El Pollo Loco (LOCO) 10-Q 2020 Q2 Quarterly report

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)

☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 24, 2020

or

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to

Commission File Number: 001-36556

EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	20-3563182
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3535 Harbor Blvd., Suite 100, Costa Mesa, California	92626
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(714) 599-5000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share	LOCO	The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   ☒  Yes    ☐  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).   ☒  Yes    ☐  No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer	☐	Accelerated Filer	☒
Non-accelerated Filer	☐	Smaller Reporting Company	☒
		Emerging Growth Company	☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).   ☐  Yes    ☒  No

As of July 24, 2020, there were 35,922,099 shares of the issuer’s common stock outstanding.

Table of Contents	Page
PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION	3
Item 1. Financial Statements.	3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)	3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)	4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)	5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Unaudited)	6
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)	8
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	9
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	31
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.	49
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.	50
PART II—OTHER INFORMATION	51
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.	51
Item 1A. Risk Factors.	51
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.	51
Item 3. Defaults of Senior Securities.	51
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.	51
Item 5. Other Information.	51
Item 6. Exhibits.	52
Signatures	53

2

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

(Amounts in thousands, except share data)

	June 24,		December 25,
	2020		2019
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	60,342	$	8,070
Accounts and other receivables, net		16,115		8,505
Inventories		1,954		2,009
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		2,696		5,718
Income tax receivable		—		376
Total current assets		81,107		24,678
Property and equipment owned, net		84,262		91,778
Property held under operating leases, net ("ROU asset")		184,308		192,395
Goodwill		248,674		248,674
Trademarks		61,888		61,888
Deferred tax assets		4,185		3,709
Other assets		1,168		1,630
Total assets	$	665,592	$	624,752
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Current portion of obligations under finance leases	$	37	$	34
Current portion of obligations under operating leases		17,979		16,406
Accounts payable		9,338		5,627
Accrued salaries and vacation		6,277		8,618
Accrued insurance		10,138		9,440
Accrued income taxes payable		1,693		—
Accrued interest		217		302
Current portion of income tax receivable agreement payable		4,987		4,935
Other accrued expenses and current liabilities		16,376		28,597
Total current liabilities		67,042		73,959
Revolver loan		138,800		97,000
Obligations under finance leases, net of current portion		63		83
Obligations under operating leases, net of current portion		189,060		197,492
Deferred taxes		1,671		1,672
Income tax receivable agreement payable, net of current portion		3,419		3,301
Other noncurrent liabilities		8,978		5,679
Total liabilities		409,033		379,186
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; NaN issued or outstanding		—		—
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 200,000,000 shares authorized; 35,854,122 and 35,126,582 shares issued and outstanding		359		351
Additional paid-in-capital		334,088		330,950
Accumulated deficit		(76,889)		(85,988)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income		(999)		253
Total stockholders’ equity		256,559		245,566
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	665,592	$	624,752

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

3

EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)

(Amounts in thousands, except share data)

	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
	June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019		June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019
Revenue
Company-operated restaurant revenue	$	87,707	$	100,139	$	180,341	$	197,289
Franchise revenue		6,719		7,918		13,781		14,362
Franchise advertising fee revenue		5,178		5,683		10,645		11,066
Total revenue		99,604		113,740		204,767		222,717
Cost of operations
Food and paper cost		22,873		27,886		48,435		55,038
Labor and related expenses		25,759		29,272		54,452		58,848
Occupancy and other operating expenses		21,922		23,032		44,031		46,259
Company restaurant expenses		70,554		80,190		146,918		160,145
General and administrative expenses		10,465		9,348		19,796		20,696
Franchise expenses		6,627		7,542		13,538		13,686
Depreciation and amortization		4,168		4,454		8,537		9,215
Loss on disposal of assets		27		134		127		178
Recovery of securities lawsuits related legal expenses and other insurance claims		(123)		(10,000)		(123)		(10,000)
Impairment and closed-store reserves		437		565		2,839		874
Loss on disposition of restaurants		—		927		—		5,051
Total expenses		92,155		93,160		191,632		199,845
Income from operations		7,449		20,580		13,135		22,872
Interest expense, net		908		922		1,813		1,781
Income tax receivable agreement expense (income)		290		(94)		170		77
Income before provision for income taxes		6,251		19,752		11,152		21,014
Provision for income taxes		752		5,665		2,053		6,014
Net income	$	5,499	$	14,087	$	9,099	$	15,000
Net income per share
Basic	$	0.16	$	0.37	$	0.26	$	0.39
Diluted	$	0.16	$	0.37	$	0.26	$	0.38
Weighted-average shares used in computing net income per share
Basic		34,836,410		37,939,912		34,747,785		38,296,807
Diluted		35,410,198		38,580,722		35,382,607		39,043,477

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

4

EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)

(Amounts in thousands, except share data)

	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
	June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019		June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019
Net income	$	5,499	$	14,087	$	9,099	$	15,000
Other comprehensive loss (income)
Changes in derivative instruments
Unrealized net losses arising during the period from interest rate swap		296		—		1,755		—
Reclassifications of losses into net income		(81)		—		(42)		—
Income benefit		(58)		—		(461)		—
Other comprehensive loss, net of taxes		157		—		1,252		—
Comprehensive income	$	5,342	$	14,087	$	7,847	$	15,000

5

EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)

(Amounts in thousands, except share data)

	Thirteen Weeks Ended June 24, 2020
								Accumulated
				Additional				Other		Total
	Common Stock			Paid-in		Accumulated		Comprehensive		Stockholders’
	Shares	Amount		Capital		Deficit		Income (Loss)		Equity
Balance, March 25, 2020	35,089,983	$	351	$	331,484	$	(82,388)	$	(842)	$	248,605
Stock-based compensation	—		—		727		—		—		727
Issuance of common stock related to restricted stock	436,263		4		(4)		—		—		—
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options	372,556		4		2,161		—		—		2,165
Shares repurchased for employee tax withholdings	(20,193)		—		(280)		—		—		(280)
Forfeiture of common stock related to restricted shares	(24,487)		—		—		—		—		—
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax	—		—		—		—		(157)		(157)
Net income	—		—		—		5,499		—		5,499
Balance, June 24, 2020	35,854,122	$	359	$	334,088	$	(76,889)	$	(999)	$	256,559
	Thirteen Weeks Ended June 26, 2019
								Accumulated
				Additional				Other		Total
	Common Stock			Paid-in		Accumulated		Comprehensive		Stockholders’
	Shares	Amount		Capital		Deficit		Income		Equity
Balance, March 27, 2019	38,730,204	$	388	$	372,825	$	(109,975)	$	—		263,238
Stock-based compensation	—		—		641		—		—		641
Issuance of common stock related to restricted shares	323,489		3		(3)		—		—		—
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options	6,709		—		80		—		—		80
Shares repurchased for employee tax withholdings	(24,172)		(1)		(278)		—		—		(279)
Repurchase of common stock	(1,303,282)		(13)		(14,930)		—		—		(14,943)
Net income	—		—		—		14,087		—		14,087
Balance, June 26, 2019	37,732,948	$	377	$	358,335	$	(95,888)	$	—	$	262,824

6

	Twenty-Six Weeks Ended June 24, 2020
								Accumulated
				Additional				Other		Total
	Common Stock			Paid-in		Accumulated		Comprehensive		Stockholders’
	Shares	Amount		Capital		Deficit		Income (Loss)		Equity
Balance, December 25, 2019	35,126,582	$	351	$	330,950	$	(85,988)	$	253	$	245,566
Stock-based compensation	—		—		1,261		—		—		1,261
Issuance of common stock related to restricted stock	436,263		4		(4)		—		—		—
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options	372,556		4		2,161		—		—		2,165
Shares repurchased for employee tax withholdings	(20,193)		—		(280)		—		—		(280)
Forfeiture of common stock related to restricted shares	(61,086)		—		—		—		—		—
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax	—		—		—		—		(1,252)		(1,252)
Net income	—		—		—		9,099		—		9,099
Balance, June 24, 2020	35,854,122	$	359	$	334,088	$	(76,889)	$	(999)	$	256,559
	Twenty-Six Weeks Ended June 26, 2019
								Accumulated
				Additional				Other		Total
	Common Stock			Paid-in		Accumulated		Comprehensive		Stockholders’
	Shares	Amount		Capital		Deficit		Income		Equity
Balance, December 26, 2018	39,009,451	$	390	$	375,734	$	(110,888)	$	—		265,236
Stock-based compensation	—		—		1,129		—		—		1,129
Issuance of common stock related to restricted shares	301,371		3		(3)		—		—		—
Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options	6,709		—		80		—		—		80
Shares repurchased for employee tax withholdings	(25,747)		(1)		(294)		—		—		(295)
Repurchase of common stock	(1,558,836)		(15)		(18,311)		—		—		(18,326)
Net income	—		—		—		15,000		—		15,000
Balance, June 26, 2019	37,732,948	$	377	$	358,335	$	(95,888)	$	—	$	262,824

7

EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

(Amounts in thousands)

	Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
	June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	9,099	$	15,000
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash flows provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		8,537		9,215
Stock-based compensation expense		1,261		1,129
Income tax receivable agreement expense		170		77
Loss on disposition of restaurants		—		5,051
Loss on disposal of assets		127		178
Impairment of property and equipment		1,972		227
Amortization of deferred financing costs		126		126
Amortization of favorable and unfavorable leases, net		—		(362)
Deferred income taxes, net		(363)		5,799
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts and other receivables, net		(7,610)		(2,084)
Inventories		55		277
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		3,021		(450)
Other assets		339		23
Accounts payable		3,610		1,057
Accrued salaries and vacation		(2,342)		(487)
Accrued insurance		698		1,163
Income taxes payable		2,069		(3)
Other accrued expenses and liabilities		(9,687)		(23,077)
Net cash flows provided by operating activities		11,082		12,859
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from disposition of restaurants		—		4,770
Purchase of property and equipment		(2,479)		(5,898)
Net cash flows used in investing activities		(2,479)		(1,128)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Minimum tax withholdings related to net share settlements		(280)		(295)
Payments on revolver and swingline loan		(10,700)		(15,000)
Borrowings on revolver and swingline loan		52,500		26,000
Proceeds from issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options, net of expenses		2,165		80
Payment of obligations under finance leases		(16)		(53)
Stock buybacks		—		(18,151)
Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities		43,669		(7,419)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents		52,272		4,312
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		8,070		6,969
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	60,342	$	11,281

	Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
	June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019
Supplemental cash flow information
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	1,738	$	1,694
Cash paid during the period for income taxes	$	434	$	218
Unpaid purchases of property and equipment	$	846	$	980
Unpaid stock buybacks	$	—	$	310

See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited).

8

EL POLLO LOCO HOLDINGS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Overview

El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc. (“Holdings”) is a Delaware corporation headquartered in Costa Mesa, California. Holdings and its direct and indirect subsidiaries are collectively referred to herein as “we,” “us” or the “Company.” The Company’s activities are conducted principally through its indirect wholly-owned subsidiary, El Pollo Loco, Inc. (“EPL”), which develops, franchises, licenses, and operates quick-service restaurants under the name El Pollo Loco® and operates under 1 operating segment. At June 24, 2020, the Company operated 196 and franchised 283 El Pollo Loco restaurants.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial statements and pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments consisting of normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. Interim results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be achieved for the full year. The condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes do not include all information and footnotes required by GAAP for annual reports. This quarterly report should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2019.

The Company uses a 52- or 53-week fiscal year ending on the last Wednesday of the calendar year. In a 52-week fiscal year, each quarter includes 13 weeks of operations; in a 53-week fiscal year, the first, second and third quarters each include 13 weeks of operations, and the fourth quarter includes 14 weeks of operations. Every six or seven years, a 53-week fiscal year occurs. Fiscal 2020 is a 53-week year ending on December 30, 2020, and fiscal 2019 was a 52-week year ending on December 25, 2019. Revenues, expenses, and other financial and operational figures may be elevated in a 53-week year.

Holdings has no material assets or operations. Holdings and Holdings’ direct subsidiary, EPL Intermediate, Inc. (“Intermediate”), guarantee EPL’s 2018 Revolver (as defined below) on a full and unconditional basis (see Note 4), and Intermediate has no subsidiaries other than EPL. EPL is a separate and distinct legal entity and has no obligation to make funds available to Intermediate. EPL and Intermediate may pay dividends to Intermediate and to Holdings, respectively, subject to the terms of the 2018 Revolver.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Holdings and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and revenue and expenses during the periods reported. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. The Company’s significant estimates include estimates for impairment of goodwill, intangible assets and property and equipment, insurance reserves, lease accounting matters, stock-based compensation, income tax receivable agreement liability, contingent liabilities and income tax valuation allowances.

9

COVID-19

On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization (“WHO”) announced a global health emergency because of a new strain of coronavirus originating in Wuhan, China ("COVID-19") and the risks to the international community as the virus spreads globally beyond its point of origin. On March 11, 2020, the WHO classified the COVID-19 outbreak as a pandemic, based on the rapid increase in exposure globally.

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted consumer demand, as well as the Company’s restaurant operations. Following the pandemic declaration in March 2020, federal, state and local governments began to respond to the public health crisis by requiring social distancing, "stay at home" directives, and restaurant restrictions - including government-mandated dining room closures - that limited business to off-premise services only (take-out, drive-thru and delivery). Historically, approximately 20% of the Company’s sales are associated with dine-in service. In May 2020, the “stay at home” directive was modified in most areas in which the Company operates, allowing for the opening of lower-risk workplaces, including restaurants, but with restrictions such as limited capacity. However, in recent months a surge in the COVID-19 pandemic has caused many state and local governments to re-implement certain restrictions to try and contain the spread of the virus. Except for 9 restaurants in Houston and 1 in Utah, all of the Company’s restaurants are operating on a take-away, mobile pick-up and delivery basis, as well as maintaining drive-thru operations where available, in order to protect its employees and customers from the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic and to comply with the government mandates. Due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, during the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, the Company has temporarily closed 31 restaurants, typically for one to three days, 30 of which have reopened and 1 remained closed as of June 24, 2020. Similarly, franchisees have temporarily closed 21 restaurants, of which 17 have reopened and 4 remain closed as of June 24, 2020. As of June 24, 2020, the Company had not permanently closed any restaurants due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

The full impact of the COVID-19 outbreak continues to evolve as of the date of this report. Management has taken precautionary actions, such as drawing on its 2018 Revolver (see Note 4), temporarily suspending all but essential capital spending and share repurchase activity, reevaluating essential support center general and administrative expenses and fine-tuning its restaurant labor model based on indoor dining room restrictions, limited dining room capacity in restaurants located in geographies where indoor dining is permitted, dining room closures and fluctuating sales volumes. Additionally, Management has delayed making April, May and June rent payments on the majority of its leased properties and has reached agreements for rent abatement and/or deferment with the Company’s landlords for those properties. See Note 5 “Other Accrued Expenses and Current Liabilities” and Note 6 “Other Noncurrent Liabilities” for details of these balances. For the Company’s franchisees, the Company deferred 50% of their April royalties as well as 100% of their 2020 remodel and new restaurant build requirements until 2021. Management is continually evaluating the impact of the global crisis on its financial condition, liquidity, operations, suppliers, industry, and workforce and will take additional actions as necessary. The disruption in operations led to the Company considering the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on its liquidity, debt covenant compliance, and recoverability of long-lived and ROU assets, goodwill and intangible assets, among others. If these disruptions to the Company’s operations from the COVID-19 pandemic continue, they may have a material negative impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, future results of operations and liquidity. The extent of such negative impact will depend, in part, on the longevity and severity of the pandemic.

Due to the rapid development and fluidity of this situation, the Company cannot determine the ultimate impact that the COVID-19 pandemic will have on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, liquidity, and future results of operations, and therefore any prediction as to the ultimate materiality of the adverse impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, liquidity, and future results of operations is uncertain.

Subsequent Events

Subsequent to June 24, 2020, the Company has temporarily closed 36 restaurants, typically for one to three days, and franchisees have temporarily closed 11 restaurants. As of July 31, 2020, 4 company-operated and 3 franchise locations remained closed.

Subsequent to June 24, 2020, the Surety, from whom the Company procured an appeal bond to secure the judgement against the Company in the matter of Janice P. Handlers-Bryman and Michael D. Bryman v. El Pollo Loco, Inc., released its collateral demand, freeing the $2.7 million Letter of Credit previously issued in April 2020. Additionally,

10

subsequent to June 24, 2020, the Company reached an agreement in principle with the plaintiffs to resolve the lawsuit. See Note 7, “Commitments and Contingencies, Legal Matters” for more details.

The Company has evaluated subsequent events that have occurred after June 24, 2020, and determined that there were no other events or transactions occurring during this reporting period that require recognition or disclosure in the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly-liquid instruments with an original maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents.

