Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES Use of Estimates The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Although management believes these estimates are reasonable, actual results could differ from these estimates. Changes in estimates are recorded prospectively. Significant assumptions are required in the valuation of proved oil and natural gas reserves that may affect the amount at which oil and natural gas properties are recorded. Estimation of asset retirement obligations (“AROs”) and valuations of derivative instruments also require significant assumptions. It is possible that these estimates could be revised at future dates and these revisions could be material. Depletion of oil and natural gas properties is determined using estimates of proved oil and natural gas reserves. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in the estimation of quantities of proved reserves and in the projection of future rates of production and the timing of development expenditures. Similarly, evaluations for impairment of proved and unproved oil and natural gas properties are subject to numerous uncertainties including, among others, estimates of future recoverable reserves and commodity price estimates. It is possible that these estimates could be revised at future dates and such revisions could be material. Accounts Receivable As of March 31, 2017 As of December 31, 2016 (In thousands) Sale of oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids $ 73,632 $ 54,422 Joint interest owners 2,289 16,681 Federal income tax receivable — 2,568 Total accounts receivable $ 75,921 $ 73,671 Accounts receivable, which are primarily from the sale of oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids (“NGLs”), are accrued based on estimates of the volumetric sales and prices the Company believes it will receive. In addition, settled but uncollected derivative contracts, receivables related to joint interest billings and income tax receivables are included in accounts receivable. The Company routinely reviews outstanding balances, assesses the financial strength of its customers and records a reserve for amounts not expected to be fully recovered. The need for an allowance is determined based upon reviews of individual accounts, historical losses, existing economic conditions and other pertinent factors. Bad debt expense was zero for each of the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 , respectively. Oil and Natural Gas Properties The Company uses the successful efforts method of accounting for its oil and natural gas exploration and production activities. Costs incurred by the Company related to the acquisition of oil and natural gas properties and the cost of drilling development wells and successful exploratory wells are capitalized, while the costs of unsuccessful exploratory wells are expensed when determined to be unsuccessful. The Company may capitalize interest on expenditures for significant exploration and development projects that last more than six months , while activities are in progress to bring the assets to their intended use. The Company has not capitalized any interest as projects generally lasted less than six months . Costs incurred to maintain wells and related equipment, lease and well operating costs and other exploration costs are expensed as incurred. Gains and losses arising from the sale of properties are generally included in operating income. Capitalized acquisition costs attributable to proved oil and natural gas properties and leasehold costs are depleted on a field level, based on proved reserves, using the unit-of-production method. Capitalized exploration well costs and development costs, including AROs, are depleted on a field level, based on proved developed reserves. For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 , depletion expense for oil and natural gas producing property was $61.0 million and $44.6 million , respectively. Depletion expense is included in depreciation, depletion and amortization in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The Company’s oil and natural gas properties as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 consisted of the following: March 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 (In thousands) Proved oil and natural gas properties $ 3,272,422 $ 2,811,853 Unproved oil and natural gas properties 2,814,354 1,833,928 Total oil and natural gas properties 6,086,776 4,645,781 Less: Accumulated depletion (614,706 ) (554,419 ) Total oil and natural gas properties, net $ 5,472,070 $ 4,091,362 In some circumstances, it may be uncertain whether proved commercial reserves have been found when drilling has been completed. Such exploratory well drilling costs may continue to be capitalized if the anticipated reserve quantity is sufficient to justify its completion as a producing well and sufficient progress in assessing the reserves and the economic and operating viability of the project is being made. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 , there were no costs capitalized in connection with exploratory wells in progress. Capitalized costs are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that an asset’s carrying amount may not be recoverable. To determine if a field is impaired, the Company compares the carrying value of the field to the undiscounted future net cash flows by applying estimates of future oil and natural gas prices to the estimated future production of oil and natural gas reserves over the economic life of the property and deducting future costs. Future net cash flows are based upon our reservoir engineers’ estimates of proved reserves. For a property determined to be impaired, an impairment loss equal to the difference between the property’s carrying value and its estimated fair value is recognized. Fair value, on a field basis, is estimated to be the present value of the aforementioned expected future net cash flows. Each part of this calculation is subject to a large degree of judgment, including the determination of the depletable units’ estimated reserves, future net cash flows and fair value. No impairment of proved property was recorded for the three months ended March 31, 2017 or 2016 . The calculation of expected future net cash flows in impairment evaluations are mainly based on estimates of future oil and natural gas prices, proved reserves and risk-adjusted probable reserve quantities, and estimates of future production and capital costs associated with our proved and risk-adjusted reserves. The Company’s estimates for future oil and natural gas prices used in the impairment evaluations are based on observable prices for the next three years, and then held constant for the remaining lives of the properties. If the prices used to assess our oil and natural gas properties for impairment were 15% lower than the prices we used for such analysis, holding