Investments | 1.25 1.00 - 1.25 N/A(a) September 30, 2015 LTV Ratios: Less than 50% $ 115 $ — $ 11 $ 126 25 % $ 125 25 % 50% to 60% 161 20 — 181 37 % 180 37 % 60% to 75% 185 — — 185 38 % 185 38 % Commercial mortgage loans $ 461 $ 20 $ 11 $ 492 100 % $ 490 100 % September 30, 2014 LTV Ratios: Less than 50% $ 44 $ — $ 1 $ 45 33 % $ 45 33 % 50% to 60% 20 — — 20 15 % 20 15 % 60% to 75% 71 — — 71 52 % 71 52 % Commercial mortgage loans $ 135 $ — $ 1 $ 136 100 % $ 136 100 % (a) N/A - Current DSC ratio not available. We establish a general mortgage loan allowance based upon the underlying risk and quality of the mortgage loan portfolio using DSC ratio and LTV ratio. A higher LTV ratio will result in a higher allowance. A higher DSC ratio will result in a lower allowance. We believe that the DSC ratio is an indicator of default risk on loans. We believe that the LTV ratio is an indicator of the principal recovery risk for loans that do default. September 30, 2015 September 30, 2014 Gross balance commercial mortgage loans $ 492 $ 136 Allowance for loan loss (1 ) — Net balance commercial mortgage loans $ 491 $ 136 The Company recognizes a mortgage loan as delinquent when payments on the loan are greater than 30 days past due. At September 30, 2015 , we had no CMLs that were delinquent in principal or interest payments. The following provides the current and past due composition of our CMLs: September 30, 2015 September 30, 2014 Current to 30 days $ 492 $ 136 Past due — — Total carrying value $ 492 $ 136 A Troubled Debt Restructuring ("TDR") is a situation where we have granted a concession to a borrower for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower's financial difficulties that we would not otherwise consider. A mortgage loan that has been granted new terms, including workout terms as described previously, would be considered a TDR if it meets conditions that would indicate a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and the new terms constitute a concession on our part. We analyze all loans where we have agreed to workout terms and all loans that we have refinanced to determine if they meet the definition of a TDR. We consider the following factors in determining whether or not a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty: • borrower is in default, • borrower has declared bankruptcy, • there is growing concern about the borrower's ability to continue as a going concern, • borrower has insufficient cash flows to service debt, • borrower's inability to obtain funds from other sources, and • there is a breach of financial covenants by the borrower. If the borrower is determined to be in financial difficulty, we consider the following conditions to determine if the borrower was granted a concession: • assets used to satisfy debt are less than our recorded investment, • interest rate is modified, • maturity date extension at an interest rate less than market rate, • capitalization of interest, • delaying principal and/or interest for a period of three months or more, and • partial forgiveness of the balance or charge-off. Mortgage loan workouts, refinances or restructures that are classified as TDRs are individually evaluated and measured for impairment. As of September 30, 2015 , our CML portfolio had no impairments, modifications or troubled debt restructuring. During the third quarter of 2015, we amended our Investment Management Agreement with CorAmerica, an affiliate of the Company, to include the origination and servicing of our Commercial Mortgage Loan portfolio. FGL's affiliation with CorAmerica is detailed in "Note 14. Related Party Transactions" to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements . Consequently, servicing of the portfolio was transferred from the prior servicer, Principal Real Estate Investors ("Principal"), to CorAmerica during the period (discussed in "Note 6. Fair Value of Financial Instruments" to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements ). Net Investment Income The major sources of “ Net investment income ” on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations were as follows: Year ended September 30, 2015 2014 2013 Fixed maturity available-for-sale securities $ 799 $ 723 $ 685 Equity available-for-sale securities 33 23 15 Related party loans 6 7 9 Commercial mortgage loans 11 3 1 Invested cash and short-term investments 2 — 1 Other investments 20 20 13 Gross investment income 871 776 724 Investment expense (20 ) (16 ) (16 ) Net investment income $ 851 $ 760 $ 708 During third quarter 2015, we received notice that we are entitled to receive a settlement as a result of our ownership of certain RMBS that were issued by Countrywide, an entity which was later acquired by