| SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES: | NOTE 2 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
a.
Principles of consolidation The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Foamix and its subsidiary. Intercompany balances and transactions including profits from intercompany sales not yet realized outside the Company, have been eliminated upon consolidation.
b.
Fair value measurement Fair value is based on the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or that would be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In order to increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements, the guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable and unobservable inputs used to measure fair value into three broad levels, which are described as follows: Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for assets or liabilities. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to Level 1 inputs. Level 2: Observable prices that are based on inputs not quoted on active markets, but corroborated by market data or active market data of similar or identical assets or liabilities. Level 3: Unobservable inputs are used when little or no market data is available. The fair value hierarchy gives the lowest priority to Level 3 inputs. In determining fair value, the Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs to the extent possible and considers counterparty credit risk in its assessment of fair value.
c.
Loss per share Net loss per share, basic and diluted, is computed on the basis of the net loss for the year divided by the weighted average number of Ordinary shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is based upon the weighted average number of Ordinary shares and of Ordinary share equivalents outstanding when dilutive. Ordinary share equivalents include outstanding share options and warrants which are included under the treasury share method when dilutive. The following share options, restricted share units (“RSUs”) and warrants were excluded from the calculation of diluted net loss per ordinary share because their effect would have been anti-dilutive for the periods presented (share data):
Six and three months ended June 30,
2018
2017
Outstanding share options and RSUs
4,911,985
3,382,102
Warrants
-
1,394,558
d.
Newly issued and recently adopted accounting pronouncements: Accounting pronouncements adopted in period: 1) In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which will supersede existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is that a company should recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 defines a five-step process that requires companies to exercise more judgment and make more estimates than under the current guidance. These may include identifying performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price, and allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligation. The Company generates revenue primarily from its development and licensing agreements. The consideration the Company is eligible to receive under its agreements typically include upfront payments, reimbursement for research and development costs, contingent payments, royalties and other contingent payments for the achievement of certain sales targets. The Company adopted the guidance as of January 1, 2018, under the modified retrospective method, however, as the current revenue of the Company is driven primarily from royalties and contingent payments as mentioned above, the Company’s adoption of the new standard did not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements. 2) In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10), which addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation and disclosure of financial instruments. The amended guidance requires changes in the fair value of equity investments to be recognized through net income, rather than other comprehensive income. Adoption of the standard will be applied through a cumulative one-time adjustment to retained earnings. This standard was adopted on January 1, 2018 and its accumulative adjustment had no material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. In addition, in February 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-03 which includes technical corrections and improvements to clarify the guidance in ASU No. 2016-01. This standard, adopted as of January 1, 2018, had no material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. 3) In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting. ASU 2017-09 was issued to provide clarity and reduce both 1) diversity in practice and 2) cost and complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718 to a change in the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. ASU 2017-09 provides guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting under Topic 718. The amendments in ASU 2017-09 are applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. This standard, adopted as of January 1, 2018, had no material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. 4) In March 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-05, Income Taxes (Topic 740), to insert the Securities and Exchange Commission's interpretive guidance from Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 into the income tax accounting codification under U.S. GAAP. The ASU permits companies to use provisional amounts for certain income tax effects of the Tax Act during a one-year measurement period. The provisional accounting impacts for the Company may change in future reporting periods until the accounting analysis is finalized, however the Company anticipates that the adoption of the new standard will not have material effect on its consolidated financial statements. Accounting
pronouncements that are not yet effective and have not been early adopted by the Company: 5) In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which supersedes the existing guidance for lease accounting, Leases (Topic 840). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize leases on their balance sheets, and leaves lessor accounting largely unchanged. Subsequently, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-13, in September 2017 and ASU No. 2018-01, in January 2018, which amends and clarifies ASU 2016-02. The amendments in this ASU are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early application is permitted for all entities. ASU 2016-02 requires a modified retrospective approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to elect to use certain transition relief. The Company is currently reviewing its lease contracts and began analyzing the standard and identify potential differences and changes which would result from applying the requirements of the new standard. The Company currently anticipates that the adoption will result an increase in assets and liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet and will not have a material impact on our consolidated statement of operation or consolidated statement of cash flows. 6) In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. This ASU significantly changes how entities will measure credit losses for most financial assets and certain other instruments that aren’t measured at fair value through net income. The standard will replace today’s “incurred loss” approach with an “expected loss” model. The new model, referred to as the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model, will apply to: (1) financial assets subject to credit losses and measured at amortized cost, and (2) certain off-balance sheet credit exposures. This includes, but is not limited to, loans, leases, held-to-maturity securities, loan commitments and financial guarantees. The CECL model does not apply to available-for-sale (“AFS”) debt securities. For AFS debt securities with unrealized losses, entities will measure credit losses in a manner similar to what they do today, except that the losses will be recognized as allowances rather than reductions in the amortized cost of the securities. As a result, entities will recognize improvements to estimated credit losses immediately in earnings rather than as interest income over time, as they do today. The ASU also simplifies the accounting model for purchased credit-impaired debt securities and loans. ASU 2016-13 also expands the disclosure requirements regarding an entity’s assumptions, models and methods for estimating the allowance for loan and lease losses. In addition, entities will need to disclose the amortized cost balance for each class of financial asset by credit quality indicator, disaggregated by the year of origination. ASU No. 2016-13 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019; early adoption is permitted for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Entities will apply the standard’s provisions as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective (i.e., modified retrospective approach). The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements. 7) In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-08, Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities. This new standard amends the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium by shortening the amortization period for the premium to the earliest call date. The new standard will be effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company anticipates that the adoption of the new standard will not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements. 8) In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging – Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. This new standard aims to better align a company’s financial reporting for hedging activities with the economic objectives of those activities. The updated standard will be effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018 and must be applied using a modified retrospective approach; however, early adoption of the ASU is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements. 9) In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Improvements to Nonemployee Share-based Payments. This ASU was issued to simplify the accounting for share-based transactions by expanding the scope of Topic 718 from only being applicable to share-based payments to employees to also include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees. As a result, nonemployee share-based transactions will be measured by estimating the fair value of the equity instruments at the grant date, taking into consideration the probability of satisfying performance conditions. This ASU is effective for annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this new standard on its consolidated financial statements, although the impact is currently expected to be immaterial. |