Liquidity

The Company’s principal liquidity and capital requirements are new restaurants, existing restaurant capital investments (remodels and maintenance), interest payments on our debt, lease obligations and working capital and general corporate needs. At June 24, 2020, the Company’s total debt was $138.8 million. The Company’s ability to make payments on its indebtedness and to fund planned capital expenditures depends on available cash and its ability to generate adequate cash flows in the future, which, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory, and other factors that are beyond the Company’s control. Based on current operations, the Company believes that its cash flow from operations and available cash of $60.3 million at June 24, 2020 will be adequate to meet the Company’s liquidity needs for the next twelve months from the date of filing of these condensed consolidated financial statements. However, depending on the severity and longevity of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company’s financial performance and liquidity could be further impacted and could impact the Company’s ability to meet certain covenants required in its 2018 Credit Agreement (as defined below), specifically the lease-adjusted coverage ratio and fixed-charge coverage ratio.

Recovery of Securities Class Action Legal Expenses and Other Insurance Claims

During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, the Company received insurance proceeds of $0.1 million related to a property claim. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, the Company received insurance proceeds of $10.0 million related to the settlement of a securities class action lawsuit. See Note 7, “Commitments and Contingencies, Legal Matters.’

Loss on Disposition of Restaurants

During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, the Company completed the sale of 4 company-operated restaurants within the San Francisco area to an existing franchisee and 7 company-operated restaurants in the Phoenix area to another existing franchisee. The Company determined that these restaurant dispositions represent multiple element arrangements, and as a result, the cash consideration received was allocated to the separate elements based on their relative selling price. Cash proceeds included upfront consideration for the sale of the restaurants and franchise fees, as well as future cash consideration for royalties and lease payments. The Company considered the future lease payments in allocating the initial cash consideration received. The cash consideration per restaurant for franchise fees is consistent with the amounts stated in the related franchise agreements, which are charged for separate standalone arrangements. The Company initially defers and subsequently recognizes the franchise fees over the term of the franchise agreement. Future royalty income is also recognized in revenue as earned.

These sales resulted in cash proceeds of $4.8 million and a net loss on sale of restaurants of $0.9 million and $5.1 million for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, respectively. These restaurants are now included in the total number of franchised El Pollo Loco restaurants.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2020, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2020-04, "Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting," which provides optional guidance, for a limited time, to ease the potential burden in accounting for or

11

recognizing the effects of reference rate reform on financial reporting. ASU 2020-04 is effective for a limited time, from March 12, 2020, through December 31, 2022. The Company adopted this ASU on March 12, 2020. The adoption of ASU 2020-04 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-13, "Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement," which finalizes proposed ASU No. 2015-350, and of the same name as part of its disclosure framework project, which focuses on improving the effectiveness of disclosures in the notes to financial statements by facilitating clear communication of the information required by U.S. GAAP that is most important to users of each entity’s financial statements. The Company adopted ASU No. 2018-13 during the first quarter of 2020. The adoption of ASU 2018-13 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, "Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments," which finalizes proposed ASU No. 2012-260 "Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Subtopic 825-15)" and adds Topic 326 "Financial Instruments—Credit Losses", to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date by replacing the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. The Company adopted ASU No. 2016-13 during the first quarter of 2020. The adoption of ASU 2016-03 did not have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes", which modifies Topic 740 to simplify the accounting for income taxes. ASU 2019-12 is effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2020, and for the interim periods therein. The adoption of ASU 2019-12 is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Concentration of Risk

Cash and cash equivalents are maintained at financial institutions and, at times, these balances may exceed federally-insured limits. The Company has never experienced any losses related to these balances.

The Company had 1 supplier for which amounts due totaled 44.5% and 11.7% of the Company’s accounts payable at June 24, 2020 and December 25, 2019, respectively. Purchases from the Company’s largest supplier totaled 26.4% and 27.0% of total expenses for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, respectively, and 30.3% and 28.8% of total expenses for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019.

Company-operated and franchised restaurants in the greater Los Angeles area generated, in the aggregate, approximately 71.1% and 71.7% of total revenue for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, respectively, and 69.3% for each of the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019.

Goodwill and Indefinite Lived Intangible Assets

The Company’s indefinite-lived intangible assets consist of trademarks. Goodwill represents the excess of cost over fair value of net identified assets acquired in business combinations accounted for under the purchase method. The Company does not amortize its goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. Goodwill resulted from the acquisition of certain franchise locations.

Upon the sale or closure of a restaurant, the Company evaluates whether there is a decrement of goodwill. The amount of goodwill included in the cost basis of the asset sold is determined based on the relative fair value of the portion of the reporting unit disposed of compared to the fair value of the reporting unit retained. The Company determined there was no decrement of goodwill related to the disposition of restaurants during the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019.

12

The Company performs an annual impairment test for goodwill during the fourth fiscal quarter of each year, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise.

The Company reviews goodwill for impairment utilizing either a qualitative assessment or a fair value test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. If the Company decides that it is appropriate to perform a qualitative assessment and concludes that the fair value of a reporting unit more likely than not exceeds its carrying value, no further evaluation is necessary. If the Company performs the fair value test, the Company will compare the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying amount, goodwill of the reporting unit is considered not impaired. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the Company will recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value; however, the loss recognized cannot exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit.

The Company performs an annual impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible assets during the fourth fiscal quarter of each year, or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. An impairment test consists of either a qualitative assessment or a comparison of the fair value of an intangible asset with its carrying amount. The excess of the carrying amount of an intangible asset over its fair value is recognized as an impairment loss.

The assumptions used in the estimate of fair value are generally consistent with the past performance of the Company’s reporting segment and are also consistent with the projections and assumptions that are used in current operating plans. These assumptions are subject to change as a result of changing economic and competitive conditions.

Due to the recent impact of the COVID-19 pandemic to the global economy, including but not limited to, the volatility of the Company’s stock price as well as that of its competitors and the challenging environment for the restaurant industry generally, the Company determined that there were indicators of potential impairment of its goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets during the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020. As such, the Company performed an impairment assessment for both goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets and concluded that the fair value of these assets substantially exceeded their carrying values. Accordingly, the Company did not record any impairment to its goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets during the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020. The ultimate severity and longevity of the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown, and therefore, it is possible that impairments could be identified in future periods, and such amounts could be material.

Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

● Level 1: Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

● Level 2: Observable prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs or significant value drivers are observable.

● Level 3: Unobservable inputs used when little or no market data is available.

During fiscal 2019, the Company entered into an interest rate swap, which is required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair value was determined based on Level 2 inputs, which include valuation models, as reported by the Company’s counterparty. These valuation models use a discounted cash flow analysis on the cash flows of the derivative based on the terms of the contract and the forward yield curves adjusted for the Company’s credit risk. The key inputs for the valuation models are observable market prices, discount rates, and forward yield curves. See "Note 4.

13

Long-Term Debt" for further discussion regarding our interest rate swaps. The following table presents fair value for the interest rate swap at June 24, 2020 (in thousands):

			Fair Value Measurements Using
	Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Other non-current liabilities - Interest rate swap	$	1,408	$	—	$	1,408	$	—

The following table presents fair value for the interest rate swap at December 25, 2019 (in thousands):

			Fair Value Measurements Using
	Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Other assets - Interest rate swap	$	360	$	—	$	360	$	—

Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. In other words, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis, but are subject to fair value adjustments only in certain circumstances (e.g. when there is evidence of impairment).

The following non-financial instruments were measured at fair value, on a nonrecurring basis, as of and for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020 (in thousands):

									Thirteen Weeks		Twenty-Six Weeks
			Fair Value Measurements at June 24, 2020 Using						Ended June 24, 2020		Ended June 24, 2020
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Impairment Losses		Impairment Losses
Certain property and equipment owned, net	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	52	$	1,429
Certain ROU assets, net	$	918	$	—	$	—	$	918	$	—	$	543

The following non-financial instruments were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of and for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019 (in thousands):

									Thirteen Weeks		Twenty-Six Weeks
			Fair Value Measurements at June 26, 2019 Using						Ended June 26, 2019		Ended June 26, 2019
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Impairment Losses		Impairment Losses
Certain property and equipment owned, net	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	227	$	227

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and ROU Assets

The Company reviews its long-lived and right-of-use assets ("ROU assets") for impairment on a restaurant-by-restaurant basis whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of certain long-lived and ROU assets may not be recoverable. The Company considers a triggering event related to long-lived assets or ROU assets in a net asset position to have occurred related to a specific restaurant if the restaurant’s cash flows for the last twelve months are less than a minimum threshold or if consistent levels of undiscounted cash flows for the remaining lease period are less than the carrying value of the restaurant’s assets. Additionally, the Company considers a triggering event related to ROU assets to have occurred related to a specific lease if the location has been subleased and future estimated sublease income is less than current lease payments. If the Company concludes that the carrying value of certain long-lived and ROU assets will not be recovered based on expected undiscounted future cash flows, an impairment loss is recorded to reduce the long-lived or ROU assets to their estimated fair value. The fair value is measured on a nonrecurring basis using unobservable (Level 3) inputs. There is uncertainty in the projected undiscounted future cash flows used in the Company’s impairment review analysis, which requires the use of estimates and assumptions. If actual performance does not achieve the projections, or if the assumptions used change in the future, the Company may be required to recognize impairment charges in future periods, and such charges could be material. The Company determined that triggering events occurred during each of the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020 that required an impairment review of the Company’s long-lived and ROU assets. Based on the results of the analysis, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges of $0.1 million and $2.0 million for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, respectively, primarily related to the carrying value of the ROU assets of 1 restaurant in Texas and the long-lived assets of 3 restaurants in California.

14

The Company recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $0.2 million for both the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, primarily related to the carrying value of 1 restaurant in California. Given the inherent uncertainty in projecting results for newer restaurants in newer markets, as well as the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company is monitoring the recoverability of the carrying value of the assets of several restaurants on an ongoing basis. For these restaurants, if expected performance is not realized, an impairment charge may be recognized in future periods, and such charge could be material.

Closed-Store Reserves

When a restaurant is closed, the Company will evaluate the ROU asset for impairment, based on anticipated sublease recoveries. The remaining value of the ROU asset is amortized on a straight-line basis, with the expense recognized in closed-store reserve expense. Additionally, any property tax and common area maintenance ("CAM") payments relating to closed restaurants are included within closed-store expense. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, the Company recognized $0.4 million and $0.9 million of closed-store reserve expense related to the amortization of ROU assets, property taxes and CAM payments for its closed locations. During the twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, the Company closed 1 restaurant in California and 1 restaurant in Texas, and recognized $0.3 million and $0.6 million of closed-store reserve expense for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, respectively, primarily related to the amortization of ROU assets, property taxes and CAM payments for its closed locations.

Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company uses an interest rate swap, a derivative instrument, to hedge interest rate risk and not for trading purposes. The derivative contract is entered into with a financial institution.

The Company records the derivative instrument on its condensed consolidated balance sheet at fair value. The derivative instrument qualifies as a hedging instrument in a qualifying cash flow hedge relationship, and the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income ("AOCI") and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. For any derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments, the gain or loss will be recognized in earnings immediately. If a derivative previously designated as a hedge is terminated, or no longer meets the qualifications for hedge accounting, any balances in AOCI will be reclassified to earnings immediately.

As a result of the use of an interest rate swap, the Company is exposed to risk that the counterparty will fail to meet their contractual obligations. To mitigate the counterparty credit risk, the Company will only enter into contracts with major financial institutions, based upon their credit ratings and other factors, and will continue to assess the creditworthiness of the counterparty. As of June 24, 2020, the counterparty to the Company’s interest rate swap has performed in accordance with its contractual obligation.

Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes, income taxes payable and deferred income taxes is determined using the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on temporary differences between the financial carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. On a periodic basis, the Company assesses the probability that its net deferred tax assets, if any, will be recovered. If, after evaluating all of the positive and negative evidence, a conclusion is made that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the net deferred tax assets will not be recovered, a valuation allowance is provided by charging to tax expense to reserve the portion of deferred tax assets which are not expected to be realized.

The Company reviews its filing positions for all open tax years in all U.S. federal and state jurisdictions where the Company is required to file.

When there are uncertainties related to potential income tax benefits, in order to qualify for recognition, the position the Company takes has to have at least a “more likely than not” chance of being sustained (based on the position’s technical merits) upon challenge by the respective authorities. The term “more likely than not” means a likelihood of more than 50 percent. Otherwise, the Company may not recognize any of the potential tax benefit associated with the position. The

15

Company recognizes a benefit for a tax position that meets the “more likely than not” criterion at the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon its effective resolution. Unrecognized tax benefits involve management’s judgment regarding the likelihood of the benefit being sustained. The final resolution of uncertain tax positions could result in adjustments to recorded amounts and may affect the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows.

The Company’s policy is to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. The Company had 0 accrual for interest or penalties at June 24, 2020 or at December 25, 2019, and did not recognize interest or penalties during the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020 or June 26, 2019, since there were no material unrecognized tax benefits. Management believes no material changes to the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will occur within the next twelve months.

On July 30, 2014, the Company entered into the income tax receivable agreement (the "TRA"), which calls for the Company to pay to its pre-IPO stockholders 85% of the savings in cash that the Company realizes in its income taxes as a result of utilizing its net operating losses and other tax attributes attributable to preceding periods. For the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, the Company recorded income tax receivable agreement expense of $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively, and for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, the Company recorded income tax receivable agreement income of $0.1 million and income tax receivable expense of $0.1 million, respectively, related to the amortization of interest expense related to our total expected TRA payments and changes in estimates for actual tax returns filed and future forecasted taxable income.

On March 27, 2020, President Trump signed into a law a stimulus package, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security ("CARES") Act, which contains several tax provisions and deferral of employer Social Security taxes that are otherwise owed for wage payments. The tax provisions include a correction of a previous drafting error related to quality improvement property ("QIP") and immediate refundability of all remaining alternative minimum tax ("AMT") credits. The new provisions did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

During the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020 the Company received a Notice of Proposed Adjustment ("NOPA"), for the years ended December 27, 2017 and December 28, 2016, related to the Company’s methodology regarding its ordering of utilization of AMT net operating losses ("NOL”). This resulted in payment of $0.4 million, and the audit is closed. As a result of the CARES Act, discussed above, this amount is immediately refundable upon filing of a Form 1139, which the Company filed during the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020 and recognized a receivable, included in Accounts and other receivables within the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 24, 2020.

2. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

The costs and related accumulated depreciation and amortization of major classes of property and equipment are as follows (in thousands):

	June 24, 2020		December 25, 2019
Land	$	12,323	$	12,323
Buildings and improvements		147,048		144,794
Other property and equipment		75,604		75,234
Construction in progress		1,443		4,213
		236,418		236,564
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization		(152,156)		(144,786)
	$	84,262	$	91,778

Depreciation expense was $4.2 million and $4.5 million for the thirteen weeks ended June 24, 2020 and June 26, 2019, respectively, and $8.5 million and $9.2 million for the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020 and June 26, 2019, respectively.

Based on the Company’s review of its long-lived assets for impairment, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges of $0.1 million and $1.4 million for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, respectively, primarily related to the carrying value of the assets of 3 restaurants in California. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, the Company recorded non-cash impairment charges of $0.2 million, primarily related to

16

the carrying value of 1 restaurant in California. Depending on the severity and longevity of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company’s financial performance could be further impacted and it is possible that material impairments could be identified in future periods.

3. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

At June 24, 2020, options to purchase 1,641,851 shares of common stock were outstanding, including 1,258,437 vested and 383,414 unvested. Unvested options vest over time; however, upon a change in control, the Board of Directors may accelerate vesting. At June 24, 2020, 820,342 premium options, options granted above the stock price at date of grant, remained outstanding. A summary of stock option activity as of June 24, 2020 and changes during the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020 is as follows:

		Weighted-Average
	Shares	Exercise Price
Outstanding - December 25, 2019	2,077,570	$	8.14
Exercised	(372,556)		5.81
Forfeited, cancelled or expired	(63,163)		11.56
Outstanding - June 24, 2020	1,641,851	$	8.53
Vested and expected to vest at June 24, 2020	1,635,204	$	8.52
Exercisable at June 24, 2020	1,258,437	$	7.66

At June 24, 2020, the Company had total unrecognized compensation expense of $1.3 million related to unvested stock options, which it expects to recognize over a weighted-average period of 2.46 years.

A summary of restricted share activity as of June 24, 2020 and changes during the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020 is as follows:

		Weighted-Average
	Shares	Fair Value
Unvested shares at December 25, 2019	588,008	$	11.23
Granted	412,224	$	12.46
Released	(108,714)	$	11.79
Forfeited, cancelled, or expired	(73,497)	$	12.21
Unvested shares at June 24, 2020	818,021	$	11.69

Unvested shares at June 24, 2020, included 733,885 unvested restricted shares, 36,058 unvested performance stock units and 48,078 unvested restricted units.

At June 24, 2020, the Company had unrecognized compensation expense of $8.0 million related to unvested restricted shares, which it expects to recognize over a weighted-average period of 3.22 years, unrecognized compensation expense of $0.1 million related to performance stock units, which it expects to recognize over a weighted-average period of 2.87 years and unrecognized compensation expense of $0.5 million related to unvested restricted units, which it expects to recognize over a weighted-average period of 1.87 years.

Total stock-based compensation expense was $0.7 million and $1.3 million for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, respectively, and $0.6 million and $1.1 million for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, respectively.