Bank of America. We have estimated our expected recovery from this settlement to be between $15 and $20 , with a best estimate of $18 . In compliance with our accounting policy described in "Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies and Practices" to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements , we updated our cash flow projections for our best estimate of the recovery as of September 30, 2015 and will accrete it prospectively over the remaining life of the related securities through our effective yield and recognize the impact within "Net investment income". This change to our cash flow projections had an immaterial impact on our "Net investment income" during the year ended September 30, 2015 . The weighted average remaining life on the affected securities is approximately 6 years. Net Investment (Losses) Gains Details underlying “Net investment (losses) gains” reported on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations were as follows: Year ended September 30, 2015 2014 2013 Net realized gains on fixed maturity available-for-sale securities $ 11 $ 104 $ 332 Realized gains (losses) on equity securities — (1 ) 12 Net realized gains on securities 11 103 344 Realized gains on certain derivative instruments 108 209 145 Unrealized (losses) gains on certain derivative instruments (215 ) 37 24 Change in fair value of reinsurance related embedded derivative 92 (42 ) 6 Change in fair value of other derivatives and embedded derivatives 7 2 — Realized (losses) gains on derivatives and embedded derivatives (8 ) 206 175 Realized (losses) on other invested assets (40 ) (2 ) (1 ) Net investment (losses) gains $ (37 ) $ 307 $ 518 For the year ended September 30, 2015 , principal repayments, tenders, and proceeds from the sale of fixed maturity available-for-sale securities totaled $4,777 , gross gains on such sales totaled $83 and gross losses totaled $72 , respectively. For the year ended September 30, 2014 , principal repayments, tenders, and proceeds from the sale of fixed maturity available-for-sale securities, totaled $5,033 , gross gains on such sales totaled $109 and gross losses totaled $5 respectively. For the year ended September 30, 2013 , principal repayments, tenders, and proceeds from the sale of fixed maturity available-for-sale securities, totaled $8,920 , gross gains on such sales totaled $351 and gross losses totaled $19 , respectively. Unconsolidated Variable Interest Entities The Company owns investments in VIEs that are not consolidated within the Company’s financial statements. VIEs do not have sufficient equity to finance their own activities without additional financial support and certain of its investors lack certain characteristics of a controlling financial interest. These VIEs are not consolidated in the Company’s financial statements for the following reasons: 1) FGL Insurance does not have any voting rights or notice rights; 2) the Company does not have any rights to remove the investment manager; and 3) the Company was not involved in the design of the investment. These characteristics indicate that FGL Insurance lacks the ability to direct the activities, or otherwise exert control, of the VIEs and is not considered the primary beneficiary of them. FGL Insurance participates in loans to third parties originated by Salus. Salus is an affiliated, limited liability company indirectly owned by HRG that originates senior secured asset-based loans to unaffiliated third-party borrowers. FGL Insurance also participates in CLOs managed by Salus and owns preferred equity in Salus within the funds withheld portfolio of the FSRCI treaty. Because Salus is not consolidated, the Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its investments in Salus is limited to the carrying value of its investments in Salus which totaled $251 and $304 as of September 30, 2015 and 2014 , respectively. FGL’s investments in Salus are detailed in “Note 14. Related Party Transactions” to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. FGL Insurance also participates in an investment managed by Fifth Street Management, LLC (“Fifth Street”). Fifth Street Senior Loan Fund II (the “Fund”) invests in loans selected and/or originated by Fifth Street. Fifth Street is an unaffiliated, limited liability company that originates financing for the Fund’s investment activity through CLOs. