Investments | 1.25 1.00 - 1.25 N/A(a) June 30, 2015 LTV Ratios: Less than 50% $ 93 $ — $ 1 $ 94 23 % $ 94 23 % 50% to 60% 129 20 — 149 37 % 149 37 % 60% to 75% 162 — — 162 40 % 162 40 % Commercial mortgage loans $ 384 $ 20 $ 1 $ 405 100 % $ 405 100 % September 30, 2014 LTV Ratios: Less than 50% $ 44 $ — $ 1 $ 45 33 % $ 45 33 % 50% to 60% 20 — — 20 15 % 20 15 % 60% to 75% 71 — — 71 52 % 71 52 % Commercial mortgage loans $ 135 $ — $ 1 $ 136 100 % $ 136 100 % (a) N/A - Current DSC ratio not available. The Company recognizes a mortgage loan as delinquent when payments on the loan are greater than 30 days past due. At June 30, 2015 , we had no CMLs that were delinquent in principal or interest payments. The following provides the current and past due composition of our CMLs: June 30, 2015 September 30, 2014 Current to 30 days $ 405 $ 136 Past due — — Total carrying value $ 405 $ 136 A Troubled Debt Restructuring ("TDR") is a situation where we have granted a concession to a borrower for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower's financial difficulties that we would not otherwise consider. A mortgage loan that has been granted new terms, including workout terms as described previously, would be considered a TDR if it meets conditions that would indicate a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and the new terms constitute a concession on our part. We analyze all loans where we have agreed to workout terms and all loans that we have refinanced to determine if they meet the definition of a TDR. We consider the following factors in determining whether or not a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty: • borrower is in default, • borrower has declared bankruptcy, • there is growing concern about the borrower's ability to continue as a going concern, • borrower has insufficient cash flows to service debt, • borrower's inability to obtain funds from other sources, and • there is a breach of financial covenants by the borrower. If the borrower is determined to be in financial difficulty, we consider the following conditions to determine if the borrower was granted a concession: • assets used to satisfy debt are less than our recorded investment, • interest rate is modified, • maturity date extension at an interest rate less than market rate, • capitalization of interest, • delaying principal and/or interest for a period of three months or more, and • partial forgiveness of the balance or charge-off. Mortgage loan workouts, refinances or restructures that are classified as TDRs are individually evaluated and measured for impairment. As of June 30, 2015 , our CML portfolio had no impairments, modifications or troubled debt restructuring. During the third quarter of 2015, we amended our Investment Management Agreement with CorAmerica, an affiliate of the Company, to include the servicing of our Commercial Mortgage Loan portfolio. FGL's affiliation with CorAmerica is detailed in "Note 14. Related Party Transactions" to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. Consequently, servicing of the portfolio was transferred from the prior servicer, Principal Real Estate Investors ("Principal"), to CorAmerica during the period (discussed in "Note 6. Fair Value of Financial Instruments" to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements). Net investment income The major sources of “ Net investment income ” on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations were as follows: Three months ended Nine months ended June 30, 2015 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2015 June 30, 2014 Fixed maturity available-for-sale securities $ 199 $ 182 $ 589 $ 532 Equity available-for-sale securities 8 7 26 16 Commercial mortgage loans 3 1 7 2 Related party loans 2 2 5 5 Other investments 5 4 16 16 Gross investment income 217 196 643 571 Investment expense (5 ) (5 ) (15 ) (12 ) Net investment income $ 212 $ 191 $ 628 $ 559 For mortgage-backed securities, included in the fixed maturity available-for-sale (“AFS”) securities portfolios, the Company recognizes income using a constant effective yield based on anticipated prepayments and the estimated economic life of the securities. When actual prepayments differ significantly from originally anticipated prepayments, the effective yield is recalculated prospectively to reflect actual payments to date plus anticipated future payments. Any adjustments resulting from changes in effective yield are reflected in “Net investment income’’. During third quarter 2015, we received notice that we are entitled to receive a settlement as a result of our ownership of certain residential mortgage-backed securities that were issued by Countrywide, an entity which was later acquired by Bank of America. We have estimated our expected recovery from this settlement to be between $15 and $20 , with a best estimate of $18 . In compliance with our accounting policy described above, we updated our cash flow projections for our best estimate of the recovery as of June 30, 2015 and will accrete it prospectively over the remaining life of the related securities through our effective yield and recognize the impact within "Net investment income". This change to our cash