Document_and_Entity_Informatio
Document and Entity Information (USD $) | 9 Months Ended | |
Dec. 31, 2014 | Feb. 11, 2015 | |
Document And Entity Information | ||
Entity Registrant Name | UA Granite Corp | |
Entity Central Index Key | 1577882 | |
Document Type | 10-Q | |
Document Period End Date | 31-Dec-14 | |
Amendment Flag | FALSE | |
Current Fiscal Year End Date | -28 | |
Is Entity a Well-known Seasoned Issuer? | No | |
Is Entity a Voluntary Filer? | No | |
Is Entity's Reporting Status Current? | Yes | |
Entity Filer Category | Smaller Reporting Company | |
Entity Public Float | $0 | |
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding | 5,650,000 | 5,650,000 |
Document Fiscal Period Focus | Q3 | |
Document Fiscal Year Focus | 2015 |
Balance_Sheets
Balance Sheets (USD $) | Dec. 31, 2014 | Mar. 31, 2014 |
Current Assets | ||
Cash | $1,755 | $19,971 |
Total Assets | 1,755 | 19,971 |
Current Liabilities | ||
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities | 2,000 | 14,500 |
Due to Directors | 8,933 | 5,123 |
Total Liabilities | 10,933 | 19,623 |
Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) | ||
Common Stock (75,000,000 shares authorized, par value 0.00001, 5,650,000 shares issued and outstanding) at December 31, 2014 and March 31, 2014, respectively | 57 | 57 |
Additional Paid in Capital | 26,731 | 26,397 |
Deficit accumulated during the development stage | -35,966 | -26,106 |
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) | -9,178 | 348 |
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) | $1,755 | $19,971 |
Balance_Sheets_Parenthetical
Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) (USD $) | Dec. 31, 2014 | Mar. 31, 2014 |
Statement of Financial Position [Abstract] | ||
Common Stock shares authorized | 75,000,000 | 75,000,000 |
Common Stock par value | $0.00 | $0.00 |
Common Stock shares issued | 5,650,000 | 5,650,000 |
Common Stock shares outstanding | 5,650,000 | 5,650,000 |
Statements_of_Operations
Statements of Operations (USD $) | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 22 Months Ended | ||
Dec. 31, 2014 | Dec. 31, 2013 | Dec. 31, 2014 | Dec. 31, 2013 | Dec. 31, 2014 | |
Operating Expenses | |||||
Legal and accounting | $1,470 | $6,000 | $4,720 | $7,700 | $16,425 |
Consulting | 12,500 | ||||
General and administrative | 4,806 | 22 | 4,806 | 38 | 6,304 |
Total Operating Expenses | 6,276 | 6,022 | 9,526 | 7,738 | 35,229 |
Other Expense | |||||
Imputed interest expense | 131 | 102 | 334 | 303 | 737 |
Net Loss | ($6,407) | ($6,124) | ($9,860) | ($8,041) | ($35,966) |
Net Loss Per Common Share - Basic and Diluted | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | |
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding | 5,650,000 | 5,134,239 | 5,650,000 | 5,044,909 |
Statements_of_Cash_Flows
Statements of Cash Flows (USD $) | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | 22 Months Ended | ||
Dec. 31, 2014 | Dec. 31, 2013 | Dec. 31, 2014 | Dec. 31, 2013 | Mar. 31, 2014 | Dec. 31, 2014 | |
Operating Activities | ||||||
Net loss | ($6,407) | ($6,124) | ($9,860) | ($8,041) | ($23,915) | ($35,966) |
Adjustment to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities: | ||||||
Imputed interest | 131 | 102 | 334 | 303 | 403 | 737 |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | ||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | -12,500 | 2,001 | ||||
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities | -22,026 | -7,738 | -33,228 | |||
Financing Activities | ||||||
Proceeds from directors | 3,810 | 8,933 | ||||
Proceeds from issuance of common shares | 26,000 | 26,050 | ||||
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities | 3,810 | 26,000 | 34,983 | |||
Increase (Decrease) in Cash | -18,216 | 18,262 | 1,755 | |||
Cash - Beginning of Period | 19,971 | 4,982 | 4,982 | |||
Cash - End of Period | 1,755 | 23,244 | 1,755 | 23,244 | 19,971 | 1,755 |
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information | ||||||
Interest | ||||||
Income taxes |
Statement_of_Changes_in_Stockh
Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (Unaudited) (USD $) | Common Stock | Additional Paid-In Capital | Accumulated Deficit during Development Stage [Member] | Total |
Beginning Balance at Feb. 14, 2013 | ||||
Beginning Balance, Shares at Feb. 14, 2013 | ||||
Common Stock Issued | 50 | 50 | ||
Common Stock Issued, Shares | 5,000,000 | |||
Net Loss | -2,191 | -2,191 | ||
Ending Balance at Mar. 31, 2013 | 50 | -2,191 | -2,141 | |
Ending Balance, Shares at Mar. 31, 2013 | 5,000,000 | |||
Common Stock Issued | 7 | 25,994 | 26,001 | |
Common Stock Issued, Shares | 650,000 | |||
Imputed Interest | 403 | 403 | ||
Net Loss | -23,915 | -23,915 | ||
Ending Balance at Mar. 31, 2014 | 57 | 26,397 | -26,106 | 348 |
Ending Balance, Shares at Mar. 31, 2014 | 5,650,000 | |||
Common Stock Issued | ||||
Imputed Interest | 334 | 334 | ||
Net Loss | -9,860 | -9,860 | ||
Ending Balance at Dec. 31, 2014 | $57 | $26,731 | ($35,966) | ($9,178) |
Ending Balance, Shares at Dec. 31, 2014 | 5,650,000 |
NATURE_OF_OPERATIONS
NATURE OF OPERATIONS | 9 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2014 | |
Notes to Financial Statements | |
NATURE OF OPERATIONS | NOTE 1 – NATURE OF OPERATIONS |
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND HISTORY | |
The Company was incorporated on February 14, 2013 in the State of Nevada. | |
The Company does not have any revenues and has incurred losses since inception. Currently, the Company has no operations, has been issued a going concern opinion and relies upon the sale of our securities and loans from its sole officer and director to fund operations. | |