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its investments in Fifth Street is limited to the carrying value of its investments in Fifth Street which totaled $57 and $30 as of September 30, 2015 and 2014 , respectively. During the third quarter fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2015, FGL invested in an unaffiliated limited partnership fund that will invest in consumer whole loans, asset-backed investments, high yield, private investments, bank portfolio liquidations, bridge financing and other investments. The initial funding occurred March 20, 2015 with the remaining commitment expected to fund over the course of the next 3 years . FGL also executed a commitment of $75 to purchase common shares in an unaffiliated private business development company ("BDC"). The BDC invests in secured and unsecured debt and equity securities of middle market companies in the United States. Due to the voting structure of the transaction, FGL does not have voting power. The initial capital call occurred June 30, 2015, with the remaining commitment expected to fund through 2017." id="sjs-B4">Investments The Company’s debt and equity securities investments have been designated as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included in AOCI net of associated adjustments for VOBA, DAC and deferred income taxes. The Company’s consolidated investments at September 30, 2015 and 2014 are summarized as follows: September 30, 2015 Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Carrying Value Available-for sale securities Asset-backed securities $ 2,148 $ 5 $ (47 ) $ 2,106 $ 2,106 Commercial mortgage-backed securities 878 14 (10 ) 882 882 Corporates 9,533 351 (354 ) 9,530 9,530 Equities 597 27 (4 ) 620 620 Hybrids 1,211 45 (42 ) 1,214 1,214 Municipals 1,520 103 (15 ) 1,608 1,608 Residential mortgage-backed securities 2,099 89 (26 ) 2,162 2,162 U.S. Government 233 11 — 244 244 Total available-for-sale securities 18,219 645 (498 ) 18,366 18,366 Derivative investments 218 13 (149 ) 82 82 Commercial mortgage loans 491 — — 491 491 Other invested assets 164 — (9 ) 155 155 Total investments $ 19,092 $ 658 $ (656 ) $ 19,094 $ 19,094 September 30, 2014 Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Carrying Value Available-for-sale securities Asset-backed securities $ 2,040 $ 12 $ (20 ) $ 2,032 $ 2,032 Commercial mortgage-backed securities 618 21 (2 ) 637 637 Corporates 9,329 499 (49 ) 9,779 9,779 Equities 679 24 (5 ) 698 698 Hybrids 1,279 52 (15 ) 1,316 1,316 Municipals 1,150 117 (7 ) 1,260 1,260 Residential mortgage-backed securities 1,985 140 (11 ) 2,114 2,114 U.S. Government 291 7 (1 ) 297 297 Total available-for-sale securities 17,371 872 (110 ) 18,133 18,133 Derivatives investments 178 123 (5 ) 296 296 Commercial mortgage loans 136 — — 136 136 Other invested assets 237 — — 237 237 Total investments $ 17,922 $ 995 $ (115 ) $ 18,802 $ 18,802 Included in AOCI were cumulative gross unrealized gains of $1 and gross unrealized losses of $2 related to the non-credit portion of OTTI on non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities ("RMBS") at September 30, 2015 and 2014 . The non-agency RMBS unrealized gains and losses represent the difference between amortized cost and fair value on securities that were previously impaired. Securities held on deposit with various state regulatory authorities had a fair value of $16,012 and $15,009 at September 30, 2015 and 2014 , respectively. Under Iowa regulations, insurance companies are required to hold securities on deposit in an amount no less than the Company's legal reserve as prescribed by Iowa regulations. The Company held no non-income producing investments for a period greater than twelve months during the years ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 . In accordance with the Company's FHLB agreements, the investments supporting the funding agreement liabilities are pledged as collateral to secure the FHLB funding agreement liabilities. The collateral investments had a fair value of $524 and $573 at September 30, 2015 and 2014 , respectively. The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity available-for-sale securities by contractual maturities, as applicable, are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or pre-pay obligations. September 30, 2015 Amortized Cost Fair Value Corporates, Non-structured Hybrids, Municipal and U.S. Government securities: Due in one year or less $ 156 $ 158 Due after one year through five years 1,801 1,818 Due after five years through ten years 2,947 2,948 Due after ten years 6,895 6,993 Subtotal 11,799 11,917 Other securities which provide for periodic payments: Asset-backed securities 2,148 2,106 Commercial mortgage-backed securities 878 882 Structured hybrids 698 679 Residential mortgage-backed securities 2,099 2,162 Subtotal 5,823 5,829 Total fixed maturity available-for-sale securities $ 17,622 $ 17,746 The Company's available-for-sale securities with unrealized losses are reviewed for potential OTTI. In evaluating whether a decline in value is other-than-temporary, the