Expected forfeitures		0%



Schedule of stock options to related party transactions		Options			Value

	Issued to board members		40,000		$	6,388
	Total		40,000		$	6,388

Shedule of non-vested stock options activity

					Weighted Average
		Unvested			Grant
		Stock Options			Date Fair Value

	Non-vested – September 30, 2012		182,644		$	0.1
	Granted		275,000		$	0.1
	Vested/Exercised		(184,000	)	$	0.1
	Forfeited/Cancelled		(41,352	)	$	0.09
	Non-vested – September 30, 2013		232,292		$	0.1
	Granted		3,967,000		$	0.11
	Vested/Exercised		(3,656,833	)	$	0.11
	Forfeited/Cancelled		-		$	-
	Non-vested – September 30, 2014		542,458		$	0.12

	Weighted average remaining period for vesting		2.06 years

Commitments_and_Contingencies_

Commitments and Contingencies (Tables)	12 Months Ended
Commitments and Contingencies (Tables)	Sep. 30, 2014
Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]
Schedule of annual minimum payments under operating lease arrangements	Fiscal Year Ending September 30
		2015	$	180,000
		2016		187,000
		2017		168,000
		2018		4,000
		Total	$	539,000

Concentrations_Tables

Concentrations (Tables)	12 Months Ended
Concentrations (Tables)	Sep. 30, 2014
Concentrations [Abstract]
Shedule of concentrations	(A)	Accounts Receivable



	Customer				September 30,				September 30,
	Customer				2014				2013
	A		***			94	%			45	%



	(B)	Sales



	Customer				September 30,				September 30,
	Customer				2014				2013
	A		***			80	%			7	%
	B					0	%			15	%



	(C)	Accounts Payable



	Vendor		September 30,				September 30,
	Vendor		2014				2013
	A			9	%			29	%
	B			3	%			14	%



	(D)	Purchases



			September 30,				September 30,
			2014				2013
	Vendor
	A			14	%			30	%
	B			0	%			41	%
	C			18	%			1	%
	D			12	%			1	%
	E			14	%			1	%
	F			12	%			0	%



	*** The loss of this customer and/or if the financial condition of this customer unexpectedly deteriorates, resulting in their inability to make payments would materially adversely affect our financial position, operating results and cash flows.

Deferred_Tax_Assets_and_Income1

Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision (Tables)	12 Months Ended
Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision (Tables)	Sep. 30, 2014
Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision [Abstract]
Summary of income tax provision (benefit)

		September 30,
		2014			2013
	Federal
	Current	-			-
	Deferred		1,606,785			(328,941	)
	State and local
	Current		-			-
	Deferred		215,215			(44,059	)
	Change in valuation allowance		(1,822,000	)		373,000
	Income tax provision (benefit)		-			-
Schedule of reconciliation for federal and state income tax expense (benefit)

		2014			2013
	U.S. Federal statutory rate		(34.0	)%		(34.0	)%
	State tax benefit, net of federal tax		(4.55	)		(4.55	)
	Change in valuation allowance		38.55			38.55
	Income tax provision (Benefit)		0	%		0	%
Summary of significant deferred tax assets

		September 30, 2014			September 30, 2013
	Deferred Tax Asset
	Net operating loss carryovers	$	1,995,000		$	3,956,000
	Intangible asset amortization		91,000			100,000
	Accounts receivable allowances		40,000			10,000
	Accrued compensation		410,000			292,000
	Total deferred tax asset		2,536,000			4,358,000
	Valuation allowance		(2,536,000	)		(4,358,000	)
	Net Deferred Tax Asset, net of valuation allowance	$	--		$	--

Significant_and_Critical_Accou3

Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices (Details)	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
UBL Europe, LLC Member
Entity Incorporation, State Country Name	Delaware	[1]
Entity Incorporation, Date of Incorporation	7-Sep-10	[1]
Attributable interest	100.00%	[1]
Mongoose Technologies, Inc Member
Entity Incorporation, State Country Name	Delaware	[2]
Entity Incorporation, Date of Incorporation	9-Sep-09	[2]
Date of acquisition	18-Jan-10	[2]
Attributable interest	100.00%	[2]

[1]	UBL Europe, LLC filed a Certificate of Cancellation on February 13, 2013.
[2]	Currently inactive.

Significant_and_Critical_Accou4

Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices (Details 1)	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Computer and software Member
Estimated Useful Life (Years)	5 years
Equipment under capital lease Member
Estimated Useful Life (Years)	5 years
Furniture and fixtures Member
Estimated Useful Life (Years)	7 years
Leasehold improvement Member
Estimated Useful Life (Years)	0 years	[1]

[1]	Amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease or the estimated useful lives, whichever is shorter.

Significant_and_Critical_Accou5

Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices (Details 2)	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares	23,390,209	14,362,875
Stock options Member
Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares	8,228,542	4,878,708
Warrant Member
Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares	5,045,000	2,167,500
Convertible Note Shares Member \| May 3, 2011, June 13, 2011 and August 1, 2011
Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares	166,667	166,667
Convertible Note Shares Member \| January 31, 2012 Member
Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares	2,600,000	2,600,000
Convertible Note Shares Member \| November 19, 2012 Member
Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares	2,050,000	2,050,000
Convertible Note Shares Member \| July 19, 2013 Member
Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares	2,500,000	2,500,000
Convertible Note Shares Member \| October 18, 2013 Member
Total potentially outstanding dilutive common shares	2,800,000

Significant_and_Critical_Accou6

Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices (Details Textual)	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014
Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices [Abstract]
Percentage of direct or indirect voting interest owned	More than 50 percent

