Summary of Significant Accounting Policies | Note 3 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies The accompanying consolidated financial statements of the Company are prepared on the accrual basis of accounting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Reclassifications Certain prior year amounts related to restricted cash have been reclassified to conform with recently adopted accounting pronouncements. Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, its wholly-owned subsidiaries and consolidated joint venture arrangements in which the Company has controlling financial interests. The portions of the consolidated joint venture arrangements not owned by the Company are presented as non-controlling interests as of and during the period consolidated. All inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company evaluates its relationships and investments to determine if it has variable interests. A variable interest is an investment or other interest that will absorb portions of an entity's expected losses or receive portions of the entity's expected residual returns. If the Company determines that it has a variable interest in an entity, it evaluates whether such interest is in a variable interest entity ("VIE"). A VIE is broadly defined as an entity where either (1) the equity investors as a group, if any, lack the power through voting or similar rights to direct the activities of an entity that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance or (2) the equity investment at risk is insufficient to finance that entity's activities without additional subordinated financial support. The Company consolidates any VIEs when it is determined to be the primary beneficiary of the VIE's operations. A variable interest holder is considered to be the primary beneficiary of a VIE if it has the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance and has the obligation to absorb losses of, or the right to receive benefits from, the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The Company qualitatively assesses whether it is (or is not) the primary beneficiary of a VIE. Consideration of various factors include, but are not limited to, the Company's ability to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity's economic performance, its form of ownership interest, its representation on the entity's governing body, the size and seniority of its investment, its ability and the rights of other investors to participate in policy making decisions and to replace the manager of and/or liquidate the entity. The Company continually evaluates the need to consolidate joint ventures based on standards set forth in GAAP. In determining whether the Company has a controlling interest in a joint venture and the requirement to consolidate the accounts of that entity, management considers factors such as ownership interest, power to make decisions and contractual and substantive participating rights of the partners/members as well as whether the entity is a VIE for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. The Company has determined the OP is a VIE of which the Company is the primary beneficiary. Substantially all of the Company's assets and liabilities are held by the OP. Use of Estimates The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Management makes significant estimates regarding revenue recognition, purchase price allocations to record investments in real estate, real estate taxes, fair value measurements, and income taxes, as applicable. Pre Plan of Liquidation All financial results and disclosures up through December 20, 2017, prior to adopting the Liquidation Basis of Accounting, are be presented based on a going concern basis (“Going Concern Basis”), which contemplated the realization of assets and liabilities in the normal course of business. As a result, the balance sheet as of December 31, 2016, and the statements of operations and the statements of cash flows for the period January 1, 2017 through December 21, 2017 and the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 are presented on a Going Concern Basis, consistent in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, as further described below. Real Estate Investments Prior to the transition to Liquidation Basis of Accounting, the Company's investments in real estate were recorded at cost. Improvements and replacements were capitalized when they extend the useful life or improve the productive capacity of the asset. Costs of repairs and maintenance were expensed as incurred. The Company evaluated the inputs, processes and outputs of each asset acquired to determine if the transaction was a business combination or asset acquisition. If an acquisition qualified as a business combination, the related transaction costs were recorded as an expense in the consolidated statement of operations. If an acquisition qualified as an asset acquisition, the related transaction costs were generally capitalized and subsequently amortized over the useful life of the acquired assets. In business combinations, the Company allocated the purchase price of acquired properties to tangible and identifiable intangible assets or liabilities based on their respective fair values. Tangible assets may have included land, land improvements, buildings and fixtures. Intangible assets may have included the value of in-place leases and above- and below-market leases and other identifiable intangible assets or liabilities based on lease or property specific characteristics. In addition, any assumed mortgages receivable or payable and any assumed or issued