Zenith Energy Logistics Partners (ARCX) 10-Q 9 May 16 2016 Q1 Quarterly report Financial data

Document and Entity Information

Document and Entity Information - shares	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016	May. 02, 2016
Document And Entity Information [Line Items]
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Mar. 31, 2016
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2,016
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q1
Trading Symbol	ARCX
Entity Registrant Name	Arc Logistics Partners LP
Entity Central Index Key	1,583,744
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Accelerated Filer
Common Units [Member]
Document And Entity Information [Line Items]
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		13,181,409
Subordinated Units [Member]
Document And Entity Information [Line Items]
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		6,081,081

Condensed Consolidated Balance

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Mar. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 6,888	$ 5,870
Trade accounts receivable	9,041	8,633
Due from related parties	1,337	1,532
Inventories	419	318
Other current assets	1,106	1,162
Total current assets	18,791	17,515
Property, plant and equipment, net	391,171	380,671
Investment in unconsolidated affiliate	73,708	74,399
Intangible assets, net	128,501	132,121
Goodwill	39,871	39,871
Other assets	3,779	3,945
Total assets	655,821	648,522
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	5,057	4,085
Accrued expenses	5,274	6,857
Due to general partner	1,020	638
Other liabilities	3,981	3,914
Total current liabilities	15,332	15,494
Credit facility	240,313	226,063
Other non-current liabilities	21,410	21,745
Total liabilities	$ 277,055	$ 263,302
Commitments and contingencies
Limited partners’ interest
Non-controlling interests	$ 84,210	$ 85,275
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income	397	1,293
Total partners’ capital	378,766	385,220
Total liabilities and partners’ capital	655,821	648,522
Common Units [Member]
Limited partners’ interest
Limited partners' units	210,480	213,281
Subordinated Units [Member]
Limited partners’ interest
Limited partners' units	$ 83,679	$ 85,371

Condensed Consolidated Balance3

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) (Parenthetical) - shares	Mar. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Common Units [Member]
Limited partners' units issued	13,181,409	13,174,410
Limited partners' units outstanding	13,181,409	13,174,410
Subordinated Units [Member]
Limited partners' units issued	6,081,081	6,081,081
Limited partners' units outstanding	6,081,081	6,081,081

Condensed Consolidated Statemen

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Unaudited) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016	Mar. 31, 2015
Revenues:
Third-party customers	$ 22,584	$ 11,379
Related parties	3,483	2,178
Revenues	26,067	13,557
Expenses:
Operating expenses	8,687	6,280
Selling, general and administrative	3,924	4,298
Selling, general and administrative – affiliate	1,322	1,076
Depreciation	3,652	1,844
Amortization	3,697	1,246
Total expenses	21,282	14,744
Operating (loss) income	4,785	(1,187)
Other income (expense):
Equity earnings from unconsolidated affiliate	2,461	2,489
Other income		5
Interest expense	(2,367)	(951)
Total other income, net	94	1,543
Income before income taxes	4,879	356
Income taxes	28	52
Net income	4,851	304
Net income attributable to non-controlling interests	(1,735)
Net income attributable to partners' capital	3,116	304
Other comprehensive (loss) income	(896)	(471)
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to partners’ capital	$ 2,220	$ (167)
Common Units [Member]
Earnings (loss) per limited partner unit:
Earnings per limited partner unit, basic and diluted	$ 0.15	$ 0.01
Subordinated Units [Member]
Earnings (loss) per limited partner unit:
Earnings per limited partner unit, basic and diluted	$ 0.15	$ 0.01

Condensed Consolidated Stateme5

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016	Mar. 31, 2015
Cash flow from operating activities:
Net income	$ 4,851	$ 304
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation	3,652	1,844
Amortization	3,697	1,246
Equity earnings from unconsolidated affiliate, net of distributions	(282)	(714)
Amortization of deferred financing costs	359	96
Unit-based compensation	1,095	1,535
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Trade accounts receivable	(219)	(196)
Due from related parties	195	(45)
Inventories	(101)	(64)
Other current assets	56	(447)
Accounts payable	(792)	(321)
Accrued expenses	(1,447)	(314)
Due to general partner	383	2,282
Other liabilities	1,073	197
Net cash provided by operating activities	12,520	5,403
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures	(5,715)	(1,334)
Investment in unconsolidated affiliate		(310)
Net cash paid for acquisitions	(8,000)
Net cash used in investing activities	(13,715)	(1,644)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Distributions	(8,473)	(5,309)
Deferred financing costs	(192)	(389)
Proceeds from credit facility	14,250
Payments of earn-out liability	(341)
Distributions paid to non-controlling interests	(2,800)	0
Distribution equivalent rights paid on unissued units	(231)	(215)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	2,213	(5,913)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	1,018	(2,154)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	5,870	6,599
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	6,888	4,445
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest	2,138	906
Cash paid for income taxes	27	52
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Increase (decrease) in purchases of property plant and equipment in accounts payable and accrued expenses	$ 438	$ 209

Condensed Consolidated Stateme6

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Partners' Capital (Unaudited) - 3 months ended Mar. 31, 2016 - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Total	Limited Partner Common Interest [Member]	Limited Partner Subordinated Interest [Member]	Non-controlling Interests [Member]	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income [Member]
Partners' capital, beginning balance at Dec. 31, 2015	$ 385,220	$ 213,281	$ 85,371	$ 85,275	$ 1,293
Net income	4,851	2,132	984	1,735
Other comprehensive income	(896)				(896)
Unit-based compensation	1,095	1,095
Distribution equivalent rights paid on unissued units	(231)	(231)
Distributions	(11,273)	(5,797)	(2,676)	(2,800)
Partners' capital, ending balance at Mar. 31, 2016	$ 378,766	$ 210,480	$ 83,679	$ 84,210	$ 397

Organization and Presentation

Organization and Presentation	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016
Organization Consolidation And Presentation Of Financial Statements [Abstract]
Organization and Presentation	Note 1—Organization and Presentation Defined Terms Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, references in these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements (“interim statements”) to “Arc Logistics” or the “Partnership” refer to Arc Logistics Partners LP and its subsidiaries. Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, references to our “General Partner” refer to Arc Logistics GP LLC, the general partner of Arc Logistics. References to “Sponsor” or “Lightfoot” refer to Lightfoot Capital Partners, LP and its general partner, Lightfoot Capital Partners GP LLC. References to “GCAC” refer to Gulf Coast Asphalt Company, L.L.C., which contributed its preferred units in Arc Terminals LP, predecessor to Arc Logistics (“Arc Terminals”), to the Partnership upon the consummation of the Partnership’s initial public offering in November 2013 (“IPO”). References to “Center Oil” refer to GP&W, Inc., d.b.a. Center Oil, and affiliates, including Center Terminal Company-Cleveland, which contributed its limited partner interests in Arc Terminals to the Partnership upon the consummation of the IPO. References to “Gulf LNG Holdings” refer to Gulf LNG Holdings Group, LLC and its subsidiaries, which own a liquefied natural gas regasification and storage facility in Pascagoula, MS, which is referred to herein as the “LNG Facility.” The Partnership owns a 10.3% limited liability company interest in Gulf LNG Holdings, which is referred to herein as the “LNG Interest.” Organization and Description of Business The Partnership is a fee-based, growth-oriented Delaware limited partnership formed by Lightfoot in 2007 to own, operate, develop and acquire a diversified portfolio of complementary energy logistics assets. The Partnership is principally engaged in the terminalling, storage, throughput and transloading of crude oil and petroleum products. The Partnership is focused on growing its business through the optimization, organic development and acquisition of terminalling, storage, rail, pipeline and other energy logistics assets that generate stable cash flows. In November 2013, the Partnership completed its IPO by selling 6,786,869 common units (which includes 786,869 common units issued pursuant to the exercise of the underwriters’ over-allotment option) representing limited partner interests in the Partnership at a price to the public of $19.00 per common unit. In connection with the IPO, the Partnership amended and restated its $40.0 million revolving credit facility. Our energy logistics assets are strategically located in the East Coast, Gulf Coast, Midwest, Rocky Mountains and West Coast regions of the United States and supply a diverse group of third-party customers, including major oil companies, independent refiners, crude oil and petroleum product marketers, distributors and various industrial manufacturers. Depending upon the location, our facilities possess pipeline, rail, marine and truck loading and unloading capabilities allowing customers to receive and deliver product throughout North America. Our asset platform allows customers to meet the specialized handling requirements that may be required by particular products. Our combination of diverse geographic locations and logistics platforms gives us the flexibility to meet the evolving demands of existing customers and address those of prospective customers. As of March 31, 2016, our assets consisted of: — 21 terminals in twelve states located in the East Coast, Gulf Coast, Midwest, Rocky Mountains and West Coast regions of the United States with approximately 7.7 million barrels of crude oil and petroleum product storage capacity; — four rail transloading facilities with approximately 126,000 bpd of throughput capacity; and — the LNG Interest in connection with the LNG Facility, which has 320,000 M 3 The Partnership interests included the following as of March 31, 2016: — 13,181,409 common units representing limited partner interests (of which 68,617 common units are held by Lightfoot); — 6,081,081 subordinated units representing limited partner interests (of which 5,146,264 subordinated units are held by Lightfoot); — a non-economic general partner interest (which is held by our general partner, which is owned by Lightfoot); and — incentive distribution rights (which are held by our general partner, which is owned by Lightfoot).

Summary of Significant Accounti

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies	Note 2—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies The Partnership has provided a discussion of significant accounting policies in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 (the “2015 Partnership 10-K”). Certain items from that discussion are repeated or updated below as necessary to assist in the understanding of these interim statements. Basis of Presentation The accompanying interim statements of the Partnership have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X issued by the SEC. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments and disclosures necessary for a fair statement of these interim statements have been included. The results reported in these interim statements are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be reported for the entire year or for any other period. These interim statements should be read in conjunction with the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015, which are included in the 2015 Partnership 10-K, as filed with the SEC. The year-end balance sheet data was derived from the audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. The most significant estimates relate to the valuation of acquired businesses, goodwill and intangible assets, assessment for impairment of long-lived assets and the useful lives of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Impairment of Long-Lived Assets Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are separately presented in the balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell and are no longer depreciated. No impairment charges were recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015. Goodwill Goodwill represents the excess of consideration paid over the fair value of net assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is not amortized but instead is assessed for impairment at least annually or when facts and circumstances warrant. Goodwill impairment is determined using a two-step process. The first step of the goodwill impairment test is used to identify potential impairment by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed. The second step compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. The Partnership determines the fair value of its single reporting unit by blending two valuation approaches: the income approach and a market value approach. The inputs included assumptions related to the future performance of the Partnership and assumptions related to discount rates, long-term growth rates and control premiums. Based on the results of the first step of the quantitative impairment assessment of its goodwill as of December 31, 2015, the fair value of the Partnership’s reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately 9% and management concluded that no impairment was necessary. In the event that market conditions were to remain weak for an extended period of time, the Partnership may be required to record an impairment of goodwill in the future, and such impairment could be material. A summary of the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill is as follows (in thousands): As of March 31, December 31, 2016 2015 Beginning Balance $ 39,871 $ 15,162 Goodwill acquired - 24,709 Ending Balance $ 39,871 $ 39,871 Refer to “Note 3—Acquisitions – JBBR Acquisition” for discussion on the goodwill recorded in the second quarter of 2015 in connection with the JBBR Acquisition (as defined in “Note 2 — — Deferred Rent The Portland Lease Agreement (as defined in “Note 11—Related Party Transactions—Other Transactions with Related Persons—Operating Lease Agreement” Contingencies In the normal course of business, the Partnership may be subject to loss contingencies, such as legal proceedings and claims arising out of its business that cover a wide range of matters. An accrual for a loss contingency is recognized when it is probable that an asset had been impaired or a liability had been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Partnership’s financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed. If the estimate of a probable loss is a range and no amount within the range is more likely, the Partnership will accrue the minimum amount of the range. There are many uncertainties associated with any legal proceeding and these actions or other third-party claims against us may cause us to incur costly litigation and/or substantial settlement charges. As a result, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected. The actual liability in any such matters may be materially different from our estimates, if any. Revenue Recognition Revenues from leased tank storage and delivery services are recognized as the services are performed, evidence of a contractual arrangement exists and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenues also include the sale of excess products and additives which are mixed with customer-owned liquid products. Revenues for the sale of excess products and additives are recognized when title and risk of loss pass to the customer. Fair Value of Financial Instruments Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at a specified measurement date. Fair value measurements are derived using inputs and assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability, including assumptions about risk. GAAP establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuation used to measure fair value. This three-tier hierarchy classifies fair value amounts recognized or disclosed in the condensed consolidated financial statements based on the observability of inputs used to estimate such fair values. The classification within the hierarchy of a financial asset or liability is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The hierarchy considers fair value amounts based on observable inputs (Levels 1 and 2) to be more reliable and predictable than those based primarily on unobservable inputs (Level 3). At each balance sheet reporting date, the Partnership categorizes its financial assets and liabilities using this hierarchy. The amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair value because of the short-term maturities of these instruments (Level 1). Because the Credit Facility (as defined in “Note 7 – Debt – Credit Facility” below) has a market rate of interest, its carrying amount approximated fair value (Level 2). In connection with the Partnership’s acquisition, through a joint venture company formed with an affiliate of GE Energy Financial Services (“GE EFS”), of all of the memberships interests of Joliet Bulk, Barge & Rail LLC (“JBBR”) from CenterPoint Properties Trust (“CenterPoint”) for $216.0 million ( the “JBBR Acquisition”), Arc Terminals Joliet Holdings LLC (“Joliet Holdings”) has an earn-out obligation to CenterPoint which was valued at the time of the JBBR Acquisition at approximately $19.7 million. Refer to “Note 3—Acquisitions – JBBR Acquisition” for further discussion on the JBBR Acquisition. Joliet Holdings’ earn-out obligations to CenterPoint will terminate upon the payment, in the aggregate, of $27.0 million. The balance of the earn-out liability is included within “Other non-current liabilities” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015. Since the fair value of the contingent consideration obligation is based primarily upon unobservable inputs, it is classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. The contingent consideration obligation will be revalued at each reporting period and changes to the fair value will be recorded as a component of operating income. Increases or decreases in the fair value of the contingent consideration obligations can result from changes in the assumed timing of revenue and expense estimates. Significant judgment is employed in determining the appropriateness of these assumptions as of the acquisition date and for each subsequent reporting period. Accordingly, future business and economic conditions can materially impact the amount of contingent consideration expense we record in any given period. No revaluation adjustments were necessary during the three months ended March 31, 2016. For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, Joliet Holdings has paid $0.3 million and $0 million, respectively, related to the earn-out obligation. Since the JBBR Acquisition through March 31, 2016, Joliet Holdings has paid $1.2 million of the earn-out to CenterPoint. The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of the contingent consideration obligation related to the JBBR Acquisition (in thousands): Balance at Earn-out Balance at December 31 Revaluation payments March 31, 2015 Adjustments paid 2016 Liabilities at fair value: JBBR contingent consideration $ 18,830 $ - $ (341 ) $ 18,489 Total liabilities at fair value $ 18,830 $ - $ (341 ) $ 18,489 The Partnership believes that its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with the values that would be determined by other market participants. However, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date. Unit-Based Compensation The Partnership recognizes all unit-based compensation to directors, officers, employees and other service providers in the consolidated financial statements based on the fair value of the awards. Fair value for unit-based awards classified as equity awards is determined on the grant date of the award, and this value is recognized as compensation expense ratably over the requisite service or performance period of the equity award. Fair value for equity awards is calculated at the closing price of the common units on the grant date. Fair value for unit-based awards classified as liability awards is calculated at the closing price of the common units on the grant date and is remeasured at each reporting period until the award is settled. Compensation expense related to unit-based awards is included in the “Selling, general and administrative” line item in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. For awards with performance conditions, the expense is accrued over the service period only if the performance condition is considered to be probable of occurring. When awards with performance conditions that were previously considered improbable become probable, the Partnership incurs additional expense in the period that the probability assessment changes (see “Note 9—Equity Plans”). Net Income Per Unit The Partnership uses the two-class method in the computation of earnings per unit since there is more than one participating class of securities. Earnings per common and subordinated unit are determined by dividing net income allocated to the common units and subordinated units, respectively, after deducting the amount allocated to the phantom units, if any, by the weighted average number of outstanding common and subordinated units, respectively, during the period. The overall computation, presentation and disclosure of the Partnership’s limited partners’ net income per unit are made in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 260 “Earnings per Share.” Segment Reporting The Partnership derives revenue from operating its terminal and transloading facilities. These facilities have been aggregated into one reportable segment because the facilities have similar long-term economic characteristics, products and types of customers. Noncontrolling Interests The Partnership applies the provisions of ASC 810 Consolidations — — Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements In May 2014, the FASB issued updated guidance on the reporting and disclosure of revenue recognition. The update requires that an entity recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This update also requires new qualitative and quantitative disclosures about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments, information about contract balances and performance obligations, and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. The Partnership is currently evaluating the potential impact of this authoritative guidance on its financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and related disclosures. In April 2015, the FASB proposed a one-year deferral of the effective date, and therefore, this guidance will be effective for the Partnership beginning in the first quarter of 2018, with early adoption optional but not before the original effective date of December 15, 2016. In August 2015, the FASB issued new guidance which adds comments from the SEC related to the presentation of debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements. The SEC commented it would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. The Partnership adopted this requirement in the first quarter of 2016 and it had no impact on its financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and related disclosures. In January 2016, the FASB issued new guidance which requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes In February 2016, the FASB issued new guidance which amends various aspects of existing guidance for leases. The new guidance requires an entity to recognize assets and liabilities arising from a lease for both financing and operating leases, along with additional qualitative and quantitative disclosures. The main difference between previous GAAP and the amended standard is the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees on the balance sheet for those leases classified as operating leases under previous GAAP. As a result, the Partnership will have to recognize a liability representing its lease payments and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term on the balance sheet. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the effect this standard will have on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Acquisitions