GOING CONCERN - These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies UA Granite Corporation will continue to meet its obligations and continue its operations for the next fiscal year. Realization value may be substantially different from carrying values as shown and these financial statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should UA Granite Corporation be unable to continue as a going concern. As at December 31, 2014 UA Granite Corporation has a working capital deficiency, has not generated revenues and has accumulated losses of $35,966 since inception. The continuation of UA Granite Corporation as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from its shareholders, the ability of UA Granite Corporation to obtain necessary equity financing to continue operations, and the attainment of profitable operations. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding the UA Granite Corporation’ ability to continue as a going concern. |
SUMMARY_OF_SIGNIFICANT_ACCOUNT
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | 9 Months Ended | ||
Dec. 31, 2014 | |||
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |||
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES | ||
BASIS OF PRESENTATION -These financial statements and related notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and are expressed in U.S. dollars. The Company’s fiscal year-end is March 31. | |||
USE OF ESTIMATES - The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net revenue and expenses in the reporting period. We regularly evaluate our estimates and assumptions related to the useful life and recoverability of long-lived assets, stock-based compensation and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. We base our estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by us July differ materially and adversely from our estimates. To the extent there are material differences between our estimates and the actual results, our future results of operations will be affected. | |||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with original maturities of three months or less when acquired, to be cash equivalents. We had no cash equivalents at December 31, 2014 or March 31, 2014. | |||
DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTITY – The Company complies with FASB guidelines for its description as a development stage company. | |||
INCOME TAXES - The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions issued by the FASB which requires recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the consolidated financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company computes tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. The potential benefit of net operating losses has not been recognized in these financial statements because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years. | |||
LOSS PER COMMON SHARE - The Company reports net loss per share in accordance with provisions of the FASB. The provisions require dual presentation of basic and diluted loss per share. Basic net loss per share excludes the impact of common stock equivalents. Diluted net loss per share utilizes the average market price per share when applying the treasury stock method in determining common stock equivalents. As of December 31, 2014 and March 31, 2014, there were no common stock equivalents outstanding. | |||
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS - Pursuant to ASC No. 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, the Company is required to estimate the fair value of all financial instruments included on its balance sheet as of December 31, 2014. The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash. The Company considers the carrying value of such amounts in the financial statements to approximate their fair value due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments. | |||
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS – In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-12, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. The new guidance requires that share-based compensation that require a specific performance target to be achieved in order for employees to become eligible to vest in the awards and that could be achieved after an employee completes the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation costs should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The requisite service period ends when the employee can cease rendering service and still be eligible to vest in the award if the performance target is achieved. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this Update either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. The adoption of ASU 2014-12 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. | |||
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10: Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation , to improve financial reporting by reducing the cost and complexity associated with the incremental reporting requirements of development stage entities. The amendments in this update remove all incremental financial reporting requirements from U.S. GAAP for development stage entities, thereby improving financial reporting by eliminating the cost and complexity associated with providing that information. The amendments in this Update also eliminate an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810, Consolidation, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the basis of the amount of investment equity that is at risk. The amendments to eliminate that exception simplify U.S. GAAP by reducing avoidable complexity in existing accounting literature and improve the relevance of information provided to financial statement users by requiring the application of the same consolidation guidance by all reporting entities. The elimination of the exception may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a reporting entity that has an interest in an entity in the development stage. The amendments related to the elimination of inception-to-date information and the other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for the clarification to Topic 275, which shall be applied prospectively. For public companies, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-10 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. | |||
