Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 12 Months Ended |
Dec. 31, 2014 |
Organization, Consolidation and Presentation of Financial Statements [Abstract] | |
Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | 1. BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
|
Description of Business |
|
Veritiv Corporation ("Veritiv" or the "Company") is a North American business-to-business distributor of print, publishing, packaging, facility and logistics solutions. Established in 2014, following the merger of International Paper Company’s ("International Paper" or "Parent") xpedx division ("xpedx") and UWW Holdings, Inc. ("UWWH"), the Company operates from more than 180 distribution centers primarily throughout the U.S., Canada and Mexico. |
|
xpedx was a business-to-business distributor of paper, publishing, packaging and facility supplies products in North America that operated in the U.S. and Mexico. xpedx distributed products and services to various customer markets, including printers, publishers, data centers, manufacturers, higher education institutions, healthcare facilities, sporting and performance arenas, retail stores, government agencies, property managers and building service contractors. |
|
UWWH, operating through Unisource Worldwide, Inc. and its other consolidated subsidiaries (collectively, "Unisource"), was a distributor of printing and business paper, publishing solutions, packaging supplies and equipment, facility supplies and equipment and logistics services that operated primarily in the U.S. and Canada. Unisource sold its products to a diverse customer base that included commercial printing, retail, hospitality, healthcare, governmental, distribution and manufacturing sectors. |
|
The Spin-off and Merger |
|
On July 1, 2014 (the "Distribution Date"), International Paper completed the previously announced spin-off of xpedx to its shareholders (the "Spin-off"), forming a new public company called Veritiv. Immediately following the Spin-off, UWWH merged with and into Veritiv (the "Merger"). The primary reason for the business combination was to create a North American business-to-business distribution company with a broad geographic reach, an extensive product offering and a differentiated and leading service platform. The Merger has been reflected in Veritiv’s financial statements using the acquisition method of accounting, with Veritiv as the accounting acquirer of UWWH. |
|
On the Distribution Date: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
• | 8,160,000 shares of Veritiv common stock were distributed on a pro rata basis to the International Paper shareholders of record as of the close of business on June 20, 2014. Immediately following the Spin-off, but prior to the Merger, International Paper’s shareholders owned all of the shares of Veritiv common stock outstanding, and | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
• | A cash payment of $404.2 million was distributed to International Paper, which was comprised of: (i) a special payment of $400.0 million, (ii) reduced by a $15.3 million preliminary working capital adjustment and (iii) increased by $19.5 million of transaction expense-related adjustments. During the fourth quarter of 2014, the working capital and transaction expense-related adjustments were finalized, resulting in an additional cash payment of $30.7 million to International Paper. Of the total payment, $432.8 million was reflected as a reduction to equity while the remaining $2.1 million was recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for 2014. | | | | | | | | | | |
|
In addition to the above payment, International Paper also has a potential earnout payment of up to $100.0 million that would become due in 2020 if Veritiv's aggregate EBITDA for fiscal years 2017, 2018 and 2019 exceeds an agreed-upon target of $759.0 million, subject to certain adjustments. The $100.0 million potential earnout payment would be reflected by Veritiv as a reduction to equity at the time of payment. |
|
Immediately following the Spin-off on the Distribution Date: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
• | UWW Holdings, LLC, the sole shareholder of UWWH, (the "UWWH Stockholder") received 7,840,000 shares of Veritiv common stock for all outstanding shares of UWWH common stock that it held on the Distribution Date, in a private placement transaction, | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
• | Veritiv and the UWWH Stockholder entered into a registration rights agreement (the "Registration Rights Agreement") that provides the UWWH Stockholder with certain demand registration rights and piggyback registration rights which is more fully described in Note 8, Related Party Transactions, | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
• | Veritiv and the UWWH Stockholder entered into a tax receivable agreement (the "Tax Receivable Agreement") which is more fully described in Note 8, Related Party Transactions, and | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
