Riverview Financial (RIVE) 10-Q 2018 Q3 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

Form10-Q

☒ Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2018

or

☐ Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the transition period from                     

001-38627

(Commission File Number)

RIVERVIEW FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Pennsylvania	38-3917371
(State of incorporation)	(IRS Employer Identification Number)
3901 North Front Street, Harrisburg, PA	17110
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip code)

(717)957-2196

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of RegulationS-T during the preceding 12 months or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.    Yes  ☒    No  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, anon-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☐
Non-accelerated filer	☐	Smaller reporting company	☒
		Emerging growth company	☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.   ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company as defined in Rule12b-2 of the Exchange Act.    Yes  ☐    No  ☒

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 9,112,408 at October 31, 2018.

RIVERVIEW FINANCIAL CORPORATION

FORM10-Q

For the Quarter Ended September 30, 2018

Contents		Page No.
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)
	Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017		3
	Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017		4
	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017		5
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018 and 2017		6
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		29
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		40
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		40
PART II	OTHER INFORMATION:
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		40
Item 1A.	Risk Factors		40
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		40
Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities		40
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures		40
Item 5.	Other Information		40
Item 6.	Exhibits		41
	Signatures		42

Riverview Financial Corporation

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

	September 30, 2018			December 31, 2017
Assets:
Cash and due from banks	$	13,310		$	9,413
Interest-bearing deposits in other banks		43,505			16,373
Investment securitiesavailable-for-sale		97,102			93,201
Loans held for sale		598			254
Loans, net		915,529			955,971
Less: allowance for loan losses		6,472			6,306
Net loans		909,057			949,665
Premises and equipment, net		18,427			18,631
Accrued interest receivable		3,066			3,237
Goodwill		24,754			24,754
Intangible assets		3,721			4,376
Other assets		43,193			43,703
Total assets	$	1,156,733		$	1,163,607
Liabilities:
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing	$	162,385		$	155,895
Interest-bearing		858,379			870,585
Total deposits		1,020,764			1,026,480
Short-term borrowings					6,000
Long-term debt		13,019			13,233
Accrued interest payable		503			468
Other liabilities		10,416			11,170
Total liabilities		1,044,702			1,057,351
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock: no par value, authorized 20,000,000 shares; September 30, 2018, issued and outstanding 9,110,676 shares; December 31, 2017, issued and outstanding 9,069,363 shares		100,999			100,476
Capital surplus		356			423
Retained earnings		13,503			6,936
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(2,827	)		(1,579	)
Total stockholders’ equity		112,031			106,256
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,156,733		$	1,163,607

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

3

Riverview Financial Corporation

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
September 30,	2018			2017			2018			2017
Interest income:
Interest and fees on loans:
Taxable	$	11,957		$	5,717		$	35,424		$	14,991
Tax-exempt		230			146			699			361
Interest and dividends on investment securitiesavailable-for-sale:
Taxable		551			477			1,616			1,607
Tax-exempt		80			47			243			140
Dividends											3
Interest on interest-bearing deposits in other banks		181			31			361			78
Interest on federal funds sold					2			20			12
Total interest income		12,999			6,420			38,363			17,192
Interest expense:
Interest on deposits		1,885			821			5,162			2,021
Interest on short-term borrowings					112			30			197
Interest on long-term debt		194			75			562			228
Total interest expense		2,079			1,008			5,754			2,446
Net interest income		10,920			5,412			32,609			14,746
Provision for loan losses		225			610			615			1,734
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		10,695			4,802			31,994			13,012
Noninterest income:
Service charges, fees and commissions		1,267			270			4,146			899
Commission and fees on fiduciary activities		226			31			671			92
Wealth management income		199			179			572			631
Mortgage banking income		168			205			527			434
Bank owned life insurance investment income		194			107			584			254
Net gain on sale of investment securitiesavailable-for-sale					43			40			106
Total noninterest income		2,054			835			6,540			2,416
Noninterest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits expense		5,032			2,928			15,575			8,521
Net occupancy and equipment expense		1,008			615			3,142			1,895
Amortization of intangible assets		215			71			656			306
Net cost (benefit) of operation of other real estate owned		29			(13	)		30			161
Other expenses		3,057			1,566			8,882			4,488
Total noninterest expense		9,341			5,167			28,285			15,371
Income before income taxes		3,408			470			10,249			57
Income tax expense		620			69			1,863			44
Net income		2,788			401			8,386			13
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized gain (loss) on investment securitiesavailable-for-sale		(576	)		(50	)		(1,539	)		1,708
Reclassification adjustment for net gain on sale of investment securitiesavailable-for-sale included in net income					(43	)		(40	)		(106	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		(576	)		(93	)		(1,579	)		1,602
Income tax expense (benefit) related to other comprehensive income		(121	)		(32	)		(331	)		544
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income taxes		(455	)		(61	)		(1,248	)		1,058
Comprehensive income	$	2,333		$	340		$	7,138		$	1,071
Per share data:
Net income:
Basic	$	0.30		$	0.08		$	0.92		$	0.03
Diluted	$	0.30		$	0.08		$	0.92		$	0.03
Average common shares outstanding:
Basic		9,100,616			4,880,676			9,089,636			4,002,165
Diluted		9,156,931			4,945,456			9,143,041			4,060,813
Dividends declared	$	0.10		$	0.14		$	0.20		$	0.41

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

4

Riverview Financial Corporation

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

	Preferred Stock			Common Stock		Capital Surplus			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total
Balance, January 1, 2018	$			$	100,476	$	423		$	6,936		$	(1,579	)	$	106,256
Net income										8,386						8,386
Other comprehensive loss, net of income taxes													(1,248	)		(1,248	)
Compensation cost of option grants							9									9
Issuance under ESPP, 401k and Dividend Reinvestment plans: 36,552 shares					406											406
Exercise of stock options: 4,761 shares					117		(76	)								41
Dividends declared, $0.20 per share										(1,819	)					(1,819	)
Balance, September 30, 2018	$			$	100,999	$	356		$	13,503		$	(2,827	)	$	112,031
Balance, January 1, 2017	$			$	29,052	$	220		$	14,845		$	(2,197	)	$	41,920
Net income										13						13
Other comprehensive income, net of income taxes													1,058			1,058
Compensation cost of option grants							23									23
Issuance of 269,885 common shares					2,658											2,658
Issuance of 1,348,809 preferred shares	$	13,283														13,283
Preferred shares converted into common shares		(13,283	)		13,283
Issuance under ESPP, 401k and Dividend Reinvestment plans: 29,840 shares					373											373
Exercise of stock options: 5,750 shares					61											61
Dividends declared: $0.41 per share										(2,010	)					(2,010	)
Balance, September 30, 2017	$			$	45,427	$	243		$	12,848		$	(1,139	)	$	57,379

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

5

Riverview Financial Corporation

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

For the Nine Months Ended September 30,	2018			2017
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	8,386		$	13
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization of premises and equipment		921			586
Provision for loan losses		615			1,734
Stock based compensation		9			23
Net amortization of investment securitiesavailable-for-sale		606			315
Net cost of operation of other real estate owned		30			161
Net loss on sale of investment securitiesavailable-for-sale		(40	)		(106	)
Accretion of purchase adjustment on loans		(3,754	)		(127	)
Amortization of intangible assets		656			306
Deferred income taxes		1,668			(47	)
Proceeds from sale of loans originated for sale		20,278			20,733
Net gain on sale of loans originated for sale		(527	)		(434	)
Loans originated for sale		(20,095	)		(20,166	)
Bank owned life insurance investment income		(584	)		(254	)
Net change in:
Accrued interest receivable		171			(269	)
Other assets		165			(1,255	)
Accrued interest payable		35			21
Other liabilities		(754	)		(638	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		7,786			596
Cash flows from investing activities:
Investment securitiesavailable-for-sale:
Purchases		(20,135	)
Proceeds from repayments		9,264			1,805
Proceeds from sales		4,825			15,827
Proceeds from the sale of other real estate owned		195			613
Net decrease (increase) in restricted equity securities		44			(341	)
Net decrease (increase) in loans		43,090			(151,072	)
Business disposition, net of cash					329
Purchases of premises and equipment		(717	)		(548	)
Purchase of bank owned life insurance		(21	)		(5,017	)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		36,545			(138,404	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase (decrease) in deposits		(5,716	)		122,390
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings		(6,000	)		5,750
Repayment of long-term debt		(214	)		(5,251	)
Proceeds from long-term debt					600
Issuance under ESPP, 401k and DRP plans		406			373
Issuance of common stock					15,941
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		41			61
Cash dividends paid		(1,819	)		(2,010	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(13,302	)		137,854
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		31,029			46
Cash and cash equivalents—beginning		25,786			19,120
Cash and cash equivalents—ending	$	56,815		$	19,166
Supplemental disclosures:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	5,719		$	2,425
Income taxes	$	300
Noncash items from investing activities:
Other real estate acquired in settlement of loans	$	657		$	293

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

6

Riverview Financial Corporation

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

1. Summary of significant accounting policies:

Nature of Operations

Riverview Financial Corporation, (the “Company” or “Riverview”), a bank holding company incorporated under the laws of Pennsylvania, provides a full range of financial services through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Riverview Bank (the “Bank”). On October 2, 2017, the Company announced the completion of its merger of equals with CBT Financial Corp. (“CBT”), effective October 1, 2017 pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger between Riverview and CBT, dated April 19, 2017. On the effective date, CBT was merged with and into Riverview, with Riverview surviving (the “merger”). Additionally, CBT Bank, the wholly-owned subsidiary of CBT, merged with and into Riverview Bank, the wholly-owned subsidiary of Riverview, with Riverview Bank as the surviving institution. The Company’s financial results reflect the merger of CBT Bank with and into Riverview Bank under the purchase method of accounting, with the Company treated as the acquirer for accounting and reporting purposes. As a result, the historical financial information included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related notes as reported in this Form10-Q is that of Riverview.

Riverview Bank, with 30 full service offices and three limited purpose offices, is a full service commercial bank offering a wide range of traditional banking services and financial advisory, insurance and investment services to individuals, municipalities and small to medium sized businesses in the Pennsylvania market areas of Berks, Blaire, Centre, Clearfield, Dauphin, Huntingdon, Lebanon, Lycoming, Northumberland, Perry, Schuylkill and Somerset Counties in Pennsylvania.

Basis of presentation:

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP’) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form10-Q and Article 8 ofRegulation S-X. In the opinion of management, all normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations for the periods presented have been included. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year’s presentation. These reclassifications did not have any effect on the operating results or financial position of the Company. The operating results and financial position of the Company for the three and nine months ended as of September 30, 2018, are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations and financial position that may be expected in the future. The condensed consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2017 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not include all of the information and disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. Accordingly, these unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s 2017 Annual Report on Form10-K, filed on March 23, 2018.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates that are particularly susceptible to material change in the near term relate to the determination of the allowance for loan losses, fair value of financial instruments, the valuation of real estate acquired in connection with foreclosures or in satisfaction of loans, the valuation of deferred tax assets, the determination of other-than-temporary impairment losses on securities and impairment of goodwill. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Recent Accounting Standards

In January 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, (“FASB”) issued ASUNo. 2016-01, “Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”. This ASU addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments by making targeted improvements to GAAP as follows: (i) require equity investments, except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee, to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. However, an entity may choose to measure equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes in orderly transactions for the identical or a similar investment of the same issuer; (ii) simplify the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment. When a qualitative assessment indicates that impairment exists, an entity is required to measure the investment at fair value; (iii) eliminate the requirement to disclose the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost for entities that are not public business entities; (iv) eliminate the requirement for public business entities to disclose the methods and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet; (v) require

7

public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; (vi) require an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for financial instruments; (vii) require separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset , securities or loans and receivables, on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements; and (viii) clarify that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related toavailable-for-sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets. The Company measured the fair value of its loan portfolio using an exit price notion for the fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2017, including interim periods thereafter. The adoption of ASU2016-01 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)”. Among other things, in the amendments in ASU2016-02, lessees will be required to recognize the following for all leases (with the exception of short-term leases) at the commencement date: a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and aright-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. Under the new guidance, lessor accounting is largely unchanged. Certain targeted improvements were made to align, where necessary, lessor accounting with the lessee accounting model and Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted upon issuance. Lessees (for capital and operating leases) and lessors (for sales-type, direct financing, and operating leases) must apply a modified retrospective transition approach for leases existing at, or entered into after, the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. The modified retrospective approach would not require any transition accounting for leases that expired before the earliest comparative period presented. Lessees and lessors may not apply a full retrospective transition approach. The Company is currently assessing the impact that ASU2016-02 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB ASUNo. 2016-13, “Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”. ASU2016-13 requires an entity to utilize a new impairment model known as the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model to estimate its lifetime “expected credit loss” and record an allowance that, when deducted from the amortized cost basis of the financial asset, presents the net amount expected to be collected on the financial asset. The CECL model is expected to result in earlier recognition of credit losses. ASU2016-13 also requires new disclosures for financial assets measured at amortized cost, loans andavailable-for-sale debt securities. The updated guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. Entities will apply the standard’s provisions as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is adopted. During the third quarter of 2018, we selected a vendor based solution and are currently collecting and reviewing loan data for use in this model. The Company is currently assessing the impact that this new guidance will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments”. The update addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice. This new accounting guidance will be effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The Company does not expect the adoption of the new accounting guidance to have a material effect on the statement of cash flows.

