UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM N-CSR
CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED
MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES
Investment Company Act File Number: 811-22939
T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund, Inc. |
(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter) |
100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
David Oestreicher |
100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202 |
(Name and address of agent for service) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (410) 345-2000
Date of fiscal year end: May 31
Date of reporting period: May 31, 2015
Item 1. Report to Shareholders
![]() |
Credit Opportunities Fund | May 31, 2015 |
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx2x1.jpg)
The views and opinions in this report were current as of May 31, 2015. They are not guarantees of performance or investment results and should not be taken as investment advice. Investment decisions reflect a variety of factors, and the managers reserve the right to change their views about individual stocks, sectors, and the markets at any time. As a result, the views expressed should not be relied upon as a forecast of the fund’s future investment intent. The report is certified under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires mutual funds and other public companies to affirm that, to the best of their knowledge, the information in their financial reports is fairly and accurately stated in all material respects.
REPORTS ON THE WEB
Sign up for our E-mail Program, and you can begin to receive updated fund reports and prospectuses online rather than through the mail. Log in to your account at troweprice.com for more information.
Manager’s Letter
Fellow Shareholders
Our previous 12 months—marking the fund’s first full year of operations—proved to be challenging. Early results were encouraging, but seven of the past 12 months saw negative absolute performance, against five negative months for the benchmark. September and December 2014 were particularly harsh, with the fund down over 3% in each month. Near-term results have been more favorable, and the fund has outpaced the benchmark for the year to date.
PORTFOLIO PERFORMANCE
The portfolio returned 1.72% for the six months ended May 31, 2015, compared with 2.98% for the Barclays U.S. High-Yield Ba/B - 2% Issuer Capped Index. As shown in the Performance Comparison table, the fund returned -2.39% during the past 12 months and underperformed the 3.00% return for its benchmark. (Results for the Advisor Class were slightly lower, reflecting its different fee structure.)
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx3x1.jpg)
PORTFOLIO REVIEW
The fiscal year began on a promising note with the fund enjoying an outsized gain in its second month through a position in First Data. The global payment technology firm was among the fund’s top holdings, and its bonds moved up sharply on word that the company’s private-equity sponsor was injecting additional capital and providing other relief to the balance sheet. Otherwise, we were finding little in the way of compelling value in the traditional high yield bond market in the months after launching the strategy and positioned the fund in alternatives, composed primarily of bank debt and select emerging markets credits, among other holdings. (Please refer to the fund’s portfolio of investments for a complete list of holdings and the amount each represents in the portfolio.)
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx4x1.jpg)
While results for the asset class confirmed we were right to pass up most traditional corporate high yield new issues and secondary offerings through the fall due to rich valuations, our allocations to the alternatives proved harmful. Several of the bank loans, emerging markets names, and other substitutes we purchased traded down materially on the back of operating results that came in below expectations or in association with general market volatility.
During the period ranging from roughly August 2014 through March 2015, the high yield market suffered a series of episodic dislocations that weighed heavily on results for the asset class and the fund. Contributing factors included a legal ruling that adversely affected our holdings in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac equity and preferred stock, whose ultimate value is premised on the outcome of the continuing saga between the federal government and various litigants. The events have been well documented, but the adverse ruling caused a sharp sell-off in the securities of these government-sponsored enterprises. We surmise these instruments were widely held in considerable size by hedge funds and some traditional fund managers. This caused a period of volatility across the distressed and high yield markets, as managers sought to rework their exposures.
While that event proved dramatic, the bigger force impacting results in the fund’s fiscal second and third quarters was the maelstrom affecting commodities, in particular energy- and coal-related credits. The energy and metals sectors dominated headlines for the high yield asset class for much of the fiscal year, and for good reason. On a combined basis, these sectors, of which coal names are a subset, reached as high as 25% of some high yield benchmarks. Names in these industries traded down dramatically, with many bonds falling as much as 50 points or more as oil fell from near $100 a barrel last year to the low $40s and back to the $50 to $60 range recently, and coal producers, too, came under intensifying pressure. We came into the sell-off overexposed to commodity-related credits, but aggressive actions in the back half of our fiscal year allowed us to earn compelling gains that offset some of the painful losses in the first part of the year.
The biggest detractor over the previous 12 months was Global Geophysical Services (GGS), a bankrupt seismic services and solutions provider to the oil industry. The fund purchased half of its investment in May 2014 at 48% of par, after the company had filed for bankruptcy protection, and averaged down with a second purchase at 34% of par in July. We were expecting an orderly workout that might deliver returns on the order of 45%, with bondholders recovering as much as 60 cents per dollar of claim. We took additional comfort that the price, at a steep discount to face value, offered better value than energy credits trading at far higher levels. In oil’s subsequent collapse over the intervening months, the company was not immune, and ultimate recoveries came in far below our projections.
Other energy and metals names that detracted from performance included bonds from Tervita, American Energy – Marcellus loans, and convertible bonds issued by Alpha Natural Resources and Energy XXI Bermuda. Like GGS, these names reflected our attempt to move away from traditional high yield energy credits, which we saw as offering little value, expecting that either their priority in the capital structure in the case of American Energy or, for the likes of Alpha, Tervita, and Energy XXI, their near-term maturities would provide valuation support. As traditional high yield energy bonds endured a dramatic sell-off, our chosen places to wait out the downdraft provided little protection and detracted from results.
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx7x1.jpg)
Away from commodities, the fund held a position in Weight Watchers International loans that suffered a meaningful decline when the provider of weight-loss strategies materially underperformed expectations. We have worked to repair this initial mistake by reducing our position and purchasing the company’s shorter-dated loans, which come due in 2016. Subsequent to our purchase, the company announced a tender offer for the shorter-maturity loans and was able to repurchase a portion of the issue, delivering a nice gain on those holdings. A modest position in Ukrainian infrastructure bonds (Financing of Infrastructure) also proved costly. Although the issue was scheduled to mature in 2017, the bonds declined more than 40% from our purchase price, and the near-term prospects for a profit evaporated as geopolitical tensions escalated.
These names and several other credits that have not lived up to their initial promise have not been the whole story. Even in the energy sector, where our initial posture proved too aggressive for what was to come, a series of recent favorable outcomes has helped offset earlier losses. As the reporting period was in its closing months, the fund benefited from large gains attributable to Rosetta Resources and Pacific Rubiales Energy, as each issuer traded up dramatically after receiving a takeover offer from a higher credit quality buyer.
Further offsetting losses, the fund generated compelling gains from the bonds of Sun Products, a detergent producer that is benefiting from efforts to improve its cost structure and is now seeing modest improvements in the highly competitive detergent market. The fund reaped attractive results in two other positions currently operating under Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection: Nextel International Telecom (NII Holdings) and TXU (Energy Future Holdings). Before Nextel’s bankruptcy filing last year, we established a position in its structurally senior LuxCo bonds, anticipating that, while Nextel may indeed file for bankruptcy, recoveries in this specific security should provide an attractive return. Early in January, the company reached an agreement to sell its Mexican operations to AT&T at a price above expectations, and it is now close to concluding the bankruptcy process. The fund’s position should result in a par recovery through a combination of cash and equity, creating a substantial gain.
Similarly, the fund holds a position in the second-lien debt of TXU, the largest ever below investment-grade default in the high yield market. While its reorganization is still underway, the position continues to accrue an above-market coupon and, in our view, is fully covered by the underlying assets. As we describe the individual contributors, we think it is important for investors to understand that we have largely worked to build the portfolio from the bottom up, on a name-by-name basis, eschewing, for the most part, too much emphasis on sector or credit quality in favor of positions that, in our estimation, offer the highest potential for total return. Under this investment approach, the portfolio’s composition has changed considerably over the past six months.
