LOANS RECEIVABLE | 5. LOANS RECEIVABLE Loans receivable consist of the following: December 31, September 30, 2018 2018 (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 322,525 $ 324,865 Multi-family residential 34,556 34,355 Commercial real estate 113,145 119,511 Construction and land development 147,669 160,228 Loans to financial institutions 6,000 6,000 Commercial business 17,474 17,792 Leases 1,472 1,687 Consumer 898 953 Total loans 643,739 665,391 Undisbursed portion of loans-in-process (47,190 ) (54,474 ) Deferred loan fees (2,871 ) (2,818 ) Allowance for loan losses (5,167 ) (5,167 ) Net loans $ 588,511 $ 602,932 The following table summarizes by loan segment the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the loans individually and collectively evaluated for impairment by loan segment at December 31, 2018: One- to four - Multi-family Commercial real Construction Commercial Lans to Leases Consumer Unallocated Total (Dollars in Thousands) Allowance for Loan Losses: Individually evaluated for impairment $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Collectively evaluated for impairment 1,427 372 1,147 1,445 193 67 16 13 487 5,167 Total ending allowance balance $ 1,427 $ 372 $ 1,147 $ 1,445 $ 193 $ 67 $ 16 $ 13 $ 487 $ 5,167 Loans: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 5,234 $ 293 $ 2,208 $ 8,753 $ - $ - $ - $ 10 $ 16,498 Collectively evaluated for impairment 317,291 34,263 110,937 138,916 17,474 6,000 1,472 888 627,241 Total loans $ 322,525 $ 34,556 $ 113,145 $ 147,669 $ 17,474 $ 6,000 $ 1,472 $ 898 $ 643,739 The following table summarizes by loan segment the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the loans individually and collectively evaluated for impairment by loan segment at September 30, 2018: One- to four - Multi-family Commercial real Construction Commercial Loanss to Leases Consumer Unallocated Total (Dollars in Thousands) Allowance for Loan Losses: Individually evaluated for impairment $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Collectively evaluated for impairment 1,343 347 1,154 1,554 187 64 18 18 482 5,167 Total ending allowance balance $ 1,343 $ 347 $ 1,154 $ 1,554 $ 187 $ 64 $ 18 $ 18 $ 482 $ 5,167 Loans: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 5,081 $ 298 $ 1,919 $ 8,750 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 16,048 Collectively evaluated for impairment 319,784 34,057 117,592 151,478 17,792 6,000 1,687 953 649,343 Total loans $ 324,865 $ 34,355 $ 119,511 $ 160,228 $ 17,792 $ 6,000 $ 1,687 $ 953 $ 665,391 The loan portfolio is segmented at a level that allows management to monitor both risk and performance. Management evaluates for potential impairment all construction, multi-family, commercial real estate, commercial business loans, all leases and all loans and leases more than 90 days delinquent as to principal and/or interest. Loans are considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect in full the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Once the determination is made that a loan is impaired, the determination of whether a specific allocation of the allowance is necessary is generally measured by comparing the recorded investment in the loan to the fair value of the loan using one of the following three methods: (a) the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate; (b) the loan’s observable market price; or (c) the fair value of the collateral less selling costs. Management primarily utilizes the fair value of collateral method as a practically expedient alternative. On collateral method evaluations, any portion of the loan deemed uncollectible is charged-off against the loan loss allowance. The following table presents impaired loans by class as of December 31, 2018, segregated by those for which a specific allowance was required and those for which a specific allowance was not required. Impaired Loans with Impaired Loans with No Specific Specific Allowance Allowance Total Impaired Loans (Dollars in Thousands) Unpaid Recorded Related Recorded Recorded Principal Investment Allowance Investment Investment Balance One-to-four family residential $ - $ - $ 5,234 $ 5,234 $ 5,591 Multi-family residential - - 293 293 293 Commercial real estate - - 2,208 2,208 2,367 Construction and land development - - 8,753 8,753 11,134 Consumer - - 10 10 10 Total loans $ - $ - $ 16,498 $ 16,498 $ 19,395 The following table presents impaired loans by class as of September 30, 2018, segregated by those for which a specific allowance was required and those for which a specific allowance was not required. Impaired Loans with Impaired Loans with No Specific Specific Allowance Allowance Total Impaired Loans (Dollars in Thousands) Unpaid Recorded Related Recorded Recorded Principal Investment Allowance Investment Investment Balance One-to-four family residential $ - $ - $ 5,081 $ 5,081 $ 5,432 Multi-family - - 298 298 298 Commercial real estate - - 1,919 1,919 2,057 Construction and land development - - 8,750 8,750 11,131 Total loans $ - $ - $ 16,048 $ 16,048 $ 18,918 The following tables present the average recorded investment in impaired loans and related interest income recognized for the periods indicated: Three Months Ended December 31, 2018 Average Income Income (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 5,158 $ 15 $ 5 Multi-family residential 296 5 - Commercial real estate 2,064 10 1 Construction and land development 8,752 - - Consumer 5 - - Total loans $ 16,274 $ 30 $ 6 Three Months Ended December 31, 2017 Average Income Income (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 9,690 $ 34 $ 4 Multi-family residential 315 6 - Commercial real estate 3,051 29 - Construction and land development 8,729 - - Consumer 10 - - Total loans $ 21,795 $ 69 $ 4 Federal regulations and our loan policy require that the Company utilize an internal asset classification system as a means of reporting problem and potential problem assets. The Company has incorporated an internal asset classification system, consistent with Federal banking regulations, as a part of its credit monitoring system. Management currently classifies problem and potential problem assets as “special mention”, “substandard,” “doubtful” or “loss” assets. An asset is considered “substandard” if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. “Substandard” assets include those characterized by the “distinct possibility” that the insured institution will sustain “some loss” if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as “doubtful” have all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified “substandard” with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make “collection or liquidation in full,” on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, “highly questionable and improbable.” Assets classified as “loss” are those considered “uncollectible” and of such little value that their continuance as assets without the establishment of a specific loss reserve is not warranted. Assets which do not currently expose the insured institution to sufficient risk to warrant classification in one of the aforementioned categories but possess weaknesses are required to be designated “special mention.” The following tables present the classes of the loan portfolio in which a formal risk weighting system is utilized summarized by the aggregate “Pass” and the criticized category of “special mention”, and the classified categories of “substandard”, “doubtful” and “loss” within the Company’s risk rating system as applied to the loan portfolio. The Company had no loans classified as “doubtful” or “loss” at either of the dates presented. December 31, 2018 Special Total Pass Mention Substandard Loans (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 315,040 $ 2,251 $ 5,234 $ 322,525 Multi-family residential 33,935 328 293 34,556 Commercial real estate 106,805 4,132 2,208 113,145 Construction and land development 138,916 - 8,753 147,669 Loans to financial institutions 6,000 - - 6,000 Commercial business 17,474 - - 17,474 Total loans $ 618,170 $ 6,711 $ 16,488 $ 641,369 September 30, 2018 Special Total Pass Mention Substandard Loans (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 317,033 $ 2,751 $ 5,081 $ 324,865 Multi-family residential 34,057 - 298 34,355 Commercial real estate 115,670 1,922 1,919 119,511 Construction and land development 151,478 - 8,750 160,228 Loans to financial institutions 6,000 - - 6,000 Commercial business 17,792 - - 17,792 Total loans $ 642,030 $ 4,673 $ 16,048 $ 662,751 The Company evaluates the classification of one-to-four family residential and consumer loans primarily on a pooled basis. If the Company becomes aware that adverse or distressed conditions exist that may affect a particular single-family residential loan, the loan is downgraded following the above definitions of special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss. The following tables represent loans in which a formal risk rating system is not utilized, but loans are segregated between performing and non-performing based primarily on delinquency status. Non-performing loans that would be included in the table are those loans greater than 90 days past due as to principal and/or interest that do not have a designated risk rating. December 31, 2018 Non- Total Performing Performing Loans (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 319,088 $ 3,437 $ 322,525 Leases 1,472 - 1,472 Consumer 898 - 898 Total loans $ 321,458 $ 3,437 $ 324,895 September 30, 2018 Non- Total Performing Performing Loans (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 321,853 $ 3,012 $ 324,865 Leases 1,687 - 1,687 Consumer 953 - 953 Total loans $ 324,493 $ 3,012 $ 327,505 Management further monitors the performance and credit quality of the loan portfolio by analyzing the age of the portfolio as determined by the length of time a recorded payment is due or overdue, as the case may be. The following table presents the loan categories of the loan portfolio summarized by the aging categories of performing and delinquent loans and nonaccrual loans: December 31, 2018 90 Days+ 30-89 Days 90 Days + Total Total Non- Past Due Current Past Due Past Due Past Due Loans Accrual and Accruing (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 317,547 $ 2,514 $ 2,464 $ 4,978 $ 322,525 $ 3,437 $ - Multi-family residential 34,395 161 - 161 34,556 - - Commercial real estate 111,727 88 1,330 1,418 113,145 1,478 - Construction and land development 138,916 - 8,753 8,753 147,669 8,753 - Commercial business 17,474 - - - 17,474 - - Loans to financial institutions 6,000 - - - 6,000 - - Leases 1,472 - - - 1,472 - - Consumer 841 57 - - 898 - - Total loans $ 628,372 $ 2,820 $ 12,547 $ 15,310 $ 643,739 $ 13,668 $ - September 30, 2018 90 Days+ 30-89 Days 90 Days + Total Total Non- Past Due Current Past Due Past Due Past Due Loans Accrual and Accruing (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 321,749 $ 1,037 $ 2,079 $ 3,116 $ 324,865 $ 3,012 $ - Multi-family residential 34,355 - - - 34,355 - - Commercial real estate 117,335 722 1,454 2,176 119,511 1,627 - Construction and land development 151,478 - 8,750 8,750 160,228 8,750 - Commercial business 17,792 - - - 17,792 - - Loans to financial institutions 6,000 - - - 6,000 - - Leases 1,687 - - - 1,687 - - Consumer 837 116 - 116 953 - - Total loans $ 651,233 $ 1,875 $ 12,283 $ 14,158 $ 665,391 $ 13,389 $ - The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense. The