Acquisitions	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016
Business Combinations [Abstract]
Acquisitions	Note 3 – Acquisitions Acquisitions The following acquisitions were accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting whereby management utilized the services of third-party valuation consultants, along with estimates and assumptions provided by management, to estimate the fair value of the net assets acquired. The third-party valuation consultants utilized several appraisal methodologies including income, market and cost approaches to estimate the fair value of the identifiable assets acquired. Gulf Oil Terminals Acquisition In January 2016, the Partnership, through its wholly owned subsidiary Arc Terminals Holdings LLC (“Arc Terminals Holdings”), acquired four petroleum products terminals (the “Pennsylvania Terminals”) located in Altoona, Mechanicsburg, Pittston and South Williamsport, Pennsylvania from Gulf Oil Limited Partnership (“Gulf Oil”) for $8.0 million (the “Gulf Oil Terminals Acquisition”). In connection with this acquisition, the Partnership also acquired an option to purchase from Gulf Oil at an agreed upon purchase price additional land with storage tanks located adjacent to one of the Pennsylvania Terminals. At closing, the Partnership entered into a take-or-pay terminal services agreement with Gulf Oil with an initial term of two years. The throughput and related services provided by the Partnership to Gulf Oil under the terminal services agreement are provided at the Pennsylvania Terminals, as well as several of the Partnership’s other petroleum products terminals. The acquisition was financed with a combination of available cash and borrowings under the Credit Facility. As of the issuance of this quarterly report, the Partnership had not concluded its assessment of the fair values of the net assets acquired as provided in ASC Topic 805, “Business Combinations” (“ASC 805”). The Gulf Oil Terminals Acquisition was accounted for as a business combination in accordance with ASC 805. The Gulf Oil Terminals Acquisition purchase price equaled the approximately $8.0 million fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and accordingly, the Partnership did not recognize any goodwill as a part of the Gulf Oil Terminals Acquisition. Transaction costs incurred by the Partnership in connection with the acquisition, consisting primarily of legal and other professional fees, totaled approximately $0.5 million and were expensed as incurred in accordance with ASC 805. Management is currently reviewing the valuation of the net assets acquired in connection with the Gulf Oil Terminals Acquisition to determine the final purchase price allocation, which is expected to be completed by the third quarter of 2016. The total preliminary purchase price of $8.0 million was preliminarily allocated to the net assets acquired as follows (in thousands): Consideration: Cash paid to seller $ 8,000 Total consideration $ 8,000 Allocation of purchase price: Property and equipment $ 8,000 Net assets acquired $ 8,000 Since the Gulf Oil Terminals Acquisition closing date in January 2016 through March 31, 2016, the Pennsylvania Terminals have generated approximately $0.4 million in revenue and less than $0.1 million of operating losses. The unaudited pro forma results related to the Gulf Oil Terminals Acquisition have been excluded as the nature of the revenue-producing activities previously associated with the Pennsylvania Terminals has changed substantially post-acquisition from intercompany revenue to third-party generated revenue. In addition, historical financial information for the Pennsylvania Terminals prior to the acquisition is not indicative of how the Pennsylvania Terminals are being operated since the Partnership’s acquisition and would be of no comparative value in understanding the future operations of the Pennsylvania Terminals. JBBR Acquisition In May 2015, the Partnership and an affiliate of GE EFS, through Joliet Holdings, purchased all of the membership interests in JBBR from CenterPoint for a base cash purchase price of $216.0 million (“JBBR Purchase Price”). Joliet Holdings is also required to pay to CenterPoint earn-out payments for each barrel of crude oil that is either delivered to or received by the Joliet Terminal (as defined below) (without duplication) or for which JBBR receives payment under minimum volume commitments regardless of actual throughput activity. Joliet Holdings’ earn-out obligations to CenterPoint will terminate upon the payment, in the aggregate, of $27.0 million. JBBR owns, among other things, a petroleum products terminal and 4-mile crude oil pipeline located in Joliet, Illinois (“Joliet Terminal”). To finance the Partnership’s portion of the consideration payable by it in connection with the JBBR Acquisition, the Partnership sold 4,520,795 common units at a price of $16.59 per unit in a private placement for proceeds totaling $72.7 million after placement agent commissions and expenses. In addition, the Partnership borrowed $61.0 million under its Credit Facility to partially finance the balance of the purchase price payable by it at the closing of the JBBR Acquisition. Joliet Holdings is consolidated under the voting interest model in the Partnership’s operating results. The GE EFS ownership interest in Joliet Holdings is presented separately as a non-controlling interest. The JBBR Acquisition was accounted for as a business combination in accordance with ASC 805. In accordance with ASC 805, the Partnership recorded $19.7 million of additional consideration related to Joliet Holdings’s earn-out payments as contingent consideration. The $19.7 million is recorded on the balance sheet of the Partnership as a liability and will be reduced by future earn-out payments made to CenterPoint. This liability is subject to remeasurement each reporting period until the full amount of the earn-out has been satisfied. The JBBR Purchase Price exceeded the $211.0 million fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and accordingly, the Partnership recognized goodwill of $24.7 million. The Partnership believes the primary items that generated goodwill are the expected ability to grow the acquired business by leveraging its existing customer relationships and by attracting new customers based on the strategic location of the Joliet Terminal. Furthermore, the Partnership expects that the entire amount of its recorded goodwill will be deductible for tax purposes. Transaction costs incurred by the Partnership in connection with the acquisition, consisting primarily of legal and other professional fees, totaled $1.3 million and were expensed as incurred in accordance with ASC 805 and included in the “Selling, general and administrative” line item in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income. Management has finalized the valuation of the net assets acquired in connection with the JBBR Acquisition and the final purchase price allocation has been determined. The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the assets acquired at the JBBR Acquisition closing date (in thousands): Consideration: Cash paid to seller $ 216,000 Earn-out liability recognized 19,700 Total consideration $ 235,700 Allocation of purchase price: Property and equipment $ 156,991 Intangible assets 54,000 Goodwill 24,709 Net assets acquired $ 235,700 The unaudited pro forma results pursuant to ASC 805 related to the JBBR Acquisition have been excluded as the Joliet Terminal was under construction prior to the consummation of the JBBR Acquisition and therefore there were no revenue-producing activities previously associated with the Joliet Terminal. The Joliet Terminal, post-acquisition, is now operating and is generating revenue. In addition, the historical financial information for the Joliet Terminal prior to the acquisition is not indicative of how the Joliet Terminal is being operated since the JBBR Acquisition and would be of no comparative value in understanding the future operations of the Joliet Terminal. Pawnee Terminal Acquisition In July 2015, the Partnership, through its wholly owned subsidiary Arc Terminals Holdings, acquired all of the limited liability company interests of UET Midstream, LLC (“UET Midstream”) from United Energy Trading, LLC (“UET”) and Hawkeye Midstream, LLC (together with UET, the “Pawnee Sellers”) for total consideration (net of certain adjustments) of $76.6 million (the “Pawnee Purchase Price”), consisting of $44.3 million in cash and $32.3 million in common units of the Partnership (the “Pawnee Terminal Acquisition”). UET Midstream’s principal assets consist of a newly constructed, substantially completed crude oil terminal and a nearby development property in northeastern Weld County, Colorado (“Pawnee Terminal”). The number of common units issued to the Pawnee Sellers at the closing of the Pawnee Terminal Acquisition was based upon an issuance price of $18.50 per unit, which resulted in the issuance of 1,745,669 of the Partnership’s common units (“Pawnee Transaction Units”). The fair value of the Pawnee Transaction Units on the closing date was $17.30 per unit (based upon the closing price of the Partnership’s common unit price on the closing date), which resulted in a further reduction of the Pawnee Purchase Price, recognized for accounting purposes, of $2.1 million. In connection with the issuance of the common units to the Pawnee Sellers, the Partnership entered into an agreement with the Pawnee Sellers granting the Pawnee Sellers certain registration rights. Arc Terminals is responsible for completing the remaining construction of the Pawnee Terminal and the costs thereof are estimated to be approximately $11.0 million. The Partnership recorded $4.5 million of liabilities related to the construction costs that had been completed, but not paid, as of the closing date. The $4.5 million is recorded on the balance sheet as a current liability and will be reduced by any payments made to satisfy the identified construction costs. As of March 31, 2016, the Partnership had $2.0 million remaining on the balance sheet as a current liability related to the construction liability acquired. The Partnership expects construction of the Pawnee Terminal to be completed in 2016. The Pawnee Terminal Acquisition was accounted for as a business combination in accordance with ASC Topic 805, “Business Combinations” (“ASC 805”). The Pawnee Terminal Acquisition purchase price equaled the $74.5 million fair value of the identifiable assets acquired and accordingly, the Partnership did not recognize any goodwill as a part of the Pawnee Terminal Acquisition. Transaction costs incurred by the Partnership in connection with the acquisition, consisting primarily of legal and other professional fees, totaled $1.8 million and were expensed as incurred in accordance with ASC 805. Management has finalized the valuation of the net assets acquired in connection with the Pawnee Terminal Acquisition and the final purchase price allocation has been determined. The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the assets acquired at the Pawnee Terminal Acquisition closing date (in thousands): Consideration: Cash paid to seller $ 44,332 Fair value of equity issued to seller 30,200 Total consideration $ 74,532 Allocation of purchase price: Property and equipment $ 23,613 Intangible assets 55,442 Less: liabilities assumed (4,523 ) Net assets acquired $ 74,532 The unaudited pro forma operating results pursuant to ASC 805 related to the Pawnee Terminal Acquisition have been excluded due to immateriality.

Investment in Unconsolidated Af

Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016
Equity Method Investments And Joint Ventures [Abstract]
Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate	Note 4—Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate The Partnership accounts for investments in limited liability companies under the equity method of accounting unless the Partnership’s interest is deemed to be so minor that it may have virtually no influence over operating and financial policies. “Investment in unconsolidated affiliate” consisted of the LNG Interest, and its balances as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are represented below (in thousands): Balance at December 31, 2015 $ 74,399 Equity earnings 2,461 Contributions - Distributions (2,179 ) Amortization of premium (77 ) Other comprehensive income (896 ) Balance at March 31, 2016 $ 73,708 Investment in Gulf LNG Holdings In November 2013, the Partnership purchased the LNG Interest from an affiliate of GE EFS for $72.7 million. The carrying value of the LNG Interest on the date of acquisition was $64.1 million and therefore the excess amount paid, by the Partnership, over the carrying value was $8.6 million. This excess can be attributed to the underlying long lived assets of Gulf LNG Holdings and is therefore being amortized using the straight line method over the remaining useful lives of the respective assets, which is 28 years. The estimated aggregate amortization of this premium for its remaining useful life from March 31, 2016 is as follows (in thousands): Total 2016 $ 232 2017 309 2018 309 2019 309 2020 309 Thereafter 6,444 $ 7,912 Summarized financial information for Gulf LNG Holdings is reported below (in thousands): March 31, December 31, 2016 2015 Balance sheets Current assets $ 5,554 $ 7,523 Noncurrent assets 881,255 889,655 Total assets $ 886,809 $ 897,178 Current liabilities $ 75,735 $ 79,970 Long-term liabilities 675,233 678,926 Member’s equity 135,841 138,282 Total liabilities and member’s equity $ 886,809 $ 897,178 Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 2015 Income statements Revenues $ 46,484 $ 46,624 Total operating costs and expenses 13,855 14,206 Operating income 32,629 32,418 Net income $ 23,845 $ 24,165 LNG Facility Arbitration On March 1, 2016, an affiliate of Gulf LNG Holdings received a Notice of Disagreement and Disputed Statements and a Notice of Arbitration from Eni USA Gas Marketing L.L.C. (“Eni USA”), one of the two companies that had entered into a terminal use agreement for capacity of the LNG Facility. Eni USA is an indirect subsidiary of Eni S.p.A., a multi-national integrated energy company headquartered in Milan, Italy. Pursuant to the Notice of Arbitration, Eni USA seeks declaratory and monetary relief in respect of its terminal use agreement, asserting that (i) the terminal use agreement should be terminated because changes in the U.S. natural gas market since the execution of the agreement in December 2007 have “frustrated the essential purpose” of the agreement and (ii) the activities undertaken by affiliates of Gulf LNG Holdings “in connection with a plan to convert the LNG Facility into a liquefaction/export facility have given rise to a contractual right on the part of Eni USA to terminate” the terminal use agreement. Affiliates of Kinder Morgan, Inc., which control Gulf LNG Holdings and operate the LNG Facility, have expressed to us that they view the assertions by Eni USA to be without merit, and that they intend to vigorously contest the assertions set forth by Eni USA. Although we do not control Gulf LNG Holdings, we also are of the view that the assertions made by Eni USA are without merit. As contemplated by the terminal use agreement, disputes are meant to be resolved by final and binding arbitration, and no date has been set for such arbitration. Eni USA has advised Gulf LNG Holdings’ affiliates that it shall continue to pay the amounts claimed to be due under the terminal use agreement pending resolution of the dispute. If the assertions by Eni USA are ultimately successful, our business, financial conditions and results of operations and our ability to make cash distributions to our unitholders would be materially adversely affected. For the three months ended March 31, 2016, 18% and 24% of our Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable Cash Flow, respectively, were associated with our LNG Interest. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, 34% and 33% of our Adjusted EBITDA and Distributable Cash Flow, respectively, were associated with our LNG Interest. We are unable at this time to predict the amount of the legal fees in this matter that will be allocable to our LNG Interest.

Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, Plant and Equipment	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016
Property Plant And Equipment [Abstract]
Property, Plant and Equipment	Note 5—Property, Plant and Equipment The Partnership’s property, plant and equipment consisted of (in thousands): As of March 31, December 31, 2016 2015 Land $ 78,455 $ 74,855 Buildings and site improvements 78,483 77,514 Tanks and trim 114,523 111,076 Pipelines 20,364 20,364 Machinery and equipment 119,098 118,503 Office furniture and equipment 730 561 Construction in progress 17,678 12,306 429,331 415,179 Less: Accumulated depreciation (38,160 ) (34,508 ) Property, plant and equipment, net $ 391,171 $ 380,671

Intangible Assets

Intangible Assets	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016
Goodwill And Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]
Intangible Assets	Note 6—Intangible Assets The Partnership’s intangible assets consisted of (in thousands): Estimated As of Useful Lives March 31, December 31, in Years 2016 2015 Customer relationships 21 $ 4,785 $ 4,785 Acquired contracts 2-12 149,342 149,342 Non-compete agreements 2-3 741 741 154,868 154,868 Less: Accumulated amortization (26,367 ) (22,747 ) Intangible assets, net $ 128,501 $ 132,121 The Partnership’s intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the expected life of each intangible asset. The estimated future amortization expense is approximately $10.8 million for the remainder of 2016, $14.0 million in 2017, $12.8 million in 2018, $12.2 million in 2019, $12.2 million in 2020 and $66.5 million thereafter.

