Description of business and summary of significant accounting policies (Policies) | 3 Months Ended |
Sep. 30, 2014 |
Accounting Policies [Abstract] | |
Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Basis of Presentation |
|
Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of our financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect, among other areas, the reported amounts of trade receivable reserves and inventory reserves, impairment of long-lived assets, and recoverability of deferred tax assets. These estimates and assumptions also impact revenues, expenses and the disclosures in our condensed financial statements and the accompanying notes. Although these estimates are based on our knowledge of current events and actions we may undertake in the future, actual results may ultimately differ from these estimates and assumptions. All amounts are presented in U.S. dollars, unless otherwise noted. |
|
The Company’s unaudited condensed financial statements are expressed in U.S. Dollars and are presented in accordance with U.S. GAAP and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures required for annual financial statements have been condensed or excluded pursuant to SEC rules and regulations. Accordingly, the unaudited financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed interim financial statements reflect all adjustments of a normal and recurring nature which are considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the interim periods presented. However, the results of operations for these interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended June 30, 2015. These unaudited condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s registration statement on Form S-1. The Company’s fiscal year end is June 30. |
| | | | | | | | | |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Cash and cash equivalents – We classify as cash and cash equivalents time deposits and other investments that are highly liquid and have maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase. The Company has no cash equivalents as of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014. |
| | | | | | | | | |
Trade and Other Accounts Receivable, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Trade Receivables – We record trade receivable at net realizable value. This value includes an appropriate allowance for estimated uncollectible accounts, to reflect any anticipated loss and is charged to the provision for doubtful accounts, included in other operating expenses in the statements of operations. We calculate this allowance based on our history of write-offs, the level of past-due accounts based on the contractual terms of the receivables, and our relationships with, and the economic status of, our customers. The Company recognized provision of doubtful debts of $0 and $0 for the three months period ended September 30, 2014 and for the fiscal years ended June 30, 2014. |
| | | | | | | | | |
Concentration Risk, Credit Risk, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Concentration of Credit Risk – We have a diversified, international customer base. We control credit risk related to accounts receivables through credit approvals, credit limits and monitoring procedures. Credit risk with respect to receivables is concentrated in the food industry sector. |
|
During the three months period ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 approximately 81% and 74% of the Company’s revenues were from two and three major customers, respectively, which constituted $1,943,039 and $2,802,340 of the Company’s revenues. As of the three months period ended September 30, 2014, the accounts receivables of these two customers are $684,797. As of the years ended June 30, 2014 the accounts receivables of these three customers were $399,490. |
|
During the three months period ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 approximately 85% and 96% of the Company’s purchases were from three and two major vendors, respectively, which constituted $1,307,155 and $6,189,623 of the Company’s purchases. As of the three months period ended September 30, 2014, the accounts payables of these three vendors are $168,420. As of the years ended June 30, 2014, the amount owed to these three suppliers was $44,600. |
| | | | | | | | | |
Inventory, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Inventory – Inventory, consisting of raw materials, is stated at the lower of cost, using the first-in, first-out method (“FIFO”) to determine cost. If the cost of the inventory exceeds market value, provisions are made currently for the difference between the cost and the market value. We monitor inventory cost compared to selling price less margin in order to determine if a lower of cost or market reserve is necessary. |
| | | | | | | | | |
Property, Plant and Equipment, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Property, plant and equipment – Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost. Repair and maintenance costs that do not improve service potential or extend economic life are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is recorded using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of our assets, which are reviewed periodically. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful life of the improvements. Capital lease are depreciated over the shorter of the lease term or the estimated useful life of the improvements. |
| | | | | | | | | |
Fair Value of Financial Instruments, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure, the Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and to determine fair value disclosures. Company bases fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. |
|
When observable market prices and data are not readily available, significant management judgment often is necessary to estimate fair value. In those cases, different assumptions could result in significant changes in valuation and may not be realize in an actual sale. Additionally, there may be inherent weaknesses in any calculation technique and changes in the underlying assumptions used, including discount rates, and expected cash flows could significantly affect the results of current or future values. |
|
For certain financial instruments, including accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses and capital lease, the carrying amounts approximate fair value due to their relatively short maturities. In the case of the notes payable, the interest rate on the notes approximates the market rate of interest for similar borrowings. Consequently the carrying value of the notes payable also approximates the fair value. It is not practicable to estimate the fair value of the related party notes payable due to the relationship of the counter party. |
