Investments | 1.25 1.00 - 1.25 < 1.00 N/A(a) June 30, 2017 LTV Ratios: Less than 50% $ 183 $ — $ 18 $ 1 $ 202 37 % $ 201 36 % 50% to 60% 256 — — — 256 46 % 257 47 % 60% to 75% 86 7 — — 93 17 % 93 17 % Commercial mortgage loans $ 525 $ 7 $ 18 $ 1 $ 551 100 % $ 551 100 % September 30, 2016 LTV Ratios: Less than 50% $ 158 $ 18 $ — $ 1 $ 177 29 % $ 181 29 % 50% to 60% 189 — — — 189 32 % 194 32 % 60% to 75% 230 — — — 230 39 % 239 39 % Commercial mortgage loans $ 577 $ 18 $ — $ 1 $ 596 100 % $ 614 100 % (a) N/A - Current DSC ratio not available. We establish a general mortgage loan allowance based upon the underlying risk and quality of the mortgage loan portfolio using DSC ratio and LTV ratio. A higher LTV ratio will result in a higher allowance. A higher DSC ratio will result in a lower allowance. We believe that the DSC ratio is an indicator of default risk on loans. We believe that the LTV ratio is an indicator of the principal recovery risk for loans that default. June 30, 2017 September 30, 2016 Gross balance commercial mortgage loans $ 551 $ 596 Allowance for loan loss (1 ) (1 ) Net balance commercial mortgage loans $ 550 $ 595 The Company recognizes a mortgage loan as delinquent when payments on the loan are greater than 30 days past due. At June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 , we had no CMLs that were delinquent in principal or interest payments. The following provides the current and past due composition of our CMLs: June 30, 2017 September 30, 2016 Current to 30 days $ 551 $ 596 Past due — — Total carrying value $ 551 $ 596 A Troubled Debt Restructuring ("TDR") is a situation where we have granted a concession to a borrower for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower's financial difficulties that we would not otherwise consider. A mortgage loan that has been granted new terms, including workout terms as described previously, would be considered a TDR if it meets conditions that would indicate a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and the new terms constitute a concession on our part. We analyze all loans where we have agreed to workout terms and all loans that we have refinanced to determine if they meet the definition of a TDR. We consider the following factors in determining whether or not a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty: • borrower is in default, • borrower has declared bankruptcy, • there is growing concern about the borrower's ability to continue as a going concern, • borrower has insufficient cash flows to service debt, • borrower's inability to obtain funds from other sources, and • there is a breach of financial covenants by the borrower. If the borrower is determined to be in financial difficulty, we consider the following conditions to determine if the borrower will be granted a concession: • assets used to satisfy debt are less than our recorded investment, • interest rate is modified, • maturity date extension at an interest rate less than market rate, • capitalization of interest, • delaying principal and/or interest for a period of three months or more, and • partial forgiveness of the balance or charge-off. Mortgage loan workouts, refinances or restructures that are classified as TDRs are individually evaluated and measured for impairment. As of June 30, 2017 , our CML portfolio had no impairments, modifications or troubled debt restructuring. Net investment income The major sources of “ Net investment income ” on the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations were as follows: Three months ended Nine months ended June 30, 2017 June 30, 2016 June 30, 2017 June 30, 2016 Fixed maturity securities, available-for-sale $ 242 $ 223 $ 706 $ 644 Equity securities, available-for-sale 11 7 31 23 Commercial mortgage loans 6 6 18 18 Related party loans — 1 — 3 Invested cash and short-term investments 2 1 2 3 Other investments 2 3 4 8 Gross investment income 263 241 761 699 Investment expense (6 ) (5 ) (17 ) (14 ) Net investment income $ 257 $ 236 $ 744 $ 685 During the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2015, the Company received notice that we are entitled to receive a settlement as a result of our ownership of certain RMBS that were issued by Countrywide Financial Corp. ("Countrywide"), an entity which was later acquired by Bank of America Corporation. An $18 cash settlement was received in the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2016 for a majority of the Countrywide securities, and another $2 was expected to be paid in the third fiscal quarter of 2017; however, the two bonds involved are a part of ongoing litigation, and the settlement proceeds have been escrowed pending resolution of this process. In compliance with the Company's accounting policy described in "Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies and Practices" of the 2016 Form 10-K, the