flow projections had an immaterial impact on our "Net investment income" during the third quarter of 2015. The weighted average remaining life on the affected securities is approximately 6 years. Net investment gains Details underlying “ Net investment gains ” reported on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations were as follows: Three months ended Nine months ended June 30, 2015 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2015 June 30, 2014 Net realized gains on fixed maturity available-for-sale securities $ 47 $ 73 $ 24 $ 93 Realized gains (losses) on equity securities 1 — — (1 ) Net realized gains on securities 48 73 24 92 Realized gains on certain derivative instruments 37 57 118 157 Unrealized (losses) gains on certain derivative instruments (44 ) 37 (90 ) 73 Change in fair value of reinsurance related embedded derivative 36 (21 ) 52 (54 ) Change in fair value of other derivatives and embedded derivatives (2 ) 1 10 1 Realized gains on derivatives and embedded derivatives 27 74 90 177 Realized losses on other invested assets (1 ) (2 ) (39 ) (2 ) Net investment gains $ 74 $ 145 $ 75 $ 267 Realized gains and losses on the sale of securities are determined on the specific identification method. For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2015 , principal repayments, calls, tenders, and proceeds from the sale of fixed maturity available-for-sale securities totaled $1,864 and $3,670 , gross gains on such sales totaled $53 and $73 , and gross losses totaled $6 and $49 , respectively. For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2014 , principal repayments, calls, tenders, and proceeds from the sale of fixed maturity available-for-sale securities, totaled $1,725 and $4,352 , gross gains on such sales totaled $75 and $97 , and gross losses totaled $2 and $4 , respectively. Unconsolidated Variable Interest Entities The Company owns investments in VIEs that are not consolidated within the Company’s financial statements. VIEs do not have sufficient equity to finance their own activities without additional financial support and certain of its investors lack certain characteristics of a controlling financial interest. These VIEs are not consolidated in the Company’s financial statements for the following reasons: 1) FGL Insurance does not have any voting rights or notice rights; 2) the Company does not have any rights to remove the investment manager; and 3) the Company was not involved in the design of the investment. These characteristics indicate that FGL Insurance lacks the ability to direct the activities, or otherwise exert control, of the VIEs and is not considered the primary beneficiary of them. FGL Insurance participates in loans to third parties originated by Salus. Salus is an affiliated, limited liability company indirectly owned by HRG that originates senior secured asset-based loans to unaffiliated third-party borrowers. FGL Insurance also participates in CLOs managed by Salus and owns preferred equity in Salus within the funds withheld portfolio of the FSRCI treaty. Because Salus is not consolidated, the Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its investments in Salus is limited to the carrying value of its investments in Salus which totaled $263 and $304 as of June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 , respectively. FGL’s investments in Salus are detailed in “Note 14. Related Party Transactions” to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. FGL Insurance also participates in an investment managed by Fifth Street Management, LLC (“Fifth Street”). Fifth Street Senior Loan Fund II (the “Fund”) invests in loans selected and/or originated by Fifth Street. Fifth Street is an unaffiliated, limited liability company that originates financing for the Fund’s investment activity through CLOs. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its investments in Fifth Street is limited to the carrying value of its investments in Fifth Street which totaled $40 and $30 at June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 , respectively. During the quarter, FGL invested in an unaffiliated limited partnership fund that will invest in consumer whole loans, asset-backed investments, high yield, private investments, bank portfolio liquidations, bridge financing and other investments. The $35 commitment is expected to fund over the course of the next 3 years . FGL also executed a commitment of $75 to purchase common shares in an unaffiliated private business development company ("BDC"). The BDC invests in secured and unsecured debt and equity securities of middle market companies in the United States. Due to the voting structure of the transaction, FGL does not have voting power. The initial capital call will be during the summer of 2015, with the remaining commitment expected to fund through 2017." id="sjs-B4">Investments The Company’s debt and equity securities investments have been designated as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) net of associated adjustments for value of business acquired (“VOBA”), deferred acquisition costs (“DAC”) and deferred income taxes. The Company’s consolidated investments at