Commitments and Contingencies | 8. Commitments and Contingencies Legal Proceedings From time to time, the Company is involved in disputes, litigation, and other legal actions, including those with respect to intellectual property, employment, testing and other matters. Such actions may include allegations of negligence, products/professional liability or other similar legal claims, and could involve claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. The Company is aggressively defending and/or prosecuting its current litigation matters, but cannot provide any assurance as to the ultimate outcome or that an adverse resolution would not have a material adverse effect on its financial condition and results of operations. There are many uncertainties associated with any litigation and these actions or other third party claims against the Company, or by the Company against third parties, may cause the Company to incur costly litigation and/or substantial settlement charges. In addition, the resolution of any intellectual property litigation may require the Company to make royalty payments, which could adversely affect gross margins in future periods. If this were to occur, the Company's business, financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows could be adversely affected. The Company assesses legal contingencies to determine the degree of probability and range of possible loss for potential accrual in its financial statements. When evaluating legal contingencies, the Company may be unable to provide a meaningful estimate due to a number of factors, including the procedural status of the matter in question, the presence of complex or novel legal theories, and/or the ongoing discovery and development of information important to the matters. In addition, damage amounts claimed in litigation against it may be unsupported, exaggerated or unrelated to possible outcomes, and as such are not meaningful indicators of its potential liability. During the periods presented, the Company has not recorded any accrual for loss contingencies associated with such legal proceedings, determined that an unfavorable outcome is probable or reasonably possible, or determined that the amount or range of any possible loss is reasonably estimable. Illumina Litigation. On March 16, 2018, a lawsuit (the ā831 lawsuit) against the Company was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California by Illumina, Inc., or Illumina, alleging that the Companyās Panorama test infringes certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 9,493,831 (the ā831 patent). Among other relief, the complaint seeks damages or other monetary relief including costs and pre- and post-judgment interest, treble damages, injunctive relief, attorneysā fees and costs. On August 16, 2018, the Company filed a counterclaim against Illumina, alleging that certain of Illuminaās NIPT tests infringe on the Companyās U.S. Patent No. 8,682,592 (the ā592 patent). Among other relief, Natera seeks damages or other monetary relief including costs and pre- and post-judgment interest, treble damages, injunctive relief, attorneysā fees and costs. On June 13, 2019, Illumina filed a petition for inter partes CareDX Litigation Matters. On March 26, 2019, CareDX, Inc., or CareDX, filed suit against the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (āCareDXās Patent Caseā). The suit alleges that the Company infringed two patents, 9,845,497 and 8,703,652. The complaint seeks unspecified damages and injunctive relief. On May 16, 2019, the Company filed a motion to dismiss CareDXās Patent Case for failure to state a claim, and a hearing on the motion took place on November 21, 2019. On March 23, 2020, CareDX additionally alleged in an amended complaint that Natera infringed U.S. Patent No. 10,329,607. On April 8, 2020, Natera filed a renewed motion to dismiss all three of CareDXās patent assertions for failure to state a claim. On May 4, 2020, Natera withdrew its earlier motion to dismiss with the intent to promptly file an early motion for summary judgment. ā In an action that has been consolidated with CareDXās Patent Case, Natera has also alleged that CareDX infringes Nateraās U.S. Patent Nos. 10,526,658 and 10,597,724, seeking unspecified damages and injunctive relief. ā In addition, on April 10, 2019, CareDX filed suit against the Company in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging false advertising, trademark disparagement, unfair competition, and unfair or deceptive trade practices based on statements describing studies that concern the Companyās technology and CareDXās technology (āCareDXās Advertising Caseā). The complaint seeks unspecified damages and injunctive relief. On May 30, 2019, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the entirety of CareDXās Advertising Case for failure to state a claim. On February 7, 2020, CareDx filed an amended complaint withdrawing its trademark disparagement claim. On February 18, 2020, the Company filed a counterclaim against CareDX in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging false advertising, unfair