In November 2014, 15.8% of holdings were in bank debt versus 59.2% in bonds. At the time, the vast majority of high yield credits were trading at premium valuations and offered little in the way of compelling value or return prospects, and we viewed the new issue market in the high yield space as even less compelling. At the end of May, the fund carried an 8.9% weighting in bank debt and an 84.0% weighting in high yield bonds. The Asset Allocation table shows our exposures across various instruments.
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx9x1.jpg)
As we shape the portfolio, we consider the landscape available to this strategy to include five broad categories. The foundation is built on a selection of conventional high yield bonds composed of our best ideas, ranging from credits that we expect to deliver solid operating results, potentially resulting in a ratings upgrade to issuers we presume might make for attractive acquisition targets by acquirers with higher credit ratings. The remaining positions include a variety of distressed or defaulted credits, single-name credit default swaps, bank loans, convertibles and preferred stock, and what we consider credit-themed equities.
Over the fund’s inaugural year, bank loans and distressed and defaulted credits have served as the largest complement to the fund’s core holdings, along with a small allocation to equities. We have found fewer ideas to pursue among credit default swaps, though the attraction among these various categories is constantly in flux. As we turn the page on our first year, we are excited by the prospects that traditional high yield bonds are presenting.
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx10x1.jpg)
The first year was volatile due to a breakdown within certain industries. We anticipate less portfolio volatility going forward.
Thank you for investing with T. Rowe Price.
Respectfully submitted,
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx10x2.jpg)
Rodney M. Rayburn
Chairman of the fund’s Investment Advisory Committee
July 9, 2015
The committee chairman has day-to-day responsibility for managing the portfolio and works with committee members in developing and executing the fund’s investment program.
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx11x1.jpg)
RISK MANAGEMENT
We would like to remind shareholders about some fundamental changes that have occurred in the fixed income markets in recent years. The markets have been particularly volatile over the past year as investors began to consider the ramifications of a potential rise in interest rates. The volatility has highlighted the importance of sound risk management.
Because of this evolving environment, T. Rowe Price is taking steps to ensure that our funds function smoothly during transitional periods as the Fed makes policy changes that are likely to affect the direction of interest rates. These steps include assessing the liquidity of our portfolios, conducting stress tests that take various market scenarios into consideration, evaluating risk management strategies to determine appropriate actions, and taking other measures to ensure the continuing smooth operation of our portfolios. We want to inform our shareholders that we are aware of the changing market environment and are monitoring it closely.
RISKS OF BOND INVESTING
Bonds are subject to interest rate risk, the decline in bond prices that usually accompanies a rise in interest rates, and credit risk, the chance that any fund holding could have its credit rating downgraded or that a bond issuer will default (fail to make timely payments of interest or principal), potentially reducing the fund’s income level and share price. High yield corporate bonds could have greater price declines than funds that invest primarily in high-quality bonds. Companies issuing high yield bonds are not as strong financially as those with higher credit ratings, so the bonds are usually considered speculative investments.
Floating rate loans are subject to credit risk, the chance that any fund holding could have its credit rating downgraded or that an issuer will default (fail to make timely payments of interest or principal), and liquidity risk, the chance that the fund may not be able to sell loans or securities at desired prices, potentially reducing the fund’s income level and share price. Like bond funds, this fund is exposed to interest rate risk, but credit and liquidity risks may often be more important.
Funds that invest overseas may carry more risk than funds that invest strictly in U.S. assets. Risks can result from varying stages of economic and political development; differing regulatory environments, trading days, and accounting standards; and higher transaction costs of non-U.S. markets. Non-U.S. investments are also subject to currency risk, or a decline in the value of a foreign currency versus the U.S. dollar, which reduces the dollar value of securities denominated in that currency.
GLOSSARY
Barclays U.S. High-Yield Ba/B - 2% Issuer Capped Index: The index measures the performance of high yield corporate bonds, with a maximum allocation of 2% for all individual issuers.
Basis point: One one-hundredth of a percentage point, or 0.01%.
Duration: A measure of a bond fund’s sensitivity to changes in interest rates. For example, a fund with a three-year duration would fall about 3% in response to a one-percentage-point rise in interest rates, and vice versa.
SEC yield (30-day): A method of calculating a fund’s yield that assumes all portfolio securities are held until maturity. Yield will vary and is not guaranteed.
Weighted average maturity: A measure of a fund’s interest rate sensitivity—in general, the longer the average maturity, the greater the fund’s sensitivity to interest rate changes. The weighted average maturity may take into account the interest rate readjustment dates for certain securities.
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx14x1.jpg)
Performance and Expenses
Growth of $10,000 |
This chart shows the value of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the fund over the past 10 fiscal year periods or since inception (for funds lacking 10-year records). The result is compared with benchmarks, which may include a broad-based market index and a peer group average or index. Market indexes do not include expenses, which are deducted from fund returns as well as mutual fund averages and indexes.
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx15x1.jpg)
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx15x2.jpg)
Fund Expense Example |
As a mutual fund shareholder, you may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees, and other fund expenses. The following example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the most recent six-month period and held for the entire period.
Please note that the fund has two share classes: The original share class (Investor Class) charges no distribution and service (12b-1) fee, and the Advisor Class shares are offered only through unaffiliated brokers and other financial intermediaries and charge a 0.25% 12b-1 fee. Each share class is presented separately in the table.
Actual Expenses
The first line of the following table (Actual) provides information about actual account values and expenses based on the fund’s actual returns. You may use the information on this line, together with your account balance, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number on the first line under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.
Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The information on the second line of the table (Hypothetical) is based on hypothetical account values and expenses derived from the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed 5% per year rate of return before expenses (not the fund’s actual return). You may compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund with other funds by contrasting this 5% hypothetical example and the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.
Note: T. Rowe Price charges an annual account service fee of $20, generally for accounts with less than $10,000. The fee is waived for any investor whose T. Rowe Price mutual fund accounts total $50,000 or more; accounts electing to receive electronic delivery of account statements, transaction confirmations, prospectuses, and shareholder reports; or accounts of an investor who is a T. Rowe Price Preferred Services, Personal Services, or Enhanced Personal Services client (enrollment in these programs generally requires T. Rowe Price assets of at least $100,000). This fee is not included in the accompanying table. If you are subject to the fee, keep it in mind when you are estimating the ongoing expenses of investing in the fund and when comparing the expenses of this fund with other funds.
You should also be aware that the expenses shown in the table highlight only your ongoing costs and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads. Therefore, the second line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. To the extent a fund charges transaction costs, however, the total cost of owning that fund is higher.
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx17x1.jpg)
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx18x1.jpg)
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx18x2.jpg)
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx19x1.jpg)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx20x1.jpg)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx21x1.jpg)
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx22x1.jpg)
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx23x1.jpg)
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx24x1.jpg)
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx25x1.jpg)
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx26x1.jpg)
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx27x1.jpg)
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx28x1.jpg)
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx29x1.jpg)
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx30x1.jpg)
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx31x1.jpg)
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx32x1.jpg)
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx33x1.jpg)
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx34x1.jpg)
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx35x1.jpg)
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx36x1.jpg)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx37x1.jpg)
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx38x1.jpg)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx39x1.jpg)
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx40x1.jpg)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx41x1.jpg)
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx42x1.jpg)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.
Notes to Financial Statements |
T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund, Inc. (the fund), is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act) as a diversified, open-end management investment company. The fund seeks a combination of long-term capital appreciation and high income. The fund has two classes of shares: the Credit Opportunities Fund original share class, referred to in this report as the Investor Class, offered since April 29, 2014, and the Credit Opportunities Fund–Advisor Class (Advisor Class), offered since April 29, 2014. Advisor Class shares are sold only through unaffiliated brokers and other unaffiliated financial intermediaries that are compensated by the class for distribution, shareholder servicing, and/or certain administrative services under a Board-approved Rule 12b-1 plan. Each class has exclusive voting rights on matters related solely to that class; separate voting rights on matters that relate to both classes; and, in all other respects, the same rights and obligations as the other class.
NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis of Preparation The fund is an investment company and follows accounting and reporting guidance in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 (ASC 946). The accompanying financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), including but not limited to ASC 946. GAAP requires the use of estimates made by management. Management believes that estimates and valuations are appropriate; however, actual results may differ from those estimates, and the valuations reflected in the accompanying financial statements may differ from the value ultimately realized upon sale or maturity.
Investment Transactions, Investment Income, and Distributions Income and expenses are recorded on the accrual basis. Premiums and discounts on debt securities are amortized for financial reporting purposes. Paydown gains and losses are recorded as an adjustment to interest income. Dividends received from mutual fund investments are reflected as dividend income; capital gain distributions are reflected as realized gain/loss. Dividend income and capital gain distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income tax-related interest and penalties, if incurred, would be recorded as income tax expense. Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Realized gains and losses are reported on the identified cost basis. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Distributions from REITs are initially recorded as dividend income and, to the extent such represent a return of capital or capital gain for tax purposes, are reclassified when such information becomes available. Income distributions are declared by each class daily and paid monthly. Capital gain distributions, if any, are generally declared and paid by the fund annually.
Currency Translation Assets, including investments, and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar values each day at the prevailing exchange rate, using the mean of the bid and asked prices of such currencies against U.S. dollars as quoted by a major bank. Purchases and sales of securities, income, and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars at the prevailing exchange rate on the date of the transaction. The effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on realized and unrealized security gains and losses is reflected as a component of security gains and losses.
Class Accounting The Advisor Class pays distribution, shareholder servicing, and/or certain administrative expenses in the form of Rule 12b-1 fees, in an amount not exceeding 0.25% of the class’s average daily net assets. Shareholder servicing, prospectus, and shareholder report expenses incurred by each class are charged directly to the class to which they relate. Expenses common to both classes and investment income are allocated to the classes based upon the relative daily net assets of each class’s settled shares; realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated based upon the relative daily net assets of each class’s outstanding shares.
Redemption Fees A 2% fee is assessed on redemptions of fund shares held for 90 days or less to deter short-term trading and to protect the interests of long-term shareholders. Redemption fees are withheld from proceeds that shareholders receive from the sale or exchange of fund shares. The fees are paid to the fund and are recorded as an increase to paid-in capital. The fees may cause the redemption price per share to differ from the net asset value per share.
New Accounting Guidance In June 2014, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-11, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860), Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures. The ASU changes the accounting for certain repurchase agreements and expands disclosure requirements related to repurchase agreements, securities lending, repurchase-to-maturity and similar transactions. The ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014. Adoption will have no effect on the fund’s net assets or results of operations.
In May 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-07, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820), Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent). The ASU removes the requirement to categorize within the fair value hierarchy all investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share practical expedient and amends certain disclosure requirements for such investments. The ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Adoption will have no effect on the fund’s net assets or results of operations.
NOTE 2 - VALUATION
The fund’s financial instruments are valued and each class’s net asset value (NAV) per share is computed at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), normally 4 p.m. ET, each day the NYSE is open for business.
Fair Value The fund’s financial instruments are reported at fair value, which GAAP defines as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The T. Rowe Price Valuation Committee (the Valuation Committee) has been established by the fund’s Board of Directors (the Board) to ensure that financial instruments are appropriately priced at fair value in accordance with GAAP and the 1940 Act. Subject to oversight by the Board, the Valuation Committee develops and oversees pricing-related policies and procedures and approves all fair value determinations. Specifically, the Valuation Committee establishes procedures to value securities; determines pricing techniques, sources, and persons eligible to effect fair value pricing actions; oversees the selection, services, and performance of pricing vendors; oversees valuation-related business continuity practices; and provides guidance on internal controls and valuation-related matters. The Valuation Committee reports to the Board; is chaired by the fund’s treasurer; and has representation from legal, portfolio management and trading, operations, and risk management.
Various valuation techniques and inputs are used to determine the fair value of financial instruments. GAAP establishes the following fair value hierarchy that categorizes the inputs used to measure fair value:
Level 1 – quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical financial instruments that the fund can access at the reporting date
Level 2 – inputs other than Level 1 quoted prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly (including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar financial instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar financial instruments in inactive markets, interest rates and yield curves, implied volatilities, and credit spreads)
Level 3 – unobservable inputs
Observable inputs are developed using market data, such as publicly available information about actual events or transactions, and reflect the assumptions that market participants would use to price the financial instrument. Unobservable inputs are those for which market data are not available and are developed using the best information available about the assumptions that market participants would use to price the financial instrument. GAAP requires valuation techniques to maximize the use of relevant observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. When multiple inputs are used to derive fair value, the financial instrument is assigned to the level within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest-level input that is significant to the fair value of the financial instrument. Input levels are not necessarily an indication of the risk or liquidity associated with financial instruments at that level but rather the degree of judgment used in determining those values.
Valuation Techniques Debt securities generally are traded in the over-the-counter (OTC) market. Securities with remaining maturities of one year or more at the time of acquisition are valued at prices furnished by dealers who make markets in such securities or by an independent pricing service, which considers the yield or price of bonds of comparable quality, coupon, maturity, and type, as well as prices quoted by dealers who make markets in such securities. Securities with remaining maturities of less than one year at the time of acquisition generally use amortized cost in local currency to approximate fair value. However, if amortized cost is deemed not to reflect fair value or the fund holds a significant amount of such securities with remaining maturities of more than 60 days, the securities are valued at prices furnished by dealers who make markets in such securities or by an independent pricing service. Generally, debt securities are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy; however, to the extent the valuations include significant unobservable inputs, the securities would be categorized in Level 3.
Equity securities listed or regularly traded on a securities exchange or in the OTC market are valued at the last quoted sale price or, for certain markets, the official closing price at the time the valuations are made. OTC Bulletin Board securities are valued at the mean of the closing bid and asked prices. A security that is listed or traded on more than one exchange is valued at the quotation on the exchange determined to be the primary market for such security. Listed securities not traded on a particular day are valued at the mean of the closing bid and asked prices for domestic securities and the last quoted sale or closing price for international securities.
For valuation purposes, the last quoted prices of non-U.S. equity securities may be adjusted to reflect the fair value of such securities at the close of the NYSE. If the fund determines that developments between the close of a foreign market and the close of the NYSE will, in its judgment, materially affect the value of some or all of its portfolio securities, the fund will adjust the previous quoted prices to reflect what it believes to be the fair value of the securities as of the close of the NYSE. In deciding whether it is necessary to adjust quoted prices to reflect fair value, the fund reviews a variety of factors, including developments in foreign markets, the performance of U.S. securities markets, and the performance of instruments trading in U.S. markets that represent foreign securities and baskets of foreign securities. The fund may also fair value securities in other situations, such as when a particular foreign market is closed but the fund is open. The fund uses outside pricing services to provide it with quoted prices and information to evaluate or adjust those prices. The fund cannot predict how often it will use quoted prices and how often it will determine it necessary to adjust those prices to reflect fair value. As a means of evaluating its security valuation process, the fund routinely compares quoted prices, the next day’s opening prices in the same markets, and adjusted prices.
Actively traded domestic equity securities generally are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Non-U.S. equity securities generally are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy despite the availability of quoted prices because, as described above, the fund evaluates and determines whether those quoted prices reflect fair value at the close of the NYSE or require adjustment. OTC Bulletin Board securities, certain preferred securities, and equity securities traded in inactive markets generally are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
Investments in mutual funds are valued at the mutual fund’s closing NAV per share on the day of valuation and are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Listed options, and OTC options with a listed equivalent, are valued at the mean of the closing bid and asked prices and generally are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Forward currency exchange contracts are valued using the prevailing forward exchange rate and are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. Swaps are valued at prices furnished by independent swap dealers or by an independent pricing service and generally are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy; however, if unobservable inputs are significant to the valuation, the swap would be categorized in Level 3. Assets and liabilities other than financial instruments, including short-term receivables and payables, are carried at cost, or estimated realizable value, if less, which approximates fair value.