In July 2013, FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, "Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists." The provisions of ASU No. 2013-11 require an entity to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or portion thereof, in the statement of financial position as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward or a tax credit carryforward, with certain exceptions related to availability. ASU No. 2013-11 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-11 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. | |||
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting these reclassifications. Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income. The amendments in the ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP. The new amendments will require an organization to: | |||
- | Present (either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income - but only if the item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period; and | ||
- | Cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period. This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension-related amounts) instead of directly to income or expense. | ||
The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income. Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual). The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies. Earlyadoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. | |||
In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011-11. The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users. In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the Board determined that it could make them more operable and cost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under IFRSs. Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. |
INCOME_TAXES
INCOME TAXES | 9 Months Ended | ||||||
Dec. 31, 2014 | |||||||
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract] | |||||||
INCOME TAXES | NOTE 3 - INCOME TAXES | ||||||
Deferred income taxes arise from temporary differences resulting from income and expense items reported for financial accounting and tax purposes in different periods. Deferred taxes are classified as current or non-current, depending on the classification of assets and liabilities to which they relate. Deferred taxes arising from temporary differences that are not related to an asset or liability are classified as current or non-current depending on the periods in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. The company does not have any uncertain tax positions. | |||||||
The Company currently has net operating loss carryforwards aggregating $35,966 (2014: $26,106), which expire through 2030. The deferred tax asset related to the carryforwards has been fully reserved. | |||||||
The Company has deferred income tax assets, which have been fully reserved, as follows as of December 31, 2014 and March, 2014 respectivly : | |||||||
2015 | 2014 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets | $ | 12,588 | $ 9,137 | ||||
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets | -12,588 | $ (9,137) | |||||
Net deferred tax assets | $ | - | - |
FAIR_VALUE_MEASUREMENTS
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS | 9 Months Ended | ||
Dec. 31, 2014 | |||
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract] | |||
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS | NOTE 4 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS | ||
The Company adopted ASC No. 820-10 (ASC 820-10), Fair Value Measurements. ASC 820-10 relates to financial assets and financial liabilities.ASC 820-10 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of this standard apply to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and are to be applied prospectively with limited exceptions. | |||
ASC 820-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. This standard is now the single source in GAAP for the definition of fair value, except for the fair value of leased property as defined in SFAS 13. ASC 820-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions, about market participant assumptions, that are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC 820-10 are described below: | |||
• | Level 1 | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities. | |
• | Level 2 | Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates); and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. | |
• | Level 3 | Inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable. These inputs rely on management's own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. (The unobservable inputs are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances and July include the Company's own data.) | |
The following presents the Company's fair value hierarchy for those assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2014 and March 31, 2014: | |||