• | The UWWH Stockholder received approximately $33.9 million of cash proceeds associated with preliminary working capital and net indebtedness adjustments, as well as cash proceeds of $4.7 million associated with transaction expense-related adjustments. During the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company finalized the working capital and net indebtedness adjustments, resulting in an additional cash payment of $5.7 million to the UWWH Stockholder. Of the total payment, $39.1 million was recorded as part of the purchase price consideration for Unisource while the remaining $5.2 million was recorded in the Consolidated Statement of Operations for 2014. | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Immediately following the completion of the Spin-off and Merger, International Paper shareholders owned approximately 51%, and the UWWH Stockholder owned approximately 49%, of the shares of Veritiv common stock on a fully-diluted basis. Immediately following the completion of the Spin-off, International Paper did not own any shares of Veritiv common stock. See Note 2, Merger with Unisource, for further details on the Merger. |
|
Veritiv’s common stock began regular-way trading on the New York Stock Exchange on July 2, 2014 under the ticker symbol VRTV. |
|
Basis of Presentation |
|
Prior to the Distribution Date, Veritiv’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows consisted of only the xpedx business of International Paper and have been derived from International Paper’s historical accounting records. The financial results of xpedx have been presented on a carve-out basis through the Distribution Date, while the financial results for Veritiv, post Spin-off, are prepared on a stand-alone basis. As such, the audited Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations, Consolidated and Combined Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) and Consolidated and Combined Statements of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2014 consist of: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
• | the combined results of operations of xpedx for the six months ended June 30, 2014 on a carve-out basis, and | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
• | the consolidated results of Veritiv on a stand-alone basis for the six months ended December 31, 2014. | | | | | | | | | | |
|
The combined financial statements as of December 31, 2013 and for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 consist entirely of the combined results of xpedx on a carve-out basis. |
|
As of December 31, 2014, all intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Prior to the Distribution Date, all significant intercompany transactions between xpedx and International Paper have been included for the periods prior to the Spin-off and were considered to be effectively settled for cash at the time the transaction was recorded. The total net effect of the settlement of these intercompany transactions is reflected in the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Cash Flows as a financing activity and in the Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets as Parent company investment. |
|
For periods prior to the Spin-off, the combined financial statements include expense allocations for certain functions previously provided by International Paper, including, but not limited to, general corporate expenses related to finance, legal, information technology, human resources, communications, insurance and stock-based compensation. These expenses have been allocated on the basis of direct usage when identifiable, with the remainder principally allocated on the basis of percent of capital employed, headcount, sales or other measures. Management considers the basis on which the expenses have been allocated to reasonably reflect the utilization of services provided to or for the benefit received by xpedx during those periods. The allocations may not, however, reflect the expenses xpedx would have incurred as an independent company for the periods presented. Actual costs that may have been incurred if xpedx had been a stand-alone company would depend on a number of factors, including the organizational structure, whether functions were outsourced or performed by employees and strategic decisions made in areas such as information technology and infrastructure. Veritiv is unable to determine what such costs would have been had xpedx been independent. See Note 8, Related Party Transactions, for further information. |
|
Following the Spin-off, certain corporate and other related functions described above continue to be provided by International Paper under a transition services agreement. Since July 1, 2014, the Company has recognized $15.5 million in selling and administrative expenses related to this agreement. |
|
For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, certain amounts in the operating activities section of the Statements of Cash Flows have been reclassified for comparative purposes to conform to the current year presentation. This reclassification did not have any impact on net cash flows from operations or the Combined Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, or on the Combined Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2013. |
|
Use of Estimates |
|
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenue and expenses, and certain financial statement disclosures. Estimates and assumptions are used for, but not limited to, revenue recognition, accounts receivable valuation, inventory valuation, employee benefit plans, income tax contingency accruals and valuation allowances and goodwill and other intangible asset valuations. Although these estimates are based on management's knowledge of current events and actions it may undertake in the future, actual results may ultimately differ from these estimates and assumptions. Estimates are revised as additional information becomes available. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