Thinly traded financial instruments and those for which the above valuation procedures are inappropriate or are deemed not to reflect fair value are stated at fair value as determined in good faith by the Valuation Committee. The objective of any fair value pricing determination is to arrive at a price that could reasonably be expected from a current sale. Financial instruments fair valued by the Valuation Committee are primarily private placements, restricted securities, warrants, rights, and other securities that are not publicly traded.
Subject to oversight by the Board, the Valuation Committee regularly makes good faith judgments to establish and adjust the fair valuations of certain securities as events occur and circumstances warrant. For instance, in determining the fair value of troubled or thinly traded debt instruments, the Valuation Committee considers a variety of factors, which may include, but are not limited to, the issuer’s business prospects, its financial standing and performance, recent investment transactions in the issuer, strategic events affecting the company, market liquidity for the issuer, and general economic conditions and events. In consultation with the investment and pricing teams, the Valuation Committee will determine an appropriate valuation technique based on available information, which may include both observable and unobservable inputs. The Valuation Committee typically will afford greatest weight to actual prices in arm’s length transactions, to the extent they represent orderly transactions between market participants; transaction information can be reliably obtained; and prices are deemed representative of fair value. However, the Valuation Committee may also consider other valuation methods such as a discount or premium from market value of a similar, freely traded security of the same issuer; discounted cash flows; yield to maturity; or some combination. Fair value determinations are reviewed on a regular basis and updated as information becomes available, including actual purchase and sale transactions of the issue. Because any fair value determination involves a significant amount of judgment, there is a degree of subjectivity inherent in such pricing decisions, and fair value prices determined by the Valuation Committee could differ from those of other market participants. Depending on the relative significance of unobservable inputs, including the valuation technique(s) used, fair valued securities may be categorized in Level 2 or 3 of the fair value hierarchy.
Valuation Inputs The following table summarizes the fund’s financial instruments, based on the inputs used to determine their fair values on May 31, 2015:
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx49x1.jpg)
There were no material transfers between Levels 1 and 2 during the year ended May 31, 2015.
Following is a reconciliation of the fund’s Level 3 holdings for the year ended May 31, 2015. Gain (loss) reflects both realized and change in unrealized gain/loss on Level 3 holdings during the period, if any, and is included on the accompanying Statement of Operations. The change in unrealized gain/loss on Level 3 instruments held at May 31, 2015, totaled $0 for the year ended May 31, 2015.
NOTE 3 - DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
During the year ended May 31, 2015, the fund invested in derivative instruments. As defined by GAAP, a derivative is a financial instrument whose value is derived from an underlying security price, foreign exchange rate, interest rate, index of prices or rates, or other variable; it requires little or no initial investment and permits or requires net settlement. The fund invests in derivatives only if the expected risks and rewards are consistent with its investment objectives, policies, and overall risk profile, as described in its prospectus and Statement of Additional Information. The fund may use derivatives for a variety of purposes, such as seeking to hedge against declines in principal value, increase yield, invest in an asset with greater efficiency and at a lower cost than is possible through direct investment, or to adjust portfolio duration and credit exposure. The risks associated with the use of derivatives are different from, and potentially much greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in the instruments on which the derivatives are based. The fund at all times maintains sufficient cash reserves, liquid assets, or other SEC-permitted asset types to cover its settlement obligations under open derivative contracts.
The fund values its derivatives at fair value, as described in Note 2, and recognizes changes in fair value currently in its results of operations. Accordingly, the fund does not follow hedge accounting, even for derivatives employed as economic hedges. Generally, the fund accounts for its derivatives on a gross basis. It does not offset the fair value of derivative liabilities against the fair value of derivative assets on its financial statements, nor does it offset the fair value of derivative instruments against the right to reclaim or obligation to return collateral.
The following table summarizes the fair value of the fund’s derivative instruments held as of May 31, 2015, and the related location on the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities, presented by primary underlying risk exposure:
Additionally, the amount of gains and losses on derivative instruments recognized in fund earnings during the year ended May 31, 2015, and the related location on the accompanying Statement of Operations is summarized in the following table by primary underlying risk exposure:
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx52x1.jpg)
Counterparty Risk and Collateral The fund invests in derivatives in various markets, which expose it to differing levels of counterparty risk. Counterparty risk on exchange-traded and centrally cleared derivative contracts, such as futures, exchange-traded options, and centrally cleared swaps, is minimal because the clearinghouse provides protection against counterparty defaults. For futures and centrally cleared swaps, the fund is required to deposit collateral in an amount equal to a certain percentage of the contract value (margin requirement) and the margin requirement must be maintained over the life of the contract. Each clearing broker, in its sole discretion, may adjust the margin requirements applicable to the fund.
Derivatives, such as bilateral swaps, forward currency exchange contracts, and OTC options, that are transacted and settle directly with a counterparty (bilateral derivatives) expose the fund to greater counterparty risk. To mitigate this risk, the fund has entered into master netting arrangements (MNAs) with certain counterparties that permit net settlement under specified conditions and, for certain counterparties, also provide collateral agreements. MNAs may be in the form of International Swaps and Derivatives Association master agreements (ISDAs) or foreign exchange letter agreements (FX letters).
MNAs govern the ability to offset amounts the fund owes a counterparty against amounts the counterparty owes the fund (net settlement). Both ISDAs and FX letters generally allow net settlement in the event of contract termination and permit termination by either party prior to maturity upon the occurrence of certain stated events, such as failure to pay or bankruptcy. In addition, ISDAs specify other events, the occurrence of which would allow one of the parties to terminate. For example, a downgrade in credit rating of a counterparty would allow the fund to terminate while a decline in the fund’s net assets of more than a certain percentage would allow the counterparty to terminate. Upon termination, all bilateral derivatives with that counterparty would be liquidated and a net amount settled. ISDAs typically include collateral agreements whereas FX letters do not. Collateral requirements are determined based on the net aggregate unrealized gain or loss on all bilateral derivatives with each counterparty, subject to minimum transfer amounts that typically range from $100,000 to $250,000. Any additional collateral required due to changes in security values is transferred the next business day.
Collateral may be in the form of cash or debt securities issued by the U.S. government or related agencies. Cash and currencies posted by the fund are reflected as cash deposits in the accompanying financial statements and generally are restricted from withdrawal by the fund; securities posted by the fund are so noted in the accompanying Portfolio of Investments; both remain in the fund’s assets. Collateral pledged by counterparties is not included in the fund’s assets because the fund does not obtain effective control over those assets. For bilateral derivatives, collateral posted or received by the fund is held in a segregated account by the fund’s custodian. As of May 31, 2015, no collateral was pledged by either the fund or counterparties for bilateral derivatives. As of May 31, 2015, no margin had been posted by the fund for exchange-traded and/or centrally cleared derivatives.
Forward Currency Exchange Contracts The fund is subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives. It uses forward currency exchange contracts (forwards) primarily to protect its non-U.S. dollar-denominated securities from adverse currency movements relative to the U.S. dollar. A forward involves an obligation to purchase or sell a fixed amount of a specific currency on a future date at a price set at the time of the contract. Although certain forwards may be settled by exchanging only the net gain or loss on the contract, most forwards are settled with the exchange of the underlying currencies in accordance with the specified terms. Forwards are valued at the unrealized gain or loss on the contract, which reflects the net amount the fund either is entitled to receive or obligated to deliver, as measured by the difference between the forward exchange rates at the date of entry into the contract and the forward rates at the reporting date. Appreciated forwards are reflected as assets, and depreciated forwards are reflected as liabilities on the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Risks related to the use of forwards include the possible failure of counterparties to meet the terms of the agreements; that anticipated currency movements will not occur, thereby reducing the fund’s total return; and the potential for losses in excess of the fund’s initial investment. During the year ended May 31, 2015, the volume of the fund’s activity in forwards, based on underlying notional amounts, was generally between 1% and 6% of net assets.
