Explanatory Note
Foamix Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (the “Company” or “Foamix”) filed its definitive proxy statement (the “Proxy Statement”) with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on January 7, 2020 relating to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of November 10, 2019 (as amended by Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of December 4, 2019, as may be further amended from time to time, the “Merger Agreement”), by and among the Company, Menlo Therapeutics Inc. (“Menlo”) and Giants Merger Subsidiary Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Menlo (“Merger Sub”). Pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement, Merger Sub will merge with and into Foamix, with Foamix surviving as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Menlo (the “Merger”).
Shareholder Litigation
As previously disclosed in the Proxy Statement and the Additional Definitive Materials (the “Additional Materials”) filed on January 10, 2020, on December 11, 2019 and December 18, 2019, purported shareholders of Foamix filed putative class action lawsuits against the members of the Company’s board of directors (the “Foamix Board”), Foamix, Menlo and Merger Sub in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware and the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, respectively, and on December 12, 2019, December 17, 2019, December 20, 2019 and January 7, 2020, purported shareholders of Foamix filed individual lawsuits against the members of the Foamix Board and Foamix. The lawsuits filed on December 12, 2019 and January 7, 2020 were filed in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey and the lawsuits filed on December 17, 2019 and December 20, 2019 were filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.
On January 21, 2020, a purported shareholder of Foamix filed an individual action against Foamix and the Foamix Board in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey under the captionNam v. Foamix Pharmaceuticals Ltd., et al., Case No.3:20-cv-00670 (D.N.J.) (the “NamAction”). TheNamAction generally claims that the Proxy Statement issued in connection with the Merger omitted material information in violation of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act. TheNamAction seeks, among other things, injunctive relief to prevent consummation of the Merger, rescission or rescissory damages in the event the Merger is consummated, a declaration that defendants violated Sections 14(a) and/or 20(a) of the Exchange Act, costs, including attorneys’ fees and such other and further relief as the court may deem just and proper. In addition, theNamAction requests an order directing the individual defendants to disseminate a proxy statement that does not contain any untrue statements of material fact and that states all material facts necessary to make the statements contained therein not misleading.
While the Company believes that the disclosures set forth in the Proxy Statement and the Additional Materials comply fully with applicable law, in order to avoid nuisance, cost and distraction that may result from litigation, and to preclude any efforts to delay the extraordinary general meeting of shareholders and closing, the Company has determined to voluntarily supplement the Proxy Statement with the supplemental disclosures set forth below (the “Supplemental Disclosures”). Nothing in the Supplemental Disclosures shall be deemed an admission of the legal necessity or materiality under applicable laws of any of the disclosures set forth herein.
Supplemental Disclosures to the Proxy Statement
The following supplemental information should be read in conjunction with the Proxy Statement and the Additional Materials, which should be read in their entirety. To the extent that information herein differs from or updates information contained in the Proxy Statement or the Additional Materials, the information contained herein supersedes the information contained in the Proxy Statement and the Additional Materials. All page references are to pages in the Proxy Statement, and terms used below, unless otherwise defined, have the meanings set forth in the Proxy Statement.
1