Company considers several factors including, but not limited to the following: (1) the extent and the duration of the decline; (2) the reasons for the decline in value (credit event, currency or interest-rate related, including general credit spread widening); and (3) the financial condition of and near-term prospects of the issuer. The Company also considers the ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time to allow for a recovery of value. The Company analyzes its ability to recover the amortized cost by comparing the net present value of cash flows expected to be collected with the amortized cost of the security. For mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, cash flow estimates consider the payment terms of the underlying assets backing a particular security, including interest rate and prepayment assumptions, based on data from widely accepted third-party data sources or internal estimates. In addition to interest rate and prepayment assumptions, cash flow estimates also include other assumptions regarding the underlying collateral including default rates and recoveries, which vary based on the asset type and geographic location, as well as the vintage year of the security. For structured securities, the payment priority within the tranche structure is also considered. For all other debt securities, cash flow estimates are driven by assumptions regarding probability of default and estimates regarding timing and amount of recoveries associated with a default. If the net present value is less than the amortized cost of the investment, an OTTI is recognized. FGL has concluded that the fair values of the securities presented in the table below were not OTTI as of September 30, 2015 . The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale securities, aggregated by investment category, were as follows: September 30, 2015 Less than 12 months 12 months or longer Total Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Available-for-sale securities Asset-backed securities $ 816 $ (14 ) $ 833 $ (33 ) $ 1,649 $ (47 ) Commercial mortgage-backed securities 262 (8 ) 133 (2 ) 395 (10 ) Corporates 2,342 (201 ) 1,328 (153 ) 3,670 (354 ) Equities 37 — 106 (4 ) 143 (4 ) Hybrids 88 (4 ) 542 (38 ) 630 (42 ) Municipals 220 (6 ) 192 (9 ) 412 (15 ) Residential mortgage-backed securities 423 (10 ) 294 (16 ) 717 (26 ) Total available-for-sale securities $ 4,188 $ (243 ) $ 3,428 $ (255 ) $ 7,616 $ (498 ) Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position less than twelve months 712 Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position twelve months or longer 396 Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position 1,108 September 30, 2014 Less than 12 months 12 months or longer Total Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Available-for-sale securities Asset-backed securities $ 939 $ (13 ) $ 290 $ (7 ) $ 1,229 $ (20 ) Commercial mortgage-backed securities 160 (1 ) 1 (1 ) 161 (2 ) Corporates 817 (16 ) 1,127 (33 ) 1,944 (49 ) Equities 181 (2 ) 54 (3 ) 235 (5 ) Hybrids 258 (2 ) 290 (13 ) 548 (15 ) Municipals — — 265 (7 ) 265 (7 ) Residential mortgage-backed securities 299 (6 ) 178 (5 ) 477 (11 ) U.S. Government 37 — 82 (1 ) 119 (1 ) Total available-for-sale securities $ 2,691 $ (40 ) $ 2,287 $ (70 ) $ 4,978 $ (110 ) Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position less than twelve months 324 Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position twelve months or longer 311 Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position 635 At September 30, 2015 and 2014 , securities in an unrealized loss position were primarily concentrated in investment grade corporate debt instruments. At September 30, 2015 and 2014 , securities with a fair value of $302 and $0 , respectively, had an unrealized loss greater than 20% of amortized cost (excluding U.S. Government and U.S. Government sponsored agency securities), which represented less than 2% of the carrying value of all investments. The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the credit loss portion of OTTI on fixed maturity securities held by the Company for the years ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 , for which a portion of the OTTI was recognized in AOCI: Year ended September 30, 2015 2014 Beginning balance $ 3 $ 3 Increases attributable to credit losses on securities: OTTI was previously recognized — — OTTI was not previously recognized — — Ending balance $ 3 $ 3 For the year ended September 30, 2015 , the Company recognized OTTI losses in operations totaling $82 , including credit impairments of $74 , and change-of-intent impairments of $8 , related to fixed maturity securities and other invested