LOANS RECEIVABLE | 5. LOANS RECEIVABLE Loans receivable consist of the following: December 31, September 30, 2019 2019 (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 262,706 $ 268,780 Multi-family residential 24,692 30,582 Commercial real estate 129,589 128,521 Construction and land development 251,972 253,368 Commercial business 19,160 19,630 Loans to financial institutions 6,000 6,000 Leases 391 518 Consumer 854 834 Total loans 695,364 708,233 Undisbursed portion of loans-in-process (98,555) (114,528) Deferred loan fees (2,434) (2,856) Allowance for loan losses (5,528) (5,393) Net loans $ 588,847 $ 585,456 The following table summarizes by loan segment the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the loans individually and collectively evaluated for impairment by loan segment at December 31, 2019: One- to four - Construction Lans to family Multi-family Commercial real and land Commercial financial residential residential estate development business institutions Leases Consumer Unallocated Total (Dollars in Thousands) Allowance for Loan Losses: Individually evaluated for impairment $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — Collectively evaluated for impairment 999 255 1,281 2,205 201 63 4 12 508 5,528 Total ending allowance balance $ 999 $ 255 $ 1,281 $ 2,205 $ 201 $ 63 $ 4 $ 12 $ 508 $ 5,528 Loans: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 4,028 $ — $ 1,473 $ 8,750 $ 15 $ — $ — $ 56 $ 14,322 Collectively evaluated for impairment 258,678 24,692 128,116 243,222 19,145 6,000 391 798 681,042 Total loans $ 262,706 $ 24,692 $ 129,589 $ 251,972 $ 19,160 $ 6,000 $ 391 $ 854 $ 695,364 The following table summarizes by loan segment the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the loans individually and collectively evaluated for impairment by loan segment at September 30, 2019: One- to four - Construction Loanss to family Multi-family Commercial real and land Commercial financial residential residential estate development business institutions Leases Consumer Unallocated Total (Dollars in Thousands) Allowance for Loan Losses: Individually evaluated for impairment $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — Collectively evaluated for impairment 1,002 315 1,257 2,034 206 63 5 13 498 5,393 Total ending allowance balance $ 1,002 $ 315 $ 1,257 $ 2,034 $ 206 $ 63 $ 5 $ 13 $ 498 $ 5,393 Loans: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 4,827 $ — $ 1,965 $ 8,750 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 15,542 Collectively evaluated for impairment 263,953 30,582 126,556 244,618 19,630 6,000 518 834 692,691 Total loans $ 268,780 $ 30,582 $ 128,521 $ 253,368 $ 19,630 $ 6,000 $ 518 $ 834 $ 708,233 The loan portfolio is segmented at a level that allows management to monitor both risk and performance. Management evaluates for potential impairment all construction, multi-family, commercial real estate, commercial business loans, all leases and all loans and leases more than 90 days delinquent as to principal and/or interest. Loans are considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect in full the scheduled payments of principal and/or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Once the determination is made that a loan is impaired, the determination of whether a specific allocation of the allowance is necessary is generally measured by comparing the recorded investment in the loan to the fair value of the loan using one of the following three methods: (a) the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate; (b) the loan’s observable market price; or (c) the fair value of the collateral less selling costs. Management primarily utilizes the fair value of collateral method as a practically expedient alternative. On collateral method evaluations, any portion of the loan deemed uncollectible is charged-off against the loan loss allowance. The following table presents impaired loans by class as of December 31, 2019, segregated by those for which a specific allowance was required and those for which a specific allowance was not required. Impaired Loans with Impaired Loans with No Specific Specific Allowance Allowance Total Impaired Loans (Dollars in Thousands) Unpaid Recorded Related Recorded Recorded Principal Investment Allowance Investment Investment Balance One-to-four family residential $ — $ — $ 4,028 $ 4,028 $ 4,392 Commercial real estate — — 1,473 1,473 1,632 Construction and land development — — 8,750 8,750 11,131 Commercial business — — 15 15 15 Consumer — — 56 56 56 Total impaired loans $ — $ — $ 14,322 $ 14,322 $ 17,226 The following table presents impaired loans by class as of September 30, 2019, segregated by those for which a specific allowance was required and those for which a specific allowance was not required. Impaired Loans with Impaired Loans with No Specific Specific Allowance Allowance Total Impaired Loans (Dollars in Thousands) Unpaid Recorded Related Recorded Recorded Principal Investment Allowance Investment Investment Balance One-to-four family residential $ — $ — $ 4,827 $ 4,827 $ 5,179 Commercial real estate — — 1,965 1,965 2,125 Construction and land development — — 8,750 8,750 11,131 Total impaired loans $ — $ — $ 15,542 $ 15,542 $ 18,435 The following tables present the average recorded investment in impaired loans and related interest income recognized for the periods indicated: Three Months Ended December 31, 2019 Average Income Income Recorded Recognized on Recognized on Investment Accrual Basis Cash Basis (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 4,593 $ 3 $ 9 Multi-family residential 148 — — Commercial real estate 1,769 — 1 Construction and land development 8,750 — — Commercial business 8 — 1 Consumer 31 — — Total loans $ 15,299 $ 3 $ 11 Three Months Ended December 31, 2018 Average Income Income Recorded Recognized on Recognized on Investment Accrual Basis Cash Basis (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 5,158 $ 15 $ 5 Multi-family residential 296 5 — Commercial real estate 2,064 10 1 Construction and land development 8,752 — — Consumer 5 — — Total loans $ 16,275 $ 30 $ 6 Federal regulations and our loan policy require that the Company utilize an internal asset classification system as a means of reporting problem and potential problem assets. The Company has incorporated an internal asset classification system, consistent with Federal banking regulations, as a part of its credit monitoring system. Management currently classifies problem and potential problem assets as “special mention”, “substandard,” “doubtful” or “loss” assets. An asset is considered “substandard” if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. “Substandard” assets include those characterized by the “distinct possibility” that the insured institution will sustain “some loss” if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as “doubtful” have all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified “substandard” with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make “collection or liquidation in full,” on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, “highly questionable and improbable.” Assets classified as “loss” are those considered “uncollectible” and of such little value that their continuance as assets without the establishment of a specific loss reserve is not warranted. Assets which do not currently expose the insured institution to sufficient risk to warrant classification in one of the aforementioned categories but possess weaknesses are required to be designated “special mention.” The following tables present the classes of the loan portfolio in which a formal risk weighting system is utilized summarized by the aggregate “Pass” and the criticized category of “special mention”, and the classified categories of “substandard”, “doubtful” and “loss” within the Company’s risk rating system as applied to the loan portfolio. The Company had no loans classified as “doubtful” or “loss” at either of the dates presented. December 31, 2019 Special Total Pass Mention Substandard Loans (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 257,164 $ 1,514 $ 4,028 $ 262,706 Multi-family residential 24,692 — — 24,692 Commercial real estate 124,425 3,691 1,473 129,589 Construction and land development 243,222 — 8,750 251,972 Loans to financial institutions 6,000 — — 6,000 Commercial business 19,145 — 15 19,160 Total loans $ 674,648 $ 5,205 $ 14,266 $ 694,119 September 30, 2019 Special Total Pass Mention Substandard Loans (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 262,164 $ 1,789 $ 4,827 $ 268,780 Multi-family residential 30,582 — — 30,582 Commercial real estate 122,838 3,718 1,965 128,521 Construction and land development 244,618 — 8,750 253,368 Loans to financial institutions 6,000 — — 6,000 Commercial business 19,630 — — 19,630 Total loans $ 685,832 $ 5,507 $ 15,542 $ 706,881 The Company evaluates the classification of one-to-four family residential and consumer loans primarily on a pooled basis. If the Company becomes aware that adverse or distressed conditions exist that may affect a particular single-family residential loan, the loan is downgraded following the above definitions of special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss. The following tables represent loans in which a formal risk rating system is not utilized, but loans are segregated between performing and non-performing based primarily on delinquency status. Non-performing loans that would be included in the table are those loans greater than 90 days past due as to principal and/or interest that do not have a designated risk rating. December 31,2019 Non- Total Performing Performing Loans (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 259,257 $ 3,449 $ 262,706 Leases 391 — 391 Consumer 798 56 854 Total loans $ 260,446 $ 3,505 $ 263,951 September 30,2019 Non- Total Performing Performing Loans (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 265,068 $ 3,712 $ 268,780 Leases 518 — 518 Consumer 834 — 834 Total loans $ 266,420 $ 3,712 $ 270,132 Management further monitors the performance and credit quality of the loan portfolio by analyzing the age of the portfolio as determined by the length of time a recorded payment is due or overdue, as the case may be. The following table presents the loan categories of the loan portfolio summarized by the aging categories of performing and delinquent loans and nonaccrual loans: December 31, 2019 90 Days+ 30‑89 Days 90 Days + Total Total Non- Past Due Current Past Due Past Due Past Due Loans Accrual and Accruing (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 259,186 $ 1,009 $ 2,511 $ 3,520 $ 262,706 $ 3,449 $ — Multi-family residential 24,692 — — — 24,692 — — Commercial real estate 128,172 — 1,417 1,417 129,589 1,473 — Construction and land development 243,222 — 8,750 8,750 251,972 8,750 — Commercial business 19,145 — 15 15 19,160 15 — Loans to financial institutions 6,000 — — — 6,000 — — Leases 391 — — — 391 — — Consumer 688 110 56 166 854 56 — Total loans $ 681,496 $ 1,119 $ 12,749 $ 13,868 $ 695,364 $ 13,743 $ — September 30, 2019 90 Days+ 30‑89 Days 90 Days + Total Total Non- Past Due Current Past Due Past Due Past Due Loans Accrual and Accruing (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 264,784 $ 750 $ 3,246 $ 3,996 $ 268,780 $ 3,712 $ — Multi-family residential 30,582 — — — 30,582 — — Commercial real estate 127,104 — 1,417 1,417 128,521 1,473 — Construction and land development 244,618 — 8,750 8,750 253,368 8,750 — Commercial business 19,630 — — — 19,630 — — Loans to financial institutions 6,000 — — — 6,000 — — Leases 518 — — — 518 — — Consumer 739 95 — 95 834 — — Total loans $ 693,975 $ 845 $ 13,413 $ 14,258 $ 708,233 $ 13,935 $ — The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense. The Company maintains the allowance at a level believed to cover all known and inherent losses in the portfolio that are both probable and reasonable to estimate at each reporting date. Management reviews the allowance for loan losses no less than quarterly in order to identify these inherent losses and to assess the overall collection probability for the loan portfolio in view of these inherent losses. For each primary type of loan, a loss factor is established reflecting an estimate of the known and inherent losses in such loan type contained in the portfolio using both a quantitative analysis as well as consideration of qualitative factors. The evaluation process includes, among other things, an analysis of delinquency trends, non-performing loan trends, the level of charge-offs and recoveries, prior loss experience, total loans outstanding, the volume of loan originations, the type, size and geographic concentration of the Company’s loans, the value of collateral securing the loans, the borrowers’ ability to repay and repayment performance, the number of loans requiring heightened management oversight, local economic conditions and industry experience. Commercial real estate loans entail significant additional credit risks compared to owner-occupied one-to-four family residential mortgage loans, as they generally involve large loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. In addition, the payment experience on loans secured by income-producing properties typically depends on the successful operation of the related real estate project and/or business operation of the borrower who is, in some cases, also the primary occupant, and thus may be subject to a greater extent to the effects of adverse conditions in the real estate market and in the economy in general. Commercial business loans typically involve a higher risk of default than residential loans of like duration since their repayment is generally dependent on the successful operation of the borrower’s business and the sufficiency of collateral, if any. Land acquisition, development and construction lending exposes the Company to greater credit risk than permanent mortgage financing. The repayment of land acquisition, development and construction loans depends upon the sale of the property to third parties or the availability of permanent financing upon completion of all improvements. These events may adversely affect the sale of the properties, potentially reducing both the borrowers’ ability to make required payments as well as reducing the value of the collateral property. Such lending is additionally subject to the risk that if the estimate of construction cost proves to be inaccurate, the Company potentially will be compelled to advance additional funds to allow completion of the project. In addition, if the estimate of value proves to be inaccurate, the Company may be confronted with a project, when completed, having less value than the loan amount. If the Company is forced to foreclose on a project prior to completion, there is no assurance that the Company would be able to recover the entire unpaid portion of the loan. The following tables summarize the primary segments of the allowance for loan losses. Activity in the allowance is presented for the three-month periods ended December 31, 2019 and 2018: Three Months Ended December 31, 2019 One- to Multi- Construction Loans to four-family family Commercial and land Commercial financial residential residential real estate development business institutions Leases Consumer Unallocated Total (Dollars in Thousands) ALLL balance at September 30, 2019 $ 1,002 $ 315 $ 1,257 $ 2,034 $ 206 $ 63 $ 5 $ 13 $ 498 $ 5,393 Charge-offs — — — — — — — — — — Recoveries — — — — — — 10 — — 10 Provision (3) (60) 24 171 (5) — (11) (1) 10 125 ALLL balance at December 31, 2019 $ 999 $ 255 $ 1,281 $ 2,205 $ 201 $ 63 $ 4 $ 12 $ 508 $ 5,528 Three Months Ended December 31, 2018 One- to Multi- Construction Loans to four-family family Commercial and land Commercial financial residential residential real estate development business institutions Leases Consumer Unallocated Total (Dollars in Thousands) ALLL balance at September 30, 2018 $ 1,343 $ 347 $ 1,154 $ 1,554 $ 187 $ 64 $ 18 $ 18 $ 482 $ 5,167 Charge-offs — — — — — — — — — — Recoveries — — — — — — — — — — Provision 84 25 (7) (109) 6 3 (2) (5) 5 — ALLL balance at December 31, 2018 $ 1,427 $ 372 $ 1,147 $ 1,445 $ 193 $ 67 $ 16 $ 13 $ 487 $ 5,167 At December 31, 2019, the Company had five loans aggregating $5.5 million that were classified as troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”). One such loan aggregating $135,000 as of December 31, 2019 was performing in accordance with the restructured terms and accruing interest. Three of the TDRs, totaling $4.9 million, which are classified as non-accrual are a part of a troubled lending relationship totaling $10.6. The remaining TDR is also on non-accrual and consists of a $428,000 loan secured by a single family property; the loan is performing in accordance with the restructured terms. The Company did not restructure any loans during the three months ended December 31, 2019 or 2018. No TDRs defaulted during either of the three month periods ending December 31, 2019 or December 31, 2018. |