Company updated its cash flow projections for its best estimate of the recovery as of May 31, 2016 and determined the new effective yield, with the resulting immaterial impact recognized in “Net investment income”. Net investment Gains (Losses) Details underlying “Net investment gains (losses)” reported on the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations were as follows: Three months ended Nine months ended June 30, 2017 June 30, 2016 June 30, 2017 June 30, 2016 Net realized (losses) gains on fixed maturity available-for-sale securities $ (8 ) $ 4 $ (23 ) $ 6 Realized gains (losses) on equity securities — 1 — 2 Change in fair value of other derivatives and embedded derivatives 1 (2 ) 2 (1 ) Realized gains (losses) on other invested assets 1 (10 ) (2 ) (13 ) Net realized (losses) gains on available-for-sale securities (6 ) (7 ) (23 ) (6 ) Realized gains (losses) on certain derivative instruments 73 (32 ) 149 (86 ) Unrealized gains on certain derivative instruments 9 48 81 112 Change in fair value of reinsurance related embedded derivative (9 ) (37 ) (8 ) (27 ) Realized gains (losses) on hedging derivatives and reinsurance-related embedded derivatives 73 (21 ) 222 (1 ) Net investment gains (losses) $ 67 $ (28 ) $ 199 $ (7 ) For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2017 , proceeds from the sale of fixed maturity available-for-sale securities totaled $169 and $529 , gross gains on such sales totaled $6 and $16 , and gross losses totaled $11 and $15 , respectively. For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2016 , proceeds from the sale of fixed maturity available-for-sale securities, totaled $190 and $939 , gross gains on such sales totaled $7 and $25 , and gross losses totaled $3 and $15 , respectively. Unconsolidated Variable Interest Entities The Company owns investments in VIEs that are not consolidated within the Company’s financial statements. VIEs do not have sufficient equity to finance their own activities without additional financial support and certain of its investors lack certain characteristics of a controlling financial interest. These VIEs are not consolidated in the Company’s financial statements for the following reasons: 1) FGL Insurance either does not control or does not have any voting rights or notice rights; 2) the Company does not have any rights to remove the investment manager; and 3) the Company was not involved in the design of the investment. These characteristics indicate that FGL Insurance lacks the ability to direct the activities, or otherwise exert control, of the VIEs and is not considered the primary beneficiary of them. FGL Insurance participates in loans to third parties originated by Salus. Salus is an affiliated, limited liability company indirectly owned by HRG that originates senior secured asset-based loans to unaffiliated third-party borrowers. FGL Insurance also participates in CLOs managed by Salus and owns preferred equity in Salus within the funds withheld portfolio of the FSRCI treaty. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its investments in or with Salus is limited to the carrying value of its investments in Salus which totaled $1 and $22 as of June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 , respectively. FGL’s investments in or with Salus are detailed in “Note 14. Related Party Transactions” to the Company’s unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. FGL also executed a commitment of $75 to purchase common shares in an unaffiliated private business development company ("BDC"). The BDC invests in secured and unsecured fixed maturity and equity securities of middle market companies in the United States. Due to the voting structure of the transaction, FGL does not have voting power. The initial capital call occurred June 30, 2015, with the remaining commitment expected to fund through 2017. FGL has funded $42 as of June 30, 2017 . In the normal course of its activities, the Company invests in various limited partnerships as a passive investor. These investments are in corporate credit and real estate debt strategies that have a current income bias. Limited partnership interests are accounted for under the equity method and are included in “Other invested assets” on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. The Company's maximum exposure to loss with respect to these investments is limited to the investment carrying amounts reported in the Company's consolidated balance sheet in addition to any required unfunded commitments. As of June 30, 2017 , the Company's maximum exposure to loss was $145 in recorded carrying value and $122 in unfunded commitments." id="sjs-B4">Investments The Company’s fixed maturity and equity securities investments have been designated as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) net of associated adjustments for deferred