Debt

Debt	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016
Debt Disclosure [Abstract]
Debt	Note 7—Debt Credit Facility In November 2013, concurrent with the closing of the IPO, the Partnership entered into the Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement (the “Credit Facility”) with a syndicate of lenders, under which Arc Terminals Holdings is the borrower. After several amendments, the Credit Facility currently has up to $300.0 million of borrowing capacity. As of March 31, 2016, the Partnership had borrowings of $240.3 million under the Credit Facility at an interest rate of 3.44%. During the first and second quarters of 2015, the Partnership had a $10 million letter of credit outstanding under its letter of credit sub-facility, which was issued in connection with the JBBR Acquisition. This letter of credit was extinguished when the JBBR Acquisition closed in May 2015. Based on the restrictions under the total leverage ratio covenant, as of March 31, 2016, the Partnership had $33.8 million of available capacity under the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility is available to fund working capital and to finance capital expenditures and other permitted payments and for other lawful corporate purposes and allows the Partnership to request that the maximum amount of the Credit Facility be increased by up to an aggregate principal amount of $100.0 million, subject to receiving increased commitments from lenders or commitments from other financial institutions. The Credit Facility is available for revolving loans, including a sublimit of $5.0 million for swing line loans and a sublimit of $20.0 million for letters of credit. The Partnership’s obligations under the Credit Facility are secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of the Partnership’s material assets (other than the LNG Interest and the assets owned by JBBR and its subsidiaries). The Partnership and each of the Partnership’s existing restricted subsidiaries (other than the borrower) guarantee, and each of the Partnership’s future restricted subsidiaries will also guarantee, the Credit Facility. The Credit Facility matures in November 2018. Loans under the Credit Facility bear interest at a floating rate, based upon the Partnership’s total leverage ratio, equal to, at the Partnership’s option, either (a) a base rate plus a range from 100 to 200 basis points per annum or (b) a LIBOR rate, plus a range of 200 to 300 basis points. The base rate is established as the highest of (i) the rate which SunTrust Bank announces, from time to time, as its prime lending rate, (ii) the daily one-month LIBOR plus 100 basis points per annum and (iii) the federal funds rate plus 50 basis points per annum. The unused portion of the Credit Facility is subject to a commitment fee calculated based upon the Partnership’s total leverage ratio ranging from 0.375% to 0.50% per annum. Upon any event of default, the interest rate will, upon the request of the lenders holding a majority of the commitments, be increased by 2.0% on overdue amounts per annum for the period during which the event of default exists. The Credit Facility contains certain customary representations and warranties, affirmative covenants, negative covenants and events of default. As of March 31, 2016, the Partnership was in compliance with such covenants. The negative covenants include restrictions on the Partnership’s ability to incur additional indebtedness, acquire and sell assets, create liens, enter into certain lease agreements, make investments and make distributions. The Credit Facility requires the Partnership to maintain a total leverage ratio of not more than 4.50 to 1.00, which may increase to up to 5.00 to 1.00 during specified periods following a material permitted acquisition or issuance of over $200.0 million of senior notes, and a minimum interest coverage ratio of not less than 2.50 to 1.00. If the Partnership issues over $200.0 million of senior notes, the Partnership will be subject to an additional financial covenant pursuant to which the Partnership’s secured leverage ratio must not be more than 3.50 to 1.00. The Credit Facility places certain restrictions on the issuance of senior notes. If an event of default occurs, the agent would be entitled to take various actions, including the acceleration of amounts due under the Credit Facility, termination of the commitments under the Credit Facility and all remedial actions available to a secured creditor. The events of default include customary events for a financing agreement of this type, including, without limitation, payment defaults, material inaccuracies of representations and warranties, defaults in the performance of affirmative or negative covenants (including financial covenants), bankruptcy or related defaults, defaults relating to judgments, nonpayment of other material indebtedness and the occurrence of a change in control. In connection with the Credit Facility, the Partnership and the Partnership’s subsidiaries have entered into certain customary ancillary agreements and arrangements, which, among other things, provide that the indebtedness, obligations and liabilities arising under or in connection with the Credit Facility are unconditionally guaranteed by the Partnership and each of the Partnership’s existing restricted subsidiaries (other than the borrower) and each of the Partnership’s future restricted subsidiaries. First Amendment In January 2014, Arc Terminals Holdings, together with the Partnership and certain of its other subsidiaries, as guarantors, entered into the First amendment to the Credit Facility (the “First Amendment”). The First Amendment principally modified certain provisions of the Credit Facility to allow Arc Terminals Holdings to enter into the Portland Lease Agreement relating to the use of petroleum products terminals and pipeline infrastructure located in Portland, Oregon (the “Portland Terminal”). Second Amendment In May 2015, Arc Terminals Holdings, together with the Partnership and certain of its other subsidiaries, as guarantors, entered into the Second Amendment to the Credit Facility (the “Second Amendment”) as part of its financing for the JBBR Acquisition. Upon the consummation of the JBBR Acquisition in May 2015, the aggregate commitments under the Credit Facility increased from $175 million to $275 million. In addition, the sublimit for letters of credit was increased from $10 million to $20 million. Third Amendment In July 2015 and in connection with the Pawnee Terminal Acquisition, Arc Terminals Holdings, together with the Partnership and certain of its other subsidiaries, as guarantors, entered into the third amendment to the Credit Facility (the “Third Amendment”). The Third Amendment principally modifies certain provisions of the Credit Facility (i) to permit the consummation of the Pawnee Terminal Acquisition and (ii) to increase the aggregate commitments under the Credit Facility from $275 million to $300 million.

Partners' Capital and Distribut

Partners' Capital and Distributions	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016
Equity [Abstract]
Partners' Capital and Distributions	Note 8—Partners’ Capital and Distributions Cash Distributions The table below summarizes the quarterly distributions related to the Partnership’s quarterly financial results (in thousands, except per unit data): Total Quarterly Total Cash Date of Unitholders Quarter Ended Distribution Per Unit Distribution Distribution Record Date March 31, 2016 $ 0.4400 $ 8,475 May 13, 2016 May 9, 2016 December 31, 2015 $ 0.4400 $ 8,472 February 12, 2016 February 8, 2016 September 30, 2015 $ 0.4400 $ 8,472 November 13, 2015 November 9, 2015 June 30, 2015 $ 0.4250 $ 8,181 August 14, 2015 August 10, 2015 March 31, 2015 $ 0.4100 $ 5,309 May 15, 2015 May 11, 2015 Cash Distribution Policy The Partnership’s partnership agreement (the “Partnership Agreement”) provides that the General Partner will make a determination no less frequently than each quarter as to whether to make a distribution, but the Partnership Agreement does not require the Partnership to pay distributions at any time or in any amount. Instead, the board of directors of the General Partner (the “Board”) has adopted a cash distribution policy that sets forth the General Partner’s intention with respect to the distributions to be made to unitholders. Pursuant to the cash distribution policy, within 60 days after the end of each quarter, the Partnership expects to distribute to the holders of common and subordinated units on a quarterly basis at least the minimum quarterly distribution of $0.3875 per unit, or $1.55 per unit on an annualized basis, to the extent the Partnership has sufficient cash after establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees and expenses, including payments to the General Partner and its affiliates. The Board may change the foregoing distribution policy at any time and from time to time, and even if the cash distribution policy is not modified or revoked, the amount of distributions paid under the policy and the decision to make any distribution is determined solely by the General Partner. As a result, there is no guarantee that the Partnership will pay the minimum quarterly distribution, or any distribution, on the units in any quarter. However, the partnership agreement contains provisions intended to motivate the General Partner to make steady, increasing and sustainable distributions over time. The Partnership Agreement generally provides that the Partnership will distribute cash each quarter in the following manner: — first , to the holders of common units, until each common unit has received the minimum quarterly distribution of $0.3875 plus any arrearages from prior quarters; — second , to the holders of subordinated units, until each subordinated unit has received the minimum quarterly distribution of $0.3875; and — third , to all unitholders pro rata, until each has received a distribution of $0.4456. If cash distributions to the Partnership’s unitholders exceed $0.4456 per unit in any quarter, the Partnership’s unitholders and the General Partner, as the initial holder of the incentive distribution rights, will receive distributions according to the following percentage allocations: Total Quarterly Distribution Per Unit Target Amount Marginal Percentage Unitholders General above $0.3875 up to $0.4456 100.0 % 0.0 % above $0.4456 up to $0.4844 85.0 % 15.0 % above $0.4844 up to $0.5813 75.0 % 25.0 % above $0.5813 50.0 % 50.0 % The Partnership refers to additional increasing distributions to the General Partner as “incentive distributions.” The principal difference between the Partnership’s common units and subordinated units is that in any quarter during the subordination period, holders of the subordinated units are not entitled to receive any distributions from operating surplus until the common units have received the minimum quarterly distribution for such quarter plus any arrearages in the payment of the minimum quarterly distribution from prior quarters. Subordinated units will not accrue arrearages. The subordination period will end on the first business day after the Partnership has earned and paid at least (1) $1.55 (the minimum quarterly distribution on an annualized basis) on each outstanding common unit and subordinated unit for each of three consecutive, non-overlapping four quarter periods ending on or after September 30, 2016 or (2) $2.325 (150.0% of the annualized minimum quarterly distribution) on each outstanding common unit and subordinated unit and the related distribution on the incentive distribution rights for a four-quarter period ending immediately preceding such date, in each case provided there are no arrearages on the Partnership’s common units at that time. The subordination period will also end upon the removal of the General Partner other than for cause if no subordinated units or common units held by holder(s) of subordinated units or their affiliates are voted in favor of that removal. When the subordination period ends, all subordinated units will convert into common units on a one-for-one basis, and all common units thereafter will no longer be entitled to arrearages.

Equity Plans

Equity Plans	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016
Disclosure Of Compensation Related Costs Sharebased Payments [Abstract]
Disclosure of Compensation Related Costs, Share-based Payments	Note 9—Equity Plans 2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan The Board approved and adopted the Arc Logistics Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2013 Plan”) in November 2013. In July 2014, the Board formed a Compensation Committee (the “Compensation Committee”) to administer the 2013 Plan. Effective as of March 2015, the Board dissolved the Compensation Committee and, on and after such date, the Board serves as the administrative committee (the “Committee”) under the 2013 Plan. Employees (including officers), consultants and directors of the General Partner, the Partnership and its affiliates (the “Partnership Entities”) are eligible to receive awards under the 2013 Plan. The 2013 Plan authorizes up to an aggregate of 2.0 million common units to be available for awards under the 2013 Plan, subject to adjustment as provided in the 2013 Plan. Awards available for grant under the 2013 Plan include, but are not limited to, restricted units, phantom units, unit options, and unit appreciation rights, but only phantom units have been granted under the 2013 Plan to date. Distribution equivalent rights (“DER”) are also available for grant under the 2013 Plan, either alone or in tandem with other specific awards, which entitle the recipient to receive an amount equal to distributions paid on an outstanding common unit. Upon the occurrence of a “change of control” or an award recipient’s termination of service due to death or “disability” (each quoted term, as defined in the 2013 Plan), any outstanding unvested award will vest in full. In July 2014, the Compensation Committee authorized the grant of an aggregate of 939,500 phantom units pursuant to the 2013 Plan to certain employees, consultants and non-employee directors of the Partnership Entities. Awards of phantom units are settled in common units, except that an award of less than 1,000 phantom units is settled in cash. If a phantom unit award recipient experiences a termination of service with the Partnership Entities other than (i) as a result of death or “disability” or (ii) due to certain circumstances in connection with a “change of control,” the Committee, at its sole discretion, may decide to vest all or any portion of the recipient’s unvested phantom units as of the date of such termination or may allow the unvested phantom units to remain outstanding and vest pursuant to the vesting schedule set forth in the applicable award agreement. Of the July 2014 awards, a total of 100,000 phantom units were granted to certain non-employee directors of the Board and are classified as equity awards for accounting purposes (the “Director Grants”). Each Director Grant will be settled in common units and includes a DER. The Director Grants have an aggregate grant date fair value of $2.5 million and vest in equal annual installments over a three-year period starting from the date of grant. For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, the Partnership recorded approximately $0.2 million and $0.2 million, respectively, of unit-based compensation expense with respect to the Director Grants. As of March 31, 2016, the unrecognized unit-based compensation expense for the Director Grants is approximately $1.1 million, which will be recognized ratably over the remaining term of the awards. In July 2015, one-third of the phantom units granted under the Director Grants vested. Of the July 2014 awards, a total of 832,000 phantom units were granted to employees and certain consultants of the Partnership Entities and are classified as equity awards for accounting purposes (the “Employee Equity Grants”). Each Employee Equity Grant will be settled in common units and includes a DER. The Employee Equity Grants have an aggregate grant date fair value of $21.2 million and vest as follows: (i) 25% of the Employee Equity Grants will vest the day after the end of the Subordination Period (as defined in the Partnership Agreement); and (ii) the three remaining 25% installments of the Employee Equity Grants will vest based on the date on which the Partnership has paid, for three consecutive quarters, distributions to its common and subordinated unitholders at or above a stated level, with (A) 25% of the award vesting after distributions are paid at or above $0.4457 per unit for the required period, (B) 25% of the award vesting after distributions are paid at or above $0.4845 per unit for the required period, and (C) the last 25% of the award vesting after distributions are paid at or above $0.5814 per unit for the required period. To the extent not previously vested, the Employee Equity Grants expire on the fifth anniversary of the date of grant, provided that the expiration date can be extended to the eighth anniversary of the date of grant or longer upon the satisfaction of certain conditions specified in the award agreement. For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, the Partnership recorded approximately $0.8 million and $1.3 million, respectively, of unit-based compensation expense with respect to the Employee Equity Grants. As of March 31, 2016, the unrecognized unit-based compensation expense for the Employee Equity Grants was approximately $13.0 million, which may be recognized variably over the remaining term of the awards based on the probability of the achievement of the performance vesting requirements. Of the July 2014 awards, a total of 7,500 phantom units were granted to certain employees of the Partnership Entities and are classified as liability awards for accounting purposes (the “Employee Liability Grants”). Each Employee Liability Grant will be settled in cash (as such award consists of less than 1,000 phantom units) and includes a DER. The Employee Liability Grants have an aggregate grant date fair value of $0.2 million and have the same term and vesting requirements as the Employee Equity Grants described in the preceding paragraph. For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, the Partnership recorded less than $0.1 million of unit-based compensation expense during each period, with respect to the Employee Liability Grants. As of March 31, 2016, the unrecognized unit based compensation expense for the Employee Liability Grants was approximately $0.1 million, which may be recognized variably over the remaining term of the awards based on the probability of the achievement of the performance vesting requirements and is subject to remeasurement each reporting period until the awards settle. In March 2015, the Board authorized the grant of an aggregate of 45,668 phantom units pursuant to the 2013 Plan to certain employees, consultants and non-employee directors of the Partnership Entities (“2015 Equity Grants”). Each 2015 Equity Grant will be settled in common units and includes a DER. The 2015 Equity Grants are classified as equity awards for accounting purposes and have an aggregate grant date fair value of $0.9 million and vest in equal annual installments over a three-year period starting from the date of grant. For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, the Partnership recorded less than $0.1 million of unit-based compensation expense during each period, with respect to the 2015 Equity Grants. As of March 31, 2016, the unrecognized unit-based compensation expense for the 2015 Equity Grants is approximately $0.5 million, which will be recognized ratably over the remaining term of the awards. In March 2016, one-third of the phantom units granted under the 2015 Equity Grants vested. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Board and Chief Executive Officer authorized the grant of an aggregate of 57,100 phantom units pursuant to the 2013 Plan to certain employees of the Partnership Entities (“2015 Performance Grants”). Each 2015 Performance Grant will be settled in common units and includes a DER. The 2015 Performance Grants are classified as equity awards for accounting purposes and have an aggregate grant date fair value of $1.0 million and have the same term and vesting requirements as the Employee Equity Grants described above. For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, the Partnership recorded less than $0.1 million of unit-based compensation expense during each period, with respect to the 2015 Performance Grants. As of March 31, 2016, the unrecognized unit-based compensation expense for the 2015 Performance Grants is approximately $0.8 million, which may be recognized variably over the remaining term of the awards based on the probability of the achievement of the performance vesting requirements. During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Board authorized the grant of an aggregate of 80,500 phantom units pursuant to the 2013 Plan to certain employees and consultants of the Partnership Entities (“2016 Equity Grants”). Each 2016 Equity Grant will be settled in common units and includes a DER. The 2016 Equity Grants are classified as equity awards for accounting purposes and have an aggregate grant date fair value of $0.9 million and vest in equal annual installments over a three-year period starting from the date of grant. For the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Partnership recorded less than $0.1 million of unit-based compensation expense with respect to the 2016 Equity Grants. As of March 31, 2016, the unrecognized unit-based compensation expense for the 2016 Equity Grants is approximately $0.9 million, which will be recognized ratably over the remaining term of the awards. Subject to applicable earning criteria, the DER included in each phantom unit award described above entitles the award recipient to a cash payment (or, if applicable, payment of other property) equal to the cash distribution (or, if applicable, distribution of other property) paid on an outstanding common unit to unitholders generally based on the number of common units related to the portion of the award recipient’s phantom units that have not vested and been settled as of the record date for such distribution. Cash distributions paid during the vesting period on phantom units that are classified as equity awards for accounting purposes are reflected initially as a reduction of partners’ capital. Cash distributions paid on such equity awards that are not initially expected to vest or ultimately do not vest are classified as compensation expense. As the probability of vesting changes, these initial categorizations could change. Cash distributions paid during the vesting period on phantom units that are classified as liability awards for accounting purposes are reflected as compensation expense and included in the “Selling, general and administrative” line item in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. During the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, the Partnership paid approximately $0.4 million, during each period, in DERs to phantom unit holders. For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, $0.2 million, during each period, was reflected as a reduction of partners’ capital, and the other $0.2 million, during each period, was reflected as compensation expense and included in the “Selling, general and administrative” line item in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The total compensation expense related to the 2013 Plan for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 was $1.1 million and $1.5 million, respectively, which was included in the “Selling, general and administrative” line item in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income The following table presents phantom units granted pursuant to the 2013 Plan: Equity Awards Liability Awards Three Months Ended Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 March 31, 2016 Number Weighted Avg. Number Weighted Avg. of Phantom Grant Date of Phantom Grant Date Fair Value at Units Fair Value Units Fair Value 3/31/2016 Balance at December 31, 2015 985,272 $ 24.76 7,200 $ 25.46 $ 10.23 Granted 80,500 $ 11.73 - $ - $ - Vested (8,551 ) $ 19.13 - $ - $ - Forfeited (6,000 ) $ 25.46 (200 ) $ 25.46 $ - Balance at March 31, 2016 1,051,221 $ 23.84 7,000 $ 25.46 $ 10.23

