SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant ☐ Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☒
Check the appropriate box:
| ☐ | Preliminary Proxy Statement | |
| ☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2)) | |
| ☐ | Definitive Proxy Statement | |
| ☒ | Definitive Additional Materials | |
| ☐ | Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 | |
INNOVIVA, INC.
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
Sarissa Capital Domestic Fund LP
Sarissa Capital Offshore Master Fund LP
Sarissa Capital Fund GP LLC
Sarissa Capital Fund GP LP
Sarissa Capital Offshore Fund GP LLC
Sarissa Capital Management GP LLC
Sarissa Capital Management LP
Dr. Alexander J. Denner
Mr. Mark DiPaolo
Mr. George W. Bickerstaff, III
Mr. Jules Haimovitz
Dr. Odysseas Kostas
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (check the appropriate box):
| ☒ | No fee required. | |||
| ☐ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rule 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11. | |||
| 1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
| |||
| 2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
| |||
| 3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
| |||
| 4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
| |||
| 5) | Total fee paid:
| |||
| ☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. | |||
| ☐ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. | |||
| 1) | Amount Previously Paid:
| |||
| 2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:
| |||
| 3) | Filing Party:
| |||
| 4) | Date Filed:
| |||
On April 10, 2017, Sarissa Capital Management LP, together with the other Participants (as defined below), issued the following press release in connection with its solicitation of proxies for the 2017 annual meeting of shareholders of Innoviva, Inc. The Participants also posted the press release to www.dfking.com/INVA:
SARISSA CAPITAL COMPELLED TO CLARIFY EGREGIOUS MISSTATEMENTS MADE BY INNOVIVA
************
ISS and Glass Lewis both recommend that Innoviva shareholders vote on Sarissa’s GOLD PROXY CARD
ISS and Glass Lewis both say DO NOT VOTE ON MANAGEMENT’S WHITE CARD
Greenwich, CT, April 10, 2017 – Sarissa Capital Management LP (“Sarissa”) today made the following statement regarding the latest misleading statements made by Innoviva, Inc. (NASDAQ: INVA).
In an extremely misleading public announcement, we believe Innoviva is trying to misinform its shareholders regarding the recent recommendations of ISS and Glass Lewis, the leading independent proxy voting and corporate governance firms. Notably, Innoviva juxtaposes comments about ISS and Glass Lewis with Innoviva’s own recommendation for whom shareholders should vote, without providing clear indication about, and thus obscuring, who is making the recommendation. In fact, while the Innoviva press release purports to be a commentary on ISS and Glass Lewis, not only are both firms not even discussed until the end of the press release, but the press release never mentions their actual recommendations. To be clear:
ISS AND GLASS LEWIS BOTH RECOMMEND THAT INNOVIVA SHAREHOLDERS VOTE ON SARISSA’S GOLD PROXY CARD. ISS RECOMMENDS ALL THREE SARISSA NOMINEES AND GLASS LEWIS RECOMMENDS TWO SARISSA NOMINEES. ISS AND GLASS LEWIS RECOMMEND THAT SHAREHOLDERS DO NOT VOTE ON MANAGEMENT’S WHITE CARD.
It is quite disturbing to us that Innoviva has misled, and continues to mislead, its shareholders. Recall other misstatements made by Innoviva throughout this proxy contest:
Misstatement #1 – Innoviva claimed that we are seeking to take effective control of the board. This is not true, we are seeking a minority position on the board.
Misstatement #2 – Innoviva claimed that Dr. Denner’s cost-cutting at Enzon resulted in catastrophic value destruction. This is not true. Enzon’s royalty revenues have declined due to expirations of royalties and less usage of the drugs from which the company received these royalties. In fact, the new board cut expenses so that more of the royalty revenue received by the company would be delivered to shareholders, instead of management.
Misstatement #3 – Innoviva claimed that we had not made a serious attempt to engage constructively with them. This is not true. In fact, the opposite is true. We had been repeatedly rebuffed in our attempts to have an active dialogue with non-management directors.
WE FIND THIS CONDUCT INEXCUSABLE. WE CANNOT FATHOM HOW ANY OBJECTIVE SHAREHOLDER CAN IN GOOD FAITH SUPPORT DIRECTORS THAT CONDONE SUCH EGREGIOUS MISCONDUCT.
ISS and Glass Lewis have stated that Innoviva has a “lack of transparency” and has “selectively structured” its responses to our concerns, respectively. Unlike Innoviva, we have set forth these quotes in full below so that our fellow shareholders have a clear understanding of the facts.