June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 are summarized as follows: June 30, 2015 Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Carrying Value Available-for sale securities Asset-backed securities $ 2,164 $ 5 $ (24 ) $ 2,145 $ 2,145 Commercial mortgage-backed securities 814 14 (7 ) 821 821 Corporates 9,362 346 (173 ) 9,535 9,535 Equities 564 23 (4 ) 583 583 Hybrids 1,224 46 (29 ) 1,241 1,241 Municipals 1,378 92 (20 ) 1,450 1,450 Residential mortgage-backed securities 2,100 101 (25 ) 2,176 2,176 U.S. Government 588 9 — 597 597 Total available-for-sale securities 18,194 636 (282 ) 18,548 18,548 Derivative investments 212 47 (39 ) 220 220 Commercial mortgage loans 405 — — 405 405 Other invested assets 224 — (6 ) 218 218 Total investments $ 19,035 $ 683 $ (327 ) $ 19,391 $ 19,391 September 30, 2014 Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Carrying Value Available-for-sale securities Asset-backed securities $ 2,040 $ 12 $ (20 ) $ 2,032 $ 2,032 Commercial mortgage-backed securities 618 21 (2 ) 637 637 Corporates 9,329 499 (49 ) 9,779 9,779 Equities 679 24 (5 ) 698 698 Hybrids 1,279 52 (15 ) 1,316 1,316 Municipals 1,150 117 (7 ) 1,260 1,260 Residential mortgage-backed securities 1,985 140 (11 ) 2,114 2,114 U.S. Government 291 7 (1 ) 297 297 Total available-for-sale securities 17,371 872 (110 ) 18,133 18,133 Derivatives investments 178 123 (5 ) 296 296 Commercial mortgage loans 136 — — 136 136 Other invested assets 237 — — 237 237 Total investments $ 17,922 $ 995 $ (115 ) $ 18,802 $ 18,802 Included in AOCI were cumulative unrealized gains of $1 and unrealized losses of $2 related to the non-credit portion of other than temporary impairments ("OTTI") on non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities ("RMBS") at June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 . The non-agency RMBS unrealized gains and losses represent the difference between amortized cost and fair value on securities that were previously impaired. Securities held on deposit with various state regulatory authorities had a fair value of $15,964 and $15,009 at June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 , respectively. Under Iowa regulations, insurance companies are required to hold securities on deposit in an amount no less than the Company's legal reserve as prescribed by Iowa regulations. The Company held no non-income producing investments during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 . In accordance with the Company's Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (“FHLB”) agreements, the investments supporting the funding agreement liabilities are pledged as collateral to secure the FHLB funding agreement liabilities. The collateral investments had a fair value of $540 and $573 at June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 , respectively. The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity available-for-sale securities by contractual maturities, as applicable, are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or pre-pay obligations. June 30, 2015 Amortized Cost Fair Value Corporates, Non-structured Hybrids, Municipal and U.S. Government securities: Due in one year or less $ 204 $ 206 Due after one year through five years 2,113 2,153 Due after five years through ten years 2,955 3,015 Due after ten years 6,607 6,788 Subtotal 11,879 12,162 Other securities which provide for periodic payments: Asset-backed securities 2,164 2,145 Commercial mortgage-backed securities 814 821 Structured hybrids 673 661 Residential mortgage-backed securities 2,100 2,176 Subtotal 5,751 5,803 Total fixed maturity available-for-sale securities $ 17,630 $ 17,965 The Company's available-for-sale securities with unrealized losses are reviewed for potential OTTI. In evaluating whether a decline in value is other-than-temporary, the Company considers several factors including, but not limited to the following: (1) the extent and the duration of the decline; (2) the reasons for the decline in value (credit event, currency or interest-rate related, including general credit spread widening); and (3) the financial condition of and near-term prospects of the issuer. The Company also considers the ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time to allow for a recovery of value. The Company analyzes its ability to recover the amortized cost by comparing the net present value of cash flows expected to be collected with the amortized cost of the security. For mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, cash flow estimates consider the payment terms of the underlying assets backing a particular security, including interest rate and prepayment assumptions, based on data from widely accepted third-party data sources or internal estimates. In addition to interest rate and prepayment assumptions, cash flow estimates also include other assumptions regarding the underlying collateral including default rates and recoveries, which vary based on the asset type and geographic location, as well as the vintage year of the security. For structured securities, the payment priority within the tranche structure is also considered. For all other debt securities, cash flow estimates are driven by assumptions regarding