non-controlling interests were recorded at their estimated fair values. The Company generally determined the value of construction in progress based upon the replacement cost. During the construction period, we capitalized interest, insurance and real estate taxes until the development reached substantial completion. The fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property with an in-place operating lease was determined by valuing the property as if it were vacant, and the “as-if-vacant” value is then allocated to the tangible assets based on the fair value of the tangible assets. The fair value of in-place leases was determined by considering estimates of carrying costs during the expected lease-up periods, current market conditions, as well as costs to execute similar leases. The fair value of above- or below-market leases was recorded based on the present value of the difference between the contractual amount to be paid pursuant to the in-place lease and the Company’s estimate of the fair market lease rate for the corresponding in-place lease, measured over the remaining term of the lease including any below-market fixed rate renewal options for below-market leases. In making estimates of fair values for purposes of allocating purchase price, the Company utilized a number of sources, including real estate valuations prepared by independent valuation firms. The Company also considered information and other factors including market conditions, the industry that the tenant operates in, characteristics of the real estate, i.e. location, size, demographics, value and comparative rental rates, tenant credit profile and the importance of the location of the real estate to the operations of the tenant’s business. In allocating the fair value to assumed mortgages, amounts were recorded to debt premiums or discounts based on the present value of the estimated cash flows, which was calculated to account for either above- or below-market interest rates. In allocating non-controlling interests, amounts were recorded based on the fair value of units issued or percentage of investment contributed at the date of acquisition, as determined by the terms of the applicable agreement. Real estate investments that were intended to be sold are designated as "held for sale" on the consolidated balance sheets at the lesser of carrying amount or fair value less estimated selling costs when they met specific criteria to be presented as held for sale. Real estate investments were no longer depreciated when they were classified as held for sale. If the disposal, or intended disposal, of certain real estate investments represented a strategic shift that had a major effect on the Company's operations and financial results, the operations of such real estate investments would have been presented as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss for all applicable periods. Depreciation and Amortization Prior to the transition to Liquidation Basis of Accounting, depreciation was computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of up to 40 years for buildings, 15 years for land improvements, five years for fixtures and improvements, and the shorter of the useful life or the remaining lease term for tenant improvements and leasehold interests. Construction in progress, including capitalized interest, insurance and real estate taxes, was not depreciated until the development had reached substantial completion. The assumed mortgage premiums or discounts were amortized or accreted as an increase or reduction to interest expense over the remaining term of the respective mortgages, as applicable. Capitalized above-market lease values were amortized as a reduction of rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases. Capitalized below-market lease values were accreted as an increase to rental income over the remaining terms of the respective leases and expected below-market renewal option periods. Capitalized above-market ground lease values were accreted as a reduction of property operating expense over the remaining terms of the respective leases. Capitalized below-market ground lease values were amortized as an increase to property operating expense over the remaining terms of the respective leases and expected below-market renewal option periods. The value of in-place leases, exclusive of the value of above-market and below-market in-place leases, were amortized to expense over the remaining periods of the respective leases. Cash The Company deposits cash with high quality financial institutions. These deposits are guaranteed by the Federal Deposit Insurance Company ("FDIC") up to an insurance limit. At December 31, 2017 , the Company had deposits of $13.3 million of which $12.6 million were in excess of the amount insured by the FDIC. At December 31, 2016 , the Company had deposits of $16.4 million , $15.3 million of which was in excess of the amount insured by the FDIC. Although the Company bears risk to amounts in excess of those insured by the FDIC, it does not anticipate any losses as a result. Restricted Cash Restricted cash generally consists of reserves related to real estate taxes, maintenance, structural improvements, and debt service. The $6.0 million of restricted cash included on the Consolidated Statement of Net Assets as of December 31, 2017 relates to escrowed cash receivable from the Asset Sale, also referred to herein as the Escrow Amount. Revenue Recognition Prior to the transition to Liquidation Basis of Accounting, the Company's rental income was primarily related to rent received from tenants in the Company's MOBs and triple-net