Significant_and_Critical_Accou7

Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices (Details Textual 1) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Common stock warrant, exercise price	$0.15
Percentage of fair value equal	75.00%
Percentage of fair value excess	90.00%
Advertising expense	$83,145	$83,764
Recognized tax benefits percent	0.00%	0.00%
Minimum [Member]
Stock options, exercise price	$0.06
Maximum [Member]
Stock options, exercise price	$0.30
Convertible Notes Payable [Member] \| May 3, 2011 Member
Principal amount of debt instrument	250,000
Convertible Notes Payable [Member] \| June 13, 2011 Member
Principal amount of debt instrument	250,000
Convertible Notes Payable [Member] \| August 1, 2011 Member
Principal amount of debt instrument	250,000
Convertible Notes Payable [Member] \| January 31, 2012 Member
Principal amount of debt instrument	260,000
Convertible Notes, Interest rate	5.00%
Convertible per share	0.1
Convertible note term	1 year
Number of convertible notes payable	2
Convertible Notes Payable [Member] \| November 19, 2012 Member
Principal amount of debt instrument	205,000
Convertible Notes, Interest rate	5.00%
Convertible per share	0.1
Number of convertible notes payable	2
Convertible Notes Payable [Member] \| July 19, 2013 Member
Principal amount of debt instrument	250,000
Convertible Notes, Interest rate	5.00%
Convertible per share	0.1
Number of convertible notes payable	3
Convertible Notes Payable [Member] \| May 3, 2011, June 13, 2011 and August 1, 2011
Principal amount of debt instrument	75,000
Convertible Notes, Interest rate	10.00%
Convertible per share	0.15
Offering price percentage	90.00%
Number of convertible notes payable	3
Convertible Notes Payable [Member] \| October 18, 2013 Member
Principal amount of debt instrument	280,000
Convertible Notes, Interest rate	5.00%
Convertible per share	0.1
Number of convertible notes payable	3
Convertible Notes Payable One [Member] \| January 31, 2012 Member
Principal amount of debt instrument	130,000
Convertible Notes Payable One [Member] \| November 19, 2012 Member
Principal amount of debt instrument	102,500
Convertible Notes Payable Two [Member] \| January 31, 2012 Member
Principal amount of debt instrument	130,000
Convertible Notes Payable Two [Member] \| November 19, 2012 Member
Principal amount of debt instrument	$102,500

Property_and_Equipment_Details

Property and Equipment (Details) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
Property and Equipment (Details) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014		Sep. 30, 2013
Computers and software	72,474		$46,853
Equipment under capital lease	6,962		6,962
Furniture and equipment	22,228		17,414
Leasehold improvements	7,425		7,425
Property and equipment - Gross	109,089		78,654
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization	-66,057		-48,995
Property and equipment - net	43,032		$29,659
Computers and software [Member]
Estimated Useful Life (Years)	5 years
Equipment under capital lease [Member]
Estimated Useful Life (Years)	5 years
Furniture and equipment [Member]
Estimated Useful Life (Years)	7 years
Leasehold improvement [Member]
Estimated Useful Life (Years)	0 years	[1]

[1]	Amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease or the estimated useful lives, whichever is shorter.

Property_and_Equipment_Details1

Property and Equipment (Details Textual) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
Property and Equipment (Details Textual) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Property and Equipment (Textual)
Depreciation and amortization expense	$17,062	$19,199

Capitalized_Software_Developme2

Capitalized Software Development Costs (Details) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
Capitalized Software Development Costs (Details) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Capitalized software development costs	109,983	$109,983
Less accumulated amortization	-109,983	-109,983
Capitalized software development costs, net
Capitalized software development costs [Member]
Estimated Useful Life (Years)	3 years

Capitalized_Software_Developme3

Capitalized Software Development Costs (Details Textual) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Capitalized Software Development Costs (Textual)
Capitalized Computer Software, Amortization	$0	$22,896

Intangible_Assets_Details

Intangible Assets (Details) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
Intangible Assets (Details) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Gross Amount	$160,683	$160,683
Accumulated Amortization	-67,854	-16,793
Impairment Charges	-92,829
Net		143,890
Customer list [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Estimated Life	3 years	3 years
Gross Amount	84,000	84,000
Accumulated Amortization	-37,222	-9,222
Impairment Charges	-46,778
Net		74,778
Non-compete [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Estimated Life	3 years	3 years
Gross Amount	69,183	69,183
Accumulated Amortization	-30,632	-7,571
Impairment Charges	-38,551
Net		61,612
Domain name [Member]
Finite-Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Estimated Life	Indefinite	Indefinite
Gross Amount	7,500	7,500
Accumulated Amortization
Impairment Charges	-7,500
Net		$7,500

Intangible_Assets_Details_Text

Intangible Assets (Details Textual) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
Intangible Assets (Details Textual) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Intangible Assets (Textual)
Amortization of intangible assets	$51,061	$16,793
Asset impairment charges	-92,829
Reducing amount of the intagible assets	$0

Notes_Payable_Details

Notes Payable (Details) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Notes Payable [Abstract]
Notes payable	$328,380	$338,223
Less: Current maturities	10,387	9,981
Notes payable, net of current maturities	$317,993	$328,242

Notes_Payable_Details_1

Notes Payable (Details 1) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Notes Payable [Abstract]
2015	$23,328
2016	23,328
2017	23,328
2018	23,328
2019	23,328
2020 and thereafter	373,248
Long-term Debt	489,888
Less interest portion	-161,508
Notes payable	328,380	338,223
Less: Current maturities	10,387	9,981
Notes payable, net of current maturities	$317,993	$328,242

Notes_Payable_Details_Textual

Notes Payable (Details Textual) (USD $)	0 Months Ended		8 Months Ended
Notes Payable (Details Textual) (USD $)	Feb. 27, 2014	Jan. 23, 2014	Aug. 31, 2010
Short Term Note
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Note issued		$50,000
Maturing date		28-Feb-14
Note interest rate		12.00%
Repayments of short-term debt	50,608
Shares issuable upon default		200,000
SBA Loan - Default and Contingent Liability Member
Debt Instrument [Line Items]
Capital loan, periodic payment			1,944
Note issued			$386,300
Maturing date			31-Jan-36
Note interest rate			4.00%

Notes_Payable_Related_Party_De

Notes Payable - Related Party (Details)	12 Months Ended
Notes Payable - Related Party (Details)	Sep. 30, 2014
Radeon, LLC [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Relationship	An entity owned and controlled by a significant stockholder and the President and Chief Revenue Officer of the Company.
The Edmonds-Jaques Family Trust dated 06/13/2003 [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Relationship	An entity of which our Chief Financial Officer and member of the board of directors of the Company is a trustee.

