Investments | 1.25 1.00 - 1.25 N/A(a) December 31, 2015 LTV Ratios: Less than 50% $ 173 $ — $ 11 $ 184 30 % $ 181 30 % 50% to 60% 175 19 — 194 31 % 189 31 % 60% to 75% 239 — — 239 39 % 232 39 % Commercial mortgage loans $ 587 $ 19 $ 11 $ 617 100 % $ 602 100 % September 30, 2015 LTV Ratios: Less than 50% $ 115 $ — $ 11 $ 126 25 % $ 125 25 % 50% to 60% 161 20 — 181 37 % 180 37 % 60% to 75% 185 — — 185 38 % 185 38 % Commercial mortgage loans $ 461 $ 20 $ 11 $ 492 100 % $ 490 100 % (a) N/A - Current DSC ratio not available. We establish a general mortgage loan allowance based upon the underlying risk and quality of the mortgage loan portfolio using DSC ratio and LTV ratio. A higher LTV ratio will result in a higher allowance. A higher DSC ratio will result in a lower allowance. We believe that the DSC ratio is an indicator of default risk on loans. We believe that the LTV ratio is an indicator of the principal recovery risk for loans that do default. December 31, 2015 September 30, 2015 Gross balance commercial mortgage loans $ 617 $ 492 Allowance for loan loss (1 ) (1 ) Net balance commercial mortgage loans $ 616 $ 491 The Company recognizes a mortgage loan as delinquent when payments on the loan are greater than 30 days past due. At December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015 , we had no CMLs that were delinquent in principal or interest payments. The following provides the current and past due composition of our CMLs: December 31, 2015 September 30, 2015 Current to 30 days $ 617 $ 492 Past due — — Total carrying value $ 617 $ 492 A Troubled Debt Restructuring ("TDR") is a situation where we have granted a concession to a borrower for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower's financial difficulties that we would not otherwise consider. A mortgage loan that has been granted new terms, including workout terms as described previously, would be considered a TDR if it meets conditions that would indicate a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and the new terms constitute a concession on our part. We analyze all loans where we have agreed to workout terms and all loans that we have refinanced to determine if they meet the definition of a TDR. We consider the following factors in determining whether or not a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty: • borrower is in default, • borrower has declared bankruptcy, • there is growing concern about the borrower's ability to continue as a going concern, • borrower has insufficient cash flows to service debt, • borrower's inability to obtain funds from other sources, and • there is a breach of financial covenants by the borrower. If the borrower is determined to be in financial difficulty, we consider the following conditions to determine if the borrower was granted a concession: • assets used to satisfy debt are less than our recorded investment, • interest rate is modified, • maturity date extension at an interest rate less than market rate, • capitalization of interest, • delaying principal and/or interest for a period of three months or more, and • partial forgiveness of the balance or charge-off. Mortgage loan workouts, refinances or restructures that are classified as TDRs are individually evaluated and measured for impairment. As of December 31, 2015 , our CML portfolio had no impairments, modifications or troubled debt restructuring. During the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2015, we amended our Investment Management Agreement with CorAmerica, an affiliate of the Company, to include the origination and servicing of our Commercial Mortgage Loan portfolio. FGL's affiliation with CorAmerica is detailed in "Note 14. Related Party Transactions" to the Company's unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Consequently, servicing of the portfolio was transferred from the prior servicer, Principal Real Estate Investors ("Principal"), to CorAmerica during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2015. Net investment income The major sources of “ Net investment income ” on the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations were as follows: Three months ended December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 Fixed maturity available-for-sale securities $ 210 $ 196 Equity available-for-sale securities 8 9 Commercial mortgage loans 6 1 Related party loans 1 2 Other investments 1 5 Gross investment income 226 213 Investment expense (4 ) (5 ) Net investment income $ 222 $ 208 During the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2015, we received notice that we are entitled to receive a settlement as a result of our ownership of certain RMBS that were issued by Countrywide, an entity which was later acquired by Bank of America. We have estimated our expected recovery