|
All assets except for intangible assets of the Company are considered Level 1 due to short term maturity. |
|
The Company adopted ASC 820-10 (formerly SFAS 157, “Fair Value Measurements”) on January 1, 2008. ASC 820-10 defines fair value, establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures of fair value measurement and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measures. The three levels are defined as follows: |
|
| · | Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets; | | | | | | | |
| · | Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the assets or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instruments; and | | | | | | | |
| · | Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value. | | | | | | | |
|
The Company used Level 2 inputs for its valuation methodology for the milk brands. |
|
| | Carrying Value | | Fair Value Measurement at | |
| | As of | | September 30, 2014 | |
| | September 30, | | Using Fair Value Hierarchy | |
| | 2014 | | Level 1 | | Level 2 | | Level 3 | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Intangible Assets - | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Milk Brands | | 9,913,979 | | - | | 9,913,979 | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Total | | 9,913,979 | | - | | 9,913,979 | | - | |
| | | | | | | | | |
Intangible Assets, Finite-Lived, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Intangible assets – Intangible assets acquired separately are measured initially at cost. The cost of intangible assets acquired in a business combination is their fair value as at the date of acquisition. Following initial acquisition, intangible assets are carried at cost less any accumulated amortisation and any accumulated impairment losses. Internally generated intangible assets, excluding capitalised development costs, are not capitalised and expenditure is reflected in statement of comprehensive income in the year in which the expenditure is incurred. |
|
For intangible assets acquired in a non-monetary exchange (see Note 6), the estimated fair values of the assets transferred (or the estimated fair values of the assets received, if more clearly evident) are used to establish their recorded values, unless the values of neither the assets received nor the assets transferred are determinable within reasonable limits, in which case the assets received are measured (by a third party) based on the carrying values of the assets transferred. Valuation techniques consistent with the market approach, income approach and/or cost approach are used to measure fair value. An estimate of fair value can be affected by many assumptions that require significant judgment. For example, the income approach generally requires assumptions related to the appropriate business model to be used to estimate cash flows, total addressable market, pricing and share forecasts, competition, technology obsolescence, future tax rates and discount rates. Our estimate of the fair value of certain assets may differ materially from that determined by others who use different assumptions or utilize different business models. New information may arise in the future that affects our fair value estimates and could result in adjustments to our estimates in the future, which could have an adverse impact on our results of operations. |
|
The useful lives of intangible assets are assessed as either finite or indefinite. Intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortised over the estimated useful lives and assessed for impairment whenever there is an indication that the intangible asset may be impaired. The amortisation period and the amortisation method are reviewed at least at each financial year end. Changes in the expected useful life or the expected pattern of consumption of future economic benefits embodied in the asset is accounted for by changing the amortisation period or method, as appropriate, and are treated as changes in accounting estimates. The amortisation expense on intangible assets with finite useful lives is recognised in statement of comprehensive income in the expense category consistent with the function of the intangible asset. |
|
Intangible assets with indefinite useful lives or not yet available for use are tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if the events and circumstances indicate that the carrying value may be impaired either individually or at the cash-generating unit level. Such intangible assets are not amortised. The useful life of an intangible asset with an indefinite useful life is reviewed annually to determine whether the useful life assessment continues to be supportable. If not, the change in useful life from indefinite to finite is made on a prospective basis. |
|
Gains or losses arising from de-recognition of an intangible assets are measured as the difference between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the asset and are recognised in the statement of comprehensive income when the asset is derecognised. |
| | | | | | | | | |
Brands [Policy Text Block] | Brands – The brands were acquired from third party. The Management estimate the useful life of the Brands is 7 years. Management believes that over the period under the contract, the brands are generating net cash inflows for the Company. |
|
The cost of the brands will be amortised over the period of 7 years. |
| | | | | | | | | |
Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Long lived assets impairment – We assess the recoverability of the carrying value of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. We have the option of performing a qualitative assessment when assessing recoverability. We may also evaluate the recoverability of such assets based upon estimates of the undiscounted cash flows from such assets. If the sum of the expected future undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset, a loss would be recognized for the difference between the fair value and the carrying amount. We did not incur any impairment charges during the periods presented as management determined that its long lived assets were not impaired. |
| | | | | | | | | |
