As previously disclosed, on June 28, 2021, New Senior Investment Group Inc., a Delaware corporation (“New Senior”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Ventas, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Ventas”), and Cadence Merger Sub LLC, a Delaware limited liability company and a subsidiary of Ventas (“Merger Sub”), pursuant to which, subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions, Merger Sub will merge with and into New Senior, with New Senior surviving the merger as a subsidiary of Ventas (the “Merger”). On August 11, 2021, New Senior filed a definitive proxy statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) in connection with the Merger which also constitutes a prospectus of Ventas (the “Proxy Statement/Prospectus”).
Since the initial filing of the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, ten complaints have been filed in federal courts in New York, Colorado and Pennsylvania and a state court in New York by purported New Senior stockholders against New Senior and the members of the New Senior board of directors in connection with the Merger: Wang v. New Senior Investment Group Inc., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-06426 (filed July 28, 2021) (S.D.N.Y.); Morris v. New Senior Investment Group Inc., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-04354 (filed August 3, 2021) (E.D.N.Y.); Hopkins v. New Senior Investment Group Inc., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-06630 (filed August 5, 2021) (S.D.N.Y.); Langlois v. New Senior Investment Group Inc., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-06774 (filed August 11, 2021) (S.D.N.Y.); Anderson v. New Senior Investment Group Inc., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-02307 (filed August 26, 2021) (D. Colo.); Ryan v. New Senior Investment Group Inc., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-02313 (filed August 26, 2021) (D. Colo.); Whitfield v. New Senior Investment Group Inc., et al., Case No. 2:21-cv-03832 (filed August 27, 2021) (E.D. Pa.); Troughton v. New Senior Investment Group Inc., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-07361 (filed September 1, 2021) (S.D.N.Y.); and Johnson v. New Senior Investment Group Inc., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-07373 (filed September 1, 2021) (S.D.N.Y.) (collectively, the “Federal Stockholder Litigation”) and Garfield v. Givens, et al., Case No. 157665/2021 (N.Y. Sup. Ct., N. Y. Cty.) (the “State Court Litigation” and, collectively with the Federal Stockholder Litigation, the “Stockholder Litigation”). Each of the complaints in the Federal Stockholder Litigation includes allegations that, among other things, the registration statement filed in connection with the Merger on July 26, 2021 omitted certain material information in violation of Sections 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and Rule 14a-9 promulgated under the Exchange Act, rendering the registration statement false and misleading. The State Court Litigation purports to allege misrepresentations claims under New York common law relating to the Proxy Statement/Prospectus. The plaintiffs in the Stockholder Litigation seek various remedies, including an order enjoining the defendants from proceeding with the Merger, requiring the defendants to disclose allegedly material information that was allegedly omitted from the registration statement, rescinding the Merger in the event that it is consummated or awarding rescissory damages, declaring that defendants violated Sections 14(a) and/or 20(a) of the Exchange Act and the related rules and regulations thereunder, awarding costs, including attorneys’ fees, and granting such other and further relief as the court may deem just and proper.
New Senior believes that the claims asserted in the Stockholder Litigation are without merit and no additional disclosures are required under applicable law. However, in order to avoid the risk of the Stockholder Litigation delaying or adversely affecting the Merger and to minimize the costs, risks and uncertainties inherent in litigation, and without admitting any liability or wrongdoing, New Senior has determined to voluntarily make the following supplemental disclosures to the Proxy Statement/Prospectus, as described in this Current Report on Form 8-K. Nothing in this Current Report on Form 8-K shall be deemed an admission of the legal necessity or materiality under applicable laws of any of the disclosures set forth herein. To the contrary, New Senior specifically denies all allegations in the Stockholder Litigation that any additional disclosure was or is required.
These supplemental disclosures will not change the consideration to be paid to stockholders of New Senior in connection with the Merger or the timing of the Special Meeting of Stockholders (the “Special Meeting”) of New Senior, which is scheduled to be held virtually, via live webcast, on September 14, 2021, at 9:00 a.m., Eastern Time. The Special Meeting can be accessed by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/SNR2021SM. The New Senior board of directors continues to unanimously recommend that you vote “FOR” the proposals to be voted on at the Special Meeting described in the Proxy Statement/Prospectus.