LOANS RECEIVABLE | 6. LOANS RECEIVABLE Loans receivable consist of the following: September 30, 2016 2015 (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 233,531 $ 259,163 Multi-family residential 12,478 6,249 Commercial real estate 79,859 25,799 Construction and land development 21,839 38,953 Commercial business 99 - Leases 3,286 - Consumer 799 392 Total loans 351,891 330,556 Undisbursed portion of loans-in-process (5,371 ) (17,097 ) Deferred loan costs 1,697 2,104 Allowance for loan losses (3,269 ) (2,930 ) Net loans $ 344,948 $ 312,633 The Company originates loans to customers located primarily in its local market area. The ultimate repayment of these loans at September 30, 2016 and 2015 is dependent, to a certain degree, on the local economy and real estate market. The following table summarizes the loans individually evaluated for impairment by loan segment at September 30, 2016: One- to four- Multi-family Commercial real Construction and land Commercial Leases Consumer Total (Dollars in Thousands) Individually evaluated for impairment $ 5,553 $ 335 $ 3,154 $ 10,288 $ 99 $ - $ - $ 19,429 Collectively evaluated for impairment 227,978 12,143 76,705 11,551 - 3,286 799 332,462 Total loans $ 233,531 $ 12,478 $ 79,859 $ 21,839 $ 99 $ 3,286 $ 799 $ 351,891 The following table summarizes the loans individually evaluated for impairment by loan segment at September 30, 2015: One- to four- Multi-family Commercial Construction and Commercial Consumer Total (Dollars in Thousands) Individually evaluated for impairment $ 4,206 $ - $ 3,768 $ 8,796 $ - $ - $ 16,770 Collectively evaluated for impairment 254,957 6,249 22,031 30,157 - 392 $ 313,786 Total loans $ 259,163 $ 6,249 $ 25,799 $ 38,953 $ - $ 392 $ 330,556 The loan portfolio is segmented at a level that allows management to monitor risk and performance. Management evaluates all loans classified as substandard or lower and loans delinquent 90 plus days for potential impairment. Loans are considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Once the determination is made that a loan is impaired, the determination of whether a specific allocation of the allowance is necessary is generally measured by comparing the recorded investment in the loan to the fair value of the loan using one of the following three methods: (a) the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate; (b) the loan’s observable market price; or (c) the fair value of the collateral less selling costs. Management primarily utilizes the fair value of collateral method as a practically expedient alternative. The following table presents impaired loans by class, segregated by those for which a specific allowance was required and those for which a specific allowance was not necessary as of September 30, 2016: Impaired Loans with Impaired Loans with No Specific Specific Allowance Allowance Total Impaired Loans (Dollars in Thousands) Unpaid Recorded Related Recorded Recorded Principal Investment Allowance Investment Investment Balance One-to-four family residential $ - $ - $ 5,553 $ 5,553 $ 5,869 Multi-family - - 335 335 335 Commercial real estate - - 3,154 3,154 3,154 Construction and land development - - 10,288 10,288 10,288 Commercial business - - 99 99 99 Total Loans $ - $ - $ 19,429 $ 19,429 $ 19,745 The following table presents impaired loans by class, segregated by those for which a specific allowance was required and those for which a specific allowance was not necessary as of September 30, 2015: Impaired Loans with Impaired Loans with No Specific Specific Allowance Allowance Total Impaired Loans (Dollars in Thousands) Unpaid Recorded Related Recorded Recorded Principal Investment Allowance Investment Investment Balance One-to-four family residential $ - $ - $ 4,206 $ 4,206 $ 4,550 Commercial real estate - - 3,768 3,768 3,768 Construction and land development - - 8,796 8,796 8,796 Total Loans $ - $ - $ 16,770 $ 16,770 $ 17,114 The following tables present the average investment in impaired loans and related interest income recognized for the periods indicated: September 30, 2016 Average Income Recognized Income (Dollars in Thousands) One-to four-family residential $ 5,099 $ 129 $ 101 Multi-family residential 344 24 - Commercial real estate 3,565 96 12 Construction and land development 9,604 - 62 Commercial business 8 - - Total $ 18,620 $ 249 $ 175 September 30, 2015 Average Income Income (Dollars in Thousands) One-to four-family residential $ 8,734 $ 431 $ 147 Multi-family residential 289 19 - Commercial real estate 3,840 210 71 Construction and land development 8,413 437 194 Total $ 21,276 $ 1,097 $ 412 September 30, 2014 Average Income Recognized Income (Dollars in Thousands) One-to four-family residential $ 10,802 $ 305 $ 53 Multi-family residential 376 26 - Commercial real estate 2,585 70 19 Construction and land development 3,582 247 - Total $ 17,345 $ 648 $ 72 Federal banking