Options The fund is subject to equity price risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives and uses options to help manage such risk. The fund may use options to manage exposure to security prices, interest rates, foreign currencies, and credit quality; as an efficient means of adjusting exposure to all or a part of a target market; to enhance income; as a cash management tool; or to adjust credit exposure. Options are included in net assets at fair value; purchased options are included in Investments in Securities; and written options are separately reflected as a liability on the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities. Premiums on unexercised, expired options are recorded as realized gains or losses; premiums on exercised options are recorded as an adjustment to the proceeds from the sale or cost of the purchase. The difference between the premium and the amount received or paid in a closing transaction is also treated as realized gain or loss. In return for a premium paid, call and put options give the holder the right, but not the obligation, to purchase or sell, respectively, a security at a specified exercise price. Risks related to the use of options include possible illiquidity of the options markets; trading restrictions imposed by an exchange or counterparty; movements in the underlying asset values and, for written options, potential losses in excess of the fund’s initial investment. During the year ended May 31, 2015, the volume of the fund’s activity in options, based on underlying notional amounts, was generally between 0% and 2% of net assets.
Swaps The fund is subject to credit risk in the normal course of pursuing its investment objectives and uses swap contracts to help manage such risk. The fund may use swaps in an effort to manage exposure to changes in interest rates, inflation rates, and credit quality; to adjust overall exposure to certain markets; to enhance total return or protect the value of portfolio securities; to serve as a cash management tool; or to adjust portfolio duration and credit exposure. Swap agreements can be settled either directly with the counterparty (bilateral swap) or through a central clearinghouse (centrally cleared swap). Fluctuations in the fair value of a contract are reflected in unrealized gain or loss and are reclassified to realized gain or loss upon contract termination or cash settlement. Net periodic receipts or payments required by a contract increase or decrease, respectively, the value of the contract until the contractual payment date, at which time such amounts are reclassified from unrealized to realized gain or loss. For bilateral swaps, cash payments are made or received by the fund on a periodic basis in accordance with contract terms; unrealized gain on contracts and premiums paid are reflected as assets, and unrealized loss on contracts and premiums received are reflected as liabilities on the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities. For centrally cleared swaps, payments are made or received by the fund each day to settle the daily fluctuation in the value of the contract (variation margin). Accordingly, the value of a centrally cleared swap included in net assets is the unsettled variation margin; net variation margin receivable is reflected as an asset and net variation margin payable is reflected as a liability on the accompanying Statement of Assets and Liabilities.
Credit default swaps are agreements where one party (the protection buyer) agrees to make periodic payments to another party (the protection seller) in exchange for protection against specified credit events, such as certain defaults and bankruptcies related to an underlying credit instrument, or issuer or index of such instruments. Upon occurrence of a specified credit event, the protection seller is required to pay the buyer the difference between the notional amount of the swap and the value of the underlying credit, either in the form of a net cash settlement or by paying the gross notional amount and accepting delivery of the relevant underlying credit. For credit default swaps where the underlying credit is an index, a specified credit event may affect all or individual underlying securities included in the index and will be settled based upon the relative weighting of the affected underlying security(s) within the index. Generally, the payment risk for the seller of protection is inversely related to the current market price or credit rating of the underlying credit or the market value of the contract relative to the notional amount, which are indicators of the markets’ valuation of credit quality. As of May 31, 2015, the notional amount of protection sold by the fund totaled $395,000 (1.0% of net assets), which reflects the maximum potential amount the fund could be required to pay under such contracts. Risks related to the use of credit default swaps include the possible inability of the fund to accurately assess the current and future creditworthiness of underlying issuers, the possible failure of a counterparty to perform in accordance with the terms of the swap agreements, potential government regulation that could adversely affect the fund’s swap investments, and potential losses in excess of the fund’s initial investment.
During the year ended May 31, 2015, the volume of the fund’s activity in swaps, based on underlying notional amounts, was generally between 0% and 12% of net assets.
NOTE 4 - OTHER INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS
Consistent with its investment objective, the fund engages in the following practices to manage exposure to certain risks and/or to enhance performance. The investment objective, policies, program, and risk factors of the fund are described more fully in the fund’s prospectus and Statement of Additional Information.
Emerging and Frontier Markets The fund may invest, either directly or through investments in T. Rowe Price institutional funds, in securities of companies located in, issued by governments of, or denominated in or linked to the currencies of emerging and frontier market countries; at period-end, approximately 10% of the fund’s net assets were invested in emerging markets and 2% in frontier markets. Frontier markets generally have economic structures that are less diverse and mature, and political systems that are less stable, than developed countries and emerging markets. These markets may be subject to greater political, economic, and social uncertainty and differing regulatory environments that may potentially impact the fund’s ability to buy or sell certain securities or repatriate proceeds to U.S. dollars. Such securities are often subject to greater price volatility, less liquidity, and higher rates of inflation than U.S. securities. Investing in frontier markets is significantly riskier than investing in other countries, including emerging markets.
Noninvestment-Grade Debt Securities At May 31, 2015, approximately 93% of the fund’s net assets were invested, either directly or through its investment in T. Rowe Price institutional funds, in noninvestment-grade debt securities, commonly referred to as “high yield” or “junk” bonds. The noninvestment-grade bond market may experience sudden and sharp price swings due to a variety of factors, including changes in economic forecasts, stock market activity, large sustained sales by major investors, a high-profile default, or a change in market sentiment. These events may decrease the ability of issuers to make principal and interest payments and adversely affect the liquidity or value, or both, of such securities.
Restricted Securities The fund may invest in securities that are subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale. Prompt sale of such securities at an acceptable price may be difficult and may involve substantial delays and additional costs.
Bank Loans The fund may invest in bank loans, which represent an interest in amounts owed by a borrower to a syndication of lenders. Bank loans are generally noninvestment grade and often involve borrowers whose financial condition is troubled or highly leveraged. Bank loans may be in the form of either assignments or participations. A loan assignment transfers all legal, beneficial, and economic rights to the buyer, and transfer typically requires consent of both the borrower and agent. In contrast, a loan participation generally entitles the buyer to receive the cash flows from principal, interest, and any fee payments; however, the seller continues to hold legal title to the loan. As a result, the buyer of a loan participation generally has no direct rights against the borrower and is exposed to credit risk of both the borrower and seller of the participation. Bank loans often have extended settlement periods, usually may be repaid at any time at the option of the borrower, and may require additional principal to be funded at the borrowers’ discretion at a later date (unfunded commitments). Until settlement, the fund maintains liquid assets sufficient to settle its unfunded loan commitments. The fund reflects both the funded portion of a bank loan as well as its unfunded commitment in the Portfolio of Investments. However, to the extent a credit agreement provides no initial funding of a tranche and funding of the full commitment at a future date(s) is at the borrower’s discretion and considered uncertain, no loan is reflected in the Portfolio of Investments until paid. At May 31, 2015, the fund’s total unfunded commitments not included in the Portfolio of Investments were $275,000.
Other Purchases and sales of portfolio securities other than short-term securities aggregated $62,806,000 and $41,010,000, respectively, for the year ended May 31, 2015.
NOTE 5 - FEDERAL INCOME TAXES
No provision for federal income taxes is required since the fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code and distribute to shareholders all of its taxable income and gains. Distributions determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations may differ in amount or character from net investment income and realized gains for financial reporting purposes. Financial reporting records are adjusted for permanent book/tax differences to reflect tax character but are not adjusted for temporary differences.