Level 1: None | |||
Level 2: None | |||
Level 3: None | |||
Total Gain (Losses): None |
RELATED_PARTY_TRANSACTIONS
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS | 9 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2014 | |
Notes to Financial Statements | |
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS | NOTE 5 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION |
A director has advanced funds to us for our legal, audit, filing fees, general office administration and cash needs. As of December 31, 2014, the director has advanced a total of $8,933. The advances do not bear interest and are without specific terms of repayment. Imputed interest of $334 was charged to additional paid in capital during the nine month period ended December 31, 2014. |
COMMON_STOCK
COMMON STOCK | 9 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2014 | |
Notes to Financial Statements | |
COMMON STOCK | NOTE 6 - COMMON STOCK |
On February 14, 2013, the company issued 5,000,000 common shares to the founder of the company. Imputed interest of $403 was charged to additional paid in capital during the fiscal year ended March 31, 2014 for related party borrowings. | |
On December 12, 2013, the company entered into an agreement to sell 650,000 common shares for total proceeds of $26,000. | |
As of December 31, 2014, UA Granite Corporation has issued 5,650,000 common shares. |
SUBSEQUENT_EVENT
SUBSEQUENT EVENT | 9 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2014 | |
Subsequent Events [Abstract] | |
SUBSEQUENT EVENT | NOTE 7 – SUBSEQUENT EVENT |
The Company has evaluated subsequent events from the balance sheet date through the date the financial statements were issued and has determined that there are no events to disclose. | |
SUMMARY_OF_SIGNIFICANT_ACCOUNT1
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Policies) | 9 Months Ended | ||
Dec. 31, 2014 | |||
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |||
BASIS OF PRESENTATION | BASIS OF PRESENTATION -These financial statements and related notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and are expressed in U.S. dollars. The Company’s fiscal year-end is March 31. | ||
USE OF ESTIMATES | USE OF ESTIMATES - The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net revenue and expenses in the reporting period. We regularly evaluate our estimates and assumptions related to the useful life and recoverability of long-lived assets, stock-based compensation and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. We base our estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by us July differ materially and adversely from our estimates. To the extent there are material differences between our estimates and the actual results, our future results of operations will be affected. | ||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS | CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with original maturities of three months or less when acquired, to be cash equivalents. We had no cash equivalents at December 31, 2014 or March 31, 2014. | ||
DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTITY | DEVELOPMENT STAGE ENTITY – The Company complies with FASB guidelines for its description as a development stage company. | ||
INCOME TAXES | INCOME TAXES - The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions issued by the FASB which requires recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the consolidated financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company computes tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. The potential benefit of net operating losses has not been recognized in these financial statements because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years. | ||
LOSS PER COMMON SHARE | LOSS PER COMMON SHARE - The Company reports net loss per share in accordance with provisions of the FASB. The provisions require dual presentation of basic and diluted loss per share. Basic net loss per share excludes the impact of common stock equivalents. Diluted net loss per share utilizes the average market price per share when applying the treasury stock method in determining common stock equivalents. As of December 31, 2014 and March 31, 2014, there were no common stock equivalents outstanding. | ||
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS | FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS - Pursuant to ASC No. 820, "Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures", the Company is required to estimate the fair value of all financial instruments included on its balance sheet as of December 31, 2014. The Company's financial instruments consist of cash. The Company considers the carrying value of such amounts in the financial statements to approximate their fair value due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments. | ||
RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS | RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS – In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-12, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. The new guidance requires that share-based compensation that require a specific performance target to be achieved in order for employees to become eligible to vest in the awards and that could be achieved after an employee completes the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation costs should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The requisite service period ends when the employee can cease rendering service and still be eligible to vest in the award if the performance target is achieved. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this Update either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. The adoption of ASU 2014-12 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. | ||