4. LONG-TERM DEBT

On July 13, 2018, the Company refinanced a credit agreement with Bank of America, N.A., initially entered into on December 11, 2014 (the “2014 Revolver”), pursuant to a credit agreement (the “2018 Credit Agreement”) among EPL, as borrower, and the Company and Intermediate, as guarantors, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, swingline lender, and letter of credit issuer, the lenders party thereto, and the other parties thereto, which provides for a $150.0 million five-year senior secured revolving credit facility (the “2018 Revolver”). The 2018 Revolver includes a sub limit of $15.0 million for letters of credit and a sub limit of $15.0 million for swingline loans. The 2018 Revolver and 2018 Credit Agreement will mature on July 13, 2023. The obligations under the 2018 Credit Agreement and related

17

loan documents are guaranteed by the Company and Intermediate. The obligations of the Company, EPL and Intermediate under the 2018 Credit Agreement and related loan documents are secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of their respective assets.

Under the 2018 Revolver, Holdings may not make certain payments such as cash dividends, except that it may, inter alia, (i) pay up to $1.0 million per year to repurchase or redeem qualified equity interests of Holdings held by past or present officers, directors, or employees (or their estates) of the Company upon death, disability, or termination of employment, (ii) pay under its TRA, and, (iii) so long as no default or event of default has occurred and is continuing, (a) make non-cash repurchases of equity interests in connection with the exercise of stock options by directors, officers and management, provided that those equity interests represent a portion of the consideration of the exercise price of those stock options, (b) pay up to $0.5 million in any 12 month consecutive period to redeem, repurchase or otherwise acquire equity interests of any subsidiary that is not a wholly-owned subsidiary from any holder of equity interest in such subsidiary, (c) pay up to $2.5 million per year pursuant to stock option plans, employment agreements, or incentive plans, (d) make up to $5.0 million in other restricted payments per year, and (e) make other restricted payments, subject to its compliance, on a pro forma basis, with (x) a lease-adjusted consolidated leverage ratio not to exceed 4.25 times and (y) the financial covenants applicable to the 2018 Revolver.

Borrowings under the 2018 Credit Agreement (other than any swingline loans) bear interest, at the borrower’s option, at rates based upon either LIBOR or a base rate, plus, for each rate, a margin determined in accordance with a lease-adjusted consolidated leverage ratio-based pricing grid. The base rate is calculated as the highest of (a) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, (b) the published Bank of America prime rate, or (c) LIBOR plus 1.00%. For LIBOR loans, the margin is in the range of 1.25% to 2.25%, and for base rate loans the margin is in a range of 0.25% to 1.25%. Borrowings under the 2018 Revolver may be repaid and reborrowed. The interest rate range was 1.67% to 3.11% and 1.67% to 3.29% for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, respectively, and 3.90% to 6.00% for both the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019.

The 2018 Credit Agreement contains certain financial covenants. The Company was in compliance with the financial covenants as of June 24, 2020. However, depending on the severity and longevity of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company’s financial performance and liquidity could be further impacted and could impact the Company’s ability to comply with certain financial covenants required in the 2018 Credit Agreement, specifically the lease-adjusted coverage ratio and fixed-charge coverage ratio.

At June 24, 2020, $11.1 million of letters of credit and $138.8 million in borrowings under the 2018 Revolver were outstanding. The Company had $0.1 million in borrowing availability under the 2018 Revolver at June 24, 2020.

Maturities

During the thirteen weeks ended June 24, 2020, the Company elected to pay down $2.7 million on its 2018 Revolver. During the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, the Company borrowed $41.8 million, net of pay downs of $10.7 million on its 2018 Revolver, primarily as a precautionary measure to bolster its existing cash position, related to the uncertainty regarding the current COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to fund litigation settlement payments. See Note 1 under "COVID-19" for further details regarding the Company’s actions related to the COVID-19 pandemic and Note 7 for further details regarding the litigation settlement payments. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, the Company borrowed $14.0 million and $11.0 million, respectively, net of pay downs of $12.0 and $15.0 million of outstanding borrowings on the Company’s 2018 Revolver, primarily to fund settlement payments. There are 0 required principal payments prior to maturity for the 2018 Revolver.

Interest Rate Swap

During the year ended December 25, 2019, the Company entered into a variable-to-fixed interest rate swap agreement with a notional amount of $40.0 million that matures in June 2023. The objective of the interest rate swap was to reduce the Company’s exposure to interest rate risk for a portion of its variable-rate interest payments on its borrowings under the 2018 Revolver. Under the terms of the swap agreement, the variable LIBOR-based component of interest payments was converted to a fixed rate of 1.31%, plus applicable margin, which is currently 1.5%. The interest rate swap was designated as a cash flow hedge, as the changes in the future cash flows of the swap were expected to offset changes in expected future interest payments on the related variable-rate debt, in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815 “Derivatives and Hedging.”

18

The changes in the fair value of the interest rate swap are not included in earnings, but are included in other comprehensive (loss) income (“OCI”). These changes in fair value are subsequently reclassified into net earnings as a component of interest expense as the hedged interest payments are made on the variable rate borrowings.

For the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, the swap was a highly effective cash flow hedge.

As of June 24, 2020, the estimated net loss included in AOCI related to the Company’s cash flow hedge that will be reclassified into earnings in the next 12 months is $0.5 million, based on current LIBOR interest rates.

The following table shows the financial statement line item and amount of the Company’s cash flow hedge accounting on the condensed consolidated balance sheet (in thousands):

	June 24, 2020				December 25, 2019
	Notional		Fair value		Notional		Fair value
Other assets - Interest rate swap		—		—	$	40,000	$	360
Other liabilities - Interest rate swap	$	40,000	$	1,408		—		—

The following table summarizes the effect of the Company’s cash flow hedge accounting on the condensed consolidated statements of income (in thousands):

	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
	June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019		June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019
Interest expense on hedged portion of debt	$	212		—	$	641		—
Interest expense on interest rate swap		81		—		42		—
Interest expense on debt and derivatives, net	$	293	$	—	$	683	$	—

The following table summarizes the effect of the Company’s cash flow hedge accounting on AOCI for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020 and June 26, 2019 (in thousands):

	Thirteen Weeks Ended						Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
				Loss Reclassified from						Loss Reclassified from
	Net Loss Recognized in OCI			AOCI into Interest expense			Net Loss Recognized in OCI			AOCI into Interest expense
	June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019	June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019	June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019	June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019
Interest rate swap	$	296	—	$	81	—	$	1,755	—	$	42	—

See Note 1 for the fair value of our derivative asset.

5. OTHER ACCRUED EXPENSES AND CURRENT LIABILITIES

Other accrued expenses and current liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):

	June 24, 2020		December 25, 2019
Accrued sales and property taxes	$	3,618	$	4,665
Gift card liability		2,811		3,006
Accrued legal settlements and professional fees		3,326		16,901
Deferred franchise and development fees		592		705
Current portion of lease payment deferrals		2,523		—
Other		3,506		3,320
Total other accrued expenses and current liabilities	$	16,376	$	28,597

19

6. OTHER NONCURRENT LIABILITIES

Other noncurrent liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):

	June 24, 2020		December 25, 2019
Deferred franchise and development fees	$	5,181	$	5,612
Derivative liability		1,367		—
Lease payment deferrals - net of current portion		805		—
Other		1,625		67
Total other noncurrent liabilities	$	8,978	$	5,679

7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Legal Matters

On or about February 24, 2014, a former employee filed a class action in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of Orange, under the caption Elliott Olvera, et al v. El Pollo Loco, Inc., et al (Case No. 30-2014-00707367-CU-OE-CXC) on behalf of all putative class members (all hourly employees from 2010 to the present) alleging certain violations of California labor laws, including failure to pay overtime compensation, failure to provide meal periods and rest breaks, and failure to provide itemized wage statements. The putative lead plaintiff’s requested remedies include compensatory and punitive damages, injunctive relief, disgorgement of profits, and reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs. NaN specific amount of damages sought was specified in the complaint. The court recently certified two classes of plaintiffs - one class encompasses restaurant employees who were not provided proper rest breaks because they were not allowed to leave the premises during their breaks and the other class encompasses restaurant employees who were required to wait at the restaurant after they finished working for the night until the manager set the alarm for safety purposes. The parties reached a settlement in principle on January 24, 2019 of all claims brought on behalf of the 32,000+ putative class members in the Olvera, as well as all claims for failure to pay overtime compensation, failure to provide meal periods and rest breaks, and failure to provide itemized wage statements brought in the class actions captioned Martha Perez v. El Pollo Loco, Inc. (Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC624001), Maria Vega, et al. v. El Pollo Loco, Inc. (Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC649719), and Gonzalez v. El Pollo Loco, Inc. (Los Angeles Superior Court Case No. BC712867). The settlement reached in principle in the Olvera, Perez, Vega, and Gonzalez actions resolves all potential claims from April 12, 2010 through April 1, 2019 that El Pollo Loco restaurant employees may have against El Pollo Loco for failure to pay for all compensation owed, failure to pay overtime compensation, failure to provide meal periods and rest breaks and failure to provide itemized wage statements, among other wage and hour related claims. A $16.3 million accrual of an expected settlement amount related to this matter was recorded as of December 26, 2018, and the court formally approved the settlement on January 31, 2020. The settlement payment was made on February 28, 2020. Purported class actions alleging wage and hour violations are commonly filed against California employers. The Company fully expects to have to defend against similar lawsuits in the future.

Daniel Turocy, et al. v. El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc., et al. (Case No. 8:15-cv-01343) was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on August 24, 2015, and Ron Huston, et al. v. El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc., et al. (Case No. 8:15-cv-01710) was filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California on October 22, 2015. The 2 lawsuits have been consolidated, with co-lead plaintiffs and class counsel. A consolidated complaint was filed on January 29, 2016, on behalf of co-lead plaintiffs and others similarly situated, alleging violations of federal securities laws in connection with Holdings common stock purchased or otherwise acquired and the purchase of call options or the sale of put options, between May 1, 2015 and August 13, 2015 (the “Class Period”). The named defendants are Holdings; Stephen J. Sather, Laurance Roberts, and Edward J. Valle (collectively, the “Individual Defendants”); and Trimaran Pollo Partners, LLC, Trimaran Capital Partners, and Freeman Spogli & Co. (collectively, the “Controlling Shareholder Defendants”). Among other things, Plaintiffs allege that, in 2014 and early 2015, Holdings suffered losses due to rising labor costs in California and, in an attempt to mitigate the effects of such rising costs, removed a $5 value option from the Company’s menu, which resulted in a decrease in traffic from value-conscious consumers. Plaintiffs further allege that during the Class Period, Holdings and the Individual Defendants made a series of materially false and misleading statements that concealed the effect that these factors were having on store sales growth, resulting in Holdings stock continuing to be traded at artificially inflated prices. As a result, Plaintiffs and other members of the putative class allegedly suffered damages in connection with their purchase of Holdings’ stock during the Class Period. In addition, Plaintiffs allege that the Individual Defendants and Controlling Shareholder Defendants had direct involvement in, and responsibility over, the operations of Holdings, and are presumed

20

to have had, among other things, the power to control or influence the transactions giving rise to the alleged securities law violations. In both cases, Plaintiffs seek an unspecified amount of damages, as well as costs and expenses (including attorneys’ fees).

On July 25, 2016, the Court issued an order granting, without prejudice, Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss plaintiff’s complaint for failure to state a claim. Plaintiffs were granted leave to amend their complaint, and filed an amended complaint on August 22, 2016. Defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint, and on March 20, 2017, the Court dismissed the amended complaint and granted Plaintiffs leave to file another amended complaint. Plaintiffs filed another amended complaint on April 17, 2017. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on or about May 17, 2017. The Court denied Defendants’ motion to dismiss the third amended complaint on August 4, 2017. On December 8, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification, and on July 3, 2018, the Court granted Plaintiffs’ motion and certified a class as to all of Plaintiffs’ claims. Defendants filed a petition for appellate review of a portion of the Court’s July 3, 2018 class certification order. On October 19, 2018 the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied the petition.

On January 23, 2019, the parties filed a Notice of Settlement and Joint Request for Order to Stay Proceedings, stating the parties have reached an agreement in principle to settle the claims and allegations in the action and are negotiating the terms of a Stipulation of Settlement. On January 24, 2019, the Court ordered that all proceedings in the action be stayed until April 3, 2019, on or before which the parties were to file and did so file a Stipulation of Settlement and a motion for preliminary approval of the settlement. The court granted preliminary approval of the settlement on May 13, 2019. Defendants maintain that the Plaintiffs’ claims are without merit, and entered into the settlement with Plaintiffs to eliminate the uncertainties, burden and expense of further protracted litigation. A $20.0 million accrual of an expected settlement amount related to this matter was recorded as of December 26, 2018 and all settlement payments were made during the year ended December 25, 2019.

On or about November 5, 2015, a purported Holdings shareholder filed a derivative complaint on behalf of Holdings in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware against certain Holdings officers, directors and Trimaran Pollo Partners, L.L.C., under the caption Armen Galustyan v. Sather, et al. (Case No. 11676-VCL). The derivative complaint alleges that these defendants breached their fiduciary duties to Holdings and were unjustly enriched when they sold shares of Holdings at artificially inflated prices due to alleged misrepresentations and omissions regarding EPL’s comparable store sales in the second quarter of 2015. The Holdings shareholder’s requested remedies include an award of compensatory damages to Holdings, as well as a court order to improve corporate governance by putting forward for stockholder vote certain resolutions for amendments to Holdings’ Bylaws or Certificate of Incorporation. The parties have stipulated to, which the court has ordered, a stay of these proceedings pending the outcome of Turocy v. El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc., discussed above. A second purported Holdings shareholder filed a derivative complaint on or about September 23, 2016, under the caption Diep v. Sather, CA 12760-VCL in the Delaware Court of Chancery. The Diep action is also purportedly brought on behalf of Holdings, names the same defendants and asserts substantially the same claims on substantially the same alleged facts as does Galustyan. Defendants moved to stay or dismiss the Diep action.

On March 17, 2017, the Delaware court granted in part, and denied in part, the motion to stay the Diep action. The court denied defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim. On January 17, 2018, the court entered an order granting the parties’ stipulation staying all proceedings in the Diep action for five months or until the completion of an investigation of the allegations in the action by a special litigation committee of the Holdings board of directors (the "SLC"). On February 13, 2019, after concluding its investigation, the SLC filed a motion to dismiss the Diep action. The SLC filed its investigative report under seal as an exhibit to the motion to dismiss. Discovery related to the SLC’s motion is ongoing.

Janice P. Handlers-Bryman and Michael D. Bryman v. El Pollo Loco, Inc., Los Angeles Superior Court (Case No. MC026045) (the “Lancaster Lawsuit”) was filed on February 9, 2016. Existing El Pollo Loco franchisees, Janice P. Handlers-Bryman and Michael D. Bryman, as individuals and in their capacities as trustees of the Handlers Bryman Trust (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), filed suit against us alleging, among other things, that we “imposed unreasonable time limitations” on their development of additional restaurant locations in Lancaster, California, and that we thereafter developed company-operated El Pollo Loco restaurants in the “market area” of Plaintiffs’ existing El Pollo Loco restaurant in Lancaster. Plaintiffs asserted claims against us for, among other things, (i) breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, (ii) intentional interference with prospective business, and (iii) unfair business practices. In addition to an unspecified amount of damages and costs of the lawsuit, Plaintiffs sought reformation of the contract, declaratory relief, disgorgement of alleged revenues and profits, injunctive relief, and a judicial mandate requiring us to either transfer the company-operated locations to Plaintiffs or to continuously disgorge to Plaintiffs the unjust

21

enrichment allegedly obtained by us through the operation of the company-operated restaurants in Lancaster. We denied Plaintiffs’ allegations as the franchise agreement did not grant Plaintiffs any exclusive territorial rights and, instead, expressly reserved for us the right to open and operate - and the right to grant others the right to open and operate - El Pollo Loco restaurants “in the immediate vicinity of or adjacent to” Plaintiffs’ restaurant in Lancaster. On April 24, 2017, four days before the commencement of trial, Plaintiffs filed a voluntary dismissal, without prejudice, of the Lancaster Lawsuit without any payment or other concession by us. The corresponding dismissal was entered by the court on April 25, 2017. On May 22, 2017, Plaintiffs filed a motion for relief from the dismissal which was granted by the court on June 29, 2017. The trial in the case was bifurcated between the liability and damages phases. The liability phase commenced on November 16, 2017. The only cause of action that the court allowed to go to the jury was the cause of action for breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. The court elected not to present the cause of action for intentional interference with prospective business to the jury. (The causes of action for reformation due to mistake and unconscionability, unfair business practices under California Business & Professions Code §17200 et seq., and declaratory relief were not presented to the jury as these types of equitable claims are to be decided by the court as a matter of law.) On December 11, 2017, the jury returned a verdict in favor of Plaintiffs finding that the Company breached the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing by (1) constructing the 2 new company-operated El Pollo Loco restaurants in Lancaster, and (2) not offering the 2 new company-operated El Pollo Loco restaurants in Lancaster to Plaintiffs. Because the trial was bifurcated, the December 11, 2017 verdict did not include a determination of damages.