assets with an amortized cost of $488 and a fair value of $406 at September 30, 2015 . For the year ended September 30, 2014 , the Company recognized OTTI losses in operations totaling $1 , including credit impairments of $1 and change-of-intent impairments of $0 related to fixed maturity securities, and low income housing tax credit securities with an amortized cost of $2 and a fair value of $1 at September 30, 2014 . For the year ended September 30, 2013 , the Company recognized OTTI losses in operations totaling $3 , including credit impairments of $1 , and change-of-intent impairments of $2 , related to fixed maturity securities, non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities and low income housing tax credit securities with an amortized cost of $10 and a fair value of $7 at September 30, 2013 . Details underlying write-downs taken as a result of OTTI that were recognized in net income and included in net realized gains on securities were as follows: Year ended September 30, 2015 2014 2013 OTTI recognized in net income: Asset-backed securities $ 36 $ — $ — Corporates 2 — 1 Hybrids — — 1 Residential mortgage-backed securities 8 — — Other invested assets 36 1 1 Total $ 82 $ 1 $ 3 The portion of OTTI recognized in AOCI is disclosed in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. During the year ended September 30, 2015 , the Company recognized impairment losses of $82 ; including $59 related to direct and indirect investments in Radioshack Corporation ("RSH") and $13 related to investments with Salus Capital Partners, LLC ("Salus"), an affiliate of FGL. Additionally, the Company incurred OTTI losses of $10 primarily related to change-of-intent. In the second fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2015, the Company recognized credit-related impairment losses of $59 , net of reinsurance, on available-for-sale debt securities, available-for-sale equity securities and other invested assets related to direct and indirect investments in RSH and other loans because the Company concluded the decline in the fair value of these investments was other than temporary. A summary of the RSH-related impairments by investment is as follows: Year ended, September 30, 2015 Type Balance Sheet Classification OTTI Losses Collateralized loan obligations ("CLOs") (a) Fixed maturities, available-for-sale $ 25 Preferred equity (a) Equity securities, available-for-sale 21 Participations Other invested assets 35 OTTI, gross of reinsurance $ 81 CLOs (a) Fixed maturities, available-for-sale (1 ) Preferred equity (a) Equity securities, available-for-sale (21 ) OTTI, net of reinsurance $ 59 (a) Preferred equity and a portion of the CLOs are included in the FSRCI funds withheld portfolio, accordingly all income and losses on these assets are ceded to FSRCI. The fair values of the impairments summarized above were determined using the following inputs as follows: • CLOs - The Company utilized a price from a third party valuation firm which considered the sufficiency of underlying loan collateral for the RSH loan and other loans. • Preferred equity - The Company utilized a price from a third party valuation firm which considered the updated fair value estimates of the Salus CLO and the Salus participation in RSH, both of which Salus owns investment interests in. • Participations - The Company considered the recovery of the underlying loan collateral for RSH based on the evidence obtained. RSH filed for bankruptcy on February 5, 2015. In late March 2015, the Court awarded a sale of assets at auction to another bidder, causing our collateral claim to become more junior to other claimants and resulting in our conclusion that the Company had realized an OTTI. As of September 30, 2015, substantially all of RSH assets in the estate have been converted to cash through liquidation and the fair value of the Company's RSH-related holdings reflects these cash balances, net of expenses. While substantially all assets represent cash, the wind-down process continues; therefore, some variability still exists in the fair value related to these costs. Please refer to "Note 6. Fair Value of Financial Instruments” to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements for more detail on the investments impacted by this impairment. Additionally, during the year ended September 30, 2015 , the Company recognized credit-related impairment losses of $13 , net of reinsurance, on available-for-sale debt securities, available-for-sale equity securities and other invested assets related to CLOs, loan participations and a direct preferred equity investment with Salus. A summary of the Salus-related impairments by investment is as follows: Year ended September 30, 2015 Type