LOANS RECEIVABLE | 5. LOANS RECEIVABLE Loans receivable consist of the following: December 31, September 30, 2016 2016 (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 225,375 $ 233,531 Multi-family residential 12,355 12,478 Commercial real estate 88,776 79,859 Construction and land development 27,023 21,839 Commercial business - 99 Leases 4,436 3,286 Consumer 1,915 799 Total loans 359,880 351,891 Undisbursed portion of loans-in-process (8,430 ) (5,371 ) Deferred loan costs 1,498 1,697 Allowance for loan losses (3,454 ) (3,269 ) Net loans $ 349,494 $ 344,948 The following table summarizes by loan segment the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the loans individually and collectively evaluated for impairment by loan segment at December 31, 2016: One- to-four Multi-family Commercial real Construction Leases Consumer Unallocated Total (Dollars in Thousands) Allowance for Loan Losses: Individually evaluated for impairment $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Collectively evaluated for impairment 1,564 135 963 415 28 35 314 3,454 Total ending allowance balance $ 1,564 $ 135 $ 963 $ 415 $ 28 $ 35 $ 314 $ 3,454 Loans: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 5,489 $ 331 $ 2,722 $ 10,511 $ - $ - $ 19,053 Collectively evaluated for impairment 219,886 12,024 86,054 16,512 4,436 1,915 340,827 Total loans $ 225,375 $ 12,355 $ 88,776 $ 27,023 $ 4,436 $ 1,915 $ 359,880 The following table summarizes by loan segment the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the loans individually and collectively evaluated for impairment by loan segment at September 30, 2016: One- to-four Multi-family Commercial Construction Commercial Leases Consumer Unallocated Total (Dollars in Thousands) Allowance for Loan Losses: Individually evaluated for impairment $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Collectively evaluated for impairment 1,627 137 859 316 1 21 10 298 3,269 Total ending allowance balance $ 1,627 $ 137 $ 859 $ 316 $ 1 $ 21 $ 10 $ 298 $ 3,269 Loans: Individually evaluated for impairment $ 5,553 $ 335 $ 3,154 $ 10,288 $ 99 $ - $ - $ 19,429 Collectively evaluated for impairment 227,978 12,143 76,705 11,551 - 3,286 799 332,462 Total loans $ 233,531 $ 12,478 $ 79,859 $ 21,839 $ 99 $ 3,286 $ 799 $ 351,891 The loan portfolio is segmented at a level that allows management to monitor both risk and performance. Management evaluates for potential impairment all construction, multi-family, commercial real estate, commercial business loans, and all leases and all loans and leases more than 90 days delinquent as to principal and/or interest. Loans are considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect in full the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Once the determination is made that a loan is impaired, the determination of whether a specific allocation of the allowance is necessary is generally measured by comparing the recorded investment in the loan to the fair value of the loan using one of the following three methods: (a) the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate; (b) the loan’s observable market price; or (c) the fair value of the collateral less selling costs. Management primarily utilizes the fair value of collateral method as a practically expedient alternative. On collateral method evaluations, any portion of the loan deemed uncollectible is charged-off against the loan loss allowance. The following table presents impaired loans by class as of December 31, 2016, segregated by those for which a specific allowance was required and those for which a specific allowance was not required. Impaired Loans with Impaired Loans with No Specific Specific Allowance Allowance Total Impaired Loans (Dollars in Thousands) Unpaid Recorded Related Recorded Recorded Principal Investment Allowance Investment Investment Balance One-to-four family residential $ - $ - $ 5,489 $ 5,489 $ 5,718 Multi-family residential - - 331 331 331 Commercial real estate - - 2,722 2,722 2,722 Construction and land development - - 10,511 10,511 10,511 Total loans $ - $ - $ 19,053 $ 19,053 $ 19,282 The following table presents impaired loans by class as of September 30, 2016, segregated by those for which a specific allowance was required and those for which a specific allowance was not required. Impaired Loans with Impaired Loans with No Specific Specific Allowance Allowance Total Impaired Loans (Dollars in Thousands) Unpaid Recorded Related Recorded Recorded Principal Investment Allowance Investment Investment Balance One-to-four family residential $ - $ - $ 5,553 $ 5,553 $ 5,869 Multi-family - - 335 335 335 Commercial real estate - - 3,154 3,154 3,154 Construction and land development - - 10,288 10,288 10,288 Commercial loans - - 99 99 99 Total loans $ - $ - $ 19,429 $ 19,429 $ 19,745 The following tables present the average recorded investment in impaired loans and related interest income recognized for the periods indicated: Three Months Ended December 31, 2016 Average Income Recognized Income (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 5,522 $ 17 $ 24 Multi-family residential 332 6 - Commercial real estate 2,938 17 11 Construction and land development 10,399 - - Total loans $ 19,191 $ 40 $ 35 Three Months Ended December 31, 2015 Average Income Recognized Income (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 4,455 $ 31 $ 23 Multi-family residential 351 6 - Commercial real estate 3,740 24 13 Construction and land development 9,057 125 - Total loans $ 17,603 $ 186 $ 36 Federal regulations and our