Qts Realty Trust DEF 14A Definitive proxy

Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. )


Filed by the Registrantý
Filed by a Party other than the Registranto
Check the appropriate box:
o		Preliminary Proxy Statement
o		Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
ý		Definitive Proxy Statement
o		Definitive Additional Materials
o		Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12


QTS REALTY TRUST, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
N/A
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
ý	No fee required.
o	Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.
	(1)	Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
	(2)	Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
	(3)	Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
	(4)	Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
	(5)	Total fee paid:
o	Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o	Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
	(1)	Amount Previously Paid:
	(2)	Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
	(3)	Filing Party:
	(4)	Date Filed:

Table of Contents

QTS REALTY TRUST, INC.

12851 Foster Street
Overland Park, Kansas 66213

March 20, 2017

Dear Stockholder:

You are cordially invited to the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Annual Meeting") of QTS Realty Trust, Inc. to be held on Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 8:00 a.m., Central Time. The Annual Meeting will be held at our corporate headquarters located at 12851 Foster Street, Overland Park, Kansas 66213.

At the Annual Meeting, stockholders will be asked to (i) elect eight directors to our Board of Directors, (ii) approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in our Proxy Statement ("Say-on-Pay"), (iii) approve the 2017 Amended and Restated QTS Realty Trust, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, (iv) ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2017, and (iv) transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any postponements or adjournments thereof. The accompanying Notice of 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders describes these matters.

The Board of Directors appreciates and encourages your participation in the Annual Meeting. Whether or not you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, it is important that your shares be represented. Accordingly, please vote your shares by submitting your proxy. If you do attend the Annual Meeting, you may withdraw your proxy and vote in person if you so choose.

We have elected to provide access to our proxy materials on the Internet under the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's "notice and access" rules, instead of mailing printed copies of those materials to each stockholder. Our proxy materials are available atwww.proxyvote.com. We have sent to our stockholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials that provides instructions on how to access our proxy materials on the Internet. Please read the enclosed information carefully before submitting your proxy.


		Sincerely,

		Chad L. Williams Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

Table of Contents

QTS REALTY TRUST, INC.
12851 Foster Street
Overland Park, Kansas 66213

NOTICE OF 2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
To be held on May 4, 2017

To the Stockholders of QTS Realty Trust, Inc.:

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 2017Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the "Annual Meeting") of QTS Realty Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation (the "Company"), will be held at the Company's corporate headquarters located at 12851 Foster Street, Overland Park, Kansas 66213 on Thursday, May 4, 2017, at 8:00 a.m., Central Time, for the following purposes:

1.: To elect eight directors to the Board of Directors to serve until the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors have been duly elected and qualify;
2.: To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of the Company's named executive officers as disclosed in the Company's Proxy Statement;
3.: To approve the 2017 Amended and Restated QTS Realty Trust, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan;
4.: To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017; and
5.: To transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and any adjournments or postponements thereof.

The Company knows of no other matters to come before the Annual Meeting. Only holders of record of shares of the Company's common stock at the close of business on March 9, 2017 are entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting or at any adjournments or postponements thereof.

Regardless of the number of shares of stock you hold, as a stockholder your role is very important, and the Board of Directors strongly encourages you to exercise your right to vote. Pursuant to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's "notice and access" rules, the Company's Proxy Statement and 2016 Annual Report to Stockholders are available online atwww.proxyvote.com.


		By Order of the Board of Directors,

		Shirley E. Goza
		Secretary and General Counsel

March 20, 2017
Overland Park, Kansas

WHETHER OR NOT YOU PLAN TO ATTEND THE ANNUAL MEETING, YOU ARE URGED TO VOTE BY INTERNET, BY TELEPHONE, OR BY MAIL BY COMPLETING, DATING AND SIGNING THE ACCOMPANYING PROXY CARD AND RETURNING IT PROMPTLY IN THE POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE PROVIDED. IF YOU ATTEND THE MEETING, YOU MAY WITHDRAW YOUR PROXY AND VOTE IN PERSON.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page

ABOUT THE MEETING		1
PROPOSAL ONE: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS		7
Nominees for Election as Directors		7
Vote Required and Recommendation		10
PROPOSAL TWO: ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION		11
Vote Required and Recommendation		12
PROPOSAL THREE: APPROVAL OF THE 2017 ESPP		13
Summary of the 2017 ESPP		13
Federal Income Tax Consequences to the Company and to Participants		14
Vote Required and Recommendation		15
PROPOSAL FOUR: RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM		16
Vote Required and Recommendation		16
Principal Accountant Fees and Services		16
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures		16
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT		18
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS		19
Corporate Governance Profile		19
Recent Corporate Governance Changes		19
Board Leadership Structure		19
Executive Sessions		20
Attendance of Directors at 2016 Board and Committee Meetings and Annual Meeting of Stockholders		20
Committees of the Board		20
Director Nominee Selection Process		23
Board Oversight of Risk Management		24
Corporate Governance Guidelines		25
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics		25
Compensation of Directors		25
Certain Company Policies		28
Communications with the Board		29
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation		29
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS		30
Recent Management Change		30
Biographies		30
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS		33
Executive Summary		33
Executive Compensation Philosophy and Objectives		35
2016 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation and Say-on-Frequency		36
Role of the Compensation Committee and Management		36
Role of the Compensation Consultant		37
Use of Comparative Market Data		37
Elements of Executive Compensation Program		38
Other Benefits and Policies		42
Employment Agreements		42
Tax and Accounting Considerations		43
Special Note Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Metrics		43
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT		45

Table of Contents

		Page

COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS		46
Summary Compensation Table		46
2016 Grants of Plan-Based Awards		48
Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table		49
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End December 31, 2016		57
2016 Option Exercises and Stock Vested		58
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control		59
Equity Compensation Plan Information		60
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT		61
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance		65
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS		66
Tax Protection Agreement		66
Partnership Agreement		66
Limited Partners' Registration Rights Agreement		66
Mr. Williams' Registration Rights Agreements		67
Office and Data Center Leases		68
Business with Williams Family Companies		68
Employment Agreements		69
Charter Aircraft Arrangement		72
Intellectual Property		72
Indemnification Agreements		72
Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons		73
MISCELLANEOUS		74
Other Matters to Come Before the 2017 Annual Meeting		74
Stockholder Proposals and Nominations for the 2018 Annual Meeting		74
Householding of Proxy Materials		74
IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 4, 2017		75
Appendix A—2017 AMENDED AND RESTATED QTS REALTY TRUST, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN		A-1

Table of Contents

QTS REALTY TRUST, INC.

12851 Foster Street
Overland Park, Kansas 66213

PROXY STATEMENT

ABOUT THE MEETING

Why am I receiving this Proxy Statement?

This Proxy Statement is furnished by the Board of Directors (the "Board") of QTS Realty Trust, Inc. in connection with the Board's solicitation of proxies for the 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of QTS Realty Trust, Inc. (the "Annual Meeting") to be held on Thursday, May 4, 2017, at 8:00 a.m., Central Time, at our corporate headquarters located at 12851 Foster Street, Overland Park, Kansas 66213, and at any adjournments or postponements thereof. This Proxy Statement first will be made available to stockholders on or about March 20, 2017. Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this Proxy Statement to "QTS," "we," "our," "us" and the "Company" refer to QTS Realty Trust, Inc., a Maryland corporation, together with its consolidated subsidiaries.

Why didn't I automatically receive a paper copy of the Proxy Statement, proxy card and Annual Report?

Pursuant to rules adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"), we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials via the Internet. Accordingly, rather than paper copies of our proxy materials, we are sending a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the "Proxy Notice") to our stockholders that provides instructions on how to access our proxy materials on the Internet.

How can I receive electronic access to the proxy materials?

The Proxy Notice includes instructions on how to access our proxy materials over the Internet atwww.proxyvote.com and how to request a printed set of the proxy materials by mail or an electronic set of materials by e-mail.

In addition, stockholders may request to receive future proxy materials in printed form, by mail, or electronically by e-mail on an ongoing basis. Choosing to receive future proxy materials by e-mail will save the Company the cost of printing and mailing documents to you and will reduce the environmental impact of our Annual Meeting. If you choose to receive future proxy materials by e-mail, you will receive an e-mail next year with instructions containing a link to those materials and a link to the proxy voting site. Your election to receive future proxy materials by e-mail will remain in effect until you terminate it.

Table of Contents

What am I being asked to vote on?

You are being asked to vote on the following proposals:

•: Proposal 1 (Election of Directors): The election of the eight director nominees to the Board to serve until the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their successors have been duly elected and qualify;
•: Proposal 2 (Say-on-Pay): The approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement;
•: Proposal 3 (2017 ESPP): The approval of the 2017 Amended and Restated QTS Realty Trust, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "2017 ESPP"); and
•: Proposal 4 (Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP): The ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.

Our Board knows of no other matters to be brought before the Annual Meeting.

What are the Board's voting recommendations?

The Board recommends that you vote as follows:

•: Proposal 1 (Election of Directors):"FOR" each of the Board's nominees for election as directors;
•: Proposal 2 (Say-on-Pay):"FOR" the approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation of the Company's named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement;
•: Proposal 3 (2017 ESPP):"FOR" the approval of the 2017 ESPP; and
•: Proposal 4 (Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP):"FOR" ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2017.

Who is entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?

The close of business on March 9, 2017 has been fixed as the record date (the "Record Date") for the determination of stockholders entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting. Only holders of record of our Class A common stock and Class B common stock (collectively, "common stock") as of the close of business on the Record Date, or their duly appointed proxies, are entitled to receive notice of, to attend, and to vote at the Annual Meeting. If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer, or other similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in "street name," and you must obtain a proxy from your brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer, trustee or nominee, giving you the right to vote the shares at the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, our outstanding voting securities consisted of 47,909,778 shares of Class A common stock and 133,000 shares of Class B common stock.

What are the voting rights of stockholders?

Each share of Class A common stock is entitled to one vote on each matter to be voted on. Each share of Class B common stock is entitled to 50 votes on each matter to be voted on. Class A common stockholders and Class B common stockholders vote together as one class. Votes may not be cumulated.

Table of Contents

How do I vote?

If your shares are registered directly in your name with our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., you are considered the stockholder of record with respect to those shares, and the Proxy Notice was sent directly to you by us. In that case, if you choose not to attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person, you may instruct the proxy holders named in the proxy card how to vote your shares of common stock in one of the following ways:

•: Vote online. You can access proxy materials and vote atwww.proxyvote.com. To vote online, you must have a stockholder identification number provided in the Proxy Notice.
•: Vote by telephone. If you received printed materials, you also have the option to vote by telephone by following the "Vote by Phone" instructions on the proxy card.
•: Vote by regular mail. If you received printed materials and would like to vote by mail, please mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it promptly in the postage-paid envelope provided.

If your shares are held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer, or other similar organization, then you are the beneficial owner of shares held in "street name," and the Proxy Notice was forwarded to you by that organization. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to instruct that organization on how to vote the shares held in your account. If you choose not to attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person, you should instruct your broker or nominee how to vote your shares by following the voting instructions provided by your broker or nominee. If you request printed copies of the proxy materials by mail, you will receive a vote instruction form for this purpose.

Of course, you always may choose to attend the Annual Meeting and vote your shares in person. If you do attend the Annual Meeting and have already submitted a proxy, you may withdraw your proxy and vote in person.

How are proxy card votes counted?

Proxies submitted properly via one of the methods discussed above will be voted in accordance with the instructions contained therein. If the proxy is submitted but voting directions are not made, the proxy will be voted "FOR" each of the eight director nominees, "FOR" approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, "FOR" approval of the 2017 ESPP, and "FOR" ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017, and in such manner as the proxy holders named on the proxy (the "Proxy Agents"), in their discretion, determine upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

If your shares of common stock are held in an account at a brokerage firm, bank, broker-dealer, or other similar organization, under applicable rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the "NYSE") (the exchange on which our Class A common stock is traded), the brokers will vote your shares according to the specific instructions they receive from you. If brokers that hold shares of our common stock for a beneficial owner do not receive voting instructions from that owner at least 10 days prior to the Annual Meeting, the broker may vote only on the proposal if it is considered a "routine" matter under the NYSE's rules. On "non-routine" matters, brokers do not have discretionary voting power and cannot vote without instructions from the beneficial owners, resulting in a so-called "broker non-vote." Pursuant to the rules of the NYSE, the election of directors, the approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the Say-on-Pay proposal and the approval of the 2017 ESPP are "non-routine" matters, and brokerage firms may not vote on these matters without instructions from their clients, resulting in broker non-votes. In contrast, ratification of the appointment of an independent registered public accounting firm is considered a "routine" matter under NYSE's rules, which means that brokers have

Table of Contents

discretionary voting authority to the extent they have not received voting instructions from their client on the matter.

How many votes are needed for the proposals to pass?

The proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting have the following voting requirements:

•: Proposal 1 (Election of Directors): With respect to Proposal One, you may vote "FOR" all nominees, "WITHHOLD" your vote as to all nominees, or "FOR" all nominees except those specific nominees from whom you "WITHHOLD" your vote. Pursuant to our bylaws, directors will be elected by a plurality of votes cast at the Annual Meeting, with each share being entitled to vote for as many individuals as there are directors to be elected and for whose election the share is entitled to vote. Therefore, the eight director nominees receiving the highest number of "FOR" votes will be elected. There is no cumulative voting in the election of directors. For purposes of the election of directors, abstentions, votes marked "WITHHOLD" and other shares not voted (whether by broker non-votes or otherwise) will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote, although they will be considered present for the purpose of determining the presence of a quorum.
•: Proposal 2 (Say-on-Pay): You may vote "FOR," "AGAINST" or "ABSTAIN" on Proposal Two. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. For purposes of the vote on Proposal Two, a majority of the votes cast means that the shares voted "FOR" the proposal must exceed the votes "AGAINST" the proposal, and therefore abstentions and other shares not voted (whether by broker non-vote or otherwise) will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote. However, both abstentions and broker non-votes will count toward the presence of a quorum.
•: Proposal 3 (2017 ESPP): You may vote "FOR," "AGAINST" or "ABSTAIN" on Proposal Three. The affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required to approve the 2017 ESPP. For purposes of the vote on Proposal Three, pursuant to NYSE rules, abstentions will be counted as votes cast and will have the same effect as votes against the proposal, while other shares not voted (whether by broker non-vote or otherwise) will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote. However, both abstentions and broker non-votes will count toward the presence of a quorum.
•: Proposal 4 (Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP): You may vote "FOR," "AGAINST" or "ABSTAIN" on Proposal Four. Pursuant to our bylaws, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for our fiscal year ending December 31, 2017. For purposes of the vote on Proposal Four, a majority of the votes cast means that the shares voted "FOR" the proposal must exceed the votes "AGAINST" the proposal, and therefore abstentions and other shares not voted will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote. However, abstentions will count toward the presence of a quorum.

What will constitute a quorum at the Annual Meeting?

Holders representing a majority of all votes of our outstanding common stock entitled to be cast at the Annual Meeting must be present, in person or by proxy, for a quorum to exist. If the shares present in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting do not constitute a quorum, the Annual Meeting may be adjourned to a subsequent time. Shares that are voted "FOR," "AGAINST" or "ABSTAIN" will be treated as being present at the Annual Meeting for purposes of establishing a quorum. Accordingly, if you have returned a valid proxy or attend the Annual Meeting in person, your shares

Table of Contents

will be counted for the purpose of determining whether there is a quorum, even if you wish to abstain from voting on some or all matters at the Annual Meeting. Broker non-votes also will be counted as present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum.

If I plan to attend the Annual Meeting, should I still vote by proxy?

Yes. Voting in advance does not affect your right to attend the Annual Meeting. If you send in your proxy card and also attend the Annual Meeting, you do not need to vote again at the Annual Meeting unless you want to change your vote. Written ballots will be available at the meeting for stockholders of record. If you are not a stockholder of record but hold shares through a broker or nominee (i.e., in street name), you may vote your shares in person only if you obtain a legal proxy from the broker, trustee or nominee that holds your shares giving you the right to vote the shares. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we recommend that you also submit your proxy or voting instructions prior to the meeting as described above so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the meeting.

Who can attend the Annual Meeting?

Only stockholders as of the Record Date, or their duly appointed proxies, may attend the Annual Meeting. Stockholders may be asked to present valid picture identification such as a driver's license or passport and proof of stock ownership as of the Record Date. If you are not a stockholder of record but hold shares through a broker or nominee (i.e., in street name), you should provide proof of beneficial ownership on the Record Date, such as your most recent account statement, a copy of the voting instruction card provided by your broker, trustee or nominee, or other similar evidence of ownership. The use of cell phones, smartphones, pagers, recording and photographic equipment and/or computers is not permitted at the Annual Meeting. For directions to the Annual Meeting, contact Investor Relations at (678) 835-4443 orir@qtsdatacenters.com.

Will any other matters be voted on?

The proposals set forth in this Proxy Statement constitute the only business that the Board intends to present at the Annual Meeting. The proxy does, however, confer discretionary authority upon the Proxy Agents or their substitutes to vote on any other business that may properly come before the meeting. If the Annual Meeting is postponed or adjourned, the Proxy Agents can vote your shares on the new meeting date as well, unless you have revoked your proxy.

Can I change my vote after I have voted?

You may revoke your proxy at any time prior to its use by (i) delivering a written notice of revocation to our Secretary, (ii) filing a duly executed proxy bearing a later date with us or (iii) attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person. If your shares of common stock are held by a broker, bank or any other persons holding common stock on your behalf, you must contact that institution to revoke a previously authorized proxy.

The enclosed proxy for the Annual Meeting is being solicited by the Board. We will pay the costs of soliciting proxies. In addition to soliciting proxies by mail, certain of our directors, officers and employees may solicit proxies by telephone, personal contact, or other means of communication. They will not receive any additional compensation for these activities. In addition, we will, upon request, reimburse brokers, banks and other persons holding common stock on behalf of beneficial owners for the reasonable expenses incurred by them in forwarding proxy materials to beneficial owners.

No person is authorized to give any information or to make any representation not contained in this Proxy Statement, and, if given or made, you should not rely on that information or representation

Table of Contents

as having been authorized by us. The delivery of this Proxy Statement does not imply that the information herein has remained unchanged since the date of this Proxy Statement.

Whom should I call if I have questions or need assistance voting my shares?

Please call Stephen Douglas at (678) 835-4443 or emailir@qtsdatacenters.com if you have any questions in connection with voting your shares.

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL ONE: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

The Board has set the number of directors at eight. The eight individuals named below, each of whom currently serves on our Board, have been recommended by our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and nominated by our Board to serve on the Board until our 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and until their respective successors are elected and qualify. Based on its review of the relationships between the director nominees and the Company, the Board has determined that all of our directors, other than Chad L. Williams, are independent under applicable SEC and NYSE rules.

The Board has no reason to believe that any of the persons named below as a nominee for our Board will be unable, or will decline, to serve as a member of the Board if elected. If any nominee is unavailable for election or service, the Board may designate a substitute nominee and the Proxy Agents will vote for the substitute nominee recommended by the Board. Under these circumstances, the Board also may, as permitted by our bylaws, decrease the size of the Board.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has set forth in a written policy minimum qualifications that a director candidate must possess. In addition, the written policy sets forth certain additional qualities and skills that, while not a prerequisite for nomination, should be considered by the Committee when evaluating a particular candidate. See "Corporate Governance and Board Matters—Director Nominee Selection Process."

Nominees for Election as Directors

The table below sets forth the names and ages of each of the individuals nominated for election at the Annual Meeting, as well as the positions and offices with us currently held by these individuals.

Name	Position With the Company

Chad L. Williams	Director, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer	46
John W. Barter	Director	70
William O. Grabe	Director	79
Catherine R. Kinney	Director	65
Peter A. Marino	Director	75
Scott D. Miller	Director	64
Philip P. Trahanas	Director	46
Stephen E. Westhead	Director	53

Set forth below is certain biographical information of our director nominees.

Chad L. Williams has been our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since May 2013 and was the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of our predecessor from 2003 until our initial public offering in October 2013. Mr. Williams has more than 26 years of experience in the management and development of various private companies and more than 16 years of experience in the ownership, management and development of commercial real estate, the last 11 of which have been focused on data center properties. In his role as Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Williams has been directly involved in every aspect of our business, from strategic acquisitions and financing, to site selection, design, development and construction and customer management. Mr. Williams currently serves on the board of directors for the U.S. Dream Academy, an organization that focuses on intervening in the lives of children of incarcerated parents. Its mission is to empower these at-risk children to maximize their potential by providing them with academic, social and values-enrichment through supportive mentoring and the use of technology.

Our Board determined that Mr. Williams should serve on our Board based on the perspective and experience he brings as our founder and Chief Executive Officer, his experience as a successful

Table of Contents

business leader and entrepreneur and his in-depth knowledge of the Company and the real estate industry.

John W. Barter has been our director since August 2013 and was a director of our predecessor from 2010 until our initial public offering in October 2013. Mr. Barter serves as the chair of the Audit Committee. Mr. Barter has more than 26 years of experience in financial management, mergers and acquisitions, executive management and planning and analysis. Mr. Barter served as the Chief Operating Officer of Spring Hill College from November 2013 until June 2015. Mr. Barter was the chief financial officer of Kestral Solutions, Inc., a technology company, from 2000 to 2001. Prior to this, Mr. Barter held various positions with AlliedSignal, Inc., now called Honeywell International, Inc. (NYSE: HON), a technology company, for most of the time between 1973 to 1997, and was an executive vice president and president of AlliedSignal Automotive from 1994 to 1997 and chief financial officer from 1988 to 1994. He currently serves on the boards of directors of Dice Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: DHX) and Engility Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: EGL), and previously served on the boards of directors of Lenovo Group Limited, a personal technology company (HKSE: 992), from 2005 until 2010, SRA International from 2003 until 2011 and Genpact Ltd. (NYSE: G) from 2005 to 2014. Mr. Barter earned a Bachelor of Science degree in physics from Spring Hill College and a Master of Business Administration in finance from Tulane University.

Our Board determined that Mr. Barter should serve on our Board based on his financial acumen and management experience.

William O. Grabe has been our director since August 2013 and was a director of our predecessor from 2009 until our initial public offering in October 2013. Mr. Grabe serves as the chair of our Compensation Committee. Mr. Grabe has over 41 years of experience in investment management and corporate operations. Mr. Grabe is an advisory director of General Atlantic LLC, a global investment firm, and was a managing director at General Atlantic LLC from 1992 to 2010. Prior to joining General Atlantic LLC, Mr. Grabe held executive positions in sales, marketing and operations at IBM Corporation and was the general manager for the Marketing and Services Group from 1988 to 1992. Mr. Grabe currently serves on the boards of directors of Lenovo Group Limited, a personal technology company (SEHK: 992), Covisint Corporation, a software company (NASDAQ: COVS), SB Holdings International, Inc., a software company, and Gartner, Inc., a technology research company (NYSE: IT). He previously served on the boards of directors of Compuware Corporation, a software company (NASDAQ: CPWR), from 1992 to 2014, Infotech Enterprises Limited (BSE: 532175; NSE: INFOTECENT) from 2007 to 2010 and iGATE Computer Systems Limited (f/k/a Patni Computer Systems Limited, NYSE: PTI) from 2002 to 2011 and the boards of directors of several other public and private global technology companies. Mr. Grabe earned a Master of Business Administration from the UCLA Graduate School of Business and a Bachelor of Science degree in engineering from New York University.

Our Board determined that Mr. Grabe should serve on our Board based on his business experience in sales and operations, his experience as a director of other public companies in the technology sector and his investment management experience.

Catherine R. Kinney has been our director since August 2013 and was a director of our predecessor from May 2013 until our initial public offering in October 2013. Ms. Kinney serves as the chair of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Ms. Kinney has over 36 years of experience in securities regulation and management. Ms. Kinney retired from NYSE Euronext in March 2009, having served as The President and Co-Chief Operating Officer from 2002-2008. From 2007-2009, she served in Paris, overseeing global listings, marketing and branding, and serving as part of the integration team following the merger of The New York Stock Exchange and Euronext in April, 2007. Ms. Kinney joined the NYSE in 1974 and held management positions with responsibility for several divisions including: all client relationships from 1996 to 2007, trading floor operations and technology from 1987 to 1996 and

Table of Contents

regulation from 2002 to 2004. Ms. Kinney currently serves on the boards of directors of MetLife, Inc. (NYSE: MET), and MSCI Inc. (NYSE: MSCI). Ms. Kinney previously served as a director of NetSuite, Inc. (NYSE: N). Ms. Kinney earned a Bachelor of Arts degree from Iona College and completed the Advanced Management Program at Harvard Business School. Ms. Kinney also has received honorary degrees from Georgetown University, Fordham University and Rosemont College.

Our Board determined that Ms. Kinney should serve on our Board based on her extensive leadership, management and corporate governance experience and experience as a director of other public companies.