from this settlement to be between $15 and $20 , with a best estimate of $18 . In compliance with our accounting policy described in "Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies and Practices" of the 2015 Form 10-K, we updated our cash flow projections for our best estimate of the recovery as of December 31, 2015 and will accrete it prospectively over the remaining life of the related securities through our effective yield and recognize the impact within "Net investment income". This change to our cash flow projections had an immaterial impact on our "Net investment income" during the first fiscal quarter of 2016 . The weighted average remaining life on the affected securities is approximately 6 years. Net investment Gains Details underlying “Net investment gains” reported on the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations were as follows: Three months ended December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 Net realized losses on fixed maturity available-for-sale securities $ (5 ) $ (4 ) Realized gains on equity securities — 1 Net realized losses on securities (5 ) (3 ) Realized (losses) gains on certain derivative instruments (12 ) 41 Unrealized gains on certain derivative instruments 53 2 Change in fair value of reinsurance related embedded derivative 27 18 Change in fair value of other derivatives and embedded derivatives 2 2 Realized gains on derivatives and embedded derivatives 70 63 Realized losses on other invested assets (2 ) (1 ) Net investment gains $ 63 $ 59 For the three months ended December 31, 2015 , proceeds from the sale of fixed maturity available-for-sale securities totaled $564 , gross gains on such sales totaled $13 , and gross losses totaled $9 . For the three months ended December 31, 2014 , proceeds from the sale of fixed maturity available-for-sale securities, totaled $434 , gross gains on such sales totaled $8 , and gross losses totaled $13 . Unconsolidated Variable Interest Entities The Company owns investments in VIEs that are not consolidated within the Company’s financial statements. VIEs do not have sufficient equity to finance their own activities without additional financial support and certain of its investors lack certain characteristics of a controlling financial interest. These VIEs are not consolidated in the Company’s financial statements for the following reasons: 1) FGL Insurance does not have any voting rights or notice rights; 2) the Company does not have any rights to remove the investment manager; and 3) the Company was not involved in the design of the investment. These characteristics indicate that FGL Insurance lacks the ability to direct the activities, or otherwise exert control, of the VIEs and is not considered the primary beneficiary of them. FGL Insurance participates in loans to third parties originated by Salus Capital Partners, LLC ("Salus"). Salus is an affiliated, limited liability company indirectly owned by HRG that originates senior secured asset-based loans to unaffiliated third-party borrowers. FGL Insurance also participates in collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”) managed by Salus and owns preferred equity in Salus within the funds withheld portfolio of the FSRCI treaty. Because Salus is not consolidated, the Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its investments in or with Salus is limited to the carrying value of its investments in Salus which totaled $172 and $251 as of December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015 , respectively. FGL’s investments in or with Salus are detailed in “Note 14. Related Party Transactions” to the Company’s unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. FGL Insurance also participates in an investment managed by Fifth Street Management, LLC (“Fifth Street”). Fifth Street Senior Loan Fund II (the “Fund”) invests in loans selected and/or originated by Fifth Street. Fifth Street is an unaffiliated, limited liability company that originates financing for the Fund’s investment activity through CLOs. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its investments in or with Fifth Street is limited to the carrying value of its investments in or with Fifth Street which totaled $55 and $57 at December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015 , respectively. During the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2015, FGL invested in Boardwalk, an unaffiliated limited partnership fund that will invest in consumer whole loans, asset-backed investments, high yield, private investments, bank portfolio liquidations, bridge financing and other investments. The initial funding occurred March 20, 2015 with the remaining commitment expected to fund over the course of the next 3 years . FGL has funded $8 of a $35 commitment as