Earnings Per Unit

Earnings Per Unit	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016
Earnings Per Share [Abstract]
Earnings Per Unit	Note 10—Earnings Per Unit The Partnership uses the two-class method when calculating the net income per unit applicable to limited partners. The two-class method is based on the weighted-average number of common and subordinated units outstanding during the period. Basic net income per unit applicable to limited partners (including subordinated unitholders) is computed by dividing limited partners’ interest in net income, after deducting distributions, if any, by the weighted-average number of outstanding common and subordinated units. Payments made to the Partnership’s unitholders are determined in relation to actual distributions paid and are not based on the net income allocations used in the calculation of net income per unit. Diluted net income per unit applicable to limited partners includes the effects of potentially dilutive units on the Partnership’s units. For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, the only potentially dilutive units outstanding consisted of the phantom units (see “Note 9—Equity Plans”). For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, none of the phantom units are considered outstanding and therefore there were no potentially dilutive units outstanding. The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per limited partner unit for the periods indicated (in thousands, except per unit data): Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 2015 Net Income attributable to partners' capital $ 3,116 $ 304 Less: Distribution equivalent rights for unissued units 274 230 Net income available to limited partners $ 2,842 $ 74 Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per limited partner unit: Allocation of net income among limited partner interests: Net income allocated to common unitholders $ 1,945 $ 39 Net income (loss) allocated to subordinated unitholders $ 897 $ 35 Net income allocated to limited partners: $ 2,842 $ 74 Denominator for basic and diluted earnings per limited partner unit: Common units - (basic and diluted) 13,176 6,868 Subordinated units - (basic and diluted) 6,081 6,081 Earnings (loss) per limited partner unit: Common - (basic and diluted) $ 0.15 $ 0.01 Subordinated - (basic and diluted) $ 0.15 $ 0.01

Related Party Transactions

Related Party Transactions	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016
Related Party Transactions [Abstract]
Related Party Transactions	Note 11—Related Party Transactions Agreements with Affiliates Payments to the General Partner and its Affiliates The General Partner conducts, directs and manages all activities of the Partnership. The General Partner is reimbursed on a monthly basis, or such other basis as may be determined, for: (i) all direct and indirect expenses it incurs or payments it makes on behalf of the Partnership and its subsidiaries; and (ii) all other expenses allocable to the Partnership and its subsidiaries or otherwise incurred by the General Partner in connection with operating the Partnership and its subsidiaries’ businesses (including expenses allocated to the General Partner by its affiliates). For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, the General Partner incurred expenses of $1.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively. Such expenses are reimbursable from the Partnership and are reflected in the “Selling, general and administrative – affiliate” line on the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Partnership had a payable of approximately $1.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively, to the General Partner, which is reflected as “Due to general partner” in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets. Registration Rights Agreement In connection with the IPO, the Partnership entered into a registration rights agreement with the Sponsor. Pursuant to the registration rights agreement, the Partnership is required to file, upon request of the Sponsor, a registration statement to register the common units issued to the Sponsor and the common units issuable upon the conversion of the subordinated units held by the Sponsor. In addition, the registration rights agreement gives the Sponsor piggyback registration rights under certain circumstances. The registration rights agreement also includes provisions dealing with holdback agreements, indemnification and contribution and allocation of expenses. These registration rights are transferable to affiliates and, in certain circumstances, to third parties. Other Transactions with Related Persons GCAC Guarantee GCAC guarantees up to $20 million of the Partnership’s Credit Facility. Under certain circumstances, the lenders may release GCAC from such guarantee. Storage and Throughput Agreements with Center Oil During 2007, the Partnership acquired seven terminals from Center Oil for $35.0 million in cash and 750,000 subordinated units in the Partnership. In connection with this purchase, the Partnership entered into a storage and throughput agreement with Center Oil whereby the Partnership provides storage and throughput services for various petroleum products to Center Oil at the terminals acquired by the Partnership in return for a fixed per barrel fee for each outbound barrel of Center Oil product shipped or committed to be shipped. The throughput fee is calculated and due monthly based on the terms and conditions as set forth in the storage and throughput agreement. In addition to the monthly throughput fee, Center Oil is required to pay the Partnership a fixed per barrel fee for any additives added into Center Oil’s product. In December 2015, the Partnership extended the term of the storage and throughput agreement with Center Oil from June 2017 to June 2020. The agreement will automatically renew for a period of three years at the expiration of the current term at an inflation adjusted rate (subject to a cap), as determined in accordance with the agreement, unless a party delivers a written notice of its election to terminate the storage and throughput agreement at least eighteen months prior to the expiration of the current term. In February 2010, the Partnership acquired a 50% undivided interest in the Baltimore, MD terminal. In connection with the acquisition, the Partnership acquired an existing agreement with Center Oil whereby the Partnership provides ethanol storage and throughput services to Center Oil. The Partnership charges Center Oil a fixed fee for storage and a fee based upon ethanol throughput at the Baltimore, MD terminal. The storage and throughput fees are calculated monthly based on the terms and conditions of the storage and throughput agreement. This agreement was renewed under the one-year evergreen provision and has been extended to May 2017. In May 2011, the Partnership entered into an agreement to provide refined products storage and throughput services to Center Oil at the Baltimore, MD terminal. The Partnership charged Center Oil a fixed fee for storage and a fee for ethanol blending and any additives added to Center Oil’s product. The storage and throughput fees were calculated monthly based on the terms and conditions of the storage and throughput agreement. This agreement was not renewed and expired in May 2015. In May 2013, the Partnership entered into an agreement to provide gasoline storage and throughput services to Center Oil at the Brooklyn, NY terminal. The Partnership charges Center Oil a fixed per barrel fee for each inbound delivery of ethanol and every outbound barrel of product shipped and a fee for any ethanol blending and additives added to Center Oil’s product. The storage and throughput fees are calculated monthly based on the terms and conditions of the storage and throughput agreement. This agreement was renewed under the one-year evergreen provision and has been extended to May 2017. Storage and Throughput Agreements with GCAC In February 2013, the Partnership entered into a storage and throughput agreement with GCAC (the “GCAC Agreement 1”) whereby the Partnership provides storage and throughput services for various petroleum products to GCAC in return for a fixed per barrel storage fee plus a fixed per barrel fee for related throughput and other ancillary services. In addition, the Partnership entered into a second storage and throughput agreement with GCAC (the “GCAC Agreement 2”) whereby the Partnership built an additional 150,000 barrels of storage tanks for GCAC to store and throughput various petroleum products in return for similar economic terms of GCAC Agreement 1. The initial term of GCAC Agreements 1 and 2 is approximately five years. These agreements can be mutually extended by both parties as long as the extension is agreed to 180 days prior to the end of the initial termination date; otherwise the Partnership has the right to lease the storage capacity to any third party. Throughput Agreements with UET During July 2015, the Partnership acquired UET Midstream and its Pawnee Terminal from the Pawnee Sellers for $44.3 million in cash and 1,745,669 in unregistered common units in the Partnership. In connection with such acquisition, the Partnership acquired two terminalling services agreements with UET (each, a “UET Throughput Agreement”). Each UET Throughput Agreement requires UET Midstream to make available to UET a minimum volume of throughput capacity on a monthly basis at the Pawnee Terminal in exchange for payment by UET of a fixed, per barrel monthly fee for such capacity regardless of whether UET utilizes any or all such throughput capacity, in each case subject to certain exceptions. The minimum monthly contract throughput capacity increases each year during the initial five-year term under one of the UET Throughput Agreements. The initial term of each UET Throughput Agreement will automatically extend under certain circumstances. Each UET Throughput Agreement requires UET to deliver crude that meets certain specifications and to pay certain other fees, including fees for the use of excess throughput capacity and certain other ancillary services. The UET Throughput Agreements contain certain other customary insurance, indemnification, default and termination provisions, including the right of a party to terminate the applicable UET Throughput Agreement following an event of default and the expiration of all applicable cure periods. The total revenues associated with the storage and throughput agreements for Center Oil, GCAC and UET and reflected in the “Revenues – Related parties” line on the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income are as follows (in thousands): Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 2015 Center Oil $ 1,460 $ 1,728 UET (a) 1,575 N/A GCAC 448 450 Total $ 3,483 $ 2,178 (a) UET did not become a related party until the closing of the Pawnee Terminal Acquisition The total receivables associated with the storage and throughput agreements for Center Oil, GCAC and UET and reflected in the “Due from related parties” line on the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets are as follows (in thousands): As of March 31, December 31, 2016 2015 Center Oil $ 507 $ 564 UET (a) 527 528 GCAC 303 440 Total $ 1,337 $ 1,532 (a) UET did not become a related party until the closing of the Pawnee Terminal Acquisition Natural Gas Supply Agreement In March 2016, the Partnership, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Arc Terminals Holdings, entered into a natural gas supply agreement with UET to supply the Portland Terminal with natural gas. UET charges the Partnership for the actual amount of natural gas supplied on a monthly basis plus a transportation fee. The agreement expires on March 31, 2017, unless mutually extended for an additional year by both UET and the Partnership. Operating Lease Agreement In January 2014, the Partnership, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Arc Terminals Holdings, entered into a triple net operating lease agreement relating to the Portland Terminal together with a supplemental co-terminus triple net operating lease agreement for the use of certain pipeline infrastructure at such terminal (such lease agreements, collectively, the “ Portland Lease Agreement”), pursuant to which Arc Terminals Holdings leased the Portland Terminal from a wholly owned subsidiary of CorEnergy Infrastructure Trust, Inc. (“CorEnergy”). Arc Logistics guaranteed Arc Terminals Holdings’ obligations under the Portland Lease Agreement. CorEnergy owns a 6.6% direct investment in Lightfoot Capital Partners, LP and a 1.5% direct investment in Lightfoot Capital Partners GP LLC, the general partner of Lightfoot Capital Partners, LP. The Portland Lease Agreement has a 15-year initial term and may be extended for additional five-year terms at the sole discretion of Arc Terminals Holdings, subject to renegotiated rental payment terms. During the term of the Portland Lease Agreement, Arc Terminals Holdings will make base monthly rental payments and variable rent payments based on the volume of liquid hydrocarbons that flowed through the Portland Terminal in the prior month. The base rent in the initial years of the Portland Lease Agreement was $230,000 per month through July 2014 (prorated for the partial month of January 2014) and is $417,522 for each month thereafter until the end of year five. The base rent also increased each month starting with the month of August 2014 by a factor of 0.00958 of the specified construction costs incurred by LCP Oregon Holdings LLC (“LCP Oregon”) at the Portland Terminal. During 2015, spending on terminal-related projects by CorEnergy since the commencement of the Portland Lease Agreement totaled 10.0 million and, as a result, the base rent has increased by approximately $95,800 per month. Accordingly, any additional terminal-related projects will be funded by the Partnership. The base rent will be increased in February 2019 by the change in the consumer price index for the prior five years, and every year thereafter by the greater of two percent or the change in the consumer price index. The base rent is not influenced by the flow of hydrocarbons. Variable rent will result from the flow of hydrocarbons through the Portland Terminal in excess of a designated threshold of 12,500 barrels per day of oil equivalent. Variable rent is capped at 30% of base rent payments regardless of the level of hydrocarbon throughput. During the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, the expense associated with the Portland Lease Agreement was $1.6 million, during each period. During the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, there was no variable rent associated with the Portland Lease Agreement. So long as Arc Terminals Holdings is not in default under the Portland Lease Agreement, it shall have the right to purchase the Portland Terminal at the end of the third year of the Portland Lease Agreement and at the end of any month thereafter by delivery of 90 days’ notice (“Purchase Option”). The purchase price shall be the greater of (i) nine times the total of base rent and variable rent for the 12 months immediately preceding the notice and (ii) $65.7 million. If the Purchase Option is not exercised, the Portland Lease Agreement shall remain in place and Arc Terminals Holdings shall continue to pay rent as provided above. Arc Terminals Holdings also has the option to terminate the Portland Lease Agreement on the fifth and tenth anniversaries, by providing written notice 12 months in advance, for a termination fee of $4 million and $6 million, respectively. Joliet LLC Agreement In connection with the JBBR Acquisition, the Partnership and an affiliate of GE EFS entered into an amended and restated limited liability company agreement of Joliet Holdings governing their respective interests in Joliet Holdings (the “Joliet LLC Agreement”). An affiliate of GE EFS owns 40% of Joliet Holdings, while the remaining 60% is owned by the Partnership. GE EFS indirectly owns interests in Lightfoot. Lightfoot has a significant interest in the Partnership through its ownership of a 29.9% limited partner interest in the Partnership, 100% of the limited liability company interests in the General Partner and all of the Partnership’s incentive distribution rights. Daniel Castagnola serves on the board of managers of Lightfoot Capital Partners GP LLC and on the Board of the General Partner and is a Managing Director at GE EFS, which is an affiliate of General Electric Capital Corporation. In addition, Arc Terminals Holdings entered into a Management Services Agreement (the “MSA”) with Joliet Holdings to manage and operate the Joliet Terminal. Arc Terminals Holdings is receiving a fixed monthly management fee and reimbursements for out-of-pocket expenses. In addition, Arc Terminals Holdings may receive additional monthly management fees based upon the throughput activity at the Joliet Terminal. During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Partnership was paid $0.2 million in fees and reimbursements by Joliet Holdings under the MSA. PIPE Transaction Registration Rights Agreement with PIPE Investors Pursuant to a Unit Purchase Agreement dated as of February 19, 2015 (the “PIPE Purchase Agreement”) among the Partnership and the purchasers named therein (the “PIPE Purchasers”), the Partnership sold 4,520,795 common units at a price of $16.59 per common unit in a private placement (the “PIPE Transaction”) on May 14, 2015 for proceeds totaling $72.7 million after placement agent commissions and expenses, which were used to partially finance the Partnership’s portion of the purchase price of the JBBR Acquisition. As a part of the PIPE Transaction, the Partnership entered into a registration rights agreement (the “PIPE Registration Rights Agreement”), dated May 14, 2015, with the PIPE Purchasers. The issuance of the common units pursuant to the PIPE Purchase Agreement was made in reliance upon an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) thereof. Pursuant to the PIPE Registration Rights Agreement, the Partnership filed, and the SEC declared effective, a shelf registration statement registering the common units of the PIPE Purchasers. In addition, the PIPE Registration Rights Agreement gives the PIPE Purchasers piggyback registration rights under certain circumstances. These registration rights are transferable to affiliates of the PIPE Purchasers. Material Relationships Relating to PIPE Transaction MTP Energy Master Fund Ltd. (“Magnetar PIPE Investor”), one of the PIPE Purchasers, purchased 572,635 c u UET Contribution Agreement In July 2015, the Partnership, through its subsidiary Arc Terminals Holdings, entered into a contribution agreement (the “Contribution Agreement”) with the Pawnee Sellers, pursuant to which it acquired all of the limited liability company interests of UET Midstream from the Pawnee Sellers for total consideration, net of certain adjustments, of $76.6 million, consisting of $44.3 million in cash and $32.3 million of common units of the Partnership. The number of common units issued to the Pawnee Sellers at the closing of the Pawnee Terminal Acquisition was based upon an issuance price of $18.50 per unit, which resulted in the issuance of 1,745,669 of the Partnership’s common units. Registration Rights Agreement with Pawnee Sellers In connection with the issuance of the Pawnee Transaction Units to the Pawnee Sellers (the “Initial Pawnee Holders”) pursuant to the Contribution Agreement as partial consideration for the Pawnee Terminal Acquisition, the Partnership entered into a Registration Rights Agreement (the “Pawnee Registration Rights Agreement”), dated as of July 14, 2015, with the Initial Pawnee Holders. The issuance of the Pawnee Transaction Units pursuant to the Contribution Agreement was made in reliance upon an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) thereof. Pursuant to the Pawnee Registration Rights Agreement, the Partnership filed, and the SEC declared effective, a shelf registration statement registering the common units of the Pawnee Sellers. In addition, the Pawnee Registration Rights Agreement gives the Pawnee Sellers piggyback registration rights under certain circumstances. These registration rights are transferable to affiliates of the Pawnee Sellers. .