all other variables constant, we would not have expected to record any material impairment to our proved oil and natural gas properties. However, it is reasonably possible that oil and natural gas prices used in future impairment evaluations may decline, which could result in the need to impair the carrying value of the Company’s proved properties. Unproved property costs and related leasehold expirations are assessed quarterly for potential impairment and when industry conditions dictate an impairment may be possible. For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 , impairment expense of unproved property was $0.1 million and $0.2 million , respectively, which primarily related to management’s expectation that certain leasehold interests would expire and not be renewed, along with certain leasehold interests that may expire or be sold in the future. Asset Retirement Obligation The Company records AROs related to the retirement of long-lived assets at the time a legal obligation is incurred and the liability can be reasonably estimated. AROs are recorded as long-term liabilities with a corresponding increase in the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset. Subsequently, the asset retirement cost included in the carrying amount of the related asset is allocated to expense through depletion of the asset. Changes in the liability due to passage of time are generally recognized as an increase in the carrying amount of the liability and as corresponding accretion expense. The Company estimates a fair value of the obligation on each well in which it owns an interest by identifying costs associated with the future down-hole plugging, dismantlement and removal of production equipment and facilities, and the restoration and reclamation of the surface acreage to a condition similar to that existing before oil and natural gas extraction began. In general, the amount of ARO and the costs capitalized will be equal to the estimated future cost to satisfy the abandonment obligation using current prices that are escalated by an assumed inflation factor up to the estimated settlement date which is then discounted back to the date that the abandonment obligation was incurred using an estimated credit adjusted rate. If the estimated ARO changes, an adjustment is recorded to both the ARO liability and the long-lived asset. Revisions to estimated AROs can result from changes in retirement cost estimates, revisions to estimated inflation rates and changes in the estimated timing of abandonment. After recording these amounts, the ARO liability is accreted to its future estimated value using the same assumed credit adjusted rate and the associated capitalized costs are depreciated on a unit-of-production basis. The ARO liability consisted of the following for the period indicated: Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 (In thousands) Asset retirement obligation at beginning of period $ 10,659 Liabilities incurred or assumed 1,401 Liabilities settled (147 ) Accretion expense 153 Asset retirement obligation at end of period $ 12,066 Income Taxes The following is an analysis of the Company’s consolidated income tax benefit (expense) for the periods indicated: Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 2016 (In thousands) Current $ 1,498 $ — Deferred 13,574 (9,298 ) Income Tax Benefit (Expense) $ 15,072 $ (9,298 ) Deferred taxes are determined based on the estimated future tax effects of differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities, given the provisions of enacted tax laws. Tax positions are evaluated for recognition using a more-likely-than-not threshold, and those tax positions requiring recognition are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority that has full knowledge of all relevant information. The Company’s policy is to record interest and penalties relating to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. At March 31, 2017 , the Company had a long-term tax payable related to uncertain tax positions totaling $6.8 million . This amount is recorded in other long term liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. The Company’s adoption of ASU 2016-09 in the first quarter of 2017 using the modified retrospective approach resulted in a decrease to deferred tax liability and a corresponding adjustment to accumulated deficit of $0.6 million as of December 31, 2016. Additional tax deductions in the first quarter of 2017 from stock compensation under the guidance of ASU 2016-09 resulted in a reduction to income tax expense of $4.0 million . The Company’s U.S. federal income tax returns for 2013 and beyond, and its Texas franchise tax returns for 2012 and beyond, remain subject to examination by the taxing authorities. No other jurisdiction’s returns are significant to the Company’s financial position. New Accounting Pronouncements In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606),” which provides a comprehensive revenue recognition standard for contracts with customers that supersedes current revenue recognition guidance including industry specific guidance. An entity is required to apply ASU 2014-09 for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. An entity can apply ASU 2014-09 using either a full retrospective method, meaning the standard is applied to all of the periods presented, or a modified retrospective method, meaning the cumulative effect of initially applying the standard is recognized in the most current period presented in the financial statements. The Company has not yet selected a transition method and is currently evaluating the impact of its pending adoption of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements; however, it has not identified any revenue stream that would be materially impacted and does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)," which requires all lease transactions (with terms in excess of 12 months) to be recognized on the balance sheet as lease assets and lease liabilities. Public entities are required to apply ASU 2016-02 for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018 with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of its pending adoption of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements; however, based on the Company’s current operating leases, the adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standard Update ("ASU") 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation Topic 718: Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting," which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions. These simplifications include the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2017 using the modified retrospective approach. Accordingly, deferred tax liability at December 31, 2016 was reduced by $0.6 million with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated deficit in the consolidated balance sheet. |