leased healthcare facility. Rent from tenants in the Company's MOB and triple-net leased healthcare facility operating segments (as discussed below) was recorded in accordance with the terms of each lease on a straight-line basis over the initial term of the lease. Because many of the leases provided for rental increases at specified intervals, GAAP required the Company to record a receivable, and include in revenues on a straight-line basis, unbilled rent receivables that the Company received if the tenant made all rent payments required through the expiration of the initial term of the lease. When the Company acquired a property, the acquisition date was considered to be the commencement date for purposes of this calculation. Cost recoveries from tenants were included in operating expense reimbursement in the period the related costs are incurred, as applicable. Resident services and fee income primarily relates to rent from residents in the Company's seniors housing — operating property ("SHOP") held using a structure permitted by the REIT Investment Diversification and Empowerment Act of 2007 and to fees for ancillary services performed for SHOP residents. Rental income from residents in the Company's SHOP operating segment was recognized as earned. Residents paid monthly rent that covered occupancy of their unit and basic services, including utilities, meals and some housekeeping services. The terms of the rent were short term in nature, primarily month-to-month. Fees for ancillary services were recorded in the period in which the services are performed. The Company deferred the revenue related to lease payments received from tenants and residents in advance of their due dates. The Company continually reviewed receivables related to rent and unbilled rent receivables and determined collectability by taking into consideration the tenant's payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operated and economic conditions in the area in which the property was located. In the event that the collectability of a receivable was in doubt, the Company recorded an increase in the allowance for uncollectible accounts on the consolidated balance sheets or it recorded a direct write-off of the receivable in the consolidated statements of operations. Offering and Related Costs Offering and related costs include all expenses incurred in connection with the IPO. Offering costs (other than selling commissions and the dealer manager fee) of the Company may have been paid by the Advisor, the Former Dealer Manager or their affiliates on behalf of the Company. Offering and related costs include, but are not limited to, (i) legal, accounting, printing, mailing, and filing fees; (ii) escrow service related fees; (iii) reimbursement of the Former Dealer Manager for amounts it paid to reimburse the itemized and detailed due diligence expenses of broker-dealers; and (iv) reimbursement to the Advisor for a portion of the costs of its employees and other costs in connection with preparing supplemental sales materials and related offering activities. The Company was obligated to reimburse the Advisor or its affiliates, as applicable, for offering costs paid by them on behalf of the Company, provided that the Advisor was obligated to reimburse the Company to the extent offering costs (excluding selling commissions and the dealer manager fee) incurred by the Company in its offering exceeded 2.0% of offering proceeds, net of repurchases and DRIP. As a result, these costs were only a liability of the Company to the extent aggregate selling commissions, the dealer manager fees and other organization and offering costs did not exceed 12.0% of the gross proceeds determined at the end of the IPO (See Note 10 — Related Party Transactions and Arrangements ). Equity-Based Compensation The Company has a stock-based incentive award plan for its directors, which is accounted for under the guidance of share based payments. The expense for such awards is included in general and administrative expenses and is recognized over the vesting period or when the requirements for exercise of the award have been met (See Note 12 — Share-Based Compensation ). Income Taxes For the period from April 24, 2014 (date of inception) to December 31, 2014, the Company was being taxed as a C corporation because it did not meet the requirements to be taxed as a REIT. The Company elected and qualified to be taxed as a REIT under Sections 856 through 860 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2015. If the Company continues to qualify for taxation as a REIT, it generally will not be subject to federal corporate income tax to the extent it distributes all of its REIT taxable income to its stockholders. REITs are subject to a number of organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement that the Company distribute annually at least 90% of the Company’s REIT taxable income to the Company’s stockholders. On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act was signed into law by the U.S. President. The Company is not aware of any provision in the final tax reform legislation or any pending tax legislation that would adversely affect its ability to operate as a REIT or to qualify as a REIT for U.S. federal income tax purposes. However, new legislation, as well as new regulations, administrative interpretations, or court decisions may be introduced, enacted, or promulgated from time to time, that could change the tax laws or interpretations of the tax laws regarding qualification as a REIT, or the federal income tax consequences of that qualification, in a manner that is adverse