probability of default and estimates regarding timing and amount of recoveries associated with a default. If the net present value is less than the amortized cost of the investment, an OTTI is recognized. FGL has concluded that the unrealized declines in fair values of the securities presented in the table below were not OTTI as of June 30, 2015 . The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale securities, aggregated by investment category, were as follows: June 30, 2015 Less than 12 months 12 months or longer Total Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Available-for-sale securities Asset-backed securities $ 941 $ (10 ) $ 597 $ (14 ) $ 1,538 $ (24 ) Commercial mortgage-backed securities 319 (7 ) 57 — 376 (7 ) Corporates 2,817 (127 ) 894 (46 ) 3,711 (173 ) Equities 60 (1 ) 95 (3 ) 155 (4 ) Hybrids 174 (5 ) 361 (24 ) 535 (29 ) Municipals 339 (13 ) 211 (7 ) 550 (20 ) Residential mortgage-backed securities 496 (13 ) 246 (12 ) 742 (25 ) U.S. Government 350 — 59 — 409 — Total available-for-sale securities $ 5,496 $ (176 ) $ 2,520 $ (106 ) $ 8,016 $ (282 ) Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position less than twelve months 787 Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position twelve months or longer 300 Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position 1087 September 30, 2014 Less than 12 months 12 months or longer Total Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Available-for-sale securities Asset-backed securities $ 939 $ (13 ) $ 290 $ (7 ) $ 1,229 $ (20 ) Commercial mortgage-backed securities 160 (1 ) 1 (1 ) 161 (2 ) Corporates 817 (16 ) 1,127 (33 ) 1,944 (49 ) Equities 181 (2 ) 54 (3 ) 235 (5 ) Hybrids 258 (2 ) 290 (13 ) 548 (15 ) Municipals — — 265 (7 ) 265 (7 ) Residential mortgage-backed securities 299 (6 ) 178 (5 ) 477 (11 ) U.S Government 37 — 82 (1 ) 119 (1 ) Total available-for-sale securities $ 2,691 $ (40 ) $ 2,287 $ (70 ) $ 4,978 $ (110 ) Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position less than twelve months 324 Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position twelve months or longer 311 Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position 635 At June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 , securities in an unrealized loss position were primarily concentrated in investment grade corporate debt instruments. At June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 , securities with a fair value of $67 and $0 , respectively, were depressed greater than 20% of amortized cost (excluding U.S. Government and U.S. Government sponsored agency securities), which represented less than 1% of the carrying value of all investments. The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the credit loss portion of OTTI on fixed maturity securities held by the Company for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 , for which a portion of the OTTI was recognized in AOCI: Three months ended Nine months ended June 30, 2015 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2015 June 30, 2014 Beginning balance $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 Increases attributable to credit losses on securities: Other-than-temporary impairment was previously recognized — — — — Other-than-temporary impairment was not previously recognized — — — — Ending balance $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 The Company recognized $4 and $65 of credit impairment losses in operations during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2015 , respectively, related to fixed maturity securities and other invested assets with an amortized cost of $156 and a fair value of $91 at June 30, 2015 . For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2014 , the Company recognized $1 of credit impairment losses in operations related to low income housing tax credit securities with an amortized cost of $2 and a fair value of $1 at June 30, 2014 . Details underlying write-downs taken as a result of OTTI that were recognized in net income and included in net realized gains on securities were as follows: Three months ended Nine months ended June 30, 2015 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2015 June 30, 2014 OTTI Recognized in Net Income: Asset-backed securities $ 3 $ — $ 27 $ — Corporates — — 2 — Other invested assets 1 1 36 1 Total $ 4 $ 1 $ 65 $ 1 The portion of OTTI recognized in AOCI is disclosed in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. In the third fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2015 , the Company recognized credit-related impairment losses of $13 on available-for-sale debt securities, available-for-sale equity securities and other invested assets, of which $9 was related to a preferred equity investment in Salus, discussed further below, that is ceded to FSRCI under our funds withheld reinsurance treaty, for net credit-related impairments of $4 . Salus restructured their business and eliminated the loan origination function, which lowered the expected future fee income to be earned by Salus. Please refer to "Note 14. Related Party Transactions” to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for more detail on the investments