|
Revenue Recognition |
|
Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the price is fixed or determinable, collectability is reasonably assured and delivery has occurred. Revenue is recognized when the customer takes title and assumes the risks and rewards of ownership. Revenue is recorded at the time of shipment for customer terms designated f.o.b. (free on board) shipping point. For sales transactions with customers designated f.o.b. destination, revenue is recorded when the product is delivered to the customer’s delivery site, when title and risk of loss are transferred. Shipping terms are determined on a customer-by-customer or order-by-order basis. When management cannot conclude collectability is reasonably assured for shipments to a particular customer, revenue associated with that customer is not recognized until cash is collected or management is otherwise able to establish that collectability is reasonably assured. |
|
Certain revenues are derived from shipments arranged by the Company made directly from a manufacturer to a customer. The Company is considered to be a principal to these transactions because, among other factors, it controls pricing to the customer, bears the credit risk of the customer defaulting on payment and is the primary obligor. Revenues from these sales are reported on a gross basis in the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations and amounted to $2.9 billion, $2.4 billion and $2.5 billion for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. |
|
Taxes collected from customers relating to product sales and remitted to governmental authorities are accounted for on a net basis. Accordingly, such taxes are excluded from both net sales and expenses. |
|
Purchase Incentives and Customer Rebates |
|
Veritiv enters into agreements with suppliers that entitle Veritiv to receive rebates, allowances and other discounts based on the attainment of specified purchasing levels or sales to certain customers. Purchase incentives are recorded as a reduction to inventory and recognized in cost of products sold as the product is sold. |
|
Veritiv also enters into incentive agreements with its customers, which are generally based on sales to these customers. Veritiv records estimated rebates to customers as a reduction to gross sales as customer revenue is recognized. |
|
Distribution Expenses |
|
Distribution expenses consist of storage, handling and delivery costs including freight to the Company's customers’ destination. Handling and delivery costs were $322.3 million, $252.9 million and $259.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. |
|
Merger and Integration Expenses |
|
Merger and integration expenses are expensed as incurred. Merger expenses include advisory, legal and other professional fees directly associated with the Merger. Integration expenses include professional services and project management fees, retention compensation, termination benefits (including change-in-control bonuses), rebranding and other non-recurring or redundant costs to integrate the combined businesses of xpedx and Unisource. |
|
Accounts Receivable and Allowances |
|
Accounts receivables are recognized net of allowances that primarily consist of allowance for doubtful accounts of $31.7 million and $22.5 million as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, with the remaining balance of $7.3 million and $0.2 million being comprised of other allowances as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. The allowance for doubtful accounts reflects the best estimate of losses inherent in the Company’s accounts receivable portfolio determined on the basis of historical experience, specific allowances for known troubled accounts and other available evidence. The other allowances balance is inclusive of credit risks, returns, discounts and any other items affecting the realization of these assets. Accounts receivable are written off when management determines they are uncollectible. |
|
Below is a rollforward of the Company's accounts receivable allowances for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012: |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Year Ended December 31, |
(in millions) | 2014 | | 2013 | | 2012 |
Beginning balance, January 1 | $ | 22.7 | | | $ | 25.3 | | | $ | 26.2 | |
|
Add / (Deduct): | | | | | |
Provision for bad debt expense | 12.8 | | | 6.4 | | | 8.7 | |
|
Net write-offs and other adjustments | (9.8 | ) | | (9.0 | ) | | (9.6 | ) |
Other(1) | 13.3 | | | — | | | — | |
|
Ending balance, December 31 | $ | 39 | | | $ | 22.7 | | | $ | 25.3 | |
|
(1) Represents accounts receivable allowances recorded in connection with the Merger. |
|
Inventories |
|
The Company's inventories are primarily comprised of finished goods and primarily valued at cost as determined by the last-in first-out ("LIFO") method. Such valuations are not in excess of market. Elements of cost in inventories include the purchase price invoiced by a supplier, plus inbound freight and related costs and reduced by estimated volume-based discounts and early pay discounts available from certain suppliers. Approximately 86% and 97% of inventories were valued using the LIFO method as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. If the first-in, first-out method had been used, total inventory balances would have increased by approximately $79.1 million and $76.6 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. |