Notes_Payable_Related_Party_De1

Notes Payable - Related Party (Details 1) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Notes Payable - Related Party [Abstract]
Notes payable - related party including accrued interest	$301,825
Discount on convertible notes	-45,521
Notes payable - related party, net	256,304
Less current maturities	-256,304
Notes payable - related party, net of current maturities

Notes_Payable_Related_Party_De2

Notes Payable - Related Party (Details 2) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Notes Payable - Related Party [Abstract]
Debt discount	$88,870
Amortization of debt discount	-43,349
Debt discount - net	$45,521

Notes_Payable_Related_Party_De3

Notes Payable - Related Party (Details Textual) (USD $)	12 Months Ended		1 Months Ended
Notes Payable - Related Party (Details Textual) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013	Aug. 31, 2014	Jan. 31, 2012	Jul. 19, 2013	Nov. 19, 2012	Sep. 30, 2012
Notes Payable Related Party (Textual)
Unamortized Discount	$45,521
Interest expense	480,967	219,761
Accrued interest	1,825
Notes payable, related parties	301,825
Debt Offering (A) [Member]
Notes Payable Related Party (Textual)
Unsecured promissory note			100,000
Note interest rate			6.00%
Default interest rate	10.00%		18.00%
Warrant term			3 years
Warrant exercise price			$0.15
Purchase of common stock, Shares			500,000
Maturing date			30-Oct-14
Unamortized Discount			30,400
Interest expense	21,607
Accrued interest	1,003
Other liabilities	101,003
Maturity date, description	On December 24, 2014 the maturity date of the note was extended from October 30, 2014 to February 28, 2015.
Notes payable, related parties	1,000
Debt Offering (B) [Member]
Notes Payable Related Party (Textual)
Unsecured promissory note			100,000
Note interest rate			6.00%
Default interest rate			18.00%	5.00%
Warrant term			3 years
Warrant exercise price			$0.15
Purchase of common stock, Shares			500,000	780,000
Maturing date			14-Oct-14	31-Jan-15
Unamortized Discount			28,065
Interest expense	22,873
Accrued interest	789
Other liabilities	100,789
Maturity date, description	On December 22, 2014 the maturity date of the note was extended from October 14, 2014 to February 28, 2015
Notes payable, related parties	1,000
Debt Offering (C) [Member]
Notes Payable Related Party (Textual)
Unsecured promissory note			100,000
Note interest rate			6.00%
Default interest rate			18.00%			5.00%
Warrant term			3 years
Warrant exercise price			$0.15
Purchase of common stock, Shares	615,000		500,000
Maturing date			30-Dec-14			31-Jan-15
Unamortized Discount			30,405
Interest expense	694
Accrued interest	33						33
Other liabilities	100,033						100,033
Maturity date, description	On December 22, 2014 the maturity date of the note was extended from December 30, 2014 to February 28, 2015				The maturity date of these notes was extended from January 31, 2014 to January 31, 2015.
Notes payable, related parties	$1,000

Convertible_Notes_Payable_Deta

Convertible Notes Payable (Details) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Convertible Notes Payable [Abstract]
Convertible notes payable	$1,020,000	$740,000
Discount on convertible notes	-127,048	-217,020
Convertible notes payable, net	892,952	522,980
Less current maturities	892,952	25,000
Convertible notes payable, net of current maturities		$497,980

Convertible_Notes_Payable_Deta1

Convertible Notes Payable (Details 1) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Convertible Notes Payable [Abstract]
Debt discount	$898,322	$765,000
Amortization of debt discount	-771,274	-401,302
Unamortized debt discount removed due to loss on debt extinguishment		-146,678
Debt discount - net	$127,048	$217,020

Convertible_Notes_Payable_Deta2

Convertible Notes Payable (Details Textual) (USD $)

12 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

0 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

0 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

0 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2014

Sep. 30, 2013

Aug. 31, 2014

Feb. 10, 2014

Sep. 30, 2012

Jan. 31, 2012

Nov. 13, 2012

Jul. 19, 2013

Nov. 19, 2012

Oct. 18, 2013

Aug. 01, 2011

Jun. 13, 2011

3-May-11

Aug. 03, 2011

Notes

Debt Instrument [Line Items]

Gross proceeds from sale of common stock

$76,933

$63,729

Conversion price per share

$0.10

Excersise price of the warrant

$0.15

Default Interest Rate on convertable notes

10.00%

Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)

$0.01

Convertible Note Shares Member | May 3, 2011, June 13, 2011 and August 1, 2011

Debt Instrument [Line Items]

Number of convertible notes payable

Convertible subordinated notes, Interest rate

10.00%

Principal amount of debt instrument

75,000

Debt Offering (A) [Member]

Debt Instrument [Line Items]

Subordinated convertible notes

25,000

Debt Instrument, Maturity Date

30-Oct-14

Convertible subordinated notes, Interest rate

10.00%

18.00%

Purchase of common stock, Shares

500,000

Maturity date, description

On December 24, 2014 the maturity date of the note was extended from October 30, 2014 to February 28, 2015.