The damages phase of the trial commenced on April 20, 2018. On May 1, 2018, the jury returned a verdict on damages in favor of Plaintiffs in the following amounts: (1) $4,356,600 in “impact damages” arising out of our construction of the 2 new company-owned El Pollo Loco restaurants in Lancaster, and (2) $4,481,206 in “lost opportunity damages” arising out of our failure to offer the 2 new company-operated El Pollo Loco restaurants in Lancaster to Plaintiffs. On August 1, 2018, the court issued a final judgment and decision on the unfair business practices claim under California Business & Professions Code § 17200 et seq. As part of the final judgment, the court found El Pollo Loco liable and issued injunctive relief requiring El Pollo Loco to revise its franchise disclosure document and franchise agreement. The court also awarded Plaintiffs restitution of $4,356,600 for “impact damages” arising out of our construction of the 2 new company-operated El Pollo Loco restaurants in Lancaster. The court, reversing its previous position, held that these damages could be awarded in addition to the "lost opportunity damages" awarded by the jury. Thus, the court entered a total monetary judgment of $8,837,806. There was no ruling on the causes of action for reformation due to mistake and declaratory relief, and on January 27, 2020, the court entered an amended judgment dismissing these claims. The trial court subsequently awarded the Plaintiffs $249,728 in costs and $1,391,703 in attorney fees. Post judgment interest is running at 10% simple interest per year on the total amount of the monetary judgment, costs, and attorney fees.

On August 27, 2018, the Company filed a notice of appeal as to the entire judgment. As required by California law, on or about August 16, 2018, the Company obtained an appeal bond through a Surety company to secure the trial court’s judgment during the pendency of the appeal. The appeal on the merits is currently pending, but has been stayed pending the Parties’ agreement in principle to settle the matter, discussed immediately below.

On March 19, 2020, the Surety, One Beacon, from whom the Company procured the appeal bond to secure the judgment against the Company in the matter of Janice P. Handlers-Bryman and Michael D. Bryman v. El Pollo Loco, Inc., issued a collateral demand to the Company. On April 17, 2020, the Company provided to One Beacon a Letter of Credit in the amount of $2,651,342 to satisfy the Surety’s collateral demand. On July 13, 2020, One Beacon agreed to release its collateral demand and returned the Letter of Credit to the Company. Subsequent to June 24, 2020, the Company reached an agreement in principle with the Plaintiffs to resolve the lawsuit for a payment by the Company of $2.5 million, which was recorded within operating expenses in the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of income for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, contingent upon approval by the court of appeal of the terms of the parties’ proposed settlement.

The Company is also involved in various other claims and legal actions that arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these other actions will have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations, liquidity, or capital resources. A significant increase in the number of claims, or an increase in amounts owing under successful claims, could materially and adversely affect its business, consolidated financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

22

Purchasing Commitments

The Company has long-term beverage supply agreements with certain major beverage vendors. Pursuant to the terms of these arrangements, marketing rebates are provided to the Company and its franchisees from the beverage vendors based upon the dollar volume of purchases for system-wide restaurants which will vary according to their demand for beverage syrup and fluctuations in the market rates for beverage syrup. These contracts have terms extending through the end of 2024.

At June 24, 2020, the Company’s total estimated commitment to purchase chicken was $11.1 million.

Contingent Lease Obligations

As a result of assigning the Company’s interest in obligations under real estate leases in connection with the sale of company-operated restaurants to some of the Company’s franchisees, the Company is contingently liable on 4 lease agreements. These leases have various terms, the latest of which expires in 2036. As of June 24, 2020, the potential amount of undiscounted payments the Company could be required to make in the event of non-payment by the primary lessee was $2.8 million. The present value of these potential payments discounted at the Company’s estimated pre-tax cost of debt at June 24, 2020 was $2.6 million. The Company’s franchisees are primarily liable on the leases. The Company has cross-default provisions with these franchisees that would put them in default of their franchise agreements in the event of non-payment under the leases. The Company believes that these cross-default provisions reduce the risk that payments will be required to be made under these leases. Due to the current uncertainty related to the COVID-19 pandemic and impact it has had on the ability of the Company’s franchisees to make their lease payments, the Company has recorded a $0.1 million liability in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements related to these contingent liabilities.

Employment Agreements

The Company has employment agreements with 3 of the officers of the Company. These agreements provide for minimum salary levels, possible annual adjustments for cost-of-living changes, and incentive bonuses that are payable under certain business conditions.

Indemnification Agreements

The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with each of its current directors and officers. These agreements require the Company to indemnify these individuals to the fullest extent permitted under Delaware law against liabilities that may arise by reason of their service to the Company and to advance expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified. The Company also intends to enter into indemnification agreements with future directors and officers.

8. NET INCOME PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is calculated using the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020 and June 26, 2019. Diluted EPS is calculated using the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding and potentially dilutive during the period, using the treasury stock method.

On August 2, 2018, the Company announced that the Board of Directors had authorized a stock repurchase program. The Company entered into a stock repurchase plan on August 28, 2018 (the “2018 Stock Repurchase Plan”), which allowed for the repurchase of up to $20.0 million of the Company’s common stock. The 2018 Stock Repurchase Plan commenced on November 6, 2018 and terminated on June 26, 2019.

On April 30, 2019, as part of the Company’s focus on stockholder returns, the Board of Directors approved a new stock repurchase program. The Company entered into a stock repurchase plan May 17, 2019 (the “2019 Stock Repurchase Plan”), which allowed for the repurchase up to $30.0 million of the Company’s common stock. The 2019 Stock Repurchase Plan commenced on June 27, 2019, and was exhausted on September 26, 2019.

23

Under the 2019 Stock Repurchase Plan, the Company was permitted to repurchase its common stock from time to time, in amounts and at prices that the Company deemed appropriate, subject to market conditions and other considerations. The Company’s repurchases were executed using open market purchases, including pursuant to Rule 10b5-1 trading plans, and/or through privately negotiated transactions.

For the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, the Company repurchased 1,303,282 and 1,558,836 shares of common stock, respectively under the 2018 Stock Repurchase Plan, using open market purchases, for total consideration of approximately $14.9 million and $18.3 million, respectively. The common stock repurchased under both the 2018 Stock Repurchase Plan and the 2019 Stock Repurchase Plan was retired upon repurchase.

Below are basic and diluted EPS data for the periods indicated, which are in thousands except for per share data:

	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
	June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019		June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019
Numerator:
Net income	$	5,499	$	14,087	$	9,099	$	15,000
Denominator:
Weighted-average shares outstanding—basic		34,836,410		37,939,912		34,747,785		38,296,807
Weighted-average shares outstanding—diluted		35,410,198		38,580,722		35,382,607		39,043,477
Net income per share—basic	$	0.16	$	0.37	$	0.26	$	0.39
Net income per share—diluted	$	0.16	$	0.37	$	0.26	$	0.38
Anti-dilutive securities not considered in diluted EPS calculation		545,881		733,449		565,118		438,547

Below is a reconciliation of basic and diluted share counts:

	Thirteen Weeks Ended		Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
	June 24, 2020	June 26, 2019	June 24, 2020	June 26, 2019
Weighted-average shares outstanding—basic	34,836,410	37,939,912	34,747,785	38,296,807
Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted shares	573,788	640,810	634,822	746,670
Weighted-average shares outstanding—diluted	35,410,198	38,580,722	35,382,607	39,043,477

9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Trimaran Pollo Partners, L.L.C. (“LLC”) owns approximately 46.7% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. This large position means that LLC and its majority owners—predecessors and affiliates of, and certain funds managed by, Trimaran Capital Partners and Freeman Spogli & Co. (collectively, “Trimaran” and “Freeman Spogli,” respectively)—possess significant influence when stockholders vote on matters such as election of directors, mergers, consolidations and acquisitions, the sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, decisions affecting the Company’s capital structure, amendments to the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation or amended and restated by-laws, and the Company’s winding up and dissolution. The Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation provides that (i) so long as LLC beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, more than 40% of the Company’s common stock any member of the Board of Directors or the entire Board of Directors may be removed from office at any time with or without cause by the affirmative vote of a majority of the Company’s common stock, and (ii) prior to the date the LLC ceases to beneficially own, directly or indirectly, 40% or more of the Company’s common stock, stockholders representing at least 40% of the Company’s common stock may call a special meeting of the Company’s stockholders.

10. REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS

Revenue Recognition

Nature of products and services

The Company has 2 revenue streams, company-operated restaurant revenue and franchise related revenue.

24

Company-operated restaurant revenue

Revenues from the operation of company-operated restaurants are recognized as food and beverage products are delivered to customers and payment is tendered at the time of sale. The Company presents sales, net of sales-related taxes and promotional allowances.

The Company offers a loyalty rewards program, which awards a customer points for dollars spent. When 100 points are accumulated a $10 reward to be used on future purchases is earned. If a customer does not earn or use points within a one-year period, their account is deactivated and all points expire. Additionally, if a $10 reward is not used within six months it expires. When a customer is part of the rewards program, the obligation to provide future discounts related to points earned is considered a separate performance obligation, to which a portion of the transaction price is allocated. The performance obligation related to loyalty points is deemed to have been satisfied, and the amount deferred in the balance sheet is recognized as revenue, when the points are transferred to a $10 reward and redeemed, the reward or points have expired, or the likelihood of redemption is remote. A portion of the transaction price is allocated to loyalty points, if necessary, on a pro-rata basis, based on stand-alone selling price, as determined by menu pricing and loyalty point’s terms. As of both June 24, 2020 and December 25, 2019, the revenue allocated to loyalty points that have not been redeemed was $1.1 million, which is reflected in the Company’s accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets within other accrued expenses and current liabilities. The Company expects the loyalty points to be redeemed and recognized over a one-year period.

The Company sells gift cards to its customers in the restaurants and through selected third parties. The gift cards sold to customers have no stated expiration dates and are subject to actual and/or potential escheatment rights in several of the jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Furthermore, due to these escheatment rights, the Company does not recognize breakage related to the sale of gift cards due to the immateriality of the amount remaining after escheatment. The Company recognizes income from gift cards when redeemed by the customer. Unredeemed gift card balances are deferred and recorded as other accrued expenses on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Franchise and franchise advertising revenue

Franchise revenue consists of franchise royalties, initial franchise fees, license fees due from franchisees, IT support services, and rental income for subleases to franchisees. Franchise advertising revenue consists of advertising contributions received from franchisees. These revenue streams are made up of the following performance obligations:

● Franchise license - inclusive of advertising services, development agreements, training, access to plans and help desk services.

● Discounted renewal option.

● Hardware services.

The Company satisfies the performance obligation related to the franchise license over the term of the franchise agreement, which is typically 20 years. Payment for the franchise license consists of three components, a fixed-fee related to the franchise/development agreement, a sales-based royalty fee and a sales-based advertising fee. The fixed fee, as determined by the signed development and/or franchise agreement, is due at the time the development agreement is entered into, and/or when the franchise agreement is signed, and does not include a finance component.

The sales-based royalty fee and sales-based advertising fee are considered variable consideration and will continue to be recognized as revenue as such sales are earned by the franchisees. Both sales-based fees qualify under the royalty constraint exception, and do not require an estimate of future transaction price. Additionally, the Company is utilizing the practical expedient available under ASC Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“Topic 606”) regarding disclosure of the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to the performance obligations that are unsatisfied for sales-based royalties.

In certain franchise agreements, the Company offers a discounted renewal to incentivize future renewals after the end of the initial franchise term. As this is considered a separate performance obligation, the Company allocates a portion of the initial franchise fee to this discounted renewal, on a pro-rata basis, assuming a 20-year renewal. This performance obligation is satisfied over the renewal term, typically 10 or 20 years, while payment is fixed and due at the time the renewal is signed.

25

The Company purchases hardware, such as scanners, printers, cash registers and tablets, from third party vendors, which it then sells to franchisees. As the Company is considered the principal in this relationship, payment for the hardware is considered revenue, and is received upon transfer of the goods from the Company to the franchisee. As of June 24, 2020, there were 0 performance obligations related to hardware services that were unsatisfied or partially satisfied.

Disaggregated revenue

The following table presents our revenues disaggregated by revenue source and market (in thousands):

	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
	June 24,		June 26,		June 24,		June 26,
	2020		2019		2020		2019
Core Market(1):
Company-operated restaurant revenue	$	81,370	$	88,808	$	167,285	$	174,114
Franchise revenue		3,208		4,174		6,716		7,673
Franchise advertising fee revenue		2,384		2,806		5,025		5,523
Total core market	$	86,962	$	95,788	$	179,026	$	187,310
Non-Core Market(2):
Company-operated restaurant revenue	$	6,337	$	11,331	$	13,056	$	23,175
Franchise revenue		3,511		3,744		7,065		6,689
Franchise advertising fee revenue		2,794		2,877		5,620		5,543
Total non-core market	$	12,642	$	17,952	$	25,741	$	35,407
Total revenue	$	99,604	$	113,740	$	204,767	$	222,717

(1) Core Market includes markets with existing company-operated restaurants at the time of the Company’s Initial Public Offering ("IPO") on July 28, 2014.

(2) Non-Core Market includes markets entered into by the Company subsequent to the IPO date.

The following table presents our revenues disaggregated by geographic market:

	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
	June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019		June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019
Greater Los Angeles area market	71.1	%	69.3	%	71.7	%	69.3	%
Other markets	28.9	%	30.7	%	28.3	%	30.7	%
Total	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%

Contract balances

The following table provides information about the change in the franchise contract liability balances during the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020 and June 26, 2019 (in thousands):

December 25, 2019	$	6,317
Revenue recognized - beginning balance		(544)
June 24, 2020	$	5,773
December 26, 2018	$	5,593
Revenue recognized - beginning balance		(203)
Additional contract liability		1,257
Revenue recognized - additional contract liability		(88)
June 26, 2019	$	6,559

The Company’s franchise contract liability includes development fees, initial franchise and license fees, franchise renewal fees, lease subsidies and royalty discounts and is included within other accrued expenses and current liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities within the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company receives area development fees from franchisees when they execute multi-unit area development agreements. Initial franchise and license fees, or franchise renewal fees, are received from franchisees upon the execution of, or renewal of, a franchise

26

agreement. Revenue is recognized from these agreements as the underlying performance obligation is satisfied, which is over the term of the agreement.

The following table illustrates the estimated revenue to be recognized in future periods related to performance obligations under the applicable contracts that are unsatisfied as of June 24, 2020 (in thousands):

Franchise revenues:
2020	$	323
2021		491
2022		410
2023		395
2024		381
Thereafter		3,773
Total	$	5,773

Contract Costs

The Company does not currently incur costs to obtain or fulfill a contract that would be considered contract assets under Topic 606.

11. LEASES

Adoption of Topic 842 "Leases"

On December 27, 2018, the Company adopted Topic 842, using the effective date method, recognizing and measuring all leases that existed as of December 27, 2018. The Company recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment as of December 27, 2018. All leases that either (1) commenced, or (2) were modified or re-measured after December 27, 2018 are accounted for under Topic 842.

As a result of Topic 842, the Company recognized a ROU asset of $205.2 million and a lease liability of $222.3 million on its consolidated balance sheet as of December 27, 2018. However, the adoption of Topic 842 did not result in a material impact on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations or consolidated statement of cash flows.

Nature of leases

The Company’s operations utilize property, facilities, equipment and vehicles leased from others. Additionally, the Company has various contracts with vendors that have been determined to contain an embedded lease in accordance with Topic 842.

As of June 24, 2020, the Company had 0 leases that it had entered into, but had not yet commenced. The Company does not have control of the property until lease commencement.

Building and facility leases

The majority of the Company’s building and facilities leases are classified as operating leases; however, the Company currently has 1 facility lease that is classified as a finance lease.

Restaurants are operated under lease arrangements that generally provide for a fixed base rent and, in some instances, contingent rent based on a percentage of gross operating profit or net revenues in excess of a defined amount. Additionally, a number of the Company’s leases have payments, which increase at pre-determined dates based on the change in the consumer price index. For all leases, the Company also reimburses the landlord for non-lease components, or items that are not considered components of a contract, such as common area maintenance, property tax and insurance costs. While the Company determined not to separate lease and non-lease components, these payments are based on actual costs, making them variable consideration and excluding them from the calculations of the ROU asset and lease liability.

27

The initial terms of land and restaurant building leases are generally 20 years, exclusive of options to renew. These leases typically have four 5-year renewal options, which have generally been excluded in the calculation of the ROU asset and lease liability, as they are not considered reasonably certain to be exercised, unless (1) the renewal had already occurred as of the time of adoption of Topic 842, or (2) there have been significant leasehold improvements that have a useful life that extend past the original lease term. Furthermore, there are no residual value guarantees and no restrictions imposed by the lease.

During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, the Company reassessed the lease terms on 4 and 7 restaurants, respectively, due to certain triggering events, such as the addition of significant leasehold improvements, the decision to terminate a lease, or the decision to renew. As a result of the reassessment, an additional $1.4 million and $1.7 million of ROU asset and lease liabilities for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, respectively, were recognized and will be amortized over the new lease term. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, the Company reassessed the lease terms on 3 restaurants due to the addition of significant leasehold improvements with useful lives that extend past the current lease expiration. This resulted in an additional $1.2 million of ROU asset and lease liability, which will be recognized over the new lease term. The reassessments did not have any impact on the original lease classification. Additionally, as the Company adopted all practical expedients available under Topic 842, no reallocation between lease and non-lease components was necessary.