regulations and our policies require that the Bank utilize an internal asset classification system as a means of reporting problem and potential problem assets. The Bank has incorporated an internal asset classification system, consistent with Federal banking regulations, as a part of the credit monitoring system. Management currently classifies problem and potential problem assets as “special mention,” “substandard,” “doubtful” or “loss” assets. An asset is considered “substandard” if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. “Substandard” assets include those characterized by the “distinct possibility” that the insured institution will sustain “some loss” if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as “doubtful” have all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified “substandard” with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make “collection or liquidation in full,” on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, “highly questionable and improbable.” Assets classified as “loss” are those considered “uncollectible” and of such little value that their continuance as assets without the establishment of a specific loss reserve is not warranted. Assets which do not currently expose the insured institution to sufficient risk to warrant classification in one of the aforementioned categories but possess weaknesses are required to be designated “special mention.” The following tables present the classes of the loan portfolio in which a formal risk weighting system is utilized summarized by the aggregate “Pass” and the criticized category of “special mention”, and the classified categories of “substandard” and “doubtful” within the Bank’s risk rating system. The Bank had no loans classified as “loss” at the dates presented. September 30, 2016 Special Total Pass Mention Substandard Doubtful Loans (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four residential $ - $ 1,681 $ 1,212 $ - $ 2,893 Multi-family residential 12,144 - 334 - 12,478 Commercial real estate 76,185 943 2,731 - 79,859 Construction and land development 11,551 - 10,288 - 21,839 Consumer 99 - - - 99 Total Loans $ 99,979 $ 2,624 $ 14,565 $ - $ 117,168 September 30, 2015 Special Total Pass Mention Substandard Doubtful Loans (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four residential $ - $ 2,107 $ 751 $ - $ 2,858 Multi-family residential 5,898 351 - - 6,249 Commercial real estate 22,005 965 2,829 - 25,799 Construction and land development 30,157 - 8,796 - 38,953 Total Loans $ 58,060 $ 3,423 $ 12,376 $ - $ 73,859 The following tables present loans in which a formal risk rating system is not utilized, but loans are segregated between performing and non-performing based primarily on delinquency status: September 30, 2016 Non- Total Performing Performing Loans (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 226,394 $ 4,244 $ 230,638 Leases 3,286 - 3,286 Consumer 799 - 799 Total Loans $ 230,479 $ 4,244 $ 234,723 September 30, 2015 Non- Total Performing Performing Loans (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 252,758 $ 3,547 $ 256,305 Consumer 392 - 392 Total Loans $ 253,150 $ - $ 256,697 Management further monitors the performance and credit quality of the loan portfolio by analyzing the age of the portfolio as determined by the length of time a recorded payment is due. The following tables present the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the aging categories of performing loans and nonaccrual loans: September 30, 2016 90 Days+ Total 30-89 Days 90 Days + Past Due Past Due Total Non- Current Past Due Past Due and Accruing and Accruing Loans Accrual (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 228,904 $ 1,860 $ 2,767 $ - $ 1,860 $ 233,531 $ 4,244 Multi-family residential 12,478 - - - - 12,478 - Commercial real estate 78,513 - 1,346 - - 79,859 1,346 Construction and land development 11,551 - 10,288 - - 21,839 10,288 Commercial business 99 - - - - 99 - Leases 3,286 3,286 Consumer 799 - - - - 799 - Total Loans $ 335,630 $ 1,860 $ 14,401 $ - $ 1,860 $ 351,891 $ 15,878 September 30, 2015 90 Days+ Total 30-89 Days 90 Days + Past Due Past Due Total Non- Current Past Due Past Due and Accruing and Accruing Loans Accrual (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 255,669 $ 1,462 $ 2,032 $ - $ 1,462 $ 259,163 $ 3,547 Multi-family residential 6,249 - - - - 6,249 - Commercial real estate 25,114 504 181 - 504 25,799 1,589 Construction and land development 38,953 - - - - 38,953 8,796 Commercial business - - - - - - - Consumer 392 - - - - 392 - Total Loans $ 326,377 $ 1,966 $ 2,213 $ - $ 1,966 $ 330,556 $ 13,932 Interest income on nonaccrual loans would have increased by approximately $604,000, $279,000, and $187,000, during fiscal years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively, if these loans would have performed in accordance with their