In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10: Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation , to improve financial reporting by reducing the cost and complexity associated with the incremental reporting requirements of development stage entities. The amendments in this update remove all incremental financial reporting requirements from U.S. GAAP for development stage entities, thereby improving financial reporting by eliminating the cost and complexity associated with providing that information. The amendments in this Update also eliminate an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810, Consolidation, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the basis of the amount of investment equity that is at risk. The amendments to eliminate that exception simplify U.S. GAAP by reducing avoidable complexity in existing accounting literature and improve the relevance of information provided to financial statement users by requiring the application of the same consolidation guidance by all reporting entities. The elimination of the exception may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a reporting entity that has an interest in an entity in the development stage. The amendments related to the elimination of inception-to-date information and the other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for the clarification to Topic 275, which shall be applied prospectively. For public companies, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-10 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. | |||
In July 2013, FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, "Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists." The provisions of ASU No. 2013-11 require an entity to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or portion thereof, in the statement of financial position as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward or a tax credit carryforward, with certain exceptions related to availability. ASU No. 2013-11 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-11 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. | |||
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting these reclassifications. Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income. The amendments in the ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP. The new amendments will require an organization to: | |||
- | Present (either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income - but only if the item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period; and | ||
- | Cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period. This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension-related amounts) instead of directly to income or expense. | ||
The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income. Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual). The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies. Earlyadoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. | |||
In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011-11. The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users. In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the Board determined that it could make them more operable and cost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under IFRSs. Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations. |
INCOME_TAXES_Tables
INCOME TAXES (Tables) | 9 Months Ended | ||||||
Dec. 31, 2014 | |||||||
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract] | |||||||
Deferred income tax assets | 2015 | 2014 | |||||
Deferred tax assets | $ | 12,588 | $ 9,137 | ||||
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets | -12,588 | $ (9,137) | |||||
Net deferred tax assets | $ | - | - |
NATURE_OF_OPERATIONS_Details_N
NATURE OF OPERATIONS (Details Narrative) (USD $) | Dec. 31, 2014 | Mar. 31, 2014 |
Notes to Financial Statements | ||
Accumulated loss | $35,966 | $26,106 |
INCOME_TAXES_Details_Narrative
INCOME TAXES (Details Narrative) (USD $) | Dec. 31, 2014 | Mar. 31, 2014 |
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract] | ||
Net operating loss | $35,966 | $26,106 |
INCOME_TAXES_Details
INCOME TAXES (Details) (USD $) | Dec. 31, 2014 | Dec. 31, 2013 |
Income Taxes Details | ||
Deferred tax assets | $12,588 | $9,137 |
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets | -12,588 | -9,137 |
Net deferred tax assets |
RELATED_PARTY_TRANSACTIONS_Det
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Details Narrative) (USD $) | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | 22 Months Ended | ||
Dec. 31, 2014 | Dec. 31, 2013 | Dec. 31, 2014 | Dec. 31, 2013 | Mar. 31, 2014 | Dec. 31, 2014 | |
Notes to Financial Statements | ||||||
Total advanced by Director | $8,933 | $8,933 | $5,123 | $8,933 | ||
Imputed interest | $131 | $102 | $334 | $303 | $403 | $737 |
COMMON_STOCK_Details_Narrative
COMMON STOCK (Details Narrative) (USD $) | 0 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 9 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | 22 Months Ended | |||
Dec. 12, 2013 | Dec. 31, 2014 | Dec. 31, 2013 | Dec. 31, 2014 | Dec. 31, 2013 | Mar. 31, 2014 | Dec. 31, 2014 | Feb. 14, 2013 | |
Notes to Financial Statements | ||||||||
Imputed interest | $131 | $102 | $334 | $303 | $403 | $737 | ||
Common shares issued | 650,000 | 5,650,000 | 5,650,000 | 5,650,000 | 5,650,000 | 5,000,000 | ||
Total proceeds | $26,000 |