Major Customers

Major Customers	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016
Risks And Uncertainties [Abstract]
Major Customers	Note 12—Major Customers The following table presents the percentage of revenues and receivables associated with the Partnership’s significant customers (those that have accounted for 10% or more of the Partnership’s revenues in a given period) for the periods indicated: % of Revenues Three Months Ended % of Receivables March 31, March 31, December 31, 2016 2015 2016 2015 Customer A 33 % 2 % 29 % 30 % Customer B 13 % 25 % 21 % 12 % Customer C 6 % 13 % 5 % 6 % Total 52 % 40 % 55 % 48 %

Commitments and Contingencies

Commitments and Contingencies	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016
Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Commitments and Contingencies	Note 13—Commitments and Contingencies Environmental Matters The Partnership may experience releases of crude oil, petroleum products and fuels or other contaminants into the environment or discover past releases that were previously unidentified. Although the Partnership maintains an inspection program designed to prevent and, as applicable, to detect and address such releases promptly, damages and liabilities incurred due to any such environmental releases from the Partnership’s assets may affect its business. As a result, the Partnership may accrue for losses associated with environmental remediation obligations, when such losses are probable and reasonably estimable. Estimated losses from environmental remediation obligations generally are recognized no later than completion of the remedial feasibility study. Loss accruals are adjusted as further information becomes available or circumstances change. Costs of future expenditures for environmental remediation obligations are not discounted to their present value. The Partnership is not a party to any material pending legal proceedings relating to environmental remediation or other environmental matters and is not aware of any claims or events relating to environmental remediation or other environmental matters that, either individually or in the aggregate, could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s business, financial condition, results of operations and ability to make quarterly distributions to its unitholders. As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Partnership had not experienced any releases of crude oil, petroleum products and fuels or other contaminants into the environment or discovered past releases that were previously unidentified that would give rise to evaluating an estimate of possible losses or a range of losses. Accordingly, the Partnership had not accrued for any loss contingencies in 2016 and 2015. Commitments and Contractual Obligations Future non-cancelable commitments related to certain contractual obligations as of March 31, 2016 are presented below (in thousands): Payments Due by Period Total 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Thereafter Long-term debt obligations $ 240,313 $ - $ - $ 240,313 $ - $ - $ - Operating lease obligations 22,235 4,868 6,357 6,347 4,663 - - Earn-out obligations 18,489 1,028 1,369 1,369 1,369 1,369 11,985 Settlement obligations 1,750 750 500 500 - - - Total $ 282,787 $ 5,896 $ 7,726 $ 248,029 $ 6,032 $ 1,369 $ 11,985 The schedule above assumes the Partnership will either exercise its Purchase Option or its right to terminate the Portland Lease Agreement (See “Note 11—Related Party Transactions—Other Transactions with Related Persons—Operating Lease Agreement” for further information). GCAC was able to receive up to an additional $5.0 million in cash earnout payments based upon the throughput activity of one customer through January 31, 2016. As of March 31, 2016, no additional amounts had been paid or will be owed to GCAC. In connection with the JBBR Acquisition, CenterPoint is entitled to receive up to an additional $27.0 million in cash earn-out payments. As a part of the purchase price allocation related to the JBBR Acquisition, Joliet Holdings recorded a liability of $19.7 million, as of the date of the JBBR Acquisition, in connection with this potential CenterPoint earn-out payment. From the date of acquisition through March 31, 2016, Joliet Holdings has paid $1.2 million related to the earn-out payment. The Partnership will continue to evaluate this liability each quarter for any changes in the estimated fair value. In connection with the Pawnee Terminal Acquisition, Arc Terminals is responsible for completing the remaining construction of the Pawnee Terminal and the costs thereof are estimated to be approximately $11.0 million. The Partnership expects the construction at the Pawnee Terminal to be completed in 2016. The construction costs will be financed by a combination of available cash and borrowings under the Credit Facility. In August 2015, the City of Mobile, AL filed a complaint against Arc Terminals Holdings, pursuant to which the City of Mobile alleged that Arc Terminals Holdings was storing sulfuric acid at its Blakeley, AL facility without proper zoning approval. Arc Terminals Holdings consented to an order with the City of Mobile, under which it agreed to cause all of the sulfuric acid of its customer (the “Blakeley Customer”) to be removed from its Blakeley, AL facility in a timely manner. Following the removal of all sulfuric acid from the Blakeley, AL facility in November 2015, the City of Mobile dismissed its complaint against Arc Terminals Holdings. The City of Mobile indicated that it intended to fine Arc Terminals Holdings $298 per day for each day that sulfuric acid was stored at its Blakeley, AL facility without the proper zoning approval. The Partnership expects to reach a settlement with the City of Mobile regarding this fine and has accrued approximately $100,000 for this potential fine, which it believes is adequate. In February 2016, Arc Terminals Holdings entered into a settlement agreement with the Blakeley Customer pursuant to which the parties agreed to terminate the terminal services agreement entered into by the parties for the storage and throughputting of sulfuric acid at the Blakeley, AL facility and to, among other things, release each party from all potential claims arising out of any non-performance of or non-compliance with the representations, warranties and covenants made thereunder. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, Arc Terminals Holdings agreed to pay to the Blakeley Customer an aggregate amount of $2.0 million in certain increments over a three-year period commencing with the first quarter of 2016, except that Arc Terminals Holdings’ payment obligations thereunder shall be reduced by $0.5 million in the event that Arc Terminals Holdings and the Blakeley Customer enter into a new terminal services agreement for the storage and throughputting of such customer’s sulfuric acid at the Blakeley, AL facility commencing no later than January 1, 2018. Neither Arc Terminals Holdings nor the Blakeley Customer has any obligation to enter into such new terminal services agreement. As of December 31, 2015, the Partnership had established an accrual of $2.0 million with respect to its obligations under such settlement agreement. For the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Partnership has paid $0.3 million related to the settlement agreement. The terminal services agreement that has been terminated pursuant to such settlement agreement provided for an amount of minimum take-or-pay revenue, on a quarterly basis over the remaining term of such terminal services agreement, that would have represented less than 1% of the Partnership’s total revenue for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Subsequent Events

Subsequent Events	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016
Subsequent Events [Abstract]
Subsequent Events	Note 14—Subsequent Events Cash Distributions In April 2016, the Partnership declared a quarterly cash distribution of $0.44 per unit ($1.76 per unit on an annualized basis) totaling approximately $8.5 million for all common and subordinated units outstanding. The distribution is for the period from January 1, 2016 through March 31, 2016. The first quarter distribution represents a 7.3% increase over the first quarter 2015 cash distribution of $0.41 per unit ($1.64 per unit on an annualized basis). The distribution is payable on May 13, 2016 to unitholders of record on May 9, 2016.

Summary of Significant Accoun21

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Basis of Presentation	Basis of Presentation The accompanying interim statements of the Partnership have been prepared in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X issued by the SEC. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments and disclosures necessary for a fair statement of these interim statements have been included. The results reported in these interim statements are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be reported for the entire year or for any other period. These interim statements should be read in conjunction with the Partnership’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015, which are included in the 2015 Partnership 10-K, as filed with the SEC. The year-end balance sheet data was derived from the audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP.
Use of Estimates	Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. The most significant estimates relate to the valuation of acquired businesses, goodwill and intangible assets, assessment for impairment of long-lived assets and the useful lives of intangible assets and property, plant and equipment. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets	Impairment of Long-Lived Assets Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If the carrying amount of an asset exceeds its estimated future cash flows, an impairment charge is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset. Assets to be disposed of are separately presented in the balance sheet and reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell and are no longer depreciated. No impairment charges were recorded during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.
Goodwill	Goodwill Goodwill represents the excess of consideration paid over the fair value of net assets acquired in a business combination. Goodwill is not amortized but instead is assessed for impairment at least annually or when facts and circumstances warrant. Goodwill impairment is determined using a two-step process. The first step of the goodwill impairment test is used to identify potential impairment by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the goodwill impairment test is performed. The second step compares the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill recognized in a business combination. The Partnership determines the fair value of its single reporting unit by blending two valuation approaches: the income approach and a market value approach. The inputs included assumptions related to the future performance of the Partnership and assumptions related to discount rates, long-term growth rates and control premiums. Based on the results of the first step of the quantitative impairment assessment of its goodwill as of December 31, 2015, the fair value of the Partnership’s reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately 9% and management concluded that no impairment was necessary. In the event that market conditions were to remain weak for an extended period of time, the Partnership may be required to record an impairment of goodwill in the future, and such impairment could be material. A summary of the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill is as follows (in thousands): As of March 31, December 31, 2016 2015 Beginning Balance $ 39,871 $ 15,162 Goodwill acquired - 24,709 Ending Balance $ 39,871 $ 39,871 Refer to “Note 3—Acquisitions – JBBR Acquisition” for discussion on the goodwill recorded in the second quarter of 2015 in connection with the JBBR Acquisition (as defined in “Note 2 — —
Deferred Rent	Deferred Rent The Portland Lease Agreement (as defined in “Note 11—Related Party Transactions—Other Transactions with Related Persons—Operating Lease Agreement”
Contingencies	Contingencies In the normal course of business, the Partnership may be subject to loss contingencies, such as legal proceedings and claims arising out of its business that cover a wide range of matters. An accrual for a loss contingency is recognized when it is probable that an asset had been impaired or a liability had been incurred and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Partnership’s financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed. If the estimate of a probable loss is a range and no amount within the range is more likely, the Partnership will accrue the minimum amount of the range. There are many uncertainties associated with any legal proceeding and these actions or other third-party claims against us may cause us to incur costly litigation and/or substantial settlement charges. As a result, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected. The actual liability in any such matters may be materially different from our estimates, if any.
Revenue Recognition	Revenue Recognition Revenues from leased tank storage and delivery services are recognized as the services are performed, evidence of a contractual arrangement exists and collectability is reasonably assured. Revenues also include the sale of excess products and additives which are mixed with customer-owned liquid products. Revenues for the sale of excess products and additives are recognized when title and risk of loss pass to the customer.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments	Fair Value of Financial Instruments Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at a specified measurement date. Fair value measurements are derived using inputs and assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability, including assumptions about risk. GAAP establishes a valuation hierarchy for disclosure of the inputs to valuation used to measure fair value. This three-tier hierarchy classifies fair value amounts recognized or disclosed in the condensed consolidated financial statements based on the observability of inputs used to estimate such fair values. The classification within the hierarchy of a financial asset or liability is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The hierarchy considers fair value amounts based on observable inputs (Levels 1 and 2) to be more reliable and predictable than those based primarily on unobservable inputs (Level 3). At each balance sheet reporting date, the Partnership categorizes its financial assets and liabilities using this hierarchy. The amounts reported in the balance sheet for cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair value because of the short-term maturities of these instruments (Level 1). Because the Credit Facility (as defined in “Note 7 – Debt – Credit Facility” below) has a market rate of interest, its carrying amount approximated fair value (Level 2). In connection with the Partnership’s acquisition, through a joint venture company formed with an affiliate of GE Energy Financial Services (“GE EFS”), of all of the memberships interests of Joliet Bulk, Barge & Rail LLC (“JBBR”) from CenterPoint Properties Trust (“CenterPoint”) for $216.0 million ( the “JBBR Acquisition”), Arc Terminals Joliet Holdings LLC (“Joliet Holdings”) has an earn-out obligation to CenterPoint which was valued at the time of the JBBR Acquisition at approximately $19.7 million. Refer to “Note 3—Acquisitions – JBBR Acquisition” for further discussion on the JBBR Acquisition. Joliet Holdings’ earn-out obligations to CenterPoint will terminate upon the payment, in the aggregate, of $27.0 million. The balance of the earn-out liability is included within “Other non-current liabilities” in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015. Since the fair value of the contingent consideration obligation is based primarily upon unobservable inputs, it is classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. The contingent consideration obligation will be revalued at each reporting period and changes to the fair value will be recorded as a component of operating income. Increases or decreases in the fair value of the contingent consideration obligations can result from changes in the assumed timing of revenue and expense estimates. Significant judgment is employed in determining the appropriateness of these assumptions as of the acquisition date and for each subsequent reporting period. Accordingly, future business and economic conditions can materially impact the amount of contingent consideration expense we record in any given period. No revaluation adjustments were necessary during the three months ended March 31, 2016. For the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, Joliet Holdings has paid $0.3 million and $0 million, respectively, related to the earn-out obligation. Since the JBBR Acquisition through March 31, 2016, Joliet Holdings has paid $1.2 million of the earn-out to CenterPoint. The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of the contingent consideration obligation related to the JBBR Acquisition (in thousands): Balance at Earn-out Balance at December 31 Revaluation payments March 31, 2015 Adjustments paid 2016 Liabilities at fair value: JBBR contingent consideration $ 18,830 $ - $ (341 ) $ 18,489 Total liabilities at fair value $ 18,830 $ - $ (341 ) $ 18,489 The Partnership believes that its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with the values that would be determined by other market participants. However, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.
Unit-Based Compensation	Unit-Based Compensation The Partnership recognizes all unit-based compensation to directors, officers, employees and other service providers in the consolidated financial statements based on the fair value of the awards. Fair value for unit-based awards classified as equity awards is determined on the grant date of the award, and this value is recognized as compensation expense ratably over the requisite service or performance period of the equity award. Fair value for equity awards is calculated at the closing price of the common units on the grant date. Fair value for unit-based awards classified as liability awards is calculated at the closing price of the common units on the grant date and is remeasured at each reporting period until the award is settled. Compensation expense related to unit-based awards is included in the “Selling, general and administrative” line item in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. For awards with performance conditions, the expense is accrued over the service period only if the performance condition is considered to be probable of occurring. When awards with performance conditions that were previously considered improbable become probable, the Partnership incurs additional expense in the period that the probability assessment changes (see “Note 9—Equity Plans”).
Net Income Per Unit	Net Income Per Unit The Partnership uses the two-class method in the computation of earnings per unit since there is more than one participating class of securities. Earnings per common and subordinated unit are determined by dividing net income allocated to the common units and subordinated units, respectively, after deducting the amount allocated to the phantom units, if any, by the weighted average number of outstanding common and subordinated units, respectively, during the period. The overall computation, presentation and disclosure of the Partnership’s limited partners’ net income per unit are made in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 260 “Earnings per Share.”
Segment Reporting	Segment Reporting The Partnership derives revenue from operating its terminal and transloading facilities. These facilities have been aggregated into one reportable segment because the facilities have similar long-term economic characteristics, products and types of customers.
Noncontrolling Interests	Noncontrolling Interests The Partnership applies the provisions of ASC 810 Consolidations — —
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements	Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements In May 2014, the FASB issued updated guidance on the reporting and disclosure of revenue recognition. The update requires that an entity recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. This update also requires new qualitative and quantitative disclosures about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments, information about contract balances and performance obligations, and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. The Partnership is currently evaluating the potential impact of this authoritative guidance on its financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and related disclosures. In April 2015, the FASB proposed a one-year deferral of the effective date, and therefore, this guidance will be effective for the Partnership beginning in the first quarter of 2018, with early adoption optional but not before the original effective date of December 15, 2016. In August 2015, the FASB issued new guidance which adds comments from the SEC related to the presentation of debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements. The SEC commented it would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. The Partnership adopted this requirement in the first quarter of 2016 and it had no impact on its financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and related disclosures. In January 2016, the FASB issued new guidance which requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes In February 2016, the FASB issued new guidance which amends various aspects of existing guidance for leases. The new guidance requires an entity to recognize assets and liabilities arising from a lease for both financing and operating leases, along with additional qualitative and quantitative disclosures. The main difference between previous GAAP and the amended standard is the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees on the balance sheet for those leases classified as operating leases under previous GAAP. As a result, the Partnership will have to recognize a liability representing its lease payments and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term on the balance sheet. The new guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the effect this standard will have on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Summary of Significant Accoun22

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Tables)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016
Accounting Policies [Abstract]
Schedule of Goodwill	A summary of the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill is as follows (in thousands): As of March 31, December 31, 2016 2015 Beginning Balance $ 39,871 $ 15,162 Goodwill acquired - 24,709 Ending Balance $ 39,871 $ 39,871
Schedule of Reconciliation of Contingent Consideration	The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending amounts of the contingent consideration obligation related to the JBBR Acquisition (in thousands): Balance at Earn-out Balance at December 31 Revaluation payments March 31, 2015 Adjustments paid 2016 Liabilities at fair value: JBBR contingent consideration $ 18,830 $ - $ (341 ) $ 18,489 Total liabilities at fair value $ 18,830 $ - $ (341 ) $ 18,489