of December 31, 2015 . FGL also executed a commitment of $75 to purchase common shares in an unaffiliated private business development company ("BDC"). The BDC invests in secured and unsecured debt and equity securities of middle market companies in the United States. Due to the voting structure of the transaction, FGL does not have voting power. The initial capital call occurred June 30, 2015, with the remaining commitment expected to fund through 2017. FGL has funded $29 as of December 31, 2015 ." id="sjs-B4">Investments The Company’s debt and equity securities investments have been designated as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) net of associated adjustments for deferred acquisition costs (“DAC”), value of business acquired (“VOBA”), and deferred income taxes. The Company’s consolidated investments at December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015 are summarized as follows: December 31, 2015 Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Carrying Value Available-for sale securities Asset-backed securities $ 2,294 $ 2 $ (105 ) $ 2,191 $ 2,191 Commercial mortgage-backed securities 848 8 (21 ) 835 835 Corporates 10,073 280 (528 ) 9,825 9,825 Equities 601 41 (5 ) 637 637 Hybrids 1,174 43 (57 ) 1,160 1,160 Municipals 1,543 104 (16 ) 1,631 1,631 Residential mortgage-backed securities 1,519 60 (33 ) 1,546 1,546 U.S. Government 233 7 — 240 240 Total available-for-sale securities 18,285 545 (765 ) 18,065 18,065 Derivative investments 223 18 (96 ) 145 145 Commercial mortgage loans 616 — — 602 616 Other invested assets 135 — (8 ) 125 127 Total investments $ 19,259 $ 563 $ (869 ) $ 18,937 $ 18,953 September 30, 2015 Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Carrying Value Available-for-sale securities Asset-backed securities $ 2,148 $ 5 $ (47 ) $ 2,106 $ 2,106 Commercial mortgage-backed securities 878 14 (10 ) 882 882 Corporates 9,533 351 (354 ) 9,530 9,530 Equities 597 27 (4 ) 620 620 Hybrids 1,211 45 (42 ) 1,214 1,214 Municipals 1,520 103 (15 ) 1,608 1,608 Residential mortgage-backed securities 2,099 89 (26 ) 2,162 2,162 U.S. Government 233 11 — 244 244 Total available-for-sale securities 18,219 645 (498 ) 18,366 18,366 Derivative investments 218 13 (149 ) 82 82 Commercial mortgage loans 491 — — 490 491 Other invested assets 164 — (9 ) 153 155 Total investments $ 19,092 $ 658 $ (656 ) $ 19,091 $ 19,094 Included in AOCI were cumulative gross unrealized gains of $1 and gross unrealized losses of $2 related to the non-credit portion of other than temporary impairments ("OTTI") on non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities ("RMBS") at December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015 . The non-agency RMBS unrealized gains and losses represent the difference between amortized cost and fair value on securities that were previously impaired. Securities held on deposit with various state regulatory authorities had a fair value of $15,976 and $16,012 at December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015 , respectively. Under Iowa regulations, insurance companies are required to hold securities on deposit in an amount no less than the Company's legal reserve as prescribed by Iowa regulations. The Company held no non-income producing investments for a period greater than twelve months during the three months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 . In accordance with the Company's Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (“FHLB”) agreements, the investments supporting the funding agreement liabilities are pledged as collateral to secure the FHLB funding agreement liabilities. The collateral investments had a fair value of $512 and $524 at December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015 , respectively. The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity available-for-sale securities by contractual maturities, as applicable, are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or pre-pay obligations. December 31, 2015 Amortized Cost Fair Value Corporates, Non-structured Hybrids, Municipal and U.S. Government securities: Due in one year or less $ 195 $ 195 Due after one year through five years 1,847 1,831 Due after five years through ten years 3,034 2,981 Due after ten years 7,288 7,218 Subtotal 12,364 12,225 Other securities which provide for periodic payments: Asset-backed securities 2,294 2,191 Commercial mortgage-backed securities 848 835 Structured hybrids 659 631 Residential mortgage-backed securities 1,519 1,546 Subtotal 5,320 5,203 Total fixed maturity available-for-sale securities $ 17,684 $ 17,428 The Company's available-for-sale securities with unrealized losses are reviewed for potential OTTI. In evaluating whether a decline in value is other-than-temporary, the Company considers several