impacted by this impairment. The asset-backed securities impairment of $3 related to a decline in valuation of the equity tranche of the collateralized loan obligations ("CLOs") resulting from a decrease in the expected recovery of a loan in the underlying CLO portfolio. In the second fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2015, the Company recognized credit-related impairment losses of $59 on available-for-sale debt securities, available-for-sale equity securities and other invested assets, net of reinsurance, related to direct and indirect investments in RadioShack Corporation ("RSH") and other loans because the Company concluded the decline in the fair value of these investments was other than temporary. A summary to the RSH-related impairments by investment is as follows: Three months ended March 31, 2015 Type Balance Sheet Classification Impairment Loss CLOs (a) Fixed maturities, available-for-sale $ 25 Preferred equity (a) Equity securities, available-for-sale 21 Participations Other invested assets 35 Impairment, gross of reinsurance $ 81 Preferred equity (a) Equity securities, available-for-sale (21 ) CLOs (a) Fixed maturities, available-for-sale (1 ) Impairment, net of reinsurance $ 59 (a) Preferred equity and a portion of the CLOs are included in the FSRCI funds withheld portfolio, accordingly all income on these assets are ceded to FSRCI. The fair values of the impairments summarized above were determined using the following inputs as follows: • CLOs - The Company utilized a price from a third party valuation firm which considered the sufficiency of underlying loan collateral for the RSH loan and other loans. • Preferred equity - The Company utilized a price from a third party valuation firm which considered the updated fair value estimates of the Salus Capital Partners, LLC ("Salus") CLO and the Salus participation in RSH, both of which Salus owns investment interests. • Participations - The Company considered the sufficiency and recoverability of the underlying loan collateral for RSH based on the evidence obtained. The total gross impact of the impairment losses above, excluding reinsurance with FSRCI was $81 for the second fiscal quarter. RSH filed for bankruptcy on February 5, 2015. In late March 2015, the Court awarded a sale of assets at auction to another bidder, causing our collateral claim to become more junior to other claimants and resulting in our conclusion that the Company had realized an other than temporary impairment. Please refer to "Note 14. Related Party Transactions” to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for more detail on the investments impacted by this impairment. Mortgage Loans on Real Estate Commercial mortgage loans ("CMLs") represented approximately 2% and 1% of the Company’s total investments as of June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 , respectively. The Company primarily makes mortgage loans on income producing properties including hotels, industrial properties, retail buildings, multifamily properties and office buildings. The Company diversifies its CML portfolio by geographic region and property type to reduce concentration risk. Subsequent to origination, the Company continuously evaluates CMLs based on relevant current information to ensure properties are performing at a consistent and acceptable level to secure the related debt. The distribution of CMLs, gross of valuation allowances, by property type and geographic region is reflected in the following tables: June 30, 2015 September 30, 2014 Gross Carrying Value % of Total Gross Carrying Value % of Total Property Type: Industrial - General $ 9 2 % $ — — % Industrial - Warehouse 67 17 % 48 35 % Multifamily 57 14 % 38 28 % Office 129 32 % 44 33 % Retail 129 32 % 6 4 % Funeral Home 1 — % — — % Hotel 13 3 % Total commercial mortgage loans $ 405 100 % $ 136 100 % US Region: East North Central $ 113 28 % $ 28 21 % Middle Atlantic 81 20 % 11 8 % Pacific 81 20 % 61 45 % South Atlantic 56 14 % — — % West North Central 6 1 % 6 4 % West South Central 20 5 % 30 22 % Mountain 42 11 % — — % New England 6 1 % — — % Total commercial mortgage loans $ 405 100 % $ 136 100 % The Company has a CML portfolio with 100% of all CMLs having a loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratio of less than 75% at June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 . As of June 30, 2015 , all CMLs are current and have not experienced credit or other events which would require the recording of an impairment loss. The Company has not established a collective or specific CML valuation allowance as of June 30, 2015 . LTV and debt service coverage (“DSC”) ratios are measures commonly used to assess the risk and quality of mortgage loans. The LTV ratio, calculated at time of origination, is expressed as a percentage of the amount of the loan relative to the value of the underlying property. A LTV ratio in excess of 100% indicates the unpaid loan amount exceeds the underlying collateral. The DSC ratio, based upon the most recently received financial statements, is expressed as a percentage of the amount of a property’s net income to its debt service payments. A DSC ratio of less than 1.00 indicates