Peter A. Marino has been our director since August 2013 and was a director of our predecessor from 2012 until our initial public offering in October 2013. Mr. Marino has over 26 years of executive experience. Mr. Marino has been a private consultant for government and industry on defense and intelligence issues since 1999. From 1996 to 1999, Mr. Marino was the president and chief executive officer of Firearms Training Systems, Inc., a provider of software and hardware simulation training systems for military, law enforcement and security forces. From 1991 to 1996, Mr. Marino served as senior vice president of E-Systems Corporation, a computing and software company which was acquired by Raytheon (NYSE: RTN) in 1995. Mr. Marino previously served as president and chief operating officer of Fairchild Industries, an aerospace and defense company, from 1988 to 1990 and was president and chief operating officer of Lockheed Electronics Company, Inc., a defense electronics company, from 1986 to 1988. From 1970 to 1986, he served in numerous capacities at the Central Intelligence Agency, including director of technical service and deputy director for the Office of Research and Development. He also attended the Senior Executive Fellows program at Harvard University. Mr. Marino currently serves on the board of directors of Engility Corporation (NYSE: EGL). Mr. Marino previously served as a director of Argon ST, Inc., a former public company, from 2004 to 2010. Mr. Marino earned a Master of Science in acoustics (engineering physics) from The Pennsylvania State University and a Bachelor of Science degree in physics from Rollins College.

Our Board determined that Mr. Marino should serve on our Board based on his experience as a successful business leader and entrepreneur, his government-related experience, his cybersecurity experience and his technology experience.

Scott D. Miller has been our director since August 2013 and was a director of our predecessor from May 2013 until our initial public offering in October 2013. Mr. Miller has over 31 years of executive experience. Mr. Miller is the chief executive officer of SSA & Company, a management consulting firm focusing on process improvement, the chief executive officer of G100, a membership organization providing a forum for current, future and recent chief executive officers of leading public and private companies and private equity firms, and the managing general partner of MSP, LLC, a private real estate development and investment company. He also serves as special advisor to General Atlantic LLC. Prior to joining SSA & Company in March 2004, Mr. Miller served as non-executive vice chairman of Hyatt Hotels and Resorts Corporation (NYSE: H), a global hospitality company, from 2003 to 2004, the president from 1999 to 2003 and executive vice president from 1997 to 1999. Mr. Miller also was the president and chief executive officer of United Infrastructure Company, a public infrastructure development company, from 1993 to 1997. From 1981 to 1993, he was a founding partner of The John Buck Company, a real estate brokerage, management and development company. Mr. Miller served on the boards of directors of Affinion Group, Inc. from 2011 to 2013, AXA Equitable Life Insurance Company from 2002 to 2012, Orbitz Worldwide, Inc. (NYSE: OWW) from 2003 to 2004, and NAVTEQ Corporation from 2004 to 2008. Mr. Miller earned a Master of Business Administration from the University of Chicago and a Bachelor of Arts degree in human biology from Stanford University.

Table of Contents

Our Board determined that Mr. Miller should serve on our Board based on his leadership and management experience as a principal executive officer of diverse organizations and experience as a director of other public companies.

Philip P. Trahanas has been our director since August 2013 and was a director of our predecessor from 2009 until our initial public offering in October 2013. Mr. Trahanas serves as our lead independent director. Mr. Trahanas has over 19 years of experience in financial advisory, investing and investment management, as well as over 10 years of experience serving on private and public company boards. Between 2000 and 2014, Mr. Trahanas was a Managing Director of General Atlantic LLC, a global investment firm. From 1996 to 2000, Mr. Trahanas worked at Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS), a global financial services firm, where he was a member of the high technology corporate finance team, was a merger and acquisition specialist and was a member of the investment banking division's operating management team. Prior to joining Morgan Stanley, Mr. Trahanas was an electrical engineer at General Electric (NYSE: GE), a diversified technology, media and financial services company, where he specialized in communications equipment and semiconductor design. Mr. Trahanas currently serves on the board of directors of InterDigital, Inc (NASDAQ: IDCC). Mr. Trahanas earned a Bachelor of Engineering degree in electrical engineering from The Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art, a Master of Business Administration from the University of Pennsylvania Wharton School and a Master of Science degree in engineering from the University of Pennsylvania Moore School of Engineering.

Our Board determined that Mr. Trahanas should serve on our Board based on his extensive operating, investment banking and private equity experience.

Stephen E. Westhead has been our director since August 2013 and was a director of our predecessor from May 2013 until our initial public offering in October 2013. Mr. Westhead has over 26 years of experience in management. Since 2007, Mr. Westhead has been the chief executive officer and lead investor of US Trailer, a semi-trailer leasing company. From January 2013 to September 2015, Mr. Westhead served as the chief marketing officer of Satori Group, Inc., an IT company. From 1987 to 2008, Mr. Westhead served as senior vice president of commercial lines underwriting for Philadelphia Insurance Companies, an insurance company. Mr. Westhead earned a Bachelor of Science degree in business administration from Cabrini College.

Our Board determined that Mr. Westhead should serve on our Board based on his executive management experience.

Vote Required and Recommendation

Directors are elected by plurality vote. Therefore, the eight director nominees receiving the highest number of "FOR" votes will be elected. There is no cumulative voting in the election of directors. For purposes of this Proposal One, abstentions, votes marked "WITHHOLD" and other shares not voted (whether by broker non-vote or otherwise) will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR"
ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES SET FORTH ABOVE.

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL TWO: ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), our stockholders are entitled to cast a non-binding advisory vote at the Annual Meeting to approve the compensation of our named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to the SEC's compensation disclosure rules, including the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" section of this Proxy Statement, or "CD&A," the compensation tables and accompanying narrative disclosures. We refer to this as our "Say-on-Pay" vote. While this Say-on-Pay vote is an advisory vote that is not binding on the Company or the Board, we value the views of our stockholders and the Board's Compensation Committee, which administers our executive compensation program, and will consider the outcome of the vote when making future compensation decisions. Last year, our Board considered the results of our "say-on-frequency" vote and determined that we will provide our stockholders with the ability to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of the named executive officers every year until our next say-on-frequency vote is conducted, which will be no later than 2022.

We believe that our executive compensation program rewards performance and aligns the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders, thereby reflecting our compensation philosophy of "pay-for-performance." Central to that goal are base salaries, which serve to fairly reward our executive officers for their value to the organization in successfully performing their respective roles, and incentive compensation, which serves to motivate and reward our executives for performance, including the achievement of our financial and operational objectives, individual goals and value creation for our stockholders. We believe that our executive compensation program allows us to attract and retain the best executive talent, and we actively evaluate and reassess our executive compensation program in light of the industry in which we operate, the marketplace for executive talent in which we compete and evolving compensation governance and best practices.

In implementing our executive compensation program, we focus on compensating our executive officers fairly and in a manner that promotes our compensation philosophy, seeking alignment with our annual and longer-term performance. We seek to maintain flexibility in our compensation program to allow us to adapt components and levels of compensation in order to motivate, reward and retain individual named executive officers within the context of the attainment of performance objectives. When determining the overall compensation of our named executive officers, including base salaries and annual short-term and long-term incentive amounts, the Compensation Committee considers a number of factors it deems important, including:

•: the executive officer's experience, knowledge, skills, level of responsibility and potential to influence our performance;
•: the business environment, our strategy, and our financial, operational and market performance;
•: corporate governance and regulatory factors related to executive compensation; and
•: marketplace compensation levels and practices.

Table of Contents

In order to achieve our compensation objectives, we have developed strong compensation practices while avoiding others:

What we do		What we don't do

ü Significant portion of executive pay is variable "at risk" compensation, designed to achieve pay-for-performance objectives		X No guaranteed salary increases, cash incentive compensation or equity grants
ü Balanced mix of performance measures used to ensure a focus on our overall performance		X Limited perquisites and supplemental benefits to our executive officers
ü Emphasis on equity-based compensation to provide long-term incentives		X No excise tax gross-up payments
ü Executive officers and directors are subject to rigorous stock ownership guidelines		X No hedging of our securities by directors and employees, including named executive officers
ü Clawback policy to recover compensation from certain executive officers engaging in fraud or intentional illegal conduct that leads to a restatement of financials		X No single-trigger change in control provisions

We believe that our executive compensation program achieves our compensation objectives. Accordingly, we ask our stockholders to vote "FOR" the following resolution at the Annual Meeting:

"RESOLVED, that the Company's stockholders approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Company's named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the compensation tables and narrative discussion in this Proxy Statement."

Vote Required and Recommendation

The affirmative vote of a majority of all votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required for approval, on a non-binding advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. For purposes of approving this Proposal Two, abstentions and other shares not voted (whether by broker non-vote or otherwise) will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" APPROVAL OF THE
COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS.

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL THREE: APPROVAL OF THE 2017 ESPP

We are asking our stockholders to approve the 2017 Amended and Restated QTS Realty Trust, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "2017 ESPP"). The 2017 ESPP has been approved by our Board of Directors, subject to approval by our stockholders. If approved by our stockholders, the 2017 ESPP will become effective on July 1, 2017 and will amend and restate the existing QTS Realty Trust, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which became effective July 1, 2015 (the "Existing Plan"). A copy of the 2017 ESPP is attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix A.

We wish to provide eligible employees with an opportunity to invest in our Company on a systematic basis at a discount. We believe that the 2017 ESPP is a powerful incentive and retention tool that mutually benefits us and the participants by providing eligible employees with a convenient means of acquiring an equity interest in our Company through payroll deductions, incentivizing them to acquire such interest, aligning the interests of participating employees with the interests of our stockholders, and encouraging the participating employees to operate and manage our business in a manner that will provide for our long-term growth.

The following is a summary of the 2017 ESPP, which is qualified in its entirety by reference to the copy of the 2017 ESPP attached hereto as Appendix A.

Summary of the 2017 ESPP

Purpose. The purpose of the 2017 ESPP is to provide eligible employees of the Company the opportunity to purchase shares of our common stock on a systematic basis at a discount. The plan is designed to facilitate the accumulation of common stock by employees, thereby aligning their economic interests with the economic interests of our stockholders.

Eligibility. Any employee (other than an employee with a five percent or more ownership of the Company or an employee who must file reports under Section 16 of the Exchange Act) who has been employed by the Company or any of our majority-owned subsidiaries for at least thirty (30) days and who performs at least thirty (30) hours of service per week may participate in the 2017 ESPP. In addition, in order for shares to be purchased on behalf of a participant under the plan, the participant must be an eligible employee on the first day of the applicable purchase period. Special rules apply to employees who are considered "Restricted Persons" under our Policy on Inside Information and Insider Trading.

Plan Provisions. The 2017 ESPP is a broad-based plan that allows employees to purchase shares of our common stock at up to a 10% discount on the price of a share either at the beginning or end of a purchase period, provided that the committee designated to administer the plan will, in advance of each purchase period, determine the exact amount of the discount and the basis on which the discount will be applied. The 2017 ESPP, as initially administered, will provide for consecutive quarterly purchase periods and a discount of 10%. As of March 9, 2017, there were approximately 756 employees who would be eligible to participate in the 2017 ESPP. The first purchase period will begin on July 1, 2017, and end on September 30, 2017, and the second purchase period will begin on October 1, 2017 and end on December 31, 2017. However, the Board of Directors, or the committee designated to administer the plan, in its discretion, may alter the duration of the purchase periods as well as set beginning and ending dates different from those described above.

Eligible employees will fund their purchases through voluntary payroll deductions that accumulate, without interest, in accounts maintained in the employee's name. A participant may contribute up to $1,000 of his or her gross base pay per paycheck and must contribute a minimum of $20 per paycheck. All deductions will be made on an after-tax basis. Eligible employees may elect to become a participant in the 2017 ESPP by submitting a payroll deduction authorization form to the plan administrator, which

Table of Contents

will remain effective from purchase period to purchase period unless and until the participant files new enrollment documents or timely withdraws from the 2017 ESPP.

Immediately following the end of each purchase period, and unless the participant terminates employment on or before the tenth day prior to the end of the purchase period, the amount credited to the employee's account will be applied to the purchase of common stock at a price determined by the Board of Directors, or the committee designated to administer the plan (not to exceed a 10% discount on the price on the first trading day of a purchase period or the last trading day of a purchase period). As of March 9, 2017, the closing price of a share of our common stock was $48.76. Shares purchased under the 2017 ESPP will be subject to a one-year holding period. Shares purchased under the 2017 ESPP have the same voting, dividend and other rights as all other shares of our common stock.

A participant's rights under the 2017 ESPP will not be transferable other than by will or by the laws of descent and distribution and such rights are exercisable only by the participant during his or her lifetime.

Stock Subject to the 2017 ESPP. There will be 241,415 shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2017 ESPP, less any shares that are purchased under the Existing Plan from the date of this Proxy Statement through June 30, 2017. We may issue new shares under the 2017 ESPP or reacquire shares for the purposes of the 2017 ESPP. In the event of any stock dividend, stock split, recapitalization, or other change in the capital structure of the Company, the Compensation Committee or a committee authorized by the Compensation Committee will make a corresponding adjustment to the number of shares of common stock that are reserved for issuance under the 2017 ESPP and, to the extent necessary, to the purchase price of shares of common stock under the 2017 ESPP.

Administration. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has delegated authority for the day-to-day administration of the 2017 ESPP to Chad Williams, Steven Bloom and Shirley Goza. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has retained the authority to modify or adjust the purchase price of shares of common stock under the 2017 ESPP, the purchase periods for the shares of common stock under the 2017 ESPP, the number of shares of common stock that may be purchased under the 2017 ESPP and to terminate or amend the 2017 ESPP.

Term. The 2017 ESPP is limited to a term of ten years, commencing on July 1, 2017.

Amendment and Termination of the 2017 ESPP. The Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors may amend the 2017 ESPP from time to time in any respect. Any such amendment is subject to stockholder approval to the extent such approval is required under applicable law.

Since participation in the 2017 ESPP is voluntary, and we are unable to predict the future value of our common stock, we cannot determine with certainty the benefits or the amounts that will be received in the future by any person under the plan.

Federal Income Tax Consequences to the Company and to Participants

Because we are structured as an UPREIT and substantially all of our employees are employed by a subsidiary of QualityTech, LP (the "Operating Partnership"), the 2017 ESPP will not qualify as an "employee stock purchase plan" as defined in section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). A general summary of the current federal income tax consequences regarding the 2017 ESPP is stated below. The consequences for individuals may vary, and federal income tax laws and regulations change frequently. Participants should look to their own tax counsel for advice regarding federal income tax treatment under the 2017 ESPP.

Table of Contents

Tax Treatment of 2017 ESPP Participants. The amount withheld from a participant's pay under the 2017 ESPP will be taxable ordinary income to the participant and will be included in gross income for federal income and payroll tax purposes in the year in which such amount otherwise would have been paid to the participant.

Upon the purchase of shares under the 2017 ESPP (on the last trading day of a purchase period), a participant will recognize ordinary income, subject to withholding, in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares on the date of purchase over his or her purchase price. The ordinary income recognized is added to the participant's basis in the shares. Upon the participant's sale or disposition of shares purchased under the 2017 ESPP, any gain realized will be taxed as capital gain and any loss realized will be a capital loss. Whether the capital gain or loss will be long-term or short-term will depend on how long the participant held the shares.

Tax Treatment of the Company. We will be entitled, with respect to the purchase of the shares under the 2017 ESPP, to an income tax deduction in an amount equal to the ordinary income recognized by the participant in the same taxable year in which the participant recognizes such income.

Vote Required and Recommendation

The affirmative vote of a majority of all votes cast on the proposal is necessary to approve the 2017 ESPP. For purposes of this Proposal Three, abstentions will be counted as votes cast and will have the same effect as votes against the proposal, while other shares not voted (whether by broker non-vote or otherwise) will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote. However, both abstentions and broker non-votes will count toward the presence of a quorum.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" THE 2017 ESPP.

Table of Contents

PROPOSAL FOUR: RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Audit Committee of our Board, which is composed entirely of independent directors, has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017. Although stockholder approval is not required, we desire to obtain from our stockholders an indication of their approval of the Audit Committee's selection of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for 2017. Even if the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm is ratified, the Audit Committee may, in its discretion, change that appointment at any time during the year should it determine that such a change would be in our and our stockholders' best interests. If our stockholders do not ratify this appointment, the Audit Committee may consider the appointment of another independent registered public accounting firm, but will not be required to appoint a different firm.

A representative of Ernst & Young LLP is expected to be present at the Annual Meeting. He or she will have the opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires and is expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

Vote Required and Recommendation

The affirmative vote of a majority of all votes cast at the Annual Meeting is required to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017. For purposes of approving this Proposal Four, abstentions and other shares not voted (whether by broker non-vote or otherwise) will not be counted as votes cast and will have no effect on the result of the vote.

THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE "FOR" THE RATIFICATION OF THE
APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS THE COMPANY'S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2017.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The following table summarizes the fees billed by Ernst & Young LLP for professional services rendered for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.

	2016		2015

Audit Fees(1)	$	1,358,114	$	1,303,000
Audit-Related Fees	$	22,102		—
Tax Fees(2)	$	245,928	$	270,871
All Other Fees		—		—
Total	$	1,626,144	$	1,573,871

(1): Audit fees for 2015 and 2016 include audit fees for services associated with review of registration statements, related issuances of comfort letters and consents and other services related to SEC matters.
(2): Tax fees consist of tax and consulting fees relating to services provided associated with tax return preparation, tax consultations and other similar matters.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

The Audit Committee's policy is to review and pre-approve, either pursuant to the Audit Committee's Policies and Procedures for the Approval of Audit Services and Permitted Non-Audit

Table of Contents

Services or through a separate pre-approval by the Audit Committee, any engagement of the Company's independent auditor to provide any audit or non-audit services to the Company. Pursuant to the Audit Committee's pre-approval policy, the Committee has pre-approved certain specified audit, audit-related, tax and other services for the audit cycle ending in March 2018. Permissible audit, audit-related, tax and other services other than those specifically pre-approved pursuant to the pre-approval policy require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. All audit, audit-related, tax and other services provided to us for the year ended December 31, 2016 either were pre-approved by the Audit Committee or were approved pursuant to the Audit Committee's pre-approval policy. Pursuant to the pre-approval policy, the Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members who are required to report any pre-approval decisions to the Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

Table of Contents

AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The Audit Committee is composed of Messrs. Barter, Marino, Miller and Westhead. The members of the Audit Committee are appointed by and serve at the discretion of the Board.

One of the principal purposes of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board in the oversight of the integrity of the Company's financial statements. The Company's management team has the primary responsibility for the financial statements and the reporting process, including the Company's accounting policies, internal audit function, system of internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 with our management.

The Audit Committee also is responsible for assisting the Board in the oversight of the qualification, independence and performance of the Company's independent auditors. The Audit Committee reviewed the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 with the independent auditors, which are responsible for expressing an opinion on the conformity of those audited financial statements with generally accepted accounting principles, their judgments as to the quality, not just the acceptability, of the Company's accounting principles and such other matters as are required to be discussed with the Audit Committee under generally accepted auditing standards and those matters required to be discussed by applicable standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB") Statement of Auditing Standards No. 61.

The independent auditors have provided to the Audit Committee the written disclosures regarding the independent auditors' independence required by PCAOB Ethics and Independence Rule 3526,Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence, and the Audit Committee has discussed with the independent auditors their independence.

In reliance on the review and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board the inclusion of the Company's audited consolidated financial statements in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 for filing with the SEC.


		Respectfully submitted,
		The Audit Committee
		JOHN W. BARTER(Chairman) PETER A. MARINO SCOTT D. MILLER STEPHEN E. WESTHEAD

The Audit Committee Report above does not constitute "soliciting material" and will not be deemed "filed" or incorporated by reference into any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that might incorporate SEC filings by reference, in whole or in part, notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in those filings.

Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND BOARD MATTERS

Corporate Governance Profile

The Company's corporate governance is structured in a manner that the Board believes closely aligns the Company's interests with those of our stockholders. Notable features of our corporate governance structure include the following:

•: our Board is not staggered, with each of our directors subject to re-election annually;
•: of the eight persons who serve on our Board, seven, or 87.5% of our directors, have been determined by us to be independent for purposes of the NYSE's corporate governance listing standards and Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act;
•: all of the members of our Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees are independent;
•: we have determined that one of our directors qualifies as an "audit committee financial expert" as defined by the SEC;
•: our stock ownership guidelines require directors to own securities of the Company equal to at least five times the annual base cash retainer and our Chief Executive Officer and other named executive officers to own securities of at least five times and three times his or her base salary, respectively;
•: our stockholders may amend our bylaws by a majority vote;
•: we have opted out of the Maryland business combination and control share acquisition statutes; and
•: we do not have a stockholder rights plan.

The Company's charter and bylaws provide that the number of directors constituting the Board may be increased or decreased by a majority vote of the entire Board, provided the number of directors may not be greater than 15 and may not be decreased to fewer than the minimum number required under the Maryland General Corporate Law ("MGCL"), which currently is one director.

There are no family relationships among our executive officers and directors. All board members except Mr. Williams have been determined by the Board to be independent under applicable NYSE and SEC rules.

Recent Corporate Governance Changes

On March 8, 2017, our Board adopted an amendment to Article XIV of our Amended and Restated Bylaws (the "Bylaws") to grant stockholders the right to amend the Bylaws. This amendment was effective immediately. Before this amendment was adopted, our Bylaws provided that our Board had the exclusive right to amend the Bylaws, as permitted by Maryland law. Now, as a result of this amendment, our Bylaws may be altered, amended or repealed either by our Board or by the affirmative vote of holders of shares representing a majority of all the votes entitled to be cast on the matter.

Board Leadership Structure

Chad L. Williams has served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer since May 2013 and was the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of our predecessor from 2003 until our initial public offering. The Board does not have a policy regarding separation of the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board. However, it evaluates the combined role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer as part of the succession planning process. The Board has determined that, based on Mr. Williams' tenure with the Company and our predecessor since its inception, the perspective and

Table of Contents

experience he brings as our founder and Chief Executive Officer, and his in-depth knowledge of the Company and the real estate industry, Mr. Williams is well-positioned to lead Board discussions and that the combined role of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer is therefore in the best interests of the Company and stockholders.

To strengthen the role of our independent directors and encourage independent Board leadership, the Board also has established the position of lead independent director, which currently is held by Philip P. Trahanas. In accordance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the responsibilities of the lead independent director include, among others:

•: serving as liaison among (i) management, including the Chief Executive Officer, (ii) our other independent directors and (iii) interested third parties and the Board;
•: presiding at executive sessions of the independent directors;
•: serving as the focal point of communication to the Board regarding management plans and initiatives;
•: ensuring that the role between Board oversight and management operations is respected;
•: providing the medium for informal dialogue with and among independent directors, allowing for free and open communication within that group; and
•: serving as the communication conduit for third parties who wish to communicate with the Board.

Our lead independent director will be selected on an annual basis by a majority of independent directors then serving on the Board.

Executive Sessions

During 2016, our non-management directors met in a special executive session without management at our March, May, August and November Board meetings. Mr. Trahanas, as lead independent director, chaired the sessions. Per our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board expects to conduct executive sessions limited to non-management directors at our regularly scheduled Board meetings, and at least annually will hold an executive session limited to independent directors.

Attendance of Directors at 2016 Board and Committee Meetings and Annual Meeting of Stockholders

During 2016, the Board held eight meetings. Every director attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and all committees thereof on which such director served during 2016.

In accordance with the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines, directors are expected to attend the annual meeting of stockholders. All eight directors attended the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

Committees of the Board

Our Board has a standing Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Each of these committees must have at least three members who are each independent directors, as that term is defined in the NYSE listing standards. Our Board may from time to time establish other committees to facilitate the management of our company.

Table of Contents

The table below provides membership information for each of the Board committees as of the date of this Proxy Statement:

Director	Audit Committee	Compensation Committee	Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

John. W. Barter	X (Chair)*
William O. Grabe		X (Chair)
Catherine R. Kinney		X	X (Chair)
Peter A. Marino	X		X
Scott D. Miller	X		X
Philip P. Trahanas		X
Stephen E. Westhead	X	X	X

*: Audit Committee financial expert.

The Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee each operate under written charters adopted by the Board. These charters are available on our website atwww.qtsdatacenters.com.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee consists of Messrs. Barter, Marino, Miller and Westhead, and Mr. Barter serves as its chairperson. The Audit Committee's written charter requires that all members of the committee meet the independence, experience, financial literacy and expertise requirements of the NYSE, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Exchange Act and applicable rules and regulations of the SEC, all as in effect from time to time. Our Board has determined that all of the members of the Audit Committee meet the foregoing requirements.

The Board also has determined that Mr. Barter is an "audit committee financial expert," as defined by the applicable SEC regulations and NYSE corporate governance listing standards, and has accounting or related financial management expertise.