Debt Offering (A) [Member] | Convertible Note Shares Member

Debt Instrument [Line Items]

Number of convertible notes payable

Gross proceeds from sale of common stock

5,000,000

Percentage of conversion equal to offering price

90.00%

Conversion price per share

$0.15

Conversion of notes and accrued interest,Shares

351,827

Conversion of notes and accrued interest, Value

52,774

Percentage of warrant to purchase against principal amount of note

30.00%

Description from extending the maturity date of $25,000 note

The maturity of the note was extended to December 31, 2014 or the closing of an equity investment where the Company receives net proceeds of more than $500,000, whichever is earlier.

Principal amount of debt instrument

25,000

Debt Offering (A) [Member] | Minimum [Member]

Debt Instrument [Line Items]

Debt Instrument, Maturity Date

1-Oct-11

Debt Offering (A) [Member] | Maximum [Member]

Debt Instrument [Line Items]

Debt Instrument, Maturity Date

31-Dec-14

Debt Offering (A) [Member] | Warrant Member

Debt Instrument [Line Items]

Number of convertible notes payable

Percentage of warrant to purchase against principal amount of note

30.00%

Number of warrants against note amount

7,500

Excersise price of the warrant

$0.75

Warrants expiration term

3 years

Debt Offering (A) [Member] | Warrant Member | Note Holder One Member

Debt Instrument [Line Items]

Warrants, Expiration date

3-May-14

Debt Offering (A) [Member] | Warrant Member | Note Holder Two Member

Debt Instrument [Line Items]

Warrants, Expiration date

13-Jun-14

Debt Offering (A) [Member] | Warrant Member | Note Holder Three Member

Debt Instrument [Line Items]

Warrants, Expiration date

1-Aug-14

Debt Offering (B) [Member]

Debt Instrument [Line Items]

Subordinated convertible notes

130,000

Debt Instrument, Maturity Date

14-Oct-14

31-Jan-15

Number of convertible notes payable

Convertible subordinated notes, Interest rate

18.00%

5.00%

Excersise price of the warrant

$0.15

Default Interest Rate on convertable notes

10.00%

Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)

$0.10

Warrants expiration term

3 years

Purchase of common stock, Shares

500,000

780,000

Maturity date, description

On December 22, 2014 the maturity date of the note was extended from October 14, 2014 to February 28, 2015

Principal amount of debt instrument

260,000

Debt Offering (B) [Member] | Warrant Member

Debt Instrument [Line Items]

Number of convertible notes payable

Conversion price per share

$0.10

Excersise price of the warrant

$0.15

Warrants expiration term

3 years

Purchase of common stock, Shares

390,000

Warrants issued

307,500

300,000

Maturity date, description

The maturity date of these notes was extended from January 31, 2013 to January 31, 2014.

The maturity date of these notes was further extended from January 31, 2014 to January 31, 2015.

Debt Offering (C) [Member]

Debt Instrument [Line Items]

Subordinated convertible notes

102,500

Debt Instrument, Maturity Date

30-Dec-14

31-Jan-15

Number of convertible notes payable

Convertible subordinated notes, Interest rate

18.00%

5.00%

Excersise price of the warrant

$0.15

Default Interest Rate on convertable notes

10.00%

Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)

$0.10

Warrants expiration term

3 years

Purchase of common stock, Shares

615,000

500,000

Warrants issued

300,000

Maturity date, description

On December 22, 2014 the maturity date of the note was extended from December 30, 2014 to February 28, 2015

The maturity date of these notes was extended from January 31, 2014 to January 31, 2015.

Principal amount of debt instrument

205,000

Debt Offering (C) [Member] | Convertible Note Shares Member

Debt Instrument [Line Items]

Conversion price per share

$0.10

Debt Offering (C) [Member] | Warrant Member

Debt Instrument [Line Items]

Excersise price of the warrant

$0.15

Warrants expiration term

3 years

Purchase of common stock, Shares

307,500

Debt Offering (D) Member

Debt Instrument [Line Items]

Subordinated convertible notes

250,000

Debt Instrument, Maturity Date

31-Jan-15

Convertible subordinated notes, Interest rate

5.00%

Conversion price per share

$0.10

Excersise price of the warrant

$0.15

Default Interest Rate on convertable notes

10.00%

Warrants expiration term

3 years

Purchase of common stock, Shares

750,000

Debt Offering (D) Member | Warrant Member | Note Holder One Member

Debt Instrument [Line Items]

Excersise price of the warrant

$0.15

Warrants expiration term

3 years

Purchase of common stock, Shares

300,000

Debt Offering (D) Member | Warrant Member | Note Holder Two Member

Debt Instrument [Line Items]

Excersise price of the warrant

$0.15

Warrants expiration term

3 years

Purchase of common stock, Shares

150,000

Debt Offering (E) Member

Debt Instrument [Line Items]

Subordinated convertible notes

$280,000

Debt Instrument, Maturity Date

31-Jan-15

Convertible subordinated notes, Interest rate

5.00%

Conversion price per share

$0.10

Conversion of notes and accrued interest,Shares

0.1

Excersise price of the warrant

$0.15

Default Interest Rate on convertable notes

10.00%

Warrants expiration term

3 years

Purchase of common stock, Shares

1,400,000

Debt Offering (E) Member | Warrant Member | Note Holder One Member

Debt Instrument [Line Items]

Purchase of common stock, Shares

650,000

Debt Offering (E) Member | Warrant Member | Note Holder Two Member

Debt Instrument [Line Items]

Purchase of common stock, Shares

500,000

Debt Offering (E) Member | Warrant Member | Note Holder Three Member

Debt Instrument [Line Items]

Purchase of common stock, Shares

250,000

Convertible_Notes_Payable_Deta3

Convertible Notes Payable (Details Textual 1) (USD $)

12 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

0 Months Ended

3 Months Ended

12 Months Ended

1 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2014

Sep. 30, 2013

Aug. 31, 2014

Feb. 10, 2014

Dec. 22, 2014

Sep. 30, 2012

Sep. 30, 2011

Jan. 31, 2012

Nov. 19, 2012

Jul. 19, 2013

Oct. 18, 2013

Aug. 03, 2011

Conversion price per share

$0.10

Loss on extinguishment of debt

($12,166)