acquisition costs (“DAC”), value of business acquired (“VOBA”), and deferred income taxes. The Company’s consolidated investments at June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 are summarized as follows: June 30, 2017 Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Carrying Value Available-for sale securities Asset-backed securities $ 2,777 $ 33 $ (7 ) $ 2,803 $ 2,803 Commercial mortgage-backed securities 950 12 (12 ) 950 950 Corporates 11,877 714 (116 ) 12,475 12,475 Equities 732 45 (3 ) 774 774 Hybrids 1,362 86 (17 ) 1,431 1,431 Municipals 1,589 152 (15 ) 1,726 1,726 Residential mortgage-backed securities 1,205 97 (8 ) 1,294 1,294 U.S. Government 85 2 — 87 87 Total available-for-sale securities 20,577 1,141 (178 ) 21,540 21,540 Derivative investments 220 146 (5 ) 361 361 Commercial mortgage loans 550 — — 551 550 Other invested assets 176 — — 174 176 Total investments $ 21,523 $ 1,287 $ (183 ) $ 22,626 $ 22,627 September 30, 2016 Amortized Cost Gross Unrealized Gains Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Carrying Value Available-for-sale securities Asset-backed securities $ 2,528 $ 16 $ (45 ) $ 2,499 $ 2,499 Commercial mortgage-backed securities 850 23 (9 ) 864 864 Corporates 10,712 760 (132 ) 11,340 11,340 Equities 640 47 (4 ) 683 683 Hybrids 1,356 77 (47 ) 1,386 1,386 Municipals 1,515 206 (4 ) 1,717 1,717 Residential mortgage-backed securities 1,327 63 (28 ) 1,362 1,362 U.S. Government 233 10 — 243 243 Total available-for-sale securities 19,161 1,202 (269 ) 20,094 20,094 Derivative investments 221 78 (23 ) 276 276 Commercial mortgage loans 595 — — 614 595 Other invested assets 60 — — 58 60 Total investments $ 20,037 $ 1,280 $ (292 ) $ 21,042 $ 21,025 Included in AOCI were cumulative gross unrealized gains of $1 and gross unrealized losses of $3 related to the non-credit portion of other-than-temporary impairments ("OTTI") on non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities ("RMBS") at June 30, 2017 and gross unrealized gains of $1 and gross unrealized losses of $3 related to the non-credit portion of OTTI on RMBS at September 30, 2016 . Securities held on deposit with various state regulatory authorities had a fair value of $19,326 and $18,075 at June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 , respectively. Under Iowa regulations, insurance companies are required to hold securities on deposit in an amount no less than the Company's legal reserve as prescribed by Iowa regulations. At June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 , the company held investments that were non-income producing for a period greater than twelve months with fair values of $0 and $2 , respectively. In accordance with the Company's Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (“FHLB”) agreements, the investments supporting the funding agreement liabilities are pledged as collateral to secure the FHLB funding agreement liabilities. The collateral investments had a fair value of $741 and $649 at June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 , respectively. The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity available-for-sale securities by contractual maturities, as applicable, are shown below. Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or pre-pay obligations. June 30, 2017 Amortized Cost Fair Value Corporates, Non-structured Hybrids, Municipal and U.S. Government securities: Due in one year or less $ 325 $ 327 Due after one year through five years 1,711 1,762 Due after five years through ten years 3,254 3,393 Due after ten years 8,871 9,468 Subtotal 14,161 14,950 Other securities which provide for periodic payments: Asset-backed securities 2,777 2,803 Commercial mortgage-backed securities 950 950 Structured hybrids 752 769 Residential mortgage-backed securities 1,205 1,294 Subtotal 5,684 5,816 Total fixed maturity available-for-sale securities $ 19,845 $ 20,766 The Company's available-for-sale securities with unrealized losses are reviewed for potential OTTI. In evaluating whether a decline in value is other-than-temporary, the Company considers several factors including, but not limited to the following: (1) the extent and the duration of the decline; (2) the reasons for the decline in value (credit event, currency or interest-rate related, including general credit spread widening); and (3) the financial condition of and near-term prospects of the issuer. As part of this assessment, we review not only a change in current price relative to the asset's amortized cost, but also the issuer’s current credit rating and the probability of full recovery of principal based upon the issuer’s financial strength. The Company also considers the ability and intent to hold the investment for a period of time to allow for a recovery of value. The Company analyzes its ability to recover the amortized cost by comparing the net present