Balance Sheet Classification OTTI Losses CLOs Fixed maturities, available-for-sale $ 13 Preferred equity (a) Equity securities, available-for-sale 9 Participations Other invested assets 2 OTTI, gross of reinsurance $ 24 CLOs (a) Fixed maturities, available-for-sale (1 ) Preferred equity (a) Equity securities, available-for-sale (9 ) Participations (a) Other invested assets (1 ) OTTI, net of reinsurance $ 13 (a) Preferred equity and a portion of the CLOs and participations are included in the FSRCI funds withheld portfolio, accordingly all income and losses on these assets are ceded to FSRCI. The CLO OTTI above related to a decline in valuation of the equity tranche of the Salus CLOs resulting from a decrease in the expected recovery of a loan in the underlying CLO portfolio. The preferred equity OTTI primarily related to business restructuring at Salus which eliminated the loan origination function lowering the expected future fee income to be earned by Salus. Mortgage Loans on Real Estate Commercial mortgage loans ("CMLs") represented approximately 3% and 1% of the Company’s total investments as of September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 , respectively. The Company primarily makes mortgage loans on income producing properties including hotels, industrial properties, retail buildings, multifamily properties and office buildings. The Company diversifies its CML portfolio by geographic region and property type to reduce concentration risk. Subsequent to origination, the Company continuously evaluates CMLs based on relevant current information to ensure properties are performing at a consistent and acceptable level to secure the related debt. The distribution of CMLs, gross of valuation allowances, by property type and geographic region is reflected in the following tables: September 30, 2015 September 30, 2014 Gross Carrying Value % of Total Gross Carrying Value % of Total Property Type: Funeral Home $ 1 — % $ — — % Hotel 13 3 % — — % Industrial - General 38 8 % — — % Industrial - Warehouse 76 15 % 48 35 % Multifamily 64 13 % 38 28 % Office 137 28 % 44 33 % Retail 163 33 % 6 4 % Total commercial mortgage loans, gross of valuation allowance $ 492 $ 136 Valuation allowance (1 ) — Total commercial mortgage loans $ 491 100 % $ 136 100 % U.S. Region: East North Central $ 121 25 % $ 28 21 % East South Central 12 2 % — — % Middle Atlantic 87 18 % 11 8 % Mountain 42 9 % — — % New England 9 2 % — — % Pacific 113 23 % 61 45 % South Atlantic 69 13 % — — % West North Central 14 3 % 6 4 % West South Central 25 5 % 30 22 % Total commercial mortgage loans, gross of valuation allowance $ 492 $ 136 Valuation allowance (1 ) — Total commercial mortgage loans $ 491 100 % $ 136 100 % The Company had a CML portfolio with 100% of all CMLs having a LTV ratio of less than 75% at September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 . As of September 30, 2015 , all CMLs were current and had not experienced credit or other events which would require the recording of an OTTI loss. LTV and DSC ratios are measures commonly used to assess the risk and quality of mortgage loans. The LTV ratio, calculated at time of origination, is expressed as a percentage of the amount of the loan relative to the value of the underlying property. A LTV ratio in excess of 100% indicates the unpaid loan amount exceeds the underlying collateral. The DSC ratio, based upon the most recently received financial statements, is expressed as a percentage of the amount of a property’s net income to its debt service payments. A DSC ratio of less than 1.00 indicates that a property’s operations do not generate sufficient income to cover debt payments. The following table presents the recorded investment in CMLs by LTV and DSC ratio categories and estimated fair value by the indicated loan-to-value ratios at September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 : Debt-Service Coverage Ratios Total Amount % of Total Estimated Fair Value % of Total >1.25 1.00 - 1.25 N/A(a) September 30, 2015 LTV Ratios: Less than 50% $ 115 $ — $ 11 $ 126 25 % $ 125 25 % 50% to 60% 161 20 — 181 37 % 180 37 % 60% to 75% 185 — — 185 38 % 185 38 % Commercial mortgage loans $ 461 $ 20 $ 11 $ 492 100 % $ 490 100 % September 30, 2014 LTV Ratios: Less than 50% $ 44 $ — $ 1 $ 45 33 % $ 45 33 % 50% to 60% 20 — — 20 15 % 20 15 % 60% to 75% 71 — — 71 52 % 71 52 % Commercial mortgage loans $ 135 $ — $ 1 $ 136 100 % $ 136 100 % (a) N/A - Current DSC ratio not available. We establish a general mortgage loan allowance based upon the underlying risk and quality of the mortgage loan portfolio using DSC ratio and LTV ratio. A higher LTV ratio will result in a higher allowance. A higher DSC ratio will result in a