Our common stock began trading on the QB Tier of OTC Markets’ “Over the Counter” Bulletin Board (“OTC”) under the symbol “CHGT” in April 2014. The following table sets forth, for the period indicated, the prices of the common stock in the over-the-counter market, as reported and summarized by OTC Markets Group, Inc. These quotations represent inter-dealer quotations, without adjustment for retail markup, markdown, or commission and may not represent actual transactions. There is an absence of an established trading market for the Company’s common stock, as the market is limited, sporadic and highly volatile, which may affect the prices listed below.
As of the date of this filing, there were three holders of record of our common stock.
To date, we have not paid dividends on shares of our common stock and we do not expect to declare or pay dividends on shares of our common stock in the foreseeable future. The payment of any dividends will depend upon our future earnings, if any, our financial condition, and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors.
We are authorized to issue 250,000,000 shares of common stock, with a par value of $0.0001. The closing price of our common stock on October 10, 2014, as quoted by OTC Markets Group, Inc., was $1.15. There were 60,000,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of October 14, 2014. All shares of common stock have one vote per share on all matters including election of directors, without provision for cumulative voting. The common stock is not redeemable and has no conversion or preemptive rights. The common stock currently outstanding is validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable. In the event of liquidation of the Company, the holders of common stock will share equally in any balance of the Company’s assets available for distribution to them after satisfaction of creditors and preferred shareholders, if any. The holders of the Company’s common are entitled to equal dividends and distributions per share with respect to the common stock when, as and if, declared by the Board of Directors from funds legally available.
Our Articles of Incorporation, our Bylaws, and the applicable statutes of the state of Florida contain a more complete description of the rights and liabilities of holders of our securities.
During the year ended June 30, 2014, there was no modification of any instruments defining the rights of holders of the Company’s common stock and no limitation or qualification of the rights evidenced by the Company’s common stock as a result of the issuance of any other class of securities or the modification thereof.
Holders of shares of our common stock do not have cumulative voting rights, which means that the holders of more than 50% of the outstanding shares, voting for the election of directors, can elect all of the directors to be elected, if they so choose, and, in that event, the holders of the remaining shares will not be able to elect any of our directors.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
The following table shows the number of shares of common stock that could be issued upon exercise of outstanding options and warrants, the weighted average exercise price of the outstanding options and warrants, and the remaining shares available for future issuance as of June 30, 2014.
| | | | | | |
Plan Category | | Number of Securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights | | Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights | | Number of securities remaining available for future issuance |
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders. | | — | | — | | — |
| | | | | | |
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders. | | — | | — | | — |
| | | | | | |
Total | | — | | — | | — |
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide the information required by this item.
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
THIS FILING CONTAINS FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. THE WORDS “ANTICIPATED,” “BELIEVE,” “EXPECT,” “PLAN,” “INTEND,” “SEEK,” “ESTIMATE,” “PROJECT,” “WILL,” “COULD,” “MAY,” AND SIMILAR EXPRESSIONS ARE INTENDED TO IDENTIFY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. THESE STATEMENTS INCLUDE, AMONG OTHERS, INFORMATION REGARDING FUTURE OPERATIONS, FUTURE CAPITAL EXPENDITURES, AND FUTURE NET CASH FLOW. SUCH STATEMENTS REFLECT THE COMPANY’S CURRENT VIEWS WITH RESPECT TO FUTURE EVENTS AND FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE AND INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, GENERAL ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS CONDITIONS, CHANGES IN FOREIGN, POLITICAL, SOCIAL, AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS, REGULATORY INITIATIVES AND COMPLIANCE WITH GOVERNMENTAL REGULATIONS, THE ABILITY TO ACHIEVE FURTHER MARKET PENETRATION AND ADDITIONAL CUSTOMERS, AND VARIOUS OTHER MATTERS, MANY OF WHICH ARE BEYOND THE COMPANY’S CONTROL. SHOULD ONE OR MORE OF THESE RISKS OR UNCERTAINTIES OCCUR, OR SHOULD UNDERLYING ASSUMPTIONS PROVE TO BE INCORRECT, ACTUAL RESULTS MAY VARY MATERIALLY AND ADVERSELY FROM THOSE ANTICIPATED, BELIEVED, ESTIMATED, OR OTHERWISE INDICATED. CONSEQUENTLY, ALL OF THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS MADE IN THIS FILING ARE QUALIFIED BY THESE CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS AND THERE CAN BE NO ASSURANCE OF THE ACTUAL RESULTS OR DEVELOPMENTS.
The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and plan of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere herein. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements including information about possible or assumed results of our financial conditions, operations, plans, objectives, and performance that involve risk, uncertainties, and assumptions. The actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in such forward-looking statements. For example, when we indicate that we expect to increase our product sales and potentially establish additional license relationships, these are forward-looking statements. The words expect, anticipate, estimate or similar expressions are also used to indicate forward-looking statements.