The Company also subleases facilities to certain franchisees and other non-related parties which are also considered operating leases. Sublease income also includes contingent rental income based on net revenues. The vast majority of these leases have rights to extend terms via fixed rental increases. However, none of these leases have early termination rights, the right to purchase the premises or any residual value guarantees. The Company does not have any related party leases.

During the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, the Company determined that the carrying value of ROU assets at one restaurant was not recoverable. As a result, the Company recorded a $0.5 million impairment expense for the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, related to 1 restaurant in Texas, sold to franchisees in the prior year. The Company did 0t recognize any impairment related to ROU assets during the thirteen and twenty-six ended June 26, 2019.

Equipment

Leases of equipment primarily consist of restaurant equipment, copiers and vehicles. These leases are fixed payments with no variable component. Additionally, no optional renewal periods have been included in the calculation of the ROU asset, there are no residual value guarantees and no restrictions imposed.

Significant Assumptions and Judgments

In applying the requirements of Topic 842 the Company made significant assumptions and judgments related to determination of whether a contract contains a lease and the discount rate used for the lease.

In determining if any of the Company’s contracts contain a lease the Company made assumptions and judgments related to its ability to direct the use of any assets stated in the contract and the likelihood of renewing any short-term contracts for a period extending past twelve months.

The Company also made significant assumptions and judgments in determining an appropriate discount rate for property leases. These included using a consistent discount rate for a portfolio of leases entered into at varying dates, using the full 20-year term of the lease, excluding any options, and using the total minimum lease payments. The Company utilizes a third-party valuation firm in determining the discount rate, based on the above assumptions. For all other leases, the Company uses the discount rate implicit in the lease, or the Company’s incremental borrowing rate.

As the Company has adopted the practical expedient not to separate lease and non-lease components, no significant assumptions or judgments were necessary in allocating consideration between these components, for all classes of underlying assets.

28

The following table presents the Company’s total lease cost, disaggregated by underlying asset (in thousands):

	Thirteen Weeks Ended
	June 24, 2020						June 26, 2019
	Property		Equipment				Property		Equipment
	Leases		Leases		Total		Leases		Leases		Total
Finance lease cost:
Amortization of right-of-use assets	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	3	$	—	$	3
Interest on lease liabilities		5		—		5		7		—		7
Operating lease cost		6,545		307		6,852		6,585		327		6,912
Short-term lease cost		—		5		5		—		9		9
Variable lease cost		105		45		150		127		27		154
Sublease income		(763)		—		(763)		(511)		—		(511)
Total lease cost	$	5,892	$	357	$	6,249	$	6,211	$	363	$	6,574

	Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
	June 24, 2020						June 26, 2019
	Property		Equipment				Property		Equipment
	Leases		Leases		Total		Leases		Leases		Total
Finance lease cost:
Amortization of right-of-use assets	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	9	$	—	$	9
Interest on lease liabilities		11		—		11		15		—		15
Operating lease cost		13,075		614		13,689		13,187		654		13,841
Short-term lease cost		—		12		12		—		17		17
Variable lease cost		209		70		279		224		98		322
Sublease income		(1,541)		—		(1,541)		(901)		—		(901)
Total lease cost	$	11,754	$	696	$	12,450	$	12,534	$	769	$	13,303

The following table presents the Company’s total lease cost on the condensed consolidated statements of income (in thousands):

	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
	June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019		June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019
Lease cost – Occupancy and other operating expenses	$	5,917	$	6,256	$	11,796	$	12,659
Lease cost – General & administrative		119		114		230		233
Lease cost – Depreciation and amortization		6		3		11		9
Lease cost – Interest expense				7		—		15
Lease cost - Closed-store reserve		207		194		413		387
Total lease cost	$	6,249	$	6,574	$	12,450	$	13,303

29

During the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020 and June 26, 2019, the Company had the following cash and non-cash activities associated with its leases (in thousands):

	Twenty-Six Weeks Ended June 24, 2020								Twenty-Six Weeks Ended June 26, 2019
	Property			Equipment					Property			Equipment
	Leases			Leases			Total		Leases			Leases			Total
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities
Operating cash flows used for operating leases	$	9,269		$	619		$	9,888	$	12,361		$	654		$	13,015
Financing cash flows used for finance leases	$	16		$	—		$	16	$	53		$	—		$	53
Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Operating lease ROU assets obtained in exchange for lease liabilities:
Operating lease ROU assets	$	1,650		$	12		$	1,662		4,995			—			4,995
Derecognition of ROU assets due to terminations, impairment or modifications	$	(543)		$	(15)		$	(558)		—			—			—
Other Information
Weighted-average remaining lease term—finance leases		2.33			—					3.33			—
Weighted-average remaining lease term—operating leases		11.73			2.74					12.23			3.55
Weighted-average discount rate—finance leases		11.10	%		—					11.10	%		—
Weighted-average discount rate—operating leases		4.34	%		3.93	%				4.38	%		3.98	%

Information regarding the Company’s minimum future lease obligations as of June 24, 2020 is as follows (in thousands):

	Finance			Operating Leases
	Minimum			Minimum		Minimum
	Lease			Lease		Sublease
For the Years Ending	Payments			Payments		Income
December 30, 2020	$	27		$	14,838	$	1,393
December 29, 2021		54			28,909		2,887
December 28, 2022		45			25,975		3,284
December 27, 2023		—			23,627		3,318
December 25, 2024		—			21,333		3,203
Thereafter		—			141,408		27,265
Total	$	126		$	256,090	$	41,350
Less: imputed interest (2.33% - 11.10%)		(26)			(49,051)
Present value of lease obligations		100			207,039
Less: current maturities		(37)			(17,979)
Noncurrent portion	$	63	��	$	189,060

30

Information regarding the Company’s minimum future lease obligations as of December 25, 2019 is as follows (in thousands):

	Finance Leases		Operating Leases
	Minimum		Minimum		Minimum
	Lease		Lease		Sublease
For the Years Ending	Payments		Payments		Income
December 30, 2020	$	54	$	26,808	$	2,754
December 29, 2021		54		25,978		2,887
December 28, 2022		45		24,871		3,284
December 27, 2023		—		22,309		3,318
December 25, 2024		—		19,751		3,203
Thereafter		—		139,454		27,265
Total	$	153	$	259,171	$	42,711
Less: imputed interest (3.96% to 11.10%)		(36)		(45,273)
Present value of capital lease obligations		117		213,898
Less: current maturities		(34)		(16,406)
Noncurrent portion	$	83		197,492

Short-Term Leases

The Company has multiple short-term leases, which have terms of less than 12 months, and thus were excluded from the recognition requirements of Topic 842. The Company has recognized these lease payments in its consolidated statements of operations on a straight-line basis over the lease term and variable lease payments in the period in which the obligation for those payments is incurred.

Lessor

The Company is a lessor for certain property, facilities and equipment owned by the Company and leased to others, principally franchisees, under non-cancelable leases with initial terms ranging from three to 20 years. These lease agreements generally provide for a fixed base rent and, in some instances, contingent rent based on a percentage of gross operating profit or net revenues. All leases are considered operating leases.

For the leases in which the Company is the lessor, there are options to extend the lease. However, there are no terms and conditions to terminate the lease, no right to purchase premises and no residual value guarantees. Additionally, there are no related party leases.

The Company received $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, of lease income from company-owned locations for the thirteen weeks ended June 24, 2020 and June 26, 2019. For each of the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020 and June 26, 2019, the Company received $0.3 million of lease income from company-owned locations.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Cautionary Statement Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this report are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements discuss our current expectations and projections relating to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance and business. You can identify forward-looking statements because they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. These statements may include words such as “aim,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “outlook,” “potential,” “project,” “projection,” “plan,” “intend,” “seek,” “may,” “could,” “would,” “will,” “should,” “can,” “can have,” “likely,” the negatives thereof and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of the timing or nature of future operating or financial performance or other events. They appear in a number of places throughout this report and include statements regarding our intentions, beliefs or current expectations concerning, among other things, our results of operations, financial condition, liquidity, prospects, growth, strategies and the industry in which we operate. All forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those that we expected.

31

While we believe that our assumptions are reasonable, we caution that it is very difficult to predict the impact of known factors, and it is impossible for us to anticipate all factors that could affect our actual results. All forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. You should evaluate all forward-looking statements made in this report in the context of the factors that could cause outcomes to differ materially from our expectations. These factors include, but are not limited to:

● the impacts of the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic on our company, our employees, our customers, our partners, our industry and the economy as a whole, as well as our franchisees ability to maintain operations in their individual restaurants;

● the adverse impact of economic conditions on our (i) operating results and financial condition, (ii) ability to comply with the terms and covenants of our debt agreements, and (iii) ability to pay or refinance our existing debt or to obtain additional financing;

● our ability to open new restaurants in new and existing markets, including difficulty in finding sites and in negotiating acceptable leases;

● our ability to compete successfully with other quick-service and fast casual restaurants;

● vulnerability to changes in consumer preferences and economic conditions;

● vulnerability to conditions in the greater Los Angeles area;

● vulnerability to natural disasters given the geographic concentration and real estate intensive nature of our business;

● our ability to effectively identify and secure appropriate new sites for restaurants;

● changes to food and supply costs, especially for chicken;

● negative publicity, whether or not valid, and our ability to respond to and effectively manage the accelerated impact of social media;

● our ability to continue to expand our digital business, delivery orders and catering;

● concerns about food safety and quality and about food-borne illness, particularly avian flu;

● dependence on frequent and timely deliveries of food and supplies and our dependence on a single supplier to distribute substantially all of our products to our restaurants;

● our ability to service our level of indebtedness;

● our reliance on our franchisees, who may incur financial hardships, lose access to credit, close restaurants, or declare bankruptcy, and our limited control over our franchisees and potential liability for their acts;

● the impact of any security breaches of confidential customer information in connection with our electronic process of credit and debit card transactions;

● the impact of any failure of our information technology system or any breach of our network security;

● ability to protect our name and logo and other proprietary intellectual property; and

● other risks set forth in our filings with the SEC from time to time, including under Item 1A, Risk Factors in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, under Item 1A, Risk Factors in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2019 and under Item 1A, Risk Factors in our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 25, 2020, which such filings are available online at www.sec.gov, at www.elpolloloco.com or upon request from El Pollo Loco.

We caution you that the important factors referenced above may not contain all of the factors that are important to you. In addition, we cannot assure you that we will realize the results or developments we expect or anticipate or, even if substantially realized, that they will result in the consequences we anticipate or affect us or our operations in the ways that we expect. The forward-looking statements included in this report are made only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. If we do update one or more forward-looking statements, no inference should be made that we will make additional updates with respect to those or other forward-looking statements. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.

Overview

El Pollo Loco is a differentiated and growing restaurant concept that specializes in fire-grilling citrus-marinated chicken and operates in the limited service restaurant (“LSR”) segment. We strive to offer food that integrates the culinary traditions of Mexico with the healthier lifestyle of Los Angeles, a combination that we call “LA-Mex”. Our distinctive menu features our signature product--citrus-marinated fire-grilled chicken--and a variety of Mexican and LA-inspired entrees that we create from our chicken. We serve individual and family-sized chicken meals, a variety of Mexican and

32

LA-inspired entrees, and sides, and, throughout the year, on a limited-time basis, additional proteins like shrimp. Our entrees include favorites such as our Chicken Avocado Burrito, Under 500 Calorie entrees, chicken tostada salads, and Pollo Bowls. Our famous Creamy Cilantro dressings and salsas are prepared fresh daily, allowing our customers to create their favorite flavor profiles to enhance their culinary experience. Our distinctive menu with healthier alternatives appeals to consumers across a wide variety of socio-economic backgrounds and drives our balanced composition of sales throughout the day (our “day-part mix”), including at lunch and dinner.

COVID-19 Impact

On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization (“WHO”) announced a global health emergency because of a new strain of coronavirus ("COVID-19") originating in Wuhan, China and the risks to the international community as the virus spreads globally beyond its point of origin. On March 11, 2020, the WHO classified the COVID-19 outbreak as a pandemic, based on the rapid increase in exposure globally.

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly disrupted our restaurant operations. Following the pandemic declaration in March 2020, federal, state and local governments began to respond to the public health crisis by requiring social distancing, "stay at home" directives, and restaurant restrictions - including government-mandated dining room closures - that limited business to off-premise services only (take-out, drive-thru and delivery). Historically, approximately 20% of the Company’s sales are associated with dine-in service. In May 2020, the “stay at home” directive was modified in most areas in which the Company operates, allowing for the opening of lower-risk workplaces, including restaurants, but with restrictions such as limited capacity. However, in recent months a surge in the COVID-19 pandemic has caused many state and local governments to re-implement certain restrictions to try and contain the spread of the virus. Except for nine restaurants in Houston and one in Utah, all of our restaurants are operating on a take-away, mobile pick-up and delivery basis, as well as maintaining drive-thru operations where available, in order to protect our employees and customers from the spread of the COVID-19 pandemic and to comply with the government mandates. Due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, during the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, we temporarily closed 31 restaurants, 30 of which have reopened and one remained closed as of June 24, 2020. Similarly, franchisees have temporarily closed 21 restaurants, of which 17 have reopened and four remain closed as of June 24, 2020. As of June 24, 2020, we have not permanently closed any restaurants due to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Below is a summary of other actions we have taken, or plan to take to enhance financial and operating flexibility for the Company and for our franchisees, and to protect our employees and customers:

● As a precautionary measure, we bolstered our existing cash position by fully drawing down our $150 million 2018 Revolver, adding $34.5 million of cash to our balance sheet.

● We have temporarily suspended all share repurchase activity, significantly reduced capital spending, reevaluated essential support center general and administrative expenses, and fine-tuned our restaurant labor model based on indoor dining room restrictions, limited dining room capacity in restaurants located in geographies where indoor dining is permitted, dining room closures and fluctuating sales volume.

● For our franchisees, we deferred 50% of their April royalties until July 1, 2020, when such royalties began to be repaid in even monthly installments over the remainder of fiscal 2020. In addition, we deferred 100% of our franchisees’ 2020 remodel and new restaurant build requirements until 2021. We also established a support team to assist franchisees in accessing funds and benefits provided by the CARES Act legislation.

● For our employees, we continue to implement actions to help protect them from the coronavirus while working in our restaurants. These include implementing enhanced cleaning procedures in our restaurants, providing gloves and masks to all system restaurant employees, installing plexiglass shields at company restaurant cashier stations and initiating other social distancing measures. We are providing extended sick leave benefits to employees impacted by COVID-19, and we have granted two weeks paid leave for employees who are 65 or older.

● We have shifted our marketing to highlight our free delivery program; our Family Meals as a healthier and affordable option; and our meaningful value platform.

● We delayed making April, May and June rent payments on the majority of our leased properties, and we have reached rent abatement and/or deferment agreements with our landlords for those properties.

● We have taken advantage of provisions available under the CARES Act. Specifically, we have deferred payment of employer Social Security taxes that are otherwise owed for wage payments.

33

The full impact of the COVID-19 outbreak continues to evolve as of the date of this report. Management is continually evaluating the impact of the global crisis on its financial condition, liquidity, operations, suppliers, industry, and workforce and will take additional actions as necessary. The disruption in operations has led to us considering the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our liquidity, debt covenant compliance, and recoverability of long-lived and ROU assets, goodwill and intangible assets, among others. If these disruptions to our operations from COVID-19 pandemic continue, they may have a material negative impact on our financial results, future operations and liquidity. The extent of such negative impact will depend, in part, on the COVID-19 pandemics longevity and severity.

Due to the rapid development and fluidity of this situation, we cannot determine the ultimate impact that the COVID-19 pandemic will have on our consolidated financial condition, liquidity, and future results of operations, and therefore any prediction as to the ultimate material adverse impact on tour consolidated financial condition, liquidity, and future results of operations is uncertain.

Growth Strategies and Outlook

As of June 24, 2020, we had 479 locations in six states. In fiscal 2019, we opened two new company-operated and two new franchised restaurants all in California. For the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, one new company-operated restaurant was opened in Nevada, which was in process prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, and two franchised restaurants, one in California and one in Arizona, were opened. As a result of the COVID-19 crisis, we have suspended company-operated new unit development until the timing of the economic recovery and our business improvement becomes more clear. In addition, we are allowing franchisees to defer their 2020 new unit development obligations until 2021. As a result, we do not expect to open any additional company-operated or franchised restaurant during the remainder of 2020.

It is our intention to return to the following long-term growth strategy after the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic subsides. We plan to continue to expand our business, drive restaurant sales growth, and enhance our competitive positioning, by executing the following strategies:

● expand our restaurant base;

● increase our comparable restaurant sales; and

● enhance operations and leverage our infrastructure.

To increase comparable restaurant sales, we plan to increase customer frequency, attract new customers, and improve per-person spend. Success of these growth plans is not guaranteed.

Highlights and Trends

Comparable Restaurant Sales

System-wide, for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, comparable restaurant sales decreased by 9.7% and 5.7%, respectively, from the comparable period in the prior year. For company-operated restaurants, comparable restaurant sales for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020 decreased by 8.5% and 4.7%, respectively. For company-operated restaurants, the quarter’s change in comparable restaurant sales consisted of a decline in transactions of 25.4%, partially offset by an approximately 22.5% increase in average check size, and the year-to-date change in comparable restaurant sales consisted of a 15.2% decline in transactions, partially offset by a 12.4% increase in average check size. For franchised restaurants, comparable restaurant sales decreased 10.6% and 6.4% for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, respectively. Refer to Comparable Restaurant Sales definition in "Key Performance Indicators" section below.

