The following language appeared as Item 8.01 Other Events on Civitas Solutions, Inc.’s Form8-K filed on February 28, 2019:
As previously disclosed, on December 18, 2018, Civitas Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”) entered into the Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), by and among the Company, Celtic Intermediate Corp. (“Parent”), and Celtic Tier II Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”), providing for the merger of Merger Sub with and into the Company (the “Merger”) with the Company surviving the Merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent. On February 14, 2019, the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) a definitive proxy statement (the “Definitive Proxy Statement”) with respect to the special meeting of the Company’s stockholders scheduled to be held on March 7, 2019, in connection with the Merger (the “Special Meeting”).
Litigation Related to the Merger
In connection with the Merger, a putative class action lawsuit,Scarantino v. Civitas Solutions, Inc., et al., CaseNo. 1:19-cv-00349-UNA, was filed on February 19, 2019, against the Company and its directors in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The complaint generally alleges that the Definitive Proxy Statement misrepresents and/or omits certain purportedly material information relating to the financial analyses performed by Barclays Capital Inc., the Company’s financial advisor, in connection with its fairness opinion delivered to the Company Board of Directors. The complaint alleges that such misrepresentations and/or omissions render the proxy statement false and misleading and accordingly alleges violations of Section 14(a) and Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), as well as Rule14a-9 promulgated under the Exchange Act. The complaint seeks, among other things, an injunction against the consummation of the Merger, costs of the action, including plaintiff’s attorneys’ and experts’ fees, declaratory relief, and any other relief the Court may deem just and proper.
While the Company believes that theScarantinoaction lacks any merit and that the disclosures in the Definitive Proxy Statement comply fully with applicable law, in order to avoid the expense and distraction of litigation the Company has determined to voluntarily supplement the Definitive Proxy Statement with the supplemental disclosures set forth below (the “Supplemental Disclosures”).
Nothing in the Supplemental Disclosures shall be deemed an admission of the legal necessity or materiality under applicable law of the Supplemental Disclosures. To the contrary, the Company specifically denies all allegations that any of the Supplemental Disclosures, or any other additional disclosures, were or are required.
The Company’s Board of Directors continues to unanimously recommend that you vote “FOR” the adoption of the Merger Agreement and “FOR” the other proposals being considered at the Special Meeting.
Supplemental Disclosures to Definitive Proxy Statement
These Supplemental Disclosures should be read in conjunction with the Definitive Proxy Statement, which should be read in its entirety. All page references in the information below are to pages in the Definitive Proxy Statement, and all capitalized terms used below shall have the meanings set forth in the Definitive Proxy Statement. Paragraph references used herein refer to the Definitive Proxy Statement before any additions or deletions resulting from the Supplemental Disclosures. As noted in the Definitive Proxy Statement, Barclays’ opinion was necessarily based upon market, economic and other conditions as they existed on, and could be evaluated as of, December 18, 2018. Barclays assumed no responsibility for updating or revising its opinion based on events or circumstances that may have occurred after December 18, 2018, and Barclays has not updated or revised its opinion subsequent to such date.
The Section of the Proxy Statement titled “The Merger—Opinion of the Company’s Financial Advisor—Summary of Material Financial Analyses—Discounted Cash Flow Analysis” is hereby supplemented by amending the paragraph on Page 50 that begins “To calculate the estimated enterprise value…” to insert the underlined words in the following sentence:
Barclays then calculated a range of implied prices per share of Civitas common stock by subtracting net debt as of September 30, 2018of $704 million from the estimated enterprise value using the discounted cash flow method and dividing the range of results of such subtraction by the fully diluted number of shares of Civitas common stockof 37.5 million based on information provided by the management of Civitas.