original terms. The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense. Management maintains the allowance at a level believed to cover all known and inherent losses in the portfolio that are both probable and reasonable to estimate at each reporting date. Management reviews the allowance for loan losses no less than quarterly in order to identify those inherent losses and to assess the overall collection probability for the loan portfolio in view of these inherent losses. For each primary type of loan, a loss factor is established reflecting an estimate of the known and inherent losses in such loan type using both a quantitative analysis as well as consideration of qualitative factors. The evaluation process includes, among other things, an analysis of delinquency trends, non-performing loan trends, the level of charge-offs and recoveries, prior loss experience, total loans outstanding, the volume of loan originations, the type, size and geographic concentration of our loans, the value of collateral securing the loans, the borrower’s ability to repay and repayment performance, the number of loans requiring heightened management oversight, local economic conditions and industry experience. Commercial real estate loans entail significant additional credit risks compared to one-to four-family residential mortgage loans, as they generally involve large loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. In addition, the payment experience on loans secured by income-producing properties typically depends on the successful operation of the related real estate project and/or business operation of the borrower who is also the primary occupant, and thus may be subject to a greater extent to the effects of adverse conditions in the real estate market and in the economy in general. Commercial business loans typically involve a higher risk of default than residential loans of like duration since their repayment is generally dependent on the successful operation of the borrower’s business and the sufficiency of collateral, if any. Land acquisition, development and construction lending exposes us to greater credit risk than permanent mortgage financing. The repayment of land acquisition, development and construction loans depends upon the sale of the property to third parties or the availability of permanent financing upon completion of all improvements. These events may adversely affect the borrower and the value of the collateral property. The following tables summarize the primary segments of the allowance for loan losses, segmented into the amount required for loans individually evaluated for impairment and the amount required for loans collectively evaluated for impairment as of September 30, 2016 and 2015. Activity in the allowance is presented for the years ended September 30, 2016 and 2015: September 30, 2016 One- to Multi- Commercial Construction Commercial Leases Consumer Unallocated Total (In Thousands) ALLL balance at September 30, 2015 $ 1,636 $ 66 $ 231 $ 725 $ - $ - $ 4 $ 268 $ 2,930 Charge-offs (11 ) - - - - - - - (11 ) Recoveries 105 - - 20 - - - - 125 Provision (103 ) 71 628 (429 ) 1 21 6 30 225 ALLL balance at September 30, 2016 $ 1,627 $ 137 $ 859 $ 316 $ 1 $ 21 $ 10 $ 298 $ 3,269 Individually evaluated for impairment $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Collectively evaluated for impairment 1,627 137 859 316 1 21 10 298 3,269 September 30, 2015 One- to Multi- Commercial Construction Commercial Consumer Unallocated Total (In Thousands) ALLL balance at September 30, 2014 $ 1,663 $ 67 $ 122 $ 323 $ 15 $ 4 $ 231 $ 2,425 Charge-offs (384 ) (1 ) - - - - - (384 ) Recoveries 77 - - 78 - - - 155 Provision 280 - 109 324 (15 ) - 37 735 ALLL balance at September 30, 2015 $ 1,636 $ 66 $ 231 $ 725 $ - $ 4 $ 268 $ 2,930 Individually evaluated for impairment $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Collectively evaluated for impairment 1,636 66 231 725 - 4 268 2,930 September 30, 2014 One- to Multi- Commercial Construction Commercial Consumer Unallocated Total (In Thousands) ALLL balance at September 30, 2013 $ 1,384 $ 22 $ 70 $ 653 $ 4 $ 2 $ 218 $ 2,353 Charge-offs (215 ) - - - - - - (215 ) Recoveries 47 - - - - - - 47 Provision 447 45 52 (330 ) 11 2 13 240 ALLL balance at September 30, 2014 $ 1,663 $ 67 $ 122 $ 323 $ 15 $ 4 $ 231 $ 2,425 Individually evaluated for impairment $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Collectively evaluated for impairment 1,663 67 122 323 15 4 231 2,425 Management established a provision for loan losses of $225,000, $735,000 and $240,000 during the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The Company determined it was prudent to record a provision for fiscal year 2016 primarily due to the increased level of commercial real estate loans offset by a reduction in single-family residential loans. The provision for loan losses was deemed