In December 2016, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2016-20, “Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers”.ASU 2016-20 updates the new revenue standard by clarifying issues that have arisen fromASU 2014-09, but does not change the core principle of the new standard. The issues addressed in this ASU include: (i) Loan guarantee fees; (ii) Impairment testing of contract costs; (iii) Interaction of impairment testing with guidance in other topics; (iv) Provisions for losses on construction-type and production-type contracts; (v) Scope of Topic 606; (vi) Disclosure of remaining performance obligations; (vii) Disclosure of prior-period performance obligations; (viii) Contract modifications; (ix) Contract asset vs. receivable; (x) Refund liability; (xi) Advertising costs; (xii) Fixed-odds wagering contracts in the casino industry; and (xiii) Cost capitalization for advisors to private funds and public funds. The updated guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The amendments can be applied retrospectively to each prior reporting period or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying this new guidance recognized at the date of initial application. Since the guidance does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including loans and securities that are accounted for under other GAAP, the new guidance did not have a material impact on revenue most closely associated with financial instruments, including interest income and expense. The Company completed its overall assessment of revenue streams and review of related contracts potentially affected by the ASU, including trust and asset management fees, deposit related fees, and interchange fees. Based on this assessment, the Company concluded that ASU2014-09 did not materially change the method in which the Company currently recognizes revenue for these revenue streams. The Company adopted ASU2014-09 and its related amendments on its required effective date of January 1, 2018 utilizing the modified retrospective approach. Since there was no net income impact upon adoption of the new guidance, a cumulative effect adjustment to opening retained earnings was not deemed necessary. The adoption ofASU 2016-20 and2014-09 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements. See Note 8 Revenue Recognition for more information.

8

In January 2017, FASB issued ASUNo. 2017-01, “Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business”. The ASU clarifies the definition of a business to assist with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of ASUNo. 2017-01 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2017-03, “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (Topic 250) and Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcements at the 2016 EITF Meetings”. The ASU adds an SEC paragraph to ASUs2014-09,2016-02 and2016-13 which specifies the SEC staff view that a registrant should evaluate ASUs that have not yet been adopted to determine the appropriate disclosure about the potential material effects of those ASUs on the financial statements when adopted. The guidance also specifies the SEC staff view on financial statement disclosures when the company does not know or cannot reasonably estimate the impact that adoption of the ASUs will have on the financial statements. The ASU also conforms to SEC guidance on accounting for tax benefits resulting from investments in affordable housing projects to the guidance in ASU2014-01, Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323). The amendments in this update are effective upon issuance. The guidance did not have a significant impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, FASB issued ASUNo. 2017-04, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment”. The ASU simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill and eliminates Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. The Company should perform its goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An impairment charge should be recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. The impairment charge is limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. The guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial positions, results of operations or disclosures.

In February 2017, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2017-05, “Other Income—Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Topic 610): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets”. The amendments clarify that a financial asset is within the scope of Topic 610 if it meets the definition of an in substance nonfinancial asset. The amendments also define the term in substance nonfinancial asset. The amendments clarify that nonfinancial assets within the scope of Topic 610 may include nonfinancial assets transferred within a legal entity to a counterparty. For example, a parent may transfer control of nonfinancial assets by transferring ownership interests in a consolidated subsidiary. A contract that includes the transfer of ownership interests in one or more consolidated subsidiaries is within the scope of Topic 610 if substantially all of the fair value of the assets that are promised to the counterparty in a contract is concentrated in nonfinancial assets. The amendments clarify that an entity should identify each distinct nonfinancial asset or in substance nonfinancial asset promised to a counterparty and derecognize each asset when a counterparty obtains control of it. The guidance is effective for public business entities for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods therein. Entities may use either a full or modified approach to adopt the ASU. The adoption of ASUNo. 2017-05 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2017-07, “Compensation—Retirement Benefits (Topic 715)”, which requires employers that offer or maintain defined benefit plans to disaggregate the service component from the other components of net benefit cost and provides guidance on presentation of the service component and the other components of net benefit cost in the statement of operations. The guidance is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The adoption of ASUNo. 2017-07 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2017, FASB issued ASUNo. 2017-08, “Receivables—Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Topic 310), Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities”. These amendments shorten the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at a premium. Specifically, the amendments require the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. The amendments do not require an accounting change for securities held at a discount; the discount continues to be amortized to maturity. The guidance is effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. The amendments should be applied on a modified retrospective basis, with a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The Company is assessing the impact of ASU2017-08 on its accounting and disclosures.

9

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2017-09, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting”. This ASU clarifies which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. Specifically, an entity would not apply modification accounting if the fair value, vesting conditions, and classification of the awards are the same immediately before and after the modification. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interims periods within those fiscal years. The adoption of ASUNo. 2017-09 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2017, FASB issued ASUNo. 2017-12, “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities”. The amendments in the Update better align an entity’s risk management activities and financial reporting for hedging relationships through changes to both the designation and measurement guidance for qualifying hedging relationships and the presentation of hedge results. To meet that objective, the amendments expand and refine hedge accounting for both nonfinancial and financial risk components and align the recognition and presentation of the effects of the hedging instrument and the hedged item in the financial statements. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial positions, results of operations or disclosures.

In September 2017, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2017-13, “Revenue Recognition (Topic 605), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Leases (Topic 840), and Leases (Topic 842)”. This Accounting Standards Update adds SEC paragraphs pursuant to the SEC Staff Announcement at the July 20, 2017 Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) meeting. The July announcement addresses Transition Related to Accounting Standards UpdatesNo. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), andNo. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). This Update also supersedes SEC paragraphs pursuant to the rescission of SEC Staff Announcement, “Accounting for Management Fees Based on a Formula,” effective upon the initial adoption of Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, and SEC Staff Announcement, “Lessor Consideration of Third-Party Value Guarantees,” effective upon the initial adoption of Topic 842, Leases. The amendments in this Update also rescind three SEC Observer Comments effective upon the initial adoption of Topic 842. One SEC Staff Observer comment is being moved to Topic 842. The adoption of ASU2017-13 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In November 2017, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2017-14 “Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220), Revenue Recognition (Topic 605), and Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)”. This Accounting Standards Update amends SEC paragraphs pursuant to the SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 116 and SEC ReleaseNo. 33-10403, which bring existing guidance into conformity with Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The adoption of ASUNo. 2017-14 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2018-02, “Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income”. The amendments in this Update allow for a reclassification of stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, and the Company elected to early adopt this guidance effective December 31, 2017. The adoption of ASUNo. 2018-02 resulted in a reclassification of stranded tax effects of $259 from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) to retained earnings.

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2018-03, “Technical Corrections and Improvements to Financial Instruments — Overall (Subtopic825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”, which makes minor changes to the ASUNo. 2016-01, “Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities”. The technical corrections affect the following aspects of the ASU: (i) equity securities without a readily determinable fair value — discontinuation; (ii) equity securities without a readily determinable fair value — adjustments; (iii) forward contracts and purchased options; (iv) presentation requirements for certain fair value option liabilities; (v) fair value option liabilities denominated in a foreign currency and (vi) transition guidance for equity securities without a readily determinable fair value. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2018. The adoption of ASUNo. 2018-03 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2018, the FASB has issued ASUNo. 2018-05, “Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin [SAB] No. 118”. The ASU adds seven paragraphs to ASC 740, Income Taxes, that contain SEC guidance related to SAB 118 codified as SEC SAB Topic 5.EE, “Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act”). The adoption of ASUNo. 2018-05 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2018, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2018-06, “Codification Improvements to Topic 942, Financial Services—Depository and Lending”. The amendments in this Update supersede the guidance in Subtopic942-740, Financial Services—Depository and Lending—Income Taxes, that is related to Circular 202 because that guidance has been rescinded by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) and no longer is relevant. The amendments in this Update were effective upon issuance of this Update. The adoption of ASUNo. 2018-06 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

10

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2018-10, “Codification Improvements to Topic 842, Leases”. The amendments in this Update corrects inconsistencies in the guidance and clarifies how to apply certain provisions of the leases standard. The amendments target 16 issues including: residual value guarantees; rate implicit in the lease; lessee reassessment of lease classification; lessor reassessment of lease term and purchase option; variable lease payments that depend on an index or a rate; investment tax credits; lease term and purchase option; transition guidance for amounts previously recognized in business combinations; recognition of certain transition adjustments in earnings rather than equity; transition guidance for leases previously classified as capital leases under Topic 840; transition guidance for modifications to leases previously classified as direct financing or sales-type leases under Topic 840; transition guidance for sale and leaseback transactions; impairment of net investment in the lease; unguaranteed residual asset; effect of initial direct costs on rate implicit in the lease; and failed sale and leaseback transaction. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial positions, results of operations or disclosures.

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2018-11, “Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements”. This amendment provides an optional transition method for adopting the new leases guidance in Topic 842 that will eliminate comparative period reporting under the new guidance in the year of adoption. This option addresses preparer feedback about the related costs of presenting comparative periods under Topic 842. Under the optional transition method, only the most recent period presented will reflect the adoption of Topic 842 with a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings, and the comparative prior periods will be reported under the previous guidance in Topic 840. In addition, the ASU offers lessors a practical expedient that mirrors the practical expedient already provided to lessees in ASU2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842).” The new practical expedient will allow lessors to elect, by class of underlying asset, to not separate nonlease components from the associated lease component when specified conditions are met. Examples of nonlease components include equipment maintenance services, common area maintenance services in real estate, or other goods or services provided to the lessee apart from the right to use the underlying asset. The practical expedient must be applied consistently for all lease contracts. The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial positions, results of operations or disclosures.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU2018-13, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement”. The amendments in this Update improve the effectiveness of fair value measurement disclosures by modifying the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, based on the concepts in FASB Concepts Statement, Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting—Chapter 8: Notes to Financial Statements, including the consideration of costs and benefits. The ASU is effective for all entities in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. In addition, an entity may early adopt any of the removed or modified disclosures immediately and delay adoption of the new disclosures until the effective date. The guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial positions, results of operations or disclosures.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASUNo. 2018-14, “Compensation—Retirement Benefits—Defined Benefit Plans—General (Subtopic715-20)—Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans”. Subtopic715-20 addresses the disclosure of other accounting and reporting requirements related to single-employer defined benefit pension or other postretirement benefit plans. The amendments in this Update remove disclosures that no longer are considered cost-beneficial, clarify the specific requirements of disclosures, and add disclosure requirements identified as relevant. Although narrow in scope, the amendments are considered an important part of the Board’s efforts to improve the effectiveness of disclosures in the notes to financial statements by applying concepts in the FASB Concepts Statement, Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting—Chapter 8: Notes to Financial Statements. The amendments in this Update apply to all employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans. The ASU is effective for all entities in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The guidance is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial positions, results of operations or disclosures.

11

2. Other comprehensive income (loss):

The components of other comprehensive income (loss) and their related tax effects are reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income (Loss). The accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets relates to net unrealized gains and losses on investment securitiesavailable-for-sale and benefit plan adjustments.

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) included in stockholders’ equity at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 is as follows:

	September 30, 2018			December 31, 2017
Net unrealized loss on investment securitiesavailable-for-sale	$	(2,710	)	$	(1,131	)
Related income taxes		(569	)		(238	)
Net of income taxes		(2,141	)		(893	)
Benefit plan adjustments		(869	)		(869	)
Related income taxes		(183	)		(183	)
Net of income taxes		(686	)		(686	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	$	(2,827	)	$	(1,579	)

Other comprehensive income (loss) and related tax effects for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 is as follows:

Three months ended September 30,	2018			2017
Unrealized gain (loss) on investment securitiesavailable-for-sale	$	(576	)	$	(50	)
Net (gain) loss on the sale of investment securitiesavailable-for-sale (1)					(43	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before taxes		(576	)		(93	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		(121	)		(32	)
Other comprehensive income (loss)	$	(455	)	$	(61	)
Nine months ended September 30,	2018			2017
Unrealized gain (loss) on investment securitiesavailable-for-sale	$	(1,539	)	$	1,708
Net (gain) loss on the sale of investment securitiesavailable-for-sale (1)		(40	)		(106	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before taxes		(1,579	)		1,602
Income tax expense (benefit)		(331	)		544
Other comprehensive income (loss)	$	(1,248	)	$	1,058

⁽¹⁾  Represents amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income and included in gains on sale of investment securities on the consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income.