($491,745)

Proceeds from stock applied extinguishment accounting

76,933

63,729

Debt Offering (A) [Member]

Maturing date

30-Oct-14

Debt Offering (A) [Member] | Extinguishment Accounting Member

Percentage of conversion equal to offering price

90.00%

Conversion price per share

$0.15

Percentage of increase in fair value

10.00%

Loss on extinguishment of debt

25,667

12,166

8,667

34,390

Maturing date

31-Dec-13

31-Dec-14

1-Mar-13

Proceeds from stock applied extinguishment accounting

500,000

Debt Offering (B) [Member]

Maturing date

14-Oct-14

31-Jan-15

Debt Offering (C) [Member]

Maturing date

30-Dec-14

31-Jan-15

Debt Offering (C) [Member] | Extinguishment Accounting Member

Percentage of increase in fair value

10.00%

Loss on extinguishment of debt

189,668

Debt Offering (D) Member

Conversion price per share

$0.10

Maturing date

31-Jan-15

November 13, 2012 [Member] | Debt Offering (B) [Member] | Extinguishment Accounting Member

Percentage of increase in fair value

10.00%

Loss on extinguishment of debt

151,610

Maturing date

31-Jan-14

July 19, 2013 [Member] | Debt Offering (B) [Member] | Extinguishment Accounting Member

Percentage of increase in fair value

10.00%

Loss on extinguishment of debt

$124,800

Maturing date

31-Jan-14

Derivative_Liabilities_Details

Derivative Liabilities (Details) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
Derivative Liabilities (Details) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Derivative Liabilities [Abstract]
Derivative liability	$1,385,973	$293,884
Fair value at the commitment date	669,200	946,676
Fair value of derivative liability associated with the extinguishment of the current note	-11,667	-837,150
Fair value of derivative liability under terms of newly issued modified note	23,833	1,182,217
Fair value mark to market adjustment	-1,850,369	-199,654
Derivative liability	216,970	1,385,973
Current portion	149,750
Non-current portion	$67,220	$1,385,973

Derivative_Liabilities_Details1

Derivative Liabilities (Details 1)	12 Months Ended
Derivative Liabilities (Details 1)	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Commitment Date [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Expected dividends	0.00%	0.00%
Commitment Date [Member] \| Minimum [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Expected volatility	162.00%	174.00%
Expected term:	1 year 1 month 2 days	10 months
Risk free interest rate	0.12%	0.11%
Commitment Date [Member] \| Maximum [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Expected volatility	171.00%	243.00%
Expected term:	3 years	3 years
Risk free interest rate	0.62%	0.59%
Remeasurement Date [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Expected dividends	0.00%	0.00%
Remeasurement Date [Member] \| Minimum [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Expected volatility	77.00%	150.00%
Expected term:	1 month	3 months
Risk free interest rate	0.02%	0.02%
Remeasurement Date [Member] \| Maximum [Member]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award [Line Items]
Expected volatility	89.00%	233.00%
Expected term:	2 years 18 days	2 years 9 months 18 days
Risk free interest rate	0.58%	0.63%

Derivative_Liabilities_Details2

Derivative Liabilities (Details 2) (Warrant Member, USD $)	12 Months Ended
Derivative Liabilities (Details 2) (Warrant Member, USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Warrant Member
Derivative [Line Items]
Beginning Balance	2,167,500	802,500
Warrants, Granted	2,900,000	1,365,000
Warrants, Exercised
Warrants, Forfeited/Cancelled	-22,500
Ending Balance - Outstanding	5,045,000	2,167,500
Exercisable, Warrants	5,045,000
Beginning Balance, Weighted Average Exercise Price	$0.16	$0.17
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Granted	$0.15	$0.15
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Exercised
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Forfeited/Cancelled	$0.75
Ending Balance, WeightedAverage Exercise Price, Outstanding	$0.15	$0.16
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Exercisable	$0.15	$0.15

Derivative_Liabilities_Details3

Derivative Liabilities (Details 3) (Warrant Member, USD $)	12 Months Ended
Derivative Liabilities (Details 3) (Warrant Member, USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013	Sep. 30, 2012
Warrant Member
Derivative [Line Items]
Warrants Outstanding, Exercise price	$0.15
Warrants Outstanding, Number Outstanding	5,045,000	2,167,500	802,500
Warrants Outstanding, Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)	1 year 10 months 21 days
Warrants Outstanding, Weighted Average Exercise Price	$0.15	$0.16	$0.17
Warrants Exercisable, Number Exercisable	5,045,000
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Exercisable	$0.15	$0.15

Derivative_Liabilities_Details4

Derivative Liabilities (Details Textual) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
Derivative Liabilities (Details Textual) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Derivative Liabilities (Textual)
Derivative expense	$389,200	$491,676
Warrants outstanding and exercisable	$0	$0

Stockholders_Deficit_Details

Stockholders' Deficit (Details) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
Stockholders' Deficit (Details) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Issuance of common stock, Quantity of Shares	722,704	335,416
Issuance of common stock, Valuation	$76,933	$63,729
Minimum [Member]
Issuance of common stock, Range of Value per Share	$0.06	$0.19
Maximum [Member]
Issuance of common stock, Range of Value per Share	$0.22	$0.20
Stock issued for settlement of liabilities [Member]
Issuance of common stock, Quantity of Shares	72,704	200,000
Issuance of common stock, Valuation	11,933	38,000
Issuance of common stock, Range of Value per Share		$0.19
Stock issued for settlement of liabilities [Member] \| Minimum [Member]
Issuance of common stock, Range of Value per Share	$0.06
Stock issued for settlement of liabilities [Member] \| Maximum [Member]
Issuance of common stock, Range of Value per Share	$0.22
Stock issued for acquisition of intangible assets [Member]
Issuance of common stock, Quantity of Shares		135,416
Issuance of common stock, Valuation		25,729
Issuance of common stock, Range of Value per Share		$0.20
Stock options exercised [Member]
Issuance of common stock, Quantity of Shares	150,000
Issuance of common stock, Valuation	15,000
Issuance of common stock, Range of Value per Share	$0.10
Stock issued for services [Member]
Issuance of common stock, Quantity of Shares	500,000
Issuance of common stock, Valuation	$50,000
Issuance of common stock, Range of Value per Share	$0.10