The fund files U.S. federal, state, and local tax returns as required. The fund’s tax returns are subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities until expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, which is generally three years after the filing of the tax return but which can be extended to six years in certain circumstances. Tax returns for open years have incorporated no uncertain tax positions that require a provision for income taxes.
Reclassifications between income and gain relate primarily to the character of premium payments and unrealized gains and losses on swaps and differences between book/tax amortization policies. For the year ended May 31, 2015, the following reclassifications were recorded to reflect tax character (there was no impact on results of operations or net assets):
Distributions during the years ended May 31, 2015 and May 31, 2014, totaled $2,435,000 and $93,000, respectively, and were characterized as ordinary income. At May 31, 2015, the tax-basis cost of investments and components of net assets were as follows:
The difference between book-basis and tax-basis net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable to, the realization of gains/losses on certain open derivative contracts, and the recognition of market discount amortization for tax purposes. The fund intends to retain realized gains to the extent of available capital loss carryforwards. Net realized capital losses may be carried forward indefinitely to offset future realized capital gains.
NOTE 6 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The fund is managed by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (Price Associates), a wholly owned subsidiary of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (Price Group). The investment management agreement between the fund and Price Associates provides for an annual investment management fee, which is computed daily and paid monthly. The fee consists of an individual fund fee, equal to 0.35% of the fund’s average daily net assets, and a group fee. The group fee rate is calculated based on the combined net assets of certain mutual funds sponsored by Price Associates (the group) applied to a graduated fee schedule, with rates ranging from 0.48% for the first $1 billion of assets to 0.275% for assets in excess of $400 billion. The fund’s group fee is determined by applying the group fee rate to the fund’s average daily net assets. At May 31, 2015, the effective annual group fee rate was 0.29%.
The Investor Class and Advisor Class are also each subject to a contractual expense limitation through the limitation dates indicated in the table below. During the limitation period, Price Associates is required to waive its management fee or reimburse expenses, excluding interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, and extraordinary expenses, that would otherwise cause the class’s ratio of annualized total expenses to average net assets (expense ratio) to exceed its expense limitation. Each class is required to repay Price Associates for expenses previously reimbursed and management fees waived to the extent the class’s net assets grow or expenses decline sufficiently to allow repayment without causing the class’s expense ratio to exceed its expense limitation. However, no repayment will be made more than three years after the date of a reimbursement or waiver.
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/arcro_ncsrx60x1.jpg)
Pursuant to this agreement, management fees in the amount of $224,000 were waived and expenses in the amount of $125,000 were reimbursed Price Associates during the year ended May 31, 2015. Including these amounts, management fees waived and expenses previously reimbursed by Price Associates in the amount of $388,000 remain subject to repayment at May 31, 2015.
In addition, the fund has entered into service agreements with Price Associates and a wholly owned subsidiary of Price Associates (collectively, Price). Price Associates computes the daily share prices and provides certain other administrative services to the fund. T. Rowe Price Services, Inc., provides shareholder and administrative services in its capacity as the fund’s transfer and dividend-disbursing agent. For the year ended May 31, 2015, expenses incurred pursuant to these service agreements were $210,000 for Price Associates and $21,000 for T. Rowe Price Services, Inc. The total amount payable at period-end pursuant to these service agreements is reflected as Due to Affiliates in the accompanying financial statements.
The fund may invest in the T. Rowe Price Reserve Investment Fund, the T. Rowe Price Government Reserve Investment Fund, or the T. Rowe Price Short-Term Reserve Fund (collectively, the Price Reserve Investment Funds), open-end management investment companies managed by Price Associates and considered affiliates of the fund. The Price Reserve Investment Funds are offered as short-term investment options to mutual funds, trusts, and other accounts managed by Price Associates or its affiliates and are not available for direct purchase by members of the public. The Price Reserve Investment Funds pay no investment management fees.
As of May 31, 2015, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., or its wholly owned subsidiaries owned 2,475,000 shares of the Investor Class, and 25,000 shares of the Advisor Class, aggregating 58% of the fund’s net assets.
NOTE 7 - BORROWING
The fund may borrow to provide temporary liquidity. The fund, along with several other T. Rowe Price-sponsored mutual funds (collectively, the participating funds), has entered into a $500 million, 364-day, syndicated credit facility (the facility) pursuant to which the participating funds may borrow on a first-come, first-served basis up to the full amount of the facility. Interest is charged to the borrowing fund at a rate equal to 1.00% plus the greater of (a) the Federal Funds rate or (b) the one-month LIBOR. A commitment fee, equal to 0.08% per annum of the average daily undrawn commitment, is allocated to the participating funds based on each fund’s relative net assets; it is accrued daily and paid quarterly. Loans are generally unsecured; however, the fund must collateralize any borrowings under the facility on an equivalent basis if it has other collateralized borrowings. During the year ended May 31, 2015, the fund incurred $1,000 in commitment fees. At May 31, 2015, the fund had no borrowings outstanding under the facility, and the undrawn amount of the facility was $500,000,000.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm |
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund, Inc.
In our opinion, the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the portfolio of investments, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund, Inc. (the “Fund”) at May 31, 2015, the results of its operations, the changes in its net assets and the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated therein, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as “financial statements”) are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of securities at May 31, 2015 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, and confirmation of the underlying fund by correspondence with the transfer agent, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Baltimore, Maryland
July 16, 2015
Tax Information (Unaudited) for the Tax Year Ended 5/31/15 |
We are providing this information as required by the Internal Revenue Code. The amounts shown may differ from those elsewhere in this report because of differences between tax and financial reporting requirements.
The fund’s distributions to shareholders included $188,000 from short-term capital gains.
For taxable non-corporate shareholders, $33,000 of the fund’s income represents qualified dividend income subject to a long-term capital gains tax rate of not greater than 20%.
For corporate shareholders, $31,000 of the fund’s income qualifies for the dividends-received deduction.
Information on Proxy Voting Policies, Procedures, and Records |
A description of the policies and procedures used by T. Rowe Price funds and portfolios to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available in each fund’s Statement of Additional Information. You may request this document by calling 1-800-225-5132 or by accessing the SEC’s website, sec.gov.
The description of our proxy voting policies and procedures is also available on our website, troweprice.com. To access it, click on the words “Social Responsibility” at the top of our corporate homepage. Next, click on the words “Conducting Business Responsibly” on the left side of the page that appears. Finally, click on the words “Proxy Voting Policies” on the left side of the page that appears.
Each fund’s most recent annual proxy voting record is available on our website and through the SEC’s website. To access it through our website, follow the above directions to reach the “Conducting Business Responsibly” page. Click on the words “Proxy Voting Records” on the left side of that page, and then click on the “View Proxy Voting Records” link at the bottom of the page that appears.
How to Obtain Quarterly Portfolio Holdings |
The fund files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q is available electronically on the SEC’s website (sec.gov); hard copies may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room, 100 F St. N.E., Washington, DC 20549. For more information on the Public Reference Room, call 1-800-SEC-0330.
Approval of Investment Management Agreement |
On March 13, 2015, the fund’s Board of Directors (Board), including a majority of the fund’s independent directors, approved the continuation of the investment management agreement (Advisory Contract) between the fund and its investment advisor, T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (Advisor). In connection with its deliberations, the Board requested, and the Advisor provided, such information as the Board (with advice from independent legal counsel) deemed reasonably necessary. The Board considered a variety of factors in connection with its review of the Advisory Contract, also taking into account information provided by the Advisor during the course of the year, as discussed below:
Services Provided by the Advisor
The Board considered the nature, quality, and extent of the services provided to the fund by the Advisor. These services included, but were not limited to, directing the fund’s investments in accordance with its investment program and the overall management of the fund’s portfolio, as well as a variety of related activities such as financial, investment operations, and administrative services; compliance; maintaining the fund’s records and registrations; and shareholder communications. The Board also reviewed the background and experience of the Advisor’s senior management team and investment personnel involved in the management of the fund, as well as the Advisor’s compliance record. The Board concluded that it was satisfied with the nature, quality, and extent of the services provided by the Advisor.