Background of our Company
Changing Technologies, Inc.(the “Company”), a Florida corporation, was formed to develop apps primarily focused on improving personal and business productivity and health and fitness monitoring. To date, our only business activity has been the formation of our corporate entity, initiating the designing of our logo, and developing our business plan. The Company was incorporated on June 18, 2013 (Date of Inception) with its corporate headquarters located in Estero, Florida. Our year end is June 30. We are a development stage company.
- 7 -
Plan of Operations
We believe we do not have adequate funds to execute our business plan for the next twelve months unless we obtain additional funding. However, should we not raise this capital, we will allocate our funding to first assure that all State, Federal and SEC requirements are met.
As of June 30, 2014, we had cash on hand of $26,000.
We intend to pursue capital through public or private financing, as well as borrowing and other sources in order to finance our business activities. We cannot guarantee that additional funding will be available on favorable terms, if at all. If adequate funds are not available, then our ability to continue our operations may be significantly hindered.
Results of Operations
We incurred a net loss of $65,087 for the year ended June 30, 2014. We had a working capital deficit of $28,187 as of June 30, 2014. We do not anticipate having positive net income in the immediate future. Net cash used by operations for the year ended June 30, 2014 was $38,900.
We continue to rely on advances to fund operating shortfalls and do not foresee a change in this situation in the immediate future. There can be no assurance that we will continue to have such advances available. We will not be able to continue operations without them. We are pursuing alternate sources of financing, but there is no assurance that additional capital will be available to the Company when needed or on acceptable terms.
Fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 compared to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013.
General and Administrative Expenses
We recognized general and administrative expenses in the amount of $65,087 and $2,100 for the twelve months ended June 30, 2014 and ended 2013, respectively. The increase is due to our having twelve days of operations in 2013, versus 365 days in 2014.
Net Loss
We incurred a net loss of $65,087 for the twelve months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to $2,100 for the comparable period of 2013. The increase in the net loss was primarily the result of having twelve days of operations in 2013, versus 365 days in 2014.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of the date of this filing, we had yet to generate any revenues from our business operations.
We anticipate needing approximately of $250,000 to fund our operations and to effectively execute our business plan over the next eighteen months. Currently available cash is not sufficient to allow us to commence full execution of our business plan. Our business expansion will require significant capital resources that may be funded through the issuance of common stock or of notes payable or other debt arrangements that may affect our debt structure. Despite our current financial status, we believe that we may be able to issue notes payable or debt instruments in order to start executing our business plan. However, there can be no assurance that we will be able to raise money in this fashion and have not entered into any agreements that would obligate a third party to provide us with capital.
Through June 30, 2014, we have incurred cumulative losses since inception of $67,187. We raised the cash amounts to be used in these activities from the sale of common stock and from advances. We currently have negative working capital of $28,187.
As of June 30, 2014, we had $26,000 of cash on hand. This amount of cash will be adequate to fund our operations for less than one month.
We have no known demands or commitments and are not aware of any events or uncertainties as of June 30, 2014 that will result in or that are reasonably likely to materially increase or decrease our current liquidity.
- 8 -
Capital Resources
We had no material commitments for capital expenditures as of June 30, 2014 and 2013. However, should we execute our business plan as anticipated, we would incur substantial capital expenditures and require financing in addition to what is required to fund our present operation.
Additional Financing
Additional financing is required to continue operations. Although actively searching for available capital, the Company does not have any current arrangements for additional outside sources of financing and cannot provide any assurance that such financing will be available.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We prepare our financial statements in conformity with GAAP, which requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions and apply judgments. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience, current trends, and other factors that management believes to be important at the time the financial statements are prepared; actual results could differ from our estimates and such differences could be material. We have identified below the critical accounting policies, which are assumptions made by management about matters that are highly uncertain and that are of critical importance in the presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Due to the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain, materially different amounts could be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. On a regular basis, we review our critical accounting policies and how they are applied in the preparation our financial statements.
USE OF ESTIMATES - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
GOING CONERN - The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. For the year ended June 30, 2014, the Company had a net loss of $65,087 and generated negative cash flow from operations in the amount of $38,900. In view of these matters, the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to achieve a level of profitability or to obtain additional capital to finance its operations. The Company intends on financing its future development activities and its working capital needs largely from the sale of public equity securities with some additional funding from other traditional financing sources, including term notes until such time that funds provided by operations are sufficient to fund working capital requirements. The financial statements of the Company do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded assets, or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
New Accounting Pronouncements
For a description of recent accounting standards, including the expected dates of adoption and estimated effects, if any, on our financial statements, see “Note 3: Significant Accounting Polices: Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements” in Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide the information required by this item.