Stockholders_Deficit_Details_1

Stockholders' Deficit (Details 1) (Employee Stock Option [Member], USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Employee Stock Option [Member]
Options
Beginning Balance	5,111,000	5,202,000
Options, Granted	3,967,000	275,000
Options, Exercised	-150,000
Options, Cancelled/Modified	-157,000	-366,000
Ending Balance - Outstanding	8,771,000	5,111,000
Ending Balance - Exercisable	8,228,542	4,878,708
Options, Outstanding options held by related parties	1,974,000	1,994,000
Options, Exercisable options held by related parties	1,974,000	1,994,000
Weighted Average Exercise Price
Beginning Balance, Weighted Average Exercise Price	$0.11	$0.11
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Granted	$0.11	$0.10
Weighted Average Exercise Price, Exercised	$0.10
WeightedAverage Exercise Price, Cancelled/Modified	$0.10	$0.10
Ending Balance, WeightedAverage Exercise Price, Outstanding	$0.11	$0.11
Ending Balance, WeightedAverage Exercise Price, Exercisable	$0.11	$0.11
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years)
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years), Outstanding	2 years 10 months 24 days	3 years 8 months 23 days
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years), Granted	2 years 1 month 17 days	2 years 6 months 7 days
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years), Outstanding	2 years 15 days	2 years 10 months 24 days
Ending Balance, Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (years), Exercisable	2 years 15 days	2 years 10 months 28 days
Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Beginning Balance, Aggregate Intrinsic Value	$478,160	$336,200
Aggregate Intrinsic Value, Granted		27,500
Ending Balance, Aggregate Intrinsic Value, Outstanding	29,060	478,160
Ending Balance, Aggregate Intrinsic Value, Exercisable	$29,060	$454,931

Stockholders_Deficit_Details_2

Stockholders' Deficit (Details 2) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
Stockholders' Deficit (Details 2) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Exercise price	$0.10	$0.10
Expected dividends	0.00%	0.00%
Expected volatility	171.00%
Risk fee interest rate	0.56%
Expected life of stock options	1 year 6 months
Expected forfeitures	0.00%	0.00%
Maximum [Member]
Exercise price	$0.30
Expected volatility	181.00%	174.00%
Risk fee interest rate	0.80%	0.52%
Expected life of stock options	2 years 9 months 18 days	1 year 6 months
Minimum [Member]
Exercise price	$0.10
Expected volatility	171.00%	132.00%
Risk fee interest rate	0.56%	0.27%
Expected life of stock options	1 year 6 months	1 year

Stockholders_Deficit_Details_3

Stockholders' Deficit (Details 3) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
Stockholders' Deficit (Details 3) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014
Stock options issued to related parties for services, Shares	40,000
Stock options issued to related parties for services, Values	$6,388
Issued to board members
Stock options issued to related parties for services, Shares	40,000
Stock options issued to related parties for services, Values	$6,388

Stockholders_Deficit_Details_4

Stockholders' Deficit (Details 4) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
Stockholders' Deficit (Details 4) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Schedule of non-vested stock options activity
Unvested Stock Options Beginning Balance, Non-vested	232,292	182,644
Unvested Stock Options, Granted	3,967,000	275,000
Unvested Stock Options, Vested/Exercised	-3,656,833	-184,000
Unvested Stock Options, Forfeited/Cancelled		-41,352
Unvested Stock Options Ending Balance, Non-vested	542,458	232,292
Beginning Balance, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value, Non-vested	$0.10	$0.10
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value, Granted	$0.11	$0.10
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value, Vested/Exercised	$0.11	$0.10
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value, Forfeited/Cancelled		$0.09
Ending Balance, Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value, Non-vested	$0.12	$0.10
Weighted average remaining period for vesting	2 years 22 days

Stockholders_Deficit_Details_T

Stockholders' Deficit (Details Textual) (USD $)	12 Months Ended		3 Months Ended
Stockholders' Deficit (Details Textual) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2012	Oct. 22, 2013	Dec. 23, 2010
Stockholder's Deficit (Textual)
Fair market value perecentage	110.00%
September 30, 2010 [Member]
Stockholder's Deficit (Textual)
Stock options issued	1,155,000
Stock options outstanding	1,155,000
Stock options cancelled	1,155,000
Stock options reissued	1,155,000
September 30, 2010 [Member] \| Black-Scholes model [Member]
Stockholder's Deficit (Textual)
Additional Compensation Cost		$43,000
September 30, 2010 [Member] \| Reissued Option [Member]
Stockholder's Deficit (Textual)
Stock option expired date	16-Dec-15
September 30, 2010 [Member] \| Minimum [Member] \| Cancelled Option [Member]
Stockholder's Deficit (Textual)
Stock option expired date	1-Oct-12
September 30, 2010 [Member] \| Maximum [Member] \| Cancelled Option [Member]
Stockholder's Deficit (Textual)
Stock option expired date	1-Oct-14
September 30, 2011 [Member]
Stockholder's Deficit (Textual)
Stock option granted		3,235,000
Total fair value		515,000
September 30, 2011 [Member] \| Minimum [Member]
Stockholder's Deficit (Textual)
Stock option expired date	30-Sep-12
September 30, 2011 [Member] \| Maximum [Member]
Stockholder's Deficit (Textual)
Stock option expired date	1-Sep-17
Vesting period	4 years
September 30, 2012 [Member]
Stockholder's Deficit (Textual)
Stock option granted			3,279,000
Total fair value			446,000
September 30, 2012 [Member] \| Minimum [Member]
Stockholder's Deficit (Textual)
Stock option expired date	31-Dec-12
September 30, 2012 [Member] \| Maximum [Member]
Stockholder's Deficit (Textual)
Stock option expired date	1-Sep-17
Vesting period	4 years
September 30, 2013 [Member]
Stockholder's Deficit (Textual)
Stock option granted	275,000
Total fair value	40,767
September 30, 2013 [Member] \| Minimum [Member]
Stockholder's Deficit (Textual)
Stock option expired date	16-Oct-14
September 30, 2013 [Member] \| Maximum [Member]
Stockholder's Deficit (Textual)
Stock option expired date	1-Jun-16
Vesting period	2 years
December 31, 2013 [Member]
Stockholder's Deficit (Textual)
Stock option granted	3,967,000
Total fair value	635,391
Vesting period	2 years 6 months 18 days
December 31, 2013 [Member] \| Minimum [Member]
Stockholder's Deficit (Textual)
Stock option expired date	14-Nov-16
December 31, 2013 [Member] \| Maximum [Member]
Stockholder's Deficit (Textual)
Stock option expired date	16-Jan-17
2010 Plan [Member]
Stockholder's Deficit (Textual)
Issued and outstanding percentage of shares	20.00%
Common stock reserved for issuance	1,980,000			4,750,000	6,000,000