The principal functions of the Audit Committee include overseeing:

•: our accounting and financial reporting processes;
•: the integrity and audits of our consolidated financial statements and financial reporting process;
•: our systems of disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting;
•: our compliance with financial, legal and regulatory requirements;
•: the evaluation of the qualifications, independence and performance of our independent registered public accounting firm;
•: the performance of our internal audit function;
•: review of all related-party transactions in accordance with our related party transactions policy; and
•: our overall risk profile.

The Audit Committee also is responsible for engaging an independent registered public accounting firm, reviewing with the independent registered public accounting firm the plans and results of the audit engagement, approving professional services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, including all audit and non-audit services, reviewing the independence of the

Table of Contents

independent registered public accounting firm, considering the range of audit and non-audit fees and reviewing the adequacy of our internal accounting controls. The Audit Committee also approves the audit committee report required by SEC regulations to be included in our annual proxy statement.

During 2016, the Audit Committee met eight times.

Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee consists of Mr. Grabe, Ms. Kinney, Mr. Trahanas and Mr. Westhead, and Mr. Grabe serves as its chairperson. The principal functions of the Compensation Committee include:

•: reviewing and approving on an annual basis the corporate goals and objectives relevant to our Chief Executive Officer's compensation, evaluating our Chief Executive Officer's performance in light of such goals and objectives and determining and approving the remuneration of our Chief Executive Officer based on such evaluation;
•: reviewing and approving the compensation of our other executive officers;
•: reviewing our executive compensation policies and plans;
•: determining the number of shares underlying, and the terms of, stock option and restricted stock awards to be granted to our directors, executive officers and other employees pursuant to these plans;
•: assisting management in complying with our proxy statement and annual report disclosure requirements;
•: producing a report on executive compensation to be included in our annual proxy statement; and
•: reviewing, evaluating and recommending changes, if appropriate, to the remuneration for directors.

During 2016, the Compensation Committee met six times.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consists of Ms. Kinney, Mr. Miller, Mr. Marino and Mr. Westhead, and Ms. Kinney serves as its chairperson. The principal functions of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee include:

•: identifying, recruiting and recommending to the full Board qualified candidates for election as directors and recommending a slate of nominees for election as directors at each annual meeting of stockholders;
•: developing and recommending to the Board Corporate Governance Guidelines, including the committee's selection criteria for director nominees, and implementing and monitoring such guidelines;
•: reviewing and making recommendations on matters involving the general operation of the Board, including board size and composition, and committee composition and structure;
•: recommending to the Board nominees for each committee of the Board;
•: annually facilitating the assessment of the Board's performance as a whole and of the individual directors, as required by applicable law, regulations and the NYSE corporate governance listing standards; and

Table of Contents

•: overseeing the Board's evaluation of management.

During 2016, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee met four times.

Director Nominee Selection Process

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has set forth in a written policy minimum qualifications that director candidates must possess. At a minimum, a director candidate must possess:

•: high personal and professional ethics and integrity;
•: an ability to exercise sound judgment;
•: an ability to make independent analytical inquiries;
•: an ability and willingness to devote adequate time and resources to perform Board duties diligently, including attending regular and special Board and committee meetings;
•: appropriate and relevant business experience and acumen; and
•: a reputation, both personal and professional, consistent with the image and reputation of the Company.

In addition to the aforementioned minimum qualifications, the written policy sets forth certain additional qualities and skills that, while not a prerequisite for nomination, should be considered by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee when evaluating a particular candidate. These additional qualities and skills include, among others, the following:

•: whether the person possesses specific industry knowledge, expertise and/or contacts, including in the commercial real estate industry generally and/or the data center industry, and familiarity with general issues affecting the Company's business;
•: whether the person's nomination and election would enable the Board to have a member that qualifies as an "audit committee financial expert" as such term is defined by the SEC;
•: whether the person would qualify as an "independent" director under the rules of the NYSE and the Company's Corporate Governance Guidelines;
•: the importance of continuity of the existing composition of the Board; and
•: the importance of a diversified Board membership, in terms of both the individuals involved and their various experiences and areas of expertise.

The Board does not have a formal policy specifying how diversity of background and personal experience should be applied in identifying or evaluating director candidates. A director candidate's background and personal experience, however, will be significant in the Board's candidate identification and evaluation process to help ensure that the Board remains aware of and responsive to the needs and interests of our customers, stockholders, employees and other stakeholders.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will seek to identify director candidates based on input provided by a number of sources, including (a) members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, (b) directors of the Company and (c) stockholders of the Company. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also has the authority to consult with or retain advisors or search firms to assist in the identification of qualified director candidates; however, we do not currently employ a search firm, or pay a fee to any other third party, to locate qualified director candidates.

As part of the candidate identification process, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will evaluate the skills, expertise and diversity possessed by the current Board, and whether

Table of Contents

there are additional skills, expertise or diversity that should be added to complement the composition of the existing Board. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also will take into account whether existing directors have indicated a willingness to continue to serve as directors if re-nominated. Once director candidates have been identified, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee then will evaluate each candidate in light of his or her qualifications and credentials, and any additional factors that the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee deems necessary or appropriate. Existing directors who are being considered for re-nomination will be re-evaluated as part of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee's process of recommending director candidates. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee evaluates the performance of each current director and considers the results of such evaluation when determining whether to recommend the nomination of such director for an additional term. All candidates submitted by stockholders will be evaluated in the same manner as all other director candidates, provided that the advance notice and other requirements set forth in our bylaws have been followed. At an appropriate time prior to each annual meeting at which directors are to be elected or re-elected, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommends to the Board for nomination by the Board such candidates as the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, in the exercise of its judgment, has found to be well-qualified and willing and available to serve.

At an appropriate time after a vacancy arises on the Board or a director advises the Board of his or her intention to resign, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will recommend to the Board for election by the Board to fill such vacancy, such prospective member of the Board as the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, in the exercise of its judgment, has found to be well-qualified and willing and available to serve. In determining whether a prospective member is qualified to serve, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider the factors listed above.

Board Oversight of Risk Management

One of the key functions of our Board is informed oversight of our risk management process. Our Board administers this oversight function directly, with support from its three standing committees, the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, each of which addresses risks specific to their respective areas of oversight as follows:

•: Audit Committee: The Audit Committee has the responsibility to consider and discuss our major financial risk exposures, including cybersecurity risk exposures, and the steps our management has taken to monitor and control these exposures, including guidelines and policies to govern the process by which risk assessment and management is undertaken. The Audit Committee also will monitor compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and oversee the performance of our internal audit function.
•: Compensation Committee: The Compensation Committee assesses and monitors compensation policies to ensure that such practices are designed to balance risk and reward in relation to the Company's overall business strategy and do not encourage excessive risk-taking.
•: Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee: The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee monitors the general operations of the Board and the effectiveness of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, including whether they are successful in preventing illegal or improper liability-creating conduct.

Our Board and its standing committees also hear reports from the members of management responsible for the matters considered in order to enable our Board and each committee to understand and discuss risk identification and risk management.

Table of Contents

The Board believes that the composition of its committees, and the distribution of the particular expertise of each committee's members, makes this an appropriate structure to monitor effectively the risks discussed above.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board has adopted a set of governance guidelines, the QTS Realty Trust, Inc. Corporate Governance Guidelines, that reflect the Board's commitment to monitoring the effectiveness of decision-making at the Board and management level and ensuring adherence to good corporate governance principles, all with the goal of enhancing stockholder value over the long term. The Corporate Governance Guidelines address, among other things:

•: the responsibilities and qualifications of directors, including director independence;
•: the functioning of the Board;
•: the responsibilities, composition and functioning of the Board committees;
•: the appointment and role of the lead independent director;
•: principles of director compensation; and
•: management succession and review.

A copy of the Corporate Governance Guidelines is available on our website atwww.qtsdatacenters.com.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics applies to directors, officers and employees. Among other matters, the code is intended to deter wrongdoing and promote:

•: honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships;
•: full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in our SEC reports and other public communications;
•: compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations;
•: prompt internal reporting of violations of the code to appropriate persons identified in the code; and
•: accountability for adherence to the code.

Only the Audit Committee is able to approve any waiver of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for our executive officers or directors, and any such waiver shall be promptly disclosed as required by law or NYSE regulations.

A copy of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on our website atwww.qtsdatacenters.com. We intend to disclose any changes in or waivers from the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics by posting such information on our website.

Compensation of Directors

The Board has adopted a non-employee director compensation policy. In accordance with the policy, on an annual basis, each non-employee director receives a grant of securities of the Company with a value of $110,000, which vests on the first anniversary of the grant date, and a cash retainer of $60,000 for services as a director. The lead independent director receives an additional cash retainer of

Table of Contents

$50,000. Each member of the Audit Committee will receive an additional $10,000 cash retainer and each member of the Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will receive an additional $7,500 cash retainer, except for the chairs of such committees. The chair of the Audit Committee will receive an additional $20,000 cash retainer and the chairs of the Compensation Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will receive additional cash retainers of $15,000 each. Each non-employee director is entitled (i) to elect to receive his or her annual cash retainers in securities of the Company, and (ii) to elect whether and to what extent the securities granted (whether as part of the annual grant or in lieu of cash retainers) will be shares of restricted stock or options to purchase our Class A common stock. Directors who are employees of the Company or its subsidiaries will not receive compensation for their services as directors. All directors are reimbursed for their out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the performance of Board duties.

In 2016, with the exception of Mr. Grabe, each non-employee director chose to receive his or her annual grant of securities and cash retainer in the form of shares of restricted stock and options to purchase our Class A common stock. Mr. Grabe elected to forego receipt of all compensation for his service as a member of the Board and chair of the Compensation Committee during 2016. Thus, on March 2, 2016, Mr. Trahanas received a grant of options to purchase 6,138 shares of Class A common stock and 3,849 shares of restricted stock, Mr. Barter and Ms. Kinney each received a grant of options to purchase 5,420 shares of Class A common stock and 3,399 shares of restricted stock, each of Messrs. Marino and Miller received a grant of options to purchase 5,094 shares of Class A common stock and 3,194 shares of restricted stock, and Mr. Westhead received a grant of options to purchase 5,289 shares of Class A common stock and 3,317 shares of restricted stock, all of which vested on the first anniversary of the grant date.

The following table presents information regarding the compensation paid during 2016 to non-employee directors who served on the Board during the year. Mr. Williams does not receive any compensation for his service as a member of the Board. The compensation paid to Mr. Williams is presented below under "Executive Compensation" in the table titled "2016 Summary Compensation Table" and the related explanatory tables.

Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash		Restricted Stock Awards(1)		Option Awards(2)		Total(3)

John W. Barter	$	—	$	155,606	$	51,869	$	207,475
William O. Grabe	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Catherine R. Kinney	$	—	$	155,606	$	51,869	$	207,475
Peter A. Marino	$	—	$	146,221	$	48,750	$	194,971
Scott D. Miller	$	—	$	146,221	$	48,750	$	194,971
Philip P. Trahanas	$	—	$	176,207	$	58,741	$	234,948
Stephen E. Westhead	$	—	$	151,852	$	50,616	$	202,468

(1): Represents the aggregate grant date fair value, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, of the shares of restricted stock issued to each of our directors on March 2, 2016. All of the restricted stock vested in full on March 2, 2017. The assumptions used to calculate these amounts are described in Note 7—"Partners' Capital, Equity and Incentive Compensation Plans" to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
(2): Represents the aggregate grant date fair value, computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, of the options to purchase shares of Class A common stock issued to each of our directors on March 2, 2016. All of the options vested in full on March 2, 2017. The assumptions used to calculate these amounts are described in Note 7—"Partners' Capital, Equity and Incentive

Table of Contents

Compensation Plans" to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

(3): The Board determined to pay compensation above the amounts in the director compensation policy due to additional responsibilities during 2016. Compensation for 2017 is expected to be consistent with the compensation arrangements described above.

The following table presents the number of outstanding stock awards, stock option awards and awards of Class O LTIP units in our Operating Partnership held by each of our non-employee directors as of December 31, 2016.

Name

John W. Barter	3,399	(2)	—		75,326	(3)
William O. Grabe	—		35,000	(4)	79,906	(5)
Catherine R. Kinney	3,399	(2)	9,748	(6)	56,963	(7)
Peter A. Marino	3,194	(2)	—		84,379	(8)
Scott D. Miller	3,194	(2)	9,748	(6)	55,394	(9)
Philip P. Trahanas	3,849	(2)	35,000	(4)	95,577	(10)
Stephen E. Westhead	3,317	(2)	9,748	(6)	48,136	(11)

(1): Each vested Class O LTIP unit may be converted into a number of OP units equal to (i) (x) the excess of the then-capital account per OP unit over (y) the capital account per OP unit on the date of issuance of the Class O LTIP unit being converted, divided by (ii) the then-capital account per OP unit. See "Compensation of Executive Officers—Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table—LTIP Units" for a description of the Class O LTIP units.
(2): These awards were granted on March 2, 2016 and vested in full on March 2, 2017.
(3): 5,420 of these options were granted on March 2, 2016 and vested in full on March 2, 2017. The remainder of these options were granted in October 2013, March 2014 and March 2015 and vested in full before December 31, 2016.
(4): These units were granted on November 5, 2012 and fully vested before December 31, 2016.
(5): These options were granted in October 2013, March 2014 and March 2015 and vested in full before December 31, 2016.
(6): These units were granted on June 17, 2013 and vest 25% on the first anniversary of the date of grant and 6.25% on each quarter-end thereafter, subject to continued service as a director.
(7): 5,420 of these options were granted on March 2, 2016 and vested in full on March 2, 2017. The remainder of these options were granted in March 2014 and March 2015 and vested in full before December 31, 2016.
(8): 5,094 of these options were granted on March 2, 2016 and vested in full on the first anniversary of the grant date. The remainder of these options were granted in October 2013, March 2014 and March 2015 and vested in full before December 31, 2016.
(9): 5,094 of these options were granted on March 2, 2016 and vested in full on March 2, 2017. The remainder of these options were granted in March 2014 and March 2015 and vested in full before December 31, 2016.

Table of Contents

(10): 6,138 of these options were granted on March 2, 2016 and vested in full on March 2, 2017. The remainder of these options were granted in October 2013, March 2014 and March 2015 and vested in full before December 31, 2016.
(11): 5,289 of these options were granted on March 2, 2016 and vested in full on the first anniversary of the grant date. The remainder of these options were granted in March 2014 and March 2015 and vested in full before December 31, 2016.

Certain Company Policies

Stock Ownership Guidelines

We believe that equity ownership by our directors and officers can help align their interests with our stockholders' interests. To that end, we have adopted formal share ownership guidelines applicable to all of our directors and named executive officers. On an annual basis, we evaluate the ownership status of the directors and named executive officers.

The Chief Executive Officer is required to own securities of the Company equal in value to at least five times his or her base salary. Each of the Company's other named executive officers is required to own securities of the Company equal to at least three times his or her base salary. The Chief Executive Officer and other named executive officers must comply with the ownership requirement within five years of being so named.

Our stock ownership guidelines with respect to our directors require stock ownership by our directors of five times the annual base cash retainer. Directors must comply with the ownership requirement within five years of becoming a member of the Board and are required to hold shares at this level while serving as a director.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee may waive the stock ownership requirements in the event of financial hardship or other good cause.

Hedging and Pledging of Company Securities

Our Insider Trading Policy prohibits our directors and employees, including our named executive officers, from engaging in the following transactions: (i) trading in call or put options involving our securities and other derivative securities; (ii) engaging in short sales of our securities; (iii) holding our securities in a margin account; and (iv) pledging our securities to secure margins or other loans, subject to limited exceptions.

Board Self-Evaluation

Our Board Self-Evaluation Policy was adopted in 2015 to establish and follow best practices in board governance and oversight. Pursuant to the policy, each year the chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will initiate the self-evaluation process by having detailed questionnaires distributed to each member of the Board soliciting input on matters such as board structure and composition, committee structure, board and committee meeting conduct, board support, education and compensation and overall board performance. Results of the questionnaires will be tabulated and analyzed at one of the Board's regularly scheduled meetings. After discussing the results of the questionnaires, if the Board determines that changes in its governance practices and polices need to be made, management and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will work with the Board to implement the necessary changes.

Table of Contents

Policy on Personal Loans to Directors and Executive Officers

Our Policy on Personal Loans to Directors and Executive Officers was adopted in 2015 to help ensure our compliance with Section 402 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which prohibits companies with securities registered in the United States or that are required to file reports with the SEC from extending, arranging or renewing personal loans to or for directors or executive officers. Our policy prohibits the Company or any company affiliated with the Company from, directly or indirectly, extending or maintaining credit, arranging for the extension of credit, or renewing an extension of credit in the form of a personal loan to or for any director or "Executive Officer" (as that term is defined in Rule 3b-7 under the Exchange Act) of the Company, or to any immediate family members of such director or executive officer.

Clawback Policy

Our Executive Compensation Recovery Policy was adopted in 2015. Pursuant to this policy, in the event of a restatement of the Company's financial results (other than a restatement caused by a change in applicable accounting rules or interpretations), the result of which is that any performance-based compensation paid to certain of our executive officers would have been a lower amount had it been calculated based on such restated results, a committee consisting of the non-management members of the Board (the "Independent Director Committee") shall review such performance-based compensation. If the Independent Director Committee determines that the executive officer engaged in fraud or intentional illegal conduct which materially contributed to the need for a restatement, the committee may seek to recover from the executive the after-tax portion of the difference between the performance-based compensation actually paid and the amount that would have been paid had the performance-based compensation been calculated based on the restated financial statements for the three-year period prior to the restatement.

Communications with the Board

Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate with the Board either by sending written correspondence to the "Lead Director" c/o the Chief Financial Officer of QTS Realty Trust, Inc., 12851 Foster Street, Overland Park, Kansas 66213, who will then directly forward such correspondence to the lead independent director, or by e-mailing directly to the independent lead director atleaddirector@qtsdatacenters.com. The lead independent director will decide what action should be taken with respect to the communication, including whether such communication should be reported to the full Board.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No member of the Compensation Committee is or ever has been an officer or employee of the Company, and no member of the Compensation Committee had any relationships during 2016 requiring disclosure by us under the SEC's rules requiring disclosure of certain relationships and related-party transactions. No executive officer serves as a member of a board of directors or compensation committee, or other committee serving an equivalent function, of any other entity that has one or more of its executive officers serving as a member of the Board or Compensation Committee. Accordingly, during 2016 there were no interlocks with other companies within the meaning of the SEC's proxy rules.

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our executive officers.

Name	Position With the Company

Chad L. Williams	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer	46
William H. Schafer	Chief Financial Officer	59
James H. Reinhart	Chief Operating Officer—Operations	52
Daniel T. Bennewitz	Chief Operating Officer—Sales & Marketing	58
Jeffrey H. Berson	Chief Investment Officer	48
Shirley E. Goza	General Counsel	60
Steven C. Bloom	Chief People Officer	53
Jon D. Greaves	Chief Technology Officer	45

Recent Management Change

On February 16, 2017, our Board approved the appointment of Jeffrey H. Berson, our current Chief Investment Officer, to the position of Chief Financial Officer, which appointment will become effective on April 3, 2017. This change is part of our succession planning process. Upon the effectiveness of the appointment, Mr. Berson will assume the duties of Chief Financial Officer from William H. Schafer and, although he will no longer have the title of Chief Investment Officer, he will continue his duties in that role. At that time, Mr. Schafer will transition to the position of Executive Vice President—Finance and Accounting where he will continue to lead key components of our finance organization. In connection with Mr. Berson's appointment as Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Berson's annual base salary will be increased from $325,000 to $350,000. We expect to enter into a new employment agreement reflecting this increase, which will replace Mr. Berson's existing employment agreement.

In addition, on February 16, 2017, in connection with his transition to the role of Executive Vice President—Finance and Accounting, we entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Schafer, which supersedes and replaces Mr. Schafer's prior employment agreement. See "Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions" for more information on Mr. Schafer's new employment agreement.

Biographies

Please see "Proposal One: Election of Directors—Nominees for Election as Directors" starting on page 7 for information regarding Chad L. Williams.

William H. Schafer has served as our Chief Financial Officer since our initial public offering in October 2013. Previously, he served as the Chief Financial Officer of our predecessor from 2010 to our initial public offering. Effective April 3, 2017, Mr. Schafer will transition to the position of Executive Vice President—Finance and Accounting where he will continue to lead key components of our financial organization. Mr. Schafer has more than 20 years of experience in the REIT industry and 34 years of experience in financial operations, accounting systems and financing activities. Prior to joining our predecessor, Mr. Schafer was the chief financial officer of DDR Corp. (NYSE: DDR) from 1992 to 2010, a public REIT and an owner and developer of retail properties. Prior to joining DDR Corp., Mr. Schafer was a senior manager of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. Mr. Schafer earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in business administration from the University of Michigan.

James H. Reinhart has served as our Chief Operating Officer—Operations since our initial public offering in October 2013. Previously, he served as the Chief Operating Officer—Operations of our predecessor from 2012 to our initial public offering. Mr. Reinhart has more than 25 years of experience

Table of Contents

in operations, technology, marketing and strategy. Prior to joining our predecessor, Mr. Reinhart held various positions at Genworth Financial, Inc. (NYSE: GNW), a financial services company, from 2005 to 2012. In his last position at Genworth Financial, Inc., Mr. Reinhart was the chief strategy and marketing officer of the U.S. Insurance & Wealth Management division. Prior to that, Mr. Reinhart held various positions at Capital One Financial Corporation (NYSE: COF), a financial services company, from 1999 to 2005, the last of which was vice president responsible for call center outsourcing, and various positions at the Hewlett-Packard Company (NYSE: HPQ), a technology products and software company, from 1993 to 1999. Mr. Reinhart earned a Master of Business Administration from the Harvard Graduate School of Business Administration, a Master of Science degree in electrical engineering from the University of Maryland and a Bachelor of Science degree in electrical engineering from the United States Naval Academy.

Daniel T. Bennewitz has served as our Chief Operating Officer—Sales & Marketing since our initial public offering in October 2013. Previously, he served as the Chief Operating Officer—Sales & Marketing of our predecessor from 2012 to our initial public offering. Mr. Bennewitz has more than 30 years of experience in sales, marketing, operations and global leadership positions. Prior to joining our predecessor, Mr. Bennewitz worked at IBM Corporation (NYSE: IBM), an information technology and products company, from 1980 to 2012. Mr. Bennewitz's responsibilities included product, industry and global leadership positions across the company, and his last position was vice president of IBM's sales model, a position in which he was responsible for leading IBM's go-to-market model and sales force transformation. Mr. Bennewitz earned an A.B. degree in economics from Princeton University.

Jeffrey H. Berson has served as our Chief Investment Officer since our initial public offering in October 2013. Previously, he served as the Chief Investment Officer of our predecessor from August 2013 to our initial public offering. Effective April 3, 2017, Mr. Berson will become our Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Berson has more than 20 years of experience in investment banking covering data center companies and the technology and telecommunications sectors. Prior to joining our predecessor, Mr. Berson was a Managing Director at UBS AG, an international investment bank, from 2011 to 2013, a Managing Director at Oppenheimer and Co. Inc., an international investment bank, from 2009 to 2011, and a Managing Director at Barclays Capital, an international investment bank, from 2007 to 2009. Prior to 2007, Mr. Berson spent over 10 years at Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce in the Investment Banking Department. Mr. Berson earned a Bachelor of Arts degree from the University of Pennsylvania, a Bachelor of Science degree from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and a Master of Business Administration from the University of Chicago.

Shirley E. Goza has served as our General Counsel since our initial public offering in October 2013. Previously, she served as the General Counsel of our predecessor from 2006 to our initial public offering. Ms. Goza has more than 30 years of experience as a practicing attorney and law professor. Prior to joining our predecessor, Ms. Goza co-owned and operated Focus Trial and Settlement Solutions, a company that facilitated mock trials for trial attorneys, and served as managing partner from 2004 to 2006. Ms. Goza previously was a partner with the law firm Shook, Hardy & Bacon from 2000 to 2004 and was Of Counsel at Spencer Fane Britt & Browne LLP from 1982 to 1990. Ms. Goza taught on the faculty at the University of Missouri, Kansas City School of Law from 1990 through 1997 and was a visiting faculty member at the University of Kansas in 1996. Ms. Goza earned a Juris Doctorate from the University of Kansas and a Bachelor of Arts degree in English and psychology from Pittsburg State University.