- 9 -
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Changing Technologies, Inc.
(A Development Stage Enterprise)
Financial Statements
June 30, 2014
Contents
| |
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms | 11 |
Consolidated Balance Sheets | 12 |
Consolidated Statements of Operations | 13 |
Consolidated Statement of Change in Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit) | 14 |
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows | 15 |
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements | 16 |
- 10 -
| |
Messineo & Co, CPAs LLC 2471 N McMullen Booth Rd Ste. 302 Clearwater, FL 33759-1362 T: (518) 530-1122 F: (727) 674-0511 | data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b2830/b283072602afee7f89703ffc4fe15385c0528dbd" alt=""
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Board of Directors and Stockholders
Changing Technologies, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Changing Technologies, Inc., a development stage entity, as of June 30, 2014 and 2013 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the year ended June 30, 2014 and the periods from June 18, 2013 (date of inception) through June 30, 2014 and 2013. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as, evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Changing Technologies, Inc., a development stage entity, as of June 30, 2014 and 2013 and the results of its consolidated operations and its cash flows for the year ending June 30, 2014 and the periods from June 18, 2013 (date of inception) through June 30, 2014 and 2013 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has incurred a loss, has not emerged from the development stage, and may be unable to raise necessary equity to implement its’ business plan. These factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09d0b/09d0bbbdad21d54b6f129658c630720fd9ee4475" alt=""
Messineo & Co. CPAs, LLC
Clearwater, Florida
October 13, 2014
- 11 -
CHANGING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
| | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2014 | | June 30, 2013 | |
ASSETS | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
CURRENT ASSETS | | | | | | | |
Cash and cash equivalents | | $ | 26,000 | | $ | 8,900 | |
Total current assets | | | 26,000 | | | 8,900 | |
| | | | | | | |
TOTAL ASSETS | | $ | 26,000 | | $ | 8,900 | |
| | | | | | | |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | |
CURRENT LIABILITIES | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | $ | 28,187 | | $ | 2,000 | |
Advances payable | | | 26,000 | | | — | |
Total current liabilities | | | 54,187 | | | 2,000 | |
| | | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES | | | 54,187 | | | 2,000 | |
| | | | | | | |
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | |
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) | | | | | | | |
Preferred Stock, $0.0001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013. | | | — | | | — | |
Common Stock, $0.0001 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized; 60,000,000 and 45,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013, respectively. | | | 6,000 | | | 4,500 | |
Additional paid-in capital | | | 33,000 | | | 4,500 | |
Accumulated deficit | | | (67,187 | ) | | (2,100 | ) |
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit) | | | (28,187 | ) | | 6,900 | |
| | | | | | | |
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT | | $ | 26,000 | | $ | 8,900 | |
On August 11, 2014 the Company issued a five-for-one stock dividend, resulting in each shareholder receiving four additional shares of common stock for each share held on the record date. All share and per share amounts have been restated to reflect the stock dividend.
The auditor’s report and accompany notes are an integral part of these audited financial statements.
- 12 -
CHANGING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
| | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended June 30, | | Period from June 18, 2013 (date of inception) through June 30, | | Period from June 18, 2013 (date of inception) through June 30, | |
| 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
OPERATING EXPENSES | | | | | | | | | |
General and administrative expenses | | 65,087 | | | 2,100 | | | 67,187 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS | | (65,087 | ) | | (2,100 | ) | | (67,187 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
NET LOSS | $ | (65,087 | ) | $ | (2,100 | ) | $ | (67,187 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE – Basic and fully diluted | $ | (0.00 | ) | $ | (0.00 | ) | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING Basic and fully diluted | | 60,000,000 | | | 45,000,000 | | | | |
On August 11, 2014 the Company issued a five-for-one stock dividend, resulting in each shareholder receiving four additional shares of common stock for each share held on the record date. All share and per share amounts have been restated to reflect the stock dividend.
The auditor’s report and accompany notes are an integral part of these audited financial statements.
- 13 -
CHANGING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGE IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Common Stock | | Additional Paid In | | Deficit Accumulated During the Development | | | |
| | Shares | | Amount | | Capital | | Stage | | Total | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
BALANCE, June 18, 2013 (Inception) | | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common shares issued for cash | | 45,000,000 | | | 4,500 | | | 4,500 | | | — | | | 9,000 | |
Net Loss | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (2,100 | ) | | (2,100 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
BALANCE, June 30, 2013 | | 45,000,000 | | $ | 4,500 | | $ | 4,500 | | $ | (2,100 | ) | $ | 6,900 | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Common shares issued for cash | | 15,000,000 | | | 1,500 | | | 28,500 | | | — | | | 30,000 | |
Net Loss | | — | | | — | | | — | | | (65,087 | ) | | (65,087 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
BALANCE, June 30, 2014 | | 60,000,000 | | $ | 6,000 | | $ | 33,000 | | $ | (67,187 | ) | $ | (28,187 | ) |
On August 11, 2014 the Company issued a five-for-one stock dividend, resulting in each shareholder receiving four additional shares of common stock for each share held on the record date. All share and per share amounts have been restated to reflect the stock dividend.