Income Tax, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Income taxes – We recognize deferred income tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the income tax and financial reporting carrying amount of our assets and liabilities. We monitor our deferred tax assets and evaluate the need for a valuation allowance based on the estimate of the amount of such deferred tax assets that we believe do not meet the more-likely-than-not recognition criteria. We follow guidelines in each tax jurisdiction regarding the recoverability of any tax assets recorded on the balance sheets and provide necessary valuation allowances as required. We review our deferred tax assets for recoverability based on historical taxable income, projected future taxable income, the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences and tax planning strategies. We also evaluate whether we have any uncertain tax positions and would record a reserve if we believe it is more-likely-than-not our position would not prevail with the applicable tax authorities. Penalties and interest, if any, are included in other expense on the statements of operations. Deferred tax assets and liabilities may be netted by jurisdiction, typically domestic and foreign, within the current and long-term classifications on the balance sheets. |
| | | | | | | | | |
Reclassification, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Reclassifications- Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on net earnings and financial position. |
| | | | | | | | | |
Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Revenue recognition – According to ASC 605, the Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service is performed or delivery has occurred, the price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is probable. |
|
For products shipped directly from the Company’s warehouse or manufactured by the Company in Singapore and then shipped to customer, both domestic and oversea, revenue is recognized at time of shipment as it is determined that ownership has passed to the customer at shipment and revenue is recognized. Amount billed to customers for freight and shipping is classified as revenue. |
|
Under normal commercial situations there will be no cancellation of orders allowed once products are produced. Under circumstances of quality dispute or any quality related issues of the products, the Company will accept sales returns from the customer upon verification by the Company for the quality dispute. This is not a normal situation and will be subjected to the acceptance of quality dispute by the Company in such instance. |
|
For domestic customers, if the customer rejects the purchase order after the manufacturing process has begun, the Company invoices the customer for any manufacturing costs incurred and revenue is recognized. The Company will fully invoice and recognize as revenue for orders rejected after time of shipment, provided all other revenue recognition criteria are met. |
|
For overseas customer, the Company will check customer’s credit risk through export credit insurance and insure products through export credit insurance. If the overseas customer rejects the order during the manufacturing process, the Company will claim the export credit insurance. The Company will also claim the export credit insurance for orders rejected after the time of shipment. |
| | | | | | | | | |
Foreign Currency Transactions and Translations Policy [Policy Text Block] | Foreign currency translation – The Company’s reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. The Company’s functional currency is the local currency in the Singapore, the Singapore Dollar (SGD). The financial statements of the Company are translated into United States dollars in accordance with ASC 830, FOREIGN CURRENCY MATTERS, using year-end rates of exchange for assets and liabilities, and average rates of exchange for the period for revenues, costs, and expenses and historical rates for equity. Translation adjustments resulting from the process of translating the local currency financial statements into U.S. dollars are included in determining comprehensive income. For the three months period ended September 30, 2014, the cumulative translation adjustment of $53,167 was classified as an item accumulated of other comprehensive loss in the stockholders’ equity section of statement of financial position. For the years ended June 30, 2014, the cumulative translation adjustment of $53,167 was classified as an item accumulated of other comprehensive loss in the stockholders’ equity section of statement of financial position. For the three months period ended September 30, 2014, the foreign currency translation adjustment to accumulative other comprehensive loss was $53,167. For the years ended June 30, 2014, the foreign currency translation adjustment to accumulate other comprehensive loss was $53,167. |
| | | | | | | | | |
Comprehensive Income, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Comprehensive income (loss) – Comprehensive income (loss) is defined to include all changes in equity except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. Among other disclosures, Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 220, Comprehensive Income, requires that all items that are required to be recognized under current accounting standards as components of comprehensive income be reported in a financial statement that is displayed with the same prominence as other financial statements. For the periods presented, the Company’s comprehensive income (loss) includes net income (loss) and foreign currency translation adjustments and is presented in the statements of comprehensive loss. We had translation adjustment to other comprehensive loss of $ 0 and $ 35,030 for the periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. |
| | | | | | | | | |
Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Earnings per share – We calculate basic earnings per share by dividing our net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period, without considering common stock equivalents. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period and the weighted average number of dilutive common stock equivalents, such as options and warrants. Options and warrants are only included in the calculation of diluted EPS when their effect is not anti-dilutive. The Company had no dilutive securities as of and for the three months ended September 30, 2014. During the three month periods ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, basic earnings per share was $0.00 and $0.02, respectively. As of the years ended June 30, 2014 basic earnings per share was $0.01. |
| | | | | | | | | |
