Collaboration Revenue | 9. Collaboration Revenue Collaboration and License Agreement with Société des Produits Nestlé S.A. (Nestlé) Summary of Agreement In January 2016, the Company entered into a collaboration and license agreement with Nestlé (the “2016 License Agreement”) for the development and commercialization of certain product candidates for the treatment and management of CDI and inflammatory bowel disease ("IBD"), including UC and Crohn’s disease. The 2016 License Agreement supports the development of the Company’s portfolio of products for CDI and IBD in markets outside of the United States and Canada (the “2016 Licensed Territory”). The Company has retained full commercial rights to its entire portfolio of product candidates with respect to the United States and Canada. Under the 2016 License Agreement, the Company granted to Nestlé an exclusive, royalty-bearing license to develop and commercialize, in the 2016 Licensed Territory, certain products based on its microbiome technology that are being developed for the treatment of CDI and IBD, including SER-109, SER-262, SER-287 and SER-301 (collectively, the “2016 Collaboration Products”). The 2016 License Agreement sets forth the Company’s and Nestlé’s respective obligations for development, commercialization, regulatory and manufacturing and supply activities for the 2016 Collaboration Products with respect to the licensed fields and the 2016 Licensed Territory. Under the 2016 License Agreement, Nestlé agreed to pay the Company an upfront cash payment of $ 120,000 , which the Company received in February 2016. The Company is eligible to receive up to $ 285,000 in development milestone payments, $ 375,000 in regulatory payments and up to an aggregate of $ 1,125,000 for the achievement of certain commercial milestones related to the sales of the 2016 Collaboration Products. Nestlé also agreed to pay the Company tiered royalties, at percentages ranging from the high single digits to high teens, of net sales of 2016 Collaboration Products in the 2016 Licensed Territory. Under the 2016 License Agreement, the Company is entitled to receive a $ 20,000 milestone payment from Nestlé following initiation of a SER-287 Phase 2 study and a $ 20,000 milestone payment from Nestlé following the initiation of a SER-287 Phase 3 study. In November 2018, the Company entered into a letter agreement with Nestlé which modified the 2016 License Agreement to address the current clinical plans for SER-287. Pursuant to the letter agreement, the Company and Nestlé agreed that following initiation of the SER-287 Phase 2b study, the Company would be entitled to receive $ 40,000 in milestone payments from Nestlé, which represent the milestone payments due to the Company for the initiation of a SER-287 Phase 2 study and a Phase 3 study. The SER-287 Phase 2b study was initiated and the $ 40,000 of milestone payments were received in December 2018. The letter agreement also provides scenarios under which Nestlé’s reimbursement to the Company for certain Phase 3 development costs would be reduced or delayed depending on the outcomes of the SER-287 Phase 2b study. The 2016 License Agreement continues in effect until terminated by either party on the following bases: (i) Nestlé may terminate the 2016 License Agreement in the event of serious safety issues related to any of the 2016 Collaboration Products; (ii) the Company may terminate the 2016 License Agreement if Nestlé challenges the validity or enforceability of any of the Company’s licensed patents; and (iii) either party may terminate the 2016 License Agreement in the event of the other party’s uncured material breach or insolvency. Upon termination of the 2016 License Agreement, all licenses granted to Nestlé by the Company will terminate, and all rights in and to the 2016 Collaboration Products in the 2016 Licensed Territory will revert to the Company. If the Company commits a material breach of the 2016 License Agreement, Nestlé may elect not to terminate the 2016 License Agreement but instead apply specified adjustments to its payment obligations and other terms and conditions of the 2016 License Agreement. Accounting Analysis The Company assessed the 2016 License Agreement in accordance with ASC 606— Revenue From Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”) and concluded that Nestlé is a customer. The Company identified the following promises under the contract: (i) a license to develop and commercialize the 2016 Collaboration Products in the 2016 Licensed Territory, (ii) obligation to perform research and development services, (iii) participation on a joint steering committee, and (iv) manufacturing services to provide clinical supply to complete future clinical trials. In addition, the Company identified a contingent obligation to perform manufacturing services to provide commercial supply if commercialization occurs, which is contingent upon regulatory approval. This contingent obligation is not a performance obligation at inception and has been excluded from the initial allocation as it represents a separate buying decision at market rates, rather than a material right in the contract. The Company assessed the promised goods and services to determine if they are distinct. Based on this assessment, the Company determined that Nestlé cannot benefit from the promised goods and services separately from the others as they are highly interrelated and therefore not distinct. Accordingly, the promised goods and services represent one combined performance obligation and the entire transaction price will be allocated to that single combined performance obligation. At contract inception, the Company determined that the $ 120,000 non-refundable upfront amount constituted the entirety of the consideration to be included in the transaction price as the development, regulatory, and commercial milestones were fully constrained. During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company received $ 10,000 from Nestlé in connection with the initiation of the Phase 1b study for SER-262 in CDI. During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Company received $ 20,000 from Nestlé in connection with the initiation of the Phase 3 study for SER-109. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company received $ 40,000 from Nestlé in connection with the initiation of the Phase 2b study for SER-287. During the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company received $ 10,000 from Nestlé in connection with the initiation of the Phase 1b SER-301 study. As of June 30, 2021, the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligation of the 2016 License Agreement was approximately $ 200,000 . During the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020, using the cost-to-cost method, which best depicts the transfer of control to the customer, the Company recognized $ 5,263 , $ 9,911 , $ 5,186 and $ 10,648 of collaboration revenue – related party, respectively. As of June 30, 2021 and December 31, 2020, there was $ 98,263 and $ 108,174 , respectively, of deferred revenue related to the unsatisfied portion of the performance obligation under the 2016 License Agreement. As of June 30, 2021, the deferred revenue is classified as current or non-current in the condensed consolidated balance sheets based on the Company’s estimate of revenue that will be recognized within the next 12 months, which is determined by the cost-to-cost method which measures the extent of progress towards completion based on the ratio of actual costs incurred to the total estimated costs expected upon satisfying the performance obligation. All costs associated with the 2016 License Agreement are recorded in research and development expense in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. AstraZeneca Research Collaboration and Option Agreement Summary of the Agreement In March 2019, the Company entered into a Research Collaboration and Option Agreement (the “Research Agreement”) with MedImmune, LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of AstraZeneca Inc. (“AstraZeneca”), to advance the mechanistic understanding of the microbiome in augmenting the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy. Under the Research Agreement, the Company and AstraZeneca conducted certain research and development activities as set forth on a research plan focused on the role of the microbiome in certain cancers and cancer immunotherapies, including the research program for SER-401, in combination with AstraZeneca compounds targeting various cancers. Pursuant to the Research Agreement, the Company agreed not to conduct research or development on any microbiome products specifically designed by the Company during the term of the Research Agreement for the treatment of cancer (“Microbiome Oncology Products”), with or on behalf of any third party without the prior approval of the joint steering committee for the Research Agreement for at least three years after the effective date (the “Exclusivity Period”). Additionally, AstraZeneca paid the Company a total of $ 20,000 in three equal installments, the first of which the Company received in April 2019, the second of which the Company received in December 2019, and the third of which the Company received in January 2021. Such payments were payable even if the Research Agreement was terminated in accordance with its terms, unless the Research Agreement is terminated by AstraZeneca for the Company’s uncured material breach. Additionally, AstraZeneca would bear its costs of conducting activities under the research plan and would reimburse the Company for all activities performed under the research plan based on actual full-time employee (“FTE”) time and certain third-party costs incurred by the Company in connection therewith. Under the Research Agreement, the Company granted to AstraZeneca an exclusive option to negotiate a worldwide, sublicensable exclusive license under relevant intellectual property rights controlled by the Company to exploit Microbiome Oncology Products for the treatment of cancer. Additionally, the Company granted to AstraZeneca an additional exclusive option to obtain a worldwide, sublicensable, license under certain intellectual property rights arising out of the Research Agreement or coming into the control of the Company during the term of the Research Agreement, to exploit AstraZeneca’s oncology and other assets which are the subject of the research plan. AstraZeneca may exercise each option at any point prior to 90 days after the end of the Exclusivity Period (the “Option Exercise Period”) by delivering an option exercise notice to the Company. If AstraZeneca exercised an option during the Option Exercise Period, the parties would enter into exclusive, good faith negotiations for a period of six months (the “Negotiation Period”) regarding the terms of the definitive license agreement contemplated by such option. If no definitive agreement was reached during the Negotiation Period, subject to certain other terms and conditions applicable for a one ( 1 ) year period, the Company was free to license, further develop or otherwise exploit its assets that were the subject of the option without further obligation to AstraZeneca. The term of the Research Agreement continued in effect until the Research Agreement was terminated by the parties in accordance with its terms by mutual written agreement. Either party may terminate the Research Agreement for the other