3. Earnings per share:

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) allocated to common stockholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Net income (loss) allocated to common stockholders is net income (loss) adjusted for preferred stock dividends including dividends declared, less income (loss) allocated to participating securities. Diluted earnings per share reflect additional common shares that would have been outstanding if dilutive potential common shares had been issued, as well as any adjustment to income that would result from the assumed issuance. The following table provides a reconciliation between the computation of basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017:

12

Three months ended September 30,	2018		2017
Numerator:
Net income	$	2,788	$	401
Dividends on preferred stock
Net income available to common stockholders	$	2,788	$	401
Undistributed loss allocated to preferred stockholders
Income allocated to common stockholders	$	2,788	$	401
Denominator:
Basic		9,100,616		4,880,676
Dilutive options		56,315		64,780
Diluted		9,156,931		4,945,456
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.30	$	0.08
Diluted	$	0.30	$	0.08

Nine months ended September 30,	2018		2017
Numerator:
Net income	$	8,386	$	13
Dividends on preferred stock				(371	)
Net income (loss) available to common stockholders	$	8,386	$	(358	)
Undistributed loss allocated to preferred stockholders				475
Income allocated to common stockholders	$	8,386	$	117
Denominator:
Basic		9,089,636		4,002,165
Dilutive options		53,405		58,648
Diluted		9,143,041		4,060,813
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.92	$	0.03
Diluted	$	0.92	$	0.03

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, there were no outstanding stock options that were excluded from the dilutive earnings per share calculation. There were 25,300 outstanding stock options for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 that were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation because of their antidilutive effect.

On January 20, 2017, Riverview announced that it entered into agreements with accredited investors and qualified institutional buyers to raise approximately $17.0 million in common and preferred equity, before expenses, through the private placement of 269,885 shares of its no par value common stock at a price of $10.50 per share and 1,348,809 shares of a newly created Series A convertible, perpetual preferred stock (the “Series A preferred stock”) at a price of $10.50 per share.

The additional capital allowed Riverview to announce on April 20, 2017, the execution of a definitive business combination agreement to form a strategic partnership with CBT Financial Corp, Clearfield, Pennsylvania. This action formed a combined community banking franchise with approximately $1.2 billion in assets.

Effective as of the close of business on June 22, 2017, the Company filed an amendment to its Articles of Incorporation to authorize a class ofnon-voting common stock after obtaining shareholder approval on June 21, 2017. As a result, each share of Series A convertible, preferred stock was automatically converted into one share ofnon-voting common stock as of the effective date. Thenon-voting common stock has the same relative rights as, and is identical in all respects with, each other share of common stock of the Company, except that holders ofnon-voting common stock do not have voting rights.

13

4. Investment securities:

The amortized cost and fair value of investment securitiesavailable-for-sale aggregated by investment category at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 are summarized as follows:

September 30, 2018	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
State and municipals:
Taxable	$	34,769	$	139	$	1,384	$	33,524
Tax-exempt		13,583		4		286		13,301
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. Government agencies		25,302		95		186		25,211
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises		16,639		15		496		16,158
Corporate debt obligations		9,519				611		8,908
Total	$	99,812	$	253	$	2,963	$	97,102
December 31, 2017	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
State and municipals:
Taxable	$	35,352	$	334	$	684	$	35,002
Tax-exempt		16,325		47		64		16,308
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. Government agencies		22,908		3		94		22,817
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises		10,218		19		148		10,089
Corporate debt obligations		9,529				544		8,985
Total	$	94,332	$	403	$	1,534	$	93,201

The maturity distribution of the fair value, which is the net carrying amount, of the debt securities classified asavailable-for-sale at September 30, 2018, is summarized as follows:

September 30, 2018	Fair Value
Within one year	$	3,470
After one but within five years		4,779
After five but within ten years		13,207
After ten years		34,277
		55,733
Mortgage-backed securities		41,369
Total	$	97,102

Securities with a carrying value of $64,719 and $93,201 at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, were pledged to secure public deposits as required or permitted by law.

Securities and short-term investment activities are conducted with a diverse group of government entities, corporations and state and local municipalities. The counterparty’s creditworthiness and type of collateral is evaluated on acase-by-case basis. At September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, there were no significant concentrations of credit risk from any one issuer, with the exception of U.S. Government agencies and sponsored enterprises that exceeded 10.0 percent of stockholders’ equity.

14

The fair value and gross unrealized losses of investment securities with unrealized losses for which an other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) has not been recognized at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, aggregated by investment category and length of time that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, are summarized as follows:

	Less Than 12 Months				12 Months or More				Total
September 30, 2018	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
State and municipals:
Taxable	$	5,334	$	113	$	20,682	$	1,271	$	26,016	$	1,384
Tax-exempt		9,932		181		2,795		105		12,727		286
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. Government agencies		7,679		134		944		52		8,623		186
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises		8,283		101		6,527		395		14,810		496
Corporate debt obligation						8,908		611		8,908		611
Total	$	31,228	$	529	$	39,856	$	2,434	$	71,084	$	2,963

	Less Than 12 Months				12 Months or More				Total
December 31, 2017	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
State and municipals:
Taxable	$	4,757	$	30	$	20,185	$	654	$	24,942	$	684
Tax-exempt		10,506		64						10,506		64
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. Government agencies		16,746		87		193		7		16,939		94
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises		4,294		23		4,174		125		8,468		148
Corporate debt obligation		3,800		200		5,185		344		8,985		544
Total	$	40,103	$	404	$	29,737	$	1,130	$	69,840	$	1,534

The Company had 89 investment securities, consisting of 42 taxable state and municipal obligations, 25tax-exempt municipal obligations, 18 mortgage-backed securities, and four corporate debt obligations that were in unrealized loss positions at September 30, 2018. Of these securities, 14 taxable state and municipal obligation, fivetax-exempt municipals, 11 mortgage-backed securities and four corporate debt obligations were in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or more. Management does not consider the unrealized losses on the debt securities, as a result of changes in interest rates, to be OTTI based on historical evidence that indicates the cost of these securities is recoverable within a reasonable period of time in relation to normal cyclical changes in the market rates of interest. Moreover, because there has been no material change in the credit quality of the issuers or other events or circumstances that may cause a significant adverse impact on the fair value of these securities, and management does not intend to sell these securities and it is unlikely that the Company will be required to sell these securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider the unrealized losses to be OTTI at September 30, 2018. There was no OTTI recognized for the three months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.

The Company had 88 investment securities, consisting of 34 taxable state and municipal obligations, 21tax-exempt state and municipal obligations, 29 mortgage-backed securities and four corporate debt obligations that were in unrealized loss positions at December 31, 2017. Of these securities, 25 taxable state and municipal obligations, five mortgage-backed securities and two corporate debt obligations were in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or more.

15

5. Loans, net and allowance for loan losses:

The major classifications of loans outstanding, net of deferred loan origination fees and costs at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 are summarized as follows. Net deferred loan costs were $1,019 and $863 at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.

	September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017
Commercial	$	128,265	$	140,116
Real estate:
Construction		36,478		34,405
Commercial		510,840		526,230
Residential		227,132		240,626
Consumer		12,814		14,594
Total	$	915,529	$	955,971

The changes in the allowance for loan losses account by major classification of loan for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 are summarized as follows:

					Real Estate
September 30, 2018		Commercial			Construction			Commercial			Residential			Consumer			Unallocated			Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning Balance, July 1, 2018		$	1,026		$	249		$	3,606		$	1,295		$	36		$	189		$	6,401
Charge-offs			(23	)								(33	)		(133	)					(189	)
Recoveries			2						1			8			24						35
Provisions			411			61			(212	)		26			120			(181	)		225
Ending balance		$	1,416		$	310		$	3,395		$	1,296		$	47		$	8		$	6,472
					Real Estate
September 30, 2018		Commercial			Construction			Commercial			Residential			Consumer			Unallocated			Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning Balance, January 1, 2018		$	1,206		$	379		$	2,963		$	1,340		$	37		$	381		$	6,306
Charge-offs			(193	)								(93	)		(295	)					(581	)
Recoveries			10						5			29			88						132
Provisions			393			(69	)		427			20			217			(373	)		615
Ending balance	��	$	1,416		$	310		$	3,395		$	1,296		$	47		$	8		$	6,472
					Real Estate
September 30, 2017		Commercial			Construction			Commercial			Residential			Consumer			Unallocated			Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning Balance, July 1, 2017		$	757		$	192		$	2,965		$	828		$	49		$	43		$	4,834
Charge-offs			(24	)								(18	)								(42	)
Recoveries			1												1						2
Provisions			421			(3	)		(56	)		127			(4	)		125			610
Ending balance		$	1,155		$	189		$	2,909		$	937		$	46		$	168		$	5,404
					Real Estate
September 30, 2017		Commercial			Construction			Commercial			Residential			Consumer			Unallocated			Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Beginning Balance, January 1, 2017		$	629		$	160		$	2,110		$	789		$	44					$	3,732
Charge-offs			(34	)								(34	)		(7	)					(75	)
Recoveries			1						3			7			2						13
Provisions			559			29			796			175			7		$	168			1,732
Ending balance		$	1,155		$	189		$	2,909		$	937		$	46		$	168		$	5,404

16

The allocation of the allowance for loan losses and the related loans by major classifications of loans at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 is summarized as follows:

			Real Estate
September 30, 2018	Commercial		Construction		Commercial		Residential		Consumer		Unallocated		Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending balance	$	1,416	$	310	$	3,395	$	1,296	$	47	$	8	$	6,472
Ending balance:
individually evaluated for impairment		398				139		34						571
Ending balance:
collectively evaluated for impairment		1,018		310		3,256		1,262		47		8		5,901
Ending balance:
purchased credit impaired loans	$		$		$		$		$				$
Loans receivable:
Ending balance	$	128,265	$	36,478	$	510,840	$	227,132	$	12,814			$	915,529
Ending balance:
individually evaluated for impairment		1,280				3,413		2,256						6,949
Ending balance:
collectively evaluated for impairment		126,697		36,478		503,555		224,085		12,814				903,629
Ending balance:
purchased credit impaired loans	$	288	$		$	3,872	$	791	$				$	4,951
			Real Estate
December 31, 2017	Commercial		Construction		Commercial		Residential		Consumer		Unallocated		Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Ending balance	$	1,206	$	379	$	2,963	$	1,340	$	37	$	381	$	6,306
Ending balance:
individually evaluated for impairment		56				76		92						224
Ending balance:
collectively evaluated for impairment		1,150		379		2,887		1,248		37		381		6,082
Ending balance:
purchased credit impaired loans	$		$		$		$		$		$		$
Loans receivable:
Ending balance	$	140,116	$	34,405	$	526,230	$	240,626	$	14,594	$		$	955,971
Ending balance:
individually evaluated for impairment		777				2,988		2,482						6,247
Ending balance:
collectively evaluated for impairment		138,824		34,405		516,300		237,089		14,594				941,212
Ending balance:
purchased credit impaired loans	$	515	$		$	6,942	$	1,055	$		$		$	8,512

17

The Company segments loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. Loans are individually analyzed for credit risk by classifying them within the Company’s internal risk rating system. The Company’s risk rating classifications are defined as follows:

• Pass—A loan to borrowers with acceptable credit quality and risk that is not adversely classified as Substandard, Doubtful, Loss or designated as Special Mention.

• Special Mention—A loan that has potential weaknesses that deserves management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or in the institution’s credit position at some future date. Special Mention loans are not adversely classified since they do not expose the Company to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification.

• Substandard—A loan that is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or by the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified must have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

• Doubtful—A loan classified as Doubtful has all the weaknesses inherent in one classified Substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make the collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

• Loss—A loan classified as Loss is considered uncollectible and of such little value that its continuance as a bankable loan is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the loan has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but rather it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off this basically worthless asset even though partial recovery may occur in the future.