factors including, but not limited to the following: (1) the extent and the duration of the decline; (2) the reasons for the decline in value (credit event, currency or interest-rate related, including general credit spread widening); and (3) the financial condition of and near-term prospects of the issuer. The Company also considers the ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time to allow for a recovery of value. The Company analyzes its ability to recover the amortized cost by comparing the net present value of cash flows expected to be collected with the amortized cost of the security. For mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, cash flow estimates consider the payment terms of the underlying assets backing a particular security, including interest rate and prepayment assumptions, based on data from widely accepted third-party data sources or internal estimates. In addition to interest rate and prepayment assumptions, cash flow estimates also include other assumptions regarding the underlying collateral including default rates and recoveries, which vary based on the asset type and geographic location, as well as the vintage year of the security. For structured securities, the payment priority within the tranche structure is also considered. For all other debt securities, cash flow estimates are driven by assumptions regarding probability of default and estimates regarding timing and amount of recoveries associated with a default. If the net present value is less than the amortized cost of the investment, an OTTI is recognized. Based on the results of our process for evaluating available-for-sales securities in unrealized loss positions for OTTI discussed above, the Company determined that the unrealized losses as of December 31, 2015 were primarily due to credit spread widening and an increase in risk free rates. Additionally, pressure in the commodity and energy markets affected the prices of securities held in these sectors; however the overall rating of the Company’s holdings in these sectors remains investment grade. Accordingly, the Company determined that the unrealized losses on the securities presented in the table below were not OTTI as of December 31, 2015 . The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale securities, aggregated by investment category and duration of fair value below amortized cost, were as follows: December 31, 2015 Less than 12 months 12 months or longer Total Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Available-for-sale securities Asset-backed securities $ 936 $ (31 ) $ 1,071 $ (74 ) $ 2,007 $ (105 ) Commercial mortgage-backed securities 538 (19 ) 55 (2 ) 593 (21 ) Corporates 3,208 (229 ) 1,635 (299 ) 4,843 (528 ) Equities 37 (1 ) 70 (4 ) 107 (5 ) Hybrids 149 (4 ) 488 (53 ) 637 (57 ) Municipals 319 (9 ) 169 (7 ) 488 (16 ) Residential mortgage-backed securities 353 (9 ) 421 (24 ) 774 (33 ) U.S. Government — — 59 — 59 — Total available-for-sale securities $ 5,540 $ (302 ) $ 3,968 $ (463 ) $ 9,508 $ (765 ) Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position less than twelve months 834 Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position twelve months or longer 525 Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position 1,359 September 30, 2015 Less than 12 months 12 months or longer Total Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Available-for-sale securities Asset-backed securities $ 816 $ (14 ) $ 833 $ (33 ) $ 1,649 $ (47 ) Commercial mortgage-backed securities 262 (8 ) 133 (2 ) 395 (10 ) Corporates 2,342 (201 ) 1,328 (153 ) 3,670 (354 ) Equities 37 — 106 (4 ) 143 (4 ) Hybrids 88 (4 ) 542 (38 ) 630 (42 ) Municipals 220 (6 ) 192 (9 ) 412 (15 ) Residential mortgage-backed securities 423 (10 ) 294 (16 ) 717 (26 ) Total available-for-sale securities $ 4,188 $ (243 ) $ 3,428 $ (255 ) $ 7,616 $ (498 ) Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position less than twelve months 712 Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position twelve months or longer 396 Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position 1,108 At December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015 , securities in an unrealized loss position were primarily concentrated in investment grade corporate debt instruments. At December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015 , securities with a fair value of $758 and $302 , respectively, had an unrealized loss greater than 20% of amortized cost (excluding U.S. Government and U.S. Government sponsored agency securities), which represented less than 4% and 2% of the carrying value of all investments at December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015 , respectively. The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the credit loss