The auditor’s report and accompany notes are an integral part of these audited financial statements.
- 14 -
CHANGING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | Year Ended June 30, | | Period from June 18, 2013 (date of inception) through June 30, | | Period from June 18, 2013 (date of inception) through June 30, | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2014 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
CASH FLOW FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | | | |
Net Loss | | $ | (65,087 | ) | $ | (2,100 | ) | $ | (67,187 | ) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | | | | | | | | | | |
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities | | | 26,187 | | | 2,000 | | | 28,187 | |
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES | | | (38,900 | ) | | (100 | ) | | (39,000 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | | |
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: | | | | | | | | | | |
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | | | 30,000 | | | 9,000 | | | 39,000 | |
Proceeds from advances | | | 26,000 | | | — | | | 26,000 | |
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES | | | 56,000 | | | 9,000 | | | 65,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH | | | 17,100 | | | 8,900 | | | 26,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
CASH, at the beginning of the period | | | 8,900 | | | — | | | — | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
CASH, at the end of the period | | $ | 26,000 | | $ | 8,900 | | $ | 26,000 | |
| | | | | | | | | | |
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information: | | | | | | | | | | |
Cash paid during the period for: | | | | | | | | | | |
Interest | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
Taxes | | $ | — | | $ | — | | $ | — | |
The auditor’s report and accompany notes are an integral part of these audited financial statements.
- 15 -
CHANGING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
JUNE 30, 2014
Note 1. Background Information
Changing Technologies, Inc.(the “Company”), a Florida corporation, was formed to develop apps primarily focused on improving personal and business productivity and health and fitness monitoring. To date, our only business activity has been the formation of our corporate entity, initiating the designing of our logo, and developing our business plan. The Company was incorporated on June 18, 2013 (Date of Inception) with its corporate headquarters located in Estero, Florida. Our year-end is June 30. We are a development stage company.
Note 2. Going Concern
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, the Company had a net loss of $65,087 and negative cash flow from operations of $38,900. As of June 30, 2014, the Company has negative working capital of $28,187. The company has not emerged from the development stage.
These factors raise a substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classifications of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.
The Company does not have the resources at this time to repay its credit and debt obligations, make any payments in the form of dividends to its shareholders or fully implement its business plan. Without additional capital, the Company will not be able to remain in business.
Management has plans to address the Company’s financial situation as follows:
In the near term, management plans to continue to focus on raising the funds necessary to implement the Company’s business plan. Management will continue to seek out debt financing to obtain the capital required to meet the Company’s financial obligations. There is no assurance, however, that lenders will continue to advance capital to the Company or that the new business operations will be profitable. The possibility of failure in obtaining additional funding and the potential inability to achieve profitability raises doubts about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.
In the long term, management believes that the Company’s projects and initiatives will be successful and will provide cash flow to the Company that will be used to finance the Company’s future growth. However, there can be no assurances that the Company’s planned activities will be successful, or that the Company will ultimately attain profitability. The Company’s long-term viability depends on its ability to obtain adequate sources of debt or equity funding to meet current commitments and fund the continuation of its business operations, and the ability of the Company to achieve adequate profitability and cash flows from operations to sustain its operations.
Note 3. Significant Accounting Policies
The significant accounting policies that the Company follows are:
Development Stage Entity
The Company is a development stage company as defined by FASB ASC 915,Development Stage Entities. The Company is still devoting substantially all of its efforts on establishing the business and its planned principal operations have not commenced. All losses accumulated since inception have been considered as part of the Company’s development stage activities.
Basis of Presentation
The Financial Statements and related disclosures have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. The Financial Statements have been prepared using the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) of the United States.
- 16 -
Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts and operations of Changing Technologies, Inc., and its wholly owned subsidiaries, 6th Dimension Technologies, Inc., a Texas corporation, and SumLin Technologies, LLC (collectively referred to as the “Company”). All material intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
All cash, other than held in escrow, is maintained with a major financial institution in the United States. Deposits with this bank may exceed the amount of insurance provided on such deposits. Temporary cash investments with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents were $26,000 and $8,900 at June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Cash Flow Reporting
The Company follows ASC 230,Statement of Cash Flows, for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by ASC 230, Statement of Cash Flows, to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments. The Company reports the reporting currency equivalent of foreign currency cash flows, using the current exchange rate at the time of the cash flows and the effect of exchange rate changes on cash held in foreign currencies is reported as a separate item in the reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of cash and cash equivalents and separately provides information about investing and financing activities not resulting in cash receipts or payments in the period.