|
The Company reduces the value of obsolete and inactive inventory based on the difference between the LIFO cost of the inventory and the estimated market value using assumptions of future demand and market conditions. To estimate the net realizable value, the Company considers factors such as age of the inventory, the nature of the products, the quantity of items on-hand relative to sales trends, current market prices and trends in pricing, its ability to use excess supply in another channel, historical write-offs and expected residual values or other recoveries. |
|
Veritiv had $58.3 million and $17.7 million of consigned inventory as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. |
|
Property and Equipment, Net |
|
Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Expenditures for replacements and major improvements are capitalized, whereas repair and maintenance costs that do not improve service potential or extend economic life are expensed as incurred. The Company capitalizes certain computer software and development costs incurred in connection with developing or obtaining software for internal use. Costs related to the development of internally developed software, other than those incurred during the application development stage, are expensed as incurred. |
|
|
The components of property and equipment, net were as follows: |
| | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
(in millions) | December 31, | | December 31, | | | | |
2014 | | 2013 | | | | |
Land, buildings and improvements | $ | 128.9 | | | $ | 143.8 | | | | | |
| | | |
Machinery and equipment | 110.2 | | | 72.5 | | | | | |
| | | |
Equipment capital leases and assets related to financing obligations with related party | 232 | | | — | | | | | |
| | | |
Internally developed software | 114.4 | | | 84.5 | | | | | |
| | | |
Construction-in-progress | 14 | | | 4.9 | | | | | |
| | | |
Less: Accumulated depreciation and software amortization | (222.1 | ) | | (198.6 | ) | | | | |
Property and equipment, net | $ | 377.4 | | | $ | 107.1 | | | | | |
| | | |
|
Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Land is not depreciated, and construction-in-progress ("CIP") is not depreciated until ready for service. Leased property and improvements to leased property are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lease term or useful life of the asset, whichever is less. |
|
Depreciation and amortization for property and equipment, other than land and CIP, is based upon the following estimated useful lives: |
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Buildings | 40 years | | | | | | | | | | |
Leasehold improvements | 1 to 20 years | | | | | | | | | | |
Machinery and equipment | 3 to 15 years | | | | | | | | | | |
Equipment capital leases and assets related to financing obligations with related party | 3 to 15 years | | | | | | | | | | |
Internally developed software | 3 to 5 years | | | | | | | | | | |
|
Depreciation and amortization expenses, including the depreciation expense for assets under capital leases and amortization expense of internally developed software, totaled $32.9 million, $15.9 million and $12.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Accumulated depreciation on equipment capital leases and assets related to financing obligations with related party as of December 31, 2014 was $15.6 million. Veritiv did not have any capital leases as of December 31, 2013. Amortization expense of the internally developed software was $11.0 million, $8.3 million and $3.0 million during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. During 2014, there were no depreciation amounts included in restructuring. During 2013 and 2012, $0.3 million and $1.2 million of depreciation was included in restructuring. |
|
As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, unamortized internally developed software costs, including amounts recorded in CIP, were $44.6 million and $17.1 million, respectively. |
|
Upon retirement or other disposal of property and equipment, the cost and related amount of accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the asset and accumulated depreciation accounts, respectively. The difference, if any, between the net asset value and the proceeds is included in net income. |
|
Leases |
|
The Company leases certain property and equipment used for operations. Such lease arrangements are reviewed for capital or operating classification at their inception. |
|
Capital lease obligations consist of delivery equipment, material handling equipment, computer hardware and office equipment which are leased through third parties under non-cancelable leases with terms generally ranging from three to eight years. Many of the delivery equipment leases include annual rate increases based on the Consumer Price Index which are included in the calculation of the initial lease obligation. The carrying value of the related equipment associated with these capital leases is included within property and equipment, net in the Consolidated and Combined Balance Sheets at December 31, 2014, and depreciated over the term of the lease. The Company does not record rent expense for capital leases. Rather, rental payments under the lease are recognized as a reduction of the capital lease obligation and interest expense. Depreciation expense for assets under capital leases is included in the total depreciation expense disclosed in the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations. |
