Stephanie July Davis - Barclays Bank PLC, Research Division - MD & Senior Research Analyst
So with that in mind and given the term fee this quarter and some of the client win announcements by your large competitor, are there any themes beyond pricing like clients that are maybe less interested in these IT investments that you’re starting to see in some of the client attrition? Or is it purely still a pricing kind of model?
Michael J. Alkire - Premier, Inc. - President, CEO & Director
It’s sort of — it’s really — Craig and I’ve been talking about this basically for quarters, but you have some health systems that really do want to look at total value that’s being created, and they want to bring all of the assets that Premier brings because they’ve got huge imperatives. They’ve got huge labor — some have huge labor issues or labor cost issues. Some are trying to transform to new payment models and those kinds of things. So I will tell you, you do have organizations that are willing to look at total value as opposed to one aspect of value that we create. And so obviously, our job is to do as much as possible, demonstrate what that total value proposition looks like to relieve some of the pressure on just the admin fee share back.
Operator
And next question comes from Kevin Caliendo with UBS.
Kevin Caliendo - UBS Investment Bank, Research Division - Equity Research Analyst of Healthcare IT and Distribution
On the Performance Services, you talked a lot about the business, but just thinking about the sort of mid-single-digit growth outlook. How much of that is sort of in your control, based on customer wins and just the overall? And how much of it — like what are the assumptions around the macro that get you there? What are the puts and takes, just the thinking about how you think about how that business is going to grow both from a micro perspective and a macro?
Michael J. Alkire - Premier, Inc. - President, CEO & Director
Yes. I could take the highest level. Look, I think that as we continue to build out services and capabilities, again, to support the healthcare systems as they’re struggling with increased labor cost, in some cases, struggling with inflation and those kinds of things. And obviously, reimbursement is not necessarily staying up with those extra costs. They’re asking us to come in and really focus in on how can we help them do more with less and basically be incredibly diligent around cost structures, but at the same time, ensuring they’re delivering the highest quality care that they can potentially deliver. So at the highest level, that’s really what’s driving quite a bit of the market.
Craig Steven McKasson - Premier, Inc. - Chief Administrative & Financial Officer & SVP
Yes. The only thing I would add to that, Kevin, is I think as we think about — and again, we’ll more formalize our ‘25 guidance in August with the underlying assumptions, but at a broad level, the early perspective that we’re trying to provide, we typically go into a fiscal year in our Performance Services business with sort of 70%, 75% visibility to the revenue, given that the majority of that business is still SaaS-based on the technology side. So we have good visibility to a large amount of that business. We’ve talked previously about enterprise license agreements, and so we have that, that we’ll have to — we have a pipeline of them to process but have to work through, which leaves some of the judgmental nature of that. But the combination of those gets us to with the wraparound services component from our advisory services part of our business gets us to the low-single-digit anticipated growth in the provider market.
10