The following tables present the major classification of loans summarized by the aggregate pass rating and the classified ratings of special mention, substandard and doubtful within the Company’s internal risk rating system at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:

September 30, 2018	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful	Total
Commercial	$	111,392	$	9,423	$	7,450		$	128,265
Real estate:
Construction		35,770		1		707			36,478
Commercial		489,199		8,805		12,836			510,840
Residential		221,778		2,524		2,830			227,132
Consumer		12,814							12,814
Total	$	870,953	$	20,753	$	23,823		$	915,529
December 31, 2017	Pass		Special Mention		Substandard		Doubtful	Total
Commercial	$	126,506	$	9,372	$	4,238		$	140,116
Real estate:
Construction		32,840		1,442		123			34,405
Commercial		497,852		15,305		13,073			526,230
Residential		234,808		2,214		3,604			240,626
Consumer		14,474		120					14,594
Total	$	906,480	$	28,453	$	21,038		$	955,971

18

The following tables present the classes of the loan portfolio summarized by the aging categories of performing loans and nonaccrual loans as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. Purchase credit impaired (“PCI”) loans are excluded from the aging and nonaccrual loan schedules.

	Accrual Loans
September 30, 2018	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 or More Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Nonaccrual Loans			Total Loans
Commercial	$	187	$	113			$	300	$	126,505	$	1,172		$	127,977
Real estate:
Construction		373						373		36,105					36,478
Commercial		379		520	$	99		998		505,260		710			506,968
Residential		1,618		367		106		2,091		223,352		898			226,341
Consumer		107		48		20		175		12,639					12,814
Total	$	2,664	$	1,048	$	225	$	3,937	$	903,861	$	2,780	��	$	910,578
Purchased credit impaired loans															4,951
Total Loans														$	915,529
	Accrual Loans
December 31, 2017	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 or More Days Past Due		Total Past Due		Current		Nonaccrual Loans			Total Loans
Commercial	$	1,829	$	85			$	1,914	$	137,612	$	75		$	139,601
Real estate:
Construction		8						8		34,397					34,405
Commercial		2,213		152	$	150		2,515		516,410		363			519,288
Residential		2,110		551		533		3,194		235,070		1,307			239,571
Consumer		149		60		9		218		14,376					14,594
Total	$	6,309	$	848	$	692	$	7,849	$	937,865	$	1,745		$	947,459
Purchased credit impaired loans															8,512
Total Loans														$	955,971

19

The following tables summarize information concerning impaired loans as of and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017, and as of and for the year ended, December 31, 2017 by major loan classification:

							This Quarter				Year-to-Date
September 30, 2018	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance:
Commercial	$	288	$	288	$		$	327	$	27	$	562	$	399
Real estate:
Construction
Commercial		6,181		6,181				6,580		795		7,081		2,165
Residential		2,865		2,883				2,941		64		3,011		201
Consumer
Total		9,334		9,352				9,848		886		10,654		2,765
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial		1,280		1,280		398		1,056		2		1,072		5
Real estate:
Construction
Commercial		1,104		1,104		139		818		4		723		11
Residential		182		320		34		184				184		3
Consumer
Total		2,566		2,704		571		2,058		6		1,979		19
Commercial		1,568		1,568		398		1,383		29		1,634		404
Real estate:
Construction
Commercial		7,285		7,285		139		7,398		799		7,804		2,176
Residential		3,047		3,203		34		3,125		64		3,195		204
Consumer
Total	$	11,900	$	12,056	$	571	$	11,906	$	892	$	12,633	$	2,784

							For the Year Ended
December 31, 2017	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance:
Commercial	$	1,107	$	1,107	$		$	1,210	$	77
Real estate:
Construction
Commercial		9,399		9,399				10,164		340
Residential		3,197		3,215				2,896		149
Consumer
Total		13,703		13,721				14,270		566
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial		185		185		56		186		1
Real estate:
Construction
Commercial		531		531		76		532		23
Residential		340		478		92		339		12
Consumer
Total		1,056		1,194		224		1,057		36
Commercial		1,292		1,292		56		1,396		78
Real estate:
Construction
Commercial		9,930		9,930		76		10,696		363
Residential		3,537		3,693		92		3,235		161
Consumer
Total	$	14,759	$	14,915	$	224	$	15,327	$	602

20

							This Quarter				Year-to-Date
September 30, 2017	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no related allowance:
Commercial	$	724	$	724			$	798	$	8	$	803	$	23
Real estate:
Construction
Commercial		2,753		2,753				2,760		32		2,992		90
Residential		2,274		2,292				2,304		28		2,408		87
Consumer
Total		5,751		5,769				5,862		68		6,203		200
With an allowance recorded:
Commercial		75		75	$	25		78				76		1
Real estate:
Construction
Commercial		918		918		194		820		8		798		20
Residential		188		326		54		189		2		126		6
Consumer
Total		1,181		1,319		273		1,087		10		1,000		27
Commercial		799		799		25		876		8		879		24
Real estate:
Construction
Commercial		3,671		3,671		194		3,580		40		3,790		110
Residential		2,462		2,618		54		2,493		30		2,534		93
Consumer
Total	$	6,932	$	7,088	$	273	$	6,949	$	78	$	7,203	$	227

For the three and nine months ended September 30, interest income related to impaired loans, would have increased by $23 and $79 in 2018 and $23 and $77 in 2017 had the loans been current and the terms of the loans not been modified.

Troubled debt restructured loans are loans with original terms, interest rate, or both, that have been modified as a result of a deterioration in the borrower’s financial condition and a concession has been granted that the Company would not otherwise consider. Unless on nonaccrual, interest income on these loans is recognized when earned, using the interest method. The Company offers a variety of modifications to borrowers that would be considered concessions. The modification categories offered generally fall within the following categories:

• Rate Modification—A modification in which the interest rate is changed to a below market rate.

• Term Modification—A modification in which the maturity date, timing of payments or frequency of payments is changed.

• Interest Only Modification—A modification in which the loan is converted to interest only payments for a period of time.

• Payment Modification—A modification in which the dollar amount of the payment is changed, other than an interest only modification described above.

• Combination Modification—Any other type of modification, including the use of multiple categories above.

Included in the commercial loan and commercial and residential real estate categories are troubled debt restructurings that are classified as impaired. Troubled debt restructurings totaled $4,766 at September 30, 2018, $5,606 at December 31, 2017 and $5,793 at September 30, 2017.

There were no loans modified as troubled debt restructuring for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018. There were no loans modified as troubled debt restructuring for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and two residential real estate loans modified as troubled debt restructuring for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 in the amount of $138.

During the three months ended September 30, 2018, there were no defaults on loans restructured and six defaults on loans restructured totaling $1,474 during the nine months ended September 30, 2018. During the three months ended September 30, 2017, there was one default on loans restructured within the last twelve months. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, there were five defaults on loan restructured within the last twelve months totaling $1,374.

21

Purchased loans are initially recorded at their acquisition date fair values. The carryover of the allowance for loan losses is prohibited as any credit losses in the loans are included in the determination of the fair value of the loans at the acquisition date. Fair values for purchased loans are based on a cash flow methodology that involves assumptions and judgments as to credit risk, default rates, loss severity, collateral values, discount rates, payment speeds, and prepayment risk.

As part of its acquisition due diligence process, the Bank reviews the acquired institution’s loan grading system and the associated risk rating for loans. In performing this review, the Bank considers cash flows, debt service coverage, delinquency status, accrual status, and collateral for the loan. This process allows the Bank to clearly identify the population of acquired loans that had evidence of deterioration in credit quality since origination and for which it was probable, at acquisition, that the Bank would be unable to collect all contractually required payments. All such loans identified by the Bank are considered to be within the scope of ASC310-30, Loan and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality and are identified as “Purchased Credit Impaired Loans”.

As a result of the merger with CBT, effective October 1, 2017, the Bank identified 37 PCI loans. As part of the merger with Citizens, effective December 31, 2015, the Bank identified 10 PCI loans. As a result of the consolidation with Union effective November 1, 2013, the Bank identified 14 PCI loans. For all PCI loans, the excess of cash flows expected at acquisition over the estimated fair value is referred to as the accretable discount and is recognized into interest income over the remaining life of the loan. The difference between contractually required payments at acquisition and the cash flows expected to be collected at acquisition is referred to as thenon-accretable discount. Thenon-accretable discount represents estimated future credit losses expected to be incurred over the life of the loan. Subsequent decreases to the expected cash flows require the Bank to evaluate the need for an allowance for loan losses on these loans. Subsequent improvements in expected cash flows result in the reversal of a corresponding amount of thenon-accretable discount which the Bank then reclassifies as an accretable discount that is recognized into interest income over the remaining life of the loan. The Bank’s evaluation of the amount of future cash flows that it expects to collect is based on a cash flow methodology that involves assumptions and judgments as to credit risk, collateral values, discount rates, payment speeds, and prepayment risk. Charge-offs of the principal amount on purchased impaired loans are first applied to thenon-accretable discount.

For purchased loans that are not deemed impaired at acquisition, credit discounts representing principal losses expected over the life of the loans are a component of the initial fair value, and the discount is accreted to interest income over the life of the asset. Subsequent to the purchase date, the method used to evaluate the sufficiency of the credit discount is similar to originated loans, and if necessary, additional reserves are recognized in the allowance for loan losses.

The unpaid principal balances and the related carrying amount of acquired loans as of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 were as follows:

	September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017
Credit impaired purchased loans evaluated individually for incurred credit losses:
Outstanding balance	$	9,853	$	16,803
Carrying Amount		4,951		8,512
Other purchased loans evaluated collectively for incurred credit losses:
Outstanding balance		339,136		421,620
Carrying Amount		337,280		418,146
Total Purchased Loans:
Outstanding balance		348,989		438,423
Carrying Amount	$	342,231	$	426,658

22

As of the indicated dates, the changes in the accretable discount related to the purchased credit impaired loans were as follows:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2018			2017			2018			2017
Balance – beginning of period	$	1,439		$	323		$	2,129		$	370
Accretion recognized during the period		(819	)		(21	)		(2,673	)		(44	)
Net reclassification fromnon-accretable to accretable		208			11			1,372			(13	)
Balance – end of period	$	828		$	313		$	828		$	313

The Company is a party to financial instruments withoff-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, unused portions of lines of credit and standby letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets.

Unused commitments at September 30, 2018, totaled $137,801 consisting of $71,813 in commitments to extend credit, $60,276 in unused portions of lines of credit and $5,712 in standby letters of credit. Due to fixed maturity dates, specified conditions within these instruments, and the ultimate needs of our customers, many will expire without being drawn upon. We believe that amounts actually drawn upon can be funded in the normal course of operations and therefore, do not represent a significant liquidity risk to us. In comparison, unused commitments, at December 31, 2017, totaled $129,734, consisting of $52,706 in commitments to extend credit, $72,157 in unused portions of lines of credit and $4,871 in standby letters of credit.

6. Other assets:

The components of other assets at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 are summarized as follows:

	September 30, 2018		December 31, 2017
Other real estate owned	$	668	$	236
Bank owned life insurance		29,670		29,065
Restricted equity securities		1,262		1,306
Deferred tax assets		6,612		7,949
Other assets		4,981		5,147
Total	$	43,193	$	43,703

As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (“FHLB”) and Atlantic Community Bankers Bank (“ACBB”), the Company is required to purchase and hold stock in these entities to satisfy membership and borrowing requirements. These restricted equity securities can only be redeemed or sold at their par value and only to the respective issuing institution or to another member institution. The Company records thesenon-marketable equity securities as a component of other assets and periodically evaluates these securities for impairment. Management considers thesenon-marketable equity securities to be long-term investments. Accordingly, when evaluating these securities for impairment, management considers the ultimate recoverability of the par value rather than recognizing temporary declines in value.

7. Fair value estimates:

The Company uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosure under GAAP. Fair value estimates are calculated without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of certain assets and liabilities that are not considered financial. Accordingly, such assets and liabilities are excluded from disclosure requirements.

In accordance with FASB ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is best determined based upon quoted market prices. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. In that regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets. In many cases, these values cannot be realized in immediate settlement of the instrument.

23

Current fair value guidance provides a consistent definition of fair value, which focuses on exit price in an orderly transaction that is not a forced liquidation or distressed sale between participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. If there has been a significant decrease in the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability, a change in valuation technique or the use of multiple valuation techniques may be appropriate. In such instances, determining the price at which willing market participants would transact at the measurement date under current market conditions depends on the facts and circumstances and requires the use of significant judgment. The fair value is a reasonable point within the range that is most representative of fair value under current market conditions.

In accordance with GAAP, the Company groups its assets and liabilities generally measured at fair value into three levels based on market information or other fair value estimates in which the assets and liabilities are traded or valued, and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine fair value. These levels include:

• Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices of identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

• Level 2: Significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

• Level 3: Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

An asset’s or liability’s placement in the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value estimate.