necessary for fiscal 2015 due to the increase in the level of commercial real estate and construction loans outstanding, charge-offs incurred during fiscal 2015 and the classification of a $10.3 million loan workout relationship as non-performing. The Company believes that the allowance for loan losses at September 30, 2016 is sufficient to cover all inherent and known losses associated with the loan portfolio at such date. At September 30, 2016, the Company’s non-performing assets totaled $16.5 million or 2.9% of total assets as compared to $14.8 million or 3.0% of total assets at September 30, 2015. All of the increase was due to the placement on non-accrual of the entire amount of the Company’s largest loan relationship totaling $12.3 million and consisting of nine loans. Non-performing assets at September 30, 2016 included five construction loans aggregating $10.3 million, 17 one-to-four-family residential loans aggregating $2.9 million, one single-family residential investment property loan totaling $1.4 million and two commercial real estate loans aggregating $1.3 million. Non-performing assets also included at September 30, 2016 two real estate properties consisting of one single-family residential property totaling $375,000 and a commercial real estate property totaling $206,000. At September 30, 2016, the Company had ten loans aggregating $8.2 million that were classified as troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”). Three of such loans aggregating $5.7 million as of September 30, 2016 were classified as non-performing as a result of not achieving a sufficiently long payment history, under the restructured terms, to justify returning the loans to performing (accrual) status. Two of these three loans totaling $4.3 million (which are part of the Company’s largest relationship referenced above) are over 90 days past due resulting from the discontinuation of funding by the Company of the development project (discussed below) due to the re-negotiation of the project’s future direction to completion. The third loan, consisting of a residential loan of approximately $1.4 million, has made all of its required payments to date, but the Company has not returned the loan to performing status due to concerns with regard to the borrower’s ability to make remaining payments due. The remaining eight TDRs have performed in accordance with the terms of their revised agreements. As of September 30, 2016, the Company had reviewed $19.4 million of loans for possible impairment of which $14.6 million was deemed classified as substandard compared to $16.8 million reviewed for possible impairment and $12.4 million of which was classified substandard as of September 30, 2015. Management will continue to monitor and modify the allowance for loan losses as conditions dictate. No assurances can be given that the level of allowance for loan losses will cover all of the inherent losses on the loans or that future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses will not be necessary if economic and other conditions differ substantially from the economic and other conditions used by management to determine the current level of the allowance for loan losses. The following tables set forth a summary of the TDRs activity for the years ended September 30, 2016, 2015 and 2014. All of the TDRs involved changes in the interest rates on the loans; no debt was forgiven. At September 30, 2016, out of the 11 TDRs loans, eight were performing and the remaining three were classified as non-performing, of which one loan was performing in accordance with their modified terms: As of and for the Year Ended September 30, 2016 Restructured Current Period (amount in thousands) Number of Pre- Modification Post-Modification One-to-four family residential 1 $ 482 $ 482 1 $ 482 $ 482 As of and for the Year Ended September 30, 2015 Restructured Current Period (amount in thousands) Number of Pre- Modification Post-Modification Commerical real estate 1 $ 750 $ 750 Construction and land development 1 3,665 3,665 2 $ 4,415 $ 4,415 As of and for the Year Ended September 30, 2014 Restructured Current Period (amount in thousands) Number of Pre- Modification Post-Modification One-to four- family 1 $ 1,455 $ 1,455 Commerical real estate 1 877 877 2 $ 2,332 $ 2,332 As of September 30, 2016, consist of two loans deemed to be TDRs aggregating $4.3 million, consisting of one construction and development loan in the amount of $3.6 million and a commercial real estate loan in the amount of $730,000, both of which were in default under their modified terms. Both loans are related to the Company’s largest borrower. At September 30, 2016, the Company had nine consumer mortgage with a carrying amount of $1.1 million that is secured by residential real estate property for which foreclosure is proceedings are in process according to local jurisdictions. |