Commitments_and_Contingencies_1

Commitments and Contingencies (Details) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014
Commitments and Contingencies [Abstract]
2015	$180,000
2016	187,000
2017	168,000
2018	4,000
Total	$539,000

Commitments_and_Contingencies_2

Commitments and Contingencies (Details Textual) (USD $)	12 Months Ended		0 Months Ended		1 Months Ended			3 Months Ended	1 Months Ended
Commitments and Contingencies (Details Textual) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013	Aug. 07, 2014	Mar. 04, 2014	31-May-14	Oct. 31, 2014	Oct. 31, 2013	Dec. 31, 2012	Nov. 30, 2012	Nov. 12, 2012
Warrants issued for services	$33,984
Warrants issued, exercise price (in dollar per share)	$0.15
Interest Paid	14,224	14,884
Capital Lease [Member]
Capital lease agreement for computer equipment	The Company entered into a capital lease agreement for computer equipment. The lease expires in May 2014.
Interest rate on the capital lease	13.50%
Interest Paid	130	595
Consulting Agreements [Member]
Consulting agreement, Term	1 year			90 days
Stock purchase warrants			576,746
Warrants maturity period			5 years
Warrants issued, exercise price (in dollar per share)			$0.06
Additional stock purchase warrants issued			100,000
Stock option pricing model			Stock purchase warrants using a Black-Scholes option pricing model
Consulting agreement cancellation description				Term 1 year, the agreement can be cancelled by either party with 30 days written notice after the first 90 days
Compensation expenses per month			5,000
Restricted stock award gross				75,000
Share to be issued				18,750
Consulting Agreements [Member] \| Months 1-6 [Member]
Compensation expenses per month				6,000
Consulting Agreements [Member] \| Months 7-12 [Member]
Compensation expenses per month				10,000
Operating Lease [Member]
New Operating lease agreement	The Company signed a new forty-three (43) month lease agreement for its office facilities expiring in July 2016
Accrued Rent	130,000
Lease annual rent to increments each year thereafter	2.50%
Rent abatemnet period	The lease contains a five (5) month rent abatement period starting on January 1, 2013. Rent expense will be recognized on a straight line basis over the term of the lease.
Renewal term	36 months
Lease expiration date	31-Jul-17
Rent expense, total	128,945	110,306
Monthly rental payments					1,500
Increase value of monthly rental					1,200
Operating Lease [Member] \| Charleston, South Carolina [Member]
Rent expense, total	13,425	0
Monthly rental payments		1,300
Operating Lease [Member] \| Newport Beach, California [Member]
Rent expense, total	30,840	0
Monthly rental payments		3,750
Operating Lease [Member] \| Irvine, California [Member]
Consulting agreement, Term						3 years
New Operating lease agreement						In October 2014, the Company signed a three (3) year lease agreement, commencing November 1, 2014, for office facilities in Irvine, California.
Lease annual rent to increments each year thereafter						2.60%
Rent expense, total						47,000
Operating Lease [Member] \| Charlotte, North Carolina [Member]
Consulting agreement, Term							6 months
Rent expense, total	13,111	0
Monthly rental payments							1,100	1,200
Total operating lease rent expense	11,250	10,800
Services Agreement [Member]
Annual minimum fee										300,000
Contract period for annual minimum fee									30 days
Agreements with Placement Agents and Finders [Member]
Credit facility percentage	5.00%
Non refundable retainer fees	5,000
Debt financing	10,000
Credit facility fee amount	$1,000,000

Concentrations_Details

Concentrations (Details)	12 Months Ended
Concentrations (Details)	Sep. 30, 2014		Sep. 30, 2013
Accounts Payable [Member] \| Vendor A [Member]
Concentration Risk [Line Items]
Concentration Risk, Percentage	9.00%		29.00%
Accounts Payable [Member] \| Vendor B [Member]
Concentration Risk [Line Items]
Concentration Risk, Percentage	3.00%		14.00%
Accounts Receivable [Member] \| Customer A [Member]
Concentration Risk [Line Items]
Concentration Risk, Percentage	94.00%	[1]	45.00%	[1]
Sales [Member] \| Customer A [Member]
Concentration Risk [Line Items]
Concentration Risk, Percentage	80.00%	[1]	7.00%	[1]
Sales [Member] \| Customer B [Member]
Concentration Risk [Line Items]
Concentration Risk, Percentage	0.00%		15.00%
Purchases [Member] \| Vendor A [Member]
Concentration Risk [Line Items]
Concentration Risk, Percentage	14.00%		30.00%
Purchases [Member] \| Vendor B [Member]
Concentration Risk [Line Items]
Concentration Risk, Percentage	0.00%		41.00%
Purchases [Member] \| Vendor C [Member]
Concentration Risk [Line Items]
Concentration Risk, Percentage	18.00%		1.00%
Purchases [Member] \| Vendor D [Member]
Concentration Risk [Line Items]
Concentration Risk, Percentage	12.00%		1.00%
Purchases [Member] \| Vendor E [Member]
Concentration Risk [Line Items]
Concentration Risk, Percentage	14.00%		1.00%
Purchases [Member] \| Vendor F [Member]
Concentration Risk [Line Items]
Concentration Risk, Percentage	12.00%		0.00%