to the Company's qualification as a REIT. If the Company fails to continue to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year and does not qualify for certain statutory relief provisions, the Company will be subject to U.S. federal and state income taxes at regular corporate rates (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) beginning with the year in which it fails to qualify and may be precluded from being able to elect to be treated as a REIT for the Company’s four subsequent taxable years. The Company distributed to its stockholders 100% of its REIT taxable income for the year ended December 31, 2017. Accordingly, no provision for federal or state income taxes related to such REIT taxable income was recorded in the Company's financial statements. Even if the Company qualifies for taxation as a REIT, it may be subject to certain state and local taxes on its income and property, and federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed income. Certain limitations are imposed on REITs with respect to the ownership and operation of seniors housing communities. Generally, to qualify as a REIT, the Company cannot directly operate seniors housing communities. Instead, such facilities may be either leased to a third party operator or leased to a taxable REIT subsidiary ("TRS") and operated by a third party on behalf of the TRS. Accordingly, the Company has formed a TRS entity under the OP to lease its SHOP and the TRS has entered into a management contract with an unaffiliated third party manager to operate the facility on its behalf. Through December 21, 2017 , the Company, through its TRS entity, owned one SHOP. The TRS entity is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the OP. A TRS is subject to federal, state and local income taxes. The Company records net deferred tax assets to the extent the Company believes these assets will more likely than not be realized. In making such determination, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations. In the event the Company determines that it would not be able to realize the deferred income tax assets in the future in excess of the net recorded amount, the Company would establish a valuation allowance which would offset the previously recognized income tax benefit. Deferred income taxes result from temporary differences between the carrying amounts of the TRS's assets and liabilities used for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. The remaining components of the deferred tax assets as of December 31, 2017 consisted of a net operating loss available for carryback. As of December 31, 2017 , the Company had a deferred tax asset of approximately $24,000 with no valuation allowance. As of December 31, 2016 , the Company had a deferred tax asset of approximately $22,000 with no valuation allowance. As of December 31, 2015 , the Company had a deferred tax asset of approximately $21,000 with no valuation allowance. The following table details the composition of the Company's tax expense (benefit) for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 , which includes federal and state income taxes incurred by the Company's TRS entity. No tax expense was recorded for the period from April 24, 2014 (date of inception) to December 31, 2015 . The Company estimated its income tax expense (benefit) relating to its TRS entity using a combined federal and state rate of approximately 39.1% and 41.2% for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 , respectively. These income taxes are reflected in income tax expense on the accompanying consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). Period From January 1, 2017 Through December 21, 2017 Year Ended December 31, 2016 Year Ended December 31, 2015 (In thousands) Current Deferred Current Deferred Current Deferred Federal expense (benefit) $ (15 ) $ (7 ) $ 122 $ (1 ) $ 79 $ (16 ) State expense (benefit) (39 ) 5 28 — 26 (5 ) Total $ (54 ) $ (2 ) $ 150 $ (1 ) $ 105 $ (21 ) As of December 31, 2017 and 2016 , the Company had no material uncertain income tax positions. The tax period for the period from April 24, 2014 (date of inception) to December 31, 2014 remains open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which the Company is subject. The amount of distributions payable to the Company's stockholders is determined by the board of directors and is dependent on a number of factors, including funds available for distribution, financial condition, capital expenditure requirements, as applicable, and annual distribution requirements needed to qualify and maintain the Company's status as a REIT under the Code. The following table details the tax treatment of the distributions paid per share during the years ended December 31, 2017 , 2016 and 2015: Year Ended December 31, 2017 2016 2015 Return of capital 100.0 % $ 1.04 67.4 % $ 1.05 93.4 % $ 1.04 Ordinary dividend income — % — 32.6 % 0.51 6.6 % 0.07 Total 100.0 % $ 1.04 100.0 % $ 1.56 100 % $ 1.11 Per Share Data Net income (loss) per basic share of common stock is calculated by dividing net income (loss) attributable to stockholders by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding during such period. Diluted net income (loss) per share of common stock considers the effect of potentially dilutive shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Reportable Segments Prior to adopting the Plan of Liquidation, the Company had three reportable segments, with activities related to investing in MOBs, triple-net leased healthcare facilities, and SHOPs. Management evaluates the operating performance of the Company's investments in