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company to calculate fair values and related carrying amounts of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

Investment securities:The fair values of U.S. Treasury securities and marketable equity securities are based on quoted market prices from active exchange markets. The fair values of debt securities are based on pricing from a matrix pricing model.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 are summarized as follows:

	Fair Value Measurement Using
September 30, 2018	Amount		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)	Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
State and Municipals:
Taxable	$	33,524		$	33,524
Tax-exempt		13,301			13,301
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. Government agencies		25,211			25,211
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises		16,158			16,158
Corporate debt obligations		8,908			8,908
Total	$	97,102		$	97,102

	Fair Value Measurement Using
December 31, 2017	Amount		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)	Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
State and municipals:
Taxable	$	35,002		$	35,002
Tax-exempt		16,308			16,308
Mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. Government agencies		22,817			22,817
U.S. Government-sponsored enterprises		10,089			10,089
Corporate debt obligations		8,985			8,985
Total	$	93,201		$	93,201

24

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 are summarized as follows:

	Fair Value Measurement Using
September 30, 2018	Amount		(Level 1) Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets	(Level 2) Significant Other Observable Inputs	(Level 3) Significant Unobservable Inputs
Other real estate owned	$	668			$	668
Impaired loans, net of related allowance		1,995				1,995
Total	$	2,663			$	2,663
	Fair Value Measurement Using
December 31, 2017	Amount		(Level 1) Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets	(Level 2) Significant Other Observable Inputs	(Level 3) Significant Unobservable Inputs
Other real estate owned	$	236			$	236
Impaired loans, net of related allowance		832				832
Total	$	1,068			$	1,068

Fair values of impaired loans are based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

Fair value of other real estate owned is generally determined through independent appraisals of the underlying collateral, which generally include various Level 3 inputs which are not identifiable. Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses. The range and weighted average of liquidation expenses and other appraisal adjustments are presented as a percent of the appraisal.

The following tables present additional quantitative information about assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and for which the Company utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:

	Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
September 30, 2018	Fair Value Estimate		Valuation Techniques	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)
Other real estate owned	$	668	Appraisal of collateral	Appraisal adjustments		0.0% to 69.0% (7.7)%
				Liquidation expenses		0.0% to 7.0% (7.0)%
Impaired loans	$	1,995	Appraisal of collateral	Appraisal adjustments		0.0% to 0.0% (0.0)%
				Liquidation expenses		0.0% to 25.0% (9.5)%
	Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
December 31, 2017	Fair Value Estimate		Valuation Techniques	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)
Other real estate owned	$	236	Appraisal of collateral	Appraisal adjustments		0.0% to 69.0% (39.0)%
				Liquidation expenses		0.0% to 7.0% (7.0)%
Impaired loans	$	832	Appraisal of collateral	Appraisal adjustments		0.0% to 0.0% (0.0)%
				Liquidation expenses		0.0% to 7.0% (7.0)%

Fair value is generally determined through independent appraisals of the underlying collateral, which generally include various Level 3 Inputs which are not identifiable.

Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses. The range and weighted average of liquidation expenses and other appraisal adjustments are presented as a percent of the appraisal.

25

The carrying and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 and their placement within the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

			Fair Value Hierarchy
September 30, 2018	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	56,815	$	56,815	$	56,815
Investment securities		97,102		97,102			$	97,102
Loans held for sale		598		598				598
Net loans (1)		909,057		898,735					$	898,735
Accrued interest receivable		3,066		3,066				776		2,290
Restricted equity securities		1,262		1,262		1,262
Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	1,020,764	$	1,014,260			$	1,014,260
Long-term debt		13,019		14,168				14,168
Accrued interest payable		503		503				503
			Fair Value Hierarchy
December 31, 2017	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Financial assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	25,786	$	25,786	$	25,786
Investment securitiesavailable-for-sale		93,201		93,201			$	93,201
Loans held for sale		254		254				254
Net loans (1)		949,665		954,876					$	954,876
Accrued interest receivable		3,237		3,237				640		2,597
Restricted equity securities		1,306		1,306		1,306
Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	1,026,480	$	1,022,068			$	1,022,068
Short-term borrowings		6,000		6,000				6,000
Long-term debt		13,233		14,634				14,634
Accrued interest payable		468		468				468

(1) The carrying amount is net of unearned income and the allowance for loan losses in accordance with the adoption of ASUNo. 2016-01 where the fair value of loans as of September 30, 2018 was measured using an exit price notion. The fair value of loans at December 31, 2017 was measured using an entry price notion.

Note 8. Revenue recognition:

On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted ASUNo. 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (Topic 606) and all subsequent ASUs that modified Topic 606. As stated in Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, the implementation of the new standard did not have a material impact on the measurement or recognition of revenue; as such, a cumulative effect adjustment to opening retained earnings was not deemed necessary. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2018 are presented under Topic 606, while prior period amounts were not adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with our historic accounting under Topic 605.

Topic 606 does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including revenue from loans and securities. In addition, certain noninterest income streams such as fees associated with mortgage servicing rights, financial guarantees, derivatives, and certain credit card fees are also not in scope of the new guidance. Topic 606 is applicable to noninterest revenue streams such as trust and asset management income, deposit related fees, interchange fees, merchant income, and other fees. However, the recognition of these revenue streams did not change significantly upon adoption of Topic 606. Substantially all of the Company’s revenue is generated from contracts with customers. Noninterest revenue streamsin-scope of Topic 606 are discussed below.

26

Service Charges, Fees and Commissions

Service charges on deposit accounts consist of monthly service fees, check orders, and other deposit account related fees. The Company’s performance obligation for monthly service fees is generally satisfied, and the related revenue recognized, over the period in which the service is provided. Check orders and other deposit account related fees are largely transactional based, and therefore, the Company’s performance obligation is satisfied, and related revenue recognized, at a point in time. Payment for service charges on deposit accounts is primarily received immediately or in the following month through a direct charge to customers’ accounts.

Fees, exchange, and other service charges are primarily comprised of debit and credit card income, ATM fees, merchant services income, and other service charges. Debit and credit card income is primarily comprised of interchange fees earned whenever the Company’s debit and credit cards are processed through card payment networks such as Mastercard. Such income is presented net of network expenses as the Company acts as an agent in these transactions. ATM fees are primarily generated when a Company cardholder uses anon-Company ATM, or anon-Company cardholder uses a Company ATM. Merchant services income mainly represents fees charged to merchants to process their debit and credit card transactions, in addition to account management fees. Other service charges include revenue from processing wire transfers, bill pay service, cashier’s checks, and other services. The Company’s performance obligation for fees, exchange, and other service charges are largely satisfied, and related revenue recognized, when the services are rendered or upon completion. Payment is typically received immediately or in the following month.

Other noninterest income consists of other recurring revenue streams such as commissions from sales of mutual funds and other investments, investment advisor fees from wealth management products, safety deposit box rental fees, and other miscellaneous revenue streams. Commissions from the sale of mutual funds and other investments are recognized on trade date, which is when the Company has satisfied its performance obligation. The Company also receives periodic service fees or trailers from mutual fund companies typically based on a percentage of net asset value. Trailer revenue is recorded over time, usually monthly or quarterly, as net asset value is determined. Investment advisor fees from wealth management products is earned over time and based on an annual percentage rate of the net asset value. The investment advisor fees are charged to the customer’s account in advance on the first month of the quarter, and the revenue is recognized over the following three-month period. Safe deposit box rental fees are charged to the customer on an annual basis and recognized upon receipt of payment. The Company determined that since rentals and renewals occur fairly consistently over time, revenue is recognized on a basis consistent with the duration of the performance obligation.

Trust and Asset Management

Trust and asset management income is primarily comprised of fees earned from the management and administration of trusts and other customer assets. The Company’s performance obligation is generally satisfied over time and the resulting fees are recognized monthly, based upon themonth-end market value of the assets under management and the applicable fee rate. Payment is generally received a few days after month end through a direct charge to customers’ accounts. The Company does not earn performance-based incentives. Optional services such as real estate sales and tax return preparation services are also available to existing trust and asset management customers. The Company’s performance obligation for these transactional-based services is generally satisfied, and related revenue recognized, at a point in time (i.e., as incurred). Payment is received shortly after services are rendered.

The following presents noninterest income, segregated by revenue streamsin-scope andout-of-scope of Topic 606, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017.

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2018	2018		2017		2018		2017
Noninterest Income:
In-scope of Topic 606:
Service charges, fees and commissions	$	1,267	$	270	$	4,146	$	899
Trust and asset management		425		210		1,243		723
Noninterest income(in-scope of Topic 606)		1,692		480		5,389		1,622
Noninterest income(out-of-scope of Topic 606)		362		355		1,151		794
Total noninterest income	$	2,054	$	835	$	6,540	$	2,416

Contract Balances

A contract asset balance occurs when an entity performs a service for a customer before the customer pays consideration, resulting in a contract receivable, or before payment is due, resulting in a contract asset. A contract liability balance is an entity’s obligation to transfer a service to a customer for which the entity has already received payment (or payment is due) from the customer. The Company’s noninterest revenue streams are largely based on transactional activity, or standardmonth-end revenue accruals such as

27

asset management fees based onmonth-end market values. Consideration is often received immediately or shortly after the Company satisfies its performance obligation and revenue is recognized. The Company does not typically enter into long-term revenue contracts with customers, and therefore, does not experience significant contract balances. As of September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the Company did not have any significant contract balances.

Contract Acquisition Costs

In connection with the adoption of Topic 606, an entity is required to capitalize, and subsequently amortize into expense, certain incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer if these costs are expected to be recovered. The incremental costs of obtaining a contract are those costs that an entity incurs to obtain a contract with a customer that it would not have incurred if the contract had not been obtained, for example, sales commission. The Company utilizes the practical expedient which allows entities to immediately expense contract acquisition costs when the asset that would have resulted from capitalizing these costs would have been amortized in one year or less. Upon adoption of Topic 606, the Company did not capitalize any contract acquisition cost.

28

Riverview Financial Corporation

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited consolidated interim financial statements contained in Part I, Item 1 of this report, and with our audited consolidated financial statements and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” presented in our Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements:

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which are subject to risks and uncertainties. These statements are based on assumptions and may describe future plans, strategies and expectations of Riverview Financial Corporation and its direct and indirect subsidiaries. These forward-looking statements are generally identified by use of the words “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “project” or similar expressions. All statements in this report, other than statements of historical facts, are forward-looking statements.

Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: our ability to achieve the intended benefits of acquisitions and integration of previously acquired businesses; restructuring initiatives; changes in interest rates; economic conditions, particularly in our market area; legislative and regulatory changes and the ability to comply with the significant laws and regulations governing the banking and financial services business; monetary and fiscal policies of the U.S. government, including policies of the U.S. Department of Treasury and the Federal Reserve System; credit risk associated with lending activities and changes in the quality and composition of our loan and investment portfolios; demand for loan and other products; deposit flows; competition; changes in the values of real estate and other collateral securing the loan portfolio, particularly in our market area; changes in relevant accounting principles and guidelines; and inability of third party service providers to perform.

These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Except as required by applicable law or regulation, Riverview Financial Corporation does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to release publicly the result of any revisions that may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of the statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements referred to in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) are incorporated by reference into the MD&A. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current year’s presentation and did not have any effect on the operating results or financial position of the Company.

Critical Accounting Policies:

Disclosure of our significant accounting policies are included in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements of the Annual Report on Form10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017. Some of these policies are particularly sensitive requiring significant judgments, estimates and assumptions. Critical accounting policies are defined as those that are reflective of significant judgments and uncertainties and could potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions and conditions. We believe that the most critical accounting policies upon which our financial condition and results of operation depend, and which involve the most complex subjective decisions or assessments, are included in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s Annual Report on Form10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 23, 2018.

Operating Environment:

Growth declined in the third quarter of 2018 from 4.2% recorded in the second quarter 2018, but the economy still posted its bestback-to-back quarters in four years as a result of strong consumer and government spending. The gross domestic product (“GDP”), the value of all goods and services produced in the United States, increased at an annualized rate of 3.5% in the third quarter of 2018. The consumer price index for the last 12 months rose 2.2% ending September 30, 2018. Excluding the food and energy components, core consumer price index increased 2.0% over the latest twelve months which was above the Federal Open

29

Market Committee (“FOMC”) inflation benchmark of 2.0%. Based on recent trends of higher inflation, the FOMC increased the federal funds target rate on September 29, 2018 for the eighth time since December 2015 to 2.25%. The FOMC is expected to continue their gradual pace of interest rate increases aimed at keeping the economy from overheating without moving so fast as to curtail the economic expansion. Accordingly, these interest rate increases may have an adverse impact on our loan growth, asset quality and fund costs.