Acquisitions (Tables)

Acquisitions (Tables)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016
Pennsylvania Terminals [Member]
Summary of Consideration Paid and Assets Acquired	The total preliminary purchase price of $8.0 million was preliminarily allocated to the net assets acquired as follows (in thousands): Consideration: Cash paid to seller $ 8,000 Total consideration $ 8,000 Allocation of purchase price: Property and equipment $ 8,000 Net assets acquired $ 8,000
JBBR Acquisition [Member]
Summary of Consideration Paid and Assets Acquired	The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the assets acquired at the JBBR Acquisition closing date (in thousands): Consideration: Cash paid to seller $ 216,000 Earn-out liability recognized 19,700 Total consideration $ 235,700 Allocation of purchase price: Property and equipment $ 156,991 Intangible assets 54,000 Goodwill 24,709 Net assets acquired $ 235,700
Pawnee Terminal Acquisition [Member]
Summary of Consideration Paid and Assets Acquired	The following table summarizes the consideration paid and the assets acquired at the Pawnee Terminal Acquisition closing date (in thousands): Consideration: Cash paid to seller $ 44,332 Fair value of equity issued to seller 30,200 Total consideration $ 74,532 Allocation of purchase price: Property and equipment $ 23,613 Intangible assets 55,442 Less: liabilities assumed (4,523 ) Net assets acquired $ 74,532

Investment in Unconsolidated 24

Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate (Tables)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016
Schedule of Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate	“Investment in unconsolidated affiliate” consisted of the LNG Interest, and its balances as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are represented below (in thousands): Balance at December 31, 2015 $ 74,399 Equity earnings 2,461 Contributions - Distributions (2,179 ) Amortization of premium (77 ) Other comprehensive income (896 ) Balance at March 31, 2016 $ 73,708
Schedule of Estimated Aggregate Amortization of Premium	The estimated aggregate amortization of this premium for its remaining useful life from March 31, 2016 is as follows (in thousands): Total 2016 $ 232 2017 309 2018 309 2019 309 2020 309 Thereafter 6,444 $ 7,912
Gulf LNG Holdings [Member]
Schedule of Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate	Summarized financial information for Gulf LNG Holdings is reported below (in thousands): March 31, December 31, 2016 2015 Balance sheets Current assets $ 5,554 $ 7,523 Noncurrent assets 881,255 889,655 Total assets $ 886,809 $ 897,178 Current liabilities $ 75,735 $ 79,970 Long-term liabilities 675,233 678,926 Member’s equity 135,841 138,282 Total liabilities and member’s equity $ 886,809 $ 897,178 Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 2015 Income statements Revenues $ 46,484 $ 46,624 Total operating costs and expenses 13,855 14,206 Operating income 32,629 32,418 Net income $ 23,845 $ 24,165

Property, Plant and Equipment (

Property, Plant and Equipment (Tables)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016
Property Plant And Equipment [Abstract]
Schedule of Property, Plant and Equipment	The Partnership’s property, plant and equipment consisted of (in thousands): As of March 31, December 31, 2016 2015 Land $ 78,455 $ 74,855 Buildings and site improvements 78,483 77,514 Tanks and trim 114,523 111,076 Pipelines 20,364 20,364 Machinery and equipment 119,098 118,503 Office furniture and equipment 730 561 Construction in progress 17,678 12,306 429,331 415,179 Less: Accumulated depreciation (38,160 ) (34,508 ) Property, plant and equipment, net $ 391,171 $ 380,671

Intangible Assets (Tables)

Intangible Assets (Tables)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016
Goodwill And Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]
Summary of Partnership's Intangible Assets	The Partnership’s intangible assets consisted of (in thousands): Estimated As of Useful Lives March 31, December 31, in Years 2016 2015 Customer relationships 21 $ 4,785 $ 4,785 Acquired contracts 2-12 149,342 149,342 Non-compete agreements 2-3 741 741 154,868 154,868 Less: Accumulated amortization (26,367 ) (22,747 ) Intangible assets, net $ 128,501 $ 132,121

Partners' Capital and Distrib27

Partners' Capital and Distributions (Tables)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016
Equity [Abstract]
Schedule of the Quarterly Distributions Related to the Partnership's Quarterly Financial Results	The table below summarizes the quarterly distributions related to the Partnership’s quarterly financial results (in thousands, except per unit data): Total Quarterly Total Cash Date of Unitholders Quarter Ended Distribution Per Unit Distribution Distribution Record Date March 31, 2016 $ 0.4400 $ 8,475 May 13, 2016 May 9, 2016 December 31, 2015 $ 0.4400 $ 8,472 February 12, 2016 February 8, 2016 September 30, 2015 $ 0.4400 $ 8,472 November 13, 2015 November 9, 2015 June 30, 2015 $ 0.4250 $ 8,181 August 14, 2015 August 10, 2015 March 31, 2015 $ 0.4100 $ 5,309 May 15, 2015 May 11, 2015
Schedule Of Percentage Of Incentive Distribution Rights To Partnership Unitholders And General Partner	If cash distributions to the Partnership’s unitholders exceed $0.4456 per unit in any quarter, the Partnership’s unitholders and the General Partner, as the initial holder of the incentive distribution rights, will receive distributions according to the following percentage allocations: Total Quarterly Distribution Per Unit Target Amount Marginal Percentage Unitholders General above $0.3875 up to $0.4456 100.0 % 0.0 % above $0.4456 up to $0.4844 85.0 % 15.0 % above $0.4844 up to $0.5813 75.0 % 25.0 % above $0.5813 50.0 % 50.0 %

Equity Plans (Table)

Equity Plans (Table)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016
Disclosure Of Compensation Related Costs Sharebased Payments [Abstract]
Schedule of Share-based Compensation, Stock Options, Activity	The following table presents phantom units granted pursuant to the 2013 Plan: Equity Awards Liability Awards Three Months Ended Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 March 31, 2016 Number Weighted Avg. Number Weighted Avg. of Phantom Grant Date of Phantom Grant Date Fair Value at Units Fair Value Units Fair Value 3/31/2016 Balance at December 31, 2015 985,272 $ 24.76 7,200 $ 25.46 $ 10.23 Granted 80,500 $ 11.73 - $ - $ - Vested (8,551 ) $ 19.13 - $ - $ - Forfeited (6,000 ) $ 25.46 (200 ) $ 25.46 $ - Balance at March 31, 2016 1,051,221 $ 23.84 7,000 $ 25.46 $ 10.23

Earnings Per Unit (Tables)

Earnings Per Unit (Tables)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016
Earnings Per Share [Abstract]
Schedule of Earnings Per Unit	The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per limited partner unit for the periods indicated (in thousands, except per unit data): Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 2015 Net Income attributable to partners' capital $ 3,116 $ 304 Less: Distribution equivalent rights for unissued units 274 230 Net income available to limited partners $ 2,842 $ 74 Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per limited partner unit: Allocation of net income among limited partner interests: Net income allocated to common unitholders $ 1,945 $ 39 Net income (loss) allocated to subordinated unitholders $ 897 $ 35 Net income allocated to limited partners: $ 2,842 $ 74 Denominator for basic and diluted earnings per limited partner unit: Common units - (basic and diluted) 13,176 6,868 Subordinated units - (basic and diluted) 6,081 6,081 Earnings (loss) per limited partner unit: Common - (basic and diluted) $ 0.15 $ 0.01 Subordinated - (basic and diluted) $ 0.15 $ 0.01

Related Party Transactions (Tab

Related Party Transactions (Tables)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016
Related Party Transactions [Abstract]
Schedule of Related Party Transactions	The total revenues associated with the storage and throughput agreements for Center Oil, GCAC and UET and reflected in the “Revenues – Related parties” line on the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income are as follows (in thousands): Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 2015 Center Oil $ 1,460 $ 1,728 UET (a) 1,575 N/A GCAC 448 450 Total $ 3,483 $ 2,178 (a) UET did not become a related party until the closing of the Pawnee Terminal Acquisition The total receivables associated with the storage and throughput agreements for Center Oil, GCAC and UET and reflected in the “Due from related parties” line on the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets are as follows (in thousands): As of March 31, December 31, 2016 2015 Center Oil $ 507 $ 564 UET (a) 527 528 GCAC 303 440 Total $ 1,337 $ 1,532 (a) UET did not become a related party until the closing of the Pawnee Terminal Acquisition

Major Customers (Tables)

Major Customers (Tables)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016
Risks And Uncertainties [Abstract]
Schedules of Percentages of Revenues and Receivables Associated with Significant Customers	The following table presents the percentage of revenues and receivables associated with the Partnership’s significant customers (those that have accounted for 10% or more of the Partnership’s revenues in a given period) for the periods indicated: % of Revenues Three Months Ended % of Receivables March 31, March 31, December 31, 2016 2015 2016 2015 Customer A 33 % 2 % 29 % 30 % Customer B 13 % 25 % 21 % 12 % Customer C 6 % 13 % 5 % 6 % Total 52 % 40 % 55 % 48 %

Commitments and Contingencies (

Commitments and Contingencies (Tables)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016
Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Schedule of Future Non-Cancelable Commitments Related to Certain Contractual Obligations	Future non-cancelable commitments related to certain contractual obligations as of March 31, 2016 are presented below (in thousands): Payments Due by Period Total 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Thereafter Long-term debt obligations $ 240,313 $ - $ - $ 240,313 $ - $ - $ - Operating lease obligations 22,235 4,868 6,357 6,347 4,663 - - Earn-out obligations 18,489 1,028 1,369 1,369 1,369 1,369 11,985 Settlement obligations 1,750 750 500 500 - - - Total $ 282,787 $ 5,896 $ 7,726 $ 248,029 $ 6,032 $ 1,369 $ 11,985

Organization and Presentation -

Organization and Presentation - Additional Information (Detail) $ / shares in Units, bbl in Millions, $ in Millions	1 Months Ended	3 Months Ended
	Nov. 30, 2013USD ($)$ / sharesshares	Mar. 31, 2016Bcf / dTerminalStateFacilitybbl / dsharesbblm³	Dec. 31, 2015shares
Organization [Line Items]
Number of terminals | Terminal		21
Number of states terminal located | State		12
Number of barrels of storage capacity | bbl		7.7
Number of rail transloading facilities | Facility		4
Rail transloading facility throughput capacity | bbl / d		126,000
Common Units [Member]
Organization [Line Items]
Limited partners' units issued		13,181,409	13,174,410
Common Units [Member] | Lightfoot Capital Partners LP And Lightfoot Capital Partners GPLLC [Member]
Organization [Line Items]
Limited partners' units issued		68,617
Subordinated Units [Member]
Organization [Line Items]
Limited partners' units issued		6,081,081	6,081,081
Subordinated Units [Member] | Lightfoot Capital Partners LP And Lightfoot Capital Partners GPLLC [Member]
Organization [Line Items]
Limited partners' units issued		5,146,264
Initial Public Offering [Member] | Terminal Credit Facility [Member]
Organization [Line Items]
Amended and restated credit facility | $	$ 40
Initial Public Offering [Member] | Limited Partners [Member]
Organization [Line Items]
Common units issued in initial public offering	6,786,869
Common units issued, per unit | $ / shares	$ 19
Initial Public Offering [Member] | Underwriters' Over-allotment Option [Member] | Limited Partners [Member]
Organization [Line Items]
Common units issued in initial public offering	786,869
Gulf LNG Holdings [Member]
Organization [Line Items]
Limited partners capital units percentage	10.30%
Gulf LNG Holdings Group, LLC Acquisition [Member]
Organization [Line Items]
Liquefied natural gas storage capacity | m³		320,000
Liquefied natural gas sendout capacity | Bcf / d		1.5

Summary of Significant Accoun34

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Additional Information (Detail)	May. 31, 2015USD ($)	May. 31, 2015USD ($)	Mar. 31, 2016USD ($)Segment	Mar. 31, 2015USD ($)	Mar. 31, 2016USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2015
Schedule Of Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Impairment charges			$ 0	$ 0
Percentage of reporting unit fair value in excess of carrying value						9.00%
Earn-out Payments paid			$ 341,000
Number of reportable segment | Segment			1
Distributions to noncontrolling interest holders			$ 2,800,000	0
JBBR Acquisition [Member]
Schedule Of Accounting Policies [Line Items]
Cash paid to seller		$ 216,000,000	216,000,000
Initial Valuation	$ 19,700,000
Earn-out payments	$ 27,000,000	$ 27,000,000	27,000,000		$ 27,000,000
Earn-out Payments paid			341,000	$ 0
Business acquisition earn-out payment			$ 1,200,000		$ 1,200,000

Summary of Significant Accoun35

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Schedule of Goodwill (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended	12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Goodwill And Intangible Assets Disclosure [Abstract]
Beginning Balance	$ 39,871	$ 15,162
Goodwill acquired	0	24,709
Ending Balance	$ 39,871	$ 39,871

Summary of Significant Accoun36

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - Summary of Reconciliation of Contingent Consideration (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016	Mar. 31, 2015
Schedule Of Reconciliation Of Contingent Consideration [Line Items]
Beginning balance	$ 18,830
Revaluation Adjustments	0
Payments of earn-out liability	(341)
Ending balance	18,489
JBBR Acquisition [Member]
Schedule Of Reconciliation Of Contingent Consideration [Line Items]
Beginning balance	18,830
Revaluation Adjustments	0
Payments of earn-out liability	(341)	$ 0
Ending balance	$ 18,489

Acquisitions - Additional Infor

Acquisitions - Additional Information (Detail)	1 Months Ended			2 Months Ended	3 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2016USD ($)Terminal	Jul. 31, 2015USD ($)$ / sharesshares	May. 31, 2015USD ($)$ / sharesshares	Mar. 31, 2016USD ($)	Mar. 31, 2016USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2015USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2014USD ($)
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Proceeds from credit facility					$ 14,250,000
Earn-out liability recognized				$ 18,489,000	18,489,000	$ 18,830,000
Goodwill				39,871,000	39,871,000	39,871,000	$ 15,162,000
Pennsylvania Terminals [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Number of terminals acquired | Terminal	4
Cash paid to seller	$ 8,000,000
Initial term of take or pay terminal services	2 years
Identifiable assets acquired, fair value	$ 8,000,000
Transaction costs	500,000
Total purchase price	$ 8,000,000
Total revenue				400,000
Pennsylvania Terminals [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Operating losses				100,000
JBBR Acquisition [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Cash paid to seller			$ 216,000,000		216,000,000
Identifiable assets acquired, fair value			211,000,000
Transaction costs			1,300,000
Total purchase price			235,700,000
Earn-out payments			27,000,000	27,000,000	27,000,000
Proceeds from private placement			72,700,000
Earn-out liability recognized			19,700,000	18,489,000	18,489,000	$ 18,830,000
Goodwill			$ 24,709,000
JBBR Acquisition [Member] | Private Placement [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Sale of common units, shares | shares			4,520,795
Price per unit of common units | $ / shares			$ 16.59
Proceeds from credit facility			$ 61,000,000
Pawnee Terminal Acquisition [Member]
Business Acquisition [Line Items]
Cash paid to seller		$ 44,332,000
Identifiable assets acquired, fair value		74,500,000
Transaction costs		1,800,000
Total purchase price		74,532,000
Business acquisition, total consideration cost		76,600,000
Business combination consideration transferred net of adjustment.		76,600,000
Business acquisition, Equity interest issued, Value		$ 32,300,000
Business acquisition, Share price | $ / shares		$ 18.50
Business acquisition, Equity interest issued or issuable, Number of shares | shares		1,745,669
Business acquisition, Fair value of share | $ / shares		$ 17.30
Business acquisition reduction of purchase price		$ 2,100,000
Estimated remaining construction cost		11,000,000
Business acquisition construction cost payable		$ 4,523,000		$ 2,000,000	$ 2,000,000

Acquisitions - Summary of Consi

Acquisitions - Summary of Consideration Paid and Assets Acquired (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	1 Months Ended			3 Months Ended
	Jan. 31, 2016	Jul. 31, 2015	May. 31, 2015	Mar. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2014
Consideration:
Earn-out liability recognized				$ 18,489	$ 18,830
Allocation of purchase price:
Goodwill				39,871	39,871	$ 15,162
Pennsylvania Terminals [Member]
Consideration:
Cash paid to seller	$ 8,000
Total purchase price	8,000
Allocation of purchase price:
Property and equipment	8,000
Net assets acquired	$ 8,000
JBBR Acquisition [Member]
Consideration:
Cash paid to seller			$ 216,000	216,000
Earn-out liability recognized			19,700	18,489	$ 18,830
Total purchase price			235,700
Allocation of purchase price:
Property and equipment			156,991
Intangible assets			54,000
Goodwill			24,709
Net assets acquired			$ 235,700
Pawnee Terminal Acquisition [Member]
Consideration:
Cash paid to seller		$ 44,332
Fair value of equity issued to seller		30,200
Total purchase price		74,532
Allocation of purchase price:
Property and equipment		23,613
Intangible assets		55,442
Less: liabilities assumed		(4,523)		$ (2,000)
Net assets acquired		$ 74,532

