| AUGUST 05, 2015 / 12:00PM, VIRT - Q2 2015 Virtu Financial Inc Earnings Call Just a follow-up on the --I guess on the global currency business one more time. When we look on a year-over-year basis, obviously both the volumes and volatility, not just kind of your proxy volumes bucket but across some of the other buckets those were definitely better than flattish. So maybe we'll be helpful just kind of flush out a little bit more on, you know, either percentage of days where you guys made money, lost money in currencies together, so a better sensible volatility in that bucket. And I guess, along the same lines, maybe it will be helpful to get an update on some of the organic initiatives you guys are doing in the currency business with streaming directly to dealers and things like that. Douglas Cifu - Virtu Financial - CEO Yes, great question, thank you Alex. Again, I'm not going to talk about days won and lost --again, I'm trying really hard to get away from that histogram but the currencies business was --did just fine relative to the opportunity in the quarter. I think the point I was trying to make in the remarks is that the CME FX volumes unhappily are very inaccurate or inconsistent proxy, if you will, for how we're going to perform. You guys probably know this better than I do in terms of the analyst, what percentage of the volume that we see is really in the spot and the forward market and how we access that. So we just look at what my good friend Chris Continuum reports on Hotspot, Reuters and those guys were up single-digit percentages as compared to the CME which was up significantly larger. So if you look at the overall pie and which we could market mix, I think there was modest increases but not as outside if you will as the CME volumes would indicate. That's the first point I'd make. The second point is that absent for last few days and obviously some of the Balkan in the European, it was really muted volatility in the second quarter, vis-a-vis the FX business, particularly the role period on the CME. And so we did not get the benefits that we saw in the first quarter where you had this exogenous event that really ripple through for 20 to 25 trading days in the first quarter. So, it was a volume environment that was not as pronounced that the CME volumes would indicate, number one. Number two, the volatility during the second quarter, and currency products was just not that interesting. So therefore you see like a baseline level of what I would call normalized results in FX. Second part of your question, in terms of how we're doing and some of the business involvement that we're doing, I mean it continues to we call it the VFX platform, is it the fancy way of saying we're finding incremental ways to distribute our liquidity. I think you are continuing to see evolution in the FX market where the large dealers no longer control a majority of the liquidity and non-traditional liquidity providers like Virtu are not welcome. So we added a number of banks and other counter parties that were either streaming to directly or using [Current X] and EVS Direct which is now a direct streaming platform. And as well, Alex, we're now doing that in metals and in US Treasuries as well where we're providing direct liquidity to counterparties either directly or through the auspices of one of these spot platforms. So I just view that as a continued evolution of the marketplace as I talked about until the last several years, I mean people want to get alternative sources of liquidity, we're happy to partner with the large broker dealers to that, we're happy to do it directly. Our preference is to find incremental distribution outlets for our liquidity, that's our business. We provide one product which is bid in an offer and we need to distribute it through distribution channels, we don't care if those were exchanges, dark pools, banks or others, we want to get our prices out there. So that business model continues to grow. 9 THOMSON REUTERS STREETEVENTS | www.streetevents.com | Contact Us ©2015 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Thomson Reuters content, including by framing or similar means, is prohibited without the prior written consent of Thomson Reuters. 'Thomson Reuters' and the Thomson Reuters logo are registered trademarks of Thomson Reuters and its affiliated companies. |