loan policy require that the Company utilize an internal asset classification system as a means of reporting problem and potential problem assets. The Company has incorporated an internal asset classification system, consistent with Federal banking regulations, as a part of its credit monitoring system. Management currently classifies problem and potential problem assets as “special mention”, “substandard,” “doubtful” or “loss” assets. An asset is considered “substandard” if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. “Substandard” assets include those characterized by the “distinct possibility” that the insured institution will sustain “some loss” if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as “doubtful” have all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified “substandard” with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make “collection or liquidation in full,” on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, “highly questionable and improbable.” Assets classified as “loss” are those considered “uncollectible” and of such little value that their continuance as assets without the establishment of a specific loss reserve is not warranted. Assets which do not currently expose the insured institution to sufficient risk to warrant classification in one of the aforementioned categories but possess weaknesses are required to be designated “special mention.” The following tables present the classes of the loan portfolio in which a formal risk weighting system is utilized summarized by the aggregate “Pass” and the criticized category of “special mention”, and the classified categories of “substandard”, “doubtful” and “loss” within the Company’s risk rating system as applied to the loan portfolio. The Company had no loans classified as “doubtful” or “loss” at either of the dates presented. December 31, 2016 Special Total Pass Mention Substandard Loans (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ - $ 1,670 $ 908 $ 2,578 Multi-family residential 12,025 330 - 12,355 Commercial real estate 85,115 1,480 2,181 88,776 Construction and land development 16,512 - 10,511 27,023 Total loans $ 113,652 $ 3,480 $ 13,600 $ 130,732 September 30, 2016 Special Total Pass Mention Substandard Loans (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ - $ 1,681 $ 1,212 $ 2,893 Multi-family residential 12,144 - 334 12,478 Commercial real estate 76,185 943 2,731 79,859 Construction and land development 11,551 - 10,288 21,839 Commercial business 99 - - 99 Total loans $ 99,979 $ 2,624 $ 14,565 $ 117,168 The Company evaluates the classification of one-to-four family residential and consumer loans primarily on a pooled basis. If the Company becomes aware that adverse or distressed conditions exist that may affect a particular single-family residential loan, the loan is downgraded following the above definitions of special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss. The following tables represent loans in which a formal risk rating system is not utilized, but loans are segregated between performing and non-performing based primarily on delinquency status. Non-performing loans that would be included in the table are those loans greater than 90 days past due as to principal and/or interest that do not have a designated risk rating. December 31, 2016 Non- Total Performing Performing Loans (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 218,559 $ 4,238 $ 222,797 Leases 4,436 - 4,436 Consumer 1,915 - 1,915 Total loans $ 224,910 $ 4,238 $ 229,148 September 30, 2016 Non- Total Performing Performing Loans (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 226,394 $ 4,244 $ 230,638 Leases $ 3,286 - $ 3,286 Consumer 799 - 799 Total loans $ 230,479 $ 4,244 $ 234,723 Management further monitors the performance and credit quality of the loan portfolio by analyzing the age of the portfolio as determined by the length of time a recorded payment is due or overdue, as the case may be. The following table presents the loan categories of the loan portfolio summarized by the aging categories of performing and delinquent loans and nonaccrual loans: December 31, 2016 90 Days+ Total 30-89 Days 90 Days + Past Due Past Due Total Non- Current Past Due Past Due and Accruing and Accruing Loans Accrual (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 222,408 $ 989 $ 1,978 $ - $ 989 $ 225,375 $ 4,238 Multi-family residential 12,355 - - - - 12,355 - Commercial real estate 87,192 238 1,346 - 238 88,776 1,346 Construction and land development 16,513 - 10,511 - - 27,023 10,511 Leases 4,303 133 - - 133 4,436 - Consumer 1,915 - - - - 1,915 - Total loans $ 344,686 $ 1,360 $ 13,835 $ - $ 1,360 $ 359,880 $ 16,095 September 30, 2016 90 Days+ Total 30-89 Days 90 Days + Past Due Past Due Total Non- Current Past Due Past Due and Accruing and Accruing Loans Accrual (Dollars in Thousands) One-to-four family residential $ 228,904 $ 1,860 $ 2,767 $ - $ 1,860 $ 233,531 $ 4,244 Multi-family residential 12,478 - - - - 12,478 - Commercial real estate 78,513 - 1,346 - - 79,859 1,346 Construction and land development 11,551 - 10,288 - - 21,839 10,288 Commercial business 99 - - - - 99 - Leases 3,286 - - - - 3,286 - Consumer 799 - - - - 799 - Total loans $ 335,630 $ 1,860 $ 14,401 $ - $ 1,860 $ 351,891 $ 15,878 The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense. The Company maintains the allowance at a level believed to cover all known and inherent losses in the portfolio that are both probable and reasonable to estimate at each reporting date. Management reviews