34

Restaurant Development

Our restaurant counts at the beginning and end of each of the last three fiscal years and the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, were as follows.

	Twenty-Six Weeks Ended	Fiscal Year Ended
	June 24, 2020	2019	2018	2017
Company-operated restaurant activity:
Beginning of period	195	213	212	201
Openings	1	2	8	16
Restaurant sale to franchisee	—	(16)	—	—
Closures	—	(4)	(7)	(5)
Restaurants at end of period	196	195	213	212
Franchised restaurant activity:
Beginning of period	287	271	265	259
Openings	2	2	9	7
Restaurant sale to franchisee	—	16	—	—
Closures	(6)	(2)	(3)	(1)
Restaurants at end of period	283	287	271	265
System-wide restaurant activity:
Beginning of period	482	484	477	460
Openings	3	4	17	23
Closures	(6)	(6)	(10)	(6)
Restaurants at end of period	479	482	484	477

Restaurant Remodeling

As of June 24, 2020, together with our franchisees, we had remodeled 34 company-operated and 45 franchised restaurants using our newest Vision restaurant design. The Vision design elevates the brand image with exterior and interior features that embrace the brand’s authentic roots with warm textures, rustic elements and a focus on the signature open kitchen layout established in previous designs. As of June 24, 2020, including new builds and remodels, we had 120 restaurants open with the Vision design in our system. Remodeling is a use of cash and has implications for our net property and equipment owned and depreciation and amortization line items on our condensed consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of income, among others. The cost of our restaurant remodels varies depending on the scope of work required, but on average, the investment is $0.3 million to $0.4 million per restaurant. We believe that our remodeling program will result in higher restaurant revenue and a strengthened brand. In addition, we are currently working on a new asset design that we believe will clearly differentiate and communicate our brand, both on the exterior and interior. We believe that this new design will deliver good new unit volumes and cash on cash returns in both existing and new markets. We also believe that our remodels using this new design will result in higher restaurant revenue and a strengthened brand. If tests are successful, this new design will replace our “Vision” design, which was implemented in 2016. However, given the uncertainty surrounding the severity and longevity of the COVID-19 pandemic, as a precautionary measure we have significantly reduced capital spending in 2020 and plan to limit our remodels to two restaurants using the new design in the fourth quarter. We do not expect our franchisees to complete any remodels in 2020 as we have deferred their remodel requirements until 2021.

Loco Rewards

During the second quarter of 2017, we introduced a new loyalty rewards points program in an effort to increase sales and loyalty among our customers, by offering rewards that incentivize customers to visit our restaurants more often each month. Customers earn points for each dollars spent and 100 points can be redeemed for a $10 reward to be used for a future purchase. If a customer does not earn or use points within a one-year period, their account is deactivated and all points expire. Additionally, if a $10 reward is not used within six months, it expires. When a customer is part of the rewards program, the obligation to provide future discounts related to points earned is considered a separate performance obligation, to which a portion of the transaction price is allocated. The performance obligation related to loyalty points is deemed to have been satisfied, and the amount deferred in the balance sheet is recognized as revenue, when the points are transferred to a $10 reward and redeemed, the reward or points have expired, or the likelihood of redemption is

35

remote. A portion of the transaction price is allocated to loyalty points, if necessary, on a pro-rata basis, based on stand-alone selling price, as determined by menu pricing and loyalty point’s terms.

In addition, customers can earn additional points and free entrées for a variety of engagement activities. As points are available for redemption past the quarter earned, a portion of the revenue associated with the earned points will be deferred until redemption or expiration. As of both June 24, 2020, and December 25, 2019, the revenue allocated to loyalty points that have not been redeemed are $1.1 million, which is reflected in the Company’s accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets within other accrued expenses and current liabilities. The Company had over 1.8 million loyalty program members as of June 24, 2020.

Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates

The preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect our reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under current circumstances in making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily available from other sources. We evaluate our estimates on an on-going basis. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Accounting policies are an integral part of our condensed consolidated financial statements. A thorough understanding of these accounting policies is essential when reviewing our reported results of operations and our financial position. Management believes that the critical accounting policies and estimates discussed below involve the most difficult management judgments, due to the sensitivity of the methods and assumptions used. For a summary of our critical accounting policies and a discussion of our use of estimates, see “Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates” in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2019.

There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies or uses of estimates since our annual report on Form 10-K.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recent accounting pronouncements are described in Note 1 to our condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

Key Financial Definitions

Revenue

Our revenue is derived from three primary sources: company-operated restaurant revenue, franchise revenue, which is comprised primarily of franchise royalties and, to a lesser extent, franchise fees and sublease rental income, and franchise advertising fee revenue. See Note 10 to Item I above for further details regarding our revenue recognition policy.

Food and Paper Costs

Food and paper costs include the direct costs associated with food, beverage and packaging of our menu items. The components of food and paper costs are variable in nature, change with sales volume, are impacted by menu mix, and are subject to increases or decreases in commodity costs.

Labor and Related Expenses

Labor and related expenses include wages, payroll taxes, workers’ compensation expense, benefits, and bonuses paid to our restaurant management teams. Like other expense items, we expect labor costs to grow proportionately as our restaurant revenue grows. Factors that influence labor costs include minimum wage and payroll tax legislation, the frequency and severity of workers’ compensation claims, health care costs, and the performance of our restaurants.

36

Occupancy Costs and Other Operating Expenses

Occupancy costs include rent, common area maintenance, and real estate taxes. Other restaurant operating expenses include the costs of utilities, advertising, credit card processing fees, restaurant supplies, repairs and maintenance, and other restaurant operating costs.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses are comprised of expenses associated with corporate and administrative functions that support the development and operations of our restaurants, including compensation and benefits, travel expenses, stock compensation costs, legal and professional fees, and other related corporate costs. Also included are pre-opening costs, and expenses above the restaurant level, including salaries for field management, such as area and regional managers, and franchise field operational support.

Legal Settlements

Legal settlements include expenses such as judgments or settlements related to legal matters, legal claims and class action lawsuits.

Franchise Expenses

Franchise expenses are primarily comprised of rent expenses incurred on properties leased by us and then sublet to franchisees, expenses incurred in support of franchisee information technology systems, and the franchisee’s portion of advertising expenses.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization primarily consists of the depreciation of property and equipment, including leasehold improvements and equipment.

Loss on Disposal of Assets

Loss on disposal of assets includes the loss on disposal of assets related to retirements and replacement or write-off of leasehold improvements or equipment.

Impairment and Closed-Store Reserves

We review long-lived assets such as property, equipment, and intangibles on a unit-by-unit basis for impairment when events or circumstances indicate a carrying value of the assets that may not be recoverable. We determine if there is impairment at the restaurant level by comparing undiscounted future cash flows from the related long-lived assets to their respective carrying values and record an impairment charge when appropriate. In determining future cash flows, significant estimates are made by us with respect to future operating results of each restaurant over its remaining lease term, including sales trends, labor rates, commodity costs and other operating cost assumptions. If assets are determined to be impaired, the impairment charge is measured by calculating the amount by which the asset carrying amount exceeds its fair value. This process of assessing fair values requires the use of estimates and assumptions, including our ability to sell or reuse the related assets and market conditions, which are subject to a high degree of judgment. If these assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges for these assets and these charges could be material.

When the Company closes a restaurant, it will evaluate the ROU asset for impairment, based on anticipated sublease recoveries. The remaining value of the ROU asset is amortized on a straight-line basis, with the expense recognized in closed-store reserve expense, in addition to property tax and common area maintenance ("CAM") charges for closed restaurants.

37

Interest Expense, Net

Interest expense, net, consists primarily of interest on our outstanding debt. Debt issuance costs are amortized at cost over the life of the related debt.

Provision for Income Taxes

Provision for income taxes consists of federal and state taxes on our income.

Comparison of Results of Income

Our operating results for the thirteen weeks ended June 24, 2020 and June 26, 2019 and expressed as percentages of total revenue, with the exception of cost of operations and company restaurant expenses, which are expressed as a percentage of company-operated restaurant revenue, are compared below.

	Thirteen Weeks Ended
	June 24, 2020			June 26, 2019			Increase / (Decrease)
	($,000)		(%)	($,000)		(%)	($,000)		(%)
Statements of Income Data
Company-operated restaurant revenue	$	87,707	88.1	$	100,139	88.0	$	(12,432)	(12.4)
Franchise revenue		6,719	6.7		7,918	7.0		(1,199)	(15.1)
Franchise advertising fee revenue		5,178	5.2		5,683	5.0		(505)	(8.9)
Total revenue		99,604	100.0		113,740	100.0		(14,136)	(12.4)
Cost of operations
Food and paper costs(1)		22,873	26.1		27,886	27.8		(5,013)	(18.0)
Labor and related expenses(1)		25,759	29.4		29,272	29.2		(3,513)	(12.0)
Occupancy and other operating expenses(1)		21,922	25.0		23,032	23.0		(1,110)	(4.8)
Company restaurant expenses(1)		70,554	80.4		80,190	80.1		(9,636)	(12.0)
General and administrative expenses		10,465	10.5		9,348	8.2		1,117	11.9
Franchise expenses		6,627	6.7		7,542	6.6		(915)	(12.1)
Depreciation and amortization		4,168	4.2		4,454	3.9		(286)	(6.4)
Loss on disposal of assets		27	0.0		134	0.1		(107)	(79.9)
Recovery of securities lawsuits related legal expenses and other insurance claims		(123)	(0.1)		(10,000)	(8.8)		9,877	(98.8)
Impairment and closed-store reserves		437	0.4		565	0.5		(128)	(22.7)
Loss on assets held for sale		—	—		927	0.8		(927)	(100.0)
Total expenses		92,155	92.5		93,160	81.9		(1,005)	(1.1)
Income from operations		7,449	7.5		20,580	18.1		(13,131)	(63.8)
Interest expense, net of interest income		908	0.9		922	0.8		(14)	(1.5)
Income tax receivable agreement expense (income)		290	0.3		(94)	(0.1)		384	(408.5)
Income before provision for income taxes		6,251	6.3		19,752	17.4		(13,501)	(68.4)
Provision for income taxes		752	0.8		5,665	5.0		(4,913)	(86.7)
Net income	$	5,499	5.5	$	14,087	12.4	$	(8,588)	(61.0)

(1) Percentages for line items relating to cost of operations and company restaurant expenses are calculated with company-operated restaurant revenue as the denominator. All other percentages use total revenue.

38

Our operating results for the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020 and June 26, 2019 and expressed as percentages of total revenue, with the exception of cost of operations and company restaurant expenses, which are expressed as a percentage of company-operated restaurant revenue, are compared below.

	Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
	June 24, 2020			June 26, 2019			Increase / (Decrease)
	($,000)		(%)	($,000)		(%)	($,000)		(%)
Statements of Income Data
Company-operated restaurant revenue	$	180,341	88.1	$	197,289	88.6	$	(16,948)	(8.6)
Franchise revenue		13,781	6.7		14,362	6.4		(581)	(4.0)
Franchise advertising fee revenue		10,645	5.2		11,066	5.0		(421)	(3.8)
Total revenue		204,767	100.0		222,717	100.0		(17,950)	(8.1)
Cost of operations
Food and paper costs(1)		48,435	26.9		55,038	27.9		(6,603)	(12.0)
Labor and related expenses(1)		54,452	30.2		58,848	29.8		(4,396)	(7.5)
Occupancy and other operating expenses(1)		44,031	24.4		46,259	23.4		(2,228)	(4.8)
Company restaurant expenses(1)		146,918	81.5		160,145	81.2		(13,227)	(8.3)
General and administrative expenses		19,796	9.7		20,696	9.3		(900)	(4.3)
Franchise expenses		13,538	6.6		13,686	6.1		(148)	(1.1)
Depreciation and amortization		8,537	4.2		9,215	4.1		(678)	(7.4)
Loss on disposal of assets		127	0.1		178	0.1		(51)	(28.7)
Recovery of securities lawsuits related legal expenses and other insurance claims		(123)	(0.1)		(10,000)	(4.5)		9,877	(98.8)
Impairment and closed-store reserves		2,839	1.4		874	0.4		1,965	224.8
Loss on assets held for sale		—	—		5,051	2.3		(5,051)	(100.0)
Total expenses		191,632	93.6		199,845	89.7		(8,213)	(4.1)
Income from operations		13,135	6.4		22,872	10.3		(9,737)	(42.6)
Interest expense, net of interest income		1,813	0.9		1,781	0.8		32	1.8
Income tax receivable agreement expense		170	0.1		77	—		93	120.8
Income before provision for income taxes		11,152	5.4		21,014	9.4		(9,862)	(46.9)
Provision for income taxes		2,053	1.0		6,014	2.7		(3,961)	(65.9)
Net income	$	9,099	4.4	$	15,000	6.7	$	(5,901)	(39.3)

(1) Percentages for line items relating to cost of operations and company restaurant expenses are calculated with company-operated restaurant revenue as the denominator. All other percentages use total revenue.

Company-Operated Restaurant Revenue

For the quarter, company-operated restaurant revenue decreased $12.4 million, or 12.4%, from the comparable period in the prior year. The decline in company-operated restaurant sales was primarily due to a decrease in company-operated restaurant revenue of $8.1 million due to an 8.5% decrease in company-operated comparable restaurant sales, which we believe was primarily related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. See above under “COVID-19 Impact” for additional information related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business. Additionally, there was a $4.2 million decrease in revenue from the closure of two restaurants and the 16 company-operated restaurants sold by the Company to franchisees during or subsequent to the second quarter of 2019 and a $0.7 million decrease due to temporary closures. This company-operated restaurant sales decrease was partially offset by an increase of $0.6 million of non-comparable restaurant sales on restaurants that had not been open the fifteen months required to be included in comparable restaurant sales. The company-operated comparable restaurant sales decrease consisted of a decline in transactions of 25.4%, partially offset by an approximately 22.5% increase in average check size.

Year-to-date, company-operated restaurant revenue decreased $16.9 million, or 8.6%, from the comparable period in the prior year. The decline in company-operated restaurant sales was primarily due to a $9.4 million decrease in revenue from the closure of four restaurants and the 16 company-operated restaurants sold by the Company to franchisees during or subsequent to the first quarter of 2019, a decrease in company-operated restaurant revenue of $8.7 million from a 4.7% decrease in company-operated comparable restaurant sales, which we believe was primarily related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and a $0.4 million decrease due to temporary closures. This company-operated restaurant sales decrease was partially offset by an increase of $1.4 million of non-comparable restaurant sales on restaurants that

39

had not been open the fifteen months required to be included in comparable restaurant sales and a $0.2 million increase in revenue recognized for our loyalty points program. The company-operated comparable restaurant sales decrease consisted of a decline in transactions of 15.2%, partially offset by a 12.4% increase in average check size.

Franchise Revenue

For the quarter, franchise revenue decreased $1.2 million, or 15.1%, from the comparable period in the prior year. This decrease was primarily due to a franchise comparable restaurant sales decrease of 10.6%, which we believe was primarily due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the closure of eight franchise locations during or subsequent to the second quarter of 2019 and a decrease in fees received from franchised restaurants related to their use of our point-of-sales system. See above under “COVID-19 Impact” for additional information related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business. This franchise revenue decrease was partially offset by the opening of two new franchised restaurants and revenue generated from 16 company-operated restaurants sold by the Company to franchisees during or subsequent to the second quarter of 2019.

Year-to-date, franchise revenue decreased $0.6 million, or 4.0%, from the comparable period in the prior year. This decrease was primarily due to a franchise comparable restaurant sales decrease of 6.4%, which we believe was primarily due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the closure of eight franchise locations during the same period and a decrease in fees received from franchised restaurants related to their use of our point-of-sales system. See above under “COVID-19 Impact” for additional information related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business. This franchise revenue decrease was partially offset by the opening of four new franchised restaurants and revenue generated from 16 company-operated restaurants sold by the Company to franchisees during or subsequent to the first quarter of 2019.

Franchise Advertising Fee Revenue

For the quarter, franchise advertising fee revenue decreased $0.5 million, or 8.9%, from the comparable period in the prior year. Year-to-date, franchise advertising fee revenue decreased $0.4 million, or 3.8%, from the comparable period in the prior year. As advertising fee revenue is a percentage of franchisees’ revenue, both the quarter and year-to-date increases were primarily due to an increase in the number of franchise locations, partially offset by the lower comparable sales discussed above.

Food and Paper Costs

For the quarter, food and paper costs decreased $5.0 million, or 18.0%, from the comparable period in the prior year, primarily due to a $4.3 million decrease in food costs and a $0.7 million decrease in paper costs. Year-to-date, food and paper costs decreased $6.6 million, or 12.0%, from the comparable period in the prior year, due to a $5.6 million decrease in food costs and a $1.0 million decrease in paper costs. The decrease in food and paper costs, for the quarter and year-to-date periods, resulted primarily from lower company transactions, due to the COVID-19 pandemic and lower food waste. For the quarter, food and paper costs as a percentage of company-operated restaurant revenue were 26.1%, down from 27.8% in the comparable period of the prior year. Year-to-date, food and paper costs as a percentage of company-operated restaurant revenue were 26.9%, down from 27.9% in the comparable period of the prior year. The percentage decrease for the quarter and year-to-date periods was due primarily to an increase in pricing, lower food usage and effective waste management, partially offset by commodity inflation and unfavorable sales mix.