|
All other leases are operating leases. Certain lease agreements include renewal options and rent escalation clauses. Assets subject to an operating lease and the related lease payments are not recorded on the Company’s balance sheet. Rent expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the expected lease term. |
|
The term for all types of leases begins on the date the Company becomes legally obligated for the rent payments or takes possession of the asset, whichever is earlier. |
|
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, Net |
|
Goodwill relating to a single business reporting unit is included as an asset of the applicable segment. Goodwill arising from major acquisitions that involve multiple reportable segments is allocated to the reporting units based on the relative fair value of the reporting unit. |
|
Goodwill is reviewed by Veritiv for impairment on a reporting unit basis annually on October 1st or more frequently if indicators are present or changes in circumstances suggest that impairment may exist. The testing of goodwill for possible impairment is a two-step process. In the first step, the fair value of a reporting unit is compared with its carrying value, including goodwill. If fair value exceeds the carrying value, goodwill is not considered to be impaired. If the fair value of a reporting unit is below the carrying value, then step two is performed to measure the amount of the goodwill impairment loss for the reporting unit. This analysis requires the determination of the fair value of all of the individual assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, including any currently unrecognized intangible assets, as if the reporting unit had been purchased on the analysis date. Once these fair values have been determined, the implied fair value of the unit’s goodwill is calculated as the excess, if any, of the fair value of the reporting unit determined in step one over the fair value of the net assets determined in step two. The carrying value of goodwill is then reduced to this implied value, or to zero if the fair value of the assets exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, through a goodwill impairment charge. The impairment test performed during the fourth quarter of 2014 and 2013 indicated the fair value of the reporting units containing goodwill was in excess of the related carrying value of the net assets. |
|
Intangible assets acquired in a business combination are recorded at fair value. The Company's intangible assets include customer relationships, trademarks and trade names and non-compete agreements. Intangible assets with finite useful lives are subsequently amortized using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. |
|
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets |
|
Long-lived assets, including finite-lived intangible assets, are amortized and tested for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate their carrying value may not be recoverable. The Company assesses the recoverability of long-lived assets based on the undiscounted future cash flow the assets are expected to generate and recognize an impairment loss when estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset plus net proceeds expected from disposition of the asset, if any, are less than the carrying value of the asset. When an impairment is identified, the Company reduces the carrying amount of the asset to its estimated fair value based on a discounted cash flow approach or, when available and appropriate, to comparable market values. |
|
No long-lived asset impairment charges were recorded during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012. |
|
Employee Benefit Plans |
|
The Company sponsors and/or contributes to defined contribution plans, defined benefit pension plans and multi-employer pension plans in the United States. In addition, the Company and its subsidiaries have various pension plans and other forms of retirement arrangements outside the United States. See Note 9, Employee Benefit Plans, for additional information. |
|
Prior to the Spin-off, certain of xpedx’s employees participated in defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans sponsored and accounted for by International Paper. In conjunction with the Spin-off, the above plans were frozen for the xpedx employees, and International Paper retained the associated liabilities. Certain xpedx union employees were added as participants to the Unisource defined benefit pension plan. In conjunction with the Merger, Veritiv assumed responsibility for Unisource’s defined benefit plans and Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan ("SERP") in the U.S. and Canada. Except as discussed below, these plans were frozen prior to the Merger. Union employees continue to accrue benefits under the U.S. defined benefit pension plan in accordance with their collective bargaining agreements. |
|
The determination of defined benefit pension and postretirement plan obligations and their associated costs requires the use of actuarial computations to estimate participant plan benefits to which the employees will be entitled. The Company’s significant assumptions in this regard include discount rates, rate of future compensation increases, expected long-term rates of return on plan assets, mortality rates, and other factors. Each assumption is developed using relevant company experience in conjunction with market-related data in the U.S. and Canada. All actuarial assumptions are reviewed annually with third-party consultants and adjusted, as necessary. |