Review of Financial Position:

Total assets decreased $6,874, to $1,156,733 at September 30, 2018, from $1,163,607 at December 31, 2017. Loans, net decreased to $915,529 at September 30, 2018, compared to $955,971 at December 31, 2017, a decrease of $40,442. All major categories of loans declined in 2018. Business lending, including commercial and commercial real estate loans decreased $25,168 while retail lending, including residential mortgages and consumer loans decreased $15,274 during the nine months ended September 30, 2018. Investment securities increased $3,901, or 4.2%, in the nine months ended September 30, 2018. Noninterest-bearing deposits increased $6,490, while interest-bearing deposits decreased $12,206 in the nine months ended September 30, 2018. Total stockholders’ equity increased 5,775, or 5.4%, to $112,031 at September 30, 2018 from $106,256 atyear-end 2017. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, total assets averaged $1,155,750, an increase of $544,273 from $611,477 for the same period in 2017. The growth in average assets was primarily a result of the inclusion of the assets for both Riverview and CBT for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, compared to Riverview on a standalone basis for the same period last year. For the third quarter of 2018, total assets and deposits increased $4,929 and $3,042, respectively, while loans, net decreased $24,358.

Investment Portfolio:

The Company’s entire investment portfolio is held asavailable-for-sale, which allows for greater flexibility in using the investment portfolio for liquidity purposes by allowing securities to be sold when favorable market opportunities exist. Investment securitiesavailable-for-sale totaled $97,102 at September 30, 2018, an increase of $3,901, or 4.2%, from $93,201 at December 31, 2017. The reduction was a result of payments, prepayments, and sales on investments partially offset by $20,135 securities acquired in the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, the investment portfolio averaged $92,162, an increase of $20,911 compared to $71,251 for the same period last year. The increase was primarily attributable to assets acquired from the merger. Thetax-equivalent yield on the investment portfolio decreased to 2.79% for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, from 3.42% for the comparable period of 2017. Thetax-equivalent yield on the investment portfolio for the third quarter of 2018 increased one basis point to 2.82% from 2.81% for the second quarter of 2018.

Securitiesavailable-for-sale are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains or losses net of deferred income taxes reported in the accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) component of stockholders’ equity. We reported a net unrealized holding loss, included as a separate component of stockholders’ equity of $2,141, net of deferred income taxes of $569 at September 30, 2018, and $893, net of deferred income taxes of $238 at December 31, 2017. The increase in the net unrealized holding loss was a result of increases in general market rates.

Loan Portfolio:

Loans, net, decreased to $915,529 at September 30, 2018 from $955,971 at December 31, 2017, a decrease of $40,442, or 4.2%. We experienced declines in all major sectors of loans during the first nine months of 2018. Business loans, including commercial, construction and commercial real estate loans, decreased $25,168, or 3.6%, to $675,583 at September 30, 2018 from $700,751 at December 31, 2017. Retail loans, including residential real estate and consumer loans, decreased $15,274, or 6.0%, to $239,946 at September 30, 2018 from $255,220 atyear-end 2017. Comparatively, loans, net, grew $150,844, or 36.9%, in the first nine months of 2017. Loan originations in the first nine months of 2018 represented a more moderate pace as compared to the same period of 2017. The reduction in loan growth was a result of management’s decision to focus on improving margins on loan originations through employing prudent pricing practices and maintaining strong underwriting standards. For the third quarter of 2018, loans, net decreased $24,358, or 2.6%. Business loans declined $20,726, while retail loans decreased $3,632 during the third quarter of 2018.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, loans, net averaged $935,304, an increase of $457,271 compared to $478,033 for the same period of 2017. Thetax-equivalent yield on the loan portfolio was 5.19% for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, an 84 basis point increase from the comparable period last year. Loan accretion included in loan interest income in the first nine months of 2018 related to acquired loans was $3,753. Thetax-equivalent yield excluding the loan accretion would have been 4.65% in the first nine months of 2018. Thetax-equivalent yield on the loan portfolio increased 29 basis points during the third quarter of 2018 to 5.24% from 4.95% in the second quarter of 2018. The primary causes of the increase in thetax-equivalent yield was the recognition of a higher amount of loan accretion of $1,140 in the third quarter of 2018 compared to $740 in the second quarter of 2018 along with the impact of an increase in the prime rate of interest on variable rate loans.

30

In addition to the risks inherent in our loan portfolio in the normal course of business, we are also a party to financial instruments withoff-balance sheet risk to meet the financing needs of our customers. These instruments include legally binding commitments to extend credit, unused portions of lines of credit and commercial letters of credit made under the same underwriting standards ason-balance sheet instruments, and may involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit risk and interest rate risk (“IRR”) in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated financial statements.

Off-balance sheet commitments at September 30, 2018, totaled $137,801, consisting of $71,813 in commitments to extend credit, $60,276 in unused portions of lines of credit and $5,712 in standby letters of credit. Due to fixed maturity dates, specified conditions within these instruments, and the ultimate needs of our customers, many will expire without being drawn upon. We believe that amounts actually drawn upon can be funded in the normal course of operations and therefore, do not represent a significant liquidity risk to us. In comparison,off-balance sheet commitments, at December 31, 2017, totaled $129,734, consisting of $52,706 in commitments to extend credit, $72,157 in unused portions of lines of credit and $4,871 in standby letters of credit.

Asset Quality:

National, Pennsylvania and market area unemployment rates at September 30, 2018 and 2017 are summarized as follows:

	2018			2017
United States		3.7	%		4.2	%
Pennsylvania		4.4	%		4.8	%
Berks County		4.3	%		4.2	%
Blair County		4.3	%		4.2	%
Centre County		3.3	%		3.3	%
Clearfield County		4.7	%		4.7	%
Dauphin County		4.1	%		4.1	%
Huntingdon County		4.7	%		4.6	%
Lebanon County		4.0	%		3.7	%
Lycoming County		4.7	%		4.9	%
Northumberland County		4.9	%		4.7	%
Perry County		3.8	%		3.7	%
Schuylkill County		5.5	%		5.1	%
Somerset County		4.8	%		4.6	%

Employment conditions in 2018 improved for the United States and Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Conversely, all of the Counties in which we have branch locations weakened slightly with the exception of Lycoming County. The average unemployment rate for all of our Counties weakened to 4.4% in 2018 from 4.3% in 2017. The lowest unemployment rate in 2018 for all the Counties we serve was 3.3% which was in Centre County with the highest recorded rate being 5.5% in Schuylkill County. An increase in unemployment rates may have a negative impact on economic growth within these areas and could have a corresponding effect on our business by decreasing loan demand and weakening asset quality.

Our asset quality weakened slightly in the nine months ended September 30, 2018. Nonperforming assets increased $185, or 2.3% to $8,336 at September 30, 2018, from $8,151 at December 31, 2017. We experienced increases in nonaccrual loans and other real estate owned which were partially offset by decreases in accruing loans past due 90 days or more and accruing restructured loans. As a percentage of loans, net and foreclosed assets, nonperforming assets equaled 0.91% at September 30, 2018 compared to 0.85% at December 31, 2017.

Loans on nonaccrual status increased $1,035 to $2,780 at September 30, 2018 from $1,745 at December 31, 2017. The increase in nonaccrual loans was due to increases of $1,097 in commercial loans and $347 in commercial real estate loans partially offset by decreases of $409 in residential real estate loans. Accruing troubled debt restructured loans declined $815, to $4,663 at September 30, 2018 from $5,478 at December 31, 2017. Accruing loans past due 90 days or more decreased $467, while other real estate owned increased $432 during the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

In addition, compared to the end of the third quarter of 2017, nonperforming assets decreased $53 to $8,336, from $8,389 at September 30, 2018. Decreases in accruing troubled debt restructured loans and accruing loans past due 90 days or more were offset by increases in nonaccrual loans and other real estate owned.

31

Generally, maintaining a high loan to deposit ratio is our primary goal in order to maximize profitability. However, this objective is superseded by our attempts to ensure that asset quality remains strong. We continue to focus our efforts on maintaining sound underwriting standards for both commercial and consumer credit.

We maintain the allowance for loan losses at a level we believe adequate to absorb probable credit losses related to specifically identified loans, as well as probable incurred loan losses inherent in the remainder of the loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date. The allowance for loan losses is based on past events and current economic conditions. We employ the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council Interagency Policy Statement, as amended December 13, 2006, and GAAP in assessing the adequacy of the allowance account. Under GAAP, the adequacy of the allowance account is determined based on the provisions of FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 310, “Receivables”, for loans specifically identified to be individually evaluated for impairment and the requirements of FASB ASC 450, “Contingencies”, for large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans to be collectively evaluated for impairment.

We follow our systematic methodology in accordance with procedural discipline by applying it in the same manner regardless of whether the allowance is being determined at a high point or a low point in the economic cycle. Each quarter, the Chief Credit Officer identifies those loans to be individually evaluated for impairment and those loans collectively evaluated for impairment utilizing standard criteria. Grades are assigned quarterly to loans identified to be individually evaluated. A loan’s grade may differ from period to period based on current conditions and events. However, we consistently utilize the same grading system each quarter. We consistently use loss experience from the latest eight quarters in determining the historical loss factor for each pool collectively evaluated for impairment. Qualitative factors are evaluated in the same manner each quarter and are adjusted within a relevant range of values based on current conditions. For additional disclosure related to the allowance for loan losses refer to the note entitled, “Loans, net and Allowance for Loan Losses”, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements to this Quarterly Report.

The allowance for loan losses increased $166 to $6,472 at September 30, 2018, from $6,306 at the end of 2017. The increase in the allowance was a result of the provision for loan losses of $615 for the first nine months of 2018 exceeding net charge-offs for the period. For the nine months ended September 30, net charge-offs were $449 or 0.06% of average loans outstanding in 2018 compared to $62, or 0.02% of average loans outstanding in 2017. Loanscharged-off, net of recoveries, for the three months ended September 30, 2018, equaled $154 compared to $40 for the same period last year.

Deposits:

We attract the majority of our deposits from within our twelve-county market area by offering various deposit products including demand deposit accounts, NOW accounts, business checking accounts, money market deposit accounts, savings accounts, club accounts and time deposits, including certificates of deposit and IRA’s. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, total deposits decreased to $1,020,764 from $1,026,480 at December 31, 2017. Noninterest-bearing transaction accounts increased $6,490 and time deposits increased $10,924, while interest-bearing transaction accounts decreased $23,130 in the nine months ended September 30, 2018. For the quarter ended September 30, 2018, total deposits increased $3,042 as an increase in interest-bearing deposits of $10,889 more than offset a decrease in noninterest-bearing deposits of $7,847.

For the nine months ended September 30, interest-bearing deposits averaged $860,061 in 2018 compared to $440,638 in 2017. The cost of interest-bearing deposits was 0.80% in 2018 compared to 0.61% in 2017. The cost of interest-bearing deposits increased eight basis points comparing the third quarter of 2018 with the second quarter of 2018. Corresponding with recent FOMC actions, interest rates have increased from historic lows that existed for an extended period. All deposit rates have increased and as such, we anticipate further increases in our cost of deposits.

Borrowings:

The Bank utilizes borrowings as a secondary source of liquidity for its asset/liability management. Advances are available from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh (“FHLB”) provided certain standards related to credit worthiness have been met. Repurchase and term agreements are also available from the FHLB.

Short-term borrowings are generally used to meet temporary funding needs and consist of federal funds purchased, securities sold under agreements to repurchase, and overnight and short-term borrowings from the Atlantic Community Bankers Bank (“ACBB”) and the FHLB. At September 30, 2018, we did not have any short-term borrowings outstanding as compared to $6,000 at December 31, 2017, all of which were borrowed under the Bank’s Open Repo Plus line with the FHLB. For the nine months ended September 30, short-term borrowings averaged $2,406 in 2018 and $22,375 in 2017. The average cost of short-term borrowings was 1.67% in the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 1.18% for the same period last year.

32

Long-term debt totaled $13,019 at September 30, 2018 as compared to $13,233 at December 31, 2017. The average cost of long-term debt was 5.72% in the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 3.11% for the same period last year.