Investment Performance of the Fund
The Board reviewed the fund’s three-month and since-inception returns and compared these returns with a wide variety of previously agreed-upon comparable performance measures and market data, including those supplied by Lipper and Morningstar, which are independent providers of mutual fund data.
On the basis of this evaluation and the fund’s limited operating history, the Board concluded that the fund’s performance was satisfactory.
Costs, Benefits, Profits, and Economies of Scale
The Board reviewed detailed information regarding the revenues received by the Advisor under the Advisory Contract and other benefits that the Advisor (and its affiliates) may have realized from its relationship with the fund, including any research received under “soft dollar” agreements and commission-sharing arrangements with broker-dealers. The Board considered that the Advisor may receive some benefit from soft-dollar arrangements pursuant to which research is received from broker-dealers that execute the applicable fund’s portfolio transactions. The Board received information on the estimated costs incurred and profits realized by the Advisor from managing T. Rowe Price mutual funds. While the Board did not review information regarding profits realized from managing the fund in particular because the fund had either not achieved sufficient portfolio asset size or not recognized sufficient revenues to produce meaningful profit margin percentages, the Board concluded that the Advisor’s profits were reasonable in light of the services provided to the T. Rowe Price funds.
The Board also considered whether the fund benefits under the fee levels set forth in the Advisory Contract from any economies of scale realized by the Advisor. Under the Advisory Contract, the fund pays a fee to the Advisor for investment management services composed of two components—a group fee rate based on the combined average net assets of most of the T. Rowe Price mutual funds (including the fund) that declines at certain asset levels and an individual fund fee rate based on the fund’s average daily net assets—and the fund pays its own expenses of operations (subject to an expense limitation agreed to by the Advisor with respect to both the Investor Class and Advisor Class). At the March 13, 2015, meeting, the Board approved an additional 0.005% breakpoint to the group fee schedule, effective May 1, 2015. With the new breakpoint, the group fee rate will decline to 0.270% when the combined average net assets of the applicable T. Rowe Price funds exceed $500 billion. The Board concluded that the advisory fee structure for the fund continued to provide for a reasonable sharing of benefits from any economies of scale with the fund’s investors.
Fees
The Board was provided with information regarding industry trends in management fees and expenses, and the Board reviewed the fund’s management fee rate, operating expenses, and total expense ratio (for the Investor Class and Advisor Class) in comparison with fees and expenses of other comparable funds based on information and data supplied by Lipper. After including waivers of the management fee pursuant to the contractual expense limitation, the information provided to the Board indicated that the fund’s management fee rate was below the median for comparable funds. The information also indicated that the fund’s total expense ratio (for the Investor Class) was above the median for certain groups of comparable funds and at or below the median for other groups of comparable funds, and the total expense ratio (for the Advisor Class) was at or below the median for comparable funds.
The Board also reviewed the fee schedules for institutional accounts and private accounts with similar mandates that are advised or subadvised by the Advisor and its affiliates. Management provided the Board with information about the Advisor’s responsibilities and services provided to institutional account clients, including information about how the requirements and economics of the institutional business are fundamentally different from those of the mutual fund business. The Board considered information showing that the mutual fund business is generally more complex from a business and compliance perspective than the institutional business and that the Advisor generally performs significant additional services and assumes greater risk in managing the fund and other T. Rowe Price mutual funds than it does for institutional account clients.
On the basis of the information provided and the factors considered, the Board concluded that the fees paid by the fund under the Advisory Contract are reasonable.
Approval of the Advisory Contract
As noted, the Board approved the continuation of the Advisory Contract. No single factor was considered in isolation or to be determinative to the decision. Rather, the Board concluded, in light of a weighting and balancing of all factors considered, as well as the fund’s limited operating history, that it was in the best interests of the fund and its shareholders for the Board to approve the continuation of the Advisory Contract (including the fees to be charged for services thereunder). The independent directors were advised throughout the process by independent legal counsel.
About the Fund’s Directors and Officers |
Your fund is overseen by a Board of Directors (Board) that meets regularly to review a wide variety of matters affecting or potentially affecting the fund, including performance, investment programs, compliance matters, advisory fees and expenses, service providers, and business and regulatory affairs. The Board elects the fund’s officers, who are listed in the final table. At least 75% of the Board’s members are independent of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (T. Rowe Price), and its affiliates; “inside” or “interested” directors are employees or officers of T. Rowe Price. The business address of each director and officer is 100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202. The Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about the fund directors and is available without charge by calling a T. Rowe Price representative at 1-800-638-5660.
Independent Directors | ||
Name | ||
(Year of Birth) | ||
Year Elected* | ||
[Number of T. Rowe Price | Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships of Public Companies and | |
Portfolios Overseen] | Other Investment Companies During the Past Five Years | |
William R. Brody, M.D., Ph.D. | President and Trustee, Salk Institute for Biological Studies (2009 to | |
(1944) | present); Director, BioMed Realty Trust (2013 to present); Director, | |
2014 | Novartis, Inc. (2009 to 2014); Director, IBM (2007 to present) | |
[165] | ||
Anthony W. Deering | Chairman, Exeter Capital, LLC, a private investment firm (2004 | |
(1945) | to present); Director, Brixmor Real Estate Investment Trust (2012 | |
2014 | to present); Director and Advisory Board Member, Deutsche | |
[165] | Bank North America (2004 to present); Director, Under Armour | |
(2008 to present); Director, Vornado Real Estate Investment Trust | ||
(2004 to 2012) | ||
Donald W. Dick, Jr. | Principal, EuroCapital Partners, LLC, an acquisition and management | |
(1943) | advisory firm (1995 to present) | |
2014 | ||
[165] | ||
Bruce W. Duncan | President, Chief Executive Officer and Director, First Industrial | |
(1951) | Realty Trust, an owner and operator of industrial properties | |
2014 | (2009 to present); Chairman of the Board (2005 to present) and | |
[165] | Director (1999 to present), Starwood Hotels & Resorts, a hotel and | |
leisure company | ||
Robert J. Gerrard, Jr. | Chairman of Compensation Committee and Director, Syniverse | |
(1952) | Holdings, Inc., a provider of wireless voice and data services for | |
2014 | telecommunications companies (2008 to 2011); Advisory Board | |
[165] | Member, Pipeline Crisis/Winning Strategies, a collaborative working | |
to improve opportunities for young African Americans (1997 | ||
to present) | ||
Karen N. Horn | Limited Partner and Senior Managing Director, Brock Capital Group, | |
(1943) | an advisory and investment banking firm (2004 to present); Director, | |
2014 | Eli Lilly and Company (1987 to present); Director, Simon Property | |
[165] | Group (2004 to present); Director, Norfolk Southern (2008 to present) | |
Paul F. McBride | Former Company Officer and Senior Vice President, Human Resources | |
(1956) | and Corporate Initiatives, Black & Decker Corporation (2004 to 2010) | |
2014 | ||
[165] | ||
Cecilia E. Rouse, Ph.D. | Dean, Woodrow Wilson School (2012 to present); Professor and | |
(1963) | Researcher, Princeton University (1992 to present); Director, MDRC, | |
2014 | a nonprofit education and social policy research organization | |
[165] | (2011 to present); Member, National Academy of Education (2010 | |
to present); Research Associate, National Bureau of Economic | ||
Research’s Labor Studies Program (2011 to present); Member, | ||
President’s Council of Economic Advisers (2009 to 2011); Chair | ||
of Committee on the Status of Minority Groups in the Economic | ||
Profession, American Economic Association (2012 to present) | ||
John G. Schreiber | Owner/President, Centaur Capital Partners, Inc., a real estate | |
(1946) | investment company (1991 to present); Cofounder and Partner, | |
2014 | Blackstone Real Estate Advisors, L.P. (1992 to present); Director, | |
[165] | General Growth Properties, Inc. (2010 to 2013); Director, Blackstone | |
Mortgage Trust, a real estate financial company (2012 to present); | ||
Director and Chairman of the Board, Brixmor Property Group, Inc. | ||
(2013 to present); Director, Hilton Worldwide (2013 to present); | ||
Director, Hudson Pacific Properties (2014 to present) | ||
Mark R. Tercek | President and Chief Executive Officer, The Nature Conservancy (2008 | |
(1957) | to present) | |
2014 | ||
[165] | ||