Investment in Unconsolidated 39

Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate - Schedule of Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliate (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016	Mar. 31, 2015
Investments In And Advances To Affiliates Schedule Of Investments [Abstract]
Beginning balance	$ 74,399
Equity earnings	2,461	$ 2,489
Contributions		310
Distributions	(2,179)
Amortization of premium	(77)
Other comprehensive income	(896)	$ (471)
Ending balance	$ 73,708

Investment in Unconsolidated 40

Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate - Additional Information (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	1 Months Ended	3 Months Ended
	Nov. 30, 2013	Mar. 31, 2016	Mar. 31, 2015
Schedule Of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Purchase of LNG Interest from an affiliate			$ 310
Percentage of adjusted EBITDA associated with LNG interest		18.00%	34.00%
Percentage of distributable cash flow associated with LNG interest		24.00%	33.00%
Gulf LNG Holdings Group, LLC Acquisition [Member]
Schedule Of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Purchase of LNG Interest from an affiliate	$ 72,700
Carrying value of LNG Interest	64,100
Purchase price excess amount paid over the carrying value	$ 8,600
Long lived assets useful life		28 years

Investment in Unconsolidated 41

Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate - Schedule of Estimated Aggregate Amortization of Premium (Detail) - Gulf LNG Holdings Group, LLC Acquisition [Member] $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016USD ($)
Schedule Of Equity Method Investments [Line Items]
Estimated future amortization expense, 2016	$ 232
Estimated future amortization expense, 2017	309
Estimated future amortization expense, 2018	309
Estimated future amortization expense, 2019	309
Estimated future amortization expense, 2020	309
Estimated future amortization expense, Thereafter	6,444
Total future amortization expense	$ 7,912

Investment in Unconsolidated 42

Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliate - Summarized Financial Information for the Gulf LNG Holdings (Detail) - Gulf LNG Holdings Group, LLC Acquisition [Member] - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016	Mar. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2015
Balance sheets
Current assets	$ 5,554		$ 7,523
Noncurrent assets	881,255		889,655
Total assets	886,809		897,178
Current liabilities	75,735		79,970
Long-term liabilities	675,233		678,926
Member’s equity	135,841		138,282
Total liabilities and partners’ capital	886,809		$ 897,178
Income statements
Revenues	46,484	$ 46,624
Total operating costs and expenses	13,855	14,206
Operating income	32,629	32,418
Net income	$ 23,845	$ 24,165

Property, Plant and Equipment -

Property, Plant and Equipment - Schedule of Property, Plant and Equipment (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Mar. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, plant and equipment, gross	$ 429,331	$ 415,179
Less: Accumulated depreciation	(38,160)	(34,508)
Property, plant and equipment, net	391,171	380,671
Land [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, plant and equipment, gross	78,455	74,855
Building and Site Improvements [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, plant and equipment, gross	78,483	77,514
Tanks and Trim [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, plant and equipment, gross	114,523	111,076
Pipelines [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, plant and equipment, gross	20,364	20,364
Machinery and Equipment [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, plant and equipment, gross	119,098	118,503
Office Furniture and Equipment [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, plant and equipment, gross	730	561
Construction in Progress [Member]
Property, Plant and Equipment [Line Items]
Property, plant and equipment, gross	$ 17,678	$ 12,306

Intangible Assets - Summary of

Intangible Assets - Summary of Partnership's Intangible Assets (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Finite Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Intangible assets, gross	$ 154,868	$ 154,868
Less: Accumulated amortization	(26,367)	(22,747)
Intangible assets, net	$ 128,501	132,121
Customer Relationships [Member]
Finite Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Intangible assets estimated useful life	21 years
Intangible assets, gross	$ 4,785	4,785
Contract-Based Intangible Assets [Member]
Finite Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Intangible assets, gross	$ 149,342	149,342
Contract-Based Intangible Assets [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Finite Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Intangible assets estimated useful life	2 years
Contract-Based Intangible Assets [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Finite Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Intangible assets estimated useful life	12 years
Non-compete agreements [Member]
Finite Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Intangible assets, gross	$ 741	$ 741
Non-compete agreements [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Finite Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Intangible assets estimated useful life	2 years
Non-compete agreements [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Finite Lived Intangible Assets [Line Items]
Intangible assets estimated useful life	3 years

Intangible Assets - Additional

Intangible Assets - Additional Information (Detail) $ in Millions	Mar. 31, 2016USD ($)
Finite Lived Intangible Assets Future Amortization Expense [Abstract]
Estimated future amortization expense, remainder of 2016	$ 10.8
Estimated future amortization expense, 2017	14
Estimated future amortization expense, 2018	12.8
Estimated future amortization expense, 2019	12.2
Estimated future amortization expense, 2020	12.2
Estimated future amortization expense, thereafter	$ 66.5

Debt - Additional Information (

Debt - Additional Information (Detail)	1 Months Ended	3 Months Ended
	Nov. 30, 2013USD ($)	Mar. 31, 2016USD ($)	Dec. 31, 2015USD ($)	Jul. 31, 2015USD ($)	May. 31, 2015USD ($)	Nov. 12, 2013USD ($)
Line Of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Credit facility		$ 240,313,000	$ 226,063,000
Sublimit for issuance of swing line loans	$ 5,000,000
Percentage of increase in interest rate on default exists	2.00%
Credit Facility [Member]
Line Of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Line of Credit Facility, amount	$ 300,000,000			$ 300,000,000	$ 275,000,000	$ 275,000,000
Credit facility		$ 240,300,000
Line of Credit Facility, interest rate		3.44%
Letter of credit outstanding amount	10,000,000
Available capacity under the credit facility		$ 33,800,000
Amount of commitments under the Credit Facility	$ 100,000,000
Credit Facility, maturity date		Nov. 30, 2018
Maximum leverage ratio to be maintained as per credit facility	4.50
Minimum interest coverage ratio	2.50
Maximum secured leverage ratio	3.50
Credit Facility [Member] | Senior Notes [Member]
Line Of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Future issuance of debt	$ 200,000,000
Credit Facility [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Line Of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Commitment fee percentage on unused portion of facility	0.375%
Credit Facility [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Line Of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Commitment fee percentage on unused portion of facility	0.50%
Increase in Partnership leverage ratio	5
Credit Facility [Member] | Base Rate [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Line Of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Basis points spread on floating rate debt	1.00%
Credit Facility [Member] | Base Rate [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Line Of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Basis points spread on floating rate debt	2.00%
Credit Facility [Member] | London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) [Member] | Minimum [Member]
Line Of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Basis points spread on floating rate debt	2.00%
Credit Facility [Member] | London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) [Member] | Maximum [Member]
Line Of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Basis points spread on floating rate debt	3.00%
Credit Facility [Member] | One-Month LIBOR Rate [Member]
Line Of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Basis points spread on floating rate debt	1.00%
Credit Facility [Member] | Federal Funds Rate [Member]
Line Of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Basis points spread on floating rate debt	0.50%
Credit Facility [Member] | Standby Letters of Credit [Member]
Line Of Credit Facility [Line Items]
Sublimit for letters of credit	$ 20,000,000				$ 20,000,000

Partners' Capital and Distrib47

Partners' Capital and Distributions - Schedule of the Quarterly Distributions Related to the Partnership's Quarterly Financial Results (Detail) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	Sep. 30, 2015	Jun. 30, 2015	Mar. 31, 2015
Distributions Made To Members Or Limited Partners [Abstract]
Total Quarterly Distribution Per Unit	$ 0.4400	$ 0.4400	$ 0.4400	$ 0.4250	$ 0.4100
Total Cash Distribution Declared	$ 8,475
Total Cash Distribution	$ 8,473	$ 8,472	$ 8,472	$ 8,181	$ 5,309
Date of Distribution	May 13, 2016	Feb. 12, 2016	Nov. 13, 2015	Aug. 14, 2015	May 15, 2015
Unitholders Record Date	May 9, 2016	Feb. 8, 2016	Nov. 9, 2015	Aug. 10, 2015	May 11, 2015

Partners' Capital and Distrib48

Partners' Capital and Distributions - Additional Information (Detail)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016$ / shares
Limited Partners Capital Account [Line Items]
Cash distribution after period end of each quarter	60 days
Annualized minimum quarterly distribution on each outstanding common and subordinated units, percentage	150.00%
Annualized minimum quarterly distribution on each outstanding common and subordinated units	$ 2.325
Conversion basis	When the subordination period ends, all subordinated units will convert into common units on a one-for-one basis, and all common units thereafter will no longer be entitled to arrearages.
Annualized Basis [Member]
Limited Partners Capital Account [Line Items]
Cash distribution received, per unit	$ 1.55
Common Units [Member]
Limited Partners Capital Account [Line Items]
Cash distribution received, per unit	0.3875
Subordinated Units [Member]
Limited Partners Capital Account [Line Items]
Cash distribution received, per unit	0.3875
All Unitholders [Member]
Limited Partners Capital Account [Line Items]
Cash distribution received, per unit	$ 0.4456

Partners' Capital and Distrib49

Partners' Capital and Distributions - Percentage of Incentive Distribution Rights to Partnership's Unitholders and General Partner (Detail)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016
Above $0.3875 up to $0.4456 [Member] | Unitholders [Member]
Incentive Distribution Made To Managing Member Or General Partner [Line Items]
Marginal Percentage Interest in Distributions	100.00%
Above $0.3875 up to $0.4456 [Member] | General Partners [Member]
Incentive Distribution Made To Managing Member Or General Partner [Line Items]
Marginal Percentage Interest in Distributions	0.00%
Above $0.4456 up to $0.4844 [Member] | Unitholders [Member]
Incentive Distribution Made To Managing Member Or General Partner [Line Items]
Marginal Percentage Interest in Distributions	85.00%
Above $0.4456 up to $0.4844 [Member] | General Partners [Member]
Incentive Distribution Made To Managing Member Or General Partner [Line Items]
Marginal Percentage Interest in Distributions	15.00%
Above $0.4844 up to $0.5813 [Member] | Unitholders [Member]
Incentive Distribution Made To Managing Member Or General Partner [Line Items]
Marginal Percentage Interest in Distributions	75.00%
Above $0.4844 up to $0.5813 [Member] | General Partners [Member]
Incentive Distribution Made To Managing Member Or General Partner [Line Items]
Marginal Percentage Interest in Distributions	25.00%
Above $0.5813 [Member] | Unitholders [Member]
Incentive Distribution Made To Managing Member Or General Partner [Line Items]
Marginal Percentage Interest in Distributions	50.00%
Above $0.5813 [Member] | General Partners [Member]
Incentive Distribution Made To Managing Member Or General Partner [Line Items]
Marginal Percentage Interest in Distributions	50.00%

Partners' Capital and Distrib50

Partners' Capital and Distributions - Percentage of Incentive Distribution Rights to Partnership's Unitholders and General Partner (Parenthetical) (Detail)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016$ / shares
Minimum [Member] | Above $0.3875 up to $0.4456 [Member]
Incentive Distribution Made To Managing Member Or General Partner [Line Items]
Cash distribution paid, per unit	$ 0.3875
Minimum [Member] | Above $0.4456 up to $0.4844 [Member]
Incentive Distribution Made To Managing Member Or General Partner [Line Items]
Cash distribution paid, per unit	0.4456
Minimum [Member] | Above $0.4844 up to $0.5813 [Member]
Incentive Distribution Made To Managing Member Or General Partner [Line Items]
Cash distribution paid, per unit	0.4844
Minimum [Member] | Above $0.5813 [Member]
Incentive Distribution Made To Managing Member Or General Partner [Line Items]
Cash distribution paid, per unit	0.5813
Maximum [Member] | Above $0.3875 up to $0.4456 [Member]
Incentive Distribution Made To Managing Member Or General Partner [Line Items]
Cash distribution paid, per unit	0.4456
Maximum [Member] | Above $0.4456 up to $0.4844 [Member]
Incentive Distribution Made To Managing Member Or General Partner [Line Items]
Cash distribution paid, per unit	0.4844
Maximum [Member] | Above $0.4844 up to $0.5813 [Member]
Incentive Distribution Made To Managing Member Or General Partner [Line Items]
Cash distribution paid, per unit	$ 0.5813

Equity Plans - Additional Infor

Equity Plans - Additional Information (Detail) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands	1 Months Ended	3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Jul. 31, 2014	Mar. 31, 2016	Mar. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2015	Nov. 30, 2013
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Unrecognized unit-based compensation expense		$ 13,000
Payments to phantom unit holders		$ 231
Phantom Units
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Number of shares granted under the plan	939,500
Phantom Units | Directors Grant
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Vesting period		3 years
Unit-based compensation		$ 200	$ 200
Unrecognized unit-based compensation expense		1,100
Employee Equity Grants
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Unit-based compensation		800	1,300
2015 Equity Grants
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Aggregate grant date fair value			$ 900
Vesting period			3 years
Unit-based compensation		100	$ 100
Unrecognized unit-based compensation expense		$ 500
Employee equity grants vested percentage		33.33%
2015 Performance Grants
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Aggregate grant date fair value				$ 1,000
Unrecognized unit-based compensation expense		$ 800
2015 Performance Grants | Maximum [Member]
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Unit-based compensation		100
2016 Performance Grants
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Aggregate grant date fair value		$ 900
Vesting period		3 years
Unit-based compensation		$ 100
Unrecognized unit-based compensation expense		900
2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan | Other Non-current Liabilities [Member]
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Unit-based compensation, liabilities		100
2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan | Selling, general and administrative
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Unit-based compensation		1,100	1,500
2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan | Employee Equity Grants Tranche One
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Employee equity grants vest percentage	25.00%
2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan | Employee Equity Grants Tranche Two
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Employee equity grants vest percentage	25.00%
Cash distribution received, per unit	$ 0.4457
2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan | Employee Equity Grants Tranche Three
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Employee equity grants vest percentage	25.00%
Cash distribution received, per unit	$ 0.4845
2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan | Employee Equity Grants Tranche Four
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Employee equity grants vest percentage	25.00%
Cash distribution received, per unit	$ 0.5814
2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan | Phantom Units
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Payments to phantom unit holders		400	$ 400
2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan | Phantom Units | Directors Grant
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Number of shares granted under the plan	100,000
Aggregate grant date fair value	$ 2,500
2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan | Phantom Units Which Will Be Settled In Cash | Minimum [Member]
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Number of shares granted under the plan	1,000
2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan | Employee Equity Grants
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Aggregate grant date fair value	$ 21,200
Number of shares granted under the plan	832,000
2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan | Employee Liability Grants
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Number of shares granted under the plan	7,500
Aggregate grant date fair value	$ 200
Unit-based compensation		100
Unrecognized unit-based compensation expense		$ 100
2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan | 2015 Equity Grants
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Number of shares granted under the plan			45,668
2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan | 2015 Performance Grants
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Number of shares granted under the plan				57,100
2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan | 2016 Performance Grants
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Number of shares granted under the plan		80,500
2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan | Employee Equity Grants And Consultants
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Payments to phantom unit holders		$ 200	$ 200
2013 Long-Term Incentive Plan | Employee Equity Grants And Consultants | Selling, general and administrative
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Unit-based compensation		$ 200	$ 200
Common Units [Member]
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Share-based Compensation Arrangement by Share-based Payment Award, Number of Shares Authorized					2,000,000

Equity Plans - Summary of Phant

Equity Plans - Summary of Phantom Units Granted (Detail)	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016$ / sharesshares
Phantom Share Units PSUs Equity Award [Member]
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Number of Phantom Units, Beginning Balance | shares	985,272
Number of Phantom Units, Granted | shares	80,500
Number of Phantom Units, Vested | shares	(8,551)
Number of Phantom Units, Forfeited | shares	(6,000)
Number of Phantom Units, Ending Balance | shares	1,051,221
Weighted Avg. Grant Date Fair Value, Beginning Balance	$ 24.76
Weighted Avg. Grant Date Fair Value, Granted	11.73
Weighted Avg. Grant Date Fair Value, Vested	19.13
Weighted Avg. Grant Date Fair Value, Forfeited	25.46
Weighted Avg. Grant Date Fair Value, Ending Balance	$ 23.84
Phantom Share Units PSUs Liability Award [Member]
Share Based Compensation Arrangement By Share Based Payment Award [Line Items]
Number of Phantom Units, Beginning Balance | shares	7,200
Number of Phantom Units, Forfeited | shares	(200)
Number of Phantom Units, Ending Balance | shares	7,000
Weighted Avg. Grant Date Fair Value, Beginning Balance	$ 25.46
Weighted Avg. Grant Date Fair Value, Forfeited	25.46
Weighted Avg. Grant Date Fair Value, Ending Balance	25.46
Fair Value, Beginning Balance	10.23
Fair Value, Ending Balance	$ 10.23