Steven C. Bloom has served as our Chief People Officer since August 2016. Mr. Bloom has over 25 years of human resources experience with global organizations such as PepsiCo, Medco and Citibank. From 2014 to 2016, Mr. Bloom performed research and consulting work for a number of clients focusing primarily on wellbeing at work through a University of Notre Dame-based research project. Mr. Bloom served as SVP of Human Resources for ProBuild, a multi-billion dollar construction supply company with 11,000 employees from 2012-2014. In this role, Bloom served as chief human

Table of Contents

resources officer with full responsibility for all aspects of people management included talent acquisition, compensation and benefits, talent development, labor and employee relations, and corporate communications. He served as the VP of HR for Medco Health Solutions from 2002-2012, and VP of HR for Excite@Home, Inc. from 2000-2002. Bloom holds a Master of Business Administration from Vanderbilt University, and a BGS in Psychology from the University of Kansas.

Jon D. Greaves has served as our Chief Technology Officer since April 2016 and prior to that he served as our Chief Innovation Officer since August 2015. From 2008 until joining the Company in June 2015 in connection with the Company's acquisition of Carpathia Hosting, Inc., Mr. Greaves served as the Chief Scientist and Chief Information Security Officer at Carpathia, a managed services and cloud company. Mr. Greaves is a recognized leader in the information technology services industry, with a particular focus on managed services, security and privacy, and he has received 7 U.S. patents for his research. Prior to joining Carpathia in 2008, Mr. Greaves served as a Distinguished Engineer and Chief Technology Officer at Sun Microsystems since 2005, and prior to that, Mr. Greaves held positions at SevenSpace, BT North America, Concert, MCI and British Telecom research labs.

Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis discusses the principles underlying our policies and decisions with respect to the compensation of our named executive officers. Specifically, this section provides an overview of our executive compensation philosophy, the overall objectives of our executive compensation program and each compensation component that we provide. Each of the key elements of our executive compensation program is discussed in more detail below. The following discussion should be read together with the compensation tables and related disclosures appearing later in this Proxy Statement.

Executive Summary

Overview

We are a leading owner, developer and operator of state-of-the-art, carrier-neutral, multi-tenant data centers. Our data centers are facilities that house the network and computer equipment of multiple customers and provide access to a range of communications carriers. We have a fully integrated platform through which we own and operate our data centers and provide a broad range of information technology, or IT, infrastructure solutions. As of December 31, 2016, we developed, owned and/or operated 25 data centers located throughout the United States, Canada, Europe and the Asia-Pacific region, containing an aggregate of approximately 5.7 million gross square feet of space (approximately 91.9% of which is wholly owned by us), including approximately 2.5 million "basis-of-design" raised floor square feet, which represents the total data center raised floor potential of our existing data center facilities. We believe that we own and operate one of the largest portfolios of multi-tenant data centers in the United States, as measured by gross square footage, and have the capacity to more than double our leased raised floor without constructing or acquiring any new buildings.

The primary objective of our executive compensation program is to align the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders in a way that allows us to attract and retain the best executive talent. In order to align executive and stockholder interests, we strive to design compensation that has a strong "pay-for-performance" orientation. The cornerstones of our executive compensation program include base salary and incentive compensation in the form of annual cash bonuses and annual equity award grants.

2016 Performance Highlights

During 2016, we delivered strong company performance in a number of areas including:

•: Achieved approximately 10% total stockholder return during 2016.
•: Achieved approximately 149% total stockholder return since our initial public offering in 2013.
•: Increased Operating FFO by 35.4% as compared to 2015.
•: Increased Operating FFO per share by 13.8% as compared to 2015.
•: Increased Adjusted EBITDA by 31.6% as compared to 2015.
•: Increased revenue by 29.3% as compared to 2015.
•: Delivered 14.8% return on invested capital ("ROIC") placed in service.

Table of Contents

See "—Special Note Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for information regarding the performance metrics described above.

2016 Compensation Highlights

During 2016, the following compensation decisions were made by our Compensation Committee:

•: No base salary increases were provided to our named executive officers for 2016.
•: Approximately 65% of total compensation paid to the named executive officers in 2016 was equity based compensation.
•: Annual cash bonus payouts of 100% of target were made to our named executive officers in recognition of our strong 2015 financial and operational performance.

Table of Contents

•: Equity awards in the form of stock options and restricted stock with values of approximately 150% of target were granted to our named executive officers in March 2016, in recognition of Company and individual performance during 2015.

Our Named Executive Officers

In 2016, our "named executive officers" and their positions were as follows:


Chad L. Williams		Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
William H. Schafer		Chief Financial Officer
James H. Reinhart		Chief Operating Officer—Operations
Daniel T. Bennewitz		Chief Operating Officer—Sales & Marketing
Jeffrey H. Berson		Chief Investment Officer

Executive Compensation Philosophy and Objectives

The primary objective of our executive compensation program is to align the interests of our executive officers with those of our stockholders in a way that allows us to attract and retain the best executive talent. In order to align executive and stockholder interests, we strive to design compensation that has a strong "pay-for-performance" orientation. Given the competitive market for executive talent with the specialized knowledge, skills and abilities to be successful in the data center business, the ability to attract and retain executives is imperative to creating long-term value for our stockholders.

The cornerstones of our executive compensation program that help us achieve our objective include:

•: Base Salaries. Central to our ability to attract and retain our executives is providing base salaries that fairly reward them for their value to the organization in successfully performing their respective roles.
•: Incentive Compensation. Incentive compensation is an important tool for providing variable, or "at risk," compensation tied to performance. We view it as a means to motivate and reward our executives for performance, including the achievement of our financial and operational objectives, individual goals and value creation for stockholders. In accordance with our "pay-for-performance" orientation, we deliver a majority of our total executive compensation in the form of incentive compensation consisting of short-term, annual cash incentives and long-term, equity-based incentives.

Holistically, we evaluate our executive pay program and make pay decisions within the context of a total compensation framework in order to ensure our overall compensation objectives are met. In doing so, we recognize the distinct nature of the individual elements of our pay program, but are mindful of the interrelationship of the various components to the successful execution of our overall pay strategy.

The table below details the target compensation opportunity for each of our named executive officers during 2016.

			Target Annual Bonus					Target Annual Long-Term Incentive Value

Name	Base Salary		% of Salary			Value		% of Salary			Value		Target Total Compensation
Chad L. Williams	$	550,000		100	%	$	550,000		400	%	$	2,200,000	$	3,300,000
William H. Schafer	$	350,000		100	%	$	350,000		200	%	$	700,000	$	1,400,000
James H. Reinhart	$	350,000		100	%	$	350,000		200	%	$	700,000	$	1,400,000
Daniel T. Bennewitz	$	350,000		100	%	$	350,000		200	%	$	700,000	$	1,400,000
Jeffrey H. Berson	$	325,000		100	%	$	325,000		200	%	$	650,000	$	1,300,000

Table of Contents

Consistent with our philosophy, we have developed strong compensation practices while avoiding others in pursuit of our compensation objectives. These practices are as follows:

What we do		What we don't do

✓ Significant portion of executive pay is variable "at risk" compensation, designed to achieve pay-for-performance objectives		✗ No guaranteed salary increases, cash incentive compensation or equity grants
✓ Balanced mix of performance measures used to ensure a focus on our overall performance		✗ Limited perquisites and supplemental benefits to our executive officers
✓ Emphasis on equity-based compensation to provide long-term incentives		✗ No excise tax gross-up payments
✓ Executive officers and directors are subject to rigorous stock ownership guidelines		✗ No hedging of our securities by directors and employees, including named executive officers
✓ Clawback policy to recover compensation from certain executive officers engaging in fraud or intentional illegal conduct that leads to a restatement of financials		✗ No single trigger change in control provisions

2016 Advisory Vote on Executive Compensation and Say-on-Frequency

At the 2016 Annual Meeting, stockholders had their first opportunity to approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers. Holders of approximately 91% of the shares represented at the meeting voted to approve our executive compensation. The Compensation Committee considered these results as strong support for our executive compensation programs and practices. In addition, consistent with the Board's recommendation, stockholders approved holding an advisory vote on executive compensation every year.

On September 12, 2016, we announced that, consistent with its recommendation at the 2016 annual meeting and the results of the vote of its stockholders, we will hold future "Say-On-Pay" votes annually until the next say-on-frequency vote is conducted, which will be no later than 2022.

Role of the Compensation Committee and Management

The Compensation Committee is comprised of non-employee independent directors who are responsible for the overall design and administration of our executive compensation programs. For a more detailed description of the responsibilities of the Compensation Committee, see "Corporate Governance and Board Matters—Committees of the Board—Compensation Committee."

When determining the compensation of our named executive officers, the Compensation Committee considers a number of factors it deems important, including:

•: the executive officer's experience, knowledge, skills, level of responsibility and potential to influence our performance;
•: the business environment, our strategy, and our financial, operational and market performance;
•: corporate governance and regulatory factors related to executive compensation; and
•: marketplace compensation levels and practices.

The Compensation Committee makes compensation decisions for our executive officers after careful review and analysis of appropriate performance information and market compensation data. The Compensation Committee determines the compensation for the Chief Executive Officer. The Chief Executive Officer provides recommendations to the Compensation Committee on the compensation for

Table of Contents

each executive officer other than himself. The Chief Executive Officer does not make recommendations with respect to his own compensation. The Chief Executive Officer's recommendations for the other executive officers are based on his personal review of their performance, job responsibilities, and importance to our overall business strategy. Although the Chief Executive Officer's recommendations are given significant weight, the Compensation Committee retains full discretion when determining compensation for all executive officers. The Compensation Committee, by its charter, may delegate its authority to any of its members.

Role of the Compensation Consultant

For fiscal year 2016, the Compensation Committee engaged the services of Willis Towers Watson, an executive compensation consultant, to provide advice and counsel in carrying out its duties. Willis Towers Watson provided the Compensation Committee with market data on executive pay practices and levels, and provided recommendations regarding the structure of executive pay opportunities and equity based incentives.

The Compensation Committee has the sole authority to approve the compensation consultant's fees and terms of its engagement. The Compensation Committee has reviewed its relationship with Willis Towers Watson to ensure that it believes that Willis Towers Watson is independent from management. This review process includes a review of the services Willis Towers Watson provides, the quality of those services, and fees associated with the services during the fiscal year, as well as consideration of the factors impacting independence that are set forth in NYSE rules.

Use of Comparative Market Data

In 2016, working with Willis Towers Watson, the Compensation Committee reviewed the peer groups used for evaluating executive pay. The Compensation Committee determined to continue to utilize three distinct comparator groups for evaluating our executive pay practices for prior fiscal years. The Compensation Committee believes these comparator groups provide a representative perspective on executive pay practices within similarly sized companies and our labor market for executive talent. The three comparator groups include:

•: Data Center Peers—Public REITs and non-REITs actively involved in the development, ownership and management of data centers. This group represents organizations against which we compete directly for business and executive talent.
•: Technology Industry Peers—Publicly traded, high-growth technology companies with cloud-based service offerings. The Compensation Committee believes this group is a relevant comparator given our 3C strategy and focus on technology services.
•: REIT Peers—Publicly traded REITs similar in size to us based on total capitalization. This group was used by the Compensation Committee to provide a perspective on pay practices of comparably sized organizations in the REIT industry.

Table of Contents

While the Committee continued to use three comparator groups, the composition of the Technology Industry and REIT peer groups changed significantly in recognition of our significant growth in size attributable to our strong performance and the 2015 acquisition of Carpathia. Listed below are the companies included in each of the three comparator groups approved by the Compensation Committee for 2016.

Data Center Peers		Technology Peers		REIT Peers

CoreSite Realty Corporation CyrusOne Inc. Digital Realty Trust Inc. DuPont Fabros Technology, Inc. Equinix, Inc. Internap Network Services Corp. Rackspace Hosting, Inc.		Aspen Technology, Inc. Endurance International Group Holdings, Inc. Fireeye, Inc. Fleetmatics Group Plc Hubspot, Inc. Infoblox Inc. Internap Corp Logmein, Inc. Manhattan Associates, Inc. Medidata Solutions, Inc. Nci, Inc. Nic Inc. Perficient Inc. Realpage, Inc. Synchronoss Technologies, Inc. Veeva Systems Inc.		CoreSite Realty Corporation CyrusOne Inc. Dupont Fabros Technology, Inc. Eastgroup Properties, Inc. Education Realty Trust, Inc. Felcor Lodging Trust Incorporated First Industrial Realty Trust, Inc. Hudson Pacific Properties, Inc. Kite Realty Group Trust Pebblebrook Hotel Trust Physicians Realty Trust Post Properties, Inc. Ramco-Gershenson Properties Trust Sabra Health Care Reit, Inc. Stag Industrial, Inc. Summit Hotel Properties, Inc. Urban Edge Properties

The Compensation Committee used pay information based on these comparative groups to guide its review of the total compensation of our executive officers. The Compensation Committee focuses on ensuring that the elements of our executive compensation program are consistent with peer and industry trends. However, the Compensation Committee does not benchmark compensation to a specific percentage of the compensation of these comparative groups or otherwise apply a formula or assign the comparative groups a relative weight.

Elements of Executive Compensation Program

The following is a summary of the elements of and amounts paid under our executive compensation programs for fiscal year 2016.

Target Pay Mix. Consistent with our pay-for-performance orientation, our executive compensation program emphasizes variable incentives over fixed compensation, and is largely incentive-based. Moreover, within the context of incentive compensation, we believe it is important to create a focus on equity-based compensation that rewards our named executive officers for long-term value creation, which generally serves to align our executive officers' interests with our stockholders. The Compensation Committee evaluates each component of compensation for each executive and targets a pay mix among base salary, target annual incentive (cash bonus) and target long-term incentive that the Compensation Committee believes best achieves our compensation objectives. The charts below illustrate this target pay mix during 2016 for our Chief Executive Officer and our other named executive officers.

Table of Contents

Annual Base Salary. Our named executive officers' base salaries represent a fixed level of compensation that is meant to reward them fairly for their value to the company based on their respective roles and responsibilities. When establishing and reviewing base salaries, our Compensation Committee considers each executive's role and responsibility, experience, knowledge, unique skills and future potential with our company, as well as salary levels for similar positions in our target market and internal pay equity. Following its annual review of each named executive officer's compensation, the Compensation Committee determined our base salaries were competitive, and did not adjust the base salaries for the 2016 fiscal year. Our named executive officers' base salaries in 2016 were as follows:

Name	2016 Base Salary

Chad L. Williams	$	550,000
William H. Schafer	$	350,000
James H. Reinhart	$	350,000
Daniel T. Bennewitz	$	350,000
Jeffrey H. Berson	$	325,000

Annual Cash Bonus. Annual cash bonuses, which serve as our annual incentive element, are designed to motivate our executive officers to achieve performance at both a company and individual level. Under the terms of their employment agreements, our executives have defined annual target bonuses, expressed as a percentage of each executive's respective salary. The following table provides detail on each executive's 2016 annual target bonus opportunity:

Name

Chad L. Williams	100	%
William H. Schafer	100	%
James H. Reinhart	100	%
Daniel T. Bennewitz	100	%
Jeffrey H. Berson	100	%

Table of Contents

During 2016, for purposes of determining actual annual bonuses for the 2016 fiscal year, the Compensation Committee established the following performance targets and hurdles against which the actual performance of the Company and each executive could be measured:

Metric	2016 Target	2016 Actual

Revenue	$395 million	$402 million
Bookings	$5.0 million	$5.5 million
Adjusted EBITDA	$176 million	$184 million
Operating FFO/Share	$2.57	$2.61
ROIC	12.5%	14.8%

See "—Special Note Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures" for information regarding the performance metrics described above.

In early 2017, the Compensation Committee reviewed the actual 2016 performance of the Company against these targets. In addition, the Compensation Committee evaluated each executive's responsibilities and individual performance and contributions to our company during 2016. Following this evaluation, on March 3, 2017 the Compensation Committee approved the following annual bonuses, in its discretion, for each of our named executive officers:

	Target Bonus					Actual Bonus for 2016

Name	% of Salary			Value		% of Salary			Value
Chad L. Williams		100	%	$	550,000		100	%	$	550,000
William H. Schafer		100	%	$	350,000		100	%	$	350,000
James H. Reinhart		100	%	$	350,000		100	%	$	350,000
Daniel T. Bennewitz		100	%	$	350,000		100	%	$	350,000
Jeffrey H. Berson		100	%	$	325,000		100	%	$	325,000

Equity Awards. We provide equity awards pursuant to the QTS Realty Trust, Inc. 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (as amended, the "2013 Plan"), which serve as the long-term incentive element of our target pay mix for our executive compensation. We believe that equity incentives focus our executives on long-term value creation, which aligns our executives' interests with those of our stockholders and serve as an important retention tool. Our equity awards generally consist of either shares of restricted Class A common stock or options to purchase Class A common stock, subject to time-based vesting.

In February 2016, the Compensation Committee established the following target values for annual long-term incentive awards for our named executive officers for the 2016 fiscal year. These targets remained unchanged from 2015 and were established at levels the Compensation Committee believes create competitive total annual compensation opportunities for each executive.

	Annual Equity Award Targets

Name	% of Salary(1)			Value
Chad L. Williams		400	%	$	2,200,000
William H. Schafer		200	%	$	700,000
James H. Reinhart		200	%	$	700,000
Daniel T. Bennewitz		200	%	$	700,000
Jeffrey H. Berson		200	%	$	650,000

(1): Based on each executive's 2016 base salary.

Equity Award Grants in 2017. On March 7, 2017, the Compensation Committee awarded options to purchase Class A common stock and shares of restricted Class A common stock to each of the

Table of Contents

named executive officers with respect to 2016 performance. The Compensation Committee considered company-specific and individual performance factors in awarding annual bonuses with respect to the 2016 fiscal year, which were the same factors used for annual cash bonuses described above, as well as other performance factors including the Company's total return to stockholders. Approximately 25% of the award value was granted as stock options and 75% as shares of restricted stock. The following table details the stock options and restricted stock granted to each named executive officer. The stock options and restricted shares vest 33% on the first anniversary of the date of grant and 8.375% on each quarter-end thereafter, subject to continued service as an employee.

	Stock Options				Restricted Stock

Name	Number of Underlying Shares		Grant Date Fair Value(1)		Number of Shares		Grant Date Fair Value(2)		Total Grant Date Fair Value
Chad L. Williams		231,467	$	2,397,999		47,335	$	2,397,992	$	4,795,991
William H. Schafer		27,027	$	280,000		16,581	$	839,994	$	1,119,994
James H. Reinhart		32,094	$	332,494		19,690	$	997,496	$	1,329,990
Daniel T. Bennewitz		31,418	$	325,491		19,275	$	976,472	$	1,301,963
Jeffrey H. Berson		34,507	$	357,493		21,170	$	1,072,473	$	1,429,966

(1): Reflects the aggregate grant date value of stock options granted on March 7, 2017, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The stock option awards have a strike price of $50.66, which represents the closing price of the Company's Class A common stock on March 7, 2017.
(2): Reflects the aggregate grant date value of restricted stock awards granted on March 7, 2017, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The aggregate grant date value of the restricted stock was calculated by multiplying the closing grant date price of $50.66 by the number of shares of restricted stock granted.

Equity Award Grants in 2016. On March 2, 2016, the Compensation Committee awarded options to purchase Class A common stock and shares of restricted Class A common stock to each of the named executive officers with respect to 2015 performance. In determining these awards, the Compensation Committee considered company-specific and individual performance factors that the Compensation Committee considered in awarding annual bonuses with respect to the 2015 fiscal year, as previously disclosed, as well as other performance factors including the Company's total return to stockholders. Approximately 25% of the award value was granted as stock options and 75% as shares of restricted stock. The following table details the stock options and restricted stock granted to each named executive officer. The stock options and restricted shares vest 33% on the first anniversary of the date of grant and 8.375% on each quarter-end thereafter, subject to continued service as an employee.

	Stock Options				Restricted Stock

Name	Number of Underlying Shares		Grant Date Fair Value(1)		Number of Shares		Grant Date Fair Value(2)		Total Grant Date Fair Value
Chad L. Williams		82,748	$	824,998		54,062	$	2,474,959	$	3,299,957
William H. Schafer		26,328	$	262,490		17,201	$	787,462	$	1,049,952
James H. Reinhart		26,328	$	262,490		17,201	$	787,462	$	1,049,952
Daniel T. Bennewitz		26,328	$	262,490		17,201	$	787,462	$	1,049,952
Jeffrey H. Berson		24,448	$	243,747		15,973	$	731,244	$	974,991

(1): Reflects the aggregate grant date value of stock options granted on March 2, 2016, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The stock option awards have a strike price of $45.78, which represents the closing price of the Company's Class A common stock on March 2, 2016.

Table of Contents

(2): Reflects the aggregate grant date value of restricted stock awards granted on March 2, 2016, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The aggregate grant date value of the restricted stock was calculated by multiplying the closing grant date price of $45.78 by the number of shares of restricted stock granted.

The above grants of stock options and restricted stock are shown in the 2016 Grants of Plan-Based Awards table under "Compensation of Executive Officers."

Other Benefits and Policies

Retirement Savings Opportunities. All employees, including our executive officers, who satisfy certain eligibility requirements, may participate in our 401(k) Retirement Savings Plan, or 401(k) plan. This plan allows our employees to save for retirement in a tax efficient manner. Under the 401(k) plan, employees are eligible to defer a portion of their salary or annual cash compensation, and we, at our discretion, may make a matching contribution and/or a profit sharing contribution. During 2016, we matched 100% of the first 1% of employee contributions as a percentage of qualified earnings, and 50% of the next 5% of an employee's contributions as a percentage of qualified earnings (subject to qualified plan maximum amounts). We provide no supplemental or additional retirement benefits for our executives.

Health and Welfare Benefits. We provide what we believe is a competitive benefits package to employees in order to attract and retain our employees by providing a level of security through these benefits that is consistent with the market. Our health and welfare benefits include medical, dental, vision, disability insurance and life insurance benefits. These benefits are made available to all full-time employees meeting our eligibility requirements.

Perquisites and Supplemental Benefits. In limited circumstances, we provide perquisites and supplemental benefits to our executives officers. These perquisites currently include financial planning assistance, and, with respect to Mr. Schafer, a corporate country club membership and the reimbursement of supplemental disability insurance premiums.

Clawback Policy. The Board has adopted our Executive Compensation Recovery Policy that generally provides that the Company may seek to recover certain performance-based compensation paid to an executive if the executive officer engaged in fraud or intentional illegal conduct which materially contributed to a restatement of the Company's financial results. See "Corporate Governance and Board Matters—Certain Company Policies—Clawback Policy.

Employment Agreements

We have entered into employment agreements with each of our executive officers. These agreements protect our executives by providing:

•: economic stability that enables our executive officers to focus on the performance of their duties;
•: death or disability payments and benefits in the event of certain terminations of employment; and
•: in some cases, payments and benefits in the event of certain terminations following a change of control in our Company.

In addition, these agreements protect the company from certain business risks such as threats from competitors, loss of confidentiality, disparagement and solicitation of employees. Consistent with good governance practices, our employment agreements do not include Section 280G excise tax gross-ups. The employment agreements are described in more detail below under "Compensation of Executive

Table of Contents

Officers—Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table" section below.

Tax and Accounting Considerations

Code Section 162(m). Generally, Section 162(m) of the Code, or Section 162(m), disallows a tax deduction for any publicly held corporation for individual compensation exceeding $1.0 million in any taxable year to its chief executive officer and each of its three other most highly compensated executive officers, other than its chief financial officer, unless such compensation qualifies as "performance-based compensation" within the meaning of the Code. The IRS has previously issued private letter rulings holding that Section 162(m) does not apply to compensation paid to employees of a REIT's operating partnership. We have therefore determined that compensation paid to the Company's executive officers by our Operating Partnership or a subsidiary of our Operating Partnership for services to our Operating Partnership should not be subject to this limit. Nonetheless, our Compensation Committee may seek to structure the compensation paid to our executive officers as "performance-based compensation" within the meaning of Section 162(m). In approving the amount and form of compensation for our executive officers in the future, our Compensation Committee will consider all elements of the cost to us of providing such compensation, including the potential impact of Section 162(m). However, our Compensation Committee may, in its judgment, authorize compensation payments that do not comply with the exemptions in Section 162(m) when it believes that such payments are appropriate to attract and retain executive talent.

Code Section 409A. Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, or Section 409A, requires that "nonqualified deferred compensation" be deferred and paid under plans or arrangements that satisfy the requirements of the statute with respect to the timing of deferral elections, timing of payments and certain other matters. Failure to satisfy these requirements can expose employees and other service providers to accelerated income tax liabilities, penalty taxes and interest on their vested compensation under such plans. Accordingly, as a general matter, it is our intention to design and administer our compensation and benefits plans and arrangements for all of our employees and other service providers, including our executive officers, so that they are either exempt from, or satisfy the requirements of, Section 409A.

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation. We follow FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718, or ASC Topic 718, for our stock-based compensation awards. ASC Topic 718 requires companies to calculate the grant date "fair value" of their stock-based awards using a variety of assumptions. ASC Topic 718 also requires companies to recognize the compensation cost of their stock-based awards in their income statements over the period that an employee is required to render service in exchange for the award. Grants of stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and other equity-based awards under our equity incentive award plans will be accounted for under ASC Topic 718. Our Compensation Committee will regularly consider the accounting implications of significant compensation decisions, especially in connection with decisions that relate to our equity incentive award plans and programs. As accounting standards change, we may revise certain programs to appropriately align accounting expenses of our equity awards with our overall executive compensation philosophy and objectives.