value of cash flows expected to be collected with the amortized cost of the security. For mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, cash flow estimates consider the payment terms of the underlying assets backing a particular security, including interest rate and prepayment assumptions, based on data from widely accepted third-party data sources or internal estimates. In addition to interest rate and prepayment assumptions, cash flow estimates also include other assumptions regarding the underlying collateral including default rates and recoveries, which vary based on the asset type and geographic location, as well as the vintage year of the security. For structured securities, the payment priority within the tranche structure is also considered. For all other fixed maturity securities, cash flow estimates are driven by assumptions regarding probability of default and estimates regarding timing and amount of recoveries associated with a default. If the net present value is less than the amortized cost of the investment, an OTTI is recognized. Based on the results of our process for evaluating available-for-sale securities in unrealized loss positions for OTTI discussed above, the Company determined that the unrealized losses as of June 30, 2017 decreased due to downward movement in the U.S. Treasury rates coupled with improvement in credit spreads. Bond prices in most sectors moved higher based on these factors. Based on an assessment of all securities in the portfolio in unrealized loss positions, the Company determined that the unrealized losses on the securities presented in the table below were not other-than-temporarily impaired as of June 30, 2017 . The fair value and gross unrealized losses of available-for-sale securities, aggregated by investment category and duration of fair value below amortized cost, were as follows: June 30, 2017 Less than 12 months 12 months or longer Total Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Available-for-sale securities Asset-backed securities $ 518 $ (2 ) $ 437 $ (5 ) $ 955 $ (7 ) Commercial mortgage-backed securities 206 (4 ) 170 (8 ) 376 (12 ) Corporates 1,227 (31 ) 721 (85 ) 1,948 (116 ) Equities 40 (1 ) 69 (2 ) 109 (3 ) Hybrids 54 (2 ) 299 (15 ) 353 (17 ) Municipals 170 (11 ) 40 (4 ) 210 (15 ) Residential mortgage-backed securities 2 — 233 (8 ) 235 (8 ) U.S. Government 6 — — — 6 — Total available-for-sale securities $ 2,223 $ (51 ) $ 1,969 $ (127 ) $ 4,192 $ (178 ) Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position less than twelve months 357 Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position twelve months or longer 324 Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position 681 September 30, 2016 Less than 12 months 12 months or longer Total Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Fair Value Gross Unrealized Losses Available-for-sale securities Asset-backed securities $ 352 $ (4 ) $ 1,368 $ (41 ) $ 1,720 $ (45 ) Commercial mortgage-backed securities 44 (1 ) 182 (8 ) 226 (9 ) Corporates 413 (9 ) 1,031 (123 ) 1,444 (132 ) Equities 51 (1 ) 75 (3 ) 126 (4 ) Hybrids 41 (2 ) 412 (45 ) 453 (47 ) Municipals 69 (2 ) 38 (2 ) 107 (4 ) Residential mortgage-backed securities 70 (1 ) 544 (27 ) 614 (28 ) Total available-for-sale securities $ 1,040 $ (20 ) $ 3,650 $ (249 ) $ 4,690 $ (269 ) Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position less than twelve months 193 Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position twelve months or longer 543 Total number of available-for-sale securities in an unrealized loss position 736 At June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 , securities in an unrealized loss position were primarily concentrated in investment grade, corporate debt, asset-backed, hybrid, and municipal instruments. At June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 , securities with a fair value of $61 and $183 , respectively, had an unrealized loss greater than 20% of amortized cost (excluding U.S. Government and U.S. Government sponsored agency securities), which represented less than 0% and 1% of the carrying value of all investments, respectively. The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the credit loss portion of OTTI on fixed maturity available-for-sale securities held by the Company for the three and nine months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 , for which a portion of the OTTI was recognized in AOCI: Three months ended Nine months ended June 30, 2017 June 30, 2016 June 30, 2017 June 30, 2016 Beginning balance $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 Increases attributable to credit losses on securities: OTTI was previously recognized — — — — OTTI was not previously recognized — — — — Ending balance $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 $ 3 The Company recognized $0 and $22 of