Common stock
The Company records common stock issuances when all of the legal requirements for the issuance of such common stock have been satisfied.
Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes under ASC 740Income Taxes. Under the asset and liability method of ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period the enactment occurs. A valuation allowance is provided for certain deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize tax assets through future operations. No deferred tax assets or liabilities were recognized as of June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic loss per share is computed in accordance with ASC Topic 260,Earnings per Share, by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted loss per share is computed giving effect to all potentially dilutive common shares. Potentially dilutive common shares may consist of incremental shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and warrants and the conversion of notes payable to common stock. In periods in which a net loss has been incurred, all potentially dilutive common shares are considered antidilutive and thus are excluded from the calculation. At June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company did not have any potentially dilutive common shares.
- 17 -
Financial Instruments
The Company’s balance sheet includes certain financial instruments. The carrying amounts of current assets and current liabilities approximate their fair value because of the relatively short period between the origination of these instruments and their expected realization.
FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 820Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASC 820) defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
| | |
| Level 1 - | Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities. |
| | |
| Level 2 - | Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates); and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. |
| | |
| Level 3 - | Inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable. |
Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of June 30, 2014. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments. These financial instruments include accounts receivable, other current assets, accounts payable, and accrued expenses. The fair value of the Company’s notes payable is estimated based on current rates that would be available for debt of similar terms that is not significantly different from its stated value.
Commitments and Contingencies
The Company follows ASC 450-20,Loss Contingencies, to report accounting for contingencies. Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably estimated. There were no known commitments or contingencies as of June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
We have reviewed the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) accounting pronouncements and interpretations thereof that have effectiveness dates during the periods reported and in future periods. The Company has carefully considered the new pronouncements that alter previous generally accepted accounting principles and does not believe that any new or modified principles will have a material impact on the corporation’s reported financial position or operations in the near term. The applicability of any standard is subject to the formal review of our financial management and certain standards are under consideration.
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-02,Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting these reclassifications. Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income. The amendments in the ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP. The new amendments will require an organization to:
- 18 -
| |
· | Present (either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income - but only if the item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period; and |
| |
· | Cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period. This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension-related amounts) instead of directly to income or expense. |
The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income. Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual). The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In January 2013, the FASB issuedASU No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011-11. The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users. In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the Board determined that it could make them more operable and cost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under IFRSs. Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-10, which eliminated certain financial reporting requirements of companies previously identified as “Development Stage Entities” (Topic 915). The amendments in this ASU simplify accounting guidance by removing all incremental financial reporting requirements for development stage entities. The amendments also reduce data maintenance and, for those entities subject to audit, audit costs by eliminating the requirement for development stage entities to present inception-to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder equity. Early application of each of the amendments is permitted for any annual reporting period or interim period for which the entity’s financial statements have not yet been issued (public business entities) or made available for issuance (other entities). Upon adoption, entities will no longer present or disclose any information required by Topic 915. The Company has adopted this standard for future reporting.
In June 2014, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-12Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718), Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. A performance target in a share-based payment that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period should be accounted for as a performance condition under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 718,Compensation — Stock Compensation. As a result, the target is not reflected in the estimation of the award’s grant date fair value. Compensation cost would be recognized over the required service period, if it is probable that the performance condition will be achieved. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after 15 December 2015 and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. Management has reviewed the ASU and believes that they currently account for these awards in a manner consistent with the new guidance, therefore there is no anticipation of any effect to the consolidated financial statements.
In August 2014, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-15Preparation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40), Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. Under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), continuation of a reporting entity as a going concern is presumed as the basis for preparing financial statements unless and until the entity’s liquidation becomes imminent. Preparation of financial statements under this presumption is commonly referred to as the going concern basis of accounting. If and when an entity’s liquidation becomes imminent, financial statements should be prepared under the liquidation basis of accounting in accordance with Subtopic 205-30, Presentation of Financial Statements—Liquidation Basis of Accounting. Even when an entity’s liquidation is not imminent, there may be conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. In those situations, financial statements should continue to be prepared under the going concern basis of accounting, but the amendments in this Update should be followed to determine whether to disclose information about the relevant conditions and events. The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. The Company will evaluate the going concern considerations in this ASU, however, at the current period, management does not believe that it has met conditions which would subject these financial statements for additional disclosure.
- 19 -
Reclassification
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior period financial statement to conform to the current period presentation. Reclassification includes retroactive effect of the five-for-one stock dividend on August 11, 2014. All share and per share amounts have been restated to reflect the stock dividend.