lower allowance. We believe that the DSC ratio is an indicator of default risk on loans. We believe that the LTV ratio is an indicator of the principal recovery risk for loans that do default. September 30, 2015 September 30, 2014 Gross balance commercial mortgage loans $ 492 $ 136 Allowance for loan loss (1 ) — Net balance commercial mortgage loans $ 491 $ 136 The Company recognizes a mortgage loan as delinquent when payments on the loan are greater than 30 days past due. At September 30, 2015 , we had no CMLs that were delinquent in principal or interest payments. The following provides the current and past due composition of our CMLs: September 30, 2015 September 30, 2014 Current to 30 days $ 492 $ 136 Past due — — Total carrying value $ 492 $ 136 A Troubled Debt Restructuring ("TDR") is a situation where we have granted a concession to a borrower for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower's financial difficulties that we would not otherwise consider. A mortgage loan that has been granted new terms, including workout terms as described previously, would be considered a TDR if it meets conditions that would indicate a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and the new terms constitute a concession on our part. We analyze all loans where we have agreed to workout terms and all loans that we have refinanced to determine if they meet the definition of a TDR. We consider the following factors in determining whether or not a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty: • borrower is in default, • borrower has declared bankruptcy, • there is growing concern about the borrower's ability to continue as a going concern, • borrower has insufficient cash flows to service debt, • borrower's inability to obtain funds from other sources, and • there is a breach of financial covenants by the borrower. If the borrower is determined to be in financial difficulty, we consider the following conditions to determine if the borrower was granted a concession: • assets used to satisfy debt are less than our recorded investment, • interest rate is modified, • maturity date extension at an interest rate less than market rate, • capitalization of interest, • delaying principal and/or interest for a period of three months or more, and • partial forgiveness of the balance or charge-off. Mortgage loan workouts, refinances or restructures that are classified as TDRs are individually evaluated and measured for impairment. As of September 30, 2015 , our CML portfolio had no impairments, modifications or troubled debt restructuring. During the third quarter of 2015, we amended our Investment Management Agreement with CorAmerica, an affiliate of the Company, to include the origination and servicing of our Commercial Mortgage Loan portfolio. FGL's affiliation with CorAmerica is detailed in "Note 14. Related Party Transactions" to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements . Consequently, servicing of the portfolio was transferred from the prior servicer, Principal Real Estate Investors ("Principal"), to CorAmerica during the period (discussed in "Note 6. Fair Value of Financial Instruments" to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements ). Net Investment Income The major sources of “ Net investment income ” on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations were as follows: Year ended September 30, 2015 2014 2013 Fixed maturity available-for-sale securities $ 799 $ 723 $ 685 Equity available-for-sale securities 33 23 15 Related party loans 6 7 9 Commercial mortgage loans 11 3 1 Invested cash and short-term investments 2 — 1 Other investments 20 20 13 Gross investment income 871 776 724 Investment expense (20 ) (16 ) (16 ) Net investment income $ 851 $ 760 $ 708 During third quarter 2015, we received notice that we are entitled to receive a settlement as a result of our ownership of certain RMBS that were issued by Countrywide, an entity which was later acquired by Bank of America. We have estimated our expected recovery from this settlement to be between $15 and $20 , with a best estimate of $18 . In compliance with our accounting policy described in "Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies and Practices" to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements , we updated our cash flow projections for our best estimate of the recovery as of September 30, 2015 and will accrete it prospectively over the remaining life of the related securities through our effective yield and recognize the impact within "Net investment income". This change to our cash flow projections had an immaterial impact on our "Net investment income" during the year ended September 30, 2015 . The weighted average