competition and deceptive trade practices and seeking unspecified damages and injunctive relief. Other Litigation Matters. On or about January 27, 2020, the Company filed suit against ArcherDX, Inc., or ArcherDX, in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, alleging that certain of ArcherDXās DNA oncology products infringe on the Companyās U.S. Patent No. 10,538,814 (the ā814 patent). On April 15, 2020, Natera filed an amended complaint alleging that ArcherDx also infringed the Companyās U.S. Patent Nos. 10,557,172, 10,597,708, and 10,590,482. The amended complaint seeks monetary damages and injunctive relief. On or about August 13, 2019, a suit was filed against the Company in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois by a patient alleging claims relating to a discordant test result and seeking monetary damages. On March 15, 2019, a purported class action lawsuit was filed against the Company in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging that the plaintiff received an unauthorized text message to her cellular telephone in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. Among other relief, the complaint seeks statutory and other damages, injunctive relief, attorneysā fees, and costs. On June 18, 2019, the Company filed a motion to dismiss, which was denied. An amended complaint was filed on April 23, 2020. On each of February 17, 2016, March 10, 2016, March 28, 2016 and April 4, 2016, purported class action lawsuits were filed in the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of San Mateo (the āSan Mateo Superior Courtā), against Natera, its directors, certain of its officers and 5% stockholders and their affiliates, and each of the underwriters of the Companyās July 1, 2015 initial public offering (the āIPOā). The complaints asserted claims under Sections 11, 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The complaints alleged, among other things, that the Registration Statement and Prospectus for the Companyās IPO contained materially false or misleading statements, and/or omitted material information that was required to be disclosed, about the Companyās business and prospects. Among other relief, the complaints sought class certification, unspecified compensatory damages, rescission, attorneysā fees, and costs. On October 23, 2017, the San Mateo Superior Court granted the Companyās motion to dismiss the claims under Sections 12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, without leave to re-file, and granted the Companyās motion to dismiss the claims under Section 11 of the Act with leave to re-file. Plaintiffs refiled an amended complaint on November 22, 2017. On August 7, 2018 the judge granted a motion by the Company for judgment on the pleadings, without leave to amend, and ordered that judgment be entered in favor of the defendants. Plaintiffs appealed the judgment on or about March 29, 2019, and the appeal was heard on February 18, 2020. On February 28, 2020, the Court of Appeal for the State of California affirmed the judgment on the pleadings in favor of Natera . ā Director and Officer Indemnifications As permitted under Delaware law, and as set forth in the Companyās Certificate of Incorporation and its Bylaws, the Company indemnifies its directors, executive officers, other officers, employees and other agents for certain events or occurrences that may arise while in such capacity. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under this indemnification is unlimited; however, the Company has insurance policies that may limit its exposure and may enable it to recover a portion of any future amounts paid. Assuming the applicability of coverage, the willingness of the insurer to assume coverage, and subject to certain retention, loss limits and other policy provisions, the Company believes any obligations under this indemnification would not be material, other than an initial $1.5 million for securities related claims and $0.3 million for commercial general liability claims. However, no assurances can be given that the covering insurers will not attempt to dispute the validity, applicability, or amount of coverage without expensive litigation against these insurers, in which case the Company may incur substantial liabilities as a result of these indemnification obligations. Third-Party Payer Reimbursement Audits From time to time, the Company receives recoupment requests from third-party payers for alleged overpayments. The Company disagrees with the contentions of pending requests and/or has recorded an estimated reserve for the alleged overpayments. Contractual Commitments The following table sets forth the material contractual commitments as of March 31, 2020 with a remaining term of at least one year: ā ā ā ā ā ā Party Commitments ā Expiry Date ā ā (in thousands) ā ā Laboratory instruments supplier $ 6,683 ā December-2021 Material supplier ā 10,375 ā March-2021 Application service providers ā 9,778 ā January-2021 - October-2022 Gene sequencing reagents and kits provider ā 675 ā April-2021 Other material suppliers ā 9,712 ā Various ā $ 37,223 ā ā ā |