portion of OTTI on fixed maturity available-for-sale securities held by the Company for the three months ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 , for which a portion of the OTTI was recognized in AOCI: Three months ended December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 Beginning balance $ 3 $ 3 Increases attributable to credit losses on securities: OTTI was previously recognized — — OTTI was not previously recognized — — Ending balance $ 3 $ 3 The Company recognized $10 of credit impairment losses in operations during the three months ended December 31, 2015 related to fixed maturity securities with an amortized cost of $64 and a fair value of $54 at December 31, 2015 . During the three months ended December 31, 2014 , the Company recognized no material credit impairment losses in operations. Details underlying write-downs taken as a result of OTTI that were recognized in "Net income" and included in net realized gains on securities were as follows: Three months ended December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 OTTI Recognized in Net Income: Asset-backed securities $ 4 $ — Corporates 6 — Total $ 10 $ — The portion of OTTI recognized in AOCI is disclosed in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Commercial Mortgage Loans Commercial mortgage loans ("CMLs") represented approximately 3% of the Company’s total investments as of December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015 . The Company primarily makes mortgage loans on income producing properties including hotels, industrial properties, retail buildings, multifamily properties and office buildings. The Company diversifies its CML portfolio by geographic region and property type to reduce concentration risk. Subsequent to origination, the Company continuously evaluates CMLs based on relevant current information to ensure properties are performing at a consistent and acceptable level to secure the related debt. The distribution of CMLs, gross of valuation allowances, by property type and geographic region is reflected in the following tables: December 31, 2015 September 30, 2015 Gross Carrying Value % of Total Gross Carrying Value % of Total Property Type: Funeral home $ 1 — % $ 1 — % Hotel 23 4 % 13 3 % Industrial - General 37 6 % 38 8 % Industrial - Warehouse 87 14 % 76 15 % Multifamily 71 12 % 64 13 % Office 174 28 % 137 28 % Retail 224 36 % 163 33 % Total commercial mortgage loans, gross of valuation allowance $ 617 100 % $ 492 100 % Valuation allowance (1 ) (1 ) Total commercial mortgage loans $ 616 $ 491 U.S. Region: East North Central $ 127 21 % $ 121 25 % East South Central 21 4 % 12 2 % Middle Atlantic 98 16 % 87 18 % Mountain 69 11 % 42 9 % New England 14 2 % 9 2 % Pacific 162 26 % 113 23 % South Atlantic 68 11 % 69 13 % West North Central 14 2 % 14 3 % West South Central 44 7 % 25 5 % Total commercial mortgage loans, gross of valuation allowance $ 617 100 % $ 492 100 % Valuation allowance (1 ) (1 ) Total commercial mortgage loans $ 616 $ 491 The Company had a CML portfolio with 100% of all CMLs having a loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratio of less than 75% at December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015 . As of December 31, 2015 , all CMLs are current and have not experienced credit or other events which would require the recording of an OTTI loss. LTV and debt service coverage (“DSC”) ratios are measures commonly used to assess the risk and quality of mortgage loans. The LTV ratio, calculated at time of origination, is expressed as a percentage of the amount of the loan relative to the value of the underlying property. A LTV ratio in excess of 100% indicates the unpaid loan amount exceeds the underlying collateral. The DSC ratio, based upon the most recently received financial statements, is expressed as a percentage of the amount of a property’s net income to its debt service payments. A DSC ratio of less than 1.00 indicates that a property’s operations do not generate sufficient income to cover debt payments. The following table presents the recorded investment in CMLs by LTV and DSC ratio categories and estimated fair value by the indicated loan-to-value ratios at December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015 : Debt Service Coverage Ratios Total Amount % of Total Estimated Fair Value % of Total >1.25 1.00 - 1.25 N/A(a) December 31, 2015 LTV Ratios: Less than 50% $ 173 $ — $ 11 $ 184 30 % $ 181 30 % 50% to 60% 175 19 — 194 31 % 189 31 % 60% to 75% 239 — — 239 39 % 232 39 % Commercial mortgage loans $ 587 $ 19 $ 11 $ 617 100 % $ 602 100 % September 30, 2015 LTV Ratios: Less than 50% $ 115 $ — $ 11 $ 126 25 % $ 125 25 % 50% to 60% 161 20 — 181 37 % 180 37 % 60% to 75% 185 — — 185 38 % 185 38 % Commercial mortgage loans $ 461 $ 20 $ 11 $ 492 