Earnings Per Unit - Additional

Earnings Per Unit - Additional Information (Detail) - shares	Mar. 31, 2016	Mar. 31, 2015
Earnings Per Share [Abstract]
Number of Phantom units, outstanding	0	0

Earnings Per Unit - Schedule of

Earnings Per Unit - Schedule of Earnings Per Unit (Detail) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, shares in Thousands, $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016	Mar. 31, 2015
Earnings Per Share Basic And Diluted [Line Items]
Net Income attributable to partners' capital	$ 3,116	$ 304
Less: Distribution equivalent rights for unissued units	274	230
Net income available to limited partners	2,842	74
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per limited partner unit:
Net income allocated to limited partners	2,842	74
Common Units [Member]
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per limited partner unit:
Net income allocated to limited partners	$ 1,945	$ 39
Denominator for basic and diluted earnings per limited partner unit:
Total basic units outstanding	13,176	6,868
Earnings (loss) per limited partner unit:
Earnings per limited partner unit, basic and diluted	$ 0.15	$ 0.01
Subordinated Units [Member]
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings per limited partner unit:
Net income allocated to limited partners	$ 897	$ 35
Denominator for basic and diluted earnings per limited partner unit:
Total basic units outstanding	6,081	6,081
Earnings (loss) per limited partner unit:
Earnings per limited partner unit, basic and diluted	$ 0.15	$ 0.01

Related Party Transactions - Ad

Related Party Transactions - Additional Information (Detail)

Nov. 30, 2015

Feb. 19, 2015USD ($)$ / sharesshares

May. 31, 2013

May. 31, 2011

Feb. 28, 2010

Mar. 31, 2016USD ($)bbl

Dec. 31, 2015USD ($)

Jul. 31, 2015USD ($)$ / sharesshares

May. 31, 2015USD ($)$ / shares

Jan. 31, 2014

Mar. 31, 2016USD ($)Terminalsharesbbl

Mar. 31, 2015USD ($)

Dec. 31, 2007USD ($)

Feb. 28, 2013bbl

Related Party Transaction [Line Items]

Selling, general and administrative expenses-affiliate

$ 1,322,000

$ 1,076,000

Due to general partner

$ 1,020,000

$ 638,000

1,020,000

Pawnee Terminal Acquisition [Member]

Related Party Transaction [Line Items]

Cash paid for Partnership acquired

$ 44,332,000

Business acquisition, Equity interest issued or issuable, Number of shares | shares

1,745,669

Business combination consideration transferred net of adjustment.

$ 76,600,000

Business acquisition, Equity interest issued, Value

$ 32,300,000

Business acquisition, Share price | $ / shares

$ 18.50

JBBR Acquisition [Member]

Related Party Transaction [Line Items]

Cash paid for Partnership acquired

$ 216,000,000

$ 216,000,000

Proceeds from private placement

$ 72,700,000

JBBR Acquisition [Member] | Private Placement [Member]

Related Party Transaction [Line Items]

Price per unit of common units | $ / shares

$ 16.59

Lightfoot Capital Partners LP And Lightfoot Capital Partners GPLLC [Member]

Related Party Transaction [Line Items]

Registration rights agreement

In connection with the IPO, the Partnership entered into a registration rights agreement with the Sponsor. Pursuant to the registration rights agreement, the Partnership is required to file, upon request of the Sponsor, a registration statement to register the common units issued to the Sponsor and the common units issuable upon the conversion of the subordinated units held by the Sponsor. In addition, the registration rights agreement gives the Sponsor piggyback registration rights under certain circumstances.

Limited partners capital units percentage

29.90%

Percentage of interest in general partner

100.00%

G E Energy Financial Services | JBBR Acquisition [Member]

Related Party Transaction [Line Items]

Business combination, equity interest in acquire percentage

40.00%

40.00%

Arc Logistics Partners LP [Member] | JBBR Acquisition [Member]

Related Party Transaction [Line Items]

Business combination, equity interest in acquire percentage

60.00%

60.00%

Arc Logistics GP LLC [Member]

Related Party Transaction [Line Items]

Selling, general and administrative expenses-affiliate

$ 1,300,000

1,100,000

Due to general partner

$ 1,100,000

$ 600,000

1,100,000

Gulf Coast Asphalt Company, L.L.C. [Member]

Related Party Transaction [Line Items]

Partnership's Credit Facility

$ 20,000,000

$ 20,000,000

Number of barrels of storage tanks | bbl

150,000

Initial term of agreement

5 years

Center Oil [Member]

Related Party Transaction [Line Items]

Cash paid for Partnership acquired

$ 35,000,000

Number of terminals acquired | Terminal

7

Center Oil [Member] | Limited Partners [Member]

Related Party Transaction [Line Items]

Partnership units issued on acquisition | shares

750,000

Written notification for termination of agreement

In December 2015, the Partnership extended the term of the storage and throughput agreement with Center Oil from June 2017 to June 2020. The agreement will automatically renew for a period of three years at the expiration of the current term at an inflation adjusted rate (subject to a cap), as determined in accordance with the agreement, unless a party delivers a written notice of its election to terminate the storage and throughput agreement at least eighteen months prior to the expiration of the current term.

Agreement extension, month and year

2017-06

2020-06

Agreement renewal term

1 year

3 years

Valuation percentage of assets at the time of acquisition

50.00%

Agreements extended month and year

2017-05

Agreement renewal, month and year

2015-05

United Energy Trading [Member]

Related Party Transaction [Line Items]

Initial term of agreement

5 years

United Energy Trading [Member] | Natural Gas Supply Agreement [Member]

Related Party Transaction [Line Items]

Agreement expiration date

Mar. 31, 2017

Arc Terminals Holdings [Member]

Related Party Transaction [Line Items]

Lease agreement rent expenses

$ 230,000

Lease agreement rent expenses for future period

$ 417,522

Rent amount increase effective date

2014-08

Number of barrels per day of oil equivalent | bbl

12,500

12,500

Percentage of variable rate on base rent

30.00%

Operating lease agreement expense

$ 1,600,000

$ 1,600,000

Arc Terminals Holdings [Member] | Portland Terminal [Member]

Related Party Transaction [Line Items]

Maximum purchase price under the lease purchase option

$ 65,700,000

Lease agreement notice period

So long as Arc Terminals Holdings is not in default under the Portland Lease Agreement, it shall have the right to purchase the Portland Terminal at the end of the third year of the Portland Lease Agreement and at the end of any month thereafter by delivery of 90 days’ notice (“Purchase Option”). The purchase price shall be the greater of (i) nine times the total of base rent and variable rent for the 12 months immediately preceding the notice and (ii) $65.7 million.

Operating lease termination notice

12 months

Arc Terminals Holdings [Member] | Fifth Anniversary [Member]

Related Party Transaction [Line Items]

Operating lease termination fee

$ 4,000,000

Arc Terminals Holdings [Member] | Tenth Anniversary [Member]

Related Party Transaction [Line Items]

Operating lease termination fee

$ 6,000,000

Arc Terminals Holdings [Member] | Minimum [Member]

Related Party Transaction [Line Items]

Percentage of change in the consumer price index

2.00%

Arc Terminals Holdings [Member] | LCP Oregon Holdings LLC [Member]

Related Party Transaction [Line Items]

Description of increase in base rent

increased each month starting with the month of August 2014 by a factor of 0.00958 of the specified construction costs incurred by LCP Oregon Holdings LLC (“LCP Oregon”) at the Portland Terminal

Arc Terminals Holdings [Member] | CorEnergy [Member]

Related Party Transaction [Line Items]

Operating lease, additional spending

$ 10,000,000

Operating leases, Rent expense increased

95,800

Arc Terminals Holdings [Member] | Pawnee Terminal Acquisition [Member]

Related Party Transaction [Line Items]

Cash paid for Partnership acquired

$ 44,300,000

Business acquisition, Equity interest issued or issuable, Number of shares | shares

1,745,669

Business combination consideration transferred net of adjustment.

$ 76,600,000

Business acquisition, Equity interest issued, Value

$ 32,300,000

Business acquisition, Share price | $ / shares

$ 18.50

Arc Terminals Holdings [Member] | Lightfoot Capital Partners LP [Member]

Related Party Transaction [Line Items]

Percentage of investment in subsidiary

6.60%

Arc Terminals Holdings [Member] | Lightfoot Capital Partners GP LLC [Member]

Related Party Transaction [Line Items]

Percentage of investment in subsidiary

1.50%

Initial term of lease agreement

15 years

Additional term for lease agreement

5 years

Joliet Holding [Member]

Related Party Transaction [Line Items]

Fees and reimbursements

$ 200,000

Investor [Member]

Related Party Transaction [Line Items]

Sale of common units in private placement, shares | shares

4,520,795

Proceeds from private placement

$ 72,700,000

Investor [Member] | MTP Energy Master Fund Ltd [Member]

Related Party Transaction [Line Items]

Sale of common units in private placement, shares | shares

572,635

Issuance of common units, net of offering costs

$ 9,500,000

Investor [Member] | Private Placement [Member]

Related Party Transaction [Line Items]

Price per unit of common units | $ / shares

$ 16.59

Private placement transaction due date

May 14, 2015

Related Party Transactions - Sc

Related Party Transactions - Schedule of Revenue from Related Parties (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016	Mar. 31, 2015
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Related parties	$ 3,483	$ 2,178
Center Oil [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Related parties	1,460	1,728
United Energy Trading [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Related parties	1,575
Gulf Coast Asphalt Company, L.L.C. [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Related parties	$ 448	$ 450

Related Party Transactions - 57

Related Party Transactions - Schedule of Accounts Receivable due from Related Parties (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Mar. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Due from related parties	$ 1,337	$ 1,532
Center Oil [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Due from related parties	507	564
United Energy Trading [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Due from related parties	527	528
Gulf Coast Asphalt Company, L.L.C. [Member]
Related Party Transaction [Line Items]
Due from related parties	$ 303	$ 440

Major Customers - Additional In

Major Customers - Additional Information (Detail) - Customer Concentration Risk - Sales Revenue, Net [Member]	3 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016	Mar. 31, 2015
Entity Wide Revenue Major Customer [Line Items]
Total percentages of revenue and receivables associated with significant customers	52.00%	40.00%
Minimum [Member]
Entity Wide Revenue Major Customer [Line Items]
Total percentages of revenue and receivables associated with significant customers	10.00%

Major Customers - Schedules of

Major Customers - Schedules of Percentages of Revenues and Receivables Associated with Significant Customers (Detail) - Customer Concentration Risk	3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Mar. 31, 2016	Mar. 31, 2015	Dec. 31, 2015
Sales Revenue, Net [Member]
Entity Wide Revenue Major Customer [Line Items]
Total percentages of revenue and receivables associated with significant customers	52.00%	40.00%
Sales Revenue, Net [Member] | Customer A [Member]
Entity Wide Revenue Major Customer [Line Items]
Total percentages of revenue and receivables associated with significant customers	33.00%	2.00%
Sales Revenue, Net [Member] | Customer B [Member]
Entity Wide Revenue Major Customer [Line Items]
Total percentages of revenue and receivables associated with significant customers	13.00%	25.00%
Sales Revenue, Net [Member] | Customer C [Member]
Entity Wide Revenue Major Customer [Line Items]
Total percentages of revenue and receivables associated with significant customers	6.00%	13.00%
Receivables [Member]
Entity Wide Revenue Major Customer [Line Items]
Total percentages of revenue and receivables associated with significant customers	55.00%		48.00%
Receivables [Member] | Customer A [Member]
Entity Wide Revenue Major Customer [Line Items]
Total percentages of revenue and receivables associated with significant customers	29.00%		30.00%
Receivables [Member] | Customer B [Member]
Entity Wide Revenue Major Customer [Line Items]
Total percentages of revenue and receivables associated with significant customers	21.00%		12.00%
Receivables [Member] | Customer C [Member]
Entity Wide Revenue Major Customer [Line Items]
Total percentages of revenue and receivables associated with significant customers	5.00%		6.00%

Commitments and Contingencies -

Commitments and Contingencies - Additional Information (Detail)	1 Months Ended		3 Months Ended		12 Months Ended	13 Months Ended
	Feb. 29, 2016USD ($)	Jul. 31, 2015USD ($)	Jun. 30, 2016USD ($)	Mar. 31, 2016USD ($)Customer	Dec. 31, 2015USD ($)	Mar. 31, 2016USD ($)	May. 31, 2015USD ($)
Operating Leased Assets [Line Items]
Accrual for loss contingencies				$ 0	$ 0	$ 0
Earn-out liability recognized				$ 18,489,000	18,830,000	18,489,000
Fine amount for storage without permit limit (per day)				298
Accrued fine amount for storage without permit limit				$ 100,000		100,000
Settlement agreement aggregate amount payable	$ 2,000,000				$ 2,000,000
Settlement agreement period	3 years
Reduction in settlement payment	$ 500,000
Settlement agreement date	Jan. 1, 2018
Settlement agreement amount paid				300,000
Maximum [Member]
Operating Leased Assets [Line Items]
Percentage of revenue represents settlement of terminal services agreement					1.00%
JBBR Acquisition [Member]
Operating Leased Assets [Line Items]
Earn-out payments				27,000,000		27,000,000	$ 27,000,000
Earn-out liability recognized				18,489,000	$ 18,830,000	18,489,000	$ 19,700,000
Business acquisition earn-out payment				1,200,000		1,200,000
Pawnee Terminal Acquisition [Member]
Operating Leased Assets [Line Items]
Estimated remaining construction cost		$ 11,000,000
Pawnee Terminal Acquisition [Member] | Scenario Forecast [Member]
Operating Leased Assets [Line Items]
Estimated remaining construction cost			$ 11,000,000
Gulf Coast Asphalt Company, L.L.C. [Member]
Operating Leased Assets [Line Items]
Earn-out payments				5,000,000		5,000,000
Earn-out payments, low				$ 0		$ 0
Number of customers | Customer				1

Commitments and Contingencies61

Commitments and Contingencies - Schedule of Future Non-Cancelable Commitments Related to Certain Contractual Obligations (Detail) - USD ($) $ in Thousands	Mar. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015
Commitments And Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
Long-term debt obligations, Total	$ 240,313	$ 226,063
Long-term debt obligations, 2018	240,313
Operating lease obligations, Total	22,235
Operating lease obligations, 2016	4,868
Operating lease obligations, 2017	6,357
Operating lease obligations, 2018	6,347
Operating lease obligations, 2019	4,663
Earn-out obligations, Total	18,489
Earn-out obligations, 2016	1,028
Earn-out obligations, 2017	1,369
Earn-out obligations, 2018	1,369
Earn-out obligations, 2019	1,369
Earn-out obligations, 2020	1,369
Earn-out obligations, thereafter	11,985
Settlement obligations, Total	1,750
Settlement obligations, 2016	750
Settlement obligations, 2017	500
Settlement obligations, 2018	500
Contractual obligations, Total	282,787
Contractual obligations, 2016	5,896
Contractual obligations, 2017	7,726
Contractual obligations, 2018	248,029
Contractual obligations, 2019	6,032
Contractual obligations, 2020	1,369
Contractual obligations, thereafter	$ 11,985

Subsequent Events - Additional

Subsequent Events - Additional Information (Detail) - USD ($) $ / shares in Units, $ in Thousands	1 Months Ended	3 Months Ended
	Apr. 30, 2016	Mar. 31, 2016	Dec. 31, 2015	Sep. 30, 2015	Jun. 30, 2015	Mar. 31, 2015
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Cash distribution, total amount		$ 8,475
Total distribution per unit		$ 0.4400	$ 0.4400	$ 0.4400	$ 0.4250	$ 0.4100
Change in cash distribution percentage						7.30%
Cash distribution payment date		May 13, 2016	Feb. 12, 2016	Nov. 13, 2015	Aug. 14, 2015	May 15, 2015
Cash distribution date of record		May 9, 2016	Feb. 8, 2016	Nov. 9, 2015	Aug. 10, 2015	May 11, 2015
Quarterly Distribution [Member]
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Total distribution per unit						$ 0.41
Annual Distribution [Member]
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Total distribution per unit						$ 1.64
Subsequent Event [Member]
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Cash distribution, declaration month and year	2016-04
Cash distribution, total amount	$ 8,500
Cash distribution payment date	May 13, 2016
Cash distribution date of record	May 9, 2016
Subsequent Event [Member] | Quarterly Distribution [Member]
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Total distribution per unit	$ 0.44
Subsequent Event [Member] | Annual Distribution [Member]
Subsequent Event [Line Items]
Total distribution per unit	$ 1.76