[1]	The loss of this customer and/or if the financial condition of this customer unexpectedly deteriorates, resulting in their inability to make payments would materially adversely affect our financial position, operating results and cash flows.

Deferred_Tax_Assets_and_Income2

Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision (Details) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Federal
Current
Deferred	1,606,785	-328,941
State and Local
Current
Deferred	215,215	-44,059
Change in valuation allowance	-1,822,000	373,000
Income tax provision (benefit)

Deferred_Tax_Assets_and_Income3

Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision (Details 1)	12 Months Ended
Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision (Details 1)	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision [Abstract]
U.S. Federal statutory rate	-34.00%	-34.00%
State tax benefit, net of federal tax	-4.55%	-4.55%
Change in valuation allowance	38.55%	38.55%
Income tax provision (Benefit)	0.00%	0.00%

Deferred_Tax_Assets_and_Income4

Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision (Details 2) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Deferred Tax Asset
Net operating loss carryovers	$1,995,000	$3,956,000
Intangible asset amortization	91,000	100,000
Accounts receivable allowances	40,000	10,000
Accrued compensation	410,000	292,000
Total deferred tax asset	2,536,000	4,358,000
Valuation allowance	-2,536,000	-4,358,000
Net Deferred Tax Asset, net of valuation allowance

Deferred_Tax_Assets_and_Income5

Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision (Details Textual) (USD $)	12 Months Ended
	Sep. 30, 2014	Sep. 30, 2013
Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision [Abstract]
U.S. federal and state net operating loss carryovers	$5,200,000
Operating loss carry forward expiration period	Expiring between the years 2023 through 2034.
Net operating loss carryovers, annual limitation amount	29,000
Deferred tax asset, impaired	2,578,000
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance	$1,822,000	($373,000)
Statutory federal income tax rate	-34.00%	-34.00%

Subsequent_Events_Details_Text

Subsequent Events (Details Textual) (USD $)	12 Months Ended	0 Months Ended	1 Months Ended			0 Months Ended
Subsequent Events (Details Textual) (USD $)	Sep. 30, 2014	Dec. 16, 2014	Dec. 31, 2014	Nov. 30, 2014	Oct. 31, 2014	Dec. 05, 2014	Aug. 31, 2014
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Common stock issued for services	$50,000
Subsequent Event [Member]
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Common stock issued for settlement accounts of payable			15,624	15,624	15,624
Debt instrument prepayment description				The Company may prepay the notes at any time, provided that the notes are paid off at one time, in full, on or before December 31, 2014, at 105% of the amount owed on the notes.
Common stock issued for services		56,250
Common stock issued for services,shares		625,000
Shares issued, price per share		$0.09
Subsequent Event [Member] \| Tranche A Term Loan [Member]
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Proceeds from issuance of debt						200,000
Debt instrument payment terms						The Tranche A Term Loan will be repaid in six consecutive monthly installments of principal and interest on the 15th day of each month commencing the month following execution of this Agreement and continuing until June 15, 2015 with the balance then owing under this Agreement being paid at that time.
Debt instrument interest rate						12.00%
Debt instrument fee						4,000
Debt instrument fee percent						2.00%
Debt instrument closing fee						2,000
Debt instrument closing fee percent						1.00%
Warrant issued to purchase common stock						1.50%
Warrant exercise price						$0.15
Warrant term						2 years
Warrant exercisable value						527,493
Subsequent Event [Member] \| Tranche B Term Loan [Member]
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Proceeds from issuance of debt						200,000
Debt instrument payment terms						The Tranche B Term Loan would be repaid in consecutive monthly installments of interest only ($2,000 per month) beginning on the 30th day following the closing of that tranche and continuing until the sixth month following the closing of the tranche, with the entire principal amount and the balance of interest then owing under this tranche being paid at that time.
Debt instrument interest rate						12.00%
Warrant issued to purchase common stock						1.50%
Warrant exercise price						$0.15
Warrant term						2 years
Subsequent Event [Member] \| Tranche C Term Loan [Member]
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Proceeds from issuance of debt						200,000
Debt instrument payment terms						The Tranche C Term Loan would be repaid in full, including principal and interest, on or before the 180th day following the closing of that tranche.
Debt instrument interest rate						14.00%
Warrant issued to purchase common stock						1.00%
Warrant exercise price						$0.15
Warrant term						2 years
Subsequent Event [Member] \| Grace Mclain Capital Advisors Llc [Member]
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Principal amount of debt instrument						600,000
Debt instrument description						Lender will lend the Company up to $600,000 in unsecured term loans in three tranches of $200,000 each (the "Loans").
Debt instrument prepayment description						The Company may prepay any of the Loans in minimum increments of $100,000 and any such prepayments will include an additional premium of 3% of the prepayment amount, subject to certain exclusions.
Debt instrument fee description						On the closing of the Tranche A Term Loan, the Company paid the Lender a 2% ($4,000) structuring fee and a 1% ($2,000) closing fee on the principal amount of the Tranche A Term Loan.
Debt reimbursement						7,500
Reimbursement expenses deposit						$6,500
Subsequent Event [Member] \| Related Party [Member]
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Debt instrument interest rate							6.00%