Market Risk Sensitivity:

Market risk is the risk to our earnings or financial position resulting from adverse changes in market rates or prices, such as interest rates, foreign exchange rates or equity prices. Our exposure to market risk is primarily interest rate risk (“IRR”) associated with our lending, investing and deposit-gathering activities. During the normal course of business, we are not exposed to foreign exchange risk or commodity price risk. Our exposure to IRR can be explained as the potential for change in our reported earnings and/or the market value of our net worth. Variations in interest rates affect earnings by changing net interest income and the level of other interest-sensitive income and operating expenses. Interest rate changes also affect the underlying economic value of our assets, liabilities andoff-balance sheet items. These changes arise because the present value of future cash flows, and often the cash flows themselves, change with interest rates. The effects of the changes in these present values reflect the change in our underlying economic value and provide a basis for the expected change in future earnings related to interest rates. IRR is inherent in the role of banks as financial intermediaries. However, a bank with a high degree of IRR may experience lower earnings, impaired liquidity and capital positions, and most likely, a greater risk of insolvency. Therefore, banks must carefully evaluate IRR to promote safety and soundness in their activities.

As a result of FOMC actions to raise short-term interest rates, it has become challenging to manage IRR. IRR and effectively managing it are very important to both bank management and regulators. Bank regulations require us to develop and maintain an IRR management program, overseen by the Board of Directors and senior management, which involves a comprehensive risk management process in order to effectively identify, measure, monitor and control risk. Should bank regulatory agencies identify a material weakness in a bank’s risk management process or high-risk exposure relative to capital, bank regulatory agencies may take action to remedy these shortcomings. Moreover, the level of IRR exposure and the quality of a bank’s risk management process is a determining factor when evaluating capital adequacy.

The Asset Liability committee (“ALCO”), comprised of members of our senior management and other appropriate officers, oversees our IRR management program. Specifically, ALCO analyzes economic data and market interest rate trends, as well as competitive pressures, and utilizes computerized modeling techniques to reveal potential exposure to IRR. This allows us to monitor and attempt to control the influence these factors may have on our rate-sensitive assets (“RSA”) and rate-sensitive liabilities (“RSL”), and overall operating results and financial position. One such technique utilizes a static gap model that considers repricing frequencies of RSA and RSL in order to monitor IRR. Gap analysis attempts to measure our interest rate exposure by calculating the net amount of RSA and RSL that reprice within specific time intervals. A positive gap occurs when the amount of RSA repricing in a specific period is greater than the amount of RSL repricing within that same time frame and is indicated by a RSA/RSL ratio greater than 1.0. A negative gap occurs when the amount of RSL repricing is greater than the amount of RSA and is indicated by a RSA/RSL ratio of less than 1.0. A positive gap implies that earnings will be impacted favorably if interest rates rise and adversely if interest rates fall during the period. A negative gap tends to indicate that earnings will be affected inversely to interest rate changes.

Our cumulativeone-year RSA/RSL ratio equaled 1.56 at September 30, 2018. Given the recent actions of the FOMC and the potential for rates to increase in the future, the focus of ALCO has been to maintain a positive static gap position.

The current position at September 30, 2018, indicates that the amount of RSA repricing within one year would exceed that of RSL, thereby causing increases in market rates, to increase net interest income. However, these forward-looking statements are qualified in the aforementioned section entitled “Forward-Looking Discussion” in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis.

Static gap analysis, although a standard measuring tool, does not fully illustrate the impact of interest rate changes on future earnings. First, market rate changes normally do not equally or simultaneously affect all categories of assets and liabilities. Second, assets and liabilities that can contractually reprice within the same period may not do so at the same time or to the same magnitude. Third, the interest rate sensitivity table presents aone-day position. Variations occur daily as we adjust our rate sensitivity throughout the year. Finally, assumptions must be made in constructing such a table.

As the static gap report fails to address the dynamic changes in the balance sheet composition or prevailing interest rates, we utilize a simulation model to enhance our asset/liability management. This model is used to create pro forma net interest income scenarios under various interest rate shocks. Model results at September 30, 2018, produced similar results from those indicated by theone-year static gap position. Given an instantaneous and parallel shift in interest rates of plus 100 basis points, our projected net interest income for the 12 months ending September 30, 2019, would increase 2.8% from model results using current interest rates. We will continue to monitor our IRR through employing deposit and loan pricing strategies and directing the reinvestment of loan and investment repayments in order to manage our IRR position.

33

Financial institutions are affected differently by inflation than commercial and industrial companies that have significant investments in fixed assets and inventories. Most of our assets are monetary in nature and change correspondingly with variations in the inflation rate. It is difficult to precisely measure the impact inflation has on us, however we believe that our exposure to inflation can be mitigated through asset/liability management.

Liquidity:

Liquidity management is essential to our continuing operations and enables us to meet financial obligations as they come due, as well as to take advantage of new business opportunities as they arise. Financial obligations include, but are not limited to, the following:

• Funding new and existing loan commitments;

• Payment of deposits on demand or at their contractual maturity;

• Repayment of borrowings as they mature;

• Payment of lease obligations; and

• Payment of operating expenses.

These obligations are managed daily, thus enabling us to effectively monitor fluctuations in our liquidity position and to adapt that position according to market influences and balance sheet trends. Future liquidity needs are forecasted, and strategies are developed to ensure adequate liquidity at all times.

Historically, core deposits have been the primary source of liquidity because of their stability and lower cost, in general, than other types of funding. Providing additional sources of funds are loan and investment payments and prepayments and the ability to sell both available for sale securities and mortgage loans held for sale. We believe liquidity is adequate to meet both present and future financial obligations and commitments on a timely basis.

We employ a number of analytical techniques in assessing the adequacy of our liquidity position. One such technique is the use of ratio analysis to determine the extent of our reliance on noncore funds to fund our investments and loans maturing after September 30, 2018. Our noncore funds at September 30, 2018, were comprised of time deposits in denominations of $250 or more and other borrowings. These funds are not considered to be a strong source of liquidity since they are very interest rate sensitive and are considered to be highly volatile. At September 30, 2018, our net noncore funding dependence ratio, the difference between noncore funds and short-term investments to long-term assets, was 0.09%, while our net short-term noncore funding ratio, noncore funds maturing withinone-year, less short-term investments to assets equaled 1.86%. Comparatively, our overall noncore dependence ratio improved fromyear-end 2017 when it was 3.73%. Similarly, our net short-term noncore funding ratio was 1.96% atyear-end, indicating that our reliance on short-term noncore funds decreased slightly fromyear-end 2017.

The Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows present the changes in cash and cash equivalents from operating, investing and financing activities. Cash and cash equivalents, consisting of cash on hand, cash items in the process of collection, deposit balances with other banks and federal funds sold, increased $31,029 during the nine months ended September 30, 2018. Cash and cash equivalents increased $46 for the same period last year. For the nine months ended September 30, 2018, we realized net cash inflows of $7,786 from operating activities and $36,545 from investing activities offset partially by net cash outflows of $13,302 from financing activities. For the same period of 2017, net cash inflows of $596 from operating activities and $137,854 from financing activities were partially offset by a net cash outflow of $138,404 from investing activities.

Operating activities provided net cash of $7,786 for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 compared to $596 for the same period last year. Net income, adjusted for the effects of gains and losses along with noncash transactions such as depreciation, amortization and the provision for loan losses, is the primary source of funds from operations.

Investing activities primarily include transactions related to our lending activities and investment portfolio. Investing activities provided net cash of $36,545 for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. For the comparable period in 2017, investing activities used net cash of $138,404. In 2018, payments and prepayments on loans exceeding loan originations was the primary factor causing the net cash inflow from investing activities. Conversely, an increase in lending activities was the primary factor causing the net cash outflow from investing in the first nine months of 2017.

Financing activities utilized net cash of $13,202 for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and provided $137,854 for the same period last year. Deposit gathering is a predominant financing activity. During the nine months ended September 30, 2018 deposits decreased $5,716 and increased $122,390, for the same period in 2017. The repayment of short-term borrowing of $6,000 and cash dividends paid of $1,819 also impacted net cash from financing activities in 2018. In addition to the strong deposit growth in 2017, cash inflows from financing activities increased $15,941 from a capital issuance.

34

We believe that our future liquidity needs will be satisfied through maintaining an adequate level of cash and cash equivalents, by maintaining readily available access to traditional funding sources, and through proceeds received from the investment and loan portfolios. The current sources of funds are expected to enable us to meet all cash obligations as they come due.

Capital:

Stockholders’ equity totaled $112,031, or $12.30 per common share, at September 30, 2018, and $106,256, or $11.72 per common share, at December 31, 2017. The net increase in stockholders’ equity in the nine months ended September 30, 2018 was a result of the recognition of earnings of $8,386, the payout of cash dividends of $1,819, compensation costs of $9 relating to option grants, the issuance of common stock to Riverview’s ESPP, 401k and dividend reinvestment plans of $406, the issuance of common stock related to the stock options exercised of $41 and the recognition of a change in other comprehensive loss of $1,248.

Bank regulatory agencies consider capital to be a significant factor in ensuring the safety of a depositor’s accounts. These agencies have adopted minimum capital adequacy requirements that include mandatory and discretionary supervisory actions for noncompliance.

The Bank’s capital ratios and the minimum ratios required for capital adequacy purposes and to be considered well capitalized under the prompt corrective action provisions are summarized below for the periods ended September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:

	Actual					Minimum Regulatory Capital Ratios under Basel III (with 1.875% capital conservation buffer phase-in)					Well Capitalized under Basel III
September 30, 2018:	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets):
Riverview Bank	$	104,567		11.8	%	$	87,620	³	9.875	%	$	88,729	³	10.0	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets):
Riverview Bank		98,025		11.0			69,874	³	7.875			70,983	³	8.0
Tier 1 capital (to average total assets):
Riverview Bank		98,025		8.7			44,896	³	4.000			56,120	³	5.0
Common equity tier 1 risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets):
Riverview Bank		98,025		11.0	%		56,565	³	6.375	%		57,674	³	6.5	%
	Actual					Minimum Regulatory Capital Ratios under Basel III (with 1.25% capital conservation buffer phase-in)					Well Capitalized under Basel III
December 31, 2017:	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets):
Riverview Bank	$	96,926		10.4	%	$	85,963	³	9.25	%	$	92,933	³	10.0	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets):
Riverview Bank		90,553		9.7			67,376	³	7.25			74,346	³	8.0
Tier 1 capital (to average total assets):
Riverview Bank		90,553		7.9			45,583	³	4.00			56,978	³	5.0
Common equity tier 1 risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets):
Riverview Bank		90,553		9.7	%		53,437	³	5.75	%		60,407	³	6.5	%

Based on the most recent notification from the FDIC, the Bank was categorized as well capitalized at September 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. There are no conditions or negative events since this notification that we believe have changed the Bank’s category.

35

Review of Financial Performance:

We reported net income of $8,386, or $0.92 per basic and diluted weighted average common share for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, compared to net income of $13, or $0.03 per basic and diluted weighted average common share, for the comparable period of 2017. The return on average assets and return on average stockholders’ equity were 0.97% and 10.21% for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. For the third quarter, we reported net income of $2,788, or $0.30 per basic and diluted weighted average common share in 2018, compared to net income of $401 or $0.08 per basic and diluted weighted average common share in 2017. The return on average assets and return on average stockholders’ equity were 0.96% and 9.89% for the three months ended September 30, 2018. The improvement in net income recognized in 2018 was directly attributable to the merger with CBT and the implementation of certain other strategic initiatives to enhance shareholder value through organic asset growth. In the first quarter of 2017, the Company successfully completed a $17.0 million private placement of common and preferred securities. The additional capital allowed Riverview to acquire CBT and provided it with the ability to significantly grow its loan portfolio by hiring multiple teams of experienced and established lenders to serve new and existing markets. The results for the first nine months ended September 30, 2018 includepre-tax merger related costs of $504.

Net Interest Income:

Net interest income is the fundamental source of earnings for commercial banks. Fluctuations in the level of net interest income can have the greatest impact on net profits. Net interest income is defined as the difference between interest revenue, interest and fees earned on interest-earning assets, and interest expense, the cost of interest-bearing liabilities supporting those assets. The primary sources of earning assets are loans and investment securities, while interest-bearing deposits, short-term and long-term borrowings comprise interest-bearing liabilities. Net interest income is impacted by:

• Variations in the volume, rate and composition of earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities;

• Changes in general market rates; and

• The level of nonperforming assets.

Changes in net interest income are measured by the net interest spread and net interest margin. Net interest spread, the difference between the average yield earned on earning assets and the average rate incurred on interest-bearing liabilities, illustrates the effects changing interest rates have on profitability. Net interest margin, net interest income as a percentage of earning assets, is a more comprehensive ratio, as it reflects not only the spread, but also the change in the composition of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.Tax-exempt loans and investments carrypre-tax yields lower than their taxable counterparts. Therefore, in order to make the analysis of net interest income more comparable,tax-exempt income and yields are reported herein on atax-equivalent basis using the prevailing federal statutory tax rate of 21% in 2018 and 34% in 2017.

