Financial Instruments and Fair Value Disclosures | 11. Financial Instruments and Fair Value Disclosures Our principal financial assets consist of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, amounts due from related parties, securities, and trade accounts receivable. Our principal financial liabilities consist of long-term debt, accounts payable, amounts due to related parties, accrued liabilities, and derivative instruments. (a) Concentration of credit risk: Financial instruments, which may subject us to significant concentrations of credit risk, consist principally of amounts due from our charterers, including the receivables from Helios Pool, cash and cash equivalents, and restricted cash. We limit our credit risk with amounts due from our charterers, including those through the Helios Pool, by performing ongoing credit evaluations of our charterers’ financial condition and generally do not require collateral from our charterers. We limit our credit risk with our cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash by placing it with highly-rated financial institutions. (b) Interest rate risk: Our long-term bank loans are based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) and hence we are exposed to movements thereto. We entered into interest rate swap agreements in order to hedge a majority of our variable interest rate exposure related to our 2015 AR Facility. Refer to Note 19 to the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 31, 2020 for information on our interest rate swap agreements related to the 2015 AR Facility. (c) Fair value measurements: Interest rate swaps are stated at fair value, which is determined using a discounted cash flow approach based on market ‑ based LIBOR swap yield rates. LIBOR swap rates are observable at commonly quoted intervals for the full terms of the swaps and, therefore, are considered Level 2 items in accordance with the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the interest rate swap agreements approximates the amount that we would have to pay or receive for the early termination of the agreements. In May 2020, our interest rate swap with the Commonwealth Bank of Australia was novated to ABN AMRO Capital USA LLC with an increase in the fixed rate from 1.4275% to 1.4675%. In October 2020 (with retroactive effect to September 28, 2020), we amended our $200 million non-amortizing interest rate swap with Citibank N.A. Key provisions of the amendment include: ● Reduction in fixed interest rate from 1.933% to 1.0908% ; ● Extension of swap maturity from March 2022 to March 2025; and ● Amortization of notional principal amount from $200 million beginning in March 2021 to $95.2 million through the period ending March 2025. In November 2020 (with retroactive effect to September 28, 2020), we amended our $50 million non-amortizing interest rate swap with ING Bank N.V. Key provisions of the amendment include: ● Reduction in fixed interest rate from 2.002% to 1.145% ; ● Extension of swap maturity from March 2022 to March 2025; and ● Amortization of notional principal amount from $50 million beginning in March 2022 to $23.8 million through the period ending March 2025. Additionally, we have taken positions in freight forward agreements (“FFAs”) as economic hedges to reduce the risk related to vessels trading in the spot market, including vessels operating in the Helios Pool, and to take advantage of fluctuations in spot market rates. Customary requirements for trading FFAs include the maintenance of initial and variation margins based on expected volatility, open position and mark-to-market of the contracts. FFAs are recorded as assets/liabilities until they are settled. Changes in fair value prior to settlement are recorded in unrealized gain/(loss) on derivatives. Upon settlement, if the contracted charter rate is less than the average of the rates for the specified route and time period, as reported by an identified index, the seller of the FFA is required to pay the buyer the settlement sum, being an amount equal to the difference between the contracted rate and the settlement rate, multiplied by the number of days in the specified period covered by the FFA. Conversely, if the contracted rate is greater than the settlement rate, the buyer is required to pay the seller the settlement sum. Settlement of FFAs are recorded in realized gain/(loss) on derivatives. FFAs are considered Level 2 items in accordance with the fair value hierarchy. We had no outstanding FFAs as of December 31, 2020. The following table summarizes the location on the balance sheet of the financial assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value on a recurring basis, which comprise our financial derivatives, all of which are considered Level 2 items in accordance with the fair value hierarchy: December 31, 2020 March 31, 2020 Current assets Current liabilities Current assets Current liabilities Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments Derivative instruments Derivative instruments Derivative instruments Derivative instruments Forward freight agreements $ — $ — $ — $ 2,605,442 December 31, 2020 March 31, 2020 Other non-current assets Long-term liabilities Other non-current assets Long-term liabilities Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments Derivative instruments Derivative instruments Derivative instruments Derivative instruments Interest rate swap agreements $ — $ 7,805,857 $ — $ 9,152,829 The effect of derivative instruments within the unaudited interim condensed consolidated statements of operations for the periods presented is as follows: Three months ended Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments Location of gain/(loss) recognized December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019 Forward freight agreements—change in fair value Unrealized gain/(loss) on derivatives $ 136,632 $ 645,000 Interest rate swaps—change in fair value Unrealized gain/(loss) on derivatives 342,902 801,395 Forward freight agreements—realized gain/(loss) Realized gain/(loss) on derivatives 153,919 — Interest rate swaps—realized gain/(loss) Realized gain/(loss) on derivatives (914,910) 449,276 Gain/(loss) on derivatives, net $ (281,457) $ 1,895,671 Nine months ended Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments Location of gain/(loss) recognized December 31, 2020 December 31, 2019 Forward freight agreements—change in fair value Unrealized gain/(loss) on derivatives $ 2,605,442 $ 1,590,000 Interest rate swaps—change in fair value Unrealized gain/(loss) on derivatives 1,346,972 (6,881,504) Forward freight agreements—realized gain/(loss) Realized gain/(loss) on derivatives (788,670) — Interest rate swaps—realized gain/(loss) Realized gain/(loss) on derivatives (2,908,245) 2,191,417 Gain/(loss) on derivatives, net $ 255,499 $ (3,100,087) As of December 31, 2020 and March 31, 2020, no fair value measurements for assets or liabilities under Level 1 or Level 3 were recognized in the consolidated balance sheets with the exception of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, and securities. We did not have any other assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis during the three and nine months ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. (d) Book values and fair values of financial instruments: In addition to the derivatives that we are required to record at fair value on our balance sheet (see (c) above) and securities that are included in other current assets in our balance sheet that we record at fair value, we have other financial instruments that are carried at historical cost. These financial instruments include trade accounts receivable, amounts due from related parties, cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts payable, amounts due to related parties and accrued liabilities for which the historical carrying value approximates the fair value due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments. Cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash and securities are considered Level 1 items. We have long-term bank debt and the Cresques Japanese Financing for which we believe the carrying value approximates their fair values as both instruments bear interest at variable interest rates, being LIBOR, which is observable at commonly quoted intervals for the full terms of the loans, and hence are considered as Level 2 items in accordance with the fair value hierarchy. We also have long-term debt related to the Corsair Japanese Financing, Concorde Japanese Financing, Corvette Japanese Financing, CMNL Japanese Financing, and CNML Japanese Financing (collectively, along with the CJNP Japanese Financing that was repaid in October 2020, the “Japanese Financings”) that incur interest at a fixed-rate with the initial principal amount amortized to the purchase obligation price of each vessel. The Japanese Financings are considered Level 2 items in accordance with the fair value hierarchy and the fair value of each is based on a discounted cash flow analysis using current observable interest rates. The following table summarizes the carrying value and estimated fair value of the Japanese Financings as of: December 31, 2020 March 31, 2020 Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value Corsair Japanese Financing $ 41,708,333 $ 46,093,687 $ 44,145,833 $ 48,867,762 Concorde Japanese Financing 46,307,692 51,546,159 48,730,769 54,407,677 Corvette Japanese Financing 46,846,154 52,190,755 49,269,231 55,059,323 CJNP Japanese Financing — — 19,058,750 21,006,399 CMNL Japanese Financing 17,049,256 18,962,197 18,076,488 20,238,260 CNML Japanese Financing 19,206,994 21,397,160 20,261,012 22,728,984 |