Special Note Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures and Other Metrics

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis contains certain non-GAAP financial measures and other metrics, which are described in more detail as follows:

•: Operating FFO. We generally calculate Operating FFO as FFO (calculated in accordance with the standards established by the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT) excluding certain non-routine charges and gains and losses that management believes

Table of Contents

are not indicative of the results of our operating real estate portfolio. A reconciliation of Operating FFO to net income (loss) is included on pages 78 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

•: Operating FFO per Share. We calculate Operating FFO per share by dividing Operating FFO by fully diluted shares on a weighted average basis for the respective period.
•: Adjusted EBITDA. We calculate Adjusted EBITDA as EBITDA (net income (loss) adjusted to exclude interest expense and interest income, provision (benefit) for income taxes (including income taxes applicable to sale of assets) and depreciation and amortization) excluding write off of unamortized deferred financing costs, gains (losses) on extinguishment of debt, transaction and integration costs, equity-based compensation expense, restructuring costs and gain (loss) on sale of real estate. A reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to net income (loss) is included on pages 65 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
•: ROIC. We calculate ROIC by dividing net operating income by the average real estate assets, net, plus depreciation, less construction in progress, plus net acquired intangibles, net leasing commissions and net other fixed assets for the associated period. We calculate net operating income as net income (loss), excluding: interest expense, interest income, tax expense (benefit) of taxable REIT subsidiaries, depreciation and amortization, write off of unamortized deferred financing costs, gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt, transaction and integration costs, gain (loss) on sale of real estate, restructuring costs and general and administrative expenses. A reconciliation of net operating income is included on pages 64 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.
•: Bookings. We define bookings as incremental annualized rent net of downgrades.

Table of Contents

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis included in this Proxy Statement with management. Based on such review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.


		Respectfully submitted,
		The Compensation Committee
		WILLIAM O. GRABE(Chairman) CATHERINE R. KINNEY PHILIP P. TRAHANAS STEPHEN E. WESTHEAD

Table of Contents

COMPENSATION OF EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following tables set forth certain compensation information for each of our named executive officers. Our named executive officers are: Chad L. Williams, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, William H. Schafer, our Chief Financial Officer, James H. Reinhart, our Chief Operating Officer—Operations, Daniel T. Bennewitz, our Chief Operating Officer—Sales & Marketing, and Jeffrey H. Berson, our Chief Investment Officer.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth a summary of all compensation earned, awarded or paid to our named executive officers in the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.

Name and Principal Position		Salary		Bonus			Stock Awards(1)		Option Awards(2)		All Other Compensation(3)		Total

Chad L. Williams	2016	$	550,000	$	550,000		$	2,474,959	$	824,998	$	48,578	$	4,448,535
Chairman and	2015	$	550,000	$	550,000		$	1,842,460	$	550,000	$	30,053	$	3,522,513
Chief Executive Officer	2014	$	550,000	$	357,521	(4)	$	—	$	—	$	32,791	$	940,312
William H. Schafer	2016	$	350,000	$	350,000		$	787,462	$	262,490	$	54,909	$	1,804,861
Chief Financial	2015	$	350,000	$	350,000		$	647,445	$	175,000	$	53,021	$	1,575,466
Officer	2014	$	350,000	$	227,530	(5)	$	799,969	$	—	$	43,182	$	1,420,681
James H. Reinhart	2016	$	350,000	$	350,000		$	787,462	$	262,490	$	35,185	$	1,785,137
Chief Operating	2015	$	350,000	$	350,000		$	524,975	$	175,000	$	35,746	$	1,435,721
Officer—Operations	2014	$	350,000	$	175,000		$	1,099,993	$	—	$	25,305	$	1,650,298
Daniel T. Bennewitz	2016	$	350,000	$	350,000		$	787,462	$	262,490	$	32,262	$	1,782,214
Chief Operating	2015	$	350,000	$	350,000		$	524,975	$	175,000	$	35,775	$	1,435,750
Officer—Sales &	2014	$	350,000	$	175,000		$	1,099,993	$	—	$	25,689	$	1,650,682
Marketing
Jeffrey H. Berson	2016	$	325,000	$	325,000		$	731,244	$	243,747	$	26,089	$	1,651,080
Chief Investment	2015	$	325,000	$	325,000		$	487,482	$	162,504	$	23,932	$	1,323,918
Officer	2014	$	325,000	$	162,500		$	699,973	$	—	$	17,965	$	1,205,438

(1): 2016 amounts reflect the aggregate grant date value of restricted stock awards granted on March 2, 2016, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The aggregate grant date value of these restricted stock grants was calculated by multiplying the closing grant date price of $45.78 by the number of shares of restricted stock granted. 2015 amounts reflect the aggregate grant date value of restricted stock awards granted on February 27, 2015, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The aggregate grant date value of these restricted stock grants was calculated by multiplying the closing grant date price of $35.81 by the number of shares of restricted stock granted. 2014 amounts reflect the aggregate grant date value of restricted stock awards granted on November 3, 2014, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The aggregate grant date value of these restricted stock grants was calculated by multiplying the closing grant date price of $35.51 by the number of shares of restricted stock granted.
(2): 2016 amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of options granted on March 2, 2016, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used to calculate these amounts are described in Note 7—"Partners' Capital, Equity and Incentive Compensation Plans" to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. 2015 amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of options granted on February 27, 2015, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The assumptions used to calculate these amounts are described in Note 7—"Partners' Capital, Equity

Table of Contents

and Incentive Compensation Plans" to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

(3)

Consists of the value of our 401(k) plan match, financial planning assistance, premiums for medical, dental, long-term disability and group term life insurance and, with respect to Mr. Schafer only, fees for a corporate country club membership and the reimbursement of supplemental disability insurance premiums. For 2016, on an individual basis, these amounts include, among other things:

•: with respect to Mr. Williams, approximately $23,690 in financial consulting services, $15,613 of healthcare premiums, dental insurance, long-term disability, company contributions to a health savings account, and wellness programs, and $9,275 in matching 401(k) contributions made by the Company;
•: with respect to Mr. Schafer, $10,605 of financial and investment planning services, $24,898 of healthcare premiums, life insurance premiums, dental insurance, long-term disability, company contributions to a health savings account, and wellness programs, $10,131 for a corporate country club membership, and $9,275 in matching 401(k) contributions made by the Company;
•: with respect to Mr. Reinhart, $10,605 of financial and investment planning services, $15,305 of healthcare premiums, dental insurance, long-term disability, company contributions to a health savings account, and wellness programs, and $9,275 in matching 401(k) contributions made by the Company;
•: with respect to Mr. Bennewitz, $10,605 of financial and investment planning services, $12,382 of healthcare premiums, life insurance premiums, dental insurance, long-term disability, company contributions to a health savings account, and wellness programs, and $9,275 in matching 401(k) contributions made by the Company; and
•: with respect to Mr. Berson, $1,200 in financial consulting services, $15,614 of healthcare premiums, dental insurance, long-term disability, company contributions to a health savings account, and wellness programs, and $9,275 in matching 401(k) contributions made by the Company.

(4)

Consists of $357,521 in cash and 5,375 shares of restricted Class A common stock, which were granted on February 27, 2015 and vest ratably over the first four anniversaries of the date of grant. The aggregate grant date value of these shares of restricted stock was $192,479, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The aggregate grant date value of these restricted stock grants was calculated by multiplying the closing grant date price of $35.81 by the number of shares of restricted stock granted. Mr. Williams elected to receive approximately 35% of his bonus in restricted stock (5,375 shares) in order to increase the amount of budgeted cash available for awarding 2014 cash bonuses to employees of the Company. These shares are reflected in the 2015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table below and the grant date fair value of these shares are included in the "Stock Awards" column of this table for 2015 and the "Bonus" column of this table for 2014. As a result, the grant date fair value of such shares, $192,479, is duplicative as it is reflected in total compensation for both 2014 and 2015.

(5)

Consists of $227,530 in cash and 3,420 shares of restricted Class A common stock, which were granted on February 27, 2015 and vest ratably over the first four anniversaries of the date of grant. The aggregate grant date value of these shares of restricted stock was $122,470, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The aggregate grant date value of these restricted stock grants was calculated by multiplying the closing grant date price of $35.81 by the number of shares of restricted stock granted. Mr. Schafer elected to receive approximately 35% of his bonus in restricted stock (3,420 shares) in order to increase the amount of budgeted cash available for awarding 2014 cash bonuses to employees of the Company. These shares are reflected in the 2015

Table of Contents

Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table below and the grant date fair value of these shares are included in the "Stock Awards" column of this table for 2015 and the "Bonus" column of this table for 2014. As a result, the grant date fair value of such shares, $122,470, is duplicative as it is reflected in total compensation for both 2014 and 2015.

2016 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table sets forth information concerning the grants of plan-based awards made to each of our named executive officers for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.

Name and Position				Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards		Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards(2)

Chad L. Williams	3/2/2016	54,062	—		—	$	2,474,959
Chairman and Chief Executive	3/2/2016	—	82,748	$	45.78		824,998
Officer
William H. Schafer	3/2/2016	17,201	—		—	$	787,462
Chief Financial Officer	3/2/2016	—	26,328	$	45.78		262,490
James H. Reinhart	3/2/2016	17,201	—		—	$	787,462
Chief Operating Officer—	3/2/2016	—	26,328	$	45.78		262,490
Operations
Daniel T. Bennewitz	3/2/2016	17,201	—		—	$	787,462
Chief Operating Officer—Sales &	3/2/2016	—	26,328	$	45.78		262,490
Marketing
Jeffrey H. Berson	3/2/2016	15,973	—		—	$	731,244
Chief Investment Officer	3/2/2016	—	24,448	$	45.78		243,747

(1): These awards vest 33% on the first anniversary of the date of grant and 8.375% on each quarter-end thereafter, subject to continued service as an employee.
(2): Amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of shares of restricted Class A common stock or options to purchase common stock, as applicable, granted to our executive officers on March 2, 2016, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. The aggregate grant date value of the restricted stock was calculated by multiplying the closing grant date price of $45.78 by the number of shares of restricted stock granted. The assumptions used to calculate the grant date fair value of the options to purchase common stock are described in Note 7—"Partners' Capital, Equity and Incentive Compensation Plans" to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Table of Contents

Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

Executive Employment Agreements

We have entered into employment agreements with each of Messrs. Williams, Schafer, Reinhart, Bennewitz and Berson. On February 16, 2017, we entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Schafer in connection with his transition to the role of Executive Vice President—Finance and Accounting. This new employment agreement supersedes and replaces Mr. Schafer's prior employment agreement. However, Mr. Schafer's prior employment agreement is described in this section below for purposes of providing narrative disclosure to the Summary Compensation Table. For more information on Mr. Schafer's new employment agreement, see "Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions".

Williams Employment Agreement

Mr. Williams' employment agreement provides for a three-year term with automatic renewal terms of one year, unless either party gives a non-renewal notice within a specified time frame. Mr. Williams is obligated to devote substantially all of his business time and effort to the performance of his duties to us, provided that he is permitted to engage in other specified activities, including engaging in civic, charitable and religious activities and management of personal investments and affairs, including active involvement in real estate or other investments not involving data centers in any material respect, in each case so long as such activities do not materially and adversely interfere with Mr. Williams' discharge of his duties and obligations to us.

Mr. Williams' employment agreement provides for a base salary of $550,000, subject to annual review, a bonus opportunity targeted at 100% of base salary for targeted performance, with additional amounts being paid for exceptional performance as determined by the Compensation Committee, and paid vacation of 25 days or the number of days granted to any other executive, whichever is greater. In addition, upon termination of Mr. Williams' employment agreement, other than as a result of a termination for "cause" or a resignation without "good reason," as those terms are defined in the employment agreement, Mr. Williams will, upon execution of a release acceptable to us, be eligible to receive the following benefits in addition to his then-accrued compensation (as defined below):

•: a lump sum cash payment equal to the sum of (A) two times his then-current base salary and (B) two times his annual bonus for the year of termination, calculated assuming achievement of all performance goals necessary to achieve the maximum bonus level;
•: full vesting of his equity awards; and
•: the right to continued participation by Mr. Williams and his family members, for a period of 24 months, in our group health plans (or, if the same is not permitted by law or the terms of the plan, reimbursement of the cost of equivalent coverage), subject to reimbursement by Mr. Williams of the cost of such participation by his extended family members.

In the event Mr. Williams is terminated other than as a result of a termination for cause or a resignation without good reason within two years following a "change in control," Mr. Williams will be eligible to receive the severance compensation set forth above, provided that (1) the payment set forth in the first bullet point set forth above will be calculated with a three times multiple, and (2) Mr. Williams also will be entitled to one year of outplacement services and support. In the event Mr. Williams is terminated as a result of death or disability, he will be eligible to receive the severance compensation set forth above, provided that the payment set forth in the first bullet point set forth above will be calculated with a one times multiple.

Pursuant to Mr. Williams' employment agreement, we provide standard company health insurance to cover Mr. Williams and members of his immediate family (and, if coverage of his immediate family

Table of Contents

is not permitted by law or the terms of the plan, he will be reimbursed for the cost of equivalent coverage). Also, we are obligated to provide standard company health insurance to cover specified members of Mr. Williams' extended family, provided that Mr. Williams will reimburse us for the cost of such coverage. In addition, Mr. Williams is provided with administrative support commensurate with his position as well as executive support services applicable to other senior executives. Mr. Williams also may from time to time seek assistance from two of our employees for personal accounting and financial matters. To the extent that Mr. Williams utilizes other employees for matters unrelated to our business, such arrangements will be in accordance with established procedures, including reimbursement of the reasonable value associated with any material use.

Mr. Williams' employment agreement provides that, during the term and for a period of one year following his termination, Mr. Williams will not (a) directly or indirectly, engage in any business involving the development, construction, acquisition, ownership or operation of data center properties, colocation facilities and/or the provision of managed services in the United States, whether such business is conducted by the executive individually or as a principal, partner, member, stockholder, joint venturer, director, trustee, officer, employee, consultant, advisor or independent contractor of any person or (b) own any interests in any data center facilities, colocation facilities or managed service providers in the United States, other than up to five percent of the outstanding shares of any public company. Moreover, Mr. Williams' employment agreement also provides that, during the term and for a one-year period following his termination, he will not solicit any of our customers for data center space within the United States, encourage any of our customers to reduce their patronage of us, solicit or hire any of our current employees or independent contractors, or encourage any of our employees or independent contractors to terminate their employment with, or cease rendering services to, us. In addition, Mr. Williams' employment agreement provides for a confidentiality covenant on the part of Mr. Williams and a covenant that both we and Mr. Williams agree not to talk about or otherwise communicate to any third parties in a malicious, disparaging or defamatory manner regarding the other.

Mr. Williams' employment agreement generally defines:

•: "change in control" as (i) the acquisition by a person, entity or affiliated group, in a transaction or series of transactions, of at least 30% of the total combined voting power of our outstanding securities, (ii) individuals who, at the beginning of any 12 month period, constitute our Board cease for any reason to constitute a majority of our Board at the end of such 12 month period, treating any individual whose election or nomination was approved by a majority of the incumbent directors as an incumbent director for this purpose, (iii) a merger, consolidation or recapitalization following which voting securities prior to the transaction represent less than 70% of our voting securities after the transaction, or (iv) a sale of all or substantially all of our assets;
•: "cause" as Mr. Williams' (i) willful act or omission that causes material harm and represents a breach of his obligation to maintain the company's confidential information, (ii) conviction and exhaustion of all appeals of, or pleading guilty or nolo contendere to, a crime that constitutes a felony involving dishonesty or moral turpitude, or (iii) willful commission of an act of fraud, embezzlement, misappropriation or breach of fiduciary duty against the Company; and
•: "good reason" as (i) the diminution in Mr. William's authority, duties or responsibilities, or any adverse change in his title as chief executive officer of the Company or in his title as Chairman of the Board (including failure of Mr. Williams to be elected Chairman of the Board at any annual meeting of stockholders), or failure of the Board to nominate Mr. Williams for election as Chairman of the Board at any annual meeting of stockholders, (ii) movement of Mr. William's place of employment by more than fifty miles from Overland Park, Kansas, (iii) any diminution in Mr. William's base compensation, as in effect from time to time, (iv) a

Table of Contents

material breach by the Company of any term of the employment agreement, or (v) the failure of any successor to the Company to assume the agreement.

Schafer Amended and Restated Employment Agreement

As described above, in February 2017, we entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Schafer, which is described under "Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions—Employment Agreements." However, this section describes Mr. Schafer's prior employment agreement, which was the employment agreement in effect during 2016, for purposes of providing narrative disclosure to the Summary Compensation Table.

Mr. Schafer's prior employment agreement provided for a base salary of $350,000, subject to annual review, a bonus opportunity targeted at 100% of base salary for threshold performance, with additional amounts being paid for exceptional performance as determined by the Compensation Committee, and four weeks' paid vacation. In addition, upon termination of Mr. Schafer's employment agreement, other than as a result of a termination for "cause," a resignation without "good reason" or a termination following death or disability, as each of those terms are defined in the employment agreement, Mr. Schafer previously would, upon execution of a release acceptable to us, be eligible to receive the following benefits in addition to his then-accrued compensation (as defined below):

•: a lump sum cash payment equal to the sum of (A) one times his then current base salary, (B) his prorated bonus for the year of termination, and (C) one times his annual bonus for the year of termination, calculated assuming achievement of all performance goals necessary to achieve the maximum bonus level;
•: solely in the case of termination without cause or with good reason, vesting of any equity awards that otherwise would have vested during the term in which the termination occurred;
•: solely in the case of death or disability, full vesting of equity awards; and
•: continued coverage under our health insurance plans for one year following termination (provided that if such continuation is not possible, we would have reimbursed an amount equal to the cost of health insurance coverage for Mr. Schafer and his family for one year following his termination that is substantially similar to the coverage provided to Mr. Schafer under our health insurance plans prior to his termination) and reimbursement of premiums for any subsequent COBRA continuation coverage.

In the event Mr. Schafer's employment would have been terminated because we elected not to renew his employment agreement, then Mr. Schafer would have been deemed to have been terminated without cause and eligible to receive the severance payments set forth above. In addition, in the event Mr. Schafer would have been terminated other than as a result of a termination for cause or a resignation without good reason within two years following a "change in control," he would have been eligible to receive the following benefits in addition to his then-accrued compensation (as defined below):

•: a lump sum cash payment equal to the sum of (A) two times his then current base salary and (B) two times his annual bonus for the year of termination, calculated assuming achievement of all performance goals necessary to achieve the maximum bonus level;
•: reimbursement of the cost of health, disability and accidental death, and dismemberment insurance in an amount not less than that provided at the time of Mr. Schafer's termination or, if greater, on the date on which the change in control occurred, until the earlier of (x) the date on which Mr. Schafer would become eligible to receive substantially the same or greater benefits from another employer or (y) the second anniversary of the date of his termination; and
•: one year of outplacement services and support.

Table of Contents

Mr. Schafer's employment agreement defined "change in control" in the same manner as Mr. Williams' employment agreement as described above in the section called "—Williams Employment Agreement." In addition, Mr. Schafer's employment agreement generally defined:

•: "cause" as Mr. Schafer's (i) willful act or omission that causes material harm and represents (a) a material breach of the agreement or (b) any breach of certain covenants in the agreement, including those related to confidential information, non-disparagement, non-competition, non-solicitation and cooperation, (ii) conviction of, or pleading guilty or nolo contendere to, a crime that constitutes a felony or a misdemeanor involving dishonesty or moral turpitude; (iii) willful and material violation of the written rules, regulations, procedures, or policies relating to the conduct of employees, directors or officers of the Company that cause material harm; (iv) commission of an act of dishonesty, theft, fraud, embezzlement or material misappropriation of property of the Company; or (v) act that will or is reasonably expected to have, a significant adverse effect on the business or reputation of the Company unless such act was taken with the good faith belief that it was in the best interest of the Company; and
•: "good reason" as (i) a material diminution in Mr. Schafer's authority, duties or responsibilities, or any significant adverse change in his title as chief financial officer of the Company, (ii) movement of Mr. Schafer's place of employment more than fifty miles from Overland Park, Kansas, (iii) a material diminution in Mr. Schafer's base compensation, as in effect from time to time, or (iv) a material breach by the Company of any term of the employment agreement.

Reinhart, Bennewitz and Berson Employment Agreements

The employment agreements of Messrs. Reinhart, Bennewitz and Berson provide for a two-year term with automatic renewal terms of one year, unless either party gives a non-renewal notice within a specified time frame. The executive is obligated to devote substantially all of his or her business time and effort to the performance of his duties to us, provided that he or she is permitted to engage in other specified activities, including civic, charitable and religious activities and management of personal investments and affairs, so long as such activities do not materially and adversely interfere with his or her discharge of his duties and obligations to us.

The employment agreements with each of Messrs. Reinhart, Bennewitz and Berson provide for base salaries of $350,000, $350,000 and $325,000, respectively, subject to annual review, a bonus opportunity equal to 100%, of base salary and four weeks' paid vacation. In addition, upon termination of these employment agreements, other than as a result of a termination for "cause" or a resignation without "good reason," as those terms are defined in each employment agreement, the executive will, upon execution of a release acceptable to us, be eligible to receive the following benefits in addition to his or her then-accrued compensation (as defined below):

•: a lump sum cash payment equal to the sum of (A) one times his or her then current base salary, and (B) one times his or her target bonus for the year of termination;
•: a lump sum cash payment equal to all bonus amounts earned but not yet paid for the year prior to the year of termination;
•: vesting of any equity awards that otherwise would have vested during the term in which the termination occurred;
•: solely in the case of Mr. Berson, full vesting of his initial, one-time equity award granted pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement;
•: reimbursement of premiums for COBRA continuation coverage; and
•: one year of outplacement services and support.

Table of Contents

In the event of termination for death or disability, the executive will receive full vesting of his or her equity awards.

In the event we elect not to renew the initial term of Mr. Reinhart's or Mr. Bennewitz's employment agreement, they will be deemed to have been terminated without cause and eligible to receive the severance payments set forth above. Similarly, in the event we elect not to renew the initial term or the next renewal term of Mr. Berson's employment agreement, he will be deemed to have been terminated without cause and eligible to receive the severance payments set forth above.

The employment agreements of Messrs. Reinhart, Bennewitz and Berson provide that, during the term and for a period of one year following the executive's termination, the executive will not (a) directly or indirectly, engage in any business involving the development, construction, acquisition, ownership or operation of data center properties, colocation facilities and/or the provision of managed services, whether such business is conducted by the executive individually or as a principal, partner, member, stockholder, joint venturer, director, trustee, officer, employee, consultant, advisor or independent contractor of any person or (b) own any interests in any data center facilities, colocation facilities or managed service providers, in each case in the United States, other than up to five percent of the outstanding shares of any public company. Moreover, each of these employment agreements provides that, during the term and for a one-year period following the executive's termination, the executive will not solicit any of our customers for data center space within the United States, encourage any of our customers to reduce their patronage of us, solicit or hire any of our current employees or independent contractors or former employees or independent contractors who left employment within the prior year, or encourage any of our employees or independent contractors to terminate their employment with, or cease rendering services to, us. In addition, each of these employment agreements provides for a confidentiality covenant on the part of the executive and a covenant that both we and the executive agree not to talk about or otherwise communicate to any third parties in a malicious, disparaging or defamatory manner regarding the other.

The employment agreements of Messrs. Reinhart, Bennewitz and Berson generally define:

•: "cause" as the executive's (i) conviction of, or pleading guilty or nolo contendere to, a crime that constitutes a felony or any lesser criminal offense involving dishonesty or moral turpitude; (ii) commission of an act of dishonesty, theft, fraud, or embezzlement, (iii) willful act that has a significant adverse effect on the reputation of the Company, or any of its affiliates, (iv) the substantial failure or refusal to perform the duties of the title specified in his or her employment agreement, or (v) material violation of the material written rules, regulations, procedures, or policies relating to the conduct of employees, directors or officers of the Company; and
•: "good reason" as (i) a material diminution in executive's authority, duties or responsibilities (including reporting responsibilities), or any significant adverse change in executive's title; (ii) a material diminution in executive's base pay, as in effect from time to time; (iii) movement of the executive's place of employment by more than fifty miles, (iv) the failure of a successor to the assets or business of the Company to assume the obligations of the Company under the agreement.