Labor and Related Expenses

For the quarter, labor and related expenses decreased $3.5 million, or 12.0%, from the comparable period in the prior year. Year-to-date, labor and related expenses decreased $4.4 million, or 7.5%, from the comparable period in the prior year. The decrease for the quarter and year-to-date periods was due primarily to a reduction in labor by restaurants closed or sold to franchisees, adjustments to the labor model based on dining room closures, operating hours and lower sales volumes and lower group insurance expense due to decreased claims activity. These decreases were partially offset by higher wages primarily due to minimum wage increases in California and, specifically, Los Angeles during fiscal 2019 and 2020.

For the quarter, labor and related expenses as a percentage of company-operated restaurant revenue were 29.4%, up from 29.2% in the comparable period in the prior year. Year-to-date payroll and benefit expenses as a percentage of company-operated restaurant revenue were 30.2%, up from 29.8% in the comparable period in the prior year. The increases for the

40

quarter and year-to-date periods were due primarily to sales deleverage, wage increases in California, specifically, Los Angeles and labor costs associated with the COVID-19 pandemic. Partially offsetting these increases were the positive impacts of an increase in pricing and labor efficiencies.

Occupancy and Other Operating Expenses

For the quarter, occupancy and other operating expenses decreased $1.1 million, or 4.8%, from the comparable period of the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to a $0.5 million decrease in advertising expenses, a $0.5 million decrease in utilities costs, a $0.3 million decrease in credit card fees, primarily related to a decrease in rates and transactions, a $0.3 million decrease in repair and maintenance costs, a $0.1 million decrease in occupancy costs, primarily related to a reduction in rent expense from restaurants closed or sold to franchisees and a $0.3 million decrease in other operating expenses. These decreases were partially offset by a $0.9 million increase in customer order delivery fees payable to third parties due to an increase in delivery orders. Year-to-date, occupancy and other operating expenses decreased $2.2 million, or 4.8%, from the comparable period of the prior year. The decrease was primarily due to a $0.8 million decrease in repair and maintenance costs, a $0.8 million decrease in advertising expenses, a $0.7 million decrease in utilities costs, a $0.6 million decrease in occupancy costs, primarily related to a reduction in rent expense from restaurants closed or sold to franchisees, a $0.3 million decrease in credit card fees primarily related to a decrease in rates and transactions, and a $0.3 million decrease in other operating expenses. These decreases were partially offset by a $1.3 million increase in customer order delivery fees payable to third parties due to an increase in delivery orders.

For the quarter, occupancy and other operating expenses as a percentage of company-operated restaurant revenue were 25.0% up from 23.0% in the comparable period in the prior year. Year-to-date, occupancy and other operating expenses as a percentage of company-operated restaurant revenue were 24.4%, up from 23.4% in the comparable period of the prior year. The increases for the quarter and year-to-date periods resulted primarily from the increases noted above and sales deleverage.

General and Administrative Expenses

For the quarter, general and administrative expenses increased $1.1 million, or 11.9%, from the comparable period in the prior year. The increase for the quarter was due primarily to a $1.9 million increase in legal expenses, primarily related to a $2.5 million settlement accrual related to an agreement in principle to resolve the longstanding lawsuit involving a contract dispute with one of the Company’s franchisees concerning asserted territory rights, partially offset by a $0.7 million decrease in labor related costs, primarily related to a decrease in management bonus expense and a $0.1 million decrease in other general and administrative expenses. Year-to-date, general and administrative expenses decreased $0.9 million, or 4.3%, from the comparable period in the prior year. The decrease for the year-to-date period was due primarily to a $1.3 million decrease in labor related costs, primarily related to a decrease in management bonus expense. This decrease was partially offset by a $0.3 million increase in legal expenses related primarily to a $2.5 million legal settlement accrual, discussed above, partially offset by a decrease in securities class action litigation costs, and a $0.1 million increase in other general and administrative expenses.

For the quarter, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenue were 10.5%, up from 8.2% in the comparable period of the prior year. The percentage increase is primarily due to the decline in revenue, as well as the cost increases discussed above. Year-to-date, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenue were 9.7%, up from 9.3% in the comparable period of the prior year. The percentage increase is primarily due to the decline in revenue, partially offset by the cost decreases discussed above.

Recovery of Securities Class Action Legal Expenses and Other Insurance Claims

During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, we received insurance proceeds of $0.1 million related to a property claim. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, we received insurance proceeds of $10.0 million related to the settlement of the securities class action lawsuit. See Note 7, Commitments and Contingencies, Legal Matters.

Loss on Disposition of Restaurants

During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, we completed the sale of four company-operated restaurants within the San Francisco area to an existing franchisee and seven company-operated restaurants in the

41

Phoenix area to another existing franchisee. We determined that these restaurant dispositions represent multiple element arrangements, and as a result, the cash consideration received was allocated to the separate elements based on their relative selling price. Cash proceeds included upfront consideration for the sale of the restaurants and franchise fees, as well as future cash consideration for royalties and lease payments. We also considered the future lease payments in allocating the initial cash consideration received. The cash consideration per restaurant for franchise fees is consistent with the amounts stated in the related franchise agreements, which are charged for separate standalone arrangements. We initially defer and subsequently recognize the franchise fees over the term of the franchise agreement. Future royalty income is also recognized in revenue as earned.

These sales resulted in cash proceeds of $4.8 million and a net loss on sale of restaurants of $0.9 million and $5.1 million for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, respectively. These restaurants are included in the total number of franchised El Pollo Loco restaurants.

Impairment and Closed-Store Reserves

During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, we recognized a $0.1 million and $2.0 million non-cash impairment charge, primarily related to the carrying value of the ROU assets of one restaurant in Texas and the long-lived assets of three restaurants in California. During each of the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $0.2 million, primarily related to the carrying value of the assets of one restaurant in California. Given the inherent uncertainty in projecting results for newer restaurants in newer markets, as well as the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company is monitoring the recoverability of the carrying value of the assets of several restaurants on an ongoing basis. For these restaurants, if expected performance is not realized, an impairment charge may be recognized in future periods, and such charge could be material.

When a restaurant is closed, we will evaluate the ROU asset for impairment, based on anticipated sublease recoveries. The remaining value of the ROU asset is amortized on a straight-line basis, with the expense recognized in closed-store reserve expense. Additionally, any property tax and CAM payments relating to closed restaurants are included within closed-store expense. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, we recognized $0.4 million and $0.9 million, respectively, of closed-store reserve expense related to the amortization of ROU assets, property taxes and CAM payments for our closed locations. During the twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, we closed one restaurant in California and one restaurant in Texas and recognized $0.3 million and $0.6 million of closed-store reserve expense for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, respectively, primarily related to the amortization of ROU assets, property taxes and CAM payments for our closed locations.

Interest Expense, Net

For each of the quarter and year-to-date periods, interest expense, net, was consistent with the prior period.

Income Tax Receivable Agreement

On July 30, 2014, we entered into the TRA. The TRA calls for us to pay to our pre-IPO stockholders 85% of the savings in cash that we realize in our taxes as a result of utilizing our net operating losses and other tax attributes attributable to preceding periods. For the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020 we recorded income tax receivable agreement expense of $0.3 million and $0.2 million, respectively, and for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019 we recorded income tax receivable agreement income of $0.1 million and income tax receivable agreement expense of $0.1 million, respectively.

Provision for Income Taxes

For the quarter ended June 24, 2020, we recorded an income tax provision of $0.8 million, reflecting an estimated effective tax rate of 12.0%. For the quarter ended June 26, 2019, we recorded an income tax provision of $5.7 million, reflecting an estimated effective tax rate of approximately 28.7%. Year-to-date ended June 24, 2020, we recorded an income tax provision of $2.1 million, reflecting an estimated effective tax rate of approximately 18.4%. Year-to-date ended June 26, 2019 we recorded an income tax provision of $6.0 million, reflecting an estimated effective tax rate of approximately 28.6%%. The difference between the 21.0% statutory rate and the Company’s effective tax rate of 18.4% for the year-to-date ended June 24, 2020 is primarily a result of state taxes, a Work Opportunity Tax Credit benefit, the change in valuation allowance against certain state credits as a result of future forecasted income apportioned to the state

42

jurisdiction, non-deductible executive compensation, changes to total expected TRA payments due to changes in future forecasted taxable income and windfall tax benefit related to stock options exercised, recorded as a discrete item during the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020.

Key Performance Indicators

To evaluate the performance of our business, we utilize a variety of financial and performance measures. These key measures include company-operated restaurant revenue, comparable restaurant sales, company-operated average unit volumes, restaurant contribution, restaurant contribution margin, new restaurant openings, EBITDA, and Adjusted EBITDA.

Company-Operated Restaurant Revenue

Company-operated restaurant revenue consists of sales of food and beverages in company-operated restaurants net of promotional allowances, employee meals, and other discounts. Company-operated restaurant revenue in any period is directly influenced by the number of operating weeks in such period, the number of open restaurants, and comparable restaurant sales.

Seasonal factors and the timing of holidays cause our revenue to fluctuate from quarter to quarter. Our revenue per restaurant is typically lower in the first and fourth quarters due to reduced January and December traffic and higher in the second and third quarters. As a result of seasonality, our quarterly and annual results of operations and key performance indicators such as company-operated restaurant revenue and comparable restaurant sales may fluctuate. In addition, we expect our quarterly company-operated restaurant revenue and comparable restaurant sales to continue to fluctuate significantly due to the current COVID-19 pandemic. See above under “COVID-19 Impact” for additional information related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business.

Comparable Restaurant Sales

Comparable restaurant sales reflect year-over-year sales changes for comparable company-operated, franchised, and system-wide restaurants. A restaurant enters our comparable restaurant base the first full week after it has operated for fifteen months. Comparable restaurant sales exclude restaurants closed during the applicable period. At June 24, 2020 and June 26, 2019, there were 469 and 459 comparable restaurants, 191 and 199 company-operated restaurants and 278 and 260 franchised restaurants, respectively. Comparable restaurant sales indicate the performance of existing restaurants, since new restaurants are excluded.

Comparable restaurant sales growth can be generated by an increase in the number of meals sold and/or by increases in the average check amount, resulting from a shift in menu mix and/or higher prices resulting from new products or price increases.

Company-Operated Average Unit Volumes

We measure company-operated average unit volumes (“AUVs”) on both a weekly and an annual basis. Weekly AUVs consist of comparable restaurant sales over a seven-day period from Thursday to Wednesday. Annual AUVs are calculated using the following methodology: First, we divide our total net sales for all company-operated restaurants for the fiscal year by the total number of restaurant operating weeks during the same period. Second, we annualize that average weekly per-restaurant sales figure by multiplying it by 52. An operating week is defined as a restaurant open for business over a seven-day period from Thursday to Wednesday. This measurement allows management to assess changes in consumer spending patterns at our restaurants and the overall performance of our restaurant base.

Restaurant Contribution and Restaurant Contribution Margin

Restaurant contribution and restaurant contribution margin are neither required by, nor presented in accordance with, GAAP. Restaurant contribution is defined as company-operated restaurant revenue less company restaurant expenses which includes food and paper cost, labor and related expenses and occupancy and other operating expenses, where applicable. Restaurant contribution excludes certain costs, such as general and administrative expenses, depreciation and amortization, impairment and closed-store reserve and other costs that are considered normal operating costs and accordingly, restaurant contribution is not indicative of overall Company results and does not accrue directly to the

43

benefit of stockholders because of the exclusion of certain corporate-level expenses. Restaurant contribution margin is defined as restaurant contribution as a percentage of net company-operated restaurant revenue.

Restaurant contribution and restaurant contribution margin are supplemental measures of operating performance of our restaurants, and our calculations thereof may not be comparable to those reported by other companies. Restaurant contribution and restaurant contribution margin have limitations as analytical tools, and you should not consider them in isolation, or superior to, or as substitutes for the analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Management uses restaurant contribution and restaurant contribution margin as key metrics to evaluate the profitability of incremental sales at our restaurants, to evaluate our restaurant performance across periods, and to evaluate our restaurant financial performance compared with our competitors. Management believes that restaurant contribution and restaurant contribution margin are important tools for investors, because they are widely-used metrics within the restaurant industry to evaluate restaurant-level productivity, efficiency, and performance. Restaurant contribution and restaurant contribution margin may also assist investors in evaluating our business and performance relative to industry peers and provide greater transparency with respect to the Company’s financial condition and results of operation.

A reconciliation of restaurant contribution and restaurant contribution margin to company-operated restaurant revenue is provided below:

	Thirteen Weeks Ended						Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
(Dollar amounts in thousands)	June 24, 2020			June 26, 2019			June 24, 2020			June 26, 2019
Restaurant contribution:
Income from operations	$	7,449		$	20,580		$	13,135		$	22,872
Add (less):
General and administrative expenses		10,465			9,348			19,796			20,696
Franchise expenses		6,627			7,542			13,538			13,686
Depreciation and amortization		4,168			4,454			8,537			9,215
Loss on disposal of assets		27			134			127			178
Franchise revenue		(6,719)			(7,918)			(13,781)			(14,362)
Franchise advertising fee revenue		(5,178)			(5,683)			(10,645)			(11,066)
Recovery of securities lawsuits related legal expenses and other insurance claims		(123)			(10,000)			(123)			(10,000)
Impairment and closed-store reserves		437			565			2,839			874
Loss on sale of restaurants		—			927			—			5,051
Restaurant contribution	$	17,153		$	19,949		$	33,423		$	37,144
Company-operated restaurant revenue:
Total revenue	$	99,604		$	113,740		$	204,767		$	222,717
Less:
Franchise revenue		(6,719)			(7,918)			(13,781)			(14,362)
Franchise advertising fee revenue		(5,178)			(5,683)			(10,645)			(11,066)
Company-operated restaurant revenue	$	87,707		$	100,139		$	180,341		$	197,289
Restaurant contribution margin (%)		19.6	%		19.9	%		18.5	%		18.8	%

New Restaurant Openings

The number of restaurant openings reflects the number of new restaurants opened by us and our franchisees during a particular reporting period. Before a new restaurant opens, we and our franchisees incur pre-opening costs, as described below. New restaurants often open with an initial start-up period of higher than normal sales volumes, which subsequently decrease to stabilized levels. New restaurants typically experience normal inefficiencies in the form of higher food and paper, labor, and other direct operating expenses and, as a result, restaurant contribution margins are generally lower during the start-up period of operation. The average start-up period after which our new restaurants’ revenue and expenses normalize is approximately fourteen weeks. When we enter new markets, we may be exposed to start-up times and restaurant contribution margins that are longer and lower than reflected in our average historical experience.

44

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA

EBITDA represents net income before interest expense, provision for income taxes, depreciation, and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA represents net income before interest expense, provision for income taxes, depreciation, amortization, and items that we do not consider representative of our on-going operating performance, as identified in the reconciliation table below.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA as presented in this report are supplemental measures of our performance that are neither required by, nor presented in accordance with, GAAP. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are not measurements of our financial performance under GAAP and should not be considered as alternatives to net income, operating income, or any other performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP, or as alternatives to cash flow from operating activities as a measure of our liquidity. In addition, in evaluating EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, you should be aware that in the future we will incur expenses or charges such as those added back to calculate EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA. Our presentation of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be construed as an inference that our future results will be unaffected by unusual or nonrecurring items.

EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA have limitations as analytical tools, and you should not consider them in isolation, or as substitutes for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are (i) they do not reflect our cash expenditures, or future requirements for capital expenditures or contractual commitments, (ii) they do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs, (iii) they do not reflect the significant interest expense, or the cash requirements necessary to service interest or principal payments, on our debt, (iv) although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized will often have to be replaced in the future, and EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA do not reflect any cash requirements for such replacements, (v) they do not adjust for all non-cash income or expense items that are reflected in our statements of cash flows, (vi) they do not reflect the impact of earnings or charges resulting from matters we consider not to be indicative of our on-going operations, and (vii) other companies in our industry may calculate these measures differently than we do, limiting their usefulness as comparative measures.

We compensate for these limitations by providing specific information regarding the GAAP amounts excluded from such non-GAAP financial measures. We further compensate for the limitations in our use of non-GAAP financial measures by presenting comparable GAAP measures more prominently.

We believe that EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA facilitate operating performance comparisons from period to period by isolating the effects of some items that vary from period to period without any correlation to core operating performance or that vary widely among similar companies. These potential differences may be caused by variations in capital structures (affecting interest expense), tax positions (such as the impact on periods or companies of changes in effective tax rates or net operating losses) and the age and book depreciation of facilities and equipment (affecting relative depreciation expense). We also present EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA because (i) we believe that these measures are frequently used by securities analysts, investors and other interested parties to evaluate companies in our industry, (ii) we believe that investors will find these measures useful in assessing our ability to service or incur indebtedness, and (iii) we use EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA internally for a number of benchmarks including to compare our performance to that of our competitors and for compensation performance benchmarks.