credit impairment losses in operations during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2017 and $0 and $0 of change of intent impairment losses in operations during the three and nine months ended June 30, 2017 , related to fixed maturity securities with an amortized cost of $13 and a fair value of $13 at June 30, 2017 . During the three and nine months ended June 30, 2016 , the Company recognized $13 and $24 of credit impairment losses, respectively, and $4 of change of intent losses during both the three and nine months ended June 30, 2016 , respectively, in operations related to fixed maturity securities with an amortized cost of $189 and a fair value of $172 at June 30, 2016 . Details underlying write-downs taken as a result of OTTI that were recognized in "Net income" and included in net realized gains on securities were as follows: Three months ended Nine months ended June 30, 2017 June 30, 2016 June 30, 2017 June 30, 2016 OTTI Recognized in Net Income: Asset-backed securities $ 1 $ 4 $ 2 $ 9 Corporates — — 20 6 Related party loans — 4 — 4 Other invested assets (1 ) 9 — 9 Total $ — $ 17 $ 22 $ 28 The portion of OTTI recognized in AOCI is disclosed in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). In the second fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2017, the Company recognized credit-related impairment losses of $20 on available-for-sale debt securities related to investments in First National Bank Holding Co. On April 28, 2017, the Federal Deposit Insurance Company (“FDIC”) shutdown First NBC Bank and named the FDIC as receiver. The bank was the holding company’s principal asset and as a result of the closure of the bank the holding company has limited remaining tangible assets. The Company expects no further recovery of its investment in First National Bank Holding Co. and has reflected the impairment in its financial statements for the nine months ended June 30, 2017 as the events are reflective of conditions that existed at the balance sheet date. Commercial Mortgage Loans Commercial mortgage loans ("CMLs") represented approximately 2% and 3% of the Company’s total investments as of June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 , respectively. The Company primarily makes mortgage loans on income producing properties including hotels, industrial properties, retail buildings, multifamily properties and office buildings. The Company diversifies its CML portfolio by geographic region and property type to attempt to reduce concentration risk. Subsequent to origination, the Company continuously evaluates CMLs based on relevant current information to ensure properties are performing at a consistent and acceptable level to secure the related debt. The distribution of CMLs, gross of valuation allowances, by property type and geographic region is reflected in the following tables: June 30, 2017 September 30, 2016 Gross Carrying Value % of Total Gross Carrying Value % of Total Property Type: Funeral Home $ 1 — % $ 1 — % Hotel 23 4 % 23 4 % Industrial - General 46 8 % 58 10 % Industrial - Warehouse 38 7 % 64 11 % Multifamily 69 13 % 70 11 % Office 157 29 % 160 27 % Retail 217 39 % 220 37 % Total commercial mortgage loans, gross of valuation allowance $ 551 100 % $ 596 100 % Allowance for loan loss (1 ) (1 ) Total commercial mortgage loans $ 550 $ 595 U.S. Region: East North Central $ 108 20 % $ 137 23 % East South Central 20 4 % 21 4 % Middle Atlantic 85 15 % 97 16 % Mountain 67 12 % 67 12 % New England 14 3 % 14 2 % Pacific 135 24 % 136 23 % South Atlantic 66 12 % 67 11 % West North Central 14 3 % 14 2 % West South Central 42 7 % 43 7 % Total commercial mortgage loans, gross of valuation allowance $ 551 100 % $ 596 100 % Allowance for loan loss (1 ) (1 ) Total commercial mortgage loans $ 550 $ 595 Within the Company's CML portfolio, 100% of all CMLs had a loan-to-value (“LTV”) ratio of less than 75% at inception at June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 . As of June 30, 2017 , all CMLs are current and have not experienced credit or other events which would require the recording of an impairment loss. LTV and debt service coverage (“DSC”) ratios are measures commonly used to assess the risk and quality of mortgage loans. The LTV ratio, calculated at time of origination, is expressed as a percentage of the amount of the loan relative to the value of the underlying property. A LTV ratio in excess of 100% indicates the unpaid loan amount exceeds the underlying collateral. The DSC ratio, based upon the most recently received financial statements, is expressed as a percentage of the amount of a property’s net income to its debt service payments. A DSC ratio of less than 1.00 indicates that a property’s operations do not generate sufficient income to cover debt payments. The following table presents the recorded investment in CMLs by LTV and