Regardless of the reason for any termination of employment, each of our executive officers who is a party to an employment agreement, including Mr. Williams and Mr. Schafer, will be entitled to receive the following upon termination, which is referred to above as "accrued compensation": (a) the executive's salary hereunder through the termination date to the extent not theretofore paid; (b) the amount of any accrued but unused vacation pay; (c) any business expense reimbursements incurred by the executive as of the termination date and duly submitted for reimbursement; and (d) any performance bonus or discretionary bonus that has been earned or declared for a bonus period ending before the termination date but not paid before the termination date.

Table of Contents

Equity Incentive Plans—Vesting and Change in Control

We and our predecessor have granted equity awards to our directors and executive officers under two equity incentive plans—the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan.

2013 Plan

Prior to the completion of our initial public offering, our board of directors adopted, and our stockholders approved, the 2013 Plan for future grants of equity awards to our non-employee directors, executive officers and other key employees and service providers, including officers and employees of our affiliates. All grants of restricted stock and stock options to our named executive officers and directors have been made under the 2013 Plan.

Under the 2013 Plan, if we experience a change in control in which outstanding options, share appreciation rights, restricted shares, share units, performance shares, performance units or other equity-based awards will not be assumed or continued by the surviving entity: (i) with the exception of any performance share or performance units, all restricted shares will vest, and all share units and dividend equivalent rights will vest and the underlying shares will be delivered immediately before the change in control, and (ii) at the board of directors' discretion either or both of the following actions will be taken (A) all options and share appreciation rights will become exercisable 5 days before the change in control and terminate upon the consummation of the change in control, or (B) all options, share appreciation rights, restricted shares and share units will be canceled in connection with the change in control for a payment equal to the price per share paid to holders of shares of common stock in the change in control transaction less, in the case, of options or share appreciation rights, the option exercise price or share appreciation right exercise price per share. In the event the option exercise price or share appreciation right exercise price of an award exceeds the price per share paid to stockholders in the change in control, such options and share appreciation rights may be terminated for no consideration. In the case of performance shares and performance units, if more than half of the performance period has lapsed, the performance shares will be converted into restricted shares based on actual performance to date. If less than half of the performance period has lapsed, or if actual performance is not determinable, the performance shares will be converted into restricted shares assuming target performance has been achieved.

In summary, a change in control under the 2013 Plan occurs if:

•: a person, entity or affiliated group (with certain exceptions) acquires, in a transaction or series of transactions, 50% or more of the total combined voting power of our outstanding securities;
•: we experience a merger or consolidation with any other entity or we approve the issuance of voting securities in connection with a merger or consolidation other than (i) a merger or consolidation which would result in our voting securities continuing to represent at least 50.1% of the combined voting power of our voting securities or any surviving or parent entity outstanding immediately after such merger or consolidation, or (ii) a merger or consolidation effected to implement our recapitalization in which no person, entity or affiliated group becomes the beneficial owner of our securities representing 50% or more of the then outstanding shares of our common stock or the combined voting power of our then outstanding voting securities;
•: we consummate a sale of all or substantially all of our assets; or
•: during the period of any twelve consecutive months, individuals who, at the beginning of such period, constitute our board of directors cease for any reason to constitute a majority of our board of directors, treating any individual whose election or nomination was approved by a majority of the incumbent directors as an incumbent director for this purpose.

Table of Contents

2010 Plan

The 2010 Plan was approved in May 2010 by the board of directors of our Operating Partnership's then-general partner for the purpose of granting awards of unit options, restricted units and profits interests in our Operating Partnership to employees, directors and other service providers of our Operating Partnership. Since the adoption of our 2013 Plan in connection with our initial public offering we have not, and we will not, make any further awards under the 2010 Plan. The only awards that remain outstanding under the 2010 Plan as of March 9, 2017 consist of 1,134,811 Class O LTIP units held by our directors, executive officers and employees. A majority of these LTIP units, which we granted between May 2010 and June 2013, generally vest over a four-year period, beginning with 25% on the first anniversary of the date of grant and 6.25% on each quarter-end thereafter. Some of these LTIP units, however, were subject to special performance and cliff vesting terms that resulted in full vesting on either March 1, 2015 or March 1, 2016.

In the event of a change of control (as defined in the 2010 Plan) of our Operating Partnership, any unvested LTIP units will become immediately vested. In summary, a "change in control" under the 2010 Plan occurs if:

•: A person, entity or affiliated group (with certain exceptions) acquires beneficial ownership, directly or indirectly, of 50% or more of the voting power of our Operating Partnership's outstanding voting securities;
•: During any period of twelve months, individuals who at the beginning of the period constitute the board of directors of our Operating Partnership's then-general partner and any new director whose election was approved by vote of at least a majority of the directors then in office, cease to constitute at least a majority of the board of directors of Operating Partnership's then-general partner;
•: The partners of our Operating Partnership approve a merger with any other entity other than a merger which results in voting securities of our Operating Partnership outstanding immediately before the merger continuing to represent at least 50.1% of the voting power of our Operating Partnership or the entity surviving the merger; or
•: There is a sale or disposition by our Operating Partnership of all or substantially all of its assets.

LTIP Units

LTIP units are a special class of limited partnership units in our Operating Partnership that are structured to qualify as "profits interests" for tax purposes, with the result that at issuance they have no capital account in our Operating Partnership. Any LTIP units issued by our Operating Partnership may be subjected to vesting requirements as determined by our Compensation Committee. When vested, LTIP units are convertible by the holder (or, with respect to Class RS LTIP units that have achieved a capital account, automatically convert) into OP units on the terms set forth in our Operating Partnership's partnership agreement. Our Operating Partnership currently has authorized and outstanding one class of LTIP units—Class O LTIP units. All previously issued RS LTIP units have vested.

Vested Class RS LTIP units receive the same quarterly per unit profit distributions as the other outstanding OP units in our Operating Partnership. Unvested Class RS LTIP units do not receive distributions until they become vested, at which time they are entitled to distributions plus catch-up distributions for the period during which such units were not vested. At the date of grant, each Class RS LTIP unit will have a capital account of zero, and, therefore, the holder of the Class RS LTIP unit would receive nothing if our Operating Partnership were liquidated immediately after the Class RS LTIP unit is awarded. However, our Operating Partnership's partnership agreement requires that "book gain" or economic appreciation in our assets realized by our Operating Partnership, whether as a result of an

Table of Contents

actual asset sale or upon the revaluation of our assets, as permitted by applicable Treasury Regulations, be allocated first to the Class RS LTIP units until the capital account per Class RS LTIP unit is equal to the capital account per OP unit. The applicable Treasury Regulations and our amended partnership agreement provide that assets of our Operating Partnership may be revalued upon specified events, including upon additional capital contributions by us or other partners of our Operating Partnership, upon a distribution by our Operating Partnership to a partner in redemption of partnership interests, upon the liquidation of our Operating Partnership or upon a later issuance of additional LTIP units. Each Class RS LTIP unit is convertible into OP units by our Operating Partnership at any time or by the holder at any time following full vesting (if such unit is subject to vesting), and upon equalization of the capital account of a Class RS LTIP unit with the per unit capital account of the OP units (and full vesting of the Class RS LTIP unit, if such unit is subject to vesting), the Class RS LTIP unit will automatically convert into one OP unit, subject to certain exceptions and adjustments. There is a risk that certain Class RS LTIP units will never become convertible into OP units because of insufficient gain realization to equalize capital accounts, and, therefore, the value that a holder will realize for vested Class RS LTIP units may be zero or less than the value of an equal number of shares of our common stock.

Class O LTIP units do not participate in quarterly per unit profit distributions (although Class O LTIP units are entitled to tax distributions equal to the lesser of (i) the amount we determine to be adequate to satisfy tax liabilities resulting from any taxable income allocation, or (ii) the distribution per OP unit for the year in question). Initially, each Class O LTIP unit will have a capital account of zero and, therefore, the holder of the Class O LTIP unit would receive nothing if our Operating Partnership were liquidated immediately after the Class O LTIP unit is awarded. However, our Operating Partnership's partnership agreement requires that "book gain" or economic appreciation in our assets realized by our Operating Partnership, whether as a result of an actual asset sale or upon the revaluation of our assets, as permitted by applicable Treasury Regulations, be allocated to the Class O LTIP units (after allocations to the Class RS LTIP units and together with the OP units) until the capital account per Class O LTIP unit is equal to the excess of the capital account per OP unit over the amount of such capital account on the date of issuance of the Class O LTIP unit. Each Class O LTIP unit is convertible into OP units by our Operating Partnership at any time or by the holder at any time following full vesting (if such unit is subject to vesting), and upon equalization of the capital account of a Class O LTIP unit (and full vesting of the Class O LTIP unit, if such unit is subject to vesting), the Class O LTIP unit generally will be convertible into a number of OP units equal to (i) the Class O LTIP unit's capital account divided by (ii) the capital account balance of an OP unit (i.e., in a manner similar to a typical stock appreciation right), subject to certain exceptions and adjustments. There is a risk that a Class O LTIP unit will never become convertible into such amount of OP units because of insufficient gain realization to equalize capital accounts, and, therefore, the value that a holder will realize for a given number of vested Class O LTIP units may be zero or less than the value of an equal number of shares of our common stock

Table of Contents

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End December 31, 2016

The following table sets forth the outstanding equity awards for each named executive officer as of December 31, 2016.

		Option/Class O LTIP Unit Awards											Stock Awards

Name and Position	Date of Grant	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable/ Number of Units Convertible			Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable / Number of Units Not Convertible			Option Exercise Price			Option Expiration Date		Number of Shares That Have Not Vested			Market Value of Shares That Have Not Vested(1)
Chad L. Williams	3/2/2016		—			—			—			—		54,062	(2)		2,684,178
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer	3/2/2016		—			82,748	(3)	$	45.78			3/2/2026		—			—
	2/27/2015		—			—			—			—		25,726	(4)	$	1,277,296
	2/27/2015		34,375			34,375	(5)	$	35.81			2/27/2025		—			—
	10/15/2013		—			—			—			—		3,684	(6)	$	182,911
	10/15/2013		31,737	(7)		7,325	(7)	$	21.00			10/15/2023		—			—
	11/5/2012		500,000	(8)		—			(9	)		—		—			—
William H. Schafer	3/2/2016		—			—			—			—		17,201	(2)	$	854,030
Chief Financial Officer	3/2/2016		—			26,328	(3)	$	45.78			3/2/2026		—			—
	2/27/2015		—			—			—			—		9,040	(4)	$	448,836
	2/27/2015		10,937			10,938	(5)	$	35.81			2/27/2025		—			—
	11/3/2014		—			—			—			—		11,264	(10)	$	559,258
	10/15/2013		—			—			—			—		2,345	(6)	$	116,429
	10/15/2013		20,196	(7)		4,661	(7)	$	21.00			10/15/2023		—			—
	9/1/2012		37,500	(8)		—			(9	)		—		—			—
	5/27/2010		37,500	(8)		—			(11	)		—		—			—
James H. Reinhart	3/2/2016		—			—			—			—		17,201	(2)	$	854,030
Chief Operating Officer—Operations	3/2/2016		—			26,328	(3)	$	45.78			3/2/2026		—			—
	2/27/2015		—			—			—			—		7,330	(4)	$	363,935
	2/27/2015		10,937			10,938	(5)	$	35.81			2/27/2025		—			��
	11/3/2014		—			—			—			—		15,489	(10)	$	769,029
	10/15/2013		—			—			—			—		2,345	(6)	$	116,429
	10/15/2013		20,196	(7)		4,661	(7)	$	21.00			10/15/2023		—			—
	9/1/2012		50,000	(8)		—			(9	)		—		—			—
Daniel T. Bennewitz	3/2/2016		—			—			—			—		17,201	(2)	$	854,030
Chief Operating Officer—Sales & Marketing	3/2/2016		—			26,328	(3)	$	45.78			3/2/2026		—			—
	2/27/2015		—			—			—			—		7,330	(4)	$	363,935
	2/27/2015		10,937			10,938	(5)	$	35.81			2/27/2025		—			—
	11/3/2014		—			—			—			—		15,489	(10)	$	769,029
	10/15/2013		—			—			—			—		2,345	(6)	$	116,429
	10/15/2013		20,196	(7)		4,661	(7)	$	21.00			10/15/2023		—			—
	9/1/2012		50,000	(8)		—			(9	)		—		—			—
Jeffrey H. Berson	3/2/2016		—			—			—			—		15,973	(2)	$	793,060
Chief Investment Officer	3/2/2016		—			24,448	(3)	$	45.78			3/2/2026		—			—
	2/27/2015		—			—			—			—		6,809	(4)	$	338,067
	2/27/2015		10,156			10,157	(5)	$	35.81			2/27/2025		—			—
	11/3/2014		—			—			—			—		9,856	(10)	$	489,350
	10/15/2013		—			—			—			—		7,981	(6)	$	396,257
	10/15/2013		18,754	(7)		4,328	(7)	$	21.00			10/15/2023		—			—

(1): The market value of unvested shares is calculated by multiplying the number of unvested shares of Class A common stock held by the applicable named executive officer by the closing price of our Class A common stock on December 30, 2016, which was $49.65.
(2): Amount represents restricted shares of Class A common stock granted on March 2, 2016. These shares vest 33% on the first anniversary of the date of grant and 8.375% on each quarter-end thereafter, subject to continued service as an employee.
(3): Amount represents options to purchase Class A common stock granted on March 2, 2016. These options vest 33% on the first anniversary of the date of grant and 8.375% on each quarter-end thereafter, subject to continued service as an employee.
(4): Amount represents restricted shares of Class A common stock granted on February 27, 2015. These shares vest 25% on the first anniversary of the date of grant and 6.25% on each quarter-end thereafter, subject to continued service as an employee.
(5): Amount represents options to purchase Class A common stock granted on February 27, 2015. These options vest 25% on the first anniversary of the date of grant and 6.25% on each quarter-end thereafter, subject to continued service as an employee.
(6): Amount represents restricted shares of Class A common stock granted concurrently with our initial public offering. These shares vest 25% on the first anniversary of the date of grant and 6.25% on each quarter-end thereafter, subject to continued service as an employee.

Table of Contents

(7): Amount represents options to purchase Class A common stock granted concurrently with our initial public offering. These options vest 25% on the first anniversary of the date of grant and 6.25% on each quarter-end thereafter, subject to continued service as an employee.
(8): Consists of Class O LTIP units in our Operating Partnership. Each vested Class O LTIP unit may be converted into a number of OP units equal to (i) (x) the excess of the then-capital account per OP unit over (y) the capital account per OP unit on the date of issuance of the Class O LTIP unit being converted, divided by (ii) the then-capital account per OP unit. See "Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table—LTIP Units" for a description of the Class O LTIP units. These awards vested in full before December 31, 2016. See "Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table—Equity Incentive Plans-Vesting and Change of Control—2010 Plan."
(9): The capital account per OP unit was $25.00 when these Class O LTIP units were granted. As of December 31, 2016, the capital account per OP unit was $46.74. See note 8 above for a description of the number of OP units receivable upon conversion of Class O LTIP units.
(10): Amount represents restricted shares of Class A common stock granted on November 3, 2014. These shares vest ratably over the first four anniversaries of the date of grant, subject to continued service as an employee.
(11): The capital account per OP unit was $20.00 when these Class O LTIP units were granted. As of December 31, 2016, the capital account per OP unit was $46.74. See note 8 above for a description of the number of OP units receivable upon conversion of Class O LTIP units.

2016 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

The following table sets forth the number of shares of restricted stock and Class RS LTIP units that vested for each of our named executive officers during 2016 and the value realized by these officers upon such vesting. During 2016, no stock options were exercised.

	Option Awards				Stock Awards					Class O LTIP Units					Class RS LTIP Unit Awards

Name and Position	Number of Shares Acquired on Exercise		Value Realized on Exercise		Number of Shares of Stock Acquired on Vesting			Value Realized on Vesting(3)		Number of Class OP Units Acquired on Exercise			Value Realized on Exercise(5)		Number of OP Units Acquired on Vesting(6)		Value Realized on Vesting(5)
Chad L. Williams		—		—		30,634	(1)	$	1,487,249		—			—		—		—
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
William H. Schafer		—		—		17,796	(2)	$	842,158		14,229	(4)	$	646,281		25,626	$	1,184,856
Chief Financial Officer
James H. Reinhart		—		—		18,198	(2)	$	852,908		—			—		6,250	$	323,000
Chief Operating Officer—Operations
Daniel T. Bennewitz		—		—		18,198	(2)	$	852,908		—			—		6,250	$	323,000
Chief Operating Officer—Sales & Marketing
Jeffrey H. Berson		—		—		22,371	(2)	$	1,090,650		—			—		—		—
Chief Investment Officer

(1): Consists of (i) restricted shares of Class A common stock granted concurrently with our initial public offering on October 15, 2013, which vest 25% on the first anniversary of the date of grant and 6.25% on each quarter-end thereafter, subject to continued service as an employee, and (ii) restricted shares of Class A common stock granted on February 27, 2015, which vest 25% on the first anniversary of the date of grant and 6.25% on each quarter-end thereafter, subject to continued service as an employee.
(2): Consists of (i) restricted shares of Class A common stock granted concurrently with our initial public offering on October 15, 2013, which vest 25% on the first anniversary of the date of grant and 6.25% on each quarter-end thereafter, subject to continued service as an employee, (ii) restricted shares of Class A common stock granted on November 3, 2014, which vest ratably over the first four anniversaries of the date of grant, subject to continued service as an employee, and (iii) restricted shares of Class A common stock granted on February 27, 2015, which vest 25% on the first anniversary of the date of grant and 6.25% on each quarter-end thereafter, subject to continued service as an employee.
(3): The value realized upon vesting is calculated by multiplying the number of shares vested on each vesting date by the market value of our common stock on such date, which is assumed to be the per share closing price on the NYSE as of such date.
(4): Consists of 12,500 Class O LTIP units granted on May 27, 2010 and 12,500 Class O LTIP units granted on September 1, 2012, which were converted into OP units during 2016. See "—Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table—LTIP Units" for a description of the Class O LTIP units and the terms of vesting.
(5): The value upon vesting or exercise, as applicable, is calculated by multiplying the number of OP units acquired on each vesting date by the market value of our common stock on such date, which is assumed to be the per share closing price on the NYSE as of such date.
(6): Consists of Class RS LTIP units in our Operating Partnership, which converted automatically into OP units upon vesting pursuant to their terms. See "Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table—LTIP Units" for a description of the Class RS LTIP units.

Table of Contents

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

The compensation payable to our named executive officers upon the following occurrences is set forth above in the sections entitled "Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table—Employment Agreements" and "—Equity Incentive Plans-Vesting and Change in Control":

•: voluntary termination by the executive for good reason (including following changes of control);
•: termination by us without cause (including following changes of control);
•: termination in the event of permanent disability or death of the executive; and
•: a change in control without a corresponding termination.

The compensation payable to our named executive officers upon such terminations or change in control will be paid in a single lump sum. The other benefits will be conditioned upon the executive's continued compliance with the non-competition, non-solicitation, confidentiality and other covenants contained in the employment agreement. All of the foregoing benefits payable upon termination are conditioned upon the executive's execution of a general release of claims.

The following table summarizes the cash payments and estimated equivalent cash value of benefits that would have been provided to our named executive officers under the terms of their employment agreements described above upon termination of those agreements under various scenarios, or upon a change in control without a termination, as of December 31, 2016:

	Termination

	Termination						No Termination
			Without Cause/For Good Reason upon a Change in Control(1)				No Termination
Name	Without Cause/For Good Reason		Without Cause/For Good Reason upon a Change in Control(1)		Death/Disability		Change in Control(2)
Chad L. Williams		7,400,124		8,510,124		6,300,124		5,150,175
William H. Schafer		1,658,275		3,833,984		3,469,769		2,365,330
James H. Reinhart		1,272,636		3,219,613		2,490,200		2,490,200
Daniel T. Bennewitz		1,265,316		3,212,292		2,490,200		2,490,200
Jeffrey H. Berson		1,700,747		3,055,288		2,375,780		2,375,780

(1): Amounts assume that equity awards under the 2013 Plan are not assumed or continued by the surviving entity in the change in control and, therefore, that such awards vest in full upon the change in control. Equity awards under the 2010 Plan vest in full automatically upon a change in control.
(2): Consists solely of acceleration of equity awards. Amounts assume that equity awards under the 2013 Plan are not assumed or continued by the surviving entity in the change in control and, therefore, that such awards vest in full upon the change in control. Equity awards under the 2010 Plan vest in full automatically upon a change in control.

Table of Contents

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table sets forth certain information, as of December 31, 2016, concerning shares of our common stock authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans.

		Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights

Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders	1,058,297	$	31.72	2,934,354
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders(1)	—		—	—
Total equity compensation plans(2)	1,058,297	$	31.72	2,934,354

(1): Our Operating Partnership's 2010 Plan was approved in May 2010 by the board of directors of our Operating Partnership's then-general partner. Since the adoption of our 2013 Plan in connection with our initial public offering we have not made, and we will not make, any further awards under the 2010 Plan. The only awards that remained outstanding under the 2010 Plan as of December 31, 2016 consisted of 1,134,811 Class O LTIP units held by our directors, executive officers and employees. As of December 31, 2016, the vested portion of these LTIP units were convertible into 550,587 OP units.
(2): This amount consists of options to purchase 997,297 shares of common stock granted to certain of our directors and executive officers and options to purchase 61,000 shares of common stock granted to certain non-executive officer employees. It does not include 414,691 outstanding shares of restricted stock granted to certain executive officers and non-executive officer employees and outstanding as of December 31, 2016.

Table of Contents

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth certain information as of March 9, 2017 (the record date for the Annual Meeting) regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock, OP units and LTIP units by (1) each of our directors, (2) each of our named executive officers, (3) all of our directors, and executive officers as a group and (4) each holder of five percent or more of our common stock. The extent to which a person holds OP units or LTIP units as opposed to common stock is described in the footnotes below.

The SEC has defined "beneficial ownership" of a security to mean the possession, directly or indirectly, of voting power and/or investment power over such security. A stockholder is also deemed to be, as of any date, the beneficial owner of all securities that such stockholder has the right to acquire within 60 days after that date through (a) the exercise of any option, warrant or right, (b) the conversion of a security, (c) the power to revoke a trust, discretionary account or similar arrangement, or (d) the automatic termination of a trust, discretionary account or similar arrangement. In computing the number of shares beneficially owned by a person and the percentage ownership of that person, common stock subject to options or other rights (as set forth above) held by that person that are currently exercisable or will become exercisable within 60 days thereafter are deemed outstanding, while such shares are not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing percentage ownership of any other person. Each person named in the table has sole voting and investment power with respect to all of the common stock, OP units and LTIP units shown as beneficially owned by such person, except as otherwise indicated in the table or footnotes below. "OP units" refer to the common units of limited partnership interest in our Operating Partnership. "LTIP Units" refer to our Operating Partnership's Class O LTIP units and Class RS LTIP units collectively. When vested, LTIP units are convertible by the holder, or convert automatically, as the case may be, into OP units on the terms set forth in our Operating Partnership's partnership agreement. OP units are redeemable for cash or, at our election, shares of our Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis.

Table of Contents

Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each named person is c/o QTS Realty Trust, Inc., 12851 Foster Street, Overland Park, Kansas 66213. To our knowledge, no shares beneficially owned by any executive officer or director have been pledged as security.

Beneficial Owner

Directors and Executive Officers
Chad L. Williams(3)	7,197,889	13.1	%	12.8	%
William H. Schafer(4)	251,868	*		*
James H. Reinhart(5)	200,661	*		*
Daniel T. Bennewitz(6)	192,253	*		*
Jeffrey H. Berson(7)	115,652	*		*
John W. Barter(8)	91,600	*		*
William O. Grabe(9)	138,010	*		*
Catherine R. Kinney(10)	66,795	*		*
Peter A. Marino(11)	103,423	*		*
Scott D. Miller(12)	64,972	*		*
Philip P. Trahanas(13)	117,950	*		*
Stephen E. Westhead(14)	57,911	*		*
All directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons)	8,672,618	15.5	%	15.2	%
Other 5% Stockholders
The Vanguard Group(15)	6,868,557	14.3	%	12.6	%
Cohen & Steers, Inc.(16)	6,160,052	12.9	%	11.0	%
BlackRock, Inc.(17)	3,735,733	7.8	%	6.7	%
Vanguard Specialized Funds—REIT Index Fund(18)	3,622,485	7.5	%	6.5	%
CBRE Clarion Securities, LLC(19)	3,085,957	6.4	%	5.5	%
Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc.(20)	2,576,100	5.4	%	4.6	%

*: Less than 1.0%
(1): Assumes a total of 47,909,778 shares of Class A common stock and 133,000 shares of Class B common stock are outstanding. In addition, amounts for individuals and directors and executive officers as a group assume that the "in the money" value of Class O LTIP units that are vested or will be vested within 60 days are converted into OP units and all OP units held by such persons are exchanged for our common stock. The total number of shares of common stock outstanding used in calculating this percentage assumes that none of the OP units or LTIP units held by other persons are exchanged for our common stock.
(2): Assumes a total of 47,909,778 shares of Class A common stock, 133,000 shares of Class B common stock and 7,937,464 OP units are outstanding, in addition to each individual's OP units that would be received upon conversion of vested Class O LTIP units or Class O LTIP Units that will be vested within 60 days.
(3): Consists of 95,274 shares of Class A common stock, 112,966 restricted shares of Class A common stock, 133,000 shares of Class B common stock, 107,086 options to purchase Class A common stock exercisable within 60 days, 6,517,000 OP units (835,000 of which are held in various family trusts of which Mr. Williams in the trustee) and 232,563 OP units that would be received upon conversion of Class O LTIP units.