45

The following table sets forth reconciliations of EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to our net income:

	Thirteen Weeks Ended				Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
(Amounts in thousands)	June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019		June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019
Net income	$	5,499	$	14,087	$	9,099	$	15,000
Non-GAAP adjustments:
Provision for income taxes		752		5,665		2,053		6,014
Interest expense, net of interest income		908		922		1,813		1,781
Depreciation and amortization		4,168		4,454		8,537		9,215
EBITDA	$	11,327	$	25,128	$	21,502	$	32,010
Stock-based compensation expense (a)		727		641		1,261		1,129
Loss on disposal of assets (b)		27		134		127		178
Recovery of securities lawsuits related legal expense and other insurance claims (c)		(123)		(10,000)		(123)		(10,000)
Impairment and closed-store reserves (d)		437		565		2,839		874
Loss on disposition of restaurants (e)		—		927		—		5,051
Income tax receivable agreement expense (income) (f)		290		(94)		170		77
Securities class action legal expense (g)		37		491		238		2,630
Legal settlements (h)		2,499		—		2,566		—
Pre-opening costs (i)		59		35		110		35
Executive transition costs (j)		—		63		—		100
Adjusted EBITDA	$	15,280	$	17,890	$	28,690	$	32,084

(a) Includes non-cash, stock-based compensation.

(b) Loss on disposal of assets includes the loss on disposal of assets related to retirements and replacement or write-off of leasehold improvements or equipment.

(c) During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, we received insurance proceeds of $0.1 million related to a property claim. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, we received insurance proceeds of $10.0 million related to the settlement of the securities class action lawsuit. See Note 7, “Commitments and Contingencies, Legal Matters.”

(d) Includes costs related to impairment of long-lived assets and closing restaurants. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, we recognized a $0.1 million and $2.0 million non-cash impairment charge, primarily related to the carrying value of the ROU assets of one restaurant in Texas and the long-lived assets of three restaurants in California. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, we recorded a non-cash impairment charge of $0.2 million, primarily related to the carrying value of the assets of one restaurant in California. Given the difficulty in projecting results for newer restaurants in newer markets, as well as the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company is monitoring the recoverability of the carrying value of the assets of several restaurants on an ongoing basis. For these restaurants, if expected performance is not realized, an impairment charge may be recognized in future periods, and such charge could be material.

When a restaurant is closed, we will evaluate the ROU asset for impairment, based on anticipated sublease recoveries. The remaining value of the ROU asset is amortized on a straight-line basis, with the expense recognized in closed-store reserve expense. Additionally, any property tax and CAM payments relating to closed restaurants are included within closed-store expense. During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, we recognized $0.4 million and $0.9 million, respectively, of closed-store reserve expense related to the amortization of ROU assets, property taxes and CAM payments for our closed locations. During the twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, we closed one restaurant in California and one restaurant in Texas, and recognized $0.3 million and $0.6 million of closed-store reserve expense for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, respectively, primarily related to the amortization of ROU assets, property taxes and CAM payments for our closed locations.

(e) During the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, we completed the sale of four company-operated restaurants within the San Francisco area to an existing franchisee and seven company-operated restaurants in the Phoenix area to another existing franchisee. These sales resulted in cash proceeds of $4.8 million and a net loss on sale of restaurants of $0.9 million and $5.1 million for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, respectively. These restaurants are now included in our franchised restaurant totals.

(f) On July 30, 2014, we entered into the TRA. This agreement calls for us to pay to our pre-IPO stockholders 85% of the savings in cash that we realize in our taxes as a result of utilizing our net operating losses and other tax attributes

46

attributable to preceding periods. For the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020 and June 26, 2019, income tax receivable agreement expense (income) consisted of the amortization of interest expense and changes in estimates for actual tax returns filed, related to our total expected TRA payments.

(g) Consists of costs related to the defense of securities lawsuits. See "Note 7, Commitments and Contingencies, Legal Matters."

(h) Includes an accrual related to an agreement in principle to resolve the longstanding lawsuit involving a contract dispute with one of the Company’s franchisees concerning asserted territory rights, as well as amounts incurred related to the payment of the final settlement amounts for consolidated wage and hour class action lawsuits resolved in prior quarters.

(i) Pre-opening costs are a component of general and administrative expenses, and consist of costs directly associated with the opening of new restaurants and incurred prior to opening, including management labor costs, staff labor costs during training, food and supplies used during training, marketing costs, and other related pre-opening costs. These are generally incurred over the three to five months prior to opening. Pre-opening costs also include occupancy costs incurred between the date of possession and the opening date for a restaurant.

(j) Includes costs associated with the transition of our CEO, such as CEO sign-on bonus.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary sources of liquidity and capital resources have been cash provided from operations, cash and cash equivalents, and the 2018 Revolver. Our primary requirements for liquidity and capital are new restaurants, existing restaurant capital investments (remodels and maintenance), interest payments on our debt, lease obligations, and working capital and general corporate needs. However, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have temporarily suspended all new restaurants and capital investments. Our working capital requirements are not significant, since our customers pay for their purchases in cash or by payment card (credit or debit) at the time of sale. Thus, we are able to sell many of our inventory items before we have to pay our suppliers for them. Our restaurants do not require significant inventories or receivables. We believe that our sources of liquidity and capital are sufficient to finance our continued operations for at least the next twelve months from the filing of the condensed consolidated financial statements. However, depending on the severity and longevity of the COVID-19 pandemic, the efforts taken to reduce its spread (including government-mandated closures of our dining rooms) and the possibility of a subsequent resurgence of the COVID-19 outbreak after the current outbreak subsides, our financial performance and liquidity could be further impacted and could impact our ability to meet certain financial covenants required in our 2018 Credit Agreement, specifically the lease-adjusted coverage ratio and fixed-charge coverage ratio.

The following table presents summary cash flow information for the periods indicated.

	Twenty-Six Weeks Ended
(Amounts in thousands)	June 24, 2020		June 26, 2019
Net cash provided by (used in)
Operating activities	$	11,082	$	12,859
Investing activities		(2,479)		(1,128)
Financing activities		43,669		(7,419)
Net increase in cash	$	52,272	$	4,312

Operating Activities

For the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, net cash provided by operating activities decreased by approximately $1.8 million from the comparable period of the prior year. This was due primarily to a decline in profitability after non-cash items, which we believe related to the COVID-19 pandemic, and unfavorable working capital fluctuations.

Investing Activities

For the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, net cash used in investing activities increased by $1.4 million from the comparable period of the prior year. This was due primarily to cash proceeds of $4.8 million received during the twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019 related to the sale of four company-operated restaurants within the San Francisco area to an existing franchisee and seven company-operated restaurants in the Phoenix area to another existing franchisee. In addition, there was one new company restaurant, which was in process prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, and no

47

remodels completed in twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020 and no new company stores and three remodels completed in the twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019.

Given the uncertainty surrounding the severity and longevity of the COVID-19 pandemic, as a precautionary measure we have significantly reduced capital spending.

Financing Activities

For the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, net cash provided by financing activities increased by $51.1 million from the comparable period of the prior year. This increase was due primarily to an increase in net borrowings of $30.8 million on the 2018 Revolver during the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, primarily as a precautionary measure to bolster our existing cash position in light of the current COVID-19 pandemic, as well as to provide for the $16.3 million litigation settlement payment. In addition, for the twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019, the Company had $18.2 million of cash outflow related to stock buybacks.

Debt and Other Obligations

On July 13, 2018, the Company entered into the 2018 Credit Agreement, which provides for the 2018 Revolver to refinance the previous 2014 Revolver. The 2018 Revolver includes a sub limit of $15.0 million for letters of credit and a sub limit of $15.0 million for swingline loans. The 2018 Revolver and 2018 Credit Agreement will mature on July 13, 2023. The obligations under the 2018 Credit Agreement and related loan documents are guaranteed by the Company and Intermediate. The obligations of the Company, EPL and Intermediate under the 2018 Credit Agreement and related loan documents are secured by a first priority lien on substantially all of their respective assets.

Under the 2018 Revolver, Holdings may not make certain payments such as cash dividends, except that it may, inter alia, (i) pay up to $1.0 million per year to repurchase or redeem qualified equity interests of Holdings held by past or present officers, directors, or employees (or their estates) of the Company upon death, disability, or termination of employment, (ii) pay under its TRA, and, (iii) so long as no default or event of default has occurred and is continuing, (a) make non-cash repurchases of equity interests in connection with the exercise of stock options by directors, officers and management, provided that those equity interests represent a portion of the consideration of the exercise price of those stock options, (b) pay up to $0.5 million in any 12 month consecutive period to redeem, repurchase or otherwise acquire equity interests of any subsidiary that is not a wholly-owned subsidiary from any holder of equity interest in such subsidiary, (c) pay up to $2.5 million per year pursuant to stock option plans, employment agreements, or incentive plans, (d) make up to $5.0 million in other restricted payments per year, and (e) make other restricted payments, subject to its compliance, on a pro forma basis, with (x) a lease-adjusted consolidated leverage ratio not to exceed 4.25 times and (y) the financial covenants applicable to the 2018 Revolver.

Borrowings under the 2018 Credit Agreement (other than any swingline loans) bear interest, at the borrower’s option, at rates based upon either LIBOR or a base rate, plus, for each rate, a margin determined in accordance with a lease-adjusted consolidated leverage ratio-based pricing grid. The base rate is calculated as the highest of (a) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, (b) the published Bank of America prime rate, or (c) LIBOR plus 1.00%. For LIBOR loans, the margin is in the range of 1.25% to 2.25%, and for base rate loans the margin is in a range of 0.25% to 1.25%. Borrowings under the 2018 Revolver may be repaid and reborrowed. The interest rate range was 1.67% to 3.11% and 1.67% to 3.29% for the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020, respectively, and 3.90% to 6.00% for each of the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended June 26, 2019.

The 2018 Credit Agreement contains certain financial covenants. The Company was in compliance with the financial covenants as of June 24, 2020. However, depending on the severity and longevity of the COVID-19 pandemic, the efforts taken to reduce its spread and the possibility of a resurgence of the COVID-19 outbreak after the initial outbreak subside, the Company’s financial performance and liquidity could be further impacted and could impact the Company’s ability to comply with certain financial covenants required in our 2018 Credit Agreement, specifically the lease-adjusted coverage ratio and fixed-charge coverage ratio.

At June 24, 2020, $11.1 million of letters of credit and $138.8 million of borrowings were outstanding under the 2018 Revolver. There were $0.1 million remaining borrowings available under the 2018 Revolver at June 24, 2020.

48

During the year ended December 25, 2019, we entered into an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $40.0 million, related to the outstanding borrowings under our 2018 Revolver. The interest rate swap was designated as a cash flow hedge and effectively converted a portion of our outstanding borrowings to a fixed rate of 1.31%, plus the applicable margin spread, which is currently 1.5%. The interest rate swap matures in June 2023.

Contractual Obligations

Our contractual obligations outstanding on June 24, 2020 have not changed materially since those disclosed under “Debt and Other Obligations – Contractual Obligations” in Part II, Item 7 of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2019 other than an increase in net borrowings of $41.8 million on the 2018 Revolver during the twenty-six weeks ended June 24, 2020 and the impact of our delay in making April, May and June rent payments on the majority of our leased properties. Refer to COVID-19 impact in "Overview" section above for additional information. Our contractual commitments relate to future (i) debt payments, including expected interest expense, calculated based on current interest rates, (ii) restaurant operating lease payments, (iii) income tax receivable agreement payments, and (iv) purchasing commitments for chicken.

Off-Balance Sheet and Other Arrangements

As of June 24, 2020, and December 25, 2019, we were using $11.1 million of borrowing capacity on the 2018 Revolver for letters of credit in support of our insurance programs, as well as to support our Surety demand related to an appeal bond used to secure a judgment against the Company. See additional information presented in "Note 7 Commitments and Contingencies—Legal Matters" in the accompanying "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements."

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Interest Rate Risk

We are exposed to market risk from changes in the interest rate on our debt, which bears interest, at our option, at rates based on LIBOR or a base rate, plus, for each rate, a margin determined in accordance with the terms of the 2018 Credit Agreement. For LIBOR loans, the margin is in the range of 1.25% and 2.25%. As of June 24, 2020, we had outstanding borrowings of $138.8 million under our 2018 Revolver, $11.1 million of letters of credit in support of our insurance programs, and the applicable margin on outstanding borrowings under 2018 Revolver was 1.5%. In addition, there is currently uncertainty around whether LIBOR will continue to exist after 2021. If LIBOR ceases to exist, we may need to enter into an amendment to the 2018 Credit Agreement and we cannot predict what alternative index would be negotiated with our lenders. If our lenders have increased costs due to changes in LIBOR, we may experience potential increases in interest rates on our variable rate debt, which could adversely impact our interest expense, results of operations and cash flows. After giving effect to the $40.0 million of interest rate swaps, we effectively had $98.8 million of long-term debt subject to variations in interest rates and a one percent increase in the variable rate of interest would increase annual interest expense by $1.0 million.

We manage our interest rate risk through normal operating and financing activities and, when determined appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. To balance our portfolio, we entered into an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $40.0 million, related to the outstanding borrowings under our 2018 Revolver. The interest rate swap was designated as a cash flow hedge and effectively converted a portion of our outstanding borrowings to a fixed rate of 1.31%, plus applicable margin, which is currently 1.5%. The interest rate swap matures in June 2023.

Inflation

Inflation has an impact on food, paper, construction, utility, labor and benefits, general and administrative, and other costs, all of which can materially impact our operations. We have a substantial number of hourly employees who are paid wage rates at or based on the applicable federal, state, or local minimum wage, and increases in the minimum wage will increase our labor costs. In general, we have been able to substantially offset cost increases resulting from inflation by increasing menu prices, managing menu mix, improving productivity, or making other adjustments. We may not be able to offset cost increases in the future.

49

Commodity Price Risk

We are exposed to market price fluctuation in food product prices. Given the historical volatility of certain of our food product prices, including chicken, other proteins, grains, produce, dairy products, and cooking oil, these fluctuations can materially impact our food and beverage costs. While our purchasing commitments partially mitigate the risk of such fluctuations, there is no assurance that supply and demand factors such as disease or inclement weather will not cause the prices of the commodities used in our restaurant operations to fluctuate. In periods when the prices of commodities drop, we may pay higher prices under our purchasing commitments. In rapidly fluctuating commodities markets, it may prove difficult for us to adjust our menu prices in accordance with input price fluctuations. Therefore, to the extent that we do not pass along cost increases to our customers, our results of operations may be adversely affected. At this time, we do not use financial instruments to hedge our commodity risk.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our disclosure controls and procedures are based on assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives. Because of their inherent limitations, we cannot guarantee that our disclosure controls and procedures will succeed in achieving their stated objectives in all cases, that they will be complied with in all cases, or that they will prevent or detect all misstatements.

Our management has evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective, at the reasonable assurance level, as of June 24, 2020.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No changes in our internal control over financial reporting occurred during the quarter ended June 24, 2020 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

50

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

For information regarding legal proceedings, see "Note 7. Commitments and Contingencies—Legal Matters" in the accompanying "Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements" in this Quarterly Report, which information is incorporated by reference into this Item 1.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 25, 2019 filed with the SEC on March 6, 2020 and our quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 25, 2020 filed with the SEC on May 1, 2020, except for the revision of the risk factor that immediately follows.

The resale of shares of common stock currently held by Trimaran Pollo Partners, L.L.C. could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Our largest stockholder, Trimaran Pollo Partners, L.L.C. (the “LLC”), holds 16,746,544 shares, or approximately 47.7%, of our outstanding common stock as of the date of this report. Members of the LLC include affiliates of Trimaran and Freeman Spogli. Pursuant to the terms of the LLC’s limited liability company operating agreement (the “LLC Agreement”), the LLC agreement can terminate, in which case the LLC will begin the process of dissolving and winding up its affairs, at the earlier of (i) the election of the managing member, or (ii) six years following the completion of our initial public offering, or July 27, 2020. We expect the process of winding up of the LLC and distribution of the Company’s shares to begin on or after July 27, 2020. If all or a substantial portion of these shares are resold into the public markets, or if it is perceived that they will be resold, the trading price of our common stock could decline.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Item 3. Defaults of Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

None.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

51

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibit Index

Number	Description	Filed Herewith	Form	Period Ended	Exhibit	Filing Date	SEC File Number
3.1	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.		10-Q	6/25/2014	3.1	9/5/2014	001-36556
3.2	Amended and Restated By-Laws of El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.		10-Q	6/25/2014	3.2	9/5/2014	001-36556
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer under section 302 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002	X
31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer under section 302 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002	X
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer under 18 U.S.C. section 1350, adopted by section 906 of the Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002	*
101.INS	Inline XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document	X
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document	X
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document	X
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document	X
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document	X
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document	X
104	Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)	X

* Pursuant to Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K (17 C.F.R. § 229.601(b)(32)(ii)), this certification is deemed furnished, not filed, for purposes of section 18 of the Exchange Act, nor is it otherwise subject to liability under that section. It will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except if the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

52

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	El Pollo Loco Holdings, Inc.
	(Registrant)
July 31, 2020	/s/ Bernard Acoca
Date	Bernard Acoca
	President and Chief Executive Officer
	(duly authorized officer)
July 31, 2020	/s/ Laurance Roberts
Date	Laurance Roberts
	Chief Financial Officer
	(principal financial officer)

53