DSC ratio categories and estimated fair value by the indicated loan-to-value ratios at June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 : Debt Service Coverage Ratios Total Amount % of Total Estimated Fair Value % of Total >1.25 1.00 - 1.25 < 1.00 N/A(a) June 30, 2017 LTV Ratios: Less than 50% $ 183 $ — $ 18 $ 1 $ 202 37 % $ 201 36 % 50% to 60% 256 — — — 256 46 % 257 47 % 60% to 75% 86 7 — — 93 17 % 93 17 % Commercial mortgage loans $ 525 $ 7 $ 18 $ 1 $ 551 100 % $ 551 100 % September 30, 2016 LTV Ratios: Less than 50% $ 158 $ 18 $ — $ 1 $ 177 29 % $ 181 29 % 50% to 60% 189 — — — 189 32 % 194 32 % 60% to 75% 230 — — — 230 39 % 239 39 % Commercial mortgage loans $ 577 $ 18 $ — $ 1 $ 596 100 % $ 614 100 % (a) N/A - Current DSC ratio not available. We establish a general mortgage loan allowance based upon the underlying risk and quality of the mortgage loan portfolio using DSC ratio and LTV ratio. A higher LTV ratio will result in a higher allowance. A higher DSC ratio will result in a lower allowance. We believe that the DSC ratio is an indicator of default risk on loans. We believe that the LTV ratio is an indicator of the principal recovery risk for loans that default. June 30, 2017 September 30, 2016 Gross balance commercial mortgage loans $ 551 $ 596 Allowance for loan loss (1 ) (1 ) Net balance commercial mortgage loans $ 550 $ 595 The Company recognizes a mortgage loan as delinquent when payments on the loan are greater than 30 days past due. At June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 , we had no CMLs that were delinquent in principal or interest payments. The following provides the current and past due composition of our CMLs: June 30, 2017 September 30, 2016 Current to 30 days $ 551 $ 596 Past due — — Total carrying value $ 551 $ 596 A Troubled Debt Restructuring ("TDR") is a situation where we have granted a concession to a borrower for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower's financial difficulties that we would not otherwise consider. A mortgage loan that has been granted new terms, including workout terms as described previously, would be considered a TDR if it meets conditions that would indicate a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and the new terms constitute a concession on our part. We analyze all loans where we have agreed to workout terms and all loans that we have refinanced to determine if they meet the definition of a TDR. We consider the following factors in determining whether or not a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty: • borrower is in default, • borrower has declared bankruptcy, • there is growing concern about the borrower's ability to continue as a going concern, • borrower has insufficient cash flows to service debt, • borrower's inability to obtain funds from other sources, and • there is a breach of financial covenants by the borrower. If the borrower is determined to be in financial difficulty, we consider the following conditions to determine if the borrower will be granted a concession: • assets used to satisfy debt are less than our recorded investment, • interest rate is modified, • maturity date extension at an interest rate less than market rate, • capitalization of interest, • delaying principal and/or interest for a period of three months or more, and • partial forgiveness of the balance or charge-off. Mortgage loan workouts, refinances or restructures that are classified as TDRs are individually evaluated and measured for impairment. As of June 30, 2017 , our CML portfolio had no impairments, modifications or troubled debt restructuring. Net investment income The major sources of “ Net investment income ” on the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations were as follows: Three months ended Nine months ended June 30, 2017 June 30, 2016 June 30, 2017 June 30, 2016 Fixed maturity securities, available-for-sale $ 242 $ 223 $ 706 $ 644 Equity securities, available-for-sale 11 7 31 23 Commercial mortgage loans 6 6 18 18 Related party loans — 1 — 3 Invested cash and short-term investments 2 1 2 3 Other investments 2 3 4 8 Gross investment income 263 241 761 699 Investment expense (6 ) (5 ) (17 ) (14 ) Net investment income $ 257 $ 236 $ 744 $ 685 During the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2015, the Company received notice that we are entitled to receive a settlement as a result of our ownership of certain RMBS that were issued by Countrywide Financial Corp. ("Countrywide"), an entity which was later acquired by Bank of America Corporation. An $18 cash settlement was received in the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2016 for a majority of the Countrywide securities, and another $2 was expected to be paid in the third fiscal quarter of 2017; however, the two bonds involved are a part of ongoing litigation, and the settlement proceeds