Table of Contents

(4): Consists of 28,044 shares of Class A common stock, 50,754 restricted shares of Class A common stock, 44,946 options to purchase Class A common stock exercisable within 60 days, 89,229 OP units and 38,895 OP units that would be received upon conversion of Class O LTIP units.
(5): Consists of 26,081 shares of Class A common stock, 56,378 restricted shares of Class A common stock, 44,946 options to purchase Class A common stock exercisable within 60 days, 50,000 OP units and 23,256 OP units that would be received upon conversion of Class O LTIP units.
(6): Consists of 18,088 shares of Class A common stock, 55,963 restricted shares of Class A common stock, 44,946 options to purchase Class A common stock exercisable within 60 days, 50,000 OP units and 23,256 OP units that would be received upon conversion of Class O LTIP units.
(7): Consists of 17,400 shares of Class A common stock, 56,515 restricted shares of Class A common stock and 41,737 options to purchase Class A common stock exercisable within 60 days.
(8): Consists of 3,399 shares of Class A common stock, 1,875 restricted shares of Class A common stock, 75,326 options to purchase Class A common stock exercisable within 60 days and 11,000 OP units.
(9): Consists of 1,825 restricted shares of Class A common stock, 79,906 options to purchase Class A common stock exercisable within 60 days, 40,000 OP Units and 16,279 OP units that would be received upon conversion of Class O LTIP units.
(10): Consists of 3,399 shares of Class A common stock, 1,899 restricted shares of Class A common stock, 56,963 options to purchase Class A common stock exercisable within 60 days and 4,534 OP units that would be received upon conversion of Class O LTIP units.
(11): Consists of 3,194 shares of Class A common stock, 1,850 restricted shares of Class A common stock, 84,379 options to purchase Class A common stock exercisable within 60 days and 14,000 OP units.
(12): Consists of 3,194 shares of Class A common stock, 1,850 restricted shares of Class A common stock, 55,394 options to purchase Class A common stock exercisable within 60 days and 4,534 OP units that would be received upon conversion of Class O LTIP units.
(13): Consists of 3,849 shares of Class A common stock, 2,245 restricted shares of Class A common stock, 95,577 options to purchase Class A common stock exercisable within 60 days and 16,279 OP units that would be received upon conversion of Class O LTIP units.
(14): Consists of 3,317 shares of Class A common stock, 1,924 restricted shares of Class A common stock, 48,136 options to purchase Class A common stock exercisable within 60 days and 4,534 OP units that would be received upon conversion of Class O LTIP units.
(15): Based on Information provided in a Schedule 13G/A filed on February 13, 2017 by The Vanguard Group ("Vanguard"). According to the Schedule 13G/A, Vanguard beneficially owns 6,868,557 shares and has sole voting power with respect to 151,410 of such shares, shared voting power with respect to 62,361 of such shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 6,715,451 of such shares and shared dispositive power with respect to 153,106 of such shares; Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company ("VFTC") beneficially owns 90,745 shares as a result of its serving as investment manager of collective trust accounts, and Vanguard Investments Australia, Ltd. ("VIA") beneficially owns 123,026 shares as a result of its serving as investment manager of Australian investment offerings. According to the Schedule 13G/A, VFTC and VIA are wholly owned subsidiaries of Vanguard. The address of Vanguard is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355.
(16): Based on information provided in a Schedule 13G/A filed jointly on February 14, 2017 by Cohen & Steers, Inc. ("C&S"); Cohen & Steers Capital Management, Inc. ("C&S Capital"); and Cohen & Steers UK Limited ("C&S UK"). According to the Schedule 13G/A, C&S beneficially

Table of Contents

owns 6,160,052 shares and has sole voting with respect to 5,120,168 of such shares and sole dispositive power with respect to all of such shares; C&S Capital beneficially owns 6,080,691 shares and has sole voting power with respect to 5,096,213 of such shares and sole dispositive power with respect to all of such shares; and C&S UK beneficially owns 79,361 shares and has sole voting with respect to 23,955 of such shares and has sole dispositive power with respect to all such shares. According to the Schedule 13G/A, C&S holds a 100% interest in C&S Capital. The address of C&S and C&S Capital is 280 Park Avenue, 10^th Floor, New York, New York 10017 and the address of C&S UK is 50 Pall Mall, 7^th Floor, London, United Kingdom SW1Y 5JH.

(17): Based on Information provided in a Schedule 13G/A filed on January 25, 2017 that indicated that BlackRock, Inc. ("BlackRock") is a parent holding company or control person that beneficially owns 3,735,733 shares and has the sole voting power with respect to 3,623,723 of such shares and the sole dispositive power with respect to all of such shares. The Schedule 13G/A further indicated that the following subsidiaries of Blackrock acquired the shares reported on the Schedule 13G/A: BlackRock (Netherlands) B.V., BlackRock Advisors, LLC, BlackRock Asset Management Canada Limited, BlackRock Asset Management Ireland Limited, BlackRock Asset Management North Asia Limited, BlackRock Asset Management Schweiz AG, BlackRock Financial Management, Inc., BlackRock Fund Advisors, BlackRock Fund Managers Ltd, BlackRock Institutional Trust Company, N.A., BlackRock International Limited, BlackRock Investment Management (Australia) Limited, BlackRock Investment Management (UK) Ltd, BlackRock Investment Management, LLC and BlackRock Japan Co Ltd. The address of BlackRock is 55 East 52^nd Street, New York, New York 10055.
(18): Based on Information provided in a Schedule 13G/A filed on February 13, 2017 by Vanguard Specialized Funds—Vanguard REIT Index Fund ("Vanguard REIT"). According to the Schedule 13G/A, Vanguard REIT beneficially owns 3,622,485 shares and has sole voting power with respect to all of such shares no dispositive power with respect to any of its shares. The address of Vanguard REIT is 100 Vanguard Blvd., Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355.
(19): Based on Information provided in a Schedule 13G filed on February 13, 2017 by CBRE Clarion Securities, LLC ("CBRE"). According to the Schedule 13G, CBRE beneficially owns 3,085,957 shares and has the sole voting power with respect to 1,617,413 of such shares, shared voting power with respect to no such shares, and sole dispositive power with respect all such shares . The address of CBRE is 201 King of Prussia Road, Suite 600, Radnor, PA 19087.
(20): Based on information provided in a Schedule 13G/A filed jointly on February 14, 2017 by Waddell & Reed Financial, Inc. ("WDR"), Waddell & Reed Financial Services, Inc. ("WRFSI"), Waddell & Reed, Inc. ("WRI"), Waddell & Reed Investment Management Company ("WRIMCO") and Ivy Investment Management Company ("IICO"). According to the Schedule 13G/A, WDR is deemed to have sole voting and sole dispositive power with respect to 2,576,100 shares by virtue of its ownership of IICO, which is deemed to have sole voting and sole dispositive power with respect to 1,534,300 shares, and WRIMCO, which is deemed to have sole voting and sole dispositive power with respect to 1,041,800 shares. WRI and WRFSI are deemed to have sole voting and sole dispositive power with respect to 1,041,800 shares. According to the Schedule 13G/A, these securities are beneficially owned by one or more open-end investment companies or other managed accounts that are advised or sub-advised by IICO, an investment advisory subsidiary of WDR, or WRIMCO, an investment advisory subsidiary of WRI. WRI is a broker-dealer and underwriting subsidiary of WRFSI, which is a subsidiary of WDR, a publicly traded company. The investment advisory contracts grant IICO and WRIMCO all investment and/or voting power over securities owned by such advisory clients. The investment sub-advisory contracts grant IICO and WRIMCO investment power over securities owned by such sub-advisory clients and, in most cases, voting power. The address of WDR, WRFSI, WRI, WRIMCO and IICO is 6300 Lamar Avenue, Overland Park, Kansas 66202.

Table of Contents

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities, to file reports of securities ownership and changes in such ownership with the SEC. Executive officers, directors and greater than ten percent stockholders also are required by rules promulgated by the SEC to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

Based solely upon a review of Forms 3 and 4 and amendments thereto and written representations furnished to us during the most recent fiscal year, no person who at any time during the fiscal year was a director, officer, or beneficial owner or more than 10% of any class of our equity securities failed to file on a timely basis, as disclosed in the above forms, reports required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act during the most recent fiscal year, except that the following Forms 4 were filed late:

•: the Form 4 reporting the January 4, 2016 restricted stock grant made to our former Chief People Officer, Stanley M. Sword;
•: the Form 3 in connection with the April 2016 appointment of Jon Greaves as our Chief Technology Officer;
•: the Form 4 reporting the vesting of Class RS LTIP units granted to William Schafer as our Chief Financial Officer on March 1, 2016; and
•: the Forms 4s reporting the March 31, 2016, April 1, 2016 and August 1, 2016 restricted stock grants made to Jon Greaves.

Table of Contents

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Tax Protection Agreement

Upon completion of our initial public offering in October 2013, we entered into a tax protection agreement with Chad L. Williams, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and his affiliates and family members who own OP units pursuant to which we agreed to indemnify them against certain tax liabilities resulting from: (1) the sale, exchange, transfer, conveyance or other disposition of our Atlanta-Metro, Atlanta-Suwanee or Santa Clara data centers in a taxable transaction prior to January 1, 2026, referred to as the protected period; (2) causing or permitting any transaction that results in the disposition by Mr. Williams or his affiliates and family members who own OP units of all or any portion of their interests in the our Operating Partnership in a taxable transaction during the protected period; or (3) our failure prior to the expiration of the protected period to maintain approximately $175 million of indebtedness that would be allocable to Mr. Williams and his affiliates for tax purposes or, alternatively, failing to offer Mr. Williams and his affiliates and family members who own OP units the opportunity to guarantee specific types of our Operating Partnership's indebtedness in order to enable them to continue to defer certain tax liabilities.

Partnership Agreement

Concurrently with the completion of our initial public offering in October 2013, we entered into an amended and restated operating partnership agreement with the limited partners in our Operating Partnership. As of March 9, 2017 (the record date for the Annual Meeting) limited partners in our Operating Partnership (other than us) owned approximately 12.4% of our Operating Partnership. Pursuant to our operating partnership agreement, holders of OP units have the right beginning on the date that is the later of (1) November 1, 2014 (which was 12 months from the beginning of the first full calendar month following the completion of our initial public offering) and (2) the date of issuance of the OP units to require our Operating Partnership to redeem all or part of their OP units for cash equal to the then-current market value of an equal number of shares of our Class A common stock (determined in accordance with and subject to adjustment under the partnership agreement), or, at our election, to exchange their OP units for shares of our Class A common stock on a one-for-one basis subject to certain adjustments and the restrictions on ownership and transfer of our stock set forth in our charter. Additionally, pursuant to our operating partnership agreement, holders of vested Class O LTIP units and vested Class RS LTIP units may convert their units into a certain number of OP units in accordance with their terms. The limited partners in our Operating Partnership who held OP units received registration rights with respect to the shares of our Class A common stock that may be issued to them upon the exchange of their OP units, see "—Limited Partners' Registration Rights Agreement."

Limited Partners' Registration Rights Agreement

Upon completion of our initial public offering in October 2013, we entered into a registration rights agreement with the limited partners in our Operating Partnership, including certain of our directors and executive officers. As required by the registration rights agreement, we filed a registration statement covering the issuance to the limited partners of shares of our Class A common stock upon redemption of their OP units (collectively, the "registrable shares"). The registration statement was declared effective on November 25, 2014.

We also agreed to indemnify the persons receiving rights against specified liabilities, including certain potential liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, or to contribute to the expenses incurred or the payments such persons may be required to make in respect thereof. We agreed to pay all of the expenses relating to the registration and any underwritten offerings of such securities, including, without limitation, all registration, listing, filing and stock

Table of Contents

exchange or FINRA fees, all fees and expenses of complying with securities or "blue sky" laws, all printing expenses, all fees of counsel and independent public accountants retained by us and the cost of any liability insurance or other premiums for insurance obtained in connection with any shelf registration statement pursuant to the registration rights agreement. The holder will be responsible for underwriting discounts and commissions, any out-of-pocket expenses (including disbursements of such holder's counsel, accountants and other advisors) and any transfer taxes related to the sale or disposition of the shares.

Mr. Williams' Registration Rights Agreements

Chad L. Williams, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, is a party to an amended and restated registration rights agreement. Under the registration rights agreements, beginning 180 days after the completion of our initial public offering, Mr. Williams has a demand right to require us to file a new registration statement and prospectus providing for the sale of some or all of his shares, provided that (i) unless he is registering all of its shares, the shares to be registered in any registration must have an aggregate offering price of at least $5 million, (ii) he may make only four such demands, and (iii) we are not required to effect more than two such demands in any 12 month period. Mr. Williams may require us to use our reasonable best efforts to cause any such demand registration to be in the form of an underwritten offering. We may satisfy this obligation by causing the requested shares to be included as part of an existing shelf registration statement that we then have on file with (and that has been declared effective by) the SEC. In addition to the foregoing, if we file a registration statement with respect to an offering for our own account or on behalf of a holder of our common stock, Mr. Williams will have the right, subject to certain limitations, to register such number of registrable shares held by him as he requests. With respect to underwritten offerings, we will not be required to include any of Mr. Williams' shares in the offering unless he accepts the terms of the offering as agreed between us and the underwriter, and then only in such amount as the underwriter believes will not jeopardize the success of the offering.

The registration rights agreement also provides Mr. Williams registration rights similar to those under the limited partner registration rights agreement described above, in that we are required to file a registration statement covering the issuance to Mr. Williams of our Class A common stock upon redemption of his OP units.

We have filed with the SEC a registration statement to satisfy our obligations under these registration rights agreements. The registration statement was declared effective by the SEC on November 25, 2014.

We also agreed in the registration right agreement to indemnify Mr. Williams against specified liabilities, including certain potential liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, or to contribute to the expenses incurred or the payments Mr. Williams may be required to make in respect thereof. We agreed to pay all of the expenses relating to the registration and any underwritten offerings of such securities, including, without limitation, all registration, listing, filing and stock exchange or FINRA fees, all fees and expenses of complying with securities or "blue sky" laws, all printing expenses, all fees of counsel and independent public accountants retained by us and the cost of any liability insurance or other premiums for insurance obtained in connection with any shelf registration statement pursuant to the registration rights agreement. The holder will be responsible for underwriting discounts and commissions, any out-of-pocket expenses (including disbursements of such holder's counsel, accountants and other advisors) and any transfer taxes related to the sale or disposition of the shares.

Table of Contents

Office and Data Center Leases

Our Operating Partnership leases approximately 27,000 square feet of office space and common area to house the Company's corporate headquarters and approximately 2,500 square feet of raised floor operating net rentable square feet data center space at the J. Williams Technology Center, which is a 35,000 square foot Class A office and technology building located at 12851 Foster Street in Overland Park, Kansas. The J. Williams Technology Centre is owned by Quality Investment Properties—Williams Centre, an entity that is 81% owned by Chad L. Williams, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and 19% owned by other members of his family. The lease was entered into in January 2009, expires in December 2018 and has one five-year automatic renewal term. We pay monthly rent of approximately $85,000 under the lease, plus our pro rata share of certain repair and maintenance expenses relating to the leased premises. We believe that the terms of this lease are fair and reasonable and reflect the terms we could expect to obtain in an arm's length transaction for comparable space elsewhere in Overland Park, Kansas

CDJ Properties, LLC, a company 100% owned by Chad Williams, leases warehouse space from the Company at 8005 Bond Street, Lenexa, Kansas. During 2016, the Company received rent in the amount of $48,820. In addition, CDJ Properties is required to pay for its pro rata share of certain repair and maintenance expenses. We believe that the terms of this lease are fair and reasonable and reflect the terms we could expect to obtain in an arm's length transaction for comparable space elsewhere in Lenexa, Kansas.

Business with Williams Family Companies

Mr. Williams and his affiliates own various interests in and operate certain non-real estate businesses, including Quality Office Interiors, LLC ("Quality Office"), an office furnishing sales and design company, Quality Auto Group, Inc. ("Quality Auto"), an auto sales and brokerage company, Quality Lease & Finance, L.L.C. ("Quality Lease & Finance"), an equipment leasing company, and Quality Auto Brokers, Inc. ("Quality Auto Brokers"), an auto sales and brokerage company.

From time to time, we have made purchases of office furnishings from Quality Office through individual purchase orders in the ordinary course of business. For each such order, we paid a design fee to Quality Office equal to 15% of the cost of such order, and paid the cost of such order directly to the vendor. We believe that these purchase terms are fair and reasonable and reflect the terms we could expect to obtain in an arm's length transaction with another vendor. Quality Office is 100% owned by Mr. Williams. In 2016, the total amount paid by us to Quality Office was approximately $208,000.

We also may, from time to time, make purchases from or enter into leasing contracts with Quality Lease & Finance. In addition, before our initial public offering, our predecessor purchased vehicles from Quality Auto and Quality Auto Brokers; however, we have not and do not expect to make any future purchases from these companies. Quality Lease and Finance and Quality Auto are 100% owned by Mr. Williams, and Quality Auto Brokers is 100% owned by James L. Williams, the father of Mr. Williams. In 2016, the total amounts paid to these companies in the aggregate was less than $120,000.

Because we are not a party to any on-going contracts with these companies, and because we may enter into any of these transactions from time to time, the amount and terms of any future transactions between these companies and us are not currently determinable. Any such future transactions would require the approval of our disinterested directors.

Table of Contents

Employment Agreements

In 2013, we entered into employment agreements with each of Messrs. Williams, Schafer, Reinhart, Bennewitz and Berson. For a description of the terms of these employment agreements, see "Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Narrative Disclosure to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table—Employment Agreements." In February 2017, we entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Schafer, effective on April 3, 2017, as described below. We also have entered into employment agreements with our other executive officers, as described below.

Goza, Bloom and Greaves Employment Agreements

In 2013, we entered into an employment agreement with Ms. Goza, pursuant to which we pay Ms. Goza an annual base salary of $294,000, subject to annual review, with a bonus opportunity equal to 60% of her base salary, and four weeks' paid vacation.

In 2016, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Bloom, pursuant to which we pay Mr. Bloom an annual base salary of $300,000 with a bonus opportunity equal to 50% of his base salary and four weeks' paid vacation.

In 2015, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Greaves, which we amended in 2016, pursuant to which we pay Mr. Greaves an annual base salary of $300,000 with a bonus opportunity equal to 50% of his base salary and four weeks' paid vacation.

The employment agreements for Ms. Goza and Messrs. Bloom and Greaves provide for a two-year term with automatic renewal terms of one year, unless either party gives a non-renewal notice within a specified time frame. The agreements further provide that, upon termination of the employment agreements, other than as a result of a termination for "cause" or a resignation without "good reason," as those terms are defined in each employment agreement, the executive will, upon execution of a release acceptable to us, be eligible to receive the following benefits in addition to his or her then-accrued compensation (as defined below):

•: a lump sum cash payment equal to the sum of (A) one times his or her then current base salary, and (B) one times his or her target bonus for the year of termination;
•: a lump sum cash payment equal to all bonus amounts earned but not yet paid for the year prior to the year of termination;
•: with respect to Ms. Goza, vesting of any equity awards that otherwise would have vested during the term in which the termination occurred;
•: reimbursement of premiums for COBRA continuation coverage; and
•: one year of outplacement services and support.

Ms. Goza's employment agreement further provides that in the event of termination for death or disability, Ms. Goza will receive full vesting of her equity awards. Moreover, regardless of the reason for any termination of employment, Ms. Goza and Messrs. Bloom and Greaves each will be entitled to receive the following upon termination, which is referred to above as "accrued compensation": (a) the executive's salary hereunder through the termination date to the extent not theretofore paid; (b) the amount of any accrued but unused vacation pay; (c) any business expense reimbursements incurred by the executive as of the termination date and duly submitted for reimbursement; and (d) any performance bonus or discretionary bonus that has been earned or declared for a bonus period ending before the termination date but not paid before the termination date.

Table of Contents

These employment agreements generally define:

•: "cause" as the executive's (i) conviction of, or pleading guilty or nolo contendere to, a crime that constitutes a felony or any lesser criminal offense involving dishonesty or moral turpitude, (ii) commission of an act of dishonesty, theft, fraud, or embezzlement, (iii) willful act that has a significant adverse effect on the reputation of the Company, or any of its affiliates, (iv) the substantial failure or refusal to perform the duties of the title specified in his or her employment agreement, or (v) material violation of the material written rules, regulations, procedures, or policies relating to the conduct of employees, directors or officers of the Company; and
•: "good reason" as (i) a material diminution in executive's authority, duties or responsibilities (including reporting responsibilities), or any significant adverse change in executive's title; (ii) a material diminution in executive's base pay, as in effect from time to time; (iii) movement of the executive's place of employment by more than fifty miles, (iv) the failure of a successor to the assets or business of the Company to assume the obligations of the Company under the agreement.

Schafer Employment Agreement

On February 16, 2017, we entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Schafer that supersedes and replaces Mr. Schafer's current employment agreement and will become effective April 3, 2017. Under the employment agreement, Mr. Schafer will serve in the position of Executive Vice President—Finance and Accounting. The employment agreement provides for an initial term of one year, expiring April 3, 2018 with automatic renewal terms of one year, unless either party gives a non-renewal notice within a specified time frame.

The employment agreement with Mr. Schafer provides for a base salary of $350,000, a bonus opportunity targeted at 100% of base salary for threshold performance, with additional amounts being paid for exceptional performance as determined by the Compensation Committee, four weeks' paid vacation and certain other benefits. In addition, Mr. Schafer's employment agreement also provides that Mr. Schafer will be eligible to receive grants of equity awards, subject to performance or three-year time-based vesting, with a target award value of 200% of his base salary.

If Mr. Schafer's employment agreement is terminated by us without "cause" (including nonrenewal of the agreement upon expiration) or by Mr. Schafer for "good reason" or a termination following death or "disability," as each of those terms are defined in Mr. Schafer's employment agreement, Mr. Schafer will, upon execution of a release acceptable to us, be eligible to receive the following severance benefits in addition to his then-accrued compensation:

•: a lump sum cash payment equal to the sum of (A) one times his then current base salary, (B) his prorated bonus for the year of termination, and (C) one times his annual bonus for the year of termination, calculated assuming achievement of all performance goals necessary to achieve the target achievement level;
•: solely in the case of termination without cause or with good reason, vesting of any equity awards that otherwise would have vested during the term in which the termination occurred;
•: solely in the case of death or disability, full vesting of equity awards; and
•: continued coverage under our health insurance plans for one year following termination (provided that if such continuation is not possible, the Company will reimburse an amount equal to the cost of health insurance coverage for Mr. Schafer and his family for one year following his termination that is substantially similar to the coverage provided to Mr. Schafer under our health insurance plans prior to his termination) and reimbursement of premiums for any subsequent COBRA continuation coverage.

Table of Contents

If Mr. Schafer's employment agreement is terminated by us without "cause" (including nonrenewal of the agreement upon expiration) or by Mr. Schafer for "good reason" within two years following a "change in control," he will be eligible to receive the following benefits in addition to his then-accrued compensation:

•: a lump sum cash payment equal to the sum of (A) two times his base salary in effect on the date of the change in control or the date of the termination, whichever is higher, and (B) two times his annual bonus for the year of the change in control or the termination, whichever is higher, calculated assuming achievement of all performance goals necessary to achieve the maximum bonus level;
•: reimbursement of the cost of health, disability and accidental death, and dismemberment insurance in an amount not less than that provided at the time of Mr. Schafer's termination or, if greater, on the date on which the change in control occurred, until the earlier of (x) the date on which Mr. Schafer becomes eligible to receive substantially the same or greater benefits from another employer or (y) the second anniversary of the date of his termination; and
•: one year of outplacement services and support.