the allowance for loan losses no less than quarterly in order to identify these inherent losses and to assess the overall collection probability for the loan portfolio in view of these inherent losses. For each primary type of loan, a loss factor is established reflecting an estimate of the known and inherent losses in such loan type contained in the portfolio using both a quantitative analysis as well as consideration of qualitative factors. The evaluation process includes, among other things, an analysis of delinquency trends, non-performing loan trends, the level of charge-offs and recoveries, prior loss experience, total loans outstanding, the volume of loan originations, the type, size and geographic concentration of the Company’s loans, the value of collateral securing the loans, the borrowers’ ability to repay and repayment performance, the number of loans requiring heightened management oversight, local economic conditions and industry experience. Commercial real estate loans entail significant additional credit risks compared to owner-occupied one-to-four family residential mortgage loans, as they generally involve large loan balances concentrated with single borrowers or groups of related borrowers. In addition, the payment experience on loans secured by income-producing properties typically depends on the successful operation of the related real estate project and/or business operation of the borrower who is, in some cases, also the primary occupant, and thus may be subject to a greater extent to the effects of adverse conditions in the real estate market and in the economy in general. Commercial business loans typically involve a higher risk of default than residential loans of like duration since their repayment is generally dependent on the successful operation of the borrower’s business and the sufficiency of collateral, if any. Land acquisition, development and construction lending exposes the Company to greater credit risk than permanent mortgage financing. The repayment of land acquisition, development and construction loans depends upon the sale of the property to third parties or the availability of permanent financing upon completion of all improvements. These events may adversely affect the sale of the properties, potentially reducing both the borrowers’ ability to make required payments as well as reducing the value of the collateral property. Such lending is additionally subject to the risk that if the estimate of construction cost proves to be inaccurate, the Company potentially will be compelled to advance additional funds to allow completion of the project. In addition, if the estimate of value proves to be inaccurate, the Company may be confronted with a project, when completed, having less value than the loan amount. If the Company is forced to foreclose on a project prior to completion, there is no assurance that the Company would be able to recover the entire unpaid portion of the loan. The following tables summarize the primary segments of the allowance for loan losses. Activity in the allowance is presented for the three month periods ended December 31, 2016 and 2015: Three Months Ended December 31, 2016 One- to Multi- Commercial Construction Commercial Leases Consumer Unallocated Total (Dollars in Thousands) ALLL balance at September 30, 2016 $ 1,627 $ 137 $ 859 $ 316 $ 1 $ 21 $ 10 $ 298 $ 3,269 Charge-offs - - - - - - - - - Recoveries - - - - - - - - - Provision (63 ) (2 ) 104 99 (1 ) 7 25 16 185 ALLL balance at December 31, 2016 $ 1,564 $ 135 $ 963 $ 415 $ - $ 28 $ 35 $ 314 $ 3,454 Three Months Ended December 31, 2015 One- to four-family Multi- Commercial Construction Commercial Consumer Unallocated Total (Dollars in Thousands) ALLL balance at September 30, 2015 $ 1,635 $ 66 $ 231 $ 724 $ - $ 5 $ 269 $ 2,930 Charge-offs (11 ) - - - - - - (11 ) Recoveries - - - - - - - - Provision (153 ) (8 ) 128 33 - 3 (3 ) - ALLL balance at December 31, 2015 $ 1,471 $ 58 $ 359 $ 757 $ - $ 8 $ 266 $ 2,919 The Company recorded a provision for loan losses in the amount of $185,000 for the three months period ended December 31, 2016, compared to no provision for the same period in 2015. At December 31, 2016, the Company had ten loans aggregating $7.5 million that were classified as troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”). Three of such loans aggregating $5.5 million as of December 31, 2016 were classified as non-performing as a result of concern as to whether the borrower has sufficient cashflow to continue to make scheduled payments. Two of these three loans totaling $4.8 million (which are part of the Company’s largest lending relationship) are over 90 days past due resulting from the discontinuation of funding by the Company due to the re-negotiation of the projects cash flows. The Company did not restructure any debt during the three month period ended December 31, 2016 and one single-family residential was restructured in the amount of $482,000 during the same period in 2015. One on construction and development loan for $3.4 million and a commercial real estate loan for $730,000 were in default as of December 31, 2016. Both loans were a part of the Company’s largest borrower. A third TDR secured by one-to-four family residential property for $1.4 million remained classified as non-performing although the borrower has made all agreed upon payments to date. Restructured during the Three Months Ended December 31, 2015 Number of Pre- Modification Post- (Dollars in Thousand) One-to four- family 1 $ 482,000 $ 482,000 1 $ 482,000 $ 482,000 |