have been escrowed pending resolution of this process. In compliance with the Company's accounting policy described in "Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies and Practices" of the 2016 Form 10-K, the Company updated its cash flow projections for its best estimate of the recovery as of May 31, 2016 and determined the new effective yield, with the resulting immaterial impact recognized in “Net investment income”. Net investment Gains (Losses) Details underlying “Net investment gains (losses)” reported on the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations were as follows: Three months ended Nine months ended June 30, 2017 June 30, 2016 June 30, 2017 June 30, 2016 Net realized (losses) gains on fixed maturity available-for-sale securities $ (8 ) $ 4 $ (23 ) $ 6 Realized gains (losses) on equity securities — 1 — 2 Change in fair value of other derivatives and embedded derivatives 1 (2 ) 2 (1 ) Realized gains (losses) on other invested assets 1 (10 ) (2 ) (13 ) Net realized (losses) gains on available-for-sale securities (6 ) (7 ) (23 ) (6 ) Realized gains (losses) on certain derivative instruments 73 (32 ) 149 (86 ) Unrealized gains on certain derivative instruments 9 48 81 112 Change in fair value of reinsurance related embedded derivative (9 ) (37 ) (8 ) (27 ) Realized gains (losses) on hedging derivatives and reinsurance-related embedded derivatives 73 (21 ) 222 (1 ) Net investment gains (losses) $ 67 $ (28 ) $ 199 $ (7 ) For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2017 , proceeds from the sale of fixed maturity available-for-sale securities totaled $169 and $529 , gross gains on such sales totaled $6 and $16 , and gross losses totaled $11 and $15 , respectively. For the three and nine months ended June 30, 2016 , proceeds from the sale of fixed maturity available-for-sale securities, totaled $190 and $939 , gross gains on such sales totaled $7 and $25 , and gross losses totaled $3 and $15 , respectively. Unconsolidated Variable Interest Entities The Company owns investments in VIEs that are not consolidated within the Company’s financial statements. VIEs do not have sufficient equity to finance their own activities without additional financial support and certain of its investors lack certain characteristics of a controlling financial interest. These VIEs are not consolidated in the Company’s financial statements for the following reasons: 1) FGL Insurance either does not control or does not have any voting rights or notice rights; 2) the Company does not have any rights to remove the investment manager; and 3) the Company was not involved in the design of the investment. These characteristics indicate that FGL Insurance lacks the ability to direct the activities, or otherwise exert control, of the VIEs and is not considered the primary beneficiary of them. FGL Insurance participates in loans to third parties originated by Salus. Salus is an affiliated, limited liability company indirectly owned by HRG that originates senior secured asset-based loans to unaffiliated third-party borrowers. FGL Insurance also participates in CLOs managed by Salus and owns preferred equity in Salus within the funds withheld portfolio of the FSRCI treaty. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its investments in or with Salus is limited to the carrying value of its investments in Salus which totaled $1 and $22 as of June 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 , respectively. FGL’s investments in or with Salus are detailed in “Note 14. Related Party Transactions” to the Company’s unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. FGL also executed a commitment of $75 to purchase common shares in an unaffiliated private business development company ("BDC"). The BDC invests in secured and unsecured fixed maturity and equity securities of middle market companies in the United States. Due to the voting structure of the transaction, FGL does not have voting power. The initial capital call occurred June 30, 2015, with the remaining commitment expected to fund through 2017. FGL has funded $42 as of June 30, 2017 . In the normal course of its activities, the Company invests in various limited partnerships as a passive investor. These investments are in corporate credit and real estate debt strategies that have a current income bias. Limited partnership interests are accounted for under the equity method and are included in “Other invested assets” on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. The Company's maximum exposure to loss with respect to these investments is limited to the investment carrying amounts reported in the Company's consolidated balance sheet in addition to any required unfunded commitments. As of June 30, 2017 , the Company's maximum exposure to loss was $145 in recorded carrying value and $122 in unfunded commitments. |