Mr. Schafer's employment agreement generally defines:

•: "change in control" as (i) any transaction that results in any person (as such term is used in Section 13(d) and 14(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")), other than current stockholders of the Company, becoming the beneficial owner (as defined in the Exchange Act), directly or indirectly, of securities representing 30% or more of the then-combined voting power of the Company's then outstanding voting securities, (ii) individuals who, at the beginning of any 12 month period, constitute our board of directors cease for any reason to constitute a majority of our board of directors at the end of such 12 month period, treating any individual whose election or nomination was approved by a majority of the incumbent directors as an incumbent director for this purpose, (iii) a merger, consolidation or recapitalization other than one following which voting securities prior to the transaction continue to represent more than 70% of the Company's voting securities after the transaction, or (iv) a sale of all or substantially all of our assets;
•: "cause" as Mr. Schafer's (i) willful act or omission that causes material harm and represents (a) a material breach of the agreement or any breach of certain covenants, (ii) conviction of, or pleading guilty or nolo contendere to, a felony or a misdemeanor involving dishonesty or moral turpitude; (iii) willful and material violation of the Company's rules and policies that causes material harm; (iv) commission of an act of dishonesty, theft, fraud, embezzlement or material misappropriation of property of the Company; or (v) act that will or is reasonably expected to have, a significant adverse effect on the business or reputation of the Company unless taken with the good faith belief that it was in the best interest of the Company; and
•: "good reason" as (i) a material diminution in Mr. Schafer's authority, duties or responsibilities, or any significant adverse change in his title as Executive Vice President—Finance and Accounting, (ii) movement of Mr. Schafer's place of employment more than fifty miles from Overland Park, Kansas, (iii) a material diminution in Mr. Schafer's base compensation, as in effect from time to time, or (iv) a material breach by the Company of any term of the employment agreement.

Mr. Schafer's employment agreement includes a non-compete covenant providing that during the term and for a period of one year following termination, Mr. Schafer may not, directly or indirectly, engage in the data center business, or own, manage, control or participate in the ownership, management or control of, or be employed or engaged by or otherwise affiliated with, any other company engaged in the data center business, other than the ownership of up to five percent of the

Table of Contents

outstanding shares of any public company. Moreover, Mr. Schafer's employment agreement provides that, during the term and for a one-year period following termination, Mr. Schafer will not solicit any of our customers for data center space within the United States, encourage any of our customers to reduce their patronage of us, solicit or hire any of our current employees or independent contractors or former employees or independent contractors who left employment within the prior year, or encourage any of our employees to leave their employment with us. In addition, Mr. Schafer's employment agreement includes a confidentiality covenant on the part of Mr. Schafer and a covenant that both we and Mr. Schafer agree not to talk about or otherwise communicate to any third parties in a malicious, disparaging or defamatory manner regarding the other.

Charter Aircraft Arrangement

Beginning in June 2015, the Company charters an aircraft from Priester Aviation for business purposes and pays a charter fee directly to Priester Aviation for its use. The aircraft is owned by Hawker I, LLC and operated by Quality Group of Companies, LLC, both companies with which are 100% owned by Chad Williams. Quality Group of Companies hired Priester Aviation, a thirty party aviation service provider, to operate and manage all charter services of the aircraft. During 2016, $492,735 of the amount that the Company paid to Priester Aviation for charter flights was paid to Quality Group of Companies.

Intellectual Property

In October 2013, in connection with our initial public offering, we entered into a license agreement with Quality Group of Companies, LLC ("QGC"), which is owned by Chad L. Williams, pursuant to which QGC granted us a license to use the trademarked stylized "Q" used in QGC's logo at no cost. The license agreement will terminate when Mr. Williams ceases to act as our Chief Executive Officer.

Indemnification Agreements

We have entered into indemnification agreements with each of our executive officers and directors that obligate us to indemnify them to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law. The indemnification agreements provide that if a director or executive officer is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any proceeding by reason of such director's or executive officer's status as a director, officer or employee of our company, we must indemnify such director or executive officer for all reasonable expenses and liabilities actually incurred by him or her, or on his or her behalf, unless it has been established that:

•: the act or omission of the director or executive officer was material to the matter giving rise to the proceeding and either was committed in bad faith or was the result of active and deliberate dishonesty;
•: the director or executive officer actually received an improper personal benefit in money, property or services; or
•: with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, the director or executive officer had reasonable cause to believe that his or her conduct was unlawful;

provided, however, that we (i) have no obligation to indemnify such director or executive officer for a proceeding by or in the right of our company, for reasonable expenses and liabilities actually incurred by him or her, or on his or her behalf, if it has been adjudged that such director or executive officer is liable to us with respect to such proceeding and (ii) have no obligation to indemnify or advance expenses of such director or executive officer for a proceeding brought by such director or executive officer against the company, except for a proceeding brought to enforce indemnification under Section 2-418 of the MGCL or as otherwise provided by our bylaws, our charter, a resolution of the

Table of Contents

Board or an agreement approved by the Board. Under the MGCL, a Maryland corporation may not indemnify a director or officer in a suit by or in the right of the corporation in which the director or officer was adjudged liable on the basis that a personal benefit was improperly received.

Upon application of a director or executive officer of our company to a court of appropriate jurisdiction, the court may order indemnification of such director or executive officer if:

•: the court determines that such director or executive officer is entitled to indemnification under Section 2-418(d)(1) of the MGCL, in which case the director or executive officer shall be entitled to recover from us the expenses of securing such indemnification; or
•: the court determines that such director or executive officer is fairly and reasonably entitled to indemnification in view of all the relevant circumstances, whether or not the director or executive officer has met the standards of conduct set forth in Section 2-418(b) of the MGCL or has been adjudged liable for receipt of an "improper personal benefit" under Section 2-418(c) of the MGCL; provided, however, that our indemnification obligations to such director or executive officer will be limited to the expenses actually and reasonably incurred by him or her, or on his or her behalf, in connection with any proceeding by or in the right of our company or in which the officer or director shall have been adjudged liable for receipt of an improper personal benefit under Section 2-418(c) of the MGCL.

Notwithstanding, and without limiting any other provisions of the indemnification agreements, if a director or executive officer is a party or is threatened to be made a party to any proceeding by reason of such director's or executive officer's status as our director, officer or employee, and such director or executive officer is successful, on the merits or otherwise, as to one or more but less than all claims, issues or matters in such proceeding, we must indemnify such director or executive officer for all expenses actually and reasonably incurred by him or her, or on his or her behalf, in connection with each successfully resolved claim, issue or matter, including any claim, issue or matter in such a proceeding that is terminated by dismissal, with or without prejudice.

We must pay all indemnifiable expenses in advance of the final disposition of any proceeding if the director or executive officer furnishes us with a written affirmation of the director's or executive officer's good faith belief that the standard of conduct necessary for indemnification by us has been met and a written undertaking to reimburse us if a court of competent jurisdiction determines that the director or executive officer is not entitled to indemnification.

In addition to the indemnification agreements, our charter and bylaws obligate us, to the maximum extent permitted by Maryland law, to indemnify and to pay or reimburse reasonable expenses in advance of final disposition of a proceeding to (1) any of our present or former directors or officers who is made or threatened to be made a party to the proceeding by reason of his or her service in that capacity or (2) any individual who, while serving as our director or officer and at our request, serves or has served another corporation, REIT, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or any other enterprise as a director, officer, partner or trustee of such corporation, REIT, partnership, joint venture, trust, employee benefit plan or other enterprise, and who is made or threatened to be made a party to the proceeding by reason of his service in that capacity.

Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons

Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics prohibits directors and executive officers from engaging in transactions that may result in a conflict of interest with us. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics allows exceptions to this prohibition, but only if a majority of the disinterested directors approve the transaction or the transaction has otherwise been approved pursuant to the Company's Related Party Transaction Policy. According to the Related Party Transaction Policy and the Audit Committee's charter, the Audit Committee will review any transaction involving a director or officer that may create a conflict of interest. The Audit Committee will either approve or reject the transaction or refer the transaction to the full Board or other appropriate committee in its discretion.

Table of Contents

MISCELLANEOUS

Other Matters to Come Before the 2017 Annual Meeting

No other matters are to be presented for action at the Annual Meeting other than as set forth in this Proxy Statement. If other matters properly come before the meeting, however, the persons named in the proxy card will vote all proxies solicited by this Proxy Statement as recommended by the Board, or, if no such recommendation is given, in their own discretion.

Stockholder Proposals and Nominations for the 2018 Annual Meeting

Any proposal of a stockholder intended to be included in our proxy statement for the 2018 Annual Meeting of stockholders pursuant to SEC Rule 14a-8 must be received by us no later than November 20, 2017 unless the date of our 2018 Annual Meeting is more than 30 days before or after May 4, 2018, in which case the proposal must be received a reasonable time before we begin to print and mail our proxy materials. All proposals should be directed to our Corporate Secretary, at 12851 Foster Street, Overland Park, Kansas 66213.

In addition, any stockholder who wishes to propose a nominee to the Board or propose any other business to be considered by the stockholders (other than a stockholder proposal included in our proxy materials pursuant to Rule 14a-8 of the rules promulgated under the Exchange Act) must comply with the advance notice provisions and other requirements of Article II, Section 12 of our bylaws, which are on file with the SEC and may be obtained from Investor Relations upon request. These notice provisions require that nominations of persons for election to the Board and the proposal of business to be considered by the stockholders for the 2017 Annual Meeting must be received no earlier than October 21, 2017 and no later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on November 20, 2017. However, in the event that the 2018 Annual Meeting is advanced or delayed by more than 30 days from the first anniversary of the date of the 2017 Annual Meeting, notice by the stockholder to be timely must be received no earlier than the 150^th day prior to the date of the meeting and not later than 5:00 p.m., Eastern Time, on the later of the 120^th day prior to the date of the meeting or the tenth day following the date of the first public announcement of the meeting.

Householding of Proxy Materials

If you and other residents at your mailing address own shares of common stock in street name, your broker or bank may have sent you a notice that your household will receive only one annual report and proxy statement for each company in which you hold shares through that broker or bank. This practice of sending only one copy of proxy materials is known as "householding." If you did not respond that you did not want to participate in householding, you were deemed to have consented to the process. If the foregoing procedures apply to you, your broker has sent one copy of our annual report and Proxy Statement to your address. You may revoke your consent to householding at any time by sending your name, the name of your brokerage firm and your account number to Broadridge, Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717 (telephone number: 1-800-542-1061). The revocation of your consent to householding will be effective 30 days following its receipt. In any event, if you did not receive an individual copy of this Proxy Statement or our annual report, we will promptly send a copy to you if you address your written request to or call QTS Realty Trust, Inc., 12851 Foster Street, Overland Park, Kansas 66213, Attention: Investor Relations at (678) 835-4443 or ir@qtsdatacenters.com. If you are receiving multiple copies of our annual report and proxy statement, you can request householding by contacting Investor Relations in the same manner.

Table of Contents

IMPORTANT NOTICE REGARDING THE AVAILABILITY OF PROXY MATERIALS
FOR THE STOCKHOLDER MEETING TO BE HELD ON MAY 4, 2017

This Proxy Statement and our 2016 Annual Report are available on our website atwww.qtsdatacenters.com. In addition, our stockholders may access this information, as well as transmit their voting instructions, atwww.proxyvote.com by having their proxy card and related instructions in hand.

Additional copies of this Proxy Statement and our Annual Report will be furnished to our stockholders upon written request to the Corporate Secretary at the mailing address for our executive offices set forth on the first page of this Proxy Statement. If requested by eligible stockholders, we will provide copies of exhibits to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 for a reasonable fee.


		By Order of the Board of Directors

		Shirley E. Goza Secretary

Overland Park, Kansas
March 20, 2017

Table of Contents

Appendix A

2017 AMENDED AND RESTATED QTS REALTY TRUST, INC. EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN

This 2017 Amended and Restated QTS Realty Trust, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the "Plan") amends and restates the QTS Realty Trust, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which previously was adopted by QTS Realty Trust, Inc. (the "Company") and became effective July 1, 2015. The purpose of this Plan is to provide eligible employees of the Company the opportunity to purchase shares of the Company's Class A common stock, $0.01 par value ("Common Stock") on a systematic basis at a discount. The Plan is designed to facilitate the accumulation of Common Stock by employees of the Company and certain of its subsidiaries, thereby aligning the economic interests of such employees with the economic interests of the Company's shareholders. The Plan is not intended to qualify as an "employee stock purchase plan" under section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code.

1. Effective Date and Term. The Plan, as amended and restated, shall be effective July 1, 2017 ("Effective Date"), subject to shareholder approval. Unless terminated earlier pursuant to Section 20, the Plan shall have a term of ten years, commencing as of the Effective Date.

2. Administration. The Plan will be administered by the Compensation Committee (the "Committee") of the Company's Board of Directors (the "Board") or by a committee of one or more persons appointed by the Board or the Committee (the "Administrator"). Subject to any limitations set forth in the delegation to the Administrator, the Administrator has the authority to take the actions specified in the Plan and the discretionary authority to interpret the Plan and to adopt and implement rules and regulations for the administration of the Plan, and its interpretation and decisions with regard thereto shall be final and conclusive. The Administrator may delegate its duties and authority under the Plan.

3. Shares Available under the Plan. As of the Effective Date, there shall be a total of 241,415 shares of Common Stock, less any shares that have been purchased under the plan in effect prior to the Effective Date, available for issuance under the Plan. The Company shall issue shares of Common Stock from authorized but unissued shares or from shares reacquired by the Company, as the Company determines is appropriate from time to time.

4. Eligibility. All employees of the Company and its majority-owned subsidiaries (each a "Designated Subsidiary") who have been employed for at least thirty (30) days and who perform at least thirty (30) hours of service per week for the Company or a Designated Subsidiary are eligible to participate in the Plan, provided that they are employees of the Company or a Designated Subsidiary on the first day of the applicable Purchase Period (as defined below), that they do not, at any time during a Purchase Period, own stock possessing 5% or more of the total combined voting power or value of all class of stock of the Company, and that they are not required to file reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Eligible Employees").

5. Purchase Periods. There shall be four Purchase Periods each year, one beginning on January 1 and ending on March 31, one beginning on April 1 and ending on June 30, one beginning on July 1 and ending on September 30, and one beginning on October 1 and ending on December 31. The Administrator may, at any time and at its discretion, change the duration of future Purchase Periods (subject to a maximum Purchase Period of twenty-seven (27) months) and/or the start and end dates of future Purchase Periods.

6. Participation. An Eligible Employee may elect to participate for a given Purchase Period, and will be considered a "Participant" for that Purchase Period, by completing and submitting an enrollment form to the Administrator no later than fourteen (14) days prior to the first day of such Purchase Period, or such other period as determined by the Administrator. The enrollment form will

A-1

Table of Contents

authorize the after-tax payroll deduction from each paycheck received by the Participant during a Purchase Period, beginning in the first Purchase Period following the Participant's timely submission of the enrollment form to the Administrator. A Participant may change (increase or decrease) his or her payroll deduction election for a Purchase Period by completing and submitting a new enrollment form to the Administrator no later than fourteen (14) days prior to a Purchase Period, in which case such Participant's payroll deduction will be increased or decreased accordingly, effective on the first pay date in the Purchase Period following the timely submission of a new enrollment form.

Unless a Participant files a new enrollment form or withdraws from the Plan, his or her payroll deductions and purchases of Common Stock will continue at the same rate for future Purchase Periods under the Plan as long as the Plan remains in effect.

7. Payroll Deductions. The Administrator or the Company will maintain bookkeeping accounts for all Participants to record their authorized payroll deductions ("Accounts"). A Participant may authorize a payroll deduction in whole dollar amounts (and in such increments as the Administrator may determine) of his or her base salary, subject to a minimum of $20 per paycheck and a maximum of $1,000 per paycheck. All payroll deductions made on behalf of each Participant from paychecks paid during each Purchase Period shall be credited to the Participant's Account and will be held for the purchase of Common Stock on the related Purchase Date (as defined below).

8. No Interest. Interest will not be paid on any Accounts under the Plan.

9. Terminating Participation and Withdrawal of Funds. A Participant may at any time prior to the close of business on the fourteenth (14^th) day prior to the Purchase Date (as defined below), and for any reason, terminate his or her participation in the Plan, in which case no further payroll deductions will be made with respect to such Participant, effective on the first pay date in the Purchase Period following the Participant's timely termination of his or her participation in the Plan. Funds remaining in a Participant's Account after a Participant terminates his or her participation in the Plan will not be refunded to the Participant but instead will be used to purchase Common Stock on behalf of such Participant pursuant to the terms of the Plan. A Participant terminating participation in the Plan may not begin participation again during the same Purchase Period in which the Participant's termination of his or her participation in the Plan became effective. The Participant may participate in any subsequent Purchase Period in accordance with the Plan and any terms and conditions as the Board or the Administrator may establish.

10. 401(k) Hardship Withdrawals. If a Participant makes a hardship withdrawal from an employee benefit plan maintained by the Company or a Designated Subsidiary and the Administrator determines that such withdrawal requires a suspension of contributions under this Plan in order for such other plan to continue to satisfy the requirements of Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, the Administrator shall have the right to unilaterally suspend such Participant's contributions.

11. Purchase of Shares. On the first business day immediately following the end of each Purchase Period, or as soon thereafter as is reasonably practicable, (the "Purchase Date"), the balance credited to a Participant's Account as of the end of such Purchase Period shall be applied in full to purchase the maximum number of full and fractional shares (to three decimal places) of Common Stock at the Purchase Price (as defined in Section 12) for such Common Stock for that Purchase Period. The Company will pay the cost of the broker's commission and fees on the purchase of the shares.

12. Purchase Price. The Purchase Price for each Purchase Period shall be determined by the Committee; provided, however, that the Purchase Price shall not be less than the lesser of ninety percent (90%) of the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock (i) on the first trading day of the Purchase Period, or (ii) on the last trading day of the Purchase Period; provided further, that in no

A-2

Table of Contents

event shall the Purchase Price be less than the par value of the Common Stock. The Fair Market Value shall be the closing sales price for a share of Common Stock as quoted on the New York Stock Exchange (or such other exchange on which the Common Stock is listed) for such date.

13. Insufficient Number of Shares. If the number of shares of Common Stock available for issuance under the Plan is insufficient to cover the number of shares that Participants' payments would purchase for a Purchase Period, then the number of shares of Common Stock a Participant would otherwise purchase on the Purchase Date for such Purchase Period shall be reduced to the number of shares determined by multiplying the number of remaining shares by a fraction, the numerator of which shall be the number of shares of Common Stock the Participant would have purchased on the Purchase Date (if there had been sufficient shares) and the denominator of which shall be the total number of shares of Common Stock all Participants would have purchased on the Purchase Date (if there had been sufficient shares).

14. Delivery of Shares. Each participant in the Plan shall be required to open an account with the designated broker for the Plan as a condition of participation in the Plan. Shares of Common Stock purchased by a Participant under this Plan shall be held for the Participant for a period of one (1) year following the Purchase Date, during which time the Participant may not sell, exchange, assign, encumber, alienate, transfer, pledge or otherwise dispose of the shares. At the end of this one (1) year period, the shares shall be credited to the Participant's account with the designated broker and may be transferred or sold by the Participant at any time, subject to any restrictions imposed by law or the QTS Realty Trust, Inc. Policy on Inside Information and Insider Trading (the "Trading Policy"). The Board or Administrator may, at any time and at its discretion, choose a different broker or direct the book entry registration of shares.

15. Termination of Employment. In the event of a Participant's termination of employment on or before the tenth (10^th) business day prior to a Purchase Date, no additional payroll deductions will be taken from any pay due to such Participant, and the balance in such Participant's Account will be paid to the Participant or, in the event of the Participant's death, to the Participant's estate. In the event of a Participant's termination of employment after the tenth (10^th) business day prior to a Purchase Date, a purchase of shares will occur in accordance with the terms of the Plan. For purposes of the Plan, a Participant's termination of employment or death will not be deemed to have occurred prior to the date the Administrator is provided written notice of such termination of employment or death. If, prior to the last day of the Purchase Period, the Designated Subsidiary by which a Participant is employed ceases to be a Designated Subsidiary, or if the Participant is transferred to a subsidiary of the Company that is not a Designated Subsidiary, the Participant will be deemed to have terminated employment for the purposes of this Plan.

16. Participants Not Stockholders. No Participant electing to participate in the Plan will be considered a stockholder of the Company with respect to his or her payroll deductions during any Purchase Period until shares of Common Stock have been purchased and credited to his or her account with the designated broker for the Plan.

17. Rights Not Transferable. Rights under the Plan are not transferable by a Participant.

18. Adjustments in Case of Changes Affecting Shares. In the event of a stock split, stock dividend, recapitalization or other subdivision, combination, or reclassification of the shares of Common Stock, the maximum number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the Plan, as set forth in Section 3, and, to the extent necessary, the Purchase Price for such shares of Common Stock shall be adjusted proportionately. In the event of any other change affecting the shares of Common Stock, such adjustment, if any, shall be made as may be deemed equitable by the Administrator to give proper effect to such event.

A-3

Table of Contents

19. Amendment of the Plan. The Board or the designated Administrator may at any time, and from time to time, amend the Plan in any respect.

20. Termination of the Plan. The Board may terminate the Plan at any time. Upon termination of the Plan, all amounts credited to the Accounts of Participants will be promptly refunded without interest.

21. Governing Law. The Plan shall be governed by and construed in accordance with Maryland law, except to the extent that such law is preempted by federal law.

22. Withholding. Each Participant must make provision satisfactory to the Administrator for payment of any taxes required by law to be withheld in connection with any transaction under the Plan. The Company may, to the extent permitted by law, deduct any such taxes from any payment of any kind otherwise due to a Participant.

23. Special Rules for Certain Employees.

(a) The special rules in this section 23 apply with respect to participation in the Plan by Eligible Employees who are "Restricted Persons," as defined in the Trading Policy. The provisions of this section are intended to make a Restricted Person's enrollment election under the Plan constitute a trading plan that satisfies the requirements for a Rule 10b5-1 plan under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, with respect to such Restricted Person. The Administrator may provide for such additional rules and conditions as it may determine to permit a Restricted Person's enrollment election to satisfy the requirements of Rule 10b5-1. To the extent the provisions of this section are inconsistent with the preceding provisions of the Plan, the provisions of this section will govern with respect to Restricted Persons.

(b) A Restricted Person may elect to participate in the Plan only during a period that is not in a "black-out period" or a "special blackout period" (as described in the Trading Policy) and during which trading in Common Stock by the Restricted Person is permitted under the Trading Policy. Such Restricted Person's enrollment under the Plan will become effective for the first pay date in the Purchase Period following the date the completed enrollment form is received by the Administrator, or for such later pay date as may be administratively practicable in such Purchase Period.

(c) A Restricted Person may not change (increase or decrease) his or her enrollment election except in the fourth window period following the window period in which the Restricted Person's most recent enrollment election was made. If the Restricted Person does not change (increase or decrease) his or her enrollment election at that time, he or she will nevertheless be deemed to have made a new enrollment election during such following window period for purposes of the preceding sentence. Any change in the Restricted Person's enrollment election permitted by this paragraph will become effective for the first pay date in the Purchase Period following the date the Restricted Person's completed enrollment form is received by the Administrator as is administratively feasible.

(d) Notwithstanding the foregoing paragraph (c) of this section, a Restricted Person may at any time until the close of business on the third business day prior to the last day in a Purchase Period and for any reason terminate his or her participation in the Plan and withdraw the balance accumulated in such Restricted Person's Account. A Restricted Person who terminates participation in the Plan may again commence participation in the Plan no earlier than the second window period following the date the Restricted Person terminates participation in the Plan.

A-4

VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. Computershare 211 Quality Circle, Suite 210 College Station, TX 77845 ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. For Withhold For All Except To withhold authority to vote for any individual nominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the AllAll The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: nominee(s) on the line below. 0 0 0 1. Election of Directors Nominees 01 Chad L. Williams 06 Scott D. Miller 02 John W. Barter 07 Philip P. Trahanas 03 William O. Grabe 08 Stephen E. Westhead 04 Catherine R. Kinney 05 Peter A. Marino The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2, 3 and 4. For 0 0 0 Against 0 0 0 Abstain 0 0 0 2 To approve, on a non-binding advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Company's named executive officers. 3 To approve the 2017 Amended and Restated QTS Realty Trust, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan. 4 To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017. NOTE: In their discretion, the Proxies are authorized to vote upon such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date 0000318426_1 R1.0.1.15

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice & Proxy Statement, Annual Report are available at www.proxyvote.com QTS REALTY TRUST, INC. Annual Meeting of Stockholders May 4, 2017 8:00 AM CDT This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors The undersigned stockholder(s) hereby appoint(s) William H. Schafer and Shirley E. Goza, or either of them, as proxies, each with the power to appoint (his/her) substitute, and hereby authorizes them to represent and to vote, as designated on the reverse side of this ballot, all of the shares of Common Stock of QTS REALTY TRUST, INC. that the stockholder(s) is/are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting of Stockholder(s) to be held at 8:00 AM, CDT on May 4, 2017, at 12851 Foster Street, Overland Park, Kansas 66213, and any adjournment or postponement thereof. This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors' recommendations. Continued and to be signed on reverse side 0000318426_2 R1.0.1.15

Qts Realty Trust (QTS) DEF 14ADefinitive proxy