For the nine months ended September 30,tax-equivalent net interest income increased $17,856, to $32,860 in 2018 from $15,004 in 2017. Overall, a favorable volume variance of $15,750 from average earning asset growth exceeding average growth in interest bearing liabilities and a favorable rate variance of $2,106 accounted for the increase. The net interest spread increased 53 basis points for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 to 4.00% from 3.47% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. Thetax-equivalent net interest margin for the nine months ended September 30 was 4.16% in 2018 compared to 3.58% in 2017. Thetax-equivalent net interest margin excluding purchase accounting adjustments would have been 3.64% in the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2018,tax-equivalent interest income increased $21,164 to $38,614 as compared to $17,450 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. A positive volume variance in interest income of $18,114 attributable to changes in the average balance of earning assets and a positive rate variance of $3,050 due to an increase in the yield on earning assets were responsible for the increase intax-equivalent interest income. Average volumes of earning assets increased $496,226 comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017. Thetax-equivalent yield on earning assets increased 72 basis points in 2018 compared to 2017. Loans, net averaged $935,304 in 2018 and $478,033 in 2017. The increase in the average loan volume accounted for additionaltax-equivalent interest income of $17,281. Thetax-equivalent yield on the loan portfolio increased to 5.19% in 2018 compared to 4.35% in 2017 and resulted in a $3,490 increase intax-equivalent interest income. Thetax-equivalent yield on the loan portfolio would have been 4.65% in the nine months of 2018 excluding loan accretion of $3,753 included in loan interest income related to acquired loans.

Total interest expense increased $3,308 to $5,754 for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 from $2,446 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The average volume of interest bearing liabilities increased to $875,596 for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, as compared to $472,805 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The increase in the average volume of interest-bearing liabilities caused interest expense to increase by $2,363. In addition, we recognized an unfavorable rate variance of $945 from a 19 basis point increase in the overall cost of funds. Cost of funds increased to 0.88% for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 as compared to 0.69% for the same period in 2017.

36

For the three months ended September 30,tax-equivalent net interest income increased $5,492 to $11,003 in 2018 from $5,511 in 2017. The increase intax-equivalent net interest income was primarily attributable to the net growth in average earning assets from the merger and organic loan growth along with an improvement in the tax equivalent net interest margin. Average earning assets grew $100,595 more than the growth of average interest-bearing liabilities comparing the third quarters of 2018 and 2017. Thetax-equivalent net interest margin for the three months ended September 30, was 4.15% in 2018 compared to 3.57% in 2017. The net interest spread increased to 3.97% for the three months ended September 30, 2018 from 3.46% for the three months ended September 30, 2017. Loan accretion included in loan interest income in the third quarter of 2018 related to acquired loans was $1,140, resulting in an increase in thetax-equivalent net interest margin of 49 basis points.

For the three months ended September 30,tax-equivalent interest income increased $6,563, to $13,082 in 2018 from $6,519 in 2017. A volume variance in interest income of $5,832 attributable to changes in the average balance of earning assets was aided by a $731 favorable rate variance due to an improvement in the yield on earning assets. Specifically, the increase was primarily due to the growth in average earning assets which increased $439,641 to $1,052,347 for the third quarter of 2018 from $612,707 for the same period in 2017. The overall yield on earning assets, on a fullytax-equivalent basis, increased for the three months ended September 30, 2018 to 4.93% as compared to 4.22% for the three months ended September 30, 2017. This improvement was a result of the combined impact of the merger along with the associated effects of applying purchase accounting and reporting a higher concentration of loans as a percentage of earning assets. Average loans increased $389,193 comparing the third quarters of 2018 and 2017 which causedtax-equivalent interest income to increase $5,141. Thetax-equivalent yield on the loan portfolio was 5.24% for the three months ended September 30, 2018 compared to 4.38% for the same period last year resulting in an increase of $1,169 intax-equivalent interest income. Overall, thetax-equivalent interest income on loans increased $6,310 comparing the third quarters of 2018 and 2017. The yield earned on investments decreased 51 basis points for the third quarter of 2018 to 2.82% from 3.33% for the third quarter of 2017 and resulted in a decrease intax-equivalent interest income of $465. Average investments increased to $91,861 for the quarter ended September 30, 2018 compared to $65,358 for the same period in 2017 resulting in an increase intax-equivalent interest income of $570. Overalltax-equivalent interest earned on investments was $653 for the three-month period ended September 30, 2018 compared to $548 for the same period in 2017.

Total interest expense increased $1,071 to $2,079 for the three months ended September 30, 2018 from $1,008 for the three months ended September 30, 2017. An unfavorable volume variance caused interest expenses to increase $897. In addition, an unfavorable rate variance resulted in a $174 increase in fund costs. The average volume of interest bearing liabilities increased to $863,552 for the three months ended September 30, 2018, from $524,506 for the three months ended September 30, 2017. Average interest-bearing deposits increased $366,844 to $850,492 for the third quarter of 2018 from $483,648 for the same period last year. The cost of funds increased to 0.96% for the three months ended September 30, 2018 as compared to 0.76% for the same period in 2017.

37

The average balances of assets and liabilities, corresponding interest income and expense and resulting average yields or rates paid are summarized as follows. Average balances were calculated using average daily balances. Averages for earning assets include nonaccrual loans. Loan fees are included in interest income on loans. Investment averages includeavailable-for-sale securities at amortized cost. Income on investment securities and loans is adjusted to a tax equivalent basis using the prevailing federal statutory tax rate.

	Nine months ended
	September 30, 2018							September 30, 2017
	Average Balance		Interest		Yield/ Rate			Average Balance		Interest		Yield/ Rate
Assets:
Earning assets:
Loans
Taxable	$	898,975	$	35,424		5.27	%	$	459,703	$	14,991		4.36	%
Tax exempt		36,329		885		3.26	%		18,330		547		3.99	%
Investments
Taxable		77,198		1,616		2.80	%		65,504		1,610		3.29	%
Tax exempt		14,964		308		2.75	%		5,747		212		4.93	%
Interest bearing deposits		28,112		361		1.72	%		9,975		78		1.05	%
Federal funds sold		1,719		20		1.56	%		1,812		12		0.89	%
Total earning assets		1,057,297		38,614		4.88	%		561,071		17,450		4.16	%
Less: allowance for loan losses		6,437							4,409
Other assets		104,890							54,815
Total assets	$	1,155,750						$	611,477
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:
Interest bearing liabilities:
Money market accounts	$	119,238		812		0.91	%	$	92,860		548		0.79	%
NOW accounts		269,630		1,196		0.59	%		140,186		409		0.39	%
Savings accounts		154,624		85		0.07	%		80,836		85		0.14	%
Time deposits		316,569		3,069		1.30	%		126,756		979		1.03	%
Short term borrowings		2,406		30		1.67	%		22,375		197		1.18	%
Long-term debt		13,129		562		5.72	%		9,792		228		3.11	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities		875,596		5,754		0.88	%		472,805		2,446		0.69	%
Non-interest-bearing demand deposits		159,749							76,166
Other liabilities		10,597							5,975
Stockholders’ equity		109,808							56,531
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,155,750						$	611,477
Net interest income/spread			$	32,860		4.00	%			$	15,004		3.47	%
Net interest margin						4.16	%						3.58	%
Tax-equivalent adjustments:
Loans			$	186						$	186
Investments				65							72
Total adjustments			$	251						$	258

Provision for Loan Losses:

We evaluate the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses account on a quarterly basis utilizing our systematic analysis in accordance with procedural discipline. We take into consideration certain factors such as composition of the loan portfolio, volumes of nonperforming loans, volumes of net charge-offs, prevailing economic conditions and other relevant factors when determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses account. We make monthly provisions to the allowance for loan losses account in order to maintain the allowance at the appropriate level indicated by our evaluations. Based on our most current evaluation, we believe that the allowance is adequate to absorb any known and inherent losses in the portfolio as of September 30, 2018.

The provision for loan losses totaled $615 for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, compared to $1,734 in 2017. The decrease in the provision for loan losses in 2018 was primarily influenced by a decrease in the net volume of loans originated in the first nine months of 2018 versus 2017, coupled with continuation of strong asset quality. For the quarter ended September 30, the provision for loan losses was $225 in 2018 compared to $610 for the same period in 2017.

38

Noninterest Income:

For the nine months ended September 30, noninterest income totaled $6,540 in 2018, an increase of $4,124 from $2,416 for the same period in 2017. Most categories of noninterest income improved as a result of the merger with the exception of the retail wealth management component of our wealth management division and net gains on sale of investment securities. Wealth management income decreased $59 due to the dissolution of a business in 2017. Service charges, fees and commissions and trust income improved $3,247 and $579, respectively, comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017. Mortgage banking income in 2018 improved to $527 compared to $434 in 2017. Income from bank owned life insurance increased to $584 in the first three quarters of 2018 compared to $254 for the comparable period in 2017.

For the quarter ended September 30, noninterest income totaled $2,054 in 2018, an increase of $1,219 from $835 in 2017. The increase in noninterest income for the quarter was due primarily to increases in services charges, fees and commissions of $997, trust income of $195, and bank owned life insurance investment income of $87.

Noninterest Expenses:

In general, noninterest expense is categorized into three main groups: employee-related expenses, occupancy and equipment expenses and other expenses. Employee-related expenses are costs associated with providing salaries, including payroll taxes and benefits, to our employees. Occupancy and equipment expenses, the costs related to the maintenance of facilities and equipment, include depreciation, general maintenance and repairs, real estate taxes, lease expense and utility costs. Other expenses include general operating expenses such as advertising, contractual services, insurance, FDIC assessments, other taxes and supplies. Several of these costs and expenses are variable, while the remainder are fixed. We utilize budgets and other related strategies in an effort to control the variable expenses.

Noninterest expense increased $12,914, to $28,285 for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, from $15,371 for the same period last year. Salaries and employee benefit expense and other operating expense comprised the majority of the increase, which was a result of the merger with CBT and related costs. Additions to facilities as a result of operating a larger company along with offices to support the lending teams were primarily responsible for the $1,247 increase in occupancy and equipment costs. The majority of the $4,394 increase in other expenses comparing the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and 2017 was a result of the business combination with CBT.

For the three months ended September 30, 2018, noninterest expense increased $4,174, to $9,341 from $5,167 for the same period last year. Salaries and employee benefit expense was $5,032 for the quarter ended September 30, 2018, an increase of $2,104 over the same period in 2017 due primarily to adding employee related costs associated with the merger. In addition, salaries expense in the third quarter of 2018 included a nonrecurring expense of $375 associated with a payout of a separation agreement of a contract employee. For the third quarter, other expenses increased to $3,057 in 2018 from $1,566 in 2017.

Income Taxes:

The Company benefitted from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act legislation enacted in the fourth quarter of 2017 which reduced the corporate federal tax rate from a maximum of 35% to a flat rate of 21% effective January 1, 2018. The reduction in the corporate income tax rate decreased income tax expense by $1,153 for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. Our effective tax rate was 18.2% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018.

39

Riverview Financial Corporation

Item 3. Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Not applicable to a smaller reporting company.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

At September 30, 2018, the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form10-Q, the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined inRule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures, at September 30, 2018, were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in such reports is accumulated and communicated to the CEO and CFO to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b) Changes in internal control.

There were no changes made in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

In the opinion of the Company, after review with legal counsel, there are no proceedings pending to which the Company is a party or to which its property is subject, which, if determined adversely to the Company, would have a material effect on the consolidated results of operations or financial condition. There are no proceedings pending other than ordinary, routine litigation incident to the business of the Company. In addition, no material proceedings are pending or are known to be threatened or contemplated against the Company by governmental authorities.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Not required for smaller reporting companies.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

Not applicable.

40

Item 6. Exhibits.

The following Exhibits are incorporated by reference hereto:

31.1	Section 302 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer (Pursuant to Rule13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)).
31.2	Section 302 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer (Pursuant to Rule13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)).
32.1	Chief Executive Officer’s §1350 Certification (Pursuant to Rule13a-14(b)/15d-14(b)).
32.2	Chief Financial Officer’s §1350 Certification (Pursuant to Rule13a-14(b)/15d-14(b)).
101	Interactive Data File (XBRL).

41

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

By:	/s/ Kirk D. Fox
	Kirk D. Fox
	Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)

Date: November 8, 2018

By:	/s/ Scott A. Seasock
	Scott A. Seasock
	Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial Officer)

Date: November 8, 2018

42