party’s uncured material breach or bankruptcy or insolvency-related events. AstraZeneca may terminate the Research Agreement for convenience. In December 2020, the Company received written notice from AstraZeneca that AstraZeneca elected to terminate the Research Agreement by and in accordance with its terms. The termination of the Research Agreement was effective on April 2, 2021 , which was 120 days from the date of the termination notice. Accounting Analysis The Company assessed the Research Agreement in accordance with ASC 606 and concluded that AstraZeneca is a customer. The Company identified the following promises under the contract: (i) a research license, (ii) an obligation to perform research and development services, and (iii) participating on a joint steering committee. The Company assessed the promised goods and services to determine if they are distinct. Based on this assessment, the Company determined that AstraZeneca cannot benefit from the promised goods and services separately from the others as they are highly interrelated and therefore not distinct. Accordingly, the promised goods and services represent one combined performance obligation and the entire transaction price will be allocated to that single combined performance obligation. Each exclusive option granted to AstraZeneca provides AstraZeneca with the right to negotiate a license agreement in the future at fair value. Therefore, the Company concluded that each option does not constitute a performance obligation at inception and has been excluded from the initial allocation since each option represents a separate buying decision at market rates, rather than a material right in the contract. At contract inception, the Company determined that the transaction price is comprised of: (i) the $ 20,000 fee, which represents fixed consideration, and (ii) the estimated reimbursement of research and development costs incurred, which represents variable consideration. The Company included the estimated reimbursement of research and development costs, approximately $ 13,900 , in the transaction price at the inception of the arrangement because the Company is required to perform research and development services and the contract requires AstraZeneca to reimburse the Company for costs incurred. Also, since the related revenue would be recognized only as the costs are incurred, and the contract precludes the joint steering committee from changing the research plan without mutual agreement, the Company determined it is not probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue would occur. The Company determined that revenue under the Research Agreement should be recognized over time as AstraZeneca simultaneously receives the benefit from the Company as the Company performs under the single performance obligation over time. The Company will recognize revenue for the single performance obligation using a cost-to-cost input method as the Company has concluded it best depicts the research and joint steering committee participation services performed prior to AstraZeneca’s ability to negotiate a license. Under this method, the transaction price is recognized over the contract’s entire performance period, using costs incurred relative to total estimated costs to determine the extent of progress towards completion. In December 2020, the Company received written notice that AstraZeneca elected to terminate the Research Agreement. As a result of AstraZeneca’s decision to terminate the Research Agreement, the Company’s performance obligations under the Research Agreement ended as of December 31, 2020. The final transaction price of $ 23,377 is comprised of the $ 20,000 fixed consideration and $ 3,376 for the reimbursed research and development costs. The Company removed all costs associated with its remaining performance from the cost-to-cost model in the fourth quarter of 2020. This resulted in the Company recognizing the remaining deferred revenue of $ 15,145 to collaboration revenue in the year ended December 31, 2020. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, the Company recognized collaboration revenue of $ 28 and $ 2,016 , respectively, under the Research Agreement. No collaboration revenue was recognized for three and six months ended June 30, 2021, as the Company's performance obligations under the Research Agreement ended December 31, 2020. Contract Balances from Contracts with Customers The following table presents changes in the Company’s contract liabilities during the six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 (in thousands): Balance as of December 31, 2020 Additions Deductions Balance as of June 30, 2021 Six Months Ended June 30, 2021 Contract liabilities: Deferred revenue - related party $ 108,174 — ( 9,911 ) $ 98,263 Balance as of December 31, 2019 Additions Deductions Balance as of June 30, 2020 Six Months Ended June 30, 2020 Contract liabilities: Deferred revenue - related party $ 110,071 — ( 10,648 ) $ 99,423 Deferred revenue $ 9,668 827 ( 2,016 ) $ 8,479 During the three and six months ended June 30, 2021 and 2020 the Company recognized the following revenues as a result of changes in the contract liability balances in the respective periods (in thousands): Three Months Ended Six Months Ended 2021 2020 2021 2020 Revenue recognized in the period from: Amounts included in the contract liability at the beginning of the period $ 5,263 $ 5,203 $ 9,911 $ 11,837 When consideration is received, or such consideration is unconditionally due, from a customer prior to transferring goods or services to the customer under the terms of a contract, a contract liability is recorded. Revenue is recognized from the contract liability over time using the cost-to-cost method. |