remaining life on the affected securities is approximately 6 years. Net Investment (Losses) Gains Details underlying “Net investment (losses) gains” reported on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations were as follows: Year ended September 30, 2015 2014 2013 Net realized gains on fixed maturity available-for-sale securities $ 11 $ 104 $ 332 Realized gains (losses) on equity securities — (1 ) 12 Net realized gains on securities 11 103 344 Realized gains on certain derivative instruments 108 209 145 Unrealized (losses) gains on certain derivative instruments (215 ) 37 24 Change in fair value of reinsurance related embedded derivative 92 (42 ) 6 Change in fair value of other derivatives and embedded derivatives 7 2 — Realized (losses) gains on derivatives and embedded derivatives (8 ) 206 175 Realized (losses) on other invested assets (40 ) (2 ) (1 ) Net investment (losses) gains $ (37 ) $ 307 $ 518 For the year ended September 30, 2015 , principal repayments, tenders, and proceeds from the sale of fixed maturity available-for-sale securities totaled $4,777 , gross gains on such sales totaled $83 and gross losses totaled $72 , respectively. For the year ended September 30, 2014 , principal repayments, tenders, and proceeds from the sale of fixed maturity available-for-sale securities, totaled $5,033 , gross gains on such sales totaled $109 and gross losses totaled $5 respectively. For the year ended September 30, 2013 , principal repayments, tenders, and proceeds from the sale of fixed maturity available-for-sale securities, totaled $8,920 , gross gains on such sales totaled $351 and gross losses totaled $19 , respectively. Unconsolidated Variable Interest Entities The Company owns investments in VIEs that are not consolidated within the Company’s financial statements. VIEs do not have sufficient equity to finance their own activities without additional financial support and certain of its investors lack certain characteristics of a controlling financial interest. These VIEs are not consolidated in the Company’s financial statements for the following reasons: 1) FGL Insurance does not have any voting rights or notice rights; 2) the Company does not have any rights to remove the investment manager; and 3) the Company was not involved in the design of the investment. These characteristics indicate that FGL Insurance lacks the ability to direct the activities, or otherwise exert control, of the VIEs and is not considered the primary beneficiary of them. FGL Insurance participates in loans to third parties originated by Salus. Salus is an affiliated, limited liability company indirectly owned by HRG that originates senior secured asset-based loans to unaffiliated third-party borrowers. FGL Insurance also participates in CLOs managed by Salus and owns preferred equity in Salus within the funds withheld portfolio of the FSRCI treaty. Because Salus is not consolidated, the Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its investments in Salus is limited to the carrying value of its investments in Salus which totaled $251 and $304 as of September 30, 2015 and 2014 , respectively. FGL’s investments in Salus are detailed in “Note 14. Related Party Transactions” to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. FGL Insurance also participates in an investment managed by Fifth Street Management, LLC (“Fifth Street”). Fifth Street Senior Loan Fund II (the “Fund”) invests in loans selected and/or originated by Fifth Street. Fifth Street is an unaffiliated, limited liability company that originates financing for the Fund’s investment activity through CLOs. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its investments in Fifth Street is limited to the carrying value of its investments in Fifth Street which totaled $57 and $30 as of September 30, 2015 and 2014 , respectively. During the third quarter fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2015, FGL invested in an unaffiliated limited partnership fund that will invest in consumer whole loans, asset-backed investments, high yield, private investments, bank portfolio liquidations, bridge financing and other investments. The initial funding occurred March 20, 2015 with the remaining commitment expected to fund over the course of the next 3 years . FGL also executed a commitment of $75 to purchase common shares in an unaffiliated private business development company ("BDC"). The BDC invests in secured and unsecured debt and equity securities of middle market companies in the United States. Due to the voting structure of the transaction, FGL does not have voting power. The initial capital call occurred June 30, 2015, with the remaining commitment expected to fund through 2017. |