|
For the recognition of net periodic postretirement cost, the calculation of the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is derived using the fair value of plan assets at the measurement date. Actual results that differ from the Company's assumptions are accumulated and amortized on a straight-line basis only to the extent they exceed 10% of the higher of the fair value of plan assets or the projected benefit obligation, over the estimated remaining service period of active participants. The fair value of plan assets is determined based on market prices or estimated fair value at the measurement date. |
|
The Company also makes contributions to multi-employer pension plans for its union employees covered by such plans. For these plans, the Company recognizes a liability only for any required contributions to the plans or surcharges imposed by the plans that are accrued and unpaid at the balance sheet date. The Company does not record an asset or liability to recognize the funded status of the plans. |
|
Stock-Based Compensation |
|
The Company measures and records compensation expense for all stock-based awards based on the grant date fair values over the vesting period of the awards. See Note 14, Equity-Based Incentive Plans, for additional information. |
|
Income Taxes |
|
Veritiv records its global tax provision based on the respective tax rules and regulations for the jurisdictions in which it operates. Where Veritiv believes that a tax position is supportable for income tax purposes, the item is included in the appropriate income tax returns. Where treatment of a position is uncertain, liabilities are recorded based upon an evaluation of the more likely than not outcome considering technical merits of the position based on specific tax regulations and facts of each matter. Changes to recorded liabilities are made only when an identifiable event occurs that alters the likely outcome, such as settlement with the relevant tax authority, the expiration of statutes of limitation for the subject tax year, change in tax laws, or a recent court case that addresses the matter. |
|
Valuation allowances are recorded to reduce deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that a tax benefit will not be realized. Significant judgment is required in evaluating the need for and magnitude of appropriate valuation allowances against deferred tax assets. The realization of these assets is dependent on generating future taxable income, as well as successful implementation of various tax planning strategies. |
|
While Veritiv believes that these judgments and estimates are appropriate and reasonable under the circumstances, actual resolution of these matters may differ from recorded estimated amounts. |
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
Fair value is the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The following fair value hierarchy is used in selecting inputs, with the highest priority given to Level 1, as these are the most transparent or reliable. |
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Level 1 – | Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. | | | | | | | | | | |
Level 2 – | Observable market-based inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. | | | | | | | | | | |
Level 3 – | Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability reflecting the reporting entity’s own assumptions or external inputs from inactive markets. | | | | | | | | | | |
See Note 10, Fair Value Measurements, for further detail. |
|
Foreign Currency |
|
The assets and liabilities of the foreign subsidiaries are translated from their respective local currencies to the U.S. dollars at the appropriate spot rates as of the balance sheet date. Changes in the carrying value of these assets and liabilities attributable to fluctuations in spot rates are recognized in foreign currency translation adjustment, a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI"). See Note 13, Shareholders' Equity, for further detail. |
|
The revenues and expenses of the foreign subsidiaries are translated using the monthly average exchange rates during the year. The gains or losses from foreign currency transactions are included in other expense (income), net in the Consolidated and Combined Statements of Operations. |
|
Recently Issued Accounting Standards |
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Standard | | Description | | Date of Adoption | | Effect on the Financial Statements or Other Significant Matters | | | | | |
Standards that are not yet adopted: | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) | | The standard will replace existing revenue recognition standards and significantly expand the disclosure requirements for revenue arrangements. It may be adopted either retrospectively or on a modified retrospective basis to new contracts and existing contracts with remaining performance obligations as of the effective date. | | 1-Jan-17 | | The Company is currently evaluating the alternative methods of adoption and the effect on its Consolidated and Combined Financial Statements and related disclosures. | | | | | |