Note 4. Advances from Third Parties
During the year ended June 30, 2014 the Company received net, non-interest bearing advances from certain third parties totaling $26,000. The total amounts due under these advances as of June 30, 2014 and 2013 were $26,000 and $0, respectively. These advances are not collateralized and are due on demand. As a result, they are included in current liabilities.
Note 5. Income Taxes
There is no current or deferred income tax expense or benefit for the period ended June 30, 2014.
The provision for income taxes is different from that which would be obtained by applying the statutory federal income tax rate to income before income taxes. The items causing this difference for the periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 are as follows.
| | | | | | | | |
| | 2014 | | | 2013 | |
Tax benefit at U.S. statutory rate | | $ | 64,987 | | | $ | 2,100 | |
Valuation allowance | | | (64,987 | ) | | | (2,100 | ) |
| | $ | — | | | $ | — | |
The Company has net operating losses of $67,187 since inception. During the year ended June 30, 2014, the Company incurred net operating losses of $64,987. Losses from inception through June 2, 2014 will be limited for IRS purposes, due to the change in control of the Company.
Note 6. Common Stock
On October 31, 2013, the Company issued 3,000,000 shares of common stock to third parties for proceeds of $30,000.
Note 7. Preferred Stock
On July 7, 2014, our Board of Directors authorized the Company to issue 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. As of October 14, 2014, there are no preferred shares issued or outstanding.
Note 8. Subsequent Events
On July 25, 2014, 6th Dimension purchased SumLin Technologies, LLC (“SumLin”), a North Carolina corporation, for $150,000, to be paid over a five-month period. SumLin specializes in personalizing 3D printing for consumer end use. As a result of the acquisition of SumLin, the Company is no longer a shell company as of July 25, 2014.
On August 11, 2014 the Company issued a five-for-one stock dividend, where each shareholder at the close of business on July 21, 2014 received four additional shares of common stock for every share held on the record date. The stock dividend was approved by our Board of Directors and stockholders holding a majority of our voting shares. Ten millions shares of preferred stock were also authorized.
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Changes in Accountants
There have been no changes in accountants since the Company’s inception.
Disagreements with Accountants
There were no disagreements with accountants on accounting and financial disclosures for the years ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.
- 20 -
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered in this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Limitations on Systems of Controls
Our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal controls will prevent all error or fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Due to the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. To address the material weaknesses identified in our evaluation, we performed additional analysis and other post-closing procedures in an effort to ensure our consolidated financial statements included in this annual report have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Accordingly, management believes that the financial statements included in this report fairly present in all material respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the company’s board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and includes those policies and procedures that:
| |
· | Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; |
| |
· | Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and |
| |
· | Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements. |
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Because of the inherent limitations of internal control, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.
As of June 30, 2014, management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) and SEC guidance on conducting such assessments. Based on that evaluation, they concluded that, during the period covered by this report, such internal controls and procedures were not effective to detect the inappropriate application of US GAAP rules as more fully described below. This was due to deficiencies that existed in the design or operation of our internal controls over financial reporting that adversely affected our internal controls and that may be considered to be material weaknesses.
- 21 -
The matters involving internal controls and procedures that our management considered to be material weaknesses under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board were: lack of a functioning audit committee; lack of a majority of independent members and a lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors; inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives; and, management is dominated by a single individual.. The aforementioned material weaknesses were identified by our Chief Executive Officer in connection with the review of our financial statements as of June 30, 2014
Management believes that the material weaknesses set forth above did not have an effect on our financial results. However, management believes that the lack of a functioning audit committee and the lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors results in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures, which could result in a material misstatement in our financial statements in future periods.
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION
On July 2, 2014, Mr. Matthew Egna resigned from all positions with the Company. There were no disagreements between Mr. Egna and the Company.
On the same date, the Board of Directors appointed Omar Durham as President and sole member of the Board of Directors. From 2008 through 2014, Mr. Durham worked as a special education teacher and football coach at a high school in Houston, Texas. From 2003 through 2008, he was the Managing Sales Director/Operator for an Avis rental car agency in Houston, Texas. Mr. Durham holds a Bachelor of Arts degree in Kinesiology with a minor in criminal justice from the University of Texas at El Paso.
Mr. Durham does not have a written employment agreement with the Company. He is being paid $10,000 per month.
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Our sole officer and director will serve until a successor is elected and qualified. Our officers are elected by the board of directors to a term of one (1) year and serve until their successor is duly elected and qualified, or until they are removed from office. The board of directors has no nominating, auditing or compensation committees.
The name, address, age and position of our president, secretary/treasurer, and director and vice president is set forth below:
| | | | |
Name | | Age | | Position |
Omar Durham 777 South Post Oak Lane One Riverway, Suite 1700 Houston, TX 77056 | | 42 | | CEO, Chairman |
Mr. Durham was appointed as CEO and a member of the board of directors on July 2, 2014.