Reverse Merger Accounting [Policy Text Block] | Reverse Merger Accounting – For accounting purposes, the stock-for-stock transaction, should be treated as a reverse acquisition and recapitalization of M-Power Food Industries Private Limited (accounting acquirer) because, prior to the transaction, Natural Resources Corporation (the “Company”) was a non-operating public shell and, subsequent to the transaction, 200,000,000 shares and interests of common stock of M-Power Industries (all of which were held by M-Power Investments) were exchanged for and converted into, 50,000,000 shares of common stock of the Company. Accordingly, for accounting purposes, the transaction was treated as a reverse acquisition and recapitalization in accordance with US GAAP. The historical financial statements will be presented in the consolidated financial statements of M-Power Food Industries Private Limited. The common stock and the corresponding capital amounts of the Company pre-merger will be retroactively restated as capital stock shares reflecting the exchange ratio in the merger. |
| | | | | | | | | |
Fiscal Period, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Fiscal Year End – Following the exchange transaction, the Company elected to adopt the June 30 year end of M-Power Food Industries Private Limited, the accounting acquirer. |
| | | | | | | | | |
Adopted Accounting Pronouncements [Policy Text Block] | Adopted Accounting Pronouncements |
|
In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 (ASU 2014-15), Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, which provides guidance on determining when and how to disclose going-concern uncertainties in the financial statements. The new standard requires management to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the financial statements are issued. An entity must provide certain disclosures if conditions or events raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ASU applies to all entities and is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted ASU 2014-15 on the Company’s financial statement presentation and disclosures. |
| | | | | | | | | |
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block] | Recently issued accounting pronouncements |
Effective January 2012, the Company adopted ASU No. 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs (ASU 2011-04). ASU 2011-04 represents the converged guidance of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) and the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) on fair value measurement. A variety of measures are included in the update intended to either clarify existing fair value measurement requirements, change particular principles requirements for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. For many of the requirements, the FASB does not intend to change the application of existing requirements under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements. ASU 2011-04 was effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on the financial statements and related disclosures. |
|
Effective January 2012, the Company adopted ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income (ASU 2011-05). ASU 2011-05 is intended to increase the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income and to facilitate convergence of accounting guidance in this area with that of the IASB. The amendments require that all non-owner changes in shareholders’ equity be presented in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-12, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items. |
|
Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05 (ASU 2011-12). ASU 2011-12 defers the provisions of ASU 2011-05 that require the presentation of reclassification adjustments on the face of both the statement of income and statement of other comprehensive income. Amendments under ASU 2011-05 that were not deferred under ASU 2011-12 will be applied retrospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on the financial statements and related disclosures |
|
In July 2012, the FASB issued guidance on testing for indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment. The new guidance allows an entity to simplify the testing for a drop in value of intangible assets such as trademarks, patents, and distribution rights. The amended standard reduces the cost of accounting for indefinite-lived intangible assets, especially in cases where the likelihood of impairment is low. The changes permit businesses and other organizations to first use subjective criteria to determine if an intangible asset has lost value. The amendments to U.S. GAAP will be effective for fiscal years starting after September 15, 2012. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on the financial statements and related disclosures. |
|
In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive (ASU 2013-02). This guidance is the culmination of the FASB’s deliberation on reporting reclassification adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI). The amendments in ASU 2013-02 do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income. However, the amendments require disclosure of amounts reclassified out of AOCI in its entirety, by component, on the face of the statement of operations or in the notes thereto. Amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income must be cross-referenced to other disclosures that provide additional detail. This standard is effective prospectively for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of this update did not have a material impact on the financial statements and related disclosures. |
|
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (ASU 2014-09), which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is to recognize revenues when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which an entity expects to be entitled for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five step process to achieve this core principle and, in doing so, more judgment and estimates may be required within the revenue recognition process than are required under existing U.S. GAAP. The standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods therein, using either of the following transition methods: (i) a full retrospective approach reflecting the application of the standard in each prior reporting period with the option to elect certain practical expedients, or (ii) a retrospective approach with the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASU 2014-09 recognized at the date of adoption (which includes additional footnote disclosures). Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the pending adoption of ASU 2014-09 on its consolidated financial statements and has not yet determined the method by which it will adopt the standard beginning January 1, 2017. |
|
Other recent pronouncements issued by FASB (including its Emerging Task Force), and the United States Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future financial statements. |
| | | | | | | | | |