100 % $ 490 100 % (a) N/A - Current DSC ratio not available. We establish a general mortgage loan allowance based upon the underlying risk and quality of the mortgage loan portfolio using DSC ratio and LTV ratio. A higher LTV ratio will result in a higher allowance. A higher DSC ratio will result in a lower allowance. We believe that the DSC ratio is an indicator of default risk on loans. We believe that the LTV ratio is an indicator of the principal recovery risk for loans that do default. December 31, 2015 September 30, 2015 Gross balance commercial mortgage loans $ 617 $ 492 Allowance for loan loss (1 ) (1 ) Net balance commercial mortgage loans $ 616 $ 491 The Company recognizes a mortgage loan as delinquent when payments on the loan are greater than 30 days past due. At December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015 , we had no CMLs that were delinquent in principal or interest payments. The following provides the current and past due composition of our CMLs: December 31, 2015 September 30, 2015 Current to 30 days $ 617 $ 492 Past due — — Total carrying value $ 617 $ 492 A Troubled Debt Restructuring ("TDR") is a situation where we have granted a concession to a borrower for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower's financial difficulties that we would not otherwise consider. A mortgage loan that has been granted new terms, including workout terms as described previously, would be considered a TDR if it meets conditions that would indicate a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and the new terms constitute a concession on our part. We analyze all loans where we have agreed to workout terms and all loans that we have refinanced to determine if they meet the definition of a TDR. We consider the following factors in determining whether or not a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty: • borrower is in default, • borrower has declared bankruptcy, • there is growing concern about the borrower's ability to continue as a going concern, • borrower has insufficient cash flows to service debt, • borrower's inability to obtain funds from other sources, and • there is a breach of financial covenants by the borrower. If the borrower is determined to be in financial difficulty, we consider the following conditions to determine if the borrower was granted a concession: • assets used to satisfy debt are less than our recorded investment, • interest rate is modified, • maturity date extension at an interest rate less than market rate, • capitalization of interest, • delaying principal and/or interest for a period of three months or more, and • partial forgiveness of the balance or charge-off. Mortgage loan workouts, refinances or restructures that are classified as TDRs are individually evaluated and measured for impairment. As of December 31, 2015 , our CML portfolio had no impairments, modifications or troubled debt restructuring. During the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2015, we amended our Investment Management Agreement with CorAmerica, an affiliate of the Company, to include the origination and servicing of our Commercial Mortgage Loan portfolio. FGL's affiliation with CorAmerica is detailed in "Note 14. Related Party Transactions" to the Company's unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Consequently, servicing of the portfolio was transferred from the prior servicer, Principal Real Estate Investors ("Principal"), to CorAmerica during the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2015. Net investment income The major sources of “ Net investment income ” on the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations were as follows: Three months ended December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 Fixed maturity available-for-sale securities $ 210 $ 196 Equity available-for-sale securities 8 9 Commercial mortgage loans 6 1 Related party loans 1 2 Other investments 1 5 Gross investment income 226 213 Investment expense (4 ) (5 ) Net investment income $ 222 $ 208 During the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2015, we received notice that we are entitled to receive a settlement as a result of our ownership of certain RMBS that were issued by Countrywide, an entity which was later acquired by Bank of America. We have estimated our expected recovery from this settlement to be between $15 and $20 , with a best estimate of $18 . In compliance with our accounting policy described in "Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies and Practices" of the 2015 Form 10-K, we updated our cash flow projections for our best estimate of the recovery as of December 31, 2015 and will accrete it prospectively over the remaining life of the related securities through our effective yield and recognize the