Biographies
Mr. Durham brings a proven track record of driving growth through his acquired expertise in devising, implementing and executing innovative marketing strategies. He comes to the Company after five years as a Managing Director/Operator at $6 billion global car rental agency Avis Rent a Car System LLC. Mr. Durham initiated a new Avis agency location in Houston, Texas, and more than tripled the branch’s revenues in its first year of operation. A graduate of the University of Texas-El Paso, Durham’s duties will leading the company’s innovative experience-based 3D printing business plan.
Family Relationships
There are no family relationships among our directors, executive officers or persons nominated to become executive officers or directors.
Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings
During the past ten (10) years, none of our directors, persons nominated to become directors, executive officers, promoters or control persons was involved in any of the legal proceedings listen in Item 401 (f) of Regulation S-K.
- 22 -
Arrangements
There are no arrangements or understandings between an executive officer, director or nominee and any other person pursuant to which he was or is to be selected as an executive officer or director.
Committees of the Board of Directors
Our sole director has not established any committees, including an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee, or a Nominating Committee, any committee performing a similar function. The functions of those committees are being undertaken by our sole director. Because we do not have any independent directors, our sole director believes that the establishment of committees of the Board would not provide any benefits to our company and could be considered more form than substance.
We do not have a policy regarding the consideration of any director candidates that may be recommended by our stockholders, including the minimum qualifications for director candidates, nor has our sole director established a process for identifying and evaluating director nominees. We have not adopted a policy regarding the handling of any potential recommendation of director candidates by our stockholders, including the procedures to be followed. Our sole director has not considered or adopted any of these policies, as we have never received a recommendation from any stockholder for any candidate to serve on our Board of Directors. Given our relative size and lack of directors and officers insurance coverage, we do not anticipate that any of our stockholders will make such a recommendation in the near future.
While there have been no nominations of additional directors proposed, in the event such a proposal is made, all current members of our Board will participate in the consideration of director nominees.
Our sole director is not an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of Item 401(e) of Regulation S-K. In general, an “audit committee financial expert” is an individual member of the audit committee or Board of Directors who:
| |
· | understands generally accepted accounting principles and financial statements, |
| |
· | is able to assess the general application of such principles in connection with accounting for estimates, accruals and reserves, |
| |
· | has experience preparing, auditing, analyzing or evaluating financial statements comparable to the breadth and complexity to our financial statements, |
| |
· | understands internal controls over financial reporting, and |
| |
· | understands audit committee functions |
Our Board of Directors is comprised of solely of Mr. Durham who is involved in our day-to-day operations. We would prefer to have an audit committee financial expert on our board of directors. As with most small, early stage companies until such time our company further develops its business, achieves a stronger revenue base and has sufficient working capital to purchase directors and officers insurance, the Company does not have any immediate prospects to attract independent directors. When the Company is able to expand our Board of Directors to include one or more independent directors, the Company intends to establish an Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. It is our intention that one or more of these independent directors will also qualify as an audit committee financial expert. Our securities are not quoted on an exchange that has requirements that a majority of our Board members be independent and the Company is not currently otherwise subject to any law, rule or regulation requiring that all or any portion of our Board of Directors include “independent” directors, nor are we required to establish or maintain an Audit Committee or other committee of our Board of Directors.
WE DO NOT HAVE ANY INDEPENDENT DIRECTORS AND THE COMPANY HAS NOT VOLUNTARILY IMPLEMENTED VARIOUS CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MEASURES, IN THE ABSENCE OF WHICH, STOCKHOLDERS MAY HAVE MORE LIMITED PROTECTIONS AGAINST INTERESTED DIRECTOR TRANSACTIONS, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AND SIMILAR MATTERS.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics
We have adopted a code of ethics meeting the requirements of Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We believe our code of ethics is reasonably designed to deter wrongdoing and promote honest and ethical conduct; provide full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosure in public reports; comply with applicable laws; ensure prompt internal reporting of violations; and provide accountability for adherence to the provisions of the code of ethic.
- 23 -
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Mr. Durham is paid $60,000 per year for his services to the company. He does not have a written employment agreement with the company.
The table below summarizes all compensation awards to, earned by, or paid to our named executive officer for all service rendered in all capacities to us for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2014 and 2013.
SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Name and Principal Position | | Fiscal Year | | Salary ($) | | Bonus ($) | | Stock Awards ($) | | Option Awards ($) | | Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) | | Nonqualified Deferred Compensation ($) | | All Other Compensation ($) | | Total ($) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Omar Durham, CEO | | 2014 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Matt Egna, | | 2013 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — |
Former CEO | | 2014 | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — |
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT JUNE 30, 2014
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Option Awards | | Stock Awards |
Name | | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable | | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable | | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) | | Option Exercise Price ($) | | Option Expiration Date | | Number of Shares of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) | | Market Value of Shares of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) | | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) | | Equity Incentive Plan Awards: market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Omar Durham | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Matt Egna | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — | | — |
Employment Agreements & Retirement Benefits
None of our executive officers is subject to employment agreements, but we may enter into such agreements with them in the future. We have no plans providing for the payment of any retirement benefits.
Director Compensation
Directors receive no compensation for serving on the Board. We have no non-employee directors.
Our Board of Directors is comprised of Omar Durham. Mr. Durham also serves as the CEO of the Company. None of our directors has or had a compensation arrangement with the Company for director services, nor have any of them been compensated for director services since the Company’s inception.
We reimburse our directors for all reasonable ordinary and necessary business related expenses, but we did not pay director’s fees or other cash compensation for services rendered as a director in the year ended June 30, 2014 to any of the individuals serving on our Board during that period. We have no standard arrangement pursuant to which our directors are compensated for their services in their capacity as directors. We may pay fees for services rendered as a director when and if additional directors are appointed to the Board of Directors.
- 24 -
Director Independence
We do not currently have any independent directors and we do not anticipate appointing additional directors in the foreseeable future. If we engage further directors and officers, however, we plan to develop a definition of independence.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
We do not currently have a stock option plan in favor of any director, officer, consultant, or employee of our company. No individual grants of stock options, whether or not in tandem with stock appreciation rights known as SARs or freestanding SARs have been made to our sole director and officer since our inception; accordingly, no stock options have been granted or exercised by our sole director and officer since we were founded.
The following table sets forth certain information as of October 14, 2014, with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company, each director, each executive officer named in the “Summary Compensation Table” and all executive officers and directors of the Company as a group, and sets forth the number of shares of common stock owned by each such person and group. Unless otherwise indicated, the owners have sole voting and investment power with respect to their respective shares.
| | | | | |
Name of Beneficial Owner | | Number of Shares Beneficially Owned | | Percentage of Outstanding Common Stock Owned |
Bordesly Group | | 45,000,000 | | 75 | % |
| | | | | |
Omar Durham | | - nil - | | - nil - | % |
| | | | | |
All directors and executive officers as a group (1) person. | | - nil - | | - nil - | % |
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
None.
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The following table summarize the fees billed to the Company by its independent accountants, Messineo & Co, CPAs, LLC, for the years ended June 30, 2014 and 2013:
| | | | | | |
| | 2014 | | 2013 |
Audit Fees | | $ | 6,800 | | $ | 2,000 |
| | | | | | |
Audit Related Fees (1) | | | — | | | — |
| | | | | | |
Tax Fees (2) | | | — | | | — |
| | | | | | |
All Other Fees (3) | | | — | | | — |
| | | | | | |
Total Fees | | $ | 6,800 | | $ | 2,000 |
Notes to the Accountants Fees Table:
| |
(1) | Consists of fees for assurance and related services by our principal accountants that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the Company’s financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” |
| |
(2) | Consists of fees for professional services rendered by our principal accountants for tax related services. |
| |
(3) | Consists of fees for products and services provided by our principal accountants, other than the services reported under “Audit Fees,” “Audit-Related Fees” and “Tax Fees” above. |
- 25 -
As part of its responsibility for oversight of the independent registered public accountants, the Board has established a pre-approval policy for engaging audit and permitted non-audit services provided by our independent registered public accountants. In accordance with this policy, each type of audit, audit-related, tax and other permitted service to be provided by the independent auditors is specifically described and each such service, together with a fee level or budgeted amount for such service, is pre-approved by the Board. All of the services provided by Messineo & Co, CPAs, LLC described above were approved by our Board.
The Company’s principal accountant did not engage any other persons or firms other than the principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees.
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
| |
3.1 | Articles of Incorporation (1) |
| |
3.2 | Bylaws (1) |
| |
21 | Subsidiaries of the Registrant (2) |
| |
31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer (2) |
| |
32.2 | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer (2) |
| |
101 | XBRL Interactive Data ( 2 ), (3) |
______________
| |
(1) | Incorporated by reference to our Form S-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 29, 2013. |
| |
(2) | Filed or furnished herewith. |
| |
( 3 ) | In accordance with Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files in Exhibit 101 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K shall be deemed “furnished” and not “filed.” |
- 26 -
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
| |
| Changing Technologies, Inc. |
| |
| |
Date: November 20, 2014 | BY: /s/ Omar Durham |
| Omar Durham |
| CEO, Chairman |
| Principal Executive Officer and |
| Principal Financial and Accounting Officer |
- 27 -