real estate and SHOPs on an individual property level. Post Plan of Liquidation As a result of the approval of the Plan of Liquidation by the Company's stockholders in December 2017, the Company’s financial position as of December 21, 2017 and 2016 and results of operations for the three years ended December 31, 2017, are presented using two different presentations. The Company adopted the Liquidation Basis of Accounting as of December 21, 2017 and for the period December 21, 2017 through December 31, 2017. As a result, a Consolidated Statement of Net Assets is presented as of December 31, 2017, which represents the estimated amount of cash that the Company will collect on disposal of assets as it carries out its Plan of Liquidation. Liabilities are carried at their contractual amounts due or estimated settlement amounts. In addition, the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Net Assets reflects changes in net assets from the original estimated values as of December 21, 2017 through December 31, 2017, as further described below. Liquidation Basis of Accounting As a result of the approval of the Plan of Liquidation by the Company's shareholders, the Company has adopted the liquidation basis of accounting as of December 21, 2017 and for the subsequent periods in accordance with GAAP. Accordingly, on December 21, 2017 assets were adjusted to their estimated net realizable value, or liquidation value, which represents the estimated amount of cash that the Company will collect on disposal of assets as it carries out its plan of liquidation. The liquidation value of the Company’s assets is presented on an undiscounted basis. Liabilities are carried at their contractual amounts due or estimated settlement amounts. The Company accrues costs and income that it expects to incur and earn through the end of liquidation to the extent it has a reasonable basis for estimation. These amounts are classified as a liability for estimated costs in excess of estimated receipts during liquidation on the Consolidated Statement of Net Assets. The Company currently estimates that it will have costs in excess of estimated receipts during the liquidation. These amounts can vary significantly due to, among other things, the timing and estimates for the amounts associated with discharging known and contingent liabilities and the costs associated with the winding up of operations. These costs are estimated and are anticipated to be paid out over the liquidation period. See Note 5 — Liability for Estimated Costs During Liquidation for further discussion. Actual costs incurred but unpaid as of December 31, 2017 are included in accounts payable, accrued liabilities and other liabilities on the Consolidated Statement of Net Assets. Net assets in liquidation represents the estimated liquidation value available to holders of Common Shares upon liquidation. Due to the uncertainty in the timing of the anticipated sale dates and the estimated cash flows, actual operating results and sale proceeds may differ materially from the amounts estimated. Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-17, Consolidation (Topic 810): Interest Held through Related Parties that Are under Common Control, which provides guidance relating to interest held through related parties that are under common control, where a reporting entity will need to evaluate if it should consolidate a VIE. The amendments change the evaluation of whether a reporting entity is the primary beneficiary of a VIE by changing how a single decision maker of a VIE treats indirect interests in the entity held through related parties that are under common control with the reporting entity. The revised guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company has adopted the provisions of this guidance effective January 1, 2017, and has applied the provisions prospectively. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows. In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force) , which provides guidance on the classification of restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. The amendment requires restricted cash to be included in the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total cash amounts. Therefore, transfers between cash and restricted cash will no longer be shown on the statement of cash flows. The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company adopted this guidance effective December 21, 2017, using a retrospective transition method. As a result, the Company adjusted it statements of cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 to include $0.04 million and $0.06 million of restricted cash, respectively, in the beginning and ending cash balances and remove the transfers between cash and restricted cash from operating activities. In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business , which revises the definition of a business. Amongst other things, this new guidance is applicable when evaluating whether an acquisition (disposal) should be treated as either a business acquisition (disposal) or an asset acquisition (disposal). Under the revised guidance, when substantially all of the fair value of gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single asset or group of similar assets, the assets acquired would not be considered a business. The revised guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and the amendments will be applied prospectively. The Company has adopted the provisions of this guidance effective January 1, 2017. All twelve of the Company's acquisitions during 2017 have been classified as asset acquisitions. |