impact within "Net investment income". This change to our cash flow projections had an immaterial impact on our "Net investment income" during the first fiscal quarter of 2016 . The weighted average remaining life on the affected securities is approximately 6 years. Net investment Gains Details underlying “Net investment gains” reported on the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations were as follows: Three months ended December 31, 2015 December 31, 2014 Net realized losses on fixed maturity available-for-sale securities $ (5 ) $ (4 ) Realized gains on equity securities — 1 Net realized losses on securities (5 ) (3 ) Realized (losses) gains on certain derivative instruments (12 ) 41 Unrealized gains on certain derivative instruments 53 2 Change in fair value of reinsurance related embedded derivative 27 18 Change in fair value of other derivatives and embedded derivatives 2 2 Realized gains on derivatives and embedded derivatives 70 63 Realized losses on other invested assets (2 ) (1 ) Net investment gains $ 63 $ 59 For the three months ended December 31, 2015 , proceeds from the sale of fixed maturity available-for-sale securities totaled $564 , gross gains on such sales totaled $13 , and gross losses totaled $9 . For the three months ended December 31, 2014 , proceeds from the sale of fixed maturity available-for-sale securities, totaled $434 , gross gains on such sales totaled $8 , and gross losses totaled $13 . Unconsolidated Variable Interest Entities The Company owns investments in VIEs that are not consolidated within the Company’s financial statements. VIEs do not have sufficient equity to finance their own activities without additional financial support and certain of its investors lack certain characteristics of a controlling financial interest. These VIEs are not consolidated in the Company’s financial statements for the following reasons: 1) FGL Insurance does not have any voting rights or notice rights; 2) the Company does not have any rights to remove the investment manager; and 3) the Company was not involved in the design of the investment. These characteristics indicate that FGL Insurance lacks the ability to direct the activities, or otherwise exert control, of the VIEs and is not considered the primary beneficiary of them. FGL Insurance participates in loans to third parties originated by Salus Capital Partners, LLC ("Salus"). Salus is an affiliated, limited liability company indirectly owned by HRG that originates senior secured asset-based loans to unaffiliated third-party borrowers. FGL Insurance also participates in collateralized loan obligations (“CLOs”) managed by Salus and owns preferred equity in Salus within the funds withheld portfolio of the FSRCI treaty. Because Salus is not consolidated, the Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its investments in or with Salus is limited to the carrying value of its investments in Salus which totaled $172 and $251 as of December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015 , respectively. FGL’s investments in or with Salus are detailed in “Note 14. Related Party Transactions” to the Company’s unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. FGL Insurance also participates in an investment managed by Fifth Street Management, LLC (“Fifth Street”). Fifth Street Senior Loan Fund II (the “Fund”) invests in loans selected and/or originated by Fifth Street. Fifth Street is an unaffiliated, limited liability company that originates financing for the Fund’s investment activity through CLOs. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its investments in or with Fifth Street is limited to the carrying value of its investments in or with Fifth Street which totaled $55 and $57 at December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015 , respectively. During the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2015, FGL invested in Boardwalk, an unaffiliated limited partnership fund that will invest in consumer whole loans, asset-backed investments, high yield, private investments, bank portfolio liquidations, bridge financing and other investments. The initial funding occurred March 20, 2015 with the remaining commitment expected to fund over the course of the next 3 years . FGL has funded $8 of a $35 commitment as of December 31, 2015 . FGL also executed a commitment of $75 to purchase common shares in an unaffiliated private business development company ("BDC"). The BDC invests in secured and unsecured debt and equity securities of middle market companies in the United States. Due to the voting structure of the transaction, FGL does not have voting power. The initial capital call occurred June 30, 2015, with the remaining commitment expected to fund through 2017. FGL has funded $29 as of December 31, 2015 . |