ISS has stated:
“In its filings, management describes Innoviva as a pass-through entity that collects royalty checks from GSK and distributes them to shareholders. However, the company has a cost structure that is incompatible with its described purpose, and during the engagement process with ISS positioned itself as a more complex business in which the additional operating costs translate in royalty growth above what would be driven solely by GSK sales efforts. Thislack of transparency makes it difficult for shareholders to understand management’s strategy, and it has probably been a factor that negatively influenced investor perception of the NPV of BREO and ANORO and, therefore, negatively impacted Innoviva’s market cap over the past two years.” [Emphasis added]
Glass Lewis has stated:
“In turn, we believe the board has offered aselectively structured, unconvincing rebuke of material concerns surrounding Innoviva’s climbing costs, poor TSR performance, dubious compensation practices and troubling corporate governance protocols. In light of these considerable concerns, we believe investors would benefit from a fresh, shareholder-friendly perspective at the board level.” [Emphasis added]
In addition, recall some of the statements made by ISS and Glass Lewis in supporting Sarissa nominees:
For example, when discussing Innoviva’s corporate governance issues, including the NomGov committee process touted by Innoviva that added Patrick LePore and Barbara Duncan to the board, Glass Lewis stated:
“While we understand the board may view this framework as providing credibility to the process leading to the appointment of directors Duncan and [LePore], we believe the overwhelming bulk of associated disclosure suggests a deeply flawed committee effort mired in, among other things,dubious meeting protocols, poor member participation, inclusion of non-member directors and, most disconcertingly, the expansive involvement of the Company’s sitting CEO. In short, then, we believe there is sufficient cause to suggest Innoviva’s corporate governance architecture may be both faulty and reactive.” [Emphasis Added]
In recommending our entire slate of nominees, ISS stated:
“[Sarissa] has made a compelling case that change at the board level is warranted. The primary issue to be addressed is the company’s apparent misalignment between operating expenses and the company’s business objectives.There are also governance shortcomings rooted in a lack of transparency and communication, suggesting that the company would benefit from additional shareholder oversight.” [Emphasis Added]
Sarissa strongly believes that Innoviva must learn that shareholder capital must be optimized for the benefit of shareholders, not management. We are gravely concerned about the ability of the current board and management team to be good stewards of future shareholder capital and its desires to “build over time a recurring revenue business.”
Our nominees – George Bickerstaff, Jules Haimovitz and Odysseas Kostas – can help fix the problems at Innoviva. These qualified nominees understand that shareholder capital must be optimized for the benefit of shareholders, not management, and will work hard to make sure shareholder capital at Innoviva is so optimized.
INNOVIVA DOES NOT MARKET OR SELL ANY DRUGS. IT JUST COLLECTS ROYALTIES.
SO WHY IS IT SPENDING SO MUCH MONEY AND
WHY IS IT PAYING ITS MANAGEMENT AND DIRECTORS SO MUCH?
IT IS TIME FOR INNOVIVA TO BE OPTIMIZED FOR SHAREHOLDERS.
Time is of the essence. We urge you to VOTE THE GOLD PROXY CARD to help us deliver the necessary change to Innoviva. It is important that you submit your GOLD proxy card AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. Importantly, if you
receive a white card from Innoviva, DO NOT return it, just discard it. If you want to follow ISS’ or Glass Lewis’ recommendation YOU MUST VOTE ON THE GOLD CARD AND YOU CANNOT VOTE THE WHITE CARD. Returning a white card, even if you withhold on Innoviva’s nominees, will not be a vote for the Sarissa nominees, and it would revoke any vote you previously submitted on the GOLD CARD.
PLEASE VOTE NOW by signing, dating and returning the GOLD proxy card. You may also vote by phone or internet by following the instructions on the GOLD PROXY CARD. If you have any questions regarding your GOLD proxy card or need assistance in executing your proxy, please contact our proxy solicitor:
D.F. KING & CO., INC.
STOCKHOLDERS CALL TOLL-FREE: (800) 549-6746
BANKS AND BROKERAGE FIRMS CALL: (212) 269-5550
WWW.DFKING.COM/INVA.
Contacts:
Sarissa Capital Management LP
Melinda Zech
203-302-2330
D.F. King & Co., Inc.
Edward McCarthy
Peter Aymar
212-269-5550
CERTAIN INFORMATION CONCERNING THE PARTICIPANTS
ON MARCH 22, 2017, SARISSA CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LP (“SARISSA”), TOGETHER WITH THE OTHER PARTICIPANTS IN SARISSA’S PROXY SOLICITATION (THE “PARTICIPANTS”), FILED A DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT AND ACCOMPANYING GOLD PROXY CARD WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (THE “SEC”) TO BE USED TO SOLICIT PROXIES IN CONNECTION WITH THE 2017 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS OF INNOVIVA, INC. (THE “COMPANY”). STOCKHOLDERS ARE URGED TO READ THE DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT AND OTHER DOCUMENTS RELATED TO THE SOLICITATION OF PROXIES FROM THE STOCKHOLDERS OF THE COMPANY BECAUSE THEY CONTAIN IMPORTANT INFORMATION, INCLUDING INFORMATION RELATING TO THE PARTICIPANTS. THE DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT AND A FORM OF PROXY IS AVAILABLE TO STOCKHOLDERS OF THE COMPANY AT NO CHARGE AT THE SEC’S WEBSITE ATWWW.SEC.GOV. THE DEFINITIVE PROXY STATEMENT AND A FORM OF PROXY IS ALSO AVAILABLE BY CONTACTING SARISSA’S PROXY SOLICITOR, D.F. KING & CO., INC., BY TELEPHONE AT THE FOLLOWING NUMBERS: STOCKHOLDERS CALL TOLL-FREE: (800) 549-6746 AND BANKS AND BROKERAGE FIRMS CALL: (212) 269-5550, OR THROUGH THE INTERNET ATWWW.DFKING.COM/INVA
Consent of the author and publication to use the quotations contained in the material filed herewith as proxy soliciting material was neither sought nor obtained.