*Each independent director serves until retirement, resignation, or election of a successor. | ||
Inside Directors | ||
Name | ||
(Year of Birth) | ||
Year Elected* | ||
[Number of T. Rowe Price | Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships of Public Companies and | |
Portfolios Overseen] | Other Investment Companies During the Past Five Years | |
Edward C. Bernard | Director and Vice President, T. Rowe Price; Vice Chairman of the | |
(1956) | Board, Director, and Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; | |
2014 | Chairman of the Board, Director, and President, T. Rowe Price | |
[165] | Investment Services, Inc.; Chairman of the Board and Director, | |
T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc., and T. Rowe Price | ||
Services, Inc.; Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer, | ||
Director, and President, T. Rowe Price International and T. Rowe | ||
Price Trust Company; Chairman of the Board, all funds | ||
Edward A. Wiese, CFA | Director and Vice President, T. Rowe Price Trust Company; Vice | |
(1959) | President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe | |
2015 | Price International | |
[54] | ||
*Each inside director serves until retirement, resignation, or election of a successor. |
Officers | ||
Name (Year of Birth) | ||
Position Held With Credit Opportunities Fund | Principal Occupation(s) | |
Michael F. Blandino (1971) | Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price | |
Vice President | Group, Inc. | |
Darrell N. Braman (1963) | Vice President, Price Hong Kong, Price | |
Vice President | Singapore, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group, | |
Inc., T. Rowe Price International, T. Rowe Price | ||
Investment Services, Inc., and T. Rowe Price | ||
Services, Inc. | ||
Christopher P. Brown, Jr., CFA (1977) | Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price | |
Vice President | Group, Inc. | |
Gregory K. Hinkle, CPA (1958) | Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price | |
Treasurer | Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company | |
Andrew P. Jamison (1981) | Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price | |
Vice President | Group, Inc. | |
Patricia B. Lippert (1953) | Assistant Vice President, T. Rowe Price and | |
Secretary | T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc. | |
James M. Murphy, CFA (1967) | Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price | |
Vice President | Group, Inc. | |
David Oestreicher (1967) | Director, Vice President, and Secretary, T. Rowe | |
Vice President | Price Investment Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price | |
Retirement Plan Services, Inc., T. Rowe | ||
Price Services, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust | ||
Company; Chief Legal Officer, Vice President, | ||
and Secretary, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Vice | ||
President and Secretary, T. Rowe Price and | ||
T. Rowe Price International; Vice President, | ||
Price Hong Kong and Price Singapore | ||
John W. Ratzesberger (1975) | Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price | |
Vice President | Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company; | |
formerly, North American Head of Listed | ||
Derivatives Operation, Morgan Stanley | ||
(to 2013) | ||
Rodney M. Rayburn, CFA (1970) | Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price | |
Vice President* | Group, Inc.; formerly, Managing Director, Värde | |
Partners (to 2014) | ||
Brian A. Rubin, CPA (1974) | Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price | |
Vice President | Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company | |
Deborah D. Seidel (1962) | Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price | |
Vice President | Group, Inc., T. Rowe Price Investment Services, | |
Inc., and T. Rowe Price Services, Inc. | ||
Robert D. Thomas (1971) | Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and | |
Vice President | T. Rowe Price International; formerly, Senior | |
Vice President, Moody’s Investors Service, | ||
(London) (to 2011) | ||
Siby Thomas (1979) | Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price | |
Vice President | Group, Inc. | |
Lauren T. Wagandt (1984) | Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price | |
Vice President | Group, Inc. | |
Jeffrey T. Zoller (1970) | Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price | |
Vice President | Trust Company | |
Unless otherwise noted, officers have been employees of T. Rowe Price or T. Rowe Price International for at least 5 years. | ||
*It has been confirmed that Mr. Rayburn will become president of the Credit Opportunities Fund at the Board of Directors meeting on July 27, 2015. |
Item 2. Code of Ethics.
The registrant has adopted a code of ethics, as defined in Item 2 of Form N-CSR, applicable to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. A copy of this code of ethics is filed as an exhibit to this Form N-CSR. No substantive amendments were approved or waivers were granted to this code of ethics during the period covered by this report.
Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.
The registrant’s Board of Directors/Trustees has determined that Mr. Bruce W. Duncan qualifies as an audit committee financial expert, as defined in Item 3 of Form N-CSR. Mr. Duncan is considered independent for purposes of Item 3 of Form N-CSR.
Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.
(a) – (d) Aggregate fees billed for the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered to, or on behalf of, the registrant by the registrant’s principal accountant were as follows:
![](https://capedge.com/proxy/N-CSR/0001206774-15-002242/wrapx2x1.jpg)
Audit fees include amounts related to the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements and services normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings. Audit-related fees include amounts reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the registrant’s financial statements and specifically include the issuance of a report on internal controls and, if applicable, agreed-upon procedures related to fund acquisitions. Tax fees include amounts related to services for tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice. The nature of these services specifically includes the review of distribution calculations and the preparation of Federal, state, and excise tax returns. All other fees include the registrant’s pro-rata share of amounts for agreed-upon procedures in conjunction with service contract approvals by the registrant’s Board of Directors/Trustees.
(e)(1) The registrant’s audit committee has adopted a policy whereby audit and non-audit services performed by the registrant’s principal accountant for the registrant, its investment adviser, and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant require pre-approval in advance at regularly scheduled audit committee meetings. If such a service is required between regularly scheduled audit committee meetings, pre-approval may be authorized by one audit committee member with ratification at the next scheduled audit committee meeting. Waiver of pre-approval for audit or non-audit services requiring fees of a de minimis amount is not permitted.
(2) No services included in (b) – (d) above were approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
(f) Less than 50 percent of the hours expended on the principal accountant’s engagement to audit the registrant’s financial statements for the most recent fiscal year were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees.
(g) The aggregate fees billed for the most recent fiscal year and the preceding fiscal year by the registrant’s principal accountant for non-audit services rendered to the registrant, its investment adviser, and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant were $2,677,000 and $1,759,000, respectively.
(h) All non-audit services rendered in (g) above were pre-approved by the registrant’s audit committee. Accordingly, these services were considered by the registrant’s audit committee in maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.
Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.
Not applicable.
Item 6. Investments.
(a) Not applicable. The complete schedule of investments is included in Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.
(b) Not applicable.
Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.
Not applicable.
Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.
Not applicable.
Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
Not applicable.
Item 11. Controls and Procedures.
(a) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days of this filing and have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of that date, in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported timely.
(b) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer are aware of no change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s second fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
Item 12. Exhibits.
(a)(1) The registrant’s code of ethics pursuant to Item 2 of Form N-CSR is attached.
(2) Separate certifications by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, are attached.
(3) Written solicitation to repurchase securities issued by closed-end companies: not applicable.
(b) A certification by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, is attached.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
T. Rowe Price Credit Opportunities Fund, Inc.
By | /s/ Edward C. Bernard | |
Edward C. Bernard | ||
Principal Executive Officer | ||
Date July 16, 2015 |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By | /s/ Edward C. Bernard | |
Edward C. Bernard | ||
Principal Executive Officer | ||
Date July 16, 2015 | ||
By | /s/ Gregory K. Hinkle | |
Gregory K. Hinkle | ||
Principal Financial Officer | ||
Date July 16, 2015 |