that a property’s operations do not generate sufficient income to cover debt payments. The following table presents the recorded investment in CMLs by LTV and DSC ratio categories and estimated fair value by the indicated loan-to-value ratios at June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 : Debt-Service Coverage Ratios Total Amount % of Total Estimated Fair Value % of Total >1.25 1.00 - 1.25 N/A(a) June 30, 2015 LTV Ratios: Less than 50% $ 93 $ — $ 1 $ 94 23 % $ 94 23 % 50% to 60% 129 20 — 149 37 % 149 37 % 60% to 75% 162 — — 162 40 % 162 40 % Commercial mortgage loans $ 384 $ 20 $ 1 $ 405 100 % $ 405 100 % September 30, 2014 LTV Ratios: Less than 50% $ 44 $ — $ 1 $ 45 33 % $ 45 33 % 50% to 60% 20 — — 20 15 % 20 15 % 60% to 75% 71 — — 71 52 % 71 52 % Commercial mortgage loans $ 135 $ — $ 1 $ 136 100 % $ 136 100 % (a) N/A - Current DSC ratio not available. The Company recognizes a mortgage loan as delinquent when payments on the loan are greater than 30 days past due. At June 30, 2015 , we had no CMLs that were delinquent in principal or interest payments. The following provides the current and past due composition of our CMLs: June 30, 2015 September 30, 2014 Current to 30 days $ 405 $ 136 Past due — — Total carrying value $ 405 $ 136 A Troubled Debt Restructuring ("TDR") is a situation where we have granted a concession to a borrower for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower's financial difficulties that we would not otherwise consider. A mortgage loan that has been granted new terms, including workout terms as described previously, would be considered a TDR if it meets conditions that would indicate a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and the new terms constitute a concession on our part. We analyze all loans where we have agreed to workout terms and all loans that we have refinanced to determine if they meet the definition of a TDR. We consider the following factors in determining whether or not a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty: • borrower is in default, • borrower has declared bankruptcy, • there is growing concern about the borrower's ability to continue as a going concern, • borrower has insufficient cash flows to service debt, • borrower's inability to obtain funds from other sources, and • there is a breach of financial covenants by the borrower. If the borrower is determined to be in financial difficulty, we consider the following conditions to determine if the borrower was granted a concession: • assets used to satisfy debt are less than our recorded investment, • interest rate is modified, • maturity date extension at an interest rate less than market rate, • capitalization of interest, • delaying principal and/or interest for a period of three months or more, and • partial forgiveness of the balance or charge-off. Mortgage loan workouts, refinances or restructures that are classified as TDRs are individually evaluated and measured for impairment. As of June 30, 2015 , our CML portfolio had no impairments, modifications or troubled debt restructuring. During the third quarter of 2015, we amended our Investment Management Agreement with CorAmerica, an affiliate of the Company, to include the servicing of our Commercial Mortgage Loan portfolio. FGL's affiliation with CorAmerica is detailed in "Note 14. Related Party Transactions" to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements. Consequently, servicing of the portfolio was transferred from the prior servicer, Principal Real Estate Investors ("Principal"), to CorAmerica during the period (discussed in "Note 6. Fair Value of Financial Instruments" to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements). Net investment income The major sources of “ Net investment income ” on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations were as follows: Three months ended Nine months ended June 30, 2015 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2015 June 30, 2014 Fixed maturity available-for-sale securities $ 199 $ 182 $ 589 $ 532 Equity available-for-sale securities 8 7 26 16 Commercial mortgage loans 3 1 7 2 Related party loans 2 2 5 5 Other investments 5 4 16 16 Gross investment income 217 196 643 571 Investment expense (5 ) (5 ) (15 ) (12 ) Net investment income $ 212 $ 191 $ 628 $ 559 For mortgage-backed securities, included in the fixed maturity available-for-sale (“AFS”) securities portfolios, the Company recognizes income using a constant effective yield based on anticipated prepayments and the estimated economic life of the securities. When actual prepayments differ significantly from originally anticipated prepayments, the effective yield is recalculated prospectively to reflect actual payments to date plus anticipated future payments. Any adjustments resulting from changes in effective yield are reflected in “Net investment income’’. During third quarter 2015, we received notice that we are entitled to receive a settlement as a result of our ownership of certain residential mortgage-backed securities that were issued by Countrywide, an entity which was later acquired by Bank of America. We have estimated our expected recovery from this settlement to be between $15 and $20 , with a best estimate of $18 . In compliance with our accounting policy described above, we updated our cash flow projections for our best estimate of the recovery as of June 30, 2015 and will accrete it prospectively over the remaining life of the related securities through our effective yield and recognize the impact within "Net investment income". This change to our cash flow projections had an immaterial impact on our "Net investment income" during the third quarter of 2015. The weighted average remaining life on the affected securities is approximately 6 years. Net investment gains Details underlying “ Net investment gains ” reported on the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations were as follows: Three months ended Nine months ended June 30, 2015 June 30, 2014 June 30, 2015 June 30, 2014 Net realized gains on fixed maturity available-for-sale securities $ 47 $ 73 $ 24 $ 93 Realized gains (losses) on equity securities 1 — — (1 ) Net realized gains on securities 48 73 24 92 Realized gains on certain derivative instruments 37 57 118 157 Unrealized (losses) gains on certain derivative instruments (44 ) 37 (90 ) 73 Change in fair value of reinsurance related embedded derivative 36 (21 ) 52 (54 ) Change in fair value of other derivatives and embedded derivatives (2 ) 1 10 1 Realized gains on derivatives and embedded derivatives 27 74 90 177 Realized losses on other invested assets (1 ) (2 ) (39 ) (2 ) Net investment gains $ 74 $ 145 $ 75 $ 267 Realized gains and losses on the sale of securities are determined on the specific identification method. For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2015 , principal repayments, calls, tenders, and proceeds from the sale of fixed maturity available-for-sale securities totaled $1,864 and $3,670 , gross gains on such sales totaled $53 and $73 , and gross losses totaled $6 and $49 , respectively. For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2014 , principal repayments, calls, tenders, and proceeds from the sale of fixed maturity available-for-sale securities, totaled $1,725 and $4,352 , gross gains on such sales totaled $75 and $97 , and gross losses totaled $2 and $4 , respectively. Unconsolidated Variable Interest Entities The Company owns investments in VIEs that are not consolidated within the Company’s financial statements. VIEs do not have sufficient equity to finance their own activities without additional financial support and certain of its investors lack certain characteristics of a controlling financial interest. These VIEs are not consolidated in the Company’s financial statements for the following reasons: 1) FGL Insurance does not have any voting rights or notice rights; 2) the Company does not have any rights to remove the investment manager; and 3) the Company was not involved in the design of the investment. These characteristics indicate that FGL Insurance lacks the ability to direct the activities, or otherwise exert control, of the VIEs and is not considered the primary beneficiary of them. FGL Insurance participates in loans to third parties originated by Salus. Salus is an affiliated, limited liability company indirectly owned by HRG that originates senior secured asset-based loans to unaffiliated third-party borrowers. FGL Insurance also participates in CLOs managed by Salus and owns preferred equity in Salus within the funds withheld portfolio of the FSRCI treaty. Because Salus is not consolidated, the Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its investments in Salus is limited to the carrying value of its investments in Salus which totaled $263 and $304 as of June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 , respectively. FGL’s investments in Salus are detailed in “Note 14. Related Party Transactions” to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. FGL Insurance also participates in an investment managed by Fifth Street Management, LLC (“Fifth Street”). Fifth Street Senior Loan Fund II (the “Fund”) invests in loans selected and/or originated by Fifth Street. Fifth Street is an unaffiliated, limited liability company that originates financing for the Fund’s investment activity through CLOs. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its investments in Fifth Street is limited to the carrying value of its investments in Fifth Street which totaled $40 and $30 at June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 , respectively. During the quarter, FGL invested in an unaffiliated limited partnership fund that will invest in consumer whole loans, asset-backed investments, high yield, private investments, bank portfolio liquidations, bridge financing and other investments. The $35 commitment is expected to fund over the course of the next 3 years . FGL also executed a commitment of $75 to purchase common shares in an unaffiliated private business development company ("BDC"). The BDC invests in secured and unsecured debt and equity securities of middle market companies in the United States. Due to the voting structure of the transaction, FGL does not have voting power. The initial capital call will be during the summer of 2015, with the remaining commitment expected to fund through 2017. |