Company maintains the allowance at a level believed to cover all known and inherent losses in the portfolio that are both probable and reasonable to estimate at each reporting date. Management reviews the allowance for loan losses no less than quarterly in order to identify these inherent losses and to assess the overall collection probability for the loan portfolio in view of these inherent losses. For each primary type of loan, a loss factor is established reflecting an estimate of the known and inherent losses in such loan type contained in the portfolio using both a quantitative analysis as well as consideration of qualitative factors. The evaluation process includes, among other things, an analysis of delinquency trends, non-performing loan trends, the level of charge-offs and recoveries, prior loss experience, total loans outstanding, the volume of loan originations, the type, size and geographic concentration of the Company’s loans, the value of collateral securing the loans, the borrowers’ ability to repay and repayment performance, the number of loans requiring heightened management oversight, local economic conditions and industry experience. Commercial real estate loans entail significant additional credit risks compared to owner-occupied one-to-four family residential mortgage loans, as they generally involve large loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. In addition, the payment experience on loans secured by income-producing properties typically depends on the successful operation of the related real estate project and/or business operation of the borrower who is, in some cases, also the primary occupant, and thus may be subject to a greater extent to the effects of adverse conditions in the real estate market and in the economy in general. Commercial business loans typically involve a higher risk of default than residential loans of like duration since their repayment is generally dependent on the successful operation of the borrower’s business and the sufficiency of collateral, if any. Land acquisition, development and construction lending exposes the Company to greater credit risk than permanent mortgage financing. The repayment of land acquisition, development and construction loans depends upon the sale of the property to third parties or the availability of permanent financing upon completion of all improvements. These events may adversely affect the sale of the properties, potentially reducing both the borrowers’ ability to make required payments as well as reducing the value of the collateral property. Such lending is additionally subject to the risk that if the estimate of construction cost proves to be inaccurate, the Company potentially will be compelled to advance additional funds to allow completion of the project. In addition, if the estimate of value proves to be inaccurate, the Company may be confronted with a project, when completed, having less value than the loan amount. If the Company is forced to foreclose on a project prior to completion, there is no assurance that the Company would be able to recover the entire unpaid portion of the loan. The following tables summarize the primary segments of the allowance for loan losses. Activity in the allowance is presented for the three month periods ended December 31, 2018 and 2017: Three Months Ended December 31, 2018 One- to Multi- Commercial Construction Commercial Loans to Leases Consumer Unallocated Total (Dollars in Thousands) ALLL balance at September 30, 2018 $ 1,343 $ 347 $ 1,154 $ 1,554 $ 187 $ 64 $ 18 $ 18 $ 482 $ 5,167 Charge-offs - - - - - - - - - - Recoveries - - - - - - - - - - Provision 84 25 (7 ) (109 ) 6 3 (2 ) (5 ) 5 - ALLL balance at December 31, 2018 $ 1,427 $ 372 $ 1,147 $ 1,445 $ 193 $ 67 $ 16 $ 13 $ 487 $ 5,167 Three Months Ended December 31, 2017 One- to Multi- Commercial Construction Commercial Loans to Leases Consumer Unallocated Total (Dollars in Thousands) ALLL balance at September 30, 2017 $ 1,241 $ 205 $ 1,201 $ 1,358 $ 4 $ - $ 23 $ 24 $ 410 $ 4,466 Charge-offs - - - - - - - - - - Recoveries - - - - - - - - - - Provision 29 (47 ) (137 ) 263 22 - (3 ) - 83 210 ALLL balance at December 31, 2017 $ 1,270 $ 158 $ 1,064 $ 1,621 $ 26 $ - $ 20 $ 24 $ 493 $ 4,676 The Company recorded no provision for loan losses in the three months period ended December 31, 2018, compared to $210,000 for the same period in 2017. At December 31, 2018, the Company had nine loans aggregating $6.0 million that were classified as troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”). Five of such loans aggregating $644,000 as of December 31, 2018 were performing in accordance with the restructured terms and accruing interest. Three of the TDRs, totaling $4.9 million, which are classified as non-accrual are a part of a troubled lending relationship totaling $10.6 million (after taking into account the previously disclosed $1.9 million write-down recognized during the quarter ending March 31, 2017 related to this borrowing relationship). The remaining TDR is also on non-accrual and consists of a $445,000 loan secured by various commercial and residential properties. The Company did not restructure any loans during the three months ended December 31, 2018, while one loan was restructured with a balance of $77,000, during the three month period ended December 31, 2017. The restructuring entailed extending the loan maturity date to February 2018, at which time the loan was paid off. As of and for the Three months Ended December 31, 2017 Number of Pre- Post- (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential 1 